Fiscal Year 1990 -tg FY 1990 STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS ITEM 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1988 1982 1981 APPROPRIATION ($ MILLIONS) Navigation 439 519 512 443 299 304 257 577 522 607 Flood Control Total 879 856 840 787 673 676 647 832 774 772 Flood Control Mississippi River and Tributaries' (220) (222) (205) (206) (227) (225) (203) (291) (177) (145) Multipurpose including power 60 73 73 69 93 112 171 221 247 275 Beach Erosion Control 43 27 23 17 12 25 5 7 12 Total New Work' 1,421 1,475 1,452.0 1,322.0 1,082.0 1,104.0 1,127.0 1,685.0 1,580.0 1,666.0 Other Work' 1,776 1,770 1,826.0 1,813.0 1,658.0 1,797.0 1,567.0 1,734.0 1,417.0 1,331.0 TOTAL 3,197 3,245 3,278.0 3,135.0 2,740.0 2,901.0 2,688.0 3,419.0 2,997.0 2,997.0 NAVIGATION (Calendar Year)* Ton-Miles of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports 68,563.4 56,208.2 50,985.0 47,274.2 44,769.3 46,508.8 45,286.7 51,262.7 58,929.2 Foreign, Great Lakes Ports 27,118.9 24,448.4 22,003.3 24.235.2 27,171.9 32,249.4 24,309.4 27,165.5 35,294.0 Domestic, Coastal (Intraterritory not compiled) 483,888.6 561,594.9 586,818.7 580,888.7 610,976.5 593,923.1 649,749.4 632,707.0 634,765.3 Domestic, Great Lakes 58,307.6 58,159.4 50,076.4 43,198.2 48,184.0 49,784.4 43,088.2 35,623.3 62,148.3 Domestic, Inland 272,157.4 269,035.7 257,336.4 248,116.9 232,707.5 242,855.4 225,628.2 217,026.7 231,184.1 Domestic, Local 1,196.3 1,238.4 1,183.9 1,197.2 1,102.0 1,157.1 1,099.7 1,111.7 1,315.6 TOTAL 911,232.2 970,685.0 968,403.7 944,910.5 964,911.2 966,478.2 989,161.6 964,896.91,023636,5 Foreign, Coastal Ports 983.1 923.7 845.1 791.4 723.0 744.5 702.7 769.2 823.9 Foreign, Great Lakes Ports 54.8 52.5 45.9 45.7 51.3 58.8 48.4 50.4 63.2 Domestic, Coastal and Intraterritory 307.2 330.3 328.2 312.0 313.2 311.1 312.8 313.9 325.1 Domestic, Great Lakes 109.1 109.7 96.5 87.4 92.0 98.0 83.5 72.1 115.4 Domestic, Inland 606.0 588.1 569.8 560.5 534.7 542.5 487.1 495.5 520.7 Domestic, Local 80.2 83.7 82.0 77.4 74.2 81.1 73.2 75.6 93.2 TOTAL 2,140.4 2,088.0 1,967.5 1,874.4 1,788.4 1,836.0 1,707.7 1,776.7 1,941.5 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED ($ Billions) 8.3 2.1 5.2 27.3 10.8 16.8 23.2 4.3 1.2 FLOOD DAMAGES SUSTAINED ($ Billions) 1.1 0.5 1.7 6 0.5 4 4 1.5 1 POWER Installed (Cumulative in millions of kw) 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.1' 20.1' 19.7' 19.7' 19.2' Generated (Billions of kwh) 81.6 81.6 72.2 74.0 80.7 88.3 91.2 88.2 75.8 77.3 RESERVOIR STORAGE (Millions of acre-feet) All Purpose 273.6 273.6 272.1 270.6 269.0 268.5 Flood Control (Maximum) 123.3 123.3 123.0 123.0 123.0 122.7 Water Supply 9.5 9.5 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.1 Irrigation 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 PUBLIC ATTENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS Recreation Days of Use (in Millions) Visitor Days (in Millions) 649 654 639 620 506 502 482 480 480 469 FUNDING General Investigation 129,251 142,405 138,767 136,287 128,272 Construction General 1,083,811 1,184,735 1,200,175 1,152,150 919,345 Operations and Maintenance, General 1,398,219 1,370,714 1,421,733 1,389,846 1,319,973 Regulatory Program 68,445 63,752 55,262 Flood Control Mississippi River & Tributaries 330,296 332,550 317,704 310,797 314,760 General Expenses 141,997 120,000 115,000 115,000 107,000 Flood Control & Coastal Emergencies 20,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 48,975 Revolving Fund 9,860 0 0 12,000 7,000 Permanent Appropriations 14,700 9,000 9,000 *0 8,000 TOTAL 3,196,589 3,245,261 3,278,091 3,135,080 2,830,050 1 Included in Flood Control Total. 2 Advanced engineering and design, and construction. (Including major rehabilitation projects.) Savings and slippages applied to projects. 3 Operation and maintenance, surveys, administrative and misc. programs and activities. 4 Includes New Melones and Spettisham, built by the Corps and operated by others. 5 All Federal agencies changed to "Visitor Days" at the direction of OMB. * For further information on waterborne commerce, see Waterborne Commerce of the United States, published annually. It may be obtained by writing the Commander, U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, ATTN: CELMN-ED-S, P. O. Box 60267, New Orleans, LA 70160-0267. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY 3 WASHINGTON, DC. 20310-0103 29 SEP 1992 TO: THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SUBJECT: Annual Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1990 I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for the Fiscal Year 1990 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1988 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1989 and September 1990. G. Edward Dickey Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) HECSA TECHNICAL LIBRARY CONTENTS New England Division .................................................................. 1-1 North Atlantic Division: New York, NY, District ........................................ 2-1 Philadelphia, PA, District ....................................... 3-1 Baltimore, MD, District ........................................ 4-1 Norfolk, VA, District ........................................ 5-1 South Atlantic Division: Wilmington, NC, District ....................................... 6-1 Charleston, SC, District ................................................................ 7-1 Savannah, GA, District ........................................ 8-1 Jacksonville, FL, District ....................................... 9-1 Mobile, AL, District .................................................................... 10-1 Lower Mississippi Valley Division: New Orleans, LA, District ...................................... 11-1 Vicksburg, MS, District ....................................... 12-1 Memphis, TN, District ........................................ 13-1 St. Louis, MO, District ........................................ 14-1 Ohio River Division: Nashville, TN, District ...................................... 15-1 Louisville, KY, District ........................................ 16-1 Huntington, WV, District ............................................................. 17-1 Pittsburgh, PA, District ....................................... 18-1 Ohio River .............................................................. 19-1 North Central Division Buffalo, NY, District ........................................ 20-1 Detroit, MI, District ........................................ 21-1 Chicago, IL, District ........................................ 22-1 Rock Island, IL, District ....................................... 23-1 St. Paul, MN, District .................................................................. 24-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN................ . 25-1 Missouri River Division: Omaha, NE, District .................................................................... 26-1 Kansas City, MO, District ...................................... 27-1 Southwestern Division: LittleRock, AR, District...................................... 28-1 Tulsa, OK, District .................................................................. 29-1 Fort Worth, TX, District............................................................. 30-1 Galveston, TX, District.............................................................. 31-1 Albuquerque, NM, District .......................................................... 32-1 South Pacific Division: Los Angeles District ................................................................... 33-1 San Francisco, CA, District .......................................................... 34-1 Sacramento.CA, District .............................................................. 35-1 Pacific Ocean Division ................................................................ 36-1 North Pacific Division: Portland, OR, District ................................................................ 37-1 Seattle, WA, District ................................................................... 38-1 Walla Walla, WA, District ........................................................... 39-1 Alaska, AK, District ................................................................... 40-1 Board of Engineers for River & Harbors .................................................. 41-1 Mississippi River Connission ............................................................ 42-1 Constnimction Engineering Research Laboratory ......................................... 43-1 Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory ..................................... 44-1 Waterways Experiment Station ............................................................ 45-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories ....................................................... 46-1 Water Resources Support Center .......................................................... 47-1 Permanent Intemrnational Association of Navigation Congresses ...................... 48-1 International Boundary Waters Board .................................................... 49-1 Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act ......................................... 50-1 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal & National Emergency Preparedness .............. 51-1 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activities........................... 52-1 California Debris Comnission ................................................................................. 53-1 Appendices: Flood Control Reservoirs Operable ................................................. A-1 Flood Control Projects Under Construction......................................... B-1 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable .............................................. C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction ........................................... D-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power in Operation ........................ E-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction ................ F-1 Flood Damages Sustained and Prevented ........................................... G-1 Index......................................................................................... I-1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION * The New England Division, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the NewYork-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Page Navigation 1. Andrews River, MA......................................1-3 2. Aquatic Plant Control..................................1-3 3. Branford Harbor, CT.....................................1-3 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA.....................................1-3 5. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA ..................... 1-4 6. Green Harbor, MA........................................1-4 7. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI ............. 1-4 8. Jonesport Harbor, ME ................................. 1-5 9. Kennebec River, ME .................................... 1-5 10. New Haven Harbor, CT...............................1-5 11. Newburyport Harbor, MA.............................1-6 12. Plymouth Harbor, MA ................................. 1-6 13. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, Point Judith, RI .......................... 1-7 14. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH .................... 1-7 15. Providence River and Harbor, RI................1-8 16. Rye Harbor, NH ........................................... 1-9 17. Wells Harbor, ME ........................................ 1-9 18. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... 1-9 19. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.........1-9 10. Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) ........................................ 1-9 21. Authorized Bridge Alteration ...................... 1-9 Beach Erosion Control 22. Revere Beach, MA ...................................... 1-10 23. Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT..............1-10 24. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects .......................................... 1-10 25. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .......................................... 1-10 26. Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization)..........................1-10 Page Flood Control 27. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI..........1-10 27A. West Hill Dam, MA....................................1-11 28. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA .................................... 1-11 29. Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT..........................................1-11 29A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT ............................ 1-12 29B. Barre Falls Dam, MA..................................1-12 29C. Birch Hill Dam, MA ................................... 1-12 29D. Colebrook River Lake, CT...........................1-13 29E. Conant Brook Dam, MA..............................1-13 29F. Farmington River, Simsbury, CT ............... 1-13 29G. Knightville Dam, MA ................................. 1-13 29H. Littleville Lake, MA ................................... 1-13 29I. North Hartland Lake, VT .......................... 1-14 29J. North Springfield Lake, VT ....................... 1-14 29K. Otter Brook Lake, NH ............................... 1-14 29L. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA...............1-14 29M. Surry Mountain Lake, NH..........................1-15 29N. Townshend Lake, VT ................................. 1-15 290. Tully Lake, MA............................................1-15 29P. Union Village Dam, VT..............................1-15 29Q. West Springfield, MA.................................. 1-16 30. Gulf Street, Milford, CT ............................. 1-16 31. Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA ......... 1-16 31A. Black Rock Lake, CT .................................. 1-17 31B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT ........................... 1-17 31C. Hop Brook Lake, CT.................................... 1-17 31D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT ........................ 1-17 31E. Thomaston Dam, CT .................................. 1-17 32. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ........ 1-17 32A. Blackwater Dam, NH ................................. 1-18 32B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ................... 1-18 32C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH ............................ 1-18 32D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH.................... 1-18 33. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA ...................................... 1-19 1-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 Page 34. New London, CT.........................................1-19 35. Little River, Belfast, ME............................1-19 36. Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME ..................... 1-19 37. Roughans Point, Revere, MA......................1-20 38. Stamford, CT .............................................. 1-20 39. Thames River Basin, CT, RI, and MA ....... 1-20 39A. Buffumville Lake, MA................................. 1-20 39B. East Brimfield Lake, MA...........................1-21 39C. Hodges Village Dam, MA...........................1-21 39D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT ....................... 1-21 39E. West Thompson Lake, CT...........................1-21 39F. Westville Lake, MA....................................1-21 40. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA ... 1-21 41. West River, New Haven, CT......................1-22 42. IT spection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................................... 1-22 43. Flood Control Reservoir Operations..........1-23 44. Hurricane Barrier Operations ................... 1-23 45. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 1-24 46. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 1-24 47. Deauthorized Projects ................................ 1-24 General Investigations 48. Surveys ....................................................... 1-24 49. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 1-24 50. Planning, Engineering and Design ........... 1-24 51. Preconstruction Engineering and D esign ......................................................... 1-25 Page Tables Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement...........1-26 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation .................. 1-35 Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 1-40 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................. 1-44 Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 1-45 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects including Power ... 1-47 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects.....................1-48 Table 1-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 ....................... 1-50 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 ...................... 1=50 Table 14J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ....................... 1-51 Table 1-K Blackstone River Basin ................... 1-51 Table 1-L Connecticut River Basin...................1-52 Table 1-M Housatonic River Basin................... 1-54 Table 1-N Merrimack River Basin .................. 1-55 Table 1-0 Thames River Basin ........................ 1-56 Table 1-P Boston Harbor, MA........................... 1-56 Table 1-Q Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................... 1-57 1-2 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 3. BRANFORD HARBOR, CT 1. ANDREWS RIVER, MA Location. On Nantucket Sound within town of Harwich, MA, about 84 miles southeast of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13229.) Existing project. Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide, extending about 2,900 feet from deep water in Nantucket Sound to a public marina, two jetties on east and west sides of harbor entrance, and three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. Eastjetty completed in June 1967. Dredging was completed in April 1968. Construction of west jetty was completed in May 1973. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the six-foot entrance channel by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was performed in June 1990, at a rental cost of $53,811. Approximately 9,825 cubic yards of material were removed. Hired labor costs of $2,679 were incurred for surveys associated with the dredging. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Division jurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to provide technical assistance in the eradication or control of aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing program.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute at least 50 percent of the cost of planning beyond the reconnaissance stage and at least 50 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations during fiscal year. On request, technical information was provided to local interests on specific aquatic weed problems. These problems included nuisance growth of Eurasian water-milfoil and excessive aquatic plant growth and basin filing due to nutrient enrichment. We continue to work closely with the States. Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, five miles east of New Haven Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12372.) Existingproject. A channel 8.5 feet deep and 100 feet wide from outer harbor to upper wharf in Branford Harbor, about 2.3 miles. The existing project was completed in 1907. (See Table-l-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, comprising two wharves near head of the harbor and one at mouth of river, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September 1989 in the amount of $620,000; an amendment in November 1989 in the amount of $14,325 for rock removal and another revision in July 1990, in the amount of $55,552 for overruns raised the final contract cost to $690,077. Dredging was accomplished from November 1989 to March 1990. A total of 76,270 cubic yards of material were removed. Hired labor costs of $91,821 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, supervision and inspection, and plotting pre-and after-dredge surveys. 4. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from head of Buzzards Bay, MA, to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. In general direction canal trends from Buzzards Bay easterly to Cape Cod Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13246.) Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. More recent major rehabilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the canal is completed. Rehabilitation of the Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in 1981. The Sagamore Highway Bridge was completed in 1982. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. 1-3 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Final contract amount for construction of a restroom at the East Boat Basin, completed in a prior fiscal year, was $180,249. Final contract amount for repairs to mooring dolphins and marine railway at the West Boat Basin, completed last fiscal year, was $561,184. A continuing contract for painting the Sagamore Bridge, awarded last fiscal year, was 84 percent complete at the end of fiscal year 1990 with earnings of$413,725. A contract, awarded last fiscal year, for improvements to the East Boat Basin was completed in August 1990. Final contract amount was $280,927. The East Mooring Basin was dredged by contract to a depth of 32 feet during the fiscal year. Work was performed from March to May 1990 at a cost of $693,907. Approximately 121,952 cubic yards of material were removed. Final payment on a contract to repair mooring dolphins and marine railway in the West Boat Basin was processed this fiscal year. Total contract amount was $561,184. Other fiscal year 1990 costs for work accomplished by hired labor and contract were: contract operation of the railroad bridge $83,004; court costs that resulted in an injunction and termination of the railroad bridge repair contract $40,342; replacement and repair of project maintenance equipment $131,680; overhaul patrol boat WAMPANOAG $47,065; resurfacing roads and parking areas at the East Boat Basin $336,075; hired labor costs associated with the dredging contract included $400 for an environmental assessment modification, $10,600 for preparation of plans and specifications, $23,700 for supervision and inspection, $72,300 for surveys, and $30,000 for the placement of disposal buoys; operating cost of roads, bridges and project facilities $608,805; operation of recreation areas $396,489; real estate activities $57,931; vessel traffic control activities $1,346,834; operation of project office $157,784; engineering and design $72,593; supervision and administration of various ongoing contracts $157,238. 5. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA Location. Atnortheastern corner of Nantucket Sound about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, MA, and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor, RI, at northern extremity of Cape Cod. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. An entrance channel ten feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Construction of existing project was initiated in September and completed in October 1957. By 1961, a break in barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused Federal Channel to fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain eight-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964 provided access to inner harbor for 1964 boating season. Anew ten-foot channel through Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The town operates a wharf on the north side of the inner harbor which is leased out to commercial users. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in April 1990 and completed in August 1990. Contract amount was $685,779. Approximately 149,609 cubic yards of sand were removed from the entrance channel and used to nourish East Harding Beach. Hired labor costs of $90,348 were incurred for the preparation of plans and specifications, supervision and inspection and surveys. 6. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town ofMarshfield, MA, about 30 miles southeast of Boston, MA, and nine miles north of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253.) Existing project. Provides for channel six feet deep (eight feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; five-acre anchorage near Town Pier, six feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200-foot extension of existing west jetty at elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation +14 feet, and raising east jetty to elevation +14. (See Table 1- B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Construction was completed in October 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was performed in the entrance channel during May 1990, at a rental cost of $153,841. Approximately 21,875 cubic yards of material were removed. Hired labor costs included $3,865 for an environmental assessment; $22,553 for preparation of plans and specifications and pre- and after-dredge surveys. 7. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. On east side of Block Island, near south end of inner curve of shoreline 13 miles south-southwest from Point Judith Harbor, RI, and about 25 miles south- 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION easterly from Stonington Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13217.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see Annual Report for 1976. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.)Completed in 1916 except for inactive portion. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Two wharves in harbor, both steel sheet pile bulkhead which comprises southern and eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical-handling facilities are available. One wharf owned by town and open to public, is consideredinadequateforpresentgeneralneedsofboating in harbor. There is limited room for expansion ofterminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An emergency maintenance dredging contract, awarded last fiscal year, was completed in November 1989. Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of material were removed from the 15-foot entrance channel. Contract payment of $51,745 was made with closeout pending as of the end of the fiscal year. Hired labor costs of $25,324 were incurred for supervision and inspection and for pre- and after-dredge surveys. 8. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME Location. Jonesport Harbor is situated on the north side of Moosabec Reach in Washington County, ME, about 190 miles northeast of Portland, ME, and about 40 miles southwest of the Canadian border at Eastport, ME. Existing project. A combined rubble mound and cellular steel sheet pile breakwater, 1,200 feet in length; a 15-acre anchorage composed of nine acres, six feet deep, and six acres, eight feet deep; and an entrance channel 100 feet wide and eight feet deep. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. For full description see Annual Report for 1987. Fully complied with for contribution during construction. Local interests must pay an additional ten percent of project costs ($832,119) within a period of 30 years following completion. Terminal facilities. There are 13 privately owned wharves in the harbor, 12 of which are used by local fishermen and one which is used for receiving about three million gallons of petroleum annually. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Removal of additional rock in anchorage area was completed in December 1989. Final contract amount was $7,350,287. 9. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME Location. Drains a large number of lakes and minor streams, and flows from Moosehead Lake about 150 miles southerly and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 25 miles east of Portland, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13298.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. A channel 27 feet deep and not less than 500 feet wide, extending from mouth to bridge at Bath; thence to Gardiner a channel not less than 150 feet wide, 17 feet deep at Beef Rock Shoal, at foot of Swan Island, 18 feet deep through rock at Lovejoy Narrows, near head of Swan Island, decreasing to 16 feet deep at Gardiner; channel west of Swan Island, 100 feet wide, 12 feet deep, except at upper shoal, where depth was to be 15 feet; and channel 125 feet wide and 11 feet deep from Gardiner upstream to Augusta at head of navigation. Section of river included in project is about 44 miles long. Work includes dredging, rock excavation, and two riprap training walls. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharves suitable for landing or loading are at Bath, Woolwich, Richmond, Randolph, Gardiner, Hallowell, and Augusta. Rail connections are available at some wharves. Depths alongside range from 12 to 25 feet. Many facilities are equipped with mechanism for handling passengers and freight. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging ofthe Popham Reach by the Government-owned hopper dredge McFARLAND was performed in November 1989 at a rental cost of $857,500. Approximately 77,362 cubic yards of material were removed. Hired labor costs of $76,600 were incurred for pre- and after-dredge surveys, $7,400 for filming the dredging operation, and $700 for disposal buoys. 10. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 75 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12371.) Previous project. For details, see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. A main channel 35 feet deep, 400 to 800 feet wide, from Long Island Sound to Tomlinson Bridge; two anchorage basins below Tomlinson Bridge of 16 and 15-foot depths; a pile-and-riprap dike about 4,200 feet long, to contract tidal flow at Fort Hale Bar; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 to 150 feet wide, from southwest corner of 16-foot anchorage basin via City Point and West Haven Wharf front to Kimberly Avenue Bridge; thence 12 feet deep and prevailing width of 75 feet up West River to about 600 feet upstream of Kimberly Avenue Bridge, and an anchorage basin six feet deep in West River opposite Mars Wharf; a channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep from 15-foot anchorage basin toward Brewery Street, about 300 feet; a channel in Quinnipiac River 22 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide to a point about 1,000 feet above Ferry Street, thence 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Grand Avenue, with turning basin 22 feet deep, 200 to 800 feet wide, and 700 feet long at mouth of Mill River; a channel up Mill River 1-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide to junction of two branches above Chapel Street, thence to Grand Avenue, 100 feet wide in East Branch and generally 125 feet wide in West Branch; and removal of certain obstructive rocks in Morris Cove. Modification authorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for: deepening the main ship channel to40 feet; widening main ship channel from 400 to 500 feet; widening ship channel bend at Southwest Ledge from 500 feet to a minimum of 780 feet, straightening the channel bend downstream of the existing turning basin and; revising the configuration of the existing 35-foot deep turning basin to provide a common, smaller 40-foot turningbasin. (The modification authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was officially placed in the "inactive" category as of October 5, 1989, due to insufficient economic justification.) Total estimated cost (July 1988) for new work is $33,250,000 exclusive of $4,205,246 for new work completed before 1953 and amounts expended on previous projects. The 22-foot channel and turning basin is to be restudied. Estimated cost (1960) of this portion is $980,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Assurances for 1986 modifications have not been requested. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction and later maintenance of the project; pay 100 percent of the costs for local improvements, presently estimated at $6,735,000; pay 25 percent of project costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $6,630,000; and pay an additional 10 percent of project costs within the 30-year period following construction, offsetby a credit for the value of lands, easements, rightsof- way, relocations (except utility relocations) and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 24 waterfront facilities; most are within city limits of New Haven. Improved waterways within port area along which facilities are located include West River, Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately owned and operated with exception of City Wharf and U.S. Coast Guard Wharf. Depths alongside piers and wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. Some of the facilities have rail connections and all are accessible by paved streets. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Ports of Southern New England No. 4, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program for fiscal year 1990 were maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys and completion of final drafts of several monitoring study reports. Hired labor costs included $300 for contract processing, and $3,100 for the completion of the Disposal Site Designation Report. A prior year undelivered order of $20,800 was deobligated at the end of the fiscal year. 11. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA Location. On south bank of Merrimack River, about 2.5 miles above mouth, and about 48 miles by water north of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13282.) Existing project. Two jetties, one projecting 4,118 feet from the north shore, the other projecting 2,445 feet from the south shore, converging until 1,000 feet apart, then extending seaward 1,000 feet parallel to axis of channel; partially closing Plum Island Basin by a timber dike; channel 12 feet deep and 400 feet wide through bar, thence nine feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves. (See Table 1-B at end of chapterforActs authorizingexistingproject.) Existing project was completed in August 1958, with the improvement of 12-foot channel and outer harbor. North jetty was completed in 1914; south jetty was completed, except for a length of about 30 feet at its outer end, in 1905. Required rehabilitation in these jetties completed in September 1970. Plum Island Basin was partially closed in 1883 by construction of a timber dike. North Rock was removed in 1901. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Marinas, a yacht club, public landings, and a commercial fish pier extend along a frontage of the south bank of Merrimack River below highway bridge and one town pier and four marinas on the north side of river. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the entrance channel by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was performed from June to July, 1990. Final payment was pending with dredge rental charges of $280,447 as of the end of the fiscal year. Approximately 62,460 cubic yards of material were removed. Hired labor costs of $8,700 were incurred for after-dredge surveys and plotting. Cost of disposal buoys placed by contract was $7,881. An adjustment of $4,009 was made to correct a prior year charge. 12. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA Location. Harbor is 45 miles by water south of Boston, MA. Its outer anchorage, the "Cow Yard," is common to Plymouth, Duxbury, and Kingston, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1815 and 1938. Existing project. Provides for: protecting by riprap sections of Long Beach damaged by storm of November 1898, and restoring Eel River to its former course; dredging a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide, increased at entrance and on curves, from the bay to town wharves, formerly in areas south of State Pier, a distance of about 2.5 miles, with a suitable turning basin at inner end; dredging a channel 150 feet wide, 15 feet deep, extending northwesterly about 0.3 miles from a point off site of 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION northerly Craigs Wharf (now State Pier) with a turning basin 300 feet square, and of same depth, at its northwesterly end; maintenance of area dredged to 18 feet deep by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, connecting 15-foot channel with 18-foot channel in vicinity of State Pier; a rubblestone breakwater extending 1,400 feet easterly from a point north of Town Wharf, and thence southeasterly for 2,100 feet; an anchorage eight feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater; and elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project; recreational development, to provide for sport fishing from breakwater, consisting of stone causeway about 360 feet long from westerly end of breakwater to land, guardrail along top of breakwater and causeway, footbridge spanning a navigation opening through breakwater, and public access, parking and sanitary facilities for sport fisherman use. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Project is complete. Construction of anchorage eight feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater was completed in 1967. Construction of the rubblestone breakwater was completed in 1971. Rehabilitation of Long Beach Dike was completed in 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three wharves of pile and timber construction; one is owned by the State, one by the town, and the third by Plymouth Yacht Club. State and town wharves are open to public use. In addition, there are two boatyards with marine railway facilities along waterfront, equipped for boat building and repairs. Local interests will maintain existing public landings open to all on equal terms, and provide all necessary mooring facilities in anchorage. Operations duringfiscalyear. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $8,271 were incurred for work on an environmental assessment and preparation of plans and specifications for repairs to a section of Plymouth Long Beach Dike. 18. POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH, RI Location. PointJudith marks southwestern entrance to Narragansett Bay. Harbor lies in shallow bight west of point, about 14 miles southwest of Newport Harbor, RI, and 33 miles east of New London Harbor, CT. Point Judith Pond is a shallow salt pond, lying inland of the beach, with a length north and south of about four miles. A small artificial opening through the beach and sand dunes connects this pond to the ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13218 and 13219.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1977. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) All work for project authorized prior to 1949 was completed in 1950. Breakwaters were completed in 1914 and dredging of shoals in project area was done in 1921. Main and east shore arm breakwater had deteriorated and required restoration to project design. In 1962 reconstruction of east arm breakwater and main breakwater dock facilities were completed. Rehabilitation required for remainder of breakwater restoration was completed in October 1963. The extension of the 15-foot channel was completed in April 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of one town wharf of steel sheetpile bulkhead construction which compriises southern and eastern limits ofbasin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical handling facilities are available. Wharf is owned by the town and open to the public. State of Rhode Island maintains two State piers, one in Galilee and one in Jerusalem, each having about 500 feet of berthing space. A facility comprising a bulkhead with 15 finger piers projecting channelward there from provides berthing space of about 4,000 linear feet. This facility is used for receipt of fish and fish products. Mechanical handling facilities including fish pumps, are available for discharge of cargo. In addition, there are approximately ten small privately owned wharves used in the fishing business and passenger traffic. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Claims resolution continued relative to the main breakwater repair contract which was terminated in fiscal year 1984. Total hired labor costs for NED and OCE personnel were $35,666. Total contract costs through the end of the fiscal year amounted to $3,179,883. A previous contract obligation of $790 for microfilming of contract files by the National Archives was deobligated. 14. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME AND NH Location. Piscataqua River forms a portion of boundary between Maine and New Hampshire. Mouth of this river is called Portsmouth Harbor. It is 45 miles northeast of Boston Harbor, MA and 37 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13278.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. Removal of ledge rock areas in vicinity of Gangway Rock, southwest point of Badgers Island and Boiling Rock to 35 feet deep; widening 35-foot channel at bends by removal of ledge rock areas in vicinity of Henderson Point, Gangway Rock, Badgers Island, Maine-New Hampshire Interstate Bridge and Boiling Rock; and extending channel from above Boiling Rock to a point about 1,700 feet above Atlantic Terminal Sales dock in Newington generally 400 feet wide, and 35 feet deep below mean low water with maneuvering basins above Boiling Rock and at head of project; channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from Little Harbor through Rye-New Castle drawbridge, then northerly between 1-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 mainland and Leach's Island to deep water in vicinity of Shapleigh and Goat Islands, channel 75 feet wide six feet deep up Sagamore Creek to public landing on downstream side of Sagamore Avenue bridge and anchorage strip, six feet deep, 75 feet wide, totalling three acres, adjacent to channel in Sagamore Creek. Public Law 86- 645, Sec. 107,1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended in 1965 and by Chief of Engineers, December 23, 1965 authorized construction of the six-foot channels and anchorages. Modification authorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for: widening of the 35-foot deep channel from 600 feet to 1,000 feet between two vertical lift bridges; widening northern limit of 35- foot deep channel adjacent to Badgers Island by 100 feet; and widening southern limit of existing 35-foot deep channel at Goat Island from 400 to 550 feet. Total estimated cost (September 1990) for new work is $17,890,000 exclusive of $5,384,043 for new work completed before 1971 and amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Assurances for 1986 modification were executed on February 4, 1988. Local interests must pay the initial 25 percent of project costs concurrent with project construction and reimburse the additional ten percent within the 30-year period following completion of construction. In addition, local interests must do the following, for which there is no estimate of cost: provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction and later maintenance of the project including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain adequate depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals; accomplish all alterations and relocations of transportation facilities (excluding railroads, combined highway and railroad and publicly owned highway bridges and approaches thereto), storm drains, sewer outfalls, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the project; prohibit the erection of any structure, within a distance to be determined by the Chief of Engineers, from the bottom edge of the proposed channel and turning basin. Terminal facilities. Waterfront terminals are chiefly on south bank of Piscataqua River in Portsmouth and Newington. U.S. Navy Yard is on opposite bank at Kittery, ME. Eighteen piers, wharves, and landings represent available terminals for handling the port's waterborne commerce. Navy Yard is not used for commercial activities. On Maine side of river are a town landing and two docks. On New Hampshire side there are 13 terminals, six of which include a public landing, two docks, three facilities used for vessel mooring and landings, are at Portsmouth. In addition there are a number of private recreational boat docks. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 1 for Ports of Searsport and Portland, ME, and Portsmouth, NH.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: Design of the remainder of the project continued. A contract for widening of the channel between the vertical lift bridges and the northern limit adjacent to Badgers Island, awarded last fiscal year was completed in July 1990. Payments through July 1990 were $12,994,934 with final payment pending at close of fiscal year. 15. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI Location: Formed at city of Providence by junction of Seekonk River, and two small streams which rise in northern Rhode Island. It is tidal and flows southerly in a deep channel between broad flats about eight miles, emptying into Narragansett Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13224 and 13225.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1936 and 1938. Existing project. Channel 40 feet deep, generally 600 feet wide from deep water in Narragansett Bay just south of Prudence Island Light to turn below Field Point at Providence, thence up to 1,700 feet wide to existing project limit at Fox Point, with easing of bends to minimum radius of 5,000 feet, excluding marginal strip 75 feet wide channelward of established harbor lines; channel 30 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending northeastward from upper end of existing project to vicinity of India Point at mouth of Seekonk River. Existing project was completed in January 1976 with the removal of rock and unclassified material in the 40-foot channel. Dredging of ordinary material in the 40-foot channel was completed in June 1971. The 35-foot channel was completed in 1949. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Assurances have been received. However, local interests have yet to provide berthing areas commensurate to channel depths. Terminal facilities. There are 27 water terminal facilities servingport of Providence, RI. Three-fourths of all facilities have railway connections. Four facilities are owned by city of Providence and two by State of Rhode Island. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England No. 4, revised in 1952.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program for fiscal year 1990 were maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys and completion of final drafts of several monitoring study reports. Previously obligated funds in the amount of $19,126 were expended for this activity. 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 16. RYE HARBOR, NH Location. On Atlantic coast of New Hampshire about five miles south of Portsmouth Harbor. It is a natural cove of about 39 acres protectedby two breakwaters. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13283.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 100 feet wide and ten feet deep for 600 feet through entrance, thence eight feet deep for 1,700 feet within harbor; dredging two five-acre anchorages, one eight feet deep and the other six feet deep; and maintaining existingbreakwaters. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean range of tide is 8.4 feet. Existing project was essentially completed in October 1962. Removal of ledge encountered during dredging process was completed in July 1964. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Much of the shoreline around Rye Harbor is undeveloped State property. Private ownership is limited to about 500 feet on the north shore west of Ragged Neck State Park, and to the south shore between the bridge and breakwater. State docking facilities and a boat launching ramp are available at the head of the harbor. Primarily, berthing is in the Federal and State anchorages. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in January 1990 and completed in June 1990. Approximately 55,375 cubic yards of material was removed from the Federal channel and anchorages and placed at the Cape Arundel Disposal Site. Total Federal contract cost was $354,400. Hired labor costs included $4,800 for preparation of plans and specifications, $2,200 for sampling and testing, $33,300 for supervision and inspection, and $42,600 for surveys. The New Hampshire Legislature had previously enacted a law prolhibiting placement of dredged material at the originally proposed upland disposal site. No other feasible land-based site was available. Under the terms of a Memorandum of Understanding with the State of New Hampshire, Department of Recreation and Economic Development, the State paid all hired labor and contract costs exceeding the estimated cost of upland disposal. The State also paid for maintenance dredging and expansion of the State anchorage, totalling 16,496 cubic yards. Total State costs through the end of the fiscal year were $308,117. Resolutions of a contract claim concerning liquidated damages was pending at the end of the fiscal year. 17. WELLS HARBOR, ME Location. In town of Wells at mouth of Webhannet River, about 20 miles northeast of Portsmouth Harbor, NH and about 34 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13286.) Existing project. Repairs to an old Government pier about 750 feet long, made of cribwork ballasted with stone extending seaward from Drakes Island; and anchorage basin 7.4 acres in area and six feet deep; a channel 100 to 150 feet wide, extending from deep water in the Atlantic Ocean to inner end of basin, with seaward section eight feet deep, and harbor section six feet deep, and two converging stone jetties, one extending 940 feet easterly from Wells Beach and the other 840 feet southerly from Drakes Island, separated so as to provide a clear opening 400 feet wide, and for revetment of seaward face of tip of Wells Beach. Extension of the Wells Beach jetty to a total length of 2,140 feet and extension of Drakes Island jetty to a total length of 1,865 feet, and dredging a 300- by 450-foot settling basin south of the anchorage, was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on September 20, 1965. Project was completed in April 1967. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one wharf of pile and timber construction on the north side of the anchorage. Facility is owned and operated by the town of Wells and is considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the outer entrance channel by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was performed in July 1990, at a rental cost of $53,231. Approximately 14,615 cubic yards of material were removed. Hired labor costs of $5,308 were incurred for surveys associated with the dredging. 18. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter.) 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-C at end of chapter.) 20. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-H at end of chapter.) Alterations of Bridges 21. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, MA. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal 1-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 cost of $138,518. In addition non-Federal contributed funds amounted to $8,062. For details see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. Beach Erosion Control 22. REVERE BEACH, MA Location. In the city of Revere, Suffolk County, MA, approximately seven miles north of the main entrance channel to Boston Harbor, and six miles northeast of the city of Boston, MA. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chart No. 13275 and U.S. Geological Survey Maps, Boston Bay quadrangle.) Existing project. Placement of sandfill along 13,000 feet of beach. The top of the sandfill will be placed at 18 feet above mean low water, including a 50-foot wide berm, sloping one-foot vertical in 15 feet horizontal to meet the existing beach. The total width of the beach will extend approximately 300 feet, of which, about 185 feet is above the mean high water line. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances were executed on May 31,1990. Consistent with the cost sharing andfinancing concepts contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), local interests are required to: contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost of construction of the project, presently estimated at $3,605,000; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic nourishment cost for an initial period of 50 years, now estimated at $22,000 annually, such contribution to be prior to each nourishment operation; assure the continued performance of the periodic nourishment and repair of the project after the first 50 years and during the economic life as may be required to serve the intended purpose; assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers would not be permitted; hold the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to place the initial beach fill was awarded in September 1990 and work was scheduled to get underway in November. 23. SEA BLUFF BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT Location. Sea Bluff Beach is located on the south-central coast of Connecticut, on Long Island Sound, in the city of West Haven and extends approximately 1,000 feet southwest from the mouth of the Cove River to the eastern end of Prospect Beach. Existing project. Beach widening by the direct placement of a suitable sandfill along approximately 1,000 feet of shorefront and providing for a 50-foot wide level beach berm. Also included is the reconstruction of the existing rock groin structure located on the southwestern end of the beach (Ivy Street) and a beach monitoring program. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Provide during the period of construction a total contribution equal to 35 percent of the total project cost; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, railroads, bridges, sewers, and related and specialfacilities determinedby the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; maintain continued public ownership of the beach and shore and its administration for public use for 50 years; maintain the protective measures during the economic life of the project; control water pollution to the extentnecessary to safeguard the health of bathers; provide, if necessary at no cost to the Federal Government, a drainage system to divert freshwater runoff away from the beach; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection and assume full responsibility for all cost in excess of the Federal cost limitation of two million dollars. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for beach erosion repair was awarded in February 1990. Ending the fiscal year work had not started. No work may be performed below mean high water (MHW) between 1June and 30 September per contract specifications (98 percent of the work is below MHW.) 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of beach erosion projects were not conducted in fiscal year 1990. 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-D at end of chapter.) 26. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-I at end of chapter.) Flood Control 27. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reser- 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION voir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd Session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI, along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, MA, and on the Clear River in Burrillville, RI, were authorized in 1985. (See Table 1-K at end of chapter on Reservoir and Local Protection Projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan.) 27A. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, three miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast of Uxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Additional payment on a contract, awarded last fiscal year, to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks resulted in a final cost of $11,820 for the West Hill shelter. 28. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. The project provides for Federal acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling 8,102 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Land acquisition is complete. A total of 3,210 acres have been acquired in fee at a cost of $2,152,853 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 4,892 acres at a cost of $591,193. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plan lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances have been received. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Remaining condemnation cases finalized. Fiscal year costs were $43,066 for administrative closeout. Maintenance: Hired labor costs for project surveillance and insp tion, as well as land use administration, were $ x25,039. 29. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA and CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction often reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control offloods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18,1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, autho- 1-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 rized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch ofWestfield River, MA, and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Act Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, VT project. Flood control projects atCambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, VT; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH, were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, NH project expired in April 1978 due to lack oflocal cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, West Springfield, MA, Hartford, VT, Wethersfield, CT, and Keene, NH authorized and constructed in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, VT, Conway, MA, Milford, CT, Simsbury, CT authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were completed. (See Table 1-L at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin.) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the comprehensive plan for the control of flood-waters in the Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, VT to enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, VT, and to provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon. The estimated project cost is $1,500,000. 29A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is two miles north of village of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Construction of initial recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract was awarded in June 1990 for replacement of fuel tanks at three projects. Work had not started at fiscal year end. 29B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA and Wachusett Mountain, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Additional payment on a contract, awarded last fiscal year, to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks resulted in a final cost of $11,420 for the Barre Falls shelter. A contract to paint the spillway and service bridges was awarded in February 1990 and completed in August 1990. Contract amount was $28,900. A contract for miscellaneous concrete repairs was awarded in May 1990. The contract was 50 percent complete at fiscal year end with earnings to date of $29,174. 29C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of city of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repair bridges at three locations awarded last fiscal year was completed in December 1989. Final contract amount was $74,720. A contract to repair Goodnow Road bridge was awarded in April 1990 and completed in September 1990. Contract amount was $35,864. A contract was awarded in July 1990 to replace fuel tanks at two projects. Work had not started at fiscal year end. 29D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is in town ofColebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract topaintthe control tower and service bridges was awarded in April 1990. The contract was 44 percent complete at fiscal year end with earnings to date of $25,000. A contract to repair six bridges at various locations was awarded in June 1990. Work had not started at fiscal year end. 29E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town ofMonson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about two miles southeast of community of Monson, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for pavement repairs awarded last fiscal year was completed in September 1989. Final quantities were determined during the current year; total contract amount was $32,073. 29F. FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT Location. The town of Simsbury is located in the central portion of Hartford County in north-central Connecticut, approximately 25 miles east of the New York- Connecticut state line and 14 miles northwest of the city of Hartford, CT. Existing project. The proposed project includes concrete grid block and stone slope protection along 900 feet of eroding Farmington River streambank. The project will protect the river bank and an adjacent three-foot diameter sewer trunk line which has failed twice in the past three years. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; perform all relocations and alterations ofbuildings, utilities,highways, railroads, bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; contribute 25 percent of actual cost of construction and preparation of plans and specifications (a minimum cash contribution of five percent of these costs is required); assume the responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; no less than once each year, inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications were developed during the fiscal year. The permitting process was initiated. 29G. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is four miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a cost of $343,235. 29H. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, one mile above its confluence with main stem of 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final quantities for a contract for access road pavement repairs, completed in September 1989, were determined. The final contract cost was $25,658. A contract for drainage repairs awarded last fiscal year was 99 percent complete at fiscal year end with earnings to date of $66,752. 29I. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and one mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks awarded last fiscal year was completed in September 1990. The North Hartland shelter was completed at a cost of $29,501. A contract to repair access road pavement awarded last fiscal year was completed in June 1990. Contract amount was $87,152. 29J. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and three miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT, and Claremont, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final amount of the contract to repair and repaint the spillway bridge, completed last fiscal year, was $302,556. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks awarded last fiscal year was completed in September 1990. The North Springfield shelter was completed at a cost of $15,250. A contract for expansion of parking lot and drainage was awarded in September 1989 and completed in August 1990. Final contract amount was $74,265. A contract to paint the gatehouse bridge was awarded in May 1990 and completed in September 1990. Contract amount was $22,000. 29K. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene, NH. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $358,570. 29L. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The town of West Springfield is situated in southwestern Massachusetts about 90 miles west of Boston and 135 miles northwest of New York City, on the west bank of Connecticut River. Riverdale is in the northern portion of the town of West Springfield, MA. Existingproject. The existinglocal protection project constructed in 1950 involved the construction of approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two pumping stations and three stop-log storage structures. The levee provides protection against a flood greater than any of record reduced by the approved plan of reservoirs. The grades are all points above the maximum stage of the greatest flood of record, that of March 1936. A plan of improvement authorized in 1987 calls for the expansion of the gravity outflow and pumping capacity of the existing Riverdale Pumping Station. This includes adding a 24-inch, diesel powered pump into the existing station. The proposed project also includes jacking a separate 5-foot diameter, reinforced concrete culvert through the dike, running parallel to the existing culvert to increase the gravity outflow capacity. The new gravity conduit will be equipped with an ungated inlet and an outlet structure which includes a 60" x 6" self contained, electronically operated sluice gate. During emergencies, the gate could be operated manually from a new bridge 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION and tower structure on the river side of the dike. An existing nine-foot diameter culvert, about 400 feet downstream on Bagg Brook will be replaced with a realigned eight-foot x 13-foot corrugated metal arch and a 50-foot long transition aligned to tie smoothly into the existing downstream channel. Project cost estimate for the modification is $818,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances for improvement authorized in 1987 have been requested. The local sponsor shall be solely responsible for operating, maintaining, replacing, and rehabilitating the project: provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of five percent of total project costs, currently estimated tobe $40,900; provide all lands, easements, rightsof- way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, sewers, and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project, currently estimated tobe $2,000; provide during the period of construction an additional cash contribution of 19.8 percent, presently estimated at $161,600, so that the total contribution equals 25 percent of total project costs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords, or that would hinder operation and maintenance; and the local sponsor will assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of $5 million. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued coordination with local sponsor. Local assurances have not been received. 29M. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and five miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $288,745. 29N. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and abouttwo miles west ofTownshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream aboutfour miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969. Secondary phase completed in September 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A co"tract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks awarded last fiscal year was completed in September 1990. The Townshend shelter was completed at a cost of $22,841. A contract to replace fuel tanks at three projects was awarded in June 1990. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 290. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is one mile north of Fryville, MA, and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks awarded last fiscal year was completed in September 1990. The Tully shelter was completed at a cost of $11,420. A contract for the inlet channel erosion repair awarded last fiscal year was terminated for default in December 1989. Solicitations were again requested and a contract awarded in April 1990 was completed in September 1990. Final payment was still pending at close of fiscal year. A contract to replace the service gate operators was awarded in April 1990. The contract was 15 percent complete with earnings of $5,000 at close of fiscal year. A contract was awarded in July 1990 to replace fuel tanks at two projects. Work had not started at fiscal year end. 29P. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, four miles above its junction with Connecticut River. Itis onefourth mile north of Union Village, VT, and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Re- 1-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 port for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June1950. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to refurbish the service gates was awarded in May 1990. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. A contract to replace the fuel tanks at three projects was awarded in June 1990. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. Work has not started also on a contract awarded last fiscal year to repair the Route 132 bridge. Contractor continues to have difficulty with the administrative phase. Contract termination is being pursued. 29Q. WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The West Springfield local protective works are located in the town of West Springfield, MA. The project is on the west bank of the Connecticut River, 76 miles above its mouth. (See Geological Survey maps for Springfield South and West Springfield, MA-CT.) Existing project. This project consists of a system of earth levees and concrete floodwalls approximately 24,500 feet in length. The system starts at high ground, in the vicinity of Harrison Place, and extends downstream along the Connecticut River and up the north bank of the Westfield River to high ground at the Boston & Albany Railroad. The work involved raising 13,700 feet of existing levee, constructing 2,300 feet of floodwall, improving 2,400 feet of river bank, and treating 6,100 feet of existing levee foundation. Three pumping stations with appurtenant drainage facilities were also constructed for the disposal of interior drainage. The project, with the approved plan of reservoirs, is designed to protect against a flood greater than any of record. The levee and floodwall grades are, at all points, above the maximum stage of the greatest flood of record, that of March 1936. The project is a unit of the comprehensive plan of flood control and other purposes in the Connecticut River Basin and was authorized by the Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938. Construction of project work was initiated in March 1939 and completed in July 1942 with the exception of foundation treatment along the Westfield River south of Agawam Bridge, which was initiated in May 1947 and completed in November 1947, and relief well and drainage system, which was initiated in August 1952 and completed in July 1953. (See Table 1- B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Modified Project. A modification of the project was authorized in October 1982 providing for the raising of the floodwall sections by one foot and the provision of a flood forecasting system. Work for flood wall modification began in April 1984 and was completed in August 1984. The National Weather Service and the town of West Springfield have entered into a Memorandum of Agreement for the installation and operation of an automated flood forecasting system. This system includes a centralized micro-computer, four precipitation gages, two river gages and a repeater site. When fully functional, the automated flood forecasting system will provide the town with timely and accurate forecasts of potential flooding along both the Connecticut and Westfield Rivers. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Installation of the early warning flood forecasting system was completed in September 1990. A supplemental Operation and Maintenance Manual was drafted in fiscal year 1990. Final inspection will take place in fiscal year 1991. 30. GULF STREET, MILFORD, CT Location. Milford is located in southwestern Connecticut along Long Island Sound about ten miles southwest of New Haven, CT. The erosion site is located immediately to the southeast of Milford Harbor. Existing project. Project involves 180 feet of stone slope protection which was completed in August 1987. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Several coastal storms, right after project completion, damaged the project causing significant undermining. In order to prevent further damage to tie-in sections, armor stone and bedding layers will be placed over the edges of the concrete block mattress. A contract for the repairs was awarded on September 11, 1990 and work was scheduled to start in the fall. 31. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and three local protection projects have been specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency bank protection projects at: Alford, Green River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Pittsfield, MA; and Waterbury-Watertown, CT, were authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-M on dams, reservoirs, and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 31A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook, about two miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repair six bridges at various locations was awarded in June 1990. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 31B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook, in town of Plymouth, CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $92,555. 31C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook, in city of Waterbury and towns of Middlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence ofNaugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repair six bridges at various locations was awarded in June 1990. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 31D. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook, about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town ofThomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repair six bridges at various locations was awarded in June 1990. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 31E. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River, about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River, and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repair six bridges at various locations was awarded in June 1990. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 32. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights 1-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system of four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs and one of the local protection projects. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction ofSaxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. An emergency bank protection project at Amesbury, MA was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-N at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works for Merrimack River Basin.) 32A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River, and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, NH, just above village of Swetts Mills, NH, 18 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final payment of the contract to replace the emergency generators at three projects, completed last fiscal year, was $69,663. Blackwater Dam portion was $21,863. 32B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH, and 14 miles east ofKeene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for drainage improvements was completed in September 1989. An additional payment of $3,753 was made this fiscal year; the final contract amount was $26,022. 32C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2.5 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last fiscal year to replace the emergency generator was completed in February 1990. Final contract amount was $65,040. 32D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton, NH. Everett Dam is on PiscataquogRiver, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River, and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of EastWeare, NH. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational developmentin accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final payment of the contract to replace the emergency generators at three projects, completed last fiscal year, was $69,663. Hopkinton-Everett portion was $47,800. A contract awarded last fiscal year to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was completed in September 1990. The Hopkinton-Everett shelters were completed at a cost of $34,261. A contract for road improvement at Elm Brook Park was awarded in April 1990 and completed in June 1990. Final contract amount was $33,386. 33. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN, AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to rehab the navigation gates was awarded in April 1990. Ending 30 September 1990, the contract was 90 percent complete. Work completed to date included dewatering of both sector gates, replacement of a broken wheel on the Fairhaven side and a new timber fender system for the main channel opening at a cost of $327,785; plus supervision and administration cost of $43,804. Operating costs included $123,487 for project operations; $55,403 for administration; $9,200 for periodic inspections; $2,000 to overhaul the generator and $1,104 for a new outboard motor. 34. NEW LONDON, CT Location. In the city of New London, CT, about 45 miles southeast of Hartford, CT, and 50 miles southwest of Providence, RI. (See Geological Survey map for New London, CT.) Existing project. The hurricane protection project consists of approximately 715 feet of rock-faced earthfill dike and 800 feet of I-walls around the northerly shore of Shaw Cove and the regrading of approximately 21 acres of land along the west shore of the cove to elevation 12.5 feet mean sea level. Top of dike and floodwalls are 14.5 feet mean sea level. Appurtenant structures include a street gate, pressure conduit and a pumping station to discharge interior drainage. Project is complete. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A final auditing of all costs is underway. 35. LITTLE RIVER, BELFAST, ME Location. The town of Belfast, ME, is located approximately 20 miles south of Bangor, ME, and lies on Maine's southern shoreline on Belfast Bay. Existing project. The plan to resolve the streambank erosion problem downstream of the southern abutment of the Little River Lower Dam would consist of approximately 80 linear feet of precast concrete modular wall. This wall would vary in height from ten to 20 feet and vary in depth from four to eight feet. A ten-foot long castin- place concrete wall about seven feet high will tie the modular wall into the downstream bank. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; contribute 25 percent of actual cost of construction and preparation of plans and specifications (a minimum cash contribution of five percent of these costs is required); assume the responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final contract amount for emergency streambank protection, completed last fiscal year, was $137,904. 36. PERLEY BROOK, FORT KENT, ME Location. Fort Kent, ME, is located in northern Aroostook County, about 50 miles northwest of Presque Isle, ME, and adjacent to the United States-Canada border. Perley Brook is a tributary of the Fish River. Existing project. The project includes stone revetment along 100 linear feet of six- to ten-foot high embankment adjacent to Route 161, the excavation of four river shoal areas, and placing gabions around the existing highway culverts. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; contribute 25 percent of actual cost of construction and preparation of plans and specifications (a minimum cash contribution of five percent of these costs is required); assume the responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 $500,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final contract amount for emergency streambank protection, completed last fiscal year, was $54,634. 37. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA Location. The city of Revere is located in Suffolk County on the Massachusetts coast about five miles northeast of the East Boston section of the city of Boston, MA. Roughans Point is a low-lying, ocean front area of Revere. The area has 55 acres which lie below elevation ten feet NGVD. Existing project. Consists of 3,930 feet of stone revetmenttodissipateincomingwaves, prevent overtopping and stabilize existing facilities along the shoreline. The revetment would extend from a point 400 feet north of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway and Leverett Avenue. The plan also calls for "backwater" protection by constructing an earth berm one foot high and 200 feet long on the existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road and a sluice gate on the 42-inch drain from the Roughans area to Sales Creek. Interior drainage improvements consist of a new intake structure at the existing pump station and a new gravity drain with a sluice gate. The total estimated project cost (October 1989) is $12,900,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessaryfor construction of the structural elements of the project, including ponding areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated material presently estimated at $880,000; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements, presently estimated at $23,000 annually; pay an amount in cash, presently estimated at $3,635,000, to bring the total non-Federal share to 35 percent of project costs allocated to storm damage reduction; provide and maintain necessary access roads; accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities, highway bridges, and other structures made necessary by construction of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued with detailed geotechnical evaluation of foundation conditions, evaluation ofdisposal alternatives and development of mitigation option. 38. STAMFORD, CT Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City, and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the emergency generator was awarded in March 1990. The contract was ten percent complete at fiscal year end with earnings of $5,100. 39. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million project. Ffolor odin itiation and partial accomplishment of Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. Local flood protection project for West River, New Haven, CT was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection districts, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 39A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River, and eight miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Or- 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION dinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $298,391. 39B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, and one mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for repairs to Pond Bridge was awarded in April 1990. The contract was 17 percent complete at fiscal year end with earnings of $12,750. A contract to repair the bridge on Five Bridge Road was awarded in June 1990. The contract was 59 percent complete at fiscal year end with earnings of $17,470. 39C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about five miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to perform remedial measures was awarded in late September 1989 and completed in September 1990. To date the contractor has received $1,155,355 with final payment pending at the close of the fiscal year. 39D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is four miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $273,978. 39E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, two miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last fiscal year to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was completed in September 1990. The West Thompson shelter, completed in August 1989, incurred additional charges this fiscal year resulting in a total cost of $12,380. 39F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last fiscal year to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was completed in September 1990. The Westville shelter, completed in July 1989, incurred additional charges this fiscal year resulting in a total cost of $11,420. 40. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE, MA Location. The project is located in the city of Quincy and the town of Braintree on the south side of Massachusetts Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, seven miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. 1-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 Existing project. Provides for the construction of a 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 190 feet below ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. New reinforced concrete box outlets will be constructed under the Southern Artery and an adjacent automobile dealer parking lot. In conjunction with this, the left bank of the Town River below the Southern Artery will be widened to provide sufficient channel capacity. The tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by reconstruction of the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located at the headwaters of Town Brook including a new spillway and outlet structure. The estimated total project cost (October 1989) is $39,400,000, exclusive of the reconstruction cost which is a non-Federal responsibility, and includes $6,100,000 in approved- for-credit compatible work that has been accomplished by the project sponsor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, presently estimated at $850,000; reconstruct Old Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity, presently estimated at $3,700,000; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $2,900,000; so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements, presently estimated at $35,000 annually. In addition, local interests must do the following, for which there is no estimate of cost: prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on both the improvements and unimproved channels, and manage all project-related channels to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued. Plans and specifications for the tunnel and inlet/outlet structures as well as for the reconstruction of the Old Quincy Dam were completed. Additional testing of the material to be excavated from the outlet area is required to determine the level of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH's). The testing will determine if there is a need for expensive sanitary landfill disposal versus upland disposal in a marine environment. Completion of this testing is a prerequsite to execution of the Local Cooperation Agreement and initiation of construction. 41. WEST RIVER, NEW HAVEN, CT Location. New Haven, CT is located in southern New Haven County, about 35 miles south of Hartford, CT. The project area is located upstream of the intersection of Route 63 and West River in northwestern New Haven. Existing project. The West River will be widened for 1,150 feet from its existing 25- to 30-foot width to a 50- to 70-foot width; a 1,150-foot modular wall will be built along the right bank and a 600-foot cantilever sheet pile wall will be built along the left bank. For Wintergreen Brook the channel will have a 20- to 30-foot width, and a 550-foot sheet pile wall and 450-foot dike on the right bank. A recreational walkway on top of the modular wall with lighting and fencing to connect two existing city parks is also included. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on January 17, 1989 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for the project. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations, presently estimated at $1,700,000; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at five percent or $291,000 so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; pay 50 percent of the costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated to be $140,000; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; bear all costs of operation and maintenance, presently estimated at $7,000 annually. In addition, local interests must do the following, for which there is no estimate of cost: participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on the project which would reduce level of protection afforded; notify, not less than once a year, affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The required real estate was furnished by the State of Connecticut/ City of New Haven in August 1990. A contract for construction of the project was awarded in September 1990 and work was scheduled to start in the fall. 42. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections ofthefollowingprojects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: April 1990--Bridgeport, Colchester, Hartford, Milford, North Canaan, Salisbury, Torrington, Winsted, Woodbury; May 1990 - Ansonia, Danbury, Derby, East Branch, East Hartford, Hall Meadow, Mad River, New Fairfield, New London, Norwalk, Pawcatuck, Stamford, Sucker Brook, Waterbury, Wethersfield. MAINE: May 1990-- Ogunquit; June 1990 - Beals, Blaine, Castine, Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Gouldsboro, Harpswell, Hartland, Indian Island, Islesboro, Lubec, Machias, Perry, Whiting. MASSACHUSETTS: October 1989--New Bedford Hurricane Barrier; April 1990 - Alford, Canton, Conway, Gardner, Haverhill, Huntington, Lancaster, Lee, Lowell, Middlebury, Pittsfield, Scituate, Sheffield, Springfield, Three Rivers, Ware, West Warren, Worcester; May 1990- 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION -Amesbury, Blackstone, Charles River Dam, Chicopee, Chicopee Falls, Hayward Creek, Holyoke, New Bedford Hurricane Barrier, Northampton, Quincy, Saxonville, West Springfield; June 1990 - Fitchburg. NEW HAMPSHIRE: November 1989--Keene; May 1990- Charlestown, Farmington, Lincoln, Nashua, North Stratford, Shelburne, West Stewartstown. RHODE ISLAND: November 1989--Fox Point Hurricane Barrier; April 1990 - Burrillville, Fox Point Hurricane Barrier; May 1990 - Woonsocket. VERMONT: May 1990--Brownsville, Village ofSaxton, Weston. 43. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of reservoirs, many of which are multipurpose in nature and all containing significant amounts of storage for flood control purposes, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. Winter pools are maintained at many projects to submerge the flood control gates and keep them from freezing. During FY90, there were only two significant flood events in New England which required notable regulation activities at any Corps reservoirs. A series of coastal storms travelling up the Atlantic coastline deposited five to eight inches of rainfall over southern New England between 14 and 21 October 1989. This prolonged period of precipitation necessitated the reduction of discharge from Corps reservoirs in Connecticut and Massachusetts to minimum releases on 20 October 1989. The resulting flood storage at these Corps reservoirs during the next several days reduced flows by 50 percent in the Thames, 40 to 60 percent in the Naugatuck and ten percent in the Blackstone River Basins of southern New England and prevented flood damage from occurring along the main stems of these rivers. During the week of 6-11 August 1990, a nearly stationary weather front persisted over New England resulting in a series of tropical downpours and thunderstorms which originated in the waters south of New England and deposited two to seven inches of rainfall over much of New England. On 11 August 1990, reservoirs in the Merrimack River Basin were throttled back to reduce downstream flows, resulting in storages of 13 to 16 percent being utilized at some reservoirs in the basin. Several reservoirs in the Connecticut River Basin were also regulated and limited flood storage was utilized. Although the rainfall and runoffassociated with this August event was significant, river levels prior to the storm were seasonally low, and the resulting reservoir regulation did not provide any benefits. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe activities occurred at Ball Mountain and Townshend--October 1989, April, May, September 1990; Otter Brook--March and April 1990; Birch Hill, Littleville, Knightville, and Tully--April 1990; Surry Mountain--May 1990. Non-flood releases were made from Colebrook Lake for low flow augmentation in October 1989 and for water supply throughout the year. Non-flood releases from North Hartland Lake have been controlled by the Vermont Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative for hydropower throughout fiscal year 1990. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN Blackwater was regulated for canoe races in May 1990. THAMES RIVER BASIN Regulation activities in the basin included regulation for canoeing at Mansfield Hollow in June 1990, East Brimfield in April 1990, and Hodges Village in May 1990. Also the permanent pool at West Thompson was raised on several occasions during fiscal year 1990 to accommodate AKC retriever trials. 44. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal floodingassociated with hurricanes and severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, CT and New Bedford- Fairhaven, MA barriers. The Fox Point, RI and the Pawcatuck and New London, CT barriers are operated by the local communities. Abrief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: STAMFORD BARRIER. The barrier gates were operated on two different occasions for coastal storms during fiscal year 1990. Benefits associated with the operation of the Stamford Barrier totalled $100,000 for FY 1990. NEW BEDFORD BARRIER. The New Bedford Barrier was operated on four different occasions during fiscal year 1990; however none of the closures resulted in damages prevented. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1990 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. PAWCATUCK HURRICANE BARRIER. The Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1990 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. 1-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 NEW LONDONHURRICANE BARRIER. The New London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1990 and did not experience damagingtidal flood conditions. 45. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter.) 46. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 14-J at end of chapter.) Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Godfrey Brook, Milford, MA Matfield River, East Bridgewater, MA Powwow River, Amesbury, MA Salisbury Brook, Brockton, MA $5,000 5,000 9,200 6,663 Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Baker River, Warren, NH Boston Harbor, Pier 6, Boston, MA Chelsea Creek, East Boston, MA Connecticut River, Middletown, CT Connecticut River, Springfield, MA Connecticut River, Guildhall, VT Deerfield River, Rowe/Monroe, MA Farmington River, Barkhamsted, CT Farmington River, CT (See Section 29F of Text) Fish River, Fort Kent, ME Gulf Street, Milford, CT (See Section 30 of Text) Housatonic River, Shelton, CT Housatonic River, Southbury, CT Housatonic River, Lee, MA Konkapot River, Monterey, MA Little River, Belfast, ME (See Section 35 of Text) Machias Bay, Machiasport, ME Machias Bay (Rte. 92) Machiasport, ME Mill River, Northampton, MA Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME Nashua River, Leominster, MA North River (Call Road), Colrain, MA Ocean Grove Beach, Swansea, MA Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (See Section 36 of Text) Planting Island Cove, Marion, MA Quaboag River, Monson, MA $7,500 9,066 10,030 56,274 4,745 1,733 6,200 1,746 42,648 4,487 19,277 1,646 7,500 4,698 1,233 14,084 15,000 7,376 4,946 1,133 6,974 7.500 1 St. Croix River (Downtown), Calais, ME Stage Brook, Blandford, MA Town River Bay, Quincy, MA Westfield Rvr. (Frog Hole), Westfield, MA White River. (Rte. 14), Hartford, VT 6,541 5,920 30,819 4,217 9,798 Emergency flood control activities--repairf,l ood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year were $143,063 for disaster preparedness. 47. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 1-G at end of chapter.) General Investigations 48. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $1,267,089 of which $292,062 was for one navigation study; $286,984 for eight flood damage prevention studies; $64,451 for one shore protection study; $183,353 for three comprehensive studies; and $440,238 for coordination studies. 49. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and a continuing program of compilation of basic hydrologic information is carried out. Division Engineer's representatives during the past year kept closely in touch with development in the basin and cooperated with their Canadian counterparts assisting in development of basins' resources. Total costs for the fiscal year were $11,941. Total costs to 30 September 1990 are $236,126. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $416,830. Total costs to 30 September 1990 are $6,433,160. 50. PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 6,225 Total costs for Planning, Engineering and Design 2,394 were $232,764 of which $153,622 were for local protection studies for Saugus River and Tributaries, MA and 7,091 $79,142 for multiple purpose projects at Townshend 6,000 Lake and Ball Mountain Lake, VT. 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 51. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction Engineering and Design costs were $5,079 for the navigation project at New Haven Harbor, CT, and $290,741 for the local protection project at Massachusetts Coastal, Roughans Point, Revere, MA. 1-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 1. Andrews River, MA (Contributed Funds) 2. Aquatic Plant Control 3. Branford Harbor, CT 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) 5. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 6. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 7. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 219,042 - 219,042 6,082 6,082 72,420 72,193 -3,677 -3,450 139,991 103,481 630,211 593,701 - 187,500 - 187,500 12,000 8,770 12,000 14,169 12,000 9,454 10,000 6,527 291,496 281,573 9,537 9,537 25,920 25,920 40,481 39,481 88,571 83,722 777,337 1,919,657 781,478 1,917,949 32,786,21912 32,786,21912 5,850,021 4,363,013 5,338,954 5,709,255 4,289,169 5,646,961 4,812,428 107,061,000 4,743,139 106,815,298 - 115,432 - 115,432 - 390,677 - 390,677 - 26,609,000 - 26,609,000 - 266,70541 - 266,70541 692,982 692,995 28,043 27,436 70,392 70,326 833,430 3,544,820s 832,130 3,542,848* 43,500 43,500 254,512 254,512 310,696 268,600 55,764 122,179 24,947 25,356 220,167 2,376,873 218,910 2,375,427 168,000 168,000 576,856 576,856 192,442 192,442 1,000 884 167,854 144,207 27,000 1,730,251 48,725 1,728,303 1-26 TABLE 1-A (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 8. Jonesport Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds--Required) 9. Kennebec River, ME 10. New Haven Harbor, CT 11. Newburyport Harbor, MA 12. Plymouth Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds--Required) 13. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 2,860,000 3,830,000 38,658 6,481,959 80,000 720,000 763,675 550,000 478,037 33,000 50,560 - 7,750,000 -10,759 7,489,073 17,884 833,000 832,119 - 1,5 9,L40 8 - 1,599,940 6 38,188 39,097 15,936 15,936 600,000 51,000 276,753 288,070 50,225 50,225 -83,000 -1,902 15,514 306,241 980,519 16,214 140,632 1,142,399 343,200 343,100 92,224 92,471 18,752 18,752 972,598 3,292,005 972,379 3,291,786 - 4,773,246 8 5,079 4,773,246 8 57,442 14,149,440 ' 42,943 14,131,162 9 - 569,225 - 569,225 401,313 4,950,950 374,789 4,924,060 1,415,524 1,415,524 2,127,218 12 2,127,218 12 70,000 315,743 69,405 315,712 10,360 10,128 21,244 1,342,2487 21,844 1,341,991 ' 573,000 541,611 894,475 894,475 927,000 1,152,000 920,741 1,161,963 153,000 152,249 - 2,714,510 11 - 2,714,510 1x 44,000 6,118,884 34,877 6,108,217 1,926,000 1,926,000 17,587 17,587 1-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 14. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH (Contributed Funds--Required) 15. Providence River and Harbor, RI 16. Rye Harbor, NH (Contributed Funds--Required) (Contributed Funds--Other) 17. Wells Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds) 22. Revere Beach, MA (Contributed Funds) 23. Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) 27A. West Hill Dam, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 200,258 138,211 12,121 12,121 100,000 4,400,000 5,676,000 15,760,301 10 69,157 1,378,000 8,183,675 15,153,085 10 8,169 8,169 40,157 39,957 32,863 2,030,269 32,863 2,030,069 1,000,000 3,500,000 4,599,707 400,000 2,553,326 3,053,033 - - 25,417,022 4 - - 25,417,022 4 252,000 232,283 52,077 51,644 41,225 41,225 40,969 40,651 482,177 440,914 - 4,082,502 $ 19,126 4,081,911 3 130,342 130,342 744,901 702,887 - 61,338 - 61,338 60,326 60,326 125,000 124,486 7,711 7,209 150,000 65,132 360,200 441,500 338,096 447,811 63,945 63,945 50,000 3 105,664 - 2 639,400 690,987 - 81,548 - 81,548 - 360,973 - 360,973 121,743 1,808,595 120,419 1,806,736 - 212,000 - 212,000 ,450,000 4,258,712 n 134,384 913,278 n ,293,000 2,435,965 - 142,965 250,000 17,158 189,000 250,000 17,158 189,000 - 2,306,902 14 - 2,306,902 14 446,664 4,611,998 381,399 4,536,360 1-28 TABLE 1-A (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 28. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA 29A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT 29B. Barre Falls Dam, MA 29C. Birch Hill Dam, MA (Contributed Funds) 29D. Colebrook River Lake, CT 29E. Conant Brook Dam, MA 29F. Farmington River, Simsbury, CT 29G. Knightville Dam, MA 29H. Littleville Lake, MA 291. North Hartland Lake, VT New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp, Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Appr p. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 46,706 34,804 236,100 122,300 248,942 147,186 337,200 311,200 352,118 374,174 436,400 316,300 476,702 368,633 - - 363,500 481,400 281,087 414,096 - -. - -. 308,100 310,000 275,495 303,553 112,500 102,705 40,000 35,436 98,700 104,497 4,540 7,236 124,300 127,825 418,700 435,932 451,400 478,718 476,400 623,168 130,800 178,771 105,900 126,417 40,000 23,646 - 8,606,000 43,066 8,606,000 145,743 1,102,443 125,039 1,075,304 - 11,039,298 1s - 11,039,298 1s 432,684 6,977,523 404,120 6,941,934 - 1,967,819 - 1,967,819 463,933 5,354,660 433,065 5,307,538 - 4,815,679 16 - 4,815,679 16 601,502 5,690,529 506,086 5,583,162 - 32,000 1t - 32,000 17 - 14,263,971 - 14,263,971 287,383 3,035,727 243,582 2,989,591 - 2,950,530 - 2,950,530 70,517 1,468,297 45,810 1,440,955 30,000 42,648 110,000 106,270 - 3,415,640 18 - 3,415,640 s18 384,000 389,800 319,196 415,920 507,500 522,977 371,742 6,581,946 343,235 6,520,428 - 7,013,412 - 7,013,412 268,500 349,500 426,542 325,743 561,200 574,335 312,836 4,701,927 231,465 4,587,489 7,312,225 19 7,312,225 19 298,300 264,500 323,690 259,848 1-29 433,900 381,073 442,728 5,212,243 473,378 5,163,746 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 29J. 29K. North Springfield Lake, VT Otter Brook Lake, NH 29L. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds) 29M. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 29N. Townshend Lake, VT 290. Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) 29P. Union Village Dam, VT 29Q. West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds) 30. Gulf Street, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 6,831,526 * 6,831,526 20 559,000 950,500 1,196,369 504,542 837,834 1,314,280 299,100 299,796 105,000 109,734 426,500 315,702 8,035 456,600 583,497 15,000 826 466,983 9,154,949 461,934 9,087,811 - 4,360,448 21 - 4,360,448 21 394,583 5,296,397 358,570 5,256,904 - 1,278,000 3,202 1,266,923 - 25,000 - 25,000 - 2,833,610 * - 2,833,610 * 289,100 302,100 282,718 309,004 456,300 295,200 469,469 314,617 323,000 338,000 397,130 340,252 251,900 257,000 245,621 250,154 649 5,522 330,000 351,551 392,000 402,749 455,900 452,772 482,900 474,338 21,368 12,390 11,500 363,648 5,778,291 288,745 5,701,606 - 7,398,413 - 7,398,413 " 419,047 6,639,018 385,736 6,574,417 - 1,666,752 * - 1,666,752 * 440,639 5,157,525 383,216 5,073,686 - 40,000 17 - 40,000 17 - 4,095,160 m - 4,095,160 * 485,337 5,002,693 292,022 4,779,426 10,000 1,803,724 a 10,218 1,799,358 a - 13,000 -86 12,304 - 100,000 - 19,277 21,000 21,000 350,000 269,277 21,000 21,000 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 31A. Black Rock Lake, CT 31B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT 31C. Hop Brook Lake, CT 31D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT 31E. Thomaston Dam, CT 32A. Blackwater Dam, NH 32B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH 32C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH 32D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 213,400 171,400 Cost 203,952 184,866 New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 68,700 112,400 Cost 62,798 116,469 New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 523,900 925,600 Cost 542,357 855,669 New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 165,300 195,300 Cost 173,108 152,753 New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 621,400 385,200 Cost 352,751 586,787 New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 216,000 254,700 Cost 239,615 251,657 New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 379,700 301,000 Cost 349,964 359,584 New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 389,122 345,500 Cost 361,738 386,402 New Work Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 528,722 860,500 Cost 568,737 774,061 8,182,300 8,182,300 272,300 285,311 234,572 3,062,281 196,744 3,021,494 4,178,911 4,178,911 87,900 90,163 145,385 1,490,034 92,555 1,434,309 6,151,562 " 6,151,562 " 920,300 1,029,440 158,500 210,899 349,400 432,468 323,300 336,978 341,400 350,042 561,500 556,450 817,400 962,420 834,840 7,135,525 722,931 6,973,217 - 2,850,512 * - 2,850,512 " 282,597 2,449,408 161,938 2,323,358 - 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 362,175 6,010,942 309,606 5,954,173 - 1,319,746 " - 1,319,746 238,909 3,883,894 210,802 3,854,197 - 2,014,253 - 2,014,253 3 329,177 4,722,669 267,761 4,657,997 - 7,950,487 0 - 7,950,487 0 439,123 7,129,382 396,856 7,080,329 - 21,452,440 a31 - 21,452,440 a31 817,308 9,212,470 685,643 9,071,315 1-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 33. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 34. New London, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds- Other) 35. Little River, Belfast, ME (Contributed Funds-Required) 36. Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (Contributed Funds-Required) 37. Roughans Point, Revere, MA 38. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds - Other) 39A. Buffumville Lake, MA 39B. East Brimfield Lake, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 11,510,088 - 11,510,088 122,400 118,300 119,269 120,493 24,802 -21 20,000 19,840 12,500 11,945 150,000 106,972 -76,348 1 132,000 39,065 43,000 25,000 24,418 67,000 53,023 193,400 173,421 4,726 15,000 93,388 43,000 50,000 47,116 18,600 18,599 245,000 116,622 22 113,100 124,600 117,216 110,349 213,400 228,900 202,934 238,894 254,400 212,000 225,428 237,777 195,700 209,717 205,700 214,535 339,300 355,006 636,257 4,630,221 562,783 4,528,500 85,000 9,357,046 9,094 9,205,463 14,084 2,394 - 18,600 1 18,600 -15,000 645,779 290,741 642,031 - 9,911,300 - 9,900,640 238,719 3,130,491 186,438 3,074,367 - 3,367,970 " - 3,367,453 a - 210,000 - 209,969 - 2,998,603 a - 2,998,603 321,394 4,058,716 298,391 4,033,778 - 7,057,043 - 7,057,043 472,156 3,798,539 346,595 3,671,750 1-32 6,513,763 * 6,513,763 3 2,255,000 * 2,251,293 " 222,250 219,250 167,000 166,378 43,000 43,000 87,500 85,873 TABLE 1-A (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 39C. Hodges Village Dam, MA 39D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT 39E. West Thompson Lake, CT 39F. Westville Lake, MA 40. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA 41. West River, New Haven, CT (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 484,400 437,500 383,725 548,646 335,400 268,300 322,863 258,483 318,400 345,300 322,774 329,781 409,900 325,300 461,487 322,201 350,000 250,000 345,011 297,725 195,000 209,861 75,000 66,149 - - 4,461,268 ' - - 4,461,268 " 510,200 1,642,659 6,058,847 496,116 1,656,803 6,045,179 - - 6,447,164 " - - 6,447,164 " 309,500 331,485 404,100 425,327 257,100 304,048 550,000 509,110 25,000 34,747 309,102 4,313,099 273,978 4,271,980 - 7,001,220 - 7,001,220 407,399 4,832,197 385,655 4,797,330 - 5,684,683 4 - 5,684,683 4 352,663 4,414,059 331,714 4,389,200 400,000 1,820,740 359,252 1,728,099 190,000 84,849 916,400 9,764 785,000 674,383 916,400 9,764 1 Includes 6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 713 funds. a Includes $650,136 for previous projects. 4 Includes $3,761,412 for previous projects. a Includes $245,000 Public Works Funds. 6 Includes $509,411 for previous projects. ' Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition $400 was expended for maintenance from Contributed Funds. * Includes $331,626 for previous projects. Includes $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 Public Works Funds. ' Includes $32,570 for previous projects. 10 Includes $130,393 for previous projects. n Includes $12,000 for previous project. 1' Includes $188,647 for previous projects. 18 Excludes $73,800 for previous project. 14 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 1" Includes $504,062 Code 711 funds. 1" Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 funds. 1 Recreational cost sharing. 1 Includes $199,303 Code 711 funds. 19In"c ludes $229,436 Code 711 funds. 0 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 21 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. * Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds. SIncludes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. a Includes $88,931 Code 711 funds. * Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 27 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 'Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 31 Includes $179,727 Code 711 funds. 32 Cash for construction only. Excludes $164,020 expended to date for land condemnation. 33 Excludes $22,517 expended to date for land condemnations. 4 Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 1-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. SIncludes $207,700 Code 711 funds. SIncludes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 713 funds. Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 4 Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 41 Includes $7,889 for previous project. Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous project. 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 (Section 2) Included in Public Works Administration program, Sept. 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration Program Apr. 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960, as amended ANDREWS RIVER, MA (See Section 1 of Text.) Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide from deep water in Nantucket Sound to public marina; two jetties; three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text). Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BRANFORD HARBOR, CT (See Section 3 of Text.) Channel between upper and lower wharves in the river. Channel at the mouth of the harbor. CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 4 of Text). Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Construct three bridges and widen canal to 250 feet. Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of eight feet. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel ten feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 6 of Text) Channel six feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing, rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 2, 1966. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. H. Doc. 100, 56th Cong., 2nd seas. andAnnual Relportfor 1901, page 1188. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd ses. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st ses. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st ses. H. Doc. 168, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 456, 77th Cong., 1st ses. Annual Report 1942. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 15, 1965. 1-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 11, 1870 Aug. 2, 1882 Aug. 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 Oct. 27, 1965 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Oct. 17, 1940 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Do. July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Aug. 16, 1949 Aug. 9, 1955 Nov. 17, 1986 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 4, 1913 Sept. 22, 1922 Oct. 23, 1962 July 9, 1965 HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 7 of Text) The main breakwater. Repairs to basin walls and cliff protection east of harbor. Breakwater inclosing inner harbor. Raising crest of main breakwater and making it sandtight. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME (See Section 8 of Text). A steel sheet pile breakwater 1200 feet in length. A 15-acre anchorage composed of nine acres six feet deep and six acres eight feet deep. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and eight feet deep. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME (See Section 9 of Text) Channel between Augusta and Gardiner, ME. Channel below Gardiner, ME. Channel west of Swan Island. 27-foot channel from mouth of Bath. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT (See Section 10 of Text) Sandy Point dike. The 16-foot anchorage basin. Present project dimensions of channels in Mill River. Present project dimensions of West River channel and anchorage. 18- and 16-foot channels in Quinnipiac River. 25-foot channel. 30-foot channel and anchorage and present location of 16-foot anchorage. 35-foot main channel, elimination of 30-foot anchorage, present location and extent of 16-foot anchorage. Brewery Street channel declared non-navigable. Abandonment of upper end of West River. Deepen main ship channel to 40 feet; widen main ship channel to 500 feet; widen at Southwest Ledge to minimum of 780 feet; straighten channel downstream of turning basin. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA (See section 11 of Text) Construction of rubblestone jetties. Dredging the bar at entrance to harbor. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA (See Section 12 of Text). Beach protection. Dredging 18-foot channel. Dredging 15-foot extension, including turning basin. Rubblestone breakwater. Anchorages are eight feet deep inside breakwater. Elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project. Recreational development. Annual Report 1868, p.7 8 5 and S. Misc. Doc. 81, 40th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Ex. Doc. 26, 47th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 27, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1885, p. 610. H. Doc. 83, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 481, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. September 23, 1976 and S. Res. October 1, 1976 pursuant to Section 201 of cited Act. H. Doc. 262, 56th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 321, 59th Cong., 2nd sess.1 H. Doc. 746, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess.1 S. Doc. 55, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' Plans approved by a Board of Engineers, October 2, 1882. H. Doc. 82, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 26, 62nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 535, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 686, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 479, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 307, 76th Cong., 1st ses. H. Doc. 517, 79th Cong., 2nd ses.' H.R. 3511, 81st Cong., 1st sess., P.L. 234 Annual Report 1910, p. 59. Annual Report for 1899, p. 1089. H. Doc. 1194, 62nd Cong., 3rd seas. H. Doc. 996, 66th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 124, 87th Cong., 2nd ses. 1-36 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 16, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960, as amended Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 August 26, 1937 July 14, 1960, as amended June 10, 1872 July 14, 1960, as amended in 1965 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 October 23, 1962 POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH, RI (See Section 13 of Text.) The main breakwater. Present dimensions of eastern shore arm. Western shore arm. Removing three shoals from the harbor arm. Abandons project for entrance to Point Judith Ponds, and authorizes channels and anchorages in lower pond and upper pond. Extension of existing 15-foot channel. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR & PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME and NH (See Section 14 of Text.) Removal of ledge rock; widening 35-foot channel; extending channel and maneuvering basins above Boiling Rock and at head of project. Modified existing project for widening and extending 35-foot channel. Construct six-foot channels and anchorages. Widen 35-foot channel to 1,000 feet between two vertical lift bridges; widen northern limit of 35-foot channel by 100 feet and widen southern limit to 550 feet at Goat Island. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI (See Section 15 of Text.) 35-foot channel. RYE HARBOR, NH (See Section 16 of Text.) Dredge channel 100 feet wide and ten feet deep for 600 feet through entrance, thence eight feet deep within harbor; dredge two anchorages and maintain existing breakwaters. WELLS HARBOR, ME (See Section 17 of Text.) Repairs of old government pier about 750 feet long; anchorage basin; channel 100 to 150 feet wide. Two stone jetties. REVERE BEACH, MA (See Section 22 of Text.) Placement of sandfill for protection and improvement. Raising and widening of about 13,000 feet of beach by placement of sandfill. SEA BLUFF BEACH, WEST HAVEN, CT (See Section 23 of Text.) Beach widening along approximately 1,000 feet of shorefront; 50-feet wide beach berm; reconstruction of existing rock groin structure and a beach monitoring program. H. Doc. 66, 51st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 60, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 911, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 2001, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 15, 80th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 29, 1976. Annual Report 1892. H. Doc. 556, 82nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 482, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 23, 1965 Annual Reports 1915, 1936, 1938. H. Doc. 173, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 439, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 202, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 20, 1965. H. Doc. 146, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 211, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. December 15, 1970 and S. Res. December 17, 1970 pursuant to Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. P.L. 87-874, Section 103. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 14, 1989. 1-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 7. 1974 July 24, 1946, as amended June 30, 1948, as amended June 28, 1938 June 30, 1948, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 July 24, 1946, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA (See Section 28 of Text.) Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totalling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT (See Section 29F of Text.) Bank protection by clearing and grubbing existing slope and refilling eroded areas with compacted granular fill. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 29L of Text.) Construct improvements to existing pumping station. WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 29Q of Text.) A system of earth levees and concrete floodwalls approx. 24,500 feet long. Work involves raising 13,700 feet of existing levee; constructing 2,300 feet of floodwall; improving 2,400 feet of river bank; treating 6,100 feet of existing levee foundation. Three pumping stations with appurtenant drainage facilities also constructed. Raise the floodwall section of the West Springfield project by one foot in combination with a flood forecasting system. GULF STREET, MILFORD, CT (See Section 30 of Text.) Construction of stone slope protection. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA (See Section 33 of Text.) Hurricane barriers in New Bedford Harbor. NEW LONDON, CT (See Section 34 of Text.) Hurricane barrier protecting city of New London from tidal damage. LITTLE RIVER, BELFAST, ME (See Section 35 of Text.) Replace existing wing wall with approximately 80 linear feet of precast concrete modular wall. PERLEY BROOK, FORT KENT, ME (See Section 36 of Text.) Construct stone revetment along 100 linear feet adjacent to Route 161. Excavate four river shoals. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 37 of Text.) Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm one-foot high and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Approved by Chief of Engineers, September 27, 1988. P.L. 80-858, Section 205, Authorized by ChiefofEngineers, June 13,1986. H. Doc. 455, 75th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 80-858. Section 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 5, 1982. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 11, 1984. S. Doc, 59, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized byChiefofEngineers, May23,1988. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 22, 1988. 1-38 TABLE 1-B (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents STAMFORD, CT (See Section 38 of Text.) July 14, 1960 Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st sess. tidal damage. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY & BRAINTREE, MA (See Section 40 of Text.) Nov. 17, 1986 Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined H. Doc. 39, 99th Cong., 1st sess. tunnel in bedrock approximately 190 feet below ground. WEST RIVER, WEST HAVEN, CT (See Section 41 of Text.) June 30, 1948, Widen river for 1,150 feet to 50-70 feet. Widen the Wintergreen as amended P.L. 80-858, Section 205. Approved Brook channel to 20-30 feet. Construct recreational walkway by Secretary of the Army, connecting two existing city parks. September 26, 1988. 1 Contains latest maps. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933. 1-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Apponaug Cove, RI' Bagaduce River, ME 3 ,4,5 Bar Harbor, ME' Bass Harbor, ME1'6 Bass Harbor Bar, ME' Beals Harbor, ME' Belfast Harbor, ME' Bellamy River, NH 3 '.4 Beverly Harbor, MA 1 Black Rock Harbor, CT' Boothbay Harbor, ME' Boston Harbor, MAI" Bridgeport Harbor, CT' Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME1'6, Bucksport Harbor, ME' Bullocks Point Cove, RI' Bunker Harbor, ME16 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA1' 6 Camden Harbor, ME 1 Canapitsit Channel, MA"4 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME' Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME' Cathance River, ME"3 Clinton Harbor, CT' Coasters Island Harbor, RI, 4 Cobscook Bay, ME13,' 4 Cocheco River, NH i ,4 Cohasset Harbor, MA' Connecticut River below Hartford, CT' Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME 1,6 Criehaven Harbor, ME' Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA' Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA' Damariscotta River, ME".4 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME14 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MAn" Duck Island Harbor, CT' Duxbury Harbor, MA' East Boothbay Harbor, ME' Edgartown Harbor, MA' Essex River, MA' Exeter River, NWH* 4 Fall River Harbor, MA5 Falmouth Harbor, MA' Fivemile River Harbor, CT 5 Frenchboro Harbor, ME' Georges River, ME' Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA' Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RP5 Greenwich Bay, RP Greenwich Harbor, CT' Guilford Harbor, CT ' Hampton Harbor, NH s Harraseeket River, ME"4* 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1988 1953 1984 1983 1987 1976 1907 1979 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1985 1911 1866 1913 1979 1988 1984 1939 1954 1987 1906 1916 1968 1953 1978 1953 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1969 1978 1978 1983 1989 1893 1969 1983 1988 1896 $ 156,874 2 28,000 a 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,561 " 34,643 246,048 18,000 25,313,083 " 4,491,119 * 316,288 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 190,438 21,000 104,957 5,500 4,173 119,089 267,767 36 1,541,185 5,3 797,954 40,776 24,200 27,176 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,297 - 6,500 65,614 " 21,759 62,454' 6,164,757 40 123,763 35,490 657,345 25,788 1,296,934 189,037 2,000 198,758 137,222 200,000 30,963 $41,141 2,187 21,475 12,175 124,641 252,763 16,821 1,569,099 22,983 10,143,544 1 2,012,970 b0 16,838 20,833 254,668 28,406 213,323 48 139,291 12,279 347,865 9,021 1,019,189 13,161 42,617 271,050 15,343,880 4 83,243 8,125 54,328 1,061,887 4 905 362,224 399,546 853,635 17,238 62,980 83,938 14 3,032 2,064,767 " 312,900 188,802 24,616 248,611 1,494,557 578,170 6,527 204,872 1,291,385 2,118,635 5,309 1-40 100,000 147,887 123,757 69,323 20,000 127,000 130,410 11,643 35,000 0 10,000 35,000 25,000 100,000 25,500 193,761 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY1 Hendrick's Harbor, ME1 Hingham Harbor, MA1 Housatonic River, CT 5 Hyannis Harbor, MA1 Ipswich River, MA Island End River, Chelsea, MA"e Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME1 Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH' Josias River, ME1 Kennebunk River, ME' Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA1 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA1,e Lamprey River, NH' ,4 Little Harbor, NH 14' 2 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA1,4 Lubec Channel, ME1 Lynn Harbor, MA' Machias River, ME1 Malden River, MA12 � Matinicus Harbor, ME1 Medomak River, ME1 Menemsha Creek, MA1 Merrimack River, MA1 Mianus River, CT1 Milford Harbor, CT *s Moosabec Bar, ME1 Mystic River, CT1 Mystic River, MA1 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA1 Narraguagus River, ME1 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA' New Harbor, ME1 New Haven Breakwater, CT 1 New London Harbor, CT 1 Newburyport Harbor, MA5 Newport Harbor, RI 1 Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT ", Northeast Harbor, ME 1 Norwalk Harbor, CT 1 Owl's Head Harbor, ME is Patchogue River, CT " Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT ' Pawtuxet Cove, RI' Penobscot River, ME1 Pepperell Cove, ME 5 Pig Island Gut, ME"6 Pleasant River, ME' Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA ' Portland Harbor, ME' Potowomut River, RI' Provincetown Harbor, MA5 1931 1957 1954 1983 1989 1969 1983 1980 1977 1977 1985 1895 1976 1913 1977 1906 1956 1956 1972 1922 1962 1953 1981 1940 1985 1989 1930 1957 1986 1989 1969 1953 1966 1950 1986 1988 1953 1972 1954 1983 1968 1984 1978 1975 1985 1969 1966 1892 1956 1985 1882 1985 8,401 28,204 28,316 859,691 484,499 5,618 311,850 137,653 80,691 115,565 261,417 8,940 99,098 19,980 133,227 18,000 380,322 755,576 32,000 104,853 14,000 21 17,000 56,926 369,891 132,435 90,506 a' 11,400 197,582 3,222,777 502,661 5 821,144 1,857,618 118,620 4 1,242,246 638,774 1' 569,225 23 733,524 66,464 138,942 531,129 2 124,158 355,445 318,787 28 295,356 501,020 171,351 191,753 3,500 1,083,504 9,588,710 27 5,000 3,548,954 41 38,462 6,325 166,800 2,397,757 642,493 32,947 180,786 643,364 122,173 1,234,403 9,089 33,563 266,119 5,224 23,941 206,203 222,352 45,097 8,989 92,359 679,858 288,102 659,390 1,323,683 56 25,227 143,385 2,008,337 733,706 71,087 708,967 26,944 40,273 1,849,869 4,549,271 142,798 111,789 51,047 3,784,092 42 13,867 648,906 658,903 172,073 917,306 46,882 86,456 217 846,590 7,903,331 50 1,053,966 222,010 103,001 192,336 4a 26,813 88,917 80,990 62,000 12,500 46,500 11,380 * 14,000 20,385 7,015 67,500 34,500 4,383 56,694 20,000 295,356 760,000 1-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA '8 Richmond Harbor, ME1,4 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME 1,4' Rockland Harbor, ME' Rockport Harbor, ME"8 Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, MA Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA Royal River, ME1, Saco River, ME1,6 St. Croix River, ME1 Sakonnet Harbor, RPI Sakonnet River, RIp � Salem Harbor, MA1 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA18 Sasanoa River, ME 1, ,4 Scarboro River, ME' Scituate Harbor, MA' Searsport Harbor, ME' Seekonk River,RPI Sesuit Harbor, MA "e South Bristol Harbor, ME1 Southport Harbor, CT' Southwest Harbor, ME' Stamford Harbor, CT' Stockton Harbor, ME' ,' 4 Stonington Harbor, CT1 Stonington Harbor, ME1, Stony Creek, Branford, CT".6 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME' Taunton River, MA' Tenants Harbor, ME' Thames River, CT1 Union River, ME3 ,15 Vineyard Haven, MA' Wareham Harbor, MA5 Warren River, RPI Warwick Cove, RP Wellfleet Harbor, MA1 Westcott Cove, CT' Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT5 Weymouth Back River, MA' Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivs., MA," Wickford Harbor, RI" Wilson Point Harbor, CT".4 Winnipesaukee Lake, NH' Winter Harbor, ME"'e Winthrop Harbor, MA' Wood Island Harbor, and Pool at Biddeford, ME' Woods Hole Channel, MA' York Harbor, ME' 1972 1883 1882 1976 1989 1986 1989 1986 1989 1950 1983 1909 1969 1922 1915 1976 1971 1966 1954 1989 1971 1962 1962 1980 1915 1959 1985 1978 1914 1948 1920 1967 1912 1943 1896 1890 1975 1981 1978 1972 1944 1979 and 1983 1973 1895 1952 1976 1895 1989 1940 1977 38,764 20,000 119,844 1,948,462 32,000 * 22,000 1,786,754 336,704 1,064,983 179,550 764,651 38,427 1,693,202 1,925,553 35,000 392,635 379,851 572,568 e16 672,214 226,306 89,593 96,927 ' 180,042 892,824 " 33,000 377,328 898,500 112,487 19,871 442,895 18,750 1,471,919 146,855 27,186 95,997 5,000 155,430 157,634 ' 55,960 19,308 48,740 30,194,613 a 233,410 54,177 7,500 162,937 8,992 143,112 230,000 239,654 1-42 1,808 452,800 250,091 194,963 728,622 12 1,806,777 36,392 198,404 9,549 565,176 16,060 124 1,239,293 148,751 45,270 793,234 278,087 12,706 388,649 66,540 1,731,856 a 23,216 123,060 5,067 313,623 32,917 13,292 1,611,737 132,356 8,699 10,296 52,955 926,068 347,248 180,824 26,411 1,463,034" 74,179 29,870 9,935 38,515 571,573 51,718 351,090 255,000 49,562 a' 19,892 21,928 10,000 69,976 67,792 124,588 2,663 18,525 7,501 169,636 92,000 107,220 32,000 21,000 20,000 630,133 49,094 12,000 32,161 TABLE 1-C (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 1 Completed. 9 Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation requirements, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. a Abandonmentrecommendedin H.Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. 4 No commerce reported. a Completed except for inactive portion. 8 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). ' Includes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. 8 Inactive. * Includes $53,254 for previous projects. 10 Commerce included under Tiverton Harbor, RI. 11 Authorized work remaining on project is comprised of an incomplete and an inactive portion. 2 Excludes $20,000 expended from Contributed Funds, Other for maintenance. 1 Recommendation for abandonment of existing project made in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. Portion of project authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec 107) is complete. 14 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. 15 Improvement adequate for commerce. 18 Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 1 Includes $40,800 for previous project. 18 Abandonmentrecommendedin H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. 1 Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. a Under State maintenance. 21 Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. SPortion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers. SExcludes $1,415,524 expended for major rehabilitation. M All assurances oflocal cooperation have not been fulfilled. Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). a Includes $11,350 for previous project. 'H.Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1stsess.recommendedeliminating maintenance dredging. 27 Includes $692,435 for previous projects. Includes $133,357 for previous project. Includes $37,000 for new work for previous project. 5 Excludes local requirements of $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharfand $52,000 for addtional construction costs. 81 Includes $42,340 for previous project. SIncludes $22,000 for previous project. 5 Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Includes $935,303 EmergencyRelief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. aIncludes $81,410 for previous project. 5 Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. 5 Includes $21,000 for previous projects. SIncludes $135,143 for previous project. 8 Includes $10,000 for previous project. 5 Includes $162,517 for previous project. 4 Includes $330,204 for previous project. 41 Includes $215,801 for previous project. 4 Includes $66,120 for previous projects. S Includes for previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, Fore R.) and $25,000(Town R.). S Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore River) and $12,577 (Weymouth, Town River). S Includes $59,420 for previous project. S Includes $35,214 for previous project. 4? Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds expended for maintenance. "Excludes $582,188 Contributed Funds, Other expended. * Includes $378,450 for previous project. 5o Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. 51 Excludes $18,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 5 Includes $287,374 for previous projects and excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, CT." 5 Excludes $60,000 expended for major rehabilitation. SIncludes $366,348 for previous projects. 55 Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1961. 5 Includes $3,160 for previous project. 57 Excludes $173,425 Contributed Funds, Other 5 Includes $45,835 for new work for previous project; excludes $211,649 expended for minor rehabilitaiton; jetty repaired in 1963. � Excludes $15,000 expended for previous project. 1-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sept.30, 1990 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT ' 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT 1 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA 1 1982 228,081 228,080 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI 5 1984 405,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Westport, CT 1 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT 1 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT 1 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT 1 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT 1 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT ' 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH ' 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT 1 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT 1 1961 3,930 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 1986 50,000- Middle Beach, CT ' 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 3 1963 14,512 29,024 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA ' 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA 1 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI ' 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA ' 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT ' 1958 104,573 240,819 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA 1 1962 621,440 1,242,880 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME 1 1989 226,843- Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI 1 1959 40,143 82,000 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT 1 1961 23,759 47,518 Seaside Park, CT1 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT' 1983 1,186,830 889,330 Short Beach, CT 4 1956 - - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1964 62,560 270,695 Southport Beach, CT 1 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA5 1964 5,490 10,981 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH 1 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA 1 1971 180,944 200,208 Willard Beach, South Portland, ME 1983 171,000- Winthrop Beach, MA 1 1960 176,567 353,134 Woodmont Shore, Milford, CT ' 1961 53,838 111,679 2 1 Completed. 2Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 3 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. * Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. (See page 88 of the 1956 Annual Report.) * Completed except for inactive portion. 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alford, Green River, MA3 .4 Alley Bay, Beals, ME3 4,10 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA34 Bagaduce River, ME 3,4,10 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 3*4 Big River Reservoir, RI Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 3 ,41.0o Bound Brook, Scituate, MA 3'4 Canton, MA 3.4 Charles River Dam, MA 3 Charlestown, NH *34 Cherryfield, ME3'4 Chicopee, MA 3 Chicopee Falls, MA3 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 3.4 Cocheco River, NH 3 .4 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH 3' 4 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH 3 .4 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA3 ,4,10 Danbury, CT 3 Derby, CT 3 East Branch Dam, CT 3 East Hartford, CT 3 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 3'4 Fort Kent, ME 3 4 Fox Point Barrier, RI3 Gardner, MA 3'4 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT3 Hartford, CT3 Hartford, White River, VT 3 .4 Haverhill, MA 3 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA3'4 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME s3410, Holyoke, MA 3 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA 3'4 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT 34.10 Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 3,4,10 Huntington, MA 3,4,10 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA 3.4 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME s3,4.,o10 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME s3,4.10 Keene, NH 3,4 Lancaster, Israel River, NH 3' 4 Lee, Housatonic River, MA s.4.o10 Lincoln, NH 3 Little River Dike, Westfield, MA 3 Lowell, MA3 Lower Woonsocket, RI3 Machias River, Machias, ME ,4 Mad River Lake, CT 3 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME s.* Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME 3,4,o Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT .4,o Nashua, NH 3 Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT3 410o Northampton, MA 3 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT3" 1977 1979 1978 1985 1989 1987 1986 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1987 1963 1982 1976 1988 1978 1977 1973 1951 1979 1979 1976 1970 1970 1960 1973 1940 1979 1980 1953 1985 1982 1981 1960 1983 1985 1985 1955 1982 1976 1961 1945 1977 1987 1973 1987 1980 1988 1950 1985 1950 1977 $ 41,419 190,500 132,113 129,500 2,591,000 249,999 47,300 180,670 41,170,921 113,330 203,000 1,433,600 2,183,912 168,000 183,100 180,000 54,703 250,000 13,143,00 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,447 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,691 2,572,357 6,094,100 332,236 1,743,485 2,325,470 207,390 3,418,000 739,003 102,800 205,608 3,900 172,000 165,500 163,082 44,100 551,606 37,852 120,000 5,000 490,600 6,600,681 152,000 4,773,020 243,000 107,682 110,000 270,000 222,500 680,000 73,865 26 4,576 92,891 5,554,088 15 385 411,292 22 180,000 2 19 7,637 3,679,500 14 15,000 2,781,100 120,000 24,447 20,000 13 1,266,638 20 9 25 327 1-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA3 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 3,4.10 Norwalk, CT' ,4 Norwich, CT 3 Park River, Hartford, CT 3 Pawcatuck, CT 3 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI 3' 4 Penobscot River, Old Town, ME 3,4 Phillips Lake, MA Pleasant Point, Perry, ME ,4 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 3 ,4 1o 0 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME 3.4,10 St. John River Basin, ME " Salmon River, Colchester, CT3'4 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME Saxonville, MA3 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME 3 4 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH 3 4 10 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA 34 South River, Conway, MA Springdale, MA3 Springfield, MA 3 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT 3,4 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH 3,4 Sucker Brook Dam, CT 3 Three Rivers, MA 3 Torrington, East Branch, CT 3'4 Torrington, West Branch, CT 3 , 4 Trumbull Lake, CT 1 Village of Saxtons, VT 3 ,4 "10 Ware, MA 34 Waterbury-Watertown, CT 3'4 Weston, VT 3' 4 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA3,4 West Warren, MA3,4 Whitmanville Lake, MA Winsted, CT 3 Woonsocket, RI 3 Worcester Diversion, MA3 lO9 R 1 ) A n 2 .a~o1 1979 1952 1960 1986 1966 1986 1986 1982 1987 1986 1980 1983 1984 1980 1985 1977 1978 1987 1952 1950 1983 1973 1976 1970 1963 1963 1983 1985 1963 1963 1957 1983 1964 1979 1954 1962 1978 81,671 52,150 1,209,000 60,150,864 644,311 3,172,150 178,045 300,000 189,000 227,500 73,674 13,070 247,100 127,500 4,218,700 1,857,475 37,657 1,803,738 133,500 700,000 577,000 116,296 19,500 2,227,792 1,577,189 389,200 228,300 1,498,800 140,500 400,000 263,300 13,000 116,492 389,200 605,023 245,500 4,040,000 5,086,859 18 12 1 Inactive. 2 Excludes $1,146,828 expended from Contributed Funds, Other. 3 Completed. 4 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 5 Reflects FY1967 settlement of outstanding claims. 6 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. ' Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. 8 Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency funds expended. S Excludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 20 Emergency Bank Protection. " Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 1 Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 1' Excludes $3,000 Contributed Funds, Other 14 Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnation. 15 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. '6 Excludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. 17 Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 18 Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. " Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 20 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 21 Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 1-46 16 214,106 6 5,350 58,800 1,800 41,000 224,476 79,316 TABLE 1-E (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. SExcludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. TABLE 1-F 24 Irrigation demonstration project. Includes $610,000 Public Works Administration funds. SIncludes $380,000 Public Works Administration funds. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER Cost to September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME 1 1935 $ 6,384,394 1 Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir -Aug 1977 $ - $ - Andover Lake, CT -Aug 1977 - - Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) - Oct 1978 - - Baker Brook, MA 1972 Nov 1979 94,000 - Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) 1932 Nov 1986 - - Beards Brook Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 78,000 - Beaver Brook Lake, NH 1973 Apr 1978 378,300 - Bennington Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 205,000 - Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) 1984 Jan 1990 - - Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1980 Nov 1979 - - Brockway Lake, VT 1946 Aug 1977 - - Cambridgeport Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Aug 1977 - - Claremont Lake, NH 1968 Dec 1970 242,700 - Clyde, RI 1948 Apr 1951 8,800 - Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT 1932 Jan 1990 132,146 - Connecticut River below Hartford CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Cotuit Harbor, MA 1962 Oct 1978 8,541 - Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME 1984 Nov 1986 26,285,298 - Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) 1968 Jan 1990 - - Eastport Harbor, ME 1984 Nov 1983 638,675 141,530 Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1978 Nov 1986 - - Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1984 Nov 1986 - - Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1969 Oct 1978 Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Oct 1976 206,600- Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) 1983 Nov 1986 - - Greenwich Point Beach, CT 1959 Oct 1978 - - Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) 1983 Nov 1986 - - Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Honey Hill Lake, NH 1949 Aug 1977 92,000 - Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1986 - - Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Ludlow Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1956 Nov 1986 - - Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 - Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 - Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 - - Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1981 Nov 1986 - - Monoosnoc Brook, MA 1967 Nov 1986 - - Monoosnoc Lake, MA 1967 Nov 1986 Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 - Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 - Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Nantasket Beach, MA 1971 Jan 1990 - Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion) 1965 Nov 1986 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA (inactive portion) 1989 Jan 1990 - - Napatree Beach, RI - Nov 1979 - - Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion) 1953 Nov 1986 - - Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Nookagee Lake, MA 1976 Nov 1986 563,677 - North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 - North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH 1963 Nov 1981 - - Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979 - - Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT (uncompleted portion) 1978 Nov 1986 - - Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Pawtucket, RI 1949 Nov 1977 - - Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1981 - - Pleasant Bay, MA 1971 Nov 1986 - - Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 - Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1976 Nov 1986 - - Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 - - Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) 1976 Nov 1986 - - Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1979 - - Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1982 Jun 1982 176,000 - Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1986 - - Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 - - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1 1964 Nov 1986 - - South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 - South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977- - Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) 1979 Jan 1990 - - Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1959 Nov 1986 - - Stonington Harbor, ME 1961 Nov 1979 2,543 - Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - - Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) 1948 Jan 1990 - - Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1967 Nov 1986 - - The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) 1964 Jan 1990 - - Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA 1961 Nov 1986 - - Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) 1896 Jan 1990 Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1948 Jul 1960 67,000 - West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 - Westerly, RI 1966 Nov 1986 - - Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 - Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 - Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1972 Nov 1979 - - Westport River, MA 1942 Jan 1990 - - Williamsville Reservoir, VT 1949 Dec 1944 146,500 - Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion) 1960 Nov 1986 - - 1Walnut Beach and impermeable groins. 1-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA Bar Harbor, ME Bass Harbor, Tremont, ME Belfast Harbor, ME Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME Cole River, Swansea, MA Danvers River, Danvers, MA East River, Wareham, MA Gloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI Green Harbor, Marshfield, MA Hockanum River, Manchester, CT Lagoon Pond, Tisbury, MA Mill Creek, Yarmouth, MA Narraguagus River, Millbridge, ME Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, MA Perkins Cove, Ogunquit, ME Pig Island Gut, Beals, ME Pine Point Harbor, Scarborough, ME Plymouth Harbor, Plymouth, MA Provincetown Harbor, MA Point Judith Pond, RI Rock Harbor, Orleans and Eastham, MA Rockport and Old Harbors, MA Roque Bluffs, ME Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA Southwest Harbor, ME Stonington Harbor, Stonington, CT Westport Harbor, Westport, MA Winthrop Harbor, Winthrop, MA Wood Island Harbor, Biddeford, ME $ 6,048 4,576 48,865 5,500 19,474 9,330 24,110 5,356 35,406 25,148 25,060 12,992 3,010 3,089 37,109 53,233 37,287 1,330 11,573 44,183 34,180 14,654 24,378 2,824 4,853 4,950 61,792 20,160 9,793 118,676 27,007 TABLE 1-I Study Identification BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 78-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Costs Bullock Neck, East Providence, RI East Haven Beaches, CT North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT (See Section 23 of Text) Sylvia State Beach, Oak Bluffs, MA Woodmont Beach, CT $ 16,222 24,490 8,625 30,894 17,158 22,117 -3,395 1-50 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-J Study Identification FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Costs Bay View Beach, Milford, CT Beaver Brook, Keene, NH Connecticut River, Stratford, NH Deerfield River, Wilmington, VT Furnace Brook, Quincy, MA Israel River, NH Kennebec River, Gardiner, ME Kennebec River, Hallowell, ME Mad River, Waterbury, CT Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI Pocasset River, Cranston, RI Pocasset River, Johnston, RI Point Beach, Milford, CT Riverdale, MA Sandy River, Farmington, ME Saugatuck Shores, Westport, CT Spicket River, Salem, NH Springfield, West Springfield, MA West River, New Haven, CT (See Section 44 of Text) TABLE 1-K BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 27 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester,MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,922 $940,000 $2,306,902 'Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. 1-51 $11,631 8,880 23,100 6,778 5,069 27,674 15,400 15,000 66,931 2,110 9,800 8,400 6,057 3,202 15,935 3,338 4,907 10,218 84,849 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-K (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,000 2 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,740,100 1,069,000 a 4,809,100 Lower Woonsocket, Flood wall, conduits and RI 13 channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection 254,575 - 254,575 5 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 168,000 - 168,000 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 4,125,000 - 4,125,000 4 1 Includes relocation. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 3 $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. $3,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. 5 $249,999 Federal; $4,576 non-Federal. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 29 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Reservoir Lands ticut Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acrewfeet) uction Damages Total Vermont: Union Village 2 White River Jct. 228.4 170 Earthfill 38,000 $3,186,860 $ 908,300 $4,095,160 North Hartland 2 White River Jct. 211.7 185 Earthfill 71,400 6,349,225 963,000 7,312,225 North Springfield 2 Springfield 191.3 120 Earthfill 50,600 4,781,526 2,050,000 6,831,526 Ball Mountain 2 Brattleboro 178.2 265 Rockfill- 54,600 10,689,298 350,000 11,039,298 earth Townshend 2 Brattleboro 168.3 133 Earthfill 33,200 5,520,413 1,878,000 7,398,413 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Keene 174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 Otter Brook 2 Keene 171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 Massachusetts: Birch Hill 2 Gardner 153.3 56 Earthfill 49,900 1,740,679 3,075,000 4,815,679 Tully 2 Athol 148.7 62 Earthfill 22,000 1,298,752 368,000 1,666,752 Barre Falls 2 Worcester 130.2 62 Rockfill- 24,000 1,928,819 39,000 1,967,819 earth Knightville 2 Northampton 102.8 160 Earthfill 49,000 2,594,440 821,200 3,415,640 Littleville 2 Northampton 102.0 150 Earthfill 32,400 5,863,412 1,150,000 7,013,412 Conant Brook 2 Springfield 122.0 85 Rockfill- 3,740 1,935,530 1,015,000 2,950,530 earth Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Winsted 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 earth Mad River Winsted 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,000 4 6,983,020 Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,227,792 180,000 a 2,407,792 ' Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2For details, see individual report. 3 Non-Federal cost. 4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. 1-52 TABLE 1-L NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-L (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Conne- Lands cticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 1 Total Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 170.4 Channel improvement $ 2,591,000 - $ 2,591,000 Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection 113,330 - 113,330 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,434,000 $ 250,000 1,684,000 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,135,447 271,000 2,406,447 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,284 - 220,284 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 495,691 35,000 530,691 Gulf Street, Milford, CT - Slope protection 290,277 - 290,277 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 6,930,000 4 1,150,000 8,080,000 Hartford, White River, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,418,000 150,000 3,568,000 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,100 - 44,100 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 110,000 - 110,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000 5 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CTa 51 Conduit 60,150,864 1,300,000 61,450,864 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,263,724 50,000 1,313,720 Salmon R., Colchester, CT2 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 133,500 - 133,500 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 932,000 6 272,000 1,204,000 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,000 2,000 15,000 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 1,789,141 3 30,000 1,819,141 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 389,200 64,000 453,200 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 1 To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. For details see individual report. a Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 4 Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. a Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 6 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 1-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-M HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 31 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Nauga- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages ' Total Hall Meadow 4 Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,000 a $3,862,357 earthfill East Branch Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,000 a 3,249,836 Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 earthfill Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,593,911 2,585,000 4,178,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 4 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1970. 2Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 5 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1973. a Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 1 Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Alford, Green River, MA Ansonia-Derby, CT Danbury, CT Derby, CT North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT Pittsfield, MA Salisbury, CT Sheffield, MA Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT Torrington, West Branch, CT Waterbury- Watertown, CT 111.0 13.0 56.0 12.0 83.0 133.0 76.0 96.0 43.0 51.0 52.0 32.0 Earth dike and stone slope protection Wall, levee, channel improvement and pumping station Walls, channel improvement and bridge replacememt Walls, levees and pumping station Snagging and clearing project Stone arch culvert Gabionade with slope protection Stone slope protection Timber Bulkhead Dike and channel improvement Walls, dikes and channel Wall, dike and channel $ 41,419 $ - $ 41,419 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 13,143,000 1,862,000 15,005,000 7,582,642 73,865 739,003 102,800 205,608 116,296 389,200 228,300 263,300 647,000 8,229,642 85,000 73,865 824,003 102,800 205,608 116,296 389,200 228,300 263,300 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-54 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-N MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 32 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 1 Total Franklin Falls 2 Blackwater 2 Hopkinton- Everett 2.4 Edward MacDowell 2 Phillips Whitmanville Franklin, NH Concord, NH Concord, NH Keene, NH Fitchburg, MA Fitchburg, MA 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 161.3 105.4 110.6 67 48 76 Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill 12,800 1,600 9,350 $ 6,190,487 766,746 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 553,000 1,319,746 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 1,708,253 13,450,000 11,590,000 306,000 7,350,000 6,210,000 2,014,253 20,800,000 s 17,800,000 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. 3 Based on "large" Phillips plan which would eliminate Nookagee Lake. 4 Substituted for Bennington and Beards Brook. Distance and height are for Everett Dam. Distance and height for Hopkinton Dam are 118 miles and 76 feet, respectively. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 1 Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and revetment $ 132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA 2 Haverhill, MA 2 21.0 Floodwall, conduit and pumping 1,743,485 - 1,743,485 6 station Lowell, MA 2 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 5 90,000 580,600 Nashua, NH 2 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,000 4 North Nashua River, MA 2,3 100.5 Channel improvement 3,241,421 - 3,241,421 Saxonville, MA 2 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 1 To be borne by local interests. 2 Project completed. 3 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration Funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 4 Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 5 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration Funds. 6 Excludes $120,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 1-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990 TABLE 1-0 THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 39 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 1 Total Hodges Village a Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 Buffumville 2 Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield 2 Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville 2 Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson 2 Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,220 1,965,000 7,001,220 Mansfield Hollow a Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 1 Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 West River, New Haven, CT - Channel improvements 589,534 - 589,534 1 Borne by local interests. TABLE 1-P BOSTON HARBOR, MA Total Federal Cost for Existing Project to September 1990 Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $21,881,851 $8,713,972 $30,595,823 Public Works 1,030,806 - 1,030,806 Emergency Relief 935,303 - 935,303 $23,847,960 $8,713,972 1 $32,561,932 1 Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 1-56 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-Q RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted CONNECICUT Branford Harbor Connecticut River (Calves Island Bar) Connecticut River (North Cove) New Haven Harbor Norwalk Harbor Patchogue River Stamford Harbor Stony Creek RHODE ISLAND Block Island (Harbor of Refuge) MAINE Biddeford Pool Jonesport Harbor Kennebec River (Doubling Point) Kennebec River (Popham Beach) Kennebunk River Owls Head South Bristol Wells Harbor York Harbor May 1990 Jun 1990 Nov 1989 Jul 1990 Nov 1989 Aug 1990 Mar 1990 Feb 1990 May 1990 Apr 1990 Sep 1990 Feb 1990 Nov 1989 May 1990 Nov 1989 Nov 1989 Aug 1990 Feb 1990 MASSACHUSETTS Andrews River Boston Harbor Boston Harbor (Chelsea Street Bridge) Boston Harbor (Reserve Channel) Cape Cod Canal (East Boat Basin) Chelsea River Green Harbor Island End River New Bedford & Fairhaven Newburyport Onset Bay NEW HAMPSHIRE Hampton Harbor Little Harbor Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program under Project Condition Surveys (PCS) for fiscal year 90 were: (1) monitoring surveys at the Cape Arundel, Saco Bay, Massachusetts Bay, Cape Cod Bay, Spring Hill Beach, Buzzards Bay, New London, Cornfield Shoals, Central Long Island Sound, and Western Long Island Sound disposal sites and (2) maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys. Additionally, 11 monitoring study reports were completed and distributed to the public and regional resource agencies. Total cost of contracts was $660,000. Labor costs of $190,000 for program management, sampling and testing, and environmental analysis were incurred. 1-57 Aug 1990 May 1990 Jun 1990 May 1990 Jul 1990 Jun 1990 Jul 1990 Sep 1990 Jun 1990 Oct 1989 Feb 1990 Sep 1990 Oct 1989 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT * This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State Line to, but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. In addition it exercises Navigation jurisdiction over matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control ....................... 2-3 2. Buttermilk Channel, N.Y....................2-3 3. East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y................... . 2-3 4. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, N.Y............... . 2-4 5. Hempstead Harbor, N.Y....................2-4 6. Hudson River, N.Y.......................2-5 7. Jones Inlet, N.Y. ......................... 2-6 8. Keyport Harbor, N.J........................2-6 9. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y........ 2-6 10. Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y....................2-7 11. Mattituck Harbor, N.Y....................... 2-7 12. Moriches Inlet, N.Y.......................2-8 13. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y.............. 2-8 14. New York and New Jersey Channels ........... 2-9 15. New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift ........................... 2-9 16. New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas ........................ 2-10 17. Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. .................. 2-11 18. Raritan River, N.J.......................2-11 19. Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y ...................... 2-12 20. Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J......... 2-12 21. Shrewsbury River, N.J......................2-13 22. Supervisor of New York Harbor ............... 2-14 23. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ......... 2-14 24. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... 2-14 25. Navigation work under special authorization ..... 2-14 28. Other Authorized Beach erosion control projects.............................2-15 29. Beach erosion control work under special authorization ....................... 2-15 Flood Control 30. Ardsley,N.Y..............................2-16 31. Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J....... 2-16 32. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y. ............ 2-16 33. Inspection of completed flood control projects ... 2-17 34. Other authorized flood control projects ......... 2-17 35. Flood control work under special authorization ....................... 2-17 36. Emergency steambank and shoreline protection under special authorization .......... 2-18 General Investigations 37. 38. 39. Surveys...............................2-18 Collection and study of basic data ............. 2-18 Deauthorized projects ...................... 2-18 Tables Beach Erosion Control 26. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) N.Y......................... 2-14 27. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J............2-15 Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement ............. 2-19 Table 2-B Authorizing legislation ................ 2-23 Table 2-C Hudson River, N.Y. Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project......................2-28 2-1 IMPROVEMENTS Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Page Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities ............... . 2-28 Table 2-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ..... 2-29 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... 2-30 Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............... 2-32 Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects...................... 2-32 Page Table 2-J Surveys ............................. 2-33 Table 2-L Costs for Flood Plain Management Services ............................. 2-33 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects ................. 2-34 Table 2-N Section 107 Reconnaissance Reports ...... 2-35 Table 2-P Section 205 Projects .................. 2-35 Table 2-Q Section 14 Reports and Plans and Specs ................... 2-35 2-2 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water chestnut, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. In FY 87 the States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting FY 88, however, local sponsors contributed 50% of the costs. Operations and results during period. FY 1990 has been the ninth year of a control program started in FY 1982 for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in Lake Champlain. This work has performed for the removal of water chestnut in the southern part of the lake at a cost of $80,000. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division areas was completed in August 1967. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $1,670.750. 2. BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, N.Y. Location. Connects deep water in Upper Bay, New York Harbor, southwest of Governors Island, with deep water in East River northeast of Governors Island, and, with Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels forms an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from Narrows to East River. It lies between Governors Island and Borough of Brooklyn, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12334 and 12335). Previous projects. For details see page 205, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. A channel 1,000 feet wide, 40 feet deep at mean low water for width of existing 500-foot width of existing channel. Suitable widening at junctions with East River and Anchorage Channel to 35 feet deep and with Red Hook Channel to 40 feet deep and for additional widening with Anchorage and Red Hook Channels to provide a minimum clear channel width of 2,100 feet to 35 feet deep. Section included in project is 2.25 miles long. mean tidal range 4.4 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.3 feet, irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water. new work for completed projected cost $4,093,951, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 35 and 40 feet below mean low water in various locations of the channel was awarded on 28 December 1989. Work commenced on 8 January and was completed on 23 January 1990. A total of 112,447 cubic yards of material was removed at a total project cost of $ 558,011. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project commenced October 1903 and was completed March 1965. Easterly 500-foot width of channel, from Anchorage Channel to East River, was completed to a 40-foot depth in May 1935. Westerly 500-feet channel, including widening the junction with East River, was completed to a 35-foot depth in July 1961. Widening the junctions with Anchorage and Red Hook Channels was completed in March 1965. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982 was $8,971,475, $122,051 public works funds and $3,971,900 regular funds, a total of $4,093,951 for new work and $4,877,524 for maintenance. 3. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12353.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmosphere pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 39 terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway. Nine of these are oil terminals, one of which has a railroad spur. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with a berthage of 7,655 feet. Of these, 21 have marine railways and 1 has mechanicalhandling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has 2-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A contract for the maintenance dredging of the Inlet was awarded on 10 January 1990. Work commenced on 27 April 1990 and was completed on 18 May 1990. A total of 182,196 cubic yards of material was removed for a total project cost of $ 834,653. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 4. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel generally parallel to the jetty 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from a littoral reservoir (sediment trap) in the ocean to deep water in the inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 feet and 2.4 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements and rights-of-way. Terminal facilities. None within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvements. Operations and results during period. A contract for the dredging and placement of 700,000 cubic yards of sand on Gilgo Beach, NY was awarded on 18 May 1990. Work commenced in September 1990 and is continuing into FY 1991, as a combined dredging and beach-nourishment project. The scheduled completion date is in January 1991. The total of Operations and Maintenance funds expended on the project during FY 1990 is $ 1,558,999, with New York State contributing an additional $ 200,000 for beach placement of sand. Condition as of September 30. The jetty, completed in 1941, surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent in a little over 10 years time. Since then extensive sand bars and shoals continued to form west of the jetty and in the inlet throat. Hydraulic dredging in the inlet was undertaken in 1959 and again in 1964 under a combined beach erosion control and navigation authorization (1958 Act). Since then 3 more hydraulic dredging operations were conducted starting in 1973 and completed in 1977 under provisions of the 1962 Act (see Table 23). Maintenance dredging using small hopper dredges has also been done from time to time. Due to local concerns about inlet dredging and erosion at Oak Beach, maintenance had been deferred since 1979 which has allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate navigation in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore of Gilgo Beach by hopper dredge. 422,460 cy was dredged at a cost of $882,000 operations and maintenance funds. O&M funds were also used during FY 1987 and 1988 to make repairs to the inner portion of the jetty. In March 1988 the District recommended a plan to maintain a realigned channel in the vicinity of the natural channel to a depth of 14 feet (plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth) and a width of 450 feet. The plan also recommended placement of the dredged material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purposes. The recommended plan was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on 2 August 1988. 5. HEMPSTEAD HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On the north shore of Long Island, 25 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City, and 13 miles southwest of Stamford Harbor, Conn. (Chart No. 12366.) Previous project. For details see page 165, Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. (a) a channel 13 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from deep water in the harbor to North Hempstead Turnpike Viaduct, a distance of 2.1 miles; (b) thence 6 feet deep at mean low water and 50-80 feet wide to head of navigation, a distance of 0.2 miles; and (c) a turning basin off west side of channel north of Viaduct 9 feet deep at mean low water, 190 in net width and 470 feet in maximum length. Dredging the 13-foot channel is subject to the condition that no work shall be done by the United States within 50 feet of any established pierhead line, wharf or other structure. Section included in project is about 2.3 miles long. Mean tidal range, 7.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.4 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.3 feet above mean high water. The present work in Hempstead Harbor involves removal of derelict barges and other debris in the shallow waters along the shore line. Estimated cost is $6,670,000 Federal funds and $3,330,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 33% of the construction cost of the barge removal project and ensure that the area will remain free of derelict vessels after construction is completed and hold the U.S. free from damages. A local cooperation agreement will be signed during FY 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. The GDM (for the barge removal project) was indorsed by our Washington 2-4 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT office in April 1990. Plans and Specs were approved in Oct. 1990. The Local Cooperation Agreement is currently under review by our Washington office and it is expected that the LCA will be approved by the Asst. Secy. of the Army for Civil Works in the 2nd Qtr of FY 1991. Once the LCA is approved it will be forwarded to the N.Y. State Dept. of Environmental Conservation (the Local Sponsor) for execution after which advertisement for contract award can begin. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under the existing navigation portion of the project was commenced March 1912 and is about 16% completed. The 6-foot channel was completed October 1912. 6. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay. Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12341, 12343, 12347, 12348, and 14786.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 164 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston, and thence 400 feet wide to Albany, with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and 1 near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2,200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of New York. In the tidal section below the Federal dam at Troy, the assumed lowest low water plane downstream to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. Mean tidal range is about 5 feet below the dam and about 4.9 feet at Albany. The normal pool level above the dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.3 feet above mean sea level, with the mean range of pool level in seasons of moderate rains being 2.2 feet. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6 Operations and results during period. A continuing contract in the amount of $ 1,348,000 was awarded on September 12, 1990 to Gibson and Cushman Dredging Corporation for removal of approximately 91,000 cubic yards of material from the Federal channel and Albany Turning Basin. Funds in the amount of $ 500,000 were expended on work performed under the continuing contract during FY 1990. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $ 107,249 were expended on engineering and design, supervision and administration, and surveys during FY 1990 in association with this contract work. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of stumps, snags, and other obstructions which constituted a potential hazards to navigation at a cost of $ 138,311 for maintenance in FY 1990. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing dredging and project condition surveys at a cost of $ 145,792 for maintenance in FY 1990. Government plant and hired labor were employed throughout the fiscal year with operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam including the associated building and grounds. Operation of the Lock was suspended for the 1989 navigation season on December 1, 1989 and was resumed for the 1990 navigation season on May 1, 1990. Total cost incurred for the operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and the associated building and grounds, including supervision and administration was $ 546,153 for FY 1990. A continuing contract in the amount of $1,738,025 was awarded to the Hull Corporation on September 30, 1988 to perform Interim Repairs to the Troy Lock and Dam to insure continued operability and safety of the facility. FY 1990 funds in the amount of $ 452,109 were expended to complete the contract work. All work was completed on 24 May 1990 at a total contract cost of $ 1,652,109. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $ 50,745 were expended for supervision and administration of this contract during FY 1990. In addition, Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $ 166,460 were expended on engineering and design work for preparation of contract plans and specifications for the Troy Lock Concrete Repair Program. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were 2-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear-foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Additionally, the 1,300 linear feet of 27-foot project remains undredged. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet except for a small part of the widening to form a harbor at Troy. Work remaining under the project consists of completion of the 12-foot harbor at Troy and dredging the 27-foot and the remainder of the 32-foot channels at Albany which are not deemed necessary at this time; and reconstruction of dikes. 7. JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. A small inlet on south shore of Long Island connecting Hempstead Bay with Atlantic Ocean, 37 miles by water southeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. An entrance jetty and a channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from that depth in the ocean through the inlet to Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek. Section included in project is about 2.1 miles long. mean tidal range varies from 4.2 feet at ocean entrance to 3.1 feet at Loop Causeway Bridge; mean range of spring tide varies from 5 to 3.7 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required, and must maintain a channel 12 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide from Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek to head of navigation in Freeport Creek at Mill Road. Terminal facilities. Within area tributary to Jones Inlet there are a number of privately owned small wharves and numerous boat repair and storage yards. The latter are equipped for repair of pleasure craft and fishing vessels. In addition, there are nine public wharves open to the public free of charge, with a total dockage of 2,180 feet. Additional terminals would have to be constructed for receipt of commercial freight in any sizable quantity. Operations and results during period. A contract for the dredging of the inlet channel with beach placement of the dredged material was awarded on 10 January 1990. Work commenced on 14 July 1990 and was completed on 22 October 1990. A total of 387,768 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited onto the adjoining beach. The total of Operations and Maintenance funds expended on the project during FY 1990 is $ 1,654,390, with New York State contributing an additional $ 1,212,035 for the beach placement of the sand. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1953 and completed June 1959. JONES INLET - JETTY REHABILITATION ($34,500). The purpose of this study is to develop a feasible and cost effective design for rehabilitation of the Jones Inlet Jetty to insure structural stability and maximize the sand trapping efficiency of the structure. Inlet hydrographic and existing jetty condition surveys have been performed. Preliminary design and cost estimates for alternative schemes have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. JONES INLET - MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS ($49,264). The purpose of this study is to develop feasible and cost efficient alternative which would minimize channel maintenance requirements. Existing tidal/inlet hydraulics, inlet/bay stability, jetty impoundment rates, etc., have been evaluated. Several methods of shoaling analysis were reviewed and the most applicable used. Preliminary design layouts and cost estimates for a deposition basin and navigation channel have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. 8. KEYPORT HARBOR, NJ Location. At mouth of Matawan Creek, on south side of Raritan bay, about 9 miles west of Sandy Hook. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No., 12327.) Existing project. A channel about 1 mile long from Raritan Bay to the town dock at Keyport, 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Mean range of tides is 4.9 feet; mean range of spring tides; 5.9 feet. High easterly or westerly winds cause tides to fluctuate from 3.8 feet below mean low water up to 5.9 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are two privately owned wharves located at the head of improvement, both in poor condition. Operations and results during period and condition as of 30 September. Work under the existing project was completed in 1911. A contract for maintenance dredging of channel to restore project depths was awarded on 7 June 1990. work Commenced in September 1990 and is continuing into FY 1991. A total of $ 548,813 was expended on the project during Fy 1990. 9. KILL VAN KULL - NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning and maneuvering areas, as well as deepening the Elizabeth and 2-5 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Port Newark channels. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at over $280,000,000 with an additional $194,000,000 to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Government which was executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed on 21 May 1987. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Stage I, channel deepening to 40 feet in six contracts, is underway. Contract No. 1, awarded in June 1987, is completed. Contract No. 2 was awarded in July 1988 and is scheduled for completion in March 91. Contract No. 3 was awarded in Sept. 1988 and was completed in Feb. 90. Contract No. 4 is planned to remove rock and hard material in the Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay. This work will be awarded in two contracts, 4A and 4B with the first award scheduled for February 1991. Contract No. 5 was awarded in May 1988 and was completed in July 1989. 10. MAMARONECK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On north shore of Long Island South, 5 miles west of Connecticut State line, and 27 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12367). Previous projects. For detail see Annual Reports for 1915, 1924, and 1938, pages 1759, 141, and 160, respectively. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Long Island Sound to Orient Point, and thence 80 feet wide to a point about 150 feet below the Boston Post Road, including an extension to nortlheast 300 feet long and 80 feet wide, all with widening at bends; for 2 anchorages, 1 of 10-foot depth about 4 1/2 acres in extent and the second about 14 acres in area to a depth of 6 feet; and an anchorage in the West Basin 6 feet deep at mean low water with a channel of like depth and 80 feet wide connecting this anchorage with the main channel. Section included in project, 1 3/4 miles. Mean tidal range, 6.9 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completion cost $258,996 exclusive of $151,044 and $43,023 expended from contributed funds, required and contributed funds, other, respectively, and amounts expended in previous projects. Local cooperation. Provisions under River and Harbor Acts of 1922 and 1935 complied with except local interests must provide adequate and suitable spoil-disposal areas suitably diked or bulk-headed as needed. River and Harbor Act of 1960 provides that local interests contribute in cash 50 percent of first cost of construction, to be paid in a lump sum prior to construction, final allocation of cost to be made after actual costs are determined; provide lands, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of anchorage; hold the United States free from damages; provide at all times adequate public landing facilities, open to all on equal terms, for access to the shore by users of the anchorage; and allocate an adequate portion of the anchorage to accommodate a minimum of 15 boats, and provide mooring facilities therein, specifically designated for use by transient craft on terms equal to those in portions of the anchorage designated for use by local craft. Assurances of compliance were furnished by the village of Mamaroneck and accepted by the District Engineer on April 3, 1962. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded on 28 March 1990. Work commenced on 17 April 1990 and was completed on 17 May 1990. A total of 54,936 cubic yards of material was removed for a total project cost of $ 728,502. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in October 1924 and was completed in May 1966. Work completed consisted of providing a 10-foot main channel, branch channel and anchorage area in East Basin completed in April 1933. A 6-foot connecting channel and anchorage area in West Basin completed in July 1939. An enlargement of anchorage area in East Basin to a depth of 6 feet completed in May 1966. In June 1963 and May 1966 controlling mean low water depth was 10 feet for a width varying from 100 to 80 feet in main channel from Long Island South to East Basin anchorage and thence 9 feet to upper limit including branch channel; in East Basin anchorage areas, 10 feet in 10-foot anchorage area and 6 feet in 6-foot anchorage area; in West Basin, 6 feet in 6-foot anchorage area and 6 feet in connecting channel thereto. 11. MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY Location. A tidal inlet on North shore of Long Island, 85 miles east of the Battery, New York City, and 24 miles southeast of New Haven Harbor, CT., extending southwards about 2'/4 mile to village of Mattituck. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12358). Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water from Long Island Sound to a 460- by 570-foot anchorage area at village of Mattituck, protected at the entrance by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart, channel widths are 200 feet at entrance 80 feet elsewhere. Total length is about 2.2 miles. Mean tidal range at entrance, 4.9 feet; at Old Mill Bridge, Waterville, 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides at entrance, 5.8 feet; at Old 2-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Mill Bridge, 6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.2 feet below mean low water up to 6.6 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Lower portion of harbor contains four commercial and two recreational boating terminals. Commercial terminals are used for handling petroleum products, sand, gravel, building materials, fish and shellfish. Recreational terminals have mooring accommodations available for 20 boats and facilities for the sale of gasoline, oil, bait, miscellaneous supplies and for repair services. Upper portion of harbor contains facilities for recreational craft which are open to the general public. Operations and results during period. A contract for maintenance dredging of the project was awarded on 1 May 1990. Work commenced in September 1990. A total of $ 326,162 was expended on this project during FY 1990. Condition as of September 30. Project is complete. Original dredging was completed in 1914. East jetty was completed in 1906 for a 775-foot length. West jetty was completed in 1938. 12. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 80 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the narrow sandy barrier beach on the south shore of Long Island which separates the Atlantic Ocean from a series of interconnected bays. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel, 10 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide extending from that depth in the Atlantic Ocean to Moriches Bay, a distance of 0.7 mile; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 1.1 miles; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Recent provisions include an outer channel deposition basin, a west jetty scour blanket, and habitat enhancement for shore birds. Estimate of cost of work is $13,050,000 (October 1988 P.L.) including $50,000 from Coast Guard and $4,550,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In accordance with the project authorization, local interests are required to furnish all easements, rights-of-way including relocations that are necessary for improvements at an overall 35% cost sharing basis. The annual Operations and Maintenance cost is estimated to be $1,860,000 of which the local share is 50% or $930,000 per year. An Agreement of Local Cooperation was executed on 30 June 1986. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Several yacht clubs, boatyards, and public wharfs and landings, and numerous private landings are located in Moriches Bay. There are boat basins open to the public. The facilities existing in the bay are considered adequate for present and probable future needs under present conditions of Moriches Inlet. There is room for expansion should future activity warrant. Operations and results during period. Work was done on rehabilitation of the jetties. Plans call for award of a contract for channel dredging but this will be contingent on cost sharing by the State. Condition as of September 30. Pre-construction planning resumed in October 1977. Coordination continued with Federal, State and local agencies on current problems and need for all project purposes (i.e., navigation; beach erosion control; water quality improvement). A post authorization change was approved in September 1983 to allow construction of each project purpose separately which clarified authority to defer all purposes except navigation. In January 1980, a breach occurred adjacent to the eastern jetty. Emergency funds ($11.3 million) were authorized under the authority of PL84-99 to close the breach. About 1,185,000 yards of sand fill were used to effect closure of the breach by March 1981. 13. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. & VT. Location. This waterway, 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See N.O.S. Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y. at head of Lake Champlain to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low lake level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year in removal of stumps and snags that posed a potential 2-8 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT hazard to navigation at a cost of $ 28,207. Government plant and hired labor were employed in replacing deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $ 15,141. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $ 21,506 were expended in FY 1990 on preliminary engineering and design, and surveys for future maintenance dredging. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 110 feet. Fender booms have been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap and Putts Rock.) 14. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333, 12331, and 12327.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinity of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively, thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike on its northern side to junction of channel into NewarkBay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide for a point opposite the east end of Constable Hook to a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line; and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Location cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. The US Army Corps of Engineers Dredge "McFarland" was employed to restore project dimensions in the Raritan Bay reach of the project in September 1990. A total of 181,778 cubic yards of material was removed at a total project cost of $ 1,948,728. Conditions as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. 15. NEW YORK HARBOR - COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J. and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1974 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterways and was funded as a maintenance activity. The current estimate of first cost is $206,230,000 (October 90 P.L.) including $44,089,000 cash contribution from local interests plus $73,961,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rights-of- 2-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results (New work - cumulative to date): A total of five Liberty State Park contracts have been completed at a cost of $10,321,121. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of Piers 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,604. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $791,656. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was completed at a cost of $2,910,400. A contract for the City of Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,123,404. Work along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at a cost of $979,580. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater was completed at a cost of $1,697,487. The Brooklyn Reach One contract was completed at a cost of $5,057,920. Work is continuing on the Weehawken to Edgewater contract No. 2 and at Hoboken Pier B. The Bayonne One contract has been completed at a cost of $735,800. Engineering and design is in progress for Brooklyn Reach 2. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. Removal and disposal of 537,770 cubic feet (4,201 cords) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier structure was accomplished at a cost of $3,375,059 in FY 1990. Conditions as of September 30. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Weehawken and Edgewater. In New York City, work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River inclusive of Piers 17 and 18, Stapleton, Staten Island. Removal work is currently underway at Weehawken-Edgewater Contract 2 and at Hoboken Pier B. 16. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower Bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor, Mass, and 165 miles northwest of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey charts 12327, 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay, opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; and southerly entrance channel, Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage, 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45,40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesend Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series no. 5, revised Vol.2. Operations and results during period. The US Army Corps of Engineers Dredge "McFarland" was employed in October 1989 and from 16 January to 13 February 1990 to restore project dimensions in New York Harbor Red Hook Flats Anchorage. A total of 375,711 cubic yards of material was removed at a project cost of $ 2,705,488. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was competed in 2-10 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends nearly southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay was completed to a 47-foot depth in November 1977. 17. PORT CHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At boundary between States of New York and Connecticut, comprises the tidal mouth, about 1.7 miles long, of Byram River whose source is in Byram Lake about 12 miles north of Port Chester. River empties into Long Island Sound about 32 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Survey Chart 12367.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915, 1758, and Annual Report for 1938, page 157. Existing project. An anchorage basin near breakwater constructed at Byram Point under a previous project, 12 feet deep, for fenders on east bank opposite southern end of Fox Island, and a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from Long Island Sound to mouth of river at southerly point of Fox Island; thence 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to 900 feet below fixed bridge at Mill Street in Portchester, including a turning basin opposite the town landing; thence 3 feet deep and 175 to 100 feet wide to 100 feet below bridge. Section included in project is about 1.7 miles long. Mean tidal range, 7.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.5 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water up to 8.6 feet above mean high water. Cost of new work for completed project was $358,475, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, and $5,500 to be contributed by local interests. Widening turning basin and construction of fenders on bank opposite southern end of Fox Island, at a cost of $93,000, (1954) is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1930 provides that local interests contribute $5,500 in cash toward widening channel at turning basin. This condition has not been fulfilled and there is no indication as to when compliance may be expected. Terminal facilities. There are 34 terminals in Port Chester between Fox Island and Mill Street Bridge, with a total berthage of about 5,300 feet, of which 3,120 feet are available for dockage. Village of Port Chester owns several bulkheads which are used as public landings for small pleasure craft. Several boatyards with storage space for 75 boats and equipped with a total of 3 marine railways are available to pleasure craft. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A contract for the maintenance dredging of the Harbor was awarded on 28 March 1990. Work commenced on 23 April 1990 and was completed on 17 May 1990. A total of 40,797 cubic yards of material was removed at a project cost of $ 580,000. Condition as of September 30. Work on active portion of existing project was completed October 1938. Controlling mean low water depth (June 1952 and Nov. 1965) was 12 feet for a width of 140-50 feet from Long Island Sound to Fox Island, 8 feet in anchorage, thence 10 feet for a width of 90-40 to turning basin, 10 feet in turning basin, thence depths varyfrom 3 to zero feet for full width to upper limit of 3-foot project. Work remaining under existing project consists of turning basin and constructing fenders on bank opposite southern end of Fox Island (inactive). 18. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. Location. Rises in north-central part of New Jersey and flows generally southeasterly into Raritan Basin, between Perth Amboy and South Amboy, about 24 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12332.) Previous projects. For Details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1918, and 1938, pages 1777, 359, and 259 respectively. Existing projects. A channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide extending 5.8 miles from turn in New York and New Jersey Channels near Great Beds Light to Government wharf on Main Channel, widened to 600 feet for 1,000 feet long opposite wharf to form a turning basin of same depth; thence a channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide 3 miles to Washington Canal, thence 10 feet deep in soft material, 11 feet deep in rock, and generally 100 feet wide with widening at bends 5 miles to Delaware and Raritan Canal entrance at New Brunswick, and a South Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide 0.8 mile from junction with Main Channel at Keasby to upper limit of Titanium Pigment Co. property; thence 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide 0.4 mile to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority; thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide 2 miles to a point 1,300 feet below upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tides is 5.1 feet at mouth of river and 5.6 feet at New Brunswick; mean range of spring tides, 6. 1 and 6.6 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to winds and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. New work for completed portion 2-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 of project, consisting of channels described above cost $1,237,000, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and including $66,000 contributed by local interests. Dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance to 25-foot channel from New York & Long Branch Railroad bridge to junction of Main and South Channels, and in South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. property. River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides local interests furnish spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore, required for maintenance of improvement, and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No., 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2, pages 274-279 and 281. Operations and results during period. A contract for the maintenance dredging of the South Channel, Raritan River NJ was awarded on 28 December 1989. Work commenced on 15 February 1990 and was completed 31 March 1990. A total of 305,229 cubic yards of material was removed for a project cost of $ 1,065,579. Conditions as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 96 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project was commenced September 1919 and completed July 1941. A shoal along northerly channel line in vicinity of Victory Bridge was eliminated by relocation of channel in February 1959. Main Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction with New York and New Jersey Channels to and including a turning basin of same depth opposite Government wharf, thence 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to mouth of Washington Canal, thence 10 and 11 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Delaware and Raritan Canal outlet locks at New Brunswick. South Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,200 feet, thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 12,400 feet to within 1,300 feet of junction with Main Channel to Crab Island. Model study of Raritan River was completed in March 1952. Work remaining under existing project is dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. 19. SHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 95 miles east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the sandy barrier beach, connecting Shinnecock Bay with the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep (mlw) and 200 feet wide with a deposition basin, thence extending through the inlet to Shinnecock Bay for a distance of about 0.7 mile; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of about 1 mile; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost for work is $22,300,000 (October 90 P.L.) of which the Federal share is $16,900,000 and non-Federal share is $5,400,000. Local cooperation. The navigation improvement will accrue both recreational and commercial benefits which result in a first cost allocation of 69 percent Federal and 31 percent non- Federal. The authorizing document also requires that local authorities: provide without cost to the United States, all lands easements, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance, when and as required; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; maintain and operate the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlet and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; maintain, for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal share of the costs is based. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on 7 Jun 90. Terminal facilities. Shinnecock Bay, and adjacent ocean area, constitute an important marine fishery. The public fishing facility includes three docks, one of which, the Shinnecock Fishermens Cooperative, stores and market the catch for the fishermen. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded on 12 Jul 90 for the channel dredging at a contract price of $2,177,500. Condition as of September 30. Work is continuing on the channel dredging contract. Engineering and design of the jetty reconstruction project is continuing. 20. SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ Location. Shoal Harbor is on the south shore of Sandy Hook Bay about 4 miles west of Sandy Hook. Compton Creek is a small stream rising on the west side of the Navesink Highlands and flowing north through meadows into Shoal Harbor. (See Coast chart 12327.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1934 and 1938, pages 211, and 265 respectively. Existing project. A 1.8 mile channel to 12 feet deep at mean low water extending from deep water in Sandy Hook 2-12 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Bay to first bend in creek, thence 8 feet deep to the main Street Bridge Across Compton Creek with a width of 150 feet in the bay and 75 feet inside the mouth of the creek, with widening at bends. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water up to 5.9 feet above mean high water. New work for the completed portion of the project cost $107,572 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and exclusive of $77,247 expendedl from contributed funds. Dredging of channel in the creek to a depth of 8 feet to a point 1,000 feet upstream from Main Street Bridge is inactive and is excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954, provides that local interests contribute in cash 50 percent of first cost of work, and agree to: (a) furnish, without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial work and for subsequent maintenance when and as required; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project: and (c) deepen to 14 feet the berths at the terminals along the improved section of channel; and provided further that no work shall be undertaken until local interests have complied with the outstanding condition of local cooperation required under existing project which pertains to construction of a public wharf. Assurances of compliance by local interests with requirements under Act of September 3, 1954, dated July 30, 1956, were accepted September 25, 1956 by the District Engineer for the United States of America. Operations and results during period. A Contract was awarded on 30 March 1990 for maintenance dredging. Work commenced on 4 May 1990 and was completed 16 June 1990. A total of 78,501 cubic yards of material was removed at a project cost of $ 595, 736. Condition as of September 30. Work under the entire existing project is about 78 percent complete. Work under active portion of the existing project was commenced in August 1936 and completed in November 1956. Work remaining to be done under the project consists of extending the 8-foot channel 1,000 feet upstream from the Main Street bridge. 21. SHREWSBURY RIVER, N.J. Location. Mainly a large tidal basin in eastern part of New Jersey, the outlet being at the southeast end of Sandy Hook. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12324.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports of 1915, 1918, and 1938, pages 1778, 373, and 267, respectively. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide, following the westerly shore, from deep water in Sandy Hook Bay 2.2 miles to a point 500 feet south of former location of railroad bridge at Highlands; then 9 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide, suitably widened at bends and turns, in south branch of river 6.8 miles to Branchport Avenue Bridge in city of Long Branch; and a channel in north branch (Navesink R.) 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide 6.1 miles from the junction to Red Bank. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide at Highlands, 3.8 feet; at Seabright, 1.7 feet; at Branchport, 1.7 feet; and at Red Bank, 3 feet. Mean range of spring tides is 4.7, 2.1, 2.2, and 3.6 feet respectively, irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.5 feet above mean high water. Dredging turning basin and anchorage in vicinity of Red Bank, 6 feet deep and about 19 acres in area; a channel in Claypit Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide about 1 mile from 6-foot curve in north branch to head of the creek; a channel in Oceanport Creek, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 2 miles long from channel in south branch to New York and Long Branch Railroad Bridge; and a channel in Little Silver Creek, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2.6 miles long from channel in south branch to Seven Bridge Road Bridge is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Cost estimate for this portion (1960) is $578,000 exclusive of $86,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorization Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain a suitable public wharf on each of the creeks to be improved, which shall be open to all on equal terms; remove Locust Avenue bridge over Claypit Creek; and make cash contributions of $25,000, $33,000, and $27,500 toward cost of improvement of Claypit, Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks, respectively. Provided further that construction of any unit of proposed improvement may be undertaken independently of the other units when the required local cooperation has been provided. These conditions have not been fulfilled. Requirements under prior acts have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 33 terminals with a total berthage of 7,986 feet on the waterway. Eight terminals with a total berthage of 1,000 feet are open to the public. In addition, many private pleasure boat landings have been constructed by owners of riverfront estates. Fifteen boatyards with storage space for 670 craft and equipped with 21 marine railways are available. None of the terminals has direct rail connections. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract in the amount of $ 2,884,932 for maintenance dredging was awarded on 22 June 1990. Work commenced on 9 July 1990 and is to be completed in December 1990. A total of $ 2,145,927 has been expended on this project during FY 1990. 2-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of existing project began in October 1919. Work completed consisted of providing authorized project dimensions in 12- foot entrance channel, 9-foot channel in South Branch, and a 6-foot channel in North Branch of the river. Work remaining (dredging an inlet channel across the base of Sandy Hook protected by jetties and bulkheads, a bay channel extending to the existing Shrewsbury River Channel and a six-lane fixed highway bridge to span the new inlet as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965) was subsequently reclassified to inactive because of state and local opposition. Formal close out of this work remains. Under the River and Harbor Act of 1950 work remaining consists of dredging turning basin and anchorage in vicinity of Red Bank and channels in Claypit, Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks. 22. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the Rivers and Harbors Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The Rivers and Harbors Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation deep draft; the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonments of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District is accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the water front for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of tows enroute to dredged material dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol is limited to New York Harbor and surrounding waters, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios patrol shorefront facilities and property. The inspectors operate out of field offices located at Long Island and Albany, New York. One inspector works directly out of the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with a Corps permit, as well as investigating unauthorized construction activities, and responding to complaints of same. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps' role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit application. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 23. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Pre-authorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) BEACH EROSION CONTROL 26. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND AREA), N.Y. Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, in Brooklyn (Kings County), approximately nine miles south of the Battery, N.Y. City. Existing project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized plan provides for beach erosion control by restoring the Coney Island public beach up to 250 feet beyond its historic shoreline; the extension of the westerly terminal groin; construction of a terminal groin at the easterly end of the restored beach, and a fillet of beachfill from the terminal groin at W. 37th St. extending approximately 2300 ft. into the community of Sea Gate. The authorized plan also provides for restoration of the beach by periodic beach nourishment. The estimated project construction cost is $146,000,000 (Oct 1990 P.L.). Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the N.Y. State Dept. of Environmental Conservation. The local cooperation agreement has not been finalized, but the customary provisions are that local interests will: provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow 2-14 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT areas necessary for construction of the project, pursuant to the requirements of Sections 210 and 305 of Public Law 91-646; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from the construction works and subsequent maintenance of the project; provide a cash contribution toward the total first cost, the final apportionment to be made after actual costs and values have been determined and based on the conditions of public use and ownership at the time of construction; assure that water pollution that would affect the health of bathers will not be permitted; assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based, during the economic life of the project; maintain public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms and maintain all improvements after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including periodic nourishment during the economic life of the project as may be required to serve the intended purpose, subject to Federal participation in the cost of periodic nourishment for the economic project life. Operations and results during period, and condition as of September 30. A report completed by the N.Y. District confirmed that storm damage reduction benefits are sufficient for justification of a project of high priority within the Corps. In FY 1990 funds were provided to continue the Preconstruction Engineering & Design (PED) effort. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed in December 1978. A supplemental environmental study will be conducted during the PED effort, which effort will also analyze other plans of protection in order to optimize project benefits and costs. 27. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Barnegat Inlet - length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, N.J. Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea Bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (PL 100-676) authorized a plan substantially in accordance with the plan recommended in the General Design Memorandum for the project dated May, 1988. In general the plan provides for beach erosion control along approximately 12 miles of coastline, extending from Sea Bright southward to Ocean Township. New Jersey, by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach berm to 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water with an additional 2 foot high berm cap to provide an extra increment of protection from overtopping. The project also provides for the notching of 15 groins, a feeder beach in the vicinity of Long Branch and periodic nourishment throughout the economic life of the project. Total estimated Federal cost is $409,700,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $229,60C,-00. Local cooperation. Includes reconstruction of sea wall at Sea Bright and all lands easements, rights of way and drainage outfall extensions. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. Federal construction has not been initiated, but project is in active status. The final GDM is currently under review at the Washington level, with approval expected in Oct 90. The State of New Jersey has begun reconstructing the seawall. SECTION II- ASBURY PARK TO MANASQUAN, N.J. Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to Manasquan - length about 9 miles. Recommended project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 50 years from the year that the total quantity to fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions. Total estimated Federal cost is $210,400,000. Total estimated non- Federal cost is $137,300,000 (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Operations and results during period and conditions as of September 30. The project is in active status with work on the Engineering & Design (E&D) effort initiated in FY 1987. The E&D effort which is continuing will result in the development of a General Design Memorandum (GDM), Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as well as the Plans and Specifications. 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 29. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Public Law 826, 84th congress as amended (None during FY 1990) 2-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 FLOOD CONTROL 30. ARDSLEY, N.Y. Location. The Village of Ardsley in Westchester County, New York is located on the Saw Mill River approximately 5 miles upstream from its junction with the Hudson River. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. The Federal flood control project provides for relocation of the existing channel from the upstream limit of the project downstream for approximately 1,000 feet, and approximately 290 feet of concrete channel upstream of the New Ashford Avenue Bridge. Upstream of the concrete channel along the left bank of the Saw Mill River, 425 feet of floodwall will be constructed running north of the Conrail Bridge. Ponding areas, drainage ditches and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the project is $5,676,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,892,000. Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in S. 1567, local interests are required to furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way including relations that are necessary for flood control improvements. The local sponsor has contributed a total cash contribution of $840,000 of which $150,000 was contributed in FY 1987 and FY 1988. The final cash payment for FY 1989 was made in January 1989 in the amount of $690,000. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the local sponsor, in an 11 December 1973 letter, indicated its intent to comply with the items of local cooperation and reaffirmed this on 15 August 1979 and 23 August 1985. The State of New York, in a 18 October 1985 letter, expressed this willingness to assume responsibility as local sponsor in accordance with the Cost sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the Administration and Senator Majority Leadership Compromise as reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. Construction of the downstream reach (the base bid) began in April 1988 and was completed in June 1988. Construction of Option I and Option II began in July 88 and were completed in November 89. The project was turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance. 31. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. Location. At Liberty Park, in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, directly behind Ellis Island and Statute of Liberty, In Upper New York Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12334.) Existing project. Construction of a levee and seawall, and pedestrian walkways; over environmentally sensitive areas. The construction of the levee project will allow the creation of a large Greenpark to include a wetlands preserve, an inland water course and boat basin, a marina, an amphitheater, indoor and outdoor recreation facilities, picnic areas, historic areas, community facilities, restaurants, plaza, and many other areas for both active and passive recreational and aesthetic benefit to visitors. The stone armored levee will also serve as a settlement- free base for subsequent construction of a tree-lined promenade, the Liberty Walk, curving along the water's edge. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $19,150,000; with an additional $19,150,000 a contribution by local interests including lands, certain relocations, utilities, and interior drainage. Local cooperation. In accordance with the project authorization, local interests are required to furnish all land, easements and rights-of-way including relocations, save those existing utilities passing through the proposed levee, necessary for the flood control improvements and to operate and maintain the project at an annual cost estimated to total $58,000. The State will assume all costs for construction of an interior drainage system to provide (10) year level of protection estimated to be $5,100,000. Local interest have agreed to voluntarily pay 50% of project cost. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection is the local sponsor. The local cooperation agreement was executed on 26 June 1986. Operation and results during period and conditions as of September 30. Phase I is completed. A contract for the levee and seawall was awarded in February 1987 and construction was completed in February 1988 with the exception of the Ellis Island Bridge location. A contract for the pedestrian walkways was awarded in June 88 and completed in November 89. The completed project was turned over to the local sponsor for operation and maintenance. 32. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The Passaic River Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide - and contains portions or Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Three Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, N.J. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was imple- 2-16 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT mented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, N.J., was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. A $1.5 million basin-wide project to improve the Flood Warning and Preparedness System was completed in 1988. This project includes enhanced and increased number of rain and stream flow gauges in combination with a state-of-the-art communication and computer system designed to improve the timeless, occupancy and reliability of flood warning in the Passaic River Basin. The project was implemented by the Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the National Weather Service and U.S. Geological Survey, the State of New Jersey is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. Existing project. The project was authorized for Phase I advance engineering and design study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the February 18, 1979 report of the Chief of Engineers. the estimate of Federal cost under the authorizing legislation is $915,200,000 (October 1990 P.L.), plus a $217,000,000 cash contribution from local interests and $105,400,000 for items of work to be contributed by local interests. The recommended plan for flood protection, navigation, hurricane protection and recreation, included a flood detention reservoir, channel diversions and modifications, levees and floodwalls, and streambank filling and grading. These works would provide protection against a storm with a recurrence interval of 235 years, which is 20 percent larger than the October 1903 flood of record. Six independent tributary local protection plans were also recommended. However, because of a lack of public support for structural components of the project in the New Jersey portion of the Basin, the entire project was reformulated during the Phase I study. The House Public Works Committee Report (94-1702) on the 1976 Water Resources Development Act directed ". . . the reformulation of the plan for water management and flood control for the entire Passaic Basin." This report further stated that local opposition to any plan which relies upon extensive use of dikes, dams and levees, such as those proposed in previous survey reports, mandates that the following alternatives, or any combination thereof, shall be the only ones surveyed and considered: (a) A full range of nonstructural flood control alternatives to include land acquisition, flood plain mapping, flood-proofing, developing early warning systems and relocation of buildings; (b) A tunnel diversion plan; (c) A system of tunnels addressing the needs of the entire basin; (d) Plans that combine local protection works where locally acceptable and nonstructural solutions including improvements to stream carrying capacity in accordance with different needs in the Lower Basin and in the Central Basin; (e) Evaluation of fulfilling water supply objectives together with flood control; (f) Aquifer recharge and underground storage; and (g) Reservoir management in the headwaters. The Phase I Study considered these alternatives in the formulation of revised plans. Conditions as of September 30. The reformulation study was initiated in October 1977 under the existing authorization and Congressional Guidance in House Report 94-1702. The overall study was completed in December 1989 at an estimated cost of $21,300,000. A wide range of Feasible Basin-wide alternative plans were developed. These alternatives, which were presented for extensive public review, included tunnel diversions, channel modification, levees and floodwalls, and nonstructural measures. In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worse in 40 years. Local protection plans were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, N.J., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These projects were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. In June 1984, The State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the local option for detailed plan formulation. The Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Impact Statement, (EIS), recommending the Pompton River/Passaic Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1988. The Phase I report was approved by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) on July 23, 1988 and by the office of the Chief of Engineers on 3 February 1989. The final EIS was filed with EPA in December 1988, with the comment period ending in January 1989. OMB approved the report 5 February 1990. OASA (CW) transmitted the report to the House of Representatives on 8 March 1990. The report is being considered for legislation in the WRDA 1990 under House Document 101- 163, and it is anticipated that authorization of the Pompton River/Passaic River Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan with the Newark Bay tunnel extension, will be included. 33. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with operation and maintenance requirements. 34. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-I at end of chapter.) 35. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation provides for advance preparation, emergency operations, re- 2-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 habilitation, emergency drinking water, advance measures and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District completed revisions of various emergency manuals and phamphlets, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response and preparation, and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fighting and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York District provides technical assistance and sandbags to local and county governmental organizations which request such aid during storm/flood events. 36. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-Q at end of chapter.) 37. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $160,317 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 39. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Projects having all, or inactive or uncompleted portions deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Water Resources Development Act of 1976, 1986, 1988 (See Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-18 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Projects Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 September 30, 1990 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. 3. East Rockaway Inlet N.Y. 4. Fire Island To Jones Inlet, N.Y. 5. Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. 6. Hudson River, N.Y. 7. Jones Inlet, N.Y. 8. Keyport Harbor, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 170,000 182,791 160,000 141,905 65,000 52,062 50,000 49,360 416,000 414,791 60,000 8,082,492 58,340 2,008,955 57,000 37,024 140,000 121,294 60,000 61,306 855,000 855,866 140,000 129,117 559,000 558,011 836,820 834,853 486,000 1,556,555 6,567,178 1,558,999 360,000 306,703 200,000 290,582 1,733,806' 1,670,748 2 4,590,201 3 4,590,201 4,953,773 4,941,152 83,969 533,334 4 9,679,556 9,677,456 594,355 594,355 28 15,310,451 15,375,269 656,468 673,777 5 76,497 76,497 4,545,900 1,666,000 2,110,000 2,384,226 4,549,347 1,643,954 2,114,916 2,392,670 1,354,000 1,342,512 11,289 90,000 1,658,940 91,349 1,654,390 21,000 549,940 20,497 548,813 44,249,800 44,249,865 6,7 40,081,541 39,971,166 8,9 1,822,530 1,822,530 o10 14,368,516 14,364,030 40,475 40,475 1,419,088 1,417,437 2-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 2-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Projects Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 September 30, 1990 9. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y. 10. Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. 11. Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. 12. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. 13. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 14. New York and New Jersey Channels 15. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7,100,000 44,374,000 14,904,000 16,300,000 1,504,912 10,607,346 42,443,863 22,826,306 37,000 37,000 62,000 61,832 728,410 728,502 82,918,000 77,651,452 513,764 513,764 1,379,087 1,379,011 177,925 27 177,925 35,000 35,000 93,000 92,999 3,475,000 3,138,000 1,103,000 167,509 2,568,517 3,821,785 327,046 326,162 91,750 1,418,130 1,389,947 7,857,000 7,725,843 9,422 9,422 36,000 30,379 25,000 29,900 794,000 3,103,000 792,986 1,679,987 55,000 55,253 64,396 64,854 97,000 2,039,022 1,222,679 1,948,728 3,657,000 6,100,000 1,269,000 1,992,556 2,872,931 3,137,515 700,000 2,424,393 3,145,000 3,433,000 3,656,000 3,368,662 2,988,000 3,299,714 3,856,047 3,375,831 681,811 12 681,811 1,202,089 1,202,060 73,052,435 73,052,435 15,17 12,341,381 46,301,954 18 41,060,000 28,998,318 19 67,690,459 67,952,506 '" 2-20 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Projects Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 September 30, 1990 16. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels & Anchorage Areas 17. Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. 18. Raritan River, N.J. 19. Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. 20. Shoal Harbor/ Compton Creek, N.J. 21. Shrewsbury River, N.J. 22. Supervisor of New York Harbor 26. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), N.Y. 27. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,013,000 1,142,900 4,708,000 5,192,886 2,022,305 1,108,460 4,699,288 5,223,871 102,000 101,998 580,000 580,000 45,009,710 45,009,710 20 53,439,310 56,256,399 433,470 23 433,470 1,742,795 1,742,096 1,551,470 1,551,470 2,350,000 2,345,639 200,000 200,000 184,000 179,341 54,000 2,987 43,000 24,112 103,000 1,065,926 102,990 1,065,579 - 5,226,000 51,014 1,613,738 80,000 98,143 595,000 595,736 83,000 2,148,304 82,515 2,145,927 600,000 593,071 50,000 49,998 610,000 613,715 450,000 419,293 2,300,000 2,000,000 2,186,594 2,112,616 725,000 724,927 685,000 587,796 595,055 599,054 531,000 587,483 1,200,000 1,613,000 946,329 1,305,100 15,135,629 26 15,125,581 5,480,000 1,867,739 124,572 24 124,572 1,822,940 25 1,822,931 1,145,457 21 1,145,457 4,704,184 22 4,702,321 30,670,502 31,153,523 1,716,000 1,644,570 9,848,000 9,237,749 2-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 2-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Projects Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 September 30, 1990 30. Ardsley, N.Y. New Work Approp. 300,000 2,146,000 2,680,000 - 5,569,000 Cost 237,963 496,676 4,186,689 138,790 5,475,442 31. Liberty State Park New Work and Seawall, N.J. Approp. 7,715,000 6,900,000 4,303,000 - 18,603,000 Cost 6,093,751 3,202,496 7,553,581 816,077 17,866,243 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 3. Includes $496,250 for new work for previous projects and $122,051 from public works funds. 4. Excludes $100,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public work fund. 5. Includes $39,465 expended for previous project. 6. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 10. Excludes $1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 12. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 15. Includes $12,809,975 for new work for previous projects and $6,621 for new work for Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 17. Includes $807,000 for new work expended from public works funds and $2,023,308 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 18. Includes $1,160,380 for maintenance for previous project, and $1,621 for maintenance of Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 19. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in O & M funds.) 20. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 21. Includes $220,894 for new work for previous projects. 22. Includes $286,600 for maintenance for previous projects. 23. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 24. Includes $17,000 for new work for previous projects. 25. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 26. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 expended from public works funds. 27. Excludes $34,580 from contributed funds. 28. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. 2-22 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents River and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 104 and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor act of 1965 July 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 1958 River & Harbor Act 1962 River & Harbor Act June 25, 1910 August 13, 1968 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 July 1, 1935 August 30, 1935 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and Progressive Eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths Provided that all research and Planning cost to be borne fully by the United States Modified project to include control of water chestnut BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 1,200 feet wide and not less than 30 feet deep. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) construction of jetty. Channel 10 feet deep. Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet. Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches HEMPSTEAD HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep, 50-80 feet wide. Channel 13 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and turning basin 9 feet deep. Removal of derelict barges HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam. Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, NY Channel 27 feet below Hudson. Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project. Relocation of 12 foot channel between Troy and Waterford. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 122, 56th Cong., 2d sess. (Annual Report 1901, p. 1299) H. Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbor Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Com. Doc. 1, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map). H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 350, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 155, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. 2-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 20, 1938 September 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 2, 1882 FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. (PL99-98) Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 20, 1935 July 14, 1960 June 3, 1896 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 11, 1964 July 14, 1960 August 8, 1917 Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany & Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Construction of jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide. KEYPORT HARBOR, N.J. (See Section 8 of Text) A channel 8 feet deep, 200 feet wide from Raritan Bay to the former Steamboat Dock at Keyport KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, N.J. & N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 44 feet. MAMARONECK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Dredging 10-foot channel and anchorage. Dredging 6-foot anchorage in West Basin and its approach channel. Dredging 6-foot anchorage in East Basin. MATTITUCK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 11 of Text) Dredging 7 foot channel and 2 riprap jetties. 250-foot extension of west jetty. Dredging anchorage area and deepening channel at upper end. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 12 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in inlet and 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Bay and 2 jetties. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 13 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 228, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 77th Cong. R&H Act Public Law 42-153 3d. sess. H. Doc. 651, 66th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 209, 86th Cong., 2nd sess.' 'Contains latest published maps. Annual Report, 1891, p. 843 H. Doc. 8, 71st Cong., Ist sess.' Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645. H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. 2-24 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents September 6, 1933 August 30, 1965 May 28, 1935 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 March 14, 1915 July 3, 1930 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 March 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 August 8, 1917 NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 14 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet. Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of Piles Creek. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 15 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 16 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet for width of 1,000 feet (Dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, December 27, 1986 by authority of Act of August 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel) to 40 feet. Maintenance of entrance channel under 1 head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. Removal of Craven Shoal Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 98th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 91-611, 91st Cong., H.R. 1987 P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. Annual Reports 1887 p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc. 159, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. (contains published map.) H. Doc. 518, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 2-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Mar 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 Aug. 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 PORT CHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 17 of Text) Entrance channel 12 feet deep, thence 10 feet deep to and including turning basin, thence 3 feet deep to head of improvement. Widening turning basin, dredging anchorage basin, and constructing fenders on east bank. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. (See Section 18 of Text) Channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Washington canal 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide to canal locks and 10 feet deep thru South Channel. 7 Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide up to New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge. Channel 10 feet deep in earth and 11 feet in rock to New Brunswick. Width reduced to 100 feet. Relocation of lower reach to South Channel. Channel 25 deep and 300 feet wide to junction of main and south channels, thence of same depth on South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction of main south channels to government wharf, including a turning basin. In South Channel, maintenance of 15-foot channel to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority. SHINNECOCK INLET, N.J. (See Section 19 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in Inlet, and 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Bay, and 2 jetties. SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, N.J. (See Section 20 of Text) 8-foot channel from the first bend in the creek to Main St. Bridge Extension of 8-foot channel to 1,000 feet upstream from Main St. Bridge. 12-foot channel in bay to the first bend in the creek. H. Doc. 1165, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 70th Cong., 2nd sess. (contains published map). H. Doc. 1341, 62nd Cong., 3d. sess. H. Doc. 127, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 454, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 74, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Report on file in the Office. Chief of Engineers (report not printed) H. Doc. 455, 86th Cong., 2d. sess. H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 1st sess. FY 83 Supplemental Appropriations Act H. Doc. 58, 73d Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 673, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 89, 82d Cong., 1st sess. 2-26 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1975 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 1986 Water Resources Development Act Section 501 July 3, 1958 Section 201 Flood Control Act of 1965 1976 Water Resources Development Act 1976 Water Resources Development Act Section 101(a) SHREWSBURY RIVER, N.J. (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 6 feet in North Branch Channel 12 feet deep. H. Doc. 1296, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 157, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Channel 9-feet deep. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 74th Cong. Turning basin and anchorage 6 feet at Red Bank and Channels 6 feet deep in Claypit, Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND) N.Y. (See Section 26 of Text) Provide beach fill to public beach to furnish storm damage protection to the area. Extension of terminal groins at W. 37 St. and Brighton Beach Fillet of beach fill at Sea Gate. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (See Section 27 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and extension of 14 existing groins. ARDSLEY, N.Y. (See Section 30 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, levees, various drainage structures. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. (See Section 31 of Text) Approximately 7,000 feet of seawall and elevated pedestrian walkway. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y., PHASE I (See Section 32 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. H. Doc. 285, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 332, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. modified by Appr. Act for Energy & Water Dev. for FY 85 H. Doc. 215/89/1 H. Rpt. 94-1702 2-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 2-C HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 6 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Complete: 1917 Cost $1,463,014 TABLE 2-E SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (See Section 22 of Text) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES-FY 1990 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore b. Vessel c. Air (helicopter) 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities b. Vessels 3. Disposition of Cases a. Voluntary Restoration b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted c. Permit not required or already under permit d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney e. Cases pending as of October 1, 1982 2-28 2.2 miles 152.6 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 13.0 feet 310 220 6 Total 536 310 220 Total 530 17 18 81 5 313 Total 471 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS - FY 1990 NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED NEW JERSEY Cheesequake Creek..................................................... Aug 90 Keyport Harbor......................................................... Oct 89 Matawan Creek....................................................... Oct 89 Newark Bay Hackensack & Passaic Rivers .................................. Nov 89, Feb 90 Raritan River Cutoff ..................................................... Feb 90 Raritan River................................................................. Jun 90 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo .............................................. May 90 Shark River ........................................................... Aug 90 Shrewsbury River ............................................... Oct, Nov, Dec 89 NEW YORK Bay Ridge & Red Hook Channels ..... Browns Creek .................. Coney Island Channel ............... East Rockaway Inlet............. East River ..................... Flushing Bay & Creek .............. Gowanus Creek Channel ............ Harlem River................... Haverstraw Bay................. Hudson River Channel ............ Huntington Harbor ............... Jamaica Bay ...................... Jones Inlet ..................... Long Island Intra. W'Way........... Mamaroneck Harbor............. Mattituck Harbor................ Moriches Inlet.................. New Rochelle Harbor............. New York Harbor............... New York & New Jersey Channels.... Northport Harbor................ Peekskill Harbor ................ Port Chester Harbor .............. Port Jefferson Harbor ............. Sheepshead Bay ................. Shinnecock Inlet ................ Tarrytown Harbor ............... Westchester Creek............... ....... Jan90 ....... Jun 90 .. Apr-May 90 ....... Mar90 ...... Aug90 ... Mar-Apr 90 ....... Apr90 ....... Oct 89 ....... Mar 90 ....... Jun 90 ....... Mar 90 .... Jan-Feb 90 ....... Oct 89 ....... Oct 89 ....... Jan 90 ....... Oct 89 ........ Jul 90 ................................. .......... Feb ................................ ........... O ct ........................................... Jun ................................ ........... M ar ................................. .......... Sep ................................. .......... O ct ................................ ........... Sep ............................................ Sep ............................ ........... N ov-D ec ................................. .......... Jun ............................. ......... M ay-Jun 90 89 90 90 90 89 90 90 89 90 90 Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1990 was $1,478,415. 2-29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Bay Ridge/Red Hook Channels Bronx River Browns Creek Burlington Harbor, VT. Channel between North & South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, VT. Coney Island Channel, N.Y. East River, N.Y. Eastchester Creek, N.Y. Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y. Flushing Bay & Creek, N.Y. Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. Gordon's Landing, Lake Champlain, VT Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. Great Chazy River, N.Y. Great Kills Harbor, N.Y. Great Lakes to Hudson River WW, N.Y. Great South Bay, N.Y. Greenport Harbor, N.Y. Harlem River, N.Y. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. Huntington Harbor, N.Y. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. Lake Montauk, N.Y. Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. Little Neck Bay, N.Y. Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, NY Matawan Creek, N.J. Milton Harbor, N.Y. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J. Newtown Creek, N.Y. New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. New York State Barge Canal, N.Y. Northport Harbor, N.Y. Peconic River, N.Y. Peekskill Harbor, N.Y. Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. Raritan R-Arthur Kill Cut-Off, N.J. Rondout Harbor, N.Y. Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. Sag Harbor, N.Y. St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, N.Y. Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J. 1989 1987 1987 1966 1909 1973 1988 1989 1953 1988 1986 1982 1972 1980 1962 1976 1974 1953 1969 1989 1953 1988 1987 1970 1969 1989 1984 1984 1989 1986 1971 1988 1956 1953 1951 1986 1931 1977 1988 1989 1895 1964 1917 1985 1967 $5,523,297 27 1,149,946 6 33,976 706,414 9 31,000 111,371 32,723,662 592,056 64,584 2,102,905 29,760 34,750 346,831 18,000 137,301 266,857 74,681 3,616,119 6,771,870 1 91,081 17 4,545,753 791,680 15 76,065 1,741,210 19 235,964 21,000 151,373 18 29,014,500 2 1,168,354 73,214 8 78,644 23 25,000 19,400 198,415 69,406 25 221,128 31 810,500 142,437 98,468 121,805 26 3,125 508,936 56,470 2-30 $36,821,314 2,933,527 673,369 303,555 1,288 341,150 5,132,613 2,636,344 21,571 5,768,978 130,760 115 314,003 292,919 88,029 457 1,290,469 21,720 492,970 25,310,574 57,527 4,814,926 1,003,616 267,768 537 7,962,588 346,529 1,017,768 25,047,361 1,690,748 172,365 11,487 116,500 66,037 256,415 1,299 359,294 3,220,630 3,165,409 249 11,710 385 3,902,330 155,213 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-G (continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. 1988 81,905 28 429,180 Shark River, N.J. 1987 150,000 1,164,813 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. 1948 33,828 64,077 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Bridge across Arthur Kill, N.Y. 1973 7,730,476 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. 1895 7,000- Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. 1974 69,836 431,199 Wallabout Channel, N.Y. 1953 18,174 36,312 Wappinger Creek, N.Y. 1950 13,000 44,691 Washington Canal and South River, NJ 1953 206,116 30 212,827 Westchester Creek, N.Y. 1987 175,933 3,953,935 Woodbridge Creek, N.J. 1953 48,823 178,398 1. Includes $346,800 for maintenance for previous projects. 2. Includes $1,836,400 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $285,600 expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,425,133 for rehabilitation. 15. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 18. Excludes $119,276 required contributed funds and $72,619 other contributed funds. 19. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 27. Includes $1,246,000 for new work for previous projects and 64,560 expended from public works funds. 28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $10,646 for previous projects. 2-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 2-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet 1959 - East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) 1989 $24,905,690 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 1981 18,044,667 217,899 TABLE 2-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Adams Hossie River Basin Mas s 1- . 7 2 a il , L1 ~ l L .~l , 11(U . Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. 1,3 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt.' Elizabeth, N.J. Fire Island to Montauk Point, N.Y. Herkimer, N.Y. Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y.' Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams 4,5,6 Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt. '3 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. North Ellenville, N.Y. Rahway, N.J. Rahway, South Branch, N.J. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, N.J. Rosendale, N. Y. Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh, N.Y. South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y.' South Ellenville, N.Y. South Orange, N.J. Staten Island, N.Y. Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y. 1 " 3 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, Vt. Winooski River, Vt.' Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Yonkers, N.Y. 1959 1963 1985 1984 1973 1956 1939 1965 1968 1978 1971 1979 1981 1975 1976 1987 1967 1984 1981 1983 1959 1976 1940 1970 1984 vA, ., ,, 363,515 2,898,334 54,165,128 12,512,957 1,240,255 1,064,626 238,169 15,572,988 7 3,900,650 973,142 8 15,863,723 11,0671,256 3,684,966 109,702 59,142 1,564,976 289,702 6,857,484 644,998 142,075 1,438,845 5,897,427 1,549,929 13,641,771 'o 2-32 143,753 262 8,200 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-I (continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended. 4. Inactive. 5. Includes $213,507 emergency relief funds. 6. Includes 3,788,341 contributed funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 10. Includes $622,871 contributed funds. TABLE 2-J SURVEYS Study Class Cost Navigation Studies $816,980 Flood Control Studies 3,134,055 Beach Erosion Studies 1,892,583 Special Studies 298,294 TOTAL SURVEYS 6,141,912 Includes review of Authorized Projects, Inspection of Dams, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, Planning Assistance to States, International Water Studies Investigations, Review of FERC Licenses and Preconstruction Engineering and Design. TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES Studies and Services Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $105,317 Flood Plain Management Unit 55,000 TOTAL 160,317 2-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Operation See Annual And Funds Funds and Projects Report For Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenance Bennington, VT (1936 & 41 Acts) Bronx River, N.Y. 4 '6 Brown's Creek, N.Y. Cheesequake Creek, N.J. 4 '6 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. 4 '6 East Rockaway (Debs) Inlet, N.Y.4 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) Elizabeth, N.J. Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. Hempstead Harbor, NY (68 Act) Hudson River, NYC to Albany 4,18 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. Irvington Harbor, N.Y. Lamoille River, Vt. Lemon Creek, NY Manhasset Bay, NY Matawan Creek, NJ (1981 Act) N. Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic River, N.J.16 N.Y. & N.J. Channels4 ,18 Orowoc Creek, NY Portchester Harbor, N.Y. 2' 3 Proctor, Otter Creek Basin, Vt. 6'7 Rahway River, N.J. 6 ' 7 Raritan River, N.Y. 4 ,6 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. 6' 7 Rutland, Otter Creek, VT Swanton Harbor, Vt. (Inactive) 6 Ticonderoga River, N.Y.1,6 Waterford, N.Y. 6,7 Waycake Creek, NJ Westchester Creek, N.Y. 1974 1981 1980 1953 1952 1963 1976 1948 1966 1989 1982 1953 1947 1939 1937 1948 1984 1979 Aug. Aug. Aug. Aug. Aug. 1982 1977 1982 1982 1977 1988 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 1988 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 1988 1988 1988 1988 1,149,946 33,976 40,000 69,489 3,503,969 13 670,000 1,159,946 33,976 8 40,000 69,489 100,000 1,185,365 60,481 60,481 165,882 165,882 4,11 39,468 49,035 68,581,451 49,837 49,837 6,621 21,000 8,800,000 1210,000 829,421 1,947,853 6 505,369 30,675 1,622 - 59,391 - 2,455 76,497 19,546 51,566 1,621 4,636 257,237 1982 Aug. 1982 1982 1949 1967 1937 1948 1981 1959 1963 1888 1895 1951 1939 1949 1981 Aug. 1982 1988 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1988 Aug. 1977 Nov. 1983 Nov. 1981 Aug. 1982 1988 Aug. 1982 433,470 1,551,470 7,000 167,760 9,253 175,933 433,470 4 37,000 4 1,617,470 15 7,000 211,015 70,500 4 16,500 9,253 175,933 4,951 - 441,656 - 307 66,000 10,113,903 - 235 - 1,260 2,781 - 2,921,311 No Commerce reported. Completed. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." Uncomplete portion deauthorized. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed and $31,454 to be contributed. Inactive. Entire project deauthorized. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. Deferred. 10. Under Section 12 Public Law 93-251. 11. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. 12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. 14. Includes $19,546 expended from contributed funds. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 16. 1912 authorization. 17. 1935 authorization. 18. 1910 construction dikes. 2-34 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-N SECTION 107 (See Section 25 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Keyport Harbor, N.J. $3,505 CONTINUE FEASIBILITY STUDY Belford, N.J. 30,279 TABLE 2-P SECTION 205 (See Section 35 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. $12,444 CONTINUE CONSTRUCTION Wallhill River (Black Dirt), N.Y. 113,488 COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION Passaic River Basin, (Sect 205) 18,619 TABLE 2-Q SECTION 14 (See Section 36 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 CONTINUE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Schoharie Creek, N.Y. COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION Green Brook, Green Brook, N.J. COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Green Brook (Regional Center), N.J. $29,480 2,624 7,802 2-35 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small Part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Absecon Creek, NJ .................................................. 3-2 2. Barnegat Inlet, NJ....................................................3-2 3. Cohansey River, NJ ................................................. 3-3 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ...............................................3-3 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA ,and Trenton, NJ...........................3-3 6 Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea ............................................ 3-4 7. Harbor of Refuge.....................................................3-5 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE................................3-5 9. Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE...............................................3-5 10. Inland Waterway from Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE........................................3-6 11. Inland Waterway Rehoboth......................................3-7 to Delaware Bay ...................................................... 3-7 12. Murderkill River, DE...............................................3-7 13. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................................................... 3-7 14. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway ........................ 3-7 15. Schuylkill River, PA................................................3-8 16. Wilmington Harbor, DE ........................................... 3-9 ach Erosion Control Page 17. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ...................................................3-9 18. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization..................................3-10 Flood Control Local Protection Page 19. Beltzville Lake, PA..................... ...................... 3-10 20. Blue Marsh Lake, PA ............................................. 3-10 21. Delaware Coast Protection, DE ............................. 3-11 22. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......................................................... 3-11 23. Emergency Bank Protection...................................3-11 24. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA ................................... 3-12 25. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA.........................................................3-12 26. Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ................................................3-12 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects......................................................3-14 28. Prompton Lake, PA................................................3-15 29. Tamaqua, PA..........................................................3-15 30. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys...................................................................3-15 31. National Emergency Preparedness ........................ 3-15 General Investigations 32. 33. 34. Tables Page Surveys .................................................................... 3-15 Collection and Study of Basic Data.......................3-16 Preconstruction, Engineering and Design .............. 3-16 Page TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial Statement................3-15 TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation.........................3-19 TABLE 3-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects................................3-24 TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects........................3-26 TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 3-26 TABLE 3-F Multiple Purpose Project Including Power.....................................3-27 TABLE 3-G Deauthorized Projects............................3-27 All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 Be "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" NAVIGATION 1 ABSECON INLET, NJ Location: On New Jersey coast about 65 miles north of Delaware breakwater, between Brigantine Beach on the north and Absecon Beach on the south, it forms an entrance to the harbor at Atlantic City, NJ. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 826 and 1217). Previous project: For details see Annual Report for 1936 page 319. Existing project: This provides for an inlet entrance channel 20 feet deep at mean low water and 400 feet wide, for an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the inlet channel Clam Creek, and for a turning basin 15 feet deep within Clam Creek. The act authorizing the inlet entrance channel also provides that if the channel should at anytime have a deleterious effect on the Atlantic City Beach, work upon the improvements may cease;it being understood that the project is adopted on the basis that the interests of the beach in front of the city are superior to those of the inlet. The total length of the section included in the project is about 1.5 miles. The extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed May 1957, Inlet channel was completed in 1938. Dredging entrance from inlet channel in Clam Creek was completed in 1957. The cost for the completed project was $307,712. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for maintenance when and as required for the dredging of the entrance channel into Clam Creek and turning basin within Clam Creek. Terminal facilities: See pages 239 and 240 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: BCR economic update was completed. 2. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main the entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Previous Project: None Existingproject: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 1935 and modified as HD 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language stating that the existing project has not worked as projected and, in fact, has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following administratively approved modifications are to be constructed as design deficiency correction measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, extending from the existing groin located near the Barnegat Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction would be placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and new south jetties, and would be stabilized by vegetation and sand fence. Dredged material from maintenance operations would be placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1988) Federal share is $27,900,000 and non-Federal is $15,250,000. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was executed on 20 March 1987. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operation during fiscal year: New Work, contract: Construction of South Jetty, aerial photography and tide gaging. New Work, hired labor: Engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, and supervision and administration. Dredging by the U.S. Government Side Casting Dredge Merritt was accomplished from October 25, 1989 to December 3, 1989 removing 40,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $278,200 and from July 31, 1990 to September 4, 1990 removing 43,500 cy at a total cost of $212,000. Work also included maintenance dredging by Dredge CURRITUCK from March 12, 1990 to June 1, 1990 removing 96,200 cubic yards of material. 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT 3. COHANSEY RIVER, NJ Location: Rises in Salem County, NJ, flows southerly and southwesterly 27 miles through Cumberland County, and empties into Delaware Bay about 62 miles below Philadelphia, PA.(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218). Previous projects: For details see page 1785, Annual Report for 1915,and page 348, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from that depth in Delaware Bay through a neck of land at the mouth and within the river to the south side of Glass Street in Bridgeton, 19 miles above the mouth; thence a channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide to Broad Street; and thence 75 feet wide to Commerce Street Bridge, 19.25 miles above the mouth; and a turning basin 12 feet deep and 800 feet long formed by widening the channel on the south side to a maximum width of 250 feet just below Glass Street. Section included in project is about 19.5 miles long. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. Extreme tidal range is from about 2 feet below mean low water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Completed project cost $110,756 for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Existing project was completed in 1939. Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for required maintenance. Terminal facilities: Twenty wharves, of which 16 are at Bridgeton and 4 at Greenwich. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included supervision and administration. Maintenance Contract: Work included dredging from 23 February 90 to 13 April 1990, removal of 124,500 cubic yards at a cost of $844,208. 4. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942.(For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included BCR review, plans and specifications. Dredging by Hopper Dredge Schweizer from 17 January 1990 to 4 February 1990 removing 64,000 cubic yards and from 6 August 1990 to 17 August 1990 removing 70,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $195,500. 5. DELIAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA, AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous projects: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S.Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the vicinity 3-3 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Stream gaging by USGS. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 6. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous projects: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938 Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to AlleghenyAvenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end ofchapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 8-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on the waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work Maintenance dredging by Norfolk Dredging Company from 01 October 1989 to 31 January 1990 removing a total of 2,732,313 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,430,700. Dredging was accomplished by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company from 01 December 1989 to 22 December 1989 removing 50,000 cubic yards of material; and from 10 September 1990 to 30 September 1990 removing 1,129,000 cubic yards at a cost of $1,462,620. Dredging was accomplished by American Dredging Company from 24 May 1990 to 04 August 1990 removing 65,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,364,305. 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT Maintenance, hired labor: Work included construction of dikes and sluices, disposal ditching, and plans and specifications on maintenance dredging, subsurface testing, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 7. HARBOR OF REFUGE LocationAt lower end of Delaware Bay, a few miles from Atlantic Ocean on Delaware side of bay. It is about 120 miles south of New York Harbor, about 114 miles north of entrance to Chesapeake Bay and about 101 miles from Philadelphia, Pa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1218, 1219 and 379.) Previous projects: For details see Annual Reports for 1874, Chart 11, page 146; page 330; and 1938, page 330. Existing project: Existing project was completed in 1951. Controlling depth at low water in channel in July 1963 was 16.8 feet. For details see page 229 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: See page 229 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, plans and specifications and dredging. 8. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No.1219.) Previous projects: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steelsheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing;, thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included inlet scour, survey dredging, and stabilization study. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included inlet scour and supervision and administration. 9. WATERWAY FROM INDIAN RIVER INLET TO REHOBOTH BAY DE Location: In southeasterly part of Sussex County, connects Rehoboth Bay with Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No.1219.) Previous projects: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from water of 6-foot depth in Rehoboth Bay to water of the same depth in Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.7 miles. The mean tidal range in the vicinity of project in Rehoboth Bay is 0.5 foot; in Indian River Bay 0.9 foot. The extreme tidal range is from 1.5 feet below mean low water to about 2.5 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project was $90,908, exclusive of $20,000 contributed by local interests. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (H. Doc) No. 304, 81st Cong., 1st sess.). The latest published map is in the project document. Local cooperation: The act authorizing the project provides that local interests shall give assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for initial work and subsequent maintenance when and as 3-5 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" required; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds; and (c) make a cash contribution of $20,000 toward the construction of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were approved on February 27, 1956. Condition of local cooperation have been complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for subsequent maintenance as required. Terminal facilities: There are no terminal or transfer facilities in the area that are fully open to public use. However, existing facilities that are available on a limited basis are adequate for the present demand, and can be expected to expand to meet future needs. Operations during fiscal year:Maintenance, hired labor: Work included plans and specification and maintenance. 10. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY DE, AND MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 milesdown Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous projects: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep;dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21,1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening of the Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is federal cost $135,300,000 and nonfederal cost $15,245,000 (October 1987). Major Rehabilitation of St. Georges and Summit Bridges are estimated at $27,000,000 federal cost. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $145,000 (July 1954). (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-ofway required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance of bridges. There was also maintenance dredging by Norfolk Dredging Coinpany from 01 October 1989 to 09 March 1990 and from 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT 26 September to 30 September 1990 removing a total of 981,908 at a cost of $3,301,401. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, maintenance of rip-rap, roadways, canal banks, night lighting, building, grounds, and banks, drainage of disposal areas, lease of equipment, bridge inspections, engineering surveys, environmental monitoring, maintenance dredging, plans and specifications, mosquito control, construction of dikes, ditching, engineering and design, supervision and administration. 11. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, DE It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous project: A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet widefrom the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of the one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge to Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. The Sheet Pile Jetty at the Delaware Bay entrance was removed during FY 1987. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance hired labor: Work included survey on maintenance dredging, plans and specifications, and supervision and administration. 12. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of Jwly 13, 1892 (H. EL Doc. 21,52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). Latest published map is in House Document 1058,62d Congress 3d Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included engineering and design. 13. NAVIGATION WORKUNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant To Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Name of Project Cost to 30 September 1990 Feasibility Reports Wills Hole Thorofare, Pt. Pleasant, NJ $75,877 Gardners Basin, NJ $43,571 14. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south 3-7 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525,79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240,82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized, for preconstruction engineering and design, a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvements. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included Pt. Pleasant bulkhead coating Phase 1,2&3 and shore to shore contract. Bank stabilization, repair bank erosion, subsurface boring Cape May Canal was accomplished. There was maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company from October 01, 1989 to December 21, 1989 removing 214,459 cubic yards of material at a cost of $391,769 and from February 13, 1990 to October 19, 1990 removing 347,514 cubic yards of material at a costof $1,356,881. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, bank stabilization, dikes construction, maintenance dredging, Bay Jetty repairs, Atlantic City sub generator, coating of Pt. Pleasant Canal bulkhead phase 1,2&3, plans & specifications and supervision and administration. 15. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuykill County, PA, flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24,1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, bcr update general maintenance, engineering and design and supervision and administration. 16. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passingthrough the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous projects: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No.4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, epproximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 38 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 320 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962.) Authority from Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 provide for channel and turning basin deepening from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990. See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included plans and specifications, water quality and shad monitoring lease of equipment, construction of disposal area, subsurface testing, investigation of a sunken vessel, and USGS Stream Gaging. There was maintenance dredging by American Dredging Company from 23 April 1990 to 22 May 1990 removing a total of 504,334 cubic yards of material at a cost of $526,810. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, drainage and construction of dikes and sluices disposal area and dredge monitoring, surveys, environmental coordination for reef design, maintenance of Stream Gaging by USGS, ditching, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Beach Erosion Control: 17. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ Location: The proposed project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project: The plan, as presented in HD 94- 641, was authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance Engineering and Design by Section 101a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981, 3-9 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" determined that only beach erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan proposed in that document consists of modifying the existing navigation project for Cape May Inlet to provide; a weir-breakwater at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore Avenues in Cape May City; placement of beachfill between Cape May Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a beach monitoring program in Lower Township area. Project estimate costs (October 1988) is Federal, $79,151,000, which includes $27,651.000 of Coast Guard contributions non-Federal costs are $6,490,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their willingness to comply with the above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent on 31 May 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work was accomplished on Groin contract, and USCG Beachfill contract. New Work, hired labor: Work was accomplished on reevaluation of benefits, real estate activities, and supervision and administration. 18. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHLORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Name of project Cost to 30 September 1990 Construction North Shore-Indian River Inlet $98,861 South Shore-Indian River Inlet $24,153 Lewes Delaware $ 990 Flood Control 19. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The constrution of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included recreation safety program, USGS Stream Gaging equipment, snow survey program, repair and maintenance of specific gages, water quality testing and monitoring, bulkhead water quality monitoring, painting of service bridge, monumentation survey, and repair outlet channel side slope. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, safety inspection, and USGS Stream Gaging. Work also included water quality testing and monitoring, test and evaluation of emergency bulkhead, water control, plans and specifications on bulkhead, replacement of valves, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 20. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was com- 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT pleted in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acrefeet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Cost of project $63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance, recreation safety program, sewage treatment plant, sewage vacuum system, USGS Stream Gaging, snow survey and NOAA Weather Service Cooperation. Work also included maintenance and repair of specific gages, water quality testing and monitoring, installation of computer terminal and peripherals, lawn maintenance, janitorial services, trash removal, purchase and repair of water supply equipment, and cost incurred for Lower Heidelberg Township police department. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir and recreation area, annual safety inspection, instrumentation and surveillance, installation of WCDS equipment, reservoir regulation data collection, water quality testing and monitoring. There was joint use of water facilities, erosion control, repair access road, plans and specifications on treatment plant roof, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Also incurred were costs for seasonal employment at recreation area and boat launch repairs. 21 DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware- Maryland border. Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, and the initial periodic nourishment was completed in 1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. which consists of the construction of a sand bypass system and periodic nourishment until 2027. (For details, see S. Doc. 90,90th Cong. 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1988) $10,000,000 includes $11,600,000 required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Other work undertaken has been engineering and design associated for the remaining portion of the project. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Section 869 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized the unsheeduled portion of the project. Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included construction of sand bypassing plant. New work, hired labor: Work included planning management, engineering and design and supervision and administration. 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORKUNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1990 Reconnaissance Reports Newton Creek, Woodlynne, NJ $16,959 Little Mill Creek, New Castle Cty,DE $14,097 Pocono Creek, Stroudsburg,PA $14,623 Willsey Creek, Wurtsboro, NJ $69,772 Feasibility Reports Assunpink Creek Basin, NJ $2,368 Lehigh River Basin, PA $1,200 Shabakunk Creek, Ewing, NJ $6,519 Palmerton, PA $73,301 Construction Pennypack Creek, Hatboro, PA Poquessing Creek Bucks County, PA $57,223 $659 Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $200,762 for disaster preparedness. 23. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Feasibility Reports Manasquan River, NJ Reconnaissance Reports Little Neshaminy Creek, PA $31,934 $7,819 Existing project: Provides a plan of improvement 3-11 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" Construction Darby Creek-Lansdowne Borough, PA $303 Delaware River-Fort Mifflin, PA $142,956 24. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA(See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587,79th Cong.,2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522,87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, constructing a new intake tower, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 264 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1988) is $21,200 including $108,800 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is completed. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission expressed its support by a resolution dated 23 April 1980 and reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1985, October 1985, and July 1988. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included general maintenance, USGS Stream Gage repair & maintenance, repair access road, analysis mapping, snow surveys, NOAA Weather Service, water quality testing and monitoring, and monumentation of surveys. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir and recreation facilities, instrumentation and surveillance of reservoir, repair access road, safety inspection, initial reservoir filling plan, emergency planning, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, installation of WCDS equipment, reservoir regulation data collection, water quality testing and monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 25. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Project completed in June 1960. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1990.) Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included instrumentation survey, USGS Stream Gaging, and NOAA Weather Service. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of the reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, safety inspection and training, water control, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 26. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May and Atlantic Counties, New Jersey. Great Egg Harbor Inlet, an unimproved inlet, is about 1.1 miles wide at its narrowest point and provides a tidal connection between the Atlantic Ocean and Great Egg Harbor Bay, the New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway, and Great Egg Harbor River. Peck Beach is occupied in its entirety by the City of Ocean City and extends from Great Egg Harbor Inlet southward to Corson Inlet. The ocean frontage is about eight miles in length. Existing project: The recommended plan consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. The beachfill will extend from Surf Road southwest to 34th Street with 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT a 1000 foot taper south of 34th Street. This plan will require the initial placement of 4,118,000 cubic yards of material and subsequent periodic nourishment of approximately 1,072,000 cubic yards every three years. The material for the initial construction, and periodic nourishment will be taken from the ebb shoal area located approximately 5,000 feet offshore of the Great Egg Harbor Inlet. Additionally, The construction of the project will require the extention of 38 storm drain pipes. All work is programmed. Local Cooperation: Federal participation in the proposed project is recommended and contingent on the local sponsor signing the Local Cooperation Agreement which identifies the required items of cooperation. The State of New Jersey reiterated their support of the project in a letter dated 17 April, 1989 which stated that they have reviewed the preliminary Draft LCA dated to March 1989 and found it acceptable. The state also provided three options for financing their share of project costs, and pending approval of the final General Design Memorandum recommending project construction the State, indicated its willingness to enter into a contract enforceable in court, with the United States of America as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611,42 U.S.C. 196d-5b) and by the Water Resource Development ACT of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) to fulfill the required items of local cooperation as set out in the preliminary draft LCA. Operations during fiscal year: New work, hired labor: Work included engineering and design, plans and specifications, and supervision and administration. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT INSPECTION DATES Lehigh River at Allentown, PA 31 October 1989 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA Delaware River at East Branch,NY Rancocas Creek at Mount Holly, NJ Chester Creek at Chester, PA 19 May 1990 18 October 1989 30 May 1990 16 November 1989 5 June 1990 16 January 1990 15 June 1990 18 December 1989 29 June 1990 Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection Cape May to Barnegat, NJ 20-21 September 1990 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $31,685. 28. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1988) is $47,200,000 including $41,600,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was preconstruction engineering and design. Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in 1966 and suspended in 1968 and resumed in FY 1986. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included instrumentation survey, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, NOAA Weather Service, repair and maintenance of specific gages, water quality monitoring and testing, and installation of relief well. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, periodic inspection, water quality monitoring and testing, repair access road, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 3-13 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" 29. TAMAQUA, PA Location: The authorized project is located in Tamaqua Borough and Walker Township, PA. Both municipalities are within Schuylkill County. Existing project: The project as authorized provides for a 2,930-foot long tunnel, 10 feet in diameter with appurtenant structures, through Sharp Mountain. The tunnel would extend from Wabash Creek on the west boundary of Tamaqua to the Little Schuylkill River just south of its confluence with Wabash Creek. The proposed basin, and a 70-foot long highway bridge. The Phase I portion of the advance engineering and design was completed in 1981. The findings from that phase resulted in the addition of a small dry detention dam to the project plan. Phase II of advance engineering and design was completed in 1984 and reduced the level of protection to 100-year. This reduced the tunnel's diameter to 9 feet. Estimated cost of project (October 1988) is $13,450,000 including $3,360,000 required non-Federal costs. The local sponsor, by letter of October 2, 1985, requested the project be constructed in two stages. It was also requested that the tunnel be constructed first followed by the dam. Local cooperation: The Borough of Tamaqua is the local sponsor. The borough, by letter of June 25, 1938, indicated its intention to comply with the items of local cooperation. The assurance was reaffirmed by the Borough on September 2, 1977, September 2, 1980, and again on October 2, 1985. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Engineering and design work was accomplished. 30. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition Surveys Salem River, NJ Lewes and Rehoboth Canal, Murderkill, DE Cohansey River, NJ Broadkill River, DE Date Survey Conducted March 1990 DE 15 May 1990 05 September 1990 January-February 1990 15 May 1990 31 NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $123.196. General Investigations 32. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $561,322 for navigation studies: $293,503 for flood control studies: $1,150,806 for special studies: a total of $2,005,631 33. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $344,371. 34. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Cost and expenditures during the period $171,524 for navigation studies; $340,947 for flood control; $1,453 for beach erosian: a total of $490,126. 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 SEPT. 30,1990 1. Absecon Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) 2. Barnegat Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Cohansey River, NJ (Regular Funds) 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River between Phila delphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Delaware River, PA NJ AND DE Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds)* 7. Harbor of Refuge (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 26,312 4,425,000 1,442,663 619,000 624,227 1,992,000 226,659 27,000 5,218,000 7,025,000 3,795,557 8,449,126 711,000 734,000 709,603 727,851 - 4,550,000 1,616,239 3,523,189 132,000 324,000 137,808 327,772 18,940 19,499 6,052,000 7,018,368 984,798 979,610 57,300 956,181 56,228 953,820 158,000 331,000 173,000 1,028,344 151,386 333,407 178,547 1,024,244 261,000 4,729,000 1,757,000 469,630 260,475 4,730,789 1,766,834 470,428 14,655,000 12,145,000 13,316,400 11,341,749 14,662,843 12,143,791 13,275,220 11,251,631 18,000 17,939 21,781 21,678 534,209 534,209 5,985,3022 5,985,1732 23,503,849 21,425,654 13,573,933 13,558,346 4,175,000 4,721,899 146,756 21 146,756 21 3,742,412 3,738,842 879,275 879,275 4,346,851 4,342,408 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,00010 150,000 10 72,147,800s 72,147,800 40,058,4904 40,058,7544 15,000 15,000 57,879,872 5 57,879,8726 375,402,30119 375,238,28619 508,324 508,324 5,162,2306 5,162,2306 1,169,144 1,169,014 3-15 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" TABLE 3-A (Contined) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 SEPT. 30,1990 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 30,000 400,000 30,145 388,801 23,000 103,245 33,804 103,045 9. Waterway Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Inland Waterway From Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, and MD (Regular Funds) 11. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Murderkill River, DE (Regular Funds) 13. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 37,217 37,217 21,925,400 10,272,600 6,566,500 11,003,107 21,846,349 6,095,000 6,065,412 335,800 338,986 41,000 43,653 10,345,251 3,697,000 3,713,393 1,200 (1,155) 6,527,440 576,000 578,316 11,049,585 3,343,031 3,364,748 43,400 309,880 44,600 303,428 90,908 90,908 291,050 291,050 132,535,5918 132,532,5988 209,332,365s 209,287,991 9 13,711,031 3,721,869 561,514 561,514 2,222,258 2,215,706 60,000 60,000 37,630 37,630 800 335,100 540 335,016 21,781 20,082 2,533,000 3,185,000 1,648,000 3,060,445 2,478,900 3,239,387 1,643,711 3,062,892 1,667,036 1,664,358 71,549 n 71,549 32,572,316 12 32,567,46912 1,196,581 1,196,581 99,000 99,000 3-16 511,210 18 511,210 3,384,168 3,383,535 1,323,775 1,323,775 210,000 210,000 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 SEPT. 30,1990 14. Schuvlkill New Work River, PA (Regular Funds) 15. Wilmington Harbor, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ (Regular Funds) 17. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (Regular Funds) 18. Beltzville Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 19. Blue Marsh Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 20. Delaware Coast Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (Regular Funds) 22. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (Regular Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 104,000 954,000 141,000 1,351,520 97,895 957,727 140,940 1,345,895 13,826,200 10,887,000 13,768,314 10,869,878 - 225,850 - 82,437 5,585,800 4,824,340 5,613,926 4,866,118 97,431 33,468 - 159,000 - 40,600 150,000 125,000 4,759,000 130,150 139,258 3,502,390 - - 200,000 - - 58,993 2,213,000 1,282,829 - 100 - - - 700 - - 617,500 658,000 406,500 562,914 635,506 637,498 427,026 519,341 (1,551) (1,730) 11,874 970 1,106,322 1,308,000 1,442,500 1,315,772 1,122,178 1,282,070 1,429,509 1,355,899 9,080 1,052 - 1,100,000 13,587 920,187 - - 900,000 - - 712,986 474,500 451,000 549,000 465,297 465,096 546,206 545,089 30,000 30,000 135,427 570,928 585,470 153,524 155,500 145,000 129,000 170,816 156,995 151,308 114,381 3,334,007 13 3,334,007 1s 28,617,553 28,609,276 1,954,72514 1,954,725 14 70,128,805 70,115,366 285,850 273,336 159,000 140,600 7,397,000 5,204,627 * 200,000 58,993 22,931,831 22,931,130 7,563,089 7,517,635 63,180,300 63,178,836 11,734,794 11,712,290 4,103,95320 3,684,83520 215,350 215,350 1,033,473 1,033,473 12,403,43216 12,351,84516 7,038,949 7,034,692 4,073,105 4,073,105 2,171,064 2,138,097 3-17 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" TABLE 3-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 SEPT.30,1989 23. Prompton Lake New Work Approp - - - - 4,609,4831 (Regular Cost - - - - 4,609,483 Funds) Maint. Approp. 296,000 1,031,000 506,700 537,779 5,071,666 Cost 282,282 1,043,084 497,921 541,355 5,062,366 24. Tamaqua, PA New Work Approp. 50,000 40,000 11,399 20,000 645,0001 (Regular Cost 34,712 53,887 12,448 3,467 628,4671 Funds) Maint. Approp. - - - - Cost - - - - *Total adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. 1. Includes $116,497 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes $23,786 for Maintenance for previous projects. 3. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) toDelaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project underl954 modification. 4. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000Jobs Bill Funds. 5. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 6. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 7. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, fiscal year 1963. 8. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Job Bill Funds. 10. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds. 11. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 12. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department Funds expended for maintenance. 13. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 14. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $40,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 16. Includes 63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710Recreation Facilities, excluded $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 17. Transfer from Baltimore District in Fiscal Year 1989. 18. Excluded $10,000for previous projects. 19. Includes$1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 20. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 21. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Dcuments Sept.22, 1922 July 24, 1946 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 2, 1985 Mar 2, 1907 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 19352 Aug 26,1937 July 24, 1946 Sept 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 ABSECON INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) An inlet entrance channel 20 feet deep. A channel 15 feet deep into Clam Creek and a turning basin. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 2 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. COHANSEY RIVER, NJ (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 feet deep over entire project. Channel 12 feet deep to Glass Street, thence 8 feet to Commerce Street with turning basin. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 5 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., H.Doc. 375,67th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 594,79th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 119, 73d Con.,2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 85 74th Con.,2d sess. H. Doc.358,79th Cong 2d sess. H. Doc.236,99th Cong 2d sess. H. Doc.645,59th Cong 1st sess. Senate Committee print, 75th Cong.,lst sess. H. Doc.388,59th Cong 2nd sess. H. Doc.262,77th Cong 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc.'358, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong. 2d sess. 3-19 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19353 June 20, 19384 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 June 3, 1896 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200,13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. HARBOR OF REFUGE (See Section 7 of Text) Breakwater construction Construction of 10 ice piers Construction of 5 additional ice piers Channel 18 feet deep to Queen Anne pier at Lewes, DE(No work has been done on this channel.) Channel 15 feet deep to pier of Atlantic Fisheries Co. about 0.7 mile east of Queen Anne pier. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 8 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. WATERWAY FROM INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY TO REHOBOTH BAY, DE (See Section 9 of Text) Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Rehoboth Bay to Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. Project length is about 2.7 miles. H. Doe. 304, 71st Cong. 2d sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3d sess. 1 H. Doc. 580,76th Cong. 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong. 1st sess. 1 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83rd Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong. 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 112.53rd Cong. 2d sess (subproject, approved by War Department, Apr 23, 1900.) Subproject, War Department, June30, 1902.) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 70th 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56 74th ng., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong. 1st seas. H. Doc. 330,76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 81-304, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 30, 1935 Aug 7, 1939 Sept 3, 1954 Aug 30, 1935 July 25, 1912 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 July 13, 1982 NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. To increase the depth of the 2,000, foot reach of the Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 15 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 10 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay. For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 11 of text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 12 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. H.Doc. 133,76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.525 79th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 3-21 H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 18 and 24, 736 Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong. 2d sess. H.Doc.275,73d Cong. 2d sess.. H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 1 75th Cong., 2st sess. H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Ex.Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess.)(See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) July 1, 1954 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 8, 1917 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990" TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts WorkAuthorized Documents July 3, 1930 July 24, 1946 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2d ses 1 H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2d sess A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 16 of Text Depths of 21,10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion ofjetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ (See Section 17 of Text) Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; maintenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply flood control and recreation BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 20 of Text) Provides for multiple purpose development for water supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is located on Tulpehocken Creek about 1 1/2 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about six miles northwest of Reading, PA. Rivers & Harbors Act of 1968 WRDAof 1986 H. Doc.522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 3-22 )H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 12501 H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2d sess. June 3,1896 July 25,1912 Sep 22,1922 July 3,1930 Aug 30, 19358 Oct 17, 1940 July 14, 1960 Nov 17, 1986 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov 17, 1986 H. Doc.90, 90th Cong 2nd sess. WRDA of 1986 Sec. 869 DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet. Project is modified to authorized the construction of sand bypass facilities and stone revetmen erosion control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (See Section 24 of Text) Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir Provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA (See Section 25 of Text) A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ (See Section 26 of Text) Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. Consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. PROMPTON LAKE, PA (See Section 28 of Text) Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. River and Harbor Act of 1965. WRDA of 1986. H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works AdministrationSeptember 6,1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935 3. Also Public Works Administration 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide fromPhiladelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 6. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 8. Also May 28,1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. 9. Deauthorized the remaining portion of the project. 3-23 H. Doc 587, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 522,87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Nov 17, 1986 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990" TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1990 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, NJ Alloway Creek, NJ Appoquinimink River,DE Big Timber Creek, NJ Broadkill River, DE Ceder Creek, Sussex City, DE Cooper River, NJ 2 1 Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ Double Creek, NJ' Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay Little River, DE Mantua Creek, NJ Maurice River, NJ Delaware Bay to Millville Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project ** Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA Oldmans Creek, NJ ** Pepper Creek, DE Raccoon Creek, NJ St. Jones River, DE Delaware Bay to Lebanon 1 '11 Jetties and entrance at mouth Manasquan River, NJ 2 1 Mispillion River, NJ 2 1 Murderkill River, NJ Schuylkilj River above Fairmount Dam, PA Smyrna River, DE Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing11 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. Toms River, NJ Channel 5 feet deep1 Channel 12 feet deeps Tuckerton Creek, NJ Woodbury Creek, NJ' COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-G COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-G COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-G COMPLETED COMPLETED 1989 1989 1934 1989 1976 1989 1989 1912 1981 1980 1966 1948 1968 1941 1989 1981 1961 1986 1989 1986 1955 1949 1950 1986 1940 11,935 21,398 36,973 58,665 68,228 256,100 33,102 256,624 7,800 168,41213 12,016 169,687 143,98421 128,20316 31,188 138,09422 83,6651 5 207,102 8,006,80718,20 385,34822 37,630 4,291,810 198,844 10,050 60,242 27,09312 84,186 55,117 41,270 71,925 243,641 285,095 396,528* 5 98,36014 288,310 339,340 161,913 - 54,601 32,125 * 38,988 341,734 66,093 - 3,417,55719 1,871,80723 1,265,067 5 197,327 33,311 638,860 56,474 3-24 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1990 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alloway Creek 1 INACTIVE 1931 21,398 35,761 Aquatic Plant Control INACTIVE 1975 87,594 - Dennis Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1897 4,701 - Goshen Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA1" 6 INACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE "'6 INACTIVE 1898 224,704 - Leipsic River, DE' INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 Little Egg Harbor, NJ "'4 INACTIVE - 15,048 - Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth INACTIVE 1948 - - For Last Full Report Cost to September 30,1990 See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon 1'l - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth9 DEFERRED - - - 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress, e1sSt ees. 4. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 5. Harbor not now required by commerce. 6. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 7. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Deferred 9. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expendedonprevious projects. 10. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 11. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 12. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. 13. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous project. 15. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 16. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 17. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal funds. 18. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 19. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 20. Includes $555,600 for previous project. 21. 10 & 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 22. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 23. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previous projects. 'Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. ** Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-25 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990" TABLE 3-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30,1990 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Brigantine Island ACTIVE - - - Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach,NJ ACTIVE 1978 314,400 - Hereford Inlet ACTIVE - - - Long Beach Island ACTIVE - - - Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ ACTIVE - - - Atlantic City, NJ INACTIVE 1972 2,083,289 -1 Ocean City, NJ INACTIVE 1969 395,831 -1 Stone Harbor, NJ INACTIVE 1961 - - Barnegat Light, NJ DEFERRED 1964 70,908 1 Cape May City, NJ DEFERRED 1961 22,9572 _1 Long Beach Island, NJ DEFERRED 1964 40,665 1 North Wildwood, NJ DEFERRED 1961 - -1 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE4 1965 326,116 -1 Ventnor, Margate and Longport,NJ DEFERRED 1961 - 1- 1. Operation and maintenance required under Public Works 3. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Acceleraion Program for by law to be assumed by local interests. Federal participation expended under extension of five existing Extension of five existing groins completed groins completed 11 May 1964. 2. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public 11 May 1964. Works funds 4. This project was included in and modified by the Delaware Coast expended for extension project. * NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1990 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 -1 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 1 Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 1 Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 - Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA INACTIVE 1984 335,299- 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing 3. $1,316,464 expended for preconstruction planning only. project. 2. New project deferred. 3-26 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1990" TABLE 3-F MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1990 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Tocks Island Lake, PA, NJ and NY2 1979 65,106,2601 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only) PA 1979 195,223 - 1. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. thority to proceed with the project. Legislation would be required to 2. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps' au- proceed with the project. TABLE 3-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Appoquinimink River, DE1 1931 3 Oct 78 HD 95-351 $ 78,243- Aquashicola Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918- Chester River, 17 Nov 86 Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 $ 7,139- Delaware River, Mouth of 5 Aug 77 Neversink 1917 HD 94-192 - - Maurice River, NJ 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 Millville fixecbridge to upper end of project - - Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Oldmans Creek, NJ3 1941 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 63,313- Rancocas River, NJ 4 1942 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 57,590- Smyrna River, DE5 1949 2 Nov 79 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed HD 95-157 $396,169- bridge. Toms River, NJ 6 1950 2 Nov 79 Channel 12 feet deep Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 43,361- Trexler Lake, PA 1981 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 76 Stat. 1180 Flood Control Projects 2 Nov 79 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA7 Section 12 1966 PL 93-251 $4,520,995 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Includes $10,050 new work, and $33,311 for maintenance. 7. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 3-27 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT * This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Annapolis Harbor, MD ............... 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA .............. 3. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift ...... 4. Cambridge Harbor, MD ............... 5. Chester River, MD ................... 6. Crisfield Harbor, MD............... 7. Fishing Bay, MD .................... 8. Fishing Creek, MD ................... 9. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD ........ 10. Knapps Narrows, MD ............... 11. Little Wicomico River, VA ............. 12. Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, MD ..... 13. Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork), DE & MD ........ 14. Neale Sound, MD .................... 15. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD .............. 16. Pocomoke River, MD ............ . ... 17. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift ............. 18. Potomac River-Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC......... 19. Potomac River below Washington, DC.................. 20. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD .............. 21. St. Jeromes Creek, MD ............... 22. Washington Harbor, DC .............. 23. Wicomico River, MD ................. 24. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.. 25. Navigation work under special authorization ............. ....... Page 4-3 4-3 4-4 4-4 4-5 4-5 4-6 4-6 4-6 4-7 4-7 4-7 4-8 4-8 4-8 4-9 4-9 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-11 4-11 4-11 4-11 Beach Erosion Control 26. Beach Erosion Control Work under special authorization .......... 27. Atlantic Coast of Maryland ........... Flood Control 28. Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV.... 29. Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD.................. 30. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV.. 31. Lackawanna River Basin, PA .......... 31A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA ........... 32. Lock Haven, PA .................... 33. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA .................. 34. Southern New York Flood Control Projects .................. 34A. Addison, NY ...................... 34B. Almond Lake, NY .................... 34C. Arkport Dam, NY .................. 34D. Avoca, NY .......................... 34E. Binghamton, NY ..................... 34F. Canisteo, NY ........................ 34G. Corning, NY ...................... 34H. East Sidney Lake, NY ................ 34I. Elmira, NY ....................... 34J. Hornell, NY ......................... 34K. Lisle, NY ......................... 34L. Oxford, NY ......................... 34M. Whitney Point Lake, NY .............. 34N. Whitney Point Village, NY ............ 35. Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA.............. 36. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA ......................... 37. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA .............. 4-1 Page 4-12 4-12 4-12 4-13 4-13 4-13 4-13 4-14 4-14 4-14 4-14 4-14 4-14 4-15 4-15 4-15 4-16 4-16 4-16 4-17 4-17 4-17 4-18 4-18 4-18 4-18 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Flood Control (cont'd) 37A. Cowanesque Lake, PA ............... 37B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ............ 38. Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock Township, PA ......... 39. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA ......................... 39A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA .............. 39B. Curwensville Lake, PA ................ 39C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA ........ 40. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA ........... 41. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 42. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ........................ 43. Flood Control Work under special authorization ...................... Water Supply 44. Washington Aqueduct ................ Page 4-19 4-19 4-20 4-20 4-20 4-20 4-21 4-21 4-21 4-21 4-21 4-22 General Investigations Page 45. Surveys ............................ 4-22 46. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 4-22 47. Pre-construction Engineering and Design ............................ 4-22 Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement ...... 4-24 Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ........... .4-30 Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............. 4-36 Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects................. 4-37 Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................. 4-38 Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 4-39 Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................ 4-40 Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects .............. 4-41 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Navigation 1. ANNAPOLIS HARBOR, MD Location. Annapolis Harbor includes certain portions of the Severn River and College and Spa Creeks bordering the city of Annapolis, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1225, 550, and 566.) Previous project. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act of June 14, 1880. For further details see page 353, Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. This provides for a channel 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Severn River to a point in Spa Creek opposite the city slip and an anchorage basin of 12 feet depth just below the county highway bridge over the creek. The mean range of tide is about 0.9 foot. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. The water front from the mouth of Spa Creek to the highway bridge is developed to a large extent for commercial purposes. On the north bank of the stream, just above the Naval Academy wall, there is a ferry dock and a lumber wharf, both of pile-and-timber construction. Above the steamboat dock is the city slip. In addition to an open frontage owned by the city of Annapolis, this slip is occupied by two oil companies, a sea-food packing house, a sand-and-gravel yard, an ice plant, and a hardware and marine supply company. Between the city slip and the bridge a concrete bulkhead and a yacht basin have been built. On the southern bank of Spa Creek there are four marine repair plants, two of which are below the bridge. One plant has four marine railways, with capacities ranging from 50 to 275 tons. Each of the other three plants has one railway of about 20-ton capacity. Most of the wharves are privately owned and not open to the public. The old steamboat wharf and the city slip are used by the public to some extent. Boats are not generally permitted to land along the Naval Academy wall. The existing facilities are considered adequate for present needs. Operations and results during fiscal year: Studying project modifications under the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Local interests desire that the existing channel location and anchorages be modified in order to improve navigational safety and mooring efficiency within the harbor. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50- foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 20.2 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Sections; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch: (a) Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles; (b) Ferry Bar West Section: a channel, 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide, from the Ferry Bar East Section to Ferry Bar, a distance of 0.8 mile; (c) Spring Garden Section: a channel, 27 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from Ferry Bar to and including a turning and anchorage basin immediately below the Western Maryland Railway Bridge, a distance of 1.0 mile; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. 4-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 c. The following anchorages: (1) Quarantine Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 600 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; (3) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (4) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $376,441,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $38,411,000 for work completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and $329,700,000 (October 1988 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $460,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $329,240,000 is Corps of Engineers and non- Federal. Widening 35-foot depth from Port Covington Channel from 150 to 400 feet to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at upper end is considered inactive and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $1,603,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The three grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 13 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1983)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: Construction of the work authorized by the River & Harbor Act of 1970 was initiated in February 1987. New work dredging, by contract, of 12,702,000 cubic yards at a cost of $43,854,300 to deepen the Craighill Entrance, Craighill Channel, Craighill Upper Range, Cutoff Angle, Brewerton Channel, Brewerton Angle, Fort McHenry Channel, and Curtis Bay Channel from 42 to 50 feet, and to complete deepening the East Channel, Northwest Branch from 35 feet to 49 feet (Maryland Channels II contract) commenced on August 18, 1989 and was approximately 95 percent complete as of September 30, 1990. New Work, Norfolk District: New work dredging, by contract, to deepen the Cape Henry Channel from 42 to 50 feet commenced on April 5, 1989 and was completed on November 5, 1989 at a cost of $13,653,725. A total of 2,857,700 cubic yards of material were dredged, of which 1,550,700 cubic yards were deposited at the Dam Neck ocean disposal area, 1,174,000 cubic yards were placed on Virginia Beach, and 133,000 cubic yards were placed on East Ocean View beach. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of 1,559,100 cubic yards of material from the Craighill Entrance, Craighill Channel, Craighill Upper Range, Cutoff Angle, Brewerton Channel, Brewerton Angle, and Fort McHenry Channel at a cost of $4,926,400 commenced on August 18, 1989, in conjunction with new work dredging of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of 1970 and was approximately 95% complete as of September 30, 1990. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of 1,428,600 cubic yards of material from the Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension at a cost of $3,521,498 commenced on May 4, 1990 and was approximately 18% complete as of September 30, 1990. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys of the project channels were made. 3. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 13,500 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 4. CAMBRIDGE HARBOR, MD Location. This harbor is a tidal estuary on the south side of Choptank River about 18 miles above its mouth. 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT It is approximately 70 miles southeast of Baltimore Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Previous project. For details see page 1789 of Annual Report for 1915, page 424 of Annual Report for 1924, and page 373 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 25 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in the Choptank River for an approximate distance of 2,000 feet; then widen into a triangular shaped turning basin 25 feet deep, 1,400 feet long and 750 feet wide; then continue with a channel 150 feet wide and 14 feet deep to the Market Street Bridge over Cambridge Creek; then 100 feet wide and 14 feet deep to the head of the harbor with a turning basin of the same depth at the head of the channel; an anchorage basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet long and 175 feet wide on the west side of the channel; another basin of the same depth, 225 feet long, and 200 feet wide on the east side of the channel below the bridge; and a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the Choptank River to the municipal boat basin north of the harbor entrance. The modification authorized by the 1948 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in December 1989. This work included a channel 150 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the Market Street Bridge over Cambridge Creek; then 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the head of the harbor with a turning basin of the same depth and irregular dimensions comprising approximately 2.4 acres. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. The waterfront of Cambridge is generally built of solid bulkhead wharves and pile and timber piers, only a few of which have mechanical freighthandling facilities. With the exception of a State owned terminal which is open to the public, the wharves are privately owned. There are town marine railways with boatrepair shops, five oil and gasoline terminals, two large fertilizer companies and one large packing house located on the shore of Cambridge Creek. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Studying various modifications to the existing Federal navigation channel and anchorages within Cambridge Creek under the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local interests desire that the channel width be reduced along certain reaches in order to enchance waterfront development projects. 5. CHESTER RIVER, MD Location. Rises in Kent County, DE, flows 50 miles generally southwesterly and empties into the Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on the easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 miles south of the highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 548 and 1226.) Previous project. For details see page 262 of the 1960 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing, section includes in project is about 5.5 miles long with the lower end of the section being about 37 miles above mouth of river; for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet square at head of channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows was deauthorized and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance of Wells Cove section of the project. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead wharves on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated mostly by the 7 marinas located on the Narrows with the remainder being owned and operated by the seafood packing houses in the area. In addition to the slips of the marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, and a public landing. All facilities are privately owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 6. CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD Location. Along western limits of town of Crisfield on east bank of Little Annemessex River, an estuary of Tangier Sound on east side of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 279 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 425 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to Somers Cove Light, thence 266 feet wide to the bend about 1,800 feet southwest of railroad pier, and thence of irregular width to a point opposite Consumers Ice Co.; a spur channel 10 feet deep and 100 4-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 feet wide from the ice plant to Hop Point; a channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Little Annemessex River via Cedar Creek, a landcut, and Daugherty Creek Canal to Big Annemessex River; a mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide and about 875 feet long roughly parallel to Brick Kiln Road, with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading therefrom to 7-foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big Annemessex Rivers; and an anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long, with an approach channel 10 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 10-foot depth curve in Little Annemessex River through the present entrance to Somers Cove. Mean range of tide at Crisfield is about 1.9 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished spoil disposal areas for fiscal year 1990 maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Waterfront of Crisfield Harbor is built up principally with solid-bulkhead wharves and pileand- timber piers. Most wharves are privately owned, but are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Few of the terminals have mechanical freighthandling devices, but most of the freight is transferred by hand. There are three boat-repair yards with marine railways having capacities up to 250 tons. Existing terminals are adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. Sufficient areas are available north of Hop Point and on Somers Cove for construction of additional terminals as needed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed on September 1, 1990. A total of 130,000 cubic yards of material was removed. 7. FISHING BAY, MD Location. McCreadys, Goose, and Farm Creeks are small tidal estuaries of Fishing Bay, a large estuary at head of Tangier Sound. Fishing Bay is connected by Hooper Strait with Chesapeake Bay to the west about 15 miles above mouth of Potomac River. Goose Creek enters the bay about 3.5 miles above the mouth. Farm Creek enters Fishing Bay about 6 miles above the mouth and approximately opposite mouth of McCreadys Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for channels 6 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide at mean low water, suitable widened where necessary to offer adequate sheltered anchorage space from deep water in Fishing Bay to vicinity of county or packing house wharves in McCreadys, Farm, and Goose Creeks. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Terminal facilities. A public wharf built with aid of Federal funds is on McCreadys Creek about 200 feet above the mouth. There is a privately owned pile-andtimber pier about 1,500 feet above the mouth of Goose Creek. There are two privately owned wharves on Farm Creek and a public wharf owned by Dorchester County. Private wharves on each of the waterways are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract for McCready Creek and Farm Creek were completed on June 17, 1990. A total of 43,964 cubic yards of material was removed in Farm Creek and 30,355 cubic yards in McCready Creek. 8. FISHING CREEK, MD Location. A narrow winding tidal stream which enters Chesapeake Bay from the west 56 miles south of Baltimore and about 26 miles south of Annapolis, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12266.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 and 60 feet from deep water in the Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in marsh 500 feet above mouth of creek, and twin stone jetties at entrance; north jetty is about 1,050 feet long, and south jetty about 1,100 feet long. The mean range of tide is about 1 foot. Cost of new work for the completed project was $111,242. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Seven hundred feet of bulkhead wharf are available on the south side of the entrance channel running west from bay shore, and the U.S. Navy Department constructed a pile-and-timber wharf on west side of basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 9. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Islands and the mainlands; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Islands. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Islands; the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek with a turning basin of the same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at the head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $66,119. 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Local cooperation. Local interests furnished spoil placement areas for maintenance dredging in fiscal year 1990. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, 4 oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonable prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed on July 2, 1990. A total of 156,000 cubic yards was removed. 10. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Location. A small channel separating Tilghman Island from mainland of eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles south of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, MD. Mean range of tide is 1.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $46,121. Existing project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration, September 16, 1933, and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf exists on each side of the southerly abutment of the bridge across the Narrows. There are several small-boat landings within the Narrows and several marine railways for repairing boats of a few feet in draft. A bulkhead landing is available for public use at the turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 11. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland County, VA, flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, which it enters on the right bank one-half mile upstream of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1223.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water in the Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties, extending to the 8-foot contour in Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from the inner ends thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River to stabilize the dredged inner channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at the entrance are: Mean 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public and numerous small wharves and stagings for private use, an oyster shucking, and packing plant, and a marine railway and boat-building yard. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on July 9, 1990. Estimated completion date is October 1990. 12. MUDDY HOOK/TYLER COVES, MD Location. Muddy Hook Cove is a small indentation about 0.7 mile south of Hoopersville on the east side of Middle Hooper Island. Middle Hooper Island is one of a chain of islands separating Honga River from Tar Bay and Chesapeake Bay on the Eastern Shore of Maryland. Tyler Cove is a small tidal indentation on the north side of Fishing Creek which separates Hooper Islands from the mainland. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12230.) Existing project. An entrance channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Honga River to an including an anchorage basin of the same depth, 160 feet wide and 400 feet long, in Muddy Hook Cove. Project also provides an entrance channel, 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from the existing channel in Fishing Creek (See Honga River and Tar Bay project) into Tyler Cove and includes an anchorage basin 200 feet wide, 250 feet long, and 6 feet deep. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $61,917. Existing project was approved for accomplishment under general authority provided by section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, pay for dike construction and provide rights-of-way for new work and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; build and maintain a suitable public landing with adequate approaches thereto at each location; accomplish alterations, relocations, and removal, as required, of sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities, and piers and stakes. Terminal facilities. Local interests have, under terms of local cooperation, provided a public landing at Tyler Cove. A few privately owned piers are on Muddy Hook Cove. Local interests provided a public landing at Muddy Hook Cove, in accordance with the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract for Tyler Cove was completed on July 2, 1990. A total of 3,100 cubic yards of material was removed. 4-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 13. NANTICOKE RIVER (INCLUDING NORTHWEST FORK), DE & MD Location. Headwaters of Nanticoke River consist of numerous branches rising mainly in the northern portion of Sussex County, DE. The river is about 50 miles long and flows southwesterly from its source to Tangier Sound. Northwest Fork is a branch of Nanticoke River which rises in Kent County, DE, and flows past Federalsburg, MD, generally southerly through Dorchester County, MD, to its junction with the main river opposite Riverton, MD. It is about 30 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 77.) Existing project. Nanticoke River: Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to the highway bridge at Seaford, DE, with a turning basin at the upper end. Disjointed sections included in the project is about 4 miles long, extending over 32 miles of river; lower end of the first section of the project is about 8 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 3.4 feet, and the extreme tidal range is 4.3 feet. Northwest Fork: Dredging a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide at mean low water from upper Browns wharf to within one-half mile of the southern boundary of town of Federalsburg, with a turning basin at the upper end. Section included in the project is about 4 miles long, and its lower end is 11.75 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished a spoil disposal area for proposed fiscal year 1990 maintenance dredging. Locals are also required to hold and save the United States free from all damages. Terminal facilities. Waterfront at Seaford consists largely of unconnected pile-and-timber bulkhead wharves with earthfills. One public wharf is used as a launching ramp. Remaining wharves are privately owned. A rail siding extends along a considerable portion 'f waterfront and offers facilities for interchange of rail and water traffic. Existing terminals are reasonably adequate for present and prospective commerce. Terminal facilities on Northwest Fork are all privately owned and open to general public use. They consist of one solid bulkhead wharf of 80-foot frontage and 3 landings each with 60-foot frontages. Depths of water are from 2 to 8 feet. Landings are log revetments backed by earthfill and are in poor condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract for Nanticoke River at Seaford, Sussex County, Delaware was completed on March 14, 1990. A total of 34,196 cubic yards of material was removed. 14. NEALE SOUND, MD Location. A tidal estuary of Wicomico River, Charles County, MD, near the junction of Potomac and Wicomico Rivers, 38 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay and 70 miles downstream from Washington, D.C. Neale Sound is 1.5 miles long and flows southeasterly parallel with Potomac River, from which it is separated by Cobb Island and a marshy barrier shore which is breached in a number of places. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide through lower entrance into Wicomico River and a second channel 6 feet deep at upper entrance extending from deep water within the south through a marshy barrier at head of Cobb Island to deep water in the Potomac with widths of 60 feet within the sound and 80 feet elswhere. Mean range of tide is 1.9 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,600, exclusive of $1,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish releases from damages and spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. Four wharves open to the public, numerous small privately-owned wharves and stages and two small marine railways are located on the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on July 9, 1990. Estimated completion date is January 1991. 15. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1220.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 200 feet wide and 10 feet deep through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep to the project harbor; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. The modification authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in December 1989. This work included 16 and 14 foot depth channels with widths from 300 to 100 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to the head of the harbor. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 19, 1990. A total of 52,000 cubic yards of material will be removed. Estimated completion date is October 1990. 16. POCOMOKE RIVER, MD Location. Pocomoke River is a tributary of Pocomoke Sound, a tidal estuary on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles north of Cape Charles, VA. Existing project. Provides for a channel 11 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from the 11-foot depth in Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and for construction of a dike along the offshore side of channel between Tulls Point and the end of the existing dike; and a channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 to 130 feet wide from Shad Landing to the bridge at Snow Hill. Length of project is about 8.7 miles from Pocomoke Sound to Williams Point, and about 4.5 miles from Shad Landing to Snow Hill, MD. Shad Landing is about 25.7 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet in Pocomoke Sound and 2.5 feet in the river at Snow Hill. Prolonged high winds on Chesapeake Bay frequently cause greater fluctuations. Estimated cost (1969) for new work is $1,071,458 exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Extension of channel above the bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep and widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end was deauthorized and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Complied with for section of project from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River and from Shad Landing to the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by acts of June 3, 1896, and August 30, 1935, except local interests must furnish releases from damage to oyster beds and spoil disposal areas as required for future maintenance. Terms for the section of the project above the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by act of March 2, 1945, required local interests to furnish all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages resulting from the improvement; and contribute one-half the initial cost of that portion of project, but not to exceed $4,250. This portion was deauthorized. Terms for the 11-foot depth channel from Pocomoke Sound to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, authorized by act of September 3, 1954, and deauthorized in December 1989 required local interests to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of the project; and hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance, including such damages as may occur to the public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Waterfronts at Pocomoke City and Snow Hill are built up principally with earthfilled timber bulkheads, the majority of which are privately owned. A few of the warehouses and factories on the river at these communities have railroad sidings and mechanical freighthandling facilities. Any appreciable increase in commerce at Pocomoke City or Snow Hill would necessitate construction of new facilities and repair of existing structures. Adequate space is available for development of additional terminals. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed on September 1, 1990. A total of 32,700 cubic yards of material was removed. 17. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 19 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 182,520 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 4-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 18. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Location. The project is located in the Potomac River and its tributaries with the northern boundary at Chain Bridge in Washington, DC extending southward to the U.S. Route 301 Bridge (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart 12289). Existing project. On July 2, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 302 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized the control of hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 6, 1986 between the Corps, MD, VA, DC and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The LCA which must be reexecuted annually expired on September 30, 1990 included the following provisions: 1. Local sponsors share 50 percent of the program cost; 2. Local sponsors provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 3. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments is responsible for coordinating local interests and issuing work orders for the program. Terminal facilities. There are 75 marina activities between DC and the U.S. Route 50 Bridge providing approximately 3,400 commercial and recreational boat slips and 50 boat ramps. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Harvesting operations resulted in 37 acres of nuisance aquatic plants at sites in Maryland and Virginia. There were no harvesting operations conducted in District of Columbia this fiscal year. 19. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Location. Potomac River is formed 21 miles below Cumberland, MD, and flows southeasterly about 285 miles and enters Chesapeake Bay, about 80 miles from Atlantic Ocean. Washington, DC is 108 miles upstream of mouth, and head of tidewater is at mile 117. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 557, 558, 559, and 560.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between the mouth of the river and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC a distance of 108 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 1.3 feet at mouth, 2.9 feet at Washington; irregular, 2 feet at mouth, 4.5 feet at Washington; extreme, about 6 feet at mouth, 10.7 feet at Washington. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $153,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In general, the improvement is a main river channel, and terminal facilities are only served where the channel runs close to either bank of river. In all, 11 wharves are thus served. These wharves are of open and solid fill construction and bulkhead type. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 20. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 75 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks and/or fishing appurtenance. There were eight detailed investigations of obstructions or sunken vessels/wrecks. Of these, two required removal actions. 21. ST. JEROMES CREEK, MD Location. St. Jeromes Creek is a tidal estuary in St. Marys County, MD, 2.5 miles long flowing in a southeasterly direction and entering the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of Point Lookout, at the mouth of the Potomac River. The creek is 86 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Chesapeake Bay to the Vicinity of Airedele, thence 60 feet wide to deep water in the creek, with a turning basin of the same depth 200 feet wide and 300 feet long opposite Airedele. The project is 4,900 feet long. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean 1.3 feet, and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The cost of the Federal Government for new work, for the completed project was $17,857, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. There are numerous privatelyowned wharves, 2 of which are open to the public. It is considered that the present terminal facilities are adequate for present and prospective commerce. 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 22. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within District of Columbia at junction of Anacostia River with Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. A combination and extension of latest projects for Potomac River at Washington, DC, and Anacostia River, DC. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers are open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 23. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is site of improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, section included in project is 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet; deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pileand- timber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 24. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). 4-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Fiscal year costs were $9,010 for Cambridge Harbor, MD; $1,019 for Island Creek, St. Marys Co., MD; $19,216 for Solomon Island Harbor, MD; and $26,381 for Tedious Creek, Dorchester Co., MD; $37,869 for Chester River, Queen Annes Co., MD; $5,849 for Nanticoke River, MD; $2,997 for Ocean City Harbor and Inlet, Worcester Co., MD; and $849 for Shallow Creek, Spur Channel, MD. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $7,140 for Solomon Island Harbor, MD. Beach Erosion Control 26. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $33,095 for town of North Beach, MD. 27. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Location. The project is located on Fenwick Island at Ocean City, Maryland which is about 35 miles south of the entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1220.) Existing project. Provides for a steel sheetpile bulkhead along the oceanward edge of the boardwalk from about 4th Street to 27th Street and a sand dune from 27th Street to about 0.3 miles across the Delaware line. The bulkhead will be fronted by a 165-foot wide beach and the dune will be fronted by a 100-foot wide beach. The project also provides for periodic nourishment over the 50-year project life. The current estimated total project cost is $348,900,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 30, 1990. The sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other facilities; pay 35% of the first costs and 47% of periodic nourishment costs; and bear all costs of operation maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of storm damage reduction facilities. To date the sponsor has fully complied with these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts were awarded for the beachfill and dune work on May 11, 1990, which is 47% complete, and for the bulkhead work on August 3, 1990, which is 5% complete. Flood Control 28. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On North Branch of Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with the South Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements of North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal costs of new work for the completed project were $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removal of gravel deposits, grass cutting of areas channelward of levees, and removal of brush and debris from channel were accomplished as required in channel area. 29. ISLE OF WIGHT BAY, OCEAN CITY, MD Location. The project is located on Chicago Avenue along the Isle of Wight Bay between 2nd and 4th Streets, in downtown Ocean City, Worcester County, Maryland. Ocean City is located on the Atlantic Ocean approximately 20 miles south of the Maryland-Delaware line. (See NOAA Chart No. 12211.) Existing project. On October 6, 1988 the Chief of Engineers, under the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, authorized the construction of shoreline protection. The work consists of the placement of 3,500 tons of stone against a deteriorated steel sheetpile bulkhead along Chicago Avenue. This stone is required to prevent the bayward movement of the bulkhead due to increased scour at the toe of bulkhead. The estimated project implementation cost is $520,000 of which the sponsor will be paying $127,600. 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Local cooperation. The July 14, 1988 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and Ocean City, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and related utilities; operate and maintain completed works; hold and save U.S. from damages; pay 25 percent of the total project costs; provide cash contribution not less than 5 percent of total project costs; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the $500,000 Federal limitation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was completed on May 25, 1990. The contractor submitted several contract claims which are under review. 30. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, "Kitzmiller" and "Westernport," MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Estimated cost (October 1986) of new work is $176,270,300 of which $58,521,700 is required non- Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia has been executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 31. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 31A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interest include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. In September 1978 a cost-sharing agreement for construction of bathhouse facilities was signed. The cost for the facilities which were completed in July 1979 was $104,400 of which $52,200 was Federal and $52,200 was non- Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32. LOCK HAVEN, PA Location. On the West Branch Susquehanna River in the City of Lock Haven, PA about 194 miles above the mouth of the Susquehanna River in Clinton County, Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Lock Haven and Mile Hall, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, five ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility reloca- 4-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 tions, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. The current estimated total project cost is $86,400,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Lock Haven Area Flood Protection Authority, a municpal authority created by the City of Lock Haven and Woodward Township, is the sponsor for the project. Negotiations on the Local Cooperation Agreement continued through the fiscal year. The local sponsor will be required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities, pay 5% of structural flood control costs during construction; pay 50% of separable recreation costs; and bear all operation maintenance and replacement costs for the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and negotiations on the Local Cooperation Agreement continued. 33. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, hiking, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Construction of a private hydroelectric plant at Raystown Lake was completed May 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 34A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscaroroa Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a draining area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 34C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 125 feet of existing flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17; a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bennetts Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bennetts Creek and the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main 4-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street; 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Flood protection for this community was originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1936. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls; about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operaton and maintenance of the project continued. 34H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract was awarded on April 12, 1989 in the amount of $950,500 to stabilize the weir. Work was completed in May 1990. 34I. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Phase I of a contract for removal of sediment from selected locations along the project was awarded in May 1990. Estimated completion date is October 1990. Phase II of the contract was awarded in July 1990. This contract will repair and replace floodwalls, replace check dams and other miscellaneous repairs to slopes and channels. Estimated completion date is November 1991. 34K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River, realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 4-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract was awarded on April 13, 1989 in the amount of $328,820 to stabilize the weir and completed in March 1990. 34N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35. SPRING BROOK CREEK, PITTSTON TOWNSHIP, PA Location. The project is located in the Township of Pittston along the banks of Spring Brook Creek adjacent to PA state route 502. Pittston Township is located in northeastern Luzerne County, PA approximately 1 mile southeast of Scranton, PA. (See USGS quad sheets "Pittston, PA" and "Avoca, PA".) Existing project. On January 26, 1989, the Chief of Engineers, under the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, authorized construction of streambank protection. The work consists of the excavation and backfilling of the existing streambank and placement of approximately 870 feet of stone riprap. Additional riprap is being placed as a betterment that was proposed by the sponsor. The estimated project implementation cost is $460,000, of which the sponsor will be paying $115,000 as well as providing $40,000 for the betterment. Local cooperation. The July 24, 1989 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and Pittston Township, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and related utilities; operate and maintain completed works; hold and save U.S. from damages; pay 25 percent of the total project costs; provide cash contribution not less than 5 percent of total project costs; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the $500,000 Federal limitation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was awarded on September 30, 1989 in the amount of $325,000 and was completed in June 1990. 36. STILLWATER LAKE LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and the remainder utilized to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres,and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 37. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 37A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project constructed under the Flood Control Act of 1958 provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing day-use recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1988) of the modification is $54,314,000 of which $1,110,000 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $53,204,000 is non- Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocated to water supply storage, $12,680,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $1,110,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contract work on recreation modifications, fish and wildlife mitigation improvements, and reservoir clearing was completed and work continued on modifications to the intake tower. Maintenance: normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 37B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Estimated Federal cost (October 1988) of new work is $193,120,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction, $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations and $7,500,000 is for construction of the Mill Creek recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required on the completed portion of the project; however, construction of the Mill Creek Area recreation facilities relies on local interests providing specialized facilities including buildings, lodges, demonstration centers, and non-water oriented equipment and accepting full responsibility for operation and maintenance of the entire recreation area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Planning for the joint development of the Mill Creek 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Recreation Area was terminated since the local sponsor was unable to finance the specialized facilities described under Local Cooperation above. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 38. TUNKHANNOCK CREEK, TUNKHANNOCK, PA Location. The project is situated on Tunkhannock Creek adjacent to Saint Peter's Episcopal Church located in the town of Tunkhannock, Wyoming County, PA. The town of Tunkhannock is located approximately 15 miles northwest of Scranton, PA. (See USGS quad. sheet titled Tunkhannock, PA.) Existing project. On September 22, 1988, the Chief of Engineers, under the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, authorized the construction of streambank protection. The work consists of the removal of a shoal in the creek and the placement of fill material capped with stone riprap along approximately 250 feet of the streambank. The estimated project implementation cost is $223,400 of which $55,000 will be funded by the Local sponsor. Local cooperation. The November 25, 1988 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and Tunkhannock Township, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and related utilities; operate and maintain completed works; hold and save U.S. from damages; pay 25 percent of the total project costs; provide cash contribution not less than 5 percent of total project costs; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the $500,000 Federal limitation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was awarded on September 30, 1989 in the amount of $160,000 and was completed in April 1990. 39. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek) and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard) on the West Branch about 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, PA; on Kettle Creek 8.4 miles above the mouth and 17 miles upstream from Renovo, PA; and on Bald Eagle Creek about one mile upstream from Blanchard, PA, respectively. In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 39A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure,about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Recreation facilities are provided for camping, fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, winter sports, hunting, and swimming by the State of Pennsylvania at Kettle Creek State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent at Clearfield. Clearfield County provides recreation including boating, fishing, picnicking, and swimming. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. A contract to automate piezometers was awarded on July 12, 1990. Estimated completion date is November 1990. 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 39C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, camping, fishing, picnicking, hunting, swimming, hiking, and winter sports by the State of Pennsylvania at Bald Eagle State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Pennsylvania-York and Hanover.) Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. Dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. Reservoir will control entire drainage area of the main branch of' Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Phase I of a contract to repair streambank slope protection, repair concrete, and restore adequate freeboard requirements along Codorus Creek was awarded on May 22, 1990, in the amount of $940,055. Estimated completion date is March 1991. 41. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See Table 4-I. 42. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $29,475. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $70,061. 43. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Cost for the period was $284,961 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $244 for Conklin-Kirkwood NY. Non-structural study for Conklin-Broome (Ice Jam) NY; $2,009 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD; $29,576 for Solomons Creek, Ashley, PA; $34 for Sterrick Creek, PA; $174 Binghamton (Lourdes Hospital Area), NY; $35 for Hunting Creek, Thurmont, MD; and $1,431 for Frankstown Branch, PA; and $247 for Solomons Island, Calvert Co., MD. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $1,816 for Gwynns Falls, MD. 4-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Water Supply 44. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in Chief of Engineers (See Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. An uninterrupted and adequate supply of purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1990 was 67,784 million gallons; the maximum daily consumption was 250 million gallons and average daily consumption was 186 million gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, VA was 42.2 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed in the amount of $5,838,210 for water furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. The treated water delivered to the 1.1 million consumers served by the Washington Aqueduct met or surpassed all Water Quality standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.I. 93-523.) General Investigations 45. SURVEYS Federal costs for the fiscal year were $1,768,620 of which $1,086,935 was for flood damage prevention studies, $103,380 for shoreline protection studies, $262,324 for special studies, $129,941 for special investigations, $27,949 for interagency Water Resource development, and $158,091 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $132,613 for shoreline protection studies, and $489,856 for flood damage prevention studies. 46. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $293,119. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 47. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Susquehanna Basin at Harrisburg, PA-The authorized project provides for an impervious railroad embankment/ floodwall line of protection 3,800 feet long, a pump station and floodgates for interior drainage, a dry detention dam along Asylum Run (a small tributary of Paxton Creek), an enlarged earth and concrete channel for Paxton Creek about 4 miles long, and minor recreation and fish and wildlife facilities. The General Design Memorandum was terminated during the fiscal year due to lack of economic justification. Non-structural flood control measures are being identified to reduce the effects of future flood events. The planning and engineering cost is $2,952,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $136,845. Lock Haven, PA-The authorized project provides for 36,600 feet of levee, 1,000 feet of flood wall, five closure structures, one pumping station, non-structural flood control measures for Woodward Township, and minor recreation facilities. Plans and specifications were essentially completed for the West Branch Susquehanna River levees. The planning and engineering cost is $4,547,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $35,364. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising)-The authorized project provides for raising the existing levees and flood walls between 3 and 5 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities, and providing some new flood walls and levees to maintain the system's integrity. The plan also includes raising four other local protection projects, removing an abandoned railroad bridge, and providing non-structural measures to mitigate any significant induced damages and the potential of a catastrophic failure of an existing project. Preparation of a Phase II General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $7,700,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $1,337,981. Atlantic Coast of Maryland & Assateague Island, VA-The authorized project provides for constructing a steel sheet pile bulkhead about 1.5 miles, and construct- 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT ing a sand dune about 6.7 miles for hurricane protection. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum was essentially completed during the fiscal year. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,640,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $55,263. Washington, DC & Vicinity-The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street) regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year and total costs were $295,157. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,300,000. Moorefield, WV-The plan of improvement recommended in the final feasibility report dated March 1990 includes 21,735 feet of earth levee, 1,290 feet of floodwall, replacement of the South Branch Valley Railroad bridge, and appurtenant project features, such as ramps, closures, riprap, and relocations. Preparation of a project management plan was initiated during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,000,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $95,117. Petersburg, WV-The plan of improvement recommended in the final feasibility report dated January 1990 includes 19,370 feet of earth levee, 920 feet of floodwall, 35,430 cubic yards of channel excavation near the Main Street bridge, bridge replacement/modification and appurtenant project features, such as ramps, closures, riprap, relocations, and ponding areas for local drainage. Preparation of a project management plan and surveying and mapping were initiated during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,000,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $257,313. 4-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 1. Annapolis Harbor, MD 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA 3. Baltimore Harbor MD Collection & Removal of Drift 4. Cambridge Harbor, MD 5. Chester River, MD 6. Crisfield Harbor, MD 7. Fishing Bay, MD 8. Fishing Creek, MD 9. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 34,2501 34,250' 37,366 37,361 20,000 19,995 25,579,000 31,700,000 14,100,000 18,096,000 142,230,7122 25,840,645 28,277,257 17,579,367 17,818,943 141,881,3622 5,992,2043 5,992,0274 17,674,000 17,198,010 217,000 217,002 10,000 10,000 2,501,5045 2,498,0186 22,186,480 21,171,953 228,000 228,000 176,700 176,699 26,870 5,869 262.000 261,999 50,200 50,200 48,000 48,000 3,748,485' 3,752,0648 13,178,920 13,769,831 224,000 223,999 61,000 61,001 -7,680 13,321 -3,000 -2,999 4,455,0639 4,316,75510 12,714,500 12,690,072 337,789 337,776 6,000 3,158 20,000 19,623 53,000 1,098,912 52,995 1,097,835 331,000 330,999 49,700 49,702 486,368 486,369 17,580 17,433 38,000 38,000 70,000 1,041,509 70,000 1,041,241 90,114,907" 89,976,510"1 65,753,900 64,829,866 4,353,999 4,353,984 195,97412 195,97412 931,958 929,116 19,190 19,190 70,49513 70,49513 1,658,924 1,658,547 349,154' 4 349,154" 4 1,772,433 1,771,351 33,874" 5 33,874 ' 5 1,580,960 1,580,960 111,242 111,242 1,439,680 1,439,533 66,11916 66,11916 4,148,435 4,148,167 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 10. Knapps Narrows, MD 11. Little Wicomico River, VA 12. Muddy Hook & Tyler Coves, MD 13. Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork DE & MD 14. Neale Sound, MD 15. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 16. Pocomoke River, MD 17. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection & Removal of Drift 18. Potomac River- Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC 19. Potomac River below Washington, DC 402,200 401,998 -67,500 -67,498 46,121'7 46,121' 7 5,000 4,282 1,892,575 1,891,85716 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 45,000 45,001 81,88518 81,88518 207,970 206,874 240,331 240,273 51,800 51,800 53,200 53,196 24,555 28,946 40,000 40,000 1,665,177 1,664,081 64,001 64,001 666,130 666,072 143,13419 143,13419 1,097,517 1,097,499 12,60020 12,60020 460,989 460,140 350,19321 350,19321 10,160,480 10,156,992 4,335,900 4,335,900 191,72622 191,72622 2,046,473 2,045,392 8,358,675 8,358,414 1,858,065 1,723,022 291,866 287,333 153,836 153,836 2,101,894 2,101,121 12,100 12,102 497,000 497,000 481,200 480,942 164,000 156,250 177,000 103.844 407,740 407,726 112,218 111,369 382,772 379,284 439,938 438,857 565,500 565,240 94,000 -24,925 69,320 68,562 40,000 40,000 33,000 33,000 575,800 575,767 162,065 127,424 80,781 120.462 100,000 99,574 74,100 74,100 36,000 36,000 516,000 516,324 175,000 257,475 -20,278 27.202 55,900 56,312 4-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 20. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD 21. St. Jeromes Creek, MD 22. Washington Harbor, DC 23. Wicomico River, MD 27. Atlantic Coast 28. Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV 29. Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD 30. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD & WV 31A. Aylesworth Lake Creek, PA 32. Lock Haven, PA Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 85,000 85,011 444,000 444,000 43,300 43,299 47,800 47,800 32,000 32,000 372,000 372,000 543,005 543,005 23,675 19,838 20,000 19,996 13,887 13,529 5,900,045 5,900,045 44,35723 44,35723 467,217 463,380 3,191,07724 3,191,07724 4,908,18325,26 4,907,82125,26 471,60927 471.60927 366,000 365,999 993,000 993,000 742,000 742,002 56,252 55,624 - 8,085,000 - 5,490,279 - 6,417,600 - 2,866,545 64,000 63,998 9,500 9,337 71,000 71,002 71,000 57,902 72,000 72,000 313,800 231,421 127,612 85,083 68,184 68,184 7,500 87,450 2,500 41,119 1,121,700 1,113,900 1,244,200 1,272,444 1,111,628 1,119,760 1,247,520 1,264,520 116,900 116,104 113,000 113,740 214,000 213,962 105,321 99,214 1,045,000 925,615 8,119,989 8,119,361 8,085,000 5,490,279 6,417,600 2,866,545 15,633,97028 15,633,97028 914,413 914,413 401,800 386,110 130,112 126,202 176,325,300 176,321,783 10,486,222 10,477,376 2,320,400 2,320,400 1,512,823 1,506,615 1,045,000 925,615 4-26 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 33. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 34A. Addison, NY 34B. Almond Lake, NY 34C. Arkport Dam, NY 34D. Avoca, NY 34E. Binghamton, NY 34F. Canisteo, NY 34G. Corning, NY 34H. East Sidney Lake, NY 34I. Elmira, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,149,400 2,279,865 2,568,100 2,358,655 2,160,024 2,263,777 2,587,911 2,342,366 9,300 9,309 324,800 322,169 199,900 199,401 31,300 31,300 320,000 20,392 28,700 28,700 27,800 27,827 50,100 50,100 378,800 378,421 27,600 27,603 6,700 6,700 307,535 308,416 144,100 143,850 9,200 9,200 415,000 396,857 17,400 17,400 45,100 45,100 43,800 43,800 13,800 13,780 322,000 323,336 142,000 141,763 9,100 9,098 30,000 50,271 30,700 30,700 42,400 42,366 26,700 26,655 364,500 1,130,600 364,266 1,130,829 7,900 7,900 12,100 12,100 9,700 9,430 301,106 295,354 136,538 136,743 8,300 8,285 26,200 24,087 45,800 44,150 50,200 49,386 690,852 690,098 15,500 14,825 77,408,770 77,408,770 27,179,815 27,159,820 827,050 827,050 217,655 217,365 5,760,211 5,760,211 4,278,281 4,272,101 1,910,00029 1,910,00029 2,213,712 2,212,922 436,37430 436,37430 438,561 438,543 3,460,00031 3,460,00031 516,781 514,668 1,183,11131 1,183,11132 779,235 777,550 3,322,00033 3,322,00033 812,358 811,499 6,049,504 6,049,504 6,012,071 6,010,917 6,883,305 6,883,305 327,649 326,974 4-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 34J. Hornell, NY 34K. Lisle, NY 34L. Oxford, NY 34M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 34N. Whitney Point Village, NY 35. Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Twp, PA 36. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 37A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 37B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 242,400 242,399 28,600 28,602 9,100 9,110 403,800 398,680 16,600 16,620 17,500 11,736 223,800 223,206 622,000 197,929 974,300 970,947 266,000 266,000 22,600 22,600 5,900 5,900 532,000 535,149 16,300 16,300 54,000 38,986 239,800 239,286 278,000 699,422 938,900 939,625 567,400 1,469,293 567,337 1,453,919 32,000 31,998 11,000 11,000 731,700 733,420 20,100 20,098 287,000 20,976 315,000 392,400 393,128 19,200 18,895 11,200 10,384 582,717 582,411 18,600 17,986 270,535 150,653 316,681 314,459 4,558,69834 4,558,69834 5,535,226 5,519,785 661,19936 661,19935 744,522 744,215 131,00036 131,00036 237,932 237,116 5,421,539 5,421,539 6,345,357 6,344,621 424,096 424,096 395,261 394,645 358,500 342,233 315,000 150,653 5,725,700 5,725,700 3,232,890 3,230,269 - - 108,860,700 -524,248 -837,120 107,493,851 1,110,400 1,168,627 8,861,581 1,111,622 1,156,918 8,847,818 1,277,000 5,010,000 5,341,000 1,121,308 577,849 4,451,354 5,572,939 2,070,014 360,000 265,978 140,000 167,374 3,779 63,588 1,412,600 1,888,400 1,333,600 1,607,989 1,403,881 1,892,334 1,337,198 1,596,890 12,749,308 12,672,156 19,244,800 19,216,065 14,627,243 14,614,888 4-28 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 38. Tunkhannock New Work Creek, Tunk- Approp. - - 131,600 - 175,100 hannock, PA Cost 7,352 2,281 1,902 127,602 172,346 Contributed Approp. - - 52,933 2,933 55,866 Cost - - - 53,359 53,359 39A. Alvin R. Bush New Work Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 7,103,001 Cost - - - - 7,103,001 Maint. Approp. 537,700 369,200 426,000 494,354 7,290,776 Cost 546,080 369,237 427,276 494,304 7,299,661 39B. Curwensville Lake, New Work PA Approp. - - - - 20,396,060 Cost - - - - 20,396,060 Maint. Approp. 456,300 449,300 449,600 674,587 9,374,376 Cost 455,574 448,896 450,171 669,293 9,367,935 39C. Foster Joseph New Work Sayers Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 30,887,06337 Cost - - - - 30,887,06337 Maint. Approp. 549,400 518,100 550,300 488,524 8,630,208 Cost 549,169 516,250 551,937 488,594 8,629,361 40. York, Indian New Work Rock Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 5,061,16738 Cost - - - - 5,061,16738 Maint. Approp. 384,300 547,500 617,400 1,001,663 8,967,28039 Cost 384,227 546,776 617,951 997,228 8,962,32139 1. Includes $8,476 for previous projects. 2. Includes $8,764,003 for previous project. 3. Includes $127,604 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 4. Includes $127,518 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 5. Includes $558,504 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 6. Includes $555,057 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 7. Includes $310,485 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 8. Includes $314,269 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 9. Includes $96,594 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 10. Includes $94,883 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 11. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 12. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds and includes $61,321 for previous project. 13. Includes $38,041 for previous project. 14. Includes $87,740 for previous project. 15. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 16. Excludes $2,200 contributed funds and includes $27,668 emergency relief funds. 17. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 18. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 19. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 20. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 21. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 22. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. Includes $20,500 for previous project. 23. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 24. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 25. Includes $1,831,609 for previous project. 26. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 27. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes $14,000 contributed funds. 28. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 29. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 30. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 31. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 32. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 33. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 34. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 35. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 36. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 37. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of sanitary system for public use. 38. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 39. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 4-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents ANNAPOLIS HARBOR, MD Aug. 30, A channel 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Severn River 1935 to a point opposite the city slip and an anchorage basin 12 feet deep in Spa Creek with local cooperation (no work was done under this project). Jun. 20, Modified to provide for the present project without local cooperation. 1938 BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug. 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor. 2 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. Increased anchorage facilities. Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordnance Depot. Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Jul. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1970 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth 2. 4-30 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 73d Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Jun. 30, Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary 1948 waters. CAMBRIDGE HARBOR, MD Mar. 3, Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the drawbridge 10 feet deep and 1925 100 feet wide from the bridge to the upper end of the harbor with a turning basin. Aug. 26, Channel 14 feet deep from that depth in Choptank River to the head of the 1937 harbor with widths of 150 feet below the Market St. Bridge in Cambridge and 100 feet above, and a turning basin of the same depth at the head of the channel; for an anchorage basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet long, and 175 feet wide on the west side of the channel and a second basin of the same depth 225 feet long and 200 feet wide on the east side of the channel; and a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Choptank River to the municipal boat basin. Jun. 30, Modification providing for deepening of the channel in Choptank River and 1948 Cambridge Creek to 16 feet, with a turning basin of the same depth and of irregular dimensions comprising approximately 2.4 acres. Jun. 16, Modification providing for Federal maintenance of locally constructed channel 1978 150 feet wide and 25 feet deep, from that depth in the Choptank River to and including a irregularly shaped turning basin of the same depth, with such modifications as in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advised at an added first cost to the United States presently estimated at $257,000. Mar. 3, 1873 Sep. 19, 1980 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 CHESTER RIVER, MD A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from the 7-foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD A 12-foot channel of varying widths to opposite Consumers Ice Co., thence 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from ice plant to Hop Point. 7-foot channel 100 feet wide from opposite Hop Point to an anchorage parallel to Brick Kiln Road. For the 7 foot x 60 foot channel in Little Annemessex River... Mar. 3, A mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide, and about 875 feet long roughly 1945 parallel to Brick Kiln Rd., with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading from there to the 7-foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big Annemessex Rivers. Sep. 3, An anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet by 600 feet by 1,000 feet with an 1954 approach channel 10 feet by 100 feet from 10-foot depth in Little Annemessex River through a land cut in Jersey Island to south side of basin. Aug. 14, Change location and dimensions of approach channel to Somers Cove to plan 1958 No. 2 through the present entrance, at no increase in Federal cost of modification. River and Harbor Act of 1948 H. Doc. 210, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 381, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 355, 95th Cong., 2 Sess.' E. Doc. 25, 42d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 65, 51st. Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 380, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 355, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 72, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 457, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 435, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 435, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 4-31 3. 5. 6. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 7. Dec. 4, 1964 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 MUDDY HOOK & TYLER COVE, MD An entrance channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in Honga River to and including an anchorage basin of same depth, 160 feet wide and 400 feet long, in Fishing Creek into Tyler Cove and includes an anchorage basin 200 feet wide, 250 feet long and 6 feet deep. NANTICOKE RIVER (INCLUDING NORTHWEST FORK), DE & MD A 9-foot channel, 100 feet wide up to Seaford, DE, with a turning basin. Slight widening between bridges in harbor at Seaford, DE. A channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide in Northwest Fork, together with turning basin. A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Tangier Sound to highway bridge at Seaford, DE. NEALE SOUND, MD Aug. 26, Channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide through lower entrance into Wicomico 1937 River and a second channel 6 feet deep at upper entrance extending from deep water within the sound through a marshy barrier at head of Cobb Island to deep water in the Potomac with widths of 60 feet within the sound and 80 feet elsewhere. FISHING BAY, MD Aug. 26, Provided for channels 6 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide at mean low 1937 water, suitably widened where necessary to offer adequate sheltered anchorage space from deep water and in Fishing Bay to vicinity of county or packing house wharves in McCreadys, Farm, and Goose Creeks. FISHING CREEK, MD Aug. 26, A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 feet and 60 feet from deep water in 1937 Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of the same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in the marsh 500 feet above the mouth of the creek and twin stone jetties at the entrance. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD Aug. 30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake 1935 Bay through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. Jun. 30, Modification providing for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet 1948 wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Aug. 30, A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends 1935 from deep water in Chesapeake Bay in deep water in Harris Creek, MD with a turning basin west of the drawbridge, 7 feet deep at mean low water, about 320 feet long and 120 feet wide. Project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration September 16, 1933 and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Aug. 30, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to deep water 1935 in Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the entrance; and 1,004 linear feet of timber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged inner channel. 4-32 8. 9. H. Doc. 186, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 241, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 35, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 308, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report, May 1964 H. Doc. 323, 53rd Cong., 3rd Sess., and Annual Report, 1985, p. 1165. H. Doc. 674, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 869, 60th Cong., 1st Sess.2 S. Doc. 69, 77th Cong., 1st Sess., H. Doc. 159, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.1 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 19353 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the 19354 west side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet 19455 above mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. 16. Jun. 3, 1896 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 POCOMOKE RIVER, MD A 9-foot channel from Shad Landing to Snow Hill. A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River. Extend channel above bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep, widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end. Channel 11 feet deep by 150 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence a channel of the same depth and 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and dike construction along south side of channel from existing dike to Tulls Point. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC-COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia 1965 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Jul. 2, Control of Hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting 1986 to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Mar. 3, A channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between mouth at Chesapeake Bay 1899 and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC, a distance of 108 miles. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 28, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, 1958 and its tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) ST. JEROMES CREEK, MD Aug. 26, A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at Airedele, thence 7 feet deep and 1937 60 feet wide to deep water in the creek, with a turning basin of the same depth 200 feet wide and 300 feet long opposite Airedele. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report for 1895, p. 1167. H. Doc. 227, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 429, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 486, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. State Design memorandum July 2, 1986 H. Doc. 33, 52nd Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Act, June 29, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1958 H. Doc. 174, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.' 4-33 15. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 23. Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 foot of 15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet 1954 deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a T-shaped harbor. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Nov. 17, Consists of a dune beginning at 27th Street extending north to the Delaware 1986 line. From 27th Street south to Fourth Street, a steel sheetpile bulkhead will be provided. The beach will also be widened and raised from Third Street to just beyond the Delaware line. CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 6, 1988 Sec. 14 Oct. 23, 1962 Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. ISLE OF WIGHT BAY, OCEAN CITY, MD Consists of the placement of 3,500 linear feet of steel sheetpile bulkhead along Chicago Avenue. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local pro- 1962 tection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. LOCK HAVEN, PA Nov. 17, Consists of 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along 1986 the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structure, seven ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. 33. Oct.23, 1962 RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947, H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.1 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Sep. 29, 1981 H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. Initial Appraisal Report Jul. 1986 H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 187, 98th Cong., H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4-34 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938; Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1958 Jan. 26, 1989 Sec. 14 Aug. 18, 1941 34. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood 1958 protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY. Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to 1976 relocate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. 1, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by 1983 Section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). Sep. 22, 1988 Sec. 14 Sep. 3, 1954 TUNKHANNOCK CREEK, TUNKHANNOCK TOWNSHIP, PA Consists of the removal of a shoal in the creek and the placement of fill material capped with riprap along approximately 250 feet of the streambank. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Construction of three flood control reservoirs. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Jun. 22, Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus 1936 Creek. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. SPRING BROOK CREEK, PITTSTON TOWNSHIP, PA Consists of the excavation and backfilling of the existing streambank and placement of approximately 870 feet of stone riprap. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Construction of a flood control reservoir. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive portion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the upper end. 3. Included in Public Works Administration program September 16, 1933. The site chosen for the inlet under this authorization was that opened just south of Ocean City by natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to Ocean City. 4. Included in Emergency Relief program 1935. 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 1956. 4-35 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. Initial Appraisal Report Nov. 1985 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. Initial Appraisal Report Mar. 1986 H. Doc. 29, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C Cost to September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA' Completed 1878 $ 5,000 $ - Anacostia River and Flats2 Deferred 1953 3,910,582 - Aquia Creek, VA Inactive 1928 52,4653 11,770 Back Creek, MD Completed 1946 23,061 41,378 Black Walnut Harbor, MD Completed 1982. 32,631 431,478 Bonum Creek, VA4 Completed 1982 202,0005 155,314 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Completed 1950 15,755 17,675 Breton Bay, MD7 Completed 1950 47,9247 12,621 Broad Creek River, DE Completed 1964 64,5108 133,088 Broad Creek, MD Completed 1962 28,227 104,215 Choptank River, MD 9 Completed 1979 96,796 94,095 Claiborne Harbor, MD 2 Deferred 1987 42,974 681,933 Corsica River, MD Completed 1948 39,0711o 106,565 Cypress Creek, MD Completed 1947 3,057 14,729 Duck Point Cove, MD Completed 1982 25,289 334,396 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD" Completed 1932 90,12112 53,808"3 Goose Creek, MD4 Completed 1973 75,900 8,312 Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD Completed 1989 50,591 769,550 Herring Creek, MD Completed 1989 1,506,259 148,329 Island Creek, MD Completed 1948 6,230 54,828 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD Completed 1988 23,836 478,009 La Trappe, MD Completed 1980 8,064 40,475 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Completed 1958 23,000' 4 7,327 Lowes Wharf, MD Completed 1986 21,000 322,080 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1904 9,916 25,143 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Completed 1988 1,787,15815 640,938 Madison Bay, MD 4 Completed 1977 125,550 33,353 Manokin River, MD 16 Completed 1919 34,7881 43,534 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Completed 1947 38,71518 50,934 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA Completed 1989 12,460 387,685 Nan Cove, MD4 Completed 1965 34,86119 22,498 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD" Completed 1983 240,817 142,131 Nanticoke River, MD Completed 1971 73,243 87,72220 Neabsco Creek, MD Completed 1978 14,600 14,800 Neavitt Harbor, MD4 Completed 1968 36,500 34,533 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA2' Completed 1946 78,446 42,063 Northeast River, MD Completed 1984 28,48922 937,074 Occoquan Creek, VA" Completed 1971 66,25323 203,198 Parish Creek, MD Completed 1988 19,17024 525,886 Patuxent River, MD" Completed 1905 14,00025- Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Completed 1977 - 184,394 Potomac River at Alexandria, VA Completed 1965 95,214 506,394 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA" Completed 1984 17,000 331,219 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC' Completed 1956 1,744,69226 27,46120 Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1985 72,85827 321,803 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD Completed 1988 304,000 1,003,857 Rock Hall Harbor, MD Completed 1982 1,072,50028 71,059 Shad Landing State Park, MD Completed 1966 33,53129 19,198 Shallow Creek, MD4 Completed 1989 278,100 Slaughter Creek, MD Completed 1987 4,140 615,897 St. Catherines Sound, MD Completed 1989 29,9473o 648,618 St. Georges Creek, MD Completed 1985 147,650 - St. Michaels Harbor, MD 4 Completed 1964 16,723'31 14,403 St. Patricks Creek, MD Completed 1987 15,752 141,506 4-36 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost to September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance St. Peters Creek, MD4 Completed 1963 46,74032 31,716 Smith Creek, MD Completed 1936 5,252 16,448 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD Completed 1985 293,57033 849,350 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA4 Completed 1974 57,03134 41,437 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Completed 1983 424,80035 395,785 Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 41,959 Tred Avon River, MD Completed 1988 523,310 845,243 Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD Completed 1988 193,175 2,574,002 Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 16,29736 54,302 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 34,777 Upper Thorofare, MD Completed 1987 62,446 814,657 Warwick River, MD Completed 1984 22,04137 148,728 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized $54,000 from contributed funds. August 5, 1977. 19. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 20. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds ex- 3. Includes $31,065 for previous project. pended for waterchestnut removal. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 21. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 5. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. November 6, 1977. 6. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 22. Includes $20,640 for previous project. 7. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 23. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 24. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration funds. 9. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the 25. Includes $10,617 for previous project. project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 26. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 22, 1979. 27. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 10. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 28. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 11. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 29. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. November 2, 1979. 30. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 12. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes 31. Excludes $600 contributed funds. $8,414 contributed funds. 32. excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 13. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 33. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 14. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. Novemb r 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and 15. Includes $5,000 for previous project. $97,390 for previous project. 16. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th 34. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. Cong., 1st sess.) 35. Excludes $16,409 contributed funds. 17. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 36. Ipcludes $10,158 for previous project. 18. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and 37. Includes $6,000 for previous project. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH TABLE 4-D EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Oxford, MD' Completed 1978 $ 97,7502 Colonial Beach, VA Active 1986 518,480 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $414,977 contributed funds. 4-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-E Cost to September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD Completed 1980 $ 6,042,325 $1,407,6551 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD 2 Completed 1977 1,000,0003 - Bainbridge, NY3,4 Completed 1959 382,000 - Bath, NY5 Completed 1970 638,332 - Bayard, WV4 Completed 1965 55,2186 - Black Walnut Point, MD Completed 1985 200,500 - Bridgewater, VA' Completed 1953 136,500 - Bull Run, PA Completed 1984 2,742,000 - Conklin-Kirkwood, NY4 Completed 1955 71,000 - Cortland, NY7 Completed 1970 324,486 - Elkland, PA Completed 1971 1,297,850 - Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Completed 1979 7,034,5348 - Forest Heights, MD 4 Completed 1964 430,0009 - Fourmile Run, VA Completed 1987 52,480,000 - Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD3 Completed 1989 186,077 - Greene, NY4 Completed 1951 37,000 - Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Completed 1979 4,731,3941�o Kitzmiller, MD 4 Completed 1965 501,500"1 - Latta Brook Rd., NY Completed 1984 115,500 - Lock Haven, PA12 Active 1980 450,00013 - Nichols, NY Completed 1974 1,487,800 - Norwich, NY4 Completed 1950 94,500 - Painted Post, NY' Completed 1970 414,181 - Plymouth, PA Completed 1958 1,911,689 4 - Savage River Dam, MD Completed 1954 2,271,939"15 33,999 Scranton, PA'6 Completed 1971 2,006,800 - Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,00017 - Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 - Tyrone, PA'8 Deferred 1980 6,401,016 - Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,00019 - Upper Marlboro, MD 4 Completed 1965 590,013 - Verona Lake, VA2 0 Deferred 1978 992,000 - Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,92721- Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,45722- Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,89323- Wyoming Valley, PA Completed 1987 25,549,098 - 1. Includes $645 for administrative closeout of FY81 contract. 2. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 3. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 5. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 6. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 7. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 8. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 9. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 10. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 11. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 12. Authorized for Phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 13. Excludes $481,000 for Phase I funded under General Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 14. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 16. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 17. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 18. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 19. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 20. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 21. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 22. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 23. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-38 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY" ,2 Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Channel) Betterton Harbor, MD Breton Bay, MD (1902 River & Harbor Act) Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & Harbor Act) Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) Coan River, VA 1970 1920 1960 1950 1949 1949 1989 1940 1988 1937 1970 1978 1977 1970 1970 1954 1950 1937 Copes Corner Lakes, NY 2 Cuckold Creek, MD4 Cunninghill Cove, MD 4 Davenport Center Lake, NY2 Fall Brook Lake, PA5 Genegantslet Lake, NY Governors Run, MD Harpers Ferry, WV May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 17, 1986 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1914 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-39 $ 24,6223 787,710 3,482 10,424 212 112 25,419 106,7003 5,720 11,200 286,4003 46,100 214,5783 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G (Continued) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hellens Creek, MD Lake Ogleton, MD Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV Neabsco Creek, VA (1881 River & Harbor Act) Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD & VA (1954 River & Harbor Act) Saint Georges Creek, MD Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA6 South Plymouth Lake, NY 1950 1950 1949 1941 1978 1989 1989 1989 1971 1974 1953 1939 1970 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD West Oneonta Lake, NY 2 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Sep. 23, 1986 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 29, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization Engineers. expired May 26, 1953. 5. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 6. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of ad- 3. Cost for preliminary work only. vanced engineering and design. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-H Date Survey Project Completed DELAWARE Broad Creek River 4-40 March 1990 7,9283 14,600 100,0363 305 189,100" BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-H (Continued) Date Survey Project Completed MARYLAND Broad Creek Claiborne Harbor Corsica River Cypress Creek Duck Point Cove Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek Lowes Wharf Middle River and Dark Head Creek Nanticoke River Parish Creek Rock Hall Harbor St. Patrick's Creek Susquehanna River above & below Havre de Grace Slaughter Creek Tilghman Island Harbor Shad Landing State Park Marina Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare River VIRGINIA Neabsco Creek May 1990 January 1990 March 1990 March 1990 July 1990 July 1990 February 1990 June 1990 August 1990 March 1990 March 1990 August 1990 February 1990 May 1990 December 1989 July 1990 June 1990 June 1990 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS TABLE 4-I Project Date Inspected MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Savage River Dam Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Bainbridge-Newton Creek Bath-Cohocton River Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Corning-Monkey Run Cortland Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal Greene Nichols Norwich Oneonta Owego Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla PENNSYLVANIA Elkland Kingston-Edwardsville Milton Plymouth October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 4-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS TABLE 4-I (Continued) Date Inspected Scranton Sunbury Swoyersville-Forty Fort Tyrone Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Twp. Williamsport VIRGINIA Bridgewater Fourmile Run District of Columbia & MD Projects Anacostia River Washington, DC & Vicinity WEST VIRGINIA Bayard Ridgeley October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October October October October October 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 October 1989 October 1989 4-42 Project NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT * NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT This district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke, and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, VA, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, VA. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION PA 1. Appomattox River, VA ................. 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ................. 3. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Nofolk District) .................... 4. Chincoteague Inlet, VA.................. 5. Deep Creek, Newport News, VA ............ 6. Greenvale Creek, VA .................. 7. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) ........... 8. Horn Harbor, VA .................... 9. Hoskins Creek, VA ................... 10. James River, VA .................... 11. Little Machipongo River, VA ............. 12. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA .................. 13. Norfolk Harbor and Channels (Deepening), VA .... a. Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA . b. Channel to Newport News, VA c. Norfolk Harbor Channels, VA . d. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA . . 14. Queens Creek, VA ......... 15. Rudee Inlet, VA ........... 16. Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) 17. Waterway on the Coast of VA .. . 18. Whitings Creek, VA ........ 19. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............ GE BEACH EROSION CONTROL 5-2 20. Tangier Island Shore Protection ......... 21. Virginia Beach, VA ................ 5-2 22. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization ........... 5-2 5-3 FLOOD CONTROL 5-3 23. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA ..... 5-3 24. Richmond, VA .................. 25. Virginia Beach Streams, 5-4 Canal Number 2, VA ............... 5-4 26. Emergency Flood Control Activities ....... 5-4 5-4 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 5-5 27. Surveys ....................... 5-5 28. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 5-5 5-5 TABLES 5-6 TABLE 5-A Cost and Financial Statement...... 5-6 5- TABLE 5-B Authorizing Legislation ......... 5-7 TABLE 5-C Data Relative to the Completed Locks . 55--7 7 TABLE 5-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects TABLE 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............. TABLE 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 5_ TABLE 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys J"o 5-8 5-8 5-1 PAGE ... 5-8 ... 5-8 ... 5-9 ... 5-9 ... 5-9 ... 5-9 ... 5-9 ... 5-10 ... 5-10 ... 5-11 ... 5-16 . . 5-20 ... 5-21 ... 5-22 .. .5-22 .. 5-23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 Navigation 1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA Location. This river rises in Appomattox County, VA, flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the James River at Hopewell, VA. The portion under improvement extends from its mouth to Petersburg, VA, a distance of 11 miles, which is the length of the tidal and navigable reach. (See U.S. Coast Geodetic Survey ChartNo. 531.) Previous Projects. For details see page 469 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. This provides for a channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run; thence 80 feet wide and of such depth, not exceeding 10 feet, as can be obtained without rock excavation to the head of navigation at Petersburg; including a basin at the mouth of Poes Run 200 feet long, 150 feet wide, and 20 feet deep: and a turning basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 500 feet long, 140 to 160 feet wide, and 12 feet deep in the upper 300 feet, the removal of rock to a depth of 18 feet in the north half of the lower 200 feet, and removal of soft material to rock in the south half of the lower 200 feet of this basin. All depths are referred to mean low water. The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with the river at a point 2.5 miles below; for about 1.7 miles of levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work incidental to the diversion channel. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.9 feet and the extremes 2.4 and 3.3 feet. There are no records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary floods. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet to 17.1 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. Terminal Facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 2 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA and the other is at Hopewell, VA near the confluence of the Appomattox and the James. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, Va 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting certain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges, under maintenance. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection of canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. For details of previous projects, see page 476 of Annual Report for FY 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on the 5-year operation and maintenance contract, awarded Feb 88 is progressing satisfactorily. A contract to replace the bulkhead at Great Bridge and South Mills, NC was awarded 4 Aug 90 and remains in progress. 3. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Existing project. Provides for deep water approach channels in Baltimore Harbor. Northern portion including Baltimore Harbor is under jurisdiction of Baltimore District. Portion under jurisdiction of Norfolk District is more fully described below. 3A. CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA Location. At mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222.) Existing project. A channel about 2.3 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water through shoal at mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 3B. RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of Rappahannock River and about 50 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12225.) Existing project. A channel about 9.9 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay, opposite Rappahannock River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 3C. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of York River and about 20 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12221.) Existing project. A channel about 18.2 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay opposite York Spit Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Terminal facilities. These three channels form the access between lower and upper Chesapeake Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design, and supervision and inspections. 4. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract was awarded 6 Feb 90 and a total of 123,037 cubic yards were dredged under this contract. Other operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design, and supervision and inspections. 5. DEEP CREEK, NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. Deep Creek is a tidal estuary of the James River, lying wholly in the city of Newport News, Va. It is about 3 miles in length, flows in a southeasterly direction, and empties into the James River on its northerly side about 10.5 miles upstream from the mouth of the James River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12222.) Previous projects. For details, see page 360 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. This provides for an approach channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide extending from the 8-foot depth contour in James River to a point where the natural creek entrance to Deep Creek is constricted, a distance of 9,040 feet thence 8-feet deep and 60 feet wide through the constricted entrance, a distance of 700 feet the enlargement of the harbor in Deep Creek opposite Menchville, extending upstream to a point near Parkers Landing and to the foot of Maxwells Lane, form 6.4 acres to about 20 acres with depth of 8 feet, 400 to 740 feet wide and 1,940 feet long, and a harbor 300 feet wide by 600 feet long to a depth of 6 feet upstream of the existing harbor. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 3 feet. The extremes of irregular fluctuations referred to mean low water due to the combined effect of wind and tides are minus 2 feet and plus 9.8 feet. Local cooperation. (a) Fully complied with for initial construction under Section 122 of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized and directed to review the requirement of local cooperation with respect to providing a spoil disposal area for the project at Deep Creek, Warwick County (now within the city of Newport News), Virginia authorized by the Act of August 26, 1937 (commonly referred to as the River and Harbor Act of 1937, 50 Stat. 846), to determine if (1) such requirement should be eliminated, and (2) Craney Island disposal area should be used as the spoil disposal area for dredged material from such project. (b) Beginning on the date of enactment of this section. (1) the requirement of local cooperation described in subsection (a) shall be suspended, and (2) Craney Island disposal area shall be used as the spoil disposal area for dredged material from such project until Congress, by a statute enacted after the date on which the report required by subsection (a) is submitted, removes such suspension. Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned piers and one public county pier and bulkhead of wooden construction at Menchville. One pier is used for pleasure craft only. The remainder are commercial. There is also a shore landing for the receipt of sand and gravel, several privately owned wooden piers and two marinas are on the south side of the harbor. The wharves have no rail connections, but are served by State highways. The existing facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 6. GREENVALE CREEK, VA Location. A tidal estuary that enters the north side of Rappahannock River about 20 miles above its mouth. It is wholly in 5-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 Lancaster County, Virginia about 60 miles north of Norfolk, Virginia. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12237.) Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from that depth in Rappahannock River about 950 feet to the mouth of Greenvale Creek, then 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the mouth into the creek for about 2,400 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see page 215 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: engineering and design and supervision and administration. 7. HAMPTON ROADS, VIRGINIA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248, 12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of 91,600 cubic feet of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using government plant and hired labor. 8. HORN HARBOR, VA Location. A tidal estuary 4 miles long in Mathews County, VA, entering Chesapeake Bay on its western shore 43 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 494.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide across entrance bar. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is about 2 feet with winds causing additional variations of 2 to 3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 3 wharves, 5 piers, and a marine railway within the harbor. Wharves are open to the public. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to dredge 7600 cubic yards was awarded 1 Jan 90 and completed 4 Jan 90. 7,358 cubic yards were dredged under this contract. 9. HOSKINS CREEK, VA Location. A tributary 2.5 miles long flowing easterly and entering the right bank of the Rapahannock River in Essex County, VA, 42 miles upstream from its mouth in Chesapeake Bay and one-half mile downstream from the town of Tappahannock, VA. The creek is 102 miles north of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 535.) Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep from that depth in the Rappahannock River to the highway bridge three-quarters of a mile above the mouth with widths of 100 feet through the bar in Rappahannock River and 80 feet within the creek suitably widened at bends, and a turning basin of the same depth 250 feet long and 200 feet wide at the public landing one-half mile above the mouth of the creek. Improved section is 1.1 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.6 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkheaded landings and two wharves. State of VA operates a small boat launching ramp on the creek. Facilities are considered adequate for navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: contract was awarded 26 Jun 90; 86, 876 cubic yards were dredged under this contract which was completed 18 Jul 90. 10. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by the junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows easterly 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide form the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the Deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock; a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long alongside the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels are referred to mean low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. The estimated (1971) total cost for new work is $71,145,940 including required 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT non-Federal cost for conditions of local cooperation imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1930, 1945, and 1950, estimated (1939) to be $1,949,700; and by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, estimated (1971) to be $2,950,000. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. Terminal facilities. River commerce at Richmond is handled by city-owned terminals, city wharf, Richmond dock, and 16 privately-owned wharves within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal, located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A contract was awarded 19 Jan 90 to dredge 215,000 cubic yards of material from Richmond Harbor. A total of 228,969 cubic yards were dredged under this contract which was completed 23 Feb 90. Other operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design, and supervision and inspections. 11. LITTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER, VA Location. This river, locally known as Parting Creek, has its source in the marsh of Bell Neck, Northampton County Va., flows in a southerly and easterly direction about 5 miles, and empties into Great Machipongo River, about 12 miles by water from Great Machipongo Inlet, and about 28 miles by water from Cape Charles, VA. The Great Machipongo Inlet and the Great Machipongo River are the waterways connecting with the Atlantic Ocean, and have a controlling depth of 16 feet. Willis Wharf, a town with a population of about 500, is located on the west bank about 1 mile above its junction with the Great Machipongo River. The high-water width varies from about 450 feet at the mouth to 350 feet at Willis Wharf. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 1221.) Existing project. This project provides for a channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 80 feet wide from the town of Willis Wharf to deep water in the river below. The mean range of tide is about 0.7 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. (see FY 1989 Annual Report) Terminal facilities. At the town of Willis Wharf, there are three wharves with a total wharfage space of about 300 feet, five bulkheads with a total wharfage space of about 1,140 feet, and two marine railways which will accommodate vessels up to 50 feet in length. All facilities are privately owned, being used for packing seafoods and servicing fishing vessels. The wharves have no railroad connections, but are served by local roads connecting with the country and State highway system. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work dredging of a turning basin accomplished during fiscal year 1989 was turned over to the sponsor. 12. LYNNHAVEN INLET Location. On the south shore of the Chesapeake Bay, 5 miles west of Cape Henry, and 10 miles east of Norfolk, VA, the inlet connects Lynnhaven Roads, a part of the Chesapeake Bay, with a network of inland waters in the northern half of the city of VA Beach. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 1222). Existing project. An entrance channel from Chesapeake Bay through Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide; a mooring and turning basin inside of Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep, 1,100 feet long, and 750 feet wide; a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide to extend from the mooring and turning basin into Broad Bay via Long Creek-Broad Bay Canal and a channel through the Narrows connecting Broad and Linkhorn Bays, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide. Depths are referred to mean low water. Mean ranges of tide in Lynnhaven Inlet is about 2 feet with extreme fluctuations of 1.5 feet below and 9.5 feet above mean low water. Range in Lynnhaven Bay is a little more than 2 feet, in Broad and Linkhorn Bays, fluctuations in water level are caused by local winds. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Localcooperation. Complied with, except local interest must furnish spoil-disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Fore details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge 175,000 cubic yards from the channel will be completed in FY91. 13. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA The four projects, Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA; Channel to Newport News, VA; Norfolk Harbor, VA; and Thimble Shoal Channel, VA, are grouped under the above heading for construction purposes only. Estimated Federal cost (1988) for new work for all three projects is $97,800,000, exclusive of amounts expended for previous projects. Details of each project are given below. 13A.ATLANTIC OCEAN CHANNEL, VA Location. The Atlantic Ocean Channel is located offshore of Virginia Beach, VA in the Atlantic Ocean. It extends southeastward from a point approximately 3.5 nautical miles offshore of Cape Henry to approximately 10 nautical miles offshore of Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, VA. Previous project. None. Existing project. A channel 57 feet deep at mean low water, 1,000 feet wide and approximately 10 miles long between 57-foot contours in the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. Local cooperation: See "Norfolk Harbor" writeup. 5-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 13B. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 400.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Dredging a channel 55 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. Local cooperation. See "Norfolk Harbor" Writeup. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. 13C.NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNELS, VA Location. Norfolk, VA is 187 miles south of Baltimore, MD and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway bridge over a Southern Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 400 and 452.) Previous Projects. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream from the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep and 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 750 feet wide to the junction of Southern Branch and Eastern Branch. SOUTHERN BRANCH: A channel 45 feet deep and 450 feet wide from the junction with the Eastern Branch to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railway Bridge; thence 45 feet deep and 375 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge; thence 40 feet deep and 250 feet to 500 feet wide to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge; thence 35 feet deep and 250 to 300 feet wide to a point 0.8 mile above Interstate 64 high level bridge. Project includes an approach and turning basin 45 feet deep opposite the Norfolk Naval Shipyard; a turning basin at the mouth of St. Julians Creek 40 feet deep, 400 to 600 feet long, and 800 feet wide; a turning basin at the mouth of Milldam Creek 40 feet deep and 800 feet square and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek, the upstream end of the project, 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge (formerly Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of the project. WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 40-foot channel, thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of 0.38 mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. SCOTTS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a distance of 0.73 mile. ANCHORAGES: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. DISPOSAL AREA: a disposal area of about 2,500 acres adjacent to and north of Craney Island, enclosed by stonefaced levee of sand; rehandling basin, approach and exit channels connecting rehandling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55-foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (Commonwealth of VA) shall: (1) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers; including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged material; (2) Accomplish without cost to the United States, all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, tunnels, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements including pier modifications made necessary by plan implementation, except for altering or replacement costs for obstructive railroad and public highway bridges, such costs to be apportioned in accordance with the principles of Section 6 of the Bridge Alteration Act of June 21, 1940, as amended; (3) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals; (4) Hold and save the United States free from damage due to implementation, operation, and maintenance of the project except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (5) Prohibit the erection of any structures within a distance to be determined by the Chief of Engineers from the bottom edge of the proposed 55-foot, 45-foot, and 40-foot channels and turning basin; and (6) Provide without cost to the United States, all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, or the costs of such retaining works required for the project including all monitoring features and stilling basins. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the Craney Island portion of the project consisted of operation and maintenance of roads, service facilities, rental equipment and government plant, engineering and design and supervision and inspection. 13D. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 13.4 miles from a point 1-1/4 miles east of Thimble Shoal Lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 1222.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1966. Existing projects. Provides for dredging a channel 55 feet deep at mean low water, 1,000 feet wide and approximately 13.4 miles long between 55-foot contours in lower Chesapeake Bay. Local cooperation. See "Norfolk Harbor" writeup. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See "Norfolk Harbor," "Newport News Channel, VA," etc. Operations during fiscal year. New Work and Maintenance: Preconstruction engineering and design is complete for deepening the channel from 45 to 55 feet. Other operations performed included condition surveys, budgeting and scheduling and engineering and design. 14. QUEENS CREEK, VA Location. An estuary on west side of Hills Bay, a tributary of Piankatank River at its mouth on western shore of Chesapeake Bay. Creek is entirely within Mathews County, about 40 miles north of Norfolk and 110 miles southeast of Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12235.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from that depth in Hills Bay into the creek and thence upstream to a point opposite the public landing, a distance of about 4,100 feet, and a turning basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, and 400 feet long at head of channel. Mean range of tide in creek is 1.2 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction. Local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. A privately owned commercial dock on the north side of creek and several small privately owned landing areas along the creek and a public dock and parking area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design, supervision and administration costs amounted to $57,830. 15. RUDEE INLET, VA Location. Rudee Inlet is located on the Atlantic Ocean at Virginia Beach in an area where boating is a major activity. It provides a gateway to a variety of oceanic pursuits varying from pleasure cruising to commercial deep sea fishing. Existing project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 110 to 72-ft and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18-ft deep and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty system at the mouth of the inlet. Local cooperation. The Local Sponsor is the City of Virginia Beach.An addendum to the Local Cooperation Agreement with the City of Virginia Beach was signed October 2, 1989. Operations during rfiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications are complete. Dredging was pending local cooperation at the end of the fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design, supervision and administration costs amounted to 79,059. 16. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451) as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409) as amended prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clan Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, removing debris and investigating navigational hazards and sunken or abandoned vessels. A derrickboat and crane l~rge performed removal of sunken vessels and navigational hazar4s and supported Federal dredging projects. In addition, surveillapce of the harbor was performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using also two small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted activities and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed piers and other structures. wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 to 53-ft wide 5-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 17. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12211, 12210, and 12221.) Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was accomplished 15 Jan through 26 Feb 90. A total of 109,592 cubic yards of credited material were removed. Other work performed included before and after dredging surveys, condition studies, maintenance engineering and design, supervision and administration. 18. WHITINGS CREEK, VA Location. Whitings Creek lies entirely within Middlesex County, VA, and is a small tidal estuary 1.5 miles long flowing in a westerly direction and entering the right bank of the Rappahannock River about 13 miles upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay. The creek is 73 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 534.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 4 feet deep, 70 feet wide and 3,100 feet long from the 4-foot contour in the Rappahannock River across the offshore bar into the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: mean, 1.5 feet; irregular, 2 feet; and extreme approximately 7.8 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 353 of Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There is a public wharf and parking facility on the project. In addition therraer e a number of privatelyowned wharves and landings on the creek. These facilities are considered adequate. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract to dredge 20,000 cubic yards to provide a 4 foot depth was awarded 11 Dec 89 and completed 18 Dec 89. 19. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The District continued work on four studies: Hunting/Gilford Creeks, VA; Scotts Creek, VA, Tylers Beach, VA; and Bennett Creek, VA. Total expenditures amounted to $33, 272. 20. TANGIER ISLAND SHORE PROTECTION Location. Tangier Island is a marshy island about 5 miles long and 1-1/2 miles wide, approximately 65 miles north of Norfolk, VA and 15 miles southwest of Crisfield, MD. Located in Accomack County, VA, it is the southernmost of a series of islands separating the Chesapeake Bay from Tangier and Pocomoke Sounds. Existing project. The project consists of a 5,700-foot long stone riprap seawall along the western side of the populated portion of the island. The crest elevation of the seawall is 6 feet above low water. The seawall extends from the Tangier Channel on the north to a point south to the airport runway. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the state of Virginia acting through the Virginia Port Authority. Requirements are described in full on page 5-8 of Annual Report for FY 88. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction initiated in February 1989 was completed during the fiscal year. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 21. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Location. On the Atlantic Seaboard, 22 miles north of Virginia- North Carolina State line, 3.5 miles south of Cape Henry, and 19 miles east of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore of Virginia Beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street by artificial placement of sand to provide a minimum beach width of 100 feet at elevation 7 feet above mean low water, and maintenance of such beach by periodic replenishment of losses to ensure continuous protection; including construction of a groin system to be undertaken at such times as estimated annual charges therewith would be less than the annual cost of beach replenishment alone. The United States shall participate in the first cost of the project to the full extent of its proportionate share of cost as a landowner, plus one third total first cost of restoring and protecting all publicly-owned sections of the shore. The 1962 modification provided that the United States shall further participate in periodic beach nourishment of the beach in the amount of one third the cost for 25 years from date of commencement of operations in placing an initial quantity of nourishment material equal to deficiency in the design beach at that time. Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act increased Federal participation to one-half of the cost incurred after October 23, 1962. Estimated Federal cost (1987) is $5,000,000. Estimated cost to local interests is $5,000,000. Construction of the groin system is not included in the above estimate. The 1962 estimate for this work was $549,000 Federal cost and $531,000 cost to local interests. The 1974 modification which provides for structural and nonstructural improvements was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Structural measures will be provided for the 6 mile reach of shoreline between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street. This will include maintaining the beach at an elevation of 5.4 feet and a width of 100 feet and construction of a 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT stepped-face concrete seawall just seaward of the existing bulkhead from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street, and raising and strengthening sand dunes from 58th Street to 89th Streets. The estimated cost of the structural improvements are Federal $40,200,000 and non-Federal $21,700,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-11 of Annual Report for FY 81 and for 1962 modification and on page 5-11 of FY 87 Annual Report for 1974 modification. The city of Virginia Beach has complied with the 1962 requirements. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project, as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, expired Feb 87. Federal participation has been extended from 25 years to 35 years, on March 10, 1988 by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. The 1974 modification project is in the preconstruction engineering and design phase. 22. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The district continued work on one study: Cape Charles City Harbor, VA. Total expenditures amounted to $22,632. FLOOD CONTROL 23. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Gathright Dam is on the Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 in Alleghany County. Gathright Dam site is in the reach of the Jackson River known as the Gorge, about 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA At the elevation of the top of the conservation pool, the lake extends upstream about 9 miles. (See Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existingproject. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-footlong, rolled-rock-fill dam with an impervious core, with the top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam; a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed-crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation pool elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2, 530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) willbereserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres.(See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Care of service and recreational facilities, water control management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. 24. RICHMOND, VA Location. The city of Richmond, the capital of Virginia, is located in the Piedmont Plateau and is bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. The James River flows directly through Richmond separating its business district into two areas, the Shockoe Creek area on the north bank and the industrial-commercial complex on the south bank. Previous project. None. Existing project. The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on both sides of the river in the downtown area which would protect against a flood higher than that which occurred in June 1972 which is the maximum flood of recent record. The project to be constructed is that generally described in House Document 98-178, 98th Congress, 2nd Session with modifications recommended by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on February 21, 1984. The present construction cost of the project is now estimated at $122,300,000. Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was signed with the city of Richmond on June 16, 1986. For details see Annual Report for 1986. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued. Construction was initiated December 1988 and is continuing. Completion is scheduled for Sep 1993. 25. VIRGINIA BEACH STREAMS CANAL NUMBER 2, VA Location. The canal number 2 watershed with a drainage area of about 37 square miles lies within the city of Virginia Beach. The city consists of 255 square miles of primarily low, flat terrain with about 75 percentof the area below elevation 15 feet, mean sea level. The existing canal, from the Eastern Branch of the Lynnhaven River to the North Landing River is about 12 miles long and follows a north-south alignment. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12205.) Existing project. The project will provide for channelization of an existing canal for a length of 1.1 miles. The canal bottom width will range from 45 feet to 80 feet and a depth from -4 feet mean sea level to -8 feet mean sea level with a flow capacity great enough to carry a 100-year flood. Its construction will require dredging 741,000 cubic yards of material. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-14 of FY 81 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction initiated in FY 88 was completed during the fiscal year. 26. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 89, $210,475 was spent on the National Emergency Preparedness Program. 5-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 27. SURVEYS Total costs of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $1,000,046. Work performed consisted of: Navigation Studies, $141,887; flood damage prevention studies, $96,931; review of completed projects $94,950; miscellaneouis activities $34,030; and coordination studies with other agencies and states $138,845 and supplemental preauthorization studies $493,043. 28. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, cost of collection and study of Basic Data was $248,829 consisting of $91,438 for Management Service Unit, $91,964 for Technical Services, and $60,427 for Va. Beach Hurricane Evacuation study and $5,000 for flood plain management planning. 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Sect. Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 To 30 Sep 1990 in Text 1. Appomattox River, VA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - 870,341 - 870,341 26,053 26,053 212,025 211,957 270,128 1,371,346 266,423 1,367,573 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, beween Norfolk, VA and St. John's River, FL (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) New Work Approp - Cost - Maint Approp 2,699,229 Cost 2,723,252 Major Rehab Approp - Cost - Recreation Approp - Cost - - - - 3,688,3721 - - - 3,688,372 2,484,827 2,255,274 3,479,644 56,088,3092 1,754,396 3,046,911 3,373,880 55,981,726 - - - 479,947 - - - 479,947 - - - 59,871 - - - 59,871 3. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 4. Chincoteague Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Deep Creek, Newport News, VA (Regular Funds) 6. Greenvale Creek, VA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 8,015,0733 8,015,073 127,604 127,518 558,504 555,057 319,453 323,236 96,594 10,748,543 94,883 10,745,972 227,000 227,000 1,041,410 1,041,409 408,732 397,984 713,341 723,695 800,686 8,408,683 793,577 8,401,179 3,850 3,850 288,278 288,278 13,059 13,059 6,014 6,014 26,297 26,297 92,119 92,009 179,445 2,273,002 131,973 2,225,530 211,677 94,708 20,003 20,003 532,935 415,856 5-11 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Sect. Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 To 30 Sep 1990 in Text 7. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) 8. Horn Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) 9. Hoskins Creek, VA 10. James River, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Little Machipongo River, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 13. Norfolk Harbor and Channels (Deepening), VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 260,000 257,865 191,000 193,135 88,366 88,366 115 115 27,405 27,405 193,000 193,000 58,169 58,169 18,321 18,321 204,400 3,789,384 189,096 3,774,080 113,935 111,207 13,987 13,987 348,958 346,230 44,100 44,100 909,297 1,577,782 890,938 1,559,423 7,639,9045 7,639,904 935,997 1,045,823 8,063 1,434 243,262 243,463 802,909 800,216 10,879 4,664 26,083 26,083 900,219 1,762,027 32,924,633 898,399 1,249,130 32,406,157 - - 413,456 - - 379,792 120,000 120,608 14,843 14,843 5,600 1,211 118 213,500 211,990 514,522 514,522 5,600 1,211 - 445,354 - 445,354 670,611 670,607 4,615,000 2,625,036 2,945,500 2,239,892 73,945 73,945 5,796,000 2,207,000 5,903,145 3,532,235 - 143,000 - 143,000 5,650,000 1,594,000 5,928,863 2,005,552 - 143,000 - 143,000 94,923 2,937,514 91,036 2,933,627 1,626,000 16,410,8096 813,749 14,916,380 143,0006 - 143,000 - 143,0006 - 10,189,0006 13,092 10,187,3996 - 143,0006 - 143,0006 5-12 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Sect. Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 To 30 Sep 1990 In Text 13a. Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA (Regualr Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13b Channel to Newport News, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13c. Norfolk Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13d. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA (Regualr Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Queens Creek 15. Rudee Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost New work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost (8,897) 625 225,293 51,948 178,371 2,238,183 130,937 2,300,473 (100) (100) 44,748 44,898 309,005 337,269 334,020 1,344,891 231 331 54,000 3,335,818 1,424,410 49,784 3,135,118 1,780,206 386,827 386,484 3,031,795 3,259,794 2,127,386 1,015,121 2,210,361 1,185,908 - 753,3526 - 608,255 - 06 0 6 1,010,871 4,097,1176 - 4,097,117 78,921 5,842,560 70,475 5,834,114 - 4,814,228 - 4,965,108 1,815,129 6,641,7966 813,749 5,811,203 3,967,562 3,384,391 2,508,553 87,789,955 4,094,369 3,633,105 2,500,064 87,776,438 134,500 1,565,962 112,104 1,491,775 4,058,699 2,106,990 188,611 169,820 2,756,500 2,078,004 10,000 545 1,205,138 1,340,363 104,989 145,452 - 1,805,4516 13,092 1,762,423 548,854 (1,200,000) 664,167- 799,059 1,089,830 692,850 1,2124,710 748,220 1,301,970 4,607 4,607 16,000 23,170 64,601 79,894 143,000 143,000 35,594 35,594 1,799 50,000 6,592 4,918,544 4,399,805 209,965 13,313,198 207,557 13,310,669 - 3,569,3216 - 3,459,868 - 143,000 - 143,000 81,550 67,256 37,000 36,093 42,940 26,949 26,949 223,554 209,260 288,000 286,055 50,000 49,532 5-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Sect. Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 To 30 Sep 1990 in Text 16. Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads, VA (Prevention of Obstructive and injurious Deposits) (Regular Funds) 17. Waterway on the Coast of VA (Regular Funds) 18. Whitings Creek, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization 20. Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA (Contributed Funds) 21. Virginia Beach, VA (Regular Funds) 22. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization 23. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (Regular Funds) Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 354,000 348,498 529,000 515,277 518,000 536,031 473,500 6,978,324 472,765 6,976,395 850,498 850,498 1,027,841 1,174,569 718,660 711,922 26,196 26,196 996,215 999,506 58,169 58,169 899,530 14,552,975 877,747 14,525,992 168,728 167,900 21,630 21,630 365,426 364,598 500 500 44,800 97,959 27,000 20,662 62,088 2,733,000 1,707,235 - 1,380,000 - 880,000 1,505,000 1,465,942 237,237 300,000 298,670 772,000 728,838 513,000 157,402 4,797 67,249 - 2,760,000 748,537 2,476,434 25,000 1,405,000 499,371 1,379,371 - 7,860,195 358,138 7,745,303 22,632 80,970,527 1,330 80,970,527 919,322 1,020,000 1,086,000 916,775 987,565 1,159,993 1,214,736 11,497,900 1,221,310 11,489,135 5-14 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Sect. Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 To 30 Sep 1990 In Text 24. Richmond, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp 1,153,000 1,400,000 3,800,000 19,562,999 27,529,181 Cost - 1,055,916 1,254,904 3,339,978 13,717,076 20,970,339 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp - - 90,012 1,015,344 1,105,356 Cost - - - 1,011,490 1,011,490 25. Virginia Beach New Work Streams, Canal Approp 1,200,000 1,739,000 982,000 - 4,764,000 Number 2, VA Cost 28,022 1,973,718 1,537,182 602,165 4,604,748 (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp - 110,205 205,000 - 315,205 Cost- - 103,205 180,158 28,503 311,866 26. Emergency Flood Cost 132,649 218,347 174,385 210,475 Control Activities 27. Surveys Cost 452,575 307,349 550,842 1,000,046 28. Collection and Cost 119,383 156,603 154,051 248,829 Study of Basic Data SIncludes $292,096 for previous projects. 2 Includes $52,804 for previous projects. 3 Costs prior to 1942 are included in the project "Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD (BaltimoreDistrict)." Costs listed are for York Spit Channel, VA; Cape Henry Channel, VA and Rappahannock Channel, VA. 4 Includes $445,291 military funds expended from new work dredging on existing project and $83,041 military funds for construction of a wharf. 5 Includes $763,000 for previous projects. 6 Excludes previous projects. See Annual Report for FY 1986. 7 Includes $72,039 for previous projects. 5-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts March 3, 1871 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1909 June 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Mar. 2, 1945 Work Authorized APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep at mean high water and 60 feet wide. Diversion channel and work incidental thereto. Increasing channel to width of 80 feet and maintenance of diversion works. Channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep at mean low water between mouth and Petersburg. Existing project dimensions. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) Mar. 3, 1899 Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, VA to sounds of North Carolina July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) July 3, 1930 Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 June 26, 1934 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Mar. 2, 1945 Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 3 of Text) CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 42 feet deep; 1,000 feet wide Channel depth increased to 50 feet RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet and depth increased to 50 feet YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet Channel depth increased to 37 feet Channel depth increased to 39 feet Channel depth increased to 42 feet Channel depth increased to 50 feet CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA (See Section 4 of Text) Existing Project DEEP CREEK, NEWPORT NEWS, VA (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep from James River to Hicks Landing with widths of 80 feet and 50 feet; a tuming basin 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 105 feet long; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and 6.4 acres in area; and a timber jetty 800 feet long on the north side of the anchorage. Existing project dimensions and elimination of timber jetty. Widening of Federal entrance channel to 100 feet and extend harbor upstream 600 feet. GREENVALE CREEK (See Section 6 of Text) Existing Project Documents Annual Report 1874, pt. II p. 54 H. Doc. 139, 56 Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1901, p. 1467 H. Doc. 952, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 215, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 223, 76th Cong., 1st sess.(1) H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 3rd sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391,62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 589, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 23, 71st Cong., 1st sess. 1 Not available H. Doc. 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept, 21, 1970 H. Doc. 186, 57th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 190, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 29, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 Approved in 1972 H. Doc. 76, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 601, 80th Cong., 2d sess. Approved in 1979 Approved in 1965 5-16 TABLE 5-B NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 7 of Text) May 17, 1950 Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads and specified in Act its tributary waters HORN HARBOR (See Section 8 of Text) July 3, 1930 Existing project Aug. 30, 1935 Removed requirement for local contribution HOSKINS CREEK, VA (See Section 9 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 A channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Rappahannock River, 80 feet wide in creek with turning basin 250 feet long and 200 feet wide. A channel depth increased to 10 feet and width in creek to 80 feet July 5, 1884 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 JAMES RIVER, VA (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 22 feet deep from mouth of Richmond and construct spur and training dikes Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Form a tumrning basin by widening channel at Richmond Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Removal of Trigg cofferdam Tumrning basin at Richmond Harbor Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal UTTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER, VA (See Section 11 of Text) July 3, 1930 Existing Project NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA (See Section 13 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA (See Section 12 of Text) Existing project. Long Creek, Lynnhaven Inlet modification Oct. 17, 1986 ATLANTIC OCEAN CHANNEL, VA (See Section 13A of Text) Construct a 60 foot channel CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA (See Section 13B of Text) Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 45-foot channel to 55 feet H. Doc. 124, 70th Cong., 1st sess. River & Harbors Comm. Doc. 22, 73d Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st sess.. H. Doc. 129, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68 74th Cong., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 260, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 580, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Approved in 1982 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNEL, VA (See Section 13C of Text) Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk Intemrnational Terminal 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet deep H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. 5-17 TABLE 5-B Acts Documents Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 TABLE 5-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 30, 1925 SOUTHERN BRANCH Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia RR bridge: thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR bridge Aug. 30, 1935 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square June 30, 1948 Approach and tumrning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Westemrn RR bridge and a tumrning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end Oct. 27, 1965 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep turning basin opposite St. Julians Creek Oct. 22, 1976 Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a tumrning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 40-foot portions to 45-feet deep Deepen portion of the 35-foot, from mile point 15 to Gilmerton Bridge, to 40 feet deep EASTERN BRANCH Mar. 2, 1907 Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet Removal of shoals at mouthSpecified in act. Mar. 3, 1925 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge July 3, 1930 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley Mar. 2, 1945 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella bridge WESTERN BRANCH Mar. 4, 1913 Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge July 3, 1930 For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge SCOTTS CREEK July 3, 1930 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept, 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 ANCHORAGES 30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius Construct a 55-foot anchorage and increase the radius to 1500 feet for an existing 45-foot anchorage THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA (See Section 13D of Text) A channel 40-feet deep and 750 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channels on either side 32-feet deep and 450 feet wide A channel 45 feet deep and 100 feet wide Deepen existing 45-foot channel to 55-feet H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 182, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong., 1st sess.3 H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess.1 S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.1 H. Docs. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. 5-18 Documents NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents QUEENS CREEK, VA (See Section 14 of Text) Existing project. RUDEE INLET, VA (See Section 15 of Text) Oct. 17, 1986 Project Authorized June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 107) WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 17 of Text) Existing project adopted Project modified Project widened to 100 feet, partially relocated, and incorporated in Delaware Bay-Chesapeake Bay Waterway in Delaware-Maryland-Virginia WHITINGS CREEK (See Section 18 of Text) Mar. 2., 1945 Existing Project TANGIER ISLAND SHORE PROTECTION (See Section 20 of Text) Oct. 17, 1986 Project authorized VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (See Section 21 of Text) Project authorized Project modified Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Project Modified GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA (See Section 23 of Text) July 24, 1946 Project authorized RICHMOND, VA (See Section 24 of Text) Existing project Project authorized for construction VA. BEACH STREAMS, CANAL NO.2, VA BEACH, VA (See Section 25 of Text) Project authorized Approved in 1965 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1970 H. Doc. 582, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. Unpublished report H. Doc. 186, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2nd sess. Chief of Engineers Report, May 22, 1985 H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 178, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 640, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 'Contains latest published map. 2Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 23, 1935. 3For latest published map, see H. Doc. 1246, 62nd Cong., 3d sess. 5-19 TABLE 5-B Jul 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 17, 1986 Aug. 15, 1985 Oct. 17, 1986 Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 201) A TABLE 5-C Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 2 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Width Available Miter Sills Year Miles of for Full Character Opened From Location Chamber Width Uft Upper Lower of to Cost Norfolk, VA feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Navigation 12.4 Albemarle and 75 600 2.7 1 1 Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 Chesapeake Canal and shells (Great Bridge, VA) 10.7 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 $348,879 Canal (Deep Creek) with cutoff walls 33.1 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 $372,556 Canal with cutoff walls (South Mills, NC) 116 feet at mean low water. 5-20 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Appomattox River, VA1 1980 $870,341 1,367,573- Aberdeen Creek, VA2 1975 109,643 201,364- Blackwater River VA Active portion 1 1975 342,118 151,750 19,300 Broad Creek, VA2 1986 27,888 610,742 500 Cape Charles, VA 1989 622,644 2,423,551- Carters Creek, VA Active portion2 3 1951 28,398 3,277- Channel to Newport News, VA 1985 4,097,117 5,834,114 4,965,108 Channel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton Roads2 1944 11,500 39,468 1,200 Channel connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Slaights Wharf2 1950 14,855 38,024 2,500 Chesconessex Creek, VA2 1968 25,516 38,201- Chincoteague Bay, VA 1984 25,126 377,661- Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA 1985 49,396 137,008- Chowan River, NC2 1975 107,220 - 5,700 Cockrells Creek, VA4 1949 - - Cranes Creek, VA 1986 6,274 418,227- Davis Creek, VA 2 1971 97,612 168,509 4,000 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., VA 1974 83,000 51,016- Deep Creek, Newport News, VA2 1990 288,278 2,225,530- Dymers Creek, VA2 1953 5,582 4,610- Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA 1988 68,656 - 7,763 Greenvale Creek, VA2 1990 20,003 415,856- Hampton Creek, VA 1989 186,237 1,219,638 62,969 Horn Harbor, VA2 1990 13,987 346,230- Hoskins Creek, VA2 1990 44,100 1,559,423 500 Jackson Creek, VA2 1971 8,500 34,514- Jarvis Creek, VA4 1979 39,259 -- Kings Creek, VA4 1957 5,593 -- Lafayette River, VA2 1982 242,047 165,831 188,962 Little Machipongo River VA 1990 211,990 514,522 1,211 Little River (Creek) VA'13 1966 168,623 491,918 16,955 Locklies Creek, VA 1928 11,581 9,560- Lynnhaven inlet, VA 1990 445,354 2,933,627- Meherrin River, VA 1987 - 54,764 Miliford Haven VA2 1950 24,568 32,803 Mill Creek, VA 1937 5,445 4,346- Mulberry Creek, VA2 1950 2,393 2,458- Nandua Creek, VA2 1950 6,988 52,445 Nansemond River, VA6 1978 167,477 444,612- Newport News Creek, VA2 1962 135,600 188,286 Nottoway River, VA2 1986 44,295 8,734 43,000 Occohannock Creek, VA Active portion2 1951 13,859 78,283- Onancock River, VA2 5 1963 187,914 468,066- Oyster Channel, VA2 1984 119,117 735,951 Pagan River, VA 2 6 1950 51,425 301,532- Pamunkey River. VA Active portion 1964 31,376 161,183 Parker Creek, VA 1987 15,530 283,251 Parrotts Creek, VA2 1957 37,045 52,046 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot2 1947 165,566 66,162 Queens Creek2 1990 26,949 209,260 Quinby Creek, VA 1987 104,176 1,133,493 Rappahannock River, VA9 1012 1983 414,633 1,959,306 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA4 1950 - - Starlings Creek, VA 1981 66,242 698,919 Tangier Channel, VA 1988 116,550 2,902,721 Taskinas Creek, VA 1975 7,479 135 Totuskey Creek, VA 1970 167,869 451,032 2,000 Tylers Beach, VA2 1982 261,201 414,427- Urbanna Creek, VA2 7 1963 55,724 113,300 5-21 TABLE 5-D Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1990 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Whitings Creek, VA 1990 21,630 365,426 500 Winter Harbor, VA2 1981 171,334 323,652 2,973 Willoughby Channel, VA2 1953 8,500 47,087 - Wishart Point Channel, VA2 1975 118,762 102,527 30,625 York River, VA Active portion2 1986 180,904 285,577 - 1lncudes $22,500 for previous projects. 8lncludes $30,000 for new work and $7,000 for maintenance for previou 2Completed. 9projects. 3In addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. In addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 4lnactive. 1 lncludes $197,146 for previous new work projects. sncldudes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for 1 1 ncludes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. previous projects. 121ncludes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects. 6indudes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. 13Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. 7In addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation. TABLE 5-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30,1990 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Anderson Park, Newport News, VA 1979 $471,474 632 $176,671 Hampton Institute, VA 1976 $156,906 984 $175,845 Saxis Island, VA 1987 $273,600 - $ 3,145 TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Buena Vista, VA 1977 $911,303 -- Newmarket Creek, VA 1970 1,000,000 12,283 $550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, VA 1973 1,851,933 32,877 516,256 Richmond Filtration Plant, VA 1985 478,2241 -- Salem Church Lake, VA 1976 1,896,71612-- Scottsville, VA 1989 3,419,078 2,316 32,954 1 Preconstruction planning terminated. 2 Includes $144,785 for previous projects. 5-22 TABLE 5-G NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY Aberdeen Creek Appomattox River Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Dismal Swamp Canal Atlantic Ocean Channel Broad Creek Channel Connecting York River with Back Creek to Slaights Wharf Channel to Newport News Chesconnessex Creek Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge Cranes Creek Davis Creek Hampton Creek James River Jordan Point - Harrison Bar Harrison Bar - Windmill Point Lafayette River Knitting Mill Creek Nandua Creek Norfolk Harbor Entrance Reach Sewells Point Anchorage Connection to Thimble Shoal Channel Onancock River Pagan River Parker Creek Parrotts Creek Tangier Channels Thimble Shoal Channel Connection to Atlantic Ocean Channel Urbanna Creek Wachapreague Channel Waterway on the Coast of Virginia Bogues Bay Burtons Bay Willoughby Channel Winter Harbor Whitings Creek Oct 89 Dec 89 Nov 89 Sep 90 Jul 90 Jan 90 Apr 90 Sep 90 Jan 90 Jul 90 Aug 90 Feb 90 May 90 May 90 Oct 89 Sep 90 Jul 90 Sep 90 Aug 90 Mar 90 Apr 90 May 90 Aug 90 Sep 90 Sep 90 Jul 90 Aug 90 Aug 90 Aug 90 Jul 90 Aug 90 Jul 90 Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance Reconnaissance 5-23 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT * This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin- Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (RI & H Actof 1965)............... ........... 6-2 2. Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. ............... 6-3 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (Wilmington District)............... 6-3 4. Beaufort Harbor, N. C........................6-5 5. Cape Fear River, N. C. Above Wilmington....... 6-5 6. Channel from Back Sound to 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Lookout Bight, N. C............ .......... 6-5 Far Creek, N. C.................. ........... 6-6 Lockwoods Folly River, N. C. ............... 6-6 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C.................6-6 Morehead City Harbor, N. C...................6-7 Ocracoke Inlet, N. C..........................6-8 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C.. ............... 6-8 Rollinson Channel, N. C......................6-8 Shallotte River, N. C.........................6-8 Silver Lake Harbor, N. C................. 6-9 16. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C....................6-9 17. Wilmington Harbor, N. C.....................6-9 Flood Control 18. Cape Fear River Basin, N. C.................6-10 18A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C......... 6-11 18B. Randleman Lake, N. C................... .6-11 19. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C............. 6-12 20. Neuse River Basin, N. C.................... 6-12 20A. Falls Lake, N. C........................6-12 21. Hamlet City Lake, N. C................... 6-13 22. Neuse River, Oriental, N. C...................6-13 23. Roanoke River Upper Basin, Va.- Headwaters Area.....................6-14 24. Wrightsville Beach, N. C............ 25. Yadkin River Basin, N. C. and S. C..: . 25A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C................. 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects............. 27. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.............. Page ......... 6-14 .......... 6-14 .......... 6-14 ..6-15 .......... 6-15 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 28. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N. C............. 6-15 28A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N . C ....... ....................... 6-15 28B. Philpott Lake, Va....... .................... 6-16 29. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations...................... 6-16 General Investigations 30. 31. 32. Surveys.............................6-17 Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 6-18 Preconstruction Engineering and Design ...... 6-18 Tables Page Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement.......... 6-19 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation.............. 6-23 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................6-26 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects....................6-27 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ ..... ....... 6-28 6-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Page Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects................ 6-29 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys....................6-30 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................ 6-30 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs.................6-31 Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................6-32 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the program. Recon studies are 100 percent Federal. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Operations for FY 90 included chemical control on about 97 river miles of alligatorweed (about 25 treatment acres), biological control of hydrilla at three lakes (95 acres of hydrilla), and monitoring of biolgoical control of hydrilla at sites stocked with triploid grass carp in previous years. All alligatorweed control in FY 90 was by the application of rodeo herbicide. All treatment sites, with the exception of Sweetwater Creek, are under maintenance control. Control sites include the Scuppernong Basin (5.2 acres/27.8 river miles), Little River Basin (0.3 acres/8.3 river miles), New River Basin (0.3 acres/7.2 river miles), Pasquotank River Basin (3.3 acres/12.7 river miles), Alligator River Basin (6.5 acres/9.0 river miles) and the Lumber River Basin (8.5 acres/20.7 river miles). Mackeys Creek (6.2 river miles) was inspected but did not require alligatorweed control. Sweetwater Creek (a tributary to the Roanoke River) continues to be a problem area with annual reinfestation of the navigation channel by alligatorweek from the adjacent swamp and excessive clearing of snags required to access treatment areas. One acre of alligatorweed was treated along 4.8 river miles of Sweetwater Creek in FY 90. No new alligatorweed treatment areas were added to the program in FY 90. New hydrilla biological control sites, which were stocked with triploid grass carp in FY 90, include Shelly Lake (53 acres), Reedy Creek (22 acres) and Sycamore Lakes (20 acres) at William B. Umstead State Park. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp to determine the effectiveness of the stocking and perdict future control needs continued in FY 90. All planning efforts were at the reconnaissance level. Several reconnaissance investigations of aquatic week problems in response to requests by others were made in FY 90. Control work was accomplished for a Federal cost of $21,685. Planning was accomplished at a Federal cost of $24,853. Condition at end of fiscal year. All alligatorweed treatment sites under maintenance control in FY 90 are expected to remain under maintenance control. A biennial treatment schedule in some maintenance level alligatorweed control sites will be implemented in FY 91. Other sites should require only spot treatments in FY 91. Onslow County has elected to take over maintenance level alligatorweed control of the New River, and this site will not be included in the Aquatic Plant Control Program (APCP) in FY 91. Aquatic weed control in Sweetwater Creek has resulted in a reduction in the area infested with alligatorweed; however, reinfestation from adjacent swamps is expected. Excessive debris (primarily downed trees and logs) in the creek is now the primary impediment to recreational navigation and causes continued operational problems resulting in high control costs. Local interests do not support continued alligatorweed control in Sweetwater Creek, and this site will not be included in the APCP in FY 91. Monitoring of hydrialla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp indicate that overall our biological control efforts have been effective. The triploid grass carp stocked in Lake Wheeler in FY 85 and FY 87 for hydrilla control continued to provide weed control throughout the FY 90 recreation season and long-term control is expected. Supplemental grass carp stocking is proposed for FY 91. Some hydrilla reduction has occurred in Lake Rogers (stocked in FY 87); however, control is not occurring as quickly as expected and restocking is proposed in FY 91. Triploid grass carp have had noticeable effects on hydriall growth in the Crabtree Project Lakes which were stocked with triploid grass carp in FY 89 (Fred Bond Park Lake was stocked in FY 87) and Holt Reservoir (stocked in FY 89). Long-term residual hydrilla control is expected in these reservoirs by FY 92. No grass carp stocking in these 6-2 Tables Table 6-F Table 6-G Table 6-H WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT sites is proposed for FY 91. Investigations of aquatic weed problems, in response to requests by county governments and municipalities, may result in the addition of new treatment sites and species in future years. 2. ATLANTIC BEACH CHANNELS, N. C. Location. In Carteret County, on south side of Bogue Sound, 3 miles west of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to the marina east of Money Island; and a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the intersection of Money Island and Causeway Channel in Bogue Sound to the southern end of Causeway Channel. The length of channels is 28 miles. Existing project was authorized November 23, 1965, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and aids to navigation, including suitable spoil-disposal areas, and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the cost of such works; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all equally in both Money Island Channel and Causeway Channel; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local channels commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; and provide a cash contribution toward the first costs of the project, expressed as a percentage of the Federal construction costs, of 50 percent for Money Island Channel, and 41.5 percent for Causeway Channel. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous wharves and piers exist along Causeway Channel, and a marina near Money Island has berthing facilities for about 100 boats. Existing facilities are not adequate, and additional facilities will be provided by local interests. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Engineering and design for cancelled pipeline dredging contract was $1,043. Between January 22 and April 20, 1990, the contract dredge Eagle removed 32,365 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $144,327. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed April 1966. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwaterintrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville Beach by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp (formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding at Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield bridges was authorized in November 1986. Estimated Federal cost is $69,000,000 (1990). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. The 12-foot-deep 6-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 channel in Peltier Creek was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The south jetty at Masonboro Inlet has an estimated Federal cost of $9,510,000 (1990) and is complete except for the training wall. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Design of Core Creek Bridge was continued at a cost of $654,429. Design of Hobucken Bridge was continued at a cost of $98,335. Maintenance: Through Channel - During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell conducted clearning and snagging operation and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $32,498. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging in the Alligator-Pungo landcut was $49,500. Cost in connection with prior year dredging from Swansboro to South Carolina state line was $2,000. Between October 1 and November 11, $989, the contract dredge Richmond removed 76,542 cubic yards from shoals in the Neuse River to the South Carolina state line at a cost of $335,221. Between January 25 and May 31, 1990, and June 12 and July 23, 1990, the contract dredge Enterprise removed 316,239 cubic yards from shoals in Inlet Crossings at a cost of $1,429,318. Between March 3 and April 12, 1990, the contract dredge Marion removed 101,653 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between Bear and Brown Inlets at a cost of $417,964. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging was $5,431. Between March 5 and May 14, 1990, the contract dredge Arlington removed 312,522 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Sound at a cost of $1,663,911. Marking easements and investigating encroachments in Hyde County cost $5. Disposal area stabilization at Swansboro and New River cost $13,291. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $42,778. Archeological investigations of sounds and inlets cost $3,221. Condition and operation studies cost $448,942. Interim inspection of three remaining bridges cost $2,269. Long-term environmental dredging and monitoring study cost $34,356. Master plan supplement for Snow's Cut cost $5,975. Reimbursement for damages to Core Creek Bridge resulted in negative cost of $38,104. Three highway bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a cost of $563,206. Bogue Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 56,828 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $279,732. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 72,894 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $176,334. Condition and operation studies cost $25,290. Environmental coordination and investigation of disposal site cost $450. A marine archeological survey of the inlet cost $1,047. Carolina Beach Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $2,500. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 9,961 cubic yards from shoals in Carolna Beach Inlet at a cost of $44,805. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 4,110 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $103,007. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 163,149 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $565,255. Monitoring of Carolina Beach Inlet cost X28,094. Marine archeological survey of wrecks cost $154. Condition and operation studies cost $14,909. Masonboro Inlet -During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $36,767. Condition and operation studies cost $4,817. Design for pipeline dredging cost $6,152. New River Inlet -During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 108,904 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $363,014. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 158,816 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $454,859. Condition and operation studies cost $18,747. New Topsail Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $864. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 90,692 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $393,722. Archeological investigations of Inlet cost $1,095. Construction of dock for U. S. debris boat Snell cost $104,012. Condition and operation studies cost $22,874. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1983 except for the training wall, three tieup dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the three remaining bridges. Joseph P. Knapp Bridge was completed on November 13, 1986. Design of Core Creek Bridge was initiated in FY 87 and Hobucken in FY 89. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990 was $145,230,030, of which $43,368,094 was for new work including $86,851 in 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT contributed funds and $101,861,936 was for maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. The remaining uncompleted portion of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of June 30, 1948, was deauthorized in accordance with Section 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. 4. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-footlong section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between August 30 and September 10, 1990, the contract dredge Enterprise removed 56,130 cubic yards from shoals in Beaufort Harbor at a cost of $169,375. Condition and operation studies cost $8,993. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1990, were $827,040 for new work, including $34,000 contributed funds and $3,956,882 for maintenance, including $326,225 contributed funds, a total of $4,783,922. 5. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared and maintained the buoy systems at the locks at a cost of $32,561. Periodic inspections of locks and dams cost $43,117. Emergency electrical repairs at three locks and dams cost $163,254. Condition and operation studies cost $69,423. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $366,467. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1990, were $19,273,762 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $15,663,308 for maintenance. 6. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2, 1945. For details see Annual Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Disposal area stabilization and monitoring at Bardens Inlet cost $4,484. Improvement of disposal area cost $84. Condition and operation studies cost $21,576. Archeological investigations cost $184. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 6-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 7. FAR CREEK, N.C. Location. Flows easterly from Engelhard into Pamlico Sound, about 95 miles south of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 80 to 100 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to highway bridge at Engelhard, with a turning basin 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 900 feet long at the head. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and May 17, 1950. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Project is served by 12 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,300 feet, all privately owned. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Construction of dikes for pipeline dredging cost $217,563. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed June 1957. 8. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for a distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interests must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in groundwater levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers and, (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 12,376 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $59,233. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 134,288 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $387,941. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 8,165 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $115,853. General archeological investigations cost $2,607. Archeological investigations of the Bendigo and new wrecks cost $2,551. Condition and operation studies cost $16,127. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 9. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot-deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deep water 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12-foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $69,900,000 (1990). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) and establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (i) pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreational navigation presently estimated at $10,300,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreational navigation facilities presently estimated at $2,372,000 annually; (j) pay 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation during construction presently estimated at $6,600,000; (k) pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas presently estimated at $5,700,000. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the modification continued at a cost of $162,890. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell maintained dredging ranges and mooring dolphins at a cost of $30,189. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 705,152 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $1,805,373. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 79,910 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $241,500. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging was $157,348. Between October 1, 1989 and January 5, 1990, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 359,213 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $580, 552. Between October 22 and November 21, 1989, the contract dredge Northerly Island removed 292,020 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet ocean bar at a cost of $905,967. Between March 25 and June 3, 1990, the contract dredge Richmond removed 224,090 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel at a cost of $647,986. Engineering and design for future year pipeline dredging in vicinity of Oregon Inlet Bridge cost $15,918. Engineering and design for future year hopper dredging of the ocean bar cost $23,909. Design for cancelled pipeline dredging contract was $28,737. Dikes were constructed for future year pipeline dredging at a cost of $12,701. Expansion of disposal island cost $10,937. Archeological investigations cost $1,244. Project monitoring cost $55,110. Environmental coordination for realignment of intersection from Old House Channel to the inlet cost $30,098. Condition and operation studies cost $198,604. Contributed funds of $192,275 were received for deposition of dredge material on Pea Island. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) 10. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. The authorized project provides for deepening of the channel, from the 42-foot-depth contour in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar to the gorge in Beaufort Inlet, to 42 feet over a bottom width of 450 feet, thence to a depth of 40 feet in the east leg of the turning basin including the 1,200-foot diameter turning area, with widths of 600 feet in the cutoff channel, and 400 feet wide to the turning basin and connecting shallow-draft channels. Project deepening was completed on August 2, 1978. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. In general the project as it now exists was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st sess.) and the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to 6-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debis boat Snell - maintained dredging ranges and mooring dolphins at a cost of $4,861. Between August 7 and September 20, 1990, the contract dredge Sugar Island removed 592,232 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $935,510. Design cost for future year pipeline dredging cost $12,761. Cost in connection with prior years dredging was $54,131. Monitoring at Morehead City Harbor cost $28,583. Ocean dumping monitoring in conjunction with EPA cost $740. Condition and operation studies cost $101,046. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the jetties. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1990, was $53,641,326 of which $6,501,569 was for new work (including $553,477 public works funds) and $47,139,757 for maintenance, including $1,256,686contributed funds. 11. OCRACOKE INLET, N. C. Location. The inlet connects Pamlico Sound with the Atlantic Ocean, about 30 miles southwest of Cape Hatteras and 43 miles northeast of Cape Lookout. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel across the ocean bar 18 feet deep and 400 feet wide. Construction of a jetty extending from Ocracoke Island to the Atlantic Ocean was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Archeological investigation of the inlet cost $5. Condition and operation studies cost $4,977. Design for cancelled pipeline dredging contract was $684. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in August 1971. 12. PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N. C. Location. The two names apply to the same river, known as the Tar above and as the Pamlico below Washington, N. C. This stream rises in Person County, flows southeasterly 180 miles to Washington, thence 38 miles to Pamlico Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 537.) Previous project. For details see page 502 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 12-foot contour in the river below Washington to Atlantic Coastline Railroad bridge at Washington; thence 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, 300 feet long, in Hardee Creek, 1,500 feet above its mouth; thence 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide to Greenville; thence 20 inches deep, 60 feet wide to Tarboro; and thence to clear the natural channel to Little Falls. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876; March 3, 1879; August 11, 1888; March 2, 1907; July 25, 1912; July 3, 1930; and August 26, 1937. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 54 wharves on the portion of this river under improvement, of which 34 are along the waterfront at Washington, 19 between Washington and the mouth, and only 1 in usable condition above Washington. They have a frontage of 3,570 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 21 and 31, 1990, and April 1 and 9, 1990, the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared at a cost of $57,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. (For details see Annual Report for 1962.) 13. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2, 1945; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for future year pipeline dredging cost $8,414. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 14. SHALLOTTE RIVER, N. C. Location. A small stream in Brunswick County, N. C., rising in the large swamp country between Cape Fear and Waccamaw Rivers, known as Green Swamp. Stream is about 30 miles long and flows southerly into Atlantic Ocean and 20 miles west of mouth of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 835.) 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Previous project. For details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 36 feet wide from the mouth to town of Shallotte. Section under improvement is 9 miles long. River is tidal, range varying from 5 feet at mouth to 3 feet at Shallotte. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 caused a tide about 16 feet above mean sea level in the river at Shallotte Point. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, and January 21, 1927. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A marine railway and shop at Shallotte Point and another in town of Shallotte with facilities for building and repairing boats up to about 60 feet long. On Shallotte River, there are 17 docks varying from 16 to 321 feet of frontage, providing 1,334 feet of wharf and docking space. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was accomplished during the fiscal year. An adjustment in funds resulted in a revocation of $47,618. Project condition surveys cost $2,840. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1929. 15. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between February 27 and March 23, 1990, the contract dredge Richmond removed 121,501 cubic yards from shoals in Big Foot Slough Channel at a cost of $431,507 Between March 1 and March 7, 1990, vibracore work was done by the U. S. debris boat Snell at a cost of $17,500. Environmental coordination for channel realignment cost $4,044. Condition and operation studies cost $13,405. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 16. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for cancelled pipeline dredging contract cost $2,260. Condition and operation studies cost $377. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 17. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic 6-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River; a 38-footdeep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. A modification to widen the existing anchorage basin by 100 feet was authorized on July 13, 1982, under Sec. 5 of the Cong. Appro. Act of March 4, 1915. A modification to widen the 38-foot by 400-foot Fourth East Jetty Channel to 500 feet; deepen the 32-foot by 400-foot channel between Castle Street and the N. C. 133 bridge to 35 feet; widen the 32-foot by 1000-foot by 800-foot turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast Cape Fear River by 50 feet on the west side and deepen to 35 feet; and environmental improvements to include acquiring, by easements or fee title, about 2,800 acres of wetlands, river bluffs and ecotones and provision for a minimum number of specially designed corridors across the wetlands for industrial access to the river was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal cost is $12,580,000 (1990). (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for latest modification. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas including necessary retaining dikes presently estimated at $909,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs for dikes presently estimated at $4,000 annually; (2) modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project, presently estimated at $12,271,000; (3) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction presently estimated at $2,775,000 and reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (which is entirely offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas; and (4) pay 25 percent of the first costs allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement presently estimated at $1,325,000, and pay 25 percent of the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $14,000 annually. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. (For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and moved buoys at a cost of $112,361. Between October 1 and 18, 1989, the contract dredge Manhattan Island removed 235,088 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $1,250,861. Between January 27 and March 31, 1990, and August 19 and 23, 1990, the contract dredge Enterprise removed 892,360 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin and the State Ports at a Federal cost of $968,784 and a contributed funds cost of $178,807. Between June 9 and August 6, 1990, the contract dredge Sugar Island removed 524,267 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $646,637. Cost in connection with prior year bucket and barge contract was $824. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging was $5,926. Environmental analysis of proposed dredged material disposal sites cost $21,727. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $23,605. Endangered species study cost $112,263. Sec. 933 dredge material study for Bald Head Island cost $47,932. Rock investigations at Cape Fear River entrance cost $79,945. Creation of intergraph data base of historical soils, geotechnical and survey files cost $47,042. Hilton Wreck damage assessment site documentation cost $25,051. Condition and operation studies cost $418,050. Contributed funds of $166,828 were expended for dike repair and construction on Eagle Island. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed October 1982 except for latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1990, was $83,408,510 of which $14,089,612 was for new work and $64,731,239 was for maintenance, including $4,587,659 contributed funds. The remaining uncompleted portion of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, was deauthorized in accordance with Secion 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. Flood Control 18. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the compre- 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT hensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1990, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 18A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N.C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated cost for new work is $144,900,000 (1990), consisting of $86,520,000 for construction, and $58,380,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30, 1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,700,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $44,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $100,000. A contract between the State of N. C. and the United States for water supply storage space was executed by ASA (CW) on April 10, 1988. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $806,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Relocation of Public Service Gasline was continued at a cost of $1,421,593. The N. C. maintenance center was completed at a cost of $64,479. Ebenezer Church recreation area was completed at a cost of $14,889. Poplar Point recreation area was completed at a cost of $73,942. Crosswinds recreation area was continued at a cost of $1,505,493. Seaforth recreation area was completed at a cost of $70,499. Repairs to Parkers Creek underground electrical service cost $22,485. The State administration center was continued at a cost of $40,307. Total Federal expenditures were $4,111,778, including the above items. Status of plans and specs: New Hope Overlook and Robeson Creek, 98 percent; and Rivers End and Wilderness Island O&M roads, 90 percent. Maintenance: Automatic gate control system and piezometer reading equipment cost $98,241. Sedimentation resurveys cost $52,588. Embankment criteria report cost $1,225. Adjustments in cost of sedimentation surveys resulted in a reduction in cost of $2,797. Normal operation and maintenance cost $776,846. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $54,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are basically complete expect for Public Service Gasline, recreation facilities, and project operations facilities. Impoundment was completed in February 1982 with dedication on May 1, 1982. Project completion is scheduled for June 1993. 18B. RANDLEMAN LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., about 15 miles south of Greensboro and about 2 miles upstream from the town of Randleman. The damsite and about two-thirds of the reservoir would lie in Randolph County. The upper one-third of the reservoir would lie in Guilford County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of an earth dam 2,300 feet long with a maximum height of 110 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 108,000 acre-feet, consisting of 46,000 acre-feet for flood control and a conservation pool of 62,000 acre-feet for water supply, water-quality control and sedimentation. Randleman Lake is the second project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River Basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control, water supply, and recreation. Estimated cost of new work is $121,000,000 (1990), consisting of $60,670,000 for construction and $60,330,000 for lands and damages, including relocations. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Based on the termination of Federal interest in the project by the ASA(CW), no local cooperation is required. 6-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project coordination cost $108. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed in FY 1982. The Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority is building a water supply and possible recreation facility at Randleman. All pertinent data that may be useful in the construction has been provided. 19. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of a dune with a base generally bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 31,800 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach; initial deposition of sufficient material north of Carolina Beach to serve as a feeder beach; and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 10 years from the year of completion of initial placement. Along the northern 2,050 feet, the project includes a rock revetment at elevation 12 fronted by a 130-foot-wide berm at elevation 8. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $17,500,000 (1990). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for 50 years. This cost has not been included. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: An economic reanalysis of the area south of Carolina Beach was continued at a cost of $217,955. A renourishment report was started at a cost of $44,393. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. The second increment of renourishment was completed in May 1988. 20. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1989. 20A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 95 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100 feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 374,450 acre-feet, of which 243,050 acre-feet is for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 61,330 acre-feet for water quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $181,000,000 (1990) consisting of $86,858,000 for construction and $94,142,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $13,900,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $101,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $20,000,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,340,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non- Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Wildlife subimpoundments were continued at a cost of $2,548,143. State maintenance center was completed at a cost of $42,219. Rolling View campground and recreation facilities were continued at a cost of $136,058. State administration center was continued at a cost of $726,742. Rehabilitation of the Mangum House was continued at a cost of $22,972. Total Federal expenditures were $5,803,487, including the above items. Status of plans and specs: Holly Point recreation area, 75 percent; and B.W. Wells and Shinleaf Peninsula recreation area, 99 percent. Maintenance: Repairs for erosion on the I-85 utility fill cost $41,255. Intake tower gate maintenance cost $293,063. Periodic inspection report cost $22,907. Normal operation and maintenance cost $875,692. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $54,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30, 1983. All facilities are basically complete except for fish and wildlife facilities, recreation facilities, State management and 0 & M facilities and project modifications due to the water storage shortage. 21. HAMLET CITY LAKE, HAMLET, N. C. Location. The project is located on Marks Creek within the city limits of Hamlet, N. C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Hamlet, N. C.) Existing project. A small earth dam constructed in the 1930's under the WPA Program impounds the shallow 50-acre lake. Much of the City's storm runoff empties into the lake and has contributed significantly to a sediment problem. Local interests desire removal of accumulated sediment and debris including construction of sediment traps and providing other devices or equipment to prevent and abate the further deposit of sediment. Results from the bottom sampling and testing program show that contaminants are much more widespread than originally estimated. Results of further tests will determine the final scope of the project and method of disposal of contaminants. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $3,200,000 (1990). The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Sec. 206, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 25 percent of the total cost of the project estimated at $1,070,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate planning was initiated at a cost of $4,650. Planning, engineering, and design was initiated at a cost of $238,274. Condition at end of fiscal year. Sediment testing was initiated. The results of this testing will determine the construction schedule. 22. NEUSE RIVER, ORIENTAL, N. C. Location. The Town of Oriental, North Carolina, is located in the Neuse River Drainage Basin near the Pamlico Sound. The Hodges Street bulkhead is located at the head of the harbor which provides berthing facilities for transient craft as well as resident commercial vessels. The harbor is part of the Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), North Carolina, project which was dredged in 1956. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Oriental, N. C.) Existing project. The approved plan is for the replacement of 230 linear feet of existing timber bulkhead (Hodges Street Bulkhead) with a steel sheet-pile system and replacement of attendant features disturbed by construction. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction is $241,100 (1990). The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 14, 1990, under Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas as determined by the Chief of Engineers to be necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to but not less than 25 percent of total project costs, estimated at $80,400, at least 5 percent of which will be cash. This amount shall include the value or cost of all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and facility and utility alterations and relocations necessary for construction of the project, including suitable borrow and excavated material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army and assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work:Plans and specifications were completed at a cost of $21,367. Contributed funds expended were $2,234 for relocations and $4,228 for betterments. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract was advertised in September 1990, and completion is scheduled for August 1991. 6-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 23. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, VIRGINIA, HEADWATERS AREA Location. The project is located on the Roanoke River in the City of Roanoke, VA. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Roanoke, VA.) Existing project. The authorized plan includes about 6.4 miles of channel widening along the 10-mile project reach through the City of Roanoke, VA. Channel widening will be accomplished with the construction of a benched channel above the elevation of the average streamflow. Other flood damage reduction features include floodproofing at one location, training walls to prevent floodwater intrusion into low areas along the river (total length 7,200 feet), replacement of two low-level bridges with constrict streamflows and a flood warning system. Recreation facilities consist of a 5-mile recreation trail along the project reach and access and parking areas. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $19,000,000 (1990). The project was authoried by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H.R. 6, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil disposal areas presently estimated at $7,023,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project presently estimated at $2,512,000; pay 25 percent of the cost of flood warning system (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations) presently estimated at $22,100; pay 5 percent of the total cost allocated to flood control in cash in addition to all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $1,386,600; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation (partially offset by a credit for land, easements, rights of way and relocations) and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities presently estimated at $1,031,900; and pay 25 percent of the cost of non-structural floodproofing of the sewage treatment plant (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) presently estimated at $28,400. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate planning was continued at a cost of $9,397. Logperch monitoring was initiated at a cost of $1,006. Planning, engineering and design was continued at a cost of $110,941. Condition at end of fiscal year. The contract for the flood warning system was awarded in September 1990, and scheduled for completion in February 1991. Completion of the total project is scheduled for July 1995. 24. WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N. C. Location. A small island 10 miles east of Wilmington, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map p. 834.) Existing project. Construct a dune with a base bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 14,000 feet from Moores Inlet on the north to Masonboro Inlet on the south. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for the life of the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for beach renourishment was completed at a cost of $120,532. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work under the initial authorization has been completed. 25. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 25A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acrefeet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Design of the management center cost $1,594. Liquefaction study cost $2,561. Design for road paving and repaving cost $19,253. Intake tower gate maintenance cost $139,106. Design for stilling basin repairs cost $5,011. Commercial activities study of Natural Resources management functions cost $6,935. Design for work from periodic inspection 7 cost $33,632. Design for converting sewage package treatment plants to septic tile fields cost $6,215. Archeological surveys cost $34,875. Updating flood control data cost $5,676. Downstream economic study cost $23,399. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,080,369. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $54,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in August 1962. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1990: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; Gapway Swamp, Columbus County, N. C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N. C.; New River, Onslow County, N. C.; Pungo Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; South Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Pungo River, Beaufort County, N. C.; Filberts Creek, Edenton, N. C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N. C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N. C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N. C.; Carolina Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsville Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, Harnett County, N. C.; Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.; Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.; Ararat River, Surry County, N. C.; South Mayo River, Stuart, Va; and Leith Creek, Scotland County, N. C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $9,470. Total cost to September 30, 1990, was $462,529, charged to operations. 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 6-K.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). National Emergency Preparedness Program cost $108,563. Disaster Preparedness Program cost $111,387. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 28. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 28A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost is $67,529,000 (1983) for construction and $24,521,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $92,050,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost-sharing with the State of N. C. at various sites cost $52,540. Replacement of shoreline bulkhead cost $47,939. Work in connection with acquisition of land in South Boston area cost $18,857. Study on the impact of water withdrawals cost $250. Archeological salvage at Satterwhite Point Historic Site cost $7,317. Replacement of the powerhouse computer was continued at a cost of $34,211. Periodic inspection of the dam bridge cost $4,315. Final guide taking line study cost $1,251. Investigation and stability analysis of earth dikes cost $35,121. Installation of inclinometer at Monolith II cost $42,740. Design and construction of courtesy docks cost $13,154. Northbend Park water system improvements cost $8,566. Design for Northbend Park lift station cost $22,737. Construction of management center exhibits cost $138,275. Design for 6-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 renovation of Rudds Creek recreation area cost $105,910. The real estate DM for acquisition in the South Boston area cost $19,657. Condition and operation studies for the Mecklenburg Cogeneration facility cost $21,336. Condition and operation studies for the coal-fired steam electric station cost $2,514. Periodic inspection and evaluation of dam cost $24,304. Archeological survey cost $93,078. Design of guardrails for the earth dikes cost $384. Vegetative erosion control research cost $7,041. Painting and carpentry repairs to buildings cost $26,421. Station service transformer feasibility study cost $132. Replacement of PCB contaminated equipment cost $123,571. Waterfowl impoundments and environmental studies cost $7,457. Sleeve gun equipment to deter striped bass from entering power plant turbines cost $24,953. Investigation of deep seated sliding of the dam continued at a cost of $37,295. Normal operation and maintenance cost $4,763,726. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $54,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 28B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. On Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate is $13,933,000 (1983) for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $15,090,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Additional cost in connection with construction of management and visitors center was $1,312. Replacement of the powerhouse computer was continued at a cost of $145,179. Commercial activities study of Natural Resources management functions cost $2,560. Installation of a tile field for Salthouse Branch recreation area cost $43,906. Design of a boathouse and bulkhead at Philpott Park cost $47,183. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,536,206. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $54,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 30. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1990 at elevation 216.18, feet m.s.l. or 0.18 feet above normal pool. Heavy rainfall on October 1 and 2 caused the lake level to rise to maximum elevation of the fiscal year at elevation 221.60 feet, m.s.l. or 5.6 feet above normal pool. Jordan Lake was drawn down to near normal pool by mid-October and remained near normal pool until December 9. Excessive rainfall over five days caused Jordan Lake to rise to elevation 220.85 feet, m.s.l. on December 15. After recessing back to normal pool, Jordan Lake remained at or near normal pool through the latter part of January. Two major rainfall events produced lake peaks of 219.50 and 220.69 feet, m.s.l. on January 29 and February 20. Jordan Lake remained near normal pool until the end of March when the lake rose to elevation 219.44 feet, m.s.l. on April 1. Except for one other minor lake peak of 219.07 on May 30, Jordan Lake reamined near normal pool through the end of June. During July through the end of September, a drought occurred at Jordan Lake with observed precipitation being 7.3 inches below normal and inflow being only 17 percent of normal. On September 30, Jordan Lake ended the fiscal year at the minimum elevation for the year at 210.52 feet, m.s.l. or 5.48 feet below normal pool. Total flood and conservation storage utilized during the year was 16 percent and 48 percent, respectively. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1990 were $571,400 making the cumulative total since inception of the project $13,062,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $108,171. Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1990 at elevation 250.33 feet, m.s.l. or 0.67 feet below rule curve. Heavy rainfall on October 1 and 2 brought the lake level to elevation 252.15 feet, m.s.l. on October 3. Falls Lake returned to rule curve elevation on October 9 and remained near rule curve through mid-December. Excessive rainfall produced a lake rise to elevation 253.07 feet, m.s.l. or 2.97 feet above rule curve on December 14. Above average rainfall caused two minor lake level rises to 251.23 and 252.57 feet, m.s.l. on January 27 and February 20, respectively. The maximum elevation of the fiscal year occurred on April 4 when a series of rainfall events caused Falls Lake to rise to elevation 254.16 feet, m.s.l. Except for a rise to elevation 253.04 feet, m.s.l. on May 6, Falls Lake remained at or near rule curve through the latter part of June. During July through September, Falls Lake was gradually drawn down to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year of 247.93 feet, m.s.l. or 3.07 feet below rule curve on September 30 and ended the fiscal year at elevation 247.94 feet, m.s.l. This drawdown was caused by below normal inflows and releases to meet downstream minimum flow requirements. Total flood and conservation storage utilized during the year was 24 percent and 26 percent, respectively. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1990 were $2,219,000 making the cumulative total since inception of the project $34,322.000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $125,572. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began fiscal year 1990 at elevation 301.55 feet, m.s.1. or 2.05 feet above rule curve. Following heavy rainfall during the first 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT part of October, Kerr Reservoir rose to 306.01 feet, m.s.1. on October 6, and then returned to near rule curve by the end of October. During November and the first part of December, the reservoir elevation fluctuated between 298 and 299 feet m.s.l. The reservoir rose to near 300 feet, m.s.l. in mid-December but was drawn down to slightly above rule curve elevation by the end of the month as rainfall was below normal and inflow near normal. The reservoir reached the minimum elevation of 295.95 feet, m.s.l. or 0.45 feet above rule curve for the fiscal year on December 25. In January, the reservoir peaked three times at elevations near 300, 301, and 299.5 feet, m.s.l. as rainfall and inflow were above normal for the month. Multiple storm events during February caused the reservoir to rise to a peak elevation of 302.98 feet, m.s.l. or 7.48 feet above the rule curve on February 20. The reservoir was drawn back down to near 299 feet, m.s.l. by the first part of March. Following heavy rains at the end of March, the reservoir rose to 304.41 feet, m.s.l. on April 5. The reservoir was drawn back down to rule curve by the latter part of April and remained near rule curve through the end of the month. In mid-May, the lake rose to near 303.5 feet, m.s.l., but quickly returned to rule curve. Heavy rainfall at the end of May produced the maximum elevation of the fiscal year at 306.73 feet, m.s.l. or 5.06 feet above rule curve on June 2. The reservoir was drawn back down to rule curve by the latter part of June as the inflow was near normal and the rainfall below normal. For most of July and August, the reservoir remained near rule curve except for one peak in mid-July near 301.5 feet, m.s.l. In September, the reservoir began a gradual drawdown from rule curve to near elevation 298.0 feet, m.s.l. as inflow and rainfall were below normal. Kerr Reservoir ended the fiscal year 1990 at elevation 298.22 feet, m.s.l. or 1.28 feet below rule curve. In cooperation with State and Federal fish and wildlife agencies, the Wilmington District continued the new fish flow regime used in fiscal year 1989 in the lower Roanoke River to enhance the striped bass fish spawning. Fish flows commenced on the first of April and concluded on June 15. Flow rates under the current plan for striped bass coincide with natural flow rates with heavier flows being released in April and lower flow rates occurring in June. Preliminary reports from state fisheries personnel indicate that the striped bass fish spawning was below average. Total flood and current contractural power pool storage utilized during the year was 28 percent and 60 percent, respectively. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 610,777,900 kilowatt hours and net marketed power revenue was $4,793,901 making a cumulative total since inception of $140,740,264. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1990 were $7,002,000, making the cumulative total since inception of the project $148,509,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $345,535. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, began fiscal year 1990 at elevation 974.35 feet, m.s.1. or 2.85 feet above rule curve. Heavy rains at the beginning of October produced the maximum elevation for the fiscal year on October 2 at elevation 978.29 feet, m.s.l. or 6.79 feet above rule curve. Philpott for navigation studies, $399,262 was for flood control studies, $56,616 was for beach erosion studies, $3,778 was 6-17 Lake was gradually drawn down to the rule curve by the end of October. Philpott Lake remained at or near rule curve through mid-February. Heavy rains then caused Philpott Lake to rise to 974.47 and 975.44 feet, m.s.l. on February 13 and March 19, respectively. Moderate rainfall and streamflows helped maintain Philpott Lake at or near rule curve through mid-July. Heavy rainfall then produced a rapid rise in lake level to elevation of 975.26 feet, m.s.l. or 1.76 feet above rule curve on July 16. Philpott Lake elevation remained above or near rule curve to the end of August. Low rainfall during September produced the minimum elevation of the fiscal year on September 28 at elevation 970.67 feet, m.s.l. or 0.86 feet below rule curve. Total flood and current contractural power pool storage utilized during the year was 37 percent and 16 percent, respectively. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 37,065,893 kilowatt hours and net marketed power revenue was $1,125,102 making a cumulative total since inception of $19,607,386. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1990 were $1,507,000, making the cumulative total since inception of the project at $153,263,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $153,952. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1990 at elevation 1,030.60 feet, m.s.l. or 0.60 feet above normal pool. Heavy rains on October 1 and 2 produced a sharp rise to 1039.00 feet,m.s.l. on October 2. The reservoir gradually fell to normal pool and remained near normal pool until mid-November. On November 16, the reservoir rose as a result of heavy rain to 1038.64 feet, m.s.l., then fell back to normal pool by November 23. The reservoir remained at or near normal pool through mid- February. Excessive rainfall produced two peaks of 1035.05 and 1036.18 feet, m.s.l. on February 17 and March 18, respectively. W. Kerr Scott then remained at or near normal pool through early July. The minimum elevation occurred on July 12 when W. Kerr Scott fell to 1029.18 feet, m.s.l. or 0.82 feet below normal pool. Six weeks later, the maximum elevation of the fiscal year occurred after the basin received about two and three quarter inches of rainfall. As a reslt, the reservoir rose to an elevation of 1041.14 feet, m.s.l. on August 24. Elevations remained at or near normal pool for the remainder of the fiscal year. W. Kerr Scott reservoir ended the fiscal year at elevation 1029.95 feet, m.s.1. Total flood and conservation storage utilized during the fiscal year was 16 percent and 2 percent, respectively. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1990 were $7,102,000 raising the cumulative total since inception of the project to $74,864,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $72,064. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $654,296, of which $90,185 was REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 for Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study, $69,874 for Special Investigations, $3,988 for FERC licenses review, $5,418 for interagency water resources development, $5,246 for hydrologic studies, and $19,929 for cooperation with states. Contributed funds in the amount of $28,225 were expended for navigation studies. 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non- Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $261,160. Total costs to September 30, 1990 were $4,880,619. 32. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for Wilmington Harbor, Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C., was continued at a cost of $194,440. PED was continued on Roanoke River Upper Basin, Virginia, Headwaters Area at a cost of $447,085. PED was continued on Brunswick County Beaches, N. C., at a cost of $101,622. PED was initiated on Sugar Creek, N. C. and S. C., at a cost of $105,534. 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. Johns River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Cape Fear River, N. C. above Wilmington 6. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C. 7. Far Creek, N. C. 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost FY 87 58,000 73,934 FY 88 66,000 20,711 FY 89 78,000 75,645 9,419 9,419 135,000 113,712 8,742,100 8,535,338 220,000 326,924 4,627,900 5,002,474 570,000 550,674 6,375,785 6,462,571 Total Cost to FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 37,000 46,538 145,370 145,370 810,000 752,765 7,544,270 7,660,282 -65,330 444,000 444,000 116,142 116,142 967,000 1,111,720 63,000 62,713 1,100 100 287,500 280,694 21,400 20,428 42,000 41,250 704,300 707,999 293,500 292,720 -1,000 588,000 603,609 106,200 101,800 172,997 178,369 750 577,200 574,023 154,800 156,933 8,700 8,700 346,700 353,386 592,400 526,315 31,809 31,809' 18,501 18,501 221,419 221,419 10,600 10,6002 43,586,9733 43,479,9503 101,374,7154 101,302,269^ 86,851 86,8515 667,300 667,300 818,0406 818,040 6 3,643,511' 3,643,511' 34,000 34,000 326,225 326,225 - 3,759,5738 - 3,759,5738 680,207 15,682,3219 674,822 15,671,4869 25,953 26,328 217,763 217,563 585,247 584,312 88,328 88,328 2,806,424 2,806,424 164,642 164,642 1,408,467 1,408,267 241,272 '0 241,27211 5,193,293 5,192,358 92,650 92,65012 6-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C. 12. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C. 13. Rollinson Channel, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Shallotte River N. C. (Regular Funds) 15. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib: Cost 165,000 158,185 4,598,700 4,605,597 156,000 156,000 1,639,000 1,595,803 -54,579 299,670 11,700 11,497 1,333 1,333 39,519 2,459 831,000 875,000 17,681 3,508,600 3,469,509 1,356,500 1,355,855 9,500 9,656 44,227 44,227 - 493,000 - 162,890 5,526,300 4,630,799 5,445,397 4,746,173 418,000 -210,725 - 192,275 1,873,400 1,775,087 89,778 82,762 8,000 9,248 18,000 18,000 366,800 366,800 364,700 354,142 651,300 651,300 22,878 239,310 21,878 259,337 8,142,94513 7,812,83513 52,332,806 52,314,298 1,435,215 1,414,007 - 6,546,053' - 6,546,05314 995,455 46,167,62815 1,137,632 46,167,62815 - 1,264,414 - 1,256,686 - 346,240 - 346,240 5,666 943,010 5,666 943,010 - 674,651 - 674,651 57,500 942,705 57,500 942,705 - 589,105 - 589,105 8,414 1,710,223 8,414 1,710,223 - 41,142 - 41,142 -44,778 2,840 669,500 669,500 269,200 269,797 466,456 466,456 2,260 2,636 18,181 18,181 530,397 530,397 184,284 184,284 6,268,874 6,268,874 75,000 75,000 502,567 502,567 2,942,969 2,942,969 2,452 2,452 6-20 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 17. Wilmington Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18B. Randleman Lake, N. C. 19. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20A. Falls Lake, N. C. 21. Hamlet City Lake, N. C. (Regular Funds) 22. Neuse River Oriental, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Roanoke River Upper Basin Va. - Headwaters Area (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 25A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C. 28A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. & N.C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 2,322,500 2,357,116 338,215 86,662 9,834,000 8,662,787 911,000 893,708 100,000 20,000 490,000 498,881 4,158,100 4,119,530 220,843 404,819 8,974,000 8,007,874 979,500 954,485 10521 14,415 137,000 142,284 - 920,000 17,840 914,556 - 1,100,000 - 975,979 7,045,000 5,218,000 5,969,059 4,913,377 1,164,000 830,400 1,331,436 966,316 - 10,000 - 7,346 3,868,100 3,888,351 422,041 231,738 3,647,000 5,392,728 1,002,400 1,050,647 31,572 308 270,000 176,764 -120,511 3,510 5,050,000 6,188,558 1,095,000 1,121,837 - 18,715,226 16 - 18,715,22616 3,836,047 65,432,06717 3,761,008 65,333,853 '7 174,182 4,937,82618 345,635 4,766,71018 2,604,000 4,111,778 1,042,587 982,900 -105 -28,208 108 139,216,641 137,902,044 8,261,84319 8,146,53420 1,821,389 1,759,168 4,797,588 4,785,767 285,000 9,373,533 262,349 9,220,601 - 6,674,45422 - 6,674,45422 8,479,000 5,803,487 1,301,061 1,286,917 - 350,000 - 242,924 30,000 22,800 32,654 21,367 - 7,000 - 6,462 - 246,000 - 121,344 - 496,000 - 97,856 50,000 50,000 1,236,000 1,556,600 1,252,762 1,597,277 373 5,222,900 5,372,772 2,480 6,653,600 5,698,688 718,000 120,532 441,000 160,806,996 157,173,988 8,665,661 19 8,616,74820 350,000 242,924 62,80023 61,36724 7,000 6,462 246,000 121,344 496,000 97,856 2,315,100 1,717,632 1,907,088 1,466,08825 --- 8,841,326 - - 8,841,326 1,307,000 1,435,956 18,102,10426 1,351,320 1,412,626 18,019,490 27 2,131 5,245,400 6,333,731 - 94,402,927 -94,402,927 5,683,442 82,657,38428 5,686,512 82,252,70029 6-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 86 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 29B. Philpott Lake, Va. New Work: Approp. - - - - 14,796,384 Cost - - - - 14,796,384 Maint: Approp. 1,672,000 1,942,000 1,796,600 1,772,490 26,128,396 30 Cost 1,759,343 1,821,459 1,892,879 1,830,346 26,036,655 31 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes $2,055 refund to local interests. 3. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 4. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 5. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 7. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 8. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 9. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 10. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 11. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 12. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 13. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual cost. 14. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 15. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 16. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 17. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 18. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823; FY 85, $60,000. 19. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000. 20. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000. 21. Amount should not have been on records. Will be deducted in FY 90. 22. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 83, $400,000; FY 84, $128,345; FY 85, $82,600. 23. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 88, $10,000; FY 89, $30,000 and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 90, $22,800. 24. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 88, $7,346; FY 89, $32,654; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 90, $21,367. 25. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 26. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000. 27. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85, $2,379; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000. 28. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000. 29. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000. 30. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000. 31. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000. 6-22 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4, 19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 November 29, 1963, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 7, 1966 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock.4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins.5 A 12-foot channel in New River.6," Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet.7 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek.8 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 ft. wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. Maintenance of a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N. C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken, and Core Creek. H. D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1478, 63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H. D. 450, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. H. D. H. D. H. D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d 421, 80th Cong., 1st 723, 80th Cong., 2d 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' sess.' sess.' sess.' H. D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 H. D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 6-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7, 1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 May 21, 1965, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 12, 1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1930 October 17, 1940 February 7, 1967, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 30, 19359 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through the ocean bar. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield Bridges. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 4 of text) A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. A channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long, from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 15 of text( Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 16 of text) A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide to Atlantic. Channels 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. H. D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report June 1980 Detailed Project Report May 1983 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. D. 776, 69th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. D. 334, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. D. 111, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1965 Detailed Project Report June 1983 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 H. D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 99, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' 6-24 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by S. D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.1 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. May 17, 1950 A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by H. D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. July 11, 1963, A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet Dec. 12, 1962 July 14, 1960 wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. September 22, 1967, An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at March 13, 1967 July 14, 1960 west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. February 17, 1969, A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side Detailed Project Report sec. 107 channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, Dec. 21, 1967 July 14, 1960 with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. April 3, 1975, Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis Detailed Project Report sec. 107 to 7 feet. Feb. 8, 1974 July 14, 196010 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12,.PL 93-251. 5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project deauthorized November 17, 1986 under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 11. Deauthorized January 1, 1990, under authority of Sec. 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. 6-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control' (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664- Avon Harbor, N. C.' 1986 74,096 440,364 Bay River, N. C.1 1950 44,382 49,627 Belhaven Harbor, N. C. ' 1989 126,687 376,401 Black River, N. C. 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.' 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C.' 1975 42,029 5,685 Chowan River, N. C. 1950 -- Contentnea Creek, N. C.' 1941 64,395 32,247 Drum Inlet, N. C.' 1979 166,119 1,053,279 Edenton Harbor, N. C.' 1960 73,750 47,642 Fishing Creek, N. C.' 1922 22,715 8,633 Knobb's Creek, N. C.', 2 19613 80,500 48,969 Mackay Creek, N. C.' 19383 13,375 6,273 Neuse River, N. C.' 1982 477,2235 328,607 Newbegun Creek, N. C. 19283 4,802 247 Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' 1950 10,688 61,139 Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 - Perquimans River, N. C.' 19103 13,750 414 Roanoke River, N. C.' 1989 404,584 572,409 Scuppernong River, N. C.' 1950 81,164 80,682 Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), N. C.' 1989 113,273 52,935 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.' 1936 12,452 23,686 Stumpy Point Bay, N. C.' 1984 268,381 741,315 Swift Creek, N. C.' 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C.' , 4 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,299 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,893,812 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C. 1984 911,099 182,725 Wrights Creek, N. C.' 1984 68,325 166,602 1. Completed. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin River, N. C., Transferred to Norfolk District. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 4. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, N. C. 6-26 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. 1984 490,000 - Fort Macon Park, N. C.' 1973 620,000 - 1. Uncompleted portion of project was deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Ararat River, Mount Airy, N.C.' Black River, Harnett County, N. C.1 Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.1 Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina- South Carolina State Line)" Conetoe Creek, N. C.' Contentnea Creek, N. C.' Core Creek, N. C.' Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N. C.' Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.' Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.' Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.'1 Filberts Creek, N. C.' Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.', 10 Gardners Creek, N. C.' Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.' Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. Howards Mill Lake, N. C. 12 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.' Leesville, Va.' Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C.1, 13 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.' Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.', 10 New River, N. C.' New River, Onslow County, N. C.' Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' Old Field Swamp, N. C.', 10 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.' Pungo Creek, N. C.' Pungo River, N. C.' Reddies River Lake, N. C.' 3 Roaring River Lake, N. C.13 Simmons Bay, N. C. 0� South Creek, N. C.' Stuart, Va.' Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.'1 Tar River, N. C. Tar River, N. C.' Tar River and tributaries, N. C.' Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Trent River, N. C.' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N.C. & S.C.','10 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.' 1987 1984 1972 1976 1960 1939-1943 & 1958 ' 1965 1989 1984 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1985 1984 1980 1984 1989 1982 1974 1978 1979 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1969 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1980 1978 1963 1971 1989 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1953 1961 1963 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 7. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 8. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 9. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 10. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 11. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 12. Reclassified to deferred category October 2, 1980. 13. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 14. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. 6-28 4,901,854 475,574 283,846 572,1145 29,867 50,889 236,2239 175,315 394,055 223,413 138,1176 37,7773 374,005 54,5978 167,800 50,430 698,400 606,18914 367,755 430,151 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 51,896 580,977 95,873 86,600 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,6022,3 985,800 370,000 186,435 194,3677 2,220,440 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 64,769 67,821 - - 623,687 61,473 -147 214,286 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Report Date Funds Funds Project For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adkin Branch, N. C. AIWW - Mooring Basins AIWW - New River Onslow County, N. C. AIWW - Peltier Creek, 12-foot project AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut Bodie Island, N. C. Cape Lookout, N. C. Conoho Creek, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C. Davis, N. C. Fort Macon State Park, N. C., Remaining Work Harbor of Refuge, N. C. Hominy Swamp, N. C. Hyde County Dike, N. C. MacKay Creek, N. C. Mann's Harbor, N. C. Mill Creek, N. C. Mocassin Swamp, N. C. Morehead City Harbor, N. C., Jetties at Beaufort Inlet Moyock Creek, N. C. Nahunta Swamp, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Neuse River Barrier, N. C. Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide channel in front of New Bern North River Dike, N. C. Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N. C. Ocracoke Island, N. C. Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon Rockfish Creek, N. C. Scuppernong River, N. C. Six Runs Creek, N. C. Sweetwater Creek, N. C. Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. Topsail Beach and Surf City, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C. Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. Wilmington Harbor Widening and Deepening, N. C. 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960 as amended. 5. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. 6-29 219,477 79,782 4,250 25,419 1982 None 1990 None None None None 1974 1972 1982 1973 1934 1973 None 1976 1973 1973 1973 1986 1973 1973 None None None None 1986 1975 1983 1976 1987 1971 1973 1976 None 1974 None 1990 8 Sept. 812 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 17 Nov. 865 23 Sept. 86' 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 771 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 783 31 Mar. 824 17 Nov. 865 1 Nov. 81' 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 771 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 20 Apr. 882 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77' 11 Jan. 852 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 1,396,653 107,472 130,900 7,265 116,395 36,680 64,416 65,673 30,911 129,592 157,721 234,032 64,977 64,584 132,767 139,339 __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 6-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Drum Inlet, N. C. Shallotte River, N. C. Stumpy Point Bay, N. C. Date Survey Conducted March 1990 April 1990 July 1990 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification New River Inlet, N. C. Whittaker Creek, Oriental, N. C. Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Passing Lane Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Turns and Bends Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Turning Basin 1. Includes $72,482 contributed funds. 2. Includes $71,485 contributed funds. 6-30 Fiscal Period Cost 3,848 5,454 144,9411 143,0302 26,687 TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest ('ity River Above of Type ('apacity i)evelopment ('onstruc- Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth l)am Ift) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and )amages 19. Cape Fear B. Everett Jordan 2 River Basin, Howards Mill 2 , 14 N.C Randleman 2 Small reservoirs 23. Neuse River Falls 2 Basin. N C. Wilson Mills Beulahtown Bakers Mills Little Buffalo Buckhorn Wiggins Mill Stantonsburg Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Hillsboro Orange 24 Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Basin. N.C.&S.C. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C John H. Kerr, Va., and N.C.2 Philpott, Va. 2 Gaston, Va and N.C 6 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 7 Smith Mountain, Va. 8 Leesville, Va. 9 Taber, Va. Melrose, Va. Randolph, Va. Stuart, Va. and N.C Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Moncure, N.C. Carthage, N.C Randleman, N.C. Falls, N C. Wilson Mills, N C Kenly, N.C. Princeton, N.C. Kenly, N.C Wilson, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Stantonsburg, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Durham, N.C. Durham, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Boydton, Va. Bassett, Va. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Rapids, N.C Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Brookneal, Va. Chase City, Va. Spray, N.C. Danville, Va. Haw D)eep D)eep Various Neuse Neuse Little Little Little Buffalo Creek Contentnea Creek Contentnea Creek Tisnot Swamp Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Eno Little Yadkin Pee I)ee Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke 4.3 112 55.0 106 85.0 110 - 20 to 70 + - 92 - 81 - 50 - 53 - 51 - 63 - 42 - 36 - 39 - 33 - 37 - 136 - 107 404.0 148 E E E E E CG.E E E E E E E E E E E E E 753,500 233,000 108,000 923,000 374,450 201,000 81,000 36,000 13.000 119,000 35.000 48,000 18,000 17,000 7,000 123,000 57,000 153,000 178.7 144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 336.2 144.9 137.0 314.2 293.7 275.0 262.9 227.8 297.2 265 9 220 108 75 244 95 54 110 147 138 126 CG 1 1 CG,E CG CG CG,E CG CG,E CG,E E CG,E 249,800 14,000 432,000 54,000 59,300 83,000 825,000 41,000 76,900 20,000 34,000 12,000 120,000 43,000 350,000 48,000 163,000 15,000 248,000 80,000 86,520,000 18,874,000 60,670,000 86,858,000 58,380.000 14,726,000 60,330,000 94,142.000 5,749,343 3,360,657 114,900,000 33,600,000 121,000.000 38,454,000 181,000,000 13,000,000 9,300,000 6.600,000 1,100,000 17,300,000 6,700,000 5,100,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 550,000 8,100,000 3,500,000 9.110,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 92,050,0005 13,933,000 27,000,000 31,300,000 28,000,000 9,100,000 8,000,000 17,700,000 22,100,000 9,000,000 27,800,000 1,157,000 3,500,000 800,000 3,800,000 1,000,000 1,700,000 6,000,000 4,700,000 1,100,000 6,400,000 15,090,000 30,500,000 32,100,000 31,800,000 10,100,000 9,700,000 23,700,0001 o 26,800,000 10,100,000 36,000,000 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,700,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests and $100,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security buildings. 4. Includes $13,900,000 presently allocated to water supply and $20,000,000 recreation and fish and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 5 Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949 Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed 12 Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $72,322,000 presently allocated to water supply, $8,676,000 allocated to recreation and $8,102,000 to flood control to be paid by local interests during construction. 14. Reclassified to the deferred category October 2, 1980. Key E - Earth CG - Concrete Gravity 29 Os &. r z' REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization) Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA. Blounts Creek, Fayetteville, N. C. Brake Branch, Montgomery County, VA. Buffalo Creek, Lee County, N. C. First Broad River, Polkville, N. C. Great Coharie Creek, N. C. Little Buffalo Creek, Sanford, N. C. Lower Creek, Lenoir, N. C.1 Maggoddee Creek, Franklin County, VA. Mason Creek, VA. Matrimony Creek, Rockingham County, N. C. Nags Nead, N. C.2 North and South Buffalo Creeks, Guilford County, N. C. Roanoke Island, Dare County, N. C.2 Sandy River, Danville, VA. South Fork Catawba River, Cramerton, N. C. 1. Includes $1,325 contributed funds. 2. Section 103 project. 6-32 TABLE 6-K Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost 6,030 38,462 1,253 42,717 48,176 32,657 27,000 1,937 77,549 16,053 14,003 1,083 15,518 54,325 22,857 3,563 --- J - - "vv a va av a v va CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control. SC ............................... 7-1 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL .............. 7-2 3. Brookgreen Gardens, SC ................................. 7-2 4. Charleston Harbor, SC .................................... 7-2 5. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ............ 7-3 6. Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC .......... 7-4 7. Folly River, SC ................................................ 7-4 8. Georgetown Harbor, SC............................. ... 7-4 9. Jeremy Creek, SC ........................................... 7-5 10. Little River Inlet, SC ....................................... 7-5 11. M urrells Inlet, SC ........................................... 7-5 12. Port Royal Harbor, SC ..................................... 7-6 13. Shipyard River, SC .......................................... 7-6 14. Town Creek, SC .............................................. 7-6 15. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .......... 7-7 16. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 7-7 17. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................................................. 7-7 Beach Erosion 18. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .............................................. 7-7 19. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization .................................................. 7-7 Flood Control 20. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............................................. 7-7 21. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........ 7-7 22. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................................................. 7-7 Miscellaneous 23. Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization .................................................. 7-7 General Investigations 24. Active Investigations ....................................... 7-7 Tables Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement ................ 8-9 Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation ...................... 10-13 Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................................................ 7-14 Table 7-D Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................................... 7-14 Table 7-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects ................................................ 7-14 Table 7-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................................................ 7-15 Table 7-G Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization....................................... 7-15 Table 7-H Other Authorized Streambank Erosion Projects .................................... 7-16 Table 7-I Active General Investigations .............. 7-16 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLAN CONTROL, S.C. Location. The project includes all public waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing Project. The project provides for the control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 50 percent of the total cost. The South Carolina Water Resources Commission is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets local interest requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 30,000 acres, with the worst problem being in Lake Marion. During FY 90, 7-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 2,445 acres of aquatic plants in 28 water bodies were treated with herbicides. Grass carp (100,000) were purchased and stocked in Lake Marion to control aquatic plants in approximately 12,000 acres. The total cost of work performed in FY90 was $666,566. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is ongoing. Federal costs for the project to date have been $4,211,446 for new work. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts near Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534 and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing projects. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston, Johns Island, and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products,fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by pipeline dredge: (a) in the AIWW to Port Royal area, removing 1,175 cubic yards of material in FY 1990 at a cost of $199,000. The high cost for this year was due to an adjustment in the cost per cubic yard to be paid to the contractor. This cost reflects adjustments made for FY 89 and FY 90 yardage. The mosquito abatement control contract costs were $81,525. The cost of operating the Snagboat Snell in the Myrtle Beach Canal area was $198,321. Costs of $414,078 were incurred for contract dike construction and $27,155 was incurred for dike maintenance. Condition and operation studies, natural resource management, inspections and reports, real estate, project operations management, lands and damages, water control management, planning, engineering and design, and construction management costs were $728,741. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $7,345,888 for new work and $50,657,201 for maintenance, for a total of $58,003,089. 3. BROOKGREEN GARDENS, S.C. Location. The project is located on the western boundary of Brookgreen Gardens near Murrells Inlet in Georgetown County, S.C. Existing project. The project provides for a 3,600 foot canal with a 30 foot bottom width maintained to a depth of four feet mlw. (See table at the end of the chapter for acts authorizing the existing projects.) Local cooperation. Requirements are fully satisfied. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on 10 May 1988. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: All new work is cost shared 90% federal and 10% non-federal. Contract dredging was performed by pipeline dredge during the period July through September 1990, removing 9,357 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $40,571. Planning, engineering and design and construction management costs for the year were $13,532. 4. CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, S.C., and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. The existing project provides for a channel 35 feet deep with varying widths from the Atlantic Ocean to the mouth of Goose Creek, a total of 26.3 miles, together with a 35-foot depth by 500-foot width channel via Town Creek, a ten foot depth by 110- foot width channel on the Mount Pleasant side of the harbor into Shem Creek to U.S. Highway 17 Bridge, and a 30-foot anchorage basin in the lower harbor between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. A 40-foot channel estimated to cost $6,060,000 (1960) was authorized to be executed when found necessary in the interest of national defense from the 40-foot contour in the Atlantic Ocean to the U.S. Naval Base. For further details see page 425 of the Annual Report for 1962; page 1808 of the Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of the Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of the Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) 7-2 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with their responsibility to date. Terminal facilities. Piers and slips extend for about one mile along the eastern waterfront of the City of Charleston with an additional mile of marginal wharves. The South Carolina State Ports Authority operated eight piers for fruit, wood, cold storage facilities and general cargo, a grain elevator and a beltline railway which serves the entire Cooper River waterfront. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The U. S. Navy Department has modern facilities for maintenance of naval vessels including nuclear-powered submarines. Loading docks and storage areas for missile-carrying type vessels have also been constructed and are being operated by the U. S. Navy. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: All new work is cost shared 75/25, federal/nonfederal respectively. Contract dredging was performed: (a) by pipeline dredge in the Rebellion to Folly Reach duringJune 1989- January 1990 removing 105,524 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $278,856, (b) in the Columbus Street Turning Basin, Horse, Shutes and Town Creek Reaches by mechanical dredge during November 1989 - March 1990, removing 865,218 cubic yards, at a cost of $3,378,873, (c) by hopper dredge in the Entrance Channel during August 1989 - March 1990, removing 2,818,847 cubic yards, at a cost of $3,465,471, (d) in October 1989 by pipeline dredge in the Wando River, removing 93,796 cubic yards of material at a cost of $164,024, and for a total contract cost of $7,287,224. Planning, engineering and design and construction management cost were $1,221,549 and $272,296, respectively. Federal costs for the project were $6,585,093. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed: (a) by hopper dredge in the Entrance Channel during October 1989 - March 1990, removing 650,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $934,396, (b) by mechanical dredge in the Columbus Street Turning Basin, Horse, Shutes and Town Creek areas during the months of November 1989- March 1990, removing 98,000 cubic yards at a cost of $122,131, (c) by pipeline dredge in the Ordnance to Navy Yard reach during the month of September 1990, removing 39,000 cubic yards at a cost of $100,000, (d) by mechanical dredge in the Town Creek to Tidewater (Lower Harbor) reach during the month of September 1990, removing 60,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $250,000, (e) by pipeline dredge in the Wando River during October 1989, removing 74, 826 cubic yards of material, at a cost of-$40,066 which reflects adjustments made to accrued earnings for work performed in FY 89. Total contract maintenance dredging cost for FY 90 was $1,366,461. Dike management costs were $965. The cost of mosquito abatement for FY 90 was $14,283. Costs of $16,000 were incurred for operating the Snagboat Snell in Cooper River and Charleston Harbor. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, project operation management, lands and damages, planning, engineering and design, and construction management costs were $692,939. Condition at end of fiscal year. Jetties protecting the entrance channel across the bar were completed in 1895. The previous project was completed in October 1962 except for the national defense portion. Federal costs under the previous project to date have been $10,165,564 for new work and $103,360,566 for maintenance, a total cost of $113,526,130. Federal costs through FY 90 for the existing project have been $18,225,553 for new work. 5. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, S.C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing projects. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density currents which trapped sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem was to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River, as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act, provided that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a flow which would not establish a density current in the harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after operational tests this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 11,000 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the project includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a relocated fish hatchery. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Funds were received for initiation of construction during FY 75. Costs during FY 90 were $-45,648 for planning, engineering and design and construction management and $7,110,206 for payment of two outstanding contract claims. Maintenance: Funds of $3,095,470 were spent for maintenance of completed work. 7-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated March 1977. The project is 99% complete. The power-on-line date was March 1985. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $196,872,779 for new work and $18,684,481 for maintenance, a total of $215,557,260. 6. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION Location. The Cooper River Seismic Project is located in Berkeley County, South Carolina, about 50 miles north of Charleston, South Carolina. Existing project. The Santee-Cooper Project was constructed in the early 1940's using the latest state-ofthe- art design for that time. The project is currently licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as project No. 199. The FERC requires that the project receive independent inspections at least once every five years. It was during the 1977 inspection that the seismic deficiency of both the West and North Dams was noted. This was confirmed again in the 1982 inspection. As a result of studying the possible consequences of the loss of both dams, the S. C. Congressional Delegation introduced legislation which was approved in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriations Act to provide $2 million for design and $20 million for construction of remedial measures. The design and construction responsibility was assigned to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps began to study various alternatives to provide remedial measures for the liquefiable foundation of the West Dam in August 1983. Current estimated cost of the project is $30,400,000, of which $29,500,000 is Federal and $900,000 is non-federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are fully satisfied. An LCA was signed on 29 March 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The contract was advertised on 7 March 1988 and awarded on 29 April 1988 for $21,069,540. As of the end of FY 90, construction was 99% complete. FY 90 costs totalled $11,025,936 with $352,536 being used for planning, engineering and design, $1,055,201 for construction management, and $9,618,199 for the contract. Federal costs for the contract to date have been $22,567,524. Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal costs through FY 90 for the existing project have been $29,027,724. 7. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides: an entrance channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River one mile through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U. S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with Folly River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in Folly River in June 1990 by the sidecaster dredge Fry at a cost of $63,057. Condition and operations studies, water control management, planning, engineering and design, and construction management costs were $60,545. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in FY 1979. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $337,736 for new work and $2,211,264 for maintenance, a total of $2,549,000. 8. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S. C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U. S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one marginal concrete pier and one of creosote-timber construction. For intracoastal waterway traffic there are a number of smaller wharves and landings along the Georgetown waterfront on the old channel. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) in the Sampit River and Upper Winyah Bay from January 1990 - September 1990, removing a total of 1,201,461 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,945,791. Contract dike management costs were $527,202. Water control management, natural resource management, condition and operation studies, project operations management, income credits to operations, planning, engineering and design and construction management costs were $614,354. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 7-4 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 1903 - 1904. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $4,615,903 for new work and $53,499,143 for maintenance, a total of $58,115,046. 9. JEREMY CREEK, S.C. Location. Jeremy Creek is located at McClellanville, S.C., approximately 40 miles northeast of Charleston and 20 miles southwest of Georgetown. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11531 and 11518.) Existing project. The dredging of Jeremy Creek or "Side Channel to McClellanville" was authorized as a part of the channel from Charleston to McClellanville (or part of what is now the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway) by the River and Harbor Act of 2 March 1907. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep at mean low water and a width of not less than 90 feet. Local cooperation. Local requirements have been met by the S.C. Coastal Council. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimping facilities, one oyster packing shed, a crabbing operation, an icehouse, a fuel dock and a public launching ramp located on Jeremy Creek. The commercial facilities are privately owned, but are open to all on an equal basis. The existing facilities are considered adequate for present and near future commerce. There are areas along the east bluff shore available for the expansion of existing facilities or the construction of new ones. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance dredging was performed in FY 1990. Costs incurred by the Snagboat Snell for debris removal were $9,493. Condition and operations studies, water control management, and project operations management costs were $3,742. Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $49,987 for new work and $78,132 for maintenance, a total of $128,119. 10. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. AND S.C. Location. The project is located near the North Carolina- South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shallotte, N.C. to Georgetown, S.C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,200 feet and 3,000 feet long on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. It is expected that existing facilities will expand and new ones will be added as demands for services exceed current capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A 5-year monitoring program was initiated in 1981 to provide information for management of the project and to determine the effect of the project on nearby coastal areas. Charleston District (CESAC) collects the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. Following conclusion of the initial 5-year monitoring plan (February 1986), CERC presented results of their preliminary analysis to CESAC and CESAD at a meeting in Charleston on 8 April 1986. The data indicated that coastal processes in the vicinity of the inlet have not reached an equilibrium condition and recommended continued monitoring at a reduced level. This effort is currently underway. Condition and operation studies and water control management, inspection and reports, real estate management, and planning, engineering and design costs were $165,296. Condition at end of fiscal year. The initial construction contract was awarded 14 January 1981. This project was completed in FY 1984. Federal costs for the existing project have been $17,037,428 for new work and $2,578,758 for maintenance, a total of $19,616,186. 11. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the city of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 115535.) Existing project. The authorization provides for an entrance channel twelve by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock with the entrance channel being stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. However, the maximum benefits were achieved with a 10-foot entrance channel and an 8-foot inner channel. The 2-foot depth difference between the authorized depth and the construction depth has been reclassified as "inactive". The entrance channel and the jetties have been shortened to the 10-foot ocean contour rather than the 12-foot contour. The project was completed in August 1981. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and 7-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added as demands for services outstrip capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 90 costs of $3,039 were related to settlement of a claim. Maintenance: No maintenance dredging was performed during FY 90. A monitoring program was initiated in April 1978 to provide site specific information for proper management of the project and to provide data on coastal response to the project. Charleston District collects most of the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. The monitoring programs has been adjusted several times based on CERC recommendations. Currently the program includes daily littoral environmental observations (LEO), annual aerial photography, jetty surveys and site inspections, semi-annual surveys of beaches and the deposition basis. Channel surveys are not scheduled but are conducted on an "as needed" basis. Results of the monitoring programs have led to recommendations for dredging the deposition basin, nourishing of a reach of eroded beach at North Litchfield Beach and erosion protection of a section of the south jetty sand dike. Condition and operations studies, water control management costs, inspections and reports, lands and damages, and planning, engineering and design costs were $110,628. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1981. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $13,410,504 for new work and $3,553,563 for maintenance, a total of $16,964,067. 12. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 47 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of Savannah River, Georgia. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. (See the table at the end of the chapter for acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. The South Carolina State Ports Authority constructed a marginal concrete wharf and operates modern terminal facilities which are considered adequate for present commerce of the port. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in the Entrance Channel by hopper dredge during the month of October 1989 to April 1990, removing 1,127,703 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,458,332. Natural resource management, condition and operation studies, water control management, planning, engineering and design, and construction management costs were $213,506. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1959. Federal cost for the existing project to date have been $1,786,100 for new work and $9,075,808 for maintenance, a total of $10,861,908. 13. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U.S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about three miles and empties into the Cooper River about three-fourths miles above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to MacAlloy Corporation's plant, including two turning basins, one opposite Gulf Oil Corporation Terminal and another at the upper end of project. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. In the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are large marginal wharves of the Gulf Oil Corporation and Shipyard River Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products, coal and fertilizer materials. In the upper channel is Macalloy Corporation's wharf for handling ores. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance dredging was performed. Condition and operations studies, water control management, project operations management, planning, engineering and design, and construction management costs were $32,340. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $487,824 for new work and $9,322,613 for maintenance for a total of $9,810,437. 14. TOWN CREEK, S.C. Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, S.C. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No, 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes a entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table at end of the chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) 7-6 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in the entrance channel by the sidecaster dredge Merritt during April - May 1990 at a cost of $171,300 and by the sidecaster dredge Merritt in June and July 1990 at a cost of $84,076. The cost of clearing and snagging by the Snagboat Snell were $28,478. Condition and operations studies, water control management, inspection and reports, project operations management, planning, engineering and design, and construction management costs were $70,942. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1975. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $219,521 for new work and $3,749,926 for maintenance, a total of $3,969,447. 15. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs incurred for condition surveys were as follows: Adams Creek, S.C. $4,215 Ashley Creek, S.C. 162 Village Creek, S.C. 2,607 Waccamaw River, N.C. & S.C. 3,627 Total $10,611 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION REPORTS (See Table 7-C) 17. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization) and Section 111, Public Law 90-433, as amended. (See Table 7-D.) Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1934 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) None. Beach Erosion 18. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 19. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, 1960 River & Harbor Act, as amended, consisted of two reconnaissance studies - Pawleys Island, S.C. and Edisto Beach, S.C. FY 1990 costs on these studies were Flood Control 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS No inspections were made during FY 1990. Cost for the period was $935. 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-F.) 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-G) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Federal costs for FY 1990 were $167,371 for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies, $10 for Inspection of Non-Federal Levees,and $126,613 for the National Emergency Preparedness Program. Miscellaneous 23. STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None (See Table 7-H for previous work in this category.) General Investigations 24. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-I which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. 7-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, FL 3 Brookgreen Gardens, SC (Contributed Funds) 4 Charleston Harbor, SC (Contributed Funds) 5 Cooper River Charleston iarbor, SC 6 Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC 7 Folly River, SC 8 Georgetown Harbor, SC 9 Jeremy Creek, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Aprop. Cst 566,000 602,642 00 0 0 754,000 674,155 42,500 34,399 00 00 2,831,000 2,924,406 00 0 426,587 3,572,000 3,863,929 550,000 337,950 00 00 1,328,000 1,011,405 1,000 7,908 00 5,385,000 2,769,722 4,294,000 4,067,062 1,297,000 923,083 - 13,000 37,675 2,226,000 2,192,630 427,000 491,838 00 00 2,019,400 2,337,601 3,000 3,971 0 0 7,045,000 8,248,738 2,914,900 3,163,395 2,763,000 2,749,580 125,000 9,484 3,764,200 3,745,712 524,000 666,566 0 0 00 1,669,282 1,648,820 62,100 49,614 7,200 4,489 7,847,000 6,585,093 2,804,942 2,090,648 2,180,000 2,195,032 7,043,608 7,064,558 3,122,259 3,095,470 745,000 20,755,000 3,602,000 1,900,000 749,898 1,786,164 13,123,808 11,025,936 00 328,000 343,680 00 3,544,000 3,241,898 00 5,000 4,073 00 313,000 313,587 0 0 1,292,000 1,493,218 00 6,000 3,763 00 260,600 259,916 0 0 2,893,400 2,845,413 00 51,000 54,061 0 0 291,107 123,602 00 3,263,737 3,087,347 00 19,675 13,235 4,234,605 4,211,446 52,028 52,028 7,455,378 1 7,455,378 1 50,862,686 2 50,726,623 2 108,600 95,982 7,200 4,489 31,064,564 3 28,391,117 3 104,125,429 4 103,360,566 4 6,240,000 5,867,695 198,638,191 196,872,779 18,963,459 18,684,481 29,500,000 29,027,724 337,736 337,736 2,380,707 2,211,264 7,061,755 5 7,061,755 5 53,986,917 6 53,613,699 6 49,987 49,987 84,675 78,132 7-8 TABLE 7-A (Cont'd) CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept 30, 1990 10 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11 Murrells.Inlet SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12 Port Royal Harbor, SC 13 Shipyard River, 14 Town Creek, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Includes $109,490 for new work for previous project. Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. Includes $10,165,564 for previous projects. Includes $401,989 for maintenance of Previous projects. In addition $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds. b Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 6 Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. ' Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-11 incurred through FY 73. 8 Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 7-9 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: AAppCroop.st New Work: Apyrop. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 00 52,000 55,353 0 0 0 342 118,100 125,715 00 0 0 52,000 51,385 00 34,500 32,891 00 422,000 435,622 00 00 88,000 78,974 00 00 2,111,000 2,104,198 00 00 54,000 72,789 00 327,000 273,810 00 352,000 352,155 00 00 52,000 57,918 00 00 143,000 124,252 00 00 474,000 473,388 00 40,000 96,188 00 393,000 392,959 00 00 194,326 165,296 00 50,000 3,039 118,231 110,628 00 0 0 1,711,252 1,671,838 00 101,520 32,340 0 0 414,051 354,796 00 17,037,428 17,037,428 2,612,002 2,578,758 1,521,920 1,521,920 13,469,240 13,410,504 3,656,500 ' 3,620,563 ' 1,380,000 1,379,148 1,786,100 1,786,100 9,127,660 9,075,808 491,974 8 491,974 8 9,395,212 9,322,613 219,521 219,521 3,810,051 3,749,926 8,600 8,600 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 R&H Act of Sept. 19, 1890 R&H Act of June 13, 1902 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19351 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of 1960, as amended R&H Act of June 18, 1878 R&H Act of Aug. 8, 1917 R&H Act of July 18, 1918 R&H Act of Jan. 21, 1927 R&H Act of Oct. 17, 1940 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC (See Section 1 of text.) Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, eurasian water-milfoil and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (See Section 2 of text.) Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, SC Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth to ten feet and bottom width to 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve feet deep and 90 feet wide. Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, S.C.4 (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) BROOKGREEN GARDENS, SC (See Section 3 of text.) Provides for a 3,600 foot canal with a 30-foot bottom width, maintained to a depth of four feet mlw. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC (See Section 4 of text.) 2 jetties.5 Increase in depth to 30 feet width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel of the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. The 35-foot channel from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel inShem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) Sec. 302, 1965 Rivers & Harbors Act (H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1900, p. 1908. Annual Report 1903, p. 1133. H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.3 H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645 Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62nd Cong, 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. pt. 1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 61-63. H.D. 249, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 7-10 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1945 R&H Act of July 14, 1960 Water Resources Development Act. of Oct. 22 1976 Water Resources Development Act of 17 Nov. 1986 R&H Act of Aug. 13, 1968 Authorized by Chief of Egrs. on Dec. 23, 1977 under authority of Section 107, R&H Act. of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of Aug, 5, 1886 R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 30, 1948 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project is authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and Design. Deepening 35 foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42 foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at Federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically justified. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON, SC (ST STEPHENS PROJECT) (See Section 5 of text.) Redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam into the Lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephens, South Carolina. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION, SC (See Section 6 of text.) Install a closure structure in the diversion canal between Lake Marion and Lake Moultrie and construct such measures as necessary to improve the seismic stability of the Pinopolis West Dam on the Cooper River. FOLLY RIVER, SC (See Section 7 of text.) Consists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and eleven feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC (See Section 8 of text.) Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basis in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in the Sampit River. JEREMY CREEK, SC (See Section 9 of text.) To provide a waterway twelve feet deep at mean low water and a width of not less than 90 feet. S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.3 H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 436, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 99-1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Act of 1968, S.D. 88, 90th Cong. H.D. 3069, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report H.Ex. Doc. 258, 48th Cong., 2nd sess.,and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110- 1111. H.D. 395, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report 7-11 TABLE 7-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972,under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974. R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by the House Committee on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971 and the Senate Committee on Public Works Nov. 18, 1971, P.L. 89-298, 1965, FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974. R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 25, 1912 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 19372 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC (See Section 10 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depth sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. MURRELLS INLET, SC (See Section 11 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC (See Section 12 of text.) A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, SC; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles; thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the SC State Ports. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC (See Section 13 of text.) Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 20-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to tawuethnotyr ifzeeedt from the depth of twelve feet previously without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburg Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. P.L. 79-14 H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 79-14, H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. River and Harbor Act, H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 7-12 TABLE 7-B (Cont'd) CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents TOWN CREEK, SC (See Section 14 of text.) Auth. by Chief of Engrs. on An entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide Detailed Project Report. Feb. 12, 1974 under Auth. of across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a chan- Sec. 107 of R&H Act of 1960, nel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five as amended. Fathom Creek to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 6.2 miles. 1 Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 2 Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. s Contains latest published maps. 4 Inactive. b Completed under previous projects. 6 For national defense. 7-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report for Construction Maintenance Adams Creek, SC 1 1978 $125,697 $26,326 Aquatic Plant Control, NC and SC 1,5 1968 379,680 -- Archers Creek, SC 1914 20,646 -- Ashley River, SC 1 1955 260,996 535,211 Edisto River, SC 1,2 1938 33,103 1,100 Great Pee Dee River, SC 1,3 1950 183,712 269,873 Mingo Creek, SC 1,2 1950 29,050 7,350 Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC 1 1982 9,500 84,370 Salkahatchie River, SC 1,2, 4 1896 15,841 200 Santee River, NC and SC 1 1950 99,750 180,833 Village Creek, SC 1985 26,500 109,651 Waccamaw River, NC and SC 1978 262,814 281,997 Wateree River, SC 1940 60,000 151,984 1 Completed 2 No commerce reported 3 Curtailment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Session) 4 Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Session) b Pilot Program TABLE 7-D NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 17 of Text) Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs Brookgreen Gardens, SC 107 $49,613 Shipyard River, SC 107 58,183 TABLE 7-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 18 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report for Construction Maintenance Hunting Island Beach, SC 1984 $2,872,7171 . 1 Excludes $1,249,336 contributed funds 7-14 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT (See Section 21 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Buck Creek, NC and SC " 2 1970 $298,167 -- Cow Castle Creek, SC 1,2 1985 250,000 -- Cowpens Swamp, SC 1,2 1960 18,679 -- Crabtree Swamp, SC 1,2 1969 97,000 -- Eagle Creek, SC 1 "2 1986 1,245,063 -- Edisto River, SC "3 1847 6,379 -- Edisto River, North Fork, SC " 2 1969 127,660 -- Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC " 2 1958 3,160 Gapway Swamp SC 1 1969 339,197 -- Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC 1 1978 247,242 -- Leith's Creek, NC 1"2 1982 430,951 -- Reddies River Lake, NC 1980 985,800 -- Reedy River, SC " 3 1974 4,500 -- Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC 14 1978 370,000 -- Saluda River, SC 1"2 1963 99,000 -- Sawmill Branch, SC 1.2 1971 248,605 -- Scotts Creek SC 1"2 1988 545,000 -- Shot Pouch Greek, Sumter, Co., SC 1"2 1971 77,400 -- Simpson Creek, SC 1"2 1957 81,000 -- Todd Swamp, SC 1,2 1964 29,000 -- Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC1 2 1974 319,669 -- Wilson Creek, Sumter County, SC 1,2 1985 277,111 -- SAuthorized by Chief of Engineers s Discontinued due to lack of interest 2 Completed 4 Phase I only TABLE 7-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthoriztion studies (See Section 22 of Text) Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, SC 205 31,950 Gilder Creek, Mauldin, SC 205 2,351 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, SC 205 348 Maidendown Swamp, SC 205 16,445 Maple Swamp, SC 205 -8 Mauldin Creek, Mauldin, SC 205 2,454 Pleasant Meadow Swamp, Loris, SC 205 33,289 Popperdam Creek, SC 205 10,851 Rawls Creek, SC 205 13,433 Socastee Creek Horry County, SC 205 67,830 Turkey Creek, Berkeley County, SC 205 31,807 Welcome Creek, SC 205 -11 White Oak Creek, Mullins, SC 205 63,107 7-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 7-H OTHER AUTHORIZED STEAMBANK EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC 1987 $211,100 1-- 1 Completed TABLE 7-I ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 24 of Text) ITEM FISCAL YEAR COSTS FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 120) Gills Creek, SC $ 532 SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 130) Myrtle Beach, SC $ -54 South Carolina Shores, North Portion 13,902 South Carolina Shores, South Portion 88,949 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) Special Investigations $ 62,334 FERC Licensing Activities 5,450 Interagency Water Resources Development 18,372 COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Department of Agriculture, SCS $ 2,797 Planning Assistance to States 54,297 TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) $ 246,579 FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) $ 148,817 HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic Studies $ 4,582 TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) $ 153,399 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (CATEGORY 400) Myrtle Beach, SC $ 261,521 TOTAL (CATEGORY 400) $ 261,521 ADVANCE ENGINEERING & DESIGN (CATEGORY 600) Charleston Harbor - Wando, SC $ -79 Folly Beach, SC 437,664 TOTAL (CATEGORY 600) $ 437,585 TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 1,099,084 7-16 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT * The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers ............................ 8-1 2. Aquatic Plant Control ............... 8-2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns River, FL (Savannah District) .......... 8-3 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA ............. 8-3 5. Savannah Harbor, GA ............. 8-4 6. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA ....................... 8-5 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................... 8-5 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 8-5 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 8-5 Beach Erosion Control 10. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization........... 8-6 11. Tybee Island, GA...... ............. 8-6 Flood Control 12A. Oates Creek, Richmond County, GA 8-6 13. Inspection of Completed Flood 14. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 8-7 15. Flood Control Work Under Special A uthorization ....................... 8-7 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 16. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization ....................... 8-7 Navigation Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 17. Savannah River Basin, GA and SC ..... 8-7 17A. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) ....................... 8-8 17B. Hartwell Lake, GA and SC .......... 8-8 17C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) .................. 8-8 18. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and FL .............. 8-9 General Investigations 19. Surveys ........................... 8-9 20. Collection and Study of Basic Data ......................... 8-9 21. Research and Development........... 8-9 22. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ..................... 8-9 Tables Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement . ..8-10 Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation ....... 8-12 Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 8-16 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 8-17 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes ............ 8-17 8-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Location. These rivers are entirely within the State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Survey Map of Georgia, formerly U. S. Geological Survey Map of Georgia.) For a full description of these rivers, see page 636, Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. Prior projects for the Altamaha River have been adopted, and expenditures made underthem, by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1881, and September 19,1890; for the Oconee River by the River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878, September 19, 1890, and March 3, 1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by the River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876, and September 19, 1890. For Further Details, see page 1815, Annual Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an appropriation of $40,000 annually for the Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, to maintain a 3-foot depth during ordinary summer low water and to gradually increase channel depth so far as practicable without sacrificing the maintenance work. This project covers the entire Altamaha River (including a channel between the river and Darien, GA), a length of 137 miles. The lower 139 miles of the Oconee River has a mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which gradually decreases to mile 33, where there is no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 feet above low water, and at extreme floods, a height of about 15 feet above low water. On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 22 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 32 feet above low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 25 feet above low water. There is no approved estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. Published maps of these rivers are in the following documents; Altamaha River, HED 282, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Oconee River, HED 211, 51st Cong., 1st sess., Ocmulgee River, HED 215, 51st Cong., 1st sess., and Lower Altamaha River and Darien Harbor, GA, HD 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along these rivers there are numerous natural shore landings which are considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities for recreational boats have been constructed at several points. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: There were no maintenance costs this fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is such that the percentage of completion cannot be stated. Channel depths have been increased by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing contraction and bank-protection works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has been rendered safer by removing obstructions. Many of the closing dams and contractions and bank-protection works need repairs. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 21, 1977. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control of water-hyacinth, lynhbya, alligator weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes. The project provides for continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H. S. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. The authorizing act provides that research costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-C for Authorizing Legislation.) The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its notice of availability appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement). Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the planning and actual control operations of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported nuisance aquatic plant infestation in Lakes Jackson, Blackshear, Worth, and in Ebenezer Creek. Total projected cost of the FY 90 program will be $185,457 of which the portion contributed by the Federal government is $92,730. FY 90 treatments include introduction of biological control agents and chemical applications. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. (See NOAA charts 11489-11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Isle of Hope, GA. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL is from 6 to 8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive or adequate terminal facilities at port of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The District employed a small business Contractor "M" Operating Company to complete dredging in the Intracoastal Waterway when the 8(a) minority contractor was stopped after reaching the total pay amount. This small business contractor removed the remaining 109,739 cubic yards of sediment at a cost of $100,961, he also completed other portions of the AlWW by removing 230,827 cubic yards of sediment at a cost $212,361. The District also performed work in conjunction with the Jekyll Island Authority and constructed a dike across an abandoned marina on Jekyll Island. The Corps will utilize the site as a disposal area until sufficient elevations are reached to allow marsh vegetation to establish on the material. Once the vegetation is established, the dike will be allowed to erode and approximately 50 acres of marsh will be created. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay River near St. Simons Island, GA, was accomplished after construction of a new bridge for the Torras Causeway. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Total expenditures for the FY are $21,449,447. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Co. wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Co.; 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the City of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. 8-3 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modem docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The District used Southern Dredging Company to dredge the East River during the latter part of the fiscal year. Their dredge, the Clinton, removed 305,988 cubic yards of silt at a total contract price of $388,939.00. Dredging to widen the southern portion of Brunswick River was done the latter part of this fiscal year by The "M" Operating Company, a small business dredging contractor. He removed 330,591 cubic yards at a cost of $1,156,065.75. The Entrance Channel was dredged by Bean Dredging Company at a cost of $2,425,722.00 for 1,027,488 cubic yards. He then moved to the Savannah Entrance Channel when completed in Brunswick. The work for others consisted of dredging in front of three of Georgia Ports Authority's (GPA) docks at the contract price. The GPA then reimbursed the District for the work performed outside of the Navigation channel. Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $2,968,119 for FY 90. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Authorized depths were maintained throughout the fiscal year. Costs for existing completed project to September 30, 1990 were $70,579,597 of which $4,573,433 was for new work and $66,005,989 was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston, SC, and 70 miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles; 38 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the Seaboard Coast Line terminal; 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal) and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Indusfries, Inc. about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings Island Turning Basin 38 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of the Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet long near Savannah Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near the Continental Can Company terminal; and a 1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority's LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide; about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depths ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1962. Maintenance. The District dredged the Savannah Harbor during FY 90, the Navigation Channel from 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Station 0 to 112 + 500. The Ship Channel contract removed 850,714 cubic yards of sediment at a cost of $656,460.90. The work was performed by Atkinson Dredging Company and expected to be completed FY-91. This contract will insure that the Navigating Channel and the Turning Basins remain available for ships to use. The Prosperity Dredging Company dredged the Sediment Basin plus the middle and lower channels for a total yardage of 5,255,982 at a total cost of $2,274,739.00. Bean Dredging Company dredged the Entrance Channel at a cost of $940,000.00, removing 600,000 cubic yards of sediment. Total costs for operation and maintenance for the fiscal year was $6,958,459 which included such items as salinity monitoring, surveying, cultural resource surveys and the operation of the Tidegate structure. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25,1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. Costs of existing projects to September 30, 1990, were $206,871,036 of which $47,003,429 was for new work and $159,867,607 was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 6. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 second-feet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of the Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, 3 miles above the Fifth Street Bridge, a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, over hanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Latest approved project cost estimate for providing a 9-foot channel (September 1963) is $6,576,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a state port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during fiscal year. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. The total cost for the yearwas $216,891. There were no dredging projects during this fiscal year. Inspection of completed works amounted to $14,082. 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey Section performed condition surveys on the following active O&M navigation projects: Savannah Harbor Brunswick Harbor AIWW Savannah River Below Augusta General regulatory function expenditures for the fiscal year were $1,948,671. 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The Valona, GA, detailed project study was continued in FY90 for a total expense of $18,238. Feasibility studies were completed for construction of the South Brunswick River, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia. 8-5 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT $843,940 was expended in FY 90. Total expenditures for this category was $1,264,148.46. Beach Erosion Control 10. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION A feasibility investigation was completed on the shoreline erosion problems at Crooked River State Park, GA, at a fiscal year cost of $2,959.11. 11. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of the Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11512, 11513, and 11509, formerly U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in HD 92-105, 92nd Cong.) The only portion of the island that has developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 mile. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. in 1981, the plan was modified and now calls for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin and renourishment. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost (including costs for construction, engineering and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocation) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers. The local contribution is presently estimated at 51.0 percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been de termined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide (after the first 10 years of project life) periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project, and provide further that construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from First Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. In January 1987, the South Groin contract was completed at a cost of $607,392. In February 1987, the first periodic renourishment contract was awarded, calling for the placement of approximately 1 million cubic yards of sand on two reaches of the island; the south end from the mouth of Tybee Creek to 14th Street, and the north end from the North terminal groin to about 6th Street. The contract was completed in May 1987 at a contract cost of $1,988,843. A Beach monitoring program has been performed for three years to monitor the performance of the design. The Local Sponsor has invested over $200,000 in additional funds for the implementation of a dune building program for the North and South ends of the islands. Fiscal year costs were $23,422.33. A reevaluation study of further participation was initiated. 12. FLOOD CONTROL 12A. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN AT OATES CREEK, GEORGIA. Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood water from an urban area of Augusta, GA. A flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized and completed as part of the Savannah River Basin study. The Oates Creek study area is located just south of Augusta, in Richmond County. The recommended plan is a channel and bridge modification flood control plan and has received support from Federal, State, and local governmental 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT agencies with no environmental opposition. In 1987, the local sponsor, Richmond County, expressed support for the project and intent to participate financially. The plan consists of improvements to approximately 12,300 feet of channel and consists of concrete-lined channels, grass-lined channels, a low levee, modifications of bridges, and culverts, and relocation of utilities. The CP&E effort began in October 1983 and consisted of the preparation of a General Design Memorandum (Sep 1986). Upon the completion and approval of the General Design Memorandum, negotiations were initiated with the local sponsor to develop a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA). The LCA was signed by Richmond County and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on 10 March 1988. Fiscal year expenditures were $2,466,735 Federal and $1,682,800 non-Federal. Conditions at end of FY90: During FY90, the remainder of the lands, easements and rights-of-way were obtained, the Road Bridge Relocation Contract was awarded September 1989, the Railroad Bridge Relocation Contract was awarded January 1990, and Channel Construction Contract was awarded in March 1990. At the end of the FY, the Road Bridge Relocation Contract, by the local sponsor, was 80% complete, the Railroad Relocation Construction Contract was 75% complete, and the Channel Construction Contract was 20% complete. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Expenditures for inspections of completed flood control projects amounted to $1,419.72. (See Table 8-D.) 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D) 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These Flood Damage reduction activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948 (Public Law 858, 80th Congress) as amended. During FY 90 a total of $97,361.36 was spent on pre-authorization flood damage reduction study effort. Study effort during the FY was as follows: Placentia Canal, Savannah, GA, completed Feasibility Phase work - $465.17; Casey Canal, Savannah, GA - initiated action to determine continued Federal interest - $6,381.10; Springfield Canal, Savannah, GA, completed Feasibility Phase - $21,792.20, initial Plans and Specifications - $5,502.60; Ocmulgee River Levee, Macon, GA - completed Reconnaissance Phase studies and obtained Feasibility cost sharing agreement - $15,000, initiated Feasibility Phase studies - $1,258.55; Reconnaissance Phase Studies on Raes Creek, Richmond County, GA - $5,258.07; Reeves Creek, Clayton County, GA - $1,419.72; Rocky Creek, Richmond County, GA - $15,572.54; Yellow River, Rockdale County, GA - $24,711.41. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 16. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. One site in McDuffie County, GA was appraised for $5,000 under authority of Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended, but did not result in a construction project. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 17. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on the Savannah River and its tributaries in GA and SC. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River basin for flood control and other purposes (H.D/ 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) was authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell Lake, and Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes.) Duke Power Company has completed construction on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jocassee pump-storage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee- Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry-Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell Lakes follow. Local cooperation. None required. 8-7 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 17A. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) GA AND SC Location. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir is located at mile 237.7 on the Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. The total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. The lake covers 71,100 acres at maximum power pool elevation 330. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydropower 1,045,000 acre-feet; dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 282,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Gross generations of electric energy for the period was 926,377,200 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Prevented flood damages were estimated at $500,000 in 1990. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $6,997,183. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. In FY 90 7,177,633 persons visited the facility. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 17B. HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, GA.(See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravitytype structure 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,390 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. At maximum conservation pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control - 293,000 acre-feet, hydropower - 1,416,000 acre-feet, dead storage - 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000 kilowatt generators having a generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. A fifth 80,000 kilowatt generating unit has been installed which increased the rated capacity to 344,000 kilowatts. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during the fiscal year. An on-going contract with Good Water, Inc., to expand and rehabilitate the Clemson Pumping Station has expended $332,800 to date. Total operation and maintenance costs for theis FY are $465,891. The fiscal year upper diversion dam rehabilitation cost amounted to $1,429 used mainly for monitoring activities. Gross generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 253,014,700 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented were estimated to be zero due to the extreme drought of 1989. Maintenance. Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $7,971,044. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register on August 21,1978. Approximately 15,001,095 persons visited the lake in FY 90. 17C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA AND SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is located on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam, and about 37.4 miles above J. Strom Thurmond Dam (formerly Clarks Hill Dam). (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations. The latest approved (fiscal year 1990) cost estimate for the project is $555,000,000 of which $428,749,000 is for construction; $28,580,000 for 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT lands and damages; $4,683,000 for cultural resources; and $92,988,000 for engineering/design and supervision/administration. Approval was received in January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A Feasibility Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement to address the installation and operation of four 75 MW reversible pump-turbines were prepared in 1979 with the Record of Decision signed in August 1980. The Richard B. Russell Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan was completed in 1981, approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in September 1982, and the provisions are being implemented. Since 1986, the District has been conducting various fishery studies in the Russell tailrace and J. Strom Thurmond Lake (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) downstream. In addition, the District is conducting water quality studies, hydraulic modeling, and an evaluation of various fish protection measures associated with hydroelectric projects. The results of these study efforts will be used to evaluate the need for fish protection at the Richard B. Russell Project associated with pumped storage operations. This evaluation is being presented in a supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) on pumped storage. Review is completed and the final is being prepared for further review and record-ofdecision (ROD) by July 1991. South Carolina McCalla State Park Recreation Facilities is scheduled to be awarded in FY93 or sooner pending receipt of State funding. During FY 90 595,349,000 kilowatts of power were generated. Maintenance. The operation and maintenance cost for the fiscal year amounted to $4,264,427. These funds were for management of lake and power activities. Approximately 833,919 persons visited the lake in FY 90. Condition at the end of fiscal year. The project is 91 percent complete. Costs of project to September 30, 1990 were $524,632,586 of which $501,278,927 was used for new work and $23,353,659 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 18. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER Location. The West Point Lake is located on the Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, GA, and was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (H.D. 570, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The project was designed and constructed for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and stream flow regulation for downstream navigation. Design and construction was accomplished by the Savannah District, U. S. Army Qorps of Engineers for the Mobile District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. For more detail, see the Mobile, AL, District's Report of the Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army 1987. General Investigation 19. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $845,401 of which $403,192 was for navigation studies; $171,720 for flood control studies; $54,252 for special investigations; $29,407 for coordination with other agencies; $24,757 for dam safety criteria studies, and $28,274 for review of completed projects. Review of FERC Licenses activities were $3,332. 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work continued under the Flood Plain Management Services Program on the compilation of flood information and potential flood damages, and preparation of Technical Services. Fiscal year expenditures for Flood Plain Management Services were $130,304 and $89,790 for Technical Services. Flood Plain Management Services included responses to other Federal agencies to aide them in fulfilling the requirements of EO 11988 (Management of Base Flood Area). Through the Technical Services Program, flood problems in several areas were analyzed and possible improvements were identified. 21. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during the fiscal year. 22. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Savannah Harbor Widening. The Savannah Harbor Widening project is designed to increase the width of the navigation channel from 400 to 500 feet along a 5.6 mile section of the Savannah River. During FY 89 the Chatham County Commissioners, the local sponsor, worked at acquiring the necessary LERR's as required by the LCA. Fiscal year expenditures were $351,877. 8-9 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 1. Altamaha, Oconee, New Work: & Ocmulgee Rivers, Approp. GA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2. Aquatic Plant New Work: Control (1965 Approp. R&H Act) Cost 3. Atlantic Intra- New Work: coastal Waterway Approp. between Norfolk, Cost VA, and the St. Maint. John's River, FL Approp. Cost 4. Brunswick Harbor, New Work: GA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Savannah Harbor, New Work: GA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Savannah River New Work: below Augusta, Approp. GA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11. Tybee Island, GA New Work: Approp. Cost 12.A Oates creek, New Work: Richmond County, Approp. GA Cost 13. Inspection of Maint. Completed Flood Approp. Control Works Cost -- 821,457(1) -- 821,457(1) -- 1,917,982(2,3) 3,684 -- 1,917,982(2,3) 205,000 143,065 90,000 78,264 75,000 39,402 49,000 63,512 760,159 651,750 -- 958,096(4) -- 958,096(4) 1,531,800 1,536,950 391,500 2,036,500 393,423 2,010,362 968,786 21,485,507(5) 976,681 21,449,447(5) -- -- -- -- 4,573,608(6) -- -- -- -- 4,573,608(6) 3,050,000 4,406,400 651,500 2,972,134 66,116,928(7) 2,974,663 4,066,019 1,063,076 2,968,119 66,005,989(7) -- 1,870,000 -- 315,648 2,866,500 3,479,400 2,799,769 3,752,042 150,161 3,581,000 3,620,820 351,877 7,125,653 6,958,459 48,057,721(8) 47,003,429(8) 160,143,693(9) 159,867,607(9) -- 6,740,031(10) -- 6,740,031(10) 804,000 788,320 387,000 1,225,729 249,000 21,000 18,135 726,000 153,550 753,450 212,123 210,729 216,891 18,034,771 18,000,380 -- 4,357,249(11) 4,980 -- 4,357,249(11) 348,000 1,800,000 4,036,000 224,921 271,390 2,466,735 16,000 19,141 17,000 16,852 17,046 14,082 6,184,000 3,212,046 255,064 251,941 17.A J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -- -- -- -- 84,841,290(12) -- -- -- -- 84,840,263(12) 7,997,022 8,437,800 10,508,885 7,307,939 103,413,678(13) 7,739,609 8,872,632 10,858,490 6,997,183 102,853,458(13) 8-10 TABLE 8-A SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30. 1990 17.B Hartwell Lake, GA and SC 17.0 Richard B. Russel Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals) New Work: Appro Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -12,213 9,709 -26,878 -- 115,937,985(14,15) 280 115,875,099(14,15) 6,823,622 7,654,400 7,566,035 8,461,499 92,069,960(16) 6,725,929 7,895,745 8,003,569 7,971,044 92,129,017(16) 6,849 27,831 21,922 1,429 6,619,000 6,610,955 19,000,000 28,700,000 12,800,000 20,751,000 508,050,509 9,753,114 17,772,233 31,104,225 18,772,385 501,278,927 3,599,922 3,685,000 3,419,698 4,570,705 3,760,665 3,866,344 3,497,898 4,264,427 14,834,625 23,353,659 1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. 2. Includes $111,950 for previous projects. 3. Does not include $69,356 contributed funds. 4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 5. Includes $134,789 for previous projects. Does not include $35,000 appropriated but unex pended of contributed funds in FYs 86 and 87. 6. Includes $643,456 for previous projects and $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $54,414 for previous projects, $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project, and $2,150,000 under 1983 Job Bill Act. Does not include contributed funds by Brunswick and Georgia Port Authority. 8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels or contributed funds.9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects and $855,941 contributed funds. 10. Includes $93,480 for previous projects and $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 11. Does not include $3,756,758 contributed funds. 12. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated under Code 710. Also includes $1,000,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 13. Includes $316,760 under special recreation use fees and $736,000 under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 14. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which $17,469,002 has been expended. 15. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,861,000 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,851,306 has been expended and $545,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 16. Includes $576,019 expended special recreation use fees. 8-11 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July 25, 1912 & March 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 3. June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 July 13, 1892 Mar. 3, 1905 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 15, 1981 ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. HD 443,62D Cong., 2d sess. HD 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA, (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Section from Beaufort, SC, to Savannah, GA Route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, GA, to Fernandina, FL. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Section from Cumberland Sound, GA and FL to St. Johns River, FL. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort, SC, and St. Johns River, FL." Section from Beaufort, SC, to Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA, via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. A 12-foot channel between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL, various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, GA. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, GA, not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Main channel relocated in the from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. HD251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD 41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. HD 450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. HD 1236, 60th Cong.,2d sess. HD 581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. HD 1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess. SD 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. SD 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 75th Cong.,3d sess. HD 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD 114, 77th Cong.,1st sess. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86- 645 as amended. 8-12 TABLE 8-B SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 4. Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 17, 1986 5. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Construction of East River jetty. Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot deep by 300 foot wide by 8000 foot channel in South Brunswick River serving Colonel's Island into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge. Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakes Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to Annual Report, 1980, p.959. HD 407,59th Cong., 1st sess. HD 393,64th Cong., 1st sess. SD 57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. SD 132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. .HD 690, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD 110, 81st Cong.,1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. HR 6,99th Cong. 2d sess. Section 846 HD 181,59th Cong.,1st sess. HD 563, 62d Cong., 2d sess. HD 1471, 64th Cong.,2d sess. .HD 261,69th Cong., 1st sess. HD 262,69th Cong., 1st sess. SD 39,71st Cong., 1st sess. 8-13 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1945 July 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide, increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement, made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and the Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. Providing sediment control works consisting 8-14 HD 276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. HD 283,76th Cong., 1st sess. HD 227,79th Cong., 1st sess. HD 678, 79th Cong., 2d sess. HD 110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. SD 115,87th Cong., 1st sess. HD 226,89th Cong., 1st sess. HD 223,89th Cong., 1st sess. SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT SPCW Resolution June 15, 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 6. Sep. 19, 1980 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 11. SPWC Resolution June 22, 1971 HPWC of June 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 12A. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Oct. 17 1986. 17A. Flood Control of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing HD 94-520, 94th Cong. dated project to include (1) incorporation of June 8, 1976. the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 38 feet. Savannah Harbor widening as described in HD 6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Report of Chief of Engineers date Dec. Dated Oct 17, 1986 19, 1978. Widen channel from 400 feet to Section 201 500 feet between Kings Island turning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin. Allows planning, engineering and design to Section 867 remove drift and debris as part of operations and maintenance. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA For a 5-foot channel.HD 255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. & Annual Report,1980,pg.1328 Special improvement by bank protection HD 962,60th Cong., 1st sess. work of 20 or 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta.' The present 6-foot channel project and HD 101,70th Cong., 1st sess. Lock and Dam, GA. Provision made for locating the lock Senate Committee Print, 73d and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Cong., 2d sess. Conditions of local cooperation modified .Rivers and Harbors Comrn., Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Provides for a 9-foot channel. SD 6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Project will provide for beach erosion HD 105, 92d Cong. control, consisting of beach restoration, groin nourishment. Extends authority for renourishment with HR 6 99th Cong., 2d sess. Federal participation from 15 to 50 years. Dated Oct.17, 1986 Section 867 OATES CREEK, GA Provided for construction of the Oates HR 6 99th Cong., 2d sess. Creek Project. dated Oct. 17, 1986 Section 401 J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR Approved the general plan for the HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 8-15 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Act of Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 17, 1986 Jan. 1988 17B. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950. Flood Control Act of July 3, 1958. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. 17C. Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Project. Recreation and fish and wildlife added as name changed. (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake). HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Provided for construction of Hartwell Project.PL 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Project.2d sess. Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. Authorized mitigation plan. HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. Section 864 HJR 376 HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL 85-500, 85th Cong., PL 94-587, Sec. 182b. 85th Cong. SD 52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986 Section 601 For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act 1962) Completed BelIville Point, GA Cedar Point, GA Darien Harbor, GA Fancy Bluff Creek, GA 1 St. Mary's River, GA and FL, and North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA 2,3 Satilla River, GA 1,5,6 1968 Completed 1986 Completed 1982 Completed 1975 Completed 1935 Completed 1951 Completed 1929 Completed 1951 Savannah River above Augusta, GA 2,3,4 See Notes Savannah River at Augusta, GA 2,3,5 See Notes 1929 1929 $25,700 656,233 199,723 8,000 15,688 17,906 9,452 69,600 200,556 185,433 7,200 69,936 19,594 57,172 5,870 17,444 1. Channel adequate for commerce. 2. Project recommended for abandonment in H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. No commerce reported. 4. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of two power dams which submerged much of the workunder the pre sent and former projects, this improvement cannot be completed as originally planned. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation andmaintenance). 6. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella Creek - DoverCreek for the purpose of reducing shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodynamic model. 8-16 TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 8 in text) SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 In text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Completed 1941 $643,016 $38,242 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA(1) See Note 1974 ---- ---- Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden Completed 1977 132,640 5,219 County, GA Macon, GA Completed 1955 380,043 38,243 Oates Creek, GA Authorized N/A 745,400(2)---- Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed 1976 582,163 5,219 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 2. Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated Oct. 17, 1986. First Federal cost of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. TABLE 8-E SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 16 In text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Reservoir, GA and SC Hartwell, GA and SC Goat Island, GA and SC(5) Middleton Shoals, GA and SC(5) Chattooga Units(4), GA and SC Tallow Hill, GA Anthony Shoals, GA Newry-Old Pickens, SC(6) Savannah Savannah Savannah Savannah Chattooga Broad Broad Keowee $79,156,000(4) 89,240,000 36,400,000 16,500,000 41,700,000 39,000,000 18,100,000 29,500,000 $79,156,000(1,4) 89,240,000(2) 36,400,000(3) 16,500,000(3) 41,700,000(3) 39,000,000(3) 18,100,000(3) 29,500,000(3) 1. Final Cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) 2. Approved Aug. 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 3. Approved July 1954. 4. Excludes Code 710 funds. 5. Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake). 6. Site of Duke Power Co. Keowee - Toxaway Project. 8-17 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT* With the exception of a small area in the north- Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and eastern section of Florida, this district comprises a including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the and the U.S. Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) .. 2 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR ................ 2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ..... 2 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL ............ 3 5. Canaveral Harbor, FL ............... 3 6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass . . . 4 7. Charlotte Harbor, FL ................ 4 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ............ 4 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL ............... 5 10. Fernandina Harbor, FL .............. 5 11. Fort Myers Beach, FL ............... 5. 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL ............... 6 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL ............ 6 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to M iam i, FL ....................... 7 15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL ............. 8 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL ....... 9 17. John's Pass, FL ................... 9 18. Longboat Pass, FL ................ 9 19. Manatee Harbor, FL ................. 10 20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR .. . 21. Melbourne Harbor, FL .. . 22. Miami Harbor, FL ...... 23. New Pass, Sarasota, FL . . 24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL 25. Oklawaha River, FL ..... 26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL . . 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL .. 28. Ponce Harbor, PR ...... 29. Port Everglades Harbor, FL 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida.......... 15 31. St. Augustine Harbor, FL ............ 15 32. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL ...................... 16 33. St. Lucie Inlet, FL .................. 16 Navigation (cont.) Page 34. San Juan Harbor, PR ............... 17 35. Tampa Harbor, FL .................. 18 36. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period .................... 19 37. Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . . . 19 38. Navigation Work under Special Authorization 19 Beach Erosion Control 39. Brevard County, FL ................ 19 40. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project .. 20 41. Duval County, FL ................... 20 42. Indian River County, FL .............. 21 43. Manatee County, FL ............... 21 44. Palm Beach County, FL ............. 22 45. Pinellas County, FL ................ 23 46. Sarasota County, FL ............... 23 47. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........................ 24 48. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ................ 24 Flood Control 49. Central and Southern Florida .......... 24 50. Dade County, FL .................. 26 51. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL .. 26 52. Four River Basins, FL ............... 27 53. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR ....... 27 54. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 28 55. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 28 56. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization .................... 28 General Investigations 57. Surveys . ....................... 28 58. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 28 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 9-1 i REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, HD 251/89/1. The Water Resource Development Act of 1986 amended the River and Harbor Act of 1965 requiring the local sponsor to share 50 percent of planning costs and 50 percent of research costs that are local in nature. The cost of research that is regional or national in scope shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Florida Department of Natural Resources holds the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contributes 50 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: There were 24,425 acres of hyacinth and/or water lettuce, 8,901 acres of hydrilla and 340 acres of minor plant controlled during the period. Costs incurred for engineering and design and supervision and administration were $9,000 and $22,091 respectively, and $1,727,546 for operations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25668.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep by 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1990 were $1,128,075 for new work and $4,291,731 for maintenance, a total of $5,419,806. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, FL, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, FL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11489.) Previous project. For details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet wide from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River, about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (H 898/62/2) and 1938 (H 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. Total costs under the existing project to September 30, 1990 were $263,659for new work and $5,300,742 for maintenance, a total of $5,564,401. 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FL Location. The Harbor connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11 by 200 feet, thence 8 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and a marina basin 8 by 200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in December 1964. Project depths have been restored. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11478 and 11484.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 37 foot deep entrance channel and maintenance of the 44 foot deep Navy channel in the 37 foot channel reach; and 35 foot depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; south entrance jetty 1,100 feet long and the entrance jetty 1,150 feet long; a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-C for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (October 1990 price levels) of the 1962 modification to the project is $18,162,000 Federal cost and $4,695,000 non-Federal cost ($138,000 contributed funds and $4,557,000 other costs); $700,000 costs to NASA and $85,000 costs to U.S. Coast Guard. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must; provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2nd session. Non- Federal contribution for new work is $1,142,000. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 1,413,000 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Open storage is 189 acres. Three cruise ship berths totaling 1,400 feet long by 34 foot depth and three 8,800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. the western cruise ship berth is equipped with a roll on/off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45 ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. There are 2 waterfront marine repair facilities with the nearest drydock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available. There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Harbor extension contract completed at a cost of $2,658,723. Engineering and design costs were $987. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of lock and dam amounted to $334,586 for the fiscal year. Natural resource management cost $14,483. Condition and operation studies, environmental studies and periodic inspections cost $375,859. Real estate management was $5,057. Contracts for FY 1990 maintenance dredging of the entrance channel and the inner channel were $2,123,177. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $336,226 and $39,612 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is about 97 percent completed. The perimeter dike and jetties are in good condition Work remaining to complete the project is completion of the harbor extension and construction of the sand transfer plant. 9-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1 mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11430.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10 foot depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8 foot depth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses; 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 7. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11429.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin at 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water levels about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower water levels about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $130,493. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $130,777 and $0 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1990 have been $533,169 for new work and $12,922,550for maintenance, a total of $13,455,719. In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-D for Locks and Dams.) Operation and maintenance of the locks and dams is a Federal responsibility. Estimated cost of new work (1970) is $179,000,000 Federal, and $19,500,000 non-Federal for lands, rights-of-way, and other costs. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs were $76,415. Maintenance: (See Table 9-E for work accomplished.) Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway; Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. Project was deauthorized in Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) and $5,000,000 of prior appropriations were withdrawn. 9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300 by 600 foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also 2 marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11503.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32 foot depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800 foot wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and 2 jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is 7 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $875,000. Terminal facilities. There are 2 large wharves operated by industrial plants; 12 wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; 3 oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs were $84,347. Maintenance. Condition and operation studies cost $83,314. Engineering and design and supervision and administration were $76,357 and $69,676 respectively. Maintenance dredging by government, Hopper and Contract Dredge, was $324,802. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 46 feet for the Kings Bay project. 11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FL Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, 9-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11427.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are 3 shrimp-packing houses and several fish-packing houses, 2 marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational craft facilities include 9 marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is closed, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11475.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27 foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Station 100+00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30 + 00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130+00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 feet at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Estimated cost of new work (October 1990 price levels) $6,665,000 Federal and $2,585,000 non- Federal ($2,175,000 contributed funds, $830,000 reimbursement, and $410,000 other cost); $20,000 costs to Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $18,574. A 25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals is required. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deepdraft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ocean disposal studies cost $16,077. Real estate management cost $3,410. Maintenance dredging costs were $487,381. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $49,019 and $95,980 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938 except for the fishing walkway atop the south jetty which was completed by local interests in 1968. Local interests installed lighting atop the jetty in 1969. The south jetty and revetments are in good condition. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11411, 11425 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT built at Caseys Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water levels by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water levels by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and 11 privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are 6 wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use by commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance of channel slopes and berms cost $7,881. Real estate audits and administration costs were $8,923. Condition and operations studies cost $18,626. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $785 and $47 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Caseys Pass was completed in 1983. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1990 were $7,597,078 for new work and $5,709,415 for maintenance, a total of $13,306,493. In addition, $14,473 contributed funds were expended for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL Location. The Waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11489, 11485, 11472 and 11467.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8 foot depth, and operation and maintenance of Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $61,000. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The cost for maintenance dredging in FY 1989 was $270,070. Condition and operation studies and Environmental studies cost $83,160. Real estate management cost $83,531. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $331,200 and $745 respectively. The highway bridge near Palm Valley was operated and maintained at a cost of $84,497. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete except for construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, which is in an inactive status. 9-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1990, were $19,156,822 for new work; $31,976,108 for maintenance, a total of $51,132,930 regular funds. In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 feet deep by 400-1,200 feet wide from ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the FEC railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30 foot channel in Arlington cut in the old Dames Point-Fulton channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40 foot depth entrance channel; widening of channel by 100 feet near mile 5 and by 200 feet near mile 7; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; construction of training walls and revetments; a navigation and floodway channel 26 by 200.feet along south side of Commodore Point; on approach and mooring basin 20 feet deep, 1,300 feet long at 20 foot depth contour and 600 feet long at pierhead line near Naval Reserve Armory in south Jacksonville; a depth of 24 feet between that depth contour and the pierhead line from Hogan Creek to the foot of Laura Street; and a depth of 28 feet to within 60 feet of pierhead line between foot of Laura Street and St. Elmo W. Acosta (formerly Upper State) bridge. Length of project is about 26.8 miles. In addition the Navy has provided funds for a deeper Jacksonville Harbor entrance channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet long, intersecting with the Navy's Mayport entrance channel to the Mayport Turning basin; also an extension of the existing project to provide 38 foot depth for the Navy fuel depot, at Drummond Creek. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and one foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $927,654. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 233 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tons. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Drydock facilities consist of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $341,795. Real estate management cost $12,945. Cost shared recreation development was $200. Maintenance dredging costs were $3,323,578. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $128,399 and $366,646 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty was repaired in FY 1985 to prevent further damage to the Mayport Naval Station. Revetments and retaining walls were in poor condition. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1990, were $44,165,055 for new work, $64,355,894 for maintenance, a total of 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT $108,520,949regular funds. In addition $290,013has been expended from public works funds for new work. 16. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL Location. The authorized Mill Cove project comprises a 6 square mile body of shallow water on the St. Johns River approximately 10 miles from the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous project. None. Existing project. The authorized project provides improved flow and circulation through Mill Cove to eliminate further shoaling. This large shallow area averages about 2 to 4 feet deep, is about 5.5 miles long, and varies from 0.5 to 2.0 miles wide. It is situated along the St. Johns River near the Dame Point- Fulton Cutoff portion of the Jacksonville Harbor navigation project. The Mill Cove project includes dredging a 650 foot by 3,600 foot flow channel at the west end to -12 feet MSL; enlarging the weir opening at the eastern end to 1,300 feet wide and -12 feet MSL; and installing flow diversion features at the west and east ends of the cove. Mean tidal range is 4.9 feet at entrance, 4.5 feet at Mayport, 3.0 feet at Dame Point, and 1.2 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In conformance with Section 221, Public Law 91-611, and prior to commencement of construction, the Jacksonville Port Authority, as local sponsor, must provide written agreement to the following local cooperation requirements: provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages that result due to construction and maintenance other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for construction. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Mill Cove Restoration Project cost was $3,151,193. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,470 and $0 respectively. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost under existing project through September 30, 1990 was $3,879,870 Federal funds. 17. JOHNS PASS, FL Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the Gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately 1,000 linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by the Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft are in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging costs were $15,000. Engineering and design costs to support maintenance dredging were $47,319. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. 18. LONGBOAT PASS, FL Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alignment to the Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are 9-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contributed funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental studies cost $15,058. Maintenance dredging costs were $75,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $71,535 and $439 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 19. MANATEE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in Manatee County on the east side of Tampa Bay 10 miles form the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11414.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the existing 40 foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basin which extends from Tampa Bay Channel to berthing facilities at Port Manatee. Also provide initial construction for a widener at the northwest end of the Manatee Harbor Channel and initial construction to deepen approximately 6.6 acres adjacent to the southern berthing area to provide a larger turning basin. All material from the project will be placed on upland sites west and northeast of the port slip. Estimated cost of new work (October 1990 price levels) $12,515,000 Federal and $15,606,000 non- Federal ($4,164,500 contributed funds and $11,441,500 for other costs and reimbursements). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Port Manatee consist of 675 acres of port operational lands, a ship basin 1,500 feet long by 788 feet wide; and an approximately 3 mile access channel, with a design width of 400 feet, which connects with the Federally authorized Tampa Bay Channel. The Manatee project was constructed between August 1968 and February 1970. The required design depth was 40 feet, and the dredging contractor was allowed a pay overdepth of 2 feet. Port Manatee also operates its own terminal railroad, which is licensed under the Interstate Commerce Commission, and publishes a switching tariff as a Class III railroad. It also maintains and operates 2 switch engines and about 30,000 feet of track which connects with the CSX Railroad. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $396,275. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not started. LCA will be negotiated in 2nd Quarter FY 1991. Construction scheduled to start late FY 1991. 20. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR Location. The Project is on the west coast of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25673.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30 by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 21. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to a 400 by 800 foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350 foot steel bulkhead with 11 finger piers, each about 40 feet long. There are also 2 privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 22. MIAMI HARBOR, FL Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11468.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500 foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36 foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; 2 rubblestone jetties at the entrance; a channel 15 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin at the municipal terminals; a channel 8 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the Intracoastal Waterway and thence 100 feet wide to Government Cut; a channel 15 feet deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet inland; and a channel 12 by 100 feet from Miami to a harbor refuge in Palmer Lake. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15 foot channel in Miami River where depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 15.3 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,300,710. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available sharehouse storage includes dry storage of 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage of 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40 ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available through local rental. Twelve waterfront repair yards and 2 offwater yards serve the port. Drydock facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 79 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and 13 tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served by the CSX and the Florida East Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging cost $952,043. Condition and operations studies cost $135,734. Real estate activities cost $994. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $48,363 and $98,310 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1968, is complete. South and north jetties are in good condition. 23. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of 9-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with 2 finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging cost $955,799. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $83,909 and $22,669 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. 24. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11428.) Previous project. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80- 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, near Stuart; an 8 foot depth basin at Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200 foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Ft. Myers with a 10 foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80 foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60 foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, one municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120 foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River, St Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations on Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440 foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125 foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150 foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125 foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50 foot wharf at Alva; and a 30 foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9- F for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing the 8 foot depth basin at Stuart, which is inactive. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1990, were $5,178,313for new work, $29,181,042 for maintenance ($67,558 excluded which represents services rendered without reimbursement), a total of $34,359,357. 25. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles above Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 6 feet deep from the river mouth to the head of Silver Springs Run; clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles in the river and 5.4 miles in Silver Springs Run. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Roads 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Ocklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel maintenance cost $28,205. Real estate management cost $286. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing a 6 foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs Run, which is in an inactive status. The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Florida flood control project. Total Federal cost under the existing project through September 30, 1990 has been $311,352 for new work and $2,254,492 for maintenance, a total of $2,566,273. 26. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet of storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space is not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or drydock facilities located at the port. A 100 ton vertical boat lift is located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1,000 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No.16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $337. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the project totaled $5,658. A continuing contract for maintenance dredging was $828,957. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $42,157 and $99,314 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 1986. 27. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long respectively, and weir in the north 9-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet, the project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the project totaled $34,717. Maintenance dredging cost $671,818. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $0 and $112,419 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Repair of the north jetty was completed in FY 86. 28. PONCE HARBOR, PR Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25677.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2,400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36 foot deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 959 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. Estimated cost of new work (October 1990 price levels) is $2,159,000 Federal ($2,149,000 Corps and $10,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $2,105,000 non- Federal (other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost share the project. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $717,304. A 25 percent contribution is required and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 40 ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has 4 steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $4,824 and $2,639 respectively. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1976 modification of the project has not commenced. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 29. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11470.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT fishing walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under H 144/93/1, local interests must: provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564,800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Drydock facilities include 2 drydocks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270 ton vertical boat lift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the CSX railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $134. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in H 144/93/1. 30. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None. required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation and Table 9-G for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 22,001 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinth and/or water lettuce), and 1,023 acres of hydrilla were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinth in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed is under maintenance control. 31. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 by 200 feet along the best natural new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin; future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet 9-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 feet in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge. These consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1990 were $1,405,131 for new work and $4,714,107 for maintenance, a total of $6,119,238. 32. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Florida, near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11492.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel is 13 by 200 feet from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H 445/78/2) and July 24, 1946 (SD 208/79/2). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to 1963 Annual Report.) 33. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 7 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about one foot on the land side of the inlet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.1 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each 5 years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required to sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on August 24, 1978. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $3,086,026. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging cost was $254,819. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $0 and $8,307 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in H 294/93/1. Total Federal costs were $10,948,511 for new work (including $3,086,026 contributed funds) and 5,424,599 for maintenance, a total of $16,373,110. 34. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico and about 35 miles from the east end of the island and 1,100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25670.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, and 1938. Existing project. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet west; deepening Anegado and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, the Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing 6 mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500 foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1990 levels) $51,480,000 Federal and $30,290,000 non-Federal ($19,800,000 contributed funds, $7,920,000 reimbursement, and $2,570,000 other costs). Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required to sewer, water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, 2 piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, 9 at the eastern side and 3 at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and 3 on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, 7 are U.S. Government property, and 24 are owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for handling loaded containers. Twentyfour are open to the general public. Pier No. 6 has been repaired and improved in 1985. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18 foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $0 and $1 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work to complete project is modification authorized in 1976. 9-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1990 were $12,997,284for new work and $16,626,026 for maintenance, a total of $29,623,310regular funds. In addition, $747,684was expended for new work and $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds and $100,000 for new work from contributed funds. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712 (this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in above costs). 35. TAMPA HARBOR, FL Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11413 and 11414.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alafia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; a 43 by 200 foot Port Sutton Terminal Channel 3,700 feet long; turning basins at Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, a 43 by 200 feet by 3,700 feet long in Port Sutton Terminal Channel, and 34 by 300 feet in East Bay Channel. (The 46 foot and 44 foot depth portions of the project include a 5 foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that 4 feet underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a one foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1990 price levels) of the 1970 modification to the project is $212,732,000 Federal cost ($210,400,000Corps and $2,332,000U.S. Coast Guard) and $18,866,000 non-Federal cost ($14,300,000contributed funds and $4,566,000other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, H 401/91/2 and H 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. The LCA for branch channels was signed June 20, 1986. An amendment to the LCA reflecting cost sharing requirements of WRDA of 1986 for section 6 was signed August 31, 1987. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,083,162. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years is required from locals. Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 square feet of storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 316 storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000 bushel total capacity. One elevator on Ybor Channel has a 1,000,000 bushel capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases of marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with tank barges of capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The CSX Railroad serves the port. 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 17, Rev. 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing dredging contract costs were $1,587,118 Federal and $320,372 non-Federal. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $23,903 and $265,979 respectively. Maintenance: District Radio Communication Network cost $9,500. Condition and operation studies cost $248,629. Real estate management cost $1,529. Maintenance dredging cost $2,712,610. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $80,250 and $173,649 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (H 401/91/2 is 65 percent complete). Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1990 were: Main project: $197,511,050 for new work and $26,288,343 for maintenance, a total of $223,799,393regular funds. In addition, $853,050 was expended for new work from public funds, $1,463,000from emergency relief funds, and $1,029,180 from contributed funds. on Hillsborough River $270,466 was expended for new work. 36. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. (See Table 9-H.) 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-1.) 38. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Aquadilla Harbor, PR, $25,432; Benner Bay-Mangrove Lagoon, VI, $14,383; Boca Chica Channel, FL, $11,832; Buena Vista, Humacao, PR, $37,173; Cedar Island-Keaton Beach Channel, FL, $16,604; Fernandina Harbor, FL, $84,347; Island of Vieques, PR, $7,152; Blount Island, Jacksonville, FL, $28,656; Moncrief Creek, Jacksonville, FL, $9,491; Moore Haven Channel, Glades City, FL, $37,250; Punta Tuna, Maunabo, PR, $35,666; Ribault River, Jacksonville, FL, $9,537. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Section 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 39. BREVARD COUNTY, FL Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11484 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (October 1990 price levels) is $15,000,000 Federal and $15,000,000 non-Federal ($15,000,000 cash contribution). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,262,000. 9-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill has been provided at Indialantic and Melbourne beaches. 40. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on the lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in the northern part of Broward County. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a shoreline protection and recreational beach at 4 locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water; a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (October 1990 price levels) is $28,800,000 Federal and $25,600,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet; establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,758,841. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $109,133 and $483 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. 41. DUVAL COUNTY, FL Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11488.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of construction with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1989 price levels) $27,800,000 Federal and $22,034,000 non- Federal ($19,700,000 contributed funds and $2,334,000 for other costs). Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United states free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $12,099,567. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach nourishment continued at a cost of $263,352. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $218,393 and $25,414 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill and 4 year advance nourishment has been completed. 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 42. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL Location. Indian River County is on the east coast of Florida, midway between Jacksonville and Miami. The authorized project comprises 2.65 miles of beach along the ocean shore of Vero Beach and 1.7 miles along the Sebastian Inlet State Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11474 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorized project provides nourishment for 8,870 feet (1.68) miles) of the State Park, south of Sebastian inlet. The initial beach fill would consist of 202,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 202,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment at 5-year intervals would be required. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 65 percent of this segment. The plan also provided for nourishment of 9,180 feet (1.74 miles) of Vero Beach. The initial beach fill consisted of 572,000 cubic yards of material, including advance nourishment. The restored beach would have a 20 foot wide level berm at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water. The beach fill as designed would provide protection against a 10 year return interval storm. An estimated 120,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment would be required at 5 year intervals. In addition to the beach fill a "Sabecon" reef breakwater was recommended. The structure would be placed 500 feet offshore of the new beach and would be 400 feet in length, with a zero mean low water crest elevation. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 43.7 percent for this segment. The project was authorized on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) by the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Estimated cost of new work (October 1990 price levels) $32,300,000 Federal and $33,405,000 non- Federal ($33,300,000contributed funds and $105,000 for other costs). Local cooperation. The authorization of a beach erosion control project for Indian River County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of way; including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material, and relocations; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore; assure maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project; provide and maintain as necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishments for the life of the project; provide an additional cash contribution for the Sebastian Inlet State Park Beach. The project, as authorized, provides that the work may be accomplished in separate units or features and that the written agreement with non- Federal interests be obtained. The Indian River County Board of Commissioners, by letters dated December 21, 1984 and January 15, 1987, affirmed their support for the project and their willingness and ability to share in project costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $119,360. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost under existing project through September 30, 1990 was $373,446 Federal funds. 43. MANATEE COUNTY, FL Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of Florida, just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. The county's 14 mile gulf shoreline consists of 2 barrier islands, Anna Maria Key and the northern half of Longboat Key, separated from the mainland by Tampa and Sarasota Bays and from each other by Longboat Pass. Project consists of about 7.5 miles of gulf shoreline. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the shore protection project for Manatee County which includes the entire 7.5 mile gulf shoreline of Anna Maria Key. The project consists of restoration of 3.2 miles of gulf shore beach to an elevation 6 feet above mean low water with a level berm 50 feet wide and a natural slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. The project also provides for periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be and justified for the project life. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet. Estimated cost (October 1990 price levels) is $18,200,000 Federal funds and $14,100,000 non- Federal funds. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Manatee County, Florida was made with the provision that Federal cost sharing would be in accordance with policy established by existing law, and the percentages based on conditions of shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction: Provided that, prior to construction, local interests furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) Provide a cash contribution equal to 9-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 47 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Corps construction line, the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) Provide all costs of construction for nourishment landward of the Corps construction line; (d) Provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 41 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) Hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (f) Assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) Adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) Agree to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitations costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $240,892. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total costs incurred on project to date is $241,677. 44. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL Location. Palm Beach County is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. Project consists of about 30 miles of ocean coastline under 2 separate authorizations. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project authorization, the River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 62.1 percent of the cost for Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 55.8 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 50 percent for south Lake Worth Inlet- Delray Beach; and 53 percent of cost for Delray Beach- Boca Raton inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorization provides for Federal participation in the costs of a plan for protection of the shore of Palm Beach Island, comprising restoration of a protective beach with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, to a general width of 150 feet at mean high water from Lake Worth Inlet to a point about 1,000 feet south of Southern Boulevard extended, thence with a general width of 100 feet to South Lake Worth Inlet, construction and operation of a sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet, and additional periodic nourishment from Lake Worth or other suitable source, substantially in accordance with the plan developed by the district engineer, with such modifications thereof as may be considered advisable by the Chief of Engineers. Federal assistance would entail contribution of funds in amount of 4.7 percent of the initial construction cost of the beach restoration and appurtenant drainage work, and of the expenditures for periodic nourishment from Lake Worth for a period of 10 years from the year of the initial placement, plus 19.3 percent of the expenditures for construction, and for operation, maintenance, and current replacements of parts of the sand-transfer plant for the same period. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (October 1990 price levels) is $22,700,000 Federal and $29,850 non-Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project (except the sand-transfer plant already under contract), of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) make appropriate modification of the location of the end of the discharge line of the sand-transfer plant to accomplish satisfactory dispersion of bypassed material; (c) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic life as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals, including operation of the sand-transfer plant; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing beach replenishment cost $1,695,862. Engineering and design cost $117,820. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local interests provided initial beach fill at Delray Beach which was completed in August 1973. A periodic nourishment contract at Delray Beach was awarded in FY 1978 by local interests and the contract has been completed. Reimbursement of Boca Raton segment was done in FY 1990. 45. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (October 1990 price levels) is $63,200,000 Federal funds and $64,562,000 non-Federal funds ($64,500,000 contributed funds and $62,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Sand Key, No. 2 costs were $4,857,054. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $475,294 and $293,095, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in 1969 and is 28 percent completed. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1990 were $9,706,600 Federal funds and $7,868,443 contributed funds for new work and $5,625 for maintenance. 46. SARASOTA COUNTY, FL Location. Sarasota County is on the Gulf coast of Florida about 30 miles south of Tampa Bay. The northern most portion of the project adjoins the Manatee County Beach Erosion Control Project on Longboat Key. The total project consists of about 5.7 miles of gulf shoreline on Longboat Key and Venice Beach. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in the construction of a protective beach 12,600 feet long at Longboat Key and a protective beach 29,400 feet long at Manasota Key at the City of Venice, Florida. Two borrow areas will be required. The first is located within 2 shoal areas located between 1 to 2 miles offshore of Manasota Key south of the project area. This borrow area will be supplemented by material located within the ebb tidal shoal of Big Sarasota Pass which is about 13 nautical miles north of the project beach at Venice. The project also provides periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and justified for life of the project. The mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. Estimated cost (October 1990 price levels) is $25,950,000 Federal and $16,800,000 non-Federal. The Federal share of each periodic nourishment is 72.55 percent for Venice, and 15.4 percent for Longboat, of applicable nourishment costs. Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b)provide a cash contribution equal to 29.3 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, and rights-of-way, relocations, and 9-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Erosion Control Line (ECL), the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) provide all costs of construction for nourishment of private lands and share in the costs of construction for public lands landward of the Erosion Control Line (ECL); (d) provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 29.3 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors;(f) assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) agrees to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $225,092. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost incurred on project to date is $238,048. 47. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-J.) 48. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Boca de Congrejos, PR $13,395; Dunedin Shores, FL $299; Little Talbot Island, FL $3,955; Isla de Cabras, PR $10,614; Madiania Public Beach, Loisa, PR -$32; Nortside Drive, Fredricksted, VI $4,409; Patillas, PR $36,290; Puerto Nuevo Beach, PR $29,210; Punta Santiago Beach, Humacao, PR -$99. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-433, Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1074, Public Law 93-251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Flood Control 49. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is generally located within the southeastern 18 counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section north of the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, FL (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, FL) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports for 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargement of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shores of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent overdrainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around the lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. Project also provides for navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft, consisting of locks and channel dredging in the upper Kissimmee and St. Johns basins. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-K. Also, see Table 9-L for principal features of locks and dams. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990 price levels) is $932,490,000 Federal funds ($930,000,000 Corps and $2,490,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $229,000,000contributed funds, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects. Estimated cost to local interests of lands, rights-ofway, and relocations is $317,345,000. (See Table 9- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-M for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date except those for the Small Boat navigation feature added in 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9- N for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie Locks; 5 hurricane gates; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. B. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 -- total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, LD3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S- 11, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Section 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gaging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. The scheduled work of project is 81 percent complete. Planning for the entire project began in November 1948 and has been continued. For construction completed prior to FY 1980 see Annual Reports for 1960-1979. Construction completed under existing project during the fiscal year is set forth in Table 9-0. All Federally maintained features of the project were generally in good condition 9-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 at the end of the fiscal year. (For status of work under contract at end of fiscal year see Table 9-P.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1990 were $355,897,323 for new work, $69,500,033 for maintenance, a total of $425,487,356. In addition, $57,301,119 has been expended from contributed funds for new work. 50. DADE COUNTY, FL Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the ;ounty from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2,5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (October 1990 price levels) is $49,400,000 Federal cost and $42,839,000 non-Federal cost ($41,000,000 cash contribution and 1,839,000 other costs.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (H 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cash for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement for Bal Harbour portion was approved June 30, 1976. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $27,857,335. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing beach replenishment cost was $3,141,128. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $40,799 and $216,054, respectively. 51. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The existing shore protection project for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the period of Federal participation from 10 years to the life of the project. Cost estimate for new work (October 1990 price levels) was $12,700,000 Federal and $11,500,000non-Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost-sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the administration and Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of- 9-26 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT way and relocations; pay 50 percent of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; pay 35 percent of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. Non-federal contribution for new work was $7,499,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing beach replenishment costs were $644,900. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $22,106 and $40,277, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continuation of planning and engineering. 52. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins -- the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers -- and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provided for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp Area -- a conservation area and 3 storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River -- 4 flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures and levees; Oklawaha River --a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of parts of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River -- one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River -- Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas-Lake Tarpon; outlet canal and control structure; Anclote River: control structure and channel improvement; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-Q on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (October 1988 price level) is $156,000,000 Federal funds and $132,400,000 non-Federal ($32,900,000 contributed funds; $99,500,000 for lands and damages). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing contracts for recreation facilities cost $131,679. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $177,423 and $48,482, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled work is 98 percent complete. See Table 9-R for construction of major features of the project completed to date. 53. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portuges, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Caribbean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22,6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the seond largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for 2 multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement -- one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2 mile long tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (October 1990 price levels) is $336,125,000 Federal and $126,305,000 non-Federal ($34,175,000 contributed funds, $72,306,000for lands and damages, $19,824,000for relocations, and highway bridges and approaches). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 9-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir which was signed March 15, 1982. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $90,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Cerrillos Dam & Spillway continued at a cost of $26,004,667. Hired labor cost $1,309,769. Contract for the Cerrillos Reservoir clearing cost $100,000. Portugues Debris Basin, contracts nos. 2 and 3 cost $286,899 and $1,965,404, respectively. Ponce Channel Recreation cost for Ceiba Park was $59,804. Hired labor for channels and canals cost $4,142. Cultural resource investigations cost $85,061. Area office equipment cost $12,081. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $2,570,454 and $3,494,924, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in September 1975 and is 76 percent complete. 54. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $27,180. 55. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-S.) 56. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 9-T.) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $278,163 for the Natural Disaster Preparedness Program, and $142,646 for the National Emergency Security Preparedness Program. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). Federal cost for the fiscal year was $33,474 for Ft. Clinch, Nassau County, FL. General Investigations 57. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year (all Federal funds) were: navigation studies $175,822; flood damage prevention studies $1,389,877; and shoreline protection studies $298; for a total of $1,565,997. Review of authorized projects cost $1,425; special investigations cost $45,978; and coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests cost $163,071. 58. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. FPMS Unit Jacksonville, FL cost $132,420; Technical services $27,358; Tampa Bay, FL restudy $8,639; Puerto Rico hurricane evacuation study $31,243; and Southeast Florida hurricane evacuation study $67,737. 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Federal Funds) 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 3. Atlantic Intercoastal Waterway between orfolk, VA and St.Johns River, FL (Federal Funds) 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) 5. Canaveral Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 7. Charlotte Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 2,516,000 2,405,000 2,450,000 2,125,000 2,666,855 2,333,423 2,510,571 2,007,829 0 18,387 467 18,387 5,032 5,032 31,290,670 31,132,827 1,128,075 I 1,128,075 4,291,731 4,291,731 361,225 2 361,225 2 5,300,742 5,300,742 243,235 3 243,235 185,688 185,688 2,979,000 2,894,020 1,034,500 1,032,134 43,100 -22,312 -20,216 -410,000 302,675 3,527,000 2,728,192 12,441 11,902 987 4,966,850 3,464,569 4,945,994 3,229,000 - 36,000 171 45,213 - 42,350 - 35,281 50,000 103,000 183,290 269,118 42,756 946,841 183,595 261,369 14,138,9104 14,138,848 49,644,240 48,541,869 1,142,000 1,137,448 305,290 305,290 1,648,880 1,641,812 159,975 159,975 533,169 s 533,169 11,991,644 12,922,550 9-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 8. Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 10. Fernandina Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Fort Myers Beach Channel,FL (Federal Funds) 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (Federal Funds) 14. Intracoastal Waterway Jacksonville to Miami, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 150,000 10,931 1,720,500 1,745,887 -2,616 50,000 62,193 150,000 143,378 87,500 81,006 4,850,000 109,295 2,404,000 1,837,662 3,107,979 3,096,182 -5,000,000 76,415 1,774,234 1,720,057 63,197,473 63,383,096 28,454,176 6 27,781,721 9,627 9,627 710,900 705,668 68,000 11,778 1,365,000 308,847 4,000 5,636 89,000 56,997 766,950 766,931 59,000 17,858 757,619 548,015 17,000 31,169 10,145 11,488 403,000 320,000 506,326 662,555 401,755 175,651 506,288 651,867 106,000 1,929,000 99,824 146,521 61,209 36,262 63,268 36,262 4,354,816 ' 4,243,474 ' 25,773,588 24,499,515 892,000 860,081 158,140 8 158,140 8 1,184,091 1,184,315 356,056 356,056 5,681,916 5,522,658 18,574 18,574 8,112,557 9 8,112,557 9 8,012,209 to 6,223,524 10to - - - - 19,251,598 " - - - - 19,251,598 n 3,095,500 1,736,000 904,692 734,369 32,806,028 u 3,093,169 909,058 983,309 583,133 31,976,108 1 - - - - 61,000 61,000 - - - 61,000 9-30 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Jacksonville Hbr. (Mill Cove), FL (Federal Funds) 17. Johns Pass, FL (Federal Funds) 18. Long Boat Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Manatee Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 21. Melborne Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 4,000,300 3,952,929 3,695,000 857,548 399,700 415,056 25,000 961,000 2,581,000 450,000 148,856 3,277,997 78,053 32,245 63,350 32,245 62,319 49,954 377,350 49,954 162,033 - 478,000 200,000 500,000 - 224,288 218,089 396,275 - 19,471 716 716 9-31 4,408,579 4,173,562 374,964 47,596,278 13 47,596,278 13 68,005,868 14 64,899,293 14 102,813 102,813 927,654 ' 927,654 n 25,000 25,000 3,992,000 3,879,870 82,098 16 82,098 16 1,503,425 1,502,394 1,020,233 1,020,233 1,827,791 1,612,474 172,324 172,324 1,178,000 838,652 328,187 168,903 1,033,390 1,052,861 17,696 17,696 634,864 634,863 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 22. Miami Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23. New Pass Sarasota, FL (Federal Funds) 24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL (Federal Funds) 25. Oklawaha River, FL (Federal Funds) 26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Ponce Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,650,000 1,820,111 1,097 38,000 11,885 - - - 32,636,066 17 - - - 30,739,667 17 127,000 203,755 1,249,937 4,092,517 74,310 203,754 1,233,456 4,022,934 - - - 2,300,710 18 - - - 2,274,595 18 - 52,289 5,000 4,940 1,735,200 1,795,491 2,587,000 1,749,662 55,000 58,000 58,759 62,284 20,000 7,183 793,000 780,280 65,422 65,414 1,147,600 1,062,377 45,811 19 45,811 19 4,321,326 4,288,383 - - 21,405,590 - - 21,405,530 2,931,330 1,859,725 40,658,221 21 2,952,854 1,750,197 39,709,090 21 72,595 39,661 72,535 28,205 979,000 934,651 996,177 181,133 930,993 976,085 132,500 136,000 2,802,500 140,306 114,769 2,801,297 200,000 775,000 1,325,000 77,861 45,078 1,954,609 - 574,329 - 42,012 199,739 679,406 817,752 808,954 -72,549 -56,764 -14,811 315,264 315,264 2,273,576 23 2,266,335 6,924,021 u 6,911,204 12,912,946 12,076,205 1,953,277 1,953,277 19,123,338 19,092,792 2,415,600 2,415,600 1,379,000 612,663 2,782,907 2 2,457,697 1,612,870 1,327,870 717,304 706,607 9-32 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See TotalCostTo Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 29. Port Everglades Harbor, Fl (Federal Funds) 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 31. St. Augustine Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 32. St. Johns River, FL Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 33. St. Lucie Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. San Juan Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 35. Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Project) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35. Tampa Harbor, FL (Cont) (East Bay - Branch Channels) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 10,200,000 10,098,627 62,523 85,000 24,077 -45,000 7,266 20,698 20,668 19,700 -134 2,738,000 2,736,000 2,815,387 2,781,380 2,744,421 2,511,647 2,820,856 2,617,006 3,167 92,000 93,740 1,811,737 364,279 363,799 269,700 263,126 - 51,553 115,050 114,847 18,707 430,000 431,706 44,450 200,000 139,792 44,500 110,000 81,330 1,650,000 1,661,897 3,440,099 3,438,932 8,750 9,531 550,000 190,287 2,260,504 2,263,294 17,967 884,410 857,218 54,463,773 27 54,415,370 2 1,737,878 1,643,021 39,082,137 38,671,440 1,476,434 28 1,476,434 2 4,714,107 4,714,107 1,171,243 2 1,171,243 2 1,300,299 30 1,300,299 3 7,863,602 31 7,862,485 31 5,441,985 5,424,599 3,086,026 3,086,026 - 13,744,968 n 32 - 13,744,968 3 - 16,696,635 " 1 16,670,756 33 6,699 3,688,163 3,216,680 - 335,000 155,885 196,186 - 100,000 - 35,695 199,143,643 " 197,511,050 " 26,661,095 " 27,665,194 " 1,083,162 1,038,711 1,100,000 682,150 144,500 35,695 9-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 37. Brevard County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 40. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control & Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Proj. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41. Duval County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. Indian River County, FL (Federal Funds) 43. Manatee County, FL (Federal Funds) 44. Palm Beach County, FL (Federal Funds) 45. Pinellas County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 46. Sarasota County, FL (Federal Funds) 49. Central and Southern Florida (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 13,667 244,000 14,771 3,544,000 564,947 3,955,250 1,862,188 4,275 500,000 2,881,443 1,160,445 16,410 - 3,750,000 12,777 109,616 2,511,000 380,337 369,577 - 1,421,917 174,579 137,582 - 200,000 100,000 432,000 - 46,539 207,547 119,360 - 400,000 - 241,677 - 1,805,000 64,028 1,813,682 234,000 58,893 885,000 2,200,000 2,992,000 3,199,000 746,218 1,503,562 674,349 3,168,144 1,435,000 407,100 868,000 2,123,578 135,542 241,027 4,756,700 2,458,842 - 400,000 - 238,048 9,814,000 9,847,398 4,507,200 4,517,244 15,300,000 11,613,403 5,211,000 3,627,164 16,100,000 17,603,265 4,807,619 4,685,876 29,203,000 26,063,497 5,428,010 5,489,488 2,346,492 2,309,101 29,001 29,001 2,262,000 2,257,081 15,027,100 11,137,647 26,884 26,884 1,758,841 36 1,758,841 3 15,467,900 12,577,963 12,099,567 8,670,835 732,000 373,446 400,000 241,677 6,602,834 5,776,012 13,621 13,621 10,988,693 9,706,600 5,625 5,625 10,297,883 4,868,443 400,000 238,048 362,538,397 37 355,897,323 71,188,290 69,500,033 9-34 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 179,183 8,230 971,000 1,016,000 57,548,049 Cost 1,025,861 1,224,366 1,407,080 1,082,021 57,301,119 50. Dade County, New Work: FL Approp. 3,359,000 200,000 1,711,000 - 38,553,956 " (Federal Funds) Cost 3,101,419 -513 149,102 1,518,105 37,934,106 " (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 1,985,000 - 576,000 1,721,250 27,857,335 39 Cost 1,601,237 324,658 10,408 1,879,876 27,002,312 39 51. Dade County, New Work: N. of Haulover Approp. 100,000 6,883,000 - - 7,133,000 Beach, FL Cost 45,309 5,928,340 351,400 400,403 6,738,391 (Federal Funds) New Work: (Contrib. Funds) Approp. 1,500,000 6,575,000 -576,000 - 7,499,000 Cost - 4,425,621 2,182,572 306,880 6,915,073 52. Four River New Work: Basins, FL Approp. 566,000 696,000 400,000 369,000 74,411,095 0 (Federal Funds) Cost 581,791 778,523 342,380 357,584 74,301,474 * (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. - 735,000 425,981 - 13,907,841 Cost 259,425 252,986 856,061 146,046 13,884,995 53. Portugues and New Work: Bucana Rivers, Approp. 39,697,000 29,080,000 8,500,000 41,254,000 259,905,568 PR Cost 27,285,097 16,547,880 30,861,960 35,971,382 250,368,371 (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. - 220,000 50,000 90,000 360,000 Cost - 171,698 22,901 111,366 305,965 ' Excludes $228,000 for contributed funds for new work. 2 Includes $97,566 for previous project. ' Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. ' Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock. s Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project from contributed funds. 6 Excludes $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. ' Includes $174,880 expended for recreation facilities. ' Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 9 Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work. ,0 Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. SIncludes $94,776 for work for previous projects. Excludes $2,199,842 expended from public works funds for new work. Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. " Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. " Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. C Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. 1 Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. " Includes $5,502,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $6,777,906 for recreation facilities. " Includes $381,479 work-in-kind and $172,314 in costs for north jetty recreation facility. " Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. SIncludes $16,222,275 for new work under previous project, $626,925 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. 2, Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects, 9-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement, and $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. SIncludes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for permanent indefinite appropriation. Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,506 contributed funds. Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. 27 Excludes $1,033,069 contributed funds. SIncludes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. SBaresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status were deauthorized by Public Law 93-251 section 12. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 30 Includes $25,838 under previous project. 3' Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. SIncludes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. Includes $44,730 in maintenance under previous project. Includes $853,050 for new work under previous project. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. SIncludes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. SExcludes work-in-kind. " Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, FL, project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. Includes $175,000 appropriationand $175,000 cost for new work at C&SF St. Johns Water Management District. " Includes $2,294,134 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. 3 Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. '0 Includes costs of $89,691 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 9-36 TABLE 9-B JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 August 26, 1937 March 4, 1913 June 20, 1939 July 14, 1960 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 Report of the Chief of Engineers October 1985 June 20, 1938 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet. Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cutoffs. BAKERS HAULOVER (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 11 x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction of jetties and protection of inlet shores. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock. Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant. Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at Port Canaveral West Turning Basin Project. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL (See Section 6 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet. Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance. Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at bend. Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin. Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend. H.Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 189, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 95, 74th Cong., 2d sess. 9-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 P.O. 675/77 July 23, 1942 November 17, 1986 June 20, 1938 June 14, 1880 July 13, 1892 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 6, 1968 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act Def. Act of March 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, March 4, 1933 Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 1st sess. CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Establishment of the Cross Florida National Conservation Area. P.L. 99-662, 17 November 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. H.Doc. 497, 75th Cong., 3d sess. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance jetties. Annual Report 1879 Raising and extending jetties to provide a 19-foot depth. Annual Report 1891 & 1896 Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20 to 24-foot depth and 400 to H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 600-foot channel width. 1st sess. Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor. Provided for a 26-foot channel. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin. H.Doc. 548, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 1st sess. vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong., 2d sess. FORT MYERS BEACH, FL (See Section 11 of Text) 12 x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong. Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals. 1st sess. Extension of 11 x 125 foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL (See Section 12 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local Specified in Act interests. Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel. Specified in Act 9-38 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 30, 1935 Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions. W.R.D.A. 1986 Deepening and enlarging channels and turning basin. November 17, 1986 Total cost $6,742,000. 17 November 1988 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL (See Section 13 of Text) March 2, 1945 9 x 100 foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice. June 30, 1948 Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U.S. May 17, 1950 Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used. September 3, 1954 Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area. May 10-16, 1957 Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-1. Auth. March 1, 1962 Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet. by Senate and House Public Works Comm. Auth. by Chief of 6 x 80 foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay. Engineers, March 1, 1963, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act H.Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676, H.Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., 1st sess. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL (See Section 14 of Text) January 21, 1927 Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami. H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 2d sess. July 3, 1930 Channel width of 100 feet. S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. PARA June 26, 1934 Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge. Specified in Act August 26, 1937 Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach. H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. March 2, 1945 Channel 12 x 125 feet. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. March 2, 1945 Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian (deauthorized). H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. March 2, 1945 Turning basin at Vero Beach. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami. Report of July 22, 1960, Mod. 12-foot channel 9-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1907 Report of the Chief of Engineers 12 Feb. 1982 JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL (See Section 15 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad H.Doc 663, 59th Cong., bridge. 1st sess. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL (See Section 16 of Text) Enlarge weir structure and west opening controlling flow into Mill P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 Cove, to reduce shoaling and improve navigation as well as 99th Cong., 2d sess. circulation. JOHN'S PASS, FL (See Section 17 of Text) Auth. by Chief of Channel 10 x 100 feet in gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, Engineers Dec. 2, 6 x 100 feet to IWW, 2.6 miles long. 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act LONGBOAT PASS, FL (See Section 18 of Text) Auth. by Chief of 12 x 150 foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Engineers, April Bridge; 10 x 100 foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly 20, 1976 under to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge. Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act, as amended Report of the Chief of Engineers 12 May 1980 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 July 3, 1930 PWA Program Sept. 6, 1933 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 MANATEE HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) Provide for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basin from Tampa Bay to Port Manatee. Initial construction of a widener at Manatee Harbor and deepen area adjacent to berthing area. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR (See Section 20 of Text) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. MIAMI HARBOR, FL (See Section 22 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth. The channel at Dinner Key Airport. An 18-foot channel in a land cut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty. Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act S.Doc. 95, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act 9-40 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 4, 1913 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 August 13, 1968 Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912. A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties. A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited to $200,000. A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay. Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward. The Virginia Key improvement. For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interests contribute one-third of the cost. Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key approach channel, widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot wide section to 500 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth. Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biscayne Boulevard terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL (See Section 23 of Text) 10 x 150 foot entrance channel; 8 x 100 foot inner channels; and 8-foot deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier. Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL (See Section 24 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from Specified in Act R&H appropriations. New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston. 3d sess. Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 9-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Auth. by Chief of Engineers Nov. 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act September 19, 1890 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 PARA June 26, 1934 March 13, 1934 December 10, 1934 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Report of the Chief of Engineers 10 Dec. 1985 October 27, 1965 Enlarge existing 8 x 90 foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL (See Section 25 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg. Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river. Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed. Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL (See Section 26 of Text) Annual Report 1889, p. 1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., interests. 2d sess. Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local Recommended by Chief of interests, to 20 feet. Engineers to Public Works Administration October 17, 1934 Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 2d sess. and Rivers 700-foot square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point and Harbors Comm. on south side of the inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet, and Doc. 42, 74th restoring existing jetties. Cong., 1st sess. Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed 2d sess. $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949. An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 1st sess. (contains mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet latest published map) north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west. Assume maintenance of locally expanded turning basin to a depth of P.L. 99-662 17 Nov 1986 25 feet on north side of existing basin. 99th Cong., 2d sess. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL (See Section 27 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south sides of inlet; H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir. 1st sess. 9-42 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PONCE HARBOR, PR (See Section 28 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local Cong., 4th sess. interests. August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 H.R. September 23, 1976, S.R. October 1, 1976 Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests. Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero. Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., 2d sess. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL (See Section 29 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests. H.Doc. 357, 71st Cong., 2d sess. August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1905 Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square. Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side. Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel. Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase turning basin in size and depth. Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed post authorization studies. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State. Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical or other means. Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 144, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. 30 of Text) Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL (See Section 31 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin. H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 9-43 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 3, 1899 March 2, 1919 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1945 November 7, 1966 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 August 8, 1917 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE BARNEY (See Section 32 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka. The improvement of Deep Creek. Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project). A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney. Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points. A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends. (Cutoffs deauthorized) Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, FL, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff). A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL (See Section 33 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet. Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet. 2d sess. Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet through bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR (See Section 34 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth. Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel. Modified condition of local cooperation. Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1899 p. 1343 H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 9-44 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth. Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock. Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal. Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32- foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. August 4, 1976 Report of the Chief of Engineers 23 December 1982 March 3, 1899 March 3, 1905 A bar channel 48 x 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 2d sess. feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 x 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar P.L. 99-662 17 Nov 1986 Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet to the west; 99th Cong., 2d sess. deepening Anegado, and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, and Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area "E" to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500-foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. TAMPA HARBOR, FL (See Section 35 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay. 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf Specified in Act of Mexico to Port Tampa. TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1899 For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay. For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary. HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12 x 200 foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 9-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Do. Do. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a 2d sess. and Annual Report previous project under title Improving Hillsborough Bay, FL). Report 1898,pp 1357-1360 TAMPA HARBOR Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor. Specified in Act Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., Sparkman Channel to 300 feet. 1st sess. For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth S.Doc. 22, 72nd Cong., of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth 1st sess. of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals. For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending 3d sess. the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet. For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Sen. Comm. Print. Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest. 76th Cong., 1st sess. For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 2d sess. 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly. For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, 1st sess. and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge. For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough S.Doc. 16, 77th Cong., Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River. 1st sess. (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950). For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port 1st sess. Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns. Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests. 2d sess. Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 34 x 400 feet. 2d sess. For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet. 1st sess. Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the H.Doc. 401, 91st Cong., Gulf to Mullet Key. 2d sess. Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet. Do. 9-46 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. August 15, 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 28 March 1988 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 January 1979 W.R.D.A. 17 Nov. 1986 Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Do. Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels. Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Do. Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels. Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet. Do. Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a Do. turning diameter of 1,200 feet. Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet. Do. Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet. Do. Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and Do. an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin. Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the Do. junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin. Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing Do. length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet. An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from Do. the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet. A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning Do. diameter of 1,200 feet. An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Do. Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet. Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a Do. distance of 4,000 feet. Maintenance of East Bay channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 5,500 feet. 1st sess. Port Sutton Channel deepening to 43 feet for a distance of 3,700 P.L. 100-676 17 Nov. 1988 feet and a width of 200 feet. TAMPA HARBOR BRANCH CHANNELS Enlarging Hillsborough Bay Cut D, Sparkman Channel, Port Tampa Channel P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, and existing turning basins at the entrance to Ybor Channel and 99th Cong., 2d sess. at Port Tampa, all to a depth of 41 feet with varying lengths and widths and deepening Ybor Channel to a depth of 39 feet. This work will be associated with the Main Channel deepening. TAMPA HARBOR EAST BAY CHANNEL Maintenance dredging. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 9-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents BEACH EROSION BREVARD COUNTY, FL (See Section 39 of Text) CONTROL PROJECTS August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL, NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 40 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, FL and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers 2 April 1982 August 13, 1968 August 15, 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 27 December 1983 October 27, 1965 W.R.D.A. 17 Nov. 1986 S.R. 31 May 1974 and H.R. 20 Nov. 1975 Report of the Chief of Engineers 22 April 1984 October 23, 1962 CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FL Shoreline protection. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. DADE COUNTY, FL (See Section 48 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane- H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., flood control project. 2d sess. DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL (See Section 48 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane- H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., flood control project. 1st sess. Extending of existing shore protection project for Dade County to P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, provide for protective beach fill and subsequent nourishment 99th Cong., 2d sess. along 2.5 miles of shore north of Haulover Beach Park. DUVAL COUNTY, FL (See Section 41 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL (See Section 42 of Text) The plans provide for a 2.65 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, Vero Beach, a 1.7 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Sebastian 99th Cong., 2d sess. Inlet State Park and for periodic nourishment of the new beaches. MANATEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 43 of Text) The plan provides for a level berm 50 feet wide at an elevation 6 feet S.Doc. 37, 93rd Cong., (MLW) along 3.2 miles of shore on Anna Maria Island and nourishment 1st sess. of entire Gulf shore of that island as needed throughout project life. MONROE COUNTY, FL Modification of existing project from 6,200-foot long to 8,770-foot P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, long beach fill stabilized with 2 groins and periodic nourishment. 99th Cong., 2d sess. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 44 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., sand-transfer plant. 1st sess. 9-48 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 November 7, 1966 Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 23 April 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 28 February 1986 Report of the Chief of Engineers 26 February 1980 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS June 30, 1948 September 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 October 23, 1962 Do. Do. Do. Do. October 27, 1965 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM LAKE WORTH INLET TO SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET, FL (See Section 44 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project on Palm Beach Island. Federal participation in cost of local sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet and shore protection project. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL (See Section 45 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. Restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island, 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key, 92,000 feet of beach at Treasure Island, and construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key. Also, renourishment of each island. SARASOTA COUNTY, FL (See Section 46 of Text) Shoreline protection along 12,600 feet of shoreline on central Longboat and 21,100 feet on Manasota Key in the vicinity of Venice, Florida and periodic nourishment of these areas. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Shoreline protection along 2.5 miles of problem area in the St. Augustine Beach and Coquina Gables area and periodic nourishment. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 49 o First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes. Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement. Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County. Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando. Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami. Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County. Project Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp. Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County. H.Doc. 772, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 342, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. f Text) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 9-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., County. 1st sess. August 13, 1968 Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties. 2d sess. Do. Improvement of supply, distribution and conservation of water resources H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee 2d sess. agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. Approved Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., December 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 April 1986 Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL (See Section 52 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water H conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (See Section 53 of Text) LAGO de CERILLOS, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and H recreation. LAGO de PORTUGUES, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. PONCE, PR Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR Project for flood control. P SAVAN GUT, ST. THOMAS, VI Project for flood control. Increased maximum allotment to P $100,000. 2d sess. [.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. [.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. .L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. '.L. 858, 80th Cong., and P.L. 101-640, 28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. 9-50 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-C CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 5 of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, FL Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock dimensions 90' wide; 600' long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of Sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,966,539 ' 56x400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was with increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a constructed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost Federal responsibility. ($700,000). Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible TABLE 9-D CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 8 of Text) R.N. Henry H. Buckman Eureka Lock Bert Dosh Dunellon Inglis Lock Lock and Dam Lock Lock and Dam Nearest town Palatka, Sparr, Ocala, Dunnellon, Inglis, (miles) 11.2 15.8 8.9 2.5 3.2 Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 90.4 111.4 127.7 156.5 168.6 Lock dimensions (ft.)' 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 Normal lift (ft.) 20 20 0-152 12-272 28 Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) 14 17 16-312 16-312 18 Character of Piles in Piles in Piles in Rock Rock foundation sand sand sand Kind of dam Movable Movable None None Movable Type construction Earth' Earth' - - Earth' Percent complete 100 100 0 0 100 Estimated contract cost $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 * Clear width and greatest available length. 2 Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. ' With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-E CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 8 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operation and Maintenance: Operations of locks, operations and maintenance of dams, spillways, reservoirs and bypasses, debris removal, performance monitoring system $ 296,655 Buildings and grounds maintenance, trash removal, potable water testing 167,236 Natural Resources Management 46,496 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, sanitary facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters and contract maintenance of grounds 151,121 Condition and operations studies and periodic inspections 52,196 Energy Conservation 1,068 Water quality studies, data collection and processing, reimbursement to USGS, water control analysis Lake Oklawaha and Inglis Bypass, and water management control 173,187 Real Estate audits, inspections and outgrants 2,060 OSHA medical exams 4,514 Supervision and Administration 120,049 Sub-Total $1,014,582 Maintenance: Maintenance of dams and spillways and contract maintenance $ 54,263 Maintenance of locks and lock repair contract 120,703 Maintenance of roads, bridges 4,044 Maintenance of Recreational Facilities 91,977 Maintenance of Recreational Roads and Bridges 7,360 SRUF 1,516 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment (Recreation) 114 Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment 146,199 Bank stabilization--maintenanceof slopes and berms, Rodman and Inglis dams, and bank stabilization contract 165,975 Maintenance of canals, clearing and snagging 81,915 Engineering and Design 1,293 Supervision and Inspection 52,364 Real Estate encroachments 2,518 Sub-Total $ 730,241 Income Credits -24,765 Sub-Total $ -24,765 Grand Total $1,720,058 9-52 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-F OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 24 of Text) Work Performed Operations and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of Locks, and Permanent Monitoring System Contract maintenance buildings, grounds, potable water testing, repair and replacement of project signs, operation and maintenance of District communications network Natural resource management Management of recreation areas and facilities Real estate management and energy conservation reports OSHA medical exams and inspections Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections Supervision and Administration Sub-Total Maintenance: Maintenance of locks and dams Real estate acquisitions, surveys, encroachments and monumentation Maintenance of roads and levees and floodwalls Maintenance of recreational facilities, recreational permanent operating equipment, and recreation roads Maintenance of permanent operating equipment non-recreational Channel and canal maintenance Engineering and Design Supervision and Inspection Sub-Total Income Credits Sub-Total Total $ 596,133 231,973 107,225 309,407 2,083 979 24,968 85,092 $ 1,357,860 -41,246 48,974 34,258 61,577 1,546,580 36,414 72,732 47,608 $ 1,806,897 -24,560 $ -24,560 $ 3,140,197 9-53 Cost REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-G REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 30 of Text) Locality Acres Controlled Cost St. Johns River and tributaries and Withlacoochee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers 22,600 $ 1,996,062 Okeechobee Waterway and tributaries 4,605 439,283 Acquisition and maintenance of airboats, engines and work tools- 33,654 Income credits - - OSHA medical exams - - Engineering and Design- 18,979 Supervision and Administration- 129,128 Total 27,205 $ 2,617,106 TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 36 of Text) Date Survey Cost Incurred Project Conducted During Period AIWW, Jacksonville to Miami, FL 7-90 $ 4,299 AIWW, Norfolk to St. Johns River, FL 1-90 47,064 Anclote River, FL 9-87 274 Arecibo Harbor, PR 4-90 572 Bakers Haulover, FL 7-90 15,438 Christiansted Harbor, VI 4-90 795 Clearwater Pass, FL 9-89 443 Crystal River, FL 2-90 7,212 Fort Pierce Harbor, FL 9-90 98 Homosassa River, FL 3-90 3,120 Johns Pass, FL 11-89 3,272 Longboat Pass, FL 11-89 2,534 Mayaguez Harbor, PR 4-90 1,937 Miami Harbor, FL 8-90 528 Miami River, FL 1-89- New Pass, FL 10-90- Oklawaha River, FL 11-84 2,257 Palm Beach Harbor, FL 8-90 2,478 Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL 2-89 218 Ponce Harbor, PR 4-90 3,112 Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL 4-90 74 Port Everglades, FL 5-89 264 San Juan Harbor, PR 10-89 1,727 St. Augustine Harbor, FL 6-89 St. Johns River to Lake Harney, FL 4-86 98 St. Petersburg River, FL 3-88 98 Steinhatchee River, FL 7-82 1,110 Suwannee River, FL 1-87 309 Withlacoochee River, FL 11-88 358 A/E Contract 165,671 Total $ 265,360 9-54 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-I OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, FL 1974 $ 267,427 $ 636,427 Aquatic Plant Control, FL (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 1,640,997 z- Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL 1939 5,099,153 Bayport, FL3 1972 58,495 - Cedar Keys Harbor, FL 1977 168,569 s 76,023 Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI' 1964 303,317 58,595 Clearwater Pass, FL2 1980 46,349 1,257,684 Courtnay Channel FL' 1940 22,846 26,779 Crystal River, FL 1941 25,000 135,212 Everglades Harbor, FL' 1964 221,509 8 51,034 Fajardo Harbor, PR3 1945 - - Guayanes Harbor, PR' 1945 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, FL' 1974 38,850- Homosassa River, FL' 1937 3,999 ' 26,454 Horseshoe Cove, FL 1977 347,521 161,864 Hudson River, FL' 1974 9,889- Intracoastal Waterway. Miami to Key West, FL' 1963 243,079 28,046 Key West Harbor, FL 1972 1,548,892 ' 534,623 Kissimmee River, FL' 1931 23,479 112,954 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL" 1931 10,276 9,035 Largo Sound Channel, FL"'2 1966 117,443 " 51,149 Little Manatee River, FL" 1949 11,903 '- Manatee River, FL" 1970 123,350 194,516 New River, FL' 1956 36,518 31,296 Orange River, FL' 1962 2,000 24,918 Ozona, FL, channel and turning basin' 1963 105,527 15,089 Palm Beach, FL, side channel and basin 1946 - - Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL"" 1966 41,297 " 60,686 Pithlachascotee River, FL 1973 400,000 1 261,401 Rice Creek, FL' 1957 85,208 "9 18,814 St. Petersburg Harbor, FL 1983 255,608 m 1,570,552 21 St. Thomas Harbor, VI' 1949 1,989- Steinhatchee River, FL' 1940 135,053 44,439 Suwannee River, FL" 1977 76,418 219,570 Withlacoochee River, FL" 1969 614,912 23 431,545 ' Complete. 2 Excludes $1,640,997 contributed funds. 3 Inactive. 4 Includes $41,222 for reconnaissanceand detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. SIncludes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 6 Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. ' Excludes $42,783 contributed funds. ' Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 9 In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. n Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. u Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 13 Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. "4 Expended on restudy. " Inactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 16 Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of R&H Act of 1960. '7 Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. 1 Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 9 Excludes 93,000 contributed funds. 20 Includes $32,689 under previous project. 21 Includes $20,532 under previous project. " Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. SIncludes $30,000 expended under previous project. 9-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-J OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 47 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park, FL 1969 $ 34,862 1 $ - El Tuque Beach, Ponce, PR 1985 1,396,730 - Key West, FL 1963 96,340 2 3,794 Lee County, FL 1971 - - Lido Key, FL 1971 - - Mullet Key, FL 1973 436,201 3 1,656 Manatee County, FL 1983 217,600 - Punta Salinas, PR 1984 855,511 - Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140 s 6,257 San Juan, PR 1965 - - Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, FL 1978 1,708,738 6 1,022 SIncludes $2,462 cost of reconnaissance and detailed Excludes $360,000 contributed funds. project reports but excludes $13,818 contributed funds. s Excludes $781,188 in property or services furnished by local Excludes $192,168 contributed funds. interests in lieu of cash contribution. 3 Excludes $187,133 contributed funds. 6 Excludes $825,771 contributed funds. TABLE 9-K CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 49 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Comrn- Actual No. Name (miles) (feet) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, FL 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, FL 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, FL 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, FL 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, FL 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. 9-56 TABLE 9-L CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 49 of Text) Miles Elevation From Lock Normal of Normal Depth Character Kind Kind Nearest Nearest Dimensions lift Pool of sills of of of Percent Contract Town Town (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) (ft.) foundation Dam Construction Complete Cost W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam' S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock S-65D Lock S-65E Lock Moore Haven Lock (HGS-1 Mod.) S-310 (HGS-2 Mod.) S-193 (HGS-6 Mod.) S-308B (Port Mayaca) S-57 S-58 S-59 S-60 S-61 S-62 S-63 S-63A S-96% S-96A S-53 S-55 S-157 S-158 At Olga Frostproof Avon Park Sebring Sebring Okeechobee Okeechobee Moore Haven Clewiston Okeechobee Pahokee Ashton Ashton Kissimmee Ashton St. Cloud Ashton Ashton Ashton Sebastian Sebastian Eau Gallie Christmas Sebastian Titusville 0 23 26 20 25 14 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 11 9 5666 10 12 14 14 16 8 12 4 15 56 x 400 30x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30x 90 30 x 90 50 x 250 50 x 60 50x 60 56 x 400 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 2.5 4.2 6.3 6.0 7.2 5.8 4.6 9.4 5.0 7.5 4.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 7.5 3.5 10.0 20.0 4.5 3.0 48.5 - 52.3' 46.3 40.0 34.0 26.8 21.0 15.5 - 17.5' 15.5 - 17.5' 15.5 - 17.5' 15.5 - 17.5' 62.0 64.0 58.0 64.0 55.0 61.0 62.0 57.0 24.0 25.0 17.5 14.0 20.0 4.0 14 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 12.9 7.5 18 6 6666666666666 Piles in clay Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Piles in sand lockwalls Slab on sand Piles in sand and slab on sand Slab on sand Earth foundation, sand Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Movable None None None None None None None None None Fixed None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete Steel sheet pile Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete Concrete and steel sheet piDo.le Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. ' Operation and care of W.P. SEstimated Franklin Lock and Dam (S-79) is a Federal responsibility. (Oct 1990). SThe normal pool level varies seasonally between the two elevations. aD U-.' y4 M) d0 0U 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 100 0 00 10 100 000000 0 0 0 $3,803,655 $1,211,465 $1,531,490 $1,068,397 $1,357,246 $1,242,909 $1,320,040 $433,0002 $3,448,406 $615,0002 $8,308,700 $2,355,000 $2,355,000 $2,349,000 $2,355,000? $2,355,000 $689,217 $2,355,000 $2,305,000 $2,063,000 $1,965,000? $1,908,000? $1,955,000 $2,486,000 $2,247,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-M CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 49 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contribution 1 Jun. 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sep. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 Jul. 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 12.8 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Backflow Features 20.0 P.L. 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 Recreation Features 50.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for under Provisions of recreational craft 50.0 Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 99-662 Upper St. Johns River Basin - non-structural flood protection 25.0 'Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administation except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-58 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-N CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 49 of Text) Work Performed New Work: Construction of Railroad bridges Channels and canals Levees Floodway control and diversion structures Pumping plants Buildings, grounds and utilities Cultural Resource Preservation Equipment operation Depreciation Engineering and design Supervision and administration Total cost Operations: Operation of locks, dams, reservoirs and performance system Maintenance, buildings and grounds, operation of District communications network, repair and replacement of project signs Patrol, inspection, and maintenance of Herbert Hoover Dike, HGS 3, 4, and 5, operation and maintenance of drainage ditches, culverts and 16 spillways, and pumping costs Natural resource management Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, dam safety studies Water quality/water control studies, data collection, regulation of Lake Okeechobee and three conservation areas Energy conservation Real estate outgranting OSHA inspections Supervision and administration Sub-Total Maintenance: Real estate encroachments and boundary monumentation contract Maintenance of locks and dams Maintenance of non-recreational roads and bridges Repair and stabilization of Crown Road, Herbert Hoover Dike, removal of weeds, rebuilding and regrading levee slopes, modification and maintenance of safety barriers, HGS 3, 4, and 5, cleaning landside too ditches, repair of culverts, replacement of fences, removal of trees, topping of trees, control of Melaleuca, replacement of rip rap on slopes and berms Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance of recreational roads and bridges Maintenance of recreational permanent operating equipment Maintenance of hydrometrological network Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment Bank stabilization contract Non-dredging channel maintenance and debris removal Engineering and design Supervision and inspection Income credits Sub-Total Total Special recreation user fees 9-59 Cost $ 0 3,958,221 13,051,894 2,435,256 00 4,819 0 0 3,976,568 1,479,822 $ 24,906,580 443,820 168,652 1,277,436 168,831 252,081 126,854 1,065,312 1,977 2,907 763 96,843 $ 3,605,476 40,888 7,348 0 1,137,662 204,450 5,050 142 23,855 213,033 17,964 0 36,193 202,428 0 1,889,013 5,494,489 176,368 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 49 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Channels and Canals: C-151 East End May 1982 - June 1987 Structures: S-155 May 1982 - June 1987 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1990 (See Section 49 of Text) Construction Approx. Feature Started Complete Levees: Herbert Hoover Dike Revetment 1st Contract (4 miles) March 1983 100 3rd Contract February 1985 45 4th Contract July 1985 98 5th Contract August 1986 32 6th Contract December 1986 100 Structures: HGS-4 Replacement (S-351) January 1986 91 HGS-5 Replacement (S-352) April 1987 88 HGS-3 (S-354) August 1988 0 TABLE 9-Q FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 52 of Text) Nearest town 20 miles Name of nearest town Ocala, FL Distance above mouth of river 65.5 miles Lock dimensions 30 x 125 feet Normal lift 18.0 feet Elevation of normal pool surface 58 feet Depth of sills 12 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Kind of dam None Type of construction Reinforced concrete Percent complete 100 Estimated cost (including dam and spillway) $1,990,138 9-60 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-R FOUR RIVER BASINS, -FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1990 (See Section 52 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 Alteration of Facilities B-195 B-594 Alteration of Facilities B-196 SCL RR Bridge, B-196 Channels and Canals: C-135 C-135, Sec. 1A C-135, Sec. 1B C-135, Sec. 1C & 2 C-135, Sec. 3A C-135, Sec. 3B C-135, Sec. 4A C-136 C-231, Phase I C-231, Phase II C-331 C-531 C-534 C-135 Structures: S-160 S-161 S-162 S-353 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway S-551 Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 L-212, Sec. 2 L-112 L-112 & Floodway S-155 S-163 S-159 Middle & Lower S-159 Upper Recreation: Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites Dead River Sites Jul 1968 - Mar 1970 May 1971 - Jan 1973 Jan 1973 - Jan 1974 Oct 1972 - Jan 1975 Dec 1972 - Jul 1975 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Jul 1966 - Aug 1967 May 1968 - Sep 1972 Jan 1971 - Dec 1973 Dec 1972 - Apr 1975 Feb 1975 - Aug 1977 Apr 1976 - Jan 1979 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Jul 1973 - Apr 1975 Jul 1973 - Jan 1974 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1966 - Jan 1969 Jun 1979 - Jul 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Apr 1975 - Jun 1977 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1967 - Mar 1969 Jul 1970 - Feb 1972 Jun 1968 - Jul 1970 Jul 1970 - Sep 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 Apr 1979 - Aug 1981 Jun 1979 - Sep 1981 Dec 1982 - Aug 1984 Mar 1985 - Jul 1986 Not transferred Do. Do. Do. Jul 1975 Dec 1968 Oct 1967 Not transferred Not transferred Oct 1977 Not transferred Not transferred Nov 1977 Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Sep 1968 Apr 1969 Nov 1971 Dec 1968 Nov 1977 Apr 1977 Nov 1968 Dec 1975 Not transferred Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Oct 1980 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Oct 1981 Jan 1985 Dec 1986 9-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 9-S OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 55 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, FL 1960 $66,485'- Biscayne Bay, FL, Hurricane Protection2 1966 - - Hillsborough Bay, FL2 1969 -- Phillippi Creek Basin, FL2 1966 -- Excludes $11, 734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. TABLE 9-T FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 56 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Curiosity Creek, Tampa, FL $ 11,667 Cano Cacul, Aguadilla, PR 6,994 Cano Madre Vieja, Aguadilla, PR 9,292 Cedar Creek, Jacksonville, FL 13,699 Cedar Hammock, Bradenton, FL 42,662 Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI 20,907 Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI 105,139 Ft. Clinch State Park, Nassau County, FL 33,474 Lagrange Gut, Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI 55,060 Linderberg Bay Area, St. Thomas, VI 6,221 Long Branch, Jacksonville, FL 5,098 Moncrief Creek, Jacksonville, FL 8,535 Naguabo River, PR 0 Ponce Regional, PR 0 Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR 79,450 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR 63,091 Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR 15,000 Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR 43,949 Rio El Ojo De Agua, PR 9,428 Rio Fajardo, PR 19,774 Rio Guadiana, Naranjito, PR 3,902 Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR 50,280 Rio La Plata, Comerio, PR 269 Rio Loco, Guanica, PR 8,946 Rio Manati, Barceloneta, PR 60,115 Rio Niqua, Arroyo, PR 0 Sabana Grande, PR 0 Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI 4,928 Strawberry Hill, St. Croix, VI 34,263 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI 142,442 Wares Creek, Bradenton, FL 0 Williams Delight Basin, St. Croix, VI 60,341 9-62 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT * This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pear River Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until October 1, 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Water from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Apalachicola Bay, FL ................................. 10-3 2. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965) .................................... 10-3 3. Bayou Coden, AL ........................................ 10-3 4. Bayou La Batre, AL..................................... 10-4 5. Biloxi Harbor, M S ...................................... 10-4 6. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, A L ................................................... 10-5 6A. Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL ............................... 10-6 6B. Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL....................................... 10-6 7. Bon Secour River, AL.................................. 10-7 8. Dauphin Island, AL...................................... 10-7 9. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL............................ 10-8 10. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL...................... 10-8 11. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL .............................. 10-9 12. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and M exican Border............................................ 10-9 13. Gulfport Harbor, M S.................................. 10-10 14. Mobile Harbor, AL .................................... 10-10 15. Panama City Harbor, FL ............................ 10-11 16. Pascagoula Harbor, MS.............................. 10-12 17. Pensacola Harbor, FL................................. 10-12 18. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ........................ 10-13 19. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS ............................. 10-13 19A.Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL and MS................ 10-14 20. Deauthorized Projects ................................ 10-15 21. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................................... 10-15 22. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization................................. 10-15 23. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys...................................... 10-15 Page Beach Erosion Control 24. Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Special Authorization...................... 10-15 25. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project .......................................... 10-15 Flood Control 26. Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL ........................................... 10-15 27. County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., M S .................................... 10-16 28. Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL .......................................... 10-16 29. Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL.......................... 10-16 30. Fort Toulouse, W etumpka, AL........................................... 10-16 31. Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co., FL .................................... 10-17 32. Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL .......................................... 10-17 33. Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., M S............................................10-17 34. Hurricane Creek, Prentiss Co., M S........................................10-18 35. Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, M S ........................................ 10-18 36. Little Cove Creek, G lencoe, A L .............................................. 10-18 37. Magby Creek, Colum bus, M S .......................................... 10-19 38. Mill Creek, Dalton, GA.............................. 10-19 39. Mill Creek, Sum rall, M S .............................................. 10-19 40. Mound State Park, M oundville, AL.......................................... 10-19 41. Murder Creek, Brewton, AL ...................... 10-20 42. Okatibbee Lake, MS ................................. 10-20 43. Proctor Creek, A tlanta, G A ............................................... 10-20 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, 1990 Flood Control Page 44. Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA................ 10-21 45. Silver Creek, Rom e, G A ............................................... 10-21 46. Sope Creek, Marietta, GA............................................10-21 47. Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS ........................................... 10-22 48. Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS .................. 10-22 49. Threemile Creek, Mobile, AL.................. 10-22 50. Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL.............................10-23 51. Tombigbee River and Tributaries, MS & AL..............................10-23 52 Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS ....................................... 10-23 53. Village Creek, Birmingham, AL ...................................... 10-24 54. Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah Co., AL ....................................... 10-24 55. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.................... 10-25 56. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-25 57. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-25 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 58. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA .......... 10-25 58A. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA .............. 10-26 58B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL.................. 10-26 58C. Coosa River, Montgomery to G adsden, AL ........................................... 10-27 58D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL ........... 10-27 Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table 10-D Table 10-E Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-J Cost & Financial Statement ........ 10-35 Authorizing Legislation ............... 10-41 Other Authorized Navigation Projects...................... 10-51 Other Authorized Beach Control Erosion Control Project ......................................... 10-51 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............................ 10-52 Deauthorized Projects .................. 10-52 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization................... 10-53 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................... 10-53 Multiple Purpose Projects Includ. Power Page 58E. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL........10-27 59. Allatoona Dam Coosa River Basin, GA ........................... 10-28 60. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA.....................10-28 60A. Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA..........................10-29 60B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA ....................................... 10-30 60C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam , FL & GA ......................................... 10-30 60D. Walter F. George Lock and Dam , AL & GA ....................................... 10-31 60E. West Point Lake Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA .... 10-31 61. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................................ 10-32 62. Deauthorized Projects...............................10-32 Miscellaneous 63. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC&CE).............................10-32 64. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP) ....................................... 10-32 65. Regulatory Functions Program................10-32 General Investigations 66. Surveys....................................................10-33 67. Collection and Study of Basic Data..........10-33 68. Advance Engineering and Design ........... 10-33 69. Continuation of Planning and Engineering........................................ 10-34 70. Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds ................................... 10-34 Table 10-K Table 10-L Table 10-M Table 10-N Table 10-0 Table 10-P Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................................ 10-54 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project ........................... 10-54 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, Al, GA, and FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple-Purpose Development Included In Existing Projects........ 10-55 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ................................... 10-56 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and M S .................................. 10-57 Completed Flood Insurance Studies And Flood Hazard Information Reports For FY 1982 Thru FY 1990 ......... 10-58 10-2 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Navigation 1. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles cast of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and nine feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length of 5,300 feet; (f)a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-and-timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Condition surveys and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $88,880. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $2,033,461 for new work and $3,855,210 for maintenance, a total of $5,888,671. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The existing project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 50 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract for field work with State of Alabama was $12,064 less than award. Water quality studies and overhead amounted to $34,535. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $681,122. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 3. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of 10-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Cedar Point, the southemrn tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel eight feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000() feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence eight feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a tumrning basin eight feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 107,253 cubic yards at a cost of $323,000. Condition surveys cost $13,815. Water control management totaled $1,419. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated March 31, 1975 and completed March 26, 1976. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $330,701 for new work and $1,144,846 for maintenance, a total of $1,475,547. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $50,000 for maintenance. 4. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southem coast of Mobile County, Al., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southem tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the 12-foot depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Plan of improvement is to deepen channel to 18-foot by 100-foot from the mouth through the turning basin, a distance of about 1.9 miles; deepen channel from tumrning basin to 0.29 miles above highway 188 bridge to 14-foot by 75-foot, a distance of about 0.86 miles; extend channel from turning basin into Snake Bayou for about 533 feet and a 12-foot by 50-foot channel within Snake Bayou about 0.26 miles; extend 12 foot by 100-foot channel in Mississippi Sound to connect with GIWW, then along GIWW alignment to connect with Pascagoula ship channel. This channel dimensions would be 18-foot by 120-foot for a distance of about 20 miles. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 275,422 cubic yards at a cost of $375,000. Condition surveys cost $25,900. Water control management and other miscellaneous costs total $9,933. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $311,095 for new work and $3,637,239 for maintenance, a total of $3,948,334. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $10,500. 5. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The existing project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport Lake, includ- 10-4 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT ing a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12- foot dccp by 100-foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12- foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel authorized by River and Harbor Act of Nov. 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in Feb. 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on March 28, 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet. This work was completed in April 1980. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-andtimber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $119,500. Water control management, and miscellaneous costs totaled $17,253. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in FY 1980. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30,1990 is $1,431,919 for new work and $9,803,316 for maintenance, a total of $11,235,235. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $238,640. 6. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to vicinity of Birmingham is about 415 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides essentially for a channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams and 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Armistead I. Selden replaced locks 8 and 9; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. A replacement lock for the old Oliver Lock has been authorized and will be located 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock will have dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A fixed crest spillway will extend 815 feet across the river. Minimum provision will be provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to the old lock 1, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at lock 1,100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet 10-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufactures, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging of the river system removed 2,700,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,657,500. Condition surveys costs $506,000. Engineering and design cost $470,100. Supervision, administration and other general charges for the overall river project totaled $3,289,900. Recreation and resource management cost $1,069,300. Recreation attendance CY 1989 totaled 6,536,024 user days. Other maintenance costs for the system include: Coffeceville Lock and Dam, $991,400; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $1,410,000; Selden Lock and Dam, $545,900; Oliver Lock and Dam, $353,500; Bankhead Lock and Dam, $564,300; Holt Lock and Dam, $447,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original lock and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1, 2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15 and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed February 6, 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Engineering and design and land acquisition for the new Oliver Lock and Dam are complete. Project construction began in November 1986 and is scheduled for completion in 1992. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $88,461,935 for new work and $234,540,069 for maintenance, and $52,292,880 for major rehabilitation, a total of $375,294,884. 6A. JACKSON PORT, JACKSON, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River in Clarke County in southwest Alabama in the city of Jackson, Alabama, approximately 90 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. Existing project. None. The authorized Port would be located on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System, which is a federally authorized 9 x 200 feet navigation project connecting Birmingham, Alabama with the Port of Mobile. In conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project, the district has been directed to construct a port at Jackson. Local cooperation. Local Cooperation Agreement requirements have not been determined. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $50,763; and supervision and administration $7,496. A total Federal cost of $58,259 for new work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Formulation and design studies are continuing. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1990 is $205,285. 6B. OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL Location. The project is located at mile 338.1 on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System extends 429 miles north from Mobile to the vicinity of Birmingham, Alabama. 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Existing project. The existing authorized channel is 9 x 200 feet and there are six (6) locks having a total lift of 255 feet. Five (5) of the locks have chamber dimensions of 110 x 600 feet while Oliver Lock has dimensions of 95 x 460 feet. Original work on the waterway was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1884. The 17 original locks have been replaced by the existing six (6) locks with Oliver Lock being the first of the replacements completed in 1940. Plan of improvement is to replace the existing Oliver Lock with a lock located 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock will have dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. A fixed-crest spillway will extend 800 feet across the river. Minimum provisions will be provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. Land acquisition is complete. Construction was initiated in November 1986 with the award of the Alabama Power Company relocation contract. The first stage cofferdam and river diversion contract was awarded in February 1987. For other information see description of Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers project. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required. One-half of the total cost of construction of the navigation lock and dam will be paid by amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts $12,874,956; engineering and design $246,159; and $986,490 for supervision and administration and miscellaneous expenditures. A total Federal cost of $14,107,605 for new work. Contributed funds expended in FY 1990 totaled $14,129,908. Condition at end of fiscal year. The transition from the Stage I Cofferdam to Stage II is underway and the new lock will be in operation in December of 1991. Concrete placement was completed in the lock chamber in October 1990. Scheduled completion date is December 1992 with an estimated cost of $118,000,000. Total Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost under existing project to September 30, 1990 is $43,657,965 for new work. Contributed funds (Inland Waterways Trust) expended total $44,891,716. 7. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 8 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are located along the existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 355,000 cubic yards at a cost of $400,000. Condition surveys and supervision and administration cost $78,739. Engineering and design cost $73,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $118,615 for new work and $935,392 for maintenance, a total of $1,054,007. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 8. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about 7 acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7 - foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about 4 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. 10-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and designs $28,634; supervision and administration $4,358. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $45,200. Water control management and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $31,580. Contract dredging removed 70,000 cubic yards at a cost of $493,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $292,864 for new work and $2,303,622 for maintenance, a total of $2,596,486. 9. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 by 100-foot channel to provide access to the Mobile ship channel. The total length to be dredged is 3,300 feet. The Fowl River project provides for a channel eight feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November, 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 22,000 cubic yards at a cost of $437,600. Condition surveys and water control management cost $27,240. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel was initiated and completed during FY 1986. Total Federal cost on the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $2,848,126; $391,354 for new work and $2,456,772 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $195,250. 10. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 12-foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 10-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $29,400. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $25,788. Engineering and design totaled $65,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $916,715 for new work and $7,728,305 for maintenance, a total of $8,645,020. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 11. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Ala., 3 miles cast of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on castern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Ala. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Scss.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on the south bank near mouth of creek, consisting of a pile-and-timber service wharves, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a commercial marina on north bank of creek. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 40,000 cubic yards at a cost of $62,000. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $24,873. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1990 amounted to $588,906 of which $29,000 was for new work and $559,906 for maintenance. 12. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou LaBatre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christain, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Carrabelle-Apalachicola Bay section: Contract dredging removed 253,933 cubic yards of material at a cost of $398,200. Other channel maintenance cost $159,600. Condition surveys, water control management, supervision and administration totaled $219,800. Apalachicola Bay - St. Andrew Bay section: Nondredging navigation channel maintenance cost $32,500. Condition surveys cost $105,000. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous cost totaled $16,100. St. Andrew Bay - Choctawhatchee Bay section: Bank stabilization cost $351,200. Condition surveys and dredging studies cost $84,200. Non-dredging navigation channel maintenance cost $23,400. Water control management, supervision and administration and miscellaneous totaled $65,900. Choctawhatchee Bay - Pensacola Bay section: Condition surveys, dredging studies, and bank stabiliziation cost $4,000. Pensacola Bay - Mobile Bay section: Condition surveys and dredging studies cost $134,700. Non-dredging channel maintenance cost $52,300. Bank stabilization, water control management. supervision and administration and miscellaneous totaled $29,600. 10-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Mobile Bay - Rigolets section: Condition surveys and other dredging studies totaled $32,900. Condition surveys, water control management, real estate activities, and miscellaneous cost pertaining to the waterway in general not site specific totaled $97,700. Direct charges to Mobile Area Office for supervision and administration were $77,700 and to Panama City Area Office totaled $71,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which has been deauthorized. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12- foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1990 is $64,714,042, of which $6,480,299 was for new work and $58,233,743 for maintenance. 13. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 35 miles west of Pascagoula, Mississippi, and 60 miles east of New Orleans. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747, Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a smallboat basin, all at a depth of eight feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is authorized in the WRDA 1986 to modify the existing ship channel to 36 x 200 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 300 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the turning basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. The FY 90 construction authorization will construct an increment of the authorized project and provide a 36 x 220 feet channel in Mississippi Sound and 38 x 300 feet across the bar. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern rail-cooperation terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed a total of 2,000,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,394,100. Condition surveys cost $203,700. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $230,431. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $969,0(X) for new work and $37,630,185 for maintenance, a total of $38,599,185. 14. MOBILE HARBOR, AL Location. The project is located along the lower five miles of Mobile River, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles cast of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 47-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 45-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6500 feet and terminating in a 300-by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channels is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. Further authorization provides for future development to deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen an additional 3.6 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island. All dredged material will be placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor to construct the project in increments. The first increment is described above. Terminal facilities. Modemrn rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract cost $4,768,656, engineering and design $85,916, and supervision and administration cost $149,818. A total Federal cost of $5,004,390. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 2,400,000 cubic yards of material from Mobile Harbor and Theodore ship channel at a cost of $8,550,800. Condition surveys cost $890,500. Dredged material disposal facility maintenance cost $812,600. Water control management, engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $560,001. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in 1931 and completed in September 1981. Phase I of the project modification was completed in June 1990. Current estimated Federal cost is $258,550,000, and non-Federal cash contributions is $221,450,000. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $95,107,835 for new work and $111,221,000 for maintenance, a total of $206,328,835. Contributed funds expended amounted to $18,147,287 for new work. 15. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel about 3.5 miles long, extending from deep water in St. Andrew Bay through barrier peninsula, known as Lands End, to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 32 feet deep in the bay through Lands End; and 450 feet wide and 34 feet deep in the gulf, protected by east, west jetties, extending 2,075 feet and 2,896 feet respectively; a channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities; and the maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou, an arm of St. Andrew Bay, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in bay to highway bridge. Authorized modifications includes branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 10-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Initiated Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $17,200. Engineering and design, water control management, and miscellaneous costs totaled $43,031. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $1,638,045 for new work and $8,410,080 for maintenance, a total of $10,048,125. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 16. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), and through Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 fect deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot dcep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River; and (f) a 12-foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad bridge) to a turning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10-foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 2,100,000 cubic yards at a cost of $3,515,500. Condition surveys cost $53,200. Water control management, supervision and administration, and miscellaneous costs totaled $315,669. Dredging studies cost $190,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was completed in November 1983. Total Federal cost of existing project to September 30, 1990 is $6,572,985 for new work and $45,467,144 for maintenance, a total of $52,040,129. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $3,330,135. 17. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33-foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300- foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner harbor channel; (d) an inner harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce (See Port Scries No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenancc: Condition surveys and dredging studies cost $22,700. Water control management and miscellaneous costs totaled $25,795. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except for features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1990 is $1,469,693 for new work and $8,204,042 for maintenance, a total of $9,673,735. 18. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence nine feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 375,100 cubic yards of material at a cost of $695,400. Condition surveys and engineering and design cost $27,300. Water control management and miscellaneous costs totaled $10,803. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in March 1969. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1990 is $629,860 for new work and $6,798,849 for maintenance, a total of $7,428,709. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 19. TENNESSEE-TOMBGIBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. The plan of improvement consists of three sections. (1) the river section, a 9- foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the lateral canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300- foot channel (except in the 27 mile long divide cut in which the bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River; the total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must make and maintain alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials 10-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with the United States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized the formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbce Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held December 5, 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,0()0 to finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. As of September 30, 1989, twelve such facilitics were operational, while five were under construction, and five more are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports and terminals must be completed before the waterway can achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction cost $906,186; recreation facilities $2,929,567; real estate $254,589; engineering and design cost $1,433,118 and supervision and administration cost $1,661,505, a total of $7,184,965 for new work. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system removed 171,529 cubic yards at a total cost of $582,375. Total cost for operation and maintenance of the project for FY 90 amounted to $17,553,985, which included general charges of $7,448,385; Gainesville Lock and Dam, $572,000; Tom Bevill Lock and Dam, $645,900; Columbus Lock and Dam, $328,800; Aberdeen Lock and Dam, $428,700; Lock A, $383,400; Lock B, $434,200; Lock C, $353,100; Lock D, $462,200; Lock E, $374,100; Bay Springs Lock and Dam, $581,400. Recreation costs totaled $5,541,800. Recreation attendance for CY 1989 totaled 5,559,631 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $1,008,681,625 for new work, and $121,748,494 for maintenance for a total of $1,130,430,119. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is essentially complete. The waterway was opened for navigation in January 1985. 19A. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION PROJECT, AL AND MS Location. This project is in Alabama and Mississippi at the following locations: (1) Existing Project Lands - Approximately 72,500 acres of Tennessee-Tombigbee Project Lands have been designated for mitigation purposes. An additional 20,100 acres have also been designated at Coffeeville Lake, Demopolis Lake, Claiborne Lake and Dannelly Reservoirs in Alabama and at Okatibbee Lake in Mississippi. (2) Separable Lands - Acquisition and management of 88,000 separable lands in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta, Alabama (not less than 20,000 acres); the Pascagoula, Pearl, and Mississippi Delta Basins in Mississippi (not less than 25,000 acres); and the balance at any location in the two states. Previous project. This project was a new construction start in Fiscal year 1990. It was authorized by Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Existing project. The authorized project calls for the acquisition of separable lands at the above named locations. The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) will assist in the selection of separable lands. The selected lands will be purchased from willing sellers at fair market value. Emphasis will be placed on forested wetlands, with a minimum of 34,000 acres of bottomland hardwoods being purchased. 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT The separable lands and the existing project lands designated for mitigation purposes will be managed for wildlife. The States will be primarily responsible for managing these lands in accordance with a management plan jointly developed by the States, Corps and the FWS. However, due to operational constraints it will be necessary for the Corps to retain management responsibility for some of the existing project lands included in the mitigation program. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required since the cost of this project is a 100% Federal responsibility. Operation and results during fiscal year. Land acquisition cost $4,772,541, Engineering and Design $87,747. Supervision and administration, $91,150. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial funding for the project was received in January 1990, with 7077 acres being acquired in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta. Land offers were also received for the Pascagoula/Pearl/Mississippi Delta increment and evaluation of these tracts was initiated. Planning activities were accomplished that will be instrumental in implementing the project. Scheduled completion date is September 1996. The total project cost is estimated to be $71,000,000. 20. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 10-G.) 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-C.) 22. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $151,537 in FY 1989. (See Table 10-H.) 23. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-K.) Beach Erosion Control 24. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Studies conducted under Section 103, 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended, amounted to $243 in FY 1989. (See Table 10-I.) 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-D.) Flood Control 26. BOGGY BAYOU, VALPARAISO, FL Location. The project is located in the city of Valparaiso, Florida in Okaloosa County on the west bank of Boggy Bayou which indents the north shore of Choctawhatchee; about 10 miles northeast of Fort Walton Beach. Existing project. The project provides for shoreline bank protection along 700-feet of shoreline of Boggy Bayou and preclude possible destruction of Bayshore Drive and utilities. The protective works would consist of a stone dike having a crest elevation of 3.0 feet NGVD and a 15-foot wide base between +1 and -1 foot NGVD. An 18-inch thick layer of riprap would be placed from the top of the dike to elevations 6.0 feet NGVD. The riprap would be placed on 6-inches of bedding material and filter cloth. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $16,476. Supervision and administration cost $2,219. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed in FY 1990. The project is scheduled for completion in June 1991. Estimated Federal cost is $156,300; and the non-Federal portion is $52,100. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $18,695 for new work. 10-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Flood Control 27. COUNTY LINE ROAD BRIDGE, ITAWAMBA COUNTY, MS Location. County Line Road Bridge crossed Mantachie Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi and is located approximately one mile west of Centerville along an unnumbered county road between County Hwy. 363 and the county line. The Mantachie Creek drainage area is located in northeast Mississippi and is a part of Tombigbee River Basin. Existing Project. The project provides protection for both banks and the channel at the bridge crossing Mantachie Creek. The banks and channel would be graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. This would preclude any streambank erosion from high velocities or from sudden drawdown associated with receding floodwaters. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction Contract $65,492. Engineering and .design cost $2,664. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $369. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in August 1989 and completed in January 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $81,800; and the non- Federal portion is $33,000. Total Federal cost to date is $99,022 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $31,000. 28. CRIBBS MILL CREEK, TUSCALOOSA, AL Location. Cribbs Mill Creek begins in the northeastern part of the city of Tuscaloosa, AL and flows generally southwestward through the city into the Warrior River. Existing project. The project consists of channel modification of about 7,300 feet of the creek. Modification would consist of widening the existing channel. The proposed plan would extend upstream from 1-359 to the confluence of Tributary 1 with the creek. Work would also be performed on 600 feet of Tributary 5. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract, $545,504. Engineering and design cost $36,904. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $12,413. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in November 1989 and is scheduled to be completed in January 1991. Estimated Federal cost is $1,605,000; and the non-Federal portion is $1,200,000. Total Federal cost to date is $1,012,425 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $150,000. 29. ESLAVA CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The city of Mobile, Alabama, which is located on the Gulf Coast of Alabama. The project begins at Pine Hill Drive and ends 2.1 miles upstream at Emogene Street. Existing project. None. The plan of improvement consists of channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding an additional barrel. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile was completed on September 14, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $3,669; engineering and design $68,295; and supervision and administration $25,629. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications are completed. The first increment of work was awarded in February 1988 and completed in August 1988. The second increment of work was awarded in September 1990 and should be completed by September 1991. Anticipate the third increment contract to be awarded in July 1991 and construction to be completed in September 1992. Current estimated Federal cost is $2,580,775; and the non-Federal portion is $1,046,800 for land and relocation, and $190,925 cash contributions. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1990 is $1,706,244. Contributed funds expended $113,500. 30. FORT TOULOUSE, WETUMPKA, AL Location. The project is located near the confluence of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers; approximately 20 miles north of Montgomery, Alabama. 10-16 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Existing project. The project would provide bank stabilization for the National Historical Landmark and Taskigi Indian Mounds. The recommended plan consists of construction of 1140-feet section of riprap revetment on the upper end of the site and 720-feet of stone dike at the lower end of the site. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $40,397. Supervision and administration cost $5,447. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completed plans and specifications in FY 1990. Construction is scheduled for completion in FY 1992. Current estimated Federal cost is $721,000 and non-Federal portion is $240,000. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $45,844 for new work. 31. GULF BREEZE, SANTA ROSA CO., FL Location. East End of the Old Highway 98 Bridge over Pensacola Bay at Gulf Breeze, Florida. Existing project. The project provides for shoreline protection around a water supply pumping station for the City of Gulf Breeze, FL. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $2,052; and supervision and administration costs amounted to $1,194. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded on 10 January 1989 and construction was completed in May, 1989. Total Federal cost to date is $139,430 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $36,094. 32. HIGHWAY 39 BRIDGE, GAINESVILLE, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River, upstream of the Highway 39 bridge in Gainesville, AL. Existing project. The authorized project provides for slope protection for a 2000-foot reach of the east bank of the Tombigbee River, immediately upstream of the existing Highway 39 bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) requires any flood control project not under construction by April 30, 1986 to enter a binding agreement with the Secretary of the Army to pay 100% of the operation and maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs of the project, and to pay the required non-Federal share of the costs of construction. Subject to the cost sharing requirements of the WRDA of 1986, a non-federal sponsor has not been identified. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Transferred funds amounted to $29,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of the project to date is $70,364. 33. HINTONVILLE ROAD BRIDGE, PERRY CO., MS Location. The Hintonville Road Bridge crosses Thompson Creek in Perry County, Mississippi and is located approximately one mile east of Hintonville along an unnumbered county road. The Thompson Creek drainage area is located in southeast Mississippi and is part of the Pascagoula River Basin. Existing project. The project provides protection for the bridge side slopes channel bottom, and to realign the channel thru the center span of the bridge. The banks 350 feet upstream and 200 feet downstream from the bridge would be graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric for 100 feet upstream and 150 feet downstream of the bridge. A 40- foot bottom width channel would be excavated and riprapped thru the center span of the bridge. A stone training dike would be constructed on the left bank of the project channel to direct low flows through the project channel and away from the left bank and left bridge abutment. The dike would be protected with 12 inches of riprap and 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract $229,822; engineering and design cost $4,754. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $637. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in September 1989 and is scheduled to be completed in March 1991. Estimated Federal cost is $235,000; and the non-Federal portion is $88,000. Total Federal cost to date is $274,877 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $67,725. 10-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 34. HURRICANE CREEK, PRENTISS CO., MS Location. Southeast Prentiss County, Mississippi. Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridge crosses Hurricane Creek Tributary to Big Brown Creek and is located about 20 miles northeast of Tupelo, Mississippi. Existing project. The project provides emergency streambank protection to the banks and the bottoms of the channel to retard erosion at the Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridge crossing Hurricane Creek, a tributary to Big Brown Creek. The banks and bottoms would be graded and protected with 12 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric upstream of and downstream from the bridge. Through the bridge section, 18 inches of riprap would be placed on 6 inches of bedding materials and filter fabric. This would preclude any streambank erosion from high velocities or sudden drawdown associated with receding floodwaters. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract $28,172; engineering and design cost $1,419. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $190. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded on 10 August 1989 and construction was completed in December, 1989. Total Federal cost to date is $51,078. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $14,000. 35. LEAF AND BOWIE RIVERS, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The Leaf River forms the east boundary of the city of Hattiesburg, the county seat of Forrest County, located in south-central Mississippi. The river separates Hattiesburg from the smaller city of Petal. Bowie River flows southeasterly along the northern boundary of Hattiesburg and joins the Leaf River at the northeast corner of the city. Existing project. The project provides for channel snagging, overbank clearing within the flood plains, riprap protection of the Southern Railroad and River Avenue Bridge piers and removal of the Petal sewage lagoon. Work will also include installation of a flood warning system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $44. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in August 1987. Total Federal cost as of September 30, 1990 is $1,584,258. 36. LITTLE COVE CREEK, GLENCOE, AL Location. Glencoe, Alabama is located five miles southeast of Gadsden, Alabama. Little Cove Creek is approximately seven miles long, originating in the foothills of Colvin mountain about five miles southeast of Glencoe. It flows northwest for five miles paralleling U.S. Highway 431, until it reaches the east edge of Glencoe. The creek flows two miles north to Hokes Bluff where it joins Cove Creek north of U.S. Highway 431. Existing project. The existing project on Little Cove Creek was constructed under the Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 and was completed in 1963. This project consisted of enlargement and realignment of 10,840 feet along Little Cove Creek to provide a channel bottom width of 25 feet and an average depth of 6 feet. Also included in the project were associated channel and overbank clearing and bridge modification work. Local cooperation. Unidentified sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $16,626. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $2,215. Work accomplished to date: A supplement to the Detailed Project Report was completed in September 1988. Current recommendations for rehabilitation of project consists of an upstream transition section to prevent head cutting and extending the project downstream to provide an adequate outlet for the existing project and reshaping of its existing channel side slopes and grassing these slopes. Problems, issues, and constraints: The Detailed Project Report estimated the benefit-to-cost ratio to be 0.02 to 1, clearly indicating that the.work is not economically justified. After review of the report, concern was expressed over the economics of the project and identification of a local sponsor. A revision to the supplement will be issued in FY 1991. Estimated Federal cost is $809,800; and the non-Federal portion is $75,200. Total Federal cost to date is $143,758 for new work. 10-18 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 37. MAGBY CREEK COLUMBUS, MS Location. Magby Creek originates in Pickens County, Alabama about 13 miles east of the Mississippi-Alabama State line. From its source, the creek flows in a westerly direction through a rural area of Mississippi and Alabama for a distance of 25 miles to enter the Luxapalila Creek .6 miles above Propst Park in Columbus, MS. Existing project. The project consists of clearing and snagging Magby Creek from mile 0.83 upstream to mile 2.06. An additional 60 feet on the right overbank was cleared of underbrush and any trees less than 6 inches in diameter. This 60 feet alternated to the left bank, where there are deep bands, creating a straighter floodway effect. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction costs amounted to $25,017, engineering and design cost $1,057, and supervision and administration costs amounted to $140. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in July 1989 and construction was completed in December 1989. Total Federal cost to date is $152,720 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $7,100. 38. MILL CREEK, DALTON, GA Location. The Mill Creek watershed comprises an area of 51.0 square miles in northeastern Walker County and west central Whitfield County, Georgia. The creek rises about 8 miles southwest of Dalton and flows in a northerly direction to its confluence with the North Fork of Mill Creek. From this point the creek flows generally in an easterly direction through the northern part of Dalton and enters Coahulla Creek 5.5 miles above its mouth. Existing project. The project consists of clearing and snagging Mill Creek from its mouth to downstream face of Willowdale Drive or a distance of 8.6 miles. This work would involve the clearing of all material, trees, shrubs, and any underbrush within the creek banks. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction and contract $164,900; engineering and design cost $2,605. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $45,298. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Detail Project Report was revised and submitted in November 1987. These revisions reflected the changes due to cost sharing and contained a revised local cooperation agreement. A construction contract was awarded on 6 November 1989. Project construction was completed in August 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $245,000; and the non-Federal portion is $200,000. Total Federal cost to date is $463,848 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $25,000. 39. MILL CREEK, SUMRALL, MS Location. Mill Creek originates in Lamar County, Mississippi; about 2 miles south of Sumrall. The town of Sumrall is located in southeastern Mississippi; about 16 miles northeast of Hattiesburg. Existing project. The project consists of clearing and snagging 1.0 mile along Mill Creek with overbank clearing for 0.63 miles to provide a 50-foot wide floodway along the left descending banks. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $29,837. Supervision and administration cost $1,083. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications were initiated in May 1990 and are essentially complete. The construction contract is scheduled to be advertised in February 1991. Current estimated Federal cost is $56,000 and the non-Federal portion is $35,000. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $79,787 for new work. 40. MOUND STATE PARK, MOUNDVILLE, ALABAMA Location. The bank stabiliziation project is located on the left descending bank of the Black-Warrior River; about 16 miles south of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The project would provide bank stabilization for the Mound State Park National Historical Landmark. The plan consists of grading approximately 800-feet of unstable bank to IV:3H and protect with riprap. Steeper upper bank sections around buildings will be protected with a 250-feet long gabion wall. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 10-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $60,168. Supervision and administration cost $7,224. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completed plans and specifications in FY 1990. Construction is scheduled for completion in FY 1992. Current estimated Federal cost is $803,000 and non-Federal portion is $268,000. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $67,392 for new work. 41. MURDER CREEK, BREWTON, AL Location. The project is located in the city of Brewton, AL near the confluence of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks in the commercial district of downtown Brewton. Existing project. The existing project provides for clearing and snagging in the vicinity of Brewton, Alabama on Murder Creek and on Burnt Corn Creek. Clearing to be accomplished by felling and removing trees leaning more than 30 degrees and snagging by removal of snags and debris from bottom and sides of the channel. A limited stream clearing and snagging project was completed in 1980 on portions of both creeks to remove obstructions to flows. This interim measure was undertaken to reduce flooding in Brewton and East Brewton. Further, an evacuation plan for East Brewton was implemented under the Section 205 authority. The project involved removal of damageable structures from the low-lying flood plain of Murder Creek. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate acquisitions during FY 1990 cost $6,160; engineering and design $2,955; and $472 for supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of project as of September 30, 1990 is $1,170,025. 42. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally form 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and top-of-conservation- pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $1,347,393. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during CY 1989 totaled 1,202,963 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $9,739,528 for new work and $12,693,313 for maintenance, a total of $22,432,841. 43. PROCTOR CREEK, ATLANTA, GA Location. The Anthony Street area south of Bankhead Highway; about a mile west of Georgia Tech in Atlanta, Georgia. Existing project. The project consists of the evacuation of 32 residential structures in the Anthony Street area. These structures were purchased and removed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operating and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real Estate acquisition and demolition of structures cost $734,484. Supervision and administration cost $563. .Condition at end of fiscal year. The remaining real estite acquisition consists of one (1) residence and the demolition of four (4) residences plus clean up of the lots. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $780,783 for new work. 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 44. RACCOON CREEK BACONTON, GA Location. The community of Baconton is located in northwest Mitchell County approximately 20 miles due south of Albany and 40 miles northeast of Bainbridge, Georgia. Raccoon Creek rises in the northeastern portion of Mitchell County known as the Tifton Upland and flows almost due west across the Daugherty Plains, where it enters the HFlint River at river mile 81.1 on the HFlint. The total drainage area, as it flows by Baconton, is 98 square miles. The total drainage area is comprised mostly of agricultural lands, which grow pecans, soybeans, and peanuts. The floodplain in Baconton varies in width from about 2,000 to 6,000 feet with an average fall of about 1 foot per mile. Exiting project. The flood control project consisted of raising about 1500 feet of South Jackson Street near the West Daniels Street bridge to elevation 176.0 feet NGVE. The channel and 30 feet on each overbank of Raccoon Creek were cleared and snagged from State Hwy. 3 to U.S. Hwy. 19. Raising South Jackson Street would prevent overbank flows from entering downtown Baconton. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract $183,000; engineering and design cost $6,921. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $5,965. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications were initiated in August 1988. A construction contract was advertised in May 1989, and a contract was awarded on 29 August 1989. The project was completed in May 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $251,000; and the non-Federal portion is $89,000. Total Federal cost to date is $369,029 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $35,000. 45. SILVER CREEK, ROME, GA Location. Silver Creek is located about 2 1/2 miles south of Rome, Georgia in Floyd County. Silver Creek originates south of Rome and flows northerly through Lindale into the Etowah River downstream of East Second Avenue Bridge. Existing project. The project provides for non-structural flood control measures along Silver Creek. The plan consists of purchasing and removing 15 houses from the 2-year flood plain. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real estate acqusistion cost $333,705. Engineering and design cost $10,099. Supervision and administration $676. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate acquires 17 residences. Remaining work consists of the demolition of four (4) residences and cleanup. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $573,817. 46. SOPE CREEK, MARIETTA, GA Location. The project is located in Marietta, Georgia in Cobb County which is in the north-central section of Georgia, just north-northwest of Atlanta. Sope Creek is a small tributary of the Chattahoochee River and flows generally from northwest to southeast from its beginning in the city of Marietta. Existing project. The project provides for flood control measures along Sope Creek in Cobb County, Georgia. The project provides for both a structural and nonstructural component. The structural component provides for clearing and snagging of the creek. This would involve the clearing of all material, trees, shrubs and any underbrush less than 12 inches in diameter from a strip 30 feet wide on each side of the creek and removing all trees, shrubs and underbrush within the creek banks. Snagging would involve the removal of all fallen trees and debris which are in the creek. The nonstructural component provides for the evacuation of 13 structures located on the west side of the creek within the Fox Hills subdivision. The project provides for purchase and removal of the structures. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction cost $10,142, engineering and design $2,009, and supervision and administration cost $959. Condition at end of fiscal year. All 13 homes have been acquired and a clearing and snagging construction contract was awarded in December 1988 and project construction was completed in September 1989. Total Federal cost to date is $1,538,554 for new work. 10-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 47. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS Location. The project is located in East Central Mississippi, Lauderdale County, in the city of Meridian, which is approximately 90 miles east of Jackson, Mississippi. Existing project. In 1955, the Corps of Engineers completed channel improvement on the lower 10.5 miles of Sowashee Creek. This work was accomplished under the authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The plan of improvement consists of a combination of channel enlargement (3.9 miles), and clearing and snagging (6.6 miles) over a reach of 10.5 miles. One (1) railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the Pat Harrison Waterway District was completed on September 23, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract cost $3,854,211; engineering and design $515,665; and supervision and administration $117,923. Condition at end of fiscal year. The initial construction contract was awarded on December 18, 1987 and project completion is scheduled for November 1991. Current estimated Federal cost is $13,520,000; and the non- Federal portion is $5,104,000 for land and relocation, $980,000 cash contributions, and $458,000 for recreational facilities. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1990 is $7,975,524 for new work. Contributed funds expended $757,412. 48. TALLAHALLA CREEK, LAUREL, MS Location. The Pascagoula River Basin lies in southeastemrn Mississippi and a small part of southwestern Alabama. The Pascagoula River system drains an area of 9700 square miles. The study area, located in Jones County, includes the city of Laurel and the unincorporated communities of Walters and Pendorf as well as the outlying areas of the city of Elllisville adjacent to the Tallahala Creek Flood plain. Existing project. The project along Tallahalla Creek would consist of channel clearing and snagging with overbank clearing of brush and trees less than 4 inches diameter for a distance of 30 feet on each bank. The project would begin about 1.5 miles below Queensburg Avenue Bridge and extend 7.25 miles to US Highway 84. Also, a flood wamrning system would be installed in the Tallahalla Creek Basin to relay data to a base station. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract $60,639; engineering and design cost $36,641. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $5,047. Condition at end of fiscal year. The advertisement for bids for clearing and snagging portion of the project was cancelled in August, 1989 due to erosion at two sites along Masonites Lagoon Dikes. Redesign of the project is underway to rectify the erosion problems and prevent velocities increases along the dikes due to project construction. It is anticipated that a construction contract will be awarded in May 1991. A flood wamrning system for the Tallahala Creek basin was awarded in January 1990 and completed in May 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $747,300; and the non-Federal portion is $336,700. Total Federal cost to date is $62,080 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $40,000. 49. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The project is located near the Gulf of Mexico in the southwest comrner of the state of Alabama and in the city of Mobile, approximately 180 miles southwest of Montgomery, Alabama. Threemile Creek originates in the westemrn part of Mobile and flows easterly about 14 miles to enter Mobile River near the Alabama State Docks. The drainage area of the basin consists of 39 square miles of urbanized area. Existing project. None. The authorized flood control project will consist of channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. The plan also includes development of certain recreational facilities of the type associated with urban parks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile, Alabama was completed on September 30, 1987. The local sponsor has agreed to make all payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contracts $174,285; engineering and design 10-22 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and Specifications were initiated in December 1986 and a construction contract was awarded on 30 September 1987 for the first increment of work. Preparation of Plans and Specifications on the remaining work are essentially complete. The first increment of work was completed in October 1988. Bids have been opened on the second increment of work, and the final two (2) contracts are scheduled for award in 1991. Current estimated Federal cost is $16,691,000; and the non-Federal portion is $6,563,000 for land and relocation, $1,216,000 cash contributions, and $160,000 for recreational facilities. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1990 is $2,596,275 for new work. Contributed funds expended $140,758. 50. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line. Existing project. Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing and snagging and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1936 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance of channels cost $56,408. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $134,801 for new work and $2,767,779 for maintenance, a total of $2,902,580. 51. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of the Tombigbee River Basin by means of channel clearing and snagging. Approved estimate of cost (1989) for new work is $43,411,000; consisting of $38,364,000 Federal funds, and $5,047,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion, with the exception of Twenty Mile Creek from mile 11.7 to mile 22.0. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost $334,690; Channel and canals contract cost $169,784, engineering and design $141,090, and supervision and administration cost $68,746. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are made available. Total Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $24,320,934 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $63,342. 52. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The proposed project on Gordons Creek is located in Hattiesburg, MS. Existing project. A Federal project on the lower 2.5 miles was constructed in 1979 under the Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consisted of clearing and snagging from the creek's confluence with the Leaf River upstream to Bay Street and channel widening to a 40-foot bottom width between Bay and Broad Streets. The first increment of Work Phase I will consist of real estate acquisition of ten (10) residences on Brookland 10-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 The first increment of Work Phase I will consist of real estate acquisition of ten (10) residences on Brookland Street and South 17th Avenue and removed from floodplain; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement for 1.1 miles between Broad and Hardy Streets; and flood damages mitigation downstream of Broad Street. The second increment of Work Phase II will consist of channel enlargement from US Hwy. 11 upstream about 2.7 miles to South 40th Avenue and Lincoln Road. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $69,367. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $6,283. Work Accomplished to Date: Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Contract I is essentially completed. It is anticipated a construction contract would be awarded in November 1991, provided necessary right-of-ways for Contract I channel improvement are available and necessary relocations are performed by local sponsors. Also, initiation of the mitigation of damages downstream of Broad Street and real estate acquisition of nine residences upstream of Hardy Street have been initiated. Plans and specifications for Contract II were initiated in December, 1989, and are 60 percent completed. Estimated Federal cost is $4,412,250; and the non-Federal portion is $3,087,750. Total Federal cost to date is $683,926 for new work. 53. VILLAGE CREEK, BIRMINGHAM, AL Location. The project is located in central Alabama, Jefferson County, in the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. None. The project is basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures, in six (6) separate neighborhoods, from the floodplain; enlarging 2 miles of the stream channel in the vicinity of the Municipal Airport which also involves modification of three (3) bridges, demolishing two (2) unused bridges, and relocating two (2) waterlines and other utilities, installing three (3) emergency floodwaming devices; and creating an area of 210 acres which can be utilized for future recreation development. Channel enlargements (2 miles) will reduce annual damages near Municipal Airport by 82 percent and evacuation of 627 structures will reduce annual damages in residential areas by 61 percent. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Birmingham, Alabama was completed on December 14, 1988. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with the project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate cost $4,580,618; engineering and design $77,568; Cultural Resources $314,371; and supervision and administration $77,513. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate design memorandum complete February 1988. Real Estate acquisition started January 1989. A total of 225 structures have been purchased. Project scheduled to be completed June 1994. Current estimated Federal cost is $31,965,000; and the non-Federal portion is $1,960,000 for land and relocation, and $10,075,000 cash contributions. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1990 is $7,358,693 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $2,414,886. 54. WHORTON'S BEND ROAD, ETOWAH CO., AL Location. The area under consideration is approximately 500 feet along the right bank of the Coosa River upstream of the State Highway 77 bridge on Whorton's Bend Road in Etowah County, Alabama, south of Gadsden. Existing project. The project provides emergency streambank protection along the left bank of the Coosa River to retard erosion of Whorton's Bend Road. The project consists of excavation and grading of approximately 1850 cubic yards (cy) of earth and of placement of 11,070 cy of riprap graded for a minimum layer thickness of 30 inches. This would preclude any streambank erosion with the Alabama Power operations on the Coosa River and receding floodwaters. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction costs amounted to $129,053, engineering and design cost $615, and supervision and administration costs amounted to $9,895. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in February, 1989 and construction was essentially completed in January 1990. Estimated Federal cott is $370,000; and the non-Federal pofrtion is $159,000. Total Federal cost to date is $308,377 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $114,000. 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 55. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION HFlood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work under Public law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under Public law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) 56. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Beaver Creek at Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel recitification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burketts Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Bumrnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Poley Bridge, Goose Pone and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, Alabama; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control projects include Harrison County, Mississippi; Leaf River, Mahned, Mississippi; Chattahoochee River at La Grange, Troup County, Georgia; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 90 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $76,981. Total cost to September 30, 1990 is $641,459 charged to maintenance. 57. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 58. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junctions of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestemrn Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, 10-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The plan was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. The present phase of improvement provides for construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements. Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and for construction of Carters Dam, a multiple-purpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the- river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. Wofford Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below Montgomery equipped for handling petroleum products. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging of the river system removed 1,700,000 cubic yards at a cost of $3,453,400. General charges for water control management, condition surveys, engineering and design, supervision and administration amounted to $2,972,088. Claiborne Lock and Dam charges were $401,700 with recreation and resource management costs of $612,700. Reservoir Operation cost $81,402. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claibome Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is essentially complete at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is essentially complete. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $69,001,823, including $3,245,400 for new work and $65,756,423 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L.) 58A. CARTERS DAM AND RESERVOIR, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Carters, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The existing project consists of a 1,950-foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a powerhouse on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum power pool elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration totaled $7,108,541. Gross power generation amounted to 440,054,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1990, of which 316,030,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during CY 1989 totaled 1,090,416 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 was essentially completed in September 1980. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $151,336,806, including $111,140,340 for new work and $40,196,466 for maintenance. 58B. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.$ miles upstream from the U.S. Highvbay 84 bridge. Existing project. The existing project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river 10-26 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60-mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the lock and dam totaled $401,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. 58C. COOSA RIVER, MONTGOMERY TO GADSDEN, AL Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Oostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama- Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on January 27, 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured.The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $14,986,400 for new work. 58D. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 kilowatt units. The 103- mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 areas at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration cost $3,484,108. Gross power generation amounted to 362,811,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1990, of which 360,128,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastemrn Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during CY 1989 totaled 2,545,718 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operations in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was essentially completed in 1980. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1990 is $63,125,300 for new work and $41,867,395 for maintenance, a total of $104,992,695. 58E. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AN D DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 281.2 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The existing project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 281.2. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on 10-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted to $2,713,471. Gross power generation amounted to 344,106,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1990, of which 340,317,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during CY 1989 totaled 2,510,100 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is essentially complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1990 is $109,496,124, including $83,360,800 for new work and $26,135,324 for maintenance. 59. ALLATOONA DAM, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3 One 48- inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installed capacity will be 110,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acrefeet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration totaled $5,058,313. Gross power generation amounted to 274,132,300 kilowatt hours during FY 1990 of which 272,256,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Allatoona Lake during CY 1989 totaled 13,648,986 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $35,709,085 for new work and $74,450,320 for maintenance, a total of $110,159,405. 60. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and HFlint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola River from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styz also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the HFlint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattal~ pochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. 10-28 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and HFlint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the HFlint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles to be accomplished by dredging, contract works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River. Three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the HFlint River were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project also provides for minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane side of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage is provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. The project was originally authorized in section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. A water supply study is currently being conducted on the upper portion of the ACF River System. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system removed 1,000,000 cubic yards at a total cost of $1,671,800. George W. Andrews Lake recreational and resource management costs totaled $464,000. Operation and maintenance of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $609,000. All other costs for the project amounted to $1,117,605. Recreational attendance during CY 1989 totaled 318,061 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lamnier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam, is complete. West Point is essentially complete with the exception of adding recreation facilities. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $4,452,162 for new work and $83,987,968 for maintenance, a total of $88,440,130. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 60A. BUFORD DAM, LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest at elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood 10-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $8,001,686. Gross power generation amounted to 288,735,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1990, of which 284,342,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during CY 1989 totaled 17,914,116 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $53,028,418 for new work and $96,392,337 for maintenance, a total of $149,420,755. (See also Table 10-M.) 60B. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock and dam cost $609,000. Maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and HFlint project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963 at a total cost of $13,038,427. (See also Table 10-M). 60C. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway of 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike sectioh 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation con- 10-30 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT sists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck fbr handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $4,490,448. Gross power generation, Jim Woodruff Powerhouse, amounted to 192,031,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1990, of which 188,533,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during CY 1989 totaled 3,804,138 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The pool was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first power-generating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third on April 26, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $47,978,751 for new work and $66,847,548 for maintenance, a total of $114,826,299. (See also Table 10-M.) 60D.WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,000 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost for FY 1990 was $8,540,470. Gross power generation amounted to 596,818,000 kilowatt hours, of which 590,716,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1989 totaled 6,612,326 user days. Major rehabilitation costs $5,751. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed onthe- line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $88,295,780 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $10,463,437 and $93,137,532 for maintenance, a total cost of $191,896,749. (See also Table 10-M.) 60E. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 10-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The existing project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intakepowerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acrefeet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 were placed on operation in March and April, 1975. The ultimate installation is 108,375 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) A flammable storage area will be constructed near the existing dam maintenance area. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project totaled $4,499,341. Gross power generation amounted to 299,834,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1990, of which 293,673,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1989 totaled 8,188,307 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, was essentially complete at the end of FY 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1990 is $131,565,287 for new work and $52,132,887 for maintenance, a total of $183,698,174. (See also Table 10-M.) 61. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers System. 62. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 10-G.) Miscellaneous 63. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Program ........................... $233,117 Em ergency Operations..............................................3,226 Total FC & CE $236,343 64. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) M obilization Preparedness.................................... $120,867 Government Preparedness ...................................... 103,844 Total NEPP $224,711 65. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation..................... $1,541,183 Enfbrcement.... ......................... 303,147 Studies.................................1,215 Other Navigation Regulations ................................ -9,557 Total Regulatory $1,835,988 10-32 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT General Investigations 66. SURVEYS During FY 1990, costs of $520,213 were incurred as shown below: Flood Damage Preventive Studies........................ $249,085 N avigation Studies .................................................. 28,154 D am Safety..............................................................26,600 Special Investigations ... ................... ........... 73,889 Coordination with Other Agencies, and non-Federal Interests........................................133,858 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission....................8,627 Total Surveys $520,213 67. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain Management services were performed at a cost of $222,480. (See Table 10-P for listings of studies completed during FY 1990.) No costs incurred for environmental data studies or the National Program for inspection of non-Federal dams. 68. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Gulfport Harbor, MS. The authorized plan of improvement consists of modifying the existing ship channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. Dredged material disposal will be in the Gulf of Mexico. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was completed in June 1989, and approved by SAD in August 1989. A Feasibility Review Conference was held in August 1989, and the Project Guidance Memorandum was received by the district in late November 1989. Revisions to the GDM, and preparation of the Project Management Plan are underway. Preparation of plans and specifications will be initiated as soon as additional funds are made available. Fiscal year 1990 expenditures for AE & D were $225,511. Pascagoula Harbor, MS. The authorized plan of improvement calls for: Deepening and widening the Gulf entrance channel to 44 x 550 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly, and providing for future realignment as conditions warrant. Deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to 42 feet. Deepening and widening the Bayou Casotte Channel to 42 x 350 feet, and constructing a turning basin at the mouth of Bayou Casotte. Provide for bend widening at those locations presenting a problem to navigation and allow for reconfigurating the impoundment basin at the entrance channel. A resurvey of project economics and initial coordination on environmental issues have been initiated. Indications are that the project is economical. A letter of assurance was received from Jackson County Port Authority. Feasiblity study completed and the GDM preparation is nearing completion. Fiscal year 1990 expenditures for AE & D were $399,661. Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL. The authorized improvements consist of five (5) locks with chamber dimensions of 84 x 600 feet to be constructed in the existing Alabama Power Company dams which will provide a navigation channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Montgomery to Gadsden, Alabama, and a barge canal on Black Creek (9' x 150') with a turning basin of 350' x 600'. Based on data provided in the economic reevaluation, which is currently being finalized, there does not appear to be an economically favorable alternative for the development of navigation along the Coosa River Channel between Montgomery and Gadsden, Alabama. The final report is scheduled to be completed at the District level by January 1990. Fiscal year 1990 expenditures for AE & D were $7,232. Fort Toulouse, AL. The authorized plan consists of a curved 4500-foot long cutoff within the inside of the bend opposite the unstable slope, 3600 feet of riprap protection on the outside of the curved channel, and closure of the existing river channel adjacent to the Fort and Indian Mounds with two (2) dikes, filled in between with dredged material. The recommended plan in the General Design Memorandum consists of approximately 1200 feet of riprap bank protection adjacent to the Fort and Indian Mounds with a 700-foot free standing stone dike from the Indian Mound downstream. Plans and Specifications are scheduled to be initiated in FY 1990 and construction initiated in FY 1991. Fiscal year 1990 expenditures for AE & D were $-806. Moundville, AL. The authorized plan for bank protection consists of the upper 1600 feet of the project protected with riprap armor up to elevation 130.0 on a graded slope 10-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 with a stone toe dike constructed at the base of the slope; and also the lower 800 feet of the project protected with sheet pile cells, back filled with grass covered pervious material. The recommended plan in General Design Memorandum consists of approximately 800 linear feet of riprap slope protection, with a stone toe dike, extending up the bank to elevation 125.0 with protective vegetation extending to the top of the bank. Steeper upper bank sections will be protected by the use of a 250 feet long gabion wall. Plans and Specifications are scheduled to be initiated in FY 1990 and construction initiated in FY 1991. Fiscal year 1990 expenditures for AE & D were $2,271. Panama City Beaches, FL. The authorized plan consists of the placement of a protective beach to elevation 4', with a storm berm to elevation 7', together providing a 110-foot wide beach, with an artificial dune system having a top width of 30 feet at elevation 15 and stabilized by vegetation. A comprehensive damage survey was completed during FY 1989 as part of the reevaluation effort. Fully controlled aerial photographs were taken early in FY 89, first for use in the damage survey and also for later development of topographic maps. The Reevaluation Report was completed with favorable results and submitted in September 1989. In FY 1990, numerical modeling was initiated. Fiscal year 1990 expenditures were $545,094. Panama City Harbor. The authorized plan of improvements are the same as described in existing project (see Section 15 in text). Fiscal year 1990 expenditures were $88,330 for planning reformulation. Total fiscal year 1990 expenditures for Advance Engineering and Design were $1,267,292. 69. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL. The project is located at mile 338.1 on the Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The plan consists of replacing the existing Oliver Lock with a lock located 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock will have dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. A fixed-crest spillway will extend 800 feet across the river. Construction was initiated in November 1986 and is scheduled to be completed in December 1992. Fiscal year 1990 expenditures were $15,124. (See also section 6A Text). Bayou La Batre, AL. The authorized plan for the project consists of an 18-foot deep channel from the turning basin within Bayou La Batre, extending into Mississippi Sound then along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway alignment connecting with the existing Pascagoula ship channel. Extensions of the existing channel to above the Highway 188 bridge at a depth of 14 feet and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet are also incrementally justified. The Final Feasibility report was completed, and has been through all required Washington level review. The project was authorized in the 1990 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA). Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) work is proceeding on schedule and will be completed in September 1991. Construction funding is budgeted in Fiscal Year 1992. Fiscal year 1990 expenditures for were $197,799. Total fiscal year 1990 expenditures for Continuation of Planning and Engineering were $212,923. 70. RIVERS AND HARBORS CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Contributed funds required for authorized Federal studies included $56,959 for Valley Creek, AL; and $6,950 for Escatawpa River, MS; a total of $63,909 for contributed funds. 10-34 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 Navigation 1. Apalachi FL icola Bay 2. Aquatic Plant Control (Contributed Funds) 3. Bayou Coden, AL (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Bayou La Batre, AL (Contributed Funds) 5. Biloxi Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, AL 6A. Jackson Port Jackson, AL 6B. Oliver Lock & Dam (Replacement), AL (Contributed Funds) 7. Bon Secour River, AL (Contributed Funds) 8. Dauphin Island, Bay, AL New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. 55,000 55,015 93,000 37,674 16,000 16,251 50,000 50,674 -25,800 723 510,000 510,101 72,104 72,105 -4,000 29,220 14,942,300 14,993,606 50,000 22,766 6,205,000 5,246,606 10,181,000 7,513,161 72,000 71,942 47,900 49,892 76,085 7,200 7,808 41,300 40,995 76,000 76,043 45,000 -7,398 58,000 52,161 119,000 119,415 198,200 1,273,000 198,391 1,268,893 2,837 13,494,000 13,252,508 70,000 56,722 16,866,000 11,230,691 16,866,000 11,260,615 19,200 20,008 13,772,500 13,982,154 45,000 67,537 4,150,000 12,017,726 4,150,000 11,988,032 94,500 93,934 10-35 90,251 88,880 41,000 46,598 338,025 338,234 412,594 410,833 134,889 136,753 14,422,518 14,305,196 65,000 58,259 15,723,000 14,107,605 15,723,000 14,129,908 557,080 551,939 2,033,4611 2,033,461 3,856,9582 3,855,210 738,687 681,122 21,225 21,225 330,7013 330,701 1,150,758 1,144,846 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 311,095 311,095 3,639,746 3,637,239 10,5004 10,500 1,431,9195 1,431,9195 9,806,1956 9,803,3166 102,600 102,600 238,640 238,640 88,461,9357 88,461,9357 234,831,9948 234,540,069 52,292,880 52,292,880 230,000 205,285 45,829,000 43,657,965 46,920,000 44,891,716 118,615 118,615 941,258 935,392 9,700 9,700 292,864 I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 9. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (Contributed Funds) 10. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL (Contributed Funds) 11. Fly Creek, AL 12. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border 13. Gulfport Harbor, MS 14. Mobile, Harbor, AL (Contributed Funds) 15. Panama City Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 16. Pascagoula Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) 17. Pensacola Harbor, FL (Cotributed Funds) Funding Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp.. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 40,800 41,305 3,402 81,200 81,699 298,500 298,700 3,567 11,851 19,500 15,287 112,200 101,000 200,069 101,321 40,400 30,000 30,566 39,851 5,576,000 2,522,000 5,577,136 2,554,913 124,842 3,540 2,220,600 415,000 2,220,857 415,393 24,003,000 1,000,000 7,172,578 14,295,571 7,324,000 5,680,300 7,032,275 6,146,522 2,171,000 5,070,000 2,972,467 5,277,168 1,045,700 93,000 1,044,813 94,424 2,083,200 516,000 2,143,997 520,634 940,413 163,162 651,209 417,737 887,100 981,000 886,252 978,543 - 312,350 - 297,587 80,000 79,698 -20,000 60,784 91,000 90,207 25,257 425,500 337,172 80,000 79,255 2,967,000 2,926,095 769,000 652,807 1,733,000 1,733,914 1,015,000 444,538 4,889,000 4,759,579 1,650,000 1,612,400 125,000 123,729 2,653,000 2,593,971 305,885 279,250 114,000 114,524 10-36 574,300 569,979 461,393 464,840 121,251 120,788 86,700 86,873 2,046,524 1,955,771 1,831,004 1,828,231 1,368,000 5,004,390 10,875,857 10,813,901 1,714,000 1,296,211 59,979 60,231 4,098,972 4,075,169 179,000 225,512 52,020 48,495 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 292,864 2,308,626 2,303,622 391,354 391,354 2,458,686 2,456,772 197,450 195,250 916,715 916,715 7,729,111 7,728,305 398,000 398,000 29,000 29,000 560,721 559,906 6,480,2999 6,480,299 58,340,24610 58,233,7431 969,00011 969,00011 37,633,50212 37,630,185 95,633,93513 95,107,83513 111,295,34014 111,221,000 18,572,500 18,147,287 1,638,045'15 1,638,04515 8,411,010311166 8,410,08016 80,000 80,000 6,572,985' 6,572,98517 45,492,59218 45,467,1441s 3,399,884 3,330,135 1,469,69319 1,469,69319 8,211,358 2 8,204,0422 312,350 297,587 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 18. Perdido Pass Channel, AL (Contributed Funds) 19. Tennessee- Tombigbee Waterway AL and MS 19A. Tenn-Tom Wildlife Mitigation Flood Control 26. Boggy Bayou Valparaiso, FL 27. County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS (Contributed Funds) 28. Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL (Contributed Funds) 29. Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL (Contributed Funds) 30. Fort Toulouse Wetumpka, AL 31. Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa, Co., FL (Contributed Funds) 32. Hwy. 39 Bridge Gainesville, AL 33. Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS (Contributed Funds) 34. Hurricane Creek Prentiss Co., MS (Contributed Funds) 35. Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS 36. Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL 37. Magby Creek, Columbus, MS Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Total Cost to FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 28,000 27,430 -5,060,000 15,256,360 18,816,000 18,765,500 65,000 58,145 147,000 181,328 50,000 62,867 7,500 7,018 155,000 290,108 62,866 25,500 31,600 32,761 6,160,000 7,898,488 18,970,000 18,516,261 25,000 10,100 45,000 48,771 1,105,000 974,600 196,000 88,000 53,000 27,945 4,26 50,00 10,10 15,00 113,76 50,00 35,77 58,00 57,73 11,000,00 5,105,01 19,043,40 19,614,11 84,00 20,39 31,00 8,00 85,00 44,45 1,435,00 293,64 02 -_ 734,400 733,503 - _ 0 420,000 5 7,184,965 0 17,807,679 6 17,553,985 - 5,200,000 - 4,951,438 - 28,000 - 18,695 0 - 7 68,525 0 - 0 23,000 0 1,555,000 3 594,821 - 170,000 - 150,000 0 1,095,000 0 97,593 25,500 - 93,500 108,238 40,500 36,094 i9 1,974 0 224,000 9 29,554 - 67,725 0 34,000 - 14,278 - 14,000 5 41,125 0 15,000 3 18,863 - 63,750 150,000 45,844 3,247 -29,000 11,257 235,213 11,275 67,725 29,781 14,000 44 18,841 629,860 629,860 6,800,217 6,798,849 510,000 510,000 10,325 10,325 1,012,798,20021 1,008,681,62521 122,319,83522 121,748,49422 5,200,000 4,951,438 28,000 18,695 109,000 99,022 31,000 31,000 2,024,327 1,012,425 170,000 150,000 3,979,121 1,706,244 196,000 113,500 150,000 45,844 146,500 139,430 40,500 36,094 71,000 70,364 285,257 274,877 79,000 67,725 56,500 51,078 14,000 14,000 1,585,000 1,584,258 145,000 143,758 169,250 10-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding Cost FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 4,703 9,606 34,174 26,214 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. -- 7,100 - Cost - - - 7,100 38. Mill Creek, New Work: Dalton, GA Approp. 10,000 15,000 10,000 235,000 Cost 12,502 162 11,354 212,803 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - 25,000 Cost - - - 25,000 39. Mill Creek, New Work: Sumrall, MS Approp. 46,500 - 21,300 20,000 Cost 30,164 14,218 4,484 30,920 40. Mound State Park New Work: Moundville, AL Approp. - - - 150,000 Cost - - - 67,392 41. Murder Creek, New Work: Brewton, AL Approp. 390,000 200,000 - - Cost 427,607 186,048 215,536 9,587 42. Okatibbee Dam, New Work: MS Approp. - - - - Cost 283 73 - Maint.: Approp. 1,031,800 1,050,000 1,000,000 1,401,043 Cost 1,020,843 995,,073 1,057,387 1,347,393 43. Proctor Creek New Work: Atlanta, GA Approp. 25,000 18,000 100,000 849,000 Cost 17,632 23,743 4,361 735,047 44. Raccoon Creek, New Work: Baconton, GA Approp. 36,800 48,000 261,000 - Cost 38,208 16,177 46,637 195,886 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - 35,000 - Cost - - - 35,000 45. Silver Creek, New Work: Rome, GA Approp. 25,000 3,000 15,000 336,000 Cost 19,842 13,339 2,936 344,480 46. Sope Creek, New Work: Marietta, GA Approp. -165,000 95,000 25,000 - Cost 18,584 67,609 106,349 13,110 47. Sowashee Creek, New Work: Meridian, MS Approp. 350,000 2,400,000 1,100,000 4,723,000 Cost 226,458 1,707,461 1,553,805 4,487,799 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 60,000 430,000 290,000 388,000 Cost - 124,999 59,025 573,387 48. Tallahalla Creek, New Work: Laurel, MS Approp. - 42,000 130,000 647,000 Cost - 15,767 46,312 102,326 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - 40,000 Cost - - - 40,000 49. Three Mile Creek, New Work: Mobile, AL Approp. 300,000 4,348,000 -2,300,000 526,000 Cost 218,592 1,005,132 912,533 460,018 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 29,000 436,000 - - Cost - 28,300 112,458 - 50. Tombigbee River New Work: (East Fork) Approp. - - - - MS and AL Cost .- - - - Maint.: Approp. 125,000 141,000 66,000 62,101 Cost 125,246 141,928 66,102 56,408 51. Tombigbee River New Work: Tributaries, Approp. 3,027,000 2,932,600 - -208,000 MS and AL Cost 1,811,493 2,280,647 1,291,495 714,310 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - Cost - - - 52. Upper Gordon Creek, New Work: Hattiesburg, MS Approp. 77,000 60,000 250,000 - Cost 31,309 103,363 153,585 75,650 53. Village Creek, New Work: Birmingham, AL Approp. 50,000 225,000 2,310,000 7,446,000 10-38 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 152,720 7,100 7,100 500,000 463,848 25,000 25,000 87,800 79,878 150,000 67,392 1,240,000 1,170,025 9,739,528 9,739,528 12,770,735 12,693,313 992,000 780,783 423,300 369,029 35,000 35,000 580,000 573,817 1,540,000 1,538,554 8,573,000 7,975,524 1,168,000 757,412 819,000 164,406 40,000 40,000 2,874,000 2,596,275 465,000 140,758 134,801 134,801 2,774,201 2,767,779 24,357,825 24,320,934 94,700 63,342 717,000 683,926 10,031,000 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 54. Whorton's Bend Road, New Work: Etowah, Co., AL Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost Multiple Purpose Projects, Lock and Dam 58. Alabama-Coosa New Work: Rivers, AL and GA Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 58A. Carters Dam and New Work: Reservoir, GA Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 58B. Claibome Lock and New Work: Dam, AL Approp. Cost 58C. Coosa River, New Work: Montgomery to Approp. Gadsden, AL Cost 58D. Millers Ferry Lock New Work: and Dam, AL Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 58E. Robert F. Henry New Work: Lock and Dam, AL Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 59. Allatoona Dam New Wokr: Coosa River Basin, Approp. GA Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 60. Apalachicola, New Work: Chattahoochee Approp. and Flint Rivers, Cost AL and GA Maint.: Approp. Cost 60A. Buford Dam New Work: Lake Sidney Approp. Lanier, GA Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 60B13. George W. Andrews New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. AL and GA Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 60C. Jim Woodruff Lock New Work: and Dam, GA and Approp. FL Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 60D. Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. AL and GA Cost Total Cost to FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 47,052 189,999 2,071,571 5,050,071 7,358,693 10,000 415 4,866,800 4,818,838 3,064,800 2,923,539 71,000 19,980 5,360,000 5,292,445 3,773,000 3,854,658 647,000 487,000 320,000 287,982 114,000 114,000 8,300,100 8,392,210 4,905,500 4,958,589 -49,000 2,136 2,585,000 2,608,238 2,024,800 2,040,427 5,315,800 5,327,800 5,120,000 5,198,930 2,041 9,729,900 9,107,400 30 30 6,451,800 5,630,585 657 3,106,500 3,030,927 3,780,000 3,917,320 2,286,000 2,220,000 2,261,938 2,289,096 6,100,000 4,977,900 5,962,769 5,267,320 4,208,600 4,159,830 8,394,600 8,654,475 30 30 7,131,800 7,709,369 3,608,500 3,633,107 7,533,100 8,015,948 30 30 5,728,500 6,029,775 10-39 2,059,710 1,927,886 50,000 139,563 7,576,394 7,521,290 7,136,984 7,108,541 2,706,710 2,414,886 451,000 447,940 114,000 114,000 3,245,400 3,245,400 65,854,954 65,756,423 111,140,340 111,140,340 40,346,584 40,196,466 27,997,450 27,997,450 14,986,400 14,986,4003 63,125,300 63,125,300 41,938,878 41,867,395 83,360,800 83,360,800 26,189,528 26,135,324 35 709 0855 35,709,085 74,610,824 74,450,320 4,452 162 4,452,162 84,051,964 83,987,968 53,030,038 53,028,418 96,694,622 96,392,337 13,038,42729 13,038,42729 30 30 48,017,85831 47,978,75131 67,021,397 66,847,548 88,295,78032 88,295,7802 3,506,013 3,484,108 2,734,375 2,713,471 5,127,601 5,058,313 3,884,587 3,862,405 8,193,115 8,001,686 30 30 4,589,017 4,490,448 I TABLE 10-A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 Maint.: Approp. 6,894,800 8,188,000 7,421,000 8,534,233 93,207,597 Cost 6,823,873 8,140,417 7,664,649 8,540,470 93,137,532 Major Rehab.: Approp. - -23,000 - - 10,477,000 Cost 4,240 204,570 1,111 5,751 10,463,437 60E. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. - 11,400 - - 131,568,760"33 Basin, GA and AL Cost 9,149 19,162 35,616 - 131,565,287" Maint.: Approp. 6,368,800 6,009,000 5,753,000 4,449,608 52,211,708 Cost 6,372,604 6,122,806 5,771,673 4,499,341 52,132,887 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,243,661 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M Funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3,347,489 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and 4809,553 for Lazer Creek design and $301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,233,325 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers projects. 31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 33. Includes $35,045 for previous project costs. 10-40 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 19631 Feb. 5, 19751 Aug. 11, 19831 Jul 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 2, 19691 Oct. 27, 1965 APALACHICOLA BAY, FL. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels. 10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, Fl., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channel is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and about 1 mile long, parallel to shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., and La. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BAYOU CODEN, AL. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre channel. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL. (See Section 4 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR(Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) H Doc 37, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 87-874 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec 107) H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-41 TABLE 10-B TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Jun 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 19791 Jul. 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sep. 19, 1890 Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 BILOXI HARBOR, MS. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500- by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport Lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500- foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150- foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about 1 mile to a 400- by 600- foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40- foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL. (See Section 6 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887 Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis. Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement to Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. H. Doc. 754. 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 639.75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258. 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326. 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256. 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293 Public Law 317 H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, p. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. 10-42 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 Jul. 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 18, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 15, 1985 May 16, 19631 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage. the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Conduct a feasibility study of protection from erosion problems on the southern bank from river mile 253 to river mile 255. MOUND STATE PARK (See Section 40 of Text) Correct erosion problems along the banks of the Warrior River in order to protect Mound State Park, near Moundville, Alabama. JACKSON PORT, AL (See Section 6A of Text) Construct a spur canal 9 feet deep, 280 feet wide, and 680 feet long in conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project. (Jackson Port) OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL (See Section 6B of Text) Construction of a lock and dam to replace the William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam. Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock Replacement BON SECOUR RIVER, AL. (See Section 7 of Text) A 10-by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL. (See Section 8 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 45.73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26. 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 97,377 Public Law 98-63 Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act 1987 (P.L. 99-591) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 10-43 TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 19, 19691 Jul. 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 1, 1980 May 17, 1950 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul 3, 1930 Jul 3, 1930 Jul 23, 1942 Jun. 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 3, 1899 DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL (See Section 9 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 feet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 11 of Text), A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 12 of Text) APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FL., TO MOBILE BAY, AL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, AL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. 10-44 DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Appropriation H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 23, 1930 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 30 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Modify the existing Ship Channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. Modify the WRDA of 1986 and authorize disposal of dredged material in open waters of the Gulf of Mexico; and by Thin-layer disposal in Mississippi Sound under a demonstration program. MOBILE HARBOR, AL (See Section 14 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point to Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet, Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basins and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Magazine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of 27 November 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' x 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-676) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) 10-45 TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 19671 Jun. 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile River, 55 by 550 feet, a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL Shoreline protection to provide a 110-foot wide beach with an artificial dune system and stabilization of vegetation. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL (See Section 15 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge.. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River, 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass. thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a tumrning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30- by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth 1 mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Hom Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-46 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 19831 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 27, 1962 long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 x 80 feet extending about 2,750 feet from deep waters in the Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an unpland diked area. Deepen and widen gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL (See Section 17 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvement of Bayou Chico. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet, PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL (See Section 18 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemount jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS (See Section 19 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms.; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. H. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-47 DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 May 4, 19904 Oct. 7, 19884 Nov. 17, 19872 Sep. 10, 19872 Oct. 7, 19884 Jul. 2, 1986 Oct. 7, 19884 Oct. 7, 19884 Oct. 3, 19852 Aug. 15, 1985 Oct. 13, 19882 Oct. 13, 19882 Mar. 14, 19902 Apr. 18, 19862 Oct. 23, 1962 Jan. 10, 19892 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WILDLIFE MITIGATION Acquire from willing sellers in a timely manner at fair market value 88,000 acres of land for mitigation of wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the project for the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. BOGGY BAYOU, VALPARAISO, FL (See Section 26 of Text) Provide bank protection along 700-feet of shoreline and preclude possible destruction of Bayshore Drive and utilities. COUNTY LINE ROAD BRIDGE, ITAWAMBA CO., MS (See Section 27 of Text) Provides protection for both banks and the channel at the bridge crossing Mantachie Creek. CRIBBS MILL CREEK, TUSCALOOSA, AL (See Section 28 of Text) Channel modification of about 7,300 feet of the creek. Modification consists of widening the existing channel. ESLAVA CREEK, VIOBILE, AL (See Section 29 of Text) Channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding an additional barrel. GULF BREEZE, SANTA ROSA CO., FL (See Section 31 of Text) Emergency action to stop shoreline erosion around a water supply pumping station for the City of Gulf Breeze, FL. HIGHWAY 39 BRIDGE, GAINESVILLE, AL (See Section 32 of Text) Slope protection for a 2000-foot reach of the east bank of the Tombigbee River, immediately upstream of the existing Highway 39 Bridge. HINTONVILLE ROAD BRIDGE, PERRY CO., MS (See Section 33 of Text) Provides protection for the bridge side slopes channel bottom, and to realign the channel thru the center span of the bridge. HURRICANE CREEK, PRENTISS CO., MS (See Section 34 of Text) Provides emergency streambank protection to the banks and the bottom of the channel to retard erosion at the Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridge crossing Hurricane Creek. LEAF AND BOWIE RIVERS, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 35 of Text) Channel snagging; overbank clearing within the flood plains; riprap protection of the Southern Railroad and River Avenue Bridge piers, and removal of the Petal sewage lagoon. Work also includes installation of a flood warning system. LITTLE COVE CREEK, GLENCOE, AL (See Section 36 of Text) The project consists of enlargement and realignment of 10,840 feet along Little Cove Creek to provide a channel bottom width of 25 feet and an average depth of 6 feet. Also included in the project were associated channel and overbank clearing and bridge modification work. MAGBY CREEK, COLUMBUS, MS (See Section 37 of Text) For clearing and snagging Magby Creek from mile 0.83 upstream to mile 2.06. MILL CREEK, DALTON, GA (See Section 38 of Text) For clearing and snagging Mill Creek from its mouth to downstream face of Willowdale Drive or a distance of 8.6 miles. MILL CREEK, SUMRALL, MS (See Section 39 of Text) Clearing and snagging 1.0 mile along Mill Creek with overbank clearing for 0.63 miles MURDER CREEK, BREWTON, AL (See Section 41 of Text) Non-structural project providing for the alleviation of flood problems at Brewton by the removal of 31 damageable structures from the 10-year flood plains of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS (See Section 42 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control water supply, water quality control, and recreation. PROCTOR CREEK, ATLANTA, GA (See Section 43 of Text) (See Section 43 of Text) Purchase and remove residential structures within flood plain. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) Urgent Supplemental Appropriation Act, 1986, (Public Law 99-349). DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985, (Public Law 99-88). DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 205) 10-48 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 13, 19882 Jan. 10, 19892 Aug. 23, 19842 Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 30, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 23, 1958 Jul. 8, 1980 Oct. 13, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 13, 19884 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 28, 1954 May 25, 1982 Nov. 17, 1986 RACCOON CREEK, BACONTON, GA (See Section 44 of text) Raise about 1500 feet of South Jackson Street Bridge to elevation 176.0 feet NGVE. Clear and snag from Hwy. 3 to U.S. Hwy. 19. SILVER CREEK, ROME, GA (See Section 45 of Text) Provide non-structural flood control measures along Silver Creek. SOPE CREEK, MARIETTA, GA (See Section 46 of Text) The project provides for flood control measures along Sope Creek in Cobb County, Georgia, by clearing and snagging and evaluation of 13 structures. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS (See Section 47 of Text) Channel enlargement, and clearing and snagging over a reach of 10.5 miles. One railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require will require modification for the channel improvement. Development of recreation facilities. TALLAHALLA CREEK, LAUREL, MS (See Section 48 of Text) Channel clearing and snagging with overbank clearing of brush and trees less than 4 inches diameter for a distance of 30 feet on each bank. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 49 of Text) Channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. Development of recreational facilities. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL (See Section 50 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL (See Section 51 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 52 of Text) Real Estate acquisition of nine (9) residences; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement. VILLAGE CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, BIRMINGHAM, AL (See Section 53 of Text) Basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures in six separate neighborhoods from floodplain; enlarge 2 miles of channel and relocate necessary facilities; Install flood warning devices. WHORTON'S BEND ROAD, ETOWAH CO., AL (See Section 54 of Text) Provides emergency streambank protection along the left bank of the Coosa River to retard erosion on Whorton's Bend Road. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL. AND GA. (See Section 58 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam. Modification to the plan for the Coosa River segment DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 205) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Special Report on Record in OCT. (Public Law 222,) 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Supplemental Appropriations and Recession Act, DPR (Sec. 205) 1980 (P.L. 96-304) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources 10-49 TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 194j Jan. 27, 1981 Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden, AL to carry out planning, engineering, and design in accordance with the Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL, Design Memorandum No. 1., General Design, dated May 1982. FORT TOULOUSE (See Section 30 of Text) Preserve and protect the Fort Toulouse National Historic Landmark and Taskigi Indian Mound by instituting bank stabilization measures. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA (See Section 59 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA AND FL (See Section 60 of Text) Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Authorized recreation facilities. Modified the existing project to provide for nine foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT Modified Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945 to restore and maintain access to bendways and interconnecting waterways in the course of routine maintenance dredging; and to acquire lands for and to construct, operate, and maintain water-related public use and access facilities. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA (See Section 60A of Text) Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL. AND GA. (See Section 60B of Text) Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at George W. Andrews site. Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL (See Section 60C of Text) Provided recreation facilities. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL, AND GA (See Section 60D of Text) Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at Columbia site. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL (See Section 60E of Text) Authorized construction for flood control, power recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Comm. on Public Works H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 10-50 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Public Law 228, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76 Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 24, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 May 19, 1953 Oct. 23, 1963 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 22 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, FL 1981 $41,650 $302,539 Bluff Creek, MS1 1963 1,000 6,883 Cadet Bayou, MS 1984 87,921 1,137,433 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL 1979 481,627 379,413 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL 1981 208,499 1,129,427 Holmes Creek, FL 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, FL 1972 289,496 133,038 Noxubee River, MS 1902 47,528 14,472 Panacea Harbor, FL 1979 122,383 101,502 Pascagoula River, MS 1956 15,000 179,535 Pass Christian Harbor, MS 1976 59,313 139,653 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL 1984 1,960,862 2,958,516 Removing Water Hyacinths 1984 - 1,100,471 St. Marks River, FL 1965 1,710,809 84,115 Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS 1988 500,500- Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1979 29,195 481,515 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Section 26 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance2 Harrison County, MS, shore protection 1 1953 $1,133,000 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-51 TABLE 10-E REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 48 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Alabama River at Montgomery, AL1 1965 $144,194- Armuchee Creek, GA 1966 115,547- Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA 1958 149,815- Big Brown Creek, Prentiss Co, MS 1987 137,500- Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS 1985 132,174 Black Creek, Gadsden, AL 1953 125,389- Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL 1986 181,500 Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL 1987 178,600- Burketts Creek, Amory, MS 1984 1,366,454- Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL 1988 206,600- Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL 1985 121,718- Clanton, AL 1964 274,024- Collinsville, AL 1940 71,119- Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS 1988 91,500- Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 1985 802,026- Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS 1982 238,219- Houston School Rd. Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS 1988 59,300- Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL 1987 155,200- Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA 1970 164,998- Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS 1986 231,618- Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL 1965 113,849- Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS 1988 78,500- Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL 1980 190,974- Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL 1986 903,474- Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS 1988 119,500- Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS 1987 143,500- Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1985 250,000- Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL 1946 649,280- Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, GA 1985 85,029- Rome, Coosa River, GA 1955 384,550- Sewerline Protection, Valley, AL 1989 180,937- Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS 1956 142,637- Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS 1984 55,569- Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS 1988 81,000- Tallahala Creek, Pascagoula River, MS 1988 3,945,757- Town Creek, Americus, GA 1965 340,409- Trim Cane Creek, Okibbeha County, MS 1984 145,519- Trussville, AL 1965 141,334- Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS 1986 215,860- West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA 1955 599,637- Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1985 114,753 Wolf Creek, U.S. Hwy. 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1986 154,641 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA 1966 330,734- 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no pre-authorization studies. construction work has been done. Includes $17,000 for 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. TABLE 10-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Year of Last Deauthorization Date Project Type Full Report Document Deauthorized Gadsden to Rome Navigation 1955 Pubic Law 99-662 Jan 1, 1990 Coosa River Channel, AL 99th Congress (Auth. 1945 Act) Noxubee River, MS Flood Control 19891 Public Law 99-662 Jan 1, 1990 (Auth P.L. 96-304) Sipsey River, AL 99th Congress Flood Control 19891 Public Law 99-662 Jan 1, 1990 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) 99th Congress Tombigbee River, AL & MS Flood Control n/a Public Law 99-662 Jan 1, 1990 (Auth. 1941 Act) 99th Congress Westfork, MS Flood Control 1989 Public Law 99-662 Jan 1, 1990 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) 99th Congress 1. Deauthorized tributaries of Tombigbee River improvements. 10-52 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATON (See Section 23 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Authority 1990 Costs Bayou Cumbest, Jackson Co., MS 107 $ 192 Eastpoint Channel, FL 107 25,582 Little Lagoon, Gulf Shores, AL 107 19,801 Ocean Springs Harbor, MS 107 6,045 Scipio Creek, Franklin, FL 107 27,453 Soldiers & Palmetto Creek, AL 107 4,669 South Fork, Bon Secour River, AL 107 15,658 Weeks Bay, AL 107 24,220 Total $123,6201 1. Excludes construction costs of $10,937 for Fort Gaines, Dauphin Island, AL. This cost is reflective in respective project cost. TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 46 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Authority 1990 Costs Blackwater River, Milton, FL 205 $11,251 Carysville, FL 205 10,874 Chattooga River, Trion, GA 205 12,787 Greens Creek, Petal, MS 205 13,181 Irondale, AL 205 452 Lost Creek, Carbon Hill, AL 205 34,014 Mixons Creek, Lamar Co., MS 205 2,955 Murder & Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL 205 1,208 Pea River, Elba, AL 205 17,026 Pea & Choctawhatchee Rivers, Geneva, AL 205 23,941 County Road 55, Etowah Co., AL 14 31,870 Portersville Bay Shoreline, AL 14 8150 Total $167,709 10-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 10-K RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 24 of Text) Cost During Project Date of Survey Fiscal Year Bayou La Batre, AL June,1990 $14,840 Biloxi Harbor, MS September, 1990 5,300 Blackwater River, FL March, 1990 1,048 Bon Secour, AL June, 1990 11,385 Cadet Bayou, MS August, 1990 9,540 Carrabelle Harbor, FL April, 1990 34,949 Dauphin Island, AL June, 1990 4,240 Escambia Bay, FL March, 1990 49,547 Fly Creek, AL July, 1990 7,375 Fowl River, AL July, 1990 6,360 La Grange Bayou, FL September, 1990 1,293 Panacea Harbor, FL April, 1990 2,629 Pascagoula, MS September, 1990 11,385 St. Marks River, FL April, 1990 25,156 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS August, 1990 9.540 Total $194,587 TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Sections 49 and 50 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam3 Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.11 42.21 245.41 26.82 47.84 Nearest town Claiborne, Ala. Camden, Ala. Benton, Ala. Carters, Ga. Cartersville, Ga. Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 -- Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 - - Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 - - Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 840 Depth over sills at low water 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 -- (feet) Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent com lete 100 100 100 100 100 Cost to date: $27,997,450 $63,125,300 $83,360,800 $111,140,340 $35,709,085 1. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles) 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10A. 10-54 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA., LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 51 of Text) Existing Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Woodruff Andrews Geoge Lake Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Miles above mouth 107.6 46.52 75.02 201.42 348.32 Nearest town Chattahoochee FL., Columbia, Al. Ft. Gaines, Ga. West Point, Ga. Buford, Ga. Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - - available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 - - Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - - Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190(Summer) 635(Summer) 1071(Summer) surface (msl) 185(Winter) 625(Winter) 1070(Winter) Depth over sills at low 14 13 13 - - water (feet) Character of foundation Limestone Limestone Limestone Rock Rock Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed Height of dam (feet) 67 62 114 95 192 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth Total reservoir capacity 367,300 18,180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 (acre-feet) Power-development 30,000 - 130,000 73,875 86,000 (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - - Estimated cost:... Cost to date: 3 $47,978,751 $13,038,427 $98,759,2174 $131,565,287 $53,028,418 Above the mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 4. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge and $10,463,437 for major rehabilitation. 10-55 1. 2. 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 6 of Text) Armistead I. William John Hollis Coffeeville Demopolis Selden Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam1 Miles above Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1 338.2 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Oak Grove Distance (miles) 3(within city) 6 15 Lock: Greatest length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 450 600 600 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 95 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 12.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated Type construction Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth- Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1940 1969 1985 Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1939 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam3 $21,597,264 $19,774,583 $13,295,553 $4,450,874 $28,100,000 $52,292,880 1. Single life lock. 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 10-56 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-0 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI (See Section 19 of Text) Existing Projects Gainesville Aliceville Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B Lock C Lock D Lock E Bay Springs Lock Lock Lock Lock and and and and and Lock and and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway and Dam Miles above mouth1 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 412 Nearest town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, MS Fulton, MS Fulton, MS Belmont, MS Tupelo, MS Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 available for full width (feet) Width of Chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 (Summer)414 pool surface (msl) (Winter)409 Depth over sills at 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 low water (feet) Character of foundation Mooreville Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Sandstone Chalk Sand & Clay Sand & Clay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay and Shale. Kind of spillway Fixed & Fixed & Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated N/A Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 103 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 (Summer)180,000 (acre-feet)(Winter)143,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Yearopenedto 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 navigation Estimated Cost $103,214,000 151,255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 147,000,000 Cost to date $100,010,600 143,190,800 174,620,500 112,620,200 92,190,500 93,106,700 62,197,000 89,610,800 76,917,700 130,398,000 1. Miles above Mobile, Alabama (Mile 0.00 is at Bankhead Tunnel on U.S. Highway 90) 10-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 10-P COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1982 THRU FY 19901 (See Section 58 of Text) Date Federal Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Anniston, Alabama Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 82 $80,900 Calhoun County, Alabama Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 82 61,200 Cave Springs, Georgia Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 84 22,500 Floyd County, Georgia Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 84 230,000 Columbus, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 36,000 Lowndes County, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 229,000 Aberdeen, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 35,000 Amory, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 50,000 Cherokee County, Georgia Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) July 85 168,000 Monroe County, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Oct 85 140,000 Dale County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 86 82,000 Lauderdale County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 87 144,000 Houston County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 87 114,000 St. Clair County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 87 43,000 Marengo County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 87 36,000 Greene County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 88 18,550 Covington County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 35,000 Pickens County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 50,000 Fulton County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 88 180,000 Monroe County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 88 33,000 Colquitt County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 48,000 Murray County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 68,000 Coffee County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 89 48,500 Montgomery County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jul 89 175,000 Clayton County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 89 250,000 Special Flood Hazard Information Chattahoochee River, Supplement Atlanta Reg. Planning Mar 82 5,000 to Buford to Whitesburg Report Commission Oothcalooga Creek Gordon Co., Ga Board of Commissioners Jun 82 10,000 Canton Creek, Ga. City of Canton, Ga. Dec 82 3,000 Oktasasi Creek, Ala. Alexander City, Ala. Jan 83 3,000 Cordele Creek & City of Cordele, Ga. May 83 4,000 Malcolm Branch, GA. Hull Branch, MS East Central Planning and Jun 84 7,000 Development District Percosin Creek & Tribs., GA City of Albany, GA Nov 84 14,000 Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay City of Ellijay, GA Jul 86 22,000 Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS Ellisville, MS Jan 87 19,000 Springers Branch, MS Starkville, MS May 87 13,000 Dixie Creek, GA La Grange, GA Jun 87 15,000 Little Scooba Creek, MS Scooba, MS Jun 87 18,000 Fishpond Drain & Trib. Donalsonville, GA Dec 87 18,000 Dearmenville & Golden Springs, Al Anniston, AL Mar 88 9,000 Chickasawhay River Quitman, MS Jun 89 19,000 Archusa Creek Quitman, MS Jun 89 9,000 Leaf River New Augusta, MS Sep 89 27,000 Shades Creek Jefferson County, AL Sep 90 45,000 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1979 through FY 1984 reports. 10-58 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT * District comprises a portion of Louisiana, embraced River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Missisin drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and sippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to 325.5 above Head of Passes (AHP), drainage area of Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Ouachita-Black River Basin, and small eastern and Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under and Sabine River and Lake. supervision of President, Mississippi River Commis- It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Water- sion (MRC), and Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi way from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont.) 1. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA ............... 11-2 2. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ..... 11-3 3. Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA ............ 11-4 4. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA ..................... 11-5 5. Navigaton work under special authorization ............... 11-5 Flood Control 6. Grand Isle and vicinity, LA .......... 11-6 7. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) ........... 11-6 8. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 11-7 9. Morgan City and vicinity, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 11-8 Page 10. New Orleans to Venice, LA (hurricane protection) ............. 11-9 11. Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (hurricane protection) ............ 11-10 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................. 11-11 13. Flood control work under special authorization ................... 11-11 Tables Table 11-A Cost and Financial Statement .............. 11-12 Table 11-B Authorizing Legislation ... 11-14 Table 11-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............... . 11-17 Table 11-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 11-19 Table 11-E Active General Investigations ........... 11-21 11-1 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 1. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Definitions. AHP is an abbreviation for Above Head of Passes and is a means of referring to river mileage for the lower Mississippi River. Likewise, BHP is an abbreviation for Below Head of Passes and is used to refer to mileages in the Mississippi River passes. LWRP is an abbreviation for Low Water Reference Plane and refers to the datum from which the project depth is measured. Its value varies from +2.53 feet NGVD at Baton Rouge to +0.48 feet NGVD at New Orleans. LDB and RDB are left and right descending bank, respectively. This usage eliminates the need for a potentially confusing reference to cardinal directions (N, E, SE, etc.) on a meandering river. Location. This reach of the river flows southeasterly through southeastern portion of Louisiana. At Head of Passes, approximately 233.8 miles below US Highway 190 bridge at Baton Rouge, river branches into three main passes: Southwest Pass, South Pass, and Pass a Loutre, two of which, Southwest Pass and South Pass, are improved under existing project. Head of Passes to mouths of Southwest and South Passes are 20.1 and 13.5 miles, respectively. Mouth of Southwest Pass is 141 miles west of Mobile, AL, and 349 miles east of Galveston, TX. Mouth of South Pass is 18.5 miles northeast of mouth of Southwest Pass. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11361, 11364, and 11369; MRC alluvial valley map, and Zachary, Baton Rouge, White Castle, Donaldsonville, Thibodaux, Mount Airy, Bonnet Carre, Hahnville, New Orleans, St. Bernard, Barataria, Pointe a la Hache, Black Bay, Empire, Forts, West Delta, East Delta, and Southwest Pass quadrangles and 1989 (57th edition) folio of flood control and navigation maps, Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA, published by the MRC.) Previous projects. For details see page 552 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions as follows: Between a line one-tenth mile below US Highway 190 bridge at Baton Rouge (Mile 233.8 AHP) to Philadelphia Point (Mile 181.0 AHP) in the vicinity of Donaldsonville, 40 feet deep (LWRP) by 500 feet wide; from Philadelphia Point to the downstream limit of the Port of New Orleans (Mile 86.7 AHP), 45 feet deep (LWRP) by 500 feet wide; in addition, within the limits of the Port of New Orleans (Miles 104.5 to 86.7 AHP), 35 feet deep (MLG) laterally between the 45 ft channel and a line 100 feet from the face of the wharves on the LDB; from Mile 86.7 AHP through Head of Passes (Mile 0.0), 45 feet deep (MLG) by 750 feet wide; in Southwest Pass, Miles 0.0 to 17.0 BHP, 45 feet deep (MLG) by 750 feet wide; thence tapering to 600 feet wide at mile 17.5 BHP, these dimensions extending through the jetty channel and bar channel, mile 21.5 BHP. Plane of reference below New Orleans is mean low gulf. Plane of reference above and through New Orleans is low water reference plane. General plan of improvement of Southwest Pass provides for constructing pass to uniform cross section with about 1,420-foot surface width by means of jetties, spur dikes, and bulkheads; for channel maintenance by dredging from Cubits Gap, Mile 3.5 AHP through the gulf entrance channel, Mile 21.5 BHP; for construction of small revetted openings through narrow portions of banks of pass for purpose of strengthening and nourishment of banks; for closure of minor outlets not required for maintenance of banks; for construction of sills to prevent enlargement of the Venice Jump and Cubits Gap; for repairs to sill across Pass a Loutre and bank revetment at Head of Passes; for construction of dikes with a view to reducing width of river above Head of Passes; for construction of a submerged deflecting dike above Head of Passes; and for other minor work. East jetty is about 24,950 feet long and west jetty 19,699 feet. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses, originally built to about elevation of mean low gulf, surmounted with a superstructure of concrete blocks and large riprap and/or stone rubble mound of core and cover stone. Spur dikes are constructed of round timber piles and/or triangular prestressed concrete piles, with riprap at the landward ends to connect the dikes to the bank line. General plan of improvement of South Pass provides for construction and maintenance of jetties and spur dikes; for channel maintenance by dredging from Head of Passes through the Gulf Entrance Channel beyond mile 13.5 BHP; maintenance of a sill across Pass a Loutre, and for seaward extension of east jetty at mouth of pass; removal of west dike and construction of spur dikes and bank revetment at Head of Passes; removal of false point at head of South Pass to bottom elevation of minus 45 feet and revetment of new bank line and construction and maintenance of east and west headland structure at Head of Passes. East jetty foundation is 12,070 feet long; inner east jetty is 11,170 feet long; west jetty is 7,820 feet long; and inner west jetty is 4,710 feet long. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses surmounted by a superstructure of stone and/or concrete blocks and large riprap. Plane of reference is mean low gulf. Variation of water surface is 16 inches at mouths and 10 inches at head of the passes, due to tides. Extreme range of tides at mouths of passes due to hurricanes is about 10 feet. At New Orleans extreme range of water surface is about 20 feet due to floods. At Baton Rouge extreme range is about 45 feet due to floods. Estimated cost of existing project (October 1987) is $268,000,000 Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $29,000 and $2,000,000 non-Federal pipeline relocations. 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required, except for modification of project in connection with Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, which is reported separately. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, or docks serve the Port of New Orleans. Most wharves on east or left bank parallel riverbank forming nearly a continuous covered quay about 10 miles long. Public wharves controlled by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans (the Dock Board), cover 62 percent of improved waterfront. These facilities include general cargo and cotton wharves, fruit landings, bunkering facilities, terminal warehouses, railroad terminals, marine railways, and drydocks. (For further details see Port Series No. 20, "The Port of New Orleans, LA" revised 1990.) A foreign trade zone is located in Port of New Orleans. City of Baton Rouge has a reinforced concrete dock for deep-sea vessels with mechanicalhandling facility. Attached to downstream end of wharf is a floating wharf boat 231 by 40.5 feet, of 2,000-ton capacity. Facilities are served by a transfer boat and municipal terminal having a capacity of 40 cars per day. Private terminals for handling oil, grain, bauxite ore, and other products are at points on both sides of river between New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details, see "Port Facilities" included in "Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico, LA," published annually by the MRC, and Port Series No.19, vol.1, "Port St. Joe, FL, Pensacola, FL, Baton Rouge, LA, and Lake Charles, LA," revised 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance during the fiscal year totalled $37,961,200. Of this amount, the following was spent on major maintenance items: (a) Baton Rouge to New Orleans: One Government dustpan dredge and one contract dustpan dredge removed approximately 12,000,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $6,827,000. (b) New Orleans Harbor: One leased cutterhead dredge removed approximately 3,324,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,837,000. (c) Cubits Gap (Mile 3.5 AHP) through Southwest Pass: One Government hopper dredge, six leased hopper dredges, and two contract cutterhead dredges removed approximately 31,622,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $18,890,000. (d) Pile Dike Tie-Ins: Pile dike tie-ins were constructed in SWP by a contractor at a total cost of $996,000. (e) Pile Dike Repairs: Repairs to the pile dikes in Southwest Pass were performed by contractors at a total cost of $1,004,000. (f) Foreshore rock dike work was conducted at a cost of $2,879,000. Condition as of Sep. 30. The existing project is 50 percent complete. Deepening Southwest Pass to 40 feet mean low gulf, as authorized by the modification of Mar. 2, 1945, was completed in September 1963. Deepening the channel to 40 feet mean low water from Baton Rouge to New Orleans and to 40 feet mean low gulf in New Orleans Harbor, as authorized by the modifications of Oct. 23, 1962, was completed in August 1963. Nineteen miles of foreshore dike have been completed on the right descending bank from Mile 10.4 AHP to Mile 17.4 BHP and 23.5 miles on the left descending bank between Miles 11.2 AHP and 17.7 BHP. In addition, bank nourishment between Miles 4.0 and 0.5 AHP on the right descending bank and between Miles 11.2 and 4.2 AHP on the left descending bank is complete. Pending work includes construction of the East Jetty Head, and rehabilitation of the east and west jetties. Bank nourishment will be performed through a combination of maintenance dredging and borrow dredging for those areas where maintenance is not required. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and the territorial waters of the United States and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1989 (57th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending easterly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of Meraux to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. 11-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) is $533,000,000 Federal and $293,800,000 non-Federal. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. The Federal cost excludes $45,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-4 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. A public facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at Mile 63. Two container ship berths are in operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operationsand results duringfiscal year. New work by hired labor: Engineering and economic studies continued for the new lock and connecting channels feature. A Reconnaissance Report entitled "Mississippi River - Gulf Outlet, St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana (Bank Erosion) - 10241" dated Mar. 10, 1988, recommended structural methods to provide bank erosion abatement at three critical reaches on the north bank of the channel. The study indicated that greater than 90 percent of the potential benefits of this work would accrue due to reduced Federal maintenance of the channel. The report recommended preparation of a supplement to the General Design Memorandum (GDM) for the MRGO project instead of conducting feasibility studies. This report was approved on May 6,1988. Model studies were initiated in FY 1988, and the results indicated that the construction of bank protection on the north bank of the channel was not economically justified. All work on this item has been terminated. One leased hopper dredge removed 1,212,000 cubic yards of material in the Gulf Entrance Channel at a cost of $2,000,000. South Jetty Repairs were completed at a cost of $1,793,400. Foreshore rock dike repairs on the south bank were completed at a cost of $748,300. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958. The channel unit is 90 percent complete and the shiplock unit is 2 percent complete. The total project is 12 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25,1963, and completed Jan. 20,1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift stone jetties have been constructed on north side of channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift and 7.34 miles of secondlift stone jetties have been constructed on south side of channel in Breton Sound. Principal work required to complete project, raising and extending jetties as required and foreshore protection. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to Bayou Bienvenue, is in a deferred status. The site for the lock remained the major problem. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site for the proposed shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recommended that, if justified, the existing lock should be replaced and expanded in place and that care should be taken to minimize dislocation of residents living adjacent to the site. These recommendations are being addressed in an Evaluation Report scheduled for completion in FY 1992. The foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette Area, Station 367+00 to Station 1007+00 is complete. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of Louisiana below Baton Rouge, consisting of the Mississippi River and its outlets to the Gulf of Mexico. Existing project. Provides more efficient deepdraft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce - maintenance. Estimated cost of existing project (Oct. 1, 1990) is $137,000,000 Federal and $346,000,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $1,200,000. Local cooperation. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 require that prior to initiation of construction, local interests shall: (a) Provide to the Federal Government lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction or operation and maintenance of the project except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Provide to the Federal Government, the non-Federal share of all other costs of construction of the project. These costs include 25 percent of the construction costs incurred for construction of the navigation channel to a depth of 45 feet, and 50 percent of the construction costs incurred for deepening the channel between 45 and 55 feet. In addition, the local sponsor shall repay the Government 10 percent of the construction costs over a 30-year period. The local sponsor 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT may be permitted to include, toward sums to be reimbursed, all or part of the value of any lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas and relocations (other than utilities) contributed or expended by the non-Federal sponsor; (d) Be responsible for 50 percent of the incremental maintenance below 45 feet on a channel depth greater than 45 feet. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) between the Government and the State of Louisiana was signed on Jun. 30,1986. A supplement to the LCA was executed on Jun. 15,1987, to comply with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. The second supplement to the LCA was executed on Jun. 25,1990, to comply with the cost sharing and financing concepts of the Water Resources Development Act of1988, Public Law 100-676. This agreement provides for the dredging of a 45-foot channel from the gulf to Mile 181.0 AHP. The State of Louisiana has requested that we proceed with the construction of the 45-foot channel from Mile 181.0 AHP to Baton Rouge. We have entered into negotiations for the Local Cooperation Agreement for this reach. Terminal facilities. See Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Negotiations continued with the State of Louisiana on a LCA for dredging of the 45-foot channel from Mile 181 AHP to Baton Rouge. A draft LCA package was completed and submitted on September 24, 1990. A design memorandum for this reach was submitted in August 1990. A design memorandum was submitted on July 17, 1990, outlining the details of permanently n4tigating saltwater intrusion caused by deepening the channel from the Gulf to Mile 181 AHP. A draft LCA covering this work was submitted on July 16, 1990. The proposed plan provides the Government providing an underwater sill, when needed, and for upgrading the existing water system in Plaquemines Parish to provide fresh water to water treatment plants impacted by increased saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 45-foot channel is completed from the Gulf to Mile 181.0 AHP. Studies have been completed and a recommendation has been made on the most economical plan to mitigate for saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. Until the recommended plan is approved, an interim plan has been developed that will provide for the barging of fresh raw water to two water treatment plants in Plaquemines Parish, The construction of mooring facilities for the barges at both of these plants is complete. 4. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Location. Bayou LeCarpe is a tidal stream which rises about 1.5 miles southeast of Houma in Terrebonne Parish and flows southerly into Bayou Pelton, thence into Bayou Grand Caillou, which flows southwesterly into Caillou Bay, a total distance of about 40 miles. (Refer to Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1116 and Geological Survey maps of Houma, Dulac, Bayou DuLarge, and Dog Lake quadrangles.) Existing project. As modified, provides for a 10- by 45-foot channel in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 2.6 miles to Houma navigation canal; a 5- by 40-foot channel through Bayou Pelton and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, a distance of about 13.7 miles. Between Miles 2.6 and 5, this project coincides with or is adjacent to 15- by 150-foot HIouma navigation canal. Normal range of tide is 3 to 10 inches; from winds, 1 to 3 feet. Cost of new work, completed in August 1964, was $129,662. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-5 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Many terminal and transfer facilities are in Houma and along waterways which flow through area between Houma and Gulf of Mexico. All facilities are privately owned and operated. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce and for reasonably prospective commerce. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities or for construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 5- by 40-foot channel was constructed from January 1938 to August 1938, and modification of Oct. 23, 1962, for enlargement of 2.54 miles of Bayou LeCarpe to 10 feet by 45 feet was initiated in May and completed August 1964. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies costs as of Sep. 30, 1990. were Bayou DuLarge, LA, for $14,050; Lake Charles Ship Channel for $6,698; and North Pass-Pass Manchac, LA, $2,792. 11-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Flood Control 6. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of Southwest Pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune would have a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet NGVD, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm would slope from an elevation of 8.5 feet NGVD at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet NGVD and, from this point, would assume its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 3,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1990) is $20,301,000 Federal and $12,656,000 non- Federal, including $7,546,318 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Local interests have the responsibility of providing rights-of-way, 30 percent of hurricane protection costs, 75 percent of beach erosion costs, and operation and maintenance of the completed work. The Louisiana Legislature, by Act 833 of 1982, authorized the Office of Public Works of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development to provide the non-Federal assurances for the Grand Isle Hurricane Protection and Beach Erosion Project. On Jan.11,1983, the Louisiana State Government authorized the Office of Public Works to execute the required assurances as a co-sponsor with the town of Grand Isle. The required assurances were executed on Mar. 10, 1983, the construction rights-ofway were provided on May 4, 1983, and local interest provided a cash contribution of $2,100,000 on Jun. 1, 1983, $70,000 in November 1985, $368,000 in September 1987 and $259,000 in May 1989. An additional $4,750,000 has been deposited in escrow to complete restoration of the dune. Maintenance of the project is the responsibility of the local assurer. The local assurer will receive Federal aid for repairing erosion and other damage to the project for a period of 15 years. The average annual Federal maintenance cost identified in the Act of Assurances is $44,000; however, this is not a fixed amount. Periodic nourishment to repair erosion will not necessarily be conducted every year, but as needed, with an estimated frequency of one in eight years on the average. It is estimated that the Federal share of the maintenance cost will be 12 percent for the 15-year period. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The repair and restoration of Grand Isle will be accomplished by two separate contracts. The jetty extensions and sand bar removal contract (partial fix), which was completed in early 1988, consisted of a 500-foot extension of the west jetty and a 200-foot extension of the east jetty, removal of about 408,000 cubic yards of sand from the cuspate bar, and placement of the excavated sand on the eroded beach in the East End State Park. The dune repair and structural reinforcement contract (total fix) will accomplish all additional items of work necessary to fully restore the project, including the placement of about 1.5 million cubic yards of sand to reconstruct the beach and dune, construction of offshore breakwaters, placement of a clay core in portions of the dune, and restoration of vehicular ramps, pedestrian crossovers, and dune vegetation. The total fix contract was awarded on March 21, 1990. Condition as of Sep. 30. The ongoing dune repair and structural reinforcement contract is approximately 47 percent complete. 7. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow landlocked tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the Gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides protection to the greater New Orleans area and other communities bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of hurricane- generated floods. The project is comprised of two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan consists of a levee and floodwall system around the Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River levees. The High Level Plan will provide for heightening and 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT strengthening the existing hurricane protection levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating the Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of U.S. Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and strengthening the existing levee which extends along the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish boundary between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook lock until its feasibility as a feature of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation project can be determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the levee and floodwall construction will be provided protection against tidal surge resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated project cost for work (October 1990) is $435,000,000 Federal and $184,000,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all rights-of-way; bear 30 percent of the first cost, consisting of fair market value of providing all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow and spoil disposal areas for construction, accomplish alteration and relocation of roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, drainage structures, and other facilities; maintain and operate all works after completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages. See H. Doc. No. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. for more detailed requirements of local cooperation. Assuring Agency: The Orleans Levee District, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, Louisiana Office of Public Works, and Pontchartrain Levee District. The State of Louisiana formed the Jefferson Levee District and assigned to it the Jefferson Parish levees, previously the responsibility of the Pontchartrain Levee District. Basic assurances were received from the following: Orleans Levee District for the entire barrier plan and that portion of the Chalmette Area Plan in Orleans Parish; Pontchartrain Levee District for the Barrier Plan; Lake Borgne Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury for the Chalmette Area Plan in St. Bernard Parish. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from the Orleans Levee District and the Pontchartrain Levee District. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, and the East Jefferson Levee District. The St. Tammany Parish portion of the project has been placed in an inactive status since the local sponsors have not provided acceptable assurances. Supplemental Assurances in connection with the High Level Plan were executed by the Orleans Levee District on May 29, 1985, and approved by the United States Jun. 21, 1985. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan were executed by the East Jefferson Levee District for the Jefferson Parish portion of the project on Jan. 16, 1987. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan were executed by the Pontchartrain Levee District for the St. Charles Parish portion of the project on Apr. 20, 1987, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Aug. 7, 1987. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan are not required from St. Bernard Parish Police Jury and the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District for St. Bernard Parish. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor. Two design memorandums were completed in FY 89, and one in FY 90. A Draft Reevaluation Report (including Draft Environmental Impact Statement) recommending the tentatively selected High Level Plan (lieu of Barrier Plan) was submitted by New Orleans District to the Lower Mississippi Valley Division in December 1983. The final Reevaluation Report was submitted to LMVD on Aug. 8, 1984. A Record of Decision was signed in February 1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on Jan. 17, 1975. By Court Order dated Dec. 30, 1977, a revised Environmental Impact Statement was ordered. A draft revised Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the High Level Plan and reevaluation report which documents the proposal to adopt that plan instead of the Barrier Plan was released to the public and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Dec. 16, 1983. The final revised Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Dec. 7, 1984. A draft mitigation report with corresponding EIS was prepared and distributed for public review on Mar. 16, 1988. A series of public meetings and workshops were held to facilitate participation in mitigation plan formulation by other agencies, environmental groups, local sponsors, and other interested groups. Prior to selecting the tentative plan, the three final plans were presented to the public at a meeting on Jul. 29, 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 79 percent complete. Contract work continued on nine contracts in FY 90 and will continue on five contracts in FY 91. One contract was awarded in FY 90 and three are scheduled for award in FY 91. Plans and specifications are underway on five contracts scheduled for award in FY 1991 and early FY 92. 8. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of 11-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point a la Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) is $71,400,000 Federal and $30,600,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas, and accomplish alterations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities necessary for the construction of the project; all at an estimated cost of $12,510,000; bear 30 percent of the total project cost, a sum presently estimated at $30,600,000 consisting of the items listed above, and a cash contribution presently estimated at $18,090,000 or equivalent work specifically undertaken as an integral part of the project after authorization and in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly without cost to the United States; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611) in acquiring real property. The Board of Commissioners of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on Nov. 13,1972, which was executed by the United States on Jul. 10, 1973, and approved on behalf of the Secretary of the Army on Aug. 29, 1973. Section 38, Paragraph 1051 et seq., Louisiana Revised Statutes created the South Lafourche Levee District. The South Lafourche Levee District assumed the rights and obligations of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District with respect to this project. Local interests have requested and received funds from the State of Louisiana for right-of-way acquisition and relocations required to support construction work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Two contracts were completed in FY 90, work on another continues into FY 91, and plans and specifications are underway on one contract scheduled for award in FY 1991. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1975 and is 68 percent complete. 9. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In south-central Louisiana, Morgan City proper, and the adjacent areas. It includes the land south of Grand Lake, Six Mile Lake, and Lake Palourde extending from Morgan City westward to Charenton drainage and navigation canal. Lower Atchafalaya River and Wax Lake Outlet, the principal outlets for Atchafalaya Basin Floodway, traverse the area. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway crosses the area in an east-west direction. Numerous bayous and artificial canals excavated for drainage purposes or for access to oil developments exist throughout the area. (See Engineer quadrangles Bayou Sale, Jeanerette, Foster, Belle Isle, Point Au Fer, Morgan City, and Lake Decade; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1116.) Existing project. Morgan City: Construction of about 5.6 miles of new levees along shore of Lake Palourde and west bank of Bayou Ramos and about 0.5 mile of new levee from Southern Pacific railroad embankment near Wyandotte to tie in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee, and construction of three gravity drainage structures. Franklin and vicinity: Enlargement of about 21.6 miles of back levee and construction of about 3.5 miles of new levees to effect a complete closure of area to be protected, construction of one floodgate and eight gravity drainage structures, and alteration of existing drainage facilities where necessary. Normal range of tide is 1.6 feet. Storm and hurricane tide have produced elevations up to 10 feet while northerly storms during winter depress the gulf level as much as 3 feet below mean sea level. During low water periods on Atchafalaya River, generally September through November, the effect of tide extends about 35 miles above Morgan City. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-8 of the FY 1986 Annual Report. Operations and results during period. The GDM for the Morgan City area was completed in FY 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Due to lack of financial local support this project has been moved to a deferred status. 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 10. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from City Price to Empire, 15 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Empire to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia (construction recently completed by local agency with credit given as equivalent work), 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and raising the river levee on the west bank (MR&T levee) from City Price to Venice, to a grade high enough to prevent overtopping by tidal surges from the east, generally called the West Bank River Plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Empire to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1990) is $164,500,000 Federal and $70,500,000 non-Federal, including $53,042,000 cash contributions or equivalent work. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $7,053,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $10,405,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $70,500,000, and cash contribution presently estimated at $53,042,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, or as a substitute for any part of the cash contribution, accomplish in accordance with approved construction schedules items of work of equivalent value as determined by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of costs to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping is provided promptly; and at least annually, notify those affected that the project will not provide complete protection from tidal flooding and that further local actions must be taken during hurricane emergencies. Local interests are also required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), in acquiring real property. Public Law 91-611. Not applicable. Construction started prior to Jan. 1, 1972. Public Law 91-646. A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana Legislature on Feb. 1, 1972, allowing local interests to comply. The estimated cost to local interests is $48,000. Assurances of local cooperation for Reaches A, B-1, B-2, and C, furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council were accepted on behalf of the United States on Apr. 14, 1965. Supplemental assurances covering provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jun. 20, 1973. Local interests were requested to furnish separate assurances for the East Bank Barrier Levee on Jun. 10,1975, Feb. 23,1976, and again on Aug. 19, 1983. By letter dated Feb. 5, 1985, the local sponsor requested the Corps of Engineers to defer further work on the design of Reach A and direct their efforts toward earliest possible construction of the East Bank Barrier Levee or a suitable alternative thereto. The Corps, with the concurrence of the local sponsor, selected a West Bank Levee alternative to the East Bank Barrier. On Dec. 29, 1987, the local sponsor provided supplemental assurances for the West Bank River Levee. These assurances were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 28, 1988. By letter dated Jul. 28, 1987, the local sponsor also requested the Corps of Engineers to advance construction on Reach A, based on the results of the geotextile test section. All negotiations for relocations are the responsibility of local interests. These mainly consist of raising several petroleum and natural gas pipelines to the levee configuration and relocation of privately owned frame structures used as fishing and boating camps. To assure that there will be no delay in construction of levees, local interests are notified well in advance so that the owners of the pipelines can be advised. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Government. Assurances for all reaches of the project have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction during FY 90 was initiated on six contracts and continued on seven others. Plans and specifications were initiated on eight construction items scheduled for award in FY 91. 11-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 The levee on the west bank from Tropical Bend to Venice would impact about 14,000 acres of which approximately 9,000 acres are marsh and 4,000 acres are shallow open waters. Although most of these impacts are temporary, about 1,000 acres of marsh would be permanently lost. To compensate for this loss, a mitigation plan has been formulated which would result in the creation of natural marsh on the Delta-Breton National Wildlife Refuge. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 42 percent complete. 11. WESTWEGO TO HARVEY CANAL, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. The project includes the Urban area within Jefferson parish between Westwego and the Harvey Canal on the west bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. The project area is generally bounded by the Harvey Canal to the east, Lakes Cataouatche and Salvador to the west, the Mississippi River to the north, and Barataria Bay to the south. Tidal waters can be carried into the project area through Lakes Cataouatche and Salvador, which connect to the Gulf of Mexico through Barataria Bay, and into the Bayou Segnette and the Harvey Canal. Fresh water comes into the area from the Mississippi River via the Harvey and Algiers Locks, direct rainfall, and pumpage from leveed areas. Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of approximately 22 miles of new and enlarged levees along the permitted alignment from the Westwego area to the V-levee, along the existing Vlevee alignment to the vicinity of Estelle Pumping Station, and along the existing Harvey Canal-Bayou Barataria Levee to the Roussell Pumping Station. Existing levees will be raised approximately 2 to 5 feet. New levees, ranging from 10 to 12 feet, will also be constructed. From that point, a floodwall is proposed to parallel the Harvey Canal and tie back into the Harvey Lock. I-type and T-type floodwalls will also be used along the levee alignment mentioned above when tieing into pumping stations and where land constraints dictate. The entire project is scheduled. The estimated project cost for work (October 1990) is $58,600,000 Federal and $31,500,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests must give assurance satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) Provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including borrow and excavated material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project at an estimated cost of $6,734,000. (2) Accomplish all necessary alteration and relocations to roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project at an estimated cost of $8,278,000. (3) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. (4) Bear 35 percent of the first cost of construction, a sum currently estimated at $31,500,000. Funds provided by non-Federal interests for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as a part of the non- Federal contribution of the project pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and subsequent policies. (5) Maintain and operate all features of the project in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including levees, floodgates and approach channels, drainage structures, drainage ditches or canals, floodwalls, and stoplog structures. (6) Provide a cash or in-kind contribution for fish and wildlife mitigation features of the project in an amount equal to the same percentage as the non- Federal share of the basic project, a sum currently estimated at $1,024,000 which is included as part of (1) above. (7) Comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91-646). (8) Comply with Section 221 of Public Law 91-611, Flood Control Act of 1970; and (9) Comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL 88-352) that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination in connection with the project on the grounds of race, creed, or national origin. Requirements of PL 91-611 and 96-646: (1) Local interest are legally qualified to execute the assurances. (2) A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on 1 Feb 1972 allowing local interest to comply. The local sponsor (West Jefferson Levee District) has applied for and received ASA (CW) approval (13 May 1988) for $6.7 million working for work accomplished during the 5-year period prior to project authorization. A draft LCA and financial plan were submitted by the local sponsor to New Orleans District (NOD) on Dec. 8,1989, and then forwarded to the Lower Mississippi Valley Division (LMVD) on Dec. 13, 1989. LMVD's comments were incorporated in a revised 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT draft LCA and then submitted to the Chiefs office on June 5, 1990. A meeting is scheduled in the Chiefs office in mid-October to discuss and finalize the LCA package. Operations and results during fiscal year. Two design memorandums were completed during FY 90. Plans and specifications are complete for two contract awards in FY 91, and one set of plans and specifications is underway for a third award in FY 91. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Oct. 23, 1987. It has undergone departmental and public review and the Record of Decision was signed Mar. 28, 1989. The project was opposed by the Department of Interior (DOI) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). DOI and EPA opposed levee construction that would impact 33 acres along and within the perimeter of the Jean Lafitte National Historical Park, and that would further impact 59 acres along and within the perimeter of the Bayou aux Carpes Section 404(c) site. The recommended levee alignment has been changed to avoid these environmentally sensitive areas, and there is presently no known environmental opposition to the project. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Oct. 23, 1987. It has undergone departmental and public review and the Record of Decision was signed on Mar. 28, 1989. A Finding of No Significant Impact was signed on Mar. 15, 1990, accompanied by an Environmental Assessment which addressed changes in project design since the time of authorization. No significant comments were received during the review period. Our application for a State Water Quality Certificate was approved on May 15, 1990, by the State of Louisiana, Department of Environmental Quality. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Construction funds were approved for FY 90. Plans and specifications are complete for two contract awards in FY 91 and underway for a third for award in FY 91. The project is 4 percent complete. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (a) Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1990. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $289,154. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1990, were $3,054,061. (b) Mississippi River and Tributaries floodwalls, levees and flood control projects were inspected during FY 1990. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as-needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $210,615. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1990 were $450,013. 13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecendent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, fiscal year costs for the period were $134,082 Rehabilitation costs for FY 90 were $1,185,690. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies cost as of Sep. 30, 1990, on Bayou Yokely, St. Mary Parish at a cost of $7,500; Bayou Chevreuil and Grand Bayou, LA, at a cost of $7,485; and Schneider Canal, LA, $11,125. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies costs as of Sep. 30,1990, on Bayou DesGlaises, LA, $15,000; and Parish Road 218, Mermentau River at Grand Chenier, LA, $3,002. 11-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 1. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA 2. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Mississippi River Ship Channel-Gulf to Baton Rouge (Contrib. Funds) 4. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterways to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayou Grand Caillou & LeCarpe, LA) 6. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost $20,110,000 $29,132,000 $ -- $ 15,429,842 29,835,724 2,819,615 -- $ 84,302,9891 848,642 83,885,5511 25,153,650 30,889,100 46,691,600 36,915,003 607,653,264 25,117,781 30,626,352 45,725,384 37,961,240 607,063,139 594,000 850,000 1,450,000 1,369,000 92,536,200 691,278 787,029 1,370,207 1,561,752 92,477,248 8,340,000 5,164,000 4,469,000 6,456,396 126,743,476 8,373,119 4,860,872 4,809,722 6,438,802 126,721,443 -- -- -- -- 1,240,4775 -- -- -- -- 1,196,4775 3,730,000 3,270,000 1,167,000 894,000 10,388,000 3,591,928 3,356,435 820,130 1,194,808 10,645,403 1,070,453 1,168,000 318,000 1,396,000 1,068,455 671,315 849,700 861,475 532 376,800 377,601 -- 2,882,000 -- 2,810,315 -- 10,740,776 -- 10,732,538 637,622 641,608 -- 1,276,032 -- 1,276,032 961,000 740,000 1,901,000 2,507,000 15,451,500 42,691 1,930,000 1,849,231 1,824,391 14,651,993 368,000 -- 259,000 1,600,000 4,507,000 368,000 258,318 1,422,827 4,219,145 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 7. Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost 13,375,000 13,140,000 9,214,000 32,882,000 13,331,227 8,425,930 13,770,957 17,751,531 (Contrib. Funds) 8. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Morgan City and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) 10. New Orleans to Venice, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (Hurricane Protection) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 281,518 349,052 636,579 34,518 436,000 404,647 -- 5,588,321 -- 5,828,894 4,813,000 4,600,000 2,675,000 4,316,000 58,592,000 5,018,844 4,007,473 2,386,886 4,486,100 56,653,908 250,000 105,760 234,087 15,913 105,760 4,908,000 2,850,000 17,200,000 4,546,692 3,032,675 16,623,500 340,000 724,883 -- 2,627,481 -- 2,599,028 -- 1,953,000 -- 1,975,628 18,325,000 14,616,098 97,643,000 93,139,082 -- 153,720 4,912,709 -- 153,720 4,912,709 -- 1,085,000 1,085,000 -- 910,967 910,967 Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 11-13 250,207,000 233,357,193 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Approp. Act of 1985, dated Jul. 2, 1986 (PL 99-88) LAKE CHARLES, LA The project for deepening of the project for navigation, Lake Charles, Louisiana, to a depth of 45 feet, at a total cost of $1,070,000. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA (See Sec. 1 of Text) Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel, 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 2 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet feature is modified to provide that the replacement and expansion of the existing industrial canal lock and connecting channels or the construction of an additional lock and connecting channels shall be in the area of the existing lock or at the Violet site. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA (See Sec. 3 of Text) Will provide more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 11-14 TABLE 11-B (Continued) NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) Aug. 30, 1985 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19762 Oct. 27, 1965 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Formalizes the cost sharing provisions of the project, permits the State of Louisiana to enact user fees to defray their portion of the project costs, and implements harbor maintenance fees to help pay for the Federal cost of the project. It also provides an option to the local sponsor to defer their initial payment for one year following initiation of construction. In terms of channel depths up to 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal for construction and 100 percent Federal for maintenance. For channels deeper than 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal for both construction and maintenance. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA)(See Sec. 4 of Text) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. BAYOU RIGOLETTE, LA A project to construct six additional floodgates at Bayou Rigolette, LA, adjacent to the existing drainage structure, at a total cost of $2,300,000. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 6 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 7 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, NORTH SHORE, LA The project for navigation, Lake Pontchartrain North Shore, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 14, 1979, at a total cost of $1,310,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $655,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $655,000. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 11-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 8 of Text) A loop levee about 36 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 9 of Text) Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 10 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. WEST BANK HURRICANE PROTECTION LEVEE, JEFFERSON PARISH, LA Structural and nonstructural measures to prevent flood damage to those areas identified in the Feb. 1984 draft Environmental Impact Statement for the West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA, at a total cost of $61,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $40,000,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $21,500,000. Funds provided by non-Federal interest for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non- Federal contribution of the project pursuant to Section 104 of this Act. H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge' Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Baton Rouge Harbor, Segment between Mi. 2.5 and 5.02 Barataria Bay Waterway, LA Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA 3 " 4' 5 ' 6 Bayou Dupre, LA7 Bayou Grosse Tete, LA8 Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Teche, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA4 ' 9 Bayou Vermilion, LA4 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA'3 Calcasieu River and Pass, LA Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA'o Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA"1 Cane River, LA3 , 6 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA12 Freshwater Bayou, LA Grand Bayou Pass, LA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, & Mexican Border Houma Navigation Canal, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA"s Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA' 4 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur- Bulkheads and Jetties Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA5 Leland Bowman Lock, LA Little Caillou Bayou, LA Complete Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized -- Complete Complete 1967 1978 1984 1984 1981 19462 1984 1974 1887 1968 1969 1967 1984 1970 1950 1970 1958 1984 1983 1961 1947 1936 1984 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1984 1950 1985 1984 1960 1956 19422 1950 1987 1973 > -- 28,234 15,070,801 30,356,691 501,963 1,572,685 30,997 5,000 38,915 -- 4,716 1,624,424 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 754,330 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 -- 27,807,310 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,116,224 7,676 $ 69,087 -- 58,828,983 1914 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1963 1931 1939 May 1981 1938 May 1956 1915 Mar. 1923 -- Mar. 1957 1916 1896 3 Oct. 1968 Apr. 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 1959 Dec. 1914 Aug. 1968 1939 22,280,069 320,758 -- 104,1877 123,454 119,191 954,145 223,616 36,780 28,315 446,197 5,735,404 1,753,053 251,691 200,169 37,169 120,221,604 .-- -- 2,000 463,401 452,611 20,663,604 14,48012 63,284,470 419,796,782 -- 20,703,464 249,052 32,200,010 77,761 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 Nov. 1979 Mar. 1985 1929 11-17 1928 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 11-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Complete 1977 5,197,97516 114,519 -- Mermentau River, LA Complete 1985 4,672,579 22,726,957 Jul. 1952 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 -- Nov. 1974 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA Complete 1986 10,008,100 14,293,564 Complete Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA)17 -- 1957 -- 139,755 -- Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 13,545 1912 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Complete 1981 -- 1,450,172 Nov. 1980 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 -- 28,739,320 Sulphur River, AR and TX36 -- 1919 45,989 -- -- Tangipahoa River, LA -- 1985 -- 1,050,201 -- Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA4 Complete 1973 8,115 92,163 1921 Vinton Waterway, LA21 Deauthorized 1950 -- -- Nov. 1979 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA13 -- 1948 10,904 0,742 -- Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 1,057,334 Jun. 1950 1. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. 2. Date authorized. 3. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 4. Includes previous project costs. 5. No commerce reported. 6. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 7. Includes $56 cost incurred in 1969. 8. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. 9. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. 10. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. 11. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." 12. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 13. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." 14. Not completed; superseded for most of it length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or parallels it. 15. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. 16. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. 17. Work is under continuing authority. 11-18 TABLE 11-D NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA1 Amite River and Tributaries, LA Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA1,12 Bayou Choupique, LA3 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, LA'3 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1,2,12 Bayou Rapides, LA3 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA1,4,5,1 2 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, LA3 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA1,7,1 2 Colfax, Grant Parishes, LA" 7 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX8 East Point, LA Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' the Pines, TX8, 9 Garland City, AR12 Grant Parish below Colfax, LA1,9 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, A 1,9,12 Maniece Bayou, AR1,2, 12 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR1', 12 Natchitoches Parish, LA12 Pineville, Red River, LA1,3,12 Posten Bayou, AR11,12 Red River Parish, LA1 "9,12 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1 " 12 Saline Point, LA '"9 Apr. 1955 Feb. 1964 Jan. 1948 Mar. 1954 Jun. 1964 Jun. 1939 Dec. 1951 May 1963 Jul. 1978 Apr. 1976 -- Aug. 1958 Jul. 1974 9 1956 1964 1948 1954 1964 1951 1952 1945 1963 1978 1977 1938 1979 1969 1979 1976 1941 1979 1941 1970 19631o 1956 1953 1973 1939 1953 1945 $ 1,653,189 3,034,2552 319,200 129,930 70,717 243,3362 95,179 336,063 1,655,700 741,892 70,348 20,839,300 486,069 14,175,197 1,335,842 38,809 1,018,005 88,006 970,9322 1,529,478 232,426 149,435 3,908,000 124,111 8,301,021 -_ Aug. 1977 Aug. 1969 Aug. 1955 Dec. 1951 9 Mar. 1953 11-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 11-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Twelvemile Bayou, LA -- 1966 335,433 -- May 1965 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX -- 1979 35,659,176 11,195,021 -- 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ..................... $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA .......... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ............... .170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA .......... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR........................... .39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ........................ 250,000 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended) 4. Construction not initiated. 5. Inactive. 6. Includes $92,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7, Flood Control Act 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. These projects transferred to the Fort Worth District, Southwestern Division, during FY 1979. 9. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 10. Date authorized. 11. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12. These projects transferred to the Vicksburg District during FY 1983. 11-20 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-E ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 90 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation(110) Bayou Lafourche & Lafourche-Jump Waterway, LA-1009 $ 69,149 GIWW LA & TX Section-10032 202,484 Mermentau River, GIWW to the Gulf of Mexico, Navigation Improvements, LA - 10284 124,565 396,198 Flood Control Studies(120) Aloha-Rigolette Area, LA-12123 10 Amite River & Tributaries, LA-50100 347,407 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Hurricane Protection-12445 43,375 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Land Loss & Marsh Creation-12348 198,835 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Mississippi River Delta-12637 26,947 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Shore & Barrier Island Erosion-12354 0 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Louisiana Coastal Comprehensive Wetlands-12636 103,342 Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, LA-34014 370,603 Upper Bayou Teche, LA-12435 20,583 Vermilion River & Bayou Tigre, LA-12439 141,566 West Bank of Mississippi River-Vicinity of New Orleans, LA-59360 298,291 1,550,959 Review of Authorized Projects(160) Deauthorization Review-77000 0 Miscellaneous Activities(170) Special Investigations-17250 36,327 Interagency Water Resources Development 12,438 48,765 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) Planning Assistance to States(186)-14822 122,521 TOTAL (Category 100) $2,118,443 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services(250) Flood Plain Management Services 156,516 Oakdale, LA - 83003 1,792 South East Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation - 83001 22,957 TOTAL (Category 250) 181,265 Coastal Data Collection(280) Re-evaluation of Section 54 Project-53891 1 TOTAL (Category 200) ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) Tangipahoa, Tchefuncte, and Tickfaw Rivers, LA - 75457 374,965 Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA - 75457 3,689 TOTAL (Category 600) 378,654 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $2,678,363 11-21 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT * This district comprises western and central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi- Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, AR; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas-Arkansas state line. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont) 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR ..................... 12-2 2. Red River emergency bank protection ....................... 12-2 3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La ............ 12-2 4. Navigation work under special authorization .................... 12-3 Flood Control 5. Bayou Bartholomew and tributaries, AR and LA ............ 12-3 6. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, ARandLA ....................... 124 7. Canal 43, AR ..................... 12-4 8. Lead Bayou, MS .................. 12-5 9. Ouachita River Levees, LA ......... .12-5 10. Ouachita River and tributaries AR and LA ....................... 12-5 11. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA ...... 12-6 12. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA ....................... 12-7 13. Porter Bayou, MS ................. 12-7 14. Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) .................. 12-7 15. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (Vicksburg District) ............... 12-7 16. Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR .............. 17. Inspection of completed Flood Control Projects .............. 18. Flood control work under special authorization ........... Tables Table 12-A Table 12-B Table 12-C Table 12-D Table 12-E Table 12-F Table 12-G Table 12-H Table 12-I Page ... 12-8 ... 12-8 ... 12-8 Cost and Financial Statement ................ 12-9 Authorizing Legislation ... 12-11 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (9-Foot Project), Locks and Dams ......... 12-14 Other Authorized Navigation Project .................. 12-15 Quachita River and Tributaries Existing Project .... 12-17 Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) New Projects ............ 12-18 Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) Incorporated Projects ...... 12-19 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 12-20 Active General Investigations ........... .12-22 12-1 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation project. New work for completed project costs $7,064,031.68, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. Authorized features for the modified project include four new locks and dams, in-river construction dredging to achieve a 9-foot navigation channel depth, and channel realignment. All 4 locks and dams are complete and in operation and initial channel dredging is complete providing 9-foot navigation depth. Remaining work consists of realignment of 25 restricted bendway sites between river miles 195 at Sterlington, LA, and river mile 335 at Camden, AR, on the Ouachita River. With these improvements in place the river system will be navigable by a four-barge tow (two abrest) to Crossett, AR, river mile 237, and a twobarge tow (abreast) to Camden, AR. Mitigation features include the 65,000-acre Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas, the 18,000-acre D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana, a series of recreation facilities along the waterway, and improvements to Catahoula Lake to preserve it for migratory waterfowl. Estimated total cost for the nine-foot navigation project is $272,833,000, which includes $256,000,000 Federal costs and $16,833,000 non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to furnishing the construction rights-of-way for the realignment work. Seven of the 25 sites are within the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge and are already owned by the Federal Government. However, there have been no indications that the land for the remaining 18 sites will be forthcoming because of strong opposition to the realignment work by local environmental groups. The six remaining recreation facilities are unscheduled at this time due to the lack of required cost sharing agreements. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, and a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Design was initiated. Construction continued for installation of a hinged crest gate in the navigation pass of Felsenthal Lock and Dam. Maintenance dredging performed by the contract dredges Alabama, and Pontchartrain during the FY 90 removed 1,121,743 cubic yards of material from the waterways. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 92 percent complete and provides limited navigation as far north as Camden, AR. All four locks and dams associated with the project are complete and in operation. Design is complete for the channel alignment plan, but due to lack of right-of-way and continued opposition, this work is on hold. Completion of design and construction for placement of mooring facilities in the lower two pools has been deferred. 2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, AR. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for this work (October 1989) is $83,300,000 Federal and $2,182,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $7,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, and general engineering. Slay Bend Revetment, river mile 339-R, was initiated, and Bear Realignment, river mile 413.5 to 422.7, was initiated. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was completed in October 1972 and is 92 percent complete. 3. RED RIVER WATERWAYMISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Existing project. Provide a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will include five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work is $1,724,317,000 Federal and $7,772,000 non-Federal, including $44,241,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost includes $317,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana. These were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The Corps entered into an agreement with the City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated from the Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of the realignment and port fill are complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued work on Design Memoranda, preparation of Plans and Specifications, Surveys, General Engineering, and Model Studies. The following contracts were awareded in FY 90: Pool 1 - Blakewood, Pump Bayou, Grand Lake reinforcements and dikes, Saline Bend dikes, Vicks Revetment extension, Lorran lake realignment closure, reinforcements to other revetments and dikes, and Part II of the Phase I recreation facilities at Lock and Dam No. 1; Pool 2 - Alexandria Front Capout, Lock and Dam No. 2 upstream dikes, reinforcements to revetments and dikes, Missouri-Pacific Railroad bridge modification, and Phase II of the Maria-Hudson Capout; Pool 3 - Cadney, Bourbeaux-Tryouge, and Grappe realignment capouts, Clarence closure and the Lock and Dam No. 3 central maintenance propulsion units; Pool 4 - Bull Revetment, and Phase I of Lock and Dam No. 4; Pool 5- Phase I of Lock and Dam No. 5. Contracts continuing included: Pool 2 - the Alexandria switchyard feature of the Louisiana and Arkansas Railroad bridge relocation, and the Lock and Dam No. 2 water service and Phase I recreation facilities; Pool 3 - downstream extension of Fausse Revetment, and Phase III of Lock and Dam No. 3; Pool 4 - Nicholas, Carroll Phase II, Gahagan, Piermont, and Howard Realignments, and Hammel and Williams downstream extension revetments. The following contracts were completed: Pool 1 - Lock and Dam No. 1 water service, Lorran Lake realignment, and Moncla Reach capout; Pool 2- Phase II and capout of the Alexandria Front revetment, Kateland revetment extension, Phase II of the Maria- Hudson capout, and the Lock and Dam No. 2 upstream dikes; Pool 3 - Powhatan and Campti realignments, Clarence closure, and Nantachie-Red Bayou extension, Eureka, and Crain revetments. Maintenance dredging was performed by the Contract Dredges Butcher, Alabama, and Pontchartrain during Fiscal Year 1990. All maintenance dredging was below Alexandria, LA. 4,130,551 cubic yards of material was removed from the channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 60 percent complete. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended. Construction was initiated in July 1989 on Yellow Bend Port and in FY 90, $1,776,701 was expended. Detailed studies continued for a port at Eudora, AR, $60,129. Flood Control 5. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Bayou Bartholomew rises in Jefferson County, AR, about 10 miles northwest of Pine Bluff and flows southerly about 370 miles to join the Ouachita River upstream from Sterlington, LA. Authorized project. Project includes ten waterretention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of Bayou Bartholomew in Louisiana. However, because of public opposition to construction of the loop levees, preconstruction planning of the six loop levees has been deferred until such time as there is sufficient support by local interests. Channel improvements previously authorized are deferred. Latest approved (1979) estimated cost of new work is $46,913,000 including $44,800,000 Federal and $2,113,000 non-Federal. 12-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-5 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and design have been deferred pending favorable benefit-cost ratios. Condition as of Sep. 30. Preparation of general design memorandum has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. Status of studies. A re-evaluation study has been completed as part of the Ouachita River and Tributaries, AR and LA Study. The authorized project is not economically feasible. Project included on list for deauthorization Dec. 1989 in accordance with Sec. 1001 WRDA 1986. 6. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. In east bank flood plain of Red River. Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, AR, and flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute Bayou, Flat River, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, about 40 miles below Shreveport, LA. Authorized project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 miles southeast of Benton, LA, proceeding southerly to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right descending bank to its junction with Cutoff Bayou for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct landside drainage channel and several culverts with flap gates to Red Chute Bayou; construct approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as needed. Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, LA, along high (left descending) bank of Red River to a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, Cutoff Bayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36-inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted drainage; construct drainage structures on Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou and along alignment of the Loggy Bayou in the vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility relocations. Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 miles, including required relocations and modifications of utilities. The subject project was one of the Water Resources projects reviewed in March 1977 in accordance with the President request. As a result of this review, the President recommended that project construction be halted and the project be deauthorized. Congress subsequently directed the Corps to take the following two actions: Construct levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that are required to prevent induced flood damage that would otherwise result from the abandonment of partly completed project. Initiate studies to determine if modifications to the authorized project would permit its completion in a form consistent with the current executive policy. Engineering and design work for the induced flood prevention plan below Cutoff Bayou and project modification studies were being conducted when President Reagan signed, on Dec. 4,1981, the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill of 1982, which contained language that "reconfirmed without further study and analysis" the plan for flood control for the project as approved by the Flood Control Act of 1965. Resumption of construction was scheduled to begin in 1984. The project sponsor, however, requested that construction be delayed while a reevaluation of the project was made. The reevaluation study has been completed. A summary of study results was submitted in January 1987 which recommended no further Federal action. The Lower Mississippi Valley Division approved the report and a notice of study termination was disseminated in June 1987. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-24 and 11-25, Annual Report for FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor forces consisted of completion of the reevaluation study. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1974 and is 17 percent complete. Alternatives to provide flood protection are being considered and these efforts will continue. 7. CANAL 43, AR Location. Canal 43 drains into Lake Chicot and is located in Lincoln and Desha Counties, Ar. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for enlarging the channel beginning approximately 1500 feet downstream of State Highway 54 and extending approximately 11.2 miles upstream; and provides a l-year frequency protection to adjacent agricultural lands. Total estimated Federal cost is $892,000. 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Local cooperation. The Cummins Drainage District has provided the necessary rights-of-way for project construction plus cash requirements totaling five percent of the total project costs. In addition, the drainage district is accomplishing all required relocations and will operate and maintain the project upon completion. Condition as of Sep 30. The construction contract was awarded September 12, 1989, and construction was completed on August 17, 1990. 8. LEAD BAYOU, MS Location. Lead Bayou is a tributary of the Sunflower River in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS, approximately 30 miles from the Mississippi River near Cleveland, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement was for enlargement of the existing Lead Bayou channel to provide a 1.5-year degree of protection to agricultural areas and a 10-year degree of protection to the small developed area near Cleveland, MS. Total estimated Federal cost was $1,724,400. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was completed Sep. 14, 1983. The stabilization of three bridges was completed in early FY 89. 9. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existingproject. There are 105.8 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A letter report, approved by the Chief of Engineers, authorized gravel surfacing 40.3 miles of levee, enlargement of 40.4 miles of levee, and a 5.7-mile southward extension of the east bank levee. Estimated Federal cost is $8,300,000. Estimated non- Federal cost is $14,100,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. A supplemental agreement for the Bawcomville segment was executed in FY 90. Condition as of Sep. 30. Item 1 of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7,1978. Additonal work was deferred pending results of a comprehensive study of the entire Ouachita River Levee System. A summary report indicating that it is economically feasible to raise portions of the existing levee to authorized grade and that complete rehabilitation of the levee system is necessary was approved by LMVD on Oct. 1, 1986. The study results were disseminated to the project sponsor and interested parties in October 1986. The Project was reclassified as an active project on May 7, 1987. The final summary report was sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers in July 1988 and design was initiated on the Bawcomville segment of the Ouachita River levees. A construction contract for the Bawcomville segment was awarded in FY 90. 10. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include 10 water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and 6 local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, De- Gray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports in 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-E. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports in 1985 report. An overall basin study is continuing. Interim study of the Ouachita River Levees is complete. The Interim Report recommended raising selected portions of the levee to authorized grade. The levee project has been reclassified as active. Interim milestones have been removed for Monroe-West Monroe and Arkansas Lakes. Results of these studies will be reported in the Overall Basinwide Report. A new start reconnaissance study for flooding problems in the vicinity of Hot Springs, Garland County, AR, will be initiated under this authority during FY 89. Publication of the Final Basinwide Report will be deferred until completion of these studies. 12-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Favorable continuing authorities reports have been approved for Chauvin and Youngs Bayou. Planning and design are underway on these items. 11. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. The basin comprises most of the Southcentral portion of Mississippi and a small part of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in Neshoba County, MS, and flows southwesterly 113 miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 233 miles to the vicinity of Bogalusa, LA. At that point, the Pearl River splits into the East and West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 48 miles, respectively, before entering the Rigolets and Lake Borgne. Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.1 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 5.34 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of Jul. 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank levee system along the Fortification Street 1-55 exit. This extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Public Law 98-63, dated Jul. 29, 1983, authorized the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided for additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and included 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This work has been completed. Mitigation lands for the clearing were purchased by the local sponsor in May 1985 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal cost of this project is $1,800,000. Authorized projects. Public Law 99-88, dated Aug. 15, 1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system in Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial structures from floods in the West Pearl. Public Law 99-662, dated Nov. 17, 1986, authorized construction of Shoccoe Dam and various flood control measures for Carthage- Leake County, MS. Local cooperation. For the Jackson-East Jackson and vicinity of Jackson projects, the requirements are as prescribed in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended. This Act requires that a local sponsor provide the easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The Slidell levee project authorization required cost-sharing and new guidelines for local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement consistent with Public Law 99-88 was signed by the Slidell local sponsor and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on Jun. 30, 1986. The local sponsors are as follows: Jackson-East Jackson, Rankin-Hinds Pearl River Flood Control Drainage District; Vicinity of Jackson Project, Pearl River Basin Development District; Slidell Levee Project, St. Tammany Levee District. Condition as of Sep. 30. An overall basin study is essentially complete, except for alternative studies to Shoccoe Dry Dam as discussed below. Flood control feasibility studies for Jackson, MS, recommending Shoccoe Dam, and for Slidell, LA, recommending a 15-mile levee system, have been completed. Detailed engineering and design studies are underway for the Slidell levee system. As a result of upstream opposition, Shoccoe Dam is not implementable. In response to a request by the local sponsor, the Pearl River Basin Development District, reconnaissance studies to evaluate alternatives to Shoccoe for flood damage reduction in the Jackson Metropolitan Area have been completed and a feasible levee plan identified. Negotiation is underway with the Project Sponsor to develop a Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement prior to beginning feasibility studies. Studies of various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, Columbia and Picayune, MS; Bogalusa, LA, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin have been completed. None were found economically feasible. Navigation studies have been conducted on the East and West Pearl Rivers. Results of these studies indicate that maintenance necessary to reopen the existing West Pearl River navigation project is economically justified. Studies also indicate that the East Pearl River does not have sufficient existing flows to support a 7- to 9-foot-deep navigation channel. The navigation study for Port Bienville, MS, has been terminated due to withdrawal of the Hancock County Port and Harbor Commission as local sponsor. Reconnaissance studies of flow distribution between the West Pearl River and the East Pearl River (boundary between the States of Louisiana and Mississippi) in the Lower Basin have been completed. A water resources development plan for flow redistribution in the Lower Basin was found economically feasible. However, the primary benefit of the plan would accrue to recreation. Reconnaissance studies did not find any problem that would be solved by a Federal project, given the current policies and priorities of the Administration. Reconnaissance studies of flood damage prevention and erosion control along Caney Creek in Jackson, MS, are currently underway. These studies will identify problems and 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT potential resolutions and determine if detailed feasibility studies are warranted. 12. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of the State of Louisiana and consists of the area bounded by the West Pearl River on the east, Interstate 10 on the west, and Lake Pontchartrain on the south. Authorized project. The project is broken into two segments of levees. The segment north of I-10 will consist of 4.5 miles of levee, a pumping station, a floodgate structure, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area north of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River. The segment south of I-10 will consist of 10.5 miles of levees, two pumping stations, floodgates, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area south of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River and provides the same level of protection against hurricane surges. These two levee segments total 15 miles of levee and would protect some 3,029 homes. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, St. Tammany Levee District, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), in an agreement consistent with the Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act Public Law 99-88) and Senate Report 1567, signed the Local Cooperation Agreement Jun. 30. 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued engineering studies to complete General Design Memorandum, initiate Feature Design Memoranda for pumping plant and plans and specifications for the first levee item. Condition as of Sep. 30. Process of developing General Design Memorandum. No construction has taken place. 13. PORTER BAYOU, MS Location. Porter Bayou is located in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS. It lies approximately 25 miles east of the Mississippi River, is approximately 5 miles south of Cleveland, MS, and travels through the town of Shaw, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement calls for selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3. This plan provides a 0.5-year frequency protection for the Porter Bayou area. All construction is being performed from one side of the stream, leaving the other side undisturbed. The total estimated Federal cost of the project is $860,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was completed Nov. 16, 1983. A separate contract was let to biologically remove alligatorweed at Shaw, MS, and follow-up with herbicide has been added. 14. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River" - 1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non- Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-H for new projects and Table 12-I for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 15. RED RIVER BELOW DENSION DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA. on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank 12-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1989) is $61,516,000 Federal and $1,560,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. Construction of the McKinney Bayou Replacement floodgate continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levees are complete and bank stabilization is 99 percent complete. 16. RED RIVER WATERWAY SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red River between Shreveport, LA, and Index, AR. Existing project. To provide for realigning the channels of Red River from Shreveport, LA, to the levee system near Index, AR, by means of dredging, cutoffs, and training works and for stabilizing its banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1989) is $249,000,000 Federal and $29,073,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on pages 12-10 and 12-11 of Fiscal Year 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued reevaluation studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. Completion of a General Re-evaluation Study is currently scheduled for December 1990. The engineering and economic feasibility of constructing the authorized project must be reviewed in light of changed conditions within the project area. 17. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $182,794 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1990, is $2,658,447. No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) Total FY costs for emergency bank protection work was $358,707. This included work on Fisher Ferry Road, Warren County, MS, at a cost of $167,912; County Road 52, Magnolia, AR, $1,000; El Dorado, AR, $10,000; Highway 119, Derry, LA, $3,458; Highway 438 Bridge, Bogue Chitto, River, LA, $9,562; Highway 495, Natchitoches Parish, LA, $2,132; Hunt Road Bridge, LaSalle Parish, LA, $56; Little Missouri River, Prescott, AR, $148,014; and Pearl River, Monticello, MS, $16,573. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies continued on Arkansas Tribs (Canal 19), Boeuf Tensas Basin at a cost of $39,590; East Natchitoches Drainage Canal, Natchitoches, LA, at a cost of $7,344. During FY 90 detailed studies were terminated on Cooley Creek, Minden, LA, $3,727; Gin Bayou, Itta Bena, MS, $243; Smackover, AR, $6,443; Wallace Lake area, LA, $343; Chauvin Bayou, LA, $351,715; Pearl-Flowood Area, MS $501; Youngs Bayou, LA $63,915. 18. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, FY costs for the period were $238,501. Advance measures - $300.00. Flood Emergency Operations costs for FY 90 were $655,825. This consisted of emergency operations on the Red River, LA, at a cost of $573,643; Arkansas River, AR, $21,456; Ouachita River, LA $17,065; and Mississippi River, LA $43,660. Total Public Law 99 cost during FY 90 was $894,625. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) No activity during the period. 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 2. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 3. Red River Waterway Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 5. Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA 6. Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 5,248,6191 -- 5,248,6191 7,814,000 2,876,000 1,033,000 2,263,000 230,608,524 8,537,018 4,791,420 2,009,983 1,189,516 228,769,237 5,235,000 4,427,500 4,854,300 4,953,338 88,608,605 5,033,649 4,387,192 4,953,458 4,797,841 88,236,704 2,355,000 4,348,000 5,571,000 1,972,000 81,208,000 3,497,107 3,439,358 4,175,110 2,771,269 28,654,957 6,825 6,825 68,000,000 103,690,000 118,000,000 100,375,000 77,210,592 98,126,979 121,938,473 96,280,732 1,121,100 2,739,000 3,686,697 1,117,843 2,674,606 3,642,852 281,000 647,000 254,000 212,000 -116,000 72,417 631,000 -- 372,065 720,789,000 690,809,900 -- 12,113,297 -- 11,516,646 -- 2,740,000 -- 2,275,0003 974,000 974,000 1,038,000 1,037,952 631,000 372,065 12-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 12-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 7. Canal 43, AR (Contrib. Funds) 8. Lead Bayou, MS 9. Ouachita River Levees, LA 11. Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS 12. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA 13. Porter Bayou, MS 15. Red River below Denison Dam Levees and Bank Stabilization New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 180,000 85,000 627,000 100,670 53,818 696,305 31,086 14,000 230,000 -92,596 69,619 49,000 89,560 892,000 850,793 31,086 -- 1,961,089 -- 1,961,089 -- 134,000 292,000 943,000 4,051,000 -- 99,158 265,208 264,124 3,310,490 176,000 175,956 97,500 116,973 14,891 3,530 0 -- 116,973 -1,000 2,080,000 -- 2,079,784 97,500 413,000 497,000 585,000 750,000 2,697,000 232,288 563,676 644,866 803,715 2,693,715 414 -- 1,035,278 -- 1,029,671 963,000 1,000,000 1,300,000 300,000 61,244,000 185,772 718,800 835,640 2,070,085 61,219,725 (Vicksburg District) 16. Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR New Work Approp. Cost 520,000 350,000 344,324 355,688 -- 1,010,0003 -- 855,497~ 12-10 1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,854,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 30, 1948 OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 1 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Section 2 of Text). Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW, AR AND LA (See Section 5 of Text) Authorized channel improvements on Bayou and Tributaries (see above). Modified 1950 authorization to include 10 lakes in the west escarpment in Arkansas and 6 local levees in Louisiana, and acquisition of lands for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. The previously authorized channel improvement was deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 6 of Text) Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. CANAL 43, AR (See Section 7 of Text) Channel enlargement 12-11 S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 506, 98th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1988. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 12-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17,1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 CANEY CREEK, MS Authorizes construction of such bank stabilization measures for Caney Creek in the vicinity of Jackson, MS, between McDowell Road and Raymond Road as the Secretary determines necessary for flood damage prevention and erosion control along approximately 3,000 feet of the creek. LEAD BAYOU, MS (See Section 8 of Text) Channel enlargement. MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LA, AND OUACHITA PARISH, LA Authorizes such structural and nonstructural measures as the Secretary deems feasible to prevent flood damage to the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita Parish, LA. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 10 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at Hwy 25 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS Planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system for Slidell, LA, pending binding cost-sharing arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or under terms and conditions provided in subsequent legislation when enacted into law. 12-12 Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-88, 99th Cong., 2d sess. VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Authorizes the Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, MS, for the construction of the Shoccoe Dam plus upstream flood control measures at east-central Leake County, south part of Carthage, MS, Highway 35 vicinity, upstream reservoirs on the Pearl River and upstream channels on the Pearl River and elsewhere in Leake County. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA (See Section 12 of Text) Authorizes flood control improvements for Pearl River Basin, St. Tammany, LA, subject to a favorable Chiefs report and approval by the Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. PORTER BAYOU, MS (See Section 13 of Text) Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS, from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA Water Resources Development of 1986 authorized for construction the project for mitigation of wildlife losses, Red River Waterway, LA, which may include all or such portion of any land adjacent to the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Section 15 of Text) Levee and bank stabilization. Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 12-13 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Still at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Per- Total from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Project Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Moving Tainter gated dam; 1002 $ 42,400,000 bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Columbia, LA 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 952 44,000,000 fixed crest navigation pass steel mitering lock gates Felsenthal, AR 1 227 84 600 18 701 13 Earth do Tainter gated dam; 882 99,600,000 navigation pass with inflatable dam on crest; steel mitering lock gates. Calion, AR 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 882 70,000,000 (H. K. hinged crest gated Thatcher) navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. Estimated Federal Cost $256,000,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost16,833,000 Total Estimated Cost 272,833,000 1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool elevation .65. 2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. 0 0 H0 0 0 I 0 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR1,2,3,4 -- 1931 $ 45,874 $ 42,857 1 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA1" 2'4 -- 1941 19,000 37,8041 Big Black River, MS1' 4'5 -- 1895 15,000 -- 1 Big Sunflower River, MS"1 4',67, -- 1942 560,027 459,328 1 Boeuf River, LA"1 34 7'8'9 -- 1949 30,000 103,737 1 Claiborne County Port, MS -- 1985 2,000,000 257,252 Dec. 1983 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA15 Complete 1971 202,817 452,611 Dec. 1914 Homochitto River, MS4 -- 1910 15,482 8,518 1 Lake Providence Harbor, LA -- 1985 208,537 3,756,292 Nov. 1963 Little Missouri River, AR, 4'5 -- 1873 19,992 -- 1 Little River, LA"4'5"0 -- 1890 1,500 -- 1 Little Tallahatchie River, MS"7 -- 1913 19,000 -- 1 Madison Parish Port, LA -- 1985 656,000 589,571 Dec. 1980 Mouth of Yazoo River, MS".7 ." -- 1953 1,179,211 563,006 1 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, Felsenthal Canal -- 193712 -- 4,387,192 1 Overton-Red River Waterway, LA -- 1985 -- -- 1 Pearl River, MS -- 1985 8,562,908 2,424,844 1956 Red River below Fulton, AR 1 "'1 6"17"1 8 -- 1978 1,963,806 2,147,890 1 Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX"'17"8 -- 1969 -- -- 1 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX' -- 1976 150,800 -- 1 Removings snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers" -- 1948 -- 272,5001 Rosedale Harbor, MS -- 1985 2,000,000 2,816,786 Sep. 1978 Saline River, AR1"3'4'5 -- 1931 26,900 12,792 1 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS, 45 -- 1939 43,481 173,066 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA18 ,12 -- 1949 38,367 85,352 12-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Completed Yalobusha River, MS, 4'5"14 -- 1937 7,000 15,936 Yazoo River, MS -- 1987 9,341,826 1,201,0951 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA. (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 12-16 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-E OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for. Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 Columbia, LA 1941 204,7403 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,0003 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA (1) 44,800,000 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $198,704,7434 1. 2. 3. 4. See individual reports herein. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply to be reimbursed by local interests. Actual cost of completed project. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954)was $4,190,000. 12-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 12-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 14 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR2 and LA -- 1,158 -- -- $25,100,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA -- -- -- -- 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 -- -- -- -- 243,3363 Caddo Lake, LA' Caddo Lake -- -- -- 3,586,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River -- -- -- 1,950,000 Garland City, AR1 6 -- -- -- -- 1,450,0003 Maniece Bayou, AR -- -- -- -- 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, AR7'8 -- -- -- -- 5,610,000 3 Posten Bayou, AR and LA2,6,9 -- -- -- -- 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA' 3 -- -- -- -- 61,516,000' Total 99,191,885 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Details presented in individual report herein. Construction on this project not started. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ................................................... $5,300,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution) ..................................... . 89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ..... .................................................................. 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA ............................................. . 480,000 East Point ............................................................................. 67,000 G arland City, AR ...................................................................... 6,000 Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ..................................................... 18,000 McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution)..................................................... 508,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX,AR, and LA ........................ 1,560,000 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. Inactive. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. Joint-use pool (sediment). Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 14 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For: Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,2371 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,200' 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 255,5291 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA5'6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481,7 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,8091 1941 Hempstead County levee district No.1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,92718 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,4261 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,0001 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,4351 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,1111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711,3 4 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District, August 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For:. Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LAx Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA' Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA Bayou Pierre, LA Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA12 Big Black River, MS3 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA3'4 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA" 5'6 Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AR Buffalo River, MS7 Caddo Lake Dam, LA Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Colfax, Grant Parish, LAx "8s DeGray Lake Caddo River, AR East Point, LA Enid Lake Garland City, AR Grant Parish below Colfax, LA" 3 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR1 " 3 Homochitto River, MS 3 Maniece Bayou, AR1,2 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR9 Monroe Floodwall, LA Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AR Natchez Port Area, MS 3,4 Natchitoches Parish, LA"2 Nov. 1986 Aug. 1977 1956 1948 1985 1985 1951 1956 1966 1945 1985 1940 1986 1978 1938 1985 1969 1976 1941 1941 1956 1970 19639 1984 1951 1985 1969 1956 $ 1,653,189 319,200 243,3362 910,185 248,823 34,023,108 1,655,700 70,348 72,033,992 286,069 42,472 1,335,841 38,809 88,006 205,000 970,9322 2,560,000 16,516,689 538,000 1,529,478 $ -- -- 3,547,333 241,130 670,750 57,910,002 984,306 37,267,153 3,051,536 144,650 40,554,647 Apr. 1955 Jan. 1948 Apr. 1961 FY 1939 Jun. 1939 3 3 Oct. 1955 Jul. 1978 Dec. 1971 Aug. 1968 Jul. 1974 3 3 3 Aug. 1969 May 1950 5 -- Aug. 1955 12-20 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-H (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS -- 1986 290,000 -- -- Pineville, Red River, LA3,4 -- 1953 232,426 -- Dec. 1951 Posten Bayou, AR'o -- 1973 -- -- -- Poverty Point, LA -- 1986 250,000 -- Oct. 1985 Red River Parish, LA' 3 -- 1939 149,435 -- Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' -- 1953 3,908,000 -- Mar. 1953 Saline Point, LA1"3 -- 1945 124,111 -- -- Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 -- 1966 335,433 -- May 1965 Wallace Lake, LA -- 1985 -- 907,887 Dec. 1946 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ............................................................... $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA ............ .......... ... ........ .... ............. 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA .......................................................... Harvey Canal, Bayou 170,799 Barataria Levee, LA ..................................................... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR.......................................................................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ................................................................... 250,000 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Deauthorized by Sec. 1002, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 8. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 9. Date authorized. 10. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 12-I ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 90 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation(110) Lower Pearl Flow Distribution, MS -12547 $ 7,787 Flood Damage Prevention (120) Caney Creek, Jackson, MS -12705 141,161 Hot Springs, Garland Co., AR -12737 167,515 Jackson Metro Area, MS -12742 129,275 Ouachita River Basin, AR and LA -12046 195 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA -122343,783 Subtotal 441,929 Comprehensive Studies (150) Red River Comprehensive (153) -15399 188,395 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Interagency Water Resources (173) -14713 31,051 Special Investigations (171) -17250 23,184 Review of FERC Licenses -538573087 Subtotal 57,322 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (181) -51840 1,014 Planning Assistance to States, MS (186) -14828 55,667 Planning Assistance to States, AR (186) -14805 23,538 Subtotal 80,219 TOTAL (Category 100) 775,652 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 172,711 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 11,199 Subtotal 183,910 TOTAL (Category 200) 183,910 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 400) Flood Control Projects (450) Aloha Rigolette (451) -12123 364,900 Subtotal 364,900 TOTAL (Category 400) 364,900 ADVANCE E&D (Category 600) Locks and Dams (622) RRWW Shreveport to Daingerfield (622) -75024 672,426 Flood Control Projects (650) Local Protection, Red River Waterway, Shreveport to Index (651) -75023 145,377 Subtotal 145,377 TOTAL (Category 600) 817,803 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 2,142,265 12-22 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Navigation work under special authorization ..................... 13-1 Flood Control 2. Millington,TN .................... 13-1 3. Nonconnah, Creek at Perkins, Memphis, TN ..................... 13-2 4. North Second St at Wolf River, Memphis, TN ..................... 13-2 5. Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN ...................... 13-2 6. Inspection of completed flood control projects .......................... 13-2 Flood Control (cont) 7. Flood control work under special authorization ................. Tables Table 13-A Table 13-B Table 13-C Table 13-D Table 13-E .. 13-3 Page Cost & Financial Statement ............... .13-4 Authorizing Legislation ...... 13-4 Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............. 13-5 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 13-6 Active General Investigations ............ 13-8 Flood Control 2. MILLINGTON, TN 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $3,139 was expended on reconnaissance studies on Cairo Harbor, IL, $1,211 on feasibility studies on DeValls Bluff Harbor, AR, and $1,671 on a preliminary evaluation for Newport Harbor, MS. Location. Millington is located in north Shelby County, TN. Authorized project. The project was approved for construction on May 14, 1990, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of 5,600 feet of levee along the right (north) bank of Big Creek in the reach between U. S. Highway 51 and the I.C. Railroad. The levee is designed to provide a 100-year frequency level of protection to the leveed area from backwater 13-1 Navigation MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT flooding. The estimated construction cost for the project is $809,000. A contract for project construction was awarded in August 1990. Approximately 4.4 acres will be directly or indirectly impacted by the project. This adverse impact will be mitigated by the creation of 8 acres and preservation of 7 acres of wetlands. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the city of Millington on May 15,1990. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Levee construction was initiated on September 10, 1990, and is currently scheduled for completion in January 1991. 3. NONCONNAH CREEK AT PERKINS STREET, MEMPHIS, TN Location. The project is located in southeast Memphis. Existing project. The project was approved for construction October 28, 1988, under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of the placement of stone, gabions, and concrete to armor the streambank and channel bed against erosion which had placed the Perkins Street bridge in imminent danger. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the City of Memphis on January 10, 1989. The sponsor was required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated January 27, 1989, and completed May 26, 1989. 4. NORTH SECOND STREET AT WOLF RIVER, MEMPHIS, TN Location. This project is located in northwest Memphis. Existing project. The streambank protection project at this location is on the opposite bank and downstream of the project completed in 1980. This project was approved for construction October 18, 1988, under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Streambank erosion on the right (north) bank and bed erosion on the Wolf River at Second Street have placed the bridge in imminent danger and caused a sewer line crossing the channel downstream of the bridge to pull loose from a manhole on the north bank. The project consists of stabilizing the right bank of the Wolf River and building a rock grade-control structure. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the City of Memphis on November 9, 1988. The sponsor was required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was completed January 24,1990. 5. PLAINVIEW ROAD BRIDGE, CHESTER COUNTY, TN Location. The Plainview Road crossing over the South Fork Forked Deer River is located in Chester County near the Town of Henderson. Existing project. The project was approved for construction July 26, 1990, under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Streambank erosion had removed the concrete bag protection and was threatening the abutment on the right bank. The bridge was in imminent danger of failure and was closed by the county highway department. The project includes stabilizing the channel slopes and establishing a new channel grade from 65 feet upstream to 50 feet downstream of the bridge using filter gravel and 18 inches of riprap. The estimated total construction cost is $159,000. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with Chester County on July 30, 1990. The sponsor was required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated September 10,1990, and completed September 19, 1990. 6. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $115,147 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1990, was $1,625,462. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 13-2 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 7. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During this period $46,812 was expended on Obion, TN; $17,210, North Fork, Obion River, Rives, TN; and $39,345 on Mayfield Creek Tributaries. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1990, $13,507 was expended on Quince Road Bridge, Nonconnah Creek lateral, Memphis, TN; $21,266 on Fletcher Creek Stabilization, Memphis, TN; $6,746 on Harrington Creek; $10,377 on Wolf River at U.S. Highway 51, Memphis, TN; and $4,897 on Tennessee Highway 78 at Obion River, Dyer Co., TN. Monies on the Quince Road project was used to complete preparation of construction plans and specifications, obtain construction approval and execute a Local Cooperation Agreement. Feasibility studies were continued on the Fletcher Creek, Harrington Creek and U.S. Highway 51 projects. A feasibility study was initiated on Tennessee Highway 78 at Obion River. Emergency flood control activities, Public Law 99, 84th Cong. Federal cost was $158,111 for disaster preparedness in FY 90. Also, $14,821 was spent on flood fight activities, and $84,618 for private levee rehabilitation. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., as amended. No work was accomplished this period under this authority. 13-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 2. Millington, TN New Work Approp. $ -- $75,000 $105,000 $607,000 $787,000 Cost -- 63,739 116,203 108,020 287,962 3. Nonconnah Creek New Work at Perkins, Approp. 20,000 45,000 292,000 0 357,000 Memphis, TN Cost 19,669 4,916 259,385 3,784 287,754 4. North Second St. New Work at Wolf River Approp. -- 70,000 329,000 0 399,000 Memphis, TN Cost -- 31,890 301,978 34,695 368,563 5. Plainview Road New Work Bridge, Approp. -- -- 20,000 131,700 151,700 Chester Co., TN Cost -- -- 7,516 107,935 115,451 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 30, 1948 Millington, TN (See Sec. 2 of Text), Levee in City as amended of Millington. Approved May 14, 19901 Jul. 24, 1946 Nonconnah Creek at Perkins Street, Memphis, TN as amended (See Sec. 3 of Text), Streambank protection Approved Oct. 28, 19882 Jul. 24, 1946 North Second Street at Wolf River, Memphis, TN as amended (See Sec. 4 of Text), Streambank protection. Approved Oct. 18, 19882 Jul. 24, 1946 Plainview Road Bridge, Chester Co., TN (See Sec. 5 as amended of Text), Streambank protection. Approved Jul. 26, 19902 13-4 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 2. Authorized under authority of Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. TABLE 13-C MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For Construction Maintenance Completed Caruthersville Harbor, MO -- 1984 $768,992 $2,854,029 Dec. 1980 Forked Deer River, TN, including South Fork"2 -- 1912 25,000 425,857 -- Helena Harbor, AR -- 1984 90,847 5,538,776 Sep. 1963 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY -- 1984 149,827 5,152,429 Jan. 1963 New Madrid Harbor, MO -- 1984 196,373 395,493 Oct. 1970 Obion River, TN1,3 -- 1911 28,716 -- -- Osceola Harbor, AR -- 1984 269,115 6,653,154 Nov. 1974 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers4'5s -- 1948 -- 318,8334 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, AR"2 -- 1942 92,000 300,449 -- White River, AR (below Newport) -- 1984 169,994 23,660,252-- Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN -- 1984 586,500 11,157,517 1959 1. No commerce. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 4. Completion date not available. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries." 13-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR' Bradford, TN Clarendon to Laconia Circle, White River Basin, AR' Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL2 Drinkwater Sewer, MO Dyersburg, TN2 Dyersburg, TN (SW) Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN Hatchie River, Alcorn Co., MS Humboldt, TN Huntingdon, TN Long Lake Area Helena, AR Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL4 Nixon Creek, TN2 Nonconnah Blvd. Nonconnah Creek, TN Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) Sandy Creek Jackson, TN St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR Treasure Island, MO Turner Creek, Corinth, MS 6 May 81 6 May 81 Se-p- 1980 Jul 1983 1977 1937 1984 1964 1984 1962 1981 1985 1987 1989 1983 1983 1960 1955 1952 1983 1987 1983 1985 1985 1981 1987 $ 70,363 95,061 147,000 1,494,828 229,6493 1,820,869 155,280 85,200 1,141,407 2,900,281 -- Dec. 1983 -- Feb. 1964 -- Jun. 1980 -- Jun. 1962 -- Oct. 1976 -- Aug. 1985 -- Feb. 1986 -- Apr. 1988 61,281 11,141,199 1,132,704 62,821 249,999 259,000 249,999 238,000 161,000 861,528 100,600 -- May 1959 -- Oct. 19596 -- Dec. 1951 -- Nov. 1981 -- Dec. 1986 -- Sep. 1980 -- Dec. 1984 -- Sep. 1985 -- Mar. 1978 -- Mar. 1987 13-6 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-D (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN -- 1984 369,200 -- Mar. 1983 W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY -- 1983 1,674,180 -- Oct. 1976 Inactive, awaiting local cooperation. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. 13-7 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 13-E ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 90 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 $31,877 Dam Safety Criteria Studies (173) 247 34,349 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Planning Assistance to States (186) 4,97 TOTAL (Category (100)39,046 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 177,513 TOTAL (Category 200)$177,513 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS216559 13-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT * This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) ................... 14-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes Melvin Price Locks & Dam) ............... 14-2 3. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL ....................... 14-2 4. Southeast Missouri Port, MO ....... 14-2 Flood Control 5. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO ........... 14-3 6. Cape Girardeau-Jackson,MO ........ 14-3 7. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL ....... 14-3 8. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL ................. 14-4 9. Pine Ford Lake, MO ............... 14-5 10. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................... 14-5 11. Navigation work under special authorization .............. 14-5 Flood Control (cont) Page 12. Flood control work under special authorization .............. 14-5 Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 13. Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, MO ............. 14-5 14. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program ........................ 14-6 Tables Table 14-A Table 14-B Table 14-C Table 14-D Table 14-E Table 14-F Cost and Financial Statement ............... .14-7 Authorizing Legislation .... 14-9 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... .14-12 Lakes, Levees, and Recreational Facilities ......... 14-12 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 14-14 Active General Investigations (96X3121) .. 14-16 14-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Rock Island District. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN (ST. LOUIS DIST.) (INCLUDES MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (1990) of $200,600,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. Estimated total Federal project cost (1990) is $264,736,600. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3rd sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: contract was continued on stone dike and revetment construction as was engineering and design and supervision and administration. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 79 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. During FY 1988 through FY 1990 low water conditions (drought) have increased maintenance dredging. To improve navigation depths a rock removal contract began Oct. 1988 and continued through FY 1990. Contract is 99% complete. Maintenance. Work consisted of 3,800 feet of dike and 19,480 feet of revetment repair. U.S. plant and hired labor plus contract dredging performed channel dredging removing 12,865,273 cubic yards of material from main channel. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. 4. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MISSOURI Location. The project is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River between river mile 47.5 to 48.8 above the Ohio River in the counties of Scott and Cape Girardeau in Southeast Missouri. Existing project. Pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended, a slackwater channel, 2,000 feet long, 230 feet wide, and 9 feet deep is being 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO. DISTRICT constructed. This project will provide a navigation channel for development of a port and related facilities at this location. Total estimated cost is $5,410,000 ($2,149,000 non-Federal). Location cooperation. On May 22, 1987, a Local Cooperation Agreement was signed between the Port District and the St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers. Results during fiscal year. All harbor construction has been completed, enabling the local sponsor to complete construction of their docking facilities during Fiscal Year 1990. A very small amount of project work remains to be accomplished, consisting of tree and shrub planting needed for mitigation of wetland habitat losses. This work has been delayed because of negotiations with the local sponsor concerning the location selected for the plantings. All issues have been resolved and a contract for the work has now been awarded. Because of the seasonal nature of such work, the plantings will be placed at the site during the spring of 1991. Flood Control 5. ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO Location. The levee system is located adjacent to the Mississippi River between Alton and Gale, Illinois. Existing Project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1946. Construction of the Alton to Gale levee system was completed in 1977. Some reaches of this levee system have, for many years, been experiencing a significant number of slides associated with design deficiencies increasing the probability of levee failure during flood events. The recommended plan will correct these slides by a lime stabilization procedure. Estimated cost is $17,610,000 Federal and $3,235,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The cost sharing applicable for the Alton to Gale Levee Slide repairs is in accordance with policies established for the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, the Local sponsor is required to operate and maintain all works after completion. Supplemental assurances have been executed for the remedial work that is 100% federally funded. Operations and results during fiscal year. Repair of levee slides continued on the Federally funded reaches. 6. Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO Location. The project is located in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, along the right bank of the Mississippi River between River Miles 50 and 55 above the Ohio River. Existing Project. The project includes a 157 acre dry detention reservoir; approximately one mile of channel improvements on Cape La Croix Creek and two miles of channel improvements on Walker Branch, eight bridge replacements; and recreational/ environmental features. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal project cost (1990) is $24,880,000. Non-Federal cost is $8,980,000 (Local Cooperation Agreement, Jul. 20, 1989). Local Cooperation. The city of Cape Girardeau, MO, local sponsor, is strongly supportive of the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on May 31,1990. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the Local Sponsor must comply with the following: - pay five (5) percent of the cost of the project assigned to structural flood control during project construction; - provide all lands, easements, right-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas and perform all necessary relocations; if the value of the five (5) percent of the cost of the project assigned to structural flood control and the value of credit for the lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge material disposal areas and cost associated with performing relations are less than 25 percent of the total project cost assigned to flood control, the local sponsor shall pay during construction a cash contribution additional amounts to make the Local Sponsor's minimum contribution equal to 25 percent; - pay one half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all costs of operation and maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; and - bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and engineering were initiated. 7. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottom lands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) 14-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Post authorization studies have indicated that flood plain detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen Creek and other related flood control measures in the Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area are not economically feasible. Also, further studies of the channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel have been deferred due to lack of support from the local sponsor of the project. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $33,600,000 (1985), $22,020,000 for Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area, and $11,580,000 for Blue Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,770,000. The 1988 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act authorized repair and rehabilitation of pump stations and appurtenant works, channels and bridge structures. The estimated total cost of this work, as shown in the Committee Report, is $25,000,000. (The unapproved estimated total cost, Oct. 89 price level, is $27,583,500.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with the requirements of local cooperation for work under the 1936 authorization. For work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances were accepted on the Blue Waters Ditch area on Jun. 25, 1981. For work under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988, PL 100-202, local interests have provided a letter of intent, and they have entered into a Local Cooperation Agreement for the first item of construction. Construction work will involve two additional Local Cooperation Agreements, and both of these agreements are currently being processed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Scheduled construction of project modifications authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 is completed. This work included ditching contracts and the Blue Waters Ditch pumping station. Work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936 is also complete. The East St. Louis pumping station, constructed under the authority of the Flood Control Act of 1936, sustained damage during an October 1986 flood event and major repairs were accomplished with non-Corps of Engineers funds. The first Local Cooperation Agreement for rehabilitation work to be done under the 1988 authorization was executed and a contract for the work included therein (rehabilitation of small gravity drains excluding inlet and outlet pipes and headwalls) was completed. A Technical Report covering the second item of construction was completed and approved, and a Local cooperation Agreement for this work (rehabilitation of remaining main-line levee items) is being processed. A General Design Memorandum covering all remaining project work was completed and is currently under review. The Local Cooperation Agreement for this third item of work is currently being drafted, by the districts. 8. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of Annual Report for 1950. Existing project. Project area contains about 9,460 acres only partially protected against flood stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, IL, gage. Flooding occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.) provides for enlarging and raising the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 years. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $14,100,000. Non- Federal cost is $2,100,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances from the Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 23, 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. All construction of gravity drains, levee embankment and 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO. DISTRICT installation of wildlife plantings is complete. Project is complete. 9. PINE FORD LAKE, MO Location. Proposed dam is on Big River at mile 43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big River is a tributary of the Meramec. Lake would extend about 34 miles up Big River. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existingproject. Project provides for construction of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and telephone lines, and construction of recreational facilities are included. Maximum storage capacity will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project cost (1984) is $147,000,000, of which $8,173,200 and $22,900,000 are local reimbursements for water supply and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocation to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning previously funded but not completed. 10. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $368,741 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of end of fiscal year is $7,201,988. 11. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Reconnaissance study cost for Jackson-Union Counties Port, IL, were $1,760. 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization study costs for fiscal year were $28,629 for St. Peters, MO; and $21,776 for Boise Brule Levee and Drainage District, MO; $1,223 for Lower Salt River, Pike County, MO; $1,912 for Mississippi Levee System, Monroe; E. Cape Girardeau Main Ditch, IL, $2,123; and Modoc Levee and Drainage District, Prairie, IL, $6,966; and Dobrey Slough, Granite City, IL, $4,113. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1990, $11,026 was expended on Pomme Creek, Arnold, MO. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $238,099 for disaster preparedness, and $350,669 for Emergency Operations. (No rehab in FY 90) Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 13. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, MO, or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 645 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project provides for construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage capacity of 1,428,000 acre-feet for use of flood control, future domestic and industrial water supply, sediment storage, and power generation. Project plan provides for installation of one 27,000 KW conventional unit and one 31,000 KW reversible unit for pumped storage operations. Total Federal project cost estimate (1984) is $330,000,000 of which $22,420,000 is for lands and damages; $14,300,000 for water supply; $76,000,000 for hydropower. 14-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-13 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances have been received from the State of Missouri and approved by the Chief of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work is complete on all major items. Lands acquired to date are 55,277 acres in fee and 10,068 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. 14. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Location. The portion of the Upper Mississippi River within the boundaries of the St. Louis District extends from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0) to river mile 300, downstream of Lock and Dam 22. Existing project. The project is composed of five elements: Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement, Long-term Resource Monitoring, Recreation, Studies of Recreation Impacts and Navigation Traffic Monitoring. The overall program, involving five states, three Engineer Districts and two Corps of Engineers Divisions, is administered by the North Central Division. For the St. Louis District's part of the program, 6 habitat rehabilitation projects have been proposed, of which one (1) has been constructed, one (1) is under construction, one (1) is awaiting approval for preparation of plans and specifications and seven others funded for planning and preliminary engineering (DPR's) in FY 90. Through Fiscal Year 1990, funds allocated to the St. Louis District have amounted to $2,844,000. The authorization limit for the overall program, projected over a 10-year period, is $191,415,000. Local cooperation. The terms of local cooperation, as established by Public Law 99-662, will vary according to the nature of the project, land ownership and pre-existing management responsibilities. The Local Sponsor for Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement projects is usually the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service in coordination with the State of Missouri or the State of Illinois. Operations and results during the fiscal year. One (1) construction contract was completed and another was awarded; one (1) detailed project report (DPR) was completed with four DPR's initiated on other projects. Mapping & preliminary data collection for DPR's has begun on three additional projects. 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 3. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 4. Southeast Missouri Port, MO (Contrib. Funds) 5. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO 6. Cape Girardeau Jackson, MO (Contrib. Funds) 7. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (Contrib. Funds) 8. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee District, IL 9. Pine Ford Lake, MO New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ 4,594,000 $18,455,000 $. 3,948,000 $ 9,021,000 $210,522,6001 4,667,633 2,437,584 17,569,473 9,268,135 208,209,9711 12,262,000 13,527,000 22,520,500 20,395,596 283,661,2292 12,566,762 13,415,950 22,533,237 20,168,279 283,145,1712 660,000 1,380,000 1,180,000 480,601 1,574,510 1,155,537 275,000 1,425,210 178,894 275,000 1,424,467 241,387 0 0 0 0 0 0 -112,000 134,522 0 99,176 0 3,465,000 267 3,435,758 1,879,105 1,869,285 901,000 1,211,000 4,066,000 208,758 1,410,532 3,573,290 00 493,000 493,000 450,851 450,851 210,000 210,000 190,506 190,506 0 150,000 2,226,000 19,723,3263 213,660 596,594 2,006,525 19,479,3164 0 0 0 0 3,951,000 4,030,000 -500,000 4,073,697 3,515,195 143,107 97,600 1,059,350 0 961,750 0 16,188,000 4,326 16,183,993 0 341 3,644,000 3,644,001 14-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 14-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 12. Clarence Cannon New Work Dam and Approp. 673,000 0 0 34,000 312,726,0285 Reservoir, Salt Cost 1,625,900 678,367 325,533 384,441 312,678,1885 River, MO Maint. Approp. 4,077,322 4,733,000 4,727,000 3,867,796 33,485,778 Cost 4,340,515 4,496,082 5,126,986 3,834,524 33,386,201 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 14-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954'3 Jul. 3, 19584 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 15, 1985 and Nov. 17, 1986 1960 River and Harbor Act as amended. Section 107 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 28, 1938 1946 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 3 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM (FORMERLY LOCK AND DAM NO.26 (REPLACEMENT)) Construct new dam and a 1,200-foot lock approximately 2 miles downstream of the existing structure. Change name from "Lock and Dam No. 26" to "Melvin Price Lock and Dam" upon termination of service in U.S. Congress. Construct a second lock, 600 feet long at the Lock and Dam No. 26. (Replacement) Project. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO (See Section 4 of Text) Construct harbor channel with adjacent landfill. ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO (See Section 5 of Text) Authorized construction of levees to protect area from flooding from the Mississippi River. S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 95-502, 95th Cong. Public Law 97-118, 97th Cong. Public Law 99-88 and Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Special report on record in OCE Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 14-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 14-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 14, 1984 Jun. 28, 1938 CAPE GIRARDEAU, JACKSON METROPOLITAN AREA, MO (See Section 6 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Dec. 8, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control and related recreational improvements in the Cape La Croix Creek Watershed. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 7 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. Repair and rehabilitate pump stations and appurtenant works, channels, and bridges. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. MALINE CREEK, MO As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 2, 1982, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control, recreation, and environmental improvements. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. Public Law 100-202, 100th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1985, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 14-10 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 7, 1966 Dec. 29, 1981 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 28, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. (See Section 9 of Text) Undertake structural and nonstructural flood control measures. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Construct dam at Benton, IL, and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO As outlined in the Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors dated Apr. 16, 1985, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes construction of a levee and a pumping plant to protect the city from Mississippi River and Gabouri Creek floods. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO (See Section 13 of Text) Modified act of Jun. 28, 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiplepurpose project. Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present designation. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 97-128, 97th Cong. Amended Section 1128, Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-298, 89th Cong. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Inactive. 4. All work completed. 5. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. 14-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO' -- 1883 $ 12,000 $ -- -- Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL Nov. 1977 19622- -- -- Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Nov. 1977 19582 -- -- -- Moccasin Springs, MO -- 1969 76,4363 -- -- Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Nov. 1977 19542 -- -- Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Nov. 1977 19502-- . --- Wabash Railraod Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL -- 1961 2,653,194 1961 -- 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. 2. Year authorized. 3. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. TABLE 14-D LAKES, LEVEES, AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES See Total Estimated Section Estimated Non-Federal Cost (Date to in Text Project Name Federal Cost Cost Revision) 11. Meramec River Basin, MO Lakes: Union"' 3 $101,305,000 $11,695,000 $113,000,000 (1982) Irondale 2'3 8,744,370 66,700,000 (1982) I-381,3 27,294,000 2,306,000 29,600,000 (1982) 1. See 1979 Annual Report for details. 2. See 1967 Annual Report for details. 3. Deauthorized Jan. 1990. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. Project and Yr. Deauthorized Report For Construction Maintenance Completed Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO Oct. 1986 1967 $ -- $ -- -- Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL' Oct. 1986 -- -- -- -- Cache River Diversion, IL -- 1953 2,837,114 -- 1953 Cape Girardeau, MO, reaches Nos. 1, 3, and 4 Oct. 1978 1959 22,000 -- -- Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 -- 1965 5,157,805 -- 1964 Carlyle Lake, IL -- 1981 46,013,699 51,637,286 Oct. 1976 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL -- 1955 185,700 -- 1955 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL2 Jan. 1990 1964 4,984,500 -- 1963 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL -- 1981 2,818,000 -- Aug. 1981 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL -- 1959 5,889,500 -- 1959 Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL -- 1976 1,720,000 -- 1976 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, IL Jan. 1990 1963 1,920,600 -- 1963 Eldred, IL Nov. 1979 1962' -- -- -- Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944)4 -- 1950 55,415 -- Oct. 1949 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)4 -- 1953 -- 1,033,279 1951 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) -- 1952 50,000 -- Jan. 1952 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) -- 1946 25,000 -- Aug. 1945 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL -- 1970 1,154,800 -- 1958 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL Oct. 1986 1971 -- -- -- Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL -- 1959 4,677,900 -- 1959 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL -- 1981 6,046,656 -- Mar. 1981 Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, IL' Nov. 1981 -- -- -- -- Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL -- 1959 297,460 -- 1949 Kaskaskia River, ILs -- 1989 147,387,000 16,482,331 1988 Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL' Oct. 1986 -- -- -- -- Lake Shelbyville, IL -- 1981 44,000,000 53,163,416 Sep. 1978 14-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 14-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 Nov. 1979 1979 -- -- -- Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10, and 13 Nov. 1979 1979 -- -- -- Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Oct. 1978 1978 496,000 -- -- Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL -- 1989 589,000 -- 1988 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL -- 1989 25,043,300 -- 1989 Meramec Park Lake, MO 6 -- 1987 31,120,348 4,659,761 -- Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL -- 1944 249,738 -- 1944 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL -- 1955 164,183 -- 1955 Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO -- 1987 2,137,000 -- -- Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO -- 1980 79,265,166 -- Jan. 1980 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO Nov. 1979 1967 -- -- -- Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO -- 1967 -- -- -- Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures -- -- 85,422 -- Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL -- 1957 939,569 -- 1957 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL -- 1989 670,000 -- 1984 Perry County Drainage and Levee 7 District Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO -- 1987 7,968,700 -- 1986 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL8 -- 1970 6,005,127 -- 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL -- 1959 3,882,600 -- 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL -- 1959 1,866,910 -- 1959 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL9"0 -- 1989 43,700,900 37,950,140 1988 Richland Creek, IL -- 1969 401,000 -- -- Riverland Levee District, MO Aug. 1977 19363 -- -- -- Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL' Oct. 1986 -- -- -- -- Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Nov. 1977 19363 .... St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Nov. 1977 19363 -- Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL -- 1957 2,123,700 -- Aug. 1956 Union Lake, MOn Jan. 1990 1979 4,917,359 9,247 -- Urban areas at Alton, IL -- 1960 192,000 -- -- Village of New Athens, IL -- 1981 1,983,000 -- Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL12 -- 1967 91,952 -- 1967 14-14 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL13 -- 1989 17,163,821 -- 1988 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO Nov. 1977 19363 -- -- -- Projects authorized or modified by Flood Control Act of Oct. 12, 1962 (see H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for details). Completed except for seepage control measures, which are inactive. Year authorized. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. Includes $200,000 for definite project under 1938 Flood Control Act. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. Includes $183,638 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. Includes Highway 185 funds. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 14-15 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 90 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) Cuivre River, MO-12744 $340,851 St. Louis Metropolitan Area, MO and IL-55040 106,365 Alexander and Pulaski Counties, IL-12217 37,955 Dardenne Creek, MO-12452 50,868 Plattin Creek, MO-12785 164,987 Subtotal 701,026 Review of Authorized Projects(160) Miscellaneous Activities(170) Special Investigations-17250 22,086 Dam Safety Criteria Studies-14713 11,001 Subtotal 33,087 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) Dept. of Agric.--Soil Cons. Service-51840 4,981 Plan Assist to State of IL-14817 15,655 Plan Assist to State of MO-14829 31,627 Subtotal 52,263 TOTAL (Category 100) $786,376 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250)-82030, and -82040 173,039 Hydrology Studies (260)-53820 6,715 Hardin, IL-83010 1,692 Swansea, IL-83012 6,499 TOTAL (Category 200) 187,945 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 400) River Des Peres, MO-12638 393,157 Coldwater Creek, MO-12252 218,590 TOTAL (Category 400) 611,747 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Cape Girardeau -- Jackson-12356 153,863 Maline Creek, MO-12297 49,451 Meramec River Basin, MO-75412 25,900 Ste. Genevieve, MO-75453 38,092 TOTAL (Category 600) 267,306 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,853,374 14-16 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT This district comprises portions of southern Ken- western portion, and embraces drainage basins of tucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Caro- Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tribulina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern taries. Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page General Investigations Page 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY ........ 15-2 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY ...... 15-3 3. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and M S ........................... 15-4 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 15-4 Alteration of Bridges 5. Authorized Alteration of Bridges ...... 15-4 Flood Control 6. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN ......... 15-4 7. Martins Fork Lake, KY .............. 15-5 8. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY .......................... 15-5 9. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, VA and KY ........................ 15-5 10. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) .... 15-6 11. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................... 15-6 12. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 15-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN ........................ . 15-6 14. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY ........................ 15-6 15. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN ............... 15-7 16. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ......................... 15-7 17. Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY ................ 15-8 18. 19. Surveys ............................ 15-8 Collection and study of basic data ...... 15-8 Tables Table 15-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... Table 15-B Authorizing Legislation ........ Table 15-C 15-9 15-11 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 15-13 Table 15-D Not Applicable Table 15-E Table 15-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 15-13 Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects, Including Power ....................... Table 15-G Deauthorized Projects .......... Table 15-H Table 15-I Table 15-J Table 15-K Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principle Features ............. Tennessee River Lock Dimensions ................... Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project .............. Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection ...... Table 15-L Reservoirs .................... Table 15-M Table 15-N Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......... 15-14 15-14 15-15 15-17 15-18 15-18 15-18 15-19 15-19 15-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1990 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, Ky., about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, Ky., from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, Ky. (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provided for construction of hydroelectric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, river mile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky., to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternative routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,181,406 Federal funds and $102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. (See table 15-H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, Tenn., varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 15-B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, Tenn., has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is $132,140,900. Estimated cost of Celina Dam (1985) is $213,000,000. (See table 15-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, Tenn., (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, Tenn. (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tailwater at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville are shown on Table 15-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9- foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 41 terminals on the Cumberland River (3 municipally owned and open for public use; 5 government owned facilities and 33 privately owned facilities). A total of 24 terminals have 15-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals, and grain. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks and dams were operated as required. Operation and Maintenance improvements included completion of rock removal at five sites on the Lower Cumberland and renovation of the Nashville Repair Station at Old Hickory. Barkley Lock was unwatered and repaired. Eroded metals were replaced with ceramic materials, lock walls strengthened, and hydraulic system repaired. Cavitation repairs were made at Cheatham and generator exciter repairs at Old Hickory. Improvements continued at Stark Knob Launching Area at Old Hickory, and shaft excavation at the Barkley Powerplant began. Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam (800,536,199 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hoosier Energy Division. Total net energy generated at Cheatham Dam (194,716,990 kw-hr), Cordell Hull (439,291,817 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (512,331,010 kw-hr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 2. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902-1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196-1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tenn. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 15-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by that agency of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, Tenn. (See table 15-I on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 154 terminals on the Tennessee River (12 municipally owned, 17 government owned facilities and 125 privately owned facilities). A total of 87 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $253,143. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major repairs at Wilson Auxiliary Lock were completed, including structural repairs to middle and lower gates, excavating and shotcreting the bluff above the lower guide wall and 15-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1990 widening lower guide wall. Renovation was completed on the lock operation building, and painting of the main lock completed. Guntersville Auxiliary Lock, Wheeler Auxiliary and Watts Bar Locks were unwatered and repaired. Lock lighting and guard rails were replaced at Chickamauga. 3. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110x600 feet. Construction of the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $750,000,000. (See 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. At the Piney Grove Recreation Site work to provide a beach and picnic area was completed. Contracts were awarded for day use areas at Scruggs Bridge East and West sites, and a public use area at Bay Springs Damsite. The project is 99% complete. Navigation features are 100% complete. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period $44,777 was expended for a study of Centre South Riverport, Hamilton Co., TN and $26,241 for study and planning for an access channel to Port of Florence, AL. Construction of a channel at Morgan County Port was completed with expenditures in FY 90 of $865,259 federal funds and $637,901 contributed funds. Alteration of Bridges 5. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman- Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 6. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATION AREA, KY AND TN Location. The proposed project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area was established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage is not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically establishes the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archaeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The area is divided into two categories, gorge and adjacent areas, with no construction permitted except limited clearing for establishment of day-use facilities, historical sites, primitive campgrounds and access roads. Lodges and other facilities will be provided in the adjacent areas. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, 1976 and Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) The present authorized cost (ceiling) for the project is $156,122,000. The National Park Service operates and maintains the useable units of the area upon completion of land acquisition and construction by The Corps of Engineers. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. The project is 71% complete. 15-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. 332.07 acres fee were acquired. Contracts were awarded for a Tack Building at Bandy Creek recreation site and an administration facility for the National Park Service. Preparations were begun to transfer jurisdiction of the Big South Fork NRRA to the Department of the Interior in FY 1991. 7. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam will be concrete type, about 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acrefeet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acre-feet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, will thus be provided during potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is to be operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and to provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project will prevent major portion of average annual flood losses at Harlan and result in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and at other urban areas downstream. Actual cost of project including $95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,911. First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated as required. 8. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away from present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. 9. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, Ky. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan, Ky. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are 15-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1990 reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $276,700,000. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Acquired 186.04 acres fee and 8.56 acres easement. The floodwall/highway at Pineville and the levee at Wallsend were completed. At Harlan construction of the diversion tunnels continued, as well as real estate acquisition and design of future phases of work. At Barbourville construction of Phase I of the levee, real estate acquisition, and design of Phase II of the levee continued. Nonstructural evacuations continued at Pineville, Harlan, and Barbourville, and the final floodproofing contract at Pineville was awarded. 10. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 15-B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 15-K. 11. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $6,883. Total cost to September 30, 1990 was $330,218 For project inspection data see table 15-M. 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal cost for the fiscal year was $189,699 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, Tenn. It is in DeKalb County, Tenn., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 funds is $53,412,022. Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (413,527,700 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. 14. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, Tenn. It is in Clay County, Tenn., and about 15-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT * 80 miles northeast of Nashville, Tenn., 28 miles north of Cookeville, Tenn., and 3 miles east of Celina, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, Ky., and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $28,317,746. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (133,045,555 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, land management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. 15. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, Tenn.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, Tenn. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including $3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $56,914,039. Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (67,703,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. 16. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, Ky. water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of a net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation was completed in FY 1986. Total cost is $56,741,232. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (72,120,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. New supervisory controls were installed in FY 90. 15-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1990 17. WOLF CREEK DAM-LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.9 (above mouth) in Russell County, Ky., about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, Ky. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, Ky. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for publicuse and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project is $188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,372 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,999,237 for major rehabilitation. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Major maintenance work items included switchyard repairs and replacement of intake gate cables. Total net energy generated (1,054,746,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of public-use facilities. General Investigations 18. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $1,263,494 for which $1,124,092 was for navigation, $2,116 for flood damage prevention studies, $78,721 for special investigations, $43,565 for coordination studies with other agencies, and $15,000 for interagency water resource development. 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $39,463 for technical services to others, and $36,738 for flood plain management services, totalling $76,201. 15-8 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text 1. Project Cumberland River, TN and KY 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY 3. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 5. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 6. Martins Fork Lake, KY 7. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 8. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 11. Cumberland, KY 12. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 13. Dale Hollow Lake Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 14. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 15. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Total to FY 90 Sep 30, 1990 - - - - 320,252,240 1,2,3 75,587 - - - 320,252,240 1,2,3 16,388,500 20,608,000 23,167,200 24,829,886 265,479,262 4 16,532,247 20,422,397 23,648,733 24,363,546 264,468,223 - - - - 16,251,4286 - - - - 16,251,428 6 13,763,000 17,122,000 17,036,700 11,486,397 177,796,048 7 13,527,412 16,991,895 17,383,402 11,567,723 177,503,640 s - - - - 400,000 - - - - 400,000 1,435,000 3,000,000 300,000 1,580,000 742,475,050 2,954,077 3,600,796 2,030,026 1,510,465 740,397,896 8,648,000 3,916,000 7,969,000 300,000 112,123,920 9 5,883,134 6,273,184 6,158,684 1,557,103 110,218,312 10 - - - - 20,479,911 - - - - 20,479,911 676,000 616,000 598,500 591,840 5,712,340 658,851 613,142 619,139 524,979 5,631,190 - - - - 817,83011 - - - - 817,83011 64,000 57,000 66,000 159,322 2,069,166 63,990 57,141 61,772 47,039 1,945,415 23,263,000 16,685,000 12,312,000 27,210,000 121,964,000 12 17,204,246 16,207,412 17,561,130 20,104,313 112,180,063 13 - - - - 66,642 - - - - 66,642 - - - - 53,412,022 14 - - - - 53,412,022 15 3,341,000 3,818,000 3,615,200 3,961,809 54,753,976 16 3,277,917 3,758,934 3,750,028 3,951,194 54,673,93117 - - - - 28,317,746 18 - - - - 28,317,746 19 3,108,000 3,380,000 3,350,100 3,560,720 52,430,627 20 3,087,685 3,375,737 3,413,865 3,430,747 52,198,875 21 - - - - 56,914,039 22 - - - - 56,914,039 23 2,740,000 2,949,000 3,324,800 2,946,865 37,076,251 24 2,646,484 2,907,243 3,341,459 3,116,459 37,031,572 25 - - - - 56,741,232 - - - 56,741,232 850,000 1,005,000 1,406,100 1,102,343 10,406,443 26 817,325 1,036,364 1,422,959 1,068,074 10,347,974 26 15-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1990 TABLE 15-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 16. Wolf Creek Dam and Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Total to FY 90 Sep 30, 1990 - - - - 83,267,958 27 - - - - 83,267,958 27 5,361,000 4,434,000 5,085,400 4,154,392 74,381,233 28 5,272,882 4,460,508 5,271,224 4,003,632 74,161,841 29 - - - - 104,999,237 30 - - - - 104,999,237 30 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous projects.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contributed by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed by Metropolitan Nashville, TN. 3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,008,157 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,008,157 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 9. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 11. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 12. Includes $19,043,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 13. Includes $18,370,135 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 14. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 16. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $463,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 17. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $463,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 18. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 19. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 20. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $463,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 21. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $463,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 22. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 24. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $407,078 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 25. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $407,078 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 26. Includes $66,678 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 30. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 15-10 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act 1. Project and Work Authorized CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Jul 13, 1892 Provision made for lock A Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests. Jul 24, 1946 Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville; via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Jun 19, 1952 Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Sep 3, 1954 Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Jul 14, 1960 Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. 1. Aug 5, 1886 CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Mar 2, 1907 Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Mar 2, 1919 Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 1934 2 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 1, 1980 Jul 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Docs. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1884, p. 1663. Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. 15-11 Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1990 TABLE 15-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text /Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9. OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Aug 28, 1937 Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300, for local flood protection works. Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Mar 7, 1974 Authorized establishing Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY Jul 24, 1946 Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings. 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 15-12 3. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) Project Caney Fork River, TN Clinch River, TN and VA Duck River, TN Elk River, AL and TN French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN Holston River, TN Little Tennessee River, TN Obey River, TN Red River, TN Status abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned b 1 1A For last Full Report see Annual Report 1895 1923 1887 1904 1931 1911 1888 1887 1884 10f4Q) Cost to Sep 30, 1990 Operation and Construction Maintenance $ 27,828- 53,949 $ 7,873 13,000- 4,000- 249,605 33,554 5,714- 5,510- 11,500- 5,000- 11 (h017 Soutih Fork of Cumberland River, KY. aoandoned i9 l,96 - TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1990 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 - Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY completed 1969 567,703 - Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY completed 1949 26,309 - Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,173 - Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126 - 1 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 15-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1990 TABLE 15-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1990 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, KY and TN beneficial use - $146,498,644 $88,175,199 1 Celina Dam, KY active - 222,575 _ 1 Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 31,682,762 61,564,139 1 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 79,874,492 41,072,249 1 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 52,266,412 73,656,636 1 1. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY." See Table 15-H, TABLE 15-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For last Full Federal Contributed Report see Funds Funds Project Annual Report for Date and Authority Expended Expended Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio 1970 Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, 75 $111,855 - River Basin, TN Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. Middlesboro, Yellow Creek - Authorized: FC Act, Dec 22, 1944, - - Bell County, KY PL 534, 78th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Cumberland River above - Authorized: River & Harbor Act, - - Nashville, TN Aug 5, 1886. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Hiwassee River, Polk and 1923 Authorized: River & Harbor Act, 123,065 - Bradley Counties, TN Aug 14, 1876. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Rossview Lake, Tennessee - Authorized: FC Act, Jun 28, 1938, 6,779 - and Kentucky PL 761, 75th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 15-14 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See. Section 1 of Text) uam ando eservoir Biarkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell HuH Celina Nearest town Miles above mouth of river Lock dimensions (feet)1 Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guardsills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level) : Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet) : Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canal: Length (miles) Bottom width (feet) Depth at minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Kuttawa, KY, 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 50 Ashland City, TN, 9 miles. 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,000 3,4 259,000 610,000 2,082,000 385 382 7,450 19,800 7 84,200 104,000 Old Hickory, TN, 3 miles. 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,605 2 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 450 3 442 27,450 125,000 5 63,000 357,000 545,000 Carthage, TN, 5 miles. 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,138 2 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 508 s 508 501 499 13,920 85,600 5,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 3 12,000 36,000 4 25,000 100,000 3 33,333 100,000 15-15 Celina, TN, 5 miles. 385.4 Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 86 2,298 290 250 Tainter 5 50 by 37 564 3 560 559 559 16,960 55,950 5 14,700 287,300 357,950 3 36,000 108,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1990 TABLE 15-H (Continued) CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Celina Cheatham Cordell Hull Old Hickory Percent of project completion 8 - 8 8 8 Year opened to navigation 1964 - 1952 1973 1954 Cost 9 $146,500,000 $213,000,000 $31,700,000 $79,874,500 $52,266,400 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acrefeet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage. 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during nonflood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 15-16 TABLE 15-I TENNESSEE RIVER (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dimensions Length Minimum Depth Width Avail- Lift on Guard Sills of able for Year Miles Cham- Full Nor- Maxi- Opened Cost of Above Miles from ber Width mal mum Lower Upper Character Navi- Kind Type of Each Lock Project 1 Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) of Foundation gation of Dam Construction and Dam Kentucky Pickwick Landing: Auxiliary lock Main lock Wilson: Auxiliary lock Main lock General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock Main lock Guntersville: Auxiliary lock Main lock Nickajack: Auxiliary lock Main lock Chickamauga Watts Bar Fort Loudon Melton Hill (Clinch R.) p-L 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, 110 KY 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, 110 TN 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg 110 TN 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 60 AL 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 110 AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence 60 AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, 110 AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 60 AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 110 AL 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 471.0 6.9 above Chattanooga, TN 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, TN 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, TN 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, TN 110 110 60 60 60 75 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 600 55 63.0 1000 55 63.0 292 94 100.0 300 600 94 100.0 400 48 51.5 600 48 51.5 360 600 600 800 360 360 360 400 39 45.0 39 45.0 39 41.0 39 41.0 49 53.0 58 70.0 72 80.0 54 60.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 12.8 10.0 Limestone 11.0 4 11.2 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 13.2 14.7 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 11.8 13.0 Limestone 12.7 13.0 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 13.0 10.0 Limestone 11.8 12.0 Shale 11.8 12.0 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1942 Fixed Concrete and 2 earthfill 1937 Fixed Concrete and s earthfill 1984 Fixed Concrete and a earthfill 1927 Fixed Concrete and $46,973,540 5 earthfill 1959 - - 7 2 1934 Fixed Concrete and 1,796,295 6 x earthfill 1963 Fixed Concrete and 7 earthfill ,J 1937 Fixed - 3 & 7 1965 Fixed Concrete and 7 earthfill 1967 Fixed Concrete 7 Fixed Concrete 7 1939 Fixed - 3 & 7 1941 Fixed Concrete and 3 earthfill 1943 Fixed Concrete and 3 earthfill 1963 Fixed Concrete 2 1. H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess., contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated under 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to existing locks and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defense Act of June 3, 1916 (H. Doc. 1262, 64th Cong., 1st sess.). Actual cost of lock and dam. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1990 TABLE 15-J TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEP 30, 1990 (See Section 2 of Text) Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,236 $9,216,272 $164,270,523 $175,731,031 1,2 Maintenance - - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compensation, - 5 - 5 rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,236 $9,216,277 $164,282,188 $175,742,701 1,2 1. In addition, surplus property value at $54,336 was tion and care of works of improvement under provisions of transferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes appropriation for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended between 1890 and June 30, 1935, on opera- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 15-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Estimated Cost Type of Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Cumberland, KY Channel 520,000 240,000 760,000 1 Improvement 1. Deferred. TABLE 15-L RESERVOIRS Total Federal Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Center Hill Lake, TN Caney Fork River $53,412,0221 Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY Obey River 28,167,7461 J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Stones River 56,868,039 1,2 Laurel River Lake, KY Laurel River 56,741,232 3 Martins Fork Lake, KY Martins Fork 20,479,911 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 15-18 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY May 1990 and Oct 1990 Corbin, KY May 1990 and Oct 1990 Lake City, TN May 1990 and Oct 1990 Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) May 1990 and Oct 1990 Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) May 1990 and Oct 1990 Paint Rock River, AL May 1990 Pineville, KY May 1990 and Oct 1990 Spring City, TN May 1990 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) Oct 1990 TABLE 15-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 90 Cost Browns Creek, Nashville, TN $263,625 Dry Creek, Goodlettsville, TN 402,374 Lytle Creek, Murfreesboro, TN 9,151 Little Limestone Creek, TN 27,646 Whites & Ewing Creeks, TN 5,989 Gibson Creek, TN 588 Trace Creek, Waverly Park, TN 23,136 Doe & Watanga River, Elizabethtown, TN 3,348 Little Harpeth River, Brentwood, TN 13,430 Beaver Dam Creek, Damascus, VA 36,221 Brush Creek, Johnson City, TN 20,865 Clinch River, Tazwell Co., VA 59,806 Hickory Creek, Warren Co., TN 11,109 East Fork of Clarks River, KY 8,909 Harpeth River, Williamson Co., TN 16,815 Martins Creek, Unicoi Co., TN 47,139 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526, 79th Congress) Project FY 90 Cost Lake Guntersville, AL $32,091 Sheffield Water Intake, AL 26,218 Duck River, Hickman Co., TN 21,434 Pond Creek, Cheatham Co., TN 21,016 Whitesburg Br., Morgan County, AL 23,887 Cumberland River Metro Nashville Landfill 18,230 Cumberland River NES Transmission Tower 13,622 Duck Island Water Refuge, Lake Barkley, KY 28,568 Fair Grounds Park, Clarksville, TN 29,054 Savannah City Park, TN 8,998 Sequoyah Hills Park, Knoxville, TN 31,538 Tennessee River, Chattanooga, TN 2,607 15-19 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southwestern Ohio, west central Kentucky, a small portion of north central Tennessee, Indiana except northern part, and southeastern Illinois except Cairo-Mounds-Mound City area, all included in drainage basin of Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY., to mouth. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation- Channels and Harbors Page 1. Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY ...... 16-2 Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio Riverl6-2 3. Green and Barren Rivers, KY ..................... 16-2 4. Kentucky River, KY ..................................... 16-2 5. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ................. 16-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects..........16-3 7. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................................. 16-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 8. Evansville, IN ............................................... 16-3 9. M ill Creek, OH ............................................. 16-3 10. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ........... 16-4 Flood Control - Reservoirs 11. Barren River Lake, KY ................................. 16-4 12. Brookville Lake, IN ....................................... 16-5 13. Buckhorn Lake, KY.......................................16-5 14. Caesar Creek Lake, OH ............................... 16-5 15. Cagles Mill Lake, IN ..................................... 16-6 16. Carr Fork Lake, KY.......................................16-6 17. Cave Run Lake, KY ....................................... 16-6 18. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN.............................16-6 19. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH ....16-7 20. Green River Lake, KY...................................16-7 21. Huntington Lake, IN.....................................16-8 22. Mississinewa Lake, IN ................................. 16-8 23. Monroe Lake, IN ........................................... 16-8 24. Nolin Lake, KY ............................................. 16-9 25. Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) ............. 16-9 26. Patoka Lake, IN ........................................... 16-9 27. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY ... ........................... 16-9 28. Salamonie Lake, IN.... ....................... 16-10 Page 29. Taylorsville Lake, KY ................................. 16-10 30. W abash River Basin ................................... 16-11 31. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH.............16-11 32. William H. Harsha Lake, OH ..................... 16-11 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................................... 16-12 34. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 16-12 35. Flood Control Works Under Special Authorization ..................................................... 16-12 36. Advance Engineering and Design ............. 16-12 General Investigations 37. Surveys.........................................................16-12 38. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 16-12 39. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .. 16-12 Tables Table 16-A Cost and Financial Statement......16-13 Table 16-B Authorizing Legislation ............... 16-18 Table 16-C Other Authorized Navigation v Projects ......................................... 16-20 Table 16-D Not applicable Table 16-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................................... 16-21 Table 16-F Not Applicable Table 16-G Deauthorized Projects ................. 16-23 Table 16-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems ........... 16-25 Table 16-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan ............................... 16-26 Table 16-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan ....................... 16-30 Table 16-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 16-31 Table 16-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 16-33 16-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, LICKING RIVER, KY Location. The Licking River originates in southeastern Kentucky and flows generally northwesterly to its confluence with the Ohio River at Covington, KY, mile 470.2 below Pittsburgh, PA. The Licking River Basin includes the drainage area of the Licking River, and all other left bank tributaries of the Ohio River from Markland Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 532) upstream to Meldahl Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 436). Existing project. There are no locks and dams on the Licking River. However, a navigable depth of 9 feet is maintained up to mile 7.0 on the Licking River. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities, oil products, and coal are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel. $12,311. Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see the heading under Ohio River. 3. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY. Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to give, with channel work in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY; a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of Green River and Dam 3 at mile 108.5 Green River. Maintenance: Contract was completed for cell removal on Green River and construction of access road and repair of concrete esplanade pavement at Lock and Dam 6 continued. Routine maintenance was performed. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, are in good condition. Lock and Dam 3, Green River, and Lock and Dam 1, Barren River are in fair condition, and Lock 4, Green River, is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs were deferred pending completion of survey report for navigatioi on Green River. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Under permit issued by District Engineer on August 20,1963, private interests dredged channel of Green River to extend 9- foot-depth to coal loading terminal at mile 105.7. Channel of Green River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 4. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-footdepth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45th Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 16-2 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 16-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) On December 19, 1976, the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 24-hour year-round operation to two-shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. On October 1, 1981, Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal year 1982 and was again closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 through 14 were leased to the State of Kentucky on May 21,1985. The State of Kentucky operated these locks on weekends during the summer boating seasons through the Fiscal Year. The lease is due to expire on October 15, 1989, and Locks 5 through 14 will be closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. During the fiscal year Locks 1 through 4 continued a two-shift, year-round operation. Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through September 30, 1990, $288,805. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities and gasoline are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964, and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 5. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 16-C. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 8. EVANSVILLE, IN Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN, on right bank of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) Existing project. Construction of a system of levees and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. Project will provide protection for City of Evansville, IN, against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood (maximum of record), with a 3-foot freeboard. Estimated total cost of new work (1990) is $51,100,000 Federal, and' $5,500,000 non-Federal. Existing project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin 1937 Flood Control Act. Howell Section, Unit 2, was reclassified from the "active" category to the "inactive" category July 7,1977, based on current studies that indicated this part of the project is not economically justified. Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of June 22,1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for Howell Unit 1 and Knight Township sections. Assurances for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 1, were executed February 11, 1963. Authorizations-of-entry for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, Parts 1, 2, and 3 have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. US Highway 41W Pump Plant construction contract advanced to 67 percent completion. Contract for Diamond Avenue, North 1st Avenue, and Stringtown Road pumping plants and associated levee and floodwall advanced to 58 percent completion. Levee Unit 2, Part 3 construction contract was completed. Knight Township, Howell, Unit 1 and Pigeon Creek, Unit 1 Sections are complete. Howell Section, Unit 2, in the "inactive" category. Construction of Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, was started in April 1974 and is about 89 percent complete. Project is about 77 percent complete overall. 9. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Fork in Hamilton County, OH. Lower Mill Creek is in the commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan area in the southwestern portion of the State. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 16-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 620 acres along the creek will be provided for highdensity urban oriented recreational use. Estimated cost of new work (1990) is $214,210,000 of which $51,210,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and on ponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurances that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25,1975, and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Construction Contracts for Section 8 (Barrier Dam) advanced to 84 percent completion; both Levee Section 2 - Slide Repair and Channel Section 4A advanced to 99 percent completion; and Channel Section 1 advanced to 28 percent completion. Flood damages estimated at $1,684,000 were prevented during the 1990 flood season. Design Memoranda. Hydrology & Hydraulics, Concrete Aggregate and Stone Protection Sources, and Railroad Relocations, General Design Memoranda, Phase I and Phase II, Design of Channel - Sections 5 and 7 are complete. Construction of channel and levee - Sections 2, 3, 4A, and 7A, Phase I, are complete. Project is about 40 percent complete overall. 10. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project provides protection for 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Estimated cost of new work (1990) is $68,626,000, of which $58,767,000 is Federal, and $9,859,000 is non- Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred until such time as a water quality problem on Pond Creek is corrected. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirement by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project was executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1,2, 3, 4, 4A, 5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Construction contracts for Pond Creek Pumps and Motors, and repairs to Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 4A continued. Engineering studies are about 99 percent complete. Construction of levee and floodwall Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 4A; railroad closure at Section 4; electric service for gatewalls; Riverport and Upper and Lower Mill Creek pumping plants; rehabilitation of pump stations; and relocation of Texas Gas Pipeline are complete. Project is 97 percent complete overall. Project was transferred to local interest on September 8, 1989. Flood Control - Reservoirs 11. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast ofScottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including $2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 16-4 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract, with the Commonwealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4,1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for replacement of hydraulic lines was awarded. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1990 flood season prevented damages of $1,817,000. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition is complete. 12. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill,182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum pool of20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Estimated cost of new work (1990) is $45,416,380 of which $37,918,888 is Federal cost and $7,497,492 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Installation of hydropower unit is complete but is not in operation pending finalization of contract with Southeastern Power Administration for purchase of surplus power. Operation for flood control during 1990 flood season prevented damages of $37,000. Routine maintenance was performed. Construction was started in November 1965 and project was placed in operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition are complete. 13. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1990 flood season prevented damages of $1,342,000. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 14. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1990) is $62,893,882 and $5,037,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major 16-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract to reroofthe Control Tower was completed, and routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages estimated at $3,714,000 were prevented during the 1990 flood season. Construction was started in January 1968 and the project was placed in operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. Project is about 99 percent complete overall. 15. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Cost of completed new work is $4,376,278 including $155,416 Federal funds, $113,094 contributed funds and $106,813 non- Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17,1952. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 26, 1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1990 flood season prevented damages of $4,375,000. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. 16. CARR FORK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8- foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1990) is $50,854,826 including $76,724 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Real estate administrative action required for condemnation of remaining tracts was continued. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1990 flood season prevented damages of $9,384,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. All land required for the project has been acquired; however, several acquisition actions remain unsettled. 17. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U.S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 7 miles southwest ofMorehead, KY. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of new work (1990) is $109,475,282 of which $35,213,000 is U.S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1990 flood season prevented damages of $1,817,000. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction was started in June 1965 and is about 95 percent complete overall. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete except recreation facilities. 18. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map of Mansfield, IN.) 16-6 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet area for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Cost of completed new work is $6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management oflands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19,1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $1,412,000 were prevented during the 1990 flood season. Construction started in October 1956 and all major items of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are completed. 19. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acrefeet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project is $22,083,660. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $268,000 were prevented during the 1990 flood season. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 20. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rockfill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of completed new work is $33,462,330, including $317,145 Federal funds and $183,732 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15,1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23,1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1984 was $21,504. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $1,997,000 during 1990 flood season. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site is complete. 16-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 21. HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost for new work (1990) is $19,622,509 made up of $19,273,252 Federal cost for the initial project and $193,903 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contracts for installation of new furnaces and resurfacing spillway access road were completed and routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $4,222,000 during 1990 flood control season. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 22. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gatecontrolled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acre-feet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost for completed new work is $24,381,129 made up of $23,793,145 Federal cost for the initial project, $239,200 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage. $174,392 Federal cost and $174,392 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $5,546,000 during 1990 flood season. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 23. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is $16,569,589 made up of $7,033,669 Federal cost for the initial project and $7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow regulation storage and $869,158 Federal cost and $869,158 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects programr. 16-8 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $1,575,000 during 1990 flood season. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 24. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details of project, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1990) is $17,193,381 including $2,594,377 for construction of recreation facilities. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for Stilling Basin repairs was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1990 flood season prevented damages estimated $887,000. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 25. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for these projects for which individual reports are given. 26. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange, and Crawford Counties. (See Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Estimated cost of new work (1990 is $73,664,159 of which $53,095,790 is Federal cost for other construction, and $20,568,369 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to ensure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent ofthejoint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Ncw work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1990 flood season prevented damage estimated at $5,164,000. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. All major features are complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. The project is about 99 percent complete overall. 27. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River, 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) 16-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acre-feet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details, see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18,1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1990 flood season prevented damages estimated at $2,124,000. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 28. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot-diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acre-feet is for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1990) is $17,046,151 made up of $16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial project and $170,697 non- Federal contributed funds for low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal cost and $315,549 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1990 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $6,782,000. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 29. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works will be slide gate controlled and spillway will be uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated cost of new work (1990 is $122,090,000 made up of $92,980,000 Federal cost for the initial project and $17,020,000 non-Federal contributed funds for initial recreation facilities and $6,045,000 Federal cost and $6,045,000 non-Federal contributed funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 16-10 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provided for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11,1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contracts for Possum Ridge Sewage Treatment Plant and Possum Ridge Road were completed; Sewage Treatment Plant Force Main Outfall advanced to 99 percent completion; and water service contract was awarded. Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1990 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $1,093,000. Engineering and design studies are about 93 percent complete and land acquisition is about 98 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. All major construction items are complete except recreation facilities. The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was May 28, 1983. The project is about 78 percent complete overall. 30. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 31. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details, see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute onehalf additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid one-half cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1990 flood season prevented damages estimated at $97,000. Construction started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program is complete. 32. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Batavia, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acrefeet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1990) is $52,023,157 and $3,485,840 non- Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981, by Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. 16-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20,1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance, and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1990 flood season prevented damages estimated at $7,839,000. Construction was started in May 1970. Engineering studies are 94 percent complete. All land required for project has been acquired. Major relocation and construction features are complete, except one recreation item. Project is about 94 percent complete overall and reservoir was placed in operation in February 1978. 33. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 16-Kfor local protection projects and channel improvements inspected.) Fiscal year costs were $110,411. Total costs to September 30, 1990, were $3,240,412. 34. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 16-E. 35. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for fiscal year were $321,480 for disaster preparedness. During the May-June flooding event in the Wabash River Basin $7,715 was expended on emergency flood response. In addition, $9,813 was expended on field reconnaissance and preparation of rehabilitation letter reports on two non-federal flood protection projects damaged during the spring flood event. Small navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor and Flood Control Act, Public Law 86-645, 86th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $182,294 for two reconnaissance studies. See Table 16-L. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $570,747 for preparation of nine Reconnaissance Studies, four Detailed Project Reports, Plans and Specifications on one project and three construction projects. See Table 16-L. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208,1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $5,848 for construction on one project. See Table 16-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress. Costs for fiscal year were $409,433 for preparation of Reconnaissance Studies on 15 projects, start of Plans and Specifications on 2 projects, and construction of 4 projects. See Table 16-L. Streambank demonstration project (Section 603,1986 Water Resource Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress). Cost for fiscal year were $14,606 for a study report at Ohio River, Gallatin County, IL. 36. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $157 for continutation of advance engineering and design studies for Camp Ground Lake, KY. General Investigations 37. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $2,851,506 consisting of $1,695,591 for 10 flood damage prevention studies and the Ohio River Main Stem Study; $785,035 for two navigation studies; $79,891 for Special Investigations, $21,799 for review of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission licenses, $20,006 for Dam Safety criteria studies, and $249,234 for planning assistance to states. 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $168,847 for flood plain management services. 39. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $4,533,736 consisting of $3,650,964 for navigation studies at Olmsted, IL and Louisville, KY; $832,853 for local protection studies at Holes Creek, OH, Hazard, KY, Louisville, KY, Fairfield, OH, Frankfort, KY, and West Fork Mill Creek, OH; and $49,919 for one reservoir study at Floyds Fork, Jefferson County, KY. 16-12 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1987 1988 1989 1990 Sept. 30, 1990 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1 Open Channel Work, New Work Licking River Approp. $ Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Navigation - Locks and Dams 3 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY Approp. Cost Maint. 11,000 11,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,311 12,000 12,311 55,311 55,311 - 13,808,222 1 - 13,808,222 1 Approp. 1,254,300 1,062,900 1,440,900 1,466,171 Cost 1,206,604 1,067,343 1,297,228 1,544,346 33,326,383 2 3 33,203,553 4 Kentucky River, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost 4,176,749 4,176,749 1,744,500 994,200 1,565,200 1,100,852 1,735,988 947,928 1,479,695 1,231,846 54,360,341 4 5 54,327,219 4 5 556,956 556,956 Flood Control, Local Protection 8 Evansville, IN New Work Approp. Cost 9 Mill Creek, OH 10 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Flood Control - Reservoirs 11 Barren River Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 363,000 661,187 5,002,000 6,523,000 410,957 579,623 2,864,214 5,382,915 12,463,000 15,153,000 10,865,000 2,456,000 10,592,245 13,791,850 6,350,916 8,129,179 40,926,043 6 37,478,061 7 81,308,742 78,098,450 6,422,000 6,153,000 1,777,000 570,000 57,267,183 5,664,866 7,058,291 1,739,587 943,109 56,698,272 - - - - 27,479,717 8 - - - - 27,479,717 8 1,740,100 1,466,900 1,269,700 1,150,838 1,658,886 1,403,868 1,424,926 1,118,208 19,043,964 9 10 11 18,955,778 9 10 11 16-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1987 1988 1989 1990 Sept. 30, 1990 12 Brookville Lake, IN New Work Approp. $ - $ -13,805 $ - $ - $ 45,416,380 12 Cost - - - - 45,402,565 12 Maint. Approp. 416,500 468,400 533,100 504,108 5,743,297 Cost 400,067 451,075 567,567 453,527 5,678,019 13 Buckhorn Lake, KY New Work Approp. - - - - 11,766,206 13 Cost - - - - 11,766,206 13 Maint. Approp. 660,400 651,300 675,100 874,833 11,728,543 14 Cost 648,737 601,512 724,265 801,127 11,624,124 14 14 Caesar Creek Lake, OH New Work Approp. - - - - 62,893,882 Cost 11,388 32,958 -3,725 -1,549 62,883,239 Maint. Approp. 792,100 743,200 650,900 734,271 6,772,934 Cost 771,070 760,749 666,348 710,737 6,716,599 15 Cagles Mill Lake, IN New Work Approp 4,376,278 15 Cost - - - - 4,376,278 16 Maint. - - - - Approp. 404,600 419,700 343,900 398,111 6,498,817 Cost 386,493 399,204 377,443 397,439 6,488,851 16 Carr Fork Lake, KY New Work Approp. - - - - 50,854,826 17 Cost 27,269 7,000 772 2,638 50,854,811 17 Maint. Approp. 855,900 802,400 882,400 912,067 10,094,667 18 Cost 814,628 819,487 915,926 880,911 10,043,054 s18 17 Cave Run Lake, KY New Work Approp. 400,000 - - - 74,262,282 Cost 615,829 17,497 17,417 17,879 74,217,862 Maint. Approp. 478,300 513,000 517,800 566,087 6,430,733 Cost 470,412 502,958 515,762 557,766 6,391,836 18 Cecil M. Hardin Lake, New Work IN Approp. - - - - 6,987,807 19 Cost - - - - 6,987,807 19 Maint. Approp. 474,000 652,700 683,800 510,044 7,918,040 Cost 472,566 615,395 706,592 528,545 7,896,943 16-14 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1987 1988 1989 1990 Sept. 30, 1990 19 Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH 20 Green River Lake, KY 21 Huntington Lake, IN 22 Mississinewa Lake, IN 23 Monroe Lake, IN 24 Nolin Lake, KY 25 Ohio River Basin Louisville District New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ - $ $ 22,083,660 22,083,660 420,900 431,100 425,400 460,567 5,374,314 412,987 411,888 449,834 445,390 5,342,974 - 33,462,330 20 - 33,462,330 20 941,000 943,800 962,397 1,069,965 945,408 900,784 1,018,736 998,018 15,662,911 21 15,557,969 21 - - - - 19,622,509 22 - - - 13 19,621,777 23 464,900 1,000,300 453,100 486,128 7,099,440 431,702 1,000,638 495,401 477,245 7,070,691 - - - - 24,381,129 24 - - - - 24,379,800 25 411,200 418,700 446,700 453,811 6,209,516 397,788 423,085 456,896 408,100 6,151,948 - - - - 16,569,589 26 - - - - 16,569,589 26 434,800 572,100 629,700 608,143 7,247,168 27 413,156 591,033 624,204 585,632 7,206,215 27 -970 2,011,400 2,208,900 1,291,100 1,244,859 1,958,358 2,265,061 1,297,261 1,207,782 17,193,381 28 17,191,441 29 22,189,174 30 22,078,386 30 1,526,142 1,526,142 16-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1987 1988 1989 1990 Sept. 30, 1990 26 Patoka Lake, IN 27 Rough River Lake & Channel Improvment, KY 28 Salamonie Lake, IN 29 Taylorsville Lake, KY 31 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 32 William H. Harsha Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ 20,863 13,837 2,480 $ 73,664,159 31 73,316,744 32 412,700 386,200 431,600 469,885 4,115,516 408,563 377,388 432,867 449,317 4,069,861 - - - - 10,643,001 33 - - - 10,643,001 33 1,304,500 1,007,600 1,575,300 1,170,502 1,241,626 997,292 1,602,455 1,177,644 20,572,712 34 20,489,715 34 - - - - 17,046,151 35 - - - - 17,039,321 36 411,700 435,400 408,768 415,839 6,259,020 394,597 452,523 421,912 404,919 6,230,415 305,000 481,000 486,000 497,000 86,594,309 37 285,296 756,351 904,636 526,392 85,516,866 38 548,900 537,000 626,800 712,271 4,089,971 541,164 515,309 626,165 681,542 4,020,677 - - - - 4,722,463 39 - - - - 4,722,463 39 296,200 392,600 280,000 379,747 282,997 367,143 305,440 339,931 8,270 5,378 885 5,107,436 5,051,148 - 52,023,157 40 52,023,157 40 444,900 442,300 453,335 521,836 5,041,937 443,723 423,889 473,034 503,165 5,004,927 1 Includes $85,000 public works funds 2Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 "maintenance and operation of dams and improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 3Includes $725,715 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $316,871 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters", and $6,405,372 expended between July 5,1885 and June 30,1937 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 5Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds and $63,187 contributed funds. 7Includes $63,169 contributed funds. 8Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds, $110,107 Code 713 Federal funds and $108,418 Code 713 non-Federal funds. 9Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 16-16 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 10 Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 11 Includes $268,675 "maintenance & operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 12Includes $7,497,492 contributed funds and $100,706 Code 711 funds. 13Includes $61,451 public work acceleraton executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 14 Includes $52,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. 15Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $119,602 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 1 6 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $119,602 Code 713 funds, and $106,813 contributed funds. 17 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. 18sIn cludes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 19 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds, $353,995 Code 713 funds, & $353,995 non-Federal contributions in kind for recreation facilities. 20 Includes $133,413 Code 711 funds, $183,732 Code 713 funds, and $40,001 contributed funds. 21 Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees and $268,675 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 2 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,903 contributed funds. 23 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,812 contributed funds. 24Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $239,200 contributed funds and $174,392 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 25 Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $237,871 contributed funds and $174,392 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 26 Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds, $869,158 Code 713 funds, $7,797,604 contributed funds and $869,158 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 27Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 28 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,377 Code 711 funds. 29 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,592,438 Code 711 funds. 30 Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees, $52,000 Supplement Funds, and $195,675 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 31 Includes $20,568,369 contributed funds. 32 Includes $20,221,129 contributed funds. 33 Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $867,396 Code 711 funds, $22,612 Code 713 funds, and $22,612 contributed funds. 34 Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees and $268,675 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 35 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $170,697 contributed funds and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 36 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 37 Includes $4,128,831 contributed funds. 38 Includes $3,549,741 contributed funds. 39 Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds, $50,000 contributed funds, $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities, and $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam. 40Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 16-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 11, 1888 Mar 3, 18931 Jul 13, 1892 Jul 13, 1902 Mar 3,1905 2 Mar 3, 1909 Jul 3,1930 2 Jun 26, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 2 Sep 3, 1954 Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul 3, 1958 GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Purchase of original improvement H. Ex. Doc 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Ann. Rept. 1887, p.1 9 0 3 Construction of Lock 2, Green River Annual Report, 1891, p. 2439 Construction of Lock 5, Green River Construction of Lock 6, Green River Annual Report, 1891, p. 2478 Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River." Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Rivers and Harbors Committee Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.,and widens bends in Bear Creek, KY H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Improvement of Nolin River H.D. 480, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green Revocation of S.D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. Authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 25 of Text) Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection Flood Control Committee of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected Basin, Document 1, 75th Congress, projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of 1st Session Secretary of War, at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Flood Control Committee purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Document 1, 75th Congress, Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial 1st Session accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers, subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan H. Doc. 504, 78th Congress, for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control 2d Session and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, KY at an estimated cost of $129,350 S.D. 105, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barrett Creek at an H.D. 535, 78th Congress estimated cost of $360,000 2d Session Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, H.D. 197, 80th Congress including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River 1st Session Basin, Illinois, and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. H.D. 198, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000. Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for H.D. 192, 85th Congress, Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an 1st Session estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000. 16-18 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Oct 23, 1962 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Mar 7, 1974 Aug 13, 1968 Dec 29, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1988 Nov 17, 1988 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $89 million for further prosection of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $35 million for further prosection of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 30 of Text) Construction of five multiple purpose reservoirs and one local protection project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with provison that construction of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation of partial accomplishment of project Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River were deauthorized. MIAMI RIVER BASIN, PLEASANT RUN, VICINITY FAIRFIELD, OH Three dry bed reservoirs and a Channel Improvement were authorized in Section 401 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. HAZARD, KENTUCKY Approximately 6 miles of Channel Improvement were authorized in Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. OLMSTED LOCKS & DAM, IL & KY A replacement structure for Ohio River Locks and Dam 52 and 53 was authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. H.D. 423, 87th Congress, 2d Session Pub. Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Session Public Law 91-282, 91st Congress, 2d Session Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, 2d Session Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, 2d Session S.D. 96, 90th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 100-676, 100th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 100-676, 100th Congress, 2d Session 16-19 Acts Documents 1Deficiency act. Act of Sep. 3, 1954. 2Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by 3Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Name of Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Licking River Completed 1901 $ 13,045 $ - Rough River, KY Completed 1951 105,500 101,196 Tradewater River, KY Completed 1858 18,568 33,331 White River, IN Completed 1909 119,312 16-20 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status 1 Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY 2 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY 2 Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue River) 2 Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 3 8 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River) 2 Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN 2 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River) 2 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Levee Unit No. 8, IN (White River) Louisville, KY 4 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)5 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY 2 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) Muncie, IN (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 2 7 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River) 6 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek, KY (Green River) 2 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) 2 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclaire, IL Saline River & Tributaries, IL Shawneetown, IL7 Sturgis, KY Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) Tell City, IN Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) 7 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY 2 1977 1954 1958 1959 1957 1965 1987 1953 1972 1965 1979 1948 1960 1953 1952 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 1953 1967 1987 1952 1975 1944 1987 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1959 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 $ 392,443 1,240,299 597,493 2,068,391 1,206,852 832,700 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,177,345 144,563 734,498 372,353 2,960,970 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,788,840 300,143 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 130,417 7,440,987 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 5,892,329 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 297,624 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,551 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 91,000 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 16-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CONTINUED Project and Status 1 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River) 2 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) 7 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 8 9 Grayville, IL Hazard, KY Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio (Great Miami River) 9 Louisville, KY Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH 9 (Great Miami River) Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River). Salyersville, KY (Licking River) Inactive: Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (WhiteRiver) Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 2 Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) Westport, KY Reservoirs: Active: Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) Eagle Creek Lake, KY Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) For Last Full Report See Annual Report 1972 1956 1964 1977 1979 1946 1979 1976 1959 1964 1983 1977 1980 1976 1975 1981 1977 1983 1976 Cost to Sep 30, 1990 Operation and Construction Maintenance $ 893,094- 1,070,926- 3,308,941- 1,095,704- 52,088 272,750 157,935 153,410 355,963 4,490 235,615 1,270,590 1,009,188 1,038,595 702,471 944,386 1,200,920 2,355,395 350,474 1,794,308 1 All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1984 Flood Control Act, as amended. s Cost includes $161,098 cash contribution consisting of $105,118 from the City of Frankfort, KY and $55,980 from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. 4 Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contributions from City of Louisville, KY. SCost shown are for levee and pump plants. 6 The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. 7 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining 9 Advance Engineering and Design funded with General Investigations Appropriation. 16-22 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 1978 $ -- Alton, IN - 1977 -- Anderson, IN (White River) 1940 1986 5,724- Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420- Bellevue, KY - 1977 19,023- Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) - 1981 -- Bromley, KY - 1977 -- California (Cincinnati), OH - 1977 16,465- Carrollton, KY - 1977 9,713- Caseyville, KY - 1986 -- Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977 -- Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977 - -- Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) - 1977 -- Cleves, OH - 1977 6,343- Clinton, IN - 1977 6,848- Cloverport, KY - 1986 -- Concordia, KY - 1986 -- Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN - 1977 -- Derby, IN - 1977 -- Elizabethtown, IL - 1977 -- Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361- Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497- Honey Creek Levee, IN - 1977 -- Leavenworth, IN - 1977 -- Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 -- Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN - 1977 -- Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 -- Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN 1938 1977 275- Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) 1973 1986 60,000- Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 -- Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 -- Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 -- Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216- Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922- Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 -- Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977 -- Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977 -- Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977 -- Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 -- Lewisport, KY - 1990 -- Louisville, KY (Partial) - 1986 -- Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503- Madison, IN - 1977 - Mauckport, IN - 1977 - Marion, IN (Wabash River) 1979 1986 209,975 McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049 Metropolis, IL - 1986 10,575 Milton, KY - 1977 - 16-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 16-G CONTINUED DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection (Cont'd.) Moscow, OH - 1977 $ - - New Amsterdam, IN - 1977 - - New Harmony, IN - 1977 - - New Richmond, OH - 1977 7,104 - Newport-Wilder, KY - 1990 - - Orleans, IN 1972 1977 13,158 - Owensboro, KY - 1990 - - Patriot, IN - 1977 - - Prestonville, KY - 1977 - - Raccoon Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Rising Sun, IN - 1977 - - Rockport, IN - 1977 - - Rome, IN - 1977 - - Shawneetown, IL - 1986 25,367 - Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 1938 1977 - - Shufflebarger Levee, IN 1950 1977 64,487 - Smithland, KY - 1990- Sugar Creek Levee, IN 1961 1977 28,061 - Terre Haute, IN - 1977 - - Tolu, KY - 1986 - - Tri Pond Levee, IL 1972 1977 65,510 - Troy, IN - 1977 - - Utica, IN - 1978 - - Vevay, IN - 1977 - - Vincennes, IN (Partial) 1964 1986 - - Westport, KY - 1977 - - Flood Control - Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN 1980 1981 1,079,867 - Clifty Creek Lake, IN 1979 1981 1,016,358 - Helm Lake, IL 1976 1981 41,616 - Lincoln Lake, IL 1979 1981 1,331,844 - Metamora Lake, IN - 1977 - - 16-24 TABLE 16-H NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS Lock Dimensions Miles Greatest Length Lock above Available Upper Depth of Year and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost Dam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock an (feet) (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER - For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. Sof id Dam GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Green River New 1 9.1 Spottaville, KY New 2 63.1 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY 3 108.5 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY 4 149.0 Woodbury, KY 5 168.1 0.3 miles below Glenmore, KY 6 181.7 2.8 miles above Brownsville, KY Barren River 1 15.0 " 0.3 miles above Greencastle, KY KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 4 of Text) Kentucky River 1 4.0 3.8 miles above Carrolton, KY 2 31.0 Lockport, KY 3 42.0 Gest, KY 4 65.0 1.0 mile below Frankfort, KY 5 82.2 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY 6 96.2 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY 7 117.0 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY 8 139.9 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY 9 157.5 Valley View, KY 10 176.4 1.0 mile below Ford, KY 11. 201.0 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY 12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 13 239.9 2.2 miles below Willow, KY 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 84.0 84.0 35.8 35.8 56.0 36.0 56.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 600.0 600.0 137.5 138.0 360.0 145.0 360.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 147.0 147.0 146.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 11.8' 14.3 17.0 16.4 15.2 9.2 15.2 8.2 13.9 13.2 13.2 15.0 14.0 15.3 18.7 17.3 17.0 18.0 17.0 18.0 17.0 349.1 12.1 363.4 15.0 380.4 7.3 396.8 7.1 412.0 * 12.0 421.1 8.0 Barren River 412.0 12.0 Kentucky River 430.0 8.2 13 443.9 7.6 457.1 8.6 470.3 6.4 485.3 10.0 499.3 9.4 514.6 9.1 533.6 10.6 550.6 10.0 567.6 9.0 585.6 10.0 602.6 9.6 620.6 9.6 637.6 8.6 11.3 11.7 5.6 6.5 9.3 8.8 9.3 14.8 6.1 6.5 7.4 6.5 6.4 6.9 6.0 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Shale and Coal Shale Rock Rock Piles and Rock Gravel 100 100 100 100 100 100 1956 1956 1836 1839 1905 1905 100 1934 Rock and Clay Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock and Piles Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1839 1839 1844 1844 1844 1894 1897 1900 1907 1907 1906 1910 1915 1971 14 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 $5,101,978 3 4,799,271 6 121,377 125,718 1,020,868 10 168,415 0 871,565 12 1,350,385l 15 - CI) 314,847 290,788 275,463 237,646 221,500 296,593 425,693 461,476 392,902 ' At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. 338.0 Ohio River datum) 2New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25,1956, old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970-71 with O&M funds at cost of $822,000. "Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. 4 New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18,1956. 5 Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. 6 Operation discontinued September 30,1981. 'Breaching of dam on May 24,1965, stopped through traffic to Bowling Green, KY. 8 With moveable A-frame crest 3 feet high. 9 Operation discontinued August 1,1951. o Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. "Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. I 2 lncludes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. "At normal pool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River Elev. 421.8 Kentucky River datum (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). "4Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882. " Builtby State ofKentucky. Cost given is for repairs by United States to Locks and Dams 1 through 5. Original construction costs to State were: L&D 1, $220,300; L&D 2, $151,983; L&D 3, $135,857; L&D 4, $131,607; and L&D 5, $137,436. ' 6Lock was closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status in September 1982. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 16-I OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 25 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River) 3 4 Brookport, IL 5 6 Cannelton, IN 5 Cincinnati, OH 5 8 Covington, KY 5 9 Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) 5 o10 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Frankfort, KY,North Frankfort (Kentucky River) 5 Golconda, IL 5 12 Harrisburg, IL 5 o10 Hawesville, KY 5 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) 5 8 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 7 Lawrenceburg, IN 5 Louisville, KY 5 14 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River) 4 5 New Albany, IN 5 s8 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 5 7 Newport, KY 5 7 Paducah, KY 5 7 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) 5 15 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Rough River, KY 3 4 Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River) 11 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) 5 16 Tell City, IN 5 14 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN 5 17 (Wabash river)(completed portion) 5 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Evansville, IN 4 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) South Frankfort 5 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) s Inactive: Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) Benson Creek 5 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) 6 Channel improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee' Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Wall and levee Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Channel improvement Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Wall and levee Levee 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,117,345 144,563 734,498 2,960,970 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 25,005,137 4,337,617 5,375,471 297,624 7,512,987 4,761,551 600,300 1,079,236 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 51,100,000 6,430,000 19,400,000 3,340,000 4,600,000 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 2,013,000 17,164 107,000 272,100 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 1,716,301 109,200 740,000 298,506 232,000 40,000 100,000 93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 285,000 150,000 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,914,039 15,130,345 161,727 841,498 3,233,070 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,758,139 26,721,438 4,446,817 6,115,471 297,624 7,811,493 4,993,551 640,300 1,179,236 1,919,778 441,359 964,936 1,143,079 3,593,941 1,245,704 5,500,000 56,600,000 29 2,140,000 8,570,000 is 2,340,000 21,740,000 21 1,150,000 4,490,000 22 1,087,000 5,687,000 23 16-26 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 25 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Project and Status 1 Type of Construction Estimated Cost 2 Federal Non-Federal Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5 New Harmony Bridge, IL and IN (Wabash River) 5 7 Deauthorized: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) 32 Alton, IN 30 Aurora, IN 31 Bellevue, KY 30 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) 5 33 Bromley, KY 30 California (Cincinnati), OH 31 Carrollton, KY 30 Caseyville, KY 5 34 Cave-in-Rock, IL 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) 30 Cleves, OH 30 Clinton, IN (Wabash River) 30 Cloverport, KY 5 34 Concordia, KY 5 34 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Derby, IN 30 Elizabethtown, IL 30 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Grandview, IN 30 Honey Creek Levee, IN 30 Leavenworth, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River,IL 30 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 17, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 2, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN 30 Lewisport, KY 5 35 Ludlow, KY 30 Madison, IN 30 Mauckport, IN 30 McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Metropolis, IL 5 34 Milton, KY 30 Moscow, OH 30 New Amsterdam, IN 30 New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) 30 New Richmond, OH 30 Owensboro, KY 6 35 Patriot, IN 30 Levee 4,630,000 Bank protection Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee $ 664,376 292,000 255,000 4,300,000 1,570,000 1,080,000 1,250,000 1,750,000 2,220,000 396,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 728,000 590,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 580,000 653,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,850,000 2,180,000 1,580,000 2,090,000 3,410,000 724,000 1,160,000 1,490,000 610,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 3,070,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 616,000 3,200,000 886,000 753,000 528,000 5,158,000 23 $ 99,000 $ 763,376 25 14,000 40,000 1,190,000 400,000 630,000 925,000 720,000 97,000 35,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 193,000 55,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 133,000 32,000 266,000 40,000 164,000 116,000 118,000 715,000 136,000 73,000 56,000 88,000 243,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 431,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 25,000 720,000 195,000 372,000 306,000 27 295,000 5,490,000 1,970,000 1,710,000 28 2,175,000 2,470,000 2,317,000 431,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 921,000 645,000 223,000 24 620,000 712,000 574,000 24 713,000 685,000 1,736,000 244,000 3,014,000 27 2,296,000 27 1,698,000 28 2,805,000 3,546,000 28 797,000 27 1,216,000 1,578,000 27 853,000 24 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 3,501,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 641,000 3,920,000 1,081,000 1,125,000 16-27 Total -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 25 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost 2 Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Prestonville, KY 30 Wall and levee $ 1,710,000 $ 55,000 $ 1,765,000 Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 426,000 37,000 463,000 24 Rising Sun, IN 30 Wall and levee 896,000 280,000 1,176,000 Rockport, IN 30 Wall and levee 466,000 133,000 599,000 Rome, IN 30 Levee 359,000 67,000 426,000 Shawneetown, IL 5 34 Wall and levee 1,810,000 361,000 2,171,000 Shufflebarger Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,380,000 90,000 2,470,000 Smithland, KY 5 35 Wall and levee 864,000 414,000 1,278,000 Sugar Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 418,000 29,000 447,000 24 Tolu, KY 5 34 Levee 303,000 35,000 338,000 Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,050,000 191,000 2,241,000 25 Troy, IN 30 Wall and levee 502,000 133,000 635,000 Utica, IN 5 32 Levee 1,570,000 120,000 1,690,000 Vevay, IN 30 Levee 1,170,000 146,000 1,316,000 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) (Uncompleted Portion) 5 34 Wall and levee 3,340,000 - 3,340,000 28 West Point, KY 5 34 Wall and levee 3,283,000 400,000 3,683,000 24 Westport, KY 30 Wall 1,610,000 41,000 1,651,000 Wilders, KY 35 Wall and levee 10,800,000 959;000 1,759,000 26 1 All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. 3 Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4 Details of this project are in individual report. 5 Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6 See Annual Report for 1958 for details. ' See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8 See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9 See Annual Report for 1965 for details. o1S0e e Annual Report for 1953 for details. 11 See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13 See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 15 Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17 See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 18 Latest cost estimate revision 1988. 19 Latest cost estimate revision 1986. 20 Latest cost estimate revision 1984. 21 Latest cost estimate revision 1983. 22 Latest cost estimate revisibn 1976. 23 Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 24 Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 25 Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 26 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 27 Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 28 Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 29 Latest cost estimate revision 1989. 30 Deauthorized Aug 05, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1971 (P.L. 93-251). 31 Deauthorized Nov 06, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 32 Deauthorized Oct 03, 1978 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 33 Deauthorized May 06, 1981 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 34 Deauthorized Nov 17, 1986 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 35 Deauthorized Jan 01, 1990 under Section 1001 (b)(1), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 16-28 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 25 of Text) RESERVOIRS Estimated Cost 1 Tributary Basin Reservoirs Status Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN 2 Metamora Lake, IN Green River: Barren River Lake, KY 2 Green River Lake, KY 2 Mining City Lake, KY Nolin Lake, KY 2 Rough River Kentucky 2 Kentucky River: Booneville Lake, KY Buckhorn Lake, KY 2 Carr Fork Lake, KY 2 Licking River: Cave Run Lake, KY 2 Falmouth Lake, KY Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH 2 William H. Harsha Lake, OH 2 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 2 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN 2 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 2 Monroe Lake, IN 2 Patoka Lake, IN 2 Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete East Fork of Whitewater River West Fork of Whitewater River Barren River Green River Green River Nolin River Rough River South Fork of Kentucky River Middle Fork of Kentucky River North Fork of Kentucky River Licking River Licking River Caesar Creek East Fork of Little Miami River West Fork of Mill Creek Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Salt Creek Patoka River $ 37,918,888 35,300,000 27,371,299 33,238,597 69,100,000 17,193,381 10,620,389 60,700,000 11,766,206 50,854,826 114,826,300 125,000,000 $ 7,497,492 3 $ 45,416,380 108,418 5 223,733 13 22,612 35,300,000 4 27,479,717 33,462,330 69,100,000 4 17,193,381 10,643,001 - 60,700,000 8 - 11,766,206 50,854,826 114,826,300 7 125,000,000 8 62,893,882 5,037,000 67,930,882 55,230,000 3,485,840 9 58,715,840 3,622,302 1,100,161 10o 4,722,463 4,263,184 6,633,812 7,902,827 113,094 353,995 8,666,762 5 5 11 4,376,278 6,987,807 16,569,589 53,095,790 20,568,369 73,664,159 1Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise noted. 2Details of this project given in individual report. 3Cash contributions for water supply storage. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 5For Code 713 recreaton development. 6Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 7Includes $35,213,000 United States Forest Service cost. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 9Reimbursement for water supply storage. 10 Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorizatin, and $529,361 for Code 713 recreation development. " Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $869,158 for Code 713 recreation development. 12 Includes $14,180,677 cash contribution for water supply storage, and $6,387,692 for initial recreation development. 13 For $183,732 Code 713 recreation development and $40,001 contributed funds. 16-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 16-J WABASH RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN: (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 30 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost Construction Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,000 2 RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,836,000 s 141,046,000 * Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,000 5 126,869,000 4 Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Inactive 74,200,000 64,448,000 136,648,000 1 Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,000 ' 40,000,000 8 Louisville Lake, IL Little Wabash River Inactive 113,000,000 14,435,000 9 127,435,000 o10 1Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. 2Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 3Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 5Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 6Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply, $8,749,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. ?Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $2,133,000 for recreation facilities. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 9Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. o1L0a test cost estimate revision 1982. 16-30 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Local Protection Projects Brevoort Levee, IN Aug 1990 Brookport, IL Oct 1989 Cache River Levee, IL Oct 1989 Cannelton, IN Dec 1989 Cincinnati, OH Apr 1990 Covington, KY Dec 1989 Dayton, KY Apr 1990 Delphi, IN Apr 1990 England Pond Levee, IL Aug 1990 Evansville, IN Sep 1990 Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort Jan 1990 Gill Township Levee, IN Mar 1990 Golconda, IL Oct 1989 Harrisburg, IL Oct 1989 Hawesville, KY Dec 1989 Indianapolis, IN Apr 1990 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Jan 1990 Lawrenceburg, IN Apr 1990 Lebanon Junction, KY Jan 1990 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Sep 1989 Levee Unit No. 8, Wabash River, IN Mar 1990 Louisville, KY Aug 1989 Lyford Levee, IN Mar 1990 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN Aug 1990 Mount Carmel, IL Sep 1989 Muncie, IN Apr 1990 Perryville, KY Aug 1989 New Albany, IN Jan 1990 Newport, KY Dec 1989 Paducah, KY Oct 1989 Reevesville, IL Oct 1989 Rochester-McClearys Bluff Levee, IL Sep 1989 Rosiclare, IL Oct 1989 Shawneetown, IL Oct 1989 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY Jul 1990 Sturgis, KY May 1990 Taylorsville, KY Mar 1989 Tell City, IN Dec 1989 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Mar 1990 Uniontown, KY Apr 1990 Vincennes, IN Aug 1990 West Terre Haute, IN Mar 1990 Channel Improvements Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY May 1990 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Jul 1989 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN Mar 1990 English, IN (Little Blue River) Jul 1990 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Jul 1990 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Aug 1989 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Jul 1990 Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jun 1989 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County), IN Aug 1989 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1988 16-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Channel Improvements (Cont'd.) Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Jul 1990 Neon-Fleming, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jun 1989 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Aug 1989 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Jul 1989 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Jul 1990 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Apr 1990 Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Jul 1989 Salamonie River, Wells County, IN Jul 1990 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Oct 1989 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY Jun 1989 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY Jun 1989 Wabash River, Adams County, IN Apr 1990 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jun 1989 Bank Revetments East Fork White River, Brownstown (Jackson County), IN Mar 1990 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY Jul 1988 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Apr 1990 Green River, Calhoun, KY Jul 1989 Licking River, Butler, KY Dec 1989 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Oct 1989 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH Apr 1990 Little Miami River, Milford, OH Apr 1990 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Jul 1990 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Jul 1989 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY Jul 1989 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL Oct 1989 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Jul 1989 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Jul 1989 Ohio River, Madison, IN Aug 1989 Ohio River, Moscow, OH Dec 1989 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN May 1990 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN Sep 1990 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN Sep 1990 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Jul 1990 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY Jul 1989 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY Jun 1989 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY Apr 1990 Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN May 1990 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Dec 1989 Ohio River, Troy, IN May 1990 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1990 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN Jul 1989 Patoka River, Jasper, IN Mar 1990 Patoka River, Winslow, IN Mar 1990 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY Jun 1989 Wabash River, near Merom, IN Mar 1990 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Sep 1989 Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West Apr 1990 Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road Apr 1990 White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN Mar 1990 Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN Apr 1990 WTP, Great Miami River, Ross, OH Apr 1990 16-32 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 35 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Total Small Navigation (Section 107) Clark Maritime Center, Jeffersonville, IN ' $ 82,180 Southwind Maritime Center, Mt. Vernon, IN 1 100,114 Flood Control (Section 205) Bailey Creek, Indianapolis, IN 1 29,904 Canoe Creek at Henderson, KY 5 21,872 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN 2 22,184 Falcon/Little Eagle Creeks, In 1 27,209 Feather Creek, Clinton, IN 2 17,489 Great Miami River, Port Jefferson, OH 4 28,869 Kentucky River, Hyden, KY 1 39 Lancassange Creek, Clark Co., IN 3 14,563 Penitentiary Jones Run, KY 1 34,871 Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN 1 50,196 Raccoon Creek, D&L Townships, IL 1 35,766 Red River, Clay City, KY 1 6,793 Rolling Fork, Lebanon Junction, KY 1 24,998 Salyersville, KY 2 20 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH 2 22,219 Swamp Creek at Versailles, OH 1 20,192 White River, Hagerstown, IN s 213,563 Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control(Section 208) Salamonie River, Montpelier, IN 5 5,848 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Big Walnut Creek, 500 W, Putnam Co., IN 1 24,855 Blue Bluff Rd., Morgan Co., IN 3 52,109 Cache River, Heron Pond, IL 1 9 Country Road, 28 W, Fountain Co., IN 1 25,000 East Fork White River, Washington Co., IN 1 20,693 Green River Road, Henderson Co., KY 1 25,000 Indian Creek, Burton Road, Morgan Co., IN 3 1,683 Kentucky River, Gilbert Creek, Anderson Co., KY 1 15,328 Little Turtle Creek, Sullivan Co., IN 1 6,020 Nameless Creek, County Road 850 N, IN 1 725 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY 1 1,734 Ohio River, City Park, West Point, KY 1 24,995 Ohio River, State Rd 166, Perry County, IN 1 19,926 Old US 41 Bridge, Vigo Co., IN 1 10,000 Owensboro, KY 6 -390 South Fork Wildcat Creek, Road 7E, Tippecanoe 4 4,301 Sugar Creek, Watermelon Hollow Road, Montgomery Co., In ' 19,733 Wabash River, Vigo Co., In 4 73,060 Wabash River, Vigo Co., Little Road, IN 4 64,492 White River, Road 400W, Pike Co., IN 1 20,151 Whitewater River, Cedar Grove, In ' 9 1Reconnaissance Study 4Construction Funds Received 2Detail Project Report 5Construction Completed 3 Plans and Specification 16-33 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and southeastern Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, PA) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River ............................................... 17-2 2. Kanawha River, WV .................................... 17-2 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River .................. 17-2 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 17-2 Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH .................................. 17-2 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV .................................. 17-3 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ...... 17-3 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ...... 17-3 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .... 17-4 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ........ 17-4 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ........... 17-4 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH.............. 17-5 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ...... 17-5 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY .......... 17-5 15. Grayson Lake, KY ........................................ 17-6 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA .................................. 17-6 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA ......... 17-6 18. M assillon, OH ............................................. 17-7 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH ...................... 17-7 20. Newark, OH ................................................. 17-8 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH ........................................... 17-8 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA ......... 17-8 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) ...... 17-9 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .... 17-9 25. Paintsville Lake, KY .................................... 17-9 26. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV .................................. 17-9 27. Roseville, OH ............................................... 17-10 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV .................................. 17-10 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ........... 17-10 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH .. 17-11 31. Yatesville Lake, KY ...................................... 17-11 32. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................................. 17-11 33. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................................. 17-12 General Investigations 34. Surveys......................................................... 17-12 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data .............. 17-12 Tables Table 17-A Table 17-B Table 17-C Table 17-D Table 17-E Table 17-F Table 17-G Table 17-H Cost & Financial Statement ......... 17-13 Authorization Legislation ............. 17-18 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................ 17-21 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............................. 17-22 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ................... 17-23 Inspection of Flood Control Projects .............................. 17-24 17-1 Page Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON THE OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 19- Ohio River. 2. KANAWHA RIVER, WV Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. Previous projects. For details of previous projects see the Annual Reports for 1875, 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and approximately two miles downstream from Montgomery, WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located approximately 31 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. Another structure is located on the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet by 360 feet. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. The existing project was completed at a cost of $23,403,201. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. For further cost details see Table 17-B, see also, Appendix C. Public Law 99-88 authorized the initiation of Engineering and Design and Real Estate Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam Replacement. Feasibility studies for modernizationhave been completed. The plan includes construction of an additional lock chamber (800'x110') adjacent to the existing locks and continued use of the riverward lock chamber and the navigation dam. The contract for Lock Replacement - Phase I was awarded in April 1990 and is 19% complete. The full funding estimate for new work is $210,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel pile mooring cells. Seventeen of these terminals have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. 3. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 19- Ohio River. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 17-C. 5. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in length with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated inAugust 1970 and completedin July 1974. The 405 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,267,422. The Sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $27,880,000, exclusive of interest, for cost allocated to water supply. 17-2 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $8,164,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $53,235,000 in flood damages. 6. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV, on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in December 1972 and completed in February 1977. See also Appendix A. A total of 485 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project was $41,987,500. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Engineering activities for remaining work items continued. The project is essentially complete, except for remaining recreation facilities, landscaping and cleanup. Operations and maintenance. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date the project has prevented an estimated $3,666,000 in flood damages. 7. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the New River in Summers County, WV, approximately three miles above Hinton, WV, and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, WV, and Giles County, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in length. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway 790 feet in length located in the channel section of the dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23-foot-high weir located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction to permit the future installation of hydropower. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acre-feet. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. A total of 338 tracts of land was acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $29,458,652, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 1962 Annual Reports. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $582,995,000 in flood damages. 8. BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County, WV, on the Little Kanawha River, approximately two miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 357 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,195,839. 17-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. The project is completed. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $50,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $26,910,000 in flood damage. 9. DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, approximately seven miles south of Mount Sterling, OH, on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741-foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting of five gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1968. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. For further project details see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,203,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $19,262,000 in flood damages. 10. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy River, approximately six miles above and north of Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. The Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,628,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $61,851,000 in flood damages. 11. DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY, and approximately six miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 17-4 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 1949. For further project detail see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the project was $7,845,547, including expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $58,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $53,180,000 in flood damages. 12. DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately six miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20-foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 748 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For further project details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate required for the project consists of 8,232 acres in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. See also Appendix A. Federal cost of the project was $30,218,135. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $20,336,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $153,161,000 in flood damages. 13. EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV, approximately six miles southeast ofWayne, WV, 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel inthe right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs of the project to date has been $37,767,475. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $36,095,000 in flood damages. 14. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximately three miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of the Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, a controlled spillway containing four tainter gates located in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, the outlet works consists of an intake structure with three conduits controlled by slide gates and discharging into a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $54,670,126, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. 17-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,361,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $267,527,000 in flood damages. 15. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Carter County, KY, on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging though a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 tracts ofland required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $19,162,741, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $736,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $39,909,000 in flood damages. 16. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson County, VA, approximately four miles northwest of Haysi, VA, on the Pound River approximately two miles above the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in length, an outlet tunnel located near the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was modified to include water quality control by adding control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acre-feet. The dam was completed in December 1963. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also AppendixA. The Federal cost for the project was $20,444,383, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and apputenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $696,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $139,149,000 in flood damages. 17. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY AND CUMBERLAND RIVERS, WV, VA, AND KY Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above Harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existing project. The authorization language directs the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full Federal expense, such flood control measures as are determined to be necesssary and advisable for the communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River basins. The authorization further states that such flood control measures would be located at or in the vicinity of Pikeville, KY; and Grundy, VA, on the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland River; 17-6 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT and Williamson and Matewan on the Tug Fork, in order to afford the named communities and other flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate for the project is $960,600,000, which includes $54,600 non-Federal contributions. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Additional engineering studies are now underway to determine what is necessary and advisable to address the flooding problems in both the Levisa Fork Basin and in the Tug Fork tributary stream areas. The contract for construction of the Pump Station at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in April 1983 and is complete. The contract for construction of the floodwall at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in July 1986 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Area Clearing was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Housing Development, Valley View Site, was awarded in September 1987 and is 99% complete. The contract for the Floodwall and Pump Stations for the Williamson Central Business District was awarded in June 1988 and is 87% complete. 18. MASSILLON, OH Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contribution of work beyond the scope of the project. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 19. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. Construction of the system was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost of the project was $41,247,815, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being corrected through the installation of downstream blankets and/or relief wells and grouting. The estimated full funding cost of the rehabilitation program is $39,100,000 in total, with $25,500,000 from the Construction, General Appropriation and $13,600,000 from the Operations and Maintenance, General Appropriation. A related but separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has been initiated. Under current hydrologic design standards, deficiencies exist in the spillways at all the 14 projects in the system. Corrective measures include widening present spillways, constructing new spillways and installing parapet walls on top of the dams. The full funding estimate for the Dam Safety Assurance Program is $60,870,000. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been met. For further details see the 1942 Annual Report. 17-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The Major Rehabilitation is continuing as scheduled. Thus far, twenty-one contracts have been awarded and the program is 65% complete. The Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated during FY 1982. Thus far eight contracts have been awarded and the Dam Safety Assurance program is 42% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $66,950,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $1,264,118,000 in flood damages. 20. NEWARK, OHIO Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. Existing project. For details of the existing project see the 1981Annual Report. Construction of the existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in November 1941. As a result of the 1968 Flood ControlAct the existing project was modified to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 and completed in December 1981. The full funding estimate forthe project is $11,100,000 Federal cost and $4,215,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For details of required and completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North Fork Channel- As a result of withdrawal of State support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the project required re-formulation. A reanalysis is complete. Engineering studies continued. The contract for construction of North Fork Channel (Phase I) was awarded in September 1986 and is complete. The contract for construction of the remaining portion of North Fork Channel was awarded in February 1988 is complete. Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 21. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, on the North Branch of Kokosing River, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and two miles northwest of Fredericktown, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet work located in the right abutment of the dam. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 45 square miles. The 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,665,985, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. 22. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River and approximately three miles upstream from Pound, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. 17-8 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $44,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $4,754,000 in flood damages. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the Ohio River Basin comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. Operations during the fiscal year. The completed local protection projects, which are operated and maintained by local interest, except for those local protection projects for which individual reports have been included. To date the project has prevented flood damages of an estimated cumulative total of $617,891,000. 24. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, OH, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 feet in length, a gale controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 576 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $26,969,962, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $1,072,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $39,866,000. 25. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately eight miles above the mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1976 and was completed in September 1980. See also Appendix A. The full funding estimate for new work is $66,478,000, which includes $3,028,000 non-Federal Costs. The local sponsor has reimbursed the Government $377,000 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is well advanced. The remaining work items include landscaping and final cleanup. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $3,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $5,653,000. 17-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 26. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one mile east of Justice, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 540 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in December 1979. See also Appendix A. A total of 2,109 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project was $261,211,700. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $6,528,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $65,318,000. 27. ROSEVILLE, OH Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six miles the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,291 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in August 1959 and completed in October 1960. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Total costs of local requirements were $62,000. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections of the improved portion of the project were conducted to determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory condition. 28. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at Gauley Bridge, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project was $48,375,884, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necesssary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $256,167,000 in flood damages. 29. SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, WV, and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gate sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. See also Appendix A. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 Annual Report for contributed funds. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated 17-10 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $174,128,000 in flood damages. 30. TOM JENKINS RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, OH, and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, a controlled works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. A total of 100 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project were $2,086,503, which includes expenditure for recreation at completed project. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $970,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $10,953,000 in flood damages. 31. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY, and 18 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction of an earthfill dam, 104 feet in height and 770 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located approximately one-half mile east ofthe right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel through the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 86,951 acrefeet and control a drainage area of 208 square miles. The full funding estimate for new work is $110,000,000, which will be allocated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $6,615,000 for the cost sharing portion of the recreation development. The local sponsor has reimbursed the Government $580,000 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. To date, 732 of the required 778 real estate tracts have been acquired. A contract for construction of the dam was awarded in January 1977 and was terminated for the convenience of the Government in August 1977. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The contract for Construction of Dam and Appurtenant Works, Phase I, was awarded in March 1984 and is complete. Contracts with the Commonwealth and the County for relocation and/or abandonment of roads affected by the project are complete. The contract for construction of Dam and Appurtenances (Phase II) was awarded in April 1986 and is complete. The contract for Relocation of SR 32-2 was awarded in February 1986 and is complete. The contract for Reservoir Clearing was awarded in June 1989 is complete. The contract for Relocating Remaining Highways was awarded in October 1988 is complete. The contract for Cemetery Relocation, Part III, was awarded in February 1989 is complete. The contract for Barker Boat Launch Area and Spillway Concrete Wall Linings was awarded in July 1990 and is 12% complete. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interest to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal year ofthose completed units transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal year 1990 were $96,144. Total cost to September 30, 1990, were $1,625,376. The flood control works inspected and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 17-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 33. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1990 Cost Location Hocking River, Rockbridge, OH Krouts Creek, Huntington, WV Whitestone Creek, Mt. Giland, OH FY 1990 Cost $26,782 83 -32 Work performed under special legislation pursuant to Water Resources Development Act of 1986 as follows: Apple Creek, Apple Creek, OH Big Sandy River, Kenova, WV Jardin Manor, Licking County, OH Kenova, WV Nimishillen Creek, East Sparta, OH Ohio River, Gallipolis, OH Ohio River, Village of Middleport, OH Point Pleasant State Park, WV River Side Drive, St. Marys, WV Sistersville City Park, WV St. Albans, WV State Route 62, Buffalo, WV $ 6,111 29,885 72,875 -9,481 5,468 2,440 17,724 2,720 31,891 134 7,337 7,542 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 853, 80th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1990 Cost Location Bridges, Massillon, OH Kanawha River, Charleston, WV Kanawha River, St. Albans, WV FY 1990 Cost $719,107 0 251 Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress were conducted as required during FY 1990 at a cost of $368,351. National emergency management activities were accomplished by the district as required. The costs for these activities during FY 1990 were $121,433. 34. SURVEYS Fiscal year 1990 costs were $2,392,717 itemized as follows: Big Horse Creek, Langing, NC Blackfork Mohican River, Shelby, OH Blacklick Creek, Franklin Co., OH Elk River at Addison, Webster Springs, WV Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH Hocking River, Chauncy, OH Krouts Creek, Huntington, WV Muskingum River, Mansfield, OH Olentangy River, Galion, OH Spring Creek, Spencer, WV Wolf Creek, Barberton/Norton, OH $ 22,881 -32 2,305 17,101 13,042 15,391 13,419 123,876 13,734 - 229 117,149 Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Comprehensive Basin Studies Special Studies Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies Continuation of Planning and Engineering Advance Engineering and Design 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $150,156. FY 1989 Cost $753,764 426,612 3,832 222 96,459 106,659 345 1,004,824 17-12 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 2. Kanawha River, New Work WV Approp. (Existing Project) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Winfield L&D New Work Approp. Cost ---- ---- ---- --- 27,853,6991 --- ---- ---- --- 27,853,6991 5,326,600 6,348,500 5,045,900 6,836,284 96,613,8682 5,273,037 6,338,485 4,956,717 6,640,967 96,230,6542 ---- ---- ---- --- 130,9843 ---- ---- ---- --- 130,9843 1,185,000 2,905,000 5,860,000 17,984,000 27,934,0004 788,585 3,049,510 5,257,766 14,967,287 24,063,148s 5. Alum Creek Lake, New Work OH Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Beech Fork Lake, New Work WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7. Bluestone Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Burnsville Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Deer Creek Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10. Delaware Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 578,800 484,500 496,800 52 584,656 464,003 492,537 51 77,021 807,500 800,170 -40,000 34,897 754,000 705,229 732,200 62 748,714 63 831,300 966,500 990,700 818,116 959,377 1,027,535 --- 56,267,422 --- 56,267,422 33,808 6,523,173 14,157 6,469,689 --- 41,987,500 --- 41,987,500 8,410 7,454,149 8,370 7,417,242 --- 29,458,6526 --- 29,458,6526 940,038 15,438,816 919,671 15,408,690 ---- ---- ---- --- 56,195,839 ---- ---- ---- --- 56,195,839 1,036,000 1,073,100 1,279,100 1,204,142 10,467,447? 1,051,479 1,022,355 1,225,891 1,265,398 10,403,6967 466,200 401,500 378,800 454,016 404,277 362,294 831,500 406,500 527,600 804,290 429,605 527,210 --- 20,406,5458 --- 20,406,5458 384,557 7,317,5829 397,027 7,297,4859 511,939 490,649 7,631,821 7,631,821 9,558,75810 9,520,71810 17-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 TABLE 17-A (cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 15. Grayson Lake, KY 16. John W. Flannagan Dam & Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA 17. Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV, & VA 18. Massillon, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,102,600 1,218,000 1,028,200 1,146,347 1,087,460 1,182,381 1,076,456 1,141,740 ---- ---- ---- --- 410,900 327,000 426,300 340,712 405,026 299,855 463,478 347,484 ---- ---- 775,000 ---- ---- 774,512 960,300 1,213,501 995,100 945,656 1,106,056 1,123,898 84,995 - 33,005 884,144 877,552 806,000 909,500 1,039,300 956,962 803,962 861,475 1,076,769 948,010 639,000 649,500 628,800 624,072 631,346 617,469 639,720 642,060 857,300 1,119,000 935,600 1,012,470 844,377 1,058,688 979,894 987,086 7,845,54711 7,845,54711 15,966,52312 15,928,86112 30,218,135 30,218,135 6,433,05513 6,423,9611s 37,885,963 37,767,475 13,390,95114 13,365,02014 54,670,1261s 54,670,12616 9,799,46016 9,758,29216 19,162,74117 19,162,74117 10,447,442 10,426,292 20,444,38318 20,444,38318 13,104,73219 13,043,34319 30,865,000 30,102,000 41,100,000 34,566,000 174,479,00020 20,547,722 36,253,188 43,081,654 30,563,339 167,394,45820 ---- ---- ---- --- 8,139,40621 ---- ---- ---- --- 8,139,40621 -100 9,000 8,575 10,000 9,587 12,940 9,359 325,648 320,970 17-14 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-A (cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 19. Muskingum River New Work Dams & Lakes, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. (Rehab.) Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost 20. Newark, OH New Work (Previous Project) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Existing Project) New Work Approp. Cost 21. North Branch of New Work Kokosing River Approp. Lake, OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22. North Fork of New Work Pound River Lake, Approp. Ohio River Basin, Cost VA Maint. Approp. Cost 23. Ohio River Basin New Work Approp. Cost 24. Paint Creek Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4,110,000 3,570,500 4,222,500 3,980,201 3,496,431 4,354,381 196,800 195,560 2,052,000 1,915,129 6,000,000 4,473,692 595,500 577,093 --- 41,247,815" --- 41,247,8152 3,835,753 72,713,8032 3,832,053 72,579,7432 200,000 209,502 572,000 50,000 349,014 375,383 9,065,000 2,410,000 7,914,562 3,921,597 5,000 79,459 1,211,000 668,997 992,300 982,155 22,214,945' 22,157,3042 25,626,000 23,806,622 845,916 845,916 23,200 23,004 265,000 356,352 20,500 -900 19,790 --- 4,087,000 550,000 2,743,720 1,638,974 - 69 758,673 --- 758,673 - 5,000 10,669,512 30,334 10,440,658 158,300 154,000 154,000 128,225 151,627 150,471 157,555 130,644 297,400 252,500 265,700 241,487 284,700 246,920 275,188 245,709 6,665,9852 6,665,9852 1,938,142 1,931,230 6,186,90126 6,186,9012 5,897,44627 5,890,88627 355,8612 355,86128 --- --- --- --- 26,969,9622 --- --- --- --- 26,969,9622 706,700 548,500 504,700 474,528 6,881,3848 669,305 590,421 503,067 452,429 6,839,5998 17-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 TABLE 17-A (cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 25. Paintsville Lake, KY 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV 27. Roseville, OH 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, OH 31. Yatesville Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 620,000 322,000 635,000 1,247,000 856,936 317,444 182,694 1,104,675 685,600 596,500 626,600 553,332 672,878 582,529 629,138 559,467 45,250,000 45,222,538 1,335,800 1,313,257 12,000 12,004 -5,000 36,623 1,723,000 1,652,811 9,000 8,665 --- 100,000 --- -61,408 1,178,000 1,244,693 1,236,457 1,232,038 22,700 .--- 25,009 40,653 2,784,500 963,500 1,040,100 966,752 2,794,884 902,053 1,086,289 968,860 1,024,800 1,284,500 1,293,900 1,158,258 1,023,670 1,223,288 1,356,331 1,180,160 234,400 227,000 242,500 300,864 240,242 227,314 226,493 302,982 5,410,000 8,287,000 17,627,000 6,799,000 15,907,584 16,007,404 18,798,052 5,313,333 --- --- --- 7,050 --- --- --- 4,739 60,691,147 60,088,862 5,222,032 5,197,232 261,317,23331 261,155,82531 13,573,30732 13,502,45632 910,785 910,785 217,677 210,249 48,375,88433 48,375,88433 19,809,7663' 19,767,86934 37,029,585" 37,029,585" 22,630,94536 22,608,00336 2,086,50337 2,086,50337 4,642,239 4,623,157 92,809,500 89,325,169 7,050 4,739 See page 17-17 for footnotes. 17-16 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT XIncludes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 2Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. 3Public Works Acceleration funds. 4lncludes $13,967,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 5Includes $13,175,000 Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 6lncludes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public Works Acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. 7Includes $268,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 8Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 Code 711 funds. I9lncludes $130,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 10Ilncludes $240,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. "Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, $1,089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 12Includes $82,900 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $268,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 13 Includes $100,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 14Includes $209,918 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $268,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 15Includes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. 6lIncludes $38,000 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $268,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 17Includes $406,919 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 18Includes $422,983 Code 711 funds. 19lIncludes $88,710 special recreation use fees. 2Includes Cost from Ohio River Division/District. 21Includes $477,813 contributed funds. 22Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery funds and $528,288 Code 711 funds. 2Includes $198,578 Maintenance and Operations funds. 24Includes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. 2Includes $45,177 Code 711 funds. "Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 2 7Includes $68,200 special recreation use fees. 2Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. 29Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. "Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. 31lncludes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. "Indudes $60,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. *Includes $300,062 Code 711 funds. 3'Includes $214,112 special recreation use fee funds, $300,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and Operation Funds. *Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. T Indudes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, $215,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $142,078 Maintenance and Operations Funds. TIncludes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. Excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 17-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 TABLE 17-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 15, 1985 5. Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 7. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 8. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 9. Jun. 28, 1938 10. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 11. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 12. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Deleted Power BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 88, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 17-18 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-B (cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 14. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 15. Jul. 14, 1960 16. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 1, 1980 18. Jun. 28, 1938 19. Feb. 20, 1934 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 20. Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 23, 1962 EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as deemed Necessary and Advisable. MASSILLON, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers. NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 17-19 17. 21. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 TABLE 17-B (cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 25. Oct. 27, 1965 26. Oct. 23, 1962 27. Jun. 28, 1938 28. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 29. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 30. Dec. 22, 1944 31. Oct. 27, 1965 32. Jun. 22, 1936 22. 24. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. 17-20 H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River WV and KY including Levisa and Tug Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,8111 131,473 Elk River, WV3 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV5 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WV6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OH7 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WA and VA5 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH8 1953 10,951 16,593 1In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 2Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 3Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 5Work suspended. 'Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. 8Private Law 954, August 31,1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth Sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full 17-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 TABLE 17-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 --- --- Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 --- --- Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 --- --- Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 --- --- Chillicothe, OH 1986 20,373,314 ---.-- East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 --- --- Galax, VA 1953 480,536 --- --- Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 --- --- Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 --- --- Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 --- --- Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 --- --- Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 2,919,578 --- --- Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 --- --- Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 --- --- Russell, KY 1953 552,493 ---.-- Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 --- --- Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY --- 11,577 -- Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 ------ Vanceburg, KY --- --- --- --- Deferred Local Protection Projects Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 --- --- --- Oceana, WV 1981 611,000 --- --- Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA --- 2,656 --- Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 1,272,740 --- Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Martin, KY 1983 212,048 ------ 17-22 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Aberdeen, OH --- May 1981 1,334 --- Athalia, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Belpre, OH --- Nov 1977 --- --- Brooklyn, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- Buena Vista, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Chambersburg, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Chesapeake, OH --- Nov 1986 ---.-- Cheshire, OH --- Nov 1977 ---.-- Chilo, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Clifton, WV --- Aug 1977 11,237 --- Coal Grove, OH --- Jan 1990 3,389 --- Columbus, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Dover, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- Friendly, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Fullerton, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- Gallipolis, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Greenup, KY --- Jan 1990 4,962 --- Hanging Rock, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Hartford, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Henderson, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Higgi nsport, OH --- Oct 1978 --- --- Hockingport, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Letart, WV--- Aug 1977 --- --- Letart Falls, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV --- Nov 1986 17,721 --- Manchester, OH --- May 1981 ---- Mapleshade, OH --- Oct 1978 --- --- Marietta, OH --- Nov 1981 --- --- Mason, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Middleport, OH --- May 1981 9,783 --- Miller, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- NMeilwlw Mooadr,t iWnsVv ille, --- Aug 1977 ---.-- WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- New Matamoras, OH --- Aug 1977 ---.-- Newport, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Normal, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- Pomeroy, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Portland, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Proctorville, OH --- Nov 1986 --- --- Racine, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Ripley, OH --- Oct 1978 7,523 --- Riverview, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- St. Mary's, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Sardis, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Sciotoville, OH --- Aug 1977 -- --- Sistersville, OH --- Aug 1977 ---.-- South Point, OH --- Nov 1986 ---.-- South Portsmouth, KY --- Jan 1990 ---.-- Syracuse, OH --- Aug 1977 ---.-- Waverley, WV --- Aug 1977 ---.-- Williamstown, WV --- Nov 1979 ---.-- Zanesville, OH --- May 1981 ---.-- 17-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1990 TABLE 17-G (cont'd) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Reservoirs and Lakes Big Bend, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 --- Birch, WV --- Nov 1986 --- --- Frazeysburg, OH --- May 1981 5,000 --- Leading Creek, WV 1974 Jan 1990 272,880 --- Logan, OH --- Oct 1985 --- --- Milersburg, OH --- May 1981 --- --- Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 --- Moores Ferry, VA --- Nov 1986 22,879 --- Mud River, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- Panther Creek, WV 1976 Nov 1986 --- --- Poca, WV --- May 1981 --- --- Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 --- Salt Creek, OH 1975 Nov 1986 1,089,943 --- Utica, OH 1975 Jan 1990 757,550 --- West Fork, WV 1974 Jan 1990 663,192 --- White Oak Creek, OH --- Nov 1981 --- --- 17-24 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-HINSPECTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS - See Section 33 of Text Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY Apr 90 Sep 90 Athens, OH May 90 Bramwell, WV Nov 90 Cairo, WV Nov 90 Canton (Nimishillen), OH Aug 90 Cattletsburg, KY Apr 90 Aug 90 Ceredo-Kenova, WV Apr 90 Aug 90 Chillicothe, OH Apr 90 Sep 90 East Rainelle, WV Jul 90 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Nov 90 Fourpole Creek, WV Jan 90 Galax, VA Nov 90 Grahn, KY Sep 90 Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Sep 90 Hutchins, KY Suspended Huntington, WV Mar 90 Aug 90 Inez, KY Oct 90 Ironton, OH Mar 90 Aug 90 Jacksonsburg, Fishing Creek, WV Nov 90 Maysville, KY May 90 Oct 90 Montcalm, WV Nov 90 Newark, OH Jul 90 Dec 90 Olive Hill, KY Sep 90 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Nov 90 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Nov 90 Parkersburg, WV May 90 Oct 90 Pax, WV Aug 90 Point Pleasant, WV May 90 Oct 90 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Apr 90 Oct 90 Prestonsburg, KY Jun 90 Dec 90 Princeton, WV Nov 90 Richwood and Fenwick, WV Jul 90 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Suspended Ripley, WV Nov 90 Roseville, OH Jan 90 Jun 90 Dec 90 Russel, KY Apr 90 Aug 90 Smithfield, WV Nov 90 South Williamson, KY Apr 90 Oct 90 Utica, OH Sep 90 West Union, Middle Island, WV Nov 90 Williamson, WV Apr 90 Oct 90 17-25 PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT * This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and Tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams ............... Page 1. Allegheny River, PA........................18-2 2. Construction of locks and dams,Ohio River.....18-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV..............18-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River.............18-3 5. Tygart Lake, W V...........................18-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects.........18-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA........................18-3 8. Elkins, WV....... ........ ................ 18-4 9. Johnstown, PA............................18-4 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA..........18-4 11. Turtle Creek, PA .......................... 18-4 Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH............18-5 13. Conemaugh River Lake,Ohio River Basin, PA. .18-5 14. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.....18-5 15. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA......................18-6 16. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY................18-6 17. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.......18-6 18. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ...................... 18-7 19. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH. ..................... 18-7 20. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ... 18-8 21. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) ........ 18-8 22. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH ................................. 18-8 23. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV. .................... 18-8 24. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA..........18-9 25. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA........18-9 26. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. .18-10 27. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and M D . ............................... 18-10 28. Inspection of completed flood control projects. 18-11 29. Other authorized flood control projects ...... 18-11 30. Flood control work under special authorization. .......................... 18-11 General Investigations 31. Surveys................................18-11 32. Collection and study of basic data...........18-11 33. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design.....18-11 34. Research and development.................18-11 Tables Table 18-A Table 18-B Table 18-C Cost & Financial Statement........18-12 Authorizing Legislation...........18-15 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................ 18-20 Table 18-D Not Applicable. Table 18-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.........................18-21 Table 18-F Not Applicable. Table 18-G Deauthorized Projects............18-23 Table 18-H Allegheny River Statistics.........18-24 Table 18-I Monongahela River Statistics...... 18-25 Table 18-J Monongahela River Total Costs.....18-27 Table 18-K Ohio River Basin Reservoirs....... 18-27 Table 18-L Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.................18-28 Table 18-M Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization....................18-29 18-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 325 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, General: A contract for concrete repairs and installation of tow haulage units at L/D 5 was awarded in September, 1990 for $1,411,159. Contract for tow haulage units at locks 2, 3, 4 and 6, awarded in September, 1988 for $330,337 was completed during the fiscal year. Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures to maintain them in a serviceable condition. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 with Grays Landing Lock and Dam and the construction of a new lock landward of the existing lock at Lock and Dam 8 (to be renamed Point Marion Lock and Dam). In accordance with the provisions of this act, 50% of the total cost of construction for the Grays Landing and Point Marion projects will be derived from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. These are also several terminals for rail-to-river and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: The right bank excavation at Grays Landing Lock and Dam was completed in November, 1989 at a cost of $12,400,000. All land for the lock site has been acquired. Work continues on cultural resources and the acquisition of real 18-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT estate for the remainder of the project. A contract for the construction of the lock was awarded on March 1, 1990 for $78,600,000 and is approximately 18% complete. The estimated total cost of the project, which is scheduled to be complete in August, 1995 is $171,200,000. A contract for the construction of the new lock for the Point Marion Project was awarded on March 26, 1990 for $78,800,000 and is approximately 10% complete. All real estate for the project has been acquired. The estimated total cost of the Point Marion project, which is scheduled to be complete in September, 1993 is $96,400,000. Work continued on a feasibility study of the structural problems and future traffic conditions at Locks and Dams 2, 3 and 4, which range in age from 87 to 55 years old. The advanced age and well-worn condition of these structures requires increasing maintenance with the associated possibility of long-term lock closures to affect the necessary repairs. In addition, the 50 mile reach of river from Locks 2 to the Maxwell Locks is the only reach of the Mon River for which modernization has not been completed or is not underway. Operations and Maintenance, General: Major work that was physically completed during the fiscal year includes: Renovation of lock gates, machinery and culvert valve - L/D 4 for $225,585; repair of dam gates damaged in runaway barge incident - Maxwell L/D for $436,121; repair of lock gate - Maxwell L/D for $69,669; renovation of gate machinery - L/D 7 for $113,226; repairs to lock gates and installation of new gates - Point Marion L/D for $216,617; renovation of culvert valve - Point Marion L/D for $158,703; replacement of hydraulic pumps and controls - Morgantown L/D for $105,572; fabrication of a tainter valve - Hildebrand L/D for an estimated $128,122; replacement of dam gate embedded sills - Hildebrand L/D for $243,562; unwatering of the lock chamber and repair of lock gates - Opekiska L/D for $781,043. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Thylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Land acquired for project consists of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $1,062,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1990 are $546,907,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, PA) Existing project. Provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg-Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvements would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. James G. Fulton Flood Control Project- Construction of Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 18-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 and was Completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was started in July 1978, completed in June 1981 and turned over to local interests on 18 November 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in Sep 1981 and completed in Dec 1981. Canonsburg- Houston Reach-Construction of Unit 1 was started in December of 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of the reach, are 99% complete. Remaining work on project has been delayed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rights-of-way. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Estimated cost for new work (1985) is $41,850,000 of which $32,750,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Direct non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,225,188. Operations during fiscal year. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by the Chartiers Creek project for this period were $3,156,000. Total benefits achieved through September 30, 1990 were estimated to be $19,207,000. 8. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV) Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started in May 1946 and completed in May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of- .channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Land acquired for project consists of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rightsof- way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine investigations and inspections were made. Project was last inspected in June 1986. Cumulative total flood damages prevented to September 30, 1990, totaled $14,311,000. 9. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed in November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Land acquired for project consists for easements over 192 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Cumulative flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $417,940,000 to end of September, 1990. 10. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 2 0% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started May 1946 and was completed June 1950. Land acquired for project consists of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities continued and routine investigations and inspections were made. Estimated flood damages prevented this fiscal year were $423,000. Cumulative flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $29,336,000 to end of September 1990. 11. TURTLE CREEK, PA Location. In Allegheny and Westmoreland Counties, adjacent to Pittsburgh, PA, along lower reaches of Turtle 18-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Creek and Thompson Run, a tributary of Turtle Creek. (See Geological Survey Chart for Pittsburgh, PA). Existing project. The existing channel improvement project was constructed during the period 1962-1967 and provided for flood protection by widening, deepening, and streamlining channel of lower Turtle Creek for about 6.3 miles and channel of Thompson Run for about 1 mile above its mouth. Appurtenant work consists of channel streambed and side slope protection where required, retaining walls, drop structures, floodgates, alteration, removal or reconstruction of restrictive structures and adjustments of affected utilities. Project was designed to accommodate a design flood corresponding to an estimated 100 year frequency. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Federal cost for completed project was $15,350,000; non-Federal cost was $1,840,000. The Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act specified that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized and directed to repair and restore the Turtle Creek, Pennsylvania, local protection project. Estimated Federal cost for repair and restoration work is $6,200,000; non-federal cost is $1,550,000. Local cooperation. The Turtle Creek Flood Control Authority was the local sponsor for the existing project. However, they are not financially able to sponsor the project restoration, nor to subsequently perform any required project maintenance. Consequently, the District has coordinated with other levels of Government, and in the process, has been advised by Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Board of Commissioners, that the County will sponsor the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The proposed project consists of debris and sediment removal from the Turtle Creek and Thompson Run channels and debris basin; clearing trees and brush from channel side slopes, restoration of channel side slopes, repairs to concrete retaining walls, debris dams, trashracks, spalled concrete joints and drainage appurtenances; and removal of vegetative growth from weepholes. During FY 90, the Design Memorandum and the draft Local Cooperation Agreement were completed and forwarded to the Corps of Engineers, Ohio River Division for review. Work was initiated for the plans and specifications. Estimated flood damages prevented this fiscal year were $1,000, total flood damages prevented through September 1990 were $82,652,000. 12. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started January 1942 and completed June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for shoreline protection at Mill Creek Recreation Area was completed for $274,787. Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $5,228,000; total benefits through September 30, 1990 are $237,287,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 13. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system is designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Land acquired for dam, reservoir and railroad relocation consists of 7608.7 acres in fee and 522.8 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $267,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1990 were $566,683,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities were continued. 14. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See 18-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth-fill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed in October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,563.6 acres in fee and 100.22 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $117,000; total benefits achieved through September 30, 1990 were $124,727,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 15. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and low-water regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gate-controlled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: A contract for shoreline protection at the Boat Launch ramp and parking area was completed for $204,892. Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir during this fiscal year were $9,000; total benefits through September 30, 1990 are $32,554,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 16. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA-NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaragus County was completed in June 1978. Land acquired for project consists of 2,646.6 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.4 acres. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operation during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $89,000; total to end of this fiscal year, $335,474,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 17. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of 18-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Land acquired for project consists of 3,331.7 acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $95,000; total benefits to September 30, 1990; $166,930,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 18. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, PA, 21.6 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam started in February 1939 and was completed in June 1941. Land acquired for projects consists of 2,519.36 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Local cooperation. None required at completed project. On November 4, 1977 a contract for Wildlife development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50%o of the first cost of initial wildlife development. Costsharing for construction of fishing access area awarded in September 1980 was completed in July 1981 for $335,405.75. On June 7, 1979, a contract for fishing and boating development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and Pennsylvania Fish Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 500% of the first costs of initial fishing and boating development. On September 9, 1980, a contract for camping and day-use recreational development was executed between the U.S. Government and the County of Armstrong. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial camping and day-use recreational development and 50% of the costs for future development. Each cooperation authority is responsible for operation, maintenance and replacement without cost to the Government of all facilities developed with their support. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood damages prevented by this project for this fiscal year were $115,000; total benefits through September 30, 1990 were $156,371,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 19. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low-water regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled-earth embankment structure with gatecontrolled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is completed and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Land acquired for project consists of 6,298.9 acres fee and easements over 27.9 acres. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal costs of completed project is $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of construction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest, and has paid $617,498.39 toward principal to date. Local interests have now contributed $4,510,538.39 towards total of $5,200,000 non-Federal costs. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1990 are $86,436,000. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year are $2,309,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation 18-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 20. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 9 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowwater regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 11,180.6 acres in fees and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year were $3,240,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1990 were $67,282,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 21. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 18-B, 18-E and 18-K on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated $12,710,000 during this fiscal year. Total flood damages prevented through September 30, 1990 are $727,455,000. 22. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Land acquired for project consists of 14,420.3 acres in fee and easements over 197.7 acres. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for FY 1990 were $227,000. Total benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1990 were $21,280,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance continued. 23. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam is concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway is uncontrolled. Storage capacity is 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1990) is $231,000,000 (includes an estimated $15,000,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to munici- 18-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT pal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,350,000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, onehalf of the separable first costs of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $24,810,000, bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $457,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the city of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: In March, 1990 the Governor of West Virginia requested the Corps to stop all design and future construction of recreation facilities at Stonewall Jackson Lake and begin to work with the State on revising the project master plan to include a lodge, golf course and cottages, which would be constructed and administered by the State, at 100% State expense, and for which the State requested credit towards their current cost-sharing debt. This request for cost-sharing credits was denied in August 1990. No contracts were awarded during FY 90. Contract work completed during the fiscal year included: Roanoke Bay Recreation Area for an estimated $13,000,000; dam area facilities for an estimated $3,000,000; water temperature profile system for an estimated $89,000; water wells at four access areas for an estimated $51,000; water wells at primitive camping area for an estimated $40,000; and the repair of oil and gas access roads for an estimated $220,000. The Carrion Bay Campground construction contract, awarded in September, 1989 was delayed by a protest to the General Accounting Office affecting the Notice to Proceed and subsequently terminated for convenience to the Government following a GAO decision. Surface land acquired for the project consists of 20,779 acres. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 90 were $630,000. Total flood control benefits for the reservoir through September 30, 1990 are $38,662,000. 24. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is com-' plete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed in January 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,797.3 acres in fee and easements over 13.1 acres. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $91,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1990 were $173,364,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 25. UNION CITY DAM, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment nongated type with uncontrolled side-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was 18-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Land acquired for project consists of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,410.3 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. On November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $2,884,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1990 were $17,759,000. 26. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolled-earth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth. Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,731.5 acres in fee and easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for FY 90 were $163,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1990 were $1,858.000. 27. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed in May 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.62 acre. A license was issued to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania covering fish conservation and management in Pennsylvania portion of reservoir. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational and sanitary facilities as required to serve the public needs. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $550,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1990 were $154,447,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 18-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 18- L for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $73,488. Total cost to September 30, 1990 was $1,217,108. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-E on other authorized flood control projects. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 18-M. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 18-M. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Corps Statutory Authorities Activities in Support Facilities Inspections Total Cost for Fiscal Year: General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Navigation studies Flood control studies Coordination Studies with other agencies Interagency Water Resource Development Special investigations Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Special Studies Total cost for fiscal year 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $166,749 for flood plain management services and $8,927 for related hydrologic studies. 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA 34. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 18-11 $178,745 31,830 11,374 20,765 $242,714 $ 144,629 1,371,874 40,480 19,860 89,975 36,129 91,956 $1,794,903 $395,329 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 18-A See Section In Text Project Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River PA 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV 5. Tygart Lake, WV Flood Control -Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek,PA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Elkins, WV 9. Johnstown,PA 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA 11. Turtle Creek, PA Flood Control -Reservoirs 12. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH 13. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Sept. 36, Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,985,100 5,905,479 3,323,000 3,080,973 11,813,800 11,727,436 7,578,300 7,649,246 9,436,000 7,334,873 11,350,400 11,441,627 7,375,589 7,318,418 17,218,000 17,718,346 11,866,029 11,873,521 221 873,300 846,746 21,000 10,372 84,000 50,417 7,000 2,679 78,000 22,239 711,000 699,244 750,871 688,409 5,000 16,083 452,500 236,5 483,915 211,1 5,000 9,254 174,000 34,901 4,0 1,2 130,0 254,4 - 18,157,860' - 18,157,860' 5,976,672 85,252,0232 6,006,794 85,192,3562 34,410,000 193,990,0853 32,750,727 190,297,4404 11,592,422 192,779,0576 11,590,143 192,676,7776 - 15,857,000 - 15,857,000 - 19,077,9327 - 19,077,9327 755,668 11,802,4518 766,703 11,791,0228 - -3,000 26,583,186 - - 26,560,187 - - 4,225,188 - - 4,204,498 - - 1,772,627 - - 1,772,627 )00 -795 262,192 704 161 261,119 - - 8,865,3889 - - 8,865,3889 33 50,152 4,633,390 55 74,649 4,630,141 - - 3,586,10710 - - 3,586,10710 00 38,909 1,077,797" 47 37,485 1,073,445" 00 222,000 15,969,352 86 290,489 15,967,41838 - - - - 8,739,98712 - - - - 8,739,98712 1,204,900 1,688,900 1,517,900 1,613,532 20,914,21513 1,238,771 1,668,230 1,498,246 1,669,700 20,897,23013 - - - - 46,012,41114 - - - - 46,012,41114 900,000 973,675 868,671 1,037,626 11,045,876 763,414 1,120,111 847,810 1,038,306 11,004,748 18-12 5,C 3,7 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 14. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 15. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 17. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 18. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 19. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 20. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 21. Ohio River Basin Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated 22. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 23. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 24. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA - - - - 4,474,524' 5 -- - - 4,431,523' 5 3,003,400 1,595,200 1,383,449 1,346,788 19,709,758'" 2,775,020 1,829,431 1,391,136 1,331,971 19,658,526'" - - - 9,539,586' -- - - 9,539,586 ' 7 728,300 817,300 804,600 1,046,827 10,634,88418 712,557 840,411 819,123 1,051,905 10,622,07418 - - - - 109,309,076' 9 -- - - 109,298,205' 9 1,137,900 1,178,200 1,133,200 1,197,365 19,141,943 1,095,568 1,235,576 1,111,672 1,196,098 19,111,860 -200,000 - - -19,000 2,921,000 8,928 - 279 - 2,920,558 -- - - 5,727,53120 -- - - 5,727,53120 1,120,000 968,300 880,449 1,003,288 14,244,29321 1,047,093 1,054,219 872,417 979,047 14,194,21621 -- - - 7,144,97322 - 6,104 55 - 7,144,97323 909,000 715,100 720,708 686,538 10,409,862 829,775 813,086 733,871 691,431 10,406,091 -- - - 47,033 -- - - 47,033 -- - - 17,376,09724 -- - - 17,376,09724 596,100 577,700 735,300 653,238 9,547,63425 605,411 575,593 710,880 678,474 9,534,80825 -- - - 4,253,02926 -- - - 4,253,02926 795,900 758,900 824,400 794,907 9,618,971 815,130 766,515 815,786 805,845 9,608,392 -- - - 985,12727 -- - - 985,19727 2,045,000 1,890,645 16,913,000 15,713,411 25,500 2,019,200 2,148,985 23,259,000 13,372,446 631,000 643,529 - 3,770 1,010,500 1,263,800 951,589 1,320,359 1,812,800 1,872,160 2,428,000 12,400,043 749,800 758,230 230 1,308,979 1,316,393 - 40,227,20128 21 40,209,91528 1,810,730 24,328,34729 1,800,274 24,288,79229 8,539,434 210,855,634 6,413,720 207,054,919 800,213 2,206,513 770,106 2,171,865 - 7,792,37830 - 7,792,379' 1,113,296 15,960,52832 1,123,154 15,938,33432 18-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 25. Union City New Work Dam, Ohio Approp. - - - - 14,559,800 River Basin, PA Cost - - - - 14,559,800 Maint. Approp. 434,900 276,249 244,547 221,904 4,200,268 Cost 451,946 264,569 262,236 221,268 4,192,712 26. Woodcock Creek New Work Lake, Ohio Approp. - - - - 20,553,4743 River Basin, PA Cost 6,497 - - - 20,545,06534 Maint. Approp. 621,800 626,298 775,600 675,988 7,877,95735 Cost 622,437 654,790 769,170 686,627 7,872,3413 27. Youghiogheny New Work River Lake Approp. - - - - 12,521,16736 Ohio River Cost - - - - 12,521,16736 Basin, PA and Maint. MD Approp. 1,722,600 1,426,978 2,271,800 1,348,398 23,302,163" Cost 1,837,361 1,506,348 2,287,890 1,372,982 23,280,529" 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 3. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects, $17,633,000 appropriated to date for Pt. Marion, LD 8, PA ($8,680,000 - CG funds, $8,953,000 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and $47,154,000 appropriated to date for Grays Landing, LD 7, PA ($23,114,000 - CG funds, $24,040,000 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). Also inclues AE & D costs from Gray's Landing ($803,000) and Pt. Marion ($618,758). 4. Includes $14,775,239 expended to date on Point Marion, LD 8, PA ($7,629,603- CG Funds, $7,145,636 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and $46,319,116 expended to date for Grays Landing, LD 7, PA ($22,748,131 - CG funds, $23,570,985 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). Also includes AE & D costs for Gray's Landing ($803,000) and Pt. Marion ($618,758). 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $464,508 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public work funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 713 funds; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations, Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds and $269,635 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 18-14 18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $500,086 contributed by local interests. 23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,482,505.70 for new work contributed by local interest. 25. Includes $315,500 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $2,303,077 Code 711 funds, ($256,531 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8,1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 33. Includes $1,679,774 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98- 8) 1983 funds). 37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 38. Includes $15,350,352 original construction cost. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935' Aug 30, 1935' June 26, 19342 Mar 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan 31, 1931P June 26, 19342 ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a moveable dam.) For locks and dams 2 and 3. For locks and dams 4 to 8 inclusive. For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, i to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruction dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27,73d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc., 1217, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 22, 70th Cong., 2d Sess. 18-15 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15 inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. Construct new lock and dam 7 (Grays Landing Lock and Dam) as follows: The Grays Landing Lock and Dam will be located 3.0 miles downriver from existing Lock and Dam 7. It will consist of a single lock chamber, 84 feet wide by 720 feet long, with a fixed crest dam 576 feet in length. The existing Maxwell Pool at elevation 763.0 will be shortened three miles and the existing Pool 7 at elevation 778.0 will be extended downriver to the new dam. There will be no change in pool elevation above existing Dam 7. Upon completion of the new replacement lock and dam, existing Lock and Dam 7 will be removed. Total authorized cost is $123,000,000. Replace existing 56'x360' lock chamber at Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) with new 84'x720' chamber. Existing movable crest dam to remain; no change in pool elevations. Total authorized cost is $82,900,000. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for low water regulation and flood control ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 18-16 S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 3. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 5. Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 28, 1938 8. Jun 28, 1938 10. Jun 28, 1938 12. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) Project and Work Authorized 13. 14. 18-17 Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Documents CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of adam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. 15. 16. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 17. 18. 19. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 20. 21. 18-18 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Oct 22, 1976 MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN -Pittsburgh District Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine rainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 90th Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 90-17. 90th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. 2nd Sess. 22. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 7, 1966 23. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 24. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Jun 22, 1936 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. amended by low water regulation. 1st Sess. Jun 28, 1938 FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of as amended 1944 25. UNION CITY DAM, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. 26. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. recreation and storage for water quality control. 2nd Sess. 27. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Jun 28, 1938 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of as amended 1944 1. Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. 18-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Completed 1934 197,000 133,940 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, PA and OH14 Inactive 1938 - - Buckhannon River, WV23 Completed 1893 5,500 - Cheat River, WV"2 Completed 1895 12,997 - Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Completed 1922 110,663 81,613 1. January 23, 1939, Chief of Engineers recommended constructing a waterway from Ohio River through Beaver, Mahoning, and Grand River Valleys to Lake Erie (H. Doc. 178, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. No Commerce reported. 4. Eligible for deauthorization. 18-20 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Flood Protection Specifically Authorized Projects Completed: Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Butler, PA DuBois, PA Elkins, WV5 Johnsonburg, PA Johnstown, PA5 Kittanning, PA, Part I Latrobe, PA Latrobe, PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Punxsutawney, PA5 Reynoldsville, PA Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) Salamanca, NY Turtle Creek, PA4 Washington, PA Wellsville, OH, Section I Wellsville, OH, Section II Youngstown, OH Active Saw Mill Run, PA Deferred: Benwood, WV Authorized by Chief of Engineers Completed: Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Burgettstown, PA Friendsville, MD Girty's Run, Millvale, PA3 Granville, PA Leetonia, OH Oil City, PA Oil City Ice Control Structure Root Creek, Bolivar, NY Slovan, PA Sykesville, PA Tharentum, PA Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA Wilmore, PA 1962 1963 1972 1970 1979 1958 1949 1951 1970 1954 1965 1954 1959 1964 1972 1972 1964 1956 1956 1976 1954 1964 1965 1986 1987 1986 1964 1981 7,601,763 964,976 1,568,661 1,556,181 4,465,200 1,772,627 674,664 8,865,388 130,317 207,659 2,556,652 3,217,531 150,386 2,070,484 3,586,107 385,494 628,888 2,880,535 15,967,418 789,093 483,910 157,633 3,621,134 40,000 130,000 2,000 49,400 597,000 353,000 180,485 72,000 113,000 81,028 183,072 364,208 83,129 41,529 2,659,263 75,908 89,299 43,595 3,131,495 1,591,436 57,811 184,246 136,591 1,554,428 530,000 96,853 18-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Active: Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River)2 1979 132,464 - - Inactive: Black Fork at Hendricks, WV 1972 6,800 - - Oakdale, PA - 14,127 - - Rouseville, PA - 1,642 - - Wallace, WV' - 11,035 - - Weston Mills, Olean, NY - 50,100 - - Weston Mills, Portville, NY - 52,100 - - Reservoirs Other: Rowlesburg Lake, WV 1977 2,857,575 - - 1. Lacks local support. 2. No longer economically justified. 3. Excludes $701,722 contributed by local interests. 4. Includes $15,350,352 original construction cost. 5. Reported in detail in an individual report. 18-22 TABLE 18-E PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH (Short Creek) - Aug 5, 1977 13,452 - Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River)' - Nov 17, 1986 4,100- Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area)' 1975 Nov 17, 1986 64,851 - Bellaire, OH - May 6, 1981 76,487 - Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA' - Nov 17, 1986 -- Brilliant, OH - Aug 5, 1977 - - Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) - Aug 5, 1977 194 - Clarington, OH - Aug 5, 1977 - - Coraopolis, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) - Aug 5, 1977 16,884 - Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH - Jan 1, 1990 100,000 - Empire-Stratton, OH' - Nov 17, 1986 33,031 - Follansbee, WV - Aug 5, 1977 -- Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) - Aug 5, 1977 - - Industry, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) - Nov 6, 1977 - - Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY 1965 Mar 2, 1970 190,722- Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA- 1935 Act 1972 May 6, 1981 1,342,000 - Leetsdale, PA' - Nov 17, 1986 - - Martins Ferry, OH' 1941 Nov 17, 1986 25,164 - McKees Rocks, PA - Oct 3, 1978 - - Mingo Junction, OH - Aug 5, 1977 - - Moundsville, WV' - Nov 17, 1986 - - Muddy Creek Dam, PA' 1977 Nov 17, 1986 402,459 - Neville Island, PA' - Nov 17, 1986 -- New Cumberland, WV - Aug 5, 1977 - - New Kensington and Parnassus, PA' - Nov 17,1986 - - Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) - Oct 3, 1978 - - Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) - Oct 3, 1978 - - Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) - Oct 3, 1978 -- Powhaten Point, OH' Nov 17,1986 - - Proctor, WV' - Nov 17, 1986 - - Redbank Creek Lake, PA - Aug 5, 1977 156,377 - Rochester, PA' - Nov 17, 1986 - - St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) - Aug 5, 1977 13,529 - Smith Ferry, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Uniontown, PA 1956 Jan 1, 1990 - - Warwood, WV' - Nov 17,1986 - - Wellsburg, WV - Aug 5, 1977 6,387 - West Bridgewater, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Wheeling, WV' 1954 Nov 17, 1986 189,067 - Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)' - Nov 17, 1986 - - Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island)' - Nov 17, 1986 21,700 - Wilcox, PA' - Mar 5, 1955 16,761 - Woodlands, WV' - Nov 17, 1986 - - Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization)'4 1971 Nov 17, 1986 232,863 - 1. Deauthorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1986 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, au- (PL99-662). thority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 2. Local Interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, au- 4. Includes $47,195 construction costs expended under previous thority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. project and $1,700 O&M costs expended under previous project. 18-23 TABLE 18-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Depths on Avail- Normal Miter Sills Width able Lift at Pool at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level 1 Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Com- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level). (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 14.5 Cheswick, PA 24.2 Natrona, PA 30.4 Freeport, PA 36.3 Clinton, PA 45.7 Kittanning, PA 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 9 62.2 Rimer, PA Total Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 2 S Abandoned lock and dam 3 S Demolishing old dam 1 Dredging channel Total 56 56 56 56 56 56 360 11.0 360 13.5 360 10.5 360 11.8 360 12.2 360 13.1 56 360 17.9 56 360 22.0 721.0 734.5 745.0 756.8 769.0 782.1 800.0 822.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $ 1,763,485 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1934' 1,875,665 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,707,690 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,940,537 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1,523,959 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1,460,008 Piling 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2,848,920 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2,510,373 $15,630,637 591,187 544,929 310,103 26,001 1,055,003 $18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. O 0 C, 0 0d TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (see Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Depths on Avail- Normal Miter Sills Width able Lift at Pool at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool LevePl' Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Con- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level) (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 4 41.5 Monessen, PA -- 61.2 Maxwell locks and dam, Maxwell, PA -- 82.2 Grays Landing Lock and dam, Grays Landing, PA 7 85.0 Greensboro, PA , 8 90.8 Point Marion, PA n -- 102.0 Morgantown lock and dam, Morgantown, WV - 108.0 Hildebrand lock and dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV 115.4 Opekiska lock and dam, 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV Marine ways, etc Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 4 Abandoned lock and dam 5 Abandoned lock and dam 6 Abandoned lock and dam 7 Abandoned lock and dam 8 Abandoned lock and dam 9 Abandoned lock and dam 10 Abandoned lock and dam 11 Abandoned lock and dam 12 Abandoned lock and dam 13 Abandoned lock and dam 14 Abandoned lock and dam 15 Dredging Total 56 360 110 720 563 360 720 563 360 720 843 720 8.7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock CribPile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 $17,872,212" 8.2 726.9 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 17,538,53658 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock 84 720 15.0 778.0 15.0 26.0 Rock 56 360 56 360 84 600 15.0 778.0 19.0 797.0 17.0 814.0 84 600 21.0 842 600 22.0 10.0 10.5 Rock 10.0 14.5 Rock 14.5 17.8 Rock 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Piles Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19322 17,254,07156 Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19642 30,110,8896 Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete -- 47,122,116w Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19252 2,639,8046 Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19252 20,802,49245 Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19502 8,778,0006 Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19592 12,506,829^ Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19642 25,179,6225 250,0005 1,019,9075 780,8166 1,074,8125 770,4495 213,7765 245,9005 191,0005 210,4455 227,6685 200,5506 190,6915 210,1275 175,8295 587,8996 $206,154,4405 TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (see Section 3 of Text) 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths. 2. Dates shown for locks and dams No. 2 to 8 inclusive, represent reconstruction. 3. 2 Chambers 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, 1958-9), $2,086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926) and $618,758 E&D costs for replacement of lock, and $7,145,636 expended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 5. Actual cost: may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam (1963-1967). 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. 8. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation. 9. Includes AE&D costs for proposed lock ($803,000) and $23,570,985 expended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 0 0 0 0 zd 0 0 0 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance Funds New Work General Total Regular $200,733,899'" $171,754,2462 $372,488,1751'" Maintenance and operation 452,623 452,623 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) - 22,549 22,549 Total $200,733,8991' $172,229,4482 $372,963,34712' 1. Excludes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects. 3. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation of LD 3, 2. Excludes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 and June $46,319,116 for replacement of LD 7 ($23,570,985 provided by the 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improvement under pro- Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and $14,775,239 for replacement of visions of permanent appropriation for such purposes and excludes lock at Pt. Marion Lock and Dam ($7,145,636 provided by the Inland $742 for maintenance of previous projects. Waterways Trust Fund.) TABLE 18-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 21 of Text) Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA' Conemaugh River $46,012,4111 Crooked Creek, PA' Crooked Creek 4,431,523'1 East Branch Clarion River, PA' Clarion River 9,539,5861' Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY' Allegheny River 112,218,763134 Loyalhanna, PA' Loyalhanna Creek 5,727,531' Mahoning Creek, PA' Mahoning Creek 7,144,973" Tionesta, PA' Tionesta Creek 7,792,3791 Union City, PA' French Creek 14,559,8001 Woodcock Creek, PA' Woodcock Creek 20,545,065" Beaver: Berlin, OH' Mahoning River 8,739,987 ' Michael J. Kirwan, OH' Mahoning River 17,376,097" Mosquito Creek, OH' Mosquito Creek 4,253,029' Shenango River, PA and OH' Shenango River 40,209,915" Monongahela: Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV' West Fork River $231,000,0002 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD' Youghiogheny River 12,521,167' 1. Reported in detail in an individual report. 2. Latest cost estimate revision in 1990. 3. Actual Cost. 4. Includes $2,920,558 actual cost for Dam Rehabilitation. 18-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 18-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Project Dates of Inspection Project Dates of Inspection Amsterdam, OH September 1990 Marianna, PA April 1990 Big Run, PA May 1990 Millvale, PA July 1990 Bolivar, NY September 1990 Oil City Bradford, PA June 1990 Ice Control Structure, Brookville, PA May 1990 Allegheny River, PA September 1990 Buckhannon, WV September 1989 Oil City LPP-(Dike), PA September 1990 Burgettstown-Slovan, PA September 1986 Olean, NY September 1990 Butler, PA June 1989 Portage, PA September 1989 Chartiers Creek, PA Portville, NY September 1990 Cannonsburg-Houston Reach September 1989 Reynoldsville, PA May 1990 James G. Fulton Reach September 1989 Ridgway, PA June 1988 Colliers, WV September 1990 Salamanca, NY September 1990 DuBois, PA May 1989 Stonewood-Nutter Fort, WV July 1983 Eldred, PA April 1987 Sykesville, PA June 1990 Etna, PA September 1989 Threntum, PA November 1976 Friendsville, MD April 1988 Turtle Creek, PA September 1987 Granville, PA June 1990 Washington, PA September 1986 Johnsonburg, PA April 1989 Wellsville, OH September 1988 Kittaning, PA August 1983 Weston, WV September 1989 Latrobe, PA September 1988 Wilmore, PA September 1988 Leetonia, OH May 1990 Youngstown, PA August 1990 18-28 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-M FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 30 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (Complete) 84,627 Clarion River, Ridgeway, PA (Reconnaissance Report) 4,147 Girty's Run, Allegheny County, PA (Complete) -3,329 Johnstown, PA (Reconnaissance Report) 4,375 Lick Run Creek, Baldwin, PA (Reconnaissance Report) 34,692 Parsons, Hambleton, Hendricks, WV (Reconnaissance Report) 19,092 Sullivan Run, Butler, PA (Reconnaissance Report) 9,102 Tygart River, Phillipi, WV (Reconnaissance Report) 1,727 W. Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (Complete) 598 WeegiePipe Creeks, Shadyside, OH (Reconnaissance Report) 61,069 Total cost for current fiscal year: 216,100 Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 of the 1846 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Airport, Glendale, WV (Terminated) 725 Brush Creek, Jeannette, PA (Plans and Specs) 68 Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (Plans and Specs) 13,858 Dry Brook Creek, Poland, NY (Terminated) 4,321 Mahoning River, Highway 139A, OH (Detailed Project Report) 20,627 Mahoning River, Warren, OH (Detailed Project Report) 4,866 Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (Plans and Specs) 11,475 Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (Plans and Specs) 12,102 Mill Run, Sinclairville, NY (Plans and Specs) 100 Neshannock Creek, New Castle, PA (Plans and Specs) 91 Orange Road, Mercer County, PA (Detailed Project Report) 9,091 Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (Detailed Project Report) 5,060 Saw Mill Run Rd., Salamanca, NY (Plans and Specs) 14,026 Sewer Outfall, Glendale, WV (Construction) 27,004 Shupe Run, Mt. Pleasant, PA (Construction) 23,300 Walnut Bottom Run, Beaver Falls, PA (Detailed Project Report) 5,370 Water Works, Wellsburg, WV (Plans and Specs) 8,166 West Run, Munhall, PA (Construction) 5,721 Yough, Turkeyfoot Twp., PA (Detailed Project Report) 9,363 Total cost for current fiscal year: 175,334 18-29 OHIO RIVER For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed structures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington, and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, WV, and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island, and Hannibal Locks and Dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, KY, and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Gallipolis, Greenup, and Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine Locks and Dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal), Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland Locks and Dams, and Locks and Dams 52 and 53. Improvements Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River ....................................................... 19-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River ................... 19-3 Tables Table 19-A Table 19-B Table 19-C Table 19-D Table 19-E Cost and Financial Statement ....19-5 Authorizing Legislation...............19-6 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Table 19-F Table 19-G Table 19-H Not Applicable Not Applicable Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project...........................................19-7 Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River ............... 19-7 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams Statistics ....................................... 19-8 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, PA, and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, IL. For description of river see page 1227,1932 Annual Report. Previous Projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, KY. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine Locks and Dams with an auxiliary lock at Gallipolis being 110 by 360 feet. Dashields is a fixed dam, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Gallipolis are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movabletype dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and Uniontown; two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland; 110- by 1,200-foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110- by 1,200- foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two section of movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Dam; widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work (existing project, 1983), is $1,701,904,235; estimated non-Federal cost is 19-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 $14,999,000. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968, for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by Gallipolis Locks and Dam authorized by August 30, 1935, Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12,13, and 14 were replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 15, 16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam were widened to 500 feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by Uniontown Locks and Dam, presently under construction; and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland Locks and Dam, presently under construction, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3,1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh Locks and Dam project. A December 1981 Act established the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a diversity of wildlife. Table 19-J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing project. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060,1962 Annual Report. See Table 19-I for licenses. Navigation system of 21 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 194 shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 19-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Emsworth Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Major rehabilitation work was completed on November 9, 1984, and included placing stone erosion protection downstream of both the back channel and the main channel, structurally rehabilitating all 14 dam gates, painting of the service bridge on the main channel dam and painting dam gates on the back channel. Lock work included rehabilitation of the river chamber and land chamber including all lock machinery. Montgomery Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Contracts completed include: Fabrication of lock miter gates, 110-foot chamber for $1,049,132; upper guard wall cells for $856,468; emergency dam bulkheads for $329,631; fabrication of 56-foot lock miter gates for $344,519. Contract for installation of 56-foot lock miter gates and major rehabilitation of locks and dam, awarded on July 29, 1985, for $22,193,960 was completed on February 18,1989, for $24,027,313. Installation of 110- foot lock miter gates was completed by hired labor. Expenditures during Fiscal Year 1990 for real estate coordination, construction, engineering and design of rehabilitation project was $61,188. Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in May 1962. All work is complete. Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. Gallipolis Lock and Dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for 1,200-foot locks in a bypass canal. These studies are complete. Initial Construction, General funds for the continuation of Engineering activities were received in September 1985. During the fiscal year real estate acquisition continued. The project was advertised and bids were 19-2 OHIO RIVER opened in September 1987. The contract was awarded in October 1987 and is 67 percent complete. The total estimated cost of the project is $346 million, which is 50 percent Federal cost and 50 percent Inland Waterways Trust Fund cost. Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in October 1954. All work is complete. Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Darn: Construction work complete. Markland Locks and Dam: Project is complete including a public highway bridge across the navigation structure, as authorized by the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-606). For details of bridge see page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1978. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area was authorized by Public Law 97-137 on December 29, 1981. The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres which consists of birdlife and other wildlife. Planning consisted of efforts to define facilities to be cost shared with local interests. All Real Estate tracts have been acquired and condemnation trials continue. $295,065. McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland Canal which work is presently deferred. Cannelton Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for financially closing out the project. $3,783. Newburgh Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in October 1962 is complete except for financially closing out the project. $12,416. Uniontown Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for continuing action on Declarations of Taking on one tract and Title Opinions. $5,404. Smithland Locks and Dam: All major construction features are complete and the project was advanced to 99 percent completion. Real Estate activity is complete except for audit work and Title Opinions. $22,733. Locks and Dam No. 52 (New Lock): Construction initiated in December 1967 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Temporary Lock): Construction initiated in December 1972 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 52 (Rehabilitation): Construction initiated in June 1979 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Rehabilitation): Constructed initiated in June 1979 is complete. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Costs were $10,446,738 for Huntington District, $14,227,762 for Louisville District, and $9,640,242 for Pittsburgh District. Dashields Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Major rehabilitation work includes new mechanical and electrical systems, structural repairs, lock wall stabilization, new land and middle wall buildings, repairs to existing land wall, service and river wall buildings, and new access road. Contract for Rehabilitation of Locks and Dam was completed in December 1990 for $27,319,351. Expenditures during Fiscal Year 1990 for construction and engineering and design for rehabilitation project were $3,864,999. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing Projects. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work; but, in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation, it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also, to permit movement of large coal tows, which movement occur'ed at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, PA, to 80 feet at Cincinnati, OH, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, KY (head of falls, 53.8 feet at Evansville, IN, rd 59.5 feet at Cairo, IL (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16.16 million, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items (1954 is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26,1934. See Table 19-B for authorizing legislation. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to 19-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd Sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Congr., 1st Sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,190,154. There was no dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River in FY 89. Dredging by contract: Huntington District 325,780 cubic yards at $949,289 and Louisville District, 1,094,906 cubic yards at $2,158,231. 19-4 OHIO RIVER Table 19-A Cost and Financial Statemeat See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 1990 (footnotes) 1. Construction of New Work Locks and Dams Approp. $5,479,000 $52,787,000 $43,833,000 $75,703,005 $1,568,521,777 1 3 5 10 17 21 on Ohio River Cost 4,974,653 45,381,646 48,444,774 74,080,673 1,562,233,488 1 3 6 11 12 15 16 18 22 Maint Approp. 33,309,500 34,400,000 34,279,987 35,342,477 726,974,798 2 4 19 Cost 32,780,076 34,640,914 34,103,524 34,314,742 724,925,890 2 13 14 19 20 Rehab. Approp. 12,486,000 2,720,000 275,000 -24,434 82,972,138 Cost 9,965,508 5,845,792 448,866 61,188 82,959,815 Rehab. (O&M) Approp. 1,784,400 12,890,200 14,129,500 3,846,551 33,917,751 Cost 1,578,959 13,155,802 14,103,501 3,864,999 33,869,361 2. Open Channel New Work Work, Ohio River Approp. - - - - 15,962,260 8 Cost - - - - 15,962,260 8 Maint. Approp. 3,860,500 4,429,600 4,394,700 4,526,955 125,828,981 ' 9 Cost 3,854,324 4,250,322 4,547,207 4,297,674 125,544,359 7 s Rehab. Approp. - - - - 944,649 Cost - - - - 944,649 'Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 3Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 4Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 5Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. 6Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. 7Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. 8Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. 9Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. 'l�Includes $100,000 placed in Fiscal Year 1971 Budget Reserve. "Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 12Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. 14Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. 15Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 16Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. 17Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,759,812 Code 713 funds. 18Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds. 19lIncludes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). 20lIncludes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous projects. 21Includes $89,213,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 22Includes $88,329,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 19-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Table 19-B Authorizing Legislation See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. March 3, 1827 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1958 December 29, 1981 November 17, 1988 Open Channel Work, Ohio River Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. Construct ice piers as a part of allotted from appropriations for general open channel work. Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, and a 200-foot strip along bank and for bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. Act of March 3, 1827, modified to include maintenance of existing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of river slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. Locks and Dams, Ohio River Act of December 29, 1981, established the 1,000-acre Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a cost not to exceed $300,000. Olmsted Locks and Dam H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H.R. 2241, PL97-137, Title II, 95 Stat. 1710 PL 100-676, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess. 19-6 OHIO RIVER TABLE 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River Total Cost of Existing Project to September 30, 1990 (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $1,469,836,313 $683,964,173 $116,829,176 $2,270,629,662 Public Works 3,258,368 0 0 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation 3,039,789 3,039,789 Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 254,578 Executive 1963 0 Total $1,474,509,330 3 $687,061,728 12 $116,829,176 4 $2,278,400,234 1Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under 3Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. permanent indefinite appropriation. 4Includes $33,869,361 cost for O & M Rehabilitation. 2Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care of previous Note:All other cost variations are listed in the Footnotes of projects. Table 19-A. Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses At Locks and Dams, Ohio River Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam Hannibal Dam F.E.R.C License 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 3,206 License Annual Charge Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1990 Public Service Co. of Indiana $ 45,950.00 $ 1,100,911.64 Louisville Gas and Electric Co. $ 95,000.00 $ 8,435,353.84 Ohio Power Co. $ 64,232.00 $ 542,601.00 City of Vanceburg, City of New Kentucky Martinsville, WV $ 261,103.00 $ 2,005,781.00 19-7 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual C Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lo Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation 'and Da 00 16 1 - Replaced 6.2 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Emsworth, PA 2 - Replaced 3 - Replaced 13.3 Dashields Locks and Dam 1.6 miles below Sewickley, PA 4 - Replaced 5 - Replaced 6 - Replaced 31.7 Montgomery Locks and Dam, 1.4 miles above Industry, PA 7 - Replaced 8 - Replaced 54.4 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, OH 9 - Replaced 10 - Replaced 11 - Replaced 84.3 Pike Island Locks and Dam, 2 miles upstream from Warwood, WV 12 - Replaced 13 - Replaced 14 - Replaced 126.4 Hannibal Locks and Dam, 1.6 miles upstream from New Martinsville, WV 15 - Replaced 16 - Replaced 1.7 Willow Island Locks and Dam, 2.7 miles above Waverly, WV 110 56 110 56 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 360 600 360 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 18.0 710.0 17.0 4 12.9 s Rock 15.5 '5 12.9 s 10.0 17.5 20.5 692.0 682.0 664.5 13.41 16.01 17.58 Rock Rock and Piles Rock 14.6' Rock Rock and and Piles Piles 7.01 14.8s Rock Rock ost of ck mn - - $ 870,034 100 1921 $ 43,347,635 214 976,767 1,144,588 100 1929 37,402,437 14* - - 1,071,472 - - 1,080,132 - - 1,123,442 100 1936 37,741,984 14 - - 1,075,000 - - 1,167,456 100 1959 39,099,688 1,177,100 1,138,000 1,162,165 21.0 644.0 17.0' 18.0' Rock Rock 100 1968 56,623,946 1,166,104 1,222,389 1,133,371 21.0 623.0 38.0 17.0 Rock Rock 99 1972 87,663,047 - 1,180,478 - 1,275,532 20.0 602.0 35.0 15.0 Rock and Piles Rock 100 1972 78,170,881 0 0 CI 0 A, 0 1 1 Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sill Actual Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Dat and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each L Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation 'and D Cost e of ock am - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 103.9 Belleville Locks and Dam, 0.3 mile below Reedsville, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 237.5 Racine Locks and Dam, 1.5 miles below Letart Falls, OH - Replaced - Replaced $ 1,362,591 927,091 1,213,848 936,696 110 110 110 110 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Rehab Dam and New Lock - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 341.0 Greenup Locks and Dam, 4.9 miles below Greenup, KY - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 436.2 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, 2.2 miles above Foster, KY - Replaced 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 1,200 600 600 360 1,200 600 22.0 582.0 37.0 15.03 Rock and Piles Rock 100 1968 62,591,255 1,484,562 1,218,798 1,851,488 22.0 23.0 560.0 538.0 18.0 18.0 15.0 Rock and Piles 15.0 Rock Rock Rock 100 1971 64,922,680 - - 1,187,542 - - 1,925,205 - - 1,307,241 100 1937 6 3,452,066 23.0 538.0 18.0 15.0 172,583,840 15 1,063,133 1,088,802 1,579,618 1,200 600 . 1,200 600 30.0 30.0 515.0 485.0 18.01 18.0' 13.0 Rock 15.0 Rock Rock Rock 100 1959 57,464,191 - - 1,359,231 - - 2,951,216 - - 1,937,166 - - 3,437,057 100 1962 74,188,216 - Replaced - 279.2 Gallipolis 110 Locks and Dam, 110 0.7 mile below Hogsett, WV Gallipolis Modernization 110 O 0 35 1,894,942 Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter S.ills Actual C Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lo Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Da 36 37 38 39 40 41 0 42 43 44 - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 531.5 Markland Locks and Dam, 1 mile above Markland, IN - Replaced - Eliminated Falls of the Ohio, 1 mile above McAlpine 604.0 McAlpine Locks and Dam (Reconstruction of Locks and Dam 41) - Eliminated - Replaced - Replaced 45 - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton Locks and Dam, 3 miles above Cannelton, IN 46 - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh Locks and Dam, 16 miles above Evansville, IN 47 - Replaced 48 - Replaced 49 - Replaced 846.0 Uniontown Locks and Dam, 3.5 miles below Uniontown, KY 50 - Replaced $ 3,704,535 1,297,924 2,857,040 110 110 N/A 110 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 N/A 200 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 35.0 N/A 37.0 25.0 455.0 N/A 420.0 383.0 50.0 15.0 Rock Piles 100 1963 63,019,403 - 2,222,448 - - - - - - 7,658,134 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A 1,766,024 49.0 19.0 19.0 38.0 12.0 11.0 Rock 11.0 13.0 Rock Rock Rock 1008 1961 45,726,189 - - 2,592,242 - - 2,819,930 - - 3,202,890 99 1972 99,032,353 o10 3,129,028 16.0 358.0 22.0 342.0 32.0 34.0 16.0 Rock 12.0 Rock Pile 99 1975 104,496,881 Rock - - 4,415,526 - - 3,062,710 - - 3,325,964 99 1975 100,313,046 3,571,762 ost of ck um 0 0 O C O 0 zn 0 0 0 0 Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Lock Miles and Below Dam Pittsburgh Distance From Nearest Town Width of Chamber (feet) Greatest Length Available For Full Width (feet) Lift (feet) Upper Normal Pool Elevation (feet, mean sea (level) (level) Depth on MActual Cost Character of Year to Date of Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation 'and Dam 51 - Replaced 918.5 Smithland Locks and Dam, 2 miles above Smithland, KY 52 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, IL 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, IL (New lock) 53 962.6 10.8 miles above Mound City, IL 962.6 10.8 miles above Mound City, IL (New lock) 974.2 Mound City Lock and Dam, 1 mile below Mound City, IL 110 110 110 1,200 1,200 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 22.0 12.0 12.0 324.0 302.0 302.0 13.4 290.0 13.4 290.0 34.0 15.4 15.4 15.4 12.0 Rock Rock - - 4,370,566 99 1980 $ 273,711,818 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,337,747 11 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1969 10,197,516 9.69 Pile Pile 100 1929 10,004,240 12 15.4 9.6 Pile 0 100 1982 38,570,920 o - - 1,539,470 13 TOTAL 'Depths 2 are on emergency dam foundation and recontrolling depths. Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. 3Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. 4Land chamber. 5River chamber. 6Roller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. 7Lock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971. 8Completed except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. 91Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. �Excludes $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. "Includes $8,876,000 for major rehabilitation project initiated in FY 79. 12Includes $4,593,572 for major rehabilitation project initiated in FY 79. $ 1,672,068,429 16 '3 For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized.(See Section 1 of Text.) '4Includes $37,485,870 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY80. 14"'Includes $33,869,361 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 83. 1 4 "Includes $32,004,373 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 86 (O&M funds). l5Includes $88,329,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 16Exclusive of $6,994,235 details below. Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute (under previous project) Examinations, survey contingencies, plants, and miscellaneous Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis Locks and Dam TOTAL GRAND TOTAL $ 5,359,203 966,232 668,800 6,994,235 $1,679,062,664 Table 19-J (Continued) BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT * The district comprises Ohio, northwestern Pennsylvania and Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage western and northern New York, embracing U.S. waters of basins from boundary between the states of Ohio and Michigan Lake Erie exclusive of small portion of western end, Lake to international boundary line east of Frontier, New York. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio ...................... 20-2 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY ....................... 20-2 3. Buffalo Harbor, NY ........................... 20-2 4. Buffalo Harbor, NFTA, NY ................... 20-3 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, NY ...................... 20-3 6. Cleveland Harbor, Ohio ....................... 20-3 7. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio ....................... 20-4 8. Dunkirk Harbor, NY .......................... 20-4 9. Erie Harbor, Pa ............................... 20-5 10. Fairport Harbor, Ohio ........................ 20-5 11. Geneva-on-the-Lake, Ohio .................... 20-5 12. Huron Harbor, NY ........................... 20-6 13. Irondequoit Bay, NY .......................... 20-6 14. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY .................. 20-6 15. Lorain Harbor, Ohio ......................... 20-6 16. New York State Barge Canal .................. 20-7 17. Olcott Harbor, N Y ............................ 20-7 18. Oswego Harbor, NY .......................... 20-7 19. Port Ontario Harbor, NY ..................... 20-8 20. Rochester Harbor, NY ........................ 20-8 21. Rocky River, Ohio ........................... 20-8 22. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio ....................... 20-8 23. Toledo Harbor, Ohio .......................... 20-9 24. West Harbor, Ohio ........................... 20-9 25. Reconnaissance and condition surveys .......... 20-9 26. Other authorized navigation projects ............ 20-9 27. Navigation work under special authorization ..... 20-9 Beach Erosion Control Page 28. Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio ................ 20-10 29. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa................ 20-10 30. Other authorized beach erosion control projects .............. ............... 20-11 31. Beach erosion work under special authorization .......................... 20-11 Flood Control 32. Ellicott Creek, N Y ............................ 20-11 33. Mount Morris Lake, N Y Genesee River ................................. 20-11 34. Point Place, Toledo, Ohio .................. 20-12 35. Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, Ohio ......... 20-12 36. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................... 20-12 37. National Emergency Preparedness ............. 20-12 38. Other authorized flood control projects ......... 20-12 39. Flood control work under special authorization .......................... 20-13 Deauthorized projects 40. Deauthorized Projects ........................ 20-13 General Investigations 41. Surveys ....................................... 42. Collection and study of basic data ............. 43. Advance Engineering & Design ................. 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1297-99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on southside of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year, Maintenance: Real estate activities, condition sediment surveys, reformulation and economic analysis regarding dredging of toxic materials from upper River, and initiation of investigation for Letter Report regarding construction of new Confined Disposal Facility by Government plant and hired labor cost $186,906. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $55,604. Payment for stone for derrickboat use from FY89 cost $460. Removal of 128,000 cubic yards shoaled material from outer harbor, by contract, cost $461,267 including supervision and inspection. Engineering and design for dredging cost $24,268. 2. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N Y Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, N Y, to and including Tonawanda Harbor, N Y. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, N Y, Black Rock Harbor and Channel, N Y and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous projects. For details see item 5 and 7, page 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see page 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost, (1961) of this portion is $339,000. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by New York State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interest for relocation of utilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation development at completed projects (Code 713 program) was executed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, N.Y. on April 16, 1985, and was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers on May 3, 1985. Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two Stateowned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, N Y, and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 297 days and closed for annual winter maintenance from January 30, 1990 through April 9, 1990. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds was accomplished throughout the year by Government plant and hired labor. Total costs of $1,070,271 were distributed as follows: Operation and care: operation of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair $594,763; maintenance of grounds $30,474; periodic inspection, real estate activities, condition sediment surveys, Commercial Activities study and support of Water Control Center $77,006. A/ E contract for stability analyses of lockwall continued at cost of $200,349. Lockwall maintenance by hired labor cost $8,260. Snagging and clearing at lock cost $84,290. Engineering and design for lockwall maintenance cost $57,290. Supervision and administration cost $17,839. 3. BUFFALO HARBOR, N Y Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on December 15, 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 20-2 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 45 wharves and piers of which 4 piers, owned by Niagara Frontier Port Authority, and 9 privately owned and operated facilities are on outer harbor and along sides of Lackawanna and Union ship canal, 4 along banks of Buffalo ship canal, and 26 along Buffalo River. Coast Guard facilities are at mouth of Buffalo River along left bank. City of Buffalo owns a slip on right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring city fireboat. Thirty-four terminals have railroad connections and 29 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor, water control management, and real estate activities cost $253,613. Environmental testing, by contract, and supervision and review of that contract cost $75,257. Repairs to about 20 l.f. of South breakwater by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $34,757. Finalization of FY87 dredging contract claim resulted in credit of $9,450. Removal of 130,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from Buffalo River, by contract, cost $1,084,035. Snagging and clearing by Government plant and hired labor cost $1,513. Maintenance at Dike 4 and emergency repairs at Times Beach disposal area cost $27,908. 4. BUFFALO HARBOR, NFTA, N Y Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833). Existing project. The project site is located at the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (NFTA) Small Boat Harbor in Buffalo Harbor, Buffalo, NY. This small boat harbor has berthing spaces for 1,045 boats, 14 boat launch ramps, 20 moorings, parking, a restaurant, bathhouse, and other associated facilities. Section 18 of the 1988 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) (P.L. 100-676) authorizes the emergency repair of the 1,900-foot long breakwater that protects the existing small boat harbor facility. This dike is primarily constructed of slag with some scattered armor stone protection and is vulnerable to wave attack from Lake Erie storms. The total cost of the emergency repair is $2,000,000 except that the Federal share may not exceed $1,000,000, to armor the existing dike which protects the 1,045 slip small boat harbor. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (NFTA) has furnished a statement of Financial Capability and financing plan for meeting their cost sharing obligations. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was negotiated with the local sponsor and submitted to higher Corps headquarters for review and approval. The NFTA will be required to sign the LCA and provide the necessary non-Federal funding and real estate requirements for the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Inhouse engineering effort for a design report, environmental assessment, and plans and specifications cost $122,904. Real estate activities cost $1,380. 5. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N Y Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, N Y and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in January 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $4,804,060. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $2,566,529, excluding $20,000 for lands. Existing project was authorized by 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., Ist sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. The cash contribution paid was $2,566,529. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys and real estate activities cost $17,203. Update of project maps cost $3,053. 6. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). Previous projects. For details see page 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized through the 1966 modification, see page 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements in the interest of commercial navigation and recreational navigation were authorized in the 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88), at a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. The commercial navigation portion of the overall project consists of: (a) enlarging and deepening to 31 feet LWD the east entrance channel; (b) deepening the east basin channel to 27 feet LWD; and (c) expanding the capacity of Dike Site 14 to contain the polluted dredged material resulting from the project. This portion of the project is currently on hold as the local sponsor has assigned this aspect a lower priority. The recreational navigation portion of the overall project consists of: an entrance channel 100 feet by 540 feet in length dredged to 8 feet below Low Water Datum (LWD) and 375 feet of associated bulkheading; a 386 foot breakwater with a 20-foot top width and shore arm connection to Pier 32 and 406 feet of associated bulkheading; an 485 foot breakwater and 635 feet of associated bulkheading along the north end of Pier 34 extending to and along the west end of Pier 36, and 1.8 acres of fill between Pier 34 and Pier 36; a 6.4 acre turning basin, anchorage area, and 20-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 harbor-of-refuge with a dredged depth varying between 7 and 8 feet below LWD and the 1,223 feet of associated bulkheading; 2,093 feet of walkway 10 feet wide along the north breakwater bulkheading and the anchorage area; and 2,593 linear feet of suitable handrail for safety along breakwaters and anchorage area, as generally described in a report entitled "North Coast Harbor/ Pier 34, Cleveland Harbor, Ohio" prepared by the District Commander, U.S. Army Engineer District, Buffalo, NY, dated December 1988. A portion of the recreational navigation project has been completed by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. The recreational navigation project was also authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and the FY 88 Energy and Water Appropriations Act (PL 100-202). These acts also authorized additional undefined improvements to Cleveland Harbor. Estimated total Federal cost of the existing project is $37,505,100 (Oct. 1989) exclusive of undefined, inactive and deferred portions of the project. The amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the balance of $8,190,000 is for new work. Estimated non-Federal cost is $20,703,000 (Oct. 1989) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $11,500,000 is required for work authorized by PL 99-88, PL 99-662, and PL 100-202. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, consisting of widening and deepening the right bank of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B.& O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels, and remaining work authorized by the 1960 R&H Act, consisting of deepening the remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) is $21,251,000. The 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 101-101) authorized the Corps to begin a Reconnaissance study of the Cuyahoga River, to address the concerns of boat traffic congestion and related risks, accidents and safety of the public. Conceptual plans are being studied to alleviate the commerical navigation problem and inadequate width and depth, in the Old and Cuyahoga Rivers. The cost of this Reconnaissance study is estimated at $250,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation, see page 32-4 of FY 87 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 65 piers and wharves. Fourteen are located in the outer harbor, 11 on banks of Old River, 40 along the deep-draft section of Cuyahoga River. Forty-one terminals have both railroad connections and mechanicalhandling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1981, Corps of Engineers). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 90 costs for North Coast Harbor/ Pier 34 for in-house engineering effort were $153,924. Real estate activities cost $17,755. FY 90 costs for the Cuyahoga River study were $149,744 for in-house reconnaissance effort. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, letter reports on new confined disposal facility (CDF) and breakwater repair, and real estate activities cost $282,434. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $28,504. Environmental activities for new CDF cost $131,211. Repairs to 310 l.f. of east breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $512,588. Snagging and clearing and maintenance of CDF by Government plant and hired labor cost $23,700 and $32,270 respectively. Finalization of breakwater repair contract cost $74,645. A/ E contract for stone evaluation cost $4,856. Removal of 480,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from Cuyahoga and Old Rivers, by FY 89 and 90 contracts, cost $2,596,212. Engineering and design costs for dredging and new CDF were $448,418. Supervision and administration cost $298,740. 7. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous projects. For details see page 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing projects. For description see page 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. See page 1274, Annual Report for 1967, for complete description of project modification authorized by 1966 R&H Act. This modification was deauthorized January 1, 1990. For completed work non- Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local cooperation for project modification as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1966. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $39,060. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $29,335. Engineering and design costs were $3,540. 8. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see page 32-8 of 20-4 BUFFALO, N Y, DISTRICT Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys and real estate activities cost $19,908. U.S. derrickboat McCauley repaired 425 l.f. of the U.S. breakwater at cost of $229,887. 9. ERIE HARBOR, PA Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 Miles westerly from Buffalo, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous projects. For details see page 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing projects. For description see pages 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion, authorized by 1899 act was deauthorized in November 1981. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was deauthorized in August 1982. Non-Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities. are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and result during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, condition sediment surveys, and real estate activities by Government plant and hired labor cost $62,109. Removal of 102,483 cubic yards of shoaled material from entrance channel, by contract, cost $226,483. 10. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized through the 1960 modifications, see page 1526 of Annual Report for 1962; for description of small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1977. The small boat harbor was deauthorized January 1, 1990. Total Federal cost of new work was $2,591,000, which is the actual cost for completed portion of project. Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, was deauthorized January 1, 1990. Non-Federal cost is $101,000 for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanicalhandling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, real estate activities, and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $56,505. U.S. derrickboat McCauley repaired 20 l.f. of west breakwater at cost of $47,255. Finalization of FY 89 dredging contract cost $34,201. 11. GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie about 17 miles east of Fairport Harbor, Ohio and 12 miles west of Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. Small boat harbor project provides for: (a) breakwaters in Lake Erie aggregating about 1,660 feet in length; (b) entrance channel about 900 feet long, 100 feet in width, 9 feet deep; (c) inner channels, 100 to 115 feet wide totaling 1,400 feet in length and 6 feet deep; (d) a mooring area 5.4 acres in area with a depth of 6 feet; (e) development of recreational facilities and (f) development of wetland mitigation features. Federal cost for new work was $3,483,175. Non-Federal cost was $3,483,175. Existing project was authorized under provision of Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H.D. 409, 91st Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. The State of Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) the responsible agency, signed a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) on June 24, 1986. The LCA was executed on the part of the Federal Government on June 26, 1986. Terminal facilities. There are no commercial facilities at the harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction started on October 9, 1986 and was completed on December 11, 1987, about one year ahead of schedule. Balancing of Federal and non-Federal shares resulted in a Federal credit of $536,389 and a non-Federal cost of $25,313. 20-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 12. HURON HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous project. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H Act was deauthorized January 1, 1990. Non-Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, condition sediment surveys, and real estate activities by Government plant and hired labor cost $45,544. Confined Disposal Facility maintenance cost $524. Removal of 188,769 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $756,833. 13. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, N Y at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815). Existing project. For details of existing project, see page 32-7 of Annual Report for FY 87. Total estimated project cost is $15,363,000 (Oct. 1984) including $3,582,000 Federal (which includes the CoE $3,536,000 and the USCG $46,000) and $11,781,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $2,661,000, lands and damages $290,000 and the cost of a movable highway bridge $8,830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with New York State, executed April 20, 1983. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project is physically complete, including upland recreation features. FY 90 Federal cost was $3 for photography. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, real estate activities and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $9,642. 14. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N Y Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work for completed project cost $69,066. Non-Federal costs of $6,000 were incurred for channel dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Non required. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $34,086. 15. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of new work is $20,475,000. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization, authorized by 1960 act and modified by 1965 act was deauthorized January 1, 1990. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers was also deauthorized January 1, 1990. Total non-Federal cost is $3,000 contributed by local interests towards construction of west shorearm. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized construction of commercial navigation improvements consisting of two bend cuts on the Black River to widen and straighten the channel between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and the 21st Street Bridge. These cuts are to be excavated to the existing channel depth of 27 feet. The authorized plan also includes widening the Upper Turning Basin at the existing depth of 21 feet. Estimated costs for this work are $2,290,000 Federal and $1,510,000 non-Federal (Oct. 1989). This portion of the project has been classified deferred. On March 12, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended authorized construction of a small boat harbor which was completed in July 1987. The project consists of a 225-foot detached rubblemound breakwater and an 800-foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Construction costs for this project, including supervision and administration, were $775,025 Federal and $775,025 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 act (and modified by 1965 act) is deauthorized. All other conditions fully complied with. On March 25, 1986, the city of Lorain, Ohio signed the local cooperation agreement, for the Section 107 project. For details see page 32-7 of Annual Report for 1986. 20-6 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT For details of local cooperation agreement for deferred project authorized by the 1986 WRDA, see page 32-9 of Annual Report for FY 87. Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considerd adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: On December 15, 1989, the Lorain Port Authority requested that the two river bend cuts and widening of the Upper Turning Basin authorized by the 1986 WRDA be placed in deferred status until conditions warrant their future development. The Port Authority's request to defer the project is due to the unwillingness of the project's primary beneficiaries to contribute financially to the project cost. On September 11, 1990, the project authorized by the 1986 WRDA was placed in the deferred category. FY 90 costs were $1,260 for real estate activities and $41,697 for in-house engineering effort (Advance Engineering and Design Preconstruction Engineering and Design). Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, real estate activities and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $95,275. Repairs to 275 1.f. of east breakwater and Confined Disposal Facility by U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $450,888. Initiation of FY 90 dredging contract cost $33,445. Engineering and design costs were $24,165. Supervision and administration cost $20,360. 16. NEW YORK STATE BARGE CANAL Location. Erie, Niagara, Orleans, Monroe, Wayne, Seneca, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oswego, Oneida and Herkimer Counties, N Y (within the Buffalo District). Existing project. The NY State Barge Canal system has 57 locks, 524 miles of canals, over 100 dams and numerous roads, bridges, buildings and other structures. The Barge Canal was built and is owned by New York State. Existing project was authorized by PL 99-662, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local cooperation. There is no cooperative agreement as yet on this project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Reconnaissance-type study with economic analysis to identify quantifiable benefits associated with current operation of Champlain Canal cost $373,656. 17. OLCOTT HARBOR, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous project. For description, see page 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500 exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The authorized modification to the existing project consists of breakwaters to provide optimum harbor protection, channel dredging, a stone jetty and recreational fishing facilities including a foot bridge, walkways and guardrails, access facilities, sanitary facilities and parking areas. The estimated cost of the authorized modifications is $13,840,000 (October 1989) of which $6,960,000 is Federal (80,000 USCG) and $6,880,000 is non-Federal. Modification of the existing project was authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) (PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project. Local interests contributed $1,500. Modifications authorized by the 1986 WRDA will require local interests to pay 50% of project cost including lands, easements, rights-ofway and dredge disposal areas. They are also responsible for construction of necessary docks and berthing spaces, construction of launching ramp, parking areas, sanitary facilities, and necessary access roads. After construction, non-Federal responsibilities would include fishing facility maintenance, except for the aids to navigation. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Inhouse engineering effort for Advance Engineering and Design Preconstruction Engineering and Design for FY 90 was $420,688. Real estate activities cost $9,974. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys, real estate activities and update of Environmental Impact Statement cost $16,465. 18. OSWEGO HARBOR, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego river, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, N Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal wharves, and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 Act, was deauthorized January 1, 1990. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 Act, was deauthorized in May 1981. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Seven piers and wharves in harbor and along river channel. In addition, Port of Oswego Authority owns two public terminals, one of which is west of river and includes a grain elevator and warehouse for miscellaneous freight. Other terminal is east of river and used for handling aluminum and general cargo. State of New York owns a river terminal used for mooring vessels. City of Oswego owns one dock and shore facilities for recreational craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $35,473. 20-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Environmental testing, by contract, cost $98,315. Dredging, by contract, for removal of 57,999 cubic yards of shoaled material cost $197,924. 19. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, N Y Location. On southeasterly end of Lake Ontario, 19 miles northeasterly of Oswego, N Y and 32 miles southerly of Sackets Harbor, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act July 4, 1836. Only information available is the index to the report of the Chief of Engineers. Existing project. As modified by Phase I and II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) two shore connected rubblemound breakwaters in Lake Ontario at mouth of Salmon River, south breakwater about 1,350 feet and north breakwater about 350 feet long; (b) entrance channel between breakwaters, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep, from deep water in lake to a limit about 1,200 feet from 8-foot depth contour in lake; (c) river channel 85 feet wide and 6 feet deep from inner limit of entrance channel for a distance upstream of about 450 feet. Federal cost for project was $2,221,873. Non-Federal cost for new work was $1,467,132 including cash contribution of $1,431,507. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Assurances were received from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. The LCA was executed on June 24, 1986. Terminal facilities. The only commercial navigation at Port Ontario is charter boat fishing. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Actual construction of the project was completed in October 1987. FY 90 Federal cost was $240 for real estate activities and $153 to finalize project. Maintenance: Update of project maps, real estate activities, and project condition sediment surveys cost $3,526. 20. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, N Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous project. For details see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $2,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 Act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Terminal facilities. One terminal facility at mouth of Genesee River has been leased to the Great Lakes Division of Pittston Stevedoring Corp. Facilities also consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, real estate activities, and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $89,792. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $35,503. Removal of 340,901 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, from the Genesee River and entrance channel cost $892,856. 21. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description see page 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $15,718. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $12,453. 22. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeasterly portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous projects. For details see page 1960 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1574 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1511-12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000, including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepened channels authorized by 1960 Act. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal facilites. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned are used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) 20-8 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $27,925. Removal of 260,500 cubic yards shoaled material, by contract, cost $956,572. 23. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Maumee River through city of Toledo has been developed extensively for deep-draft navigation. Detailed information on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 44 (revised 1972) prepared and published as Part 2, by board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as Part 1 by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition sediment surveys, real estate activities, and various operations services cost $230,400. Environmental activities in conjunction with new Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) cost $91,261. Removal of 540,000 total cubic yards of shoaled material, by FY 89 and 90 contracts, cost $2,600,089. Repairs to CDF by hired labor cost $39,375. Engineering and design cost for new CDF were $348,825. 24. WEST HARBOR, OHIO Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northeast of Port Clinton, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $3,303,898. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $3,922,000 including cash contribution of $3,795,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated January 31, 1978, State of Ohio stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation, and executed LCA was received on March 9, 1981. Terminal facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous reports and condition sediment surveys cost $29,332. Settlement of claim for finalization of FY 88 dreding contract cost $17,453. 25. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed by the Buffalo District at a cost of $59,247. Real estate activities, to include utilization inspections, cost $11,391. Supervision and administration, to include program management and project map updates, cost $14,439. Project Barcelona, NY Little River, NY Morristown, NY Niagara River, NY Oak Orchard, NY Ogdensburg, NY Wilson, NY Great Sodus, NY Vermilion, OH Date of Survey Jun 1990 Sept 1990 Jul 1990 Sept 1990 Jul 1990 Jul 1990 Sept 1990 Aug 1990 Sept 1990 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 20-C. 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 20-G. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 17 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 22 miles northeast of Dunkirk, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Angola, NY). Existing project. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, on October 21, 1987. The project provides for rehabilitation of the existing breakwater with a rubblemound facing and raised concrete walkway, construction of a rubblemound west breakwater extension, construction of a rubblemound east breakwater, a shore revetment, and dredging. The project will provide needed access to Lake Erie between Buffalo and Dunkirk, NY. The marina will provide mooring for 210-230 boats, protection and access to the lake for the trailered boat launch ramp and fishing access for non-boaters. The non-Federal sponsor (Town of Evans, NY) is required to provide approximately 50% of the cost of the general navigation features, provide the lands, easements and rights of way, relocations, dredging into the mooring area, docking facilities, and upland improvements. Estimated Federal project cost is $1,460,000 (October 1987). Estimated non-Federal project cost is $1,475,000 (October 1987). In addition, the local sponsor is required to provide associated costs estimated at $1,000,000. Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with the Town of Evans, NY, signed October 26, 1987. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction was 100% complete in December 1988. FY 90 Federal costs were $120 for real estate activities and $26,483 for in-house engineering effort. Non-Federal costs were $1,647 for in-house engineering effort. Maintenance: Federal cost for maintenance dredging was $1,901. 20-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Investigation and removal of sunken vessels and other obstructions to navigation under authority of Section 19 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899. Billing from NAVSEACOM for removal of sunken Barge No. 45, pinned against the upstream face of Peace Bridge pier 4, on the Niagara River was continued at a cost of $113. Navigation work pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483. Lorain Harbor, OH - Costs of $300 were incurred for preauthorization studies. West Harbor, Ottawa, OH - Costs of $6,005 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Navigation work pursuant to Section 208, Public Law 83-780. Unnamed Tributary to Lake Erie, Blasdell, N Y - Costs of $3,851 for preauthorization studies. Beach Erosion Control 28. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK, OHIO Location. Maumee Bay State Park is located in Lucas County, OH approximately 5 miles east of Toledo. The 1,855 acre park has 11,000 feet of shoreline along the southerly end of Maumee Bay (Lake Erie). (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Oregon, OH). Existing project. The study for Maumee Bay was conducted under the Western Lake Erie Shore Study authorized by the Committee on Public Works of the House of the Representatives on April 11, 1974. The project was authorized for construction by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (PL 99-662), November 17, 1986. The recommended plan as described in the General Design Memorandum (May 1988) consists of a 2500 ft. long protective sand beach stabilized by rubblemound breakwaters and groins, in addition to a 2700 ft. long rubblemound revetment along the west half (5,200 ft.) of park shoreline. The authorized plan also included a rubblemound revetment along the easterly half of the park shoreline. However, in July 1986, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), initiated advance construction of the rubblemound revetment and work was completed in February 1987. This has reduced the estimated cost of the project to $11,160,000 (Oct. 1989) of which $3,300,000 is Federal cost and $7,860,000 is non-Federal cost including lands, utilities, and other recreation facilities. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation, see page 32-14 of FY 87 Annual Report. A Local Cooperation Agreement was negotiated with the local sponsor (ODNR) and executed August 8, 1990 by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The plan described in the General Design Memorandum was awarded for construction on September 25, 1990. FY 90 Real Estate Activities cost $6,420. In-house engineering effort cost $103,840. 29. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, N Y and 102 miles eastnortheast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835). Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. For details of project authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), 1976 WRDA and 1986 WRDA, see page 32-14 of Annual Report for FY 87. Actual Federal cost for the authorized beach nourishment project modifications through FY 90 is $16,579,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $10,933,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. Actual non-Federal cost for the authorized projecct and modifications through FY 90 is $8,669,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $4,686,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. The estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1989) for the 58 breakwater project is $16,400,000. The estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1989) for the breakwater project is also $16,400,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources was entered into on February 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 WRD Act. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the United States of America and the local sponsor for construction of the 58 breakwater project was executed by the Secretary of the Army on June 22, 1989. See page 20-10 of Annual Report for FY 89 for details of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRD Act was continued. A total of 170,228 tons of sand were placed on the beaches. The 1990 nourishment program included placement of approximately 150,236 tons of upland sand at a unit price of $4.92 per ton on beaches 5, 6, 8, and Duck Pond Crossover. In addition, approximately 19,992 tons of fine off-shore sand at a unit price of $8.47 per ton was used in the top dressing layer on beaches 6, 8 and on Duck Pond Crossover. During the year a total of $993,193 ($693,108 Federal and $300,085 non-Federal) was expended for beach nourishment operations. Of this total, contract costs were $659,249 Federal, including supervision and administration and chemical testing and aerial photography architect/engineering contracts and $296,270 non-Federal. Inhouse engineering effort cost $33,859 Federal and $3,815 non- Federal. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania contributed $300,000 for their share of the FY 90 nourishment operations. The cumulative non-Federal total project share for the beach nourishment project through FY 90 is $8,669,011. Construction of the breakwater project was initiated. During the year, a total of $5,093,278 ($2,469,470 Federal and $2,623,808 non-Federal) was expended to initiate construction of the breakwater project. Of this total, contract costs were $2,387,610 Federal and $2,499,030 non-Federal, including monitoring contract and construction management. In-house engineering effort cost $57,050 Federal and $124,778 non-Federal. A total of $24,810 Federal was expended for real estate activities. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania contributed $2,620,000 in FY 90 toward this project. 20-10 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 20-D. 31. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION CENTURY PARK, LORAIN, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841). Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbors Act, as amended, on July 11, 1989. The project will restore 350 linear feet of beach, by construction of an east groin 170 feet long and a west groin 185 feet long, with a crest height of 8 feet above Low Water Datum. In addition, an existing deflection wall and other man-made structures will be removed and clean sand will be placed between the newly constructed groins. Estimated cost (April 1988) is $212,000 Federal and $212,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the city of Lorain, OH, in July 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 90 Federal costs were $3,110 for real estate activities, $9,993 for in-house engineering effort and $3,515 for contract supervision and administration. Non-Federal costs were $12,240 for inhouse engineering effort and $110 for contract supervision and administration. LAKESHORE PARK ASHTABULA, OHIO Location. Lakeshore Park is located in Ashtabula, Ashtabula County, Ohio about 40 miles southwest of Erie, Pennsylvania, and about 50 miles northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Ashtabula North, OH). Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in July 1983. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 90 Federal cost was $2,870 for supervision and administration of beach nourishment contract. Beach erosion activity pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorizations tudies). Geneva State Park, OH - Costs of $31,156 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Simms Park, Euclid, OH - Costs of $57,584 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Flood Control 32. ELLICOTT CREEK, N Y Location. The channel improvement is located on the downstream portion of Ellicott Creek in the towns of Amherst and Tonawanda, Erie County. (See Geological Survey maps of Tonawanda East and Buffalo Northeast, N Y.) Existing project. For detailed description of the original project as authorized by Section 201 of the 1970 Flood Control Act, see page 32-24 of Annual Report for 1973. The basic authorization, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, provided authority to undertake flood control measures to alleviate flooding that is compatible with the authorized project and any alternatives currently under restudy pursuant to the Flood Control Act of 1970. As a result of restudy of alternatives, the project provides for: (a) widening, straightening and deepening about 2.1 miles of existing creek channel including the existing bypass channel in Ellicott Creek Park; (b) construction of a diversion channel about 5,500 feet long between Maple Road and Millersport Highway; (c) construction of a diversion channel about 1,950 feet long through Pfohl Park; (d) construction of a diversion channel about 9,150 feet long from Niagara Falls Boulevard upstream to about Pfohl Park; (e) construction of 3 highway bridges; (f) modification of utilities and drainage outlets; and (h) recreation facilities consisting of a bike and hike path about 5.4 miles long, with open space park areas. The estimated Federal cost of existing project is $11,312,000 (Oct. 1988). The estimated non- Federal cost is $9,235,000 (Oct. 1988). Completion of preconstruction planning and construction was authorized Dec. 29, 1981, under Section 5, PL 97-128. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see page 32-22 of Annual Report for 1976. On October 25, 1976, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation furnished a letter of intent to cooperate toward construction of the project. On June 22, 1983, a formal Local Cooperation Agreement was requested from N.Y. State. On January 20, 1984, this agreement was fully executed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In August 1987 a contract was awaded and construction initiated on Stage 2. A third and final contract, Stage 2A, which completed the project, was awarded in May 1988. Construction on Stages 2 and 2A was completed in Spring 1989 and the project was accepted by the sponsor in July 1989. Federal costs for FY 90 were $46,517 for modification of the contract, including supervision and administration, $25,088 for in-house engineering effort and $180 for real estate activities. Non- Federal costs were $166 for construction contract, supervision and administration. 33. MT. MORRIS LAKE, N Y GENESEE RIVER Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, N Y. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, N Y (See Geological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, N Y). 20-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Existing project. For descrioption of existing project as authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act see page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition $5,000 contributed funds were expended for new work. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of dam, reservoir and service facilities, condition and operation studies, real estate activities and miscellaneous reports, to include stability analysis, periodic inspection and instrumentation, were accomplished by hired labor at a cost of $593,974. Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program accomplished by U.S. Geological Survey and National Weather Service reporting and hydroclimatic network cost $86,352. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $232,231. Purchase of communications and grasscutting equipment cost $37,293. Hydraulic maintenance cost $35,364. Repair to garage roof, by contract, cost $18,247. Debris removal, by contract, cost $178,269. Continuing rehab of elevator, by contract, cost $181,922. Engineering and design effort for other than listed work cost $82,293. Supervision and administration cost $73,766. 34. POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO Location. Point Place is located on a peninsula in northeast portion of city of Toledo, Ohio. Its shores are bounded on the east by Maumee Bay of Lake Erie and on the west by Ottawa River. The peninsula extends in a northeasterly direction immediately north of mouth of Maumee River. Existing project. The project provides for: (a) combination of protective structures consisting of 5,700 linear feet of steel sheet pile wall and 18,700 feet of levee; (b) three new pumping stations; and (c) 5,500 linear feet of new storm sewer facilities, including 2,400 linear feet of gravity outfalls. The project costs are $9,916,000 Federal and $4,220,897 non-Federal including a cash contribution of $1,865,800. Existing project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 363, 92nd Cong., 2d sess). Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see pages 32-24 and -25 of Annual Report for 1978. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed by city of Toledo on January 27, 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The entire project was completed in June 1986. Balancing of Federal and non-federal shares resulted in a Federal net credit of $267 for in-house engineering effort. Non-Federal in-house engineering effort cost $428. 35. RENO BEACHHOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO Location. Area is located in Lucas Country, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map for Reno Beach and Metzger Marsh, OH). Existing project. The local protection project, as authorized, provides for construction of 8,200 feet of roadway seawall, consisting of an earth dike, faced on the lakeward side with a quarry-run stone fill; and a steel sheet pile floodwall connecting the easterly end of this seawall at Wards Canal to the existing inland dike paralleling the canal. Estimated Federal cost of new work consisting of reconstructing to a permanent project the "Operation Foresight" work which was completed in 1973, is $5,770,000 (Oct. 1989). Non-Federal cost estimate is $1,930,000 (Oct. 1989) includes cash contribution of $550,000 toward first cost of construction plus all lands, easements, and rights-ofways. Project was authorized under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (H.D. 554, 80th Cong. 2d sess). Local cooperation. A local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed with the local Sponsor on July 22, 1988 and by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on September 30, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 90 continued coordination with local sponsors, the State of Ohio and Congressional Representatives resulting in the resolution of problems in acquiring the necessary lands, easements and Rights-of-way (LER). Availability of LER was received on June 5, 1990 from the local sponsors. In-house engineering effort cost $112,765. Real estate activities cost $10,873. Contract cost, including supervision and administration cost $6,031. 36. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $248,562. This includes updating the hydraulics and hydrology of various local flood control projects. Total cost to Sept. 30, 1990 was $1,570,988. 37. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FY 90 costs were $137,671. 38. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 20-E. 20-12 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 39. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 20-H. CONESUS LAKE, LIVONIA, N Y Location. Conesus Lake is situated in western New York State about 25 miles south of the city of Rochester. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Livonia, N Y). Existing project. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, on July 22, 1985. For description of existing project, see page 32-19 of the Annual Report for FY 87. Total Federal cost of the project is $1,445,000 (June 1988). Total non-Federal cost is $300,000 (June 1988). Local cooperation. On September 25, 1985, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation signed the Local Cooperation Agreement. For details see page 32-16 of Annual Report for FY 86. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction is 100% complete as of June 1988. FY 90 Federal costs were $37,294 for in-house engineering effort and $230 for contract administration. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962). FY 90 costs for the Disaster Preparedness Program were $250,068. Costs to support Emergency Operations totaled $46,449, which included reconnaissance efforts, liaison activities and providing technical advice to local response agencies in flood fight operations. The emergency rehabilitation of a Section 14 steambank protection project at Baldwin Road in the Village of Kirtland Hills, Lake County, Ohio cost $87,443 for the contract, including supervision and administration, $14,992 for in-house engineering and $360 for real estate activities. This project, providing repair for 400 feet of rip-rap steambank protection was completed in July 1990. The emergency rehabilitation of concrete slope protection along Euclid Creek in the City of Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, Ohio is approved for construction, at an estimated total Federal cost of $147,200. FY 90 in-house engineering effort cost $15,550. Real estate activities cost $786 and supervision and administration to prepare the contract cost $346. This project provides for the repair of 550 feet of damaged concrete slope protection located adjacent to the Section 205 Euclid Creek Flood Control Project completed in 1984. FY 90 in-house costs totaling $4,554 were required to complete the redistribution of Government furnished materials which remained unused at the termination of the Advance Measures Self-Help Program in 1988. 40. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 20-I. General Investigations 41. SURVEYS During FY 1990 costs of $556,834 were incurred as shown below: Navigation Studies ......................... . $ 1,296 Flood Damage Prevention Studies............... 70,877 Shoreline Protection Studies ................... 67,189 Special Studies ............................ . 237,284 Miscellaneous Investigations ................... 73,327 Coordination Studies ......................... 106,396 Phase I GDM Studies ........................ .. 0 Comprehensive Studies ....................... . 465 Review of Authorized Projects ................. . 0 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $133,620 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $473,741 incurred under the Operations and Maintenance appropriation for a total cost of $607,361. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a cost of $234,918. During the year, flood hazard evaluation studies were essentially completed for the towns of Freedom, Evans Mills in New York and Vermilion, OH. The results of these studies will enable local officials to encourage and enforce prudent use of the identified flood plains. Also hundreds of technical assistance requests regarding flood plain matters were completed during the year responding to individuals, corporations, real estate companies, insurance agents, engineering firms and local agencies. Costs for General Hydrologic Studies were $1,990. 43. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $623,364 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design Advance Engineering and Design projects. For details of individual projects, see sections 15 and 17 in text. 20-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Buffalo Harbor, NY 4. Buffalo Harbor, NFTA, NY 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Cleveland Harbor, OH 7. Conneaut Harbor, OH 8. Dunkirk Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - - - - 12,805,339' - - - - 12,805,339 1 781,500 577,000 898,500 793,383 12,905,829 750,105 608,844 900,683 728,505 12,823,608 - - - - 6,077,000 - - - - 6,077,000 - - - - 11,135,1202 - - - - 11,135,120 2 1,861,755 2,122,000 574,896 1,073,524 39,367,385 3 1,985,726 2,007,904 734,621 1,070,271 39,340,419 3 - - - - 620,000 209,852 - 150 - 620,000 -- - - 23,115,187 4 -- - - 23,115,187 4 1,806,000 1,708,000 768,000 1,555,250 56,936,765 5 1,536,751 2,000,059 771,923 1,467,633 56,779,240 5 - - - - 295,457 - - - - 295,457 125,000 124,284 5,547 17,397 50,000 49,794 3,509,000 3,450,536 300,000 136,368 9,236 9,260 250,000 102,991 5,807,000 5,071,289 218,182 33,864 41,882 127,579 2,986,000 3,440,654 6,754 20,256 335,000 321,423 4,079,074 4,433,578 14,000 441,500 126,000 70,881 31,314 428,606 137,871 71,935 33,000 240,004 119,460 296,238 30,914 195,346 166,661 249,795 125,000 124,284 4,804,060 4,804,060 150,923 140,215 2,566,529 2,566,529 32,481,2996 32,448,0866 155,727,559 7 155,673,742 7 16,404,903 16,404,903 8,346,641 8 8,346,641 8 9,776,483 9 9,776,462 9 651,850 651,850 3,010,024 10 3,010,024 10 2,401,572 2,354,860 1,950,000 I 1,950,000" 20-14 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 9. Erie Harbor, PA 10. Fairport Harbor, NY 11. Geneva-on-the Lake, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 12. Huron Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Irondequoit Bay, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 14. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 15. Lorain Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. New York State Barge Canal New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 185,006 1,162,001 400,512 288,129 111,071 1,287,977 404,352 288,593 111,000 116,277 2,303,000 2,430,901 725,000 663,810 487,000 496,441 843,000 130,047 895,406 137,961 - -536,825 - -536,389 60 - 60 - 2,356,000 209,000 1,945,177 1,226,849 -53,625 25,313 792,000 615,000 -22,000 815,423 754,196 617,197 30,624 802,901 198,565 105,000 1,850 71,340 262,725 50,000 48,621 38 96 267,500 18,204 364,095 24,760 - 59,346 9,402 62,683 1,230 2,806 577,000 36,515 788,111 70,607 1,087,000 635,000 1,059,216 703,157 203,000 -17,449 696,038 135,315 - 12,500 - 3,007 2,491 2,491 208,000 281,336 545,000 539,352 3 12,406 9,642 39,356 34,086 23,000 42,957 1,195,964 624,133 - 375,000 9,493 373,656 3,597,873 12 3,597,873 12 16,882,403 13 16,882,398 13 1,154 1,154 2,959,611 14 2,959,611 14 14,846,719 14,845,294 3,145,175 3,145,175 60 60 3,261,375 3,261,375 5,103,795 15 5,103,795 15 17,027,349 17,013,743 247,030 247,030 63,079 63,079 3,535,800 3,535,713 403,110 400,346 2,720,186 2,720,039 301,394 16 301,394 16 3,138,155 3,132,885 742,822 742,822 22,240,073 17 22,239,424 17 26,699,393 26,117,871 845,551 845,551 387,500 386,156 20-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 17. Olcott Harbor, NY 18. Oswego Harbor, NY 19. Port Ontario Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20. Rochester Harbor, NY 21. Rocky River Harbor, NY 22. Sandusky Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23. Toledo Harbor, OH 24. West Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - 350,000 - 178,133 23,336 12,094 23,269 12,161 733,009 -107,442 553,436 72,131 920,000 500,000 1,028,304 460,136 - 359 - 359 560,000 520,000 824,358 510,677 400,000 494,360 16,374 16,374 376,000 430,663 16,465 16,465 24,240 343,269 24,240 331,713 16,150 4,893 4,893 393 3,526 3,526 556 1,266,210 18 1,243,366 18 594,517 19 594,517 19 14,477 20 14,477 20 8,430,01621 8,430,01621 6,980,594 22 6,969,038 22 307,590 307,590 2,400,000 23 2,374,791 23 8,778 8,778 1,350,000 1,335,591 - - - 2,439,308 24 - - - 2,439,308 24 627,000 1,285,000 38,000 1,019,209 19,612,025 25 721,364 1,266,283 77,136 1,018,151 19,610,950 25 3,270 59 3,270 18,301 18,301 30,303 28,171 639,000 165,000 446,000 1,317,845 624,082 157,030 437,085 1,056,371 20,000 19,999 -4,554 -4,555 3,741,500 2,958,000 2,894,800 3,794,923 2,001,213 4,710,343 2,779,048 3,309,950 45,472 688,700 210,275 46,832 26,296 430,722 487,428 46,785 343,494 343,494 2,282,910 2,280,778 6,727,270 26 6,727,270 26 16,253,284 15,959,901 675,606 675,606 15,445 15,445 17,191,842 27 17,191,842 27 87,196,276 28 86,572,493 28 3,303,898 3,303,898 1,075,126 1,075,079 3,795,000 3,795,000 20-16 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 27. Lake Erie, Sturgeon Pt., N Y (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Maumee Bay State Park, OH 29. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Century Park, Lorain, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Ellicott Creek, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 33. Mt. Morris Lake, N Y Genesee River 34. Point Place, Toledo, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35. Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 39. Conesus Lake, Livonia, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 173,000 1,460,000 -15,000 -100,000 167,117 1,451,120 -143,915 26,603 - -- 3,000 - -1,901 1,464,858 -108,000 - 404,395 948,684 250,000 113,000 15,000 229,777 136,816 1,163,000 1,297,000 3,608,000 1,163,404 1,277,795 1,264,281 486,429 464,143 508,126 440,157 10,000 9,732 73,045 1,647 100,000 110,260 3,846,000 3,162,578 2,956,429 2,920,000 593,922 2,923,894 12,000 174,000 12,106 16,618 202,250 - 12.351 20,000 30,000 16,108 29,547 2,474,000 4,878,000 2,819,385 4,906,278 - 400,000 - 399,900 1,081,000 987,246 253,000 238,554 2,870 71, 931,000 880,000 1,233,500 1,392, 951,801 857,780 1,092,381 1,519, -30, 10,501 9 -30,000 90,480 -5,831 58,164 8,744 32,978 25,000 200,000 335,000 12,159 210,486 163,353 953,000 88,000 38,400 1,084,884 235,462 47,510 14,964 19,000 1,686,900 29 1,662,457 29 3,000 1,901 1,356,858 1,354,726 478,000 476,853 22,584,562 19,535,990 4,978 4,978 12,632,713 10,245,627 298,500 140,956 202,250 12,351 921,844 919,345 249,707 249,707 - 11,193,000 785 11,168,824 - 653,000 166 638,620 23,365,559 30 23,365,559 30 838 15,328,647 711 15,276,142 267 9,885,733 -267 9,885,733 1,871,631 428 1,871,631 237,093 129,669 250,000 62,500 37,523 1,000 1,407,560 1,125,899 250,000 62,500 2,069,400 2,069,372 35,000 34,964 20-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projects. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 3. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred for new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Section 107. 5. Includes 1,883,647 for previous projects. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 6. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107,1960 R&H Act. 7. Includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operations and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 8. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 9. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 10. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 11. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 12. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 13. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 14. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 15. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 16. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 17. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 18. Includes $140,210 for previous projects. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 19. Includes $38,959 for previous projects. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act. 21. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 22. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. 23. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 24. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 25. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 26. Includes $477,149 for previous projects. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 27. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 28. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 29. Includes $341,900 study funds under authority Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 30. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 20-18 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132 H. Doc. 654, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 1 of Text) Construction of breakwater. Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and constructing new east breakwater pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east breakwater. Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Remove portion of east breakwater, extend breakwaters to present project dimensions and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Extend river channel to present project limit. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 25-foot depth. A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters, thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater, thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard materials in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River, 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N Y (See Section 2 of Text). Dredging channel through horseshoe reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor to 16 feet. Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deepwater pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier and towpath wall. Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. 486, 83rd Cong., 2d 148, 86th Cong., 1st H. Doc. 269, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888, p. 2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116-3120. H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1900 p. 4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1901, p. 3343. H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess. and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. 20-19 sess. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1905 July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 26, 19345 Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Aug. 30, 19356 Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island pier, improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project. 7 Mar. 2, 1945 Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Sept. 3, 1954 Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. BUFFALO HARBOR, N Y (See Section 3 of Text). Constrution of south pier (extended in 1868)9. Construction of old breakwater. 9 May 20, 1826 June 23, 1866 June 23, 1874 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1909 June 6, 1900 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 190710 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 194511 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Extension of old breakwater. 9 Stony Point and south breakwater. 9 North breakwater. 9 Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' South entrance breakwater.9 Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site.9 Deepening areas A, B, and D in outer harbor to 21 feet, and area C in north entrance to 23 feet. Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor to 21 feet. Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. Deepening approach to south entrance channel to 30 feet; deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of south entrance channel; and deepen to 28 feet southerly part of outer harbor. Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined with this act as a single improvement. H. Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 423, 83d Cong., 2d sess. 4 , 8 Annual Report 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232 and 236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72. 55th Cong., lst sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 481,68th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 451, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 20-20 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan bridge. BUFFALO HARBOR, NFTA, N Y (See Section 4 of Text). Replace dike at small boat harbor. Repair dike at small boat harbor. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N Y (See Section 5 of Text). Construction of arrowhead breakwaters at mouth of Creek; entrance channel 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and eight feet deep from that depth in lake to point 1,575 feet upstream; channel 100 feet wide, six feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and recreational fishing facilities at mouth. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 6 of Text). West breakwater. Part of east breakwater. 9 . Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 29, 1937 Aug. 30, 193512 Aug. 30, 193511 Mar. 2. 194514 Extension of east breakwater. Reconstruction of piers. 9 Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor in discretion of Secretary of War. Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap misnh ore arm of west breakwater, removal of easterly 150 feet of west main breakwater, elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension of west pier, and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit. 15,16 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 15, 1980. Sec. 601, PL 99-662. Sec. 18, PL 100-676. July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 13, 1968 20-21 H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1876, p. 558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865. H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong. 2d sess. No printed report. H. Doc. 891, 63th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 477, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges. 2 July 3, 1958 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower, 2,000 feet of river.3 July 14, 1960 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin.24 Oct. 23, 1962 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending about 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. July 14, 1960 Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. as amended Oct. 22, 1976 Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements con- (Sec. 175) sisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater extension of east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. Nov. 17, 1986 Bulkheading and other necessary repairs at pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vessels in the area south of pier 34. June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 17 Aug. 30, 193511 Oct. 23, 1962 CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 7 of Text). Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater, removal of portion of old west breakwater, and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Realinement of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier. Removal of a portion of west breakwater, extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions, construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier, extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. H. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. sess. 415, 87th Cong., 2d DUNKIRK HARBOR, N Y (See Section 8 of Text) Mar. 2, 1827 Construction of west pier.9,18 S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1866 pt. IV, p. 155. 20-22 H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by chief of Engineers Dec. 6, 1966. Sec. 202, PL 99-662. BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1867 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 Dec. 15, 1970 (House Public Works Comm.) June 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 May 26, 1824 Mar. 3, 1899 June 15, 1910 Nov. 28, 192020 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 182521 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193522 Breakwater and excavation of entrance channel to 13 feet9 Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Construction of small-boat harbor. Dredging and maintenance of eastern inner harbor. ERIE HARBOR, PA (See Section 9 of Text). Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle Peninsula.9 Deepening channel and harbor basin to 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection work on peninsula. Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, deepening a portion of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier, thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over a 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin.26 Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of piers. Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier, and deepening of harbor to 19 feet. 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the United States of $715,000. Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present project dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier, and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Annual Report, 1871, p. 214 H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., I1st sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 848, PL 99-662. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H. Doc. 70, 55th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1896, p. 3237.19 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153. H. Doc. 347, 54th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p. 2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. 20-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 30, 1852 June 23, 1866 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 3, 1881 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc 706, 79th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 409, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Dredging of 8-foot river channel. GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, OHIO (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of breakwaters aggregating 1,350 feet in length; entrance channel about 730 feet long, 100 feet in width, 9 feet and 6 feet deep; mooring area 0.5 acres in area with a depth of 6 feet; development of recreational facilities; and development of wetland mitigation features. HURON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 12 of Text) Extension of west pier, construction of east breakwater, removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier, construction of new spur pier, enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of breach at shore end of west pier. Extension of west pier with pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and constructing pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier, and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin and abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY (See Section 13 of Text). Construction of entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels, a distance of about 1,300 feet; inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet; access channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the west; two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 feet in length at the natural entrance; and recreational facilities. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N Y (See Section 14 of Text). West entrance pier.9 Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel to 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide. 9 East pier and east breakwater. 9 Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 15 of Text). Breakwaters and extensions of piers to present dimensions. Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Extend breakwaters to present project dimensions. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock. Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1871, p. 234. Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364. H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2d sess. 20-24 H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193522 Oct. 23, 1962 July 3, 1958 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock. 12 Approach channel to municipal pier. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 to present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater, to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet of east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project. 27 Construction of a 225 foot detached rubblemound breakwater and an 800 foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Two bend cuts on Black River between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and 21st Street Bridge, excavated to existing channel depth of 27 feet. Widening Upper Turning Basin at existing authorized depth of 21 feet.8 NEW YORK STATE BARGE CANAL (See Section 16 of Text) Reimbursement to State of New York for 50 percent of the cost of operating, maintaining and rehabilitating the New York Barge Canal. The Federal contribution to rehabilitation costs shall be limited in any fiscal year to $5,000,000, or 50 percent of the expenditures in that fiscal year whichever is the lesser. OLCOTT HARBOR, NY (See Section 17 of Text) Dredging a channel 11 feet deep between parallel piers.9 Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. Construct the project for Navigation, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 11, 1980. OSWEGO HARBOR, N Y (See Section 18 of Text) Construction of outer west breakwater.9 Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A). 3 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor between arrowhead breakwaters; west outer harbor east of Erie- Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet. 29 Widening channel to harbor line in Oswego River north of Seneca Street.. Closing gap in west breakwater; deepening west outer harbor, west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth.30 Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of the inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor.3' Sec. 1105, PL 99-662 Annual Report, 1866 pt. III, p. 15 and pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62d Cong., 2d sess.4 Sec. 601, PL 99-662 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220 and 221. H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 20-25 H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar. 12. 1986. H. Doc. 124, 99th Cong., 1st sess. July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 4, 1913 Nov. 17, 1986 July 11, 1870 Mar. 2, 1907 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 June 30, 1948 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 June 10, 1872 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193525 Mar. 2, 1945 H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 24-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater and elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. PORT ONTARIO, NY (See Section 19 of Text) Construct harbor of refuge. Maintain harbor of refuge. ROCHESTER, HARBOR, N Y (See Section 20 of Text) Construction of piers.9 Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers. 9 Deepening channel to 20 feet. Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Maintenance of existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier, a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 21 of Text) East pier and dredging of channel. Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 22 of Text) Construction of channel protection works. Widening of Straight and Dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of Dock channels to 21 feet, and westerly portion of Dock channel to 20 feet. Deepening of Dock Channel to 22 feet. Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock dike. Maintenance of Bay Channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Annual Report, 1871, p. 211. H. Doc. 70, 75th Cong., I1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2708 H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 20-26 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 615, PL 99-662. Annual Report, 1874, p. 247. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 July 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Extending Moseley Channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels and deepening to 26 feet; deepening the Straight channel to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to junction with Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from the junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania Coal dock No. 3 to 25 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 23 of Text). A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 19 feet deep above that point and a 500-foot turning basin at Upper End. A stone revetted earth dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour to mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide on each side of center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning basin at Upper end 18 feet deep. Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. Deepen Bay Channel including widenings to 28 feet, deepen River channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne Brige.28. WEST HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 24 of Text). Construction of arrowhead breakwaters, entrance channel, and access channel. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, N Y (See Section 27 of Text). Rehabilitate existing breakwater, construct rubblemound west breakwater extension, construct rubblemound east breakwater, a shore revetment, and dredging. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK, OHIO (See Section 28 of Text). Protective sand beach stabilized by rubblemound offshore breakwaters and jetties along the west half of park shoreline and rubblemound revetment at the east end of the park. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA (See Section 29 of Text). Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Periodic nourishment of shores for a 10-year period. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced offshore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sandfill. Construct offshore breakwaters and restore beaches. CENTURY PARK, LORAIN, OHIO (See Section 31 of Text). Construction of two stone groins, removal of a stone deflection wall and placement of clean beach fill material. LAKESHORE PARK, ASHTABULA, OHIO (See Section 31 of Text). Construction of offshore breakwaters, restoration of an 800-foot long beach, and subsequent periodic nourishment as necessary. H. Doc. 231, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 397, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 796, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 501, PL 99-662. Sec. 103, PL 87-874, Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 11, 1989. Sec. 103, PL 87-874. Authorized by Chief of Engineers April 26, 1982. 20-27 H. Doc. 144, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 21, 1987. Sec. 501, PL 99-662. Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 101) Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 as amended REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ELLICOTT CREEK, NY (See Section 32 of Text). Dec. 31, 1970 Widening, straightening and deepening channel in Ellicott Creek Park; Sec. 201, PL 91-611 Mar. 7, 1974 construct diversion channels; construct 3 highway bridges; modify Sec. 14, PL 93-251 culverts; modify utilities and drainage outlets; and construct recreation facilities. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, N Y, (See Section 33 of Text). Dec. 22, 1944 Construction of a concrete gravity dam and reservoir. H. Doc. 615, 78th Cong., 2d sess. POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO (See Section 34 of Text). Oct. 27, 1965 Construction of steel sheet pile wall, levees, pumping stations, storm H. Doc. 363, 92d Cong., 2d sess. sewer facilities, and gravity outfalls. RENO BEACH - HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO (See Section 35 of Text). June 30, 1948 Construction of dike and levees. H. Doc. 554, 80th Cong., 2d sess. CONESUS LAKE, LIVONIA, NY (See Section 39 of Text). June 30, 1948, Construction of sheetpiling, concrete control structure, outlet channel, Sec. 205, PL 80-858. Authorized as amended and creek channelization. by Chief of Engineers July 22, 1985. 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at end of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept.6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriations Act approved April 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov. 1981. 20. Public Law 366. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 23. First Supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1944 approved Dec. 23, 1943. 24. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to and including Old River, classified deferred. 25. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 26. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug. 1982. 27. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut 1 has been deauthorized. 28. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet and turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 29. Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is deauthorized. 30. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor deauthorized in May 1981. 31. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct. 26, 1962. 20-28 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 26 of Text) Cost to September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Barcelona Harbor, N Y Completed 1989 $1,185,853 18 $1,934,203 Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio' Completed _ 2 19,763 3 - Black River Harbor, N Y4 - 2 42,401 - Cape Vincent Harbor, N Y Completed 1962 275,082 $1,564,791 Cattaraugus Creek, N Y5 -_ 2 57,410 - Elk Creek Harbor, Pa. Active 1978 101,500- Grasse River (Massena), N y4,6 - 1891 9,000 3 - Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N Y Completed 1988 610,959 16 2,479,488 17 Kelleys Island, Ohio Active 1974 12 129,874 - Little River at Cayuga Island, N Y Completed 1969 46,804 7 4,335 Morristown Harbor, N Y Completed 1949 6,221 10,200 Niagara Remedial Works, N Y8 Completed 1966 6,069,395 510,819 Niagara River, N Y13 Completed 1964 559,4579 152,487 Oak Orchard Harbor, N Y Completed 1989 1,586,996 19 260,749 Ogdensburg Harbor, N Y Completed 1987 1,720,466 14 1,379,722 s15 Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio Completed 1985 71,950 935,712 Pultneyville Harbor, N Y11 - 1934 68,219 20,087 Put in Bay, Ohio Completed 1951 12 51,609 13,328 Sackets Harbor, Ohio Completed 1982 25,010 26,572 Sandusky River, Ohio4 - 1894 58,000 3 557 Vermilion Harbor, Ohio Completed 1989 1,156,118 2o 2,036,078 Wilson Harbor, NY Completed 1989 535,246 21 563,752 22 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Channel improved by local interests. 7. Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. 8. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 9. Includes local interests contribution of $27,563. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 11. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 12. Annual Report for Detroit District. 13. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 14. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. Excludes $57,000 contributed funds. 15. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 16. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 17. Excludes $713,544 for Rehab. 18. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $181,500 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $139,775 for rehab and $740,679 contributed funds. 21. Includes $57,342 for previous projects. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 22. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 20-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 20-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) Cost to September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hamlin Beach State Park, N Y Completed 1976 $1,769,600 - Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH Completed 1987 1,741,125 2 Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, N Y' Completed 1963 58,978 $2,946 1. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. 2. Does not include $739,700 contributed funds. 20-30 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 38 of Text) Cost to September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, N Y, Owasco Outlet Completed 1962 $ 371,985 3- Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, N Y Completed 1957 335,385- Camp Perry, Ohio Completed 19678 275,0007- Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N Y2 Completed 1984 1,404,500- Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio Active 1985 1,117,000- Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N Y Active 1985 490,300- Fremont, Ohio, Sandusky River Completed 1976 8,589,8246- Ithaca, N Y, Cayuga Inlet, N Y Completed 1978 3,929,3009 - Lackawanna, N Y, Smokes Creek Completed 1971 3,542,068 4 Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, N Y Completed 1954 797,300- Marsh Creek, Geneva, N Y Completed -226,429- Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, N Y Completed 1954 1,681,785- Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N Y2 Completed 1964 330,231- Ottawa, Ohio Deferred 1989 374,000- Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Inactive/ Brook, N Y' Deferred 1950 281,559- Scajaquada Creek, N Y Completed 1985 4,944,852- Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, N Y Completed 1954 3,349,248- Warsaw, N Y, Oatka Creek2 Completed 1969 558,3175 - Wellsville, N Y, Genesee River Completed 1978 3,145,30310 1. Inactive portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local interest and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of local interests. 2. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 4. Includes local interest contribution of $50,000. 5. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes,, June 1972. 6. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes cost of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 7. Includes local interest contribution of $125,000. 8. Annual Report for Detroit District. 9. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 20-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 20-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 27 of Text) Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification East Harbor State Park, OH Cayuga Lake, Seneca Co., NY North Sandy Pond, Oswego Co., NY Seneca Lake, Geneva, NY Toussaint River, Carrol Twsp., OH Fiscal Year Cost $ 23,792 26,940 9,553 29,411 41,740 20-32 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-H FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 39 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Sec. 205 Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Andover, Dyke Creek, NY Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY Canandiagua Lake, NY Cattaraugus Creek, Arcade, NY Cazenovia Creek, Buffalo, NY Chagrin River, Eastlake, OH Cross Lake, NY Ellicott Creek, Lehn Springs, NY Genesee River, Village of Belmont, NY Honeoye Lake, NY Keuka Lake Outlet, NY Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY Maumee River, Grand Rapids, OH Oneida Lake, NY Owasco Inlet, Groton, NY Sandy Creek, Village of Albion, NY Scajaquada Creek, Depew, NY Silver Creek, Silver Creek, NY Swan Creek, Toledo, OH Village of Malone, NY W. Br. Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY Fiscal Year Cost $ 754 12,978 510 38,252 241 36,414 24,585 39 9,963 1,453 38,571 98,030 9,663 245 7,548 39,627 79 6,336 46,939 9,652 1,333 Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Study Identification Butternut Creek, E. Syracuse, NY Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY Cattaraugus Creek, Village of Arcade, NY Chagrin River, Solon Rd., OH Chagrin River, East Branch, Route 84, OH Chagrin River, East Branch, Wisner Rd., OH Clear Creek, Bray Rd., Freedom, NY Clear Creek, Rt. 98, Freedom, NY Clear Creek, Freedom, NY Cuyahoga River, Akron Peninsula Rd., OH Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Rd., OH Cuyahoga River, North Portage Path, Akron, OH Cuyahoga River, Riverview Rd., Northampton, OH Keshequa Creek, Nunda, NY Lake Erie, Eastlake, OH Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY Lake Erie, Linwood Park, Vermilion, OH Lake Erie, Middle Bass Island, Deist Rd., OH Lake Erie, North Point Dr., Avon Lake, OH Lake Erie, St. Joseph Christian Life Center, OH Lake Erie State Park, Brocton, NY Maumee River, Providence Metro Park, OH Mill Creek, Warrenville Twsp, OH Thatcher Brook, Gowanda, NY Fiscal Year Cost $ 4,996 15,825 14,756 17,487 3,363 12,943 12,690 10,910 14,970 20,854 21,519 45,3654 -10,0341 10,821 51 5,397 96,1093 281,8476 6,365 54,4295 133,2092 13,225 18,678 23,249 1. Does not include $12,809 in contributed funds. 2. Does not include $47,867 in contributed funds. 3. Does not include $31,301 in contributed funds. 4. Does not include $17,389 in contributed funds. 5. Does not include $18,738 in contributed funds. 6. Does not include $100,667 in contributed funds. 20-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 20-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act' 1962 Aug 1977 - - Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1954 R&H Act 1962 May 1981 - - Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act 1950 Jan 1990 - - Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1962 Nov 1986 -- Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 FC Act 1948 Jan 1990 $12,464- Conneaut Harbor, OH 1966 R&H Act6 1966 Jan 1990 -- Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act 1968 3 Nov 1979- Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act 1976 Jan 1990 506,344- Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act 1963 Nov 1981 -- Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 -- Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1982 - Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act - Jan 1990 -- Fairport Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act 1962 Jan 1990 67,000 - Fairport Harbor, OH Sec 201 1965 FC Act 1977 Jan 1990 - - Fort Niagara State Park, NY Sec 201 1965 FC Act -Jan 1990 - - Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 Aug 1977 1,524 - Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1962 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 - - Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act 1973 Jan 1990 72,052 - Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act 1951 Nov 1983 29,000 - Huron Harbor, OH 1962 R&H Act7 1963 Jan 1990 - - Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 8,159- Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 12,300 - Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act modified by 1965 R&H Act5 1966 Jan 1990 - - Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act 19713 Nov 1977 12,000- Niagara River, Compensating Works, NY 1930 R&H Act 1964 Aug 1977 - - Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act 1986 Nov 1986 -- Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act 1963 Jan 1990 - - Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act2 1963 May 1981 -- Ottawa River Harbor, MI & OH, Sec 201, 1965 FC Act 1977 3 Jan 1990 99,000- Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act - Jan 1990 -- Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act 1975 Nov 1986 361,241 - Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 May 1981 19,010 - Selkirk Shores State Park, NY 1954 R&H Act5 1963 Jan 1990 - - Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act - Aug 1977 - Watkins Glen, NY 1941 FC Act 1958 Aug 1977 43,182 - White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act - Jan 1990 -- 1. Extension of guide pier only; other improvements completed. 4. Deepen East Outer Harbor. 2. Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements 5. Uncompleted portion. completed. 6. Six foot channel and breakwater. 3. Annual Report for Detroit District. 7. Breakwater. 20-34 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT * The district is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 600 feet; Lake Michigan- Huron, 576.8 feet; Lake Erie, 568.6 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 571.7 feet. Elevations in feet are above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum -- 1955). IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Arcadia Harbor, MI ... ............................ 21-2 2. Ashland Harbor, WI ... ............................ 21-2 3. Au Sable Harbor, MI... ........................... 21-3 4. Bayport Harbor, MI.... ........................... 21-3 5. Black River Harbor (Alcona County), MI..........21-3 6. Black River, (P.H.)M I ........................................ 21-3 7. Black River Harbor, (U.P.) MI .......................... 21-4 8. Bolles Harbor, MI... ............................. 21-4 9. Channels in the Straits of Mackinac, MI .......... 21-4 10. Charlevoix Harbor, MI ...................................... 21-5 11. Clinton River, M I ............................................... 21-5 12. Detroit River, M I ............................................... 21-6 13. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI ............... 21-6 14. Eagle Harbor, M I...............................................21-7 15. Fox River, W I ......................................... .......... 21-8 16. Franfort Harbor, MI .... .......................... 21-8 17. Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI......21-9 18. Grand Marais Harbor, MI..............................21-10 19. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI .................... 21-10 20. Green Bay Harbor, WI ... ......................... 21-10 21. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI...............................21-11 22. Harbors at Washington Island, WI ........... 21-11 23. Holland Harbor, MI .... .......................... 21-12 24. The Inland Route, MI.... ......................... 21-12 25. Kenosha Harbor, WI ....................................... 21-13 26. Kewaunee, W I.................................................21-13 27. Keweenaw Waterways, MI ............................. 21-14 28. Lake St. Clair, MI Channels...........................21-14 29. Leland Harbors, M I ......................................... 21-15 30. Lexington Harbor, MI ... ..................... 21-15 31. Little Lake Harbor, MI ... ......................... 21-15 32. Ludington Harbor, MI...................................21-16 33. Manistee Harbor, MI.... ..................... 21-16 34. Manistique Harbor, MI ... ........................ 21-16 35. Manitowoc Harbor, WI ..................................... 21-17 Navigation (cont.) Page 36. Marquette Harbor, MI ... ......................... 21-18 37. Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI ..... 21-18 38. Milwaukee Harbor, W I....................................21-18 39. M onroe Harbor, M I ......................................... 21-19 40. Muskegon Harbor, MI.... ........................ 21-20 41. New Buffalo Harbor, MI ... ....................... 21-20 42. Northport Harbor, WI ... ......................... 21-21 43. Ontonagon Harbor, MI.... ........................ 21-21 44. Pentwater Harbor, MI.... ........................ 21-21 45. Pointe Lookout Harbor, (Au Gres River) MI... 21-22 46. Portage Lake Harbor, MI ................................ 21-22 47. Port Austin Harbor, MI........................21-22 48. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI.................................. 21-23 49. Port Washington Harbor, WI........................21-23 50. Port Wing Harbor, WI .... ........................ 21-23 51. Presque Isle Harbor, MI.... ..................... 21-24 52. Rouge River, MI.... ............................ 21-24 53. Saginaw River, MI.... ........................... 21-24 54. St. Clair River, MI ... ............................ 21-25 55. St. Joseph Harbor, MI.... ........................ 21-25 56. St. Marys River, MI.... ........................... 21-26 57. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI.21-28 58. Saxon Harbor, WI .... ........................... 21-28 59. Sebewaing River, M I.......................................21-28 60. Sheboygan Harbor, WI .... ........................ 21-29 61. South Haven Harbor, MI ................................ 21-29 62. Sturgeon Bay & Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI .... 21-30 63. Two Harbors, MN... .............................. 21-30 64. Two Rivers Harbor, W I........................................21-30 65. Whitefish Point Harbor, MI ................................ 21-31 66. W hite Lake Harbor, MI ....................................... 21-31 67. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............. 21-31 68. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............... 21-31 69. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..21-32 21-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Beach Erosion Control Page 70. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects.... 21-32 71. Emergency Shore Protection .......................... 21-32 72. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ................................................. 21-32 73. Mitigation of Shore Damages ......................... 21-33 Flood Control 74. Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI ............... 21-33 75. Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI .................. 21-33 76. Kawkawlin River, MI ...................................... 21-34 77. Saginaw River, M I........................................... 21-34 78. Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI ................... 21-35 79. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .21-35 80. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............ 21-35 81. Flood Control Under Special Authorization........21-35 82. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters........21-36 General Investigations Page 83. Surveys ................................................................ 21-39 84. Preconstruction Engineering and Design............21-39 85. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................... 21-41 Tables Table 21-A Cost & Financial Statement ................... 21-42 Table 21-B Authorizing Legislation............................ 21-58 Table 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....21-71 Table 21-D Not Applicable ................................................... Table 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 21-72 Table 21-F Multiple Purpose Projects, including Power St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project ....21-72 Table 21-G Deauthorized Projects ............................. 21-73 Table 21-H Features of Existing Project .................... 21-75 Table 21-I Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams ................. 21-76 Table 21-J Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys......21-77 Navigation 1. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14907). Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $48,100. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $530. An adjustment of -$25,033 was made to contract completed last FY for repairs to the North and South Pier and Revetment. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $16,458, removing approximately 2,414 cubic yards of shoal material by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $44,125. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Maintenance of the harbor is based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in excellent condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,167,546. 2. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $23,120. Breakwater repairs were performed by the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $186,655. Supervision and administration cost of $3,980. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,977,176, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $3,281,531 for maintenance. 21-2 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 3. AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI Location. The AuSable River and village of Oscoda, MI are on the west shore of Lake Huron, 8 miles north of Au Sable Point, northeast limit of Saginaw Bay. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see pages 336 and 2453 of Annual Report 1892. Existing project. Riprapping outer 200 feet of north pier at mouth of Au Sable River, dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and dredging between piers and upstream to State highway bridge 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizinglegislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small timber pile wharves used primarily by commercial fishermen and pleasure craft operators; also a private marina basin east of Highway 23 Bridge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,736. Existing project was completed in 1962. Total cost for existing project to the end of FY was $2,793,077, of which $209,776 was for new work (includes $16,400 contributed funds) and $2,583,301 for maintenance. 4. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI Location. On Wild Fowl Bay on east shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Caseville, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14863.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide extending 5,750 feet from 6-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to intersection of private service channels to be dredged by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small wharves used primarily by commercial fishermen. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,402. Engineering, design and real estate, for a maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY, cost $24,293. Existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $244,367, of which $93,597 was for new work and $150,770 for maintenance. 5. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (ALCONA COUNTY), MI Location. Black River Harbor is located at the mouth of Black River which empties into Lake Huron at the village of Black River, Alcona County, MI, on the westerly shore of Lake Huron about 115 miles southeasterly by water from the straits of Mackinac. Alpena, located 18 miles northerly, is the largest community in the area. Existing project. Provides for improving the existing non-Federal small boat harbor by constructing an east breakwater 1,210 feet long, a north breakwater 570 feet long, an approach channel 10 feet deep from the 10-foot contour in Lake Huron to the harbor entrance, an access channel 8 feet deep from the harbor entrance to the river mouth, a river channel 6 feet deep from the mouth of the Black River to the first bridge located about 1,100 feet upstream, and a footbridge and walkway to provide for recreational fishing from the east breakwater. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) This project was authorized on December 17, 1970, under the provisions of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act. However, funds were never appropriated and the project was not constructed. In FY 90, in accordance with Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986, (P.L. 99-662), the project was deauthorized on December 31, 1989. 6. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI Location. This river has its source in the northern part of Sanilac County, MI, is about 60 miles long, and flows in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Previous project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, decreasing to 100 feet, about 800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet; widening two bends to 100 feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the 1-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935, is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River, near its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available, as are privately owned and operated marinas. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $22,188. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded this FY in the amount of $549,410. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, surveys and real estate for maintenance dredging cost $53,631. Supervision and administration cost $4,671. All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935, and the latest modification, has been completed. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,510,616, of which $830,165 was for new work (includes $349,921 contributed funds) and $680,451 for maintenance. 7. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MI Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Terminal facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet; on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,463. Project was completed in June 1958. A triangularshaped rock shoal 50 feet wide at easterly end extends along southerly side of channel. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,096,206, of which $383,350 was for new work and $712,856 for maintenance. 8. BOLLES HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Erie at mouth of La Plaisance Creek, 7 miles southwest of Monroe, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14846.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel in Lake Erie, 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water to a point opposite the outer end of existing jetty, thence widening to 100 feet at creek mouth; an access channel in La Plaisance Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the mouth widening to 120 feet and extending to the first bend, thence narrowing to 50 feet wide and continuing at that width to the La Plaisance Road bridge; a steel sheet pile revetment, about 200 feet long, located along Michigan State Conservation Department property on west side of channel at creek mouth. Project also provides for inclusion of existing 400-foot long steel sheet pile jetty constructed by Michigan State Waterways Commission at the mouth of La Plaisance Creek. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Monroe Boat Club and three marinas provide facilities adequate for existing recreational boat traffic. There is also a public launching ramp and parking area at Conservation Department fishing site at creek mouth. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were perform by Government forces at a cost of $5,599. The existing project was completed in 1970 (Adequate depths exist over the project length except for the upstream 800 feet). Total cost for existing project to the end ofFY was $3,292,322, of which $426,413 was for new work (includes $255,000 contributed funds) and $2,865,909 for maintenance. 9. CHANNELS IN THE STRAITS OF MACKINAC, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel, joins Lakes Michigan and Huron at their upper ends and is about 7 miles northeasterly from Mackinaw City, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a channel between Mackinac Island and Round Island, MI, 1,250 feet wide, 30 feet deep, and 3,500 feet long; and for removal of Poe Reef Shoal to a depth of 30 feet over an area of about 120,000 square yards to permit navigation through Straits of Mackinac by vessels drawing 25.5 feet at low water datum. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. 21-4 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Terminal facilities. None. Operation during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $650. The existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,056,633, of which $2,832,629 was for new work and $224,004 for maintenance. 10. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Section 25 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 provides authorization pertaining to the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor. It states, "The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to restore recreational uses established prior to May 1, 1988, or provide comparable recreational uses at the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor project, Charlevoix, Michigan, in order to mitigate any adverse impact on recreational uses resulting from reconstruction of the South Pier..." Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-ways required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request ofthe Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general pubic interest for initial and subsequent disposal ofexcavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-ways for construction of the projects, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction (1975) is estimated at $625.000. Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, real estate, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $78,875. The U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC performed obstruction removal along channel limits at a cost of $19,398. Repairs to safety features were performed by hired labor at a cost of $4,148. An adjustment of -$76 was made to the contract for repair of South Pier and Revetment, Sections A & F, completed in FY 89. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $8,162. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. A controlling depth of 18 feet is available throughout the entire project, except for minor shoaling along the channel limits. Total cost for existing project to the end of FY was $9,329,389, of which $180,623 was for new work, $8,019,370 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352) and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 11. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its source in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 21-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private wharves along the river below the city. They are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $43,106. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $697. A contract for construction of an off-loading platform was awarded this FY in the amount of $291,980. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, supervision and administration for construction of the off-loading platform cost $59,380. An adjustment of -$139,102 was made to the contract for construction of a confined disposal facility completed last FY. Engineering and design during construction and real estate cost $5,182. Supervision and administration for Dike Disposal cost $38,408. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $5,710,752, of which $549,798 was for new work (includes $289,752 contributed funds) and $5,160,954 for maintenance. 12. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long, flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 21-H. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 571.7 and 568.6 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum--1955.) (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated 1978 Federal cost of new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $159,300.000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1946 and 1956 R & H Acts, construction of the Compensating Works, with the uncompleted portion of the Trenton Channel modification approved August 13, 1968, were deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 ofthe W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, master plan, environmental studies, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,348,097. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $175,963. Location and removal of obstructions cost $1,425,357. An adjustment of -$26,334 and -5,725 cubic yards was made to the contract for Pointe Mouillee maintenance dredging completed last FY. A maintenance dredging contract at East Outer and Lower Livingstone channels was awarded and completed this FY removing approximately 240,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,598,000. Engineering, design and surveys for maintenance dredging cost $47,117. Supervision and administration cost $136,768. Under the Dike Disposal Program, an adjustment of $287,364 was made to the FY 78 Pointe Mouillee Disposal Site Phase II contract for settlement of a claim for Differing Site Conditions due to encountering unanticipated quantities of cobbles and boulders while dredging. Supervision and administration for dike disposal cost $19,987. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 21-H. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $207,348,647, of which $76,877,357 was for new work ($75,346,669 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Works Funds) and $130,471,290 (includes $361,235 Section 150 contributed funds) for maintenance. 13. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 ofAnnual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet deep in inner channels. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 21-6 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized modifications to the project to deepen the western portions of North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and the Minnesota Channel to 27 feet LWD; widen the Cross Channel to provide a minimum turning basin of 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet; and construct an upland confined disposal facility. Estimated cost (Oct. 89) is $13,500,000; which includes $7,250,000 Federal and $6,250,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as described in House Document 150, 86th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of P.L. 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $2,350,000. The estimated cash contribution of $2,350,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $940,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-ways, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one are privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $552. An adjustment of -$26,035 was made to the contract for the rehabilitation of North and South Piers Sections 0, N-i, N and M contract completed last FY. Engineering and design, supervision and inspection cost $75,030. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $464,999. Operation and maintenance of the museum was performed by Government forces at a cost of $374,810. Operation and maintenance of service facilities and pier was performed at a cost of $86,002. A Commercial Activities Program study for the Visitor's Center cost $6,994. Repairs to Superior entry breakwater and seawalls were performed by Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $348,564. Safety maintenance as performed by hired labor at a cost of $31,791. The contract for maintenance dredging of contaminated materials awarded last FY was completed with approximately 159,073 cubic yards removed this FY at a cost of $1,344,400. A contract for maintenance dredging of contaminated materials was awarded and completed this FY removing approximately 110,485 cubic yards of material at a cost of $810,531. A contract for maintenance dredging of clean material was awarded this FY in the amount of $349,184. The contract is approximately 58 percent complete removing 26,066 cubic yards of material at a cost this FY of $199,999. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $297,743. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue West channel portion which was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $76,566,147, of which $16,109,258 was for new work, $49,456,469 for maintenance, and $11,000,420 for rehabilitation. 14. EAGLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior on the North Face of Keweenaw Point, 31 miles northeasterly from the Upper Entrance of Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for a short entrance channel, a guide pier marking the entrance on the west side, and a harbor basin. Project depths are 14 feet in the entrance channel and 12 feet in the harbor basin. For additional details see page 1182 of Annual Report for 1959. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 21-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Terminal facilities. An old L-shaped timber wharf is available but is in poor condition. A dock and launching ramp constructed by the State is located on the north side of the Harbor Basin. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,383. The original project was completed in 1879. The modification for a small boat harbor was completed in 1959. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $294,441, of which $205,164 was for new work and $89,277 for maintenance. 15. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 ofAnnual Report for 1962. Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from De Pere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below De Pere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513,424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1925, was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 21-I on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports, safety training and plans for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of $43,207. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $42,471. Sandblasting and painting offive tainter gates at Appleton Lower Dam were performed at a cost of $32,404. An archeological study for disposal was undertaken, totaling $1,495. Real Estate inspections and outgranting was performed at a cost of $48,729. The operation and maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks and two (2) guard locks totaled $798,060. Fox River O.S.H.A. Program and major miscellaneous items of supply totaled $6,613. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $250,295. Engineering and design costs were $23,902. Supervision and administration costs were $214,673. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 21-I for year of completion of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. Existing locks and dams are generally in fair to good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $46,242,298, of which $3,753,334 was for new work and $42,488,964 for operation and maintenance. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 16. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. One east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters and to a maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters; thence to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of 21-8 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built ofstonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $34,007. Repairs to North and South Breakwater, Sections A, B, C, D and South Revetment, Sections O and P, were performed using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $127,306. Supervision and administration cost $14,339. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. Navigation structures are in good condition and programmed for major repair on an as needed basis. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $10,138,378, of which $1,955,159 (includes $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $7,908,443 for maintenance, and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 17. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 ofAnnual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the harbor entrance and river channels to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; and provides for a new and larger turning basin. Estimated cost (Oct 89) is $19,400,000, which includes $11,400,000 Federal and $8,000,000 non-Federal. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as described in House Document 661, 76th Congress, 3d Session, and also includes, as a result of P.L. 99-662, construction cost sharing requirements as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $3,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of $3,650,000 to be paid in lump sum, prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $1,460,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution of lands, easements, rights-of-ways, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, master plan, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $194,109. The U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC performed repairs to the South Pier, Section L, and S. Revetment at a cost of $102,191. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $22,246. An adjustment of -$245 was made to the contract for maintenance dredging of the inner harbor completed last FY. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor, removing 16,221 cubic yards of shoal mate- 21-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 rial at a cost this FY of $94,877. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $46,688. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed next FY cost $13,435. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $74,549. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $34,864. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $20,827. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are generally in good condition; repairs are made on an as needed basis. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $28,322,541, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $26,050,459 for maintenance (includes $15,585 contributed funds), and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 18. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 93 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a channel protected by parallel piers and for closing natural entrance channel with a pile dike. Project depths are 18 feet between piers and 20 feet in lake approach. For additional details see page 1449 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small piers, a Coast Guard Station, and a small boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan provide facilities adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,886. Repairs to West Breakwater, Cells 5 and 11, and Connectors 1-2, 3-4, 4-5, 5-6, 6-7, 7-8 and 8-9 were performed by U.S. Cranebarge MARKUS at a cost of $167,362. Supervision and administration cost $5,769. Existing project is complete except for widening a portion of channel from 250 to 300 feet. Project now being maintained to 19 and 15 feet below I.G.L.D., in lieu of 20 and 18 feet, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $2,949,551, of which $1,055,871 was for new work and $1,893,680 for maintenance. 19. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Existing project. Provides two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operation during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,888. Breakwater repairs were performed by the Cranebarge MARKUS at a cost of $61,723. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed by contract next FY cost $13,197. Existing project was completed in 1950 except for extension of north pier completed in 1964. Steel cells and piers are in good condition. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $2,072,498, of which $266,037 was for new work and $1,806,461 for maintenance. 20. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI, and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous projects. See page 1366 ofAnnual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000 Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion ofthe 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C. & N. W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the C. & N. W. Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1989) is $5,700,000; $3,705,000 Federal and $1,995,000 non- Federal which includes $1,390,000 local contribution. Section 601c of the Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized deepening the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation. Nautical Chart 14964.) 21-10 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, master plan, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $259,821. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $4,191. The contract for maintenance dredging the Inner Channel with Disposal in Bayport awarded last FY was completed removing 58,866 cubic yards of material at a cost of $563,694. A contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging the Inner Channel in the amount of $693,300. The contract is approximately 22 percent complete, removing 31,783 cubic yards of material at a cost this FY of $150,000. A contract for emergency maintenance dredging the Fort Howard Turning Basin was awarded this FY in the amount of $385,300. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $175,865. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility cost $65,238. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C. & N. W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of the turning basin above Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the River and Harbor Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment of Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end ofFY was $40,568,046, of which $39,627,246 were regular funds and $940,000 Public Work funds; $9,946,395 for new work and $30,621,651 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $100,000 contributed funds. 21. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a pubic recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $70,493. A contract was awarded for repair ofthe Main Breakwater, Phase II, in the amount of $2,335,750. The contract is approximately 99 percent complete at a cost this FY of $2,000,000. Engineering and design during construction for the second phase of repairing the Main Breakwater was performed at a cost of $63,899. Engineering and design for the third phase of repairing the Main Breakwater was performed at a cost of $80,939. Supervision and administration cost $84,770. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $13,252,974, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $11,857,872 for maintenance, and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 22. HARBORS AT WASHINGTON ISLAND, WI Location. In the entrance to Green Bay, a westerly arm of Lake Michigan, about 4 miles northeasterly from the north end of the peninsula which separates Green Bay from Lake Michigan and about 30 miles southeasterly from Escanaba, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14909.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel at Detroit Harbor, located on the south side of Washington Island, 150 feet wide and 14 feet deep at low-water datum from that depth in Green Bay to a turning basin of the same depth, 400 feet long and 150 to 300 feet wide, near the inner end of Detroit Island, a distance of about 3,700 feet; and for an entrance channel at Jackson Harbor, located on the north side of Washington Island, 150 feet wide and 12 feet deep at low-water datum through the entrance bar, a distance of about 500 feet. The project depths are referred to low-water datum for Lake Michigan, which is 578.5 feet above mean tide at New York. The fluctuations of water level are seasonal changes of about one-half foot above or below the annual mean stage, and extreme fluctuations of a temporary nature, due to wind and barometric pressure, of about one and one-half feet above or below the mean lake level prevailing at the time. 21-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 The existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of August 26, 1937 (H. Doc. 90, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.). The latest published map is in the project document. The Detroit Harbor element of this project is complete; however, removal of ledge rock at Jackson Harbor, which would provide the full project depth of 12 feet, has not been completed. In FY 90, this uncompleted portion of the project was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with the provisions of Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 23. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. One east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. The uncompleted portion of the project, widening bend ofentrance channel into Lake Macatawa, was deauthorized December 31,1989, in accordance with Section 1001 ofthe W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Work authorized by Act of 1954 is subject to condition that work on either or both proposed modifications may be undertaken by the United States provided local interests furnish all lands except 1.5 acres of Federal lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance; remove buildings and other structures, except existing revetments, from lands to be furnished; and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa, and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, master plan, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $207,375. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $15,877. A contract was awarded for repair of South Revetment, Section P, in the amount of $863,300. The contract is approximately 3 percent complete at a cost this FY of $25,000. Engineering and design for repair to the South Revetment, Section P, cost $60,765. The contract for maintenance dredging the inner harbor awarded last FY was completed, removing 40,394 cubic yards of material at a cost this FY of $436,405. An adjustment of 163 cubic yards of material was made to a contract for dredging the outer harbor completed last FY. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging of the outer harbor at a cost of $75,055, removing 20,777 cubic yards of dredge material. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering and design for repairs to the North and South Connector, Section Q, was performed at a cost of $45,647. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed by contract next FY cost $6,085. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $99,182. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $26,338. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $21,169. Engineering, design, supervision and administration for Section 111 cost $17,930. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $24,114,218, of which $1,392,827 was for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $22,218,939 for maintenance, and $502,452 for rehabilitation. 24. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 21-12 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Terminal facilities. None exist for commercial cargohandling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the State of Michigan at no cost to the Government. In FY90, the lock was operated from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. April 27- 29, May 5-31, Sept 17-30 and Oct 1-31. The lock was operated from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. June 1-30 and Sept 1-16. The lock was operated from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. July 1-31 and Aug 1-31. Water control activities at the lock and weir performed under contract by the State of Michigan cost $6,999. Winter operation and shut down of Alanson Locks cost $6,958. Condition surveys, real estate, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $15,901. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,763,652, of which $918,222 was for new work (includes $148,000 contributed funds) and $2,845,430 for maintenance. 25. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1986) Federal cost is $455,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $195,000 non-Federal which includes $155,000 local contribution. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act, dredging of 25-foot wide strips adjacent to the north and south piers, was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 ofthe W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fishing wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $50,601. Repairs to Confined Disposal Facility were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $85,316. Engineering and design for repairs to Detached Breakwater - Section H, was completed at a cost of $38,143. Engineering and design for repairs to the confined disposal facility was completed at a cost of $11,679. A contract was awarded for repairs to Detached Breakwater - Section H, and repairs to Confined Disposal Facility in the amount of $1,318,800. The contract is approximately 34 percent complete at a cost this FY of $216,000 for breakwater repairs and $233,999 for CDF repairs. Supervision and administration cost $64,037. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. The north pier is in excellent condition. The south pier and breakwater are in generally good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $12,048,665, of which $12,021,007 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief funds; $988,969 being for new work, $9,789,421 for maintenance, and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new cost does not include $3,000 contributed funds. 26. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, P. 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021, Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000 July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 21-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, master plan, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $72,882. Repairs to N Breakwater Sections H & F were performed by the cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $128,353. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,338. Repairs to diked disposal area performed by hired labor cost $16,728. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $31,774. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outlet end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $9,807,396, of which $758,333 was for new work ($338,333 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief funds) $8,431,763 regular funds for maintenance and $617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 27. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project for navigation at Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Aug. 30, 1935, Public Law 409, 73rd Congress, which consists of extending the lower entrance breakwater by 2,000 feet, including the necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to channel deepening, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 -Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $113,763. The Derrickbarge COLEMAN performed breakwater and revetment repairs at a cost of $154,979. The contract for major repair of Section F, North Revetment, was completed at a cost this FY of $1,216,925. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FYwas completed with approximately 75,000 cubic yards removed this FY at a cost of $688,579. Engineering and design during construction for major repair of Section F, North Revetment, cost $5,647. Engineering, design and surveys for maintenance dredging cost $15,512. Supervision and administration cost $89,887. Active portion of the project is complete. Breakwaters are in generally good condition except for a weakness occurring in about 300 feet of substructure of breakwater lower entrance. The flared revetment at the upper entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the stilling basin entrance. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $29,277,588, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, and $23,303,447 for maintenance. 28. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI CHANNELS Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882 Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, support of Water Control Center, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $72,803. Minor maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $470. 21-14 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $20,435,194, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,666,762 regular funds and $1,008,595 Public Works Funds) and $12,759,837 for maintenance. 29. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side ofriver below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,205. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging removing 17,358 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $90,233. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $20,479. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,098,492, of which $1,027,089 was for new work, $2,000,725 for maintenance and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 30. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On Southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost of new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,622. Condition surveys, monitoring, miscellaneous inspections and reports under Section 111 mitigation were performed by Government forces at a cost of $21,075. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,720,717, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $1,613,525 for maintenance. 31. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project site consists of a public dock built by State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $25,393. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed at a cost of $100,645, removing approximately 24,402 cubic yards of shoal material. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $28,414. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. An analysis for the Deficiency Report was submitted to North Central Division in March 1978 and approved. The design deficiency letter report and Environmental Assessment, drafted in FY 87, were reviewed by CENCD. 21-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service concerning the Federally protected Piping Plover was completed in FY 90. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,066,220, of which $600,478 was for new work and $3,465,742 for maintenance. 32. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAANautical Chart 14937.) Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 ofAnnual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwaters, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total costs for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, master plan, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $111,368. Structure repairs were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,051. Safety maintenance was performed at a cost of $7,041. The maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY was completed removing 60,512 cubic yards of material at a cost of $369,790. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $35,356. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Breakwaters, Sections A and E, was performed at a cost of $44,236. Under the Section 111 program, supervision and administration cost $231. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $21,016,557, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $12,126,442 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. 33. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake i lichigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $33,938. Repairs to safety features cost $482. An adjustment of -$6,530 and -5,544 cubic yards of material was made to the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. An adjustment of -$499 was made for engineering, design, and surveys for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $10,781,134, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $6,710,448 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 34. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Location. On the north shore of Lake Michigan, 135 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous project. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, 21-16 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1451 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $21,345. Repairs to the Breakwater were performed by the U.S. Cranebarge MARKUS at a cost of $37,093. Supervision and administration cost $875. Total cost for existing project to end ofFY was $3,754,196, of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $2,138,508 for maintenance and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 35. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee and about 106 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal Cost is $1,085,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension reaffirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $14,200; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rightsof- way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the united States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $71,645. Repairs to N. Breakwater Section C, S. Breakwater Sections B, E, F, and Disposal Facility - Section J, were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $63,710. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,143. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed by contract next FY cost $37,678. Supervision and administration cost $21,583. Existing project is completed except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modificiation was deauthorized December 31, 1990. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. The breakwater, completed in 1910, is in generally fair condition. Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. Cost for existing project to end of FY was $12,792,813, of which $3,960,044 was for new work (includes $1,911,130 contributed funds) and $8,832,769 for maintenance. 21-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 36. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. Terminal facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,780. Breakwater repairs were performed by the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $186,886. Supervision and administration cost $1,721. Total cost for existing project to end ofFY was $3,950,893, of which $1,282,893 was for new work, $2,202,243 for maintenance and $465,757 for rehabilitation. 37. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On Lake Michigan at the mouth ofMenominee River on the western shore of Green Bay, 16 miles northwest of the mouth of Sturgeon Bay, and 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. The river forms the boundary between the commercial harbors at Marinette, WI, and Menominee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous projects. See page 1361 ofAnnual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects are $221,053 Federal and $50,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City ofMarinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by city of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $59,310. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,605. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging cost $39,630. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded this FY in the amount of $189,800. No work was performed this FY. Supervision and inspection cost $9,543. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and completed in October 1968. The cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,694,929, of which $570,238 was for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $2,772,839 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation. 38. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 ofAnnual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, Page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,937,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 ofthe W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). Uncompleted portion of 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21-18 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except inactive portion of 1945 Act. Act of August 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, February 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. Four car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: An adjustment $19,500 was made to the FY 85 contract for major rehabilitation of the North Pier and North Breakwater completed in FY 89. Engineering and design cost $3,096. Supervision and administration was performed at a cost of $2,318. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, master plan, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $175,345. Repairs to S. Breakwater were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $110,281. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $25,364. Repairs to diked disposal facility were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $29,691. A contract for emergency maintenance dredging of Kinnickinnic River was awarded and completed this FY removing 10,757 cubic yards of material at a cost of $133,805. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded this FY in the amount of $792,800. The contract is approximately 25 percent complete, removing 28,033 cubic yards of material at a cost this FY of $200,000. Engineering and design for CDF expansion cost $2,953. Engineering and design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $152,293. Engineering and design for construction of walkway to be performed by contract next Fy cost $59,452. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, city of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward ofpierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for the uncompleted portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humboldt Avenue. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $56,557,232, of which $8,231,024 was for new work, $35,610,648 for maintenance, and $12,715,560 for rehabilitation. 39. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to city of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the River Raisin portion of the existing 200 foot navigation channel from 21 to 27 feet between existing turning basin and the river's mouth; deepen the lake channel from 21 to 28 feet, and widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet, for a distance of approximately 47,000 feet from the river's mouth to the Maumee Bay Entrance Channel; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, with a diameter of at least 1,600 feet, at the river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre confined disposal area in Plum Creek Bay behind which would enable the creation of a 700 acre marsh. Estimated total cost (Oct. 88) is $150,200,000; $59,000,000 Federal and $91,200,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $19,650,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P. L.. 99-662), are as described in the Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 22, 71st Congress, 1st Session; R & H Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Congress, 1st Session, and 45, 75th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of P.L. 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $19,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of $19,650,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or 21-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $7,860,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. c. The confined dike area construction is a non-Federal responsibility and is estimated to cost $70,156,000. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $125,373. Maintenance of the disposal facility was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,310. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY removing approximately 172,082 cubic yards of material at a cost this FY of $861,622. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $72,286. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $56,900,312, of which $987,340 was for new work (includes $300,000 contributed by Port Commission of Monroe) and $55,912,972 for maintenance (includes $166,667 contributed funds, $125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company). 40. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 19434.) Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1981) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $98,730. Repairs to the Entrance Channel and South Revetment, Section Q, were performed by the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $99,638. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $7,162. Supervision and administration cost $12,876. Environmental monitoring was performed in conjunction with the authorized Section 111 project at a cost of $5,012. Real estate, engineering and design for Section 111 cost $2,300. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $25,679,467, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $8,838,057 for maintenance, and $13,824,300 for rehabilitation. 41. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $33,532. Repairs to safety features cost $1,793. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY removing 14,920 cubic yards of material at a cost of $71,760. Engineering, 21-20 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $33,903. Existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $6,102,790, of which $2,472,183 was for new work (includes $1,186,467 contributed funds) and $3,630,607 for maintenance. 42. NORTHPORT HARBOR, WI Location. On north tip of Door County Peninsula, on the east side of Wisconsin, which separates Green Bay from Lake Michigan, and is about 75 miles northeasterly of Green Bay, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14909.) Existing project. The project was authorized in 1972 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act, and provides for an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep, a north breakwater 560 feet long, an east breakwater 650 feet long, and a south breakwater 460 feet long. The breakwaters would be of rubblemound construction. The project also includes a maneuvering area located within the breakwater which is 100 to 150 feet wide, 450 feet long and 12 feet deep. In FY 75, work was begun on the General Design Memorandum - Phase I report; however, due to lack of local cooperation, the GDM was never completed. In subsequent years, the project could no longer be economically justified and the project was placed in an inactive category. In FY 90, this project was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with the provisions of Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 43. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior. It consists of improvement of mouth of Ontonagon River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 ofAnnual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17 and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. (See Table 21-B for authorized legislation.) The turning basin feature of the project for navigation at Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 (Section 1002) Nov 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. The channel modification project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 81. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $53,525. Breakwater repairs were performed by the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $177,026. Lighthouse maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $4,014. An adjustment of $9,328 and 3,273 cubic yards of material was made to the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $363,974 removing 57,942 cubic yards of material. Engineering and design for repair to the West Revetment, Section E, to be performed by contract next FY cost $114,802. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed by contract next FY cost $14,026. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $73,910. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $11,139,995, of which $953,903 was for new work and $10,186,092 for maintenance. 44. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stone filled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 21-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $20,532. Repairs to safety features cost $4,907. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed removing 14,209 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $69,237. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $15,778. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200- foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,084,717, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $3,904,818 for maintenance. 45. POINTE LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800- foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100- foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long, 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $21,288. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $4,669. Existing project was completed in 1974. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $6,068,559, of which $2,642,584 was for new work and $3,425,975 for maintenance. 46. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $22,034. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $451. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed, removing 26,554 cubic yards ofmaterial at a cost this FYof$109,662. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $7,981. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. The structures are generally in fair condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $2,194,020, of which $256,129 was for new work and $1,937,891 for maintenance. 47. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron at extreme southeastern limit of Saginaw Bay, and 29 miles south of AuSable River (Oscoda). (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge at the mouth of Bird Creek, consisting of a harbor basin dredged to a depth of 10 feet protected by a breakwater structure, and for dredging an entrance channel to the harbor basin to a depth of 12 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of docks near mouth of Bird Creek and a State-owned dock inside breakwater. Facilities accommodate recreational craft and are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The contract for additional breakwater awarded last FY was completed at a cost this FY of $693,221. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $120,318. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,817. An adjustment of -$2,500 was made to the contract for repair of the Breakwater Cell Cap completed last FY. Supervision and administration cost $4,813. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $5,274,694, of which $3,352,008 was for new work (includes $172,100 contributed funds) and $1,922,686 for maintenance. 21-22 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 48. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70- foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater addition. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections, and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,193. Safety maintenance was performed at a cost of $1,513. An adjustment of -$2,499 was made to the contract for Breakwater Cell Cap Repairs completed last FY. Supervision and administration cost $1,084. Condition surveys, monitoring, miscellaneous inspections and reports under Section 111 mitigation were performed at a cost of $18,858. The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification which was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,860,946, of which $1,733,071 was for new work (includes $487,108 contributed funds) and $3,127,875 for maintenance (includes $115,000 contributed funds). 49. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $23,321. Structure repairs were performed by hired labor at a cost of $5,634. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $23,242. Real estate, supervision and administration cost $945. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $6,834,088, of which $4,206,204 was for new work (includes $1,624,000 contributed funds) and $2,627,884 for maintenance. 50. PORT WING HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles easterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for two parallel piers at entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet apart; an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide with 15-foot depth; an irregular-shaped turning basin 15 feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. Portion of dredging of entrance channel to complete project width and depth is considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing conditions. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,057. Repairs to the entrance channel were performed by the Cranebarge MARKUS at a cost of $40,045. Existing project is complete, except channel between piers, and has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Piers are in good condition. At the end of FY controlling depth was 12 feet in lake approach, 10 feet between piers in northerly portion of turning basin, and 8 feet in easterly 21-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 inner channel. Land owned by the United States totals 7.80 acres. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $986,436, ofwhich $63,393 was for new work and $923,043 for maintenance. 51. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore ofLake Superior at Marquette, MI. It is an indentation about 1.5 miles long and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presqve Isle Point. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet at inner portion with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 1965 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One merchandise and petroleum receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,221. Total cost of existing project to end ofFY was $2,249,074, of which $1,252,192 was for new work, $920,382 for maintenance and $76,500 for rehabilitation. 52. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of city of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of August 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of October 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on January 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $196,810. An adjustment of -$65,168 and -10,026 cubic yards of material was made to the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Engineering and design for a maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $7,797. Surveys, supervision and administration cost $4,187. Under the Dike Disposal Program, an adjustment of $91,882 was made to the FY 78 Pointe Mouillee Disposal Site Phase II Contract for settlement of a claim for Differing Site Conditions due to encountering unanticipated quantities of cobbles and boulders while dredging. Supervision and administration for Dike Disposal cost $51,611. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $34,892,472, of which $675,251 was for new work and $34,217,221 for maintenance. In addition, $29,563 was expended for new work from Emergency Relief Act Funds. 53. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. 21-24 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, support ofwater control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $401,913. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging contaminated material was completed at a cost of $1,587,280, removing approximately 330,383 cubic yards of shoal material. Maintenance of disposal area cost $2,525. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging the Bay and River section was performed at a cost of $52,391. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $84,520. Engineering, design, and real estate for construction of a diked disposal area for upper Saginaw was continued at a cost of $182,907. Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $75,670,120, of which $14,930,727 was for new work and $60,739,393 for maintenance. 54. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair; 576.8 and 571.7 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec; International Great Lakes Datum 1955. (See Tables 21-B and 21-H for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946, provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel at an estimated cost (1986) of $870,000; $435,000 Federal and $435,000 non- Federal. On June 16, 1969, the Director of Civil Works approved substitution of the middle Channel of the St. Clair River for the authorized north channel. Subsequently, however, the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, wood-pulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, master plan, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $331,157. Location and removal of obstructions cost $341,822. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $600. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging Pte. Edwards, Blue Water and Lower River removing 16,500 cubic yards of material at a cost of $266,670. Engineering and design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $61,642. Existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end ofFY was $39,020,509, ofwhich $19,213,246 was for new work and $19,807,263 for maintenance. 55. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth ofBenton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at 21-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor Canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88th Congress declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, real estate, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $183,565. Repairs to North Revetment, north and south piers, were performed using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $126,790. Hired labor cost for maintenance of disposal area and safety features was $16,243. An adjustment of -$15,347 was made to the FY 88 structure repair contract completed last FY for repair of North Pier, Section A, South Pier, Sections H and N, and North Revetment, Section B. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the Outer Channel, removing approximately 58,314 cubic yards of material at a cost of $196,581. Engineering and design for a Wave Deflection Wall in Section E of the North Revetment cost $73,228. Engineering, design, survey, real estate, supervision and administration cost $39,850. Engineering, design, and real estate for disposal area and polluted dredged material cost $48,206. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed next FY cost $4,894. Under the Section 111 P.L. 90-483 program, $38,140 was expended for monitoring, condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging contract cost $120,485. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $172 for Section 111. Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures are in generally good condition. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $21,268,450, of which $1,804,485 was for new work, $18,501,749 for maintenance and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 56. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Providence of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5 foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from June 9, 1881, to November 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock destroyed in 1942 by excavation for MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from September 1, 1881, to June 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from August 3, 1896, Davis Lock from October 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from September 18, 1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200 foot by 110 foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 21-F. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 600 feet and at upstream side of locks is 599.5 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum 1955). Below locks: When water surface at downstream side of locks is at elevation 577.8 feet and Lake Huron is 576.8 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum 1955). Estimated (1974) cost for new work is $163,087,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized construction of a second lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Material removed during construction of the replacement lock will be placed on the Northwest Pier to 21-26 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT serve as a windbreak for downbound vessels approaching the lock. Estimated cost (Oct. 89) is $166,400,000 Federal and $89,600,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as follows: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the proposed project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged/demolition material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the implementation and maintenance ofthe project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations and relocations ofpipelines, powerlines, cables, sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities, structures, and improvements made necessary by the project (Any such costs of the items on Federal property at the locks, would be part of the total construction cost and not separable local sponsor cost.); (d) Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $61,500,000. The estimated cash contribution of $61,500,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and (e) Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $24,600,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. (f) Any construction needed to prevent/mitigate for erosion or shoaling attributed to the lock would be cost shared in the same proportion as the project. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and village of DeTour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Operations, maintenance, and care of locks: Two canals and three locks were operated (the fourth lock, Sabin, was out of service) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 285 days (from 1 October 1989 through 30 September 1990). During that period, a total of 12,563 vessels, aggregating 83,617,654 short tons of freight and 277,635 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe and Davis Locks. Cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks for this FY was $6,489,569, which included $181,098 for extended season operation and maintenance, and $65,385 for operation and maintenance of the Gatelifter PAUL BUNYAN. Powerhouse and equipment: Two hydroelectric powerhouses were operated and maintained at a cost of $840,863 during the FY, which includes a deduction of $39,008 for interdepartmental electricity sold by not paid for and supervision and administration at a cost of $31,922. A C.A. Study was performed for the Power Plant at a cost of $32,408. Other operation and care items: Building and grounds were operated and maintained, condition surveys, operations studies, real estate, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $1,705,504, which includes a custodial, snow removal and grounds upkeep contract for $233,946. A service contract for security measures was performed at a cost of $51,264. The survey and mapping accrued cost in the amount of $10,477. A study on winter and extended navigation season, ice measurements, and weather monitoring was performed at a cost of $190,854. Hired labor repairs to the Soo Harbor ice boom cost $26,337. Work was done on the Compensating Gates at a cost of $6,482. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. Removal of shoals in the St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was accomplished by hired labor with U.S. Derrickboats NICOLET and HARVEY at a cost of $1,203,337. Other miscellaneous items: Engineering and design for the master plan for the facility was performed at a cost of $589. Other miscellaneous engineering and design, supervision and administration cost $284,705. A C.A. Study was performed on winter maintenance of the locks at a cost of $61,095. 21-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Recreational facilities: Information center, comfort stations, park fountain, observation and overlook platforms were maintained at a cost of $133,144, which included a janitorial contract for the Information Center at a cost of $19,072. A Commercial Activity study was performed for the Visitor Center at a cost of $10,247. Visitors entering the Soo Locks Information Center numbered 640,634. Visitors to the observation platforms overlooking the locks numbered 446,606. The total number of visitors to the Soo Locks park was 607,384. A grand total of 885,019 people visited the Soo Locks. Total project costs in FY 90 amounted to $11,046,875. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $382,508,922, ofwhich $160,657,070 was for new work and $221,851,852 for maintenance. 57. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456, 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At village ofSaugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $18,632. Repairs to safety features by hired labor cost $1,576. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed removing 11,427 cubic yards of material at a cost this FY of $50,652. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $17,978. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,722,885, of which $364,527 was for new work and $3,358,358 for maintenance. 58. SAXON HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of harbor at Bayfield, WI, and 21 miles westerly of harbor at Black River, MI; 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Perkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see page 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance; Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,143. The maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY was completed removing 7,644 cubic yards of material at a cost this FY of $85,906. Surveys, supervision and administration cost $15,736. The project was completed in March 1968. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion ofthe shoreline west ofthe harbor. Construction of a 600-foot stone revetment to mitigate shoreline damages adjacent to County Highway A west of Saxon Harbor was completed in October of 1989. Financial close-out of the mitigation project was accomplished in June 1990. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,815,455, of which $1,094,377 was for new work (includes $50,193 contributed funds) and $721,078 for maintenance. 59. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. 21-28 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of$11,820. An adjustment of -$9,652 was made to the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Real estate was performed at a cost of $1,942. An adjustment of-$14,875 was made for supervision and administration of the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,462,530, of which $35,573 was for new work and $3,426,957 for maintenance. 60. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230, Annual Report for 1963. New Work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $47,427. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections A, B, Bi, and South Breakwater, Sections I, J, K, L, M, were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $84,873. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,250. Engineering and design for repair to South Pier, Section N, was performed at a cost of $41,743. Engineering and design for a maintenance dredging contract deferred until next FY cost $16,946. Supervision and administration cost $23,348. Engineering and design for dike disposal site selection cost $200. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Piers and breakwaters are in generally good condition. Inner 260 feet of south pier was replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $8,258,995, of which $1,136,088 was for new work, $6,513,879 for maintenance and $609,028 for rehabilitation. 61. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906..) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin, for additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, wood-pulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities will have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,519. Hired labor cost for minor structure repair was $53. Supervision and administration cost $231. Condition surveys and monitoring in connection with Section 111 was performed at a cost of $2,956. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively (in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized), which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $7,690,807, of which $984,426 was for new work, $5,074,305 for maintenance and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 21-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 62. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous project. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in city of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities and four shipbuilding yards. city of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from city of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $104,667. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections A and B, South Breakwater, Section D, North Revetment, Sections J, L, O, M, and South Revetment, Sections H, J, K, N, O, were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $87,944. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,911. Engineering, design, miscellaneous inspections and reports for construction of off-loading disposal facility to be performed by contract next FY cost $29,840. Supervision and administration cost $26,851. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $10,260,714, of which $1,059,722 was for new work, $8,316,093 for maintenance and $884,899 for rehabilitation. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 63. TWO HARBORS, MN Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is provided for public recreational use. For details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 local cooperation agreement was entered into with the city of Two Harbors on August 14, 1978. Terminal facilities. No publicly owned wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,955. Archeological studies and mitigation of the S.P. ELY Shipwreck in connection with scheduled repair to the W. Pier cost $43,759. Engineering and design for repair to W. Pier - Section C, to be performed by contract next FY cost $20,864. Supervision and administration cost $1,228. The existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $6,489,500, of which $4,170,710 was for new work and $2,318,790 for maintenance. 64. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is essentially complete, except for dredging a 10-foot width along each side of the entrance channel between the piers. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 R & H Act was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing 21-30 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $33,608. Structure repairs performed by hired labor cost $1,518. Safety maintenance was performed at a cost of $12,858. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed removing 49,633 cubic yards of material at a cost this FY of $229,938. Surveys, supervision and administration cost $31,842. Existing project is complete except for portion deauthorized in December 1989. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. South pier was completed in 1883 and is in generally good condition. North pier was completed in 1908. North revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $7,466,261, of which $360,320 was for new work, $7,047,884 for maintenance, and $58,057 for minor rehabilitation. 65. WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 40 miles northwesterly from Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 53 miles easterly from Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor or refuge protected by two breakwaters structures and for dredging a harbor basin and entrance channel, 12 feet deep. The addition of a 270-foot wave absorbing breakwater inside the harbor was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 17, 1967, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned fishing wharf and a small-boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at cost of $17,039. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging at a cost of $91,433, removing approximately 15,106 cubic yards of shoal material by bucket dredge. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $27,377. Existing project was completed in 1960. The interior breakwater and repairs to the shoal connection were accomplished by contract during FY 1969. Remaining structures are in generally good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,159,596, of which $771,639 was for new work and $387,957 for maintenance. 66. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on north side of lake about 3 miles from inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across lake, at village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,526. Condition surveys, monitoring, supervision and administration in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 were performed at a cost of $34,470. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. The structures are in generally good condition. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,789,777, of which $457,562 was for new work and $3,332,215 for maintenance. 67. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 21-J. 68. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 21-C. 21-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 69. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107. Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) None. Beach Erosion Control 70. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS A beach erosion control project for 9,550 feet of publicly owned shore of Lake Michigan in Manitowoc County, Wisconsin, from Two Rivers to Manitowoc, was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1958. The Act authorized Federal participation in the project, which was completed by the Wisconsin State Highway Department in 1963. The total cost of the project was $182,500, of which $60,500 was contributed by the Federal government, including $56,000 in reimbursement to the State in 1964. 71. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit services (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended.) Bar Lake, MI - Construction of a stone revetment to protect 600 feet of Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to Lakeshore Road was completed on November 20, 1989, at a cost of $118,299 Federal and $50,890 non-Federal. Baraga County, MI- Plans and specifications for protection of 400 feet of Lake Superior shoreline adjacent to U.S. Highway 41 were completed at a cost of $9,250. The Local Cooperation Agreement for construction of the project was executed on August 16,1990, and the required cash contribution and rights-of-entry will be provided early in FY 1991. Charlevoix County, East Jordan River, MI- Construction of a stone revetment to protect 800 feet of shoreline adjacent to the M-32 bridge abutment embankments was completed on August 31, 1990, at a cost of $80,220 Federal and $28,949 non-Federal. Fair Haven, MI - Plans and specifications for protection of 850 feet of the Anchor Bay shoreline adjacent to State Highway M-29 were completed at a cost of $5,330. Lakeshore Drive, Allegan County, MI -A feasibility study to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to 1,800 feet of Lakeshore Drive was initiated at a cost of $7,408. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Muskegon, MI - The completed project was turned over to the local sponsor on December 27, 1989, and the Operation and Maintenance manual and financial close-out of the project were completed at a cost of $8,290 Federal and $4,390 non-Federal. Lake Michigan Shoreline, South Milwaukee, WI - A feasibility study to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to the outfall pipe of the city's Wastewater Treatment Plant, was completed; however, further revisions are required to address review comments. Although additional funding was received in late August 1990, no funds were expended in FY 1990. Marysville, St. Clair River, MI - Construction of a stone revetment to protect 2,000 feet of the St. Clair River shoreline adjacent to River Road was completed on November 20, 1989, at a cost of $225,712 Federal and $79,325 non-Federal. Memorial Drive, McKinley Park, WI - Review and approval of the completed Detailed Project Report, which recommended the construction of a stone revetment to protect 500 feet of the Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to Lincoln Memorial Drive, was continued. No funds were expended in FY 1990. Memorial Drive, Muskegon, MI- The feasibility study to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to 800 feet of Scenic Drive at Memorial Drive, was continued at a cost of $11,691. Milwaukee South Shore Park, WI - The Detailed Project Report, which recommended the construction of a stone revetment to protect the pavilion/bathhouse complex and its parking lot, was approved on September 24, 1990, and plans and specifications funding was received on September 25, 1990. No funds were expended in FY 1990. Scenic Drive, Duck Lake, MI- Construction of a stone revetment to protect 1,500 feet of Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to Scenic Drive was initiated on August 14, 1990, and is expected to be completed on October 12, 1990. FY 1990 costs were $339,374 Federal and $123,544 non- Federal. Sheboygan, WI - The Detailed Project Report, which recommended the construction of 6,000 feet of stone revetment to protect the city's Sanitary Interceptor Sewer and related manholes from erosion, was approved on May 22, 1989. Plans and specifications funding was received on January 18, 1990, and P&S work was initiated at a cost of $19,947. St. Joseph River, Buchanan Twp., MI- A feasibility study, to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing streambank erosion protection to 3,600 feet of Red Bud Trail, was initiated at a cost of $3,781. 72. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. None. 21-32 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 73. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. Algoma, WI - Due to lack of a local sponsor, the study was suspended and a Termination Report was completed on May 9, 1990, at a cost of $1,770. Cornucopia, WI- The preparation of a Detailed Project Report was initiated on December 27, 1989, when Bell Township indicated its willingness to be the local sponsor for the project. FY 1990 costs were $16,169. Marinette, WI - Due to lack of a local sponsor, the study was suspended and a Termination Report was completed on May 17, 1990, at a cost of $2,992. Saxon, WI - Construction of a 600-foot stone revetment to mitigate shoreline damages adjacent to County Highway A west of Saxon Harbor was physically completed on October 24, 1989, and was financially completed June 18, 1990, at a cost of $52,057 Federal and $8,179 non-Federal. Sturgeon Bay, WI - Work on the Reconnaissance Report resumed on June 25, 1990, when the Door County Soil and Water Conservation Department expressed a willingness to act as the local sponsor for the project. FY 1990 costs were $3,352. Flood Control 74. KALAMAZOO RIVER BATTLE CREEK, MI Location. River drains an area of 1,980 square miles in Hillsdale, Jackson, Calhoun, Eaton, Barry, Kalamazoo, Van Buren, Allegan, Kent, and Ottawa Counties in southwestern MI, and discharges into Lake Michigan 2 miles downstream from village of Saugatuck. City of Battle Creek is 108 miles upsteam from mouth of Kalamazoo River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14901.) Existing project. Flood protection along Kalamazoo River at, and in vicinity of, Battle Creek, MI, to consist generally of excavation and clearing of Battle Creek Channel to provide for an enlarged channel within city of Battle Creek extending from above Union Street Bridge downstream to its Channel near Liberty Street and Washington Avenue to bypass constricted existing channel through heart of city; excavation and straightening Kalamazoo River Channel downstream from confluence of Battle Creek and new rerouted Kalamazoo River Channel to below Fort Custer Waterworks Bridge; riprapping or paving channels at critical locations in new enlarged channels where velocity of floodflows might be high enough to cause damage; constructing new and reinforcing existing highway and railroad bridges as required, and constructing levees. Project is designed to provide protection for city of Battle Creek from such peakflood discharges in channels which would produce, when combined, a discharge of about 11,000 cubic feet per second below confluence of Battle Creek and Kalamazoo River. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The initial phase of this project was completed in 1974 and included channel improvements along the Kalamazoo River Channel, the concrete cut-off channel and the Battle Creek Channel up to the old confluence with the Kalamazoo River. The Battle Creek Channel in the city of Battle Creek is the remaining element of this project to be constructed. This final phase of the project consists of scour protection and underpinning piers at Michigan Avenue and McCamly Street Bridges; underpinning foundations at Capital Avenue, Monroe and Elm Street Bridges; concrete paving through bridges at Division and Union Streets; reinforcing foundations, underpinning and concrete paving at the NYC Bridge (upper), and channel improvements at Battle Creek from Station 19+50 to upstream end of the project. In FY 90, on December 31, 1989, the uncompleted portion of the project was deauthorized, in accordance with the provision of Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 75. KALAMAZOO RIVER KALAMAZOO, MI Location. Rises in southern part of lower peninsula of Michigan, flows northwesterly 185 miles, and empties into Lake Michigan 2 miles downstream from village of Saugatuck. It drains an area of 1,980 square miles. City of Kalamazoo lies 75 miles upstream from mouth of river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14901). Existing project. Provides for flood protection at and near Kalamazoo to consist generally of widening, deepening, and straightening the river channel from immediately above Comstock about 10 miles to near Cooper. Plan would include riprapping channel where necessary to prevent erosion at critical locations, reconstruction and reinforcement of railroad and highway bridges as required, and necessary alterations to existing buildings and utilities. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Preconstruction planning was initiated in FY 1966 and a General Design Memorandum was completed and approved in October 1970. Planning was nearing completion in FY 73 when work was suspended due to local environmental opposition and diminishing local interest. Consequently, the project was reclassified from the "Active" to the "Deferred" category on May 3, 1979. Renewed interest on the part of the local sponsor, the Kalamazoo County Board of Commissioners, resulted in a restudy being undertaken to determine the economic justification, social, and environmental impacts and feasibility of completing the project. The restudy was completed in September 1983, and resulted in a substantial reduction in the scope of the project. Protection of the downtown and Portage Creek area was the only economically feasible and environmentally acceptable portion of the plan. The remaining portions of the project had significant detrimental environmental, social and economic impacts and 21-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 have been deleted from the project. Therefore, reclassification of the project from a "Deferred" to "Active" category was recommended and approved on 29 June 1984. In FY 90, the project was deauthorized on December 31, 1989, in accordance with the provisions of Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 76. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI Location. River drains an irregularly shaped area of about 220 square miles in Bay, Gladwin, Midland, and Saginaw Counties in east-central Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay 2 miles northwest of Saginaw River. (See Geological Survey Bay City quadrangle and NOAA Nautical Charts 14867 and 14863.) Existing project. Provides for deepening about 1.8 miles of river channel between the river mouth and Euclid Street Bridge; altering Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge by addition of two 45.9 foot spans; protecting by riprapping the channel bottom through Euclid Street Bridge, existing piers at Henry Street Bridge and Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge; and a number of utility relocations. The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986, dated Nov. 17, 1986, Section 837, modified the flood control project on the Kawkawlin River, MI, that was authorized by Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operation and maintenance of the project shall be 50 percent. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded this FY in the amount of $137,250. This contract includes a Memorandum of Agreement with Local Sponsors to provide 50 percent of the cost to perform maintenance dredging. The contract is approximately 30 percent completed at a cost this FY of $40,763. Cost incurred this FY was for mobilization only. Engineering and design, real estate, supervision and administration cost $64,603 (Costs for FY90 were $54,540 Federal, and $50,826 non-Federal). Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $347,066 (includes $50,826 contributed funds). 77. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River Basin including its tributaries, Tittabawasee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867). Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Sanilac Flats, MI, Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction floodwalls, modifications of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct 1984) of $8,620,000 and non-Federal cost of $579,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non- Federal cost of $2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of costs ofrights-of-ways; (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on December 15,1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $23,417,500 Federal and non-Federal cost of $2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom onehalf cost of lands for conservation; and provided further 21-34 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT that before starting works for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood-waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and $1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completion; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted by the United States on November 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished February 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on September 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on June 7, 1982, declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated January 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated August 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Flint: Settlement of claims for FY 76 Channel Improvement, Section C-2, and Sediment Removal, Sections A, B and C1, contract was completed in FY 90 at a cost of $40,269. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. 78. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through village of Sebewaing, MI, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater that the maximum flood of record. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,891. Total costs to the end of FY were $778,420. 79. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NAME OF PROJECT Estral Beach, MI Flint River, MI Frankenmuth, Cass River, MI Red Run, Clinton River, MI Mt. Clemens Spillway and Cutoff Canal , Clinton River, MI DATE OF INSPECTION September 1990 January 1990 September 1990 May 1990 May 1990 FY 90 costs were $116,085. Total costs to end of FY were $1,728,477. 80. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 21-E. 81. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and P.L. 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1990 Disaster Preparedness $ Emergency Operations $ Rehabilitation $ Advance Measures $ Advance Measures (Contributed Funds) $ 269,348 23,868 37,909 (34,573) 67,720 Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. 21-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Cedar Creek, Auburn, IN - The Reconnaissance Report was completed and approved on July 20, 1990, and preliminary discussions were initiated with the city of Auburn, concerning future negotiations of a Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement. FY 1990 costs were $27. City of Monroe, MI- Due to lack of economic justification, the reconnaissance study was suspended and a Termination Report was completed on April 12, 1990, with total FY 1990 costs of $4,703. Grand Pointe, Eaton County, MI - The reconnaissance study to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing flood control measures to the Grand Pointe Subdivision was continued during FY 1990, at a cost of $50,772. Kawkawlin River, MI- Further work to upgrade the completed abbreviated reconnaissance report to a full scale reconnaissance report was delayed pending the recoordination of the cost sharing requirements with the project sponsor and receipt of a local willingness to participate in future study and construction cost sharing. FY 1990 costs were $1,949. LaPorte, Pine Lake, IN - Reconnaissance Report was completed on August 10, 1990, and is currently undergoing local and higher Corps authority review. FY 1990 costs were $8,371. Lincoln Creek, Milwaukee, WI -A favorable Reconnaissance Report was completed on September 19, 1989, and was approved on November 7, 1989. Negotiations are underway with the project sponsor to determine if the study should continue under the Section 205 authority or be pursued under the broader G.I. authority. FY 1990 costs were $14,688. Menomonee River, Milwaukee, WI - Due to lack of economic justification, the reconnaissance study was suspended and a Termination Report was completed on May 7, 1990, with total FY 1990 costs of $25,895. Oconto River, MI- Based on an August 15, 1989, site visit and subsequent historical flood damage data, reconnaissance study funds were provided on April 4, 1990, for preparation of a reconnaissance report to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing flood control measures on the Oconto River. FY 1990 costs were $45,774. Ontonagon, MI- Completion of a final Detailed Project Report was suspended when the village ofOntonagon, the potential non-Federal sponsor, failed to provide the required expression of willingness and intent to fulfill the items of local cooperation. The study was officially terminated on November 22, 1989, with the submission of a Termination Report. FY 1990 costs wee $1,733. Root River, Milwaukee, WI - Due to lack of economic justification, the reconnaissance study was suspended on October 4, 1989, and final local coordination and study termination were subsequently initiated at a cost of $5,452. Three Rivers, MI- Initial reconnaissance phase funding was provided on December 13, 1989, for a determination of eligibility under the Section 205 program. Based on the March 13, 1990, site visit and review of historical flood damage data, it has been determined that the potential for a feasible project exists. Development of the reconnaissance study efforts and recoordination of future cost sharing requirements with the project sponsor were initiated. FY 1990 costs were $4,812. Yellow River - Marshal County, IN - Initial reconnaissance funding was provided on January 22, 1990. Based on observations made during a March 5, 1990, site visit and subsequent analysis, it was concluded that the potential for a feasible project did not exist. Therefore, all work was suspended and a Termination Report was completed on September 6, 1990, at a cost of $5,000. Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. None. Aquatic Plant Control activities pursuant to Section 302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-298).None. 82. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS AND INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES Field Operations. The following field operations, which were complemented by office activities, were conducted during the report period. In support of the International Niagara Board of Control and the New York Power Authority, the District conducted current velocity and discharge measurements on the Niagara River. These measurements were part of programs to verify the stagedischarge relationship for the American Falls gage, and to support mathematical and physical modeling activities. These programs are essential to maintaining an accurate estimate of flow over Niagara Falls, to satisfy the Niagara Treaty, and for design of structural and/or operational measures to mitigate the effects of potential ice jamming and flooding in the upper Niagara River prior to implementation of upgrade plans at the Niagara Power Project. In support of the International Lake Superior Board of Control, discharge measurements were conducted on the upper St. Marys River for the calibration of the Sault Ste. Marie Compensating Works. In support of the Chicago District, Corps of Engineers, discharge measurements were made at various Lake Michigan Diversion control structures in the Chicago area. These measurements were conducted to assess the accuracy of the reported diversion flows and the amount of leakage at each of the control structures. Field measurement programs are scheduled for the St. Marys, Detroit, St. Clair, and Niagara Rivers during FY 91. During the winter months, the District monitors the presence and intensity of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, 21-36 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT and Detroit Rivers as an ongoing mission. Water levels are monitored continuously at key gages in these rivers for automated updating ofhydrographs used for detecting possible ice jams and the associated potential for flooding. This information can be used to provide advance warning to area residents and to trigger emergency actions by the Corps and other governmental agencies (in support of respective Flood Alert Plans). Currently, data can be obtained from water level gages via direct communication with the gages or from a satellite downlink station using portable lap-top personal computers. This provides water level data from critical sites to the District office within minutes of data collection. International Activities. The following activities were conducted specifically for the International Joint Commission (IJC) Boards and Committees: a. Members of the Detroit District staff attended the spring semi-annual appearances ofthe International Great Lakes Boards before the Commission in Washington, D.C. b. IJC Water Level Reference Study. As a result of the record high Great Lakes levels in 1985-86, and the prospect, at the time, of even higher levels in 1987, the governments of the United States and Canada issued the IJC a Reference, on August 1, 1986, requesting a new water level study. Under this study, the IJC was asked to examine and report upon methods of alleviating the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River basin. As previously indicated, the water levels of the lakes were at or near recorded highs for this century. This led to an initial emphasis on high water levels and interim emergency actions which could be taken to aid interests harmed or threatened. To carry out this mission, interim task groups were created and charged with completing a study within one year. Personnel from the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch of the Detroit District headed several of these groups and were involved in preparing many of the groups' findings and recommendations. In addressing potential measures for alleviating the adverse effects of water level fluctuations, the groups identified and provided advice on crisis intervention, intermediate measures and long-term considerations. In October 1987, an interim report was provided to the IJC. The IJC, in turn, sent their report, "Interim Report on 1985-86 High Water Levels in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence River Basin," dated October 1988, to the two Governments. Although water levels subsided dramatically in 1987, the main study commenced. The magnitude of this study requires that it be addressed in two phases. Phase I, which was completed in May 1989, identified the major types of measures, which address the problems brought on by lake level fluctuations, and developed a comprehensive framework for the systematic evaluation of these measures. The Detroit District was heavily involved in providing support to several of the study groups under Phase I, including Functional Group 1 - Hydraulics, Hydrology and Climate, and Functional Group 2- Coastal Zone Ecology Resources, Uses and Management. The IJC reviewed the work of the study groups and issued their Phase I progress report in July 1989. This report was titled, "Living With the Lakes: Challenges and Opportunities." During FY 90, in anticipation of Phase II of the study, the Detroit District continued re-evaluation of the present operating plan for the regulation of Lake Superior outflows, continued investigation of system-wide regulation and continued Geographic Information Systems development and application. FY 90 funds in the amount of $550,078 were expended to accomplish this work. Phase II will lead to specific responses to issues explicitly identified in the Reference. This effort started with the IJC approval of the Phase II Plan of Study, dated July 19, 1990. It is expected that the study organization will be formulated and staffed during FY 91, and specific tasks will be assigned and started. Phase II of the Reference Study is scheduled for completion in October 1992. c. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative of the Board of Control. In support of the U.S. Section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydraulic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based on the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes, rendering outflows under the approved operating rule (Plan 1977 up through May 1990, Plan 1977-A since June 1990). During FY 90, the Detroit District continued its efforts, in support of the Board, to update Plan 1977, to include such things as: an additional decade of water level data; an increase in outflow capacity following construction of a new powerhouse by Great Lakes Power Limited, Canada; and the additional knowledge gained since Plan 1977 has been in effect. The Board submitted to the IJC for approval an updated and revised edition of Plan 1977 in October 1989. This plan known as Plan 1977-A was approved by the Commission on a test basis and has been used in operation since June 1990. It is expected that further modification of the regulation plan will be explored by the Detroit District under its association with the IJC Reference Study. During FY 90, a series of discharge measurements were made at the St. Marys River Compensating Works as part of a continuing program to verify the existing gate rating equations or to establish new ones. Further measurements will be required in order to obtain adequate data for the reevaluation. d. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. The Chiefofthe Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is on the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Under 21-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 the auspices of the International Niagara Committee, the Detroit District computes, coordinates and publishes, with Canada, the monthly flows in the Niagara River. The District also provides direct technical support and consulting engineering services to the Board and Committee. During FY 89, a series of discharge measurements were made at the International Bridge Section for verification of Lake Erie outflow equations. Measurements are currently scheduled for this section in FY 92, in accordance with the Board's recommendation to continue making them every three years. Measurements may be made in FY 91 should there be a low water regime on Lake Erie. Due to the dynamic nature of the Niagara River, the District is involved with the periodic verification of the rating curves for the Ashland Avenue and American Falls gages. The Ashland Avenue relationship measures the total flow over the American and Canadian falls to ensure that the Board operates within the terms of the Niagara Treaty. The American Channel relationship provides a measure of the flow over the American Falls. Measurements for verification of these relationships were last made in FY 89 for the Ashland Avenue relationship, and in FY90 for the American Channel relationship. Discharge measurements for the Ashland Avenue rating curve are scheduled every three years, with the next series scheduled for FY 92. Similarly, measurements are taken in the American Channel every five years, with the next series scheduled for FY 95. e. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. When requested, the Detroit District supported the Buffalo District in its activities. In FY 87 and FY 88, the Detroit District conducted an intensive flow measurement program in the Copeland Cut reach of the St. Lawrence River to collect data to be used for development of a mathematical model of critical sections in the river, and for proposed physical models. In FY 93, further flow distribution measurements are scheduled. These would be used to calibrate the existing mathematical model of the river. f. International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board. The IJC submitted its recommendations, based on the Board's report and subsequent public hearings, to the governments of the United States and Canada, in a report dated January 1985. A former Detroit District Engineer was Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Until such time as the Board is either dissolved or continued, certain personnel within the District continue to hold membership on the Diversions and Environmental Evaluation Subcommittees and on the Public Involvement Ad Hoc Group. In FY 89 the USGS provided District personnel with updated Great Lakes consumptive uses data, which the District evaluated in support of the IJC Reference Study. The District expects to continue to provide support to the IJC relative to the evaluation of consumptive uses. g. International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board. Although the Board is inactive at this time, the Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch remains the Secretary to the U. S. Section, as well as a member of the Hydraulics and Hydrology Committees. The Board completed its study and provided a report of its findings and recommendations to the IJC in December 1984. In January 1985, the IJC informed the governments of the United States and Canada of the findings of the Board. One of the recommendations of this Board, to create a modeling group, has since been adopted by the Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is the U.S. Secretary of this Committee, as well as a member of several subcommittees. The District continued its support of Committee operations pertaining to the coordination ofbasic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. By early FY 91, final coordinated basic data will be available through calendar year 1989. District efforts continue to more closely coordinate the format of the U.S. and Canadian water level bulletins, in order to avoid confusion and to better inform the public. District personnel were involved in the update of the "Great Lakes Hydrometeorological Station Directory" which was released in FY 90 as a computerized data base. A hydraulics/ hydrology modeling inventory is being initiated in FY 91. In FY 90, District personnel sent out for review the first draft of a Coordinating Committee report which documents all the discharge measurements (U.S. and Canadian) made on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1860 to present. Through the auspices of the Coordinating Committee, the Corps ofEngineers, by 1983, had provided funds to Canada, in the amount of $215,000, to aid in completion of precise leveling in the International Section of the St. Lawrence River. This survey, as well as similar surveys conducted in the U.S. by NOAA, are part of a program to update the International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD). The new IGLD will evolve around the epoch year 1985 and is expected to be published in FY 91. NCD Master Plan for the Water Control Data System. During FY 90, the District continued to implement the Great Lakes Water Control Data System, using a Harris-800 mini-computer and an extensive system of automated gaging stations. The computer collects data from the District's data collection platforms (DCP's), from dedicated lines to the National Weather Service's telecommunication network, and from NOAA/NOS and Canadian water level computer systems. The District has 30 active DCP's and plans to install as many as three additional DCP's in the near future. Great Lakes Information Management. The District has continued development of capabilities for processing satellite and aerial photography and encoding of mapped information into a Geographic Information System (GIS) for the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes. The GIS is being generated to contain multiple information layers on the physiographic, economic, sociologic, environmen- 21-38 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT tal, and hydrologic characteristics of the Great Lakes region. The GIS is designed to create a "corporate data base" to support various District operations and studies, including improved monitoring of hydrometeorologic conditions over the basin. In FY 90, GIS data layers were completed for a comprehensive land use inventory of the U.S. Great Lakes shorelines, along with information on public lands ownership and flooding and erosion hazard areas. The Detroit District also provided reimbursable support to the St. Paul District and the Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory for acquisition of satellite imagery at a cost of $24,900, and aerial photography reproduction for the Buffalo District at a cost of $5,747. Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e., runoff, over water precipitation, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use ofreal-time hydrologic data were continued by Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch staff members. Hydrologically based and new statistically based computer models are being calibrated and tested for each of the Great Lakes for possible use in the District's ongoing water supply forecasting efforts. Water supply forecasts are used routinely in forecasting water levels and regulating the outflows from Lakes Superior and Ontario. District personnel, in cooperation with National Weather Service personnel, are continuing to assess water supply conditions over both Lakes Superior and Ontario, through use of airborne snow and soil moisture surveys, and processed satellite imagery. Levels of the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch provided technical information and expertise regarding recorded lake levels and still water lake level forecasts to many interested parties, such as Congressmen, state and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, concerned property owners and recreational boaters. Upon request, water level information was supplied to the public in the form of direct answers to numerous inquiries, addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with the news media. Currently, daily reports on present water levels, precipitation and significant events on the Great Lakes basin, are being made available on the District's Harris- 800. Historical water level data are also available on this system. Those agencies and individuals interested can retrieve this information at any time via a telecommunication device. The publication of an internationally coordinated (U.S. and Canada) forecast of Great Lakes water levels, under the auspices of the Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data, was continued during the period. The circulation in the U.S. alone is about 8,200 copies. Total costs for FY90 under Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters were $1,440,678. Also in FY90, an additional $22,000 were expended for International Water Studies. General Investigations 83. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs of $107,168 were expended for a navigation study at St. Joseph Harbor, MI, to initiate Reconnaissance Report investigations. Flood Damage Prevention studies cost $158,026 in FY 90. Funds in the amount of $9,639 were used to coordinate a final Reconnaissance Report for Southern Wayne County, MI. Final coordination of the Saginaw River, MI, Basin study was accomplished at a cost of $50,195. The St. Joseph River, MI, Basin study was completed at a cost this FY of $34,782. Flood control investigations were initiated for the Milwaukee Metropolitan Area, WI, at a cost of $63,440. Coordination Studies with Other Agencies includes: Special Investigations, $64,080 (includes $55,080 for engineering and technical assistance given to local citizens because of fluctuating lake levels of the Great Lakes; F.E.R.C., $2,000; and Interagency Water Resources Development, $7,000); Soil Conservation Service, $2,000; and Planning Assistance to States (Section 22), $67,894 (includes $3,000 - WI, $40,894 - MI, $24,000 - IN). Funds in the amount of $191,522 for Fox River, WI, and $14,589 for the Inland Route, MI, were expended to continue the restudy of Federal interest under Section 216. FY 90 funds of $63,268 were used to initiate a reconnaissance restudy of the deferred project at Menominee Harbor, MI. 84. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN MONROE HARBOR, MI: A final Survey Report recommending structural modifications was completed in February 1980. The report recommendations are: to deepen the River Raisin portion of the project to 27 feet; to widen to 500 feet and deepen to 28 feet the entrance channel from Lake Erie; to provide a new turning basin able to accommodate 1,000 foot vessels; and to construct a confined disposal facility that would create a 700 acre marsh and provide shoreline protection behind the disposal facility. The Monroe Harbor Study was included in the FY 1984, 1985, and 1986 budgets under the category "Continuation of Planning and Engineering" for the purpose of collecting updated and detailed project data, reevaluating project channel dimensions and dredged material disposal requirements, reaffirming project economic and environmental feasibility, and preparing preliminary project design. A reevaluation report was completed in FY 89 which proposed a reduction in the recommended channel width and depth, and use of disposal for the dredge materials. FY 90 costs for continuing preconstruction engineering and design for Monroe Harbor, MI, were 21-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 $54,593. Further work was suspended in FY 90 due to the lack of a non-Federal sponsor willing to express an intent to share in construction costs. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MI-WI: Preconstruction Engineering and Design funds in the amount of $198,081 were utilized this FY to complete the draft General Design Memorandum. Final approval of this document is scheduled for December 1990. Construction will be initiated in FY 91. The recommended project involves deepening approximately 4.0 miles of navigation channels (North, South, Upper and Minnesota Channels) in the St. Louis River, to 27 feet, widening the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet, widening the bend at the Arrowhead Bridge up to 600 feet, and disposing the dredged material in a 130- acre Superior Forest upland disposal site. In addition, a second disposal site has been identified on property owned by the Hallett Dock Company. The total (1990) project cost is estimated to be approximately $15,200,000; $8,400,000 Federal and $6,800,000 non-Federal. FOX RIVER CHANNEL, GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI: A reconnaissance study for Green Bay Harbor, WI, was initiated in April 1990 to investigate the feasibility of deepening the existing commercial navigation project (Fox River Channel). Work efforts concentrated on collection of economic data, identification of potential dredge material disposal sites and coordination with the non- Federal local sponsor. FY 90 costs for the reconnaissance effort for Green Bay Harbor, WI, were $57,851. ECORSE CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN, MI: Fiscal year 1990 costs were $55,396 for continuation of preparation of the General Design Memorandum, to be completed in FY 1993. The project, as subsequently authorized in the Water Resources Act of 1990, calls for construction of a storm water retention basin along the North Branch of Ecorse Creek. This basin will have a storage volume of approximately 275 acre-feet and would collect floodwaters in excess of the bank capacity. This plan would generally provide 2- to 7-year frequency flood protection upstream of Interstate Highway 94 for the communities of Dearborn Heights, Taylor, and Allen Park. In July 1990, a detailed cost estimate was prepared which indicated a total project cost of $9,473,000; $6,880,000 Federal and $2,593,000 non-Federal. FORT WAYNE, IN: Fiscal year costs were $583,883 for the continuation of preparation of the General Design Memorandum, to be completed in FY 92. The total project provides a 100-year level of protection utilizing 27,900 linear feet of concrete and steel sheet pile flood wall and 23,300 linear feet of levee along the St. Marys, St. Joseph and Maumee Rivers, and Spy Run Creek. In addition, several areas require slope protection and interior drainage improvements would be made as necessary. The 1.3 miles of existing hiking/biking trails would be expanded to 4.8 miles. In July 1990, a detailed cost estimate was prepared which indicated a total project cost of $36,300,000; $27,000,000 Federal and $9,300,000 non-Federal. GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS AND HARBORS: Funds of $91,089 were utilized in FY 90 to initiate the Preconstruction Engineering and Design work activities. The General Design Memorandum is underway with completion scheduled for FY 92. The recommended plan provides for deepening areas along the upper St. Marys River and within Duluth- Superior Harbor to include: (a) deepening areas along the upper St. Marys River and the entrance and lower harbor channels at the Duluth portion of the Duluth-Superior Harbor, as necessary, to permit a maximum safe draft for downbound vessels of 26 1/2 feet at LWD; (b) disposal of the estimated 267,600 cubic yards of dredged materials from the upper St. Marys River in an environmentally acceptable manner, creating an island in Izaak Walton Bay to provide habitat enhancement for a Federally endangered species - the Piping Plover; (c) disposal of the dredge sediment from Duluth-Superior Harbor as follows: 286,500 cubic yards of dredged materials from the Cross and South Channels, West Gate Basin, East Gate Basin, Duluth Harbor Basin (Northern and Southern Sections) and the Duluth Ship Canal would be placed in the Lakehead upland site. The recommended plan provides for disposal of the dredged and excavated sediments in the least costly, environmentally acceptable manner. The Superior Harbor portion of this project has not been authorized since no local sponsor has come forward. The total project cost (1990 estimate) is approximately $13,400,000; $8,960,000 Federal and $4,440,000 non- Federal. 21-40 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 85. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA FY 90 costs were $194,197 for Flood Plain Management Services. Flood Insurance Studies. Four Flood Insurance Studies were completed in FY 90 for Brown County, Wisconsin; and the Michigan, communities of Georgetown Township, Ottawa County; Lapeer City, Lapeer County; and Thomas Township, Saginaw County. The studies were completed at a total cost of $152,814. The FY 90 costs for the four studies were $96,624, $1,027, $5,171, and $4,939, respectively. Michigan Flood Insurance Studies for Alpena Township, Alpena County; Baldwin Township, losco County; Fraser Township, Bay County; Greenbush Township, Alcona County; Kawkawlin Township, Bay County; Pinconning Township, Bay County; Sims Township, Arenac County; and Tawas City, losco County will be completed in FY 91. The FY 90 costs associated with these studies were $17,070, $14,937, $11,867, $12,365, $13,385, $12,842, $12,100, and $10,411, respectively. FY 90 coordination costs for Allen County, Indiana; and the Michigan communities of Adrian Township, Lenawee County; Ann Arbor City, Washtenaw County; Clare City, Clare County; Holland City, Ottawa County; Three Rivers City, St. Joseph County; and Wyoming City, Kent County, were $118, $280, $207, $7,800, $398, $393, and $243, respectively. Final coordination meetings were held on completed Flood Insurance Studies for the Michigan communities of Chassel Township, Houghton County; Hersey Village, Osceola County; Lincoln Township, Newaygo County; Manistique City, Schoolcraft County; Northfield Township, Washtenaw County; and Pittsfield Township, Washtenaw County. The FY 90 costs for these activities were $137, $195, $126, $473, $216, and $51, respectively. Costs in FY 90 in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Assistance Program, Limited Map Maintenance Program, and a special study on Great Lakes Wave Runup Methodology were $20,912, $51,610, and $2,581, respectively. 21-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 1. Arcadia Harbor, MI 2. Ashland Harbor, WI 3. Au Sable Harbor, MI 4. Bayport Harbor, MI 6. Black River Harbor, MI (P.H.) 7. Black River Harbor, MI (U.P.) 8. Bolles Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Cost Approp. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 433,000 272.000 2.134.000 79,170 387,088 283,253 2,158,207 84,180 364,948 9,528 360,246 14,231 --- 89,697 --- 35,364 87,254 212,227 82,952 213,755 7,000 15,039 61,333 11,736 49,346 40,410 49,346 28,695 --- 22,071 66,435 --- 18,414 69,106 --- 147,000 (14,000) 1,410 135,450 (2,480) 222,422 377,499 143,902 335,703 (1,000) 141,632 146,301 80,490 1,433 1,463 5,597 5,599 21-42 4,173,532 4,167,546 1,695.645 1,695,645 3,284,305 3,281,531 209,7761 209,7761 2,586,604 2,583,301 93,597 95.597 161,693 149,978 792 792 830,1652 830,1652 747,2483 680,4513 383,350 383,350 712,856 712,856 426,4134 426,4134 1,675,359 1,675,359 1,190,550 1,190,550 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 9. Channels in the Straits of Mackinac, MI 10. Charlevoix Harbor, MI 11. Clinton River, MI 12. Detroit River, MI Contributed Funds 13. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 1,478 650 253,000 1,080,000 251,394 1,115,167 1,523,000 1,528,061 111,668 110,507 89,661 19,248 122,935 129,078 89,661 14,342 126,559 103,183 261,000 2,219,000 237,122 2,098,062 4,017,500 2,714,000 4,030,841 2,673,764 966,100 1,109,377 (98,120) (95,512) 3,680,100 4,668,085 3,709,048 4,704,968 --- --- 768,600 301,291 54 --- 765,570 307,351 72,612 46,343 ---- 89,344 68,891 --- --- 2,219,700 3,694,400 2,304,284 3,699,515 3,773,000 (55,000) 3,930,167 (63,083) 2,665,000 4,054,372 2,684,950 3,965,833 --- 63,410 18,330 49,547 21-43 2,832,629 2,832,629 224,832 224,004 180,623 180,623 8,021,568 8,019,370 1,129,396 1,129,396 549,7985 549,7985 1,384,381 1,357,204 3,809,180 3,803,750 76,877,3576 76,877,3576 87,673,509 87,639,470 42,470,585 42,470,585 361,235 361,235 16,109,2587 16,109,2587 48,015,742 47,900,220 1,556,249 1,556,249 11,021,410 11,000,420 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 14. Eagle Harbor, MI 15. Fox River, WI 16. Frankfort Harbor, MI 17. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 Contributed Funds 18. Grand Marais Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,000 1,948 1,246,100 1,545,000 1,251,433 1,565,066 1,331 1,383 1,383,000 1,485,453 1,355,554 1,461,849 150,999 25,000 74,449 176,487 150,723 21,193 80,360 175,652 673,200 672,100 979,000 543,454 670,055 654,999 993,902 547,850 91,000 69,000 65,000 56,177 92,608 67,261 60,379 55,691 27,936 161,000 5,643 175,017 21-44 205,1648 205,1648 89,277 89,277 3,753,3349 3,753,3349 42,555,22610 42,488,96410 1,955,15911 1,955,15911 6,705,832 6,703,943 274,776 274,776 1,204,500 1,204,500 1,283,46912 1,283,46912 175,000 175,000 23,251,90913 23,247,46413 813,613 813,613 780,400 780,400 2,014,861 2,007,010 27,200 15,585 1,055,871 1,055,871 1,901,956 1,893,680 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 19. Grand Traverse Harbor, MI 20. Green Bay Harbor, WI 21. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 23. Holland Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 266,037 266,037 89,000 43,000 23,000 86,099 87,584 37,660 29,756 76,808 1,299,000 2,562,000 1,384,841 2,630,676 205,000 25,000 205,760 23,982 295,641 2,651,100 252,600 2,671,991 454,000 1,137,600 472,285 1,096,765 2,796,200 1,182,657 2,803,935 1,153,571 --- 76,940 402 65,238 330,900 2,311,649 363,060 2,300,101 3,915,000 3,961,525 972,492 971,391 80,000 49,500 22,000 68,216 74,093 58,655 19,829 65,437 1,815,752 1,806,461 9,946,39514' 15 9,946,3951415 23,803,09216 23,747,50516 6,890,747 6,874,146 1,200,598 1,200,598 11,628,629 11,614,772 194,504 194,504 243.100 243,100 771,8271718 771,8271718 621,000 621,000 18,885,804 18,882,272 1,679,916 1,673,367 502,452 502,452 1,663,300 1,663,300 21-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 24. Inland Route, MI 25. Kenosha Harbor, WI 26. Kewaunee Harbor, WI 27. Keweenaw Waterway, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 64,000 74,000 85,167 60,411 46,000 63,861 27,728 29,858 1,072 --- --- --- 1,182,600 352,000 216,200 705,160 1,206,019 351,863 232,834 699,775 --- --- --- 1,270,275 - - -.- - -- - -.- - - 172,000 954,200 559,500 235,877 159,073 962,764 562,078 251,075 2,822,000 584,000 2,777,736 631,023 855,000 162,500 875,855 150,762 4,588,700 2,272,831 4,564,738 2,285,292 15,000 30,149 21-46 918,22219 918,22219 2,443,616 2,441,130 404,300 404,300 988,96920,21 988,96920,21 5,416,82822 5,410,82122 1,270,275 4,378,600 4,378,600 758,33323 758,33323 5,475,16824 5,470,30224 617,300 617,300 2,961,461 2,961,461 5,974,141 5,974,141 21,819,21525 21,779,94725 1,523,500 1,523,500 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 28. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels 29. Leland Harbor, MI 30. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Section 111 Maint. Approp. Cost 31. Little Lake Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 103,000 256,000 105,926 225,803 54,100 80,686 100,244 73,273 105,000 135,000 129,500 127,011 100,159 138,200 128,479 120,917 49,000 194,000 10,000 22,997 210,048 19,955 5,622 5,622 88,000 115,000 294,000 24,986 92,307 32,489 375,817 21,075 165,600 216,000 162,500 158,357 166,243 221,928 163,102 154,452 21-47 7,675,35726 7,675,35726 7,648,87027 7,640,03727 5,119,800 5,119,800 1,027,08928 1,027,08928 2,010,022 2,000,725 70,678 70,678 1,646,304 1,646,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 372,000 372,000 382,666 382,666 1,235,986 1,230,859 600,47829 600,47829 3,470,972 3,465,742 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 32. Ludington Harbor, MI Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Section 111 Maint. Approp. Cost 1,743,000 566,000 150,500 544,682 1,764,395 565,357 132,183 569,842 41,800 11,000 40,390 13,086 10,000 2,769 (7,000) 231 33. Manistee Harbor, MI 34. Manistique Harbor, MI 35. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 777,000 299,000 784,446 313,522 454,000 25,958 458,202 27,391 --- 39,436 172,400 96,820 --- 39,435 168,966 59,313 283,000 213,000 297,160 220,309 134,000 200,149 134,498 197,759 21-48 7,912,20230 7,912,20230 620,000 620,000 11,410,74831 11,409,10231 357,913 357,913 717,340 717,340 2,696,52232 2,696,52232 6,710,69133 6,710,44833 1,374,164 1,374,164 1,299,35534 1,299,35534 2,179,450 2,138,508 316,333 316,333 2,048,91435 2,048,91435 1,911,130 1,911,130 5,757,66436 5,751,01336 3,081,756 3,081,756 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 36. Marquette Harbor, MI 37. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI Contributed Funds 38. Milwaukee Harbor, WI 39. Monroe Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 184,646 9,188 6,741 185,349 8,369 7,810 149,886 26,000 114,500 149,204 29,387 115,121 2,783,000 540,300 442,400 2,753,156 608,059 426,799 1,235,000 3,592,400 1,229,552 3,537,129 1,576,000 1,289,500 1,577,775 1,133,479 (1,000) (6,500) 34,881 (1,077) (1,818) --- 5,442 --- 784,000 901,866 514,800 699,862 21-49 196,901 194,387 136,029 110,088 878,539 889,184 (2,650) 24,914 1,071,398 1,060,591 1,282,893 1,282,893 2,204,757 2,202,243 465,757 465,757 533,47637 533,47637 2,210,86938 2,181,82538 1,351,852 1,351,852 593,660 591,014 36,762 36,762 8,231,02439 8,231,02439 29,240,51340 29,229,72340 12,715,560 12,715,560 6,380,925 6,380,925 987,34041 987,34041 17,229,81841 17,215,39941 38,614,400 38,614,391 83,182 83,182 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 40. Muskegon Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 41. New Buffalo, Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 43. Ontonagon Harbor, MI 44. Pentwater Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 80,000 532,000 245,000 214,326 77,241 533,537 242,196 218,406 45,000 70,000 305,700 58,390 29,843 337,972 60,000 84,085 0 7,832 0 7,312 0 804 5,000 398,371 109,800 142,813 10,057 386,063 121,175 140,988 56,000 3,000 48,354 10,824 8,000 18,525 0 1,733 443,600 573,700 691,000 795,031 420,997 563,053 701,989 810,605 221,000 288,000 261,500 115,513 222,504 283,769 268,761 110,454 21-50 2,912,11042 2,912,11042 105,000 105,000 6,515,44143 6,513,93043 2,324,700 2,324,127 13,824,300 13,824,300 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 3,454,137 3,449,107 181,500 181,500 953,90344 953,90344 10,183,88445 10,165,09245 21,000 21,000 179,899 179,899 3,911,268 3,904,818 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 45. Point Lookout Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 46. Portage Lake, MI 47. Port Austin Harbor, MI 48. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Contributed Funds Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 33,991 266,980 30,000 35,484 259,915 40,242 25,993 25,957 13,854 9,292 249,400 114,128 14,664 6,406 226,286 140,128 50,000 100,000 1,245,000 800,000 5 87,191 1,272,186 813,539 (62,502) 106,867 (55,855) 38,044 177,000 128,101 51,263 242,404 207,000 6,000 45,478 157,407 79,824 17,519 140,401 22,130 87,000 4,205 92,717 9,291 (1,000) 21,251 11,545 18,858 21-51 2,642,584 2,642,584 3,295,154 3,295,118 121,600 121,600 9,257 9,257 256,129 256,129 1,937,891 1,937,891 3,375,33446 3,352,00846 1,767,341 1,763,686 159,000 159,000 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 336,000 336,000 1,971,490 1,970,859 115,000 115,000 9,158 9,158 1,035,251 1,032,858 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 49. Port Washington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 50. Port Wing Harbor, WI 51. Presque Isle Harbor, MI Section 111 52. Rouge River, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost --- --- 106,506 56,944 --- --- 106,506 53,142 --- 78,935 --- 78,216 0--- 0 --- 00--- 182,100 11,859 176,994 16,968 0--- 0 --- 0 --- 0 --- 2,685,000 (82,000) 2,673,425 (50,114) 3,598 52,004 4,140 46,102 4,336 4,221 817,500 145,838 827,076 143,626 --- --- 247,000 136,495 12 174 246,608 143,493 21-52 2,582,20447 2,582,20447 2,621,06548 2,617,26348 10,621 10,621 1,624,000 1,624,000 63,393 63,393 929,122 923,043 1,190,492 1,190,492 61,700 61,700 903,997 903,882 76,500 76,500 16,500 16,500 675,25149 675,25149 19,313,94150 19,309,90350 14,907,318 14,907,318 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 53. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 54. St. Clair River, MI 55. St. Joseph Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 56. St. Marys River, MI 57. Saugatuck Harbor, MI and Kalamazoo River, MI New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14,917,12751 14,917,12751 13,600 13,600 2,548,000 1,937,000 1,642,100 2,110,968 2,422,846 2,052,297 1,634,544 2,128,629 126,000 80,000 188,000 205,990 149,558 71,832 198,388 182,907 1,527,000 1,927,100 573,500 979,596 1,519,667 1,874,080 605,737 1,001,891 647,000 3,406,700 527,100 682,973 670,265 3,301,795 633,865 674,010 --- (5,700) --- --- 868 (5,700) --- --- 387,000 465,000 74,800 162,350 520,434 244,935 331,988 158,797 9,934,400 14,288,300 10,527,500 9,497,511 14,783,035 10,499,775 11,265,113 11,046,875 40,987,363 40,976,774 19,785,89052 19,762,61952 19,213,246 19,213,246 19,828,109 19,807,263 976,48553 976,48553 828,000 828,000 13,448,238 13,432,776 962,216 962,216 638,076 638,076 4,434,450 4,430,897 160,657,07154 160,657,07054 222,582,421 221,838,752 13,100 13,100 29,270 156,161 134,973 40,126 26,250 152,608 88,532 88,838 364,52766 364,52766 3,362,81656 3,358,35856 21-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 58. Saxon Harbor, WI Section 111 59. Sebewaing River, MI 60. Sheboygan Harbor, WI 61. South Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 15,191 50,000 158,500 84,548 2,434 59,766 135,491 107,785 230,400 396,176 522,051 (11,104) 111,517 366,111 670,660 (10,765) 301,000 217,000 61,500 220,086 251,568 267,383 61,112 215,787 64 --- 197,335 65,000 116,500 194,378 85,519 116,801 --- --- 13,000 3,198 3,584 13,725 11,503 11,803 1,933 2,956 21-54 426,50757 426,50757 667,870 667,870 723,841 721,078 35,573 35,573 3,426,957 3,426,957 1,136,08858 1,136,08858 5,610,97859 5,606,08759 609,028 609,028 907,792 907,792 452,42660 452,42660 532,000 532,000 3,874,80461 3,874,80461 1,632,076 1,632,076 42,381 42,381 1,158,933 1,157,120 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 62. Sturgeon Bay, WI & Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI 63. Two Harbors, MN 64. Two Rivers Harbor, WI 65. Whitefish Point Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 141,300 269,500 246,000 257,036 121,157 266,195 271,429 252,213 -1- -.- -- - 24,521 157,000 160,722 13,315 120,516 203,960 75,446 75,806 23,416 7,174 159,992 283,764 15,445 26,713 134,581 309,764 14,772 141,488 14,772 135,849 21-55 1,059,72262 1,059,72262 8,012,45163 8,004,97463 311,119 311,119 884,899 884,899 4,170,7104 4,170,7104 2,322,882 2,318,790 360,32065 360,32065 5,860,41266 5,860,41266 1,187,472 1,187,472 58,057 58,057 771,639 771,639 392,515 386,876 1,081 1,081 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 66. White Lake Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 76. Kawkawlin River, MI (Contributed Funds) 77. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 78. Sebewaing River, MI 82. Surveillance of North Boundary Waters New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 95,000 139,000 166,900 91,872 141,570 170,793 9,226 9,526 49,000 11,000 23,000 32,615 53,483 8,936 23,587 34,470 55,000 54,540 160,000 50,826 --- 260,000 --- (58,000) 44,928 19,298 148,628 40,269 0 --- --- --- 3 --- --- --- 5,000 4,000 8,000 4,000 1,230,000 1,435,000 1,278,991 1,372,820 7,500 7,243 5,311 4,891 1,440,000 1,483,500 1,458,207 1,440,678 21-56 207,862 207,862 249,700 249,700 2,568,589 2,568,589 766,615 763,626 296,700 296,240 160,000 50,826 24,755,359 24,755,359 173,000 173,000 365,64267 365,64267 413,455 412,778 45,812,83468 45,692,89468 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 'Includes $114,786 for previous projects. 2Includes $85,849 for previous projects. 3Includes $12,008 for maintenance of previous projects. 4Includes $255,000 contributed funds. 'Includes $25,500 for previous projects and $289,752 contributed funds for existing projects. 6Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. 'Includes $1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. 8Excludes $27,800 for previous projects. 9Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. �Includes $89,309 for previous projects. "Includes $31,709 contributed funds. 2Includes $311,329 for previous projects. "13Includes $13,437 for previous projects. 14Includes $396,974 for previous projects. "6Includes $109,463 for previous projects. "16Includes $8,918 for previous projects. "7Includes $176,620 for new work, $127,598 for maintenance. "8Includes $35,705 contributed funds. "9Includes $148,000 contributed funds for existing project. 20Includes $453,839 for previous projects. 21Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 22Includes $21,818 for previous projects. "23Includes $149,312 for previous projects. 24Includes $88,364 for previous projects. 25Includes $402,242 for previous projects. 26Includes $656,000 for previous projects. 27Includes $235,346 for previous projects. 28Includes $354,139 contributed funds. 29Includes $57,670 contributed funds. 30Includes $491,416 for previous projects. "Excludes $136,286 contributed funds. 32Includes $354,999 for previous projects. "33Includes $150,910 for previous projects. "34Includes $3,955 for previous projects. 35Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 36Includes $54,288 for previous projects. 37Includes $312,423 for previous projects. "38Includes $36,194 for previous projects. 39Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. 40Includes $459,305 for previous projects. 41 Includes contributed funds of $300,000 for new work and $166,667 for maintenance contributed by: Port Commission of Monroe, $300,000; Consolidated Paper Co., $125,000; and River Raisin Co., $41,667. 42Includes $613,400 for previous projects. 43Includes $446,183 for previous projects. "Includes $284,802 for previous projects. 45Includes $113,326 for previous projects. 46Includes $172,100 contributed funds. 47Includes $188,495 for previous projects. 48Includes $15,123 for previous projects. 49Includes $50,084 for previous projects. 5"Includes $56,608 for previous projects. 51Includes $962,556 for previous projects. 52Includes $1,671,660 public works funds and $49,419 emergency relief funds. 53Includes $503,113 for previous projects. 54Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. 55Includes $90,232 for previous projects. 56Includes $117,554 for previous projects. 57Excludes $50,193 contributed funds. "58Includes $487,817 for previous projects. 59Includes $87,131 for previous projects. 60Includes $187,233 for previous projects. "61Includes $131,239 for previous projects. 62Includes $323,419 for previous projects. 63Includes $219,730 for previous projects. "4Includes $48,404 National Recovery Act for new work funds. 65Includes $212,857 for previous projects. 66Includes $33,113 for previous projects. 67Includes $15,000 for previous projects. 68Includes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 21-57 TABLE 21-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1990 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 May 20, 1965 Dec. 31, 197030 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Sept. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 23, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 6, 1965 Aug. 30, 1935 ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 1 of Text) Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel ASHLAND HARBOR, WI (See Section 2 of Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvements on enlarged project' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extent of channel to be dredged Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. Deepening portions of east basin and west channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI (See Section 3 of Text) Dredging channels 12 and 10 feet deep and riprapping North Pier. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (ALCONA COUNTY), MI (See Section 5 of Text) Dredging Channels 10, 8, and 6 feet deep protect d where needed by Breakwater. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI (See Section 6 of Text) Channel from mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Settling Basin Deepening channel and settling basin to 20 feet, and widening to 100 feet 2 bends; 1 at the foot of 12th St., the other below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of existing channel. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENINSULA) (See Section 7 of Text) Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. BOLLES HARBOR, MI (See Section 8 of Text) Entrance channel in Lake Erie, Access channel in LaPlaisance Creek, Steel sheet pile revetment. CHANNELS IN THE STRAITS OF MACKINAC, MI (See Section 9 of Text) Dredging channel between Round Island and Mackinac Island, 1250 feet wide, 27 feet deep and 3,250 feet long. Removal of Poe Reef Shoal to a depth of 27 feet over an area of about 22,000 square yards. H. Doc 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Ex.Doc 89,48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337,77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 165,86th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 361, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.1 Annual Report 1889, p. 2291 No Printed Report H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 2, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-58 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 29, 1977 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19353 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 194631 May 17, 19504 Mar. 21, 195631 Jul. 14, 1960 Deepening channel between Round Island and Mackinac Island and Poe Reef Shoal to depths of 30 feet. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 10 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. Restore recreational uses or provide comparable recreational uses at the South Pier. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 11 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin. DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 12 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse Ile Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingston Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and construction of necessary compensating works, Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through East Draw of lower Grosse Ile Bridge and extend 300-foot width of Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way Channels, exept in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower, (29-foot depth) Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel. 27.5 foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal, Inclusive. Trenton Channel; Deepen to 27 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 across in area outside project limits. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Ex. Doc.16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1876, p. 523 No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong, 2d Sess., Sec. 25 of the W.R.D.A. of 1988. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1880, p. 2062 and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1886, p. 219. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess., and 322, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 21-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 13, 196831 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 19085 Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 19303 Aug. 30, 19303 Jul. 16, 19524 Jul. 14, 19607,31 Oct. 4, 1961 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 19258,31 Jun. 26, 19349 Jul. 3, 195810 Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet from downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works to maintain water levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 13 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area of basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. Deepen portions of the North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and Minnesota Channel to 27 feet; widen the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet, and construct an upland CDF. EAGLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 14 of Text) Breakwater and dredging of entrance channel 130 feet wide to depth of 14 feet. Project modified by reduction of channel width from 130 feet to 80 feet. Project modified by increasing width of breakwater from 20 feet to 30 feet and increasing the channel from 80 to 130 feet. Project modified by omitting breakwater and constructing guide piers. Inner harbor basin and breakwaters and removal of east guide pier. FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 15 of Text) Improvement of Fox River. Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River. Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108, that Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property H. Doc. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.1 H.Ex. Doc. 59, 53rd Cong., 3d Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82., 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess., H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Annual Report for 1868, p. 89. Annual Report for 1874, pp. 36, 135 and 136. Annual Report for 1877, p. 98. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 (plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886). H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong. ,lst Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-60 TABLE 21-B (Continued) Acts DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. Jun. 23, 186611 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 23, 1866 Jun. 14. 1880 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 14, 1880 May 17, 1950 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 16, of Text) A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the area in Lake Betsie. Deepen approach and entrance Channels. Extend Inner Basin and Dredge recreational anchorage area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 17 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project dimensions of Harbor channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Channel to Spring Lake. Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. Deepen the harbor entrance channel and harbor river channel to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; provide a new and larger turning basin, trapezoidal in shape, 1,200 feet long at the channel, 300 feet long at the shore, 800 feet at a right angle to the channel and 18 feet deep. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI (See Section 18 of Text) Existing Project, except for pile dike. For Pile Dike. 800-Foot Extension of West Pier. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 19 of Text) Two Parallel piers, and entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI (See Section 20 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Island. 12 Inner channel 13 Turning basin at De Pere. Maintenance of turning basin at De Pere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western R.R. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channcel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. Deepen the Fox River channel at Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. H. Doc. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess., S. Doc. 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 1 H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 227, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of W.R.D.A. of 1986. Specified in Act. Annual Report 1881, p. 2050. Annual Report 1895, p. 351. H. Doc. 751, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc., 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986, Sec. 601c) 21-61 _ Documents __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 16, 1984 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 195431 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 19352 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 196231 Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19352,14 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 21 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 23 of Text) Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan. 12 Piers and Revetments. 12 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Reveted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 24 of Text) Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 25 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater.12 Extending Breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI(See Section 26 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a miximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 27 of Text) Acquisition of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved May 15, 1898.) Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Annual Report 1873, p. 282, H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report 1905, p. 2176; H. Doc., 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess.1 Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772, H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Ex. Doc. 105, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-62 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30 193515 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19333 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. Deauthorization of the uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS (See Section 28 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Pointe. Second Canal for downbound vessels. 21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 29 of Text) Entrance Channel protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Approach Channel and removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 30 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.1 LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 31 of Text) 12-Foot Deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 32 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension, Reconstruction and Repairs to Existing Structures and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of Outer Ends of the Two Inner Piers. Deepen Channels and Widen Opening between Breakwaters. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and further Pier extension. Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, and extend North Pier if required. 23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, and widen river entrance Channel. Present Project dimensions of Channel through Outer Basin and River, and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI (See Section 34 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present Location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R. (formerly S. 1567) 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) Annual Report 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1867, p. 114.16 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 16 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1867, p. 115 Annual Report 1891, p. 2678 H. Doc. 599, 62nd Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1908, p. 648, and Unpublished Report of Mar. 13, 1908. Approved by Secretary of War, 21-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 193517 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 196230 Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Jun. 26, 1979 Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. 11, 1888 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19351 Jul. 11, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 Sec. 107 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 193531 Mar. 2, 1945 s MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 35 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25-feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th St., and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. Construct 765-foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemound bulkhead; construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic yards for entrance channel. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 36 of Text) Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 37 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by Act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 38 of Text) North Pier 12 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater.12 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Apr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun. 1967 Detailed Project Report; Apr. 1982 Supplement.1 Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. pts, 1 and 2, and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.1 Annual Report, 1867, p. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report Dec. 1966.1 S. Doc. 175. 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report 1906, p. 1752. (No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions.) H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc., 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-64 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 183517 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 14, 193221 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 196230� Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1881 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 16, 1984 Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo St., and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western R.R. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 39 of Text) 9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-foot channel, dikes and Turning Basin.20 Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act of Jul. 3, 1930. Deepen portion of existing navigation channel to 27 feet; deepen lake channel to 28 feet; widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, 1,600 feet wide at river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre CDF in Plum Creek Bay to enable creation of a 700 acre marsh behind the CDF. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 40 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 41 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new no. and so. breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 43 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. Enlarging and deepening the existing harbor basin. Deauthorization of the turning basin feature of the project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 44 of Text) Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel. POINTE LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI (See Section 45 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 46 of Text) Entrance Channel 18 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI (See Section 47 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Basin, Channel Dredging. Construct a breakwater access for recreation purposes. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess., 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc.602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 287, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. R. 6(formerly S. 1567) 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 163422 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Ses.,P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 106. 21-65 TABLE 21-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 1987 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 193528 Jul. 3, 195829 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 30, 1948 Aug. 5, 1977 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13. 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 19352,24,25 Jul. 3, 19582 Oct. 23, 19622 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Breakwater. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 48 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Achorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 49 of Text) North pier and south basin. 12 North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. PORT WING HARBOR, WI (See Section 50 of Text) Construction of parallel piers and dredging. Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments and channels. Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 51 of Text) Breakwater, 1,000 feet long. Shore extension, 216 feet long. For dredging and rubblemound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet long; Changed designation of project. Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. ROUGE RIVER, MI (See Section 52 of Text) 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal. 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter, and 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Ave. (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 53 of Text) Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw. Turning Basin. Present Project Channel Dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet in River Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination of present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-foot Project above 6th St. Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins. 3 Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 54 of Text) 20-foot Channel in the River. P.L. 100-71. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 318, 54th Cong., 1st. Sess., Annual Report for 1903, pp. 474, 1823. H. Doc. 473, 72nd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 23 H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. 21-66 TABLE 21-B (Continued) Acts DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 19463' Mar. 21, 195631 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 1934'9 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River between limits of 27.1 to 30 feet to provide save navigation by vessels with drafts of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada at Southeast Bend and abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. Deauthorization of the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Jul. 24, 1946. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 55 of Text) Interior Revetments.26 Benton Harbor Canal.26 Present Project dimensions of Piers and a Turning Basin. Present project dimensions of the channel and turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of canal above west line of 9th Street. Turning Basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate Turning Basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of Turning Basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 56 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and deepen existing State Channel.26 Poe Lock.' Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River below Locks. Davis Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls, Lease entered into with Michigan Northern Power Co. provided for construction of remedial and compensating works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend anchorage and maneuver area below Locks. Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and maneuver H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309. 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H.R. 6 (Formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report 1880, pp. 2030, 2031 and 2049, 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Report by Maj. O.M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, not published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1891, p. 2810. H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.(Plan 3) H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. and H. Doc. 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-67 Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug.. 5, 1886 Aug. 30, 1935 areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when levels of Lakes Superior and Huron are at their respective low-water datums. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, June 21, 1940. Construct a second large lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjuacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 57 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening entrance to 16 feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. SAXON HARBOR, WI (See Section 58 of Text) Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 59 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 60 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Ave. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 61 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge. 12 Present dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present Project dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI (See Section 62 of Text) Breakwaters.12 Acquisition of the canal. Canal revetments and consolidation of canal and harbor works. Present project dimensions of channels and elimination of turning basin immediately west of revetted canal. Turning basin between city and Bushman wharves. TWO HARBORS, MN (See Section 63 of Text) Breakwater and dredging. Construction of two breakwater piers. Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging maneuvering area. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.1 None H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1896, Vol. 2. Pt. 5,p. 2739. Annual Report 1907, p. 6416. H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Act, H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.,1Annual Report for 1965, p. 1025. H. Doc. 71, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.1 No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc.119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 9, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' and unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 21, 1934. H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H.Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 117, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 421, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report for 1887, p. 1952 Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 17, 21-68 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 7. 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 193531 Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 17, 1967 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 3, 195431 Jul. 3, 195830 Construct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 64 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment. 12 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22d Street Bridge. WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MI (See Section 65 of Text) Breakwaters, Entrance Channel, Anchorage Basin. Breakwater Inside Harbor WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 66 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present Project Depth of Channel. KALAMAZOO RIVER, BATTLE CREEK, MI (See Section 74 of Text) Flood Control improvements to Kalamazoo River in vicinity of Battle Creek. KALAMAZOO RIVER, KALAMAZOO, MI (See Section 75 of Text) Enlarging and Straightening River Channel, Riprapping Channel where necessary, reinforcement and reconstruction of bridges as required and alterations to existing buildings and utilities. 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 805, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.1 Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897). H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess." H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Chief of Engineers. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate.27 S. Doc. 98, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 53, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.1 KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI (See Section 76 of Text) Apr. 7, 1966 Deepening River Channel, altering Railway Bridge. Riprapping portions of Channel bottom, and utility relocations. Nov. 17, 1986 Provides that the Federal share of the cost of operation and maintenance of the project shall be 50 percent. Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1941 SAGINAW RIVER, MI FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 77 of Text) Flood Control improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 78 of Text) Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (Sec. 837 of W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' 21-69 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 1Contains latest published map. 2Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 3Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 4This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 5Administrative Act, Section 4. 6Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 7Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 8This portion inactive. 9Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 10Transfer completed June 1962. 11Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. 12Completed under previous project. '3Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. 14Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. 15Latest published map is in Annual Report 1914, p. 2974. 1 6Latest published map in Annual Report 1914, p. 2914. 17Superceded by Act of October 23, 1962. 18Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo St. Bridge to North Humboldt Ave. Bridge). 19Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 20Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 21War Department Appropriations Act. 22Latest published map is in House Document 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 23Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 24Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth of old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. 25This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 26Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 27Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 28Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 29Deauthorized in 1977. 3 0This modification deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 31Uncompleted portion deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 21-70 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alpena Harbor, MI Completed 1985 337,3941 948,834 Algoma Harbor, MI Completed 1981 205,0102 962,741 Bayfield Harbor, WI Completed 1979 183,855 94,313 Belle River, MI Completed 1980 24,301 82,038 Beaver Bay, MN Active 1982 293,000 2,818 Big Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1988 390,4333 1,209,377 Big Suamico Harbor, WI Completed 1989 20,243 770,186 Caseville Harbor, MI Completed 1988 587,314 361,297 Cedar River Harbor, MI Active 1982 215,000 0 Cheboygan Harbor, MI Completed 1988 504,236 901,216 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Completed 1959 125,629 13,528 Cornucopia Harbor, WI Completed 1988 462,653 869,497 Cross Village, MI Active 1983 364,000 0 Detour Harbor, MI Completed 1989 2,559,346 140,024 Grand Marais Harbor, MN Completed 1989 450,972 3,222,626 Grays Reef Passage, MI Completed 1970 190,521 744,191 Greilickville Harbor, MI Completed 1976 366,579 145,934 (Formerly Traverse City Harbor, MI) Hammond Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1988 1,092,366 494,587 Harrisville Harbor, MI Completed 1988 2,639,392 1,063,827 Knife River Harbor, MN Active 1986 412,945 289,224 Lac La Belle Harbor, MI Completed 1989 269,270 556,561 La Pointe Harbor, WI Completed 1986 139,874 102,094 Les Cheneaux Islands Channels, MI Completed 1980 399,478 324,036 Little Bay DeNoc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Completed 1966 332,832 100,962 Lutsen Harbor, MN Active 1982 357,000 0 Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Completed 1989 334,089 1,812,044 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Completed 1986 136,2864 85,684 Oconto Harbor, WI Completed 1985 130,7545 1,203,1806 Pensaukee Harbor, WI Completed 1986 0 29,072 Petoskey Harbor, MI Completed 1986 123,839 551,536 Pine River, MI Completed 1980 13,649 41,789 St. James, Beaver Island, MI Completed 1957 49,1717 72,722 St. Joseph River, MI Completed 1975 54,555 19,185 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1986 1,955,7458 27,477 Washington Island, WI Completed 1950 62,838 77,361 'Includes $18,889 for previous projects. 2Includes $92,774 for previous projects. 'Excludes $56,500 Contributed Funds. 4Excludes $136,286 Contributed Funds. 6.Includes $84,569 for previous projects. 6.Includes $8,161 for previous projects. 7Excludes Contributed Funds of $7,500. -Includes $834,677 Contributed Funds. 21-71 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI1,2 Deferred 1975 4,471,235 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI Completed 1953 1,136,0083 Paw Paw Lake, MI Completed 1989 3,589,000 Upper River Rouge, MI4 Inactive 1968 7.935 River Rouge, MI Completed 1981 31,960,332 lIncludes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 3Includes $202,996 Contributed Funds. 2Uncompleted portion deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, 4Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of in accordance with Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. local cooperation. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). TABLE 21-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (SEE SECTION 56 OF TEXT) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls1 Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls1 Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,0002 $3,275,0003 $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,0005 $1,750,0006 $12,718,8064,7 $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. 11, 1943 Jun. 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost _ $300,000 Type Steel Stoplogs Recessed Steel Stoplogs Recessed Into Lock Masonry Into Lock Masonry Cost Completed -9 $169,2248 Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 1At low water datum 599.5 above and 577.8 below. 2Includes cost of North Canal. 3Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 5Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. 6Excludes cost of canal excavation to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 8Including engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separate from cost of locks. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls 21-72 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Berrien County, MI 1963 Nov 1986 0 0 (St. Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, Alcona County, 1971 Dec 1989 0 0 MI (Authorized Dec. 17, 1979, under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1936 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl, MI 1976 Dec 1989 159,300,000 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 13, 1968 R&H Act) Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, 1990 Dec 1989 14,562,100 0 MN and WI (Jul. 14, 1960 R&H Act) Forestville Harbor, MI 1969 Nov 1986 0 0 (1968 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI 1966 Nov 1977 0 0 (Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI1 1990 Dec 1989 93,993,349 0 (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) Harbors of Washington Island, WI 1950 Dec 1989 62,838 0 (R&H Act of 1937) Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI 1962 Dec 1989 0 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act) Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI 1975 Dec 1989 6,656,668 108,332 (Uncompleted portion) (1954 Flood Control Act) Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI 1975 Dec 1989 416,822 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Kenosha Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 552,000 43,000 (Uncompleted portion) (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Kewaunee River, WI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (1960 R&H Act) 21-73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Lansing (Grand River), MI 1971 Jun 1981 7,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Lower Fox River, WI 1990 Dec 1989 3,753,334 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act) Manitowoc Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 0 0 (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 6,937,804 478,000 (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Act of 1935) Northport Harbor, WI - - Dec 1989 132,000 0 (Authorized in 1972 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Ontonagon Harbor, MI 1990 Dec 1989 27,482 0 (R&H Act of 1962) Pentwater Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Jul. 13, 1892 R&H Act) Racine Harbor, WI 1963 May 1986 9,441,554 0 (Mar. 2, 1907; Aug. 26, 1937; Mar. 2, 1945, R&H Acts, and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI 1983 Nov 1986 3,823,000 0 (1970 Flood Control Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI 1926 Aug 1977 5,892 0 (Jun. 25, 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 22,000 0 (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 12,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (Jul. 3, 1930 R&H Act) South Milwaukee Harbor, WI 1906 Aug 1977 0 0 (1836 Flood Control Act) St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates) , MI 1977 Oct 1978 0 0 (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) Two Rivers Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 147,463 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) 21-74 1Includes Detroit and St. Clair Rivers. TABLE 21-H DETROIT, MI DISTRICT FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Project Datum Planes Miles Used by Above Mean Length from Upbound Water Level of Mouth or Down- Project Project at Father Channel of bound Width Depth Point, Quebec Year Name of Channel (Feet) River Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) Complete DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 12 OF TEXT) Channel North of Belle Islel, 2 Channel at Head of Detroit River 38,800 Miscellaneous Shoals and Obstructions 44,500 Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel 24,800 Ballards Reef Channel North of Junction 12,200 with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc., Shoals and Obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstberg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Reach (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal 26,000 10,887 12,313 42,000 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 30 32 25 17 12 Both Both Both 200 800 Both 800 Both 600 10 Down 450 5 Down Both _ Both _ Both Both 10 17 14 14 Up Up Up Down Local Local Local Local 450,800 800-1,200 1,200 21.0 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 27.7 29.0 29.0 28.5 571.3 571.5-570.9 570.9-570.3 569.8 569.8 569.8-568.6 1964 568.6 568.6 568.6 28.5-29.53 568.6 29.5 568.6 600 600 6,000 800 300 300 250-300 27.5 21-27.54 21-28.55 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 569.8-569.5 569.5-568.9 568.9-568.6 568.6 569.7-569.6 569.6-568.8 569.8 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 54 OF TEXT) Channel at Foot of Lake Huron Channel North of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stag Island St. Clair to Russell Island Russell Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel 26,500 44 4,100 39 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 39 31 24 11 5 Both 800 Both 800 Both Both Both Both Both Both Small Craft 800 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 30.0 30.0 30.0 27.4 27.3 17.2 27.1 27.1 10.0 576.8-576.5 1961 576.4-576.1 1962 576.4-576.1 574.9-573.8 573.8-572.4 572.4-572.1 573.1-572.0 572.1-571.7 571.7 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 'This is a Side Channel. 2Extends from Deep Water Near Windmill Point to a Point Opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 feet. 'Project Depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet over other than Rock Shoals. 4Project Depth 21 feet in Easterly 300-foot width of Channel and 27.5 feet in Westerly 300-foot width. 5Project Depth 21 feet in Easterly 300-foot width of Channel and 28.5 feet in Westerly 300-foot width. 6Project Complete Except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. 21-75 1964 1964 1964 1962 1963 1961 1961 1964 1962 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19646 1964 1941 1904 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS (SEE SECTION 15 OF TEXT) Depth at Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Character Kind Y4 Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall1 Sill of of Type of C Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction pl De Pere lock 2 7.1 De Pere --- 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 12.0 Rock --- Concrete De Pere dam2 7.2 De Pere --- --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed 3,4 Concrete 1 Little Kaukauna lock2 13.0 De Pere 6 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 9.5 Clay --- Concrete 1 Little Kaukauna dam2 13.1 De Pere 6 --- .-- .-- .-- .-- Clay and gravel Fixed 3,4 Piers and concrete 1 Rapide Croche lock2 19.2 Wrightstown 2 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 9.3 Rock --- Concrete 1 Rapide Corche Dam 2 19.3 Wrightstown 2 --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed 3,4 Concrete 1 Kaukauna fifth lock 2 22.8 Kaukauna --- 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 9.3 Rock --- Composite 1 Kaukauna fourth lock 2 23.1 Kaukauna --- 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 6.0 Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Kaukauna third lock2 23.3 Kaukauna --- 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 6.3 Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Kaukauna second lock2 23.4 Kaukauna --- 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 6.0 Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Kaukauna first lock2 23.6 Kaukauna --- 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 6.0 Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Kaukauna Dam 2 24.0 Kaukauna --- --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed 3,4 Concrete 1 Kaukauna guard lock 24.0 Kaukauna --- 40.0 --- --- 9.4 --- Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Little Chute combined lock: Lower 24.4 Little Chute 1 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 8.6 Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Upper 25.4 Little Chute 1 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 6.0 Hardpan --- Stone masonry 1 Little Chute second lock 2 26.4 Little Chute --- 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 6.1 Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Little Chute first (guard) lock' 26.5 Little Chute --- 35.4 --- --- 6.6 --- Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Little Chute Dam 2 26.6 Little Chute --- --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed3,4 Concrete 1 Cedars lock2 27.3 Little Chute 1 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 7.3 Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Cedars Dam2 27.4 Little Chute 1 --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed3,4 Concrete 1 Appleton fourth lock2 30.7 Appleton 1 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 7.9 Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Appleton lower dam 2 30.9 Appleton 1 --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed3,4 Concrete 1 Appleton third lock 2 31.3 Appleton --- 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 8.6 Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Appleton second lock 2 31.6 Appleton --- 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 6.0 Clay --- Stone masonry 1 Appleton first lock2 31.9 Appleton --- 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 6.0 Rock --- Stone masonry 1 Appleton upper dam 32.2 Appleton --- --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed Concrete 1 Menasha lock2 37.0 Menasha --- 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 8.0 Clay --- Composite 1 Menasha Dam2 37.8 Menasha --- --- --- --- --- --- Hardpan Fixed3 Concrete 1 ear om- Actual ete Cost 936 $229,308 929 209,536 938 362,427 926 179,398 934 228,738 930 118,975 898 13,3105 879 37,536 879 39,948 903 24,313 883 38,704 931 123,763 891 12,630 879 102,304 879 --- 881 48,555 904 7,8175 932 82,554 888 34,972 933 84,973 907 40,893 934 73,903 900 32,238 901 22,940 884 36,004 940 151,558 899 19,3265 937 84,686 1Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 2Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 3Provided with sluices. 4Flash boards used. 5Partially rebuilt. 21-76 TABLE 21-I DETROIT, MI DISTRICT RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS ALGOMA HARBOR, WI ALPENA HARBOR, MI BAYFIELD HARBOR, WI BELLE RIVER HARBOR, MI BIG BAY HARBOR, MI BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (U.P.) BOLLES HARBOR, MI CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI DETOUR HARBOR, MI EAGLE HARBOR, MI. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI GRAYS REEF PASSAGE, MI GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI KNIFE RIVER, MN LAC LABELLE HARBOR, MI LAPOINTE HARBOR, WI LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI LITTLE BAY DENOC, MI MANISTEE HARBOR, MI MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI OCONTO HARBOR, WI POINTE LOOKOUT HARBOR, MI PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI PORT WING HARBOR, WI SAUGATUCK HARBOR, MI SEBEWAING RIVER, MI SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI ST. JAMES HARBOR, MI TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MI WASHINGTON ISLAND, WI WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI AUGUST 1990 JUNE 1990 AUGUST 1990 SEPTEMBER 1990 MAY 1990 MAY 1990 AUGUST 1990 JUNE 1990 JUNE 1990 AUGUST 1990 JULY 1990 AUGUST 1990 SEPTEMBER 1990 SEPTEMBER 1990 JUNE 1990 SEPTEMBER 1990 JULY 1990 AUGUST 1990 APRIL 1990 JULY 1990 AUGUST 1990 JULY 1990 MAY 1990 FEBRUARY 1990 JULY 1990 MAY 1990 FEBRUARY 1990 APRIL 1990 MARCH 1990 AUGUST 1990 JUNE 1990 JULY 1990 JULY 1990 21-77 TABLE 21-J Name of Project Date Survey Conducted CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT * The district comprises Cook, Mc Henry, Lake, Kane, Du Page, and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, including a portion of La Porte County along Lake Michigan. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN' 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 4. Chicago Harbor, IL 5. Chicago River, IL 6. Indiana Harbor, IN 7. Michigan City Harbor, IN 8. Waukegan Harbor, IL 9. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 10. National Emergency Preparedness Alterations of Bridges 11. Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Beach Erosion Control 12. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (Beverly Shores, IN) 13. Indiana Shoreline, IN 14. Other Authorized Beach Erosion 15. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization Page 22-2 22-2 22-2 22-3 22-3 22-4 22-4 22-5 22-5 22-5 Flood Control 16. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) 17. Lake George, Hobart, IN 18. Little Calumet River, IN 19. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 20. North Branch, Chicago River, IL 21. O'Hare Reservoir, IL 22. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 23. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 22-5 General Investigation 24. Surveys 25. Collection and Study of Basic Data 26. Continuation of Planning and Engineering 22-5 27. Advance Engineering and Design 22-6 22-6 22-6 Page 22-6 22-6 22-7 22-7 22-7 22-8 22-9 22-9 22-9 22-9 22-9 22-9 TITLE Cost and Financial Statement ........................................ Authorizing Legislation............................. ........... Existing Projects ..................................................... Other Authorized Bridge Alteration................................ Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects ................... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... Deauthorized Projects ........................... . ......... 22-1 TABLES 22-A 22-B 22-C 22-D 22-E 22-F 22-G PAGES 22-10-12 22-13-16 22-17 22-18 22-18 22-18 22-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Existing Project. Provides for (a) rubblemound north breakwater 5,830 feet long; (b) a rubblemound west bulkhead 1,200 feet long; (c) a stone-filled steel sheet pile cell, west bulkhead shore connection 2,400 feet long; (d) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (e) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (f) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; (g) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965 (Public Law 89- 298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army the authority to reimburse the State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under supervision of the Chief of Engineers. (See table 22-C.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Seven berths and docks are available, three on the west harbor arm, one on the harbor basin, and three on the east harbor arm. One dock on the west harbor arm is used for shipment and receipt of steel products. One dock on the east harbor arm is used for receipt of iron ore pellets and limestone and shipment of steel products. Five facilities are administered by the Indiana Port Commission and are used for handling general cargo. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Hydrographic surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,938 and by contract at a cost of $4,500. Stone placement along the north breakwater was completed by contract at a cost of $38,047. Project management and supervision and administration were performed by hired labor at a cost of $4,468 and $12,098, respectively. Condition at end of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1990 were $19,038,004 of which $13,599,900 was for new work ($13,584,000 federal and $15,900 non-federal) and $5,438,104 for maintenance. 2. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, at the mouth of the Burns Ditch, approximately 35 miles southeast of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound west breakwater 1,003 feet long; (b) a rubblemound north breakwater 678 feet long; (c) channel improvement 5,200 linear feet with 145,000 cubic yards dredged material and used for beach nourishment. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facility. There are several marinas located at Burns Ditch. The commodities handled at this harbor are fresh fish. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Beach monitoring analysis and surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $169,344 and by contract at a cost of $20,488. Project management costs were $28,456. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990 was $4,194,929 of which $3,770,558 was for new work, ($2,000,000 federal and $1,770,558 non-federal), and $424,371 for maintenance. 3. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within corporate limits of the City of Chicago, except for breakwaters, and approach channel and an anchorage area which are in Illinois and Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) stone-filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stone filled doublerow steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; (c) a north pier 2,450 feet long; (d) an approach channel 29 feet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (e) an outer harbor anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (f) an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet wide; (g) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th Street; (h) three turning basins designated as numbers, 1, 3, and 5; (i) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, August 30, 1935, July 14, 1960, October 23, 1962, and October 27, 1965. (See table 22-C.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves and terminals are available. The Chicago Regional Port 22-2 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are iron ores and concentrates, coal, and lignite. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and analysis were performed at a cost of $154,154. Water quality activities were continued by contract at a cost of $60,810. Installation and retrieval of wave gauges were continued at a cost of $153,265. Plans and specifications for the Coast Guard light and foundation were completed at a cost of $142,528. Construction of the light and foundation was performed by contract at a cost of $140,000. Maintenance of Reach C breakwater was performed by hired labor at a cost of $142,778; supervision and administration costs were $31,388. Real estate and project management costs were $7,268 and $94,283, respectively. Under the major rehabilitation project, placement of stone on Reach A of the breakwater was completed by contract at a cost of $49,753. Engineering and design during construction was performed by hired labor at a cost of $15,008. Supervision and administration costs were $75,212. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is 100 percent complete. Work remaining to be accomplished, consisting of widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 106th Street and closing the gap between the breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor, was deauthorized on January 1, 1990 in accordance with Public Law 99-662, Section 1001 (b). Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1990 were $55,637,240 of which $22,578,567 was for new work ($19,541,964 regular funds and $3,036,603 public work funds), $26,794,005 regular funds for maintenance, $836,667 non-federal funds for maintenance, and $5,428,001 regular funds for rehabilitation. 4. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northwestern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib shore arm extension breakwater 2,250 feet long; (b) a stone-filled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubblemound and stone-filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of 582 foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304 foot shore return and a 754 foot gap; (f) a stone-filled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long, enclosing an inner basin of approximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver area inside the exterior breakwater and exterior breakwater southerly extension 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; (i) an inner basin 21 feet deep; (j) an entrance channel of 21 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of July 11, 1870, June 14, 1880, March 3, 1899, July 25, 1912, March 2, 1919 and October 23, 1962. (See table 22-C.) The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The deep draft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep and uses a steel cellular design. Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government pursuant to Public Law 90-63 approved July 30, 1983, Section 107 of the Public Law 97-88, and Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are three docks, two for passenger excursion boats and one for cargo. The most important cargoes handled are sugar and non-metallic minerals. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: The lock operations contract was continued with International Research and Development, Inc. at a cost of $539,415. Rehabilitation of the southeast gate was performed by other COE at a cost of $251,151. Other costs associated with the lock operation amounted to $150,837. Surveys and studies were performed by contract at a cost of $67,147 and by hired labor at a cost of $112,149. Periodic inspection was performed by hired labor at a cost of $34,155. Installation of a wave gauge retrieval system was continued at a cost of $71,334. Rehabilitation of the lock electrical system was completed by contract at a cost of $42,234. Plans and specifications to replace damaged stone on the southeasterly pier breakwater were initiated at a cost of $93,021, real estate costs were $31,452. Project management and supervision and administration costs were $129,344 and $5,209, respectively. Condition at end of Fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1990 were $21,172,539 of which $4,788,827 was for new work, $15,057,112 for maintenance and $1,326,600 for rehabilitation. 5. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAANautical Chart Numbers 14926,14927 and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to 22-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 the junction of the North and South Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep on the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep on the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21 foot deep North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; (e) a channel 9 feet deep on the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street. All dredging to within 20 feet of existing docks. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, March 2, 1907, and July 24, 1946. Portion of project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1946 is in deferred-for-restudy category. (See table 22-C) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. River and Harbor Act of July 1946, which provided improvement of channel, is subject to condition that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and an environmental impact statement of the North Branch were performed by contract at a cost of $25,000 and by hired labor at a cost of $29,962. Water control and water quality activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $704,680, by other federal agency at a cost of $118,850, by contract at a cost of $82,860, and by other COE at a cost of $15,571. Real estate and project management were performed by hired labor at a cost of $15,595 and $50,231, respectively. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act. Head of navigation for deep draft vessels is North Avenue, 5.97 miles from deauthorized Michigan Avenue bridge. Under Section 1142, PL 99-662, the Corps assumed responsibility for monitoring of the Diversion of Lake Michigan water into the Illinois Waterway. The Corps assumed full diversion accounting responsibility in FY 1988. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1990 were $13,822,874 of which $1,500,565 was for new work and $12,322,309 was for maintenance. 6. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (see NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for (a) northerly rubblemound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped concrete caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubblemound extension 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, March 2, 1919, March 20, 1922, July 3, 1930, August 30, 1935, August 26, 1937, and July 4, 1960. (See table 22-C.) Local Cooperation. Substantially complied with. See the FY 1986 Annual Report for full requirements. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks handle iron ore and limestone. Six docks are for handling petroleum products. Three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. Operation and results during period. Maintenance: Environmental studies and surveys were conducted by hired labor at a cost of $201,814, by contract at a cost of $60,137 and by other COE at a cost of $8,100. Maintenance of the breakwater was performed by hired labor at a cost of $29,811. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1990 were $14,837,469, of which $4,909,648 was for new work and $9,927,821 was for maintenance. 7. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in La Porte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a stone filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone filled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) a turning basin 18 feet deep; (i) an outer basin 12 feet deep; (j) an outer basin 8 feet deep; (k) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1889, March 3, 1905, January 21, 1927, August 30, 1935, and Section 107 of July 14, 1960 approved on September 30, 1966. ( See table 22-C.) 22-4 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies of Trail Creek basin were conducted by hired labor at a cost of $100,291, and by contract at a cost of $15,823. Plans and specifications for capping the CDF and for resurfacing the concrete cap on the east pier were preformed by hired labor at a cost of $17,569, and $222,362, respectively. Capping of the confined disposal facility was performed by contract at a cost of $300,466. Engineering and design for dredging the outer harbor was performed by hired labor at a cost of $7,735 and by contract at a cost of $22,500. Maintenance of the breakwater was performed by hired labor at a cost of $25,519. Real estate cost was $2,000. Project management and supervision and administration costs were $62,768 and $70,290, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30,1990 were $10,373,976 of which $1,574,446 was for new work ($1,543,646 federal and $30,800 non-federal funds), $7,180,860 for maintenance, and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation. 8. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14904 and 14905.) Previous Projects. See page 1392 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Projects. Provides for (a) northerly stonefilled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stonefilled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone-filled double-row steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single-row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a single-row steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone filled timber crib pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone-filled double-row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 13 feet deep; (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of June 13, 1902, July 13, 1930, and March 2, 1945. ( See table 22-C.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Environmental studies and monitoring activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $41,542, and by contract at a cost of $50,012. Retrieval of information from the wave gauge system was continued by other COE at a cost of $21,451. Plans and specifications for dredging the outer harbor were performed by hired labor at a cost of $58,158. Engineering and design costs were $40,116. Dredging was performed by contract at a cost of $190,000. Engineering and design costs associated with the construction of the confined disposal facility were $87,556. Project management, and supervision and administration were $79,208 and $8,444 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification which is inactive. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1990 were $8,556,114, of which $823,026 was for new work and $7,733,088 was for maintenance. 9. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys and aerial photos were performed at a cost of $89,021. Project management was performed by hired labor at a cost of $23,038. 10. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal Year costs of $139,221 were for : Training and Exercises Management and Mobilization Planning $ 28,297 $110,924 Alteration of Bridges 11. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION See table 22-D Beach Erosion 12. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKE SHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, approximately 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAANautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. Provides for 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of rip-rap to maintain the full length of beach front at Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Public Law 97-88 and Public Law 98-63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 22-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Final cost of emergency repairs on the existing revetment was $915. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1990 were $1,087,500 of which $660,000 is for new work and $427,500 is for maintenance. 13. INDIANA SHORELINE, IN Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan along a two-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. The project consists of beach nourishment of approximately two miles of beach between Michigan City Harbor and Beverly Shores, Indiana, requiring an initial placement of 264,500 cubic yards of sand. Periodic replenishment of about 264,500 cubic yards of sand at five year intervals would be required throughout the life of the project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Estimated federal cost (1989) for new work is $7,820,000 and $13,780,000 for the present worth of the future beach nourishments. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. New work: Advance engineering and design was continued at a cost of $90,000. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and engineering was initiated in fiscal year 1984. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1990 is $320,000 for new work. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS See table 22-E 15. BEACH EROSION CONTROLUNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended. Location. Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of March 7, 1974. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish, without cost of the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion, without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. Assurance of local cooperation for this Act was approved on July 31, 1972. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non-federal interests paying 25 percent of the cost of maintenance. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act changed the cost sharing requirement to include the non-federal interests paying 50 percent of the cost of maintenance plus cost of disposal. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Engineering and design for FY 89-90 Debris Removal project was continued by hired labor at a cost of $42,731 and by contract at a cost of $180,000. Contract administration costs were $5,608. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990 was $2,606,312 of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $2,374,428 was for maintenance ($1,846,041 federal funds and $528,387 non-federal contributed funds.) 17. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN Location. Lake George in Hobart, Indiana and the Deep River watershed upstream of the lake through Lake Station, Indiana. Project and Location Fiscal Yea to September 3( North Chicago, IL Sunrise Park, Lake Bluff, IL Flood Control 16. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) r Costs Existing Project. The project consists of the removal 0, 1990 of approximately 900,000 cubic yards of silt, aquatic growth and other material and the construction of silt, $ 604 traps or other devices to prevent and abate the deposition $ 495 of sediment. Estimated cost (1989) for new work is $4,260,000 federal and $1,420,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 22-6 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Section 602 (b), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated March 9, 1987 the City of Hobart, Indiana indicated that it was a potential local project sponsor and applied for credit for previous work applicable to the project under the provisions of Section 104 (d) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations and results during period. New work. Advanced engineering and design was initiated at a cost of $23,534. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1990 is $23,534. 18. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN Location. Little Calumet River is located in northwest Indiana between the Illinois-Indiana state line and the Conrail Railroad in east Gary, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of replacing 9.5 miles of existing spoil bank levees with 12.2 miles of new levees, floodwalls, closure and appurtant structures between the Illinois-Indiana state line and Cline Avenue; construction of 9.7 miles of set-back levees in Gary; a diversion structure at Hart Ditch; permanent evacuation of 29 structures in the Black Oak area of Gary; flood proofing 38 residential structures in Gary; modifying 7 miles of channel and 3 accompanying bridge culvert modifications; modifying 1 highway bridge construction of 16.8 miles of hiking trails and accompanying recreation support facilities, and preservation of 788 acres of wetlands with wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated Federal cost (1989) for new work is $51,400,000 and $23,800,000 to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission. The local cooperation agreement was signed on August 16, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-ways, provide all required relocations, hold and save the United States from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a five percent cash contribution for structural flood control measures, fifty percent for recreation features and twenty-five percent for fish and wildlife enhancements. Operations and results during period. New work: Advance engineering and design was completed at a cost of $8,000. The first construction contract for nonstructural measures was awarded on September 26, 1990. Engineering and design costs were $1,738,434 for hired labor and $420,066 contract. Real estate review of appraisals was initiated at a cost of $14,640. Conditions at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. Construction is in progress. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1990 were $4,185,140 for new work. 19. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL Location. The McCook Reservoir will be located within the communities of McCook and Hodgkins, Illinois, at the existing McCook Quarry. The Thornton Reservoir will be located in the community of Thornton, Illinois at the existing Thornton Quarry. Existing Project. The project consists of converting two quarries into flood storage reservoirs. The McCook reservoir will have a storage volume of 32,100 acre-feet (9.8 billion gallons); the Thornton reservoir will have a volume of 14,600 acre-feet (4.8 billion gallons). The reservoirs will store floodwater from tunnels constructed or under construction by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago as part of the Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1989) is $535,000,000 including federal cost for new work of $401,000,000 and $134,000,000 to be contributed by nonfederal interests. Project was authorized by Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Local Cooperation. By letter dated 13 November 1986, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago indicated that it would be the local sponsor and provide the required local cooperation. Operation and results during period. New work: Continuation of planning and engineering was continued at a cost of $575,856 and advanced engineering and design was initiated at a cost of $489,965. Condition at end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning, engineering and design is in progress. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1990 were $1,720,436 for new work. 20. NORTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. The North Branch Chicago River Basin is located north of the City of Chicago in suburban Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. The project consists of constructing two excavated floodwater storage reservoirs on the West Fork and one excavated reservoir on the Middle Fork. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 401, also includes authorization to reimburse non-federal interests 50 percent of the costs of planning and construction for three existing reservoirs on the West Fork, known as Techny reservoirs, and the existing Mid Fork reservoir on the Middle Fork. Reservoir 27 in the Village of Bannockburn, was built on the West Fork, 12.7 miles 22-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. It has a flood water storage capacity of 525 acrefeet. Excavation for the reservoir was approximately 48 feet deep. Approximately 700 feet of the West Fork channel was improved and relocated for construction of the diversion structure. The second reservoir to be constructed, Reservoir 29A, will be built 9.6 miles above the mouth of the West Fork and 3.1 miles south of Reservoir 27. The reservoir flood water storage capacity is 575 acrefeet. Site 29A is located near the Village of Deerfield in unincorporated Cook County. Two project features, the channel relocation and construction of two bridges, will be accomplished by private or local government interests prior to construction of the reservoir at 29A. The last reservoir to be constructed, Reservoir 15, will be located near the City of Green Oaks on the Middle Fork, 22.1 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. The design floodwater storage capacity is 500 acre-feet. The excavated reservoir will be approximately 42 feet deep except in the sedimentation pool area which will be about 15 feet deeper. Channel improvements and relocation of about 800 feet of the channel will be required for construction of the diversion structure at the north end of the reservoir. Estimated federal cost (1989) for new work is $18,800,000. An additional $9,700,000 will be the required contribution by local interests. The non-federal improvements on Reservior 29A will require a $550,000 cash contribution from the locals. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H. Doc. 100-72 100th Congress, 1st session). Local Cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreements with the Lake County Forest Preserve for Reservoir 15 were executed on April 27,1988 and June 14, 1990, respectively. The Local Cooperation Agreement and Memorandum of Agreement for the non-federal improvements for Reservoir 29A were executed on March 9, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, provide all required relocations, and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of flood control to twenty-five percent of the total project costs. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction of Reservoir 27 was substantially complete on June 13, 1990 at a cost of $1,237,458 ($1,072,798 federal and $164,660 non-federal). Electrical service installation costs were $21,579. Engineering and design costs associated with Reservoir 27 were $35,147 (- $7,475 federal and $42,622 non-federal) and construction management costs were $158,753 hired labor ($131,239 federal and $27,514 non-federal), and -$231 federal costs for soil testing. The construction contract for Reservoir 29A was awarded on June 23, 1990 and construction was initiated at a cost of $600,000 federal. Engineering and design costs associated with Reservoir 29A were $114,006, ($113,662 federal and $344 non-federal) and construction management costs were $77,354 hired labor ($52,710 federal, $2,855 non-federal required cash and $21,789 non-federal improvements). The construction contract for Reservoir 15 was awarded on August 15, 1990 and construction was initiated at a cost of $125,000 federal. Engineering and design costs associated with Reservoir 15 were $379,849 federal and construction management costs were $1,105 hired labor ($982 federal and $123 non-federal). The Memorandum of Agreement with the Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago for the reimbursement for Techny and Mid Fork reservoirs was executed on June 26, 1990 and payment in the amount of $4,467,298 was made on July 31, 1990. Associated project management costs for Techny and Midfork were $2,597. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. The existing project is 66 percent complete. Construction of Reservoir 27 was substantially complete on June 13, 1990. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1990 were $13,582,417 for new work of which $13,137,351 was Federal funds, $423,277 required non-federal funds and $21,789 non-federal improvements, excludes $4,493,298 non-federal cost for Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. 21. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL Location. The reservoir will be located in unincorporated portion of Elk Grove Township in northwestern Cook County, Illinois about 1 mile northwest of Chicago O'Hare International Airport. Existing Project. The project consists of a 1,050 acrefoot capacity reservior, excavated to a depth of 80 feet. The reservior would be constructed at the terminus of the existing system of 6.6 miles of deep tunnels, recently constructed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1989) is $21,800,000 including federal cost for new work of $15,000,000 and $6,800,000 to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The local cooperation agreement for the first construction contract, creek relocations, was signed on July 31, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, provide all required relocations and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution of five percent of the total project costs. Operations and results during period. New work: Advance engineering and design was continued at a cost of $25,000. The construction contract for 22-8 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT creek relocations was awarded on September 17, 1990. Engineering and design costs were $728,487 for hired labor and $220,133 for contract. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and engineering is completed. Construction is in progress. Total costs to the existing project to September 30, 1990 were $2,051,620 for new work. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-F. 23. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congressional antecedent legislation). Fiscal Year Costs Program to September 30, 1990 Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Advance Measures Emergency Water Supplies/Drought $195,112 2,609 -77,032 6,124 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood control Act Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1990 Batavia, IL Dune Acres, IN Lake Michigan, Temple Emanuel, IL $ 453 3,136 17,108 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1845, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $159,468 for flood control activities The Reconnaissance Phase was continued for Fox River Ice Jam, IL ($29,999), and for Monticello Avenue, IL ($16,532). The initial work in developing Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement for Valleyview, IL ($21,439), and McCook Levee, IL ($4,765) was continued. Northfield, IL study was terminated due to unwillingness of local sponsor to cost share the Feasibility Phase ($1,949). The Draft Definite Project Report was continued for Fox River, McHenry County, IL ($38,491) and for Wilmington, IL ($19,583). The Feasibility Phase on North Libertyville Estates, IL was continued at a cost of $26,710 federal funds and $26,711 for non-federal funds. Flood control activities specifically directed in FY 1990 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (Public Law 101-101). Kankakee River Icebreaker, Wilmington, IL $11,467 General Investigations 24. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $333,666 itemized as follows: Flood Damage Prevention Studies $ 59,957 Shoreline Protection Studies 209,709 Special Investigations 45,000 Coordination Studies 19,000 25. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs of $237,398 were for: Flood Plain Management Services $109,318 International Water Studies $128,080 26. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Costs during the period were $575,856. Costs were incurred on the McCook and Thornton Reservior projects. See section 19 for details. 27. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $636,499. For details see sections 13, 17, 18, 19 and 21. 22-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Burns Waterway Small Boat Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Chicago Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) 5. Chicago River, IL New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Maint: Contib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 80,000 350,000 1,041,000 12,311 58,181 190,357 1,172,824 62,051 0 13,000 239,573 18,633 0 79 30,000 20,000 185,000 199,435 2,101 30,700 173,282 218,288 89,172 251,805 3,886 0 0 3,886 368,500 1,305,000 446,500 914,963 337,350 244,567 1,458,542 926,474 350,000 2,204,000 2,185,000 237,488 748,562 3,612,977 0 139,973 905,000 1,260,000 1,327,000 1,437,160 957,037 1,053,456 1,333,944 1,527,448 738,000 946,000 1,076,000 981,657 694,096 694,064 1,347,097 1,042,749 22-10 See Section In Text Project Funding 13,584,000 13,584,000 5,438,104 5,438,104 15,900 15,900 2,000,000 2,000,000 434,435 424,371 1,770,558 1,770,558 22,578,567(1) 22,578,567 (1) 26,900,737 (2) 26,794,0052) 5,428,001 (3) 5,428,001 (3) 836,667 836,667 4,788,827 (4) 4,788,827 (4) 15,209,446 15,057,112 1,326,600 1,326,600 1,500,565 (5 1,500,565 (5) 12,377,394 (6) 12,322,309 (6 TABLE 22-A (Continued) CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 6. Indiana Harbor, In. (Contributed Funds) 7. Michigan City Harbor, IN (Contributed Funds) 8. Waukegan Harbor, IL 12. Indiana Dunes Nat'l Lakeshore Beverly Shores, IN 13. Indiana Shore- Line, IN 16. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost: New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 395,000 380,000 611,000 290,200 293,694 372,199 745,455 299,862 1,292,000 124,000 270,000 832,542 1,115,432 279,174 275,935 847,323 300,000 956,000 158,224 1,066,704 201,000 173,840 467,500 (30,000) (10,000) 395,208 29,638 1,679 616,788 576,487 915 0 108,000 15,000 90,000 -1,106 74,925 49,092 90,000 20,000 285,000 33,000 247,350 31,687 239,476 40,327 228,339 8,400 80,925 0 350,000 11,575 46,898 22-11 4,897,148 (7) 4,897,148 (7) 9.945,988 (8) 9,927,821 (8) 12,500 12,500 1,543,646 *9 1,543,646 (9) 7,184,054 7,180,860 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,800 30,800 823,026 (10) 823,026 (10) 7,841,768 (11) 7,733,088 (1) 660,000 660,000 427,500 427,500 320,000 320,000 191,884 191,884 1,928,350 1,846,041 40,000 40,000 875,398 528,387 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 22-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 17. Lake George, New Work: Hobart, IN Approp. 89,000 89,000 Cost 23,534 23,534 18. Little Calumet New Work: River, IN Approp. 288,000 350,000 337,000 2,366,000 4,378,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 243,404 396,662 329,053 2,181,140 4,185,140 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Contrib. 160,000 160,000 Cost 0 0 19. McCook and New Work: 0 150,000 1,107,000 617,000 1,874,000 Thornton Approp: 0 54,765 599,850 1,065,821 1,720,436 (CUP) IL 20. North Branch New Work: Chicago River, IL Approp. 315,000 3,800,000 1,476,500 7,097,000 13,556,500 (Federal Funds) Cost 309,626 907,753 4,094,037 6,960,007 13,137,351 (Contributed New Work: Funds Required) Contrib. 255,000 183,000 374,000 812,000 Cost 0 185,118 238,159 423,277 (Non-Federal New Work: Improvements) Contrib. 173,752 173,752 Cost 21,789 21,789 21. O'Hare Reservoir, New Work: Chicago, IL Approp. 85,000 500,000 493,000 1,504,000 2,582,000 Cost 39,587 492,485 545,928 973,620 2,051,620 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Contrib. 80,500 80,500 Cost 0 0 (1) Includes $855,973 for previous projects. (2) Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree (No. 54-C-1608) regarding removal of flue dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. (3) Includes $689,001 in settlement pursuant to decree regarding removal of flue dust. (4) Includes $446,005 for previous projects. (5) Includes $955,886 for previous projects. (6) Includes $109,463 for previous projects. (7) Includes $60,668 for previous projects. (8) Includes $2,509 for previous projects. (9) Includes $287,389 for previous projects. (10) Includes $218,233 on previous projects. (11) Includes $15,711 on previous projects. 22-12 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 193512, Aug. 30, 19351,2 Mar. 2, 19453 Jul. 14, 196013 Oct. 23, 196213 Oct. 27, 196513 Jul. 11, 1870 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1931 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and depths; North Breakwater, West Bulkhead. Approach Channel and Outer Harbor, East and West Harbor Arms. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 3 of Test) Outer Harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance Channel 300 feet wide and 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J. and E. Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basins 1, 3, and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad Bridge (Nickle Plate) to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 4 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior Breakwater. Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and Public Law, 89-298, H Doc. 160. 88th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1896, pp. 2584 et Seq. and H. Doc 277,H. 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 172. 54thCong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 346, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc.494, 72d Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc., 180. 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc.,149, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.8 H. Doc., 87thCong., 2d Sess.1 H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 114,41st Cong.,2d Sess. and Annual Report 1879, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report, 1870 pp 1562-1567 Annual Report, 1897,pp 2790-2791 H.Doc. 710, Cong., 2d Sess. H.Doc.1303,64th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong. Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H. Doc.485,87th Cong., 22-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 4, 1981 Jul. 30, 1983 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 24, 1946 No. 17, 1986 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 193010 Jul. 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 28, 1937 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 196512 deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Provides for lock operationsand maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 5 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in liew of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896. Turning Basins. Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. Responsible for monitoring of Lake Michigan Diversion INDIANA HARBOR, IN (See Section 6 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of innder harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment esterly and northerly breakwaters. Reduce length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Steel and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks. Authorized Secretary of War to seel Inland Steel Co., about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths of 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J. & E. Ry, Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. 2d Sess4 Section 107 of Public Law 97-88 Public Law 98-63. Specified in act. Specified in act. H. Doc.95, 56th Cong. 1st Sess. (Annual Report, 1900 p. 3863 and Annual Reportl909, p. 709) H.Doc.,1294,64th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.6,7 Section 1142, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 176, 67th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 219, 72d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc., 195, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 227, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 22-14 CHICAGO, IL DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 7 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Mar. 3, 1889 Mar. 3, 1905 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 30, 1966 Sec. 107 Jun. 14, 1880 Aug. 3, 1882 Jun. 13, 1902 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965 Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present located. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin, and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin to E. Street Bridge. Recommendations of a Board of Engineers. Annual Report 1870. p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers. Annual Report 1851, pp 218 7-2189; Annual Report 1882. p. 2264-2266. Annual Report 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint Resolution of Congress approved May 13, 1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 74thCong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report June 19658 WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Parallel piers and basins.9 Annual Report 1880, p. 142 Modified location of harbor entrance. Annual Report,1882, pp. 277, 2162. Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end H. Do. 343, 56th Cong., of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. 1st Sess. Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north piers Rivers and Harbors Committee and enlarging inner basin. Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an anchorage area in 1st Sess. southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 25 feet and extending to the depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying 2d Sess. from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth to 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basinto 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IN BEVERLY SHORES, IN (See Section 12 of Text) Dec. 4, 1981 Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially Public Law 97-88 constructed in 1973. Jul. 30, 1983 Provides for operations and maintenance of the shore protection measures. Public Law 98-63 Nov. 17, 1986 INDIANA SHORELINE, IN (See Section 13 of Text) Provides for beach nourishment along a two-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. Sec. 501, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 22-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN (See Section 18 of Text) Provides for levee construction, a diversion control structure at the mouth of Hart Ditch. Permanent evacuation of a portion of the Black Oak area of Gary and non-structural flood proofing measures in Gary. NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 16 and 20 of Text) Construction of three reservoirs and reimbursement to locals for 50 percent of the costs of Techny and Mid-Fork reservoirs. Clearing fallen trees, roots and other debris and objects which contribute flooding. O'HARE RESERVOIR, CHICAGO, IL (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for a 1,050 acre-foot excavated reservior. LAKE GOERGE, HOBART, IN (See Section 17 of Text) Provides for removal of silt, aquatic growth and construction of silt traps. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIR (See Section 19 of Text) Nov. 17, 1988 Provides for construction of two floodwater storage reservoirs in the quarries of the same name. Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 1. Included in Public Works Administrative Program September 6, 1943, and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.) 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (breakwater closure). 4. Contains latest map of habor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is an Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen Lake George Branch). 11. Included in Public Works Administration Progarm Sept. 6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen main canal and 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 13. Project deauthorized in 1989. 22-16 Sec. 401. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 H. Doc. 100-72, 100th Cong. 1st Sess., Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. River and Harbor Act.(Sec.116) Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 602. Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 3 Water Resources Development Act of 1988. CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT EXISTING PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth in Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 4. Chicago Harbor IL 5. Chicago River, IL 6. Indiana Harbor, IN 7. Michigan City Harbor, IN 8. Waukegan Harbor, IL North Breakwater Outer West Bulkhead Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm North Breakwater West Breakwater Approach Channel Burns Ditch Northerly Crib Breakwater Southerly Steel Breakwater North Pier Chicago Confined Disposal Facility Approach Channel Outer Harbor River Entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning Basin No. 3 to Turning Basin No. 5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension in Lake Calumet Turning Basins 1, 3, and 5 Shore arm extension Exterior breakwater Exterior breakwater southerly ext. North inner breakwater South inner breakwater North Pier Approach Channel Channel and maneuver Lock Inner Basin Entrance Channel Main Branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin Nor therly Breakwater Easterly Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor Entrance Channel Main Channel Turning Basin Lake George Branch Calumet River Branch Detached Breakwater West Pier East Pier East Breakwater Entrance Channel Main Channel Outer Basin Trail Creek Trail Creek North Breakwater and Shore Connection North Pier and North Revetment South Pier Entrance Channel Channel to Inner Basin Inner Basin Anchorage Area 1Area of about 6 acres. 22-17 TABLE 22-C 400 Varies 620 620 30 28 27 27 5,830 3,600 2,200 3,700 2,100 3,800 678 1,043 1,200 5,593 6,714 5,007 2,450 2,979 9,700 10,500 3,000 21,100 8,00 4,00( 3,00( 200 100 7 3,200 2,000 290 200 and variable 0 Variable S 400 S 1,000 11 9 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 29 28 23 21 21 21 21 21 21 800 1,300 80 740 190-470 190-390 91-390 56-210 800 Varies 65-280 61-210 64-160 160-260 2,250 5,421 4,944 4,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 600 1,270 7,300 3,800 11,100 5,500 1,120 2,525 7,200 4,200 3,600 7,400 3,700 2,500 1,304 835 1,276 1,000 1,900 2,400 900 3,000 2,300 1,896 2,074 3,111 3,250 1,700 1,650 1 29 28 27 22 22 22 22 18 18 8-12 86 22 18 18 8 150-425 120-150 900 50-100 50 390 200 375-500 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 22-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 11 of Text) For Last Cost to Septmber 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridgesi 1967 1,625,068 'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6(g) of the Act of October 16, 1966, P.L. 89-670 TABLE 22-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Septmber 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Casino Beach, Chicago, IL 1987 Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' 1975 65,611 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL2 1975 5,200 lAuthorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. 2Uncompleted portion deauthorized in 1977. TABLE 22-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Septmber 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL 1989 $2,062,347 Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 Little Calumet RiverBasin (Cady March Ditch), IN 1987 22-18 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL 1975 1977 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL 1975 1977 Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 53,136 22-19 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL.............. 23-2 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN................. 23-2 3. Illinois Waterway Navigation Study, IL......... 23-3 4. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN...................... 23-3 5. Upper Mississippi River Navigation Study.......23-3 6. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI.......................23-4 7. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.......... 23-4 Flood Control 8. Clinton, IA (Deficiency Correction)............ 23-4 9. Coralville Lake, IA .......................... 23-4 10. Des Moines Recreational River and G reenbelt, IA ................................ 23-4 11. Farm Creek, IL................... ........... 23-5 12. Hannibal, MO ............................ 23-5 13. Loves Park, IL ........................... 23-5 14. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA........ 23-5 15. Saylorville Lake, IA ......................... 23-6 16. South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL...23-6 17. Waterloo, IA (Bridges).....................23-6 18 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects............................23-7 19. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....... 23-7 20. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization..................... ........... 23-7 General Investigations 21. Surveys.................. ................... 23-7 22. Collection and Study of Basic Data............ 23-7 23. Preconstruction Engineering and Design........ 23-7 Tables Page Table 23-A Cost and Financial Statement.........23-7 Table 23-B Authorizing Legislation............... 23-9 Table 23-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 23-12 Table 23-D Not Applicable Table 23-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................. .23-12 Table 23-F Not Applicable Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects..............23-14 Table 23-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects....................23-15 Table 23-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 23-16 Table 23-J Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams...................23-18 Table 23-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost..... 23-18 Table 23-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost ......... 23-19 Table 23-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project... 23-20 Table 23-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project...................23-21 23-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initiated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. The repair and modification work was underway until a suit was filed by three Illinois counties and their Commissioners of Highway against the Federal Government and the State in 1974 over maintenance of highway bridges crossing the canal. After the lawsuit was filed, further rehabilitation work by the Federal Government on the canal was suspended. On 4 November 1981, the Corp of Engineers deposited $3,722,572 with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Chicago in full satisfaction of the Court's judgment. These funds are currently being used by the counties to complete bridge rehabilitation work as directed in the court order. Rehabilitation work by the Federal Government in coordination with the state was resumed in 1984 with the remaining authorization expended in 1987. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. The State of Illinois filed a lawsuit against the United States on July 6, 1987 in the U.S. Claims Court in the amount of $8,472,572. The suit consisted of two parts: (1) a claim for reimbursement of previously expended State funds for bridge repair and (2) that the federal funds ($3,722,572) used by the Government to satisfy the judgement in the Commission of Highway vs. United States be restored to the remaining authorization. Litigation of this suit will continue in FY91. Local cooperation. A revised agreement listing Federal remaining work items and the State desired priority of remaining work items is being developed in FY91. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design work: (1) Performed hydraulic assessment of east end of canal, (2) Developed list of remaining federal work items; (3) Developed draft of revised agreement; and Initiated environmental coordination for remaining federal work at a cost of $143,763 during FY 1990. 2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles), Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, I1, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 23-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work was $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferredfor- restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non Federal; is excluded from present cost estimate. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. (See Table 23-J through 23-N on existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional features entering into cost of project; existing project and total cost of existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by the Government cutterhead pipeline Dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed in the LaGrange pool at a cost of $774,700 with a total of 122,115 cubic yards of material being removed. Emergency channel dredging was performed in the LaGrange Pool by St. Louis District contract cutterhead pipeline dredge at a cost of $134,500 with 80,146 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $149,800. Strike removal and snagging and clearing were accomplished in various locations by hired labor at a cost of $342,800. Maintenance of the Lucas-Berg Disposal Facility cost $6,300. Structural repairs to locks and dams were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,093,500. Contractor completed construction of lock chamber bulkhead slots 23-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT and repairs to the riverwall at Lockport Lock at a cost of $193,800. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging cost $31,900. Real estate support of maintenance activities cost $50,300. Installation of fuel tanks at Locks and Dams was initiated at a cost of $214,000. Buildings, grounds, and utility maintenance at locks and dams and Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria totaled $33,100. Permanent operating equipment costs were $38,700. Engineering and design work cost $108,000 and supervision, administration and inspection for the maintenance features totaled $243,100. Total maintenance costs were $4,414,500. Net credits to the project were $19,100. Operation and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $6,561,000. Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria was continued at a cost of $548,300. Real estate management services were provided at a cost of $31,800. Visitor's Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $139,900. OSHA inspections and medical examinations were accomplished at a cost of $22,300. Surveys, studies, and other inspections were performed at a cost of $789,400; natural and cultural resource activities cost $84,700; and water control management costs were $533,300. Supervision and administration for the operation features totaled $200,000. Total operation costs were $8,910,700. Total operation and maintenance costs were $13,306,100 for all pools above Alton Pool. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation work at LaGrange, Peoria, Marseilles, and Brandon Road Locks and Dams was in progress. Costs at LaGrange were $929,610; at Brandon Road, $20; at Marseilles, $514,741; and at Peoria, $2,258,082; for a total of $3,702,453. Alton Pool Operation: Costs by hired labor for condition and operation studies were $118,442; water control management $67,394; supervision and administration $151,776; natural resource management $52,584; and recreation management $11,051. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $654,338 for dredging and $70,809 for supervision and administration. Total cost for work in Alton Pool was $1,126,394. Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above Alton Pool were $13,306,100. Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs were $1,126,394; for a total operation and maintenance cost of $14,432,494. 3. ILLINOIS WATERWAY NAVIGATION STUDY, IL Location. The study area is defined as the Illinois Waterway, its navigation system, and adjacent watershed. It extends from Lake Michigan in Chicago and extends southwest to where the waterway joins with the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois. Located entirely within the State of Illinois, the navigable portion of the waterway meanders through 20 counties and is 327 miles long. Existing project. The purpose of the study is to investigate the problems associated with navigation; i.e. lock delays, effects of navigation on the ecosystem, and making capital improvements to the 50-year-old structures. In the first phase of planning, the study team was able to determine a Federal interest in undertaking more detailed engineering, environmental, and economic investigations. The review of this completed project is authorized by Section 216, Flood Control Act of 1970, PL 91-611. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. The reconnaissance phase planning study was initiated in November 1989. A public scoping meeting was held in January 1990 and study updates were widely distributed in March and August 1990. A final report of reconnaissance study findings was submitted to higher authority for approval in October 1990. The report will recommend that a feasibility study be undertaken to prioritize capital investments on the navigation system for the 50-year planning horizon and to perform system-wide environmental analyses. The report will recommend preparation of appropriate NEPA documents and performing detailed engineering, economic, and environmental studies at the first priority site, identified as LaGrange Lock at Illinois River Mile 80.2. The Division Commander is expected to issue a notice of report availability to the public in the second quarter of fiscal year 1991. Total costs incurred were $382,542. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 5. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER NAVIGATION STUDY Location. The study area covers over 600 miles of the Upper Mississippi River from the headwaters at St. Anthony Falls near Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota; downstream to just above Melvin Price Lock and Dam at Alton, Illinois. The river system meanders through the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri , and over 40 counties. Existing project. The project consists of investigating problems associated with navigation on the river system. Undertaken by three Corps Districts: St. Paul, Rock Island, and St. Louis, the purpose of the study is to examine information related to the existing condition of the structures, and to determine what navigation and environmental problems and opportunities merit more detailed study. The review of this completed project is authorized by Section 216, Flood Control Act of 1970, PL 91-611. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. The Upper Mississippi River Navigation reconnaissance study was initiated in April 1990. Since that time, the study team has held coordination meetings allowing them to set framework and to develop and assign 23-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 work tasks. A coordination meeting was also held with the environmental community in June 1990 which afforded an open exchange of ideas and expectations as they relate to environmental problems and opportunities on the river system. In addition, three public meetings will be held in St. Louis, Missouri; Davenport, Iowa; and Minneapolis, Minnesota, in October 1990. The study efforts and findings will be detailed in a draft report which will be submitted to higher authority in April 1991. Total costs incurred were $466,675. 6. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Location. The program is authorized for those river reaches having commercial navigation channels on the Upper Mississippi River, Illinois River, Minnesota River, St. Croix River, and Kaskaskia River in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin. Existing Project: The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River System, recognizing its several purposes. The program includes habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects to counteract the effects of backwater sedimentation. Long Term Resource Monitoring will provide the means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized are a study of the economic impacts of recreation, navigation traffic monitoring, and recreation projects (currently unfunded). The program was initiated in FY 1986 utilizing funds provided by the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. The execution of the program is being closely coordinated with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, the five affected states, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation: Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects for such projects not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the meaning of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations During Fiscal Year. Costs during the year totaled $15,706,110. The majority of funds were expended on two program elements: habitat projects and long term resource monitoring. Design was initiated on six projects and continued on 22; construction was initiated on three projects, continued on five, and completed on two projects. Funds were also used for the economic impacts of recreation study, navigation traffic monitoring, and continuing coordination of the General Plan for the UMRS-EMP. 7. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 23-C Flood Control 8. CLINTON, IA (DEFICIENCY CORRECTION) Location. Clinton is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River, 518.2 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Clinton County, IA. Existing Project. See page 28-3, Annual Report for 1981 for project details. The Clinton project was completed in 1981. Since 1982 erosion problems associated with towboat propwash and Mississippi River flooding, have been occurring for about 700 feet of the existing levee. The work to be completed consists of: regrading approximately 700 feet of embankment slope; furnishing and installing an 8-inch thick concrete articulated erosion control mat, up to elevation 574.0, and furnishing and placing new bedding and riprap slope protection from elevation 574.0 to elevation 586.0. See Table 23-B for authorization legislation. Local Cooperation. The local cooperation agreement was signed by the Assistant Secretary of Army (CW) on November 28, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. The erosion repair contract was awarded to J. F. Brennan Co., Inc. of LaCrosse, Wisconsin, on August 16, 1990. The project will be cost shared: Federal, (75�/o); non-federal, (25%). Total costs incurred in FY 90 were $28,845. 9. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,406 acres of land were acquired in fee, and flowage easements obtained for 24,411 acres. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. local cooperation. None required, except in connection with the Mehaffey Bridge which has been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Additional land acquisition to provide for the present plan of reservoir operation performed at a cost of $173,944. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $1,968,063. Reservoir maintenance and operation funds FY cost of $50,000. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $99,549. 10. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river miles to U.S. Highway 20 at Fort Dodge, IA. It includes the Corps' operated Lake Red Rock and Sayorville Lake projects. Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities and streambank stabilization structures; 23-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT (2) the operation and maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of authorization of this project (other than any such structure operated and maintained by any person under a permit or agreement with the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, vegetation, and wildlife protection and development and other activities as will enhance the natural environment for recreatiional purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the porject, the Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines are necessary to carry out such project. The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee will be established for consultation with the Department of the Army consisting of three Corps of Engineers appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one from each other incorporated municipality within the greenbelt, two from each of eight counties in the greenbelt, and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Letters of Assurance for the overall project have been furnished by Polk County (28 Oct. 85), City of Johnson (ll Nov. 85), Iowa Department of Natural Resources (6 Dec. 85), City of Ft. Dodge (5 Dec. 85), City of Swan (7 Dec. 85), Marion County (16 Dec. 85), Jasper County (16 Dec. 85), Boone County (18 Dec. 85), Webster County (14 Jan. 86), City of Des Moines (7 Apr. 86), City of West Des Moines (28 May 87), City of Dayton (20 May 87), Hamilton County (1 Sept. 87), City of Stratford (12 Jan. 88), Polk City (12 Mar. 87), and the Town of Lehigh (13 Mar. 86). Operations during fiscal year. Coordination was maintained with the Advisory Committee in accordance Public Law 99-88. Feature Design Memorandum was completed for the Lutheran Hospital Trail Segment (Jul 90). The construction contract was awarded for the Multi-Purpose Trail, Red Rock Segment I. Costs incurred were $674,166. 11. FARM CREEK, IL Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, IL, is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois Waterway at mile 162 above mouth. Existing project. See page 28-5, Annual Report for 1983 for description of project. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $130,849. 12. HANNIBAL, MO Location. Hannibal is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 309 and 310 in Marion County. The area to be protected contains about 50 acres, which have been extensively developed for light industrial, commercial, public, and residential purposes. Existing project. The project provides a 500-year level of protection for Hannibal by construction of levees and floodwalls along Front and Collier Street. The proposed project is approximately 0.7 of a mile long, with an average levee height of 12.5 feet. Concrete floodwalls would be used in confined areas. There are four street closure structures and six gatewells. Provisions for interior drainage includes a new 3,000 foot interceptor sewer, together with a 1.0 acre ponding area and a 40,000 GPM station. The area to be protected includes 19 blocks of the city's downtown area, including the historic Mark Twain District. The estimated cost is $6,860,000 which includes $1,710,000 non-federal costs. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreement for the project was executed on 27 December 1988. Operations during fiscal year. The first construction contract was awarded in March 90. Costs incurred were $862,427. 13. LOVES PARK, IL Location. The Loves Park project is located in Winnebago County, IL on the northeast boundary of the city of Rockford, IL. Loves Park is 17 miles south of the Illinois- Wisconsin state line. Existing project. The project provides 100 year level against flooding of Loves Park Creek. Protection measures would consist of 17,900 feet of channel improvements, a 16,300 GPM pump plant, and ponding. The General Design Memorandum was completed in FY 90. Plans and specifications for Stage IIA-1 were also initiated in FY 90. The estimated project cost is $27,500,000, including $8,300,000 non-federal costs for land and relocations. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement is scheduled to be executed in FY 91. Operation during fiscal year. Planning, Engineering and Design were accomplished at a cost of $306,481. 14. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 48,065 acres in fee and 28,607 acres in flowage easement. Landowner complaints, that lake operation have flooded their lands more frequently than what they were told to expect when flowage easements were initially acquired, let Congress to modify the project authorization. Language in PL 99-190 authorizes acquisition from willing sellers fee simple title in real property, which is subject to 23-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 periodic flooding in connection with the operation of the project. Potentially, there are approximately 1,000 tracts consisting of about 30,000 acres involved. Estimated Federal cost is $33,600,000. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: Land Acquisition costs were $418,180. The REDM (#5W) was approved February 1988. Preparation of second REDM (#5X) was initiated. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $2,326,831. Flood control reservoir maintenance and operation funds FY cost $50,000. Expenditures from the return of recreation use fees were $191,361. 15. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and houses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment section, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des Moines River Valley. Reaches along the Mississippi River downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefited. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification included relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements to Highway 415, the main access road to existing facilities on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project by Congress in 1984. Segments A and B of Highway 415 have been completed. Segment C of Highway 415 is scheduled to be completed in 1993. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 26,530 acres acquired in fee, flowage easements for 1,926 acres. The estimated project cost is $116,470,000 including $2,820,000 non-Federal costs from the State of Iowa and the City of Des Moines, Iowa toward recreational development. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The principal work item was the construction of recreational facilities and real estate acquisition for Segment C of Highway 415. New work costs were $1,588,884. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $3,209,190. Reservoir maintenance and operation funds FY costs of $50,000. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $101,335. The project is about 97 percent completed, excluding deferred work. 16. SOUTH QUINCY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, in Adams County, is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 318.5 and 325.5 just south of Quincy, Illinois. It is bounded by the Mississippi River on the west, the river bluffs on the east, Curtis Creek on north, and Mill Creek on the south. Existing project. About 8.8 miles of earth levee and a pumping station constructed by local interests and improved by the Federal Government in 1967 was designed and built to provide protection against a flood having a 2 percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any one year. Increasing the level of protection to a 500-year chance of occurrence includes raising the existing levee approximately 3.5 feet in height and adding .4 mile of levees and floodwall. Associated features of the proposed plan include raising and resurfacing existing road ramps, and a railroad closure structure. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of Stage III, Levees. Continued construction of Stage II, Levees. Costs for FY 90 were $1,095,208. 17. WATERLOO, IA (BRIDGES) Location. The city of Waterloo is located along both banks of the Cedar River in Black Hawk County, IA. Existing Project. See page 28-7, Annual Report for 1987 for project details. The Waterloo, IA project was completed in 1985. The Waterloo bridges project involves the construction of two highway bridges to replace undersized box culverts to convey design flows on Blowers Creek. The estimated project cost is $2,557,000, of which $1,432,000 in non-federal funding. Local Cooperation. The local cooperation agreement was executed in June 1990. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in July 1990. Construction is 10% complete. Total 23-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT costs incurred were $117,705. 18. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $150,378 (See Table 23-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 23-E. 20. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities, Section 205, Public Law 84-685. See Table 23-I Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. See Table 23-I. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526.) See Table 23-I. Emergency Flood Control Activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress. See Table 23-I. General Investigations 21. SURVEYS There were two flood prevention studies (Black Hawk County, Iowa and South Fork, Sangamon River, Illinois) in progress during FY 90 at a cost of $37,554. Special investiga- TABLE 23-A COST AND FINAN tions, FERC review, Dam Safety Criteria Studies. Inventory of Dams, SCS Coordination, and Planning Assistance to States efforts totaled $1,009,160. Total cost of surveys was $1,046,714. 22. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services cost $180,559. There were no hydrologic studies, sedimentation studies, streamflow studies, or rainfall studies completed during FY 90. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $180,559. 23. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Located in Muscatine and Louisa Counties, Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, together with the city of Muscatine, Iowa form a joint drainage and flood protection area for 30,700 acres of bottom land. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 subject to a favorable Chief's Report and approval by the Secretary of the Army. The project will provide flood protection by increasing the height of the existing main stem levee and flank levee. Work continued on the General Design Memorandum in FY 90 at a cost of $148,264. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. The West Des Moines - Des Moines, Iowa project is located in Polk County in central Iowa. The recommended project of levees and flood walls will provide flood protection from the Raccoon River, Walnut Creek, and Jordan Creek for approximately 927 urban acres. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. FY 90 funds were used to complete work on the Design Memorandum (DM). Total funds expended in FY 90 were $417,041. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Total cost for preconstruction engineering and design was $619,126. (PED funds of $53,821 for Loves Park, IL are shown with the Loves Park flood control project.) CIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 September 1990 1. Illinois and New Work: Mississippi Canal, IL 2. Illinois Waterway IL and IN 3. Illinois Waterway Navigation Study, IL Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 42,558 377,489 5,639 115,000 105,286 153,880 143,763 7,605,143' 7,605,143' 18,202,2482 18,176,3652 - - - - 126,707,751 - - - 126,706,419 12,491,000 15,938,200 12,730,200 14,531,426 281,439,5734 12,748,599 15,755,768 13,238,903 14,432,494 278,508,645� 29,671,000 18,153,200 10,865,000 3,758,100 137,997,925 30,572,350 18,003,459 11,457,670 3,702,453 136,591,821 390,000 382,542 390,000 382,542 23-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 23-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 5. Upper Mississippi River Navigation Study 6. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 8. Clinton, IA (Def Corr) 9. Coralville Lake, IA 10. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 11. Farm Creek, IL 12. Hannibal, MO 13. Loves Park, IL 14. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA 15. Saylorville Lake IA 16. South Quincy, IL 17. Waterloo, IA (Bridges) r Total Cost to Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 September 1990 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost 1,683,000 1,571,225 132,327 2,048,522 2,225,575 371,000 404,519 4,150 25,986 89,000 93,074 184,000 119,421 430,000 297,233 2,638,322 2,801,950 961,000 4,740,366 3,823,422 3,362,400 143,489 245,111 230,000 231,040 5,911,000 4,601,786 72,339 2,599,400 2,566,631 240,000 199,368 8,632 138,500 100,069 84,000 154,746 275,000 339,749 500,000 90,566 2,647,700 2,914,375 1,500,000 1,511,897 3,542,400 3,870,708 136,454 166,102 2,574,000 2,363,592 480,000 401,083 7,364,000 6,300,372 100,000 180,546 2,774,000 2,990,552 480,000 371,106 145,984 4,916 115,600 148,814 395,000 303,889 193,000 227,046 1,057,000 227,006 2,531,000 2,475,492 1,522,000 1,448,816 4,568,800 4,594,994 168,033 44,640 2,570,000 2,623,855 1,180,000 966,423 586,000 466,675 14,860,000 15,706,110 290,000 28,845 111,000 714 110,000 173,944 2,210,047 1,968,063 1,802,000 674,166 45,365 150,097 139,209 130,849 1,152,000 862,427 198,000 149,336 296,000 306,481 418,180 2,234,542 2,326,831 850,000 1,588,884 2,987,976 3,209,190 168,033 173,253 1,440,000 1,095,208 465,000 589,887 1,125,000 117,705 120,000 54,014 23-8 586,000 466,675 30,662,000 28,688,243 290,000 28,845 111,000 714 30,179,4885 30,137,4655 33,043,074 30,748,138 3,146,000 1,813,156 227,399 189,631 9,859,0206 9,859,0206 3,167,541 3,050,931 2,459,993 2,079,109 198,000 149,336 1,705,000 1,661,660 96,860,484 96,039,236 34,898,887 32,537,458 114,659,887 113,982,029' 37,284,641 34,200,102 2,920,839 2,580,507 7,173,000 6,670,321 2,125,000 1,957,393 1,125,000 117,705 120,000 54,104 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 September 1990 23. Muscatine Island, IA New Work: Approp. 100,000 225,000 150,000 72,000 547,000 Cost 25,843 238,497 68,127 148,264 480,731 23. West Des Moines, IA New Work: Approp. 75,000 250,000 250,000 376,000 951,000 Cost - 247,658 273,269 417,041 937,968 1. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 5. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 con- 2. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent tributed funds). Indefinite Appropriation." 6. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 3. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 7. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 4. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. TABLE 23-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See l)ate Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 1934' August 30, 1935 August 30, 19353 June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 October 23, 1943 March 2, 1945 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of State for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River Rivers and Harbors Committee l)oc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and larbors Commnittee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 23-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 (Continued) a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funiids shall be expended for removal or aite(ration of Illinois Central RR. bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Substitute following work for that authorized by act of March 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Caluinet Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Ilarbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Illinois River at Peoria, IL modification of navigation project to include an adjacent downstream water area. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Provide for a 10-year environmental program to include habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; longterm resource monitoring with computerized inventory and analysis; recreational development; assessment of economic benefits from recreational activities; and navigation system traffic monitoring. 23-10 See Section in Text l)ate Authorizing Act July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 August 18, 1968 November 17, 1986 II. I)oc. 677, 79th Cong.. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. II. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 4 Specified in Act. Also II. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 857, II.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. HI. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 6. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) _ ~~ ~ --- - ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act November 17, 1986 8. August 13, 1968 9. June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 10. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) November 17, 1986 11. 1944 Flood Control Act 12. October 23, 1962 13. November 17, 1986 14. June 28, 1938 December 19, 1985 15. July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 16. November 17, 1986 17. November 17, 1986 _ _ WATERLOO, IA (Bridges) Sec. 835, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 23-11 _ i Project and Work Authorized Approves 1982 Upper Mississippi River Master Plan, authorizes interstate agreements between Upper Mississippi River states, directs Secretary to implement GREAT II recommendations for disposal of dredged material and facilitate the productive use of dredge material, directs and interagency agreement with the Department of Interior for its participation in the plan, authorizes second lock at Lock and Dam No. 6. CLINTON, IA (Def Corr) Levees, floodwalls, railroad raises, street ramps, closure structure, pumping plants and gravity drainage outlets. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Recreational development; environmental enhancement; and related streambank stabilization. Defines area of work. FARM CREEK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. HANNIBAL, MO Levee, floodwall, closure structures, and pumping plant for flood control. LOVES PARK, IL Improved channel, pumping plant and pond storage. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Land Acquisition SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. SOUTH QUINCY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise existing levee, construct levees and floodwalls, raise road ramps and construct railroad closure. Documents Sec. 1103, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 604, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 564, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. PL 99-190 S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401,H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Sec Section in Text I)ate Authorizing Act 23. November 17, 1986 23. November 17, 1986 Project and Work Authorized MUSCATINE ISLANI) IEVEE )ISTII'lCT AND MUSCATINE-,LOUISA COUNTY DRAINAGE I)ISTRICT, NO. 13, IA Raise existing levees. WEST DES MOINES, IA Construct levees and floodwall. I)ocu ments Sec. 401, 11.1.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 401, 11.R.6, Water Resources l)evelopment Act of 1986. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines Rivers. TABLE 23-C OTHER AUTHORIZED 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administration Program October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet Sag portion. NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 7 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hannibal SBII, MO Completed 1958 108,700" 58,000 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,979' 9,345 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,499" 171,000 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 Muscatine Ilarbor, IA Completed 1964 353,000 85,999 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $137,869 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $20,300 contributed funds. TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1990 Construction Operation and Maintenance Completed Projects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL Bear Creek D)am (City of Ilannibal, MO) Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Canton, MO' Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL I)es Moines and Mississipp)i Levee l)istrict No. I, MO Des Moines, IA IDrtury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool D)rainage and Levee District, IL Project For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Contributed Funds Expended 1943 1962 1987 1943 1964 1981 1954 1941 1969 1972 1964 1974 1941 247,822 1,679,056 14,881,399 144,910 1,496,555 26,001,996 1,923,145 68,898 1,492,016 4,993,224 1,144,875 10,861,170 207,826 - 228,073 761,050 23,323 145,415 23-12 __ ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 19 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects East Moline, IL 1984 9,692,097 - - East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 -- Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 - - Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 -- Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 -- Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 - - Galena, IL 1952 844,100 - 118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 - - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 - 20,626 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 -- Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 -- Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 -- Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 -- Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 - - Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 - - Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 - - Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' 1957 123,300 - - Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 -- Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 -- Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 -- Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 - - Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 - - Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 - 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 -- Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 - 269,739 Milan, IL 1988 13,437,663 - 213,554 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 - - Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 - 220,000 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 - - Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 -- Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' 1957 72,432 -- Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 - - Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 - - Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 - - Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 - - Rockford, IL 1989 9,991,232 - 514,188 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 -- Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 - - Sangamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 -- Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 -- Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 - 23-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 23-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1990 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 - - South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 - - South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 - - South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 - - Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 - - Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 - - Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 - - Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 - - Waterloo, IA 1987 48,619,736 - 83,300 Authorized Projects Not Constructed Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 1987 1,400,800 - - Davenport, IA 1987 - - - Moline, IL2 1987 - - - Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 - - Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 - - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 2. FY 89 funds of $5,639 were expended to close out project. TABLE 23-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual DI)ate Funds Funds Project Report For I)eauthorized Expended Expended Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL Freeport, IL Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA Hlenderson River, IL Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1986 1969 1938 1970 1942 1979 1938 1964 1982 1986 1938 1986 1979 1977 1977 1986 1986 1977 1977 1981 1986 1977 $ 76,664 55,664 286,000 102,310 23-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 - - Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI - 1977 - - Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA - 1977 - - South Beloit, IL 1979 1986 270,000 - William L. Springer Lake Decatur, IL 1979 1986 - - Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal 1989 1990 - - Peoria Levees, IL - 1990 - - TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 18 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Burlington, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Fulton, IL Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Hergot Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL October 1989 December 1989 December 1989 October 1989 December 1989 November 1989 December 1989 October 1989 January 1989 January 1990 October 1989 November 1989 November 1989 November 1989 October 1989 January 1990 September 1989 January 1990 March 1990 October 1989 October 1989 December 1989 December 1989 September 1989 October 1989 November 1989 November 1989 November 1989 November 1989 December 1989 December 1989 December 1989 December 1989 23-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 18 of Text) Date Project Inspected Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL Milan, IL Muscatine Island, L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL Rock Island, IL Sabula, IA Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL The Sny Basin, IL Valley Drainage and Levee District IL Van Meter, IA Volga, IA Waterloo, IA West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL Worthington, MN November 1989 January 1990 January 1990 January 1990 February 1990 December 1989 October 1989 October 1989 December 1989 December 1989 October 1989 September 1989 September 1989 October 1989 January 1990 December 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 January 1990 December 1989 December 1989 January 1990 December 1989 January 1990 November 1989 December 1989 January 1989 October 1989 October 1989 October 1989 February 1990 August 1989 TABLE 23-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 20 of Text) Study Identification Beaver Creek, New Hartford, IA Cedar Falls, Cedar River, IA Cheslea Creek, Mason City, IA East Peoria, IL Gale Creek, Oregon, IL Village of Hull, IL Illinois and Michigan Canal, IL Fiscal Year Costs $ 7,243 17,382 305 36,148 1,783 51,631 401 23-16 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 20 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Illinois River, Liverpool, IL Iroquois River, Sugar Creek, Watseka, IL North River, Marion County, MO Oelwein, Fayette County, IA Ottawa, IL Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA Sabula, IA Sink Creek, Waterloo, IA Sny Island Levee and Drainage District, IL Tama, IA Vermilion River, Pontiac, IL Walnut Creek, Clive, IA Willow Creek, Mason City, IA Wolf Creek, LaPorte City, IA $ 16,562 2,965 1,053 1,367 48,493 18,080 76,580 34,858 43,864 30,995 233,115 2,188 39,950 20,931 4,274 TABLE 23-I Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Preauthorization) (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) (See Section 20 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs None TABLE 23-I Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) (See Section 20 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Buena Vista, IA $ - 1,450 Des Moines River, Bridge 32527, MN - 95 Eldon, IA 12,685 Farmington, Des Moines River, IA 9,417 Fox River, Bridge Site #4, Davenport Co., IA 13,528 Fox River, Bridge Site #7, Davenport Co., IA 10,635 Fox River, Route J40 Bridge, Davenport Co., IA 11,474 Iowa Falls River Road, IA 254 Iowa River, Louisa Co., IA 389 Iowa River, Wapello, IA - 686 Maquoketa River, County Road 47 Bridge, IA 11,916 Monroe County, IA 7,808 Soap Creek, Bridge Site #3, Davenport Co., IA 13,320 Turkey River, City Road, Clayton, IA 9,273 Van Buren Co., IA 11,064 Wapello County, IA 64,539 Whitetie River, Grundy County, IL 501 23-17 TABLE 23-I (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 23-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Continued) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation) (See Section 20 of Text) Project and Location Federal Cost Advance Preparation: $ 313,059 Rehabilitation: None Emer Water Supply & Drought Assistance: Packard, IA 1,283 TABLE 23-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills at Low Water Available Lift at Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) La(Grange Iock 80.2 7.8 below lHenardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 1 3.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.02 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at flat pools. Lockport is (due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. TABLE 23-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Illinois River, mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. 23-18 $ 2,733,499' ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-K (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete and sheet piling Movable (wicket with Aframe- crest) Movable (wicket type) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Concrete and timber Concrete and timber Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel LaGrange Peoria Starved Rock Marseilles Dresden Island Brandon Road gates) Movable (Bear trap) (Bear trap) Piles in clay Fixed structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and sheet piling Piles in sand Piles in sand Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Piles in clay 1939 1939 1933 1933 1933 1933 1933 1960 Lock and dam - - - - - - equ ipnent 'l'otal locks - - - - - - and dams 1. Actual cost. 2,744,592' 3,381,030' 885,315' 1,853,725' $ 2,503,376' 2,031,683' 133,608' 6,954,700' 1,250,304' $ 24,471,832 TABLE 23-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places Starved Rock to Lockport Starved Rock to Grafton Calumet-Sag Channel Peoria small boat harbor Movable Concrete (tainter and I oA)cpko rt 'T.J. O'Brien $ 2,135,358' 813,418' 3,650,635 2,917,607 19,238,200 24,937' 23-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 23-L (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Protection piers at all locks Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration Rebuild highway bridges Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Recreation Facilities, Code 711 Removal of Blue Island lock Grand Calumet River controlling works 2 St. Louis District Total additional features Total existing project 1. Actual cost. TABLE 23-M See Section in Text 77,613' 5,141,474 5,466,804 19,327,850 20,828,435' 18,362,041' 445,000 288,600' 1,081,600' $100,442,142 $124,913,974 2. Placed in inactive status November 19, 1974. EXISTING PROJECT Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Nine locks and six dams Grafton to Lockport, IL Lockport to controlling works Controlling works to junction with Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL 23-20 300 200-300 225 9 9 291.1 miles 2.0 miles 10.0 miles 16.0 miles 7.7 miles 9.0 miles 4.2 miles 22.1 miles 225 300 160 175-300 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 (See Section 2 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $120,886,748 $278,508,645 $136,591,821 $535,987,214 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 - - 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 - - 1,858,936 Total $126,706,419 $278,508,645 $136,591,821 $541,806,885' 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. operation and care of the works of improvement under the provisions 23-21 ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT * District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Page 1. Minnesota River, MN........................24-2 33. Root River at Hokah, MN.................... 24-13 2. Mississippi River between Missouri River 34. Rochester, MN ............................ 24-14 and Minneapolis, MN........................24-2 35. Roseau River, MN ......................... 24-14 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi 36. Sheyenne River, ND ........................ 24-14 River, MN.................................24-2 37. Souris River Basin, ND ..................... 24-15 38. State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI ............. 24-16 Flood Control 39. St. Paul, MN .............................. 24-16 40. Warner Road at Sibley Street, Mississippi 4. Bassett Creek, MN..........................24-3 River, St. Paul, MN ........................ 24-17 5. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD .. 24-3 41. Zumbro River at Genoa, MN ................. 24-17 6. Cannon River at Faribault, MN ................ 24-3 42. Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN ....... 24-18 7. Chaska, MN ................................ 24-4 43. Inspection of completed flood control projects .... 24-18 8. Devils Lake, ND............................24-4 9. Eau Galle River, WI......................... 24-4 10. Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN .............. 24-5 Miscellaneous 11. Enderlin, Maple River, ND ................... 24-5 12. Grafton Pumping Station, ND ................. 24-6 44. Other work under special authority ............. 24-18 13. Grand Mound-State Historical Site, MN .......... 24-6 14. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ................... 24-6 General Investigations 15. Houston, MN .............................. 24-7 16. Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN........24-7 45. Surveys.................................. 24-19 17. La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI...... 24-7 46. Collection and study of basic data .............. 24-19 18. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, 47. Advance engineering and design ............... 24-19 Sheyenne River, ND.........................24-8 19. Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN .............. 24-8 Tables 20. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN................................24-9 Table 24-A Cost & Financial Statement............. 24-20 21. Mankato and North Mankato, MN .............. 24-9 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation ............... 24-24 22. Marshall, MN ............................ 24-9 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 24-25 23. Middle River at Argyle, MN ................. 24-10 Table 24-D Not Applicable 24. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN ............ 24-10 Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 24-26 25. Portage, WI.............................. 24-10 Table 24-F Not Applicable 26. Prairie du Chien, WI....................... 24-10 Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects................. 24-28 27. Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater Table 24-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN ............................... 24-11 River..............................24-29 28. Red Lake River, Gentilly, MN ................ 24-11 Table 24-I Red River of the North Drainage Basin: 29. Red River of the North at Argusville, ND ....... 24-11 Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan ..24-30 30. Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN .... 24-12 Table 24-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control 31. Red River of the North at Fargo, Projects ........................... 24-31 ND - Moorhead, MN ...................... 24-12 Table 24-K Flood Control Work Under Special 32. Red River of the North drainage basin, Authorization ....................... 24-32 MN, SD & ND........................... 24-13 Table 24-L General Investigations ............... 24-34 24-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, MN and SD, and flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, MN, thence northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River opposite St. Paul, MN. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous projects. For details see page 1890 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at Savage, MN, and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at Shakopee, MN. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report for 1965. (See table 24-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See also page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. There are privately-owned terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by hired labor cost $345. Snagging and clearing cost $1,090 by hired labor. Engineering and administrative costs amounted to $10,024. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on project for 4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, MN, and easements on 123.08 acres of land. 46.20 acres have been transferred from the Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force to the project. Navigation from mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for a 9-foot chanhel started in May 1966 and was terminated in January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in August 1968. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1990, were $4,662,570, of which $1,940,180 was for new work and $2,722,390 for maintenance. In addition, cost from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot depth under provisions of section 4, River and Harbor Act of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See table 24-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See table 24-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment maintained, and surveys, repairs, and reports were made by hired labor at a cost of $1,123,692. Reservoirs were operated by contract at a cost of $135,384. Physical security cost $2,774 by hired labor. Periodic inspection and dam safety costs were $43,369 by hired labor and $878 by other Corps. A bridge replacement construction contract at Winnibigoshish cost $299,891. Cultural resource investigation cost $1,237 by contract, $17,425 by hired labor and $15,000 by the U.S. Forest Service. Land acquisition analysis and survey cost $18,676 by hired labor. Environmental review and drought planning cost $8,633 by hired labor. Data collection, water analysis, structural inventory for drought planning and maintenance of stream gauging cost $163,210 by hired labor, $2,085 by contract, $1,205 by other Corps, and $41,840 by U.S. Geological Survey. Miscellaneous engineering and design cost $113,975 by hired labor, and $11,396 by contract. Real estate was managed at a cost of $16,482. Lands and damages cost $7,635. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $376,199. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by the United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being 24-2 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See table 24- H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) Flood Control 4. BASSETI CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The proposed project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound floodwaters and a new tunnel (part of which is being constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the plan are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Estimated Federal cost (1990) for new work is $28,700,000 and $9,570,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the costs of lands, easements, and rights- of-way are less than 20 percent of total project costs, local interests are required to furnish the standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Department of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Miscellaneous lands and damages cost $25,411. Engineering and design cost $6,774 by contract, and $554,621 by hired labor. Stages 2C, 3 and 4 construction contracts cost $3,064, $360,618 and $2,795,540 respectively. North Central Division real estate costs were $10,665. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $268,333. Total Federal costs were $3,696,101 and non-Federal $328,929. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the first control structures is complete. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has completed construction of the downstream portion of the tunnel including the last 4,800 feet and outlet to the Mississippi River. The amount of $3,642,888 was reimbursed to MnDOT for the Federal share of the work. Construction work was completed on the tunnel segment located in sandstone (Stage 3). Construction work on the tunnel segment in soft ground (Stage 4) is currently underway. 5. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN AND SD Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and Odessa, MN, and Big Stone City, SD, at the outlet of Big Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Counties, MN, and Grant County, SD. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and recreation. For additional details see AnnualReport for 1970. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest map; and H. Doc. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $46,543 by hired labor and $939 by other Corps. Data collection and water control analysis cost $18,647 and $13,853, respectively. Data collection by other government agencies cost $24,170. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $2,735. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $23,551 and $28,822, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. A general plan between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for administrating the use of waters, land, or interests therein has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was approved. On March 31, 1975, the Secretary of the Army transferred lands in the project not required for Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the Department of Interior. The transfer of property was accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. The project was transferred to the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District for operation and maintenance. 6. CANNON RIVER AT FARIBAULT, MN Location. The project site is located along the left bank of the Cannon River, about 5 miles north of Faribault, Minnesota, in southeastern Minnesota. Existing project. The plan consists of protecting approximately 440 feet of shoreline with riprap and clearing fallen trees from the channel at the erosion site. The project provides 24-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 a minimum of 8 feet would be maintained between the edge of the road surface and the edge of the riverbank. The bank was shaped and filled with pervious fill to a 1 vertical on 2.5 horizontal slope and was protected with 12 inches of riprap and 6 inches of bedding above the water level. A guardrail was installed as an additional measure to protect the public safety. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on August 19, 1988. The project was being constructed under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed by Rice County, Minnesota in August 1988. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $4,152 and $963, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was let in February 1989 and construction was completed in April of 1989. The project was turned over to local interests by letter dated August 21, 1990. An audit is under way to determine the final Federal and non-Federal cost shares. 7. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 1.1 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 0.6 mile of diversion channel and 0.3 mile of channel improvement on East Creek. Approximately 2.9 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1990) for new work is $24,900,000 and $8,300,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on September 12, 1988. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real Estate cost $35,575. Stage 1 construction contract cost $56,219. Stage 2 construction contract cost $4,604,477. Engineering and design cost $23,422, by contract and $503,928 by hired labor. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $311,323. Total Federal costs were $5,460,941 and non-Federal, $79,003. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for Stage 2 of the flood control project was awarded in September, 1989. Stage 1 construction is complete. 8. DEVILS LAKE, ND Location. In Ramsey County in north central North Dakota about 80 miles west of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Involves a system of levees and interior flood control facilities at the head of Creel Bay. The main embankment across Creel Bay is 1,810 feet long and varies from 0 to 27 feet high. The south Creel Bay tieback embankment is 1,030 feet long and varies from 0 to 3 feet high. The north Creel Bay tieback embankment is 2,400 feet long and varies from 0 to 8.5 feet high. The south embankment is 3,100 feet long and varies from 0 to 9.5 feet high. The interior flood control system consists of temporary stormwater retention ponds immediately north and south of the city's sewage lagoons, a 16,000 gallon per minute pumping station and a system of ditches and culverts linking the ponds to the pumping station. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 15, 1983, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Devils Lake in August 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts cost $477. Engineering and design cost $12,799 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $4,179. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction work on the project is substantially complete. 9. EAU GALLE RIVER, WI Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, WI, on Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa River, and its tributary, Mines Creek, which flows through the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, MN, and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, WI. (See Geological Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) 24-4 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. Project provides for earth and rock-filldam, an uncontrolled outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt Creek were eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 1083 of Annual Report for 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure and recreation facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations and evaluations were performed at a cost of $325,202 by hired labor and $27,100 by contract. Real estate management cost $4,025. Data collection cost $2,661 by hired labor and $7,850 by other government agencies. Water control analysis and water quality by other Corps of Engineer districts cost $8,872 and $31,350, respectively. Engineering and design by contract cost $6,819. Administrative and other miscellaneous costs were $63,252. Condition at end of rfiscal year. Mines Creek improvements were substantially completed in 1964; minor work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been provided. Remedial work to repair eroded gutters and road ditches was completed in September 1973. Repair of failing discharge conduit by installing a steel linerwas completed in April1982. 10. EMERSON, MANITOBA-NOYES, MN Location. The unincorporated village of Noyes is located in Kittson County in extreme northwestern Minnesota about 80 miles north of Grand Forks, North Dakota. Noyes is situated on the right overbank of the Red River of the North, approximately one-half mile from the channel. Existing project. The project will consist of a "ring" levee which will protect both Noyes and the city of Emerson, Manitoba, Canada. The project will have three basic components: upgrading the existing Emerson, Manitoba, emergency levee to provide 100-year flood protection; constructing a 3,800-foot- long levee at Noyes, Minnesota, to provide 100- year flood protection; and constructing a 2,000-foot-long International levee in Minnesota which will run parallel to the International boundary. The levees will provide a complete and continuous levee system around the two communities. The levees will have a 10- foot top width, side slopes of 1 vertical on 3 horizontal, and vary in height from 7 to 12 feet. The interior flood control facilities consist of one ponding area and two gravity outlets. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction on July 26,1988, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See AnnualReport for 1988 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed by St. Vincent Township, Minnesota, the local sponsor, in August 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: An adjustment of $-1,750 was made on a construction contract. Utility relocation work cost $22,362. Engineering and design cost $7,337. Supervision and administration cost $14,157. Federal costs were $-30,256, non-Federal $72,362. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract let in September 1988 was essentially completed in November 1989. Plans are underway to let a small contract to improve drainage in the borrow area south of the levee. 11. ENDERLIN, MAPLE RIVER, ND Location. In Ransom County in southeastern North Dakota on the Maple River about 45 miles southwest of Fargo, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project at Enderlin involves a system of levees along the right bank of the main stem and the left'bank of the South Branch of the Maple River. The total levee system would be about 1.2 miles long and would have an average height of about 8 feet. Other features of the project include channel improvements on the south branch, replacement of the Soo Line railroad bridge, and interior drainage facilities consisting of three ponding areas with gated outlet conduits. To prevent failure of the channel and levee by erosion, rip-rapping is provided in selected reaches. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 11, 1982, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1982 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Enderlin in July 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A railroad closure structure contract cost $17,860. Engineering and design by hired labor cost $911. Supervision, administration and other miscellaneous costs were $137. Total Federal costs were $176, non-Federal $18,732. 24-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is substantially complete. 12. GRAFTON PUMPING STATION, ND Location. The project site is located in an unincorporated area of Walsh County, North Dakota. The erosion site is on the left bank of the Red River of the North immediately downstream of the County Highway 17 bridge which is 10 miles east of Grafton. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion that threatened the City of Grafton's water supply intake facility was authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial appraisal report was dated January 1988. The recommended plan consisted of reshaping the existing bank and placing 1,200 cubic yards of riprap along approximately 250 feet of the riverbank to protect the city's pumping station from further erosion. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on August 18, 1988. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the City of Grafton, North Dakota in August 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $389. Construction contract costs were $3,248. Total Federal costs were $-5,932 and non- Federal, $9,569. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed and the project was transferred to the city of Grafton in February 1990. 13. GRAND MOUND, STATE HISTORIC STE, MN Location. Along the left (south) bank of the Rainy River on the northern boundary of the Grand Mound State Historic Site, about 17 miles west of International Falls, MN, at the confluence of the Rainy and Big Fork Rivers. Existing project. The Grand Mound site is on the National Register of Historic Places because of its irreplaceable Indian burial mounds and other artifacts from the prehistoric Laurel and Blackduck cultures. Serious erosion is causing loss of skeletal remains and artifacts. A Feasibility Report and EnvironmentalAssessment was completed in September 1989 under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. This report recommended riprap protection along 1,500 feet of riverbank with all work taking place from a "bench" constructed along the riverbank to keep equipment from disturbing the Indian mounds. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on March 22,1990. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers, and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2,1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection, and, if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations, including section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PublicLaw 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." A local cooperation agreement was executed on June 20, 1990. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate costs were $320. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $36,294 and $5,039, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed and a contract was awarded in September 1990. 14. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in 24-6 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See AnnualReport for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non- Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $85,034. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. 15. HOUSTON, MN Location. In Houston County in southeastern Minnesota on the Root River in the city of Houston, Minnesota. Existing project. The plan of protection provides levee flood protection together with appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Main features of the project include 3.1 miles of levee, 0.2 miles of road raise, an interior drainage pumping station, and road and rail closures. Estimated Federal cost (1990) for new work is $4,350,000 and $1,860,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was approved for construction by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662) and is being reevaluated based on changes since the 1975 Feasibility Report. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. During preparation of the General Design Memorandum, the items of local cooperation will be modified to reflect current cost sharing requirements. By a resolution dated February 22, 1990, the city of Houston expressed its commitment to the financial requirements of the project and its desire for an early construction start. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $267,028. Condition at end of fiscal year. General Reevaluation study is under review by higher authority and preconstruction planning is in progress. 16. LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River between head of Marsh Lake and Granite Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations were performed at a cost of $185,420 by hired labor and $1,900 by contract. Reservoir operations planning evaluation cost $13,862 by hired labor. Data collection cost $4,293 by hired labor and $51,060 by U.S. Geological Survey. Water control analysis cost $30,808 and $1,376 by other Corps of Engineer districts. Real estate cost $6,137. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $2,698 and $65,400, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been operated by the Government since transfer from State of Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The United States owns fee title to 517.62 acres of land and easements on 19,859.47 acres of land. In 1957, 60.1 acres were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction under present plan of improvement was started in September 1941 and completed in December 1951 except for recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 17. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction of aggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of levees, supplementary 24-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $23,598. Condition at end of fiscal year. General and Real Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 1968. The first land payment was made on January 15, 1969, and the land acquisition program is 80 percent complete. Contracts for excavation of the left abutment, for test wells, and for construction of the outlet works and right abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has been completed. All further construction has been indefinitely suspended. Work has been accomplished to provide for completion of relocation work left partially completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove has relocated out of the floodplain area after receiving funds from other agencies. A study of a modified dry dam was completed in early FY 1985. On the basis of the study results, it was recommended that no further work be done to establish the economic feasibility of a dry or wet dam at La Farge and that the La Farge Lake and channel improvement project be deauthorized. 18. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See AnnualReport for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See AnnualReport for 1962. Complied with except for construction of Fargo diversion dam and ditch for which assurances furnished by city of Fargo were approved by the Secretary of War on June 26, 1947. Necessity for this feature will be reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Dam Safety: Cultural resources costs by hired labor were $77. Engineering and design cost $48,485, $1,145,687 by hired labor and $12,535 by other Corps. Administrative costs were $3,880. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations, monitoring and evaluations were performed at a cost of $487,386 by hired labor and $72,411 by contract. Real estate management cost $15,051. Data collection cost $6,696 by hired labor and $52,300 by other government agencies. A law enforcement contract cost $9,162. Water control and quality analysis by hired labor cost $20,131. Administrative costs were $119,741. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. Baldhill Dam has been classified as a large, high hazard dam under the National Program for the inspection of dams. A risk assessment report prepared in June 1986 indicated a serious spillway discharge capacity deficiency. A General Design Memorandum which recommended increasing the spillway capacity was approved by OCE in July 1987. 19. LAKE PUIASKI, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN Location. Lake Pulaski is approximately 45 miles northwest of the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. It lies within three local political jurisdictions (City of Buffalo, Wright County and Buffalo Township). Existing project. Lake Pulaski has no natural outlet. Prior to construction of this project, the lake had been rising, inundating a number of houses or summer residences. A combination of a pumped pipeline and gravity-flow storm sewers to convey excess water through the city of Buffalo from Lake Pulaski to Buffalo Lake was constructed to stabilize the lake. Included in this project was a storm sewer upgrade which was constructed by the city of Buffalo. The lake will be maintained at elevation 966.0 feet mean sea level. This is the lowest level permitted for an artificial outlet under State of Minnesota rules governing landlocked lakes. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in March 1985 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1986 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the Lake Pulaski Improvement District, the local sponsor, in August 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A 24-8 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT real estate non-Federal LERRD credit was for $1,097. Supervision and administration costs were $3,086. Total Federal costs were $2,925, non-Federal $1,258. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed and the project was transferred to the Lake Pulaski Improvement District in March 1989. 20. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, SD AND MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, MN, and the mouth of Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, MN. Lake drains through river to Red River of the North, and two waters form a portion of boundary between State of Minnesota and States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Existing project was authorized by Flood ControlAct of June 22,1936. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project and related facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $329,426. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in June 1948, except for minor recreational facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and easements on 6,172.25 acres of land have been acquired. White Rock Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, and structures and appurtenances are in good condition. Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was completed in November 1968. Roadways across structure are open to public travel. 21. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MN Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in southcentral Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of the T.H. 169 Bridge relocations was completed. Adjustments were made for construction contract payments to include $-63,499 at Mankato and $-4,200 at North Mankato. Construction costs for improvements at Le Hillier were $63,501. Survey work for levees and floodwalls cost $19,067. An adjustment was made for engineering and design by contract for $-15,000. Engineering and design by hired labor cost $16,336. Supervision and administration cost $7,575 by hired labor. Other miscellaneous costs and adjustments total $-14,691. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 22. MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1059 of AnnualReport for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to $1,802,866. The existing flood control project was completed in 1963. In response to a need for additional flood control, a feasibility study was completed in 1979. The project recommended in the feasibility report was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PublicLaw 99-662, Section 401(a). Improvements include 4.7 miles of additional levees, 3.8 miles of bank protection, 03 mile of new high-flow diversion channel, an interbasin overflow structure, modifications to the existing diversion and drop structures, and a recreation plan. The recreation plan consists of 2.5 miles of biking/walking trail, five miles of cross-country skiing/hiking trail, and related picnic and rest area facilities. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 115 years. Estimated Federal cost (1990) for new work is $5,330,000 and $1,970,000 is tobe contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Project was transferred to local interests on December 23, 1963. For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. By letter dated November 19, 1986, the city of Marshall indicated its willingness to participate financially in construction of a project consistent with the cost sharing and financing 24-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 concepts reflected in the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $25,156. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed December 1963. Preconstruction planning for the new work is in progress. 23. MIDDLE RIVER AT ARGYLE, MN Location. In Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota on the Middle River within the city limits of Argyle, Minnesota. Existing project. The plan of protection includes a system of levees, road raises along with interior drainage facilities to provide main developed parts of the city of Argyle with one percent chance flood protection. Also included is the evacuation of 12 residences which are located outside of the line of flood barrier protection. The project was approved for construction on August 1, 1985 by the Chief of Engineers. The project is being constructed under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Argyle in August 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real estate costs were $501 by hired labor. A construction contract cost $930,263. Engineering and design cost $45,504 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $91,164. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for Stage I is complete. A Stage II construction contract involving the remainder of the project was awarded in September 1989. The evacuation of the 12 residences is complete. The project was substantially complete at the end of the fiscal year. 24. MINNESOTA RIVER AT HENDERSON, MN Location. In Sibley County in southeastern Minnesota about 50 miles southwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project at Henderson involves a system of levees to protect the flood prone areas of the city from floods on the Minnesota River. The proposed levee is about 1.6 miles long and has an average height of 15 feet. Appurtenant interior flood control facilities include a system of interceptor stormsewers and ditches, and two ponding areas each with a gravity outlet and a pumping station designed to discharge impounded storm water during flood periods when exterior flood levels would require the gravity outlets to be closed. Provisions for the temporary closure of two state highways and a county highway are also included as project features. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction June 26, 1987, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the City of Henderson, the local sponsor, in May 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction by contract cost $243,690. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $18,173 and $38,473, respectively. Federal costs were $247,526, while non-Federal, $52,810. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was substantially complete at the end of the fiscal year. 25. PORTAGE, WI Location. In Columbia County in central Wisconsin along the Wisconsin River about 35 miles north of Madison, Wisconsin. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Wisconsin.) Existing project. The recommended plan provides for improvement to the existing levee system along the left bank of the Wisconsin River at Portage. The plan includes 2.9 miles of existing levee improvement; 550 feet of flood wall; rehabilitation of the Portage lock gate as a flood barrier while retaining its intrinsic historic value; interior flood control facilities; and recreational and aesthetic facilities. The project would protect against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 500 years. Estimated Federal cost (1990) for new work is $5,760,000 and $2,020,000 is tobe contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1989 for requirements. By letter dated July 14, 1988, the city of Portage indicated a willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation for flood control and recreation. A draft local cooperation agreement will be prepared during preconstruction planning and willbe negotiated and finalized prior to initiation of construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $311,462. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. 26. PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI Location. In Crawford County in southwestern Wisconsin on the left bank of the Mississippi River. (For general 24-10 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Combines total evacuation with flood proofing and land use control measures to provide the reduction of potential flood damages within design limits. Evacuation was accomplished by purchase and relocation of structures in lowest portions of the floodplain. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was entered into with the city of Prairie du Chien on May 2, 1978, and signed by the Chief of Engineers on September 11, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in September 1984. 27. RED LAKE RIVER, MN, INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a point near Plummer, MN, and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of the Red River of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, MN. Clearwater River has a general westerly course from its source near Ebro, MN, about 205 miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structures were operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $50,846. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of major improvements on Red Lake River and the Clearwater River were completed in June 1956. Replacement of rock and brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in November 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood control measure. 28. RED LAKE RIVER AT GENTILLY, MN Location. The project site is located on the left bank of the Red Lake River in northwestern Minnesota about 1.5 miles west of Gentilly and 6 miles east of Crookston, the county seat of Polk County. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion that is threatening Polk County State Aid Highway 11 and bridge was authorized under Section 603 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99- 662). The plan of improvement recommended in the project report dated May 1989 consists of stabilizing approximately 1200 feet of riverbank by slope reshaping and the placement of riprap. Based on the recommendation contained in the report, the project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on August 22, 1989. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1989 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement between the Department of the Army and the Red Lake Watershed District, the local sponsor of the project, was fully executed on September 5, 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $254,367. Engineering and design cost $11,355 by hired labor and $186 by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Real Estate costs were $1,747. Supervision and administration cost $21,594. Federal costs were $209,249, non-Federal $80,000. Condition at end offiscal year. A construction contract for the project was awarded on September 28,1989. Construction of the project was substantially complete at the end of the fiscal year. 29. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT ARGUSVILLE, ND Location. In Cass County in eastern North Dakota near the confluence of the Red River of the North and the Sheyenne River about 15 miles northwest of Fargo, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project involves a levee encircling the city of Argusville with associated interior flood control facilities. The total levee system is about 1.9 miles long and has an average height of about 8 feet. Interior flood control facilities consist of interceptor ditches and pipes, two temporary ponding areas and a pumping station to periodically discharge impounded water. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction July 5, 1985, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 24-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the city of Argusville, the local sponsor, in July 1985. Operations at end of fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract cost $2. Engineering and design cost $9,739 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $1,571. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was complete at the end of the fiscal year. 30. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT BRECKENRIDGE, MN Location. In Wilkin County in west central Minnesota on the Red River of the North, approximately 200 miles northwest of Minneapolis-St. Paul. Existing project. Provide for erosion control along the east bank of the Red River of the North adjacent to the St. Francis Nursing Home, a city owned facility. The project involves excavation and the placement of granular fill, bedding materialand riprap along an approximate 300-foot reach of eroding riverbank. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in September 1988 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the city of Breckenridge, the local sponsor, in September, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $15,761. Engineering and design costs were $1,218. Supervision and administration costs were $737. Total Federal costs were $11,988, non-Federal $5,728. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the erosion control project at Breckenridge was awarded in September 1988. Construction of the project was substantially complete at the end of the fiscal year. 31. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT FARGO, ND - MOORHEAD, MN Location. A 9.7-mile reach of the Red River of the North within the Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN metropolitan area. Existing project. Dutch elm disease is causing an epidemic of dead and dying trees along the riverbanks. When these trees topple into the river, they get hung up at bridges, sharp bends, and sandbars. The resulting increases in channel roughness and number and size of flow blockages raise flood stages and escalate flood damages. The Detailed Project Report dated March 1989 was conducted under the authority of Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, as amended. This report recommended removing fallen trees from the channel and riverbanks and standing, but dead or dying, trees close to the edge of the riverbank to alleviate existing and potential threats. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on December 27, 1989. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers, and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection, and, if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations, including section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." A local cooperation agreement was executed on January 9, 1990. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract cost $87,136. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $45,793 and $10,429, respectively. Total Federal costs were $121,574, non-Federal $21,784. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase 1 (Clearing) plans and specifications were prepared and construction started 24-12 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT during the 1989-90 winter. Phase 2 (Snagging) plans and specifications were initiated and are nearing completion. 32. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MN, SD & ND Location. Red River of the North Basin, within the United States, includes northeastern comrner of South Dakota and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See table 27-I for active units in comprehensive basin plan.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of the city of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the city of East Grand Forks requested reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 17,1975, permitting local interests additional time to fumish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975, and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. In a July 9, 1986 letter, the city of East Grand Forks withdrew support for the project presented in the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $197,152 by hired labor and $19,710 by contract. Real estate management cost $5,291. Data collection cost $8,139 by hired labor and $17,450 by U.S. Geological Survey. Water control and water quality cost $13,419 and $4,633, respectively. Engineering and design for dam safety cost $88,262 by hired labor. Engineering and design for a spillway ODM cost $122,802 by other Corps. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $52,446. Condition at end of fiscal year. Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, MN, is complete. The East Grand Forks project was reclassified from active to inactive status on August 19, 1988. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, ND, started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. (See table 24-I at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) 33. ROOT RIVER AT HOKAH, MN Location. In Houston County in southeastern Minnesota on the Root River at Hokah about 140 miles southeast of Minneapolis - St. Paul. Existing project. Provides for erosion control along about 1,500 feet of the south bank of the Root River at the wastewater treatment plant serving Hokah. The project consisted of clearing and snagging, excavation, placing rock fill and extending the concrete pipe outfall at the treatment plant. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on April 27, 1990 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was executed by Houston County on May 1, 1990. Local interests are required to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposalareas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers, and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from 24-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection, and, if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations, including section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of FederalRegulations, as well as Army Regulation 600- 7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate costs were $548. A construction contract cost $50,000. Engineering and design costs were $34,359. Supervision and administration costs were $12,976. Total Federal costs were $93,213, non-Federal $4,670. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for the erosion control project at Hokah was awarded in August 1990. Construction of the project was 70 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. 34. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmsted County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 0.5 mile of grass-sloped channels, 6.1 miles of riprapped or gabion-lined channels, 0.9 mile of architecturally-treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, six drop structures, 2.4 miles of levee, and hiking and biking trails. Estimated cost (1989) to the United States for new work is $61,300,000 and $21,300,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed August 27, 1987 by the city of Rochester. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts for Stage 1A2B, 1A1, 1B1, and 1B3 were $455,685, $192,703, $2,900,336, and, $3,646,004, respectively. Engineering and design cost $419,911 by contract, $2,048,451 by hired labor, and $46,918 by other Corps. Real estate activities cost $58,715. Construction management cost $297,844 by hired labor and $35,007 by contract. Total Federal costs were $9,015,991 and non-Federal costs were $1,085,583. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction continued on Stages 1A2B, 1A1, and 1B1. A construction contract was awarded for Stage 1B3 in February 1990. 35. ROSEAU RIVER, MN Location. In Roseau County on the Roseau River in northwestern Minnesota near the city of Duxby. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1988 for description of project as authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965. The project, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, provided for construction of about 6 miles of flood control levee approximately 3 feet high in the vicinity of Duxby, Minnesota. Estimated cost (1990) to the United States for new work on the modified project is $356,000 and $119,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements of project as authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965. For the modified project, local interests are required to provide the entire cost of lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for construction of the project and make a cash contribution to increase their share to 25 percent of total project costs for flood control. Local interests have formed the Roseau River Watershed District to provide local cooperation requirements and acquire rights-of-way. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $187,613. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is underway for the Duxby levee project. 36. SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass 24-14 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT County and the city of West Fargo. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act consists of three major components for Federal implementation: 1) 11.9 miles of levee and a 6.7 mile flood diversion channel at West Fargo; 2) 7.5 miles of flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo; and 3) a five-foot raise of the Baldhill Dam flood control pool. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 stipulated that the project shall also include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection on the Maple River. There are several items of local cooperation required to implement the plan, and several components identified for non-Federal implementation which would supplement the recommended plan. Estimated cost (1990) to the United States for new work is $40,500,000 and $21,000,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. Project consists of four separable components requiring four Local Cooperation Agreements. The Southeast Cass Water Resource District will serve as the local sponsor for the West Fargo Unit and the Horace to West Fargo Unit. The local cooperation agreement for the West Fargo Unit was executed on July 25, 1988, and for the Horace to West Fargo unit on March 6, 1990. The State Water Commission will serve as the quasi-sponsor for the other components until a formal sponsorship is determined by benefiting entities. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: West Fargo railroad construction contracts cost $751,175. Construction contracts at West Fargo for channels and levees cost $906,511 and $879,999, respectively. Engineering and design cost $264,708 by hired labor, $56,563 by contract and $446 by other Corps. Real Estate costs were $2,855. Supervision and administration cost $11,824 by contract and $154,942 by hired labor. A construction contract at Horace cost $350,000. Engineering and Design at Horace cost $401,887 by hired labor and $1,000 by other Corps. Supervision and administration cost $30,194. At Maple River, engineering and design and supervision and administration by hired labor cost $38,819 and $5,456, respectively. TotalFederal costs were $3,808,885, non-Federal costs were $47,494. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of both the West Fargo and Horace to West Fargo Units are under way. An economic evaluation study for the Maple River Unit was completed which showed that by Federal criteria the Maple River dam was not incrementally justified and no further studies are recommended. 37. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, Mc- Henry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The current plan of improvement authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 is the one-time purchase of 400,000 acre-feet of flood storage in Rafferty and Alameda Dams in Saskatchewan, Canada and the operation and maintenance of Rafferty Dam, Alameda Dam and the existing Boundary Dam in conjunction with the existing Lake Darling Dam to provide 100-year flood protection at Minot, North Dakota. The Act also authorizes those flood control measures upstream and downstream of the dam which are necessary for effective operation of the project. The 4-foot raise of the Lake Darling design pool (authorized by Section III of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1982, PL 97-88) and the construction of Burlington Dam (authorized by PL 91-611) will no longer be authorized upon completion of the structure(s) in Canada. An International Agreement between Canada and the United States was signed in October 1989. The work under the current plan authorized by PL 99-662, consists of either one or two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as the Rafferty and Alameda projects); a modified outflow structure at Lake Darling Dam; a downstream flood warning system from the Canadian border; levee improvements at Sawyer, Renville County Park, and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot, flood proofing of about 90 rural homes in the basin and the purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modifications to dams 320, 326, 332, 341 and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. Estimated Federal cost (1990) for new work is $86,000,000 and $8,240,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva was signed in November 1984. A local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project as authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was signed in October 1989. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: An 24-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 adjustment of construction contract costs for improvements at Velva was made for $4,600. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for Velva were $2,186. Preconstruction planning for the Souris River basin reservoir continued. Respective costs for the applicable sub-projects are as follows: Miscellaneous contracts and work by others costs were $367,915. Burlington to Minot stages 1, 2, 3, and 4, costs were $224,581 by hired labor, $393,972 by contract, and $27,374 by supervision and administration. Sawyer improvement costs were $82,652 by hired labor and $11,070 by supervision and administration. Rural improvement costs were $123,392 by hired labor and $17,753 by supervision and administration. Refuge structures costs were $526,388 by hired labor, $77,694 by contact, and $57,767 by supervision and administration. Renville County Park improvement costs were $58,952 by hired labor, $24,642 by contract, and $7,010 by Supervision and Administration. Cash contributions for the Rafferty and Alameda Dams were $18,662,781 and $1,231,781 respectively. International Agreement Development and Canadian Dams design and construction review costs were $51,461. Lake Darling Dam improvement costs were $270,119by hired labor and $21,412 by supervision and administration. Flood warning systems costs were $6,919 by hired labor and $889 by supervision and administration. Study management costs were $12,060 by hired labor and $1,500 by supervision and administration. Total Federal costs were $22,266,870, non- Federal costs $0. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the channel and levee improvement work at Velva is complete. Construction has started on the Canadian reservoirs (Rafferty and Alameda Dams) and contracts have been awarded and work started for construction of the U.S. features. Preconstruction engineering and design are in progress for the remainder of the project.complete at the end of the fiscal year. 38. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WI Location. In La Crosse County in west-central Wisconsin, on the south side of the City of La Crosse. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement for local protection (flood control) consists of channel deepening and enlarging downstream from Hagen Bridge to the mouth of Pammel Creek and includes 13,600 feet of concrete-lined rectangular channel, a drop chute inlet structure, a side channel inlet structure, a stilling basin, a terminus structure, and three new street bridges. The upper 4,000 feet of rectangular channel is designed for supercritical flow and the remaining 9,600 feet of channel is designed for subcritical flow. When completed, the project will provide Standard Project Flood (SPF) protection. The city replaced a fourth bridge in 1980 that was previously included in the authorized plan. The city also replaced a railroad bridge in 1985 that was also included in the authorized plan. In 1986, the city constructed 450 feet of rectangular channel in the downstream reach to SPF protection. Estimated cost (1990) to the United States for new work, exclusive of the Ebner Coulee portion of the project which was deleted due to lack of economic feasibility, is $25,800,000 and $8,600,000 is to be contributed by local interests including a credit of $1,000,000 for advance construction work. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1969 for requirements. The local sponsor withdrew support for the project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units of government located within the project area. The project was reclassified as inactive on April 7, 1977, but was reactivated on November 8, 1978, after the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on September 17, 1978, July 13, 1978, and July 10, 1978, respectively, which requested continuance of the project. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and the City of La Crosse, Wisconsin, for the construction of the State Road flood control project was entered into August 11, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A Stage 1 construction contract cost $732,311. Real estate costs were $16,994. Cultural resources cost $16,046 by hired labor and $72,447 by contract. Engineering and design cost $462,450 by contract, $141,365 by hired labor and $750 by other Corps. Supervision and administration costs were $117,389. Total Federal costs were $993,167, non-Federal $566,585. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract for Stage 1 (outlet structure to Broadview Place) was completed in July 1990. A construction contract for Stage 2 (middle segment) was awarded in September, 1990. Construction is continuing. 39. ST. PAUL, MN Location. In Ramsey County at St. Paul, Minnesota, on the Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous project. For details see page 27-20 of Annual Report for 1974. Existing project. Since completion of the St. Paul and South St. Paulflood control project in 1964, the protected area has experienced two floods greater than the previous flood of record. The plan of protection provides for a nominal 4-foot barrier raise along the existing project alignment. Estimated cost (1989) to the United States for new work is $7,160,000 and $2,390,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project 24-16 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. The General Design Memorandum completed March, 1990, contains a draft local cooperation agreement which reflects cost sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. In a letter dated January 9, 1990, local officials from the city of St. Paul requested the addition of recreation as a project purpose. A February 16, 1990, letter from the city outlined the city's monetary commitment to the project and reaffirmed the local sponsor's support of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $511,006. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is continuing. 40. WARNER ROAD AND SIBLEY STREET, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ST. PAUL, MN Location. Along the left bank of the Mississippi River at approximately river mile 839.1 in St. Paul, MN. Existing project. The existing site is a sheetpile wall supporting a 30-foot embankment on which Warner Road is built. This highway is a vital artery serving over 17,000 vehicles per day entering and leaving downtown St. Paul. The Mississippi River's 9-foot commercial navigation channel is just riverward of this site. About 100 feet of the wall has kicked out at the base, and a 32-foot section has broken away from the top and bowed out into the river. Embankment material is being lost and threatens to undermine the roadway. Sudden catastrophic failure could result in blockage of the 9-foot commercial navigation channel. The Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment dated January 1990 was prepared under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. This report recommended installing an additional sheetpile wall 3-feet riverward of the existing wall, tying the new wall back into the existing structure, filling the space between the two wall with pervious fill, and capping the unit with concrete. Local cooperation. The local sponsor, the City of St. Paul, has expressed its willingness to provide the required local assurances by letter dated January 10, 1990. Local interests are required to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers, and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-ofway for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection, and, if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations, including section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as wellas Army Regulation 600- 7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $32,980 and $4,242, respectively. Condition at the end of fiscal year. Studies are completed. Plans and specifications are underway. 41. ZUMBRO RIVER AT GENOA, MN Location. In New Haven Township, Olmsted County in southeastern Minnesota about 60 miles south of Minneapolis- St. Paul. Existing project. Provides for erosion control along the west bank of the Zumbro River to protect Township Road G. The project involves clearing and shaping the bank and placement of rock protection along 300 feet of riverbank. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in May, 1990 under authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the New Haven Township, Minnesota in July 1990. Local interests are required to provide, during the period of 24-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers, and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection, and, if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations, including section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real estate costs were $354. Engineering and design costs were $7,903. Supervision and administration costs were $1,150. Total Federal costs were $9,407, non-Federal costs $0. Condition at end of fiscal year. A material delivery contract was awarded at the end of the fiscal year. 42. ZUMBRO RIVER AT JARRETT AND MILLVILLE, MN Location. The project sites are located on the left bank of the Zumbro River. The first site is about 1/2 mile downstream from Jarrett, Minnesota, and the second is about 1 1/4 miles downstream from Millville, Minnesota. The sites are about 16 miles northeast of Rochester, Minnesota, in south-central Wabasha County, in southeastern Minnesota. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion that is threatening County State Aid Highway 11 was authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial appraisal reports were dated June 1986 and March 1987 for Millville and for Jarrett, respectively. The recommended plan consists of placing 2,200 tons of rockfill along 700 feet of the riverbank to protect the road from further erosion at the Millville site, and minor excavation and placing 11,450 tons of rockfill along 1130 feet of the riverbank to protect the road from further erosion at the Jarrett site. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on July 22, 1988. A construction contract for slope protection was awarded on September 19, 1988 and completed in March 1989. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. Local cooperation agreements for the projects were signed by Wabasha County, Minnesota in July 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $163 and $32, respectively. Total Federal costs were $8,133, non-Federal, $8,328. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. Project was turned over to local interests by letter dated October 2, 1989. 43. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See table 24-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $81,156. Total cost to September 30, 1990, is $1,087,502. Miscellaneous 44. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, Public Law 298, 89th Congress) study management cost $40,211 by hired labor and $6,302 by other Corps. Study management at Buffalo Lake cost $1,922. A contract for aquatic plant control operations at Buffalo Lake, Wisconsin cost $51,532. Supervision and administration cost $6,408. 24-18 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Condition/operation studies for removal of silt and aquatic growth in Sauk Lake, Minnesota (Section 602, Water Resources Development Act of 1986) cost $6,865 by contract $8,400 by agreement with the United States Geological Survey, $950 by Detroit District Corps of Engineers, $975 by agreement with the Waterways Experiment Station, and $120,217 by hired labor. Supervision and administration cost $18,884. General Investigations 45. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $883,502 which included seven flood damage prevention studies, one restudy of deferred projects study, miscellaneous activities, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 24-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 46. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost was $298,459 which included the items concerning international water studies, flood plain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 24-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 47. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $1,137,724 which included five local protection projects. Table 24-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. For details of the individual projects see sections 15, 22, 25, 36 and 39. 24-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 1. Minnesota River, MN 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN 4. Bassett Creek, MN 5. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD 6. Cannon River at Faribault, MN 7. Chaska, MN 8. Devils Lake, ND 9. Eau Galle River, WI 10. Emerson, Manitoba- Noyes, MN 11. Enderlin, Maple River, ND 12. Grafton Pumping Station, ND 13. Grand Mound - State Historical Site, MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 283,000 282,907 35,546 115,700 35,639 114,499 - $2,057,7221 - 2,057,7221 10,965 2,723,097 11,459 2,722,390 - - - - 4,398,6282 - - - - 4,398,6282 1,643,200 2,305,600 2,413,600 2,406,809 32,590,8553 1,964,106 2,153,201 2,538,360 2,400,986 32,495,5493 - - - - 425,000 - - - - 425,000 5,522,000 3,131,000 1,051,000 5,548,000 17,382,000 5,159,893 1,598,739 2,883,210 3,696,101 15,358,9124 - 12,175,000 104,960 - 12,174,914s 181,300 133,800 197,300 167,354 2,790,954 177,527 150,131 195,915 159,260 2,780,943 14,500 7,500 57,750 6,988 46,144 5,115 72,250 65,747' - 217,000 901,000 6,218,000 9,179,000 1,347 209,888 891,512 5,460,941 8,404,837' 100,000 107,000 75,701 152,113 25,000 38,903 30,000 2,732,000 17,455 2,708,319 - - - - 9,039,250 - - - - 9,039,250 488,500 420,500 597,200 475,285 6,942,590 663,301 512,070 591,644 477,131 6,926,971 15,000 35,793 20,057 350,000 68 27,584 10,000 139,000 38,592 336,071 9,959 60,205 - 10,000 - 9,999 -30,256 440,000 395,7688 -- 4,000,000 176 4,000,0009 -5,932 255,000 41,653 149,000 92,86510 265,000 51,652 24-20 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 14. Homme Lake and Dam, ND 15. Houston, MN 16. Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN 17. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 18. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND 19. Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN 20. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN 21. Mankato and North Mankato, MN 22. Marshall, MN 23. Middle River at Argyle, MN 24. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 64,600 65,211 84,600 79,641 77,500 82,812 250,000 229,000 180,000 152,000 190,852 222,100 - 1,396,097 - 1,396,09711 99,435 2,529,556 85,034 2,514,147 217,000 267,028 876,000 831,980 - 964,873 - 964,873 476,600 478,200 462,200 478,975 495,181 520,713 385,245 6,796,908 362,954 6,767,191 - 18,642,000 - 18,642,000 45,600 68,774 34,200 36,774 16,300 16,300 836,000 1,165,900 724,600 1,084,350 1,121,528 761,998 29,357 23,598 306,457 300,097 - 3,325,638 - 3,325,63812 792,879 16,427,531 783,328 16,405,335 - 1,080,000 401,000 1,200,000 2,681,000 - 456,218 554,671 1,210,664 2,221,553 760,000 981,973 20,000 2,997 15,762 400,900 516,900 331,900 399,078 504,140 348,094 10,035,000 9,200,000 1,298,000 10,550,414 9,008,612 2,139,575 190,000 94,958 18,000 161,205 25,000 33,569 200,000 100,000 196,334 94,983 215,000 1,020,000 350,000 234,728 475,312 712,016 - 1,187,500 2,925 1,186,64913 - 1,339,727 - 1,339,727 332,213 4,694,532 329,426 4,676,698 - 97,378,500 9,089 96,949,62714 25,000 2,520,866 25,156 2,520,180's 990,000 360,000 2,375,000 77,750 1,067,432 2,144,550 100,000 1,847,500 247,526 1,792,07516 24-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 25. Portage, WI 26. Prairie du Chien, WI 27. Red Lake River, MN, including Clearwater River, MN 28. Red Lake River, Gentilly, MN 29. Red River of the North at Argusville, ND 30. Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN 31. Red River of the North at Fargo, ND- Moorhead, MN 32. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND 33. Root River at Hokah, MN 34. Rochester, MN 35. Roseau River, MN 36. Sheyenne River, ND 37. Souris River Basin, ND 38. State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 300,000 - 280,668 12374 42051 12,374 42,051 -69,891 65,200 84,700 140,400 68,424 78,031 154,746 - 100,000 - 24,445 570,000 -50,000 803,174 145,050 7,500 7,500 67,500 6,971 - 20,000 214,000 185,313 140,000 84,216 17,238 59,206 35,000 19,898 -35,000 1,250 358,400 324,700 428,900 413,858 294,219 461,120 - - 22,000 - - 20,727 311,000 311,462 611,000 592,130 - 3,685,000 - 3,528,347 - 3,120,079 - 3,120,07917 59,025 1,290,627 50,846 1,282,358 90,000 209,249 330,000 317,91018 - 1,534,000 11,312 1,534,000 10,665 11,988 165,000 121,574 85,665 85,66519 220,000 141,47220 - 8,138,984 - 8,138,98421 529,852 5,026,386 529,304 5,006,270 222,000 93,213 244,000 113,94022 673,000 3,489,000 5,514,000 7,852,000 20,652,000 563,018 1,510,876 6,461,148 9,015,991 20 ,6 3 3,8 7 12 23,548 14,775 23,548 14,775 9,193 25,000 2,153,000 187,613 2,145,467 845,000 522,000 780,000 4,755,000 9,168,000 688,070 687,427 759,579 3,808,885 8,198,81324 2,057,000 2,450,000 1,500,000 23,000,000 33,572,000 2,388,438 2,404,279 1,879,501 22,266,870 32,606,604" - 1,265,000 4,582,000 1,313,000 8,722,000 14,134 231,633 5,543,747 993,167 8,330,547" 24-22 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 1990 39. St. Paul, MN New Work: Approp. - 400,000 475,000 513,000 1,388,000 Cost - 389,808 479,221 511,006 1,380,035 40. Warner Road at New Work: Sibley Street, Approp. - - 30,000 103,500 133,500 St. Paul, MN Cost - - 19,179 37,222 56,401 41. Zumbro River New Work: at Genoa, MN Approp. - 6,000 - 39,500 45,500 Cost - 220 3,371 9,407 12,998 42. Zumbro River New Work: at Jarrett and Approp. 44,500 141,000 -10,000 -34,060 141,440 Millville, MN Cost 17,345 39,043 93,185 -8,133 141,44027 1 Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes $359,202 contributed funds. 2 Includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 3 Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 4 Excludes $547,869 contributed funds. 5 Excludes $152,223 contributed funds. In addition, $486,313 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. 6 Excludes $14,841 contributed funds. ' Excludes $308,330 contributed funds. 8 Excludes $118,801 contributed funds. 9 Excludes $150,191 contributed funds. 1o Excludes $27,583 contributed funds. " Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. 12 Excludes $208,000 contributed funds. 3 Excludes $35,160 contributed funds. 4 Excludes $79,537 contributed funds. 1s Includes $1,802,866 for new work for previous project. 1 Excludes $196,970 contributed funds. 17 Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. 8 Excludes $80,000 contributed funds. 1 Excludes $26,055 contributed funds. 20 Excludes $21,784 contributed funds. 21 Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit $11,239, which is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has expires: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 22 Excludes $4,670 contributed funds. 23 Excludes $1,639,933 contributed funds. 24 Excludes $1,150,000 sunk costs for deauthorized Kindred Lake unit (see Table 24-G). Excludes $1,845 contributed funds for Horace to West Fargo unit and $45,649 for West Fargo unit. 2 Excludes $4,919,000 sunk costs for deffered Lake Darling Dam unit. (see Table 24-E). s Excludes $225,000 sunk costs for inactive Ebner Coulee unit (see Table 24-E) and $775,668 contributed funds. 27 Excludes $38,173 contributed funds. 24-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MINNESOTA RIVER, MN 1. July 13, 1892 Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a Annual Report 1891. channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. p. 2209 July 3, 1958 Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to S. Doc. 144.84th mile 14.7 Cong., 2d sess. 1 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Mar. 3, 1899 Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Mar. 2, 1907 Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. June 25, 1910 Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech H. Doc. 363, 61st Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project Cong., 2d sess. abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) July 27, 1916 Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and H. Doc. 413, 64th Gull Lake. Cong., 1st sess. 1 June 26, 19342 Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 'Contains latest published map. 2 Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 24-24 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Reportto September 30.1990 See Annual Operation Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 Black River, WI 1 1950 67,585 - Lake Traverse, MN and SD 4 1921 92 - Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN s 1925 47,794 3,891 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed3 1923 9,070 - Red River of the North, MN and ND 3,6 1921 293,344 76,209 St. Croix River, MN and WI Completed 1989 150,410 1,178,055 Wisconsin River, WI 23 1888 - - Warroad Harbor and River, MN Completed 1989 86,105 1,221,449' Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive5 1928 27,941 22,1808 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN Completed 1989 515,0009 - 1Existing channel adequate for commerce (see table 24-G for deauthorized portion of project). 2Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2d sess.). Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 3No commerce reported. 4Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 1st sess.). 5Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 1st sess.). 6Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.). 'Includes $1,662 for condition surveys for FY 1990. 8Includes $11,041 for condition surveys for FY 1990. 9Excludes $307,556 contributed funds. 24-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing Cty,MN Completed 1988 $471,000 - Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND s Completed 1985 58,500- Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND Deferred 1983 5,568,600'- Dry Run, IA Completed 1966 1,790,7592- Elk River, MN Completed 1970 259,7003- Grafton, ND Active 4 1983 - - Guttenberg, IA Completed 1974 2,361,915- Hanover, Hennepin County, MN s Completed 1988 259,500- Irving Township, Jackson County, WI s Completed 1984 189,600 - Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI5 Completed 1986 158,500- Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI5 Completed 1987 33,000- Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN5 Completed 1989 61,3266- Lake Darling Dam, ND Completed 1987 4,919,000- Lost River, MN Deferred 1967 517,5198- Lower Branch Rush River, ND9 Completed 1974 1,000,00010 Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN5 Completed 1986 250,000" Minneota, MN9 Completed 1963 161,545- Minot, ND Completed 1983 21,479,50012 Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Completed 1957 1,675,835- Pembina River, ND Active 4 1983 - Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI s Completed 1989 62,76213 Red Lake River at Huot, MNs Completed 1984 64,500- Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN5 Completed 1984 131,000- Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN s Completed - 27,500 - Red River of the North at Halstad, MN9 Completed 1986 2,012,000 - Red River of the North at Oslo, MN9 Completed 1984 1,960,200- Red River of the North at Pembina, ND9 Completed 1979 2,000,000- Redwood River below Marshall, MN9 Completed 1960 202,400- Rushford, MN Completed 1980 3,192,333 - Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul,MN5 Completed 1985 250,00014- Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND5 Completed 1988 111,000- Souris River, Velva, ND s Completed 1988 137,500- St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN Completed 1974 8,476,01215s State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI (Ebner Coulee Unit) Inactive 1987 225,000- Twin Valley, MN Inactive 1988 2,115,700- Upper Iowa River, IA Completed 1964 888,445- Velva, ND9 Completed 1970 334,628 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN9 Completed 1980 999,900 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River Hastings, MN s Completed 1985 182,000 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul,MN5 Completed 1987 250,000 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN Completed 1989 5,620,700 Winona, MN Completed 1989 32,741,13116 Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 - 24-26 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS ' Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Lake Darling project. Additional authorization required for implementation of recommended plan. The Senate Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 2 Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 3 In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. SPreconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under General Investigations. s Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 6 Excludes $20,441 contributed funds. 7Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Souris River Basin Project (see Section 37 and Table 24-A for costs for active project). 8Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see Table 24-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. 9Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 205,1948 Flood Control Act as amended. 10Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. "Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. '2Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. "3Excludes $20,920 contributed funds. 14Excludes $62,620 contributed funds. l5Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. 16Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 24-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI' 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - Hudson Harbor, WI2 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 -- Kindred Lake, ND3 1987 Nov. 17, 1986 $1,150,000 - La Crosse, WI4 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 -- Maple River, ND5 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 1,241- Moorhead, MN s 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700- Pembina River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 50,000- Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034- Sheyenne River, NDs 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956- Tongue River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 23,695 - Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN 1974 Nov. 17, 1986 182,000- Warroad Harbor and River, MN6 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 - 'Portion of project for removal of obstructions at various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see Table 24-C for costs for completed portion of the project). 2Part of the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin project. 3Previously part of Sheyenne River, ND project (see Section 36 and Table 24-A for costs for active project). 4Authorized for further study by a House committee on Public Works Resolution dated March 15, 1988. 5Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 32 in text and Table 24-I for costs for active units of project). 6Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth (see Table 24-C for costs for completed portion of project). 24-28 TABLE 24-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (Square Original Stage Tota Reservoir (feet) River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) Completed Cost Completed Cost Cos Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1163 173 205.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 --- --- 1913 86,826 86 Surveys and flowage rights --- --- --- --- 160,939 160 Recreational facilities --- --- --- --- 2,834,838 2,834 Total new work --- --- 681,805 --- 3,716,823 4,398 Total operating and care --- --- 100,857 --- 31,427,494 31,528 Permanent indefinite --- --- -- -.- 967,197 967 appropriation for operation and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 Rehabilitation --- --- --- --- 425,000 425 Total 2,152,840 --- $782,662 --- $36,536,514 $37,319 1Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29,1944. 2Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. I1 t ,470 ,185 ,030 ,020 ,320 ,826 ,939 ,838 ,628 ,351 ,197 ,000 ,176 zz REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 24-I RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 32 of Text) Total Cost to Estimated Name of Unit State Type September 30, 1990 Federal Cost Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,7001 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,700 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Fork Minnesota Levees, floodwall, 1,698,200 17,500,0002 North Dakota pumping plants Red River at Fargo Channel improvement 1,639,924 1,639,9003 levees Total cost to date 8,060,8484 Total estimated cost 23,862,000s 1Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities. 2The East Grand Forks unit was reclassified from active to inactive on August 19, 1988. The cost of this unit was last revised in 1987. 3Includes $67,900 for lands. "Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge deferred unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. s The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'deferred' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated tobe $666,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in Table 24-G. In FY 89, the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit was included as part of the General Investigation program under Restudy of Deferred projects. 24-30 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 43 of Text) Project Date Inspected Aitkin, M N ..................................................................... ............. October 1989 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD .......... ...................................................... September 1990 Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN ................................................... October 1989 Breckenridge, MN ............................................... ....... ..................... September 1990 Cochrane, W I .................................... .............................................. October 1990 Elk River, M N ...................................... ................... ................. September 1990 Fargo, ND............................................. .... .... ............. ................. September 1990 Grand Forks, ND ............................................................................. December 1989 Halstad, M N ................................................................................ December 1989 Hanover, M N ............... . ............ .......... ..................................... September 1990 H uot, M N ..................................... .......... . ....................... ........... ... O ctober 1990 LeSueur, M N ............................................................................... September 1990 M ahnomen, M N ........................................... ......................... ............. October 1989 Mankato, North Mankato, and LeHillier, MN ....................................................... September 1990 M arshall, M N ............. . ..................... ..................................... September 1990 M inneota, M N ............... ................................................................ September 1990 M inot, ND .............. . ................................................................ October 1989 Oslo, M N .......... ......................................................... ................. O ctober 1989 Pembina, ND .................. ............................................. .................... October 1989 Plum Creek - Pine Island, MN................................................................... September 1990 Red Lake Falls, M N ........................................................................... October 1989 Rushford, M N ............................................................................... September 1990 Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN............................ ................... September 1990 Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND................................................................. September 1990 South St. Paul, M N ............................................................................. October 1990 St. Paul, M N ................................................................................ November 1990 Velva,ND .................................................................................... October 1989 Velva (Bonnes Coulee), ND ....................................................................... October 1989 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN ................................................................ September 1990 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN ...................................... September 1990 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN.................................................... September 1990 Wild Rice River at Mahnomen County, MN......................................................... October 1989 W inona, M N ............................................................................... September 1990 Zippel Bay, M N .............................................................................. October 1989 Zumbro River, MN ........................................................................... September 1990 24-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 24-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Anoka,MN.................................................................$11,511 Avoca, WI...............................................................................1,406 Beaver Lake, Stearns County, MN..................................................... 833 Beebe Lake, Frankfort, M N ........................................ ..... .................... 18,927 Cochrane, Mississippi River, WI................................................. ............. 8,726 Elk River Lake, Orono, M N ................................................................. 4,395 Gilmore Creek, M N ........................... ................... .... .... ................. 43,881 Kawishiwi River, MN............................................. .. ...................... 1,649 Kickapoo River, Viola, WI....................................... ........................ 10,856 Lake Charlotte, M N .............. . ..................................................... 21 Pelican Lake, Frankfort, MN................. ....... .................................. 3,406 Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI....................................... ........................ 16,099 Shell Lake, WI...................... ..................... ..................... 9,433 Snake River, Alvarado, MN..................... .................................... 41,068 Trempealeau River, Arcadia, WI.....................................................4,084 Zumbro River Lake, Zumbro, M N ..................... ....................................... 9,027 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs County Hwy. 41 No.-MN R.-Mankato, MN.................... ......................... $21,812 Flambeau Lake, WI...................................................................... 19,957 Long Interlaken Lake, W I................................................................ 30,000 Red Lake River, State Hwy 32, MN .......................................................... 5,317 Red River of the North, Cty Rd #2, ND ....................................................... 1,624 W abasha, M ississippi River, M N ................................ ............................ 7,574 24-32 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-K (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs M arais River, ND ........................................................................... $1,953 Red Lake River, East Grand Forks, MN ........................................................... 7,615 Red River of the North, Grand Forks, ND ......................................................... 7,919 W ild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee, MN ............................................................. 18,412 W ild Rice River, Lake Ida, MN ................................................................. 1,267 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Project Fiscal Year Costs Disaster Preparedness..................... ...... ...................................... $159,760 Emergency Operations....................................................................... 210,708 Rehabilitation ......... .................................. ................................... 300,596 Emergency Water Supplies & Drought Assistance.................................................. 27,100 Total emergency flood control activities.............................................$698,164' 1 Cost for FY 1989, including $159,335 for Disaster preparedness, $1,218,966 for Emergency Operations and $82,599 for Emergency water supplies and drought assistance were inadvertently omitted from the FY 1989 Annual Report. 24-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 24-L GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 45, 46 and 47 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Crookston, MN.......................................................... $285,807 Grand Forks, ND....................................................... 122,875 La Crosse, WI........................................................... .. 7,532 Minnesota River Basin, MN................................................ .11,799 Rainy River Basin, MN ...................................................... 54,921 Red Lake and Clearwater Rivers, MN........................................ ... 7,453 Red River of the North, MN and ND............................................ 5,958 Review of Authorized Projects Wahpeton-Breckenridge, MN.................................... ............. 31,151 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations.............................. .. .......... ............ 62,564 FERC Licensing Activities............................ .... ...... ............ 9,355 Intra Agency Water Resources Development..................................... 12,389 Coordination with Other Agencies Soil Conservation Services.......................... ....................... 1,847 Bureau of Reclamation.................. .... .. .... .. ....... ............. 5,573 Planning Assistance to States-MN.............................................. 127,269 Planning Assistance to States-ND ............................................. 114,581 Planning Assistance to States-WI........................................... 22,428 TOTAL SURVEYS............................................................. $883,502 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International Water Studies.................................................... 46,5781 Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services Unit......................................... 64,717 Technical Services, General................................................... 28,212 Special Studies........................................................... 111,365 Hydrologic Studies Sedimentation Studies....................................................... 47,000 Stream Flow Data.......................................................... 597 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA ................................ $298,469 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Houston, MN ............................................................... 267,028 Marshall, MN........................................................... 25,156 Portage, W I.............................................................. 311,462 Sheyenne River, ND........................... ........................ 23,072 St. Paul, MN............................................................. 511,006 TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN................................... $1,137,724 'Includes $40,346 for International Water Studies under O&M Appropriation. 24-34 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to Location. Mississippi River rises in northern part of Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. Lates map and profile showing this section of river is in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to 'Missouri River) is in River and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge of 2.7 miles, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 25-C, 25-D, 25-E and 25-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, I and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. See House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, was contingent upon the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and Upper Mississippi River mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements have been complied with for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See Table 25-F for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) St. Paul District. New Work: None Maintenance: Channel Dredging to remove shoal areas was performed. Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed 374,342 cubic yards of material at 4 locations at a cost of $1,140,631. Mechanical dredging contract at the St. Paul Small Boat Harbor cost $15,000. Mechanical dredging contractors removed 151,082 cubic yards of material at 13 locations at a cost of $919,994. Dredging surveys cost $440,056. Water quality testing for dredging cost $79,695. Modification of the wing dam at Jackson Island cost $122,767. A site preparation contract for Pool 1 cost $74,858. Disposal site restoration by hired labor cost $280,207. Other dredging and snagging cost $126,393. Painting at locks and dams cost $608,827. Contracts for electrical work at Lock and Dam 6, general dam maintenance, and general lock maintenance cost $249,998, $14,301, and $10,195, respectively. A herbicide service contract cost $23,587. Contracts for dam gate seals, for roller gate chains, and for gate hoist machinery at Locks and Dams 2, 4, and 5, cost $21,410, $451,355, and $1,200,096, respectively. Contracts to repair the fixed crest spillway at Lock and Dam 10 and to raise the service bridge at Lock and Dam 2 cost 25-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 $322,999 and $3,438,904, respectively. Contracts for lock work at Locks and Dams 3, 4, and 5 cost $1,216,863, $1,026,612, and $24,999, respectively. Contracts for major maintenance at Locks and Dams 4 and 5, for dewatering at Locks and Dams 5 and 10, cost $46,373, $564,003, and $1,128,810, respectively. Supply and equipment contracts for lock operating machinery, for purchase of spare parts for locks, for equipment replacement, and for computer processing equipment cost $57,596, $112,344, $50,262, and $4,676, respectively. Contracts for a railroad crossing at Lock and Dam 8, for repair of an access road at Lower St. Anthony Falls, for a service bridge crane at Lock and Dam 2, and an underground sprinkler system at Lock and Dam 10 cost $6,497, $22,468, $8,589, and $24,955, respectively. Engineering work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $2,799,739 and by contract for $514,817. Project condition surveys cost $8,173. Other miscellaneous hired labor, payments, supplies, and equipment cost $2,092,571. The total cost of maintenance was $19,251,620. Rehabilitation: A contract for electrical work at Lock and Dam 3, electrical contract for Lock and Dam 6, and a supply contract for roller chains cost $1,134,996, $419,996, and $50,000, respectively. Engineering, administration, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $466,337 and by contract for $154,932. Total rehabilitation costs were $2,226,261. Operating and care: Locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Total cost of operating and care was $10,959,049. Costs to St. Paul District were $30,210,669 for operation and maintenance and $2,226,261 for rehabilitation, for a total cost of $32,436,930. Rock Island District. New Work: Work continued on Stage II, Rock Excavation, in Pool 15 with 43,707 cubic yards of rock and overburden being removed by contract at a cost of $360,000. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead pipeling dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in Pools 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 21 and 22 at a cost of $771,100 with 412,722 cubic yards of material being removed. Mechanical dredging by St. Paul contract equipment was performed in Pool 11 at a cost of $173,500 with 29,430 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $64,400. Snagging, clearing, and excavation was performed by hired labor at various locations at a cost of $297,900. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging and channel maintenance activities cost $61,400. Repair of channel regulating works structures was performed at a cost of $1,447,400. Structural repairs, including sandblasting and painting, were performed by hired labor at locks and dams at a cost of $2,544,200. Repairs to spillways and dikes cost $104,400. Riprap repairs to the nonoverflow dike at Lock and Dam 12 were completed at a cost of $22,500. Construction of bulkheads at Locks 12 and 13 were completed at a cost of $369,400. Raising the LeClaire Base Storage Yard and Security improvement was completed at a cost of $600. The Stage I contract for major maintenance to the dams at Locks and Dams 17 and 18 was continued at a cost of $1,257,700. The work includes repairs to the structural components of the dams, placement of additional rock fill upstream and downstream of the gated sections of the dam, repairs to the spillways, and removal of silt from the auxiliary lock bays. The Stage II major maintenance contract for electrical/ mechanical system replacement at Lock 17 was continued at a cost of $6,750,200. The contract for structural repairs to dam gates at Lock and Dam 22 were initiated at a cost of $230,700. Road/railroad maintenance at Lock and Dam 22 was completed at a cost of $12,400. Repairs to Landwall Bullnose at Lock and Dam 21 were made at a cost of $117,000. Drilling a new well at Lock and Dam 16 was completed at a cost of $44,300. Installation of fuel tanks at Locks and Dams was initiated at a cost of $131,900. Maintenance dredging at Gregory Drainage Ditch was initiated at a cost of $216,000. Pool 18 Swift Chute dredging was completed at a cost of $292,900. Maintenance of roads and bridges, and of building, grounds and utilities cost $300. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $630,500; and maintenance and purchase of permanent operating equipment cost $300,000. Maintenance of levees cost $312,900. Real estate activities relating to maintenance cost $96,300. Engineering and design work was performed at a cost of $975,100. Supervision, administration, and inspection for maintenance features cost $1,299,100. Total maintenance costs were $18,524,100. Net credits to the project were $210,000, primarily as a result of collection of damages from towboat companies to lock and dam structures. Operating and care: Operation of locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $10,039,600. Real estate management services were performed at a cost of $242,800. Natural and cultural resource activities cost $304,300. Public use areas and Mississippi River Visitors Center were operated at a cost of $1,156,900, with contract law enforcement provided at a cost of $60,600. OSHA inspections and medical examinations were accomplished at a cost of $10,600. Surveys, various condition and operation studies, and structural inspections cost $974,100. Water control management costs were $661,200, and the amount of $28,200 was expended on Master Plans. Supervision and administration for operations features cost $286,300. Total operation costs were $13,764,600. Total operation and maintenance costs were $32,288,700. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation continued at Locks and Dams 20, 21, and 22 at a cost of $13,120,817, $1,620,336, and $1,348,248, respectively. Total rehabilitation costs were $16,089,401. Costs to Rock Island District were $360,000 for new work; $32,288,700 for operations and maintenance; and $16,089,401 for major rehabilitation for a total cost of $48,738,101. St. Louis District. New work: Costs incurred for Melvin Price Locks and Dam, formerly Lock and Dam 26 replacement were $1,198,859 for real estate acquisition, $859,330 for relocations, $19,728,008 for the dam, $2,576,288 for the lock, 25-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN * $1,904 for wildlife, $3,238 for roads, $7,677,666 for channels, $49,358 for levees and floodwalls, $275,000 for recreation facilities, $372,891 for buildings, grounds, and utilities, $508,094 for permanent operating equipment, $2,798,137 for engineering, and $3,934,171 for supervision and administration. Costs incurred for 2nd lock were $46,006,488 for the lock, $1,782,317 for engineering and $2,043,454 for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work was $89,815,203. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made. Other work accomplished was management of natural resources, operation of recreation areas, condition and operation studies, water control management and other studies and reports for a total cost of $4,865,705. Costs to St. Louis District were $89,815,203 for new work and $7,216,052 for operations and maintenance for a total cost of $97,031,255. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition; Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned or controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. in addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by the Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: None. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: Construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hanibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pools 15 and 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock and Dam 15. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive consisting of 93,601 acres in fee and 10,541 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: None. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams 24, 25, and Melvin Price Locks and Dam, except for guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of construction guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25. Melvin Price Locks and Dam are under construction. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of lands in Pools 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 3,836 acres has been acquired for the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Louis District: Work remaining on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project includes completion of the third stage, (the 600 foot lock and 1 gatebays of the dam). Other work includes completion of the removal of the existing lock and dam, a railroad bridge, and construction of the administration/maintenance building and Visitor Center. Approximately 363.5 acres remain to be acquired; all of which are for mitigation purposes for terrestrial wildlife losses. Total Federal costs of existing project to end of fiscal year for the three Districts was $178,206,286 of which $90,175,203 was for new work, $69,715,421 regular funds for operation and maintenance and $18,315,662 regular funds for rehabilitation. 25-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 25-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 Mississippi River New Work' between Missouri River Approp. 2 $102,998,100 $72,364,918 $36,641,700 $87,951,000 $951,162,621 and Minneapolis, Cost' 83,924,837 72,366,650 47,598,654 90,175,203 945,751,906 Minnesota (Federal Maint. 4 Funds) Approp. 59,089,429 59,310,934 57,726,400 70,295,150 970,173,538 Cost 50,351,678 56,948,760 61,399,510 69,715,421 948,932,070 Rehab. Approp. 12,950,000 15,902,500 24,729,200 18,519,770 130,874,657 Cost 12,283,403 16,248,598 24,918,657 18,315,662 130,485,417 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 2,041,140 Cost 0 0 0 0 2,041,140 1. Includes $56,945,518 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $721,773,000. 3. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $710,853,666. 4. Includes $8,504,026 for maintenance on previous project. TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 25-B TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $ 60,145,9912 24,210,071 $9,071,214 $93,427,276 Maintenance3 401,727,112 - - 401,727,112 Rehabilitation 53,331,877 - - 53,331,877 Total 515,204,980 24,210,071 9,071,214 548,486,265 Rock New Work4 71,307,9455 17,403,322 11,338,865 100,050,132 Island Maintenance6 354,031,833 - - 354,031,833 Rehabilitation 77,153,540 - - 77,153,540 Total 502,493,318 17,403,322 11,338,865 531,235,505 St. Louis New Work 8 739,957,882' 10,282,566 2,440,266 752,680,714 Maintenance 202,405,954 - - 202,405,954 Total 942,363,836 10,282,566 2,440,266 955,086,668 1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expend- Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts ed in pool No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $797,670 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. covering their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 6. Costs subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the operating and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such pruposes. 7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 8. Includes $710,853,666 for Melvin Price Locks and Dam. 25-4 TABLE 25-C LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi. Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 In city of 56 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 1002 - $ 18,203,000' Falls, upper Lock St. Anthony Falls, lower Lock and dam Lock and dam 1 Lock and dam 2 Lock and dam 3 Lock and dam 4 Lock and dam 5 Lock and dam 0 5A Lock and dam 6 Lock and dam 7 Lock and dam 8 Lock and dam 9 Lock and dam 10 Lock and dam 11 Lock and dam 12 Lock and dam 13 Lock and dam 14 Le Claire Lock (Canal) Lock and dam 15 Lock and dam 16 Minneapolis, MN 853.3 In city of Minneapolis, MN 847.6 Minneapolis- St. Paul, MN 815.2 1.3 above Hastings, MN 796.9 6.1 above Red Wing, MN 752.8 Alma, WI 738.1 Minneiska, MN 728.5 3 above Winona, MN 714.3 Trempealeau, WI 702.5 Dresbach, MN 679.2 Genoa, WI 647.9 3.3 below Lynxville, WI 615.1 Guttenberg, IA 583.0 3.7 above Dubuque, IA 556.7 Bellevue, IA 522.5 4.3 above Clinton, IA 493.3 3.7 below Le Claire. IA 493.1 3.9 below Le Claire, IA 482.9 Foot of Arsenal Island, Rock Island, IL 457.2 1.8 above Muscatine. IA stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 56 400 26.94 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone. piles. 56 400 35.94 725.1 13.54 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel. 56 400 35.9 - 12.5' 7.6 in gravel. 110 500 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 110' 600' 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay. 110 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. silt and clay. 110 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and clay. silt. 110 600 8.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and gravel. broken rock. 110 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. gravel and silt. 110 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand clay and and gravel. gravel. 110 600 11.0 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. Rock. 80 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. Rock. 110 600 16.0 561.0 24.011 11.0 Rock. Rock. 110 360 16.0 - 17.011 11.0 110 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 100 1959 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 92 100 100 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1938 1939 1922 1934 98 1937 12.382,000* C,' 2,358,000' 6,492,000' 5,596,000 4,865,000 5,081,000 4,549,000 Z 4,874,000 O 5,574,000 6,061,000 Z 6,539,000 z 4,750,000 7,428,000 0 C,' 5,580,000 z7,502,000 7,502,000 6,284,000 1o 14,201,000 9,788,000 _ 1 l l l l TABLE 25-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost o Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva. Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Lock and dam 437.1 4.2 above New 110 600 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 99 1939 $ 5,843,000 17 Boston, IL and gravel. Lock and dam 410.5 6.5 above 110 600 9.8 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 90 1937 10,308,000 18 Burlington, IA Lock and dam 364.2 Keokuk, IA 110 358 38.2 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. Rock. 100 1913 19 110 1,200 5.0 13.0 99 1957 14,813,000 Lock and dam 343.2 0.9 above 110 600 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. Rock and 97 1936 6,281,000 20 Canton, MO piles in sand and gravel. Lock and dam 324.9 2.1 below 110 600 10.5 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 95 1938 8,065,000 21 Quincy, IL and gravel, and gravel. Lock and dam 301.2 1.5 below 110 600 10.2 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock. 99 1938 5,275,000 22 Saverton, MO Lock and dam 273.4 Clarksville, MO 110 600 15.0 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand. 991 1940 10,337,000 24 Lock and dam 241.4 Cap Au Gris, 110 600 15.0 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 9914 1939 13,694,000 25 MO and gravel. and gravel. Lock and dam 202.9 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles and 100 1938 12,824,000' 26 (Henry T. 110 360 24.0 - 16.0 10.0 sand. Rainey Dam) Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to 87 - 746,700,000' Locks and Dam bedrock. bedrock. Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to 28 230,000,000 Locks and Dam bedrock. bedrock. (2nd Lock) Total, Locks and dams $ 1,202,247,000 N 1. Elevation of pools 1 to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 1912 adjustment: pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 2. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. 3. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 4. Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 5. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower rock. (Federal cost only.) 6. In addition S1.948,000 expended from previous projects and 81,349,600 from O & C appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam rehabilitation program. 7. Old upper guard sill. 8. Landward lock. 9. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. 10. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous project cost $540,000. 11. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at lock 15. 12. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. 13. Includes cash contribution of $3,950,000. 14. Complete except for guidewall extensions. 15. Lock and Dam 26 is in the process of being demolished. It has been replaced by the Melvin Price Locks and Dam at which full pool was raised 1 February 1990. At this time, Lock and Dam 26 is not operational. f 12 s 13 O 0 0 0 d C 0 zm C r O TABLE 25-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Mles above Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name OhMiaeRsb iovoe Location Type depth Percent Estimated OhRioi ver(feet) (feet) WWiiddtthh LLeenngth Complete Cost St. Paul Harbor, MN Hastings Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Bay City Harbor, WI Lake City Harbor, MN Pepin Harbor, WI Wabasha Harbor, MN Alma Harbor, WI Winona Harbors, MN Lansing Harbor, IA Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI Dubuque Harbor, IA Savanna Harbor, IL Clinton Harbor, IA Moline Harbor, IL Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, IL Andalusia Harbor, IL Muscatine Harbor, IA Fort Madison Harbor, IA 836.5-839.2 In city of St. Paul, MN 839.7 Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. 813.2 Lower end of city of Hastings, MN 791.4 In city of Red Wing, MN 791.1 In city of Red Wing, MN 785.9 Upper end of Bay City, WI 773.0 In city of Lake City, MN 767.1 In city of Pepin, WI 760.0 Upper end of city of Wabasha, MN 751.3 Upper end of Alma, WI 726.0 In city of Winona, MN Latsch Island 726.2 Crooked Slough 663.3 Upper end of city of Lansing, IA 635.5 Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, WI 635.0 In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. 579.4 At Dubuque, IA 537.3 At Savanna, IL 519.0 At Clinton, IA 488.0 At Moline, IL 484.2 At Lindsay Park 479.8 473.0 455.5 455.6 At Rock Island, IL Andalusia Slough At Muscatine, IA 383.7 At Fort Madison, IA Commercial a 0n1n n0)'(.;1., P,, Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial' Small-boat' Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Entrance channel small-boat harbor Small-boat Small-boat Freight terminal approach channel Small-boat ,vvv 300 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 170 400 4. elllll 400 100 100 500 100 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 850 600 800 500 1,000 6,000 500 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 800 100 1,000 frontage 12 55 5 5 6 5 59 5 340 280 400 230 200 100 40 150 200 250 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 1,100 100 100 0 78 100 100 435 100 950 100 1,890 100 900 100 21I ,1iUU 230,200 74,300 146,800' 8,700 39,4002 93,500 1,077,000' 205,500' 41,700 56,300 89,800 84,700 95,300 85,500 93,100 55,200 310,000 101,912 110,328 262,100 31,000 21,000 353,000 184,200 C,1 C/) C) CA' b 0 C,) z Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name Miles above Location Type Depth Percent Estimated Ohio River (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Warsaw Harbor, IL 359.1 At Warsaw, IL Small-boat 5 100 600 100 73,000 Quincy Harbor, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay, IL Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 6 Hannibal Harbor, MO 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 Total $4,269,640 1. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 2. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 3. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary use is small-boat, although some commercial activity exists. 4. In addition, local interests contributed $812,599. 5. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 6. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. to 0 0 ;.q O 0 0 n r;. O C 0 TABLE 25-D (Cont'd) HARBOR IM[PROVEIMENTS TABLE 25-E MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project (new work) $ 11,106,600 8,473,200' 545,000 193,600 4,780,9002 18,705,900 516,183,512 1. Includes a lump sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch Bridge, Minneapolis, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TABLE 25-F THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1990 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1990 St. Anthony Falls Lower Northern States Power $ 3,300 $ 93,277 Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 6,203,040 Total project (No. 362) 6,296,317 25-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 25-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized I)ocunmelts Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 l)ec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 21, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 195(0 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable. Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9 foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN harbor. I)etermine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, MN harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s. Winona, MN basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, MN harbor. Wabasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, MN harbor. Lansing, IA harbor. Fort Madison, IA harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. Davenport, IA harbor. Muscatine, IA harbor. Alma, WI harbor. Hannibal, MO harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. Opposite Ilamburg, II, harbor.' Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1915 (II. )oc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL. 2 None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and larbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None II. I)oc. Il03I, 7 th ('ong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., Ist sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. II.D )oc. 432, 771th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d( sess. H. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2(d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 661, 80th Cong. 2d sess. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2d(se1ss . H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st sess. iI. D)oc. 254, 81st Cong., Ist sess. None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess. 25-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 25-G (Cont'd) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee districts caused by operation of navigation pools. Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide adequate facilities for existing navigation. Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna 2, Moline, Andalusia, New Boston5, Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue', Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk 3, IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN'; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville5, WI. Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. Repair of Stone Arch Bridge at Minneapolis, MN. Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Change name of Lock and Dam 26 to Melvin Price Locks and Dam effective on the date of Melvin Price's death. (Apr. 22, 1988 - date of death) H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. None Public Law 95-502 Public Law 97-118 1. Deauthorized FY 75. 2. Inactive. 3. Deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 4. Guidewalls at Locks 3, 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, and 10 deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 5. Deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 6. Guidewall extensions at Locks 16, 18, and 21; construction of mooring facilities at Locks and Dams 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; upper approach improvement at Lock 19 and Lock and Dam 20; and rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools 14, 18, and 21 deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 25-11 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1959 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Documents Oct. 23, Oct 23, Nov. 7, Oct. 21, Dec. 29, 1962 1962 1966 1978 1981 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyo- drainage basin of Missouri River along main stem and ming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Colo- tributraries to Rulo, NE. rado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE................................26-2 2. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 26-2 Flood Control 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO ....................... 26-2 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND ................... 26-2 5. Chatfield Lake, CO ......................... 26-2 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO ..................... 26-3 7. Fall River Basin, SD ........................ 26-3 8. Great Falls, M T ............................ 26-3 9. Little Sioux River, IA.......................26-3 10. Lost Creek at Columbus, NE ................ 26-3 11. Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND ............ 26-4 12. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD .......................... 26-4 13. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA ....................... 26-4 14. Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE..................26-4 15. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE ................................. 26-5 16. Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE..................26-5 17. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha Dist)......................26-5 18. Pipestem Lake, ND.........................26-5 19. Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE ................ 26-5 20. South Platte River Basin, CO................26-5 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control W orks ............................. 26-6 22. Scheduling Flood Control Resrvoir Operations ........................ 26-6 23. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ....................... 26-6 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power Page 24. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD .................. 26-6 25. Fort Peck Lake, MT.......................26-6 26. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD .................. 26-7 27. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND .................. 26-7 28. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, 'Missouri River Basin, NE and SD...........26-7 29. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND ................... 26-7 Miscellaneous 30. National Emergency Preparedness...........26-8 General Investigations 31. See Table 26-K ............................ 26-8 Tables 26-A Cost and Financial Statement ............ 26-9 26-B Authorizing Legislation..................26-12 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 26-15 26-D Not Applicable 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects...26-15 26-F Other Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ........................ 26-17 26-G Deauthorized Projects ................... 26-17 26-H Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE .............. 26-18 26-I Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program....... 26-18 26-J Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects ...................... 26-18 26-K Active General Investigations.............26-21 26-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ............. 26-22 26-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in fiscal year 1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed in September 1980. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. Total cost was $189,226,000, of which $187,639,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $1,587,000 is the non-Federal cost, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. A complete list of terminal facilities are included in the Missouri River Navigation Maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Local interests operate and maintain the recreation sites. 2. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). No work during the period. Flood Control 3. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet, and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. The total cost of the project was $61,528,600. Recreation facilities were developed utilizing cost sharing funds at an additional cost of $500,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Finished investigation of contractor claim. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 400,700. 4. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. Damsite is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing project. A dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and reservoir with a storage capacity of about 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 123,415. 5. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. On the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet, a crest length of 12,500 feet, and a reservoir with flood control capacity of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 26,692 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation, and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps is participating with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and is 99 percent complete, with a scheduled completion date in FY 1991. Construction is essentially complete at the project with the exception of the recreation facilities along the downstream channel and fish and wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $104,800,000 (1990) of which $95,500,000 is the Federal cost for construction, $6,400,000 local cost in connection with the downstream channel improvement, and $2,900,000 is the local cost for acquisition of water for the recreation pool. 26-2 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies to the downstream channel improvement. The Colorado Water Conservation Board provided assurances of local cooperation for the downstream improvement on December 13, 1967. Local interests must provide water for filling the sediment reserve pool for recreation use which the state agreed to on April 25, 1967. Operations during fiscal year. Continued design by hired labor. Continued work on O&M manuals. Continue downstream channel recreation facilities. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 4,623,700. 6. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and 14,300 feet long. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiple-purpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in fiscal year 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $15,220,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 6,910,800. 7. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook; and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during fiscal year 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in fiscal year 1953 with exception of a road and parking area which were completed in fiscal year 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs unit dam was completed in fiscal year 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities which were completed in fiscal year 1972. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) For last funding see FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 505,008. 8. GREAT FALLS, MT Location. In Great Falls, Cascade County, MT at confluence of the Sun and Missouri Rivers. Existing project. Provides for levees along the left bank of the- Sun River and an interceptor ditch and closed conduit to collect and convey side-hill runoff to the Sun River. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $13,962,000 of which $11,912,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $2,050,000 is the local cost for lands, relocations and a cash contribution for replacement of a storm sewer conduit desired by local interests. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of fiscal year 1989 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on the O&M manuals. 9. LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IA Location. The project is located in the lower portion of the Little Sioux River Basin in Harrison and Monona Counties, IA, near the confluence of the Little Sioux and Missouri River. Previous project. For details see page 646, Annual Report for 1970. Existing project. Construction of the original project was completed in June 1966. Sill No. 4 was identified as a design deficiency in a June 17, 1981 report by the Omaha District, approved by OCE. Based on that report, design studies for a permanent solution to the problem were completed. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $23,630,000 (1990) of which $20,630,000 is the Federal cost of construction, and $3,000,000 is the local cost for lands, relocations, and associated E&D. Local cooperation. The Little Sioux Inter-County Drainage District was sponsor of that portion of the original project where the remedial work is being accomplished. Remedial work was 100 percent Federally funded. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on O&M manuals. 10. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Location. On Lost Creek just north of the City of Columbus in Platte County, NE. 26-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Existing project. This project provides levee and channel improvements on the north side of Columbus and provides protection to commercial and residential areas. The estimated cost of the construction is $4,480,000 (1990) of which $3,620,000 is the Federal cost, and $860,000 is non-Federal contributed funds - other, that provides for all necessary right of way, utility, and bridge relocations. Local cooperation. A contract with the City of Columbus to sponsor the project was approved on February 18, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated investigation of contractor claim. Continued preparation of O&M manuals for the project. 11. LOWER HEART RIVER, MANDAN, ND Location. Mandan, North Dakota, is located just upstream from the confluence of the Missouri and Heart Rivers in Morton County, adjacent to Bismarck, North Dakota. The Heart River is a right-bank tributary to the Missouri River. Existing project. The plan includes raising a 7,150-foot reach of the Mandan Unit of the existing levee an additional 1-1/2 to 2 feet to provide a full three feet of freeboard above the 100-year ice-affected event; raising a 12,300-foot reach of the Lower Unit four to five feet to provide three feet of freeboard above the SPF ice-affected event; and continued zoning and flood insurance for the unprotected portions of the Lower Unit. Construction was completed in September 1989. The total estimated cost of the project is $1,161,443. The non-Federal portion of this cost is $333,000 which includes $69,300 for lands, easements and rights-of-way. Local cooperation. The Lower Heart River Water Resources District (LHRWRD) is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. The LHRWRD has obtained cost-sharing assistance from the North Dakota State Water Commission. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of O&M manuals for the project. 12. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Location. NE and SD. The Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. Erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, will at the same time preserve high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of construction is $21,633,000 (1990) of which $21,000,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $633,000 is the non-Federal contributed funds - other costs. Local cooperation. All construction on this project will be done in accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. A cost-sharing contract with the State of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site was signed on June 24, 1986 and the Yankton-Riverside Park Section 215 Agreement was signed on April 24, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Efforts to protect Federally listed threatened and endangered species continued. 13. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing project. Construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. (See Table 26-A for total costs.) 14. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBRASKA, KANSAS AND MISSOURI (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA to St. Louis, MO. Active portion of the project in Omaha District extends from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Construction was initiated June 1948. (See Table 26-H for status of active units). Cost estimate for active portion of project from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE is $42,582,000 (1990) of which $37,964,000 is Federal cost for construction and $4,618,000 local costs for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units. Local interests have furnished assurances of their willingness and ability to fulfill local cooperation requirements for the remaining active units. Operations during fiscal year. Completed work on O&M manuals for Levee Unit L-611-614. 15. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair, flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha area where it is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creek flows along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing project. The active project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvement and a flood warning system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction was initiated in FY 1972. Completed proj- 26-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT ects include Standing Bear Lake (Site 16), Glenn Cunningham Lake (Site I11), Ed Zorinsky Lake (Site 18) and Wehrspann Lake (Site 20). Remaining work includes construction of recreational facilities and channel improvement on the Big Papio Channel. Estimated total costs for the project are $59,700,000 Federal funds with $4,539,000 non-Federal reimbursement, and $2,730,000 other and cash contributions. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Revise GDM and complete plans and specifications for Big Papio Channel. Continue construction Recreation Facilities Stage I at Site 18; and completed Effluent Storage Facility. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities continued at all four dam sites. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 8,678,849. 16. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Location. Scribner, Nebraska, is located in Dodge County about 47 miles northwest of Omaha, Nebraska. Pebble Creek is a right-bank tributary to the Elkhorn River. Existing project. The plan includes a 3.6-mile-long levee with an average height of about eight feet providing 100-year flood protection plus 3 feet of freeboard from Pebble Creek, a closure structure at U.S. Highway 275 at the northern edge of Scribner, four road ramps over the levee, an automated flood warning system, and appropriate land use zoning and continued flood insurance for unprotected areas. In the process of providing FEMA the necessary data to revise the flood insurance rate maps to reflect the Pebble Creek levee, it was determined that Scribner is subject to greater residual flooding from the Elkhorn River than was previously determined. In April 1989 additional studies were began to correct the problem. The studies concluded that it would be feasible to construct a levee to provide protection from the Elkhorn River. Local cooperation. The city of Scribner is the non- Federal sponsor of the project. The city has obtained costsharing assistance from the Nebraska Natural Resources Commission and the Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District. Operations during fiscal year. Construction on the Pebble Creek levee was completed in October 1989. Work began on the plans and specifications for the additional segment of the project along the Elkhorn River in April 1989 and continued into Fiscal Year 1990. The total estimated cost of the project is $2,470,000. The non-Federal portion of this estimate is $617,500 which includes $335,600 for lands, easements and rights-of-way. 17. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising Missouri River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 26-I for projects in the Omaha District included in the program. 18. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, 3 miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The miltipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 272,805. 19. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alterations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of Salt Creek survey report, remaining units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual visitation hours to the system of dams were estimated at 16,211,113. 20. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing project. General plan for flood control and 26-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 other purposes provides for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 26-B for authorizing legislation). 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the fiscal year are set forth in Table 26-J, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. Fiscal year costs were $195,159. 22. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1990 were $331,338 and total costs to September 30, 1990 were $5,987,201. 23. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for FY 1990 were $358,018 for disaster preparedness, $368,366 for emergency operations, $37,807 for emergency water supply and drought assistance and $3,800 for advance measures. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948). Plans and Specifications are currently being done on Sidney, NE. The following feasibility studies were initiated in FY 90. Cache La Poudre River, Greeley, CO; Elkhorn River, West Point, NE; Milk River, Malta, MT; Salt Creek Levees, Lincoln, NE. The following Reconnaissance Studies were initiated in FY 90: Cedar Creek at Cedar Lodge, NE; Corporate Gulch, Norfolk, NE; Little Missouri River, ND; Oak Creek, Dannebrog, NE; Sand Creek, Sterling, CO. Three negative Initial Appraisal Studies were submitted during FY 90 at a cost of $19,156. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946.) Operations under this heading were as follows: Construction was completed on 13 projects: Logan Creek, Bancroft, NE; Madison River, Madison County, MT, Medora, ND; Milk River, Blaine County, MT; Niobrara River, Bassett, NE; Platte River, North Bend, NE; Waterman Creek, O'Brien County, IA; Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT; South Platte River, Fort Lupton, CO; Power River, Arvada, WY; West Nishnabotna River, Malvern, IA, Oakland, IA; Milk River, Malta. Plans and specifications are currently being prepared on the following projects: Cannonball River, Shields, ND; Cedar River, Spaulding, NE; East Bow Creek, Cedar County, NE; Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MT; Nine Mile Drain, Scottsbluff, NE; Plum Creek, Norden Dam Access Road, NE; Shields River, Park County, MT; South Table Creek, Nebraska City, NE; White River, Tripp County, SD; Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT and Elkhorn River, Norfolk, NE. The following studies were initiated: South Platte River, Weld County, CO (Bridge 28); South Platte River, Weld County, CO (Bridge 61); South Platte River, Weld County, CO (Bridge 87); South Platte River, Logan County, CO; East Nishnabotna River, Page County, IA (Bridge) and Beaver Creek, Platte County, NE. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 24. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River, 987.4 miles above mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall Reservoir. Big Bend Reservoir extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of eight 58,500 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,883,000 acre-feet. Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, power production and other multiple uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. During the period, 752,449,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 4,379,789. 25. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Location. Reservoir is in Missouri River Valley in Mc- Cone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 miles above mouth of Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest, and Nashua, 9 miles north. Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, 26-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,909,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on original project in October 1933 and on second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The 5 generators have a total output of 185,250 KW, 2 generators at 40,000 KW each, 2 generators at 43,500 KW each and 1 generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost of the project was $158,428,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multi-purpose uses. Major Repair Work: Power Plant No. 1 (3 generators) was removed from service on 13 April 1990 to replace the penstock system at a cost of $19,000,000 and will be back on line in October 1992. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 937,567,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 3,400,405. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 24,137,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units, three units rated at 109,250 kilowatts each, and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each, three flood control tunnels and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the project was $299,938,000 including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required except cost-sharing with the State of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 1,804,383,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 9,262,000. 26. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS 28. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER Location. On Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above mouth of Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with a maximun height of 165 feet, a crest length of 10,700 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,574,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non-Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 1,386,634,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 8,241,186. 27. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above mouth of river and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about 4 miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A concrete and rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 504,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 44,099 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $49,617,000. Construction of original project was initiated in March 1952 and was completed in 1964. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 629,820,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity during fiscal year. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 9,405,563. 29. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about 6 miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above mouith of river. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 245 feet, a crest length of 9,300 feet, and reser- 26-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 voir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,337,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 112,290 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated August 1948 and project placed in operation June 1963. Miscellaneous 30. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $202,789. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation 31. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project Fiscal Year 1990 costs totaled $1,979,050 for all was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River General Investigation activities. See Table 26-K which reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power pro- covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Reduction, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal op- search and Development, Preconstruction Engineering eration and maintenance procedures were accomplished and Design (projects not fully authorized), Planning and during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and 1,876,562,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual Preconstruction Engineering and Design (fully authorized project visitation hours were estimated at 13,251,000. projects). 26-8 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 2. Sioux City Marina 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 5. Chatfield Lake, CO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 7. Fall River Basin, SD 8. Great Falls, MT (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 9. Little Sioux River and Tributaries, IA (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 1990 1. Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 2,475,000 2,464,261 -20,000 -21,364 268,00) 275,403 175,000 174,940 600,000 1,369,780 3,941 96,498 603,941 1,466,278 474,000 471,710 -65,000 567,000 566,993 266,000 254,829 -80,000 118,213 -80,000 118,213 100,000 26,511 6,329 106,329 26,511 26-9 2,406,000 2,412,217 9,000 10,080 243,000 243,329 276,000 275,668 361,000 449,983 444,539 361,000 894,522 503,000 497,720 4,115 833,000 756,453 312,000 317,400 -25,000 31,283 -25,000 31,283 30,000 93,556 2,051 8,380 32,051 101,936 1,926,284 1,927,227 -284 40,000 11,538 244,000 244,269 177,000 176,890 360,000 341,698 360,000 341,698 502,000 500,802 425,000 501,292 288,000 291,312 8,930 8,930 16,782 16,782 - 189,225,9911 - 189,225,9911 1,532,748 112,263,450 1,466,877 112,189,343 - 88,716 - 88,716 -15,000 62,028,600 3,471 62,018,608 250,609 2,597,609 226,794 2,572,992 - 4,372,174 - 4,372,174 161,227 2,459,270 135,848 2,432,049 654,000 95,157,700 513,862 94,969,753 -7,549 1,238,622 37,979 1,225,893 646,451 96,396,322 551,841 96,195,646 642,430 5,171,230 587,374 5,102,435 - 15,220,364 - 15,220,364 754,963 8,006,474 591,509 7,839,294 - 5,538,432 - 5,538,432 331,860 4,263,001 308,771 4,236,593 -11,912,1124 - 11,904,6104 - 308,600 - 308,600 - 12,220,7124 - 12,213,2104 - 20,629,920 6,973 20,628,873 8,380 8,380 20,638,300 6,973 20,637,253 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 26-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project 10. Lost Creek, Columbus, NE (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 11. Lower Heart River l Mandan, ND (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated l Summary) 12. Missouri National l Recreational River NE & SD r 13. Missouri River r Kenslers Bend, NE, to Sioux City, IA 14. Missouri River r Levees, IA NE, KS & MO (Required r Contributed Funds) (Consolidated I Summary) 15. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE r 16. Pebble Creek Scribner, NE (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated I Summary) 18. Pipestem Lake, I ND Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Mlaint. Approp. Cost COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Thru FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 1990 -15,000 -50,000 125,069 -15,000 74,232 73,000 24,575 73,000 24,575 25,000 57,516 5,533 52,000 51,304 120,000 166,202 120,000 166,202 2,270,000 2,129,384 514,000 513,416 109,000 114,703 109,000 114,703 351,000 352,918 20,542 20,542 211,000 223,950 263,700 474,700 223,950 70,000 88,586 200,000 45,780 45,000 45,828 250,000 99,087 250,000 99,087 2,868,000 3,008,487 594,000 585,395 140,000 45,607 205,000 345,000 45,607 534,000 532,078 150,000 67,625 150,000 67,625 703,000 613,121 224,689 703,000 837,810 68,000 71,561 200,000 345,793 41,000 41,318 178,349 178,349 1,671,000 1,511,524 710,000 721,885 1,067,000 1,071,987 179,559 1,067,000 1,251,546 267,000 268,752 60,567 60,567 -73,657 52,146 3,994 -73,657 56,140 611,000 565,852 100,000 70,662 47,350 42,504 33,000 63,630 33,000 63,630 3,055,000 2,516,780 581,444 487,355 74,487 95,868 20,844 74,487 116,712 280,404 263,878 3,619,518 3,527,754 147,300 147,300 3,766,818 3,675,054 1,161,443 1,139,355 263,700 228,683 1,425,143 1,368,038 1,530,800 1,480,298 1,052,000 1,011,820 11,294,414 11,294,414 4,575,419 4,569,972 37,964,1776 37,945,7736 38,810 38,810 38,002,987 37,984,583 53,481,7625 52,738,3105 4,348,444 4,244,725 1,838,484 1,770,309 205,000 200,404 2,043,484 1,970,713 9,277,545 9,277,545 4,075,404 4,058,229 26-10 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 1990 19. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 21. Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects 22. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 24. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 25. Fort Peck Lake MT 26. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 27. Garrison Dam- Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 28. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, SD and NE 29. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD & ND New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost Major Rehab Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 946,000 946,653 209,000 209,511 279,000 278,567 4,861,200 4,868,068 2,555,400 2,535,237 6,418,100 6,525,664 8,332,700 8,366,465 820,000 821,892 140,000 140,060 292,000 293,188 4,322,000 4,319,764 2,862,000 2,852,583 7,088,000 7,040,950 7,492,000 7,500,354 5,307,300 4,819,000 5,306,454 4,685,741 7,452,300 7,395,467 8,322,300 8,295,810 749,000 690,683 184,000 183,728 274,000 274,342 4,770,000 4,729,117 4,087,000 3,936,406 7,032,000 6,786,599 6,620,000 6,465,668 4,753,000 4,791,142 7,945,000 7,929,133 5 4 4, 4 703,801 636,656 212,128 195,159 12,197,6212 12,197,6212 9,925,276 9,798,152 3,324,476 3,307,088 344,708 6,000,684 331,338 5,987,201 - 107,497,597 - 107,497,597 ,268,530 61,799,7043 ,942,976 61,384,1503 - 158,428,080 - 158,428,080 ,579,469 66,903,4233 ,188,420 66,302,2413 - 199,065,883 - 199,065,883 7,111,147 108,127,0993 7,073,663 107,752,5313 - 295,729,613 - 295,729,613 7,550,057 121,916,4573 7,085,277 121,246,4983 - 4,208,310 - 4,208,310 - 686,961 - 686,961 - 49,617,239 - 49,617,239 4,063,805 78,223,2553 3,968,185 78,003,8473 - 346,520,603 - 346,517,696 7,762,851 114,522,5963 7,460,063 114,056,5923 1. Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act 3. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and $1,181,125 for pre- 4. Includes $110,000 transferred to inactive portion for vious project. planning cost. 2. Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that 5. Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred 6. Does not include $2,228,211.50 cost of inactive sites. status. 26-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Jan 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 13, 1968 Flood Control Act of 1962 Flood control Act of 1950 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Acts of 1955, 1965 Flood Control Act of 1954 June 30, 1948 June 30, 1948 National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 1. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. LOWER HEART RIVER, MANDAN, ND Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend (Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 alloted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, IA. For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO A flood control reservoir for protection of metropolitan Denver, CO. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood control reservoir and water supply. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. Modified 1950 Flood Control Act to operate dam and other Federal improvements to achieve authorized level of protection, beginning at dam and ending 82 miles downstream. Reassigns a portion of the storage space in the lake project to joint flood control-conservation purposes. Modified 1974 WRDA to exemp prohibition of encroachments for Mineral Ave/ Ken Caryl Rd. ext & transmission line. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs, SD. GREAT FALLS, MT Levees and channel improvement for local protection. PL 858, 80th Cong. PL 858, 80th Cong. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri PL 95-625 River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. 26-12 H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. PL 70-560 PL 71-520 PL 73-67 H. Doc 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong. PL 79-14 S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong. PL 87-874 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 655, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 343, 85th Cong. PL 85-500 PL 89-298 3. 5. 6. 7. 9. 10. 11. 12. LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IA Correction of design deficiency. PL 341, 80th Cong. PL 83-780 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act See Section in Text 13. 14. 15. 16. Flood Control Act of 1968 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 June 30, 1948 June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Project and Work Authorized MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike, revetments. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO. Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City, IA to Kansas City, MO. Extended project from Kansas City, MO to mouth and provided for increased protection. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing protection for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. Authorized additional $4.8 million for channel improvement on Big Papillion Creek, and to Union Pacific RR bridge, rec trail and flood warning system. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000 Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Documents H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 80-858 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 475, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Doc. 349, 90th Cong. PL 90-485 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 PL 858, 80th Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. PL 75-761 H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 79-526 PL 81-516 H. Does. 549 and 642, 81st Cong. PL 83-780 PL 83-776 PL 84-505 H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. PL 85-500 PL 86-645 PL 88-253 PL 89-042 PL 90-17 26-13 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 17. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 31, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Flood Control Act of 27 Oct 1965 July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Dec 22, 1944 June 16, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 May 18, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 June 3, 1948 Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Oahe Dam and Reservoir, ND. Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown, ND and downstream areas. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood control around Lincoln, NE. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin FORT PECK LAKE, MT Construction of earth dam, as recommended by Chief of Engineers Sep 30, 1933, was approved by Executive Order by the President and included in Public Works Administration program, Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). Completion, maintenance, and operation of a hydroelectric power plant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. Modified authorization to provide for full multiple purpose operation. Payments to be made to school districts serving project as reimbursement for educational facilities (including transportation to and from school) for pupils who are dependents of persons engaged in construction, operation, and maintenance of projects. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 91-748 and S. Doc. 91-895 PL 91-282 S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. PL 91-576 H. Doc. 91-23 and PL 91-611 PL 92-222 PL 93-251 PL 94-347 PL 95-189 H. Doc. 266, 89th Cong. PL 89-298 H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong. PL 85-500 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 PL 90-17 PL 90-843 PL 91-282 PL 92-222 PL 93-251 PL 94-347 PL 95-189 H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 PL 75-529 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 80-586 26-14 18. 19. 20. 24. 25. OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Water Resources Modified authorization to include recreation as a H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. Development Act project purpose. PL 99-662 of 1986 26. FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 27. GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, PWA 1968 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 78th Cong. PL 78-534 28. GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE & SD Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 78th Cong. PL 78-534 29. OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, SD & ND Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1990 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582 88,716 TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1990 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD 1 Complete 1940 37,410 - Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA Complete 1982 7,458,934 - Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE2 Complete 1970 262,479 - Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE2 Complete 1974 293,016 - Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND 2 Complete 1960 102,980 - Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 - City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282 - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 - - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 - 26-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 26-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1990 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD 2 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, ND Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Forsyth, MT Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Gering Valley, NE Glasgow, MT Greybull, WY Havre, MT Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Hooper, NE2 Ida Grove, IA 2 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Linton, ND2 Little Papillion Creek, NE Loup River, Columbus, NE2 Lower Big Sioux River, IA and SD Lower Heart River, ND Madison, NE, Inion and Taylor Creeks Mandan, Heart River, ND Marmarth, ND McCook Lake, SD Miles City, MT Missouri River, Aten, NE Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Mott, ND Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE2 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Norfolk, NE Omaha, NE Pierce, NE Platte River Near Schuyler, NE2 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Platte River and Tributaries, NE Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Saco, MT Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Sheridan, WY3 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT 2 Sioux Falls, SD South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO Vaughn, MT, Sun River 2 Waterloo, NE West Point, NE Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT 101 (O AA Complete Active Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Deferred Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete 1964 1978 1970 1950 1982 1971 1939 1960 1958 1954 1968 1972 1950 1973 1976 1973 1966 1964 1967 1960 1960 1958 1956 1951 1945 1976 1948 1971 1954 1967 1948 1971 1980 1958 1978 1976 1951 1966 1957 1971 1970 1966 1960 400,000 616,639 11,556,667 255,177 435,000 5,989,663 16,832 248,507 1,825,881 50,216 326,667 522,344 3,643,111 1,000,000 1,961,173 234,839 676,916 169,498 147,627 578,791 99,370 1,000,000 236,000 3,400,504 5,903,640 296,597 74,940 257,398 1,538,269 1,004,000 67,793 184,380 2,618,809 25,747 5,288,707 457,582 237,883 149,596 230,294 1. Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Includes inactive segment. 26-16 55,,663333 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1990 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 Springfield, SD Water Intake Active Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Rillin, MRT 1976 rC 201 FC Art 1950 75000- Buffalo, Johnson County Diversion Channel, WY Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO Davids Creek Lake, IA Dayton, WY 17/V 1976 1961 1943 1972 1956 1952 1969 1973 1950 1966 1962 1968 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE Indian Creek Lake, IA Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE Morrison, Bear Creek, CO Redwater River and Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD Shell Creek, NE Vermillion River and Tribs, SD ,. . ,I . ,11147 Jv 23 Mar 81 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 PL 77-228 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 203, PL 90-483 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 6 Nov 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 204, PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 3 Oct 78 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 142,666 135,000 30,000 1,000 71,000 208,000 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86: Aowa & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD; Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River, IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin, ND; Sheridan, WY (Stage III); Missouri River Levee System Units: R531, R540, R553, R555, R577, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644, R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750. 26-17 Boulder, CO Boulder, CO REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TABLE 26-H (See Section 14 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 Mosquito Creek Levee 14.2 Complete 1950 L601 Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees 15.0 Complete 1966 L594 Pleasant Valley Levee 11.4 Complete 1964 R580 Nebraska City Levee 0.2 Complete 1950 L575 Thurman-Hamburg Levee 45.8 Complete 1950 R573 Otto County Drainage District No. 2 5.9 Complete 1950 R562 Peru Dike 7.6 Complete 1950 L561-550 Atchison County Levee District No. 1 41.3 Complete 1952 R548 Brownville-Nemaha Levee 19.5 Complete 1952 L536 Mill Creek Levee 13.6 Complete 1952 R520 Richardson County Drainage Dist. No. 8 6.3 Complete 1960 R613 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee 14.0 Complete 1971 R616 Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees 4.5 Complete 1987 L611-614 Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees 22.0 Complete 1988 LL652671,- 5L5062 4 Remedial Studies on Completed Units Studies Complete Comprehensive Restudy of Levee System Started Mar 1988 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 26-I (See Section 17 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Peck Lake, MT1, 2 158,428,000 1,103,000 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, NDI1 ,2 299,938,000 1,516,000 Missouri River Levee System, VI, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE)I,- 37,931,000 4,618,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, SD and ND 1 ,2 346,521,000 2,320,000 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD1,2 107,498,000 302,000 Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD 1I,2 199,066,000 1,609,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE1 ,2 49,617,000 137,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Iake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE 13,516,000 - Omaha, NE2 5,904,000 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA 2 2,558,000 146,000 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND2 9,413,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO ,2 15,220,000 285,000 1Details presented on individual report. 2 Completed. 3 Active portion of project. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (See Section 21 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Glasgow, Milk River Dec 89 Saco, Beaver Creek Sep 90 Havre, Milk River Sep 90 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Sep 90 Clyde Park, Shields River Apr 90 Three Forks, Lower Madison River Apr 89 Forsythe, Yellowstone River Sep 90 West Glendive, Yellowstone River Sep 90 Vaughn, Sun River Sep 88 *Yellowsatone River, Water Plant, Livingston Apr 89 Sun River, Great Falls Sep 90 26-18 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 21 of Text) Location Month Inspected *Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge Apr 90 *Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge Apr 90 *Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge Inactive *Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake & Sewage Lagoon Inactive *Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings Inactive *Yellowstone River, Yellowstone County Bridge, Near Billings Apr 90 *Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, Near Big Timber May 89 *Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, Near Three Forks Aug 89 *Jefferson River, Bank Protection, Near Waterloo Aug 89 *Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges Aug 89 *Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, Near Twin Bridges Aug 89 *Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin Inactive *Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton Aug 89 *Yellowstone River, Glendive Sep 90 Madison River, Quake Lake Sep 90 Madison River, Malta Sep 90 Wyoming Greybull, Big Horn River Apr 90 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks Apr 90 *Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell Apr 90 *Shoshone River, Byron Apr 90 North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Jul 90 Marmarth, Little Missouri River Sep 90 Scranton, Buffalo Sep 90 South Dakota Big Sioux River, Union County Jun 90 Big Sioux River, North Sioux City Jun 90 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Jun 90 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Dec 89 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Jul90 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Jul 89 Herreid, Spring Creek Jan 90 *Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Jun 90 *Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre Sep 90 *Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 90 *Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 90 Rapid Creek, Rapid City Jul90 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton Jun 90 *Vermillion River, Vermillion Jun 90 *Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh Jun 90 *Big Sioux River, Jefferson Jun 90 Deadman Gulch, Sturgis Dec 89 *Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Jun 90 *Marne Creek, Yankton Jun 90 Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam Jun 90 *Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora Apr 89 *Cache La Poudre River, Windsor Jun 89 *South Platte River, Kersey Apr 89 *South Platte River, Merino Apr 89 *South Platte River, Iliff Apr 89 *South Platte River, Platteville Apr 89 *Big Thompson River, Johnstown Apr 89 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) Jun 89 South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington St. Water and Sanitary District Jul 89 26-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 21 of Text) Location Month Inspected Nebraska Blackbird Creek, Decatur Mar 90 Omaha, Missouri River Aug 90 Waterloo, Elkhorn River Aug 90 West Point, Elkhorn River May 90 Pierce, Elkhorn River Jul 90 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Jun 90 Hooper, Elkhorn River Jun 90 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River Jun 90 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Jul 90 *Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island Jan 90 *Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville Jan 90 *Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna Sep 90 *Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk Mar 90 *North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare Jul 89 *Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft Apr 90 *Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek Mar 90 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Aug 90 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Jul 90 Gering Valley, Gering Drain & Tributaries Jul 89 Macy, Blackbird Creek Jun 90 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Feb 90 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek May 90 Columbus, Loup River Aug 90 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Sep 90 *Tangeman, Little Nemaha River Jan 90 *Julian, Rock Creek Inactive *Muddy Creek Near Syracuse Jan 90 *Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue Jan 90 *Platte River, Brady Sep 90 *Elm Creek, Decatur Jul 90 *Wiggle Creek, Homer Apr 90 *Elk Creek, Jackson Apr 90 *South Creek, Martinburg Mar 90 *Elk Creek, Willis Apr 90 Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Aug 90 *Shell Creek, County Road Near Columbus Feb 90 *Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder Mar 90 *Elm Creek, Burt County Mar 90 *Redbird Creek, O'Neill Jun 90 *Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln Jan 90 *Platte River, Ashland Feb 90 *West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE Sep 90 *Niobrara River, Bassett, NE Jun 90 *Niobrara River-Carns Bridge, Johnston, NE Jun 90 Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Sep 90 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Jul 90 Sioux City, Floyd River Aug 90 Hawarden, Dry Creek Jul 90 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River Apr 90 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 90 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 90 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 90 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Jan 90 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Hastings Jan 90 *East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex Jan 90 *Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City Sep 90 *West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock Jan 90 *East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold Jan 90 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Feb 90 26-20 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 21 of Text) Location Big Sioux River, Sioux City *Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County *East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County *Little Sioux River, Anthon *Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees L601, Watkins Levee District L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 L594, Waubansie Drainage District L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District L575, Benton-Washington Levee District L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District L575, McKissock Island Levee District L575, Buchannan Levee District L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District L611-614, M & P Missouri River Levee District R613, Papio Natural Resources District R562, Peru Levee District R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District R548, Little Nemaha Levee District R520, Richardosn Co. Levee Dist. #8 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 R616, Sarpy County Papio Natural Resources District Month Inspected Aug 90 Apr 90 Feb 90 Apr 90 Sep 90 Apr 90 Jun 90 Aug 90 May 90 May 90 Jun 90 Jun 90 Jun 90 Feb 90 Jun 90 Jun 90 Jun 90 Mar 90 May 90 Aug 90 Apr 90 Apr 90 Apr 90 Mar 90 Apr 90 Aug 90 *Denotes Section 14 Projects ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (See Section 21 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 90 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE 93,306 Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD 99,411 Box Elder Creek Basin, CO 4 Thurman to Hamburg, IA 88,599 Platte River Basin, CO 62 Eastern SD and Upper Big Sioux River, SD, IA 6 Ft. Collins, CO 56,809 Goose Creek, Boulder, CO 37,433 Ralston & Leydon Creeks, CO 195 James River Basin, SD 36,497 Watertown and Vicinity, SD 158,607 Missouri River, SD, NE, ND, MT 4,233 Wood River, Grand Island, NE 76,450 Subtotal 651,612 Special Studies (140) Elm Creek, Decatur, NE 6,955 James River Environmental, SD 8,049 Platte River Bank Stabilization Project, NE 200 Subtotal 15,204 Review of Authorized Projects (160) None 26-21 c REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (Continued) (See Section 31 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 90 Categories Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations 160,230 FERC Licensing 2,431 Interagency Water Resources Development 14,094 Subtotal 176,755 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) 1,523 Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) 3,914 River Basin & Reg. Plan. Comm. (183) 1,121 Planning Assistance to States (186) 360,840 Shore & Streambank (188) 262 Subtotal 367,660 TOTAL (Category 100) 1,211,231 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) 85,213 SS - Council Bluffs, IA (250) 7,894 SS - Jefferson Co. above Bear Creek (250) 9,269 Technical Services, General (250) 143,277 Hydrologic Studies (260) 18,497 TOTAL (Category 200) 264,150 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - PROJECTS NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED (Category 400) None PLANNING AND ENGINEERING UNDER PROPOSED LEGISLATION (Category 500) None PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - FULLY AUTHORIZED PROJECTS (Category 600) Missouri River F&W Mitigation (621) 80,052 Perry Creek, IA (650) 325,862 Platte River Bank Stab., NE (650) 97,755 TOTAL (Category 600) 503,669 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 1,979,050 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (See Section 23 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Disaster Preparedness - 358,018 Flood Flight and Rescue Operations - 368,366 Rehabilitation - Emergency Water Supply & Drought Assistance - 37,807 Advance Measures - 3,800 Section 205: Beaver Creek, Brush, CO R 31,561 Big Dry Creek, Littleton, CO - 148 Boyer River, Missouri Valley, IA R 2,697 Cache La Poudre River, Greeley, CO F 6,945 26-22 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (Continued) (See Section 23 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost Cedar Creek at Cedar, Lodge, CO 302 Corporate Gulch, Norfolk, NE 9,291 East Nishnabotna River & Coe Creek- 22,884 Dutch Creek, Columbine Valley, CO R 22,884 Elkhorn River, Crowell, NE R 654 Elkhorn River, West Point, NE F 7,654 Indian Creek, Hastings, IA - 38,872 Little Missouri River, Medora, ND- 6,380 Oak Creek, Dannebrog, NE - 10,949 Salt Creek, Levees, Lincoln, NE -17,944 Sand Creek, Sterling, CO- 19,933 Little Sioux River, Spencer, IA - 269 Lodge Creek, Chinook, MT R 251 Logan Creek, Wakefield, NE R 9,716 Lost Creek at Columbus, NE C 60,567 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND C 52,146 Milk River, Malta, MT F 10,555 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE C 95,868 Platte River, Cedar Creek, NE F 4,944 Sidney, NE P 57,633 Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO F 53,547 Wet Spottedtail Creek, Mitchell, NE R 26,715 Yellowstone River, Glendive, MT R 1,060 1 Negative Appraisal 15,171 Total (Section 205's) 577,824 Section 14: Arrow Creek, Hwy 50 Chouteau County -2,792 Baldwin Creek, Fremont County B ridge, WY -366 Big Hole River, Wisdom, MT -2,162 Big Sioux River, Flandreau, SD -1,245 Bldwn, Sqw Crk Lndr Swg Lgn, WY - 4,363 Cannonball River, Shields, ND P 2,403 Cedar River, Spaulding, NE P 3,857 East Bow Creek, Cedar County, NE P 5,536 East Nishnabotna River, Page Bhy Brdg - 4,516 Elkhorn River, Beemer, NE P 8,239 Fort Lupton, CO (Lagoon) C 5,456 Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MT P 9,773 James River, Yankton, SD C 946 Keg Creek, Minden, IA (WW Lagoon) C 509 Knife River, Stanton, ND P 5,486 Logan Creek, Bancroft, NE C 5,708 Madison River, Madison County, MT (State Hwy 287) C 28,488 Medora, ND (Sewage Lagoon) C 35,954 Milk River, Blaine County, MT (Finley Bridge) C 25,440 Milk River, Malta, MT (Sewerline) C 7,210 Nine Mile Drain, Scottsbluff, NE P 7,739 Niobrara River, NE (Carnes Bridge) - 2,500 Oakland, IA C 19,140 Platte River, Douglas County, NE (Ginger Cove Sewage Lagoon) C 12,345 Platte River, North Bend, NE C 1,917 Plum Creek, Norden Dam Access Road, NE P 7,660 Powder River, Arvada, WY C 5,640 Shields River, Park County, MT (US 89) P 9,312 Soldier River, Ute, IA - 955 South Fork, Ewing, NE C 2,852 South Platte River, Commerce City, CO (1-270) - 1,072 South Platte River, Logan County Bridge -4,277 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 28, CO -4,208 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 61, CO -4,266 26-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (Continued) (See Section 23 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 87, CO South Table Creek, Nebraska City, NE Squaw Creek, Hwy 287 Bridge, WY Squaw Creek Lander City Bridge, WY Waterman Creek, O'Brien County, IA West Nishnabotna, River, Malvern, IA West Papillion Creek, Douglas County, NE White River, Tripp County, SD Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT (1-90) Yellowstone River, Rt. 11, Livingston, MT Yellowstone River, Hwy 89 Bridge, MT 5 Negative Appraisals Total (Section 14's) Total Flood Control Activities R =Recon P = Plans & Specs C = Construction F = Feasibility - = Does Not Apply P CC P C 2,244 3,317 1,309 594 2,052 45,682 11,827 2,449 38,216 3,626 15,464 12,813 360,476 938,300 26-24 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT * The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth)..... 2. Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, and MO. Flood Control 3. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO ........ 4. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO............... 5. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS ........... 6. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, N E .... ............. ............. 7. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS .......... 8. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS ....... 9. Little Blue River Lakes, MO ............... 10. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO ............................... 11. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS ........................ 12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS ........ 13. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) .......... 14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS ............ 15. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) ....................... 16. Pomme de Thrre Lake, Pomme de Thrre River, MO ............................... 17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS.......................... 18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA............ 19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO ..... 20. Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO .. 21. Thttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS ....... 22. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS............ . Page Flood Control (cont.) Page 23. Scheduling of Flood Control .27-2 Reservoir Operations ....................... 27-7 24. Inspection of Completed Flood .27-2 Control Projects ........................... 27-7 25. Disaster Preparedness Program-Inspections . .27-8 26. Flood Control Activities under Special .27-2 Authorization ........................... 27-8 .27-3 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power .27-3 27. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ......................... 27-8 .27-3 28. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO...............27-9 .27-3 27-4 General Investigations .27-4o qA 2299.. GGeenneerraall IInnvvesetisgattiigonast .i..o...n...s.................... ............2727--99 Tables 27-4 Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement ........ Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation ........... .27-4 Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation .27-5 Projects..................... Table 27-D Not Applicable . 27-5 Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control .27-5 Projects ..................... Table 27-F Not Applicable . 27-5 Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects ............. Table 27-H Missouri River Levee System ...... . 27-6 Table 27-I Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri .27-6 Basin Program .................. . 27-6 Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood S27-6 Control Projects .................. .27-7 Table 27-K Active General Investigations ...... 27-7 Table 27-L Flood Control Activities Under 27-7 Special Authorization ............. . 27-10 .. 27-13 .. 27-16 ... 27-17 ... 27-18 .. 27-19 .. 27-20 .. 27-20 ... 27-21 . .27-22 27-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the channel, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from the mouth to Rul, Nebraska, a distance of 498.4 miles. The Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was $237,942,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme stage fluctuations are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facilities. 'Irminal facilities. A listing of terminal facilities are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. The 1974 Base Line Study of the reach of the Missouri River in the Kansas City District estimated recreation use on the river at 1,250,000 recreation days annually. The projected tonnage on the river for CY 1990 was approximately 1.4 million, excluding sand, gravel, and waterway improvement materials. Maintenance: Repair of dikes and revetments by contract. In addition, following work was accomplished by hired labor: Construction of environmental gaps, dike and revetment repair, real estate management, channel reconnaissance, condition studies, surveys and mapping, stream gauging, engineering and design, surveys and layout of construction, and supervision and administration. 2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, and MO Location. This project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the Mouth near St. Louis, a river distance of 732 miles. This location is coincident with the Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project on the river. Existing project. The project is to mitigate losses of fish and wildlife habitat resulting from construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project. The four major components of the plan are restoration of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands (2,500 acres), preservation of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands subject to the effects on riverbed degradation (700 acres), acquisition and development of existing undeveloped habitat on private lands (28,000 acres), and development of terrestrial wildlife habitat on existing undeveloped public lands (16,900 acres). Estimated cost of the project (1990) is $59,300,000, all Federal. Both the Kansas City and Omaha Districts are involved in the implementation of the project, with Kansas City District involvement directed mainly to sites in Kansas and Missouri. Local cooperation. There is no non-Federal sponsor for the project. The states of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri are voluntarily serving on a coordinating team which is actively involved in ongoing project activities. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in December 1989. A Reaffirmation Report was completed in July 1990 which reaffirmed that the findings, conclusions, and recommendations which were contained in the Feasibility Report remain valid. A Real Estate Design Memorandum was completed in March 1990, which is currently under review at HQUSACE. In September 1990 the first annual implementation report was submitted. That report included fact sheets for the sites selected for initial development: Grand Pass, Missouri, and Louisville Bend, Iowa. Flood Control 3. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1990) is $181,000,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $26,100,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. The City of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. The Section 221 agreement was signed by the Kansas City District Engineer on September 8, 1983. 27-2 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and final designs are underway. The first and second channel contracts are complete. A contract for pile stabilization is complete. Relocation contracts with four railroad companies are complete. A contract for removal of contaminated sediments is nearing completion. 4. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. A major tributary of the Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, and Johnson County, Kansas, draining a highly urbanized 29-square-mile area in the two states. Existing project. The authorized project consists of improving about 7,500 feet of the channel from near Roanoke Parkway downstream to near Troost Avenue in Kansas City. At the request of the sponsor, Kansas City, Missouri, a modified project will be built which provides identical flood protection, but which also accommodates park and recreation development in the authorized reach. Estimated fully funded Federal cost of the modified project (1990) is $19,485,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, relocations, and cash is $22,715,000. Local cooperation. The City of Kansas City provided a letter of assurance, dated June 20, 1986, officially stating its intent and ability to cost share the project. The City and the Corps of Engineers are negotiating a Local Cooperation Agreement on the project. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design was completed. Plans and specifications were completed for Stage 1, which consists of removal of a railroad bridge and a conduit between Oak and Locust Streets. Under funding provided by the sponsor under a Memorandum of Agreement, a General Design Memorandum was completed on the modified project. A negotiated Local Cooperation Agreement was completed and forwarded for Washington-level review. An environmental assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact were prepared for the modified project. M-CACES cost estimates were prepared and approved for both the authorized and modified projects. 5. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, in Douglas County, Kansas. Lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial waste supply and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 855,450 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 6. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, 1/2 miles south of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. Project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 383,951 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 7. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 21/2 miles west of Hillsdale, in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in December 1974 and project was placed in operation in October 1981. Federal cost of construction was $64,161,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $23,342,756 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. Local interests have shown no interest in sponsoring recreational development at this time. Therefore, only minimum recreational facilities have been built. 27-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 187,624 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 8. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Smoky Hill River about 205 river miles above mouth of stream, and about 11 miles northwest of Marquette, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Ibtal Federal cost of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $12,577,227. Construction was initiated in June 1940 and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 498,122 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included renovation of Venango PUA, replacing collector system, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 9. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about one-half mile south of U.S. Highway 40 and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109th Street. Existing project. The Blue Springs dam is an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 46,900 acre-feet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for sedimentation). Estimated Federal cost (1989) for both lakes through construction of the project is $140,750,000. Construction was initiated in September 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on July 5, 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Estimated reimbursement for recreation is $14,564,000 of which $450,000 will be accomplished during construction by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Project is essentially complete except for asbestos removal from Longview Farm. Project is 99 percent complete. Land acquisition is complete. Visitation for FY 1990 was 1,012,023 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 10. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 2 miles west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in right abutment. Tbtal reservoir storage capacity is 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1990) is $20,108,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,455,000. Construction was initiated in March 1973. Project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,567,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,455,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the City of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation development. Missouri state agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of City of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 276,666 visitor days. Project is 99 percent complete on scheduled work. The remaining work is construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 11. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 4 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 27-4 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 398,338 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 12. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Republican River near village of Alida about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River; and about 4 miles northwest of Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project at request of Governor of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $49,566,492. Construction was initiated in July 1961. Project was placed in operation in June 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $13,045,576 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 779,746 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included replacing relief wells and ordinary operation and maintenance. 13. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. Portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated cost (1990) for the active portion of the project from Rul, Nebraska, to mouth is $83,004,000, including $77,647,000 Federal and $5,357,000 non-Federal contributions. Costs of $8,126,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending completion of restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Current cost estimate for deferred, inactive, and deauthorized portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $432,354,000 (1964, 1986, and 1987 price levels), of which $393,956,000 is Federal cost for construction and $38,398,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Adjustment to estimate will be required to reflect units deauthorized on Jan. 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001 (b) (1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 27-H on Missouri River Levee System. Planning on remaining active unit continued. 14. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Delaware River about 5 miles above mouth in Jefferson County, and about 3 miles northwest of Perry, Kansas Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet (480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project plan at request of State of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $724,212 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $9,208,342 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 792,029 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included initiation of work on Slough Creek boat ramp and ordinary operation and maintenance. 15. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works 27-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 27-B for authorizing legislation and Table 27-I on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. 16. POMME DE TERRE LAKE POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. Dam is on main stem of Pomme de Terre River, about 44 miles above mouth of stream in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extending upstream into Polk County, Missouri. Site is about 4 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multipurpose). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $14,946,784. Total Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 1,042,957 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 17. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Location. Dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 8 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet workes and an ungated chutetype spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total Federal cost of project, including supplemental recreational development $731,130 (Code 710), was $14,003,238. Construction began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $71,018. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 594,675 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 18. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. Damsite is on Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acre-feet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total Federal cost of project, including $588,948 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), was $27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished; and a supplement to the master plan was approved, which resulted in relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization work to compensate for the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 824,990 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 19. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the project was $87,685,314. Construction was initiated in November 1973, and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958, and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non-Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 717,077 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 27-6 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT 20. TRIMBLE WILDLIFE AREA, SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO The Corps of Engineers acquired the Trimble Wildlife Area as part of the land acquisition for construction of Smithville Lake, which is on the Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Trimble Wildlife Area was acquired from the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) on July 25, 1979. The negotiated agreement for acquisition of Trimble included an agreement by the Corps to identify and recommend Federal acquisition of a suitable replacement site. The Trimble Wildlife Area was established in 1949 by the State of Missouri using funds provided under the Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration (Pittman-Robertson) Act. Rules for use of those funds stipulated that if control of an area were lost or the facilities used for unapproved purposes a diversion of Federal aid funds would result. The Smithville Lake multipurpose pool inundated portions of the Trimble Wildlife Area making the area unmanageable for the purposes for which it was established. Subsequent declaration on December 3, 1982 stated that the MDC must replace the area within three years or permanent loss of Federal Aid to Wildlife funding for MDC's activities would result. In a letter dated September 1985, the MDC stated it had acquired a 3,816-acre site to replace the Trimble Wildlife Area. The site lies along both banks of the South Grand River, in an area known as Settle's Ford, in Cass and Bates Counties, Missouri, a few miles upstream of the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir project, and about 45 miles southeast of Kansas City. The MDC indicated it no longer sought acquisition of land by the Corps to replace the Trimble Area, but supported the replacement plan which included a lump sum to be paid to the MDC. Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) authorized a lump-sum payment of $1,570,000 to the State of Missouri for participation with the State in developing wildlife management resources and facilities rather than the acquisition of lands and development of a replacement site for the Trimble Wildlife Area. The FY 1990 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act allocated $1,570,000 for the project under Construction, General funding. On January 3, 1990, payment of $1,570,000 was made by the Corps to reimburse the State of Missouri to mitigate the Corps' acquisition of Trimble Wildlife Area. 21. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on main stem of Big Blue River, about 12 miles above the mouth of stream in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 5 miles north of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total Federal cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in operation in July 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 939,069 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included replacing relief wells and ordinary operation and maintenance. 22. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low flow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $20,463,367. Construction began in April 1961 and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 347,178 visitor days. Maintenance: Activity consisted of renovation of relief wells and ordinary operation and maintenance. 23. SCHEDULING OF FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See Table 27-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 27-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 25. DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM-INSPECTIONS Non-Federal flood protection works constructed or rehabilitated under P.L. 84-99 must be inspected by the Corps of Engineers to assure compliance with local cooperation agreements. 26. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Operations for period October 1, 1989 thru September 30, 1990 were as follows: Disaster Preparedness Program includes planning, training, inspection, supplies and equipment and personnel. Inspections of both non-Federal farm levees and Federal authorized levees to assure compliance with eligibility and maintenance requirements were performed during FY 1990. Emergency Operations Severe flooding which occurred during May-June 1990 over the District resulted in Emergency Operations Funding in excess of $105,300, as well as rehabilitation cost for investigation and repair of non-Federal levees. Reimbursement for this event, however, was not received until the last day of the FY and will be reflected in FY 91 totals. Rehabilitation of Non-Federal Flood Control Works Resultant of the May-June 1990 flood, nine levees applied for Federal assistance. Of the nine, seven were non-Federal levees and two were Federal. Seven of these levees were approved for repair, six non-Federal; one Federal. Funding for the repair of these levees was received in the last month of the FY and will be reflected as FY 90 carryover funds. Total rehabilitation costs, however, will not be available until mid-91. Drought Assistance emergency hauling of potable water continued to five communities in southwestern Iowa during FY 90. All assistance was terminated on August 1, 1990, when it was determined that privately owned wells had begun recharging and the State's efforts to connect to rural water lines had been completed. Final funding costs will be made during the last quarter of FY 91, due to final settlement of payment-to-contractor clause which is not required to be made until August 1, 1991. (See Table 27-L for costs.) Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948, as amended). Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $5 million. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rightsof- way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and prevent future encroachments on improved channels. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 requires the non-Federal sponsors of Section 205 projects to pay 50 percent of the cost of the feasibility study. For structural flood control projects, the sponsor must pay in cash during the construction at least 5 percent of the construction cost. The sponsor's cash and other contributions must equal 25 percent of the total construction cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 percent. There were no Section 205 projects under construction in Fiscal Year 1990. See Table L for expenditures under Section 205 during Fiscal Year 1990. Emergency Streambank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Each project selected must be complete in itself, engineeringly feasible, economically justifiable, environmentally acceptable, and limited to a Federal statutory cost of not more than $500,000. The local sponsoring entity must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide over the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limit. No projects were constructed in FY 90. See Table L for Emergency Streambank Protection expenditures during Fiscal Year 1989. Multiple Pupose Projects Including Power 27. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on main stem of Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with a combined generating capability of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri, to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Estimated cost (1990) through construction of the project is $549,400,000. Construction of relocation of Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and 27-8 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The embankment has been completed including paving roadway on top of the dam. The spillway was completed in October 1979. The Southwestern Power Administration powerline needed for final testing and commercial operation of the generators was completed in December 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on December 22, 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearing required remedial design on the bearing. Restricted commercial power production began in April 1982. Through September 1990, power generation totaled 2,976,956,800 kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $50,026,562 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 2,486,895 visitor days. Work was continued on acquisition of land and rights-of-way and construction of the powerplant. Project is 98 percent complete. During FY 1990, 345,143,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance activities consisted of continuation of contract for repair of turbine blades, rehabilitation of foundation drains, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 28. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with Osage River, and about 1 mile east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri, lake extending into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,715,300. Estimated cost of the project, including $3,758,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $79,975,357 (1988). Construction was initiated in October 1963, and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level. Rightof- way for construction of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend has been acquired, and construction has been completed. Sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills have been acquired. Completion assured downstream channel capacity to Caplinger Mills of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500-kilowatt level. Through September 1990, power generation totaled 1,086,588,800 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $20,617,235 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1990 was 1,329,757 visitor days. The project is complete and in operational status. The net amount of power marketed with Southwestern Power Administration was 94,889,000 kilowatt-hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of construction of Orleans Trail sewage lagoon, initiation of guardrail raise across dam, and ordinary operation and maintenance. General Investigations 29. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal year 1989 costs totaled $1,130,941 for all General Investigations activities. See Table 27-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 27-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 1. Missouri River, New Work: Sioux City, IA Approp. to Mouth (Rulo, Cost Nebr., to Mouth) Maint. (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work: Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2. Missouri River Fish New Work: & Wildlife Mitigation, Approp. IA, NE, KS & MO Cost 3. Blue River Channel New Work: Kansas City, Approp. MO Cost 4. Brush Creek, New Work: Kansas City, Approp. MO Cost 5. Clinton Lake, New Work: Wakarusa Approp. River, KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Harlan County New Work: Lake, Republican Approp. River, NE Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 7. Hillsdale Lake, New Work: Big Bull Approp. Creek, KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Kanopolis Lake, New Work: Smoky Hill Approp. River, KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Little Blue River New Work: Lakes, Little Blue Approp. River, MO Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 237,942,1901 - - - - 237,942,190' 5,312,600 4,731,500 5,424,000 4,052,460 289,466,7742 5,312,600 4,731,500 5,274,000 4,200,762 289,465,0762 - - - - 816,190 - - - - 816,190 - - - - 22,642 - - - - 22,642 - - - - 238,758,3801 - - - - 238,758,3801 5,312,600 4,731,500 5,424,000 4,052,460 289,489,416 5,312,600 4,731,500 5,274,000 4,200,762 289,487,718 223,000 167,395 5,750,000 4,370,000 7,031,000 5,141,000 3,029,536 4,108,250 9,982,519 5,170,969 488,000 752,000 255,000 380,000 510,235 748,429 259,530 297,961 1,193,100 1,554,100 1,300,000 1,291,100 1,188,950 1,556,750 1,301,490 1,291,110 1,024,500 1,113.800 1,203,000 1,229,923 1,039,936 1,115,994 1,202,000 1,219,576 589,300 652,900 587,500 644,700 1,663,400 1,658,450 4,152,000 4,165,726 271,600 271,600 1,541,200 1,546,150 3,997,000 3,476,930 646,100 646,099 807,000 577,670 817,000 560,739 2,222,000 2,222,000 1,742,000 642,178 838,000 837,970 2,681,302 2,644,205 -100,000 1,470,599 761,084 743,328 223,000 167,395 40,092,171 40,086,2593 2,200,000 2,117,867 57,415,433 57,415,4334 12,821,600 12,821,600 47,111,926 47,111,9265 21,782,684 21,770,087 1,017,623 1,017,623 64,161,400 64,161,400 5,287,370 5,270,439 12,577,227 12,577,2276 22,085,912 22,048,815 140,650,200 140,561,1267 2,516,784 2,498,997 27-10 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 10. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, MO (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 11. Melvern Lake Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 13. Missouri River Levee System IA, NE, KS and MO 14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 16. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS 18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA 19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO 20. Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 480,000 374,529 685,100 680,100 -5,803 224,016 474,197 598,545 20,675 562,100 567,100 146,717 167,392 1,213,200 1,400,400 1,213,200 1,400,400 1,557,400 1,555,900 2,129,000 742,202 1,503,200 1,502,000 1,277,400 1,277,400 1,165,900 1,163,088 1,321,300 1,331,082 67,000 35,559 801,100 801,050 1,939,600 1,942,100 904,000 2,137,188 1,427,300 1,426,000 1,453,700 1,452,200 1,177,900 1,168,483 - -70,000 15,371 697 627,000 564,412 627,000 563,110 - 11,554 - 28,393 - -58,446 15,371 29,090 1,292,000 1,292,000 1,631,000 1,630,995 655,000 809,164 1,651,000 1,630,496 1,346,000 1,347,500 1,262,000 1,274,229 1,324,694 1,321,419 1,829,616 1,818,913 387,000 384,449 1,565,189 1,585,369 1,345,489 1,333,858 1,223,287 1,201,462 1,565,900 1,535,000 1,408,793 1,575,400 1,535,500 1,367,746 37,136 862,500 862,550 1,246,000 936,848 1,246,000 932,462 1,570,000 1,570,000 18,216,177 18,216,016 5,392,112 5,390,810 1,108,0758 1,032,717 19,324,252 19,248,733 37,436,530 37,436,530 16,587,054 16,583,779 49,566,492 49,566,492 22,499,140 22,488,432 60,960,851 60,958,251 49,095,918 49,095,918 23,790,173 23,787,349 17,365,452 17,365,452 22,011,101 21,999,470 14,003,238 14,003,238 18,805,420 18,783,595 27,622,159 27,622,159 21,998,711 21,957,664 87,685,314 87,685,314 8,943,448 8,939,062 1,570,000 1,570,000 27-11 Z REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 21. Tuttle Creek Lake New Work: Big Blue Approp. - - - - 80,584,079 River, KS Cost - - - - 80,584,079 Maint. Approp. 2,036,400 2,860,100 1,666,000 1,596,153 23,897,432 Cost 2,022,437 2,867,463 1,672,600 1,571,371 23,872,650 22. Wilson Lake, New Work: Saline River, Approp. - - - - 20,463,367 KS Cost - - - - 20,463,367 Maint. Approp. 1,671,900 974,900 1,234,000 1,251,658 16,957,504 Cost 1,889,950 974,900 1,209,540 1,258,428 16,939,814 23. Scheduling Flood Maint. Control Reservoir Approp. 164,000 177,000 180,000 225,969 54,761,452 Operations Cost 164,000 177,000 180,000 225,969 54,761,452 24. Inspection of Maint. Completed Flood Approp. 287,400 366,000 338,000 324,616 5,309,431 Control Projects Cost 287,400 366,000 338,000 324,616 5,309,431 25. Disaster Prepared- Maint. ness Program- Approp. 39,000 132,000 200,2509 200,000 1,030,250 Inspections Cost 39,000 132,000 200,241 180,922 1,011,163 27. Harry S. Truman New Work: Dam & Reservoir Approp. 3,507,000 4,868,000 2,660,000 2,746,000 538,363,900 Osage River, MO Cost 3,412,650 4,244,971 2,359,661 2,873,772 537,429,256 Maint. Approp. 6,444,100 6,997,600 6,012,500 7,822,962 53,130,362 Cost 6,438,198 6,993,112 6,026,000 7,659,290 52,966,690 28. Stockton Lake, New Work: Sac River, MO Approp. 201,000 43,000 - - 79,975,357 Cost 220,675 37,772 9,756 178 79,968,620 Maint. Approp. 2,217,200 2,394,500 2,777,500 3,031,371 31,588,871 Cost 2,220,270 2,394,560 2,775,794 3,013,528 31,569,322 1. Includes $8,665,594 costs of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Excludes $35,296 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized project (Blue River Channel Mobay Chemical 1984-1987). 4. Excludes $118,805 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized project (1973-1979). 5. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $24,198. 6. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $7,885. 7. Excludes $2,727,401 thru FY 1990 non-Federal contributions not required for authorized project. 8. Corrected total. Excludes $42,149 interest during construction. 9. After FY 1988 inspections of non-Federal levees previously funded under O&M are funded under FC&CE, 96X3125 (910-140) Disaster Preparedness Program- Inspections which had a carryover into FY 1989 of $250. 27-12 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Act Project and Work Authorized Jul. 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 12, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a mimimum width of 200 feet and depth of 6 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends, mouth to upper end of Quindaro Bend, Kansas City, MO. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO, Quindaro bend, and Sioux City, IA. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, IA. Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION MO, KS, IA, & NE Project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, MO, KS, IA, & NE: April 24, 1984, Report of Chief of Engineers, authorized at estimated cost of $51,900,000. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control on Brush Creek, a tributary of the Blue River, Kansas City, MO, authorized at estimated total cost of $16,100,000. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS The project for the Kansas River, KS, NE, and CO is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amended and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62. H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., P.L. 560-70. P.L. 67-73 H.R.11781 P.L. 520-71 H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 409-73 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 14-79. Title VI, Section 601(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong. Sec. 401(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662 1962 Flood Control Act S. Doc 122, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 780, 83rd Cong., H. Doe. 549, 81st Cong. 27-13 See Section in Text 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO .Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Little Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, is authorized at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and provided for increased protection. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong. H. Docs. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 5491 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Docs. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Docs. 642 and 5491 83rd Cong. 27-14 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 2, 1956 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 30, 1963 Jun. 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution on general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,000,000 additional expenditure. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Expanded general comprehenssive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Platte River and tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an estimated cost of $26,889,000. TRIMBLE WILDLIFE AREA, SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Project for replacement of Timble Wildlife Area- Sept. 22, 1977 Report of Chief of Engineers at total cost of $1,570,000; rather than replacement of lands, statute authorized participation with State of Missouri in development of wildlife management measures and facilities. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. H. Docs. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 5491, 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 89th Cong.) Title VI, Section 601(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 27-15 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS 21. Jun. 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Flood Control Committee River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiatiion Doc. 1, 75th Cong., and partial accomplishment. P.L. 761. Aug. 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, P.L. 77-228. NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS 22. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. Jul. 14, 19602 Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River P.L. 645. Basin. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO 27. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 5491 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional P.L. 780. expenditure. Oct. 23, 1962 The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby modified in 1962 Flood Control Act, accordance with recommendations of the Chief of H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., Engineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an P.L. 87-874. estimated additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 28. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 5491 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional P.L. 780. expenditure. 1. Contains latest published maps of Missouri River. 2. Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 - Gasconade River, MO 1, 2 Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 Osage River, MO, lock and dam3 Complete 1952 658,076 850,495 1. Improvement adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. 2. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 3. Operation of lock and dam placed in standby status in July 1952; deauthorized by Section 1001(b)(1) of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), 17 Nov. 1986. 27-16 TABLE 27-E KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, KS Atchison, KS Barnard, KS' Bartley, NE Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA' Big Blue River, Seward, NE' Big Stranger Creek, KS1 Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO 2 Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO - Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)3 Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) East Muddy Creek, MO2 Elk Creek, Clyde, KS 1 Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS' Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) Indianola, NE Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS 4 Lawrence, Kansas River, KS5 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO Lower Grand River, MO 2 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) Missouri River Additional Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO 2, 6 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Seward, NE' Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS' Topeka, Kansas River, KS Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO 2 Upper Grand River, MO 2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Inactive Inactive 1965 1973 1953 1974 1966 1976 1977 1973 1966 1984 1973 1976 1966 1984 1950 1984 1980 1985 1989 1966 1967 1976 1973 1966 1976 1982 1973 1975 1967 1973 1972 1974 1966 1966 1,099,350 4,099,590 127,860 118,269 652,414 126,887 337,131 451,400 692,7063 8,052,990 989,015 726,966 757,500 1,271,025 2,782,793 67,275 25,010,500 42,434,197 8,773,488 25,530,083 2,488,585 432,245 139,883 2,036,624 4,462,661 5,315,168 222,193 700,000 3,878,668 126,887 6,896 246,995 21,174,593 1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Grand River Basin reconnaissance study (authorized by resolution of Committee on Public Works and Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives on July 3, 1987) reviewed and updated costs for these projects authorized in the Flood Control Act of 1965, and found no economically feasible plan. 3. Inactive units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork were deauthorized 1 Jan. 1990 by Section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Construction cost includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost of deauthorized Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork units. 4. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 5. Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. 6. Pattonsburg Lake Highway Relocation and Town Relocation portions of the project were deauthorized 1 Jan. 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 27-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Arlington Lake, MO Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO - Inactive Units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork Units only' Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO Hays, Big Creek, KSI' Indian Lake, Blue River, KS Kansas River Navigation Marysville, KS Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvements) KS (1974 Act) Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS Mill Lake, Blue River, MO Missouri River Levee System, IA, KS, MO, and NE KS Units R402; R393-395; and R414 (deauthorized by Section 1002 Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662) Deauthorized by WRDA Section 1001(b)(1): Units L36; R42; L51; R55-59-61; L68-92; R70; L78; R87; L94; L99; L103; R104; R107; R112; L117; L121; L124; L129; L134; L137-139; L145; R150; L154; L157; R161; L164; R169; L175; R179-184; L191-196; L205; L217; R226; R240; R251; L256; R259; R263-270; R272; R284; R302; R336; L353; L357; R361; L362; L392; L419-426; L435; R512-513; 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 1965 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1977 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1974 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 281, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1973 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1977 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong. 2d sess.) - Authorized by Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1974 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved October 27, 1965 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1980 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, Sec. 201 - Flood Control Act of September 3, 1954 - Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 17 1970 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1971 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) - Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. R -147'7 16,317 211,600 51,989 71,466 1,754,019 499,200 127,297 259,900 133,682 39,708 57,500 Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. -U-t . u, J I I - May 6, 1981 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Aug. 5, 1977 - Jan. 18, 1978 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Jan. 1967 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Nov. 27, 1973 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Jan. 1, 1990 27-18 V',U L TABLE 27-G (Continued) KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, 1982 Flood Control Act of 1962, $2,178,261 - Nov. 17, 1986 KS October 23, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO4 Highway Relocation 1976 1965 Flood Control Act, 393,623 - Jan. 1, 1990 Town Relocation 1976 P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 241, 91,929 - Jan. 1, 1990 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Pioneer Lake, KS 1952 Flood Control Act approved 95,692 - Aug. 5, 1977 June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Richland Lake, MO 1948 Flood Control Act approved 8,548 - Aug. 5, 1977 June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Conotrol Act approved December 2, 1944 Tomahawk Lake, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 77,189 - Nov. 17, 1986 Blue River, KS 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road 1977 Sec. 18 of Water Resources 3,000 - Nov. 17, 1986 Improvement - 1974 Mod.) Development Act of 1974 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS - Water Resources Development Act - - Jan. 1, 1990 Road and Bridge (1976 Act) of 1976, Section 189, P.L. 94-587 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 1,095,020 - Nov. 17, 1986 KS 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1. For completed Shoal Creek unit of Chariton-Little 3. Actual costs for deauthorized units will be determined Chariton Basin, MO, see Table 27-E. when MRLS PB-3 is updated. 2. A study of water supply and flood problems at Hays, 4. Pattonsburg Lake portion of project is inactive. See KS, is being studied under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Table 27-E. Congress, as amended. TABLE 27-H MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 13 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R 512-513 Richardson Co. D. D. #7 R 500 Iowa Point D. D. #4 Kimsey Holly Creek L 497 Forest City L. D. L488 Holt Co. D. D. #7 R 482 Burr Oak D. D. #3 L 476 Amazonia L. D. R 460-471 Elwood-Gladden L. D. L 455 S. St. Joseph L. D. L 443-448 Halls L. D. R 440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. L 408 Farley-Beverly D. D. L 400 Waldron L. D. L 385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. R 351 Atherton L. D. L 330-345 Orrick L. D. L 319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. L 246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. L 15 North County L. D. Remaining units 19.1 4.1 4.4 16.0 11.5 8.2 10.8 13.8 15.6 17.3 10.7 12.2 7.6 6.5 15.9 43.4 35.0 20.0 40.0 Complete-1958 Complete-1954 Complete-1970 Complete-1962 Complete-1955 Complete-1954 Complete-1956 Complete-1968 Complete-1967 Complete-1957 Complete-1959 Complete (Levee raise modification)-1972 Complete-1957 Planning underway Complete-1966 Inactive Inactive Complete-1983 Inactive Detailed planning not initiated 27-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 27-I KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 15 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Non-Federal Cost Cost Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS $ 1,099,350 $ 287,000 Bartley, Republican River, NE 118,269 9,500 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS' 90,500,000 44,800,000 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS2 71,4663 - Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 48,129,549 - Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO 549,400,000 138,191,000 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS 64,161,400 23,342,756 Indianola, Republican River, NE 67,275 7,592 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 12,577,227 - Lawrence, Kansas River, KS 8,620,111 2,130,000 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS 2,488,585 265,000 Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 37,436,530- Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Authorization)2 500,000 214,300 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 49,566,492 - Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth4 77,647,000 13,483,000 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 2,036,624 348,300 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 4,462,661 876,000 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 49,095,918 - Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 17,365,453 - Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS 14,003,238 - Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS 3,878,668 1,960,000 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO 79,975,357 17,458,000 Topeka, Kansas River, KS 21,174,593 10,383,492 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS 80,584,079 - Tuttle Creek Lake, KS-Road and Bridge (1976 Act)2 630,000 610,000 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Modification)2 500,000 214,300 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS 20,463,367 - 1. Inactive. 4. Active portion of project. Deferred portion of project is 2. Deauthorized by Water Resources Development Act of currently estimated to cost (1990) $46,753,000 Federal and 1986, P.L. 99-662 (See Table 27-G). $4,336,000 non-Federal. Inactive portion of project is current- 3. Total Federal funds expended. ly estimated to cost (1990) $347,146,000 Federal and 3. Inactive. $34,062,000 non-Federal. Actual cost of units deauthorized prior to FY 1990 was $57,000 Federal. Pending adjustment to estimate will be required to reflect units deauthorized on Jan. 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-262). TABLE 27-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Main Stem Missouri River Levees: R 512-513, R 500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L 497, L 488, R 482, L 476, R 460-471, L 455, L 443-448, R 440, L 408, L 400 and R 351, L 246 Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Armourdale, Birmingham, CID (Mo & Kans), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex Osage River, Kansas and Missouri Ottawa, Kansas Osawatomie, Kansas Kansas River and Minor Tributaries Topeka, Kansas; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units Republican River, Nebraska and Kansas Bartley, Nebraska Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers Abilene, Kansas Mar/Sep 90 Mar/Sep 90 Apr 89/Oct 90 Apr 89/Oct 90 Apr 89/Sep 90 May/Oct 90 May 89/Sep 90 27-20 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-K ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 28 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item and CWIS Number FY 90 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO - 12563 $128,822 Grand River Basin, MO & IA - 12432 1,940 Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO - 12381 129,364 Subtotal $260,126 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 $103,834 Interagency Water Resources Dev - 14713 13,002 Subtotal $116,836 Coordinate Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) - 51840 $ 7,781 Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) - 51820 17,000 Regional Planning (183) - 53847 13,000 Planning Assistance to States, Colorado (186) - 14808 10,143 Planning Assistance to States, Kansas (186) - 14820 18,400 Planning Assistance to States, Missouri (186) - 14829 23,865 Subtotal $90,189 TOTAL (Category 100) $467,151 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) - 82030 $125,114 Technical Services, General (250) - 82040 37,398 Hydrology Studies (262) - 53820 35,922 TOTAL (Category 200) $198,434 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Navigation Projects Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation (621) - 14105 $167,395 Flood Control Projects Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (651) - 12319 $297,961 TOTAL (Category 600) $465,356 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,130,941 27-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 27-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 25 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Status1 Cost Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS F $4,089 Rossville, Cross Creek, KS F 89,476 Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS P 102,918 TOTAL FOR 3 ACTIVE PROJECTS: $196,483 2 Section 205 studies were terminated in FY 1990, total $34,062 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $230,545 Emergency Streambank Protection - Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress July 24, 1946, as Amended Little Blue River, Clay County, NE, Weyenberg Bridge O (-$137) Little Blue River, Nuckolls County, NE, Bridge #4525 O 267 Chariton River, Schuyler County, MO, Eason Bridge O 609 West Fork Grand River, Ringgold County, IA, Parker Bridge O 6,690 West Fork Grand River, Ringgold County, IA, Redding Bridge O 8,856 Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, Spence Bridge P 2,328 Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, County Road P 1,009 Gregg Creek, Brown County, KS, Granada Bridge P 5,278 Middle Fork Wolf River, Brown County, KS, Avenue Road Bridge P 11,278 Tributary of Kill Creek, DeSoto, KS, Sewage Treatment Plant P 3,033 Little Blue River, Thayer County, NE, Gilead North Bridge P 10,440 Big Blue River, Blue Springs, NE, Sewerline and Road P 10,578 Thompson River, Union County, IA, H17 Bridge P 13,381 Middle Nodaway River, Adair County, IA, Bridge #56240 P 14,267 Marais des Cygnes River, Osawatomie, KS, Water Supply Facilities P 17,662 102 River, Nodaway County, MO, South Pickering Bridge P 10,378 Republican River, Clifton, KS, Sewage Lagoons P 22,638 Rock Creek, Pottawatomie County, KS, County Bridge F 2,871 Osage River, Lake Ozark, MO, Sewermain F 5,023 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $146,450 Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control Section 208, Public Law 780 83rd Congress, as Amended Big Blue River, Fillmore County, NE F $4,324 Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work - Public Law 99 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation Disaster Preparedness Program Corps Statutory Activities $157,975 Activities in Support of Others 47,396 Facilities 104,227 Inspections 180,922 Total Disaster Preparedness Program $490,520 Emergency Operations $9,861 Rehabilitation, Non-Federal Flood Control Works 33,672 Emergency Water Supply and Drought Assistance 196,791 TOTAL ALL ACTIVITIES $730,844 1. Status: R = Recon; F = Feasibility; P = P&S; C = Construction; O = Operational 27-22 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS DISTRICT * The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri within the Arkansas River, Little River, and White River basins. In the Arkansas River Basin, the District is responsible for those areas embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above and exclusive of Pine Bluff, AR, and below the mouth of the Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. The District has responsibility for planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance of the navigation portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System in the State of Arkansas (including that portion below Pine Bluff). In the Little River Basin, the District is responsible for those portions of the drainage basin of the Arkansas portion of Little River and its tributaries above its mouth near Fulton, AR. In the White River, the District is responsible for those portions in southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas embraced in the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on the White River below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is part of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. AR River Basin,AR, OK, and KS ................................ 28-2 2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No.9),AR .............. 28-2 3. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR .......... 28-3 4. David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No.6),AR.................... 28-3 5. Emmett D. Sanders Lock and Dam (No.3) ................ 28-3 6. James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No.13).................. 28-3 7. Lock No.2 and Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No.2), AR .......... 28-3 8. Lock and Dam No.3,AR ............................................ 28-3 9. Lock and Dam No.5, AR ............................................ 28-4 10. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR ....................................................... 28-4 11. Murray Lock and Dam (No.7), AR ............................ 28-4 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization............ 28-4 13. Norrell Lock and Dam (No.1) and Entrance Channel, AR ......................................................... 28-4 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects........................ 28-4 15. Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No.8),AR ............. 28-4 Flood Control 16. Blue Mountain Lake, AR .......................................... 28-5 17. Clearwater Lake, MO ............................................... 28-5 18. DeQueen Lake, AR ................................................. 28-5 19. Dierks Lake, AR....................................................... 28-5 20. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......................................................... 28-6 21. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR ...................... 28-6 22. Gillham Lake, AR..................................................... 28-6 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects..................................................... 28-6 24. Little R'd River and Tributaries,Clinton, AR .............. 28-7 25. Little River Basin, AR ............................................. 28-7 26. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR ........................................ 28-7 27. Millwood Lake, AR ................................................... 28-7 28. Nimrod Lake ............................................................. 28-8 29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................... 28-8 30. White River Basin (Little Rock Dist (AR & MO) .......... 28-8 31. White River, Batesville, AR ........................................ 28-8 32. White River, St. Paul, AR ......................................... 28-9 Multiple-Purpose Prolects Including Power 33. Beaver Lake, AR ..................................................... 28-9 34. Bull Shoals Lake, AR ............................................... 28-9 35. Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No.10), AR ...................... 28-10 36. Greers Ferry Lake, AR .............................................. 28-10 37. Norfork Lake, AR ..................................................... 28-10 38. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam(No.13), AR ............ 28-11 39. Table Rock Lake, MO................................................ 28-11 General Investigations 40. Surveys .................................................................... 28-11 41. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............................ 28-11 42. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.................... 28-12 Tables Table 28-A, Cost and Financial Statement ...................... 28-13 Table 28-B, Authorizing Legislation.................................. 28-17 Table 28-C, Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... 28-20 Table 28-E, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...... 28-21 Table 28-G, Deauthorized Projects .................................. 28-22 Table 28-H, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation ............................................ 28-23 Table 28-1, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Lakes ................................................... 28-27 Table 28-J, Little River Basin, AR: Lakes ........................ 28-28 Table 28-K, White River Basin, AR and MO: Lakes.......... 28-29 28-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, CO, and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA. (See Geological Survey state maps, 1:24,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition scale 1:62,500.) Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, aid pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel 9 feet deep and 444.8 miles long, beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 49.8 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, OK Waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple-purpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in Tables 28-H and 28-I, and Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation Lakes. For authorization see Table 28-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. For McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear increased cost of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Pine Bluff (Jefferson County), Little Rock, and Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa-Rogers County), OK Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark and Van Buren, AR, and Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facilities are in operation or being built at 35 locations in Arkansas and at 25 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. (See Tables 28-H and 28-I for navigation and lake listings.) For details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see the Tulsa District report. During FY 90, annual flood damages prevented by projects in the Arkansas River Basin totaled $162,163,000: $142,796,000 by projects in the Little Rock District; $19,367,000 by projects in the Tulsa District. Projections on navigation activities in calendar year 1990 indicate that about 9.0 million tons of commerce will be moved on the Arkansas portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. This represents an increase of 7 percent over the CY 89 level. Other details concerning the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas are shown on the following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Tables 28-H and 28-I, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation/Lakes for status for individual items, navigation project, lakes, and basin plan. The overall project is 96 percent complete. Construction of the Holla Bend closure at Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam project was completed in September 1987. Work continues on the Arkansas River project in this District including construction of meander cutoff levee between the Arkansas and White Rivers, extension of the stilling basin at Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2), land acquisition studies, and continue detailed engineering studies to raise the existing North Little Rock floodwall and levee. Tow haulage equipment has been added to David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Lock and Dam No. 5, and Emmett D. Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4), and Lock and Dam No. 3; this equipment will be operational in January 1991. The feasibility report on the low-stage water problem on the White River at Montgomery Point is being reviewed. 2. ARTHUR V. ORMOND LOCK & DAM (NO. 9), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Non-Federal hydropower is being developed at the project under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Rockefeller Lake (Pool 9) has four developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 2.8 million visitor hours that resulted in $17,900 fee revenue. 28-2 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. Construction of Holla Bend closure structure (fish and wildlife mitigation) began in July 1986 and was completed in September 1987. 3. BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas- White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining Arkansas and White rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. For a complete description of reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project, see the FY 81 Annual Report. Total Federal cost to date is $119,300,184 for existing project in Little Rock District. For authorization see Table 28-B, Authorizing Legislation. 4. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in August 1968. Tow equipment has been added and will be operational in January 1991. Currently has two developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 6.7 million visitor hours that resulted in $5,400 fee revenue. 5. EMMETT D. SANDERS LOCK AND DAM (NO. 4), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 4 has 2 developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.0 million visitor hours that resulted in $1,200 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. Design is 60 percent complete on a 40-ft. wide by 9,600-ft. long highway bridge crossing the lock and dam. Construction is scheduled to begin in August 1991. Design and construction is mandated to the Corps of Engineers as the Federal agency having jurisdiction and custody of the dam (23 U.S.C. 320 (Public Law 85-67)). Design and construction are 100 percent funded by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department and the Federal Highway Administration. 6. JAMES W. TRIMBLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 13), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY 90, the project's three developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 4.9 million visitor hours that resulted in $16,700 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in April 1969. Bridge across dam was completed in July 1968. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in November 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 7. LOCK NO.2 AND WILBUR D. MILLS DAM (NO.2), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Wilbur D. Mills has four developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 3.2 million visitor hours that resulted in $55,200 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. Lock was placed in operation in March 1968. Emergency repairs to the scour protection features and tainter gates at the dam that resulted from the barge accident in December 1982 were completed in FY 85. The barges that clogged the dam gates during the December 1982 flood showed that, with a certain set of circumstances (higher than normal head combined with the clogged gates resulted in high, current velocity that caused both upstream and downstream scouring), the structure could fail. This condition exists primarily because the structure was constructed on piling and designed for all of the gates to operate in unison. A model study by the Waterways Experiment Station determined the most feasible solution to this problem is to extend the stilling basin downstream. A contract to extend the stilling basin was awarded in June 1990; completion is scheduled for July 1993. Project costs are estimated at $21.4 million. 8. LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. 28-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 3 has three developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.0 million visitor hours that resulted in $14,800 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Design is 60 percent complete on a 40-ft. wide by 9,600-ft. long highway bridge crossing the lock and dam. Construction is scheduled to begin in August 1991. Design and construction is mandated to the Corps of Engineers as the Federal agency having jurisdiction and custody of the dam (23 U.S.C. 320 (Public Law 85-67)). Design and construction are 100 percent funded by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department and the Federal Highway Administration. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operation and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 5 has two developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.0 million visitor hours that resulted in $19,500 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and was placed in operation in November 1969. 11. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Excavation of the high rock in Pool 7 was completed in January 1989. Operation and maintenance continued. Has five developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.7 million visitor hours that resulted in $84,200 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in May 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies under the small project continuing authorities program, navigation activities, Section 107, Public Law 86-6456, as amended. No activity during this fiscal year. 13. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO.1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Recommended modification. The White River Entrance Channel is the first reach in the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System project. The water surface elevation in the entrance channel is controlled by the elevation of the Mississippi River. Feasibility studies were conducted to determine a solution to a low-stage water problem. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES), Vicksburg, MS, conducted a test model which showed that an additional lock and dam in the entrance channel would relieve restrictions on the navigation system during low flows. WES determined that other alternatives tested would not solve the low-flow problem. A feasibility report recommending construction of Montgomery Point Lock and Dam is being reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. The project currently has one developed park which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 119,300 visitor hours; no fee revenue was realized. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in June 1967. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 28-C, Other Authorized Navigation Projects. 15. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY 90, the project's five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 3.1 million visitor hours that resulted in $27,900 fee revenue. 28-4 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Conway water supply project was completed and transferred to the city for operation and maintenance in July 1983. Flood Control 16. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-1, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes. Existing project. Construction cost was approximately $5.1 million. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $1,149,000; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1990, are estimated at $21,630,000. The project's seven developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.5 million visitor hours that resulted in $29,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. In-house water treatment plant replaced with municipal service. Project is complete except for additional recreational sanitary facilities. A vault rest room was converted to waterborne with showers in Waveland Park. Construction of the project began in May 1940 and was placed in operation in March 1947. 17. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO Location. See Table 28-K. White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Construction cost, including the cost of modifying the project, is estimated at $22.4 million. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B, Authorizing Legislation. Major rehabilitation. Construction began in July 1987 on a seepage berm on the upstream face of the dam, a grout curtain on the right abutment, and a parapet wall along the dam. An additional 9 acres of land was acquired to widen the spillway from 190 feet to 370 feet. The parapet wall and the widened spillway will pass about 90 percent of the probable maximum flood. The cost of the modification is estimated at $11 million. Construction was essentially complete in September 1989. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $1,883,560; cumulative benefits through September 1990 are estimated at $79,676,560. Releases made from the lake during low-water periods were sufficient to supply municipal water for Poplar Bluff and other usages. Project currently has seven developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.2 million visitor hours that resulted in $134,00u fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional and improvement to sanitary facilities in recreation areas. Construction of project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 18. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR Location. On Rolling Fork River, river mile 22.8, a tributary of Little River, in Sevier County, about 4 miles northwest of DeQueen, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Chapel Hill, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total storage of 136,100 acre-feet (101,200 for flood control storage and 34,900 for conservation and sedimentation reserve). Federal cost of project is estimated at $19,623,752. (See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $473,000; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1990, are estimated at $5,425,000. In FY 90, the project's seven developed parks experienced publicvisitation exceeding 1.9 million visitor hours that resulted in $17,400 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966. Project was placed in useful operation in August 1977. 19. DIERKS LAKE, AR Location. On Saline River, river mile 56.6, a tributary of Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Dierks Dam, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) 28-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,760 feet long, about 153 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at west end of dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24-inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acre-feet for flood control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. Federal cost of project is estimated at $16,002,781. (See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $178,000; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1990, are estimated at $3,430,000. During the year, 254 acre-feet of water supply storage were withdrawn by Tri-Lakes Water District. Currently has four developed parks which in FY 90 experienced 903,100 visitor hours that resulted in $21,400 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was completed in May 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 20. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (1) Emergency bank protection, Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: Black River Highway HH, Wayne County, MO, $3,276; Indian Creek, McDonald Co., MO, $12,000; Hwy 41, Red River, Little River Co., AR, $2,332; Petit Jean River, Yell Co, AR, $15,583. (2) Snagging and clearing, Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: Black River, Butler Co., MO, $38,024; White River, St. Paul, AR, $21,028. (3) Flood control activities, Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: Cato Springs Branch, Fayetteville, AR, $2,204; Crooked Creek, Saline Co., AR, $15,000; Current River, Tributary A, Van Buren, MO, $1,011; Little Red River, Clinton, AR, $9,281; White River, Elkins, AR, $10,677; McKenzie Creek, Piedmont, MO, $9,767; Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR, $354,230; Mud Creek, Fayetteville, AR, $10,000; Harrison, AR, Reconnaissance Report, $10,003; Sager Creek, Siloam Springs, AR, $12,000; Spring Creek, Springdale, AR, $20,000; Turkey Creek, Joplin, MO, $30,719; White River, Batesville, AR, $48,433. 21. FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN, LITTLE ROCK, AR Location. On Fourche, Rock and Grassy Flat Creeks in vicinity of Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR. Existing project. The project, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662), consists of widening, clearing and snagging with alteration of highway and railroad bridges. The estimated project cost is $29 million: $19.1 million, Federal; $9.9 million, non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Little Rock, the project sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1987. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Funds were provided for award and construction of two channel improvement contracts and one railroad relocations contract. The final construction contract is scheduled for award in July 1991. Overall project completion is scheduled for September 1992. 22. GILLHAM LAKE, AR Location. Damsite is on Cossatot River, river mile 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham, Sevier County, AR. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Gillham Dam, AR, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, see page 19-12 of Annual Report for 1977 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is estimated at $17,826,703. (See Table 28-H for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $532,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $6,440,000. During the year, Tri-Lakes Water District withdrew 627 acre-feet of water supply storage. In FY 90, the project's five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 722,800 visitor hours that resulted in $22,500 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was completed in May 1975 and the project was placed in useful operation. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects were made to determine extent of compliance with approved 28-6 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Costs for FY 90 were $46,937. Total costs through September 30, 1990, were $1,305,335. 24. LITTLE RED RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CLINTON, AR Location. In Clinton, Van Buren County, AR, along the tributaries of the Little Red River. The city lies between the tributaries of Archey Fork and South Fork and is bisected by Town Branch. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consists of 100-foot bottom-width channel for 1.35 miles on Archey Fork Creek and a 300-foot bottom-width channel for 1.99 miles on South Fork, Little Red River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Mitigation measures to compensate for damages to the walleye pike fishery are being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in 1985 and was transferred to the city of Clinton in August 1986 for operation and maintenance. An Operation and Maintenance manual was furnished the city of Clinton. 25. LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR Location. Improvements are on Little River and tributaries, Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 28-J, Little River Basin. Existing project. Part of a six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River, and two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective in October 1980, the four projects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. See individual projects for details. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 26. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southwest Fort Smith, Sebastian County, AR. Existing project. The study began under the General Investigations Program but was changed to Section 205 of the Continuing Authority Program due to the size of the project. The approved plan includes improvements on 3.9 miles of the Mill Creek channel and modifications on three bridges. The estimated project cost is $7,711,900: $3,856,000, Federal; $3,855,000, non-Federal. Local cooperation. The City of Fort Smith, the local sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in November 1988. Operations during the fiscal year. The contract for channel construction was awarded in August 1990. Project is scheduled for completion in May 1991. 27. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR Location. On Little River, river mile 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, AR, and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, AR. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Red Bluff, AR, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $46,100,082. (See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 54,187 acre-feet of water was released from the lake for water supply to Southwest Arkansas Water District. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $2,055,000; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1990, are estimated at $9,325,000. Millwood Lake has 12 developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 6.2 million visitor hours that resulted in $15,500 fee revenue. 28-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full-flood control operation in August 1966. Remaining work consists of additional recreational facilities. 28. NIMROD LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-I, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,005,627. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities continued. In FY 90 seven parks experienced public visitation exceeding 2.4 million visitor hours that resulted in $40,700 fee revenue. Flood damages prevented on an average of 1,978 acres of improved land during FY 90 are estimated at $1,407,000; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1990, are estimated at $14,133,000. Eighty-seven acre-feet of water withdrawn by the city of Plainview, AR. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition of and improvement to sanitary recreation facilities. A vault rest room was converted to waterborne with shower at Quarry Cove Park. Construction of project began in January 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1942. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 28-E, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. 30. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR & MO Location. Improvements are on White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 28-K, White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in White River Basin. The plan includes seven lakes; two are flood-control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell Foley lakes were selected and approved for construction by Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on six of these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. The Bell Foley project, the remaining unbuilt authorized project, was reevaluated in FY 89; the project continues to have a favorable benefit-to-cost ratio since its formulation in 1968. The lakes in the plan are listed in Table 28-K, White River Basin. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin lakes during FY 90 are estimated at $34,015,820; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1990, are estimated at $331,433,820. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin levees during FY 90 are estimated at $5,844,800; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1990, are estimated at $63,295,800. Electric energy delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing during FY 90 totaled 3,574,043,400 kilowatt-hours. Water releases for fish hatcheries were: 28,960 acre-feet from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery; 14,480 acre-feet from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery; and, 14,480 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: Beaver Water District, 34,084 acre-feet from Beaver Lake; Water and Sewer Improvement District No. 3 of Mountain Home, AR, 2,624 acre-feet from Norfork Lake; the Community Water System, Cleburne County, AR, and the city of Clinton, AR, 6,870 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry lakes are complete and in operation. Progress on these lakes is shown in individual reports. Bell Foley lake project is in a deferred status. Water Valley and Lone Rock lakes have been deauthorized. 31. WHITE RIVER, BATESVILLE, AR Location. On White River, within the city of Batesville, Independence County, AR. Existing project. The Definite Project Report, recommending construction of a levee and floodwall to protect the industrial area, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, was approved in June 1988. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, applies. 28-8 LITLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Operations and results during the fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed in April 1990. The project is on hold until the sponsor is able to obtain cost sharing funds. 32. WHITE RIVER, ST. PAUL, AR Location. Along the right bank of the White River, St. Paul, Madison County, AR. Existing project. Channel improvements, under Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, included clearing and grubbing of 2,800 feet by 30 feet. Construction of the project, approved in August 1988, was delayed until the city could acquire the necessary land. Location cooperation. Section 3 of the 1936 Flood Control Act applies. The local cooperation agreement was signed by the city of St. Paul, AR, in August 1989. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Construction completed and project transferred to the local sponsor for maintenance in January 1990. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 33. BEAVER LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-K. White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,797,000. For further information see pages 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B. Major rehabilitation. Since the dam was constructed there has been a seepage problem below Dike No. 1. Based on detailed investigation, it was determined that the limestone foundation under Dike No. 1 and 200 feet of the north end of the main dam embankment is the main problem. The plan of improvement was a concrete seepage cutoff in Dike No. 1 and the north end of the main dam. A contract to construct a concrete cutoff wall was awarded in June 1989; the notice to proceed was issued in October 1989. The contract period was estimated to be 760 days. However, the contractor has ceased productive work due to inability to excavate rock. Local Cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act, and Section 301 the 1958 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $4,350,830; cumulative benefits are estimated at $25,751,830. During the year, 235,443,800 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 34,084 acre-feet. The project has 10 developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 17.2 million visitor hours that resulted in $378,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for modifications to existing recreation and sanitary facilities. Alterations to existing parks to enhance fee collections, improve efficiency, and reduce the maintenance effort or rehabilitate the 20-year old park operation through operation and maintenance and SRUF funds, as appropriate. Construction of project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. Work on a dam seepage problem is described above. 34. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost with eight generating units is $96,356,000. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $12,077,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $103,723,210. During the year, 1,197,278,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project has 18 developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 16.2 million visitor hours that resulted in $170,500 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for modifications to existing recreation and sanitary facilities. Alterations are needed to existing parks to enhance fee collections, to improve efficiency, to reduce maintenance effort or to rehabilitate 35-year-old park facilities through operations and maintenance or SRUF funds, as appropriate. Planning Division and Construction Operation Division, (LRD) and Arkansas Game & Fish Commission and Arkansas Department of Parks and Tourism worked together to provide environmentally sensitive bank stabilization along the White River at Bull Shoals State Park. Gravel excavation was conducted so as to avoid brown trout spawning sites. Environmental damages were offset with the placement of large boulders which serve as habitat for juvenile and adult trout. The boulders also provide excellent angling opportunities for this world class fishery. Construction of project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, 28-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. 35. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 10), AR Location. See Table 28-H, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost is $86,507,000. (See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool fluctuated within 2-foot power pondage, elevation 336.0 to 338.0. Power generation continued. During FY 90, 567,589,100 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. In FY 90 the project's 15 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 24.1 million visitor hours that resulted in $96,300 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. The hydraulic turbines at the Dardanelle powerplant will require extensive rehabilitation in the near future. Complete disassembly of the turbines will be required to replace the turbine blade bearings and oil seals. Several repair alternatives are being examined including replacement of the turbines to increase the available power output of the generating units. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line in April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. Lock became operable in December 1969. Visitors Center and resident office were completed in May 1985. 36. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-K, White River, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000. For further information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. (See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, 1938 Flood Control Act and 1988 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $2,542,500; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $21,936,500. In FY 90, 237,135,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. In FY 90, 1,878 acre-feet of water supply storage was withdrawn. The project has 18 developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 18.6 million visitor hours that resulted in $434,500 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in June 1957 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in January 1962. Power units 1 and 2 were operable in March and May 1964, and water supply was operable in April 1971. Visitors Center was completed in June 1983 at a cost of $813,000. 37. NORFORK LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Total estimated cost is $111,624,000, including $38,700,000 for addition of power units 3 and 4, and $40,000,000 for highway bridge construction. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 28-H for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $2,570,960; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $34,366,960. During the year, 248,572,300 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply withdrawn by the city of Mountain Home, AR, totaled 2,624 acre-feet. In FY 90, the project's 18 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 13.1 million visitor hours that resulted in $164,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities, and addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. Construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries was completed in November 1982. The bridges were transferred to the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department for operation and maintenance in July 1984. 28-10 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 38. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (NO. 12), AR Location. See Table 28-H, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed; spillway has 15 tainter gates 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, 1 foot of power pondage is provided in Pool No. 13 between elevations 391.0 and 392.0. Estimated cost is $86,167,000. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Delivered 291,479,200 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Ozark Lake has 10 developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.6 million visitor hours that resulted in $29,100 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1964. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: Unit 1, November 1972; Unit 2, August 1973; Unit 3, October 1973; Unit 4, December 1973, and Unit 5, May 1974. Remaining work consists principally of modifications to the powerplant. 39. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO Location. See Table 28-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $71,233,000. For further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 90 are estimated at $10,590,760; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $65,978,760. During the year, 776,596,000 kilowatt hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The District and the Waterways Experiment Station are investigating the possibilities of improving the quality of Table Rock releases with a hypolimnetic oxygenation system. Table Rock Lake has 16 developed parks which in FY 90 experienced public visitation exceeding 30.5 million visitor hours that resulted in $396,500 fee revenue. This project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including forestry, fish and wildlife, are managed and protected for future generations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954. The project was ready for beneficial flood control use in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 40. SURVEYS Total fiscal year expenditures were $970,854: navigation studies, $409,422; flood damage prevention studies, $464,470; review of authorized projects, $4,232; special investigations, $35,000; review of FERC licenses, $2,000; interagency water resource development, $16,978; and, coordination studies with other agencies, $38,752. 41. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services (FPMS). The authority for the FPMS program is Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation of flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year: technical services and planning guidance responses furnished during FY 90 exceeded 13,000, including services to Federal and non-Federal agencies, individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Costs for providing these services during FY 90 totaled $271,039. Hydrologic studies. During FY 90, 114 stations were operated; 74 cooperatively with USGS and 40 by the Corps. The total cost for streamflow and some sediment data from all sources of funding was $581,715, of which $416,080 was transferred to USGS. The District also participated in a cooperative program with National Weather Service for 28-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 42. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (PED) During FY 90, a total of $81,636 PED funds was expended: $1,494 in carryover funds on Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence County, AR; $80,142 in carryover funds to prepare a draft feasibility report on North Little Rock (Dark Hollow), AR. Although a justified levee plan for the Dark Hollow project was found, the city of North Little Rock chose not to support the plan. The study has been placed in an inactive status. 28-12 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1,2 See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY90 Sept.30,'90 Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla. & Kans. 3. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR 2,4-5, 6,9,11, 13,15 Navigation Locks & Dams, AR 16. Blue Mountain Lake, AR New Work Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Maint. Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Special Funds Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Mainm. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 3,346,000 3,346,000 4,400,979 4,400,979 53,820,069 11,386,703 42,433,366 54,463,823 11,676,676 42,792,147 $4,852,926 $7,481,000 $2,369,690 $1,479,255,743 _ 150,318,533 4,852,926- 7,481,000 2,369,690 1,328,937,210 4,352,714 4,256,220 2,389,514 1,474,862,155 150,279,504 4,352,714 4,256,220 2,389,514 1,324,587,651 73,193,568 12,883,200 60,310,368 69,730,438 12,211,917 57,518,521 68,731,146 13,230,308 51,500,838 20,319,918 13,699,711 56,620,207 76,824,993 17,676,594 59,148,399 70,427,194 17,077,747 53,349,447 868,554,555= 188,033,095 680,521,460 866,731,2652 187,171,988 679,559,277 291,106 291,106 1,609,842 1,609,842 19,926,755 S 19,926,755 531,336 531,336 119,300,184 119,300,184 S 4,561,666 4,561,666 3,154,000 3,614,165 4,852,926 7,481,000 6,657,000 437,510,399 4,288,918 4,256,220 _ 433,576,551 18,739,150 25,388,560 19,445,670 26,793,291 277,570,4732 18,913,983 24,612,255 20,251,719 22,855,940 276,202,0742 _ 161,481 _ 21,256 395,123 1,529,989 193,632 1,178,455 531,336 531,336 5,069,974 5,069,974 701,722 693,553 762,000 769,708 747,000 750,782 762,082 12,823,098 671,231 12,698,451 28-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 28-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT, See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept..30,'901 2 17. Clearwater Lake, MO 18. DeQueen Lake, Little River Basin, AR 19. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, AR 21. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR 22. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, AR 24. Little Red River & Tributaries, Clinton, AR 25. Little River Basin, (Little Rock Dist.) 26. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost _ 620,000 _ 620,000 __ 11,073,403 11_,0 60,204 1,540,922 1,546,000 1,590,000 1,483,556 26,698,0001 1,555,704 1,482,319 1,654,115 1,418,672 26,628,9531 348,000 6,119,000 3,660,000 347,823 6,096,046 3,674,652 501,910 10,628,910 391,122 10,509,641 19,629,753 S 19,623,752 691,400 713,943 823,000 813,849 834,000 823,816 798,951 8,255,3812 654,520 8,086,1182 -_ 16,002,904 _ 16,002,781 697,300 707,478 798,000 746,097 881,000 919,005 818,159 8,675,162 721,818 8,564,6402 360,000 2,225,000 2,252,000 5,706,000 12,214,000' 343,750 2,200,119 1,313,562 3,983,325 9,455,429' 108,000 64,750 766,722 814,460 88,000 62,864 328,578 371,828 819,000 816,034 12,131 166,900 61,900 170,000 200,000 773,478 698,478 17,827,111 _ 17,826,703 847,360 847,710 3,865,144 3,902,000 4,129,360 3,945,354 3,749,058 4,210,494 90,000 122,848 20,000 37,177 119,000 60,955 _ 68,400 _ 30,254 862,836 7,916,4032 690,716 7,737,644 3,999,500' 9,280 3,770,573' S99,959,850 S99,544,384 S46,232,7842 S46,076,9432 3,465,000 3,856,000' 354,230 674,703' 120,000 111,843 188,400 142,097 28-14 LITLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTi, (Continued) See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept.30,'901-. 27. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, AR 28. Nimrod Lake, AR 30. White River Basin (Little Rock District) 31. White River Batesville, AR 32. White River St. Paul, AR 33. Beaver Lake, AR 34. Bull Shoals Lake, AR 35. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10) AR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintm. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost MainL Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maim. Approp. Cost -- 46,087,3822 -.- 46,091,2482 1,709,722 1,462,000 1,567,000 1,837,799 25,440,1782 1,712,473 1,373,078 1,619,963 1,276,114 25,034,7092 -.. 4,092,826 -.- 4,005,627 916,722 1,103,000 1,085,000 1,062,917 15,636,377 909,774 1,076,793 1,122,310 972,960 15,532,5512 9,005 620,000 620,000 _ 335,651,873 -_ 335,378,666 20,126,632 26,134,860 23,919,340 15,807,440 321,254,7512 20,196,826 25,588,775 24,188,550 14,119,499 321.637,3562 85,000 37,511 5,000' 12,374k 3,200' 2,067 104,200 101,698 1,000 1,105 48,432 20,000 21,028 1,500 346,7001 345,8471 24,200k 24,200 1,500 1,500 S 46,183,033 -46,112,072 3,416,922 3,626,100 3,000,640 3,234,847 44,452,9382 3,382,140 3,544,464 2,900,812 2,899,250 43,861,3062 __. _ 221,000 4,362,320 4,583,320 - 169,363 4,140,246 4,309,609 - 88,858,711 -..- 88,858,707 4,435,922 7,146,900 6,227,200 3,909,514 71,628,8892 4,430,634 6,970,679 6,219,379 3,780,267 75,820,497 - 84,270,124 - 84,261,240 4,284,300 4,558,000 4,736,000 4,311,019 61,395,1872 4,425,056 4,338,146 4,862,558 4,074,968 60,961,8562 28-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 28-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT,2 See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept.30,'90.2 36. Greers Ferry New Work Lake, AR Approp. _ - - _ - _ 48,865,512 Cost - - - _ 48,865,512 Maintm. Approp. 3,832,922 4,461,340 4,743,000 4,106,295 59,801,6952 Cost 3,886,414 4,318,096 4,789,616 4,014,868 59,544,2632 37. Norfork Lake, New Work AR Approp. _ _ _ 70,997,929 Cost 378 - _ _ 70,716,087 Maint. Approp. 2,537,022 3,250,860 3,229,000 3,046,931 51,402,004 Cost 2,547,120 3,211,880 3,268,163 2,378,574 50,596,638 38. Ozark-Jeta Taylor New Work Lock & Dam Approp. _ - _ - _ - _ 85,629,412 (No.12), AR Cost - - _ _ 85,629,412 Mainm. Approp. 3,526,400 3,376,000 4,675,000 4,078,319 51,247,197 Cost 3,525,398 3,344,691 4,688,530 3,672,219 50,797,660 39. Table Rock New Work Lake, MO Approp. _ _ - _ - _- 67,224,000 Cost .. __. 67,224,000 Maintm. Approp. 4,362,922 4,446,000 5,129,500 4,132,592 67,884,380 Cost 4,394,814 4,283,388 5,187,102 3,642,736 67,240,376 1. For more details on project funds see text for individual projects. 2. Beginning data shown in Table 28-A includes special recreation use fees. 3. Includes funds for plans and specifications. 4. Unexpended study funds used to initiate plans and specifications. 28-16 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, & KS (See Section 1 of text) Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, OK Oologah Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Wister Lake, OK Blue Mountain Lake, AR Nimrod Lake, AR Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK, and Mo, and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, OK Fall River Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Toronto Lake, KS Neodosha Lake, KS Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, OK Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Blackburn Reservoir, OK Mannford Reservoir, OK Taft Reservoir, OK Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, AR Eufaula Lake, OK Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, AR Short Mountain Lock and Dam, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, OK. Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake for Mannford, Blackburn and Taft Reservoirs. 28-17 Flood Control Conm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc 107, 81st Cong., 1st sess. May 17, 1950 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all pervious authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. November 17, 1986 June 10, 1948 Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (See Section 21 of text.) Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (See Section 26 of text.) Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL. 99-662, Sec. 401. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Asst. Sec. of the Army (CW), 10/14/88. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR (See Section 25 of text) Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization. Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 1st sess. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 30 of text) June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 March 1, 1974 Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, AR, Norfork Lake, AR, Clearwater Lake, MO, Water Valley Lake, AR, Bell Foley Lake, AR, Greers Ferry Lake, AR, and White River emergency. Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, AR, and MO, Table Rock Lake, MO, and AR, and Norfork Lake, AR, and MO (power). Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added Beaver Lake to the plan. Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. Authorizing highway bridge construction across Norfork Lake. Flood Control Cornm. Doc 1,75th Cong.,lst sess. H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 352, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Cornm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 28-18 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 30, 1948 October 22, 1976 June 30, 1948 August 28, 1937 Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR (See Section 24 of text.) White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for trout production facilities downstream from Beaver Dam. White River, Batesville, AR. (See Section 31 of text.) White River, St. Paul, AR. (See Section 32 of text.) Section 205, PL. 80-858. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, 10/11/84. Water Resources Development Act of 1976, PL. 94-587, Sec. 105. Section 205, P.L. 80-858, construction to be approved by AS A (CW). Section 208, P.L. 75-406. Authorized by the Asst. Sec. of the Army (CW), 10/29/88. 28-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Federal Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR ' 1988 $736,869 Black River, AR and MO 2 1950 80,000 $ 930,324 Current River, AR and MO 2 1964 17,0003 132,178 Upper White River, AR 4 s 1952 813,197 1,788,374 White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff) 2 s 1950- 785,666 White River, Jacksonport, AR 6 1984 43,110 1. Completed. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R & H Act, as amended, (P.L.86-645). 2. Channe' adequate for existing commerce; completion not contemplated. 3. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 4. Federal operation and maintenance terminated Ghne 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. 1,2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Cong. 5. Completed. 6. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream from Newport, AR; transferred to Memphis District in FT 62. 28-20 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR' Inactive 1975 $1,432,116 Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO Completed 1985 44,500 Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR Completed 1958 84,315 Butler County Drainage District 3, MO Completed 1983 42,172 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1951 919,955 Clarksville, AR Completed 1962 271,717 Conway County Drainage and Levee District District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1959 187,440 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 1,018,840 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 390,952 Crawford County Levee District, AR Completed 1983 53,506 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1954 2,001,820 Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, AR Completed 1983 117,898_ East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO Completed 1958 304,699 Faulkner County Levee District No.1, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1941 99,511 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1951 1,077,546 From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR (above Plum Bayou) Completed 1954 845,300 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, ARz2 Cancelled 1973 22,890 Jackson Couinty Levee District 2, White River, AR Completed 1983 131,699- Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR Completed 1988 198,096 Little Red River District 1, AR Completed 1983 28,968 Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR Completed 1983 63,355 Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou, AR Completed 1975 1,901,899 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1950 422,549- Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1953 198,069 Newport, White River, AR Completed 1941 314,276 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1958 512,001 Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR Completed 1987 162,204 - Petit Jean River, AR Completed 1966 84,350 - Pine Mountain Lake, AR' Inactive 1985 1,432,331 - Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, AR Completed 1983 86,943 - Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1950 269,907 - Rolling Fork River, Sevier Cointy, AR Completed 1983 64,500 - Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR Completed 1941 81,023 - South Bank Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), AR Completed 1964 1,404,852 - 28-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 28-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, AR, Tucker Lakes Completed 1961 409,115 - Swan Creek Bank Stab., Taney County, MO Completed 1986 76,800 - Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 438,222 - Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, AR' Completed 1972 1,567,156 Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties, AR Inactive 1977 510,217 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1962 1,269,959 - White River, at Hwy 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, AR Completed 1981 214,308_ White River Bank Stab., Batesville, AR Completed 1986 101,100_ White River, Jacksonport, AR Completed 1987 277,600. White River, Newport, AR Completed 1989 93,929 - 1. Reclassified as inactive in Jun '77; reviewed & 4. See H Doc 577, 87th Cong for description. deferred in May '85; funded for reevaluation 5. Reclassified in Jun '77; local interests unable (draft report dated Sep '89) to met local cooperation requirements; funded 2. Construction of project cancelled because local for reevaluation in FY 89; recommended to be interests failed to provide right-of-way for placed in the inactive status. construction and maintenance. 3. Reclassified as inactive in Jul '85. TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Federal Contributed Project Report For Authority Deauthorized Funds Funds Crooked Creek Lake & Levee, AR 1969 1968 FCA 1990- Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR 1959 1938 FCA 1977 $130,653 Prosperity Lake, MO PL93-251 1989 864,000 Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR & MO 1959 1963 FCA 1977 414,011 28-22 TABLE 18-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened stream Lock Pool of to from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Foun- Kind of Type of Naviga- Es Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) dation Dam Construction tion LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock No. 2 Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2) Lock and D No. 3 Emmett D. Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6) 10.3 8 east of Arkansas Post, AR 13.3 6 east of Arkansas Post, AR 40.5 3 southeast Arkansas Post, AR 50.2 5 north of Grady, AR 66.0 7 east of Pine Bluff, AR 86.3 4 southeast of Redfield, AR 108.1 12 southeast of Little Rock, AR 110 by 600 30 max 110 by 600 20 nom 28 max 142 16 15 Piles in Fixed sand overflow 162 Concrete 18 14 Piles in sand Piles in sand 110 by 600 20 182 110 by 600 110 by 600 14 196 17 213 110 by 600 18 231 18 14 Piles in sand 18 14 Piles in sand 18 14 Clay 18 14 Piles in sandl Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 1967 $34,265,000 1967 43,869,000 1968 1968 1968 1968 1968 33,791,000 40,831,000 29,568,000 62,585,000 Total timated Cost 0 -4 0~4 TABLE 28-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened stream Lock Pool of to form Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Foun- Kind of Type of Naviga- E Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) dation D)am Construction tion Total stimnated Cost Murray Lock and Dam (No.7) Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8) Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9) Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10) Lock and Dam No. 11 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12) James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) 125.4 6 northwest of Little Rock, AR 155.9 6 west of Conway, AR 176.9 3 southwest of Morrilton, AR 205.5 2 northwest of Dardanelle, AR 110 by 600 18 249 110 by 600 16 265 110 by 600 19 284 110 by 600 54 338 18 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Sandstone Deleted 256.8 1 east of Ozark, AR 292.8 7 east of Fort Smith, AR 110 by 600 34 372 110 by 600 20 392 18 15 Sandstone and shale 18 14 Sandstone and shale Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment enlds Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 $37,492,000 56,912,000 34,357,000 84,270,124 85,629,412 46,187,000 0d 0 r!I z 0 0 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened stream Lock Pool of to T form Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Foun- Kind of Type of Naviga- Esti Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) dation Dam Construction tion C otal mated ost TULSA DISTRICT3 James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) (part) W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14) 1970 $6,858,000 319.6 4 east of Redland, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock 336.2 1 north of Cowlington, and Dam (No. 15) OK Webbers Falls Lock 366.6 1 northwest of Gore, and Dam (No. 16) OK Chouteau Lock and 401.4 4 northwest of Okay, Dam (No. 17) OK Newt Graham Lock 421.6 8 southwest of Inola, and Dam (No. 18) OK 110 by 600 20 lO by 600 48 412 460 110 by 600 30 490 110 by 600 21 110 by 600 21 14 15 Rock Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Rock Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends 19 16 Rock Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends 511 15 14 Rock Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends 532 15 14 Rock Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends 32,655,000 94,578,237 83,738,277 31,619,000 44,355,000 TABLE 28-H (Continued) O! 0 0 TABLE 28-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 per cent complete ........... $119,300,184 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, 99 percent complete .................................... 7,500,000 Total, Little Rock District .......................... 716,556,720 Navigation aids (U.S. Coast Guard).......................... 2,268,000 Tulsa District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete...............................12,700,038 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete ............................................. 2,750,000 Subtotal ........................................ $309,253,552 Upstream Lakes:, Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete.........................................$46,772,329 Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete..........................................123,171,173 Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, complete...........................................123,350,747 Subtotal........................................293,294,249 Total, Tulsa District.............................602,547,801 Total Project Cost 96 percent complete .......... $1,319,104,521 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River except Dam No. 2 is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Includes cost of entrance channel. 3. Details in Tulsa District report. O' t,J _____ __ 0 0 H O H C'1 r l O 0 0 z 0 I -- Table 28-I ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage height Reservoir Power Year or o Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Estim Lake and State River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete Co Blue Mountain, AR Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, AR 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 1947 $ 5,06 Canton, OK North Canadian 384.3 Canton, OK 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 _ 1948 11,20 Elk City, KS Elk 8.7 Independence, KS 634 107 Earthfill 284,300 1966 19,05 (Table Mound) Eufaula, OK 12 Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 123,35 Fall River, KS Fall 54.2 Fall River, KS 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 - 1949 10,550 Fort Gibson, OK1 Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK 12,492 110 Concrete-gravity 1,284,400 45,000 1953 42,591 Keystone, OK ', Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK 74,506 121 Earthfill 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,171 Markham Ferry, OK, Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, OK 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,908 Neodesha, KS' Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 0 92 Nimrod, AR Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, AR 680 103 Concrete-gravity 336,010 _ 1942 4,092 Oologah, OK' Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, OK 4,339 137 Earthfill 1,519,000 _ 1974 46,722 Pensacola, OK,'' Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK 10,298 147 Concrete arch 2,197,000 86,400 1940 52 Tenkiller Ferry, OK' Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK 1,610 197 Earthfill 1.230,8(X) 34,(XX) 1953 24,01 Toronto, KS Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS 730 90 Earthfill 199,7(X)00 _ 1960 13,89 Wister, OK Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 _ 1949 10,501 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah. 148,04 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK and KS: Navigation (Table 28-H). 1,319,10 Total, Arkansas River Basin, 98 percent complete. 1,467,14 tal sated )st 9,974 9,834 2,990 ),791 3,873 1,298 1,173 3,756 ],910 2,826 2,329 2,126 ,724 5,324 1,226 1,861 4,521 6,382 1. Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2. Cost included in navigation project. 3. Details in Tulsa Distriot report. 4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 5. Inaotive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. tJ 0N0o J. r x'. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 28-J LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES (See Section 25 of Text) Project River Site' Nearest Town DeQueen Lake' Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, AR Gillham Lake' Cossatot River 49.0 Gillham, AR Dierks Lake' Saline River 56.6 Dierks, AR Millwood Lake' Little River 16.0 Millwood, AR 1. Project is reported separately herein. 28-28 WHITE RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES TABLE 28-K (See Section 30 of text) Miles Drainage Reservoir Power Ti Above Area Height of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development Estii Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) C Beavers Wu 609.0 BO k. Sras..AR 1 .6 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 $ 50, Bell Foley3 straws:y 27.2 Pok.u,AR 519 136 feet Concrete-gravity and earthfill 518,000 93, Bull Shoals2 Wa. 418.6 Msu.. 1n.1.Ai 6,036 258 feet concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96, Clearwater2 Black 257.4 Podmat, MO 89 154 feet earthfill 413,000 _ 11, Greers Ferry2 un Re.d 79.0 lhber Spr,,.AR 1 146 243 feet concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55, Norfork2 NUthIPk 4.8 No.ak, AR 1,806 216 feet concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 111, Table Rock2 Whal. s2s3.s BuoM 4,020 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 3,462,000 200,000 71, Total 15,580,000 828,550 490, 1. Current FY prioe levels unlessotberwise noted. 2. For details see individual reports. 3. Inactive--placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Estimate based on 1983 price levels. otal mated ost 797,000 700,000 356,000 395,000 125,000 624,000 233,000 230,000 0 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT * The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 160,000 square miles which includes Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas and Red River Basins. The District's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas Panhandle. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas-Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Basin cover the northern portion of Texas, and the southern portion of Oklahoma. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Red River and its tributaries above Fulton, AR. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Page 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK ........... 29-2 2. Other Authorized Navigation Projects . .29-2 Flood Control Arcadia Lake, OK ............... 29-2 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX ......... 29-2 Area V, Estelline Springs .......... 29-3 Area VIII .................... 29-3 Birch Lake, OK ................ 29-3 Candy Lake, OK ............... 29-3 Canton Lake, OK ................ 29-4 Copan Lake, OK ............... 29-4 Council Grove Lake, KS ........... 29-4 El Dorado Lake, KS ............. 29-4 Elk City Lake, KS ............... 29-4 Fall River Lake, KS .............. 29-4 Fort Supply Lake, OK ............ 29-4 Great Bend, KS ................ 29-5 Great Salt Plains Lake, OK ......... 29-5 Halstead, KS .................. 29-5 Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK . . 29-5 Hugo Lake, OK ................ 29-5 Hulah Lake, OK ................ 29-5 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS . 29-6 Kaw Lake, OK ................ 29-6 Lake Kemp, TX ................ 29-6 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX ..... 29-6 Marion Reservoir, KS ............ 29-6 Mingo Creek, OK...............29-6 Oologah Lake, OK .............. 29-7 Optima Lake, OK ............... 29-7 Parker Lake, OK ............... 29-7 Page 29. Pat Mayse Lake, TX ............ 29-7 30. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS . . . 29-7 31. Pine Creek Lake, TX ........... 29-7 32. Sardis Lake, OK .............. 29-8 33. Skiatook Lake, OK ............. 29-8 34. Toronto Lake, KS ............. 29-8 35. Waurika Lake, OK ............. 29-8 36. Wister Lake, OK .............. 29-8 37. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............... 29-8 38. Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects ............. 29-8 39. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................. 29-8 40. Emergency Flood Control Activities . . 29-9 41. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................. 29-9 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 42. Broken Bow Lake, OK ....... 43. Eufaula Lake, OK ........... 44. Fort Gibson Lake, OK ........ 45. Keystone Lake, OK ......... 46. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OKandTX ............... 47. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK .......... 48. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK...... 49. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK ... 29-9 ... 29-9 ... 29-9 ... 29-9 ... 29-9 ... 29-9 ... 29-10 . . 29-10 29-1 3. 4. 4a. 4b. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 General Investigations Page Page 29-E Other Authorized Flood 505. 1. SurlSvuervyeyss .............. ............. . 2299--1100 22 -E COothnetrr oAl uPthroojreizcetsd F..l.o..o..d......... 29-19 51. Collection and Study of Basic Data . . . 29-10 29-F Not Applicable 52. Preconstruction 29-G Deauthorized Projects ........... 29-19 Engineering and Design .......... 29-10 29-H Arkansas River Basin Multiple- Purpose Plan ................. 29-20 Tables 29-I Inspection of Completed Local Flood 29-A Cost and Financial Statement ....... .29-11 Protection Projects ............. 29-20 29-B Authorizing Legislation ........... .29-16 29-J Flood Control Work Under Special 29-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects . 29-18 Authorization ................. 29-21 29-D Not Applicable 29-K General Investigations ........... 29-22 NAVIGATION 1. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM (Tulsa District Portion), OK. Location. The Tulsa District portion of the McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for the entire navigation system can be found in Little Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. Existing projects. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project is a component of the multiplepurpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provides for the improvement of the basin through the construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan-Kerr project consists of bank stabilization, channel straightening, and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has a minimum depth of 9 feet and minimum widths of 250 feet on the Arkansas River and 150 feet on the Verdigris River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation system consists of Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sans Bois Navigation Channel, WD. Mayo Lock and Dam, Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, and the pool in Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in Table 29-H. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK, and at Fort Smith, AR. At Sallisaw, OK, a port authority has been active in seeking development of public facilities at that location. Other private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. See Table 29-C. FLOOD CONTROL 3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Deep Fork River at river mile 218.3 in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 102 feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of a gated tower and conduit. The lake has a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), and controls a 105- square-mile drainage area. Construction began in October 1980 and the project became operational for flood control in November 1986. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is 99 percent complete. Estimated cost is $93,100,000 (October 1990 price level base). Funds of $2,357,000 were transferred to the project in FY 90. Remaining recreation is unscheduled pending settlement of a lawsuit filed against the city of Edmond for payment of completed recreation work. Litigation is now in Western District Court, OK. Court date is tentatively scheduled for August 1991. The city of Edmond has signed an interim lease to assure parks will remain open. 4. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, KS, OK, AND TX. Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa District. 29-2 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Existing project. Provided for studies involving the control of water pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The Arkansas and the Red Rivers represent major national and regional water resources severely limited due to poor water quality primarily caused by the natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted by ten naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas and southwestern Oklahoma. These studies included the construction and subsequent maintenance of an injection well and a ring dike used for data collection. Preauthorization studies completed in 1966 and 1970 recommended construction of project features at 13 of the 15 sites. For a detailed discussion of the chloride control projects, see the page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966. The Arkansas River portion of the project was deferred in 1982 (not economically justified). Preconstruction engineering and design is complete on the Red River portion of the project. Construction funds of $5,000,000 are provided for 1991. 4a. AREA V, ESTELLINE SPRINGS. Location. Chloride Control Area V is located about 0.5 mile east of Estelline, TX, on the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1987. Construction started in 1963 and the structure was completed in 1964. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. 4b. AREA VIII. Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at river mile 74.9 of the South Fork of the Wichita River in King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of two low-flow collection dams with attendant pumping stations and pipeline facilities. These two dams (the Bateman Low Flow Dam and the Ross Ranch Low Flow Dam) would be equipped with an inflatable fabric-type weir located in the spillway section which would be deflated to pass relatively good quality high flows. The collected brine would be pumped to the storage reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles northwest of Truscott, TX, would contain the collected brine from this area as well as future collections from Area X. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscott Brine Dam in 1976. The first of the two low-flow dams was completed and put into full operation in May 1987. The second was to be constructed after initial operation of the first to determine the effectiveness of the operation. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized construction of the remaining areas of the Red River Chloride Control project pending transmittal of a report of a favorable finding of the effectiveness of the operation of Area VIII. Public Law 99-662 established a panel to assess the improvement in water quality downstream of Area VIII as a measure of its effectiveness. A favorable report was submitted by the panel to the Secretary of the Army (CW) and to the Public Works Committees of the House and Senate in August 1988. 5. BIRCH LAKE, OK. Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, OK. (See Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in November 1973 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 6. CANDY LAKE, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 1.9. The damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10- by 11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18- by 24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. 29-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was about 13 percent complete when construction was delayed because the U.S. Justice Department decided to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire mineral rights. Estimated cost of the project was $38,300,000 (October 1984 price level base). The project was deferred in January 1984. Project land has been made available for low intensity recreation use. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 7. CANTON LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 394, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in December 1940 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 8. COPAN LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary of the Caney River in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 9. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove in Morris County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1959 and the project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 10. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See El Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Construction began in October 1973, and impoundment began in June 1981. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 11. ELK CITY LAKE, KS. Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence in Montgomery County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in February 1962 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 12. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, about 4 miles northwest of Fall River in Greenwood County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 13. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK. Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward in Woodward County, OK. (See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in October 1938 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary of the 29-4 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 14. GREAT BEND, KS. Location. In Barton County, KS, on the north bank of the Arkansas River about 4.5 miles above its confluence with Walnut Creek. (See Great Bend, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, provides for 6.2 miles of leveed channel to divert Walnut Creek flood flow around Great Bend into the Arkansas River upstream from the city; a 1.5-mile leveed channel to divert Little Walnut Creek flood flow into the Walnut Creek diversion levees along the Arkansas; a tie-back levee 4.3 miles long on the Arkansas left bank upstream from the junction of the Walnut diversion channel; and appurtenant facilities. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the city of Great Bend, KS, agreed to participate in project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $40,700,000 (October 1990 price level base). The contract for Phase II-B was awarded 28 February 1990. 15. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the project began in September 1938 and was completed in July 1941. The project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 16. HALSTEAD, KS. Location. In the city of Halstead in Harvey County, KS, along the Arkansas River. (See Halstead, KS, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for channel modification and construction of about 4 miles of levee in combination with clearing and snagging and straightening and widening approximately 3.6 miles of the Little Arkansas River channel to a 60-foot-bottom width in the vicinity of Halstead. Channel modification will be restricted to one side of the channel except in transition areas. Tree planting and revegetation will be done and ten pool riffle areas will be established to minimize environmental impacts. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds provided in FY 90 were used to complete the Plans and Specifications. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed in October 1989. Estimated project cost is $9,000,000 (October 1990 price level base). 17. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles west of Sapulpa in Creek County, OK. (See Lake Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 599 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction started in March 1948 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1950. Channel improvements below the lake were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. The channel improvement project below the lake was never maintained by the sponsor, Joint Drainage District No. 1, Tulsa and Creek Counties, Oklahoma. For this reason, the channel returned to its pre-project condition and does not provide flood protection for the affected area. The Corps of Engineers discontinued maintenance inspections of the channel project in 1982 due to the condition of the project and lack of cooperation on the part of the sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 18. HUGO LAKE, OK. Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo in Choctaw County, OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in October 1967 and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 19. HULAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Caney River at river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1951. 29-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 20. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington in Coffey County, KS. (See John Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959 and was completed in December 1965. The project was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 21. KAW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City in Kay County, OK. (See Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in June 1966 and the project was placed in operation in May 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 22. LAKE KEMP, TX. Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in May 1970 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 23. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK, TX. Location. The project is located in Wichita and Archer Counties, TX. The Lake Wichita dam and the Holiday Creek channel are located in the city of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Wichita Falls, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The proposed plan includes the replacement of the existing Lake Wichita dam with an earthen dam approximately 16,000 feet long, a concrete spillway, an auxiliary spillway, and low-flow outlet works. The plan also includes channel improvements along Holliday Creek from the new spillway to the Wichita River, a distance of 9.3 miles. Local cooperation. The city has removed one bridge, initiated construction of a portion of the channelization, initiated acquisition of real estate necessary for construction of the project, and initiated engineering and design for the relocation of utilities, streets, and highway bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction of Phase II channels is approximately 80 percent complete and will continue in FY 91 along with engineering and design and supervision and administration. Estimated project cost is $45,300,000 (October 1990 price level base). 24. MARION RESERVOIR, KS. Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion in Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1964 and the project was placed in flood control operation in February 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 25. MINGO CREEK, OK. Location. On the right-bank tributary of Bird Creek in Tulsa County, OK. (See Tulsa, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of 23 detention sites which would capture peak flows and hold them temporarily until downstream flows subside. There would be about 9.4 miles of channelization in selected locations on the tributaries and main stem of Mingo Creek. This plan will provide a minimum of 65-year protection in the major damage area. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. 29-6 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The local sponsor is the city of Tulsa, OK. On August 26, 1983, the city of Tulsa adopted a Resolution of Assurance to provide a minimum share equal to 35 percent or the traditional lands, easements, and rights-ofway, whichever is greater, and will be required to assist in the actual financing of construction. The city has constructed 4.75 miles of channel and placed two excavated detention facilities into flood control operation. Operations and results during fiscal year. One contract was awarded during FY 90 - main stem Phase I-B in February 1990 for $1,760,000. Estimated project cost is $169,100,000 (October 1990 price level base). 26. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah in Rogers County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report for 1972. Construction began in July 1950, but the project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction resumed in December 1955 and was completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate (second stage) development was initiated in July 1967 and was completed in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 27. OPTIMA LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the existing improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in March 1966 and impoundment began in October 1978. Construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 28. PARKER LAKE, OK. Location. On Muddy Boggy Creek, a tributary of the Red River, about 23 miles east of Ada in Coal County, OK. (See Parker, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Parker Lake, when constructed, will be a multipurpose element in a plan of improvement for the Upper Muddy Boggy Creek Basin, OK. The project consists of an earthfill dam about 2,200 feet long, a gated outlet works for flood control and water supply, and a 100-foot-wide spillway. The lake created would have a total storage capacity of 220,240 acre-feet and would yield 42 million gallons per day for municipal and industrial water supply. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board, the sponsor, has agreed to cost share in the flood control portion of the project and the water supply provided enough interested users for the water supply can be identified. Operation and results during fiscal year. Work in FY 90 included continued coordination with the sponsor. Estimated project cost is $65,300,000 (October 1990 price level base). 29. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris in Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in March 1965 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 30. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in April 1974 and impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 31. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City in McCurtain County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 29-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in February 1963 and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 32. SARDIS LAKE, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton in Pushmataha County, OK. (See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Sardis Lake will be operated as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin. (The three-lake system includes Hugo and Tuskahoma Lakes.) Construction began in August 1975 and the project became operational in January 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is 100 percent complete. Estimated cost of the project is $68,603,000 (October 1990 price level base). 33. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, about 5 miles west of Skiatook in Osage County, OK. (See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1;24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see Page 19-8 of the Annual Report for 1987. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment began in October 1984, and the project became operational in November 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The authorized project is complete. Estimated cost of the project is $122,300,000 (October 1990 price level base). 34. TORONTO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, about 4 miles southeast of Toronto in Woodson County, KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in November 1954 and the project was placed in full operation in March 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 35. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, OK-TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction began in July 1971 and impoundment began in August 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. 36. WISTER LAKE, OK. Location. On the Poteau River at iver mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister in LeFlore County, OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in April 1946 and was completed in May 1949. The project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract for Phase II of major rehabilitation was awarded in March 1990 in the amount of $5,080,000. Estimated major rehabilitation cost is $11,500,000 (October 1990 price level base). 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See Table 29-E. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Inspections of completed, Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are owned, operated, and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers in determining if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. See Table 29-I for a list of projects inspected in FY 90. Fiscal year cost was $96,907. 39. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. The Tulsa District, Corps of Engineers is responsible for flood control operations at 12 non-Corps projects. These include nine Bureau of Reclamation lakes, two 29-8 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Grand River Dam Authority lakes, and one city-county owned lake. All of these projects were constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. As a result of heavy rainfall in the spring, record pool levels were reached at Arbuckle and McGee Creeks. Near record levels were reached at Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry), and channel capacity releases were required at Altus Lake. Fiscal year costs for scheduling flood control reservoir operations totaled $557,663. 40. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES. Fiscal year cost for national emergency preparedness was $105,289 and for advance preparation was $124,795. 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. See Table 29-J for FY 90 expenditures for Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Projects (Section 14); Snagging and Clearing; and Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies, Field Investigations. MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 42. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow in McCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements, see page 29-17 of the Annual Report for 1971. Construction began in November 1961 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 43. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula in McIntosh County, OK. (See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in December 1956 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 44. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson in Muskogee County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in March 1942 but was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction resumed in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The fourth generator was installed and the project placed in full operation in September 1953. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the construction of hydropower units 5 and 6. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 45. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in January 1957 and the project was placed in flood control operation in September 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 46. LAKE TEXOMA (DENISON DAM), OK AND TX. Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Report for 1969. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction started in August 1939 and was completed in February 1944. Commercial power generation was started in March 1945. Authorized work is complete except for installation of the third, fourth, and fifth power units. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 47. ROBERTS. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw in LeFlore County, 29-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 OK. (See Robert S. Kerr, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report for 1972. The Robert S. Kerr Lockand Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in April 1964 and closure was completed in October 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, 3, and 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Five sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 48. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK. Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 7 miles northeast of Gore in Sequoyah County, OK. (See Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1947 and was completed in July 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 49. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls in Muskogee County, OK. (See Webbers Falls, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report for 1977. The Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, and 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Facilities at the Port of Muskogee include: A cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority; a liquid cargo loading facility and a steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company; grain holding facilities built by Conagra, Inc.; and a general-purpose private dock built by the Fort Howard Paper Company. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 50. SURVEYS. Fiscal year cost was $1,382,498 which included 12 flood damage prevention studies; 2 authorization reports; 2 restudies of deferred projects; inventory of dams - special investigations, review of FERC licenses, and intragency water resources development; and coordination with other Federal agencies, States, and non-Federal interests. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 51. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Fiscal year cost was $325,681 which includes floodplain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 52. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Fiscal year cost was $1,737,956 which includes two navigation projects, five local protection projects, and one flood control reservoir. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 29-10 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 19901 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK (Tulsa District Portion) 3. Arcadia Lake, OK 4. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, KS, OK, and TX 4a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX 4b. Area VIII, TX 5. Birch Lake, OK 6. Candy Lake, OK 7. Canton Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - - - - 130,936,6382 - - - - 130,936,6382 7,778,050 10,166,800 4,207,100 3,505,573 136,012,634 7,895,973 9,367,272 4,224,784 3,447,239 130,823,959 6,300,000 6,092,367 168,700 142,836 1,500,000 815,940 294,600 304,715 768,000 1,323,780 417,500 392,488 376 -222 -222 435 1,660 330,844 459,500 457,269 5,700 5,048 28,300 26,232 341,291 693,500 654,204 615,400 709,800 611,826 687,249 - -22,000 47,590 8,272 - 24,100 - 14,338 3,635 4,288 3,300 5,288 115,936 770,300 802,076 759,972 771,336 19,000 19,242 0 145,748 312,182 344,939 82,108,289 81,803,712 1,193,082 1,184,663 - 25,705,208 - 25,705,068 - 3,533,506 - 3,646,832 - 300,028 - 300,028 3,788 172,899 2,995 186,694 189,000 237,159 638,748 632,946 46,682,000 46,655,645 2,689,348 2,673,727 - 13,549,170 - 13,549,296 714,177 7,682,750 701,214 10,954,454 - 4,927,922 - 4,927,714 9,200 52,300 18,712 52,292 - - - - 11,209,834 - - - - 10,918,727 1,146,922 1,585,400 1,403,400 1,436,982 21,336,576 1,142,413 1,481,886 1,508,298 1,340,993 21,312,572 29-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 19901 8. Copan Lake, OK 9. Council Grove Lake, KS 10. El Dorado Lake, KS 11. Elk City Lake, KS 12. Fall River Lake, KS 13. Fort Supply Lake, OK 14. Great Bend, KS 15. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 16. Halstead, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 450,000 725,909 587,100 609,896 1,420,122 1,444,285 2,127,911 729,800 674,358 818,300 803,059 - 1,930,000 453,181 2,064,749 329,100 328,807 416,500 391,983 353,133 903,200 875,777 843,900 864,027 131,000 318,066 536,208 539,477 654,300 777,400 1,005,708 686,243 745,711 1,026,682 696,600 888,200 1,054,600 703,723 801,319 1,132,283 622,800 942,600 1,024,500 619,807 889,571 970,456 -35,000 88,641,999 36,198 92,023,901 739,178 4,490,178 755,231 4,408,433 - 11,810,509 - 11,810,509 761,899 12,583,843 740,635 12,533,881 - 92,432,468 24,332 92,289,381 411,680 3,339,588 424,463 3,325,755 - 19,052,990 - 19,052,990 652,118 11,422,932 671,250 11,394,509 - 10,550,873 - 10,550,873 720,496 11,906,491 735,620 12,075,162 - 7,724,134 - 7,723,127 753,624 11,507,597 820,457 11,436,841 220,000 1,140,000 1,500,000 5,398,000 8,258,000 126,531 1,031,858 1,247,994 5,225,004 7,631,387 370,600 507,200 1,033,200 366,615 427,519 1,119,370 250,000 375,000 156,920 454,756 200,000 203,551 - 4,626,270 - 4,626,270 434,679 7,516,986 399,847 7,472,449 259,000 1,084,000 244,356 1,059,583 29-12 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 19901 17. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK 18. Hugo Lake, OK 19. Hulah Lake, OK 20. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 21. Kaw Lake, OK 22. Lake Kemp, TX 23. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 24. Marion Reservoir, KS 25. Mingo Creek, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 610,400 564,381 693,200 681,398 826,000 787,096 1,868 974 4,023 2,712,122 2,398,900 1,328,700 2,597,490 2,462,384 1,343,855 642,100 648,068 721,000 681,541 595,300 597,517 - 2,560,572 - 2,560,572 601,250 9,398,173 628,135 9,422,977 3,456,700 3,748,348 1,219,694 1,245,018 41,216,442 41,180,456 17,966,544 17,813,065 - 11,388,150 - 11,182,433 404,921 11,500,200 454,003 11,462,198 - - - - 135,718 - - - - 135,718 -- - - 28,151,515 -- - - 28,151,515 1,009,622 1,212,200 1,546,200 1,078,323 19,880,000 892,125 1,284,003 1,562,032 1,050,865 19,897,957 5,264 2,118,422 2,139,648 3,102 2,430,300 2,202,005 -390 - 109,430,750 - 109,429,274 1,772,700 1,562,033 20,885,123 1,884,007 1,488,022 20,641,317 - 7,637,702 - 7,637,702 118,300 120,895 169,700 160,954 150,680 158,216 122,278 2,109,192 110,666 2,095,014 805,000 1,704,000 6,755,000 12,071,000 21,335,000 677,910 1,275,692 6,826,669 10,009,893 18,790,164 - - - - 13,420,817 -- - - 13,420,817 831,500 830,572 906,600 797,669 889,800 910,507 894,872 12,905,218 958,866 12,848,863 - 2,087,000 4,884,000 5,090,000 12,061,000 - 446,418 2,268,007 7,904,520 10,618,945 29-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 19901 26. Oologah Lake, OK 27. Optima Lake, OK 28. Parker Lake, OK 29. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 30. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 31. Pine Creek Lake, OK 32. Sardis Lake, OK 33. Skiatook Lake, OK 34. Toronto Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost ..- 46,722,3293 ..- 46,721,5563 1,252,522 1,295,700 1,135,100 1,496,487 20,847,913 1,246,801 1,309,601 1,143,974 1,270,804 20,602,406 451,500 542,900 448,801 525,318 561,000 578,602 961,000 200,000 -654,000 55,496 288,951 119,194 - 47,173,438 - 47,273,438 443,728 5,202,150 441,111 5,229,725 40,871 522,000 504,512 - 9,310,661 - 9,310,661 692,800 689,368 927,400 805,100 870,590 869,122 812,641 11,971,250 779,710 11,924,279 - 16,879,166 - 16,879,165 767,300 1,007,300 1,025,700 786,870 961,795 1,066,793 22,313 780,800 768,370 572,000 3,607,419 665,350 690,076 509,874 609,700 639,033 400,500 410,820 - -202 849,500 1,008,600 883,439 999,405 5,215,000 4,138,635 823,900 812,244 2,000,000 279,972 795,900 712,124 313,200 291,831 1,350,000 4,273,156 888,800 887,629 433,000 2,189,460 987,700 1,002,919 211,900 233,835 919,818 6,621,018 851,358 5,783,336 - 20,628,049 170 20,628,017 924,395 11,981,053 933,647 11,934,089 1,075,000 2,626,250 882,840 853,845 20,000 130,038 1,191,638 1,215,888 68,968,479 68,386,603 5,085,690 5,031,156 106,201,282 106,268,127 4,381,938 4,297,096 - 13,896,324 - 13,896,324 277,303 5,563,406 273,670 5,557,608 29-14 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 19901 35. Waurika Lake, OK 36. Wister Lake, OK 42. Broken Bow Lake, OK 43. Eufaula Lake, OK 44. Fort Gibson Lake, OK 45. Keystone Lake, OK 46. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX 47. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 29,910 901,922 899,739 774,500 758,208 73,000 192,927 1,121,600 1,083,398 -8,034 1,209,100 1,212,261 852,100 802,800 836,200 805,894 - 940,000 - 922,683 - 67,153,050 - 67,142,501 1,129,587 9,963,553 1,141,034 8,925,668 - 10,501,226 - 10,501,226 733,693 11,597,553 689,495 11,517,776 6,195,529 7,135,529 5,756,325 6,679,008 - - - - 41,222,692 - - - - 41,222,692 1,334,022 1,677,900 1,626,200 1,644,380 20,160,921 1,342,585 1,501,749 1,779,734 1,623,572 20,097,113 192,000 786,814 3,771,922 3,751,284 63,796 17,617 4,725,100 3,666,000 4,488,574 3,403,633 - 123,350,7474 19,824 123,032,5864 3,861,000 54,741,366 4,121,612 51,495,048 - - - - 42,591,2985 - - - - 43,497,7915 3,239,622 3,300,400 3,230,500 2,989,814 48,559,002 3,144,482 3,138,033 3,354,424 3,052,430 49,831,065 - - - - 123,171,1736 - - - - 123,170,6756 3,081,022 3,666,600 2,902,200 2,745,433 42,523,085 3,033,653 3,491,838 3,024,825 2,752,389 42,496,188 - - - - 68,168,9607 - - - - 68,019,1097 4,593,222 5,668,500 5,350,600 7,078,815 88,879,985 4,534,606 5,592,446 5,473,749 5,667,880 87,373,321 - - - - 46,237 - - - - 46,237 - - - - 94,578,237 - - - - 94,578,237 2,413,300 4,273,100 4,592,584 4,233,112 46,811,932 2,531,516 4,037,108 4,781,357 3,612,433 45,738,656 29-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 19901 48. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK New Work Approp - - - - 24,017,7208 Cost - - - - 24,057,7188 Maint Approp 3,115,037 3,291,800 2,739,000 2,837,232 42,038,846 Cost 3,178,124 3,061,753 2,831,687 2,906,764 41,949,879 49. Webbers Falls Lock New Work and Dam, OK Approp - - - 2,369,690 86,107,967 Cost - - - 2,369,690 86,108,391 Maint Approp 2,341,900 2,860,500 2,433,300 2,152,027 41,906,791 Cost 2,368,464 2,529,036 2,728,735 1,964,705 41,785,836 1. Includes $2,077,900 expended by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, 6. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 29-M of the 7. Includes $433,539 Emergency Relief funds. Exchange FY 85 Annual Report. $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 2. Includes $12,700,038 for Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectifi- 8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public cation. Works acceleration funds. 3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special 9. The cost for Grand Lake O' the Cherokees has been added funds. to amount reported in paragraph 40, Scheduling Reservoir 4. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 special Operations. funds. 5. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public Works acceleration funds. Table 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 1. July 24, 1946 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 3. December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 4. 4a. October 23, 1962 4b. November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 November 17, 1986 McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project W.D. Mayo Hydropower ARCADIA LAKE Changed water quality to water supply ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Authorized Area V (Estelline Springs) Authorized Areas VII, VIII, and X Authorized Areas I, II-III, VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV Authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority. HD 79-758 PL 79-525 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 HD 91-299 PL 94-587 SD 87-107 PL 89-789, SD 110 PL 91-611 PL 99-662 29-16 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 5. October 23, 1962 6. October23, 1962 7. June 28, 1938 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 8. October 23, 1962 9. May 17, 1950 10. October 27, 1965 11. August 18, 1941 12. August 18, 1941 13. June 22, 1936 14. November 17, 1986 15. June 22, 1936 16. November 17, 1986 17. July 24, 1946 18. July 24, 1946 19. June 22, 1936 20. May 17, 1950 February 15, 1958 21. October 23, 1962 22. October 23, 1962 23. November 17, 1986 24. May 17, 1950 March 14, 1990 25. November 17, 1986 26. June 28, 1938 27. June 22, 1936 28. November 17, 1986 29. October 23, 1962 30. October 23, 1962 November 10, 1978 31. July 3, 1958 32. October 23, 1962 December 4, 1981 33. October 23, 1962 34. August 18, 1941 35. December 30, 1963 BIRCH LAKE CANDY LAKE CANTON LAKE Approved Irrigation Storage Approved Water Supply Storage COPAN LAKE COUNCIL GROVE LAKE EL DORADO LAKE ELK CITY LAKE FALL RIVER LAKE FORT SUPPLY LAKE GREAT BEND GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE HALSTEAD HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK HUGO LAKE HULAH LAKE JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR Authorized name change KAW LAKE LAKE KEMP LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK MARION RESERVOIR Authorized name change MINGO CREEK OOLOGAH LAKE OPTIMA LAKE PARKER LAKE PAT MAYSE LAKE PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE Authorized name change PINE CREEK LAKE SARDIS LAKE Authorized name change SKIATOOK LAKE TORONTO LAKE WAURIKA LAKE HD 87-563 HD 87-563 HD 75-569 HD 87-563 HD 80-442 HD 89-232 HD 76-440 HD 76-440 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 80-290 HD 79-602 HD 74-308 HD 80-442 PL 85-327 HD 87-143 HD 87-144 PL 99-662 HD 80-442 PL 101-253 PL 99-662 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 88-71 HD 87-472 PL 95-265 HD 85-170 SD 87-145 PL 97-88 HD 87-563 HD 76-440 PL 77-228 SD 88-33 PL 88-253 29-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Table 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 36. June 28, 1938 WISTER LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session July 30, 1983 Changed conservation pool PL 98-63 elevation 42. July 3, 1958 BROKEN BOW LAKE HD 85-170 October 23, 1962 SD 87-137 43. July 24, 1946 EUFAULA LAKE HD 79-758 44. August 18, 1941 FORT GIBSON LAKE HD 76-107 July 24, 1946 Incorporated into the PL 76-228 multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin November 17, 1986 Added hydropower units 5 & 6 PL 99-662 45. May 17, 1950 KEYSTONE LAKE SD 81-07 46. LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) June 28, 1938 Flood control and power HD 75-541 October 17, 1940 Navigation and regulating flows PL 76-868 Sepember 30, 1944 Authorized name PL 78-454 August 14, 1953 Water supply PL 83-273 November 17, 1986 Recreation PL 99-662 47. July 24, 1946 ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND HD 79-758 DAM AND RESERVOIR July 8, 1963 Authorized name change PL 88-62 48. June 28, 1938 TENKILLER FERRY LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session June 24, 1946 Power HD 79-758 49. July 24, 1946 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM HD 79-758 Table 29-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Big and Little Sallisaw Navigation Project Inactive - Poteau River Navigation Project, OK and AR Complete 1983 536,952 Red River from Fulton, AR, to Mouth of Washita River Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 29-18 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta LPP, KS ' 2 1938 - 84,217 Big Pine Lake, TX3 1984 1,701,670- Boswell Lake, OK3 1952 - - Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK2 1970 261,448 - Crutcho Creek LPP, OK3 1972 213,016 - Dodge City LPP, KS2 - - - Enid LPP, OK2 1963 743,612 14,599 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, Tulsa, OK 2' 4 1975 1,741,000 Florence LPP, KS2 1965 369,782- Hutchinson LPP, KS2 1956 3,497,718 - Iola LPP, KS2 1939 22,290- Jenks LPP, OK2 1950 344,797- Joe Creek LPP, OK 2 - 308,041- Lamed LPP, KS2 - - - Lukfata Lake, OK3 1983 1,424,685- Marion, KS2 1988 5,488,190- McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX5 - - - Oklahoma City LPP, OK2 1960 8,047,512- Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison, OK and TX2 1953 222,105- Sand Creek LPP, KS2 1968 545,996- Sand Lake, OK3 1963 - - Shidler Lake, OK 3 1983 568,191- Tulsa and West Tulsa LPP, OK2 1954 2,785,070- Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK3 1975 144,853- Tuskahoma Lake, OK3 1963 - - West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS2 1965 364,200- Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS2 1960 12,247,379- Winfield LPP, KS 1" 2 1937 - - LPP - Local Protection Project. 1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 2. Complete. 3. Deferred. 4. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 5. Active with no current year expenditures. TABLE 29-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Cedar Point Lake, KS 1980 November 17, 1986 0 0 Public Law 99-662 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS 1971 November 17, 1986 363,720 0 Public Law 99-662 El Dorado, West Branch, 1977 November 17, 1986 92,319 0 Walnut River, KS Public Law 99-662 Neodesha Lake, KS 1952 November 17, 1986 97,910 0 Public Law 99-662 Towanda Lake, KS 1981 November 17, 1986 392,361 0 Public Law 99-662 29-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 29-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mile1 Nearest Town LAKES Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, OK Elk City Elk River 8.7 Elk City, KS Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK Neodesha Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK (Tulsa District Portion) Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification Verdigris and Arkansas N/A2 Fort Smith, AR, to Catoosa, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK Lock and Dam 13, AR Arkansas 292.8 Fort Smith, AR Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 1. On the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, these are navigation miles. 2. As required for a channel 9 feet deep. TABLE 29-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 38 of Text) Projects Inspected in Fiscal Year Inspection Date South Deer Creek, OK October 1989 Dodge City, KS November 1989 Florence, KS November 1989 Hutchinson, KS May 1990 lola, KS December 1989 Lamed, KS November 1989 Marion, KS October 1989 Sand Creek, KS November 1989 Park City, KS June 1990 West Branch Chisholm Creek, KS June 1990 Wichita/Valley Center, KS June 1990 Cherry/Red Fork Creeks, OK October 1989 Flat Rock/Valley View Creeks, OK October 1989 Haikey Creek, OK October 1989 Jenks, OK October 1989 Joe Creek, OK October 1989 Tulsa/West Tulsa Levees, OK October 1989 Enid Diversion Channel, OK November 1989 Oklahoma City Floodway, OK February 1990 2920 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 41 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS (Section 205) Bird Creek, Owasso, OK Blackboy Creek, Tulsa County, OK Chikaskia River, Blackwell, OK Coal Creek, Henryetta, OK Coweta Creek, Coweta, OK Dog Creek, Waynoka, OK Dry Creek, Braman, OK East Plum Creek, Wichita Falls, TX Gordon Creek, Iowa Park, TX Haikey Creek, Tulsa County, OK Joe Creek, Tulsa, OK Little Arkansas River, Sedgwick, KS Manard Bayou, Muskogee County, OK Merkle Creek, Norman, OK Muskogee, OK North Canadian River Wastewater Plant, Oklahoma City, OK Rock Creek, Burlington, KS Sycamore Creek, Coffeyville, KS Tahlequah Creek Walnut Creek, Purcell, OK Washita River, OK Whiskey and Rock Creeks, Independence, KS Wichita Falls, TX TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) Chikaskia River, Blackwell, OK City Dam, Little Caney River, KS County Bridge, Walnut River, Arkansas City, KS County Road (Sec. 2), Deer Creek, KS County Road (Sec. 6), Deer Creek, KS County Road, Washita River, Caddo County Road, North Canadian River, OK County Road, Verdigris River, KS County Bridge, Elk River, Elk City, KS Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, KS Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa Murray County Bridge, OK Section 20 Aqueduct Washita River, Caddo Section 24 Aqueduct Washita River, Caddo Section 24 Road North Canadian River, Pottawatomie Section 27 Road North Canadian River, Pottawatomie Sewage Lagoon, South Canadian River, New Castle Sewage Lagoons, North Canadian River State Highway 156, Kay County, OK Verdigris River City Dam, Independence, KS Walnut River, Cowley County, KS Washita River, Anadarko, OK TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION SNAGGING AND CLEARING Fischer Creek, Sand Springs, OK South Deer Creek, Shawnee, OK Unnamed Trib., Tecumseh, OK Walnut Creek, Purcell, OK TOTAL SNAGGING AND CLEARING FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES, FIELD INVESTIGATIONS Red River and Tribs TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES, FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 29-21 5,000 18,122 33,214 85,590 261 408 10,000 100,100 23,711 4,582 1,688 21,182 2,942 36,267 9,778 386,433 25,215 2,458 4,392 22,390 4,725 31,727 1,458 831,644 197,190 1,040 887 4,916 3,897 6,518 931 2,304 887 636 1,448 1,020 6,515 6,245 8,398 7,468 9,190 6,535 4,807 -28,818 8,728 1,723 252,456 10,000 2,132 8,898 5,846 26,876 16,318 16,318 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 29-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 50, 51, and 52 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Arkansas River, Great Bend, KS, to Tulsa, OK Arkansas River Basin, AR and OK Canadian River, OK, TX, and NM Crutcho Creek, OK Grand (Neosho) River Basin, KS and OK Grand (Neosho) River, KS and OK Keystone Dam to Tulsa, Ark River Lake Texoma, OK and TX Miami and Vicinity, OK North Canadian River Above Lake Overholser Verdigris River Basin Verdigris River Basin, KS and OK, Caney Authorization Reports Arkansas River and Tributaries, South Central-Southeast Areas, OK Red River Basin, AR, TX, LA, and OK CM Review of Authorized Projects Restudy of Deferred Projects Lukfata Lake, OK Winfield, KS Inventory of Dams Special Investigations Review of FERC Licenses Intragency Water Resources Development Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests Soil Conservation Service Bureau of Reclamation Planning Assistance to States - Texas Planning Assistance to States - Kansas Planning Assistance to States - Oklahoma TOTAL SURVEYS COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Claremore OK, FW/P Flood Plain Management Services Ponca City, OK, Flood Forecast Map Technical Services General Tulsa Forecast Maps Hydrologic Studies Storm Studies TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Projects Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Red River Waterway to Denison Dam, TX Flood Control Projects Local Protection Arkansas City, KS Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK McGrath Creek, TX Upper Little Arkansas River Watershed, KS Winfield, KS Flood Control Reservoirs Douglass Lake, KS TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 29-22 308,413 101,805 25 184,129 26 4,147 12,722 228,222 17,789 228 2,263 3,315 119,936 98,133 15,681 22,301 46,755 1,999 13,489 3,852 5,362 10,979 35,520 145,405 1,382,498 21,477 92,353 5,051 188,826 42 17,932 325,681 49,283 8,183 495,844 294,465 286,679 567,540 35,690 272 1,737,956 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and western boundaries of McMullan; and the western boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. 30-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Trinity River Project, TX .... Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX . 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Belton Lake, TX .. 5. Benbrook Lake, TX 6. Boggy Creek, TX.. 7. Canyon Lake, TX . 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Page Flood Control (Cont) Page ........... 30-2 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................ 30-11 27. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir ........... 30-3 Operations ......................... 30-11 ........... 30-3 28. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 30-12 .30-4 29. Work Under Special Authorization ...... 30-12 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .......... Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' The Pines, TX ................. Grapevine Lake, TX .................. Hords Creek Lake, TX ................ Joe Pool Lake, TX ................... Lavon Lake, TX ...................... Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX .............. Lewisville Dam, TX .................. Navarro Mills Lake, TX ............... O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX .......... Proctor Lake, TX ..................... Ray Roberts Lake, TX ................. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ... San Gabriel River, TX ............... Somerville Lake, TX .................. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX ............ Waco Lake, TX ...................... Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ...... .. 30-4 .. 30-4 .. 30-5 30-5 30-6 30-6 30-7 30-7 30-7 30-7 30-8 30-8 30-8 30-8 30-9 30-9 30-10 30-10 30-10 30-11 30-11 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 30. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX ... 31. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX .... 32. Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX ............. 33. Whitney Lake, TX .................. General Investigations 34. Surveys ............................ 30-13 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 30-13 Tables Table 30-A Cost and Financial Statement ... Table 30-B Authorizing Legislation ........ Table 30-C Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... Table 30-D Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............. Table 30-E Work Under Special Authorization ................ Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,201,000,000 including $141,000,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the local protection features (Oct. 1, 1990, base price). Operations during fiscal year. The authorized projects have been dormant for several years due to lack of local support. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Chhnnel to Liberty begins at the Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $147,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $44,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $191,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, 30-2 30-12 30-12 30-12 30-12 30-15 30-19 30-22 30-22 30-23 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT * (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $34,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $913,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $461,754,000 for water supply and $9,533,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $471,287,000, exclusive of interest. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION: Location. Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a leveed floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 7,300 acres of urban lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated Federal cost is $97,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $97,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $194,000,000 for the improvement (Oct. 1, 1990, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all alterations to existing improvements, other than railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the project after completion, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $1,878,000 (excluding future recreation) exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing Acts see Annual Report for 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29, 1976. To date, the Authority has paid $147,933 toward principal and $17,000 to operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to Aquilla project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $5,107,000. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $643,172 toward principal and $814,474 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 30-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Benefits accrued to Bardwell project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $9,298,000. 4. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $1,215,329 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,345,173 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2, 1957. Amount of $331,410 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Belton project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $127,407,000. 5. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date $174,735 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $124,514 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20, 1977. To date, $18,321 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 are estimated at $960,652,000. 6. BOGGY CREEK, AUSTIN, TX Location. The project is located on Boggy Creek in southeast portion of the city of Austin, Texas. Existing project. The Boggy Creek Channel Improvement Project will consist of approximately 2 miles of concrete and gabion lined channel beginning just upstream of Webberville Road and extending downstream almost to Jain Lane. From there the Channel is about 1.0 mile of grasslined trapezoidal channel to Ed Bluestein (Highway 183) where it transitions back into the natural channel. The project will include a 54 acre tract near the lower end of the project which will serve as a mitigation and environmental quality enhancement area. Approximately 1.0 mile of nature trail will be included in the mitigation/enhancement area. The project will require the replacement or modification of four bridges. It will also include the replacement of two railroad bridges with one bridge. Estimated Federal cost is $16,700,000 and $8,500,000 non-Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1990, base price). The proposed flood control channel will provide capacities for the 100 year flood. Design will provide for containment of flows within the banks of the improved channels. Bottom widths for the concrete channel will vary from 60 feet to 90 feet, and top widths from 80 feet to 120 feet. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the City of Austin is required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas, presently estimated at $2,129,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project presently estimated at $4,719,000; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $231,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities, presently estimated at $32,000 annually; pay five percent of cost allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $1,227,000 and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $43,000 annually; pay 33 percent of the first costs allocated to environmental quality enhancement, presently estimated at $64,000; pay 37 percent of the separable first cost allocated to fish and wildlife mitigation, presently estimated at $130,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $5,000. The city will also be required to hold and save 30-4 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT the United States free from damages due to the construction work, operate and maintain all works after completion, prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project, provide and maintain adequate lateral drains and channels, publicize flood plain information for all streams in the watershed and adopt and enforce regulations to minimize damages to future developments within the 100-year flood plain, and administer and assure access to the recreational facilities and lands to all on an equal basis. Operations during fiscal year. Specific authorization for construction of Boggy Creek is found in FY 1985 Supplemental Act. In FY 1990 Channel Improvement Part I was completed. Work on Channel Improvement Part II, recreation and turfing continues. Project completion is scheduled for FY 1991. 7. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe- Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe- Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the water storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date $1,894,540 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,137,400 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Canyon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $58,878,000. 8. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Location. Cooper Dam is located in northeast Texas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.2 on the South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a multipurpose reservoir with levee and channel improvements on the Sulphur River. The reservoir consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of about 79 feet, 28,070 feet long at its crest, a single conduit 10.5 feet in diameter, 530 feet long, two 10.5 foot by 4.75 foot sluices, and a 700 foot wide uncontrolled concrete spillway. The reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at the top of the flood control pool, 19,305 acres at the top of the water supply pool, and 5,084 acres at the top of the sediment pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acre-feet of flood control storage, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply storage, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Construction of the project began in July 1958 and, to date, approximately 66 percent of the lands required for project construction have been acquired and 98 percent of the levees and 100 percent of the channel work have been completed. Approximately 14.8 miles of the South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of the Middle Sulphur River channels have been excavated. Approximately 3.4 miles of levee embankment on the South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles on the Middle Sulphur River have been constructed upstream of the Cooper Lake. About 10.5 miles of levee on the North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on the Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Lake. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel work between April 1964 and February 1971. Construction was started again, however, in May 1971. The Texas Committee on Natural Resources, et. al., secured an injunction to halt construction on the project pending preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. A statement was prepared and filed on June 24, 1977. The plan recommended, in the Final EIS, minimized further construction of the authorized channels and provided for construction of the lake and downstream levees. The sufficiency of the Final EIS was challenged in the court and in December 1978 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled the statement inadequate, citing five deficiencies and halting all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with the court's decision was prepared and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency in March 1981. The recommended plan of improvement consists of the multipurpose lake, 48.2 miles of levee, and the acquisition of 24,724 acres of wildlife mitigation lands. All remaining channel and levee work was deleted from the recommended plan. The Supplemental EIS was filed with the court in July 1981 and numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were subsequently filed. After the Supplemental EIS was filed in July 1981, numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were filed through October 1982. On December 30, 1982, the U.S. District Court issued a 30-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 95-page order continuing the permanent injunction. On March 22, 1983, the order was revised and Judge William Wayne Justice issued an Amended Memorandum Opinion and a Permanent Injunction against the construction of Cooper Lake. The Government filed a Notice of Appeal with the court in May 1983. On July 16, 1984, litigation was resolved and the injunction was released. The project was transferred to the Fort Worth District at the end of FY 1979. Public Law 101-101, H.R. 101-235, approved September 29, 1989, authorized $5 million for additional recreation. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1990 base price) is $137,427,000, non- Federal cost for land for the levees is $227,000 and in addition $52,300,000 is to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50-year period. Local cooperation. Except for Cooper Lake, local interest must furnish lands and rights-of-way and alter and relocate highways and related facilities and utilities, except railroads, for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion, and preserve channel capacities by preventing encroachment. Local agencies furnished rights-of-way for the first two phases of work on the levees and channel downstream from Cooper Dam. Rights-of-way acquisition for the second phase was also essentially complete when construction was halted. Assuring agencies are the following counties in Texas: Franklin, Hopkins, Titus, and Red River. Basic assurances have been received. Operations during fiscal year. Contract awarded during FY 1990 include the following: Reservoir Clearing, awarded May 1, 1990; Revegetation Mitigation, awarded May 15, 1990; Fencing White Oak Mitigation, June 6, 1990. Cooper Lake and Channels is approximately 73 percent complete overall. Major items completed through FY 1990 are Relocations of Railroads, 100 percent; Channels and Canals, 100 percent; Levees and Floodwalls, 98 percent; and Lands and Damages, 72 percent. Land Acquisition and Engineering and Design continues. Deliberate Impoundment is scheduled for September 1991 and project completion is scheduled June 1994. Benefits accrued to Cooper Lake and Channels project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 are estimated at $5,734,000. 9. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O' THE PINES, TX Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet, including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,000 acre-feet for municipal and industrial .water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $8,826,000. 10. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with City of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with City of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To date, $119,277 has been paid. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities $112,231, Dallas $552,564, and Grapevine $154,051. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30, 1983 and completed FY 1990. The proposed plan of improvement provides for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and 30-6 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $1,494,436,000. 11. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $937,000. 12. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Location. Dam site is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 22,360 feet, including 50-foot type spillway, which will control 232 square miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 123,100 acre-feet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project is $198,900,000 (Oct. 1, 1990, base price) including $10,600,000 non-Federal first cost. Project is a unit in the general comprehensive plan for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River Basin. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority were approved by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. The recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was modified March 28, 1979, to allow the Corps to participate with the State of Texas and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Recreation development contract with the State of Texas was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $48,650,000 for water supply and $8,650,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $57,300,000 exclusive of interest. To date $37,847 has been paid. Of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, $1,326 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. The project has been under construction since FY 1975 and through FY 1989 is approximately 99 percent complete overall. All major items are complete thru FY 1990 except for the State Park recreation and the Penn Site restoration. Deliberate Impoundment was January 1986. Project completion is scheduled for May 1993. Public Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $119,342,000. 13. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date North Texas Municipal Water District has paid $2,654,348. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, and to date has paid $640,785. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $124,461,000. 14. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Mile 31.8. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1988. Construction of project was initiated in May 30-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and $220,000 local interests, a total of $69,970,000. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $3,492,486 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $37,825,004. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project are 100 percent complete. 15. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. Dam is in Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with City of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denison must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $3,311,075 and Denison $140,169. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $1,720,221,000. 16. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost of project is $13,154,000, including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $895,259 for water supply and $926,006 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $29,350,000. 17. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake Januiary 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water-supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water-supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,336 toward operation and maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay additional contributions of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $2,376,000. 18. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. 30-8 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $408,099 for water supply and $359,103 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Proctor project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $19,126,000. 19. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $298,800,000 (Oct. 1, 1990, base price). Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8094, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. To date the city of Dallas has paid $3,878,934 and the city of Denton has paid $1,362,867 toward principal. Dallas has paid $35,441 and Denton has paid $12,452 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project. Operations during fiscal year. The project is about 93 percent complete overall. Acquisition of real estate continues. FY 1990 funds were used to award the following contracts: Relief Wells, awarded January 30, 1990; Flood Damage Roads, awarded October 26, 1990. Engineering and Design continues. Deliberate Impoundment began June 30, 1987 at Ray Roberts Lake, the pool raise at Lewisville Lake was November 1988. Project completion is scheduled for December 1995. At the request of the City of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. Benefits accrued to Ray Roberts Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $992,086,000. 20. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez Creeks, and Espada Aqueduct located in vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Existing project. The project consists of 34.9 miles of channel and associated improvements on six separate streams. Completion of detailed engineering and design studies revealed that the least costly alternative for the remaining channel improvements would consist of two tunnels. The San Pedro Creek tunnel would be 6,040 feet in length and the San Antonio River tunnel would be 16,360 feet in length, and construction and alteration of railroad bridges. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $132,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1990, base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $94,000,000 which includes $3,500,000 cash contributions and $90,500,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $226,000,000. Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 86 percent complete. Project completion is scheduled for February 1994. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $1,764,210 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio Channel. Operations during fiscal year. FY 1990 funds were used to continue construction and engineering and design studies. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1990 were $117,514,900. 30-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 21. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct 1, 1986, base price) and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $171,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for a total of $70,172,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18, 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. A Draft Reevaluation Report on South Fork Lake was submitted to headquarters in October 1986. The report recommended no Federal action and defer further studies indefinitely. Future water supply needs of the area would be addressed by reallocating storage at Granger Lake. The South Fork Lake project was placed on inactive status and would be eligible for deauthorization in FY 1997 if no funds are obligated by then. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $24,605,000. 22. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started in June 1962 and project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, has paid $1,438,559 to date. Also under the contract, the authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Somerville project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $33,216,000. 23. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $1,794,201. Also under the contract the Authority 30-10 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $788,750. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1990 is $28,050,000. 24. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at City of Waco, McLennan County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the City of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date, the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $2,003,841. Also under the contract the Authority and the City must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $940,653 and the City has paid $146,305. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for municipal and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Waco project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $71,358,000. 25. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17, 1968. To date, the City has paid $524,374. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $13,859,000. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with Section 208.10, of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local flood-protection works approved by Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 30-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY from regular funds for maintenance were $35,000. Total costs to September 30, 1990 were $851,000. 27. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944, expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near City of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near City of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1990 were $193,366,800 and by Twin Buttes through FY 1990 were $418,000. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $94,253. 30-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 30-C.) 29. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 30-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 585, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); emergency streambank protection under Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended; Snagging and Clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control, Section 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $176,006 for disaster preparedness; no levee repair. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 30. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original construction. Town Bluff Dam was completed and placed in operation in 1951. A Design Analysis Report completed in April 1982 and a Feasibility Report was approved September 9, 1983 indicated that installing hydropower at this project is now economically feasible. The hydropower facilities will include a 6,000 kilowatt power plan (two units at 3,000 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and necessary switchgear equipment to be located in the main embankment at the old diversion channel and will be operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The installation and operation of hydropower facilities will not result in the altering of the existing operation at Town Bluff. The project will produce an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy per year. There is no Federal cost on this project. It is completely funded by non-Federal funds. The estimated non-Federal cost is $18,900,000. 101st Congress House Report 923, effective February 7, 1989, changed the name of Town Bluff Hydropower to Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower. Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Authority was approved by Secretary of the Army, June 28, 1985, relative to financing, escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. Operation during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed and construction on the turbine-generator was initiated in FY 1986. Construction on the powerhouse was initiated in FY 1987. Project completion date is scheduled for 1991. 31. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report 1969. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $4,200,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the City of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the City has paid $153,600. Also under the contract the City of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the City has paid $136,607. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $232,478,000. 32. TOWN BLUFF DAMB. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 33. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from City of Waco, Texas. 30-12 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started June 1946 and ready for flood'control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date, the authority has paid $237,022. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Whitney project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1990 were $171,169,000. General Investigations 34. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $749,217 for flood damage prevention studies; $102,472 for coordination with other agencies; $369 for review of authorized projects; $174,723 for miscellaneous activities; and $0 for preauthorization studies Phase I for a total of $1,026,781. 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $338,607. Fiscal year costs were $15,378 for hydrologic studies. 30-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 This page intentionally left blank. 30-14 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-A See Section in Text Project 1. Trinity River Project, TX Includes Channel to Liberty, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Dallas Floodway Extension 2. Aquilla Lake, TX 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Belton Lake, TX 5. Benbrook Lake, TX 6. Boggy Creek, TX (Federal Costs) (Contributed Funds) 7. Canyon Lake, TX 8. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (Contributed Funds) 9. Ferrells Bridge Dam Lake O' The Pines, TX 10. Grapevine Lake, TX 11. Hords Creek Lake, TX COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost To Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 199017 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 275,000 235,826 39,227 - 22,574,865 - 22,574,865 - - - - 45,506,300 13,509 1,324 - - 45,506,300 506,300 436,800 532,500 520,507 3,122,107 519,866 441,685 529,579 438,501 3,020,149 - - - - 10,934,505 - - - - 10,934,505 954,122 1,148,400 1,194,800 1,632,675 16,294,88418 963,614 1,174,518 1,183,423 1,168,319 14,643,50718 - - - - 16,960,549 - - - - 16,960,5491 1,488,622 1,993,300 1,716,300 2,533,345 23,052,10918 1,481,234 2,010,129 1,761,276 1,638,622 22,033,91118 - - - - 13,130,463 - - - - 13,069,9912 1,100,522 1,398,100 1,245,400 2,262,948 22,339,38518 1,105,422 1,261,787 1,376,992 1,505,796 21,419,37718 1,045,000 3,100,000 4,205,000 6,651,000 16,021,000 1,102,585 2,158,645 2,769,539 7,585,800 14,545,321 16,500 922,968 35,132 1,215,500 2,189,900 - 357,601 281,160 1,158,253 1,796,914 - - - - 19,088,5243 - - - - 19,088,524 1,094,522 1,266,600 1,186,900 1,306,478 16,551,50418 1,095,387 1,248,993 1,169,578 1,266,674 16,206,15318 6,055,000 17,200,000 20,534,000 23,265,000 94,925,000 6,082,525 8,082,802 24,757,172 22,945,751 89,409,493 - - - - 227 - - - - 227 - - - - 14,175,1974 - - - - 14,175,1975 6 1,860,122 2,096,400 1,680,700 2,780,974 28,233,02718s 1,854,337 2,077,743 1,721,149 2,073,792 27,507,80318 - - - - 21,317,790 2,801 7,030 6,050 512 21,317,790 1,571,122 2,001,400 1,912,100 2,624,949 26,482,33918 1,572,836 1,975,327 1,903,328 1,734,685 25,517,83418 - - - - 2,731,0898 - - - - 2,731,089 30-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project 12. Joe Pool Lake, TX 13. Lavon Lake, TX 14. Lavon Lake Modification & East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 15. Lewisville Dam, TX 16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 17. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX 18. Proctor Lake, TX 19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX 30. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (Contributed Funds) 31. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX 20. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Funding Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 199017 1 1 30-16 658,300 713,900 769,600 732,748 12,107,217 650,938 709,692 772,873 707,564 11,997,38518 11,100,000 9,100,000 5,182,000 2,087,000 187,258,000 5,739,280 8,404,244 10,379,003 2,496,541 186,297,044 355,800 448,300 529,900 496,620 1,938,620 354,030 428,177 532,438 480,658 1,901,221 - - - - 12,864,796 - - - - 12,864,796 2,148,322 2,352,400 1,841,300 3,058,296 28,015,93618 2,152,944 2,327,877 1,850,509 1,934,149 26,820,04918 - - - - 69,796,862 184 - - - 69,796,862 - - - - 25,333,988 - - - - 25,333,9889 3,899,822 2,230,600 2,108,300 4,814,960 38,405,18510, 1is 3,929,412 2,140,815 2,133,211 3,251,393 34,296,02310, 18 - - - - 9,846,759 - - - - 9,846,75911 1,095,422 1,257,900 1,311,800 1,423,654 16,045,45418 1,080,767 1,244,267 1,286,746 1,223,316 15,765,26518 - - - - 16,027,467 - - - - 16,027,467 685,900 1,026,660 867,400 907,035 13,941,92518 646,518 1,052,790 851,790 885,734 13,852,53918 - - - - 14,469,585 - - - - 14,469,585 938,022 1,228,100 1,401,800 2,111,287 16,633,94118 942,557 1,193,209 1,413,347 1,221,199 15,505,52018 39,000,000 10,534,000 15,583,000 16,427,000 279,256,700 33,801,189 13,117,540 13,682,191 18,602,293 274,939,119 36,300 319,500 449,600 581,002 1,386,402 25,754 309,453 456,846 523,614 1,315,667 4,541,000 8,758,000 3,458,000 104,000 18,622,000 4,417,320 9,229,935 3,385,422 157,592 18,503,380 - - - 200,000 60,870,957 - - - 101,856 60,772,81312 2,455,322 2,724,400 2,305,100 2,201,218 41,804,25418 2,451,539 2,734,448 2,288,354 1,956,530 41,177,04618 0,859,000 17,800,000 19,891,000 14,698,000 103,463,048 5,985,903 11,285,198 17,605,602 16,386,648 91,190,362 353,935 602,750 - - 1,956,210 - 956,685 - - 1,956,210 e., FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 87 21. San Gabriel River, TX New Work: Approp. 23,000 Cost 36,593 Granger Maint. Approp. 834,722 Cost 839,763 Lake Georgetown Maint. Approp. 1,044,822 Cost 1,004,730 22. Somerville Lake, TX New Work: Approp.- Cost- Maint. Approp. 2,190,122 Cost 2,183,967 23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, New Work: TX Approp. - Cost- Maint. Approp. 921,122 Cost 886,513 32. Town Bluff Dam- New Work: B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Approp.- TX Cost - Maint. Approp. 747,400 Cost 757,622 24. Waco Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost- Maint. Approp. 1,772,722 Cost 1,800,333 33. Whitney Lake, TX New Work: Approp.- Cost- Maint. Approp. 2,428,122 Cost 2,490,316 25. Wright Patman Dam New Work: and Lake, TX Approp. - Cost- Maint. Approp. 2,023,322 Cost 1,945,964 1 Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 2 Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. SExcludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 4 Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 6 Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. Total Cost To FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990' 7 1,220,600 1,179,792 1,465,000 1,485,058 1,116,200 1,130,161 1,181,000 1,180,248 1,116,67 1,045,32 1,127,26 1,096,51 2,071,900 1,590,400 1,647,48 2,030,709 1,637,136 1,497,35 1,529,700 1,495,401 750,500 734,887 1,405,000 1,269,49 1,452,494 1,083,86 1,158,000 1,578,36 1,191,374 1,129,62 2,040,625 1,694,700 2,512,41 2,019,545 1,681,788 1,840,04 2,686,800 2,717,800 4,717,06 2,653,768 2,713,466 3,551,73 1,658,402 1,743,100 1,860,54 1,731,222 1,751,522 1,390,88 - 101,796,100 - 101,796,100 T3 10,414,95118 1 10,289,22718 39 9,877,82318 l8 9,814,34818 - 27,790,438 - 27,790,436 30 25,413,83818 9 22,729,46618 - 20,522,08413 - 20,522,084 9 15,374,54718 1 15,124,32718 - 6,602,737 - 6,602,73714 38 15,713,83618is I 1 15,178,47018 - 49,521,12115 - 49,521,121 l9 24,806,52418 [1 23,982,03918 - 42,952,938 - 42,952,93816 33 41,997,66518 33 40,411,65818 - 35,731,626 - 35,731,626 [6 27,990,06018 31 27,460,94518 7 Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 8 Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. 9 Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. o1I0n cludes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. 11 Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 12 Excludes $3,000,000 expended from contributed funds. 13 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 14 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 15 Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 30-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 16 Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of 18 Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Table lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. A includes Special Recreation Use Fees. Data for previous 7 Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new dated March 24, 1983). procedure. 30-18 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 13, 1968 3. Mar. 31, 1960 4. Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 5. Mar. 2, 1945 6. Jun. 22, 1936 7. Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 8. Aug. 3, 1955 9. Jul. 24, 1946 10. Mar. 2, 1945 11. Aug. 18, 1941 12. Oct. 27, 1965 30-19 TABLE 30-B AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. BOGGY CREEK, TX Construction of a concrete trapezoidal channel on Boggy Creek beginning just above Webberville Road and extending downstream about 2.2 miles to just below Bolm Road. From there, a grass lined channel would extend further downstream and transition with the natural channel at Ed Bluestein Boulevard, a distance of about 1.7 miles. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Construction of earth-fill dam and reservoir area; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, miles 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8; channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between miles 1 and 5. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TX Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 535. 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Act of 1936 (PL 738) H. Doc. 247, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Mar. 2, 1945 14. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 15. Mar. 2, 1945 16. Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 17. Aug. 18, 1941 18. Sep. 3, 1954 19. Oct. 27, 1965 31. Mar. 2, 1945 20. Sep. 3, 1954 21. Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 3, 1975 22. Sep. 3, 1954 23. Sep. 3, 1954 32. Mar. 2, 1945 LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess., and H. Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 30-20 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX 30. Mar. 2, 1945 Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with 1st Sess. Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX 1. Oct. 27, 1965 Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of 1st Sess., and Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a 2nd Sess. distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX 24. Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and 2nd Sess. Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TX 33. Aug. 18, 1941 Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 miles H. Doc. 390, 76th Cong., southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. 1st Sess. Raise the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX 25. Jul. 24, 1946 Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 30-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 30-C OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 29 of Text) PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1990 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Belton Lake Modification, TX7 1988 - - Big Fossil Creek, TX3 1969 - - Big Sandy Lake, TX2 1986 - - Big Spring, TX2 1979 - - Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX5 - - Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX2 1979 - - Dam "A" Lake, TX8 1987 - - Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX4 1983 - - Elm Fork Floodway, TX 1987 - - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX3 1971 - - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX3 1971 - - Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill)3 1987 - - Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road)3 1989 - - Greenville, TX3 1983 - - Lake Brownwood Modification, TX4 1983 - - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX5 - - - Millican, TX2 1988 - - Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX4 - - - Plainview Local Flood Protection Project, TX4 1979 - - Roanoak Lake, TX2 1979 - - Rockland Lake, TX6 1988 - - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX3 1969 - - Zacate Creek Channel, TX3 1983 - - Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX3 1986 - - 1Deauthorized 1 Nov 81. 5Deauthorized Nov 86. 2Inactive. 6Deauthorized Oct 88. 3Completed. 7Deferred. 4Recommended for deauthorization, H.R. 3678, 8Deauthorized Jan 90. August 23, 1983, 98th Congress, 1st Session. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 30-D (See Section 27 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Big Fossil Creek .. ................................................................ Dec. 5, 1989 Calloway Branch, Hurst . ........................................................... Aug. 15, 1990 Dallas Floodway .. ............................................................... Nov. 16, 1989 East Fork ............................................................................ Nov. 7, 1989 Fort Worth Floodway ............................................................... Oct. 4, 1990 Grand Prairie Landfill ............................................................. Aug. 14, 1990 Grand Prairie Meyers Road .......................................................... Aug. 14, 1990 Greenville .. .................................................................... Oct. 19, 1989 Munday .. ...................................................................... Nov. 8, 1989 Pleasanton .. ................................................................... May 21, 1990 Poteet ......................................................................... May 21, 1990 San Antonio Floodway .. ........................................................... M ay 23, 1990 Wheeler Creek ... ............................................................... .May 24, 1990 Zacate Creek .................................................................... M ay 23, 1990 30-22 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-E WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 30 of Text) Project Flood Control Activities - Section 205 Cost Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX ......................................... ................ $ 27,017 Beverly Hills, McLennan Cnty, TX ............... ..................................... ... 67,230 Burton Creek, Bryan, TX ................... ......................................... 58 Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX ................... ....................................... .. 484 Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX ................ ................................... ... . 26,012 Carrizo Creek, Carrizo Spring, TX ................. ....................................... .4,528 Chacon Creek, Laredo, TX ............... ........................................... ... . 69,664 Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX ................ ............................................ . 17,214 Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX ................ ..................................... 12,151 Duck Creek, Garland, TX ........... ........................... ..................... 6,295 Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX ................. ................................... .4,036 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX .............. ....................................... 0 Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX ............... ....................................... ... 151,882 Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX ............. ............................................. .. 1,887,945 Plants Creek, Seymour, TX ................ ............................................. .3,588 Post Oak Creek, Corsicana, TX ................ ....................................... .. 7,756 Rush Creek, Arlington, TX ................ .............................................. 39,844 Seymour Creek, Seymour, TX ................ ........................................ .. 4,657 Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX ................ ..................................... ... . 216,522 South Mesquite, M esquite, TX .............. .......................................... 6 Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX ............... .......................................... ... 61,446 Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX.............. ........................................... .. 27,027 Ten Mile Creek, Duncanville, TX.............. ........................................ 1,207 Ten Mile Creek, Lancaster, TX ................. .......................................... 72,303 Timber Creek, Double Oak, TX ................... ..................................... 190 Town Branch Creek, Lockhart, TX..................................................... 628 Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX ................. ......................................... 12,465 Valley View Branch, Hurst, TX.............. ......................................... .. 55,532 Waco Creek, Waco, TX .................. ........................................... .8,368 Walnut Creek, Hood County, TX ....................................................... 74 W alnut Creek, M ansfield, TX ................ ........................................ ... 64,451 W alnut Creek, Sequin, TX .............. ............................................ .... 669,887 W hitney Creek, W hitney, TX .................. ....................................... 45 Zarzamdra Creek, San Antonio, TX ................... .................................. 71 Project Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 Cost Beltline Road, Cottonwood Creek, TX............. ...................................... . $ 4,210 Broadway Street, Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX............................................ 393 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene, TX............................................................. 7,208 County Road 42, Bosque River, McLennan County, TX....................................... 501 Moss Street, Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX ................ ............................... 884 Park Row, Arlington, TX ................ ........................................... ... . 17,290 W ashington Street Bridge, Laredo, TX .................................................. 15,467 Project Snagging and Clearing of Flood Control - Section 208 Cost Maxwell Creek, Parker County, TX ............. .......................................... $ 1,079 Timber Creek, Double Oak, TX ....................................................... 26 30-23 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT * Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. 31-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division)........................... 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX ............. 3. Cedar Bayou, TX .................... 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ....... 5. Freeport Harbor, TX ................ 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX ..... 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border ............................ 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX ............ 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX .......... 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX .......... 11. Texas City Channel, TX ............... 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX ...... 12A. Anahuac Channel, TX ................ 12B. Channel to Liberty, TX .............. 12C. Wallisville Lake, TX ................ 13. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .. 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... Beach Erosion Control 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX ............ Flood Control 16. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ..... 16A. Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX ..... 16B. Brays Bayou, TX ................... 16C. Greens Bayou, TX .................. 16D. Halls Bayou, TX ................... 16E. Hunting Bayou, TX ................. 16F. Little White Oak Bayou, TX .......... 16G. Carpenters Bayou, TX ............... 17. Clear Creek, TX ................... 18. Cypress Creek, TX .................. Page Flood Control (cont.) 19. Falfurrias, TX ..................... 31-2 20. Kirbyville, TX .................... 31-3 21. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX .......... 31-3 21A. Arroyo Colorado, TX ............... 31-3 21B. South Main Channel, TX ............. 31-4 21C. Raymondville Drain, TX ............. 31-5 22. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane-Flood Protection ........... 23. Sims Bayou, TX .................... 31-5 24. Taylors Bayou, TX ................. 31-7 25. Texas City and Vicinity, TX 31-7 Hurricane-Flood Protection ........... 31-8 26. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX ..... 31-8 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control 31-9 Works ........................... 31-9 28. Flood Control Work Under Special 31-9 Authorization..................... 31-10 29. Emergency Stream Bank and Shoreline 31-10 Erosion Work and Snagging and Clearing Under Special Authorization .......... 31-11 31-11 31-11 31-11 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-13 31-13 31-13 31-13 General Investigations 30. Surveys .......................... 31. Planning and Engineering ............ 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... Page 31-14 31-14 31-14 31-14 31-15 31-15 31-15 31-15 31-16 31-16 31-16 31-16 31-16 31-17 31-17 31-17 31-18 Tables 31-A Cost and Financial Statement. 31-19 thru 31-22 31-B Authorizing Legislation ..... .31-23 thru 31-36 31-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .. 31-37 31-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. 31-37 31-E Total Cost of Existing Projects ........ 31-38 31-F Channel Dimensions ........ 31-39 thru 31-41 31-G Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels ........ 31-42 thru 31-43 31-H Dredging Operations ........ 31-44 thru 31-45 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Control of hydrilla, water hyacinth and alligatorweed continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin and Brazos River Basin. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Control work by the State of Texas continued. A new one year contract with the option to renew for an additional four years was negotiated with the State. Monitoring of the biological control nursery areas was maintained and biological control technology transfer was continued. 31-2 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Expansion of the program to Coleto Creek Reservoir was approved. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 15F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $28,581,647, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, and non-Federal $15,367,258, including $7,449,258 contributed funds, $288,000 lands, $2,165,000 relocations, and $5,465,000 other costs, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. (October 1, 1990 base price). Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was deauthorized under Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Work remaining consists of enlarging 14.8 miles of the existing Brownsville Channel from 36 feet by 200 feet to 42 feet by 250 feet and by enlarging 2.5 miles of the entrance channel from 38 feet by 300 feet to 44 feet by 300 feet. The turning basin would be enlarged to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) Local cooperation. Complied with for the completed work. For the 42 foot project authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; levees and spillways for disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, during construction, and pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 3. CEDAR BAYOU, TX Location. The bayou is about 30 miles long. It flows to the south and empties into northwest corner of upper Galveston Bay, about 1.5 miles below mouth of San Jacinto River and about 28.5 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Project provides for a channel 10 feet by 100 feet from Houston Ship Channel to Bayou Mile 11.0. Channel was completed from Houston Ship Channel to first bend in Cedar Bayou above the mouth in 1931. Channel from Mile -0.1 to Mile 3.0 was completed in March 1975. Channel from Mile 3.0 to Mile 11.0 was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of Public Law 93-251. Project also includes jetties at mouth of bayou provided for under previous project. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 0.6 feet and extreme range 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. U.S. Steel Company has a barge dock at bayou mile 2.8, and there are a few small wharves, privately owned, for local use at various places along Cedar Bayou. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance required for fiscal year. 4. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning 31-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 31-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $74,938,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects: and non- Federal $18,977,431 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $7,644,435 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1990 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Tule Lake Turning Basin through Viola Turning Basin was completed in 1989, and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins has been deferred. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to and through the Chemical Turning Basin at 45-foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. First stage disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed in September 1984. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for alteration of a 10" natural gas pipeline, Suntide Area, was completed at a cost of $74,641. Construction of the effluent ditch for the Suntide Disposal Area was completed at a fiscal year cost of $590,080. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 5. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 31-F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. Work remaining consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin, as authorized by the R&H Act of 1970. The initial contract for the 45 foot project, construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty, was awarded in May 1987. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $60,027,000 Federal (Corps); and $30,496,000 non-Federal, including $19,988,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed 31-4 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT work, $6,587,448 lands, $2,990,000 levees and spillways, and $570,000 relocations. (October 1, 1990 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed 26 June 1986, requires that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including land for recreation, and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $9,260,000, modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project, presently estimated at $570,000, contribute in cash one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $406,000; and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, presently estimated at $18,824,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty continued at a fiscal year cost of $2,182,940. Contract for dredging Brazos Harbor and Turning Basin and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin was awarded in August 1989 and continued at a fiscal year cost of $2,112,553. Dredging the Entrance Channel, Station -230 +00 to 50+ 35.91 was initiated in April 1990 and continued through the fiscal year at a cost of $4,733,832. The contract for dredging the Jetty Channel and Lower Turning Basin, Station 50+23 to 82+00 was awarded in June 1990 and continued at a cost of $96,500 through the fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 6. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. See Section 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX regarding work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary 31-5 7. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about one-fourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. (See Table 31-G on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River was completed in 1986. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: (1) Mouth of Colorado River, dredging a navigation channel from gulf to the GIWW; construction of an impoundment basin; constructing a turning basin at Matagorda, Texas; construction of a diversion dam and channel; construction of a dam at Tiger Island Cut; construction of an oyster cultch; and recreation facilities; (2) Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 for enr.larging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $91,764,000 (excluding $42,000 Department of Transportation cost for Channel to Victoria) Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non-Federal $25,025,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $3,466,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $1,930,000 contributed funds for Channel to Victoria, $5,148,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,242,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and $8,769,000 other costs for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (October 1, 1990 base prices.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act and Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Non-Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Texas, $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Texas, $347,950 for Channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, and $3,466,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Texas, and $1,930,000 for Channel to Victoria. 31-6 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1979) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Mouth of Colorado River New work: Contract for the diversion channel and levees was completed at a fiscal year cost of $758,464. Dredging the Navigation Channel, Sta. 24 +400 to Sta. 37+600, and Impoundment Basin was initiated in September 1989 and contract cost for the fiscal year was $2,356,490. Contract for construction of Jetty Park was awarded in March 1990 and continued through the fiscal year at a cost of $347,778. Channel to Victoria New Work: See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance: The Channel to Victoria had a contract awarded in August 1990 for Bank Stabilization and Drainage Structure repairs Station 1527 +50, 1536+85 and 1540+40. The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $1,289,199 including engineering and design, supervision and administration, and real estate activities. Contract for rehabilitation of Sector Gates for Brazos River Floodgates and Colorado River Locks was awarded in January 1990 and $355,908 was expended for the Floodgates this fiscal year. A contract to replace Guidewalls for the West Gate, Brazos River Floodgates was awarded in August 1990. The fiscal year costs were $100,000. The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $954,698 including engineering and design and supervision and administration. A contract for rehabilitation of Mooring Walls, Colorado River Locks, was awarded in November 1988 and completed in December 1989. Cost for Fiscal Year 1989 was $1,459,210 and $216,990 for Fiscal Year 1990. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 8. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jenson Drive, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation of House and Stimson Tracts disposal areas was completed and fiscal year cost was $251,211. Rehabilitation of Peggy Lake disposal area was completed at a fiscal year cost of $1,311,017. Rehabilitation of Lost Lake disposal area fiscal year cost was $2,712,066. Routine maintenance, including mosquito control spraying. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 9. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 31-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 non-Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. The project was completed in March 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 10. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance including mosquito control spraying. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 11. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. Work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7-mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. At the request of local sponsor, City of Texas City, the project has been placed in the "�deferred" category. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) 31-8 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $123,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $74,393,700 non-Federal, including $62,027,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $10,737,000 levees and spillways, $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Snake Island, $561,000 for berthing areas, and $386,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide levees for disposal areas and wetlands; relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide berthing areas; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation to a depth of 45 feet plus 50 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation deeper than 45 feet; pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas; and pay 50 percent of the costs incurred for operation and maintenance below the 45-foot depth. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 12. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 12A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location: Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. 12B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and 31-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rights-of-way and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150-foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance including mosquito control spraying. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 12C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 5,600-acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 4 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 58,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $73,000,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1990 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. In March 1986, the Court rendered it Memorandum of order continuing the injunction and directing the Corps to re-commence the administrative process at the time when the first departure from standard NEPA procedures occurred prior to the 1983 legislative action. The Corps and local sponsors perfected an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals and on May 11, 1987, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Corps and dismissed the suit in its entirety. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1990 provided $4,000,000 for the project. In the fall of 1989, a pair of bald eagles were discovered nesting at the project site which led to additional consultation under the Endangered Species Act. Solicitation of the contract for the non-overflow dam was postponed to allow for environmental coordination. An Environmental Assessment was prepared with a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) which was signed in September. Construction will be resumed after final approval of the environmental documents. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, one-half of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest reimbursement is estimated at $10,689,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications for the non-overflow dam, Interstate 10 to the Lock site, were approved in May 1986. Further work has been deferred pending resolution of environmental issues. Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of project, and administration of duck blind permit program was conducted. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys were conducted on the following projects: Project Brazos Island Harbor Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Freeport Harbor Texas City Channel Matagorda Ship Channel Trinity River Galveston Harbor & Channel Port Aransas Channel to Victoria Date of Survey Oct 1989 - Sep 1990 Oct 1989 - Sep 1990 Oct 1989 - Nov 1989 Jul-Aug 1990 Oct-Nov 1989 Nov-Dec 1989 Nov 1989 - Feb 1990 Nov 1989 - May 1990 Dec 1989 - May 1990 Jul 1990 Fiscal Year Cost $11,581 2,649 3,762 588 2,291 19,618 7,141 3,132 28 $51,063 31-10 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Reconnaissance studies of navigation channel improvements on Cedar Bayou at Baytown, Texas were completed in fiscal year 1989 at a cost of $54,674. No new reconnaissance studies for navigation channel improvements were performed in fiscal year 1990. Beach Erosion Control 15. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. Estimated cost of new work is $2,150,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,265,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,150,000 Contributed funds, $43,000 relocations, and $72,000 lands. (October 1, 1990 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Section 934 of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 provides for extension of nourishment period to 50 years for beach nourishment projects. A study to determine the appropriateness of such an extended nourishment period for the Federal beach nourishment project was completed. The study indicated that there was no economic justification for continued Federal participation in the program. The responsibility for beach monitoring and maintenance was transferred to the City of Corpus Christi in July 1990. Flood Control 16. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvements of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Estimated cost of new work is $127,000,000 Federal (Corps) and $86,891,000 non-Federal for lands and relocations. (October 1, 1990 base price.) Channel rectification on Brays Bayou with an improved channel length 25.4 miles was completed in March 1971. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required bridge relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterment. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. 16A. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TX Location. Reservoirs are located in and west of the City of Houston in Harris, Waller, and Fort Bend Counties, Texas. Existing project. Construction of Barker Dam was complete in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was complete in 1969. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Estimated cost of new work is $11,214,000 Federal (Corps) for Dam Safety Assurance and $11,900,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code 713 funds). Non-Federal funds consist of $11,900,000 contributions for recreational facilities. (October 1990 base price.) Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work to be accomplished includes raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam 1 to 3 feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 3 to 5 feet and 31-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 armor-plating low ends of both dams. A contract with the city of Houston for cost-sharing in the construction of recreation facilities was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Community Park West (Phase IB) and the velodrome were completed in November 1986. Grading and clearing for an archery range was performed by the City of Houston in March and April 1987. Work has been initiated on a construction contract, awarded for Community Park West (Phase 2) in 1988. Harris County Precinct 3, Cullen-Barker Park, completed Community Park 2 which includes soccer fields and parking lots. The plans for Community Park West, Phase III, were approved in 1989. Construction on Phase III was initiated in 1990. Dam Safety Assurance: Contract for armor plating the ends of the dams, awarded in May 1987, is physically complete but remains financially incomplete due to a pending claim. Contracts for construction of concrete T-wall at Outlet, Addicks Dam was completed at a cost of $3,423. Construction contract for T-wall at outlet and road crossing at Barker Dam was awarded in September 1989 and incurred fiscal year cost of $150,434. A contract for aesthetic improvements at both Addicks and Barker Dams, awarded in June 1989, continued with a fiscal year cost of $279,510. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance at Addicks and Barker Dams. A contract for fence repairs was completed at a cost of $83,406. 16B. BRAYS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the southcentral portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $155,422,000 Federal (Corps) and $155,421,000 non-federal consisting of $17,249,000 cash contributions, and $138,142,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Location cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $17,279,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. 16C. GREENS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the northcentral portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX, and does not include the Halls Bayou tributary. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $140,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $66,027,000 non-Federal consisting of $12,000,000 cash contributions, and $54,027,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $12,000,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. 16D. HALLS BAYOU, TX Location. Halls Bayou is a major tributary of Greens Bayou, located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 18 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, boat ramps, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $50,325,000 Federal (Corps) and $41,778,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,834,000 cash contributions, and $35,944,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $5,834,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 16E. HUNTING BAYOU, TX Location. Hunting Bayou is located in Houston, approximately 4 to 5 miles from the central business district. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 14.3 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $49,779,000 Federal (Corps) and 31-12 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT $48,508,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,235,000 cash contributions, and $43,273,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $5,235,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 16F. LITTLE WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX Location. Little White Oak Bayou is a tributary of White Oak Bayou in north-central Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 6.0 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $17,958,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,957,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,996,000 cash contributions, and $15,961,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,996,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 16G. CARPENTERS BAYOU, TX Location. Carpenters Bayou is a tributary of Buffalo Bayou in northeastern Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 9.7 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $3,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,950,000 non-Federal consisting of $370,000 cash contributions, and $2,320,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $370,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 17. CLEAR CREEK, TX Location. The project is located about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in Harris and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear Lake. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 34.8 to contain within its banks all flood fl s up to and including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual 100-year flood plain and measures to mitigate environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the project upstream of the Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximate improved Mile 18.5, was placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $57,000,000 Federal (Corps) and $49,000,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,300,000 cash contributions, $22,300,000 for lands, and $21,400,000 for relocations (October 1, 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed 30 June 1986, requires local interests to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project; make a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent with the non-Federal share of total project costs without mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design is underway. A contract for relocation of the Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad bridge at mile 6.79 continued at a fiscal cost of $309,602. Construction of a second outlet-gated structure was continued. Fiscal year cost was $1,616,611. 18. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Location. The project is located north of Houston, Texas in Harris County. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the Cypress Creek Channel, incorporating grassed side slopes and channel bottom and appropriate erosion control measures; application of floodplain management techniques in the residual floodplain; construction of project-oriented recreation features, including 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related facilities for health, safety, and public access; and habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County 31-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Parkway land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of the project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat along the creek, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. Estimated cost for new work is $92,800,000 Federal (Corps) and $32,000,000 non-Federal consisting of $10,990,000 cash contribution, $15,080,000 for lands, and $5,930,000 for relocations (October 1, 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $10,990,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. 19. FALFURRIAS, TX Location. The city of Falfurrias is located near the confluence of Palo Blanco and Cibolo Creeks, intermittent streams that drain a 600-square-mile area in south Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a 5.6 mile long diversion levee; a 1.8 mile long pilot channel; a flowage easement of 11,000 acres of land subject to overflows from the pilot channel; and a 0.8 mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. Estimated cost for new work is $16,200,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,200,000 non- Federal consisting of $1,620,000 cash contribution, $12,500,000 for lands, and $2,080,000 for relocations (October 1, 1990 base price). Local cooperation. The local sponsor would be required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipeline, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,620,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. 20. KIRBYVILLE, TX Location. The project is located in Southeast Texas in the Sabine River basin on Trout Creek and Pin Oak Creek in the vicinity of Kirbyville, Texas, about 45 miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement is a combination channelization and floodplain management plan for Trout and Pin Oak Creeks. The structural element consists of a slightly enlarged channel and clearing and straightening of Trout Creek. The non-structural part consists of controls on future development in the residual 100-year floodplains along Trout and Pin Oak Creeks. Channel improvements in Trout Creek begin about 0.8 mile downstream from the Jasper-Newton County line and end about 0.4 mile upstream from the U.S. Highway 96 bridge. The improved, grass-lined channel will be 2.7 miles long, and generally follow the existing alignment of Trout Creek. A steel sheet pile and riprap drop structure will be constructed on Pin Oak Creek near its confluence with Trout Creek. Drainage culverts will be constructed along the improved channel on Trout Creek to facilitate lateral drainage and control erosion. Work includes some alterations to a Santa Fe Railroad bridge to accommodate the project and a new roadway bridge providing approximately 2,000 square feet of opening for passage of floodwaters. Estimated cost for new work is $1,488,000 Federal (Corps) and $785,000 non-Federal consisting of $90,000 cash contribution, $695,000 for lands and relocations. (1 October 1990 base prices) Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is the City of Kirbyville, Texas. A Local Cooperation Agreement was signed by the sponsor in August 1987. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for channelization, awarded in August 1989, continued at a cost of $599,726. Alteration of Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Bridge was completed for a fiscal year cost of $100,670. 21. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Location. The project is located in Willacy, Hidalgo, and Cameron Counties. The basin is bounded on the east by the Gulf of Mexico, on the south by the Rio Grande which forms the international boundary between the United States and Mexico, on the west by Starr County, and on the north by Brooks and Kenedy Counties. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. 21A. ARROYO COLORADO, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. The estimated cost for new work is $4,400,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,500,000 non-Federal consisting of $850,000 cash and $650,000 lands. Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $850,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. 31-14 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 21B. SOUTH MAIN CHANNEL, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. The estimated cost for new work is $95,800,000 Federal (Corps) and $59,800,000 non-Federal consisting of $7,800,000 cash and $27,000,000 lands and $25,000,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facililties, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $7,800,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 31, Planning and Engineering funds. 21C. RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX Location. The project is located in northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide a drainage outlet to the Laguna Madres for northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties. The project consists of 43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of existing channels and construction of new channels, a 3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the west side of Raymondville. The estimated cost for new work is $45,200,000 Federal (Corps) and $14,640,000 non-Federal consisting of $3,040,000 cash and $5,900,000 lands and $5,700,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $3,040,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 22. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffin Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the active portion of the project was completed in 1984. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $59,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $26,100,000 non-Federal consisting of $16,292,000 cash contributions, $3,403,000 for lands, $6,405,000 for relocations, and $449,000 for pumping station betterments and levee realignment betterments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. A severe settlement problem exists in the Chevron Sabine Road Tank Farm area. The Galveston District continued to conduct investigations and monitoring of the settlement to help determine appropriate corrective actions of Federal interest. 23. SIMS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris County, in the southern portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou to provide 25-year flood protection; environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development to include 27 miles of hike-and-bike trails connecting to existing public parks, together with picnic, playground, and other leisure facilities. Estimated cost for new work is $169,200,000 Federal (Corps) and $82,100,000 non-Federal consisting of $14,600,000 cash contributions, $34,000,000 for lands, $31,200,000 for relocations and $2,300,000 other cost (October 1, 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 12 percent of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. The Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control was executed on October 19, 1990. The recreation Local Cooperation Agreement is pending. 31-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Fiscal Year 1990 operations include finalization of the Local Cooperation Agreement, investigations for hazardous and toxic waste, coordination of real estate requirements with the local sponsor, and continuation of design work. See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. 24. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivotot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Initial contract on the "active" portion of the project was awarded in August 1982. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is $38,000,000 Federal (Corps) and $38,880,000 non- Federal, including $13,050,000 cash contribution, $3,630,000 lands, and $22,200,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1990 base price.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Operation during fiscal year. Construction of the water control structure at Star Lake continued at a cost of $315,966. Channel rectification of Hillebrandt Bayou Sta. 97 + 90 to Sta. 224+00 was completed for a fiscal year cost of $1,063,141. Contract for channel rectification of Hillebrandt Bayou Sta. 224+00 to Sta. 350+00 was completed for a fiscal year cost of $2,394,191. 25. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. On the west and southwest shore of Galveston Bay, about 9 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. Project fronts on the west side of Galveston Bay and protects a land area of about 36 square miles. Existing project. Plan provides for construction of improvements for control of storm tides. Improvements consist of 15.9 miles of new levees, 1.3 miles of concrete floodwall, related drainage and stoplog structures, one tide control structure, and two pumping plants. The project was initiated in 1962, and physically completed in 1987; however, remedial measures required to approximately 1.7 miles of levee toe to avoid further erosion were made in 1990. Estimated cost for new work is $38,983,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,023,000 non-Federal, including $14,603,000 cash contribution, $1,071,000 work contribution, and $1,349,000 for lands, and $256,000 for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity for La Marque Pumping Plant. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for erosion protection was awarded in January 1990 and completed in August 1990 for a cost of $933,739. 26. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Location. Watershed of Vince Bayou and tributary, Little Vince Bayou, has an area of about 17 square miles and lies entirely within Harris County. Vince Bayou is a minor tributary of Buffalo Bayou in San Jacinto River Basin on upper gulf coast of Texas. Existing project. Project provides for enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 7.3 miles upstream and Little Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 4.2 miles upstream, a total distance in both streams of about 11.5 miles. The project was initiated in 1968. All work on Vince Bayou is complete. Estimated cost for new work is $19,347,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,300,000 non-Federal, consisting of $5,100,000 for lands and $12,200,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1990 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for channel rectification on Little Vince Bayou was completed at a fiscal year cost of $3,179. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $101,970. Date of Project Inspection Lavaca River Flood Protection, Halletsville, TX November 1989 Highland Bayou Diversion Channel, TX December 1989 Vince Bayou - Flood Control Project, TX January 1990 Colorado River Flood Protection, Matagorda, TX March 1990 Texas City Hurricane Flood Protection Project, TX May 1990 28. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended: Construction of a flood control project at Kirbyville, Texas is discussed in Section 20. 31-16 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Reconnaissance studies of a flood control project on the Lower Guadalupe River at Victoria, Texas were completed, and feasibility studies were started, at a fiscal year cost of $23,943. Reconnaissance studies of flood control at Crystal Beach, Texas, were continued at a fiscal year cost of $1,723. The following reconnaissance studies of flood control projects were completed at the fiscal year costs shown: Petronilla Creek at Driscoll, Texas $2,945 Batiste and Willow Creeks in Liberty County, Texas $9,769 Blaus Gulley and Long Island Creek in Liberty County $40,698 Gaylor Creek in Liberty County, Texas $9,990 Swifts Slough in Orange County, Texas $9,628 All of the above studies have been terminated. Reconnaissance studies of flood control projects on Channel III near Oak Ridge North in Montgomery County, Texas, on Chiltipin Creek at Sinton, Texas, and on Spring Creek and Panther Branch at Timber Ridge, Texas, were initiated at fiscal year costs of $33,892; $9,015; and $7,544 respectively. Reconnaissance studies were initiated and completed, and feasibility studies were initiated for flood control projects on Old River Drain, Liberty County, Texas, and on Tarkington and Luce Bayous, Liberty County, Texas, at fiscal year costs of $43,598 and $9,062 repsectively. Emergency flood control - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation): Cost was $258,181 for disaster preparedness and $57,423 for emergency operations. National Emergency Preparedness Program fiscal year cost was $69,669. 29. EMERGENCY STREAM BANK AND SHORELINE EROSION WORK AND SNAGGING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Stream bank and shoreline erosion activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 525, as amended: Feasibility studies of shoreline erosion control for State Highway 111 at Texana, Texas were completed at a fiscal year cost of $4,056. Feasibility studies of streambank protection at U.S. Highway 190 Bridge near Merryville, Louisiana were completed and work on plans and specifications was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $22,491. Feasibility studies of streambank protection at County Road, on the Neches River, Orange County, Texas, were initiated at a fiscal year cost of $381. Snagging and clearing activities for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, as amended: Feasibility studies of snagging and clearing for flood control were initiated and completed on Cloud and Halls Bayous, Galveston County, Texas, on Webb Gulley, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana, and on White Oak Creek, Montgomery County, Texas, at fiscal year costs of $7,681; $10,000; and $6,391 respectively. All studies have been terminated. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,041,742 of which $122,708 was for navigation studies, $396,859 was for flood damage prevention studies, $29,040 was for shoreline protection studies, $373,098 was for Review of Completed Projects, $4,938 was for coordination with other agencies, $86,137 was for Special Investigations, $13,228 for Interagency Water Resources, and $15,732 was for Planning Assistance to States, also, $164,610 was expended from contributed funds for the Cameron County flood damage prevention study. Local sponsor's in-kind services for Cameron County study were $43,570 for fiscal year 1990. 31. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Brazos Island Harbor, Texas (42-Foot Project) - The project will provide for enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 300 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 250 to 300 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,100,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1987. Fiscal year costs were $831,456. Channel to Victoria, Texas - The project will provide for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet, the same dimensions as the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, with disposal of the dredged materials in upland areas. In addition, the project includes creation of additional marsh along the landlocked reach of the channel. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,200,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1989. Fiscal year costs were $263,980. Sims Bayou at Houston, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou to provide flood protection, environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development consisting of hike-and-bike trails connecting public parks, as well as picnic and other day-use facilities. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,300,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1986 and completed in Fiscal Year 1989. Fiscal year costs were $42,346. 31-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Texas City Channel, Texas (50-foot Project) - The project will provide for enlargement of Texas City Channel to 50 feet deep and 600 feet wide over its 6.7 mile length and enlargement of Galveston Harbor Channel to 50-52 feet deep and 800 feet wide over the 10.5 mile length. The Galveston Entrance Channel would be extended 12.5 miles to the 52-foot bottom in the Gulf of Mexico. A 50-year dredged material disposal plan will be provided by a combination of containment of dredged material on Snake Island, establishment of 600 acres of wetland, enlargement of Texas City Dike, and deposition of dredged material in the Gulf. Ninety acres of water-oriented recreational facilities on the Texas City Dike are included as a part of the proposed project. At the request of local sponsor, City of Texas City, the project has been placed in the "deferred" category. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,000,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Fiscal year costs were $2,346. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement of the Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Ship Channel. The recommended plan for the Houston Ship Channel consists of a 50-foot deep by 600-foot wide channel to the vicinity of the Shell Docks at Boggy Bayou in Houston with additional widening to the Clinton Island Turning Basin. The recommended plan for the Galveston Channel consists of a 50-foot deep by 450-foot wide channel within the existing 1,125-foot channel. The 50-foot by 800-foot entrance channel, previously authorized with the Texas City Channel but unconstructed, is also incorporated into this project. The project will be constructed in two phases, with Phase I enlarging the Houston Ship Channel to 45 by 530 feet, the Galveston Ship Channel enlarged to 45 by 450 feet, and deepening the entrance channel to 45 feet. Phase II will deepen both channels to 50 feet and widen the Houston Ship Channel to 600 feet. A locally preferred dredged material disposal plan for Galveston Bay has been incorporated with the plan of improvement. The plan would utilize confined or beneficial uses of dredged material in the bay and/or offshore disposal for Phase I and Phase II construction activities and the operations and maintenance resulting from them. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $12,314,000. Estimated planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $1,237,816. Brays Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $5,150,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $317,019. Greens Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $3,415,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $312,938. Cypress Creek, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the channel. Project-oriented recreation features include 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related recreation facilities, habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway project land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $6,100,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $127,009. Arroyo Colorado, Texas - The project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $830,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $128,677. South Main Channel, Texas - The project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,360,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $38,890. Falfurrias, Texas - The project consists of a levee and pilot channel to divert Standard Project Flood flows in Palo Blanco and Cibolo Creeks around the west side of Falfurrias to Baluarte Creek. Major plan elements include water control structures in Palo Blanco and Cibol Creeks, a 5.6-mile long diversion levee, a 1.8-mile long pilot channel, flowage easements on 11,000 acres of land and 0.8 mile of ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $590,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $95,343. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management and technical services were performed at a cost of $31,496 and $65,277, respectively. Hydrologic studies cost $9,237. 31-18 TABLE 31-A See Section in Text Project 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Cedar Bayou, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost To Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 199027 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 410,000 218,283 263,000 201,963 4,324,300 4,384,707 5,186,000 5,820,870 1,500,800 1,501,507 900,000 966,167 1,400,000 1,312,905 1,774,100 1,752,328 256,800 252,486 600,000 601,461 11,807,893 12,291,328 280,000 362,827 330,000 337,341 489,000 376,459 50,000 43,758 6,370,000 5,197,915 1,045,780 1,025,178 789,000 737,743 6,664,000 5,822,023 2,725,000 2,744,490 4,520,000 4,494,522 2,531,000 2,299,493 13,404,000 13,179,818 280,000 377,075 500,000 376,918 1,598,700 1,711,336 670,500 676,444 6,441,000 7,018,984 2,692,300 2,704,984 948,000 858,215 9,758,000 3,556,541 3,400,400 3,403,677 2,515,000 2,540,953 5,339,000 4,953,438 15,842,600 15,954,354 31-19 296,000 3,214,1001 301,148 3,132,0521 742,000 13,692,5022 831,456 13,605,1812 2,009,715 44,136,0763 1,961,671 44,088,0263 - 2,170,080 - 2,170,080 - 681,2634 - 681,2634 - 2,809,8165 298 2,809,816s - 76,635,3596 790,564 75,414,9376 1,775,990 90,249,6487 1,759,261 90,223,2607 - 3,576,684 - 3,576,684 - 6,279,088 66,190 5,959,162 7,924,000 28,758,1528 11,764,019 25,458,5468 49,700 50,188,4159 44,541 50,181,4959 - 8,935 - 8,935 - 29,096,39210 - 29,096,39210 3,229,365 86,333,08811 3,130,578 86,221,38311 - 7,969,329 - 7,969,329 4,636,000 74,359,30312 4,286,153 73,281,06112 10,723,994 247,182,64213 9,852,723 246,082,56114 - 434,638 - 434,638 - 835,873 - 835,873 - 35,760,3821s - 35,760,38215 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 8. (Continued) 9. Matagorda, Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Regular Funds) 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Includes Wallisville) 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 16. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 17. Clear Creek, TX (Contributed Funds) 18. Cypress Creek, TX 19. Falfurrias, TX Funding Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Recreation: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost To FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 199027 31-20 4,573,100 5,370,000 5,807,400 9,231,155 123,157,27816 4,625,738 4,839,291 6,258,038 9,047,821 122,880,98616 - - - - 18,058,77717 - - - - 18,058,77717 1,898,700 1,315,000 2,668,600 1,027,350 43,379,238 1,954,301 1,280,648 2,691,027 1,040,131 43,374,141 - - - - 56,136,81518 - - - - 56,136,81518 8,801,900 5,766,000 2,191,200 3,716,320 150,375,94019 8,830,303 5,736,919 2,215,722 3,701,954 150,354,64419 800,000 550,000 169,500 - 15,131,97220 789,006 552,610 193,258 2,346 15,129,21120 756,300 1,624,000 25,900 867,050 24,481,51121 755,245 1,611,594 38,062 860,271 24,473,36421 - - - - 726,158 - - - - 726,158 96,000 - 78,000 3,944,000 33,223,67622 49,190 43,479 26,757 299,842 29,460,54822 856,800 626,500 426,400 2,030,711 13,717,01423 811,757 666,001 395,234 1,865,559 13,495,22723 - 90,000 - - 2,120,641 9,337 14,621 79,360 20,914 2,120,641 - - - - 2,038,345 9,444 309 - - 2,009,710 - - - 928,000 58,134,32424 - - - 629,956 57,836,28024 - - - - 377,804 86,703 (-)200 (-)12,151 7,605 365,790 1,166,600 1,250,000 1,291,000 1,233,702 22,185,115 1,196,542 1,201,080 1,288,343 1,215,140 22,074,025 - - - - 12,475,000 - - - - 12,475,000 5,210,000 2,696,000 1,587,000 166,000 11,130,000 2,902,172 5,477,640 725,846 699,348 10,428,550 579,000 2,740,000 1,700,000 3,000,000 11,220,361 572,718 1,031,961 2,394,973 2,801,151 9,959,604 300,000 100,000 100,000 - 500,000 200,000 110,000 28,723 159,673 498,396 - - - 214,000 214,000 - - - 127,009 127,009 - - - 171,000 171,000 - - - 95,343 95,343 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 199027 20. Kirbyville, TX New Work: Approp. - 130,000 935,000 - 1,458,000 Cost 1,734 6,971 123,921 711,902 1,235,658 21. Lower Rio Grande Ba- New Work: sin, TX Approp. - - - 175,000 175,000 Cost - - - 167,567 167,567 22. Port Arthur and New Work: Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Approp. - 50,000 150,000 - 59,902,509 Flood Protection Cost 26 13,514 67,473 71,628 59,834,681 (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - - 16,291,97525 Cost - 4,787 22,256 22,935 16,287,62225 23. Sims Bayou, TX New Work: Approp. 552,000 850,000 605,000 1,158,000 3,548,000 Cost 508,887 809,881 728,079 917,100 3,264,723 24. Taylors Bayou, TX New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. 4,700,000 2,730,000 2,763,000 2,942,000 27,672,198 Cost 4,767,108 1,794,939 2,712,071 3,314,535 26,848,833 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 1,500,000 1,000,000 735,000 1,275,000 8,309,000 Cost 1,745,394 294,303 870,703 1,316,854 7,746,500 25. Texas City and Vicin- New Work: ity, TX Hurricane-Flood Approp. - - 70,000 930,000 38,982,400 Protection Cost 138,296 4,693 65,512 863,748 38,882,553 (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 15,000 - 26,000 150,000 14,401,10026 Cost 137,455 1,851 21,455 133,823 14,376,40326 26. Vince and Little Vince New Work: Bayous, TX Approp. 2,800,000 1,333,000 61,000 (-)16,000 19,331,100 Cost 2,464,974 1,744,821 288,880 5,645 19,268,973 2 Excludes $949,138 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $1,806,619 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. SIn addition, $14,692 expended from contributed funds. 4 Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. * Includes $69,784 for previous projects. 6 Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. 7 Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $445,269 8Ienxcpleunddeesd from contributed funds. $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $8,368,714 expended from contributed funds. ($586,184 on 45' project.) 9In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. 'l�Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,122,583 expended from contributed funds. 'Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); and Mouth of Colorado River ($3,180,425). ' 3 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $4,211,680. Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600. Chocolate Bayou Channel $1,091,500. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $742,850. Channel to Port Mansfield $1,241,385. Starting in fiscal year 1990 includes Channel to Red Bluff $410,000. 14Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $4,195,573, Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600, Chocolate Bayou Channel $1,091,500. In addition $566,875 was expended from contributed funds for Chocolate Bayou Channel. Also includes amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $733,847. Channel to Port Mansfield $1,000,416. Includes funds in the amount of $392,661 expended for Channel to Red Bluff, separately funded in fiscal year 1990. 15Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. 16Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $534,641 expended from contributed funds, of which $200,000 was for previous projects. 17In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. '8 Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. '9Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $3,516,069 expended from contributed funds. 31-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 20lIncludes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. 21Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 22Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 23Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 24Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 25Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local spo2n6sEoxr cflourd ews ork-in-kind. $1,349,069 estimated value of contributed lands and $1,070,959 credit given local sponsor for work-inkind. 27Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 31-22 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Amended cost sharing requirements to provide for 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal participation in control operations. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet.27 Enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on the crown of the North and South Jetties, and construction of park-type public use facilities at the inner end of the North Jetty. 31-23 TABLE 31-B H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 103(c), PL 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc., 4281 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 201, PL 99-662 2. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Jul. 3, 19303 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 CEDAR BAYOU, TX Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Houston Ship Channel to a point on bayou 11 miles above mouth.9 CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Acquisition of old curvey portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredge by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. S. Doc 107, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Committee Docs. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 31-24 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 19545 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Channel to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deep draft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Sec. 124, PL 94-587 31-25 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 5. Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 19256 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 5, 1961 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Modified local cooperation requirements for the 1970 Act. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.8 Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 2 Sec. 101, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. 31-26 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 19109 Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 4, 1938 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 23, 1971 (House Res.) Nov. 18, 1971 (Senate Res.) Mar. 2, 1907 Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St., and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.' o Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar to 43rd Street. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER 1 2 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong. H. Doc. 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-27 TABLE 31-B 7. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section in Text 31-28 Date Authorizing Act Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193813 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 19459 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 194514 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Project and Work Authorized Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, in Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." Documents H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See PL 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. PL 516, 81st Cong. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 12, 1952 Sep. 3, 195415 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 9, 1959 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri-Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 31-29 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 196517 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 195820 Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. Modified 1968 authorization to provide that diversion features be constructed at Federal expense and operation and maintenance be shared 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. Enlarge existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.18 A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou.' 9 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin. Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 812, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' 31-30 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 10. Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou. 21 Maintenance of Greens Bayou, Barbour Terminal Channel, and Bayport Ship Channel to forty-foot depths at Federal expense. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 819, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 773, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-31 TABLE 31-B 9. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 194623 Jul. 24, 194624 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine-Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 60, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 158, 77th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 31-32 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 196226 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Senate Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) 31-33 11. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 12. Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 30, 1983 15. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Senate Res.) 16. Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channels to 52 feet; extending the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52 foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico; and establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Anahuac Channel. Six-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. Sec. 201, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 98-63 H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-34 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 28, 1990 17. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 18. Nov. 17, 1988 19. Nov. 17, 1988 21. Nov. 17, 1986 22. Oct. 23, 1962 23. Nov. 17, 1986 24. Oct. 27, 1965 25. Jul. 3, 1958 26. Oct. 23, 1962 Flood damage reduction improvements and recreational development for the Houston, Texas urban area, divided into six separable elements - Brays, Greens, Hunting, Halls, Carpenters and Little White Oak Bayous. Flood control improvements consist of 75.3 miles of stream enlargement, 14 miles of stream clearing, 7 flood detention basins, 7 miles of diversion channels and environmental revegetation. Recreation features consist of 14.7 miles of trails, 502 picnic facilities, 12 group pavilions, 2 boat launching ramps, 10 restrooms, play-grounds, exercise stations and parking facilities. CLEAR CREEK, TX Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8.3o Modified local cooperation requirements of the 1968 authorization. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Enlargement and rectification of lower 29.4 miles of Cypress Creek channel and recreational development. FALFURRIAS, TX Construction of a 5.6-mile long diversion levee west of Falfurrias; a 1.8-mile long pilot channel west of Falfurrias; a flowage easement; and a 0.8-mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Channel improvements to provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and to provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, La Villa, and Lyford. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees. 28 SIMS BAYOU, TX Enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou; environmental measures and riparian habitat along entire alignment, and recreational development. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge.29 TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) Construction of improvements for control of storm tides, consisting of new and enlarged levees and floodwalls approximately 14.1 and 2.1 miles in length; related drainage and stoplog structures; a navigation opening and pumping plants. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou and Little Vince Bayou upstream for a total of 11.5 miles for both streams. Sec. 101, PL 101-640 H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 1001, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 206 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 H. Doc. 441, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 31-35 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1 Contains latest published maps. 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. SDredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. 4 Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. 6 West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 6 Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. SDredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. SDredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. o1D0 eepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 11 Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13 Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 14 Dredging upper 5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 15 Inactive. 16 Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. Relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 17 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. s1C8o nstruction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 19 Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 20 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 25 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 27 Jetty extension was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 28 Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 29 Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 30 Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. 31 Turning basin was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 31-36 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1990 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)6 1967 38,2521 - Bastrop Bayou, TX2 1931 9,920 27,129 Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington3 1924 216,9894 223,010 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 1987 133,9248 1,173,8929 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 1982 66,934 537,139 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula 1968 1,194,344 26,467 Dickinson Bayou, TX 1954 33,942 57,553 Double Bayou, TX 1987 226,558 1,412,07810 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX5 1922 2,476 847 Johnson Bayou, LA6 1933 2,261 54,042 Little Bay, TX 1979 - 252,728 Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, TX (Advance Engineering & Design) 1984 1,503,843 - Oyster Creek, TX 1922 6,942 7,556 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff)3 1971 -- 1 Excludes $1,672 work contribution. 7 Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, TX, 2 Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth constructed project as authorized by 1950 River and Harbor was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Act (H. Doc. 114, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.) in 1955 under 3 Deauthorized 4u nder Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. Department of Army permit. 8lncludes $48,711 for previous projects. 4Includes $123,676 for previous projects. 9Includes $46,101 for previous projects. 5 In inactive category for maintenance. 1In addition, $102,325 expended from contributed 6 Channel adequate for existing commerce. funds. TABLE 31-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1990 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, Texas 1986 201,300- Baytown, Texas' 1980 245,400- Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas2 1963 273,757- Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection2 1984 29,285,042 - Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas2 1978 505,749- Highland Bayou, Texas 2 1984 12,254,390 - Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043- General channel project 1952 21,086- Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas6 1971 98,517 Mill Creek, Texas' 1952 24,753 Peyton Creek, Texas4 1975 66,377- San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas2 1963 135,175 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas2 1956 130,239 - Three Rivers, Texas5 s 5,835,927 - Upper White Oak Bayou, Texas 1989 972,300 1 Inactive. 2 Completed. s In addition, $8,695,438 expended from contributed funds, $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands, and $2,726,446 for relocations by local interests. 4 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 5 See Annual Report for 1983, Fort Worth District, page 16-12. 6 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 31-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-E TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Sep. 30, 1990 2. Brazos Island Regular 10,080,766 44,088,026 2,170,080 56,338,872 Harbor, TX 3. Cedar Bayou, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project 2,848,560 1,683,258 14,612,584 642,176 25,000 667,176 74,718,116 324,287 5,959,930 81,002,333 1,716,695 276,720 82,995,748 25,194,873 116,575 8,368,714 33,680,162 360,249 34,040,411 11,920,187 8,754,209 3,648,932 24,323,328 72,107,875 466,477 4,282,909 76,857,261 395,000 139,776 77,392,037 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 14,626,092 136,296 1,023,819 15,786,207 27,494,242 66,000 27,560,242 . - 14,692 44,102,718 2,740,032 2,740,032 90,160,808 445,269 90,606,077 90,606,077 50,181,494 229,311 50,410,805 50,410,805 85,609,973 512,163 13,121 2,122,583 88,257,840 244,555,997 22,672 244,578,669 244,578,669 121,667,844 334,641 122,002,485 147,974,967 3,516,069 151,491,036 151,491,036 24,278,281 24,278,281 12,951,565 12,951,565 2,170,080 3,576,684 3,576,684 3,576,684 8,935 8,935 8,935 7,373,356 595,973 7,969,329 1,270,511 1,270,511 1,270,511 726,158 726,158 2,848,560 1,697,950 60,885,382 3,382,208 25,000 3,407,208 168,455,608 324,287 6,405,199 175,185,094 1,716,695 276,720 177,178,509 75,385,302 116,575 8,598,025 84,099,902 360,249 84,460,151 104,903,516 9,862,345 13,121 5,771,515 120,550,497 317,934,383 466,477 4,305,581 322,706,441 395,000 139,776 323,241,217 150,710,137 2,612,932 1,717,401 155,040,470 197,567,298 1,363,652 5,619,504 204,550,454 32,000 116,760 204,699,214 39,630,531 136,296 1,023,819 40,790,646 40,445,807 66,000 40,511,807 31-38 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS See Section in Text Project Section of Waterway 2. Brazos Island Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Harbor, TX Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel 4. Corpus Christi Aransas Pass Outer Bar Ship Channel, Channel TX Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewel Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) 5. Freeport Outer Bar Channel Harbor, TX Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,200s 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 150 400 400 7504 400 1,0004 375 1,200 4 200 500 200 Adopted Project Dimensions Depth in Feet (Below Mean Low Bottom Tide) Width (Feet) 44-42 400 42 300 42 300 42 300 42 500 36 1,000 36 200 36 200 36 1,000 15 370-305 15 370-305 15 370 15 270 15 100 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 45 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 700 600 Irregular 100 2002 300-400 600-500 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,0505 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 300 200 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 1,550 200 900 5,423 1,150 1,690 1,000 1,000 800 1,250 400 1.8 1.0 0.1 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 1.0 1.1 0.2 0.6 0.3 3.1 0.2 1.8 0.2 5.6 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.8 3.0 0.8 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30 30 36 31-39 Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Mean Low Width Length Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 38-36 300 2.5 36 200 2.1 36 200 9.6 36 200 3.2 36 500 1.3 36 1,000 2,670 0.5 36 200 1.4 36 200 0.8 36 1,000 1,300 0.2 15 370-305 1,470 0.3 15 370-305 1,200 0.2 15 370 1,470 0.3 15 265 1,230 0.2 15 100 770 0.1 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 600 0.1 - 1.1 500 0.1 - 0.5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth min Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project 5. (Continued) 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Brazos Harbor Turning Basin Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. Bolivar Roads to Morgan Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Bayport Ship Channel Turning Basin Anchorage Area Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin 7504 800 800 800 2,8751 800 1,125 36 52 52 50 36 50 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 30 42 42 40 36 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 800 1,125 400 400 300 300 948-1,0009 965-1,0709 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 675 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.81 - 1.0 - 3.9 - 26.2 - 12.8 - 2.4 - 5.3 1,375 - 1,592 - - 0.6 - 2.9 3,100 0.6 1,000 0.2 - 0.9 - 3.1 2,000 0.4 - 3.8 1,000 0.3 - 1.9 - 4.1 - 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 0.2 - 4.1 532 0.1 - 1.9 1,682 0.3 1,750 0.3 - 20.2 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 3,000 - - 5.6 - 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 31-40 400 400 300 300 900-1,0009 8009 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth m Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 10. (Continued) Port Arthur West Turning Basin 40 600 40 350-550 1,610 0.3 Channel connecting Port Arthur West and Taylors Bayou Turning Basins 40 200-250 40 200-250 - 0.6 Taylors Bayou Turning Basin 40 150-1,000 40 90-1,233 3,470 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River 40 400 40 400 - 11.2 Turning Point at Mile 19.5 40 9004 40 9004 _- 8 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area Beaumont Turning Basin 40 400 40 400 - 18.3 Turning Point, Mile 31.1 40 1,0004 40 1,000 700 8 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 40 1,0004 40 1,000 930 8 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 40 1,0004 40 1,300 1,530 8 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 36 350 36 350 1,265 0.2 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin 40 Irregular 40 Irregular 1,300 0.2 Beaumont Turning Basin 34 500 34 160-535 1,500 0.3 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension 34 350 34 300 - 0.4 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company 30 200 30 200 - 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River 30 200 30 200 - 4.4 Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 Old Channel Around Harbor Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 Channel to Echo7 12 125 - - - - Adams Bayou 12 100 12 100 - 1.7 Cow Bayou 13 100 13 100 - 7.0 Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 1 Average. 2 Includes 100-foot channel width. 4 Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. 4 Diameter. 5 Includes 350-foot channel width. 6 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. 7 Deauthorized. 8 Included in channel length. 9 Includes 300-foot channel width. 31-41 TABLE 31-F REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-G GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Tributary Channel Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout West Turnout 9-Foot Channel Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel Colorado River Channel Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via East Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout Channel Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield 1 Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth m Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles 12 12 2 12 s 12 4 9 9 5 9 6 9 99 7 15-12 12 8 12 12 12 12 9 12 12 12 99999999 14 14 14 14 o 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 200-100 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 100 600(AVG) 100 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 12 12 12 12 9 999 12 12 12 12 129 99999 9 99 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 100 400 150 125 200 300 130-400 100 500(AVG) 100 100 200 100 200 342(AVG) 125-175 300 0.2 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 2,200 500 635 1,130 80 23 1,22 2,21 12 1,80 2.3 0.4 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 - 34.8 )0(AVG) 0.1 - 0.8 - 2.0 30 - - 0.5 - 2.1 05.2 - 6.1 L2 0.4 5 )0 0.3 - 0.8 - 0.4 )0 0.1 - 7.7 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.3 1,250 0.2 580 0.1 860 0.2 1,450 0.3 31-42 3C GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-G GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 12511 - 25.812 Turning Basin near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 500 0.1 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 - 0.7 Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 - 0.6 Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 - 0.4 South Leg 12 125 12 125 - 0.2 Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 - 75 - 1.4 Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 - 0.3 Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 1,308 0.2 1 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3 Constructed by local interests. 4 Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 was deauthorized. s Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. 6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 7 Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long 8 Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. o1A0 lso provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) 1 South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 was deauthorized. 31-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 31-H DREDGING OPERATIONS Brazos Island Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Brazos Island Harbor, TX - Brownsville Channel March 22, 1990 to July 16, 1990 1,388,467 $1,420,280 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging La Quinta Channel to Beacon 82 August 11, 1990 to September 23, 1990 3,337,352 $1,496,880 Freeport Harbor, TX (New Work) Dredging Entrance Channel Sta 260+00 to Sta 50+35.91 June 4, 1990 to September 30, 1990 1,885,032 $4,407,207 Dredging Jetty Channel to Lower Turning Basin Sta 50+23 to Sta 82+00 August 26, 1990 to September 30, 1990 2,420 $72,375 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Brazos Harbor Channel and Turning Basin, Enlarging Upper Turning Basin October 17, 1989 to July 11, 1990 1,542,112 $1,434,164 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Bolivar Roads to Pier B, U.S. Navy, U.S.C.G. and Corps of Engineers Facilities September 30, 1989 to September 30, 1989 1,524,838 $22,148 Dredging Entrance Channel, Outer and Inner Bar Channel, Bolivar Channel August 9, 1990 to September 30, 1990 1,528,089 $2,720,000 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Port Isabel to Mud Flats and Channel to Harlingen, Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor October 1, 1989 to November 28, 1989 1,510,121 $409,263 Dredging Vicinity Rollover Pass and Port Bolivar October 1, 1989 to October 4, 1989 247,521 $256,684 Dredging Freeport Harbor to Vicinity FM-457 October 1, 1989 to March 28, 1990 1,844,403 $1,746,264 Dredging Main Channel in Matagorda Bay October 1, 1989 to November 15, 1989 227,279 $22,942 Dredging Channel to Port Mansfield Entrance Channel March 9, 1990 to September 30, 1990 131,692 $338,005 Dredging Main Channel Across Aransas Bay July 23, 1990 to September 30, 1990 1,585,066 $516,744 Houston Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Red Fish Reef to Morgans Point, Five Mile Cut Channel, Circulation Channel No. 1 and Atkinson Island Barge Mooring Basin September 20, 1989 to March 17, 1990 3,725,899 $2,716,718 Dredging Carpenters Bayou to Greens Bayou July 21, 1990 to September 30, 1990 444,000 $999,973 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Indian Point to Point Comfort December 1, 1989 to March 2, 1990 2,060,726 $798,950 31-44 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-H DREDGING OPERATIONS Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Red Bluff August 28, 1990 to September 30, 1990 826,696 $379,010 Sabine Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Lower Reach - Neches River Channel August 30, 1989 to April 15, 1990 1,696,000 $1,102,758 Dredging Port Arthur Turning Basin and Junction Area August 31, 1989 to January 16, 1990 2,028,269 $903,463 Dredging Upper Reach Neches River Channel November 25, 1989 to April 27, 1990 1,062,672 $900,165 Texas City Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Texas City Channel December 11, 1989 to January 6, 1990 1,330,095 $786,552 Trinity River and Tributaries Channel and Channel to (Maintenance) Dredging Anahuac Liberty July 13, 1990 to September 30, 1990 755,615 $1,286,026 31-45 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises the watershed of the Canadian River and its tributaries and the watershed of Arkansas River and its tributaries in Colorado including Colorado and New Mexico; the watershed of Rio Grande and its tributaries including the Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and the watershed of the Mimbres River and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in June 1986 to include the portion of New Mexico west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM ........ 2. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM ..... 3. Conchas Lake, NM ................. 4. ElPaso,TX ..................... 5. Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO ........... 6. John Martin Reservoir, CO ............ 7. Puerco River, Gallup, NM ............ 8. Rio Grande Basin, NM............... 8A. Abiquiu Dam, NM ................. 8B. Cochiti Lake, NM.................. 8C. Galisteo Dam, NM ................. 8D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM ............. 8E. Rio Grande Floodway, NM ............ 8F. Truth or Consequences Unit, NM ........ 9. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM ......... Page 32-1 32-2 32-2 32-3 32-3 32-4 32-4 32-4 32-5 32-5 32-6 32-6 32-6 32-7 32-7 Flood Control (Continued) 10. Trinidad Lake, CO .................. 11. Two Rivers Dam, NM ................ 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects.................... 13. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ................. 14. Other authorized flood control projects..................... 15. Flood control work under special authorizations ................ General Investigations 16. Surveys ......................... 17. Collection and study of basic data ......... 18. 19. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .... Advance Engineering and Design ......... Flood Control 1. ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM Location. There are about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico, most of which are located in northcentral New Mexico. Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 1113, the project consists of about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico. These community ditch systems provide irrigation water to about 160,000 acres on an estimated 12,000 farms. Acequias have been in existence since the early Spanish Colonization period of the 17th and 18th Centuries and represent one of the oldest forms of cooperative institutions in the United States. They are an integral part of the culture and heritage of New Mexico. Diversion structures, many of which are constructed of available materials such as rock and brush, are frequently destroyed by flows greater than normal resulting from spring runoff or summer thunderstorms. Disruption of the ditches usually occurs during peak irrigation season and severely *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 32-1 Page 32-8 32-8 32-9 32-9 32-10 32-10 32-10 32-10 32-10 32-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 impacts crop production. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 directs the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake measures, without regard to economic analysis, as are necessary to protect and restore the river diversion structures and associated canals. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor, the State of New Mexico, has a law whereby the State of New Mexico provides 17.5% of the project costs, and low interest loans to the local Acequias for the remaining 7.5%. The State of New Mexico has appropriated, and will appropriate on an annual basis, the funds necessary to meet the requirements of local sponsorship. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. Construction contracts were awarded in FY 1988, FY 1989, and FY 1990. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed on structures for eight projects in FY 1990: Madre del Llano; Eledge Mill; Canjillon; Cleveland de San Antonio; Ojo Caliente Ditch; Questa Citizens Middle Ditch; Tajique Ditch; and Plaza del Medio. 2. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, NM Location. The project is located in an area which comprises watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of the Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. Combined drainage area of the tributaries is about 276 square miles. The Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of the Rio Grande, forms the eastern border of the watersheds. The crest of this mountain range rises more than a mile over the river to an elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. Improvements consist of north and south diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to the valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 17-2 of the Annual Report for FY 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North Diversion Channel prevented $35,075,000 in flood damages during FY 1990. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented are $120,966,500. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1990 were: North Diversion Channel near Alameda 5,780 c.f.s.; South Diversion Channel 2,000 c.f.s.. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the North and South Diversion Channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. The South Diversion Channel is in good condition and well maintained by the local interests. The North Diversion Channel has experienced severe arching and cracking of the concrete lined portion. Construction to correct this problem was initiated and completed in FY 1987. Additionally, a hydraulic flow problem exists on the North Diversion Channel. A model study, completed in February 1986, identified corrective measures. 3. CONCHAS LAKE, NM Location. The dam is in San Miguel County, NM, on the Canadian River, about one-fourth mile downstream from the confluence of the Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map, Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. A concrete gravity main dam section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in the Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side have an overall length of about 3.7 miles. The main section contains conduits in its base for the release of water to maintain low flows and for drainage of the reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. The earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and the north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 513,900 acre-feet (198,170 for flood control, 254,200 for water conservation and irrigation, and 61,530 dead storage). The dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None Required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the reservoir continued. The reservoir was operated for storage of floodwater and releases for irrigation purposes. $55,200 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1990 while no flood damages were prevented. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1990 were $3,197,700. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1990 were $176,200. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1990 were $9,633,600. The pool elevation at the start of FY 1990 was 4,190.11 feet with corresponding storage of 224,154 acre-feet. Total releases for this reporting period were 82,741 acre-feet. Releases of 80,810 acre-feet were 32-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 1,921 acre-feet to Bell Ranch. The pool elevation on September 30, 1990 was 4,184.86 feet with corresponding storage of 189,064 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 493 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was essentially complete in 1939. Reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. Irrigation of some lands downstream from the project was begun in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was completed in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. 4. EL PASO, TX Location. The project is located at El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on the left bank of the Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of the international boundary between the United States and the Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of a single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into the Rio Grande. Runoff from the tributary arroyos on the eastern, southern, and western slopes of the adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of the city and its outlying suburban developments. The project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applied for the Northwest and Central areas. The Local Cooperation Agreement for the Southeast area reflects the cost sharing requirements contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1990 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit (March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel (May 1985); Dam Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range and Northgate Dams (May 1986); Borderland Diversion Channel (September 1986); and Phelps Dodge Basin (January 1990). During FY 1990 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal, however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. The estimated total flood damages prevented since completion of Northgate and Range Dams in 1973 through FY 1990 were $22,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has temporarily ended in the Central Area. The only remaining work is the Pershing Dam, Dam Safety Assurance. The Northwest Area of the project for all practical purposes is 100 percent complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Southeast Area was completed in September 1987. Construction was completed in January 1990 on the Phelps Dodge Basin, and construction was initiated in August 1990 on Phelps Dodge Channel. 5. FOUNTAIN CREEK, PUEBLO, CO Location. The project is located on Fountain Creek approximately 1 mile above the confluence of the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek in the city of Pueblo in southeastern Colorado. Pueblo is approximately 30 miles east of the Wet Mountains of the Rocky Mountains. (See Geological Survey Map, Northeast Pueblo, CO quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, the project comprises 11,500 feet of channel modification and 9,700 feet of levee which will provide a 200-year level of protection at an estimated first cost of $8,880,000 ($6,410,000 Federal and $2,470,000 non-Federal). (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds for initiation of construction were initially received in fiscal year 1987. A construction contract for recreation was awarded in September 1987. The remaining construction contract for levees and channel work was awarded 21 June 1988. Construction was substantially complete in July 1989. Condition at end of year. Construction on the levees and channel began in July 1988 and the entire project is scheduled for completion in April 1991. 32-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 6. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO Location. The project is located on the Arkansas River, 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, in Bent County, about 18 miles upstream from the city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. The project consists of a concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of the reservoir at the top of flood control is 608,250 acre-feet (259,800 for flood control and 348,450 for conservation and recreation storage). This reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For details of the completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of the Arkansas River Compact. $99,300 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1990. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by this project through FY 1990 were $91,921,400. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1990 were $290,500. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $24,753,700. Maximum pool elevation of 3,816.79 feet with corresponding storage of 74,203 acre-feet occurred on April 22, 1990. Total releases for FY 1990 were 164,793 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 73,930 acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 887 acre-feet in FY 1990. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of the reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. The reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. A contract will be issued in FY 1991 to rehabilitate the controls on the sixteen tainter gates on the main dam. Additional studies will determine the need and extent of rehabilitation of the existing primary and secondary electrical distribution system. 7. PUERCO RIVER, GALLUP, NM Location. The project is located on the Puerco River in the city of Gallup in northwestern New Mexico in McKinley County. Proposed project. This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662 and the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988. The project consists of improvement of existing levees, construction of new levees and limited channel rectification. The project will provide the 100-year level of protection at an estimated first cost of $6,670,000 ($5,000,000 Federal and $1,670,000 non-Federal) 1 October 1989 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. A construction contract for the 1-40 Auxiliary Levee was awarded in September 1988. The remaining construction contracts for the construction of the levees and channel improvement were awarded in June 1989. The entire project is scheduled for completion in July 1991. Condition at end of year. The construction contract for levee and channel improvement was awarded in June 1989. The project is scheduled for completion in July 1991. 8. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Location. Improvements are on the Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of development of water resources of the Rio Grande basin in New Mexico (H. Doc 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with the exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from the authorized plan. It was excluded without prejudice from future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by the States of Colorado and Texas, that the project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By the same act, Congress also authorized 32-4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT for the construction irrigation phase of the comprehensive plan as recommended by the Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with a joint agreement approved by the Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement the Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of the unified plan of improvement. Authority for the Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation and Table 32-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects contained in the authorized plan are reflected in individual reports on the following pages. 8A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM Location. The project is one unit of the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on the Rio Chama near the town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from the confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-1, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of the left abutment. The reservoir provides 554,579 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at the spillway crest is 1,201,200 acrefeet. For a detailed description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September, 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 1989, the pool elevation was 6,211.24 feet. The maximum pool (6,216.24 feet) and storage (176,096 acre-feet) occurred on July 29, 1990. On September 30, 1990, the pool elevation was 6,211.22 feet with a corresponding storage of 156,665 acre-feet. There was 932 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1990. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1990. Sediment damages prevented were $104,400. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $232,848,000 through FY 1990. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in February 1963. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. In March 1989 a contract was awarded for construction of two drainage adits to alleviate seepage problems in the north and south abutments. Construction of the adits was completed in February 1990. Emergency gates were not installed in the outlet conduit of Abiquiu Dam during its construction. A plan for the Abiquiu Dam emergency gates has been prepared in accordance with Section 1112 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Construction of the emergency gates is necessary to increase safety and enhance flood and sediment control. A Design Memorandum will be prepared in FY 1991. 8B. COCHITI LAKE, NM Location. The dam is at river mile 340 on the Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at the intersection of the New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. The project extends generally in an east-west line across the Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of the Rio Grande and then southward across the Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160- foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is at the embankment on the south side of the Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in the left abutment on the Rio Grande. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 492,500 acre-feet for flood control, 103,800 acre-feet for sediment and 50,130 acre-feet for recreation within the sediment space, for a total of 596,300 acrefeet. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvement details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. 32-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1989, the pool elevation was 5,332.58 feet with a corresponding storage of 50,520 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,340.46 feet with a storage of 61,026 acre-feet on December 6, 1989. On September 30, 1990 the pool elevation was 5,333.13 feet with a corresponding storage of 51,206 acre-feet. There was 621 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1990. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1990. Sediment damages prevented were $69,600. Accumulated total damages prevented are $252,075,200. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completed in 1977. The Tetilla Peak recreation area was completed in 1981. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8C. GALISTEO DAM, NM Location. The dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of Rio Grande. The reservoir will extend upstream from the dam for about 4 miles, near the village of Waldo, NM (See Geological Survey Map,. San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above the streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10-foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with a pool at the spillway crest elevation. The spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in the right abutment. The flood control storage is 89,000 acre-feet. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1989. No storage occurred during FY 1990. Peak inflow was 658 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 658 c.f.s. There was 29 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1990. Sediment damages prevented during the FY were $3,200 totaling $126,200 through FY 1990. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1970. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM Location. The project is located in Sandoval County, NM, on the Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from the confluence of the Jemez River and the Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 780 feet long with maximum height of 135 feet above streambed, and off-channel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13- foot diameter gated outlet in the left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with a pool at spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 14.1 feet and the spillway widened 28 feet in 1986 and 1987 to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir has a capacity of 102,712 acre-feet (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 29,712 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17- 17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1989, the pool elevation was 5,191.86 feet with a corresponding storage of 23,062 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,192.08 feet with a storage of 23,330 acre-feet on October 6, 1989. On September 30, 1990 the pool elevation was 5,188.10 feet with a corresponding storage of 18,684 acre-feet. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during FY 1990. Sediment deposition during FY 1990 was 233 acre-feet. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1990. Sediment benefits during FY 1990 were $26,100. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1990 were $11,957,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1953. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8E. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Location. This project is one unit of the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of improvement for the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is on the Rio Grande and covers a section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream to Espanola, NM, about river mile 394. (See table 32- D on Rio Grande Floodway.) 32-6 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT Existing project. This project consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect the levees. Construction of the project is a joint undertaking by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by the Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channel-rectification and drainage-rehabilitation work being the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist throughout the reach of the river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by the meandering river. (See Table 32-D on existing project and Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to the usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of the project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act, Section 401, 1986 Water Resource Development Act, and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for the completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with the construction of the Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. The Espanola Valley unit is in the deferred category. Neither the city of Espanola nor Santa Clara Pueblo have given any indication that they plan any positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were no flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1990. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1990 amounted to $44,011,400. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 5,610 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on September 29, 1990. The peak at San Acacia was 3,298 c.f.s. on July 16, 1990. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Albuquerque unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Bernalillo to Belen unit was completed in June 1986. The General Design Memorandum for the San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit was approved in August 1990. Construction was initiated on the Truth or Consequences Unit in fiscal year 1989. The Espanola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 8F. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Location. This project is located on Cuchillo Negro Creek in the vicinity of the city of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948 and 1950, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, to provide that the Secretary is authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande in lieu of the authorized floodway. The project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $13,600,000 ($10,200,000 Federal and $3,400,000 Non- Federal) 1 October 1989 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract for the construction of the dam was awarded on 22 September 1989 and is scheduled for completion in September 1991. 9. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM Location. The project is located on a lake in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Operation of the project began in November 1979. It consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. The purposes of the project are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipator. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 447,100 acre-feet which includes 80,100 acre-feet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. The surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,685 acres. The contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Sumner Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs is the responsibility of the Federal Government; however, the Carlsbad Irrigation District is required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an equal amount to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. The Carlsbad Irrigation District also agreed to use Sumner Lake for 32-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 flood control. Because they realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks manages the recreation facilities. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980. Pool elevation at the start of the fiscal year was 4,711.99 feet with storage of 22,920 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 49,518 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1990 was 4,711.44 acre-feet with a storage of 22,252 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,720.21 feet with a storage of 35,147 acre-feet on May 20, 1990. There was 535 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. No flood damages were prevented in FY 1990. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $59,900. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 44,731 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $156,600 with an accumulative total of $1,751,500 through FY 1990. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for the recreation area was awarded in September 1979 and completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construction was completed in FY 1982. 10. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO Location. This project is located on the Purgatoire River about 161 miles above its junction with the Arkansas River. The Project is about 4 miles upstream from the city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map, Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in the left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in the right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,870 c.f.s. with a water surface at top of the flood control pool. In 1985, a 3- foot high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir provides for storage of 60,000 acre-feet for flood control, 39,000 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet for irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 123,500 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and is operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation see page 17- 14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for flood control and irrigation releases during the fiscal year. On October 1, 1989 the pool elevation was 6,147.42 feet with a corresponding storage of 5,776 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,164.60 feet with a corresponding storage of 12,925 acre-feet on May 13, 1990. On September 30, 1990 the pool elevation was 6,147.55 feet with a corresponding storage of 5,820 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1990 was 107 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1990 was $25,500. Accrued sediment benefits are $2,135,400. Irrigation benefits for FY 1990 were $51,200. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1990 were $1,368,000. Irrigation benefit releases for the year were 13,033 acre-feet. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was awarded in September 1982 and was completed in May 1983. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 11. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM Location. The project is located about 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM on the Rio Hondo and the Rocky Arroyo. The Rio Hondo is formed at the confluence of the Rio Ruidoso and the Rio Bonito, near the village of Hondo, NM, in the foothills region of Sierra Blanca in the southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with the Pecos River near Roswell, NM (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. The Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 32-8 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for water storage except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell will not exceed the Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 1,000 c.f.s. The capacity of the Two Rivers Reservoir at its spillway crest is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 18,000 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1989. There were $1,844,300 flood damages prevented during 1990. Sediment damages prevented were $10,400. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1990 were $9,852,500. There were 93 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1990. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1990 are $931,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. The project features are in good condition and in operation. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. The projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for fiscal year 1990 were $82,679. 13. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, five projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, Sumner, Navajo, and Brantley Dams. Platoro Dam on the Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. The authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Total storage is 60,000 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet for flood control. The 54,000 acre-feet is joint use storage with flood control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by the Interior Appropriation Act of 1941. (see H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of this project was completed by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1952. On October 1, 1989 storage in Platoro Reservoir was 19,419 acre-feet at elevation 9,981.92 feet. Maximum storage of 22,138 acre-feet at elevation 9,986.57 feet occurred on June 29, 1990. On September 30, 1990, storage was 8,848 acre-feet at elevation 9,960.19 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 1,760 c.f.s. on June 7, 1990. There were no flood damages prevented by the project during FY 1990. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $4,507,500. Total cost for activity, by the Corps of Engineers during FY 1990 was $13,248. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County, Colorado. Pueblo Reservoir has 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1989 was 113,434 acre-feet, elevation 4,838.53 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 151,642 acre-feet at elevation 4,851.51 feet on March 30, 1990. Storage on September 30, 1990 was 87,866 acre-feet at elevation 4,828.60 feet. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 1990. Total cost for FY 1990 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $13,167. Total flood damages prevented to date are $2,852,100. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Storage on October 1, 1990 was 15,862 acre-feet at elevation 4,243.2 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1990 was 32,197 acre-feet at elevation 4,253.2 feet on March 12, 1990. Storage on September 30, 1990 was 7,253 acre-feet at elevation 4,239.9 feet. Total cost for FY 1990 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $12,896. Navajo Dam and Reservoir is located on the San Juan River at river mile 298.6 in San Juan County, New Mexico. Navajo Dam was authorized as part of a Colorado River Storage Project by an act of 84th Congress, 11 April 1956 (PL 485). The Bureau of 32-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Reclamation constructed and is responsible for operation of the project. Construction was initiated in June 1958 and the project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. Storage on October 1, 1989 was 1,309,989 acre-feet, elevation 6,057.30 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1990 was 1,379,053 acre-feet, elevation 6,062.74 feet on July 17, 1990. Storage on September 30, 1990 was 1,360,983 acre-feet, elevation 6,061.34 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1990 activity was $21,522. Brantley Dam on the Pecos River above the town of Carlsbad in Eddy County, NM controls runoff from 13,208 square miles of uncontrolled area. The authorized purposes are irrigation, flood control, Fish and Wildlife and Recreation and for the elimination of the hazards of failure of the McMillan and the Avalon Dams. The total storage is 348,544 acre-feet with 189,000 acre-feet for flood control. The Brantley Dam was authorized for construction on 20 October 1972 by Public Law 92-514 with the cost ceiling raised for the project in October 1980 by Public Law 96-375. On September 6, 1988 the conduits were closed and Brantley Dam started its initial filling. On September 30, 1990, the storage was 8,240 acre-feet at elevation 3,236.9 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1990 activity was $14,179. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs during FY 1990 were: Alamo Canyon, Alamogordo, NM $17,094; Kistenmacher Arroyo, U.HGTS, SD., Las Cruces, NM, $55,290; Willow Creek Floodway, Creede, CO, $9,880; Zuni River at Zuni, NM, $16,431; and Templeton Gap Floodway, Colorado Springs, CO, $4,834. Emergency flood control activities; repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for FY 1990 were $178,559 for advance preparation, none for flood emergency operations, and there were no repair and restoration costs. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal costs during FY 1990 were: Pinon Bridge, Fountain Creek, CO $7,969; Alameda Street, Santa Fe, NM $512; Pueblo State Rec Area, Pueblo, CO $12,085; Hampton Arroyo at SH550, Aztec, NM $356; Dona Ana Drain, Dona Ana County, NM $312; Fountain Creek (MI 44.5) Stratmoor Hill (SDSL), Colorado Springs, CO $14,323; St. Hwy 194 at Bent's Old Fort, Arkansas, RI. La Junta, CO $9,279; Southmoor Drive, Fountain Creek, Fountain, CO $1,060; Water Main, Fountain Creek, Fountain CO $753; Hampton Arroyo at McCoy St., Aztec, NM $15,667; and State Road 12, Stark Weather R., Reserve, NM $239. Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, 83rd Cong.) Costs during FY 1990 were: Gallinas River, City of Las Vegas, NM $19,303 General Investigations 16. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $729,759 for flood damage prevention studies, $123,708 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies). 17. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $100,282 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, special study for Pikes Peak flood warning systems, hydrometeorological studies, and sedimentation studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $15,829. 18. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING There was no cost associated with the Continuation of Planning and Engineering in FY 1990. 32-10 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 19. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance Engineering and Design Costs for FY 1990 were $387,961 for the following flood control Projects: TABLE 32-A COST AND FINA Alamogordo, NM ($3,087); Rio Grande Bernalillo to Belen, NM ($35,631); Puerco River and Tribs, Gallup, NM (-$999); Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache, NM ($359,626) and Rio Grande Floodway TorC Unit, NM ($616). NCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM 2. Albuquerque Diversion Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 3. Conchas Lake, NM 4. El Paso, TX 5. Fountain Creek Pueblo, CO New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,678,000 2,000,000 479,263 1,142,950 301,000 277,737 200,000 1,323,966 23,263 3, 878,00( 2,946,1795 17,569,450 17,569,450 518,356 518,356 679,322 725,985 910,800 886,032 903,300 942,571 598,000 1,729,000 3,206,000 715,687 792,511 3,056,377 300,000 2,878,000 3,032,000 256,135 1,072,391 4,673,143 894,725 887,342 854,644 854,644 13,821,499' 13,821,499' 15,954,519 15,922,086 3,483,000 67,033,294 1,276,426 63,630,908 200,000 367,812 6,410,000 6,636,481 32-11 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 6. John Martin Reservoir 7. Puerco River, Gallup, NM 8. Rio Grande Basin, NM 8A. Abiquiu Dam, NM 8B. Cochiti Lake, NM 8C. Galisteo Dam, NM 8D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM 8E. Rio Grande Floodway New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 15,555,3582 15,555,3582 1,085,222 1,501,300 2,010,500 1,081,879 1,346,719 2,176,195 25,000 25,000 275,000 268,826 2,792,000 396,592 1,297,295 20,431,818 1,259,238 20,378,710 1,434,000 3,277,977 4,476,000 6 3,918,50756 26,745,028 26,745,028 3,925,122 1,564,400 3,864,200 3,682,277 1,788,361 3,974,747 2,434,626 25,063,153 2,128,878 24,752,179 97,084,559 97,084,559 1,217,022 1,192,200 1,266,200 1,208,537 1,049,950 1,454,062 141,000 135,193 610,000 601,864 233,000 195,877 136,900 140,391 9,339 267,500 310,108 211,600 215,037 371,800 370,477 1,159,945 14,559,067 1,065,137 14,462,301 179,948 164,243 635,281 575,245 14,275,053 14,275,053 2,157,924 2,140,576 6,293,972 6,293,972 6,830,632 6,768,974 4,794,8683 4,794,8683 32-12 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sept. 30, 1990 8F. Rio Grande Floodway New Work T or C Unit, NM Approp. 254,000 393,000 3,422,000 3,600,000 7,645,000 5 Cost 366,766 386,718 772,829 4,575,047 7,087,68245 9. Santa Rosa Dam New Work & Lake, NM Approp. - - - -1,821 41,039,741 Cost 5,621 23,277 -660 - 41,039,056 Maint. Approp. 621,000 601,400 731,600 597,936 5,704,136 Cost 627,678 615,688 750,828 505,525 5,611,545 10. Trinidad Lake, CO New Work Approp. - - - - 55,774,758 Cost 23,344 175 - - 55,774,758 Maint. Approp. 441,000 476,100 363,500 519,429 5,663,529 Cost 485,188 475,952 374,903 464,825 5,606,767 11. Two Rivers Dam, NM New Work Approp. - - - - 4,847,244 Cost - - - - 4,847,244 Maint. Approp. 242,000 294,300 280,300 246,409 3,230,722 Cost 240,312 291,180 290,782 227,087 3,210,304 'Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and $869,978 for of Reclamation under memorandum of agreement between that agency and the emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of initiating project under the Corps. authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed with funds transferred to the Corps under Public 4Starting in FY 1982, AE&D programs are funded through GI appropriations. Works acceleration Act of 1962. 3Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY 1986. 2Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. Includes $30,000 for Code 710. 6FY 1986 PED funds were appropriated to and expended by Los Angeles District. 3Includes funds for preconstruction planning of Espanola Valley unit. Excludes $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred to Bureau TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Nov. 17, 1986 ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM An Irrigation System dating back to the eighteenth century with significant engineering works in the settlement and development of the western portion of the United States. Restoration and preservation of this system has cultural and historic values to the region. Measures are necessary to restore and protect the river division structures and associated canales. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. (Sec. 1113) 32-13 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section In Tex 4. Date 1 Authorizing t Act Oct. 27, 1965 5. Nov.17, 1986 7. Nov. 17, 1986 8. June 30, 1948 May 17,1950 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 8 E June 30, 1948 and May 17, 1950 Project and Work Authorized EL PASO, TX A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) FOUNTAIN CREEK, PUEBLO, CO Channel improvements and levee construction on both sides of Fountain Creek approximately 1 mile above the confluence of the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek. PUERCO RIVER, GALLUP, NM Channel rectifications, improvement of existing levees and construction of new levees on both sides of Rio Puerco in the city of Gallup, NM. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Department of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized installation of the Abiquiu Dam Emergency Gates by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache Unit.) Documents H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong. 2nd sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong.,1st sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. Public Law 662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Cong., 1st sess.' and Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. 32-14 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 8F. June 30, 1948 TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Approved comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin is set forth H. Doc. 243, 81st in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1948, for Cong., 1st flood control of Rio Grande Basin. sess. May 17, 1950 In addition to previous authorizations, the completion of the plan H. Doc. 243, 81st approved in the Flood Control Act of 1948, for the Rio Grande Basin, Cong., 1st sess. at an estimated cost of $39,000,000. November 17, Modify previous authorizations to provide that the Secretary is Public Law 662, 1986 authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek 99th Cong., 2nd in lieu of the authorized floodway. sess. (Sec 871) 'Contains latest published maps. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM TABLE 32-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) Miles Drainage Total Above Nearest Area (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espanola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 30,397,0963 NM 1,212,000 acre feet capacity Jemez Canyon Jemez 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 4,217,206 Dam NM acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 - - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,0002 Floodway to 394' enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 340' Cochiti, NM 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 96,900,000 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, NM 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 89,000 14,340,280 acre-feet capacity IRiver mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 3lncludes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities and $3,600,000 for emergency gates. 32-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 32-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico 1966 189,356 Alpine, Texas3 1977 130,488 Cibolo Creek, Texas' 1983 829,500 Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway)' 1959 881,262- Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' 1952 219,789- Highway 12, Colorado' 1985 120,500- Holly, Colorado' 1985 2,021,400- Las Animas, Colorado2 1980 4,956,000- Las Cruces, New Mexico2 1980 4,815,236- Pecos, Texas3 1977 480,273- Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec.212)' - 130,678- Pueblo, Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)t 1954 201,958- Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico3 1983 1,123,900- Smith Creek, Colorado' 1985 219,000- Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico t 1965 2,259,328- 'Completed. 2Responsibility of local interests. 3Inactive. Deferred. 32-16 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT * This district (total area about 230,000 square miles) comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 Miles north of entrance to Los Angeles Harbor); lower Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ.) which southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California;and the southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Channel Islands Harbor. 2. Oceanside Harbor, CA 3. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. San Diego Harbor, CA Santa Barbara Harbor, CA Ventura Harbor, CA LA-LB Harbor, CA Marina Del Rey, CA Morro Bay Harbor, CA Port Hueneme, CA San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Flood Control 13. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ 14. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA 15. Gila River Basin, AZ 15A. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ 15B. Phoenix, AZ, and vicinity (incl. New River) 16. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA 17. Los Coches Creek, CA 18. Lytle & Warm Creeks, Santa Ana Basin, CA 19. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA 20. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dam, Colorado River Basin, NV 21. San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, CA 22. Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA 23. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange Co), CA 24. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA 25. W. Magnesia Canyon Channel, Rancho Mirage, CA 26. Whitewater River, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA 27. Whitewater River Floodwarning System 28. Inspection of completed flood control project 29. Scheduling flood control reservr operations 30. Flood control work under special auth. Page 33-02 33-02 33-02 33-02 33-03 33-03 33-03 33-03 33-04 33-04 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-07 33-07 33-07 33-07 33-07 33-08 33-08 33-08 33-08 33-08 33-09 33-09 33-09 General Investigations R 31. Surveys 3309 32. Collection & study of basic data 3309 33. Research and development 3309 Preconstruction, Engineering & Design 34. Little Colorado River at Holbrook, 3309 35. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor) CA 33-10 36. Rillito River in the vicinity of Tucson, Gila Rvr & Tribs, AZ 33-10 37. Clifton, AZ 3310 38. Hansen Dam, CA 3311 39. Lake Elsinore, CA 33-11 40. Lower Mission Creek, CA 33-11 41. Marina Del Rey, CA 42. Nogales Wash, AZ 43. Santa Paula Creek, CA 44. Tropicana/Flamingo Wash, NV Tables Table 33-A Cost and financial Statement Table 33-B Authorizing legislation Table 33-C Other authorized navigation projects Table 33-D Other authorized beach erosion control projects Table 33-E Other authorized flood control projects Table 33-F Not applicable Table 33-G Deauthorized projects Table 33-H Reconnaissance & condition surveys Table 33-1 Inspection of completed flood control projects 3311 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-13 33-26 3337 3338 3340 3341 3342 3342 33-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 Navigation 3. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA (KING HARBOR), CA Location: On the coast of southern California about a mile northwest of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202). Existing project: For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Location cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Performed engineering and design for the maintenance dredging. 2. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5101.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual report for 1981. Local cooperation. Letter of support from Oceanside Small Harbor Craft District dated April 1985 and letter of intent, March 29, 1989. Terminal Facilities. Berthing for 957 boats (783Abl single-tie slips, 38 double-tie slips and 136 side-ties, of which 54 are visitors' slips); 12 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,732 cars; with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a boatel/motel; condominiums; and a sportfishing facility. Operations during the fiscal year. Continued physical model testing at Corps of Engineers Research Center in support of the design effort for the project. Location. On the coast of southern California at the end of Santa Monica Bay, 18 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and about 417 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5101 and 5144). Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. The City of Redondo Beach submitted a letter of assurance on 14 August 1990. Terminal facilities. Consist of 3 boat basins containing 1,500 small boat slips; outer harbor containing 120 moorings; fuel docks; sewage pump-out station; 2 boat hoists; launching ramp for hand carried boats; boat repair facilities; marine hardware stores; sport-fishing pier, with facilities for the on-and offloading of passengers from vessels for hire; and a commercial/recreational/fishing pier adjacent to the harbor facilities. 4. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California just north of the Mexican border, about 109 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107). Previous projects. For details, see page 1976 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1642 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details, see pages 33 and 34 of annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 33 to 35 of Annual Report for 1980. Terminal facilities. Consist of 45,070 feet of wharves, exclusive of Government-owned and 24,000 feet are privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North Island are restricted to military use only. Operations during fiscal year. Performed hydrographic condition survey of the Federal navigation channels in May 1990. 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 5. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California, 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 320. miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (see Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5261.) Existing Project. For details, see page 33-4 Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969 for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. Terminal Facilities. A wharf 200 feet long; a pair 325 feet long in harbor for tie-up mooring for Coast Guard cutter; a landing float; and open mooring and slip anchorage for small craft; and a launching ramp for small craft. 6. VENTURA HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of the City of Los Angeles, about 70 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach harbors, and about 6 miles northwest of Channel Islands Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Draft local cooperation agreement included in feasibility report. Letter of intent from Ventura Port District dated June 22, 1989. Terminal Facilities. For details, see page 33-4 of the Annual Report for 1987. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance of entrance channel. Sand traps A, B, and C completed between October 1989 and March 1990. 7.LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA Location. On coast of southern California in San Pedro bay about 25 miles south of the City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Fransisco Harbor (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5147). Previous projects. For details see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report 1984. Existing project. For Details, see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1984. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development act. Both ports have expressed their willingness to provide local cooperation agreements when necessary. Sponsors desire early preparation of a local cooperation agreement. Sponsors are opposed to additional ship simulation modeling during PED. Ports might receive credit, contingent upon the Secretary of the Army's approval, for advance work performed per WRDA 88 (Sec. 4d). Terminal Facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 82,553 feet of wharves, if which 75,729 feet are owned by the city and 6,824 feet are owned by private interest, In Long Beach Harbor, 58,985 feet of wharves, if which 51,775 feet are owned by the city and 7,210 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, Federal Government owns 19,700 feet of waterfront inside the Navy Mole, exclusive of finger piers. 8. MARINA DEL REY, CA. Location. On Coast of southern California, Santa Monica Bay in Los Angeles County, 20 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5101 and 5144). Existing Project. For details see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981. Local Cooperations. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. About 6,039 boats are currently berthed in 20 operating anchorages, which afford 6,039 berths. A Coast Guard Station with a permanently assigned 82-foot cutter; a firefighting detachment with a fire boat, a pumper, a ladder truck; and a Sheriff's Harbor Patrol with five patrol boats and five auxiliary vessels are on 24-hour duty. Two fuel docks, one on each side of the main channel, are operational. A 10-lane public launching ramp with 33-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 parking for 233 cars and trailers; dry storage for 396 trailer-borne boats; and several commercial hoists are in operation as well as two haul-out yards, one containing a 100-tone and a 60-ton marine travel lift. Three Hotels, two motels, a ship chandlery, a fisherman's village shopping and tourist center, 26 restaurants, several snack bars, five coffee shops, and eight yacht clubs called the marina home port. About 5,886 apartments, almost all of them occupied, and additional residential/transient facilities are being planned, including a total of 600 rooms in two high-rise hotels. The Marina has reached its design capacity of about 6,000 boats and dry storage for about 2,000 more. Condominium conversion of 600 mid-rise apartment units is underway. Operations during fiscal year. Performed hydrographic condition survey of the Federal navigation channel in December 1989. Performed comprehensive condition survey of the structures. 9. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Fransisco and Los Angeles. (see Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387.) Existing Project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. The City of Morro Bay signed a Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement, as local sponsor, on September 1, 1988. The local share of the total project $1,900,000 is about $670,000. Local agencies have contributed more than $300,000 to the feasibility study so far. Local interests have concluded they could contribute their share through general revenue and possibly state grants. Terminal facilities. Facilities which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department on Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet of floating docks constructed by the City of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately owned floating docks. 10. PORT HUENEME, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. about one mile southeast of channel Islands Harbor, immediately west of the city of Port Hueneme, four miles southwest of the city of Oxnard, and 10 Miles southeast of the city of Ventura. Existing project. Adoption, maintenance, and expansion of existing harbor for deep-draft vessels at Port Hueneme, built by local interests and subsequently acquired by the U.S. Navy. As modernized and expanded, the harbor consists of a west jetty about 800 feet long; an east jetty about 1,000 feet long; and an approach channel about 800 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 40 feet deep; an entrance channel about 1,550 feet long, 330 feet wide, and 36 feet deep; a central basin 1,080 feet long, 1,025 feet wide, and 35 feet deep; and a channel (Channel A) 2,830 feet long, 275 feet wide, and 35 deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-3 of annual report for 1976. Terminal facilities. Oxnard Harbor District owns and operates terminal facilities known as the Port of Hueneme. Two commercial deepwater concrete wharves provide berthing space for vessels of 35-foot draft at mean lower low water; and 400 feet of medium draft berthing is available, as well as fishing vessel berthing. Ancillary facilities include extensive paved open storage areas; the clear span transit shed and a warehouse provide 125,00 square feet of covered storage area; with ample rail and truck-loading capability; and an administration building. Construction is under way to expand deep-draft facilities to five berths. Plans also include expanding transit shed capacity by 60,000 to 80,000 square feet with additional truck loading capacity. Expansion is scheduled for completion in mid-1988. Operations during the fiscal year. Performed engineering and design for the maintenance dredging. 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 11. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Location. The San Diego River has its source on the tableland in the Cuyamaca Mountains near Santa Ysabel, CA, and flows southwestward 52 miles to the Pacific Ocean at the City of San Diego. Mission Bay Harbor is adjacent to the outlet of the San Diego River, 77 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and 8 miles north of San Diego Harbor. Existing project. A leveed flood channel 800 feet wide, with a capacity of 115,000 cubic feet per second, from 0.4 mile above Morena Boulevard, 3.3 miles directly to the ocean; an altered railroad bridge over the leveed river flood channel; an entrance channel about 5,200 feet long, 670 feet wide, and 20 to 25 feet deep into Mission Bay; in the bay a main channel and turning basin about 2,700 feet long, 1,000 feet wide, and 20 feet deep, and two anchorage basins, one about 3,200 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 15 feet deep, and the other about 1,600 feet long, ranging from 800 to 1,800 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; three jetties at the entrance; and stone revetment for the banks of the entrance; and main channels and turning basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Latest approved estimated (1986) first cost is $37,700,000 ($20,200,000 federal and $17,500,000 Non-Federal). This project modified the flood control project: "San Diego River Basin, California." (see H. Doc. 635, 77th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Letter dated February 1989 from the City of San Diego stated desire to proceed on weir based on cost-sharing requirements of WRDA 86 and intent of budgeting $300 in 1989-90 budget for non-Federal cost-sharing. Terminal facilities. None, with the exception of mooring facilities for recreational craft and commercial sport-fishing boats only. Operations during the fiscal year. Surveyed the hydrographic condition of the entrance channel in April 1990. 12. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 33-H. Flood Control 13. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, AZ in a narrow gorge at river mile 39 on the Bill Williams River, a tributary of the Colorado River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual the Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 14. CUCAMONGA ANA RIVER BASIN, CREEK, SANTA CA Location. In and near the cities of Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, and Ontario, and the communities of Alta Loma and San Antonio Heights, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, Ca. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the Annual Report for 1987. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on Annual Report for 1981. 15. GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ 15A. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ. Location. The Gila River (mile 126) about 20 miles downstream from Gila Bend, AZ, in Gila River Basin, which is a part of the Colorado River Basin. Existing Project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. 33-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 15.B PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER) (STAGE 2 AND REMAINING WORK) Location: On Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, Dreamy Draw, New River, and Agua Fria River in Maricopa County, adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. Existing Project: The plan was modified by Division Engineers, South Pacific Division in July 1977 to provide for four dams and detention basins, one each on Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek and New River; Arizona Canal Diversion Channel; channel improvements on Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; flowage easements along Skunk Creek and New and Agua Rivers; flood plain management along Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek and New River; and recreational facilities. Approved estimated (1987) first cost for modified project is $421,712,000 (full funding estimate and includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $254,009,000 Federal and $167,703,000 non-Federal. Map of Modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No.3, General Design Memorandum- Phase I, plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," Prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1981. Local Cooperation: Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 Annual Report for 1981. 16. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location: Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek, and tributaries thereof in Los Angeles County, CA. Previous Project: For Details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1942; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. Existing project: Flood control improvements in four stream basins in Los Angeles County, CA, as Follows: Los Angeles River Basin, San Gabriel River Basin, Rio Hondo Basin, and Ballona Creek Basin. Protection of about 325,000 acres in densely populated Los Angeles County, including areas in Los Angeles, Pasadena. Glendale. Burbank,and other cities. Five flood control dams (Hansen, Lopez, Santa Fe, Sepulveda and Whittier Narrows); debris basins at mouths of 22 canyons; channel improvements along 101.3 miles of Los Angeles River, San Gabriel River Rio Hondo and Ballona Creek; and channel improvements along 192.89 miles of tributary channels. For details on units see Annual Report for 1962. For other pertinent information, see table 33-G, "De-authorized Project." A rehabilitation plan was approved in May 1984. The rehabilitation plan provides for restoring deteriorated portions of the Los Angeles River channel along a 23.5 mile reach from Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road, and for repairing and improving the Los Angeles River channel along a 1-mile reach upstream from Sepulveda Dam in the vicinity of Balboa Boulevard. Latest approved estimated (1985) Federal first cost for rehabilitation is $29,700,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period). A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and revised in March 1984. Local cooperation: Requirements are described in full on page 33-11 of Annual Report for 1981. The Los Angeles County department of Public Works has agreed to local cooperation, by letter of May 25, 1983. 17. LOS COCHES CREEK, CA Location. In the community of Lakeside, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for a 1.8-milelang rectangular concrete channel; an inlet structure just downstream from the Los Coches and Ha-Hana Roads; and an outlet structure at the confluence of the San Diego River. Plan also provides for 5 double box culverts and 1 triple box culvert. Latest approved estimated (1983) first cost for project is $6,197,000 ($4,000,000 Federal and $2,197,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1985. 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 18. LYTLE AND WARM SANTA ANA BASIN, CA CREEKS, Location: Near San Bernardino and Colton, San Bernardino County, CA. Existing project: a regular concrete channel extending 3.5 miles along the East Branch of Lytle Creek From existing the Foothill Blvd. inlet structure to the confluence with warm Creek; a concrete trapezoidal channel on Warm Creek for 1.5 miles from confluence with East the Branch of Lytle Creek to the confluence with Santa Ana River; a leveed channel extending about 1.8 miles along Santa Ana River from mouth of existing East Twin and Warm Creeks concrete channel to Mount Vernon Ave. crossing; 4 replaced railroad bridges and 12 replaced highway bridges; 3 new highway bridges; inlets for side drainage; and relocated and protected utilities. Design capacities of improvements are; the East Branch of Lytle Creek, 58,000 cubic feet per second; Warm Creek, 60,000 to 90,000 cubic feet per second; and the Santa Ana River, 167,000 to 234,000 cubic feet per second. Authorized project was modified by Design Memorandum No. 1, approved in May 1972, which contains a map of modified project plan. Supplement to Design Memorandum No. 1 was approved in August 1985. Local cooperation: Requirements are described on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. 19. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Location: On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from the mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project: For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation: Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. 20. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location: In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project: For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation: Fully complied with. 21. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA Location. Along the lower 7.2 miles of the river, in and around the city of Oceanside, San Diego County, about 86 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. A double levee, 5.4 miles long; stone protection with a soft bottom; 1,330 feet of parapet walls at the ocean on the north and south levees; six interior drainage ponds; and a five-mile bike trail. Local cooperation. The Secretary of the Army and the city of Oceanside signed a local cooperation agreement on May 13, 1988. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of Reach 1 (Ocean to Priory Road). Completed plantings for the four-acre mitigation plan for the endangered species, least bell's vireo. 22. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA Location. Along a 75-mile reach of the Santa Ana River in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties, emptying into the Pacific Ocean between the cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Harbor, 50 miles south of Los Angeles, and 90 miles north of San Diego. Existing project. For details, please see Page 33-9 of the Annual Report for 1987. Local cooperation. Counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange. 33-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 Operations during fiscal year. The construction contract for the marshland enhancement at the lower Santa Ana River was awarded on August 16, 1990, and the abutment-stripping work at Seven oaks was awarded on June 8, 1990. The contract for the construction of Mill Creek was awarded on April 30, 1991. The construction contract for the first reach of the lower Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Channel was awarded on April 15, 1991, and is scheduled for completion in December 1992. The Intake Structure Excavation contract at Seven Oaks was awarded on august 14, 1991. 23. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN AND ORANGE COUNTY, CA (FINAL REPORT) Location. On the Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. General plan of improvement. For details, see page 33-14 of Annual Report for 1981. Existing project. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. For other pertinent information, see Table 33-G, "Deauthorized Projects." Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Continued with interim study at a cost of $189,900. 24. SWEETWATER RIVER, CA Location. Empties into San Diego Bay in the cities of Chula Vista and National City and unincorporated San Diego County, four miles south of the city of San Diego, and eight miles north of the Mexican Border. Existing project. Construction of 3.2 miles of channel improvements along the Sweetwater River from Interstate 805 to San Diego Bay, in combination with State Route 54 and Interstate 4 construction; and construction of two railroad bridges and 188 acres of preservation and mitigation land. Local cooperation. San Diego County is costsharing. Operations during fiscal year. Construction resumed when channel completion was awarded in September 1990. 25. WEST MAGNESIA CANYON CHANNEL, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA Location. In the City of Rancho Mirage, Riverside County, CA Existing project. Plan provides for a debris basin at mouth of Magnesia Spring Canyon; a 1.4-mile-long rectangular concrete channel; and an energy dissipator at the confluence of the Whitewater River. Plan also provides for preservation and enhancement of wildlife habitat values on 20 acres of alluvial cone. Latest approved estimate (1983 26. WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Location. In the Coachella Valley of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, flowing about 55 miles from the base of the San Bernardino Mountains to the Salton Sea, about 165 miles east, northeast of San Diego, and 90 miles east southeast of Los Angeles. Existing project. Investigate flood damage reduction and related purpose through the entire length of the Whitewater River from the base of the San Bernardino Mountains to the Salton Sea, about 50 miles. Local cooperation. The Coachella Valley Water District and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Operations during fiscal year. None. 27. WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN FLOODWARNING SYSTEM, CA Location. The Coachella Valley area of San Bernadino and Riverside Counties, about 100 miles east of the City of Los Angeles. Existing project. Build rain and stream gages in appropriates places in the Whitewater River tributary basin, and install receiving and processing stations at two local emergency agency offices. 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. The Coachella Valley Water District signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1989. Operations during fiscal year. The local sponsors installed 95 per cent of the equipment. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $513,824. (See table 33-1 on inspection of completed flood control project.). 29. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued. Cost for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $8,629,868. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See table 33-J on flood control work under special authorization. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 RFlood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $265,519 for Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $165,734 for advance preparation. Rood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $4,422,390 regular funds, of which$1,134,452 were for navigation studies; $22,952 were for beach erosion control studies; $2,226,531 were for flood control studies; $636,420 were for surveys; $122,221 were for special studies involving coordination with other agencies; $98,791 were for review of authorized projects; and $131,253 were for miscellaneous activities. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $00.00 for technical services; and $231,154 for flood plan management 33. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fiscal year cost was $227 for hydrologic studies. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 34. HOLBROOK, AZ Location. In the city of Holbrook, AZ, about 150 miles northeast of Phoenix. Existing project. The plan will provide 100- year-flood protection by raising and extending the existing Corps of Engineers levee on the north side of the Little Colorado River, building a ring levee around the McLaws area, relocating residents of the south bank flood plain east of the Apache Railroad, acquisition of ponding areas and wildlife mitigation. It is the NED plan. Local cooperation. The City of Holbrook submitted a local cooperation agreement dated April 16, 1987. 33-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 35. KING HARBOR, REDONDO BEACH, CA Location. On the coast of southern California, on the downcoast portion of Santa Monica Bay, in the city of Redondo Beach, about 18 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbor and about 417 miles southeast of San Francisco. Existing project. Reconstruction of about 1,455 feet of the original (north) 2,400-foot stone breakwater, construction of a 2,830-foot extension of the original breakwater, construction of a south breakwater 600 feet long, and maintenance of original breakwater as reconstructed, the breakwater extension and the south breakwater. Modification of the existing project to provide greater protection from heavy wave action was authorized in 1964. The modification included raising crest height of 2,050 feet of north breakwater from plus 14 feet mean lower low water to plus 22 feet mean lower low water and sealing that part of the north breakwater to plus 9 feet mean lower low water. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. In Santa Monica Bay, range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.6 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Federal first cost of new work on completed project as modified was $4,766,898 (excluding $20,000 for Coast Guard costs). Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 2, General Design for Redondo Beach King Harbor, Calif.," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1964. Project modification was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99- 662, dated November 17, 1986; and further modification was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676, dated November 17, 1988. The plan of improvement to modify the existing project provides for raising 1,300 feet at the south end of the north breakwater to 20 feet, raising 300 feet at the shoreward end of the south breakwater to 16 feet, and extending the seaward end of the south breakwater 150 feet. Local cooperation. Initiated negotiations with the City of Redondo Beach, CA, on the conditions of local cooperation for project modifications. Completed a draft local cooperation agreement for approval by ASA(CW). The city of Redondo Beach submitted a letter of assurance on August 14, 1990. Terminal facilities. There are three boat basins containing 1,500 small-boat slips; outer harbor containing 120 moorings; fuel docks; sewage pump-out station; three boat hoists; launching ramp for handcarried boats; boat repair facilities; marine hardware stores; sport-fishing pier, with facilities for the on- and off-loading of passengers from vessels for hire; and a commercial/recreational/fishing pier adjacent to the harbor facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preconstruction engineering and design with completion of General Design Memorandum No. 3 and initiation of plans and specifications for the project modifications. Estimated preconstruction, engineering and design cost is $781,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $168,974. 36. RILLITO RIVER, AZ Location. The north portions of the Tucson metropolitan area of Pima County, AZ. Existing project. Provide flood protection by building soil cement for bank erosion control and gradecontrol structures in the channel bottom to prevent degradation along 13.2 miles of the river. Local cooperation. Pima County Transportation and Flood Control District submitted letters of assurance on February 24, 1986 and May 6. 1987. 37. CLIFTON, AZ Location. Clifton is in Greenlee County, AZ, about 170 miles northeast of Tucson. Existing project. The project consists of both structural and nonstructural elements, including an earthfill levee about 3,000 feet long, with floodgates. Implementation will involve flood proofing of 11 businesses, flood plain evacuation plans, and recreation development. Local cooperation. The State of Arizona is the local sponsor. An April 27, 1984 letter from Governor Bruce Babbit asked the Corps to act as lead agency in flood recovery. Governor Evan Mecham sent a letter of intent and support dated January 26, 1987, to provide 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT all local requirements including costs. Governor Rose Mofford included funding for right-of-way acquisition and initiation of construction in the State's FY 91 budget. Operations during fiscal year. preconstruction engineering and design. Did 38. HANSEN DAM, CA Location. In the San Fernando Valley area of the city of Los Angeles. 20 miles northwest of Downtown Los Angeles, and four miles east of the city of San Fernando. Existing project. A 10-acre recreation lake financed by the Federal government, and picnic facilities, access roads and parking facilities financed by the city of Los Angeles. Local cooperation. No cooperation needed because the city of Los Angeles will independently fund and build portions of the lake development. In the absence of further legislation Los Angeles will costshare according to usual the 710 procedures for any future development that occurs after exhaustion of mineral-removal royalties. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of master plan. 39. LAKE ELSINORE, CA Location. In Riverside County, about 70 miles southeast of Downtown Los Angeles, and 30 miles southeast of the city of Corona. Existing project. The plan consists of an earthen-trap outlet channel about 2.5 miles long, with a 30-foot to 80-foot base and IV on 3H side slopes. Will relieve flooding at the 100-year-flood level in the downtown area, as well as around the perimeter of the lake. The final plan includes building six bridges and protecting an endangered species habitat. Local cooperation. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District signed a costsharing agreement on April 4, 1986. Operations during fiscal year. Continued planning and preparation for the project. 40. LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA Location. In Santa Barbara County, about 100 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. Plan consists of providing 100-year-flood protection with 1.2 miles of concrete channelization for the lower portion of Mission creek, including six bridge replacements. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the Santa Barbara County Flood Control District and Water Conservation District. The County Board of Supervisors supported the recommended plan by letters of August 7, 1986 and January 12, 1987. Santa Barbara City Council supported the recommend plan in a letter of July 18, 1986. Operations during fiscal year. Started project economic development studies. Collected economic data and obtained new topography. 41. MARINA DEL REY, ANGELES COUNTY, CA LOS Location. On the coast of southern California, Santa Monica Bay in Los Angeles County, 20 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles south east of San Francisco bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5101 and 5144.) Existing Project. For details see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981. Local Cooperations. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. About 6,039 boats are currently berthed in 20 operating anchorages, which afford 6,039 berths. A Coast Guard station with a permanently assigned 82-foot cutter; a firefighting detachment with a fire boat, a pumper, and a ladder truck; and a sheriff's harbor patrol with five patrol boats and five auxiliary vessels are on 24-hour duty. Two fuel docks, one on each side of the main channel, are operational. A 10-lane public launching ramp with parking for 233 cars and trailers; dry storage for 396 trailer-borne boats; and several commercial hoists are in operation as well as two haul-out yards, one containing a 100-ton and a 60-ton marine travel lift. Three hotels, two motels, a ship chandlery, a fisherman's village shopping and tourist center, 26 restaurants, several snack bars, five coffee shops, and 33-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 eight yacht clubs called the Marina home port. About 5,886 apartments, almost all of them occupied, and additional residential/transient facilities are being planned, including a total of 600 rooms in two highrise hotels. The Marina has reached its design capacity for about 6,000 boats and dry storage for about 2,000 more. Condominium conversion of 600 mid-rise apartment units is under way. Operations during fiscal year. Performed hydrographic condition survey of the Federal navigation channel in December 1989. Performed comprehensive condition survey of the structures. 42. NOGALES WASH, AZ Location. At the Mexican Border, in extreme southern Arizona in central and northern portions of the city of Nogales, about 60 miles south of Tucson. Existing project. Plans include a lateral collector channel to capture Overland Street flow and divert it into the existing covered channels; a 3,300- foot-long grouted stone/concrete channel system in the Chula Vista community; and a flood warning system and recreation component associated with Chula Vista channels. Local cooperation. The Santa Cruz Flood Control District has signed a cost-sharing agreement. 43. SANTA PAULA CREEK CHANNEL, CA Location. Near the city of Santa Paula, Ventura County, about 16 miles from the ocean and 40 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. Remove the damaged existing channel and build about 2.9 miles of concrete channel from the Santa Clara River to; a single debris basin located near Mupu School. Local cooperation. The Ventura County Flood Control District has given its assurance of support for channel removal, subject to approval of a flood assistance plan. Operations during fiscal year. None. 44. TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV Location. West of and through urbanized Las Vegas community along both washes. Existing project. Study structural and nonstructural means of reducing flood damage and provide erosion control, water supply, recreation and enhancement. Local cooperation. The Clark County Regional Flood Control District approved the Feasibility Cost- Sharing Assessment in July 1985. Operations during fiscal year. * Rescoped Feasibility study in March 1990 * Held Feasibility Review Conference (FRC) 31 Aug.1990. * Formulated tentatively recommended plan; 4 Detention Basins, 4 Debris Basins, 28 miles of Concrete Primary Channel, 32 miles of Earthen Lateral Channels * Estimated cost = $252 Million (Funded) TO be cost shared 25% non-Fed, 75% Fed * Plus sponsor pays for Laterals ($28 Million Fully Funded) * Expect to complete Feasibility Study in January 1992. 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 Channel Islands, CA Carlsbad Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 4. Marina del Rey, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 1. 3,203,170 3,198,140 391,771 103,427 3,053,480 79,131 3,085,940 60,000 49,308 10,000 9,218 657 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost 406,047 969,709 840,434 90,912 74,111 40,000 50,283 4,054,086 813,348 110,000 108,809 392,428 1,136,664 2,939,127 243,494 2,164,333 2,165 408,212 268,785 1,238,494 205,937 1,046,371 175,000 75,109 175,000 75,109 33-13 - 1,545,000 257,463 31,088 1,287,455 602,296 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 5. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) Port Hueneme, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 8. San Diego Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 2,392,152 2,331,215 2,518,915 1,940,549 1,137,731 2,301,884 1,619,552 1,392,867 580,000 483,161 14,538 14,538 810,475 720,543 40 5,553 1,238 1,248,243 324,859 1,224,701 340,156 97,731 106,733 22,000 66,307 152 1 873,000 880,854 882,806 3,274,958 129,715 2,460,930 637,145 3,356,060 590,619 3,082,490 658,000 602,372 2,002 114,587 69,922 491,286 491,286 755,731 709,105 602,000 557,023 129,125 84,612 810,475 720,543 - 28,094,095 - 28,093,478 15,000 2,136,243 24,333 1,129,888 33-14 7. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 9. San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA 10. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 11. Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), CA 12. Alamo Lake Dam, Bill Williams River, AZ 13. Arroyo Conejo Creek, Camarillo, CA 14. Bisbee, AZ New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 190 334,000 319,850 787,000 823,733 163 65,000 91,094 158,806 541,898 1,659,500 1,586,000 921,364 1,644,746 1,587,940 936,799 581 777,000 741,897 664,000 679,831 20,000 2,064 65,000 79,173 28,410 23,092 353 427,410 434,036 837,435 1,783,241 756,948 2,122,579 414,015 3,044,879 264,530 2,846,275 581 750,312 1,607,526 3,798,838 754,272 1,231,684 3,407,665 16,196 4,982 3,841 20,000 15,503 228,000 137,636 40,000 33,763 297,982 220,650 33-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 15. Bowman Wash, CA 16. Cache Creek, CA 17. Chino Canyon, Palm Springs, CA 18. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 19. Ephraim Canyon Wash New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib Cost New Work: Contrib Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 29,000 34,753 10,000 7,141 29,500 29,776 45,747 15,934 49 22,734 500 5,563 70,000 71,708 203,000 7,661 4,462 29,500 40,316 80,000 78,849 186,190 1,593 232,500 223,627 74,536 15,934 49 2,205 2,205 33-16 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 20. Ganado Dam, AZ 21A. Gila River Basin, AZ Painted Rock Dam (Gila River) Gila River Basin, AZ Phoenix AZ, and Vicinity (including New River) (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) Gila River Basin, AZ, Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek Gila River Erosion Gila River, Pima Bridge, Safford, AZ. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib Cost New Work: Contrib Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 20,000 105,000 61,590 805,000 803,109 34,500,000 8,925,957 745,000 251,052 1,730,000 282,212 58,000 52,423 54,000 50,702 7,417 309,500 56,307 7,417 225,309 8,447 125,000 61,590 805,000 803,109 34,500,000 8,925,957 745,000 251,052 1,730,000 282,212 112,000 103,125 7,417 7,417 309,500 290,063 33-17 21B. 21C. 21D. 21E. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 Gila River, Riverside, AZ Heacock Channel, CA Hememway Wash, NV New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 7,500 7,500 10,000 8,803 10,000 3,833 4,321 1,679 7,500 7,500 10,000 8,803 11,679 8,154 33-18 21F. 22. 23. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 24. Lake Elsinore, CA 25. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) LA-LB Hbr Model Study Los Coches Creek, San Diego County, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib Cost Maint.: Contrib Cost New Work: Contrib Cost Maint.: Contrib Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib Cost 24,000 27,276 280,000 280,412 254,000 41,993 4,647 3,649,400 2,046,000 2,911,406 2,245,157 11,121,000 4,566,377 2,271,931 7,967,331 2,174,188 7,330,751 2,584,090 2,556,319 13,705,090 7,122,696 366 107,413 116,365 1,441,000 870,752 1,446,394 873,350 1,400,000 1,407,470 1,587,488 2,225,517 61,203 61,203 7,778 478,235 2,789,987 394,995 2,714,739 1,482 1,400,000 1,477,933 1,587,488 2,225,517 33-19 558,000 349,681 4,647 366 107,413 26. 27. 116,365 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 28. Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA 29. McDonald Canyon 30. Meadow Valley Wash, NV 31. Mission Zanja 32. Mojave County Flood Warning 33. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 150,000 1,538,906 2,475 14,689 2,475 4,351 150,000 1,538,906 - 50,093 4,351 10,000 14,806 4,351 4,351 10,621 20 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 676,000 316,945 300,000 659,111 20,621 14,826 976,000 982,107 100,000 49,849 980,188 567,811 6,051 100,000 49,849 663,188 245,819 134,000 115,710 183,000 206,282 33-20 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 34. Norco Bluffs, CA 35. Phoenix Az & Vic Stage 2 36. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV 37. Quail Wash, Joshua Tree, CA 38. Rialto Channel, Rialto, CA 39A. San Antonio Creek, CA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 167,000 167,615 26,785 1,403 1,284 15,000 12,252 18,000,000 29,663,604 6,039 6,039 107,000 106,915 25,200,000 30,548,322 105,000 98,228 6,039 80,000 26,750 30,054,000 32,288,943 71,972 20,136 87,000 71,712 16,403 13,536 50,574,000 92,500,869 339,972 282,916 56,000 57,637 6,039 69,153 26,785 33-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 39B. San Antonio Creek, CA 40. San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, CA 41. Santa Clara River Fillmore, CA 42. Santa Cruz River, Marana, AZ Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) Santa Paula Creek New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 5,000 2,244 85,000 60,875 26,785 90,000 89,904 250,000 2,800,000 4,633,000 2,270,000 9,953,000 223,717 609,989 6,284,196 1,586,807 8,704,709 24,000 6,699 10,000 116 2,112 50,000 24,492 24,116 8,811 20,000 53,946 17,292,000 2,211 10,250,887 1,728,000 1,670,993 -38,322 -38,322 100 48,232 17,622 80,000 78,438 17,292,000 10,250,887 1,815,061 2,124,199 3,939,260 1,939,254 2,025,348 3,964,602 787 50,000 1,125 50,000 1,912 33-22 43. 44. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 45. Santa Rosa Wash 46. Sepulveda Rec. Area 47. Sierra Vista, AZ 48. Springdale Wash, UT 49. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA 50. Tanque Verde Creek, AZ 51. Telegraph Canyon 52. Tijuana Standby, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 7,000,000 6,727,806 163,000 63,048 9,655 7,163,000 6,800,509 2,435,040 4,201,500 1,845,000 8,481,540 2,789,041 4,086,603 2,052,246 8,927,890 50,000 8,829 10,000 6,919,000 600,000 4,164,487 2,215,062 134,000 80,794 50,000 51,639 234 253 50,000 8,829 60,234 51,892 - 2,162,000 9,681,000 364,149 925,668 7,669,366 40,000 80,468 3,400,000 750,000 3,134,380 1,018,273 8,716 361 174,000 169,978 4,150,000 4,153,014 300,000 300,000 1,209,270 1,209,270 33-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 90 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 53. Town Wash, NV 54. Virgin River & Tributaries, UT 55. Walnut Canyon, Anaheim Hills, CA 56. West Magnesia Canyon Channel, Rancho Mirage, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) 57. Whitewater River Floodwarning System 58. Agua Hedionda 59. Port San Luis New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 15,000 14,416 10,000 570 15,000 30,000 39,428 85,000 97,546 572 15,000 14,986 100,000 97,546 40,000 40,000 275 275 336,250 150,000 90,893 200 250,000 50,038 25,640 190 50,000 32,303 336,250 400,000 166,571 390 50,000 32,303 33-24 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 30 Sep 90 Painted Rock, AZ New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 725,000 732,020 681,019 717,117 1,406,019 1,449,137 33-25 60. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Sep. 3, 1954 Nov. 17, 1988 June 3, 1896 June 25,1896 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. LOS ANGELES RIVER, CA The Secretary is directed to perform maintenance dredging of the existing Federal project at the mouth of the Los Angeles River, CA, to the authorized depth of 20 feet for the purpose of maintaining the flood control basin and navigaton safety. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Ferman. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance channel. For silt-diversion works. Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor entrance channel. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). 33-26 H.Doc. 362,83d Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 100-676- Nov.17, 1988 S.Doc.18,55th Cong.,1st sess. H.Doc. 969, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.9, 64th Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 1013, 66th Cong.,3d sess. H. Doc.349, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 2. 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Do. S. Doc.130, 71st Con.,2d sess. Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-foot wide entrance channel to Los Angeles outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. 33-27 S.Committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 3d sess. Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17,1940 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 22, 1976 H.Doc.161, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.94-594, 94th Cong., 2d sess.1 33-28 Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents If non-Federal interest carry out any work associated with such project which is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may credit such non-Federal interest an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of such work, without interest. In analyzing costs and benefits of such project, the Secretary shall consider the costs and benefits produced by any work which is carried out under the preceding sentence by non-Federal interests and which the Secretary determines is compatible with such project. The feasibility report for such project shall include consideration and evaluation of the following proposed project features: Long Beach Main Channel, Channel to Los Angeles Pier 300, Channels to Los Angeles Pier 400, Long Beach Pier "K" Channel, and Los Angeles Crude Transshipment Terminal Channel. Public Law 100-676 Sep. 3, 1954 MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels. H.Doc.389, 83d Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to bay, a breakwater extending south by west from Morro Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. H.Doc.283, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 33-29 Nov. 17, 1988 4. 5. 6. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 7. Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 3, 1875 Sep. 19, 1890 June 25,1910 Mar. 4, 1913 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 PORT HUENEME, CA Adoption and maintenance of existing harbor for deep-draft vessels; dredged central basin to 35 feet deep, and extend southern-most interior channel. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Diversion dike. Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet deep. Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 feet deep, and a channel through middle ground 32 feet deep. Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by dredging area C (north of area B). Dredging area A (south of area B). Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. Dredging areas D and E. Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier 1 by dredging an portion of area F (north of area C). Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, widen area H, and dredge a channel to National City and Chula Vista 33-30 H.Doc.362, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report. 1873; p.1142 H.Ex.Doc.177, 50th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report, 1888; p.2114). H.Doc.961, 60th Cong., 1st session. H.Doc.1309, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.648, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.1000, 66th Cong., 3d sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc.2, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc.81, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 8. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 July 24, 1946 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to Naval Air Station opposite turning basin. Dredging areas Q.Q-1, M, N, and O. Dredge a seaplane basin (area S.) of about 3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin. Dredge triangular approaches to 26-and 35- foot anchorages, area M. Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, CA, to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Modification of existing project. H.Doc.223, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.89, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.844, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.390, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.365, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H.Doc.760, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 1 S.Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.518, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 33-31 9. 10. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1988 12. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1988 Dec. 22, 1944 Aug. 13, 1968 May 17, 1950 Dredging and maintenance by United States. SUNSET HARBOR, CA The demonstration project is modified to include wetland restoration as a purpose of such demonstration project. All costs allocted to such wetland restoration shall be paid by non-Federal interest in accordance with section 916 of such Act. VENTURA HARBOR (VENTURA MARINA), CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. The Harbor commonly known as Ventura Marina, located in Ventura County,CA, and adopted and authorized by section 101 of Public Law 90-483, shall hereafter be known and designated as "Ventura Harbor". ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Debris-collection facilities, with a system of channels, and a diversion system. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. None Public Law 100-676 H.Doc.356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 100-676 H.Doc.625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.323, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 33-32 11. 13. 14. 15A. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 15B. 15C. Oct. 27, 1965 July 24, 1946 16. June 22, 1936 May 15, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 PHOENIX, AZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project Provision of lands, easements, and rightsof- way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000). Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. H.Doc.216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. None None None H.Doc.838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. None None 33-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. In addition to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under to comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. Authorized modification of Hansen Dam by removing and selling dredged material to facilitate flood control, recreation, and water conservation. 33-34 None None None None None None None None REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1988 17. Feb. 7, 1985 2 18. Oct. 27, 1965 19. July 14, 1960 20. May 17, 1950 21. Dec. 17, 1970 3 Nov. 17, 1986 21. June 22, 1936 The Secretary may convey to the city of South El Monte, CA, approximately 7.778 acres of real property, together with improvements theron, located within the Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. LOS COCHES CREEK, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Channel improvement. LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Channels and levees. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. Authorized non-Federal project cost sharing at a minimum of 25 percent and a maximum of 50 percent. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. Public Law 100-676 None S.Doc.53, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc.91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess. None None 33-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 3, 1958 Nov. 28, 1990 Aug. 13, 1968 San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. Rescinded provisions of Flood Control Act of 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States. $3,500,000). Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million for prosecution of projects approved in above-mentioned flood control acts. The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, including Saniago Creek, CA, is modified to authorized the Secretary to develop recreational trails and facilities on lands between Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Dam, including flood plain management areas. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. H.Doc.688, 75th Cong., 3d sess. None H.Doc.534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 1 None H.Doc.148, 90th Cong., 1st sess. 33-36 22. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents WEST MAGNESIA CANYON CHANNEL, Feb. 7, 1985 2 RANCHO MIRAGE, CA None 23. Debris basin, channel improvements, energy dissipator, and preservation and enhancement of wildlife values. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended. 3. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public Works Committees resolution under provisions of section 201, Public Law 89-298. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Avalon Active 1990 $ 43,960- Dana Point, Harbor, CA Completed 1984 4,737,550 709,908 Harbor office at Morro Bay, CA 1 Newport Bay Harbor, CA Active 1990 796,897 4,497,131 Port San Luis, CA Completed & 1990 1,426,050 5,539,483 Active (mod) Redondo Beach Harbor Completed & 1990 4,766,8982 1,991,550 (King Harbor), CA Active Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA ' 1. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986, subject to favorable report. 2. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 10. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY58. Includes $293,167 expended in FY87. 33-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Fnr I act net tn S p 1 QQ99( Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange Completed 1967 $ 89,119 County, CA' Bird Rock area, La Jolla Completed 1967 25,881 San Diego County, CA Cabrillo Beach Active 1990 9,998 Coast of California, Point Mugu, Completed 1972 1,253,594 to San Pedro breakwater, CA Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny Completed 1968 578,717 State Beach), CA Imperial Beach, CA Active 1990 2,629,602 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego Co, CA Active 1976 107,484 Mission Beach Active 1990 971 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA Completed 1960 7,912 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Completed 1982 4,367,442 Oceanside Sand By-Pass, CA Active 1990 3,440,161 Port San Luis Shore & Bluff Erosion Active 1990 58,235 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,000 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay Active 1985 9,722,100 (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed (part) 1969 715,819 & Deferred (part) 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H.Doc.602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA 33-38 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Fnr I a t Cn_'t tn 3 San 199O Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allenville, AZ C City Creek levee, San C Bernardino County, CA Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ Coyote and Berryessa Creeks CA Gila River Basin, AZ: D Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gila and Salt Rivers levee A and channel improvements D Indian Bend Wash C Lower Gila River levee & Ir channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Middle Gila River channel A improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements D (Globe) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot C Dam and Lake St. Clair) Tucson diversion channel C Goleta, CA, and vicinity Hansen Dam, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA (mod) Holbrook levee Little Colorado C River, Colorado River Basin, AZ Little Colorado River at Holbrook Needles, San Bernardino Co. C Nogales Wash and Tributaries, AZ Oceanside Harbor, CA Oro Grande Wash channel improve- C ments, Mojave River Basin, CA Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, C San Bernardino Co. CA Rose Creek channel improvements, C San Diego, CA San Diego River (Mission Valley), Ir San Diego River Basin, CA Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm C Creeks channel improvements & Lytle Creek levee Mill Creek levees C Riverside levees C ompleted ompleted Active Active eferred fctive (part) & eferred (part) ompleted nactive fctive )eferred ompleted ompleted Active Active ompleted ompleted Active Active ompleted ompleted ompleted nactive :ompleted ompleted ompleted 1984 1988 1989 1963 1966 1990 1975 1970 1968 1982 1986 1982 1990 1950 1973 1989 1989 1970 1972 1978 1962 1961 1959 $ 3,000,000 400,000 12,510,000 56,300,000 73,201 32,488,487 2,413,051 402,867 121,509 10,218,900 6,922,633 500,000 335,757 335,000 1,000,000 11,100,000 5,100,000 1,000,000 212,745 982,432 1,708,437 7,753,937 617,890 2,104,478 33-39 San Jacinto River levee & Bautista Creek channel Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara Rvr Basin, CA Santa Clara Riv, Fillmore, CA Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA Santa Paula Creek channel & debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara Rvr Basin, CA Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA South Fork of the Santa Clara Rvr, Santa Clarita Valley, CA Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA Tijuana River Basin, CA Ventura Harbor, CA Completed Completed Active Completed Active Completed Active Active Completed Active 1985 1961 1989 1984 1983 1984 1985 1985 1979 1990 9,258,207 2,126,672 2,112 10,079,927 4,790,173 4,000,000 632,158 844,732 1,703,031 6,455,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon debris basin & Completed 1964 939,908 channel Ventura River levee Completed 1950 1,349,638 Whitewater River, CA: Banning levee-San Gorgonio Completed 1966 97,868 River, Riverside County1 Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Completed 1973 819,878 Springs1 Tahchevah Creek detention basin Completed 1967 1,420,552 and channel improvements Tahquitz Creek Inactive 1974 1,063,600 Winslow (tributaries of Little Completed (part) 1973 1,831,300 Colorado River), Little Colorado & Deferred (part) River Basin, AZ 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 33-40 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Repor Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Aliso Creek Dam San Juan Dam Trabuco Dam Villa Park Dam Sierra Madre Wash channel, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA 1958 1964 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1977 Sec. 12, Public Law 93,251 1986 1950 Sec. 1002 Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 University Wash and Spring 1975 Brook, Riverside, CA 33-41 $295,191 67,361 213,313 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 11 of Text) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-1 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 24 of Text) 33-42 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Oakland Harbor, CA ................ 34-1 2. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA ...... 34-2 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)......................34-2 4. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA. . . 34-3 5. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys. .... 34-3 6. Navigation Work under Special Authorization........................34-3 7. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization ...................... 34-3 Flood Control 8. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 34-4 9. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization....................... 34-4 10. Surveys..........................34-4 Navigation 1. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Location. Oakland Harbor is located in the City of Oakland, California, on the eastern shore of central San Francisco Bay immediately south of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of June 23, 1874, June 25, 1910, September 22, 1922, January 21, 1927, April 28, 1928, July 3, 1930, March 2, 1945 and October 23, 1962. The project was completed February 1975, except for deepening the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to Park Street, and to 25 feet above Park Street which was deauthorized November 1977. Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge was completed in December 1973 and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance. Project consists of entrance channel to Oakland Outer Harbor, 35 feet deep from deep water in San Francisco Bay and 800 feet wide across the shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island, narrowing to 600 feet at Oakland Mole; thence, a channel and turning basin 35 feet deep and from 600 to 950 feet wide in outer harbor to the Army Base. Project also provides entrance channel to Oakland Inner Harbor, 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide to west end of Government Island, with additional widening to General Investigations 11. Collection and Study of Basic Data . . . 12. Preconstruction Engineering and Design Tables Table 34-A Table 34-B Table 34-C Table 34-D Table 34-E Table 34-F Table 34-G Table 34-H Page S.. 34-4 . .. 34-4 Cost and Financial Statement................34-5 Authorizing Legislation ............... 34-9 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 34-11 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ..... .34-11 Not Applicable Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ....... 34-12 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...........34-12 within 75 feet of the pierhead line in front of Grove and Market Street (formerly municipal) piers and along the south side of the channel from Harrison Street eastward to harbor line point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Brooklyn Basin; for a triangular area 35 feet deep about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin; a channel along north side of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 1,300 feet, thence 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,700 feet to a turning basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long; a channel in the tidal canal 35 feet deep and 275 feet wide from Brooklyn Basin to Park Street, thence 18 feet deep to San Leandro Bay; a total channel length of 8-1/2 miles from San Francisco Bay to San Leandro Bay. Project also includes parallel rubblemound jetties at entrance to inner harbor, north jetty 9,500 feet long and south jetty 12,000 feet long; three highway bridges across the tidal canal, two of which (at Park Street and High Street) have been replaced by local interests and the Fruitvale Avenue Bridge constructed by Federal Government has been transferred to Alameda County. The railroad bridge has been transferred to the County for operation and maintenance. The Federal Government will reimburse the County for the cost of operating and maintaining the railroad bridges. 34-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized deepening the 4 mile Inner and 3.4 mile Outer Harbors channels to 42 feet deep and widening the entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocation of the Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward; and widening the turning basin to 1,800 feet and constructing a 1,200 foot turning basin in the Inner Harbor, 42 feet deep, at mile 3.7. Present estimated total cost for the authorized improvements is $79,600,000 of which $59,700,000 is Federal cost (includes $50,000 Coast Guard cost) and $19,900,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. The Port of Oakland has indicated its intent to sign the Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; (2) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; and (3) pay additional 10 percent plus interests of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Terminal facilities. The port occupies 19 miles on the mainland shore of San Francisco Bay. There are 550 acres of marine terminal facilities, 28 deepwater berths and 25 container cranes, including 5 of the post Panamax type. On-dock covered storage space exceeds 600,000 square feet. Three major railroads, Santa Fe, Southern Pacific and Union Pacific serve the port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work. Sediment testing, ocean site baseline and intitial monitoring studies, preparation of SEIS draft and GDM draft. 2. RICHMOND HARBOR (DEEPENING), CA Location. Richmond Harbor is located in central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County in the City of Richmond. Existing project. The existing navigation channel extends from deep water in San Francisco Bay to the Port of Richmond. The Southhampton Shoal Channel and Long Wharf Maneuvering Area, at the entrance to the harbor channels are maintained to -45 feet MLLW. The Entrance Channel, Potrero Reach Channel, Potrero Sharp Turn, Inner Harbor and about half of the Santa Fe Channel, to -35 feet and the remainder of the Santa Fe Channel to -30 feet. The width of the navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its length to Point Richmond with two maneuvering areas: one in front of the Long Wharf and the other at Point Richmond. At Potrero Reach, the 500 foot width flares to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with a turn at the point, 1,150 feet wide and 35 feet deep except for a depth of 30 feet at the southerly apex of the bend. Thence, the channel continues into the inner harbor at a width of 850 feet in a northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe Channel. The Santa Fe Channel extends northwesterly at a width of 200 feet into the upper basin terminus. A turning basin is provided at Point Richmond, and a rubble-mound training wall extending 10,000 feet westerly from Brooks Island is also provided in the Potrero Reach. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Proposed improvements consists of a two-phased construction plan extending four and a half miles of channel between Richmond Long Wharf and the Santa Fe Channel. Phase I would deepen the existing 35-foot channel to a 38-foot channel for bulk carriers, and provide a turning basin of 1,200 feet in diameter near Point Potrero. Approximately 1,500,000 cubic yards of sediment are to be dredged and transported to an upland and/or aquatic disposal site. In addition, 2,600 cubic yards of rock are to be excavated and disposed of at the Port-owned land disposal site. The estimated cost of Phase I is $16,100,000 of which $12,550,000 is Federal cost (includes $50,000 Coast Guard costs) and $3,550,000 is non-Federal cost. Phase II has been deferred and is reclassified to the inactive category. The existing project was authorized on October 27, 1965. Previous projects were authorized by Acts adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. The proposed improvements are authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) pay 10 percent of the costs to 20 feet below mean lower low water and 25 percent of costs between 20 and 45 feet below mean lower low water and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to general navigation facility of the project within a period of 30 years following completion of construction; and (3) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocation and dredged material disposal areas necessary for the projects. The value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas can be credited toward the payment required under item (2) above. The agreement is scheduled to be executed in August 1994. Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond encompasses nine privately-owned terminals and seven terminals owned by the Port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work. Continued preconstruction planning and engineering. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. Navigation channels extending from entrance to San 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT Francisco Bay to Suisun Bay near Martinez through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay Channels to the vicinity of Martinez to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to the vicinity of Martinez; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along the channel route. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed in February 1974. The South Hampton Shoal Channel and the Richmond Long Wharf manevering area was completed in December 1986. For the approved cost estimate (1990) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor, Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1983, No. 31, revised 1982, and No. 32, revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and the Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued planning engineering and design activities. 4. SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA Location. The model, including a regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond the Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, CA, Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81- 516, Section 110). The model was authorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the model continues. Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981. Extensive exhibit upgrade for the Visitor Center and development of Cooperative Association completed September 30, 1989. The Cooperative Association provides financial and educational support to visitor center programming. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1990, was $18,233,915, of which $7,153,489 was for the regional visitor center, $1,288,219 for exhibits, and $9,792,207 for maintenance. 5. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than Fiscal Year 90 and jetty structures were conducted on the following projects: Bodega Bay; Fisherman's Wharf; Monterey Harbor; Napa River; Petaluma River; Pillar Point Harbor; Richardson Bay Channel; San Francisco Harbor; San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove); San Leandro Marina; Santa Cruz Harbor; and Suisun Bay Channel, all in California. Fiscal year costs were $485,681 of which $158,668 was for jetty condition surveys and $327,013 for project condition surveys. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year total costs for preauthorization studies were $11,945 of which $6,836 was for Crescent City Harbor, Del Norte County, CA; and $5,109 for Larkspur Ferry, Marin County, CA. 7. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $84,824 for Emeryville, Alameda County, CA. 34-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Mitigation of shore damages activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $632 for Moss Landing Harbor, CA. 8. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included a requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $228,804. Total cost to September 30, 1990 was $2,348,894. See Table 34-H for inspections made this fiscal year. 9. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $450,403 for preauthorization studies of which -$177 for Felton Grove, Santa Cruz County, CA; $8,335 for Gold Gulch, Santa Cruz County, CA; $9,053 for Haciena Carmel, Carmel River, CA; $43,224 for Las Gallianas Creek, Manin County, CA; $2,430 for Pescadero and Butano Creeks, CA; $296,610 for Petaluma River, Sonoma County, CA; $10,006 for Rohner Creek, Fortuna, CA; $6,957 for San Felipe Lake, San Benito County, CA; Humboldt County, CA; $72,767 for San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; and $1,198 for Soquel Creek, Santa Cruz County, CA. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs of $4,029,879 were incurred for emergency flood control activities of which $456,314 was for disaster preparedness; and $3,573,565 for rehabilitation. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year cost was $12,641 for Salinas River, CA. General Investigations 10. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $980,306, of which $261,607 was for navigation studies; $524,248 for flood damage prevention; and $82,107 for inventory of dams; $110,346 for shore protection studies; and $1,998 for coordination studies with other agencies. 11. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $45,260 were incurred, of which $43,280 was for flood plain management service program and $1,980 for hydrologic studies. 12. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plans of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project. Due to significant differences in the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA provides for one detached offshore 400 foot breakwater aligned in a north-south direction along the southern portion of Noyo Cove, west of the entrance channel in Noyo Harbor. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $3,500,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $114,670 with General Investigation funds. Planning is about 70 percent complete. A Plan of Action Report is being prepared to outline the work remaining on this project. The breakwater will be ready for construction in January 1996, at an estimated cost of $24,000,000 (1990 dollars). The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Channel Extension), CA provides for a 60-foot wide channel, 7 feet deep, for a distance of about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the existing Federal project to the Dolphin Isle Marina. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $580,000. This project has been put in an inactive category at the request of the sponsor. 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 Bodega Bay, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Crescent City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Fisherman's Wharf New Work Areas, San Francisco Approp. Harbor, CA Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA Moss Landing Harbor, CA Napa River, CA Noyo River and Harbor, CA 1. Oakland Harbor, CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - $1,226,765 1 240 - - - - 1,226,765 1 340 $39,374 $34,257 $34,358 158,835 1,349,349 4 40 42,542 40,520 34,362 158,835 1,349,349 4 40 - - - - 397,779 5 - - - - 397,779 5 - - - - 9,454,972 6 36 - - - - 9,454,972 6 36 777,000 1,606,614 1,213,875 201,711 22,286,938 7 36 850,714 1,633,938 1,210,973 207,212 22,264,840 7 36 - - - - 525,000 8 - - - - 525,0008 -116,000 - - - 9,199,000 41 48 50 28,014 -763 2,057 - 9,199,000 41 49 50 - - 7,894 17,610 25,504 51 - - 7,894 17,610 25,504 51 - - - - 9,847,299 9 40 - - - - 9,847,299 9 40 2,369,000 2,628,700 853,000 3,358,159 63,142,800 10 40 2,342,236 2,680,296 814,563 3,287,440 63,018,761 10 40 - 15,000 - 85,000 438,215 11 40 - - 14,312 632 353,159 11 40 465,000 15,000 59,018 534,403 5,040,205 12 40 467,211 21,258 65,968 526,338 5,032,140 12 40 - - - - 1,021,274 13 40 - - - - 1,021,274 13 40 6,412 724,000 1,321,300 2,948 3,894,882 13 14 40 6,412 722,384 1,291,094 34,770 3,894,882 13 14 40 - 580,000 141,000 109,000 2,351,482 15 16 40 829 232,814 474,448 114,670 2,343,414 15 17 40 422,000 363,000 53,875 498,562 7,591,091 18 19 40 445,886 387,248 65,482 496,742 7,578,952 18 19 40 - - - - 222,810 20 40 - - - - 222,810 2040 915,000 3,400,000 1,976,000 3,364,000 20,142,684 21 40 984,397 2,573,759 2,836,782 3,066,269 19,715,653 21 40 2,620,200 1,917,900 2,009,000 2,355,098 37,619,444 22 40 2,582,782 1,913,913 2,053,312 2,369,732 37,608,849 22 40 34-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 Petaluma River, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Pillar Point New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Redwood City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost 2. Richmond Harbor, New Work CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost 3. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, CA Approp. (John F. Baldwin Cost and Stockton Ship Channels) 4. San Francisco Bay New Work and Delta Model, Approp. CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Francisco New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Francisco New Work Harbor and Bay, CA Approp. (Removal of Drift) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Leandro New Work Marina, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Pablo Bay New Work and Mare Island Approp. Strait, CA Cost 297,146 23 40 297,146 23 40 755,000 1,129,000 736,454 729,877 1,032,148 857,991 -3,700 -1,244 59,010 59,010 561,000 662,879 1,811,300 1,803,232 12,827 12,827 77,260 77,260 779,532 237,782 448,576 444,208 437,000 975,507 4,604 10,438,711 24 40 6,159 10,438,129 24 40 - 6,697,396 43 44 - 6,697,396 43 44 61,554 2,158,748 44 45 61,554 2,158,748 44 45 2,704,180 2,684,564 778,000 635,180 1,672,722 25 40 1,672,722 25 40 10,630,748 26 40 10,606,764 26 40 6,405,527 27 28 6,253,701 27 28 610,300 2,589,440 1,195,171 22,778,553 29 40 593,290 2,596,465 1,167,042 22,721,720 29 40 - - - - 164,689 - - - - 164,689 1,937,000 1,600,000 1,186,000 2,500,000 31,511,200 2,216,315 1,157,869 1,759,997 1,262,488 30,190,955 980,000 1,050,000 1,880,000 1,668,234 18,460,934 1,077,118 1,043,711 1,820,403 1,590,145 18,233,917 - - - - 2,689,356 28 30 40 - - - - 2,689,356 28 30 40 1,593,036 2,615,833 1,282,785 3,577,625 31,555,140 31 40 1,595,213 2,432,154 1,438,119 2,113,134 30,043,908 31 40 1,305,000 1,570,000 1,317,000 1,740,098 26,908,280 40 1,109,605 1,698,448 1,426,004 1,671,508 26,741,279 40 38,337 38,337 34,105 815,663 303,167 2,437,175 32 34,105 815,127 303,683 2,437,175 32 - - - 1,369,372 28 33 40 - - - 1,369,372 28 y3 40 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 Maint. Approp. 1,898,935 891,543 994,034 851,430 36,947,643 34 40 Cost 1,848,904 806,132 1,120,892 857,128 36,942,768 34 40 San Rafael, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 32,359 40 47 Cost - - - - 32,359 40 47 Maint. Approp. 626,591 202,007 - - 3,816,962 40 48 Cost 629,727 231,575 4,026 1,047 3,816,526 40 48 Santa Cruz New Work Harbor, CA Approp. - 20,468 - - 4,126,808 52 (Federal Funds) Cost 198,922 19,715 755 - 4,126,808 52 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 160,000 36 Cost - - - - 160,000 3 Maint. Approp. 64,000 62,000 - 22,821 9,623,481 40 53 Cost 59,497 67,328 8,808 22,821 9,623,481 40 53 Suisun Bay New Work Channel, CA Approp. - - - - 200,928 36 Cost - - - - 200,928 36 Maint. Approp. 174,000 296,700 250,717 875,268 4,358,545 37 40 Cost 160,402 309,816 253,884 864,137 4,347,213 37 40 Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 217,677 38 Cost - - - - 217,677 38 Maint. Approp. 92,312 95,498 88,765 491,711 2,171,618 39 Cost 92,312 95,498 88,765 470,441 2,150,348 39 1. Include $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $584,563 Preconstruction Planning costs ($455,563 Construction General costs and $129,000 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $414,799 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. 5. Excludes contribution funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $80,284 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royalty-free rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $1,710 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $126,283 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. Excludes contributed funds of $180,200. 13. Excludes previous project costs. 14. Includes $277,456 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. Excludes $492,788 contributed funds. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $2,053,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($1,473,000 for Breakwater of which $500,000 allocated under Construction, General and $973,000 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 allocated under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 17. Includes $2,044,932 Preconstruction cost ($1,464,932 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, General and $964,932 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 was under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 18. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $19,311 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 34-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $774 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $156,190 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. Excludes contributed funds of $192,424. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $277,728 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 29. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $3,364 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes $193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $257,258 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $179,268 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1990. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of $859,947. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $32,832 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1990. 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds. 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for detail. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $48,735 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1990. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $372,398 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-1990. Includes $727,510 for previous project. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. 41. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual Report for full report. 43. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full report. 45. Includes $91,948 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1990. 46. Includes $162,015 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1990. 47. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 48. Includes $9,199,000 funds of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. Excludes Contributed Funds of $742,360. 49. Includes $9,199,000 costs of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 50. See FY 1987 Annual Report for last full report. 51. Includes $25,504 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1989-1990. 52. See FY 1988 Annual Report for last full report. 53. Includes $22,821 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1990. 34-8 TABLE 34-B SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. June 23, 1874 June 25, 1910 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 2 Apr. 28, 1928 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 3 Nov. 17, 1986 2. Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 4 OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Jetties. North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, and tidal canal to 18 feet. Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island and thence to Webster St.; South channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin; and channel in Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 30 feet deep. Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, maintain area to within 75 feet of pierhead line south of channel from Harrison St. to Harbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide alteration or replacement of bridges by local interests shall apply only to that feature of project covering deepening tidal canal to 25 feet. Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings whereby title was obtained to rightof- way for tidal canal. Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 feet wide. Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening tidal canal. Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning basin. Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin to 35 feet. Deepen Inner and Outer Harbor channels to 42 feet. Widen entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocate Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward and widen turning basin to 1800 feet. Construct 1,200 foot turning basin in Inner Harbor. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning basin at head of navigation. Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet; approach areas in outer harbor to 32 feet. Annual Report, Part II, 1874, p. 378. H. Doc. 647, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 144, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 407, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Public Res. 28, 70th Cong. Rivers and Habors Committee Doc. 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 466, 77d Cong., 1st sess. Report on File in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 353, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 1986 WRDA, Public Law 99-662 H. Doc. 515, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 73d Cong., 1st sess., and 10, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 34-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 20, 1938 Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; H. Doc 598, 75th Cong., enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning 3d sess. basin at Terminal No. 1. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo H. Doc. 715, 76th Cong., Bay north of Point San Pablo. 3d sess. Sep. 3, 1954 Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent H. Doc. 395, 83rd Cong., to Southampton Shoal; enlarge and deepen to 35 2d sess. 1 feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. Eliminate restriction that widening north of Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local interests furnish assurances industries will avail themselves of improved navigation facilities. and reclamation of Reservation Point. Oct. 27, 1965 West Richmond channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., wide; enlarge and deepen to 45 feet maneuvering 1st sess. 1 area at Richmond Long Wharf (Sacramento Dist. "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockon Ship Channels)"). Nov. 17, 1986 Deepen channel to 38 feet between Richmond 1986 WRDA, Public Law Long Wharf and Santa Fe Channel. Construct 99-662 1,200 feet turning basin. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included deepening of tidal canal above Park Street Bridge to 25 feet, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 3. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 4. Included in part in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 34-10 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA 1 Completed 1966 $155,550 2 $6,120 s Berkeley Marina, CA 1 Completed 1979 505,201 3 - Lower San Francisco Bay, CA Inactive 1935 - - Monterey Harbor, CA Completed 1971 1,108,182 4 110,214 6 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA 1 Completed 1976 848,227 7 - San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA Completed 1974 180,472 6 5,114 10 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA 1 Completed 1976 210,390 8 - Saucelito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA Inactive 1963 103,095 70,165 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, condition survey for FY 1956-1990. Public Law 86-645). 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. excludes contributed funds $153,618. 3. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. 4. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administra- 8. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and tion funds and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) excludes contributed funds $138,189. placed inactive 1974. The barrier groin and sandtrap 9. Includes $6,120 for jetty condition surveys for feature of the project was deauthorized November 17, FY 1987-1990. 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 10. Includes $5,114 reconnaissance and condition 5. Includes $23,980 for reconnaissance and survey for FY 1990. TABLE 34-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Humboldt Bay, CA Inactive 1958 $2,000- Santa Cruz County, CA Inactive 1966 245,639- 34-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA 1974 Aug. 5, 1977 -- Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 -- Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 -- San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) 1962 Nov. 6, 1977 -- San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) 1982 Nov. 6, 1977 -- TABLE 34-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 8 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Alameda Creek July 1990 Corte Madera Creek Aug 1990 Coyote Creek Aug 1990 East Weaver Creek Apr 1990 Eel River at Sandy Prairie Apr 1990 Klamath River Apr 1990 Mad River Apr 1990 Mad River at Blue Lake Apr 1990 Pajaro River Apr 1990 Pinole Creek Jun 1990 Redwood Creek Apr 1990 Rheem Creek Jun 1990 Rodeo Creek Jun 1990 Russian River Jun 1990 San Leandro Creek July 1990 San Lorenzo Creek July 1990 San Lorenzo River May 1990 Wildcat Creek Jun 1990 34-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Sacramento River, CA ........... 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA .............. 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)................ 4. San Joaquin River, CA ........... Flood Control 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Page .... 35-2 ..... 35-3 .... 35-3 ..... 35-4 Chowchilla River, CA................. 35-5 6. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ......... 35-5 7. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA ................ 35-6 8. Corte Madera Creek, CA .............. 35-7 9. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA .......... 35-7 10. Guadalupe River, CA .............. .35-8 11. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA..........................35-9 12. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA .......... 35-9 13. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA . . . . 35-10 14. Little Dell Lake, UT................. 35-11 15. Lower San Joaquin River, CA .......... 35-12 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA ....................... 35-13 17. Merced County Streams ............. 35-13 18. Merced County Stream Group, CA ...... 35-14 19. Pajaro River, CA...................35-14 20. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA ...... 35-14 21. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA ...... 35-16 22. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA... 35-16 23. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ......... .35-17 24. Walnut Creek, CA ................. 35-19 25. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA ...... 35-20 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 35-21 27. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ..................... 35-21 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations................ 35-21 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 29. New Melones Lake, CA .............. 35-21 General Investigations 30. Surveys............... ........... 35-23 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 35-23 32. Research and Development ............ 35-23 33. Preconstruction Engineering and Design... 35-23 34. Other Work under Special Authority ...... 35-24 Tables Table 35-A Page Cost and Financial Statement ............... 35-25 Table 35-B Authorizing Legislation...............35-33 Table 35-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 35-35 Table 35-D Not Applicable Table 35-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 35-36 Table 35-F Not Applicable Table 35-G Deauthorized Projects ...... 35-38 Table 35-H Sacramento River, CA: Tidal and Flood Conditions Prevailing................35-38 Table 35-I San Joaquin River, CA: Total Cost of New Work for Project ............... 35-39 Table 35-J San Joaquin River, CA: Project Units (1950 Modification) Reclassified and Excluded from Project Cost .............. 35-39 Table 35-K Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work. .35-40 35-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) Page Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs ............ 35-40 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, Collinsville to Shasta Dam: Project Units Units Reclassified and Excluded from Cost Estimate . . 35-41 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provided for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. However, shallow-draft channel feature Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallowdraft feature. Tables Page Table 35-N Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam: Construction Accomplished and Contract Table 35-0 Costs.................... 35-41 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as Amended (Preauthorization) ......... 35-42 Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by, Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallow-draft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. On November 17, 1986, remaining shallow-draft feature, Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662). Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 35-2 Tables Table 35-L Table 35-M SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Location. On the Sacramento River between Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of about 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, Contra Costa, Solano, and Yolo, CA. Existing project. Project provides for deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to the Port of Sacramento, and the Avon to New York Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, and widening the channel as necessary. Current selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, and establishment of wetland habitat and upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Project estimate (October 1990) is $45,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $22,500,000; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $300,000; and non-Federal cost of $22,200,000 for lands and damages, relocations, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($7,430,000) that local interests must pay. Existing project was adopted by Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985, August 15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88), 99th Cong., 1st sess. and modified by 1986 Water Resources Development Act, November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) 99th Cong., 2d sess. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; and provide retention dikes for dredged material disposal area; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $7,340,000. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) (sec. 221) was executed June 27, 1986. An LCA modification necessitated by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was executed December 6, 1988. Terminal facilities. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering was continued. First construction contract continued at contract fiscal year cost of $324,246,000. Second construction contract (river mile 41.5-35) was awarded in September 1990. Historical summary. General Design Memorandum was approved and Record of Decision was signed in May 1987. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) modification was approved and was signed by Port of Sacramento on August 19, 1987. LCA modification was executed December 6, 1988. First construction contract was awarded February 2, 1989 and second contract was awarded September 12, 1990. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA, (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and the inundated or low-lying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and placing additional rock revetment on waterside of levees bordering channels. Project estimate (October 1990) is $169,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $143,900,000, including basic recreation facilities; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $1,100,000; and non-Federal cost of $24,000,000 for lands and damages, relocations, berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($20,000) that local interests must make for land enhancement at time of construction. Local interests must also pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest 35-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoil-disposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers; provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads, and embankments except as applicable to spoildisposal areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting therefrom; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial construction for modification of Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must also give satisfactory assurances, before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered, set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U.S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $20,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation; and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon- Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise improving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. The Stockton Port District, in August 1980, formally provided their intent to sponsor the Avon to Pittsburg reach (Suisun Bay Channel) and recreational development on Roberts Island. The Port of Stockton, by letter of October 20, 1981, stated that they would furnish the necessary assurances for fish and wildlife mitigation and enhancement, and on April 13, 1982, provided formal updated assurances for the Avon to Stockton portion. A sec. 221 agreement satisfying all requirements of local cooperation for Southampton Shoal and Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area was obtained from Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and signed by District Engineer July 31, 1984. On May 3, 1988, Board passed a resolution of continued support for construction in West Richmond, Pinole Shoal, Carquinez Strait, and Suisun Bay Channels. A Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Army, San Francisco District and Contra Costa County to sample berthing areas of project was executed September 12, 1989. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1983, and 31, revised 1982, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1986, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued. San Francisco District: planning activities continued including continuation of a vessel simulation navigation study and initiation of sediment quality testing for ocean, upland and wetland disposal. Historical summary. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 37 percent complete. 4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 3.) Historical Summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. Flood Control 5. BUCHANAN DAM-H.V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $28,919,597, of which $27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H.V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. An hydrilla eradication (spraying) program at Eastman Lake, which began at the end of FY 1989, was continued in FY 1990. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $20,010. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 14,200 acre-feet occurred June 1, 1990. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 68 cubic feet per second on January 14, 1990. Maximum release of 101 cubic feet per second on July 10, 1990, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 3,500 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances were combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. Final land audit was approved on December 3, 1985. An hydrilla eradication (spraying) program was initiated at the end of FY 1989. 6. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA (CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN) Location. At the mouth of Cache Creek in Yolo County where it enters the Yolo Bypass about 2 miles east of city of Woodland and about 15 miles northwest of city of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for raising the perimeter levees of the existing settling basin an average of 12 feet, extending the levees upstream to County Road 102 to provide 50-year sediment storage capacity, enlarging and reconstructing the cobble weir, and degrading existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to western perimeter levee to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity (340 acre-feet annually.). Estimated cost (October 1990) for existing project is $22,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $14,800,000 is 35-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Federal and $7,200,000 is non-Federal (which includes $1,080,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986 (HD 98-134, 98th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map.) Project as authorized included development of a national wildlife refuge within the settling basin; however, the Department of the Army determined that such refuge would be more appropriately funded and developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent of which $1,080,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. 7. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTILEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; local interests paid $3,388,092 through December 31, 1989. A long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam-Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During rainflood season, Duck Creek Diversion and Littlejohn Creek at Farmington had no active storage. New Hogan Lake-Maintenance and operation activities continued. Renovation of recreational area was continued at a fiscal year contract cost of $12,000. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 44,400 acre-feet occurred April 29, 1990. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 1,100 cubic feet per second on February 17, 1990. Maximum release of 330 cubic feet per second on May 2, 1990, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 30,300 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 8. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 square miles in Marin County, CA, and flow into west side of San Francisco Bay about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. (See Geological Survey quadrangle San Rafael.) Existing project. Provides for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprapping, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-ofway to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures as necessary to individual properties and other necessary structural measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Portion of project upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard previously classified inactive was modified on November 17, 1986, to eliminate any channel modification. Current project has 3 miles of channel enlargement and levees, about 1.8 miles of rectangular concrete channel improvements, and 450,000 cubic yards of redredging on lower Corte Madera Creek. Approved estimated cost for new work (October 1990) is $31,800,000, of which $18,000,000 is Federal cost and $13,800,000 is non- Federal cost (includes $760,000 to be contributed by local interests.) (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley unit and tidal areas, an estimated $730,000. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 1967, and July 8, 1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. Project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court Judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed on June 29, 1985. Marin County also provided support for Ross Valley Unit 4 by resolution on March 24, 1987 and by the resolution on September 13, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering continued. Coordination with locals continued regarding selection of a plan to complete the project. Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. Project is about 77 percent complete considering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Frances Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. In lieu of the authorized concrete channel, an alternative plan consisting of wing walls and individual house floodproofing is being recommended in the Significant Post-Authorization Change Report. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed June 29, 1985. Construction on Lower Corte Madera Creek Channel was completed and transferred to Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by letter of May 28, 1987. San Francisco District will monitor maintenance and operation of the project. 9. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. Existing project. Provides for channel improvement on Ledgewood, Laurel, and McCoy Creeks and diversion of three creeks upstream from Fairfield (Pennsylvania Avenue Creek into Ledgewood Creek, Union Avenue Creek into Laurel Creek, and Laurel Creek into McCoy Creek). Project related recreation facilities such as access roads, parking areas, a boat-launching ramp and hiking, bicycle, and horseback trails would also be constructed. Estimated cost (October 1990) for existing project is $39,900,000 35-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $17,300,000 is Federal and $22,600,000 is non-Federal (includes $350,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 201, 1965 Flood Control Act (1970 Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions) and Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), December 19, 1985, and Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1987. (HD 91-159, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains published map). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project, pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $535,000, of which $80,000 is for lands, $105,000 is credit for recreation facilities built by local interests per Public Law 100-71, July 11, 1987, which directs that project proceed under provisions of sec. 117, Public Law 99-190, and $350,000 is cash contribution; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities and flood control facilities. Ultimate non-Federal cost for flood control will be reduced by a Federal reimbursement of one-half of the non-Federal costs in excess of the Federal construction costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Project had been in "deferred" status since September 15, 1977, due to lack of local assurances. In April 1982, the cities of Fairfield and Suisun affirmed their support and intent to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation for a modified version of the authorized project from 200-year to 100-year flood protection. On June 23, 1982, project was reclassified from "deferred" to "active" status. The State of California Reclamation Board has provided a letter of intent to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, November 8, 1982, to cooperate with the Federal Government to begin construction of the project. In accordance with FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control and recreation (sec. 221) was executed June 3, 1986. Sec. 117 of Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 contained the following authorization language which will be reflected in any future modified agreements: "The Secretary shall include as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project for flood control, Fairfield Vicinity Streams, California, authorized in accordance with sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, the cost of any work carried out by non-Federal interests on the project after December 31, 1973, and before the date of the enactment of this joint resolution if the Secretary determines such work is reasonably compatible with the project. Costs and benefits resulting from such work shall continue to be included for purposes of determining economic feasibility of the project." Prior local expenditures of $6,800,000 have been reported by the sponsor. The Corps is evaluating costs and benefits of all completed works by non-Federal interests after December 31, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract for Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase II, was fiscally completed at a fiscal year cost of $33,339; Laurel Creek, Phase III, was physically completed at fiscal year cost of $411,368 and was transferred to local interests on April 30, 1990; and Laurel Creek Diversion, Phase IIA, relocations contract was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $1,523,500 (railroad relocations $741,468 and bridge relocations $782,032). Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 3, 1986. Construction was initiated in October 1986. Enlargement of McCoy Creek and construction of Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was transferred to local interests in July 1987; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase II, was transferred to local interests in November 1988 and Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase III, was transferred to local interests in April 1990 for maintenance. Relocations contract for Laurel Creek Diversion, Phase IIA, was initiated. 10. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA Location. On Guadalupe River in downtown area of city of San Jose, Santa Clara County, CA. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for widening and deepening one or more sides of Guadalupe River for 2.5 miles from Interstate Highway 280 to Interstate Highway 880 in downtown San Jose, CA, and channel modifications with provisions for fish and wildlife mitigation, as necessary. Project is an integral component of a much larger regional park plan being undertaken by the San Jose Redevelopment Agency. Estimated cost (October 1990) is $112,200,000 (which includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $56, 100,000 is Federal and $56,100,000 is non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act for 1990 which directed the Secretary of the Army to construct the project notwithstanding sec. 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 regarding project cost limitations. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, which are partially offset by a credit allowed ($15,947,000) for prior work (sec. 104, Water 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Resources Development Act of 1986); modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Federal reimbursement will be made to non-Federal sponsor for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. On June 2, 1989, the local sponsor, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, expressed intent to provide all needed cost sharing funds. On September 21, 1990, the San Jose Redevelopment Agency requested modification of project to include recreation facilities and confirmed that they intend to participate as local sponsor for recreation. Operations and results during fiscal year. A Draft General Design Memorandum was submitted and the final General Design Memorandum was initiated incorporating the Guadalupe Park plan. 11. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $8,818. Runoff of Fresno River below Hidden Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 15,300 acre-feet occurred June 19, 1990. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 90 cubic feet per second on May 29, 1990. Maximum release of 260 cubic feet per second on July 23, 1990, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 9,700 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 12. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term 35-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. All concessionaires will operate under permits granted by the Corps. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $965,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $534,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Between 1962 and 1982, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HBO7-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 1974, effective retroactively. Such charges will now vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 1984) was included in 1984 payment of $244,790. The 1985 payment was $52,747; 1986 payment was $51,905. No payment was received in 1987. The 1988 payment was $58,187. No payment was received in 1989. Two payments ($60,894 and $55,443) were received in 1990. Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1990, amounted to $1,883,692. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 97,400 acre-feet occurred June 13, 1990. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 1,010 cubic feet per second on May 8, 1990, and maximum outflow of 1,130 cubic feet per second occurred July 19, 1990. During the year, 227,200 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 13. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and waterright holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1989: Terminus, $1,864,457 and Success, $880,736. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council and developed a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($360,000) and the marina concessionaires ($373,000) is about $733,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Success Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 88,800 acre-feet occurred on June 1, 1990. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir on May 28, 1990, was about 1,100 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 1,200 cubic feet per second occurred June 13, 1990. Water released for irrigation and spreading releases totaled 134,200 acre-feet. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were completed at a fiscal year cost of $2,294. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above Success Dam was below normal during the year. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 500 cubic feet per second on May 28, 1990, and maximum outflow of 195 cubic feet per second occurred on July 8, 1990. Maximum storage of 22,500 acre-feet occurred on June 2, 1990. Water released for irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 29,300 acre-feet. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968. Final land audit was approved on April 20, 1987. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 14. LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. Existing Project. Project providing for construction of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation and fish and wildlife was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 170, Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976. Facility would be operated in conjunction with existing downstream 3,200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir on Parleys Creek for flood control and water supply. 35-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Authorized project has been reexamined and scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. Current plan of improvement includes only flood control and water supply purposes. Recreation was deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive status. Project will include an earthfill dam 224 feet high, a 20,500 acre-foot reservoir, and 10,035 feet of pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek. Estimated project cost (October 1990) is $56,800,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $32,700,000 is Federal and $24,100,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $17,500,000. Project is included in FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) August 15, 1985. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply; pay 13 percent of costs allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently estimated at $17,500,000. By letters of January 22, 1986, and January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their support and willingness to proceed with a reduced scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed on June 10, 1986. Water Revenue Bonds were issued August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the amount of $14,300,000 have been deposited in the Little Dell Construction Fund Account. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Construction of core trench and test fill was completed at a fiscal year contract cost of $198,950.Main dam and appurtenances construction contract was continued at contract fiscal year cost of $6,802,053. Historical summary. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. Construction was initiated in April 1988. Construction of core trench and test fill was completed in February 1989. Main dam and appurtenances contract was awarded May 12, 1989. 15. LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. On Lower San Joaquin River, CA, from city of Stockton, CA, extending about 225 miles upstream to Friant Dam (about 19 miles northeast of Fresno) and along Kings River North for approximately 25 miles upstream from Mendota Dam. Existing project. This project is a modification and extension of the previous Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries project (see Annual Report for 1976) to provide clearing and snagging on San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, upstream to Friant Dam. Estimated first cost (October 1990) is $29,776,000, of which $22,876,000 is Federal and $6,900,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period as well as $12,976,000, Federal, and $5,000,000, non-Federal, for work completed by 1974). Existing project was included in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 98-63, July 29, 1983, which states that project for flood protection on Lower San Joaquin River, CA, authorized by the Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944, as amended, is modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to perform clearing and snagging on San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, to Friant Dam, at an estimated cost of $5,000,000. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1988, Public Law 100-202, December 22, 1987 (H.J. Res. 395) modifies Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1983 to include: clearing and snagging in area of North Fork of Kings River in Mendota Pool from southerly boundary of James Reclamation District Number 1606 to Mendota Dam; fish and wildlife mitigation; and such riprapping in area of clearing and snagging on such rivers as may be necessary to prevent erosion from such clearing snagging; and increase estimated cost of clearing and snagging on Lower San Joaquin River, including activities above, from $5,000,000 to $8,000,000. Local cooperation. Prior to initiation of construction, a non-Federal entity shall furnish adequate assurance for providing all lands, easements, rights-ofway and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in construction of project at no expense to the Federal Government, execute a local cooperation agreement pursuant to sec. 221 Public Law 96-611; agree to operate and maintain the project works upon completion of construction in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Department of the Army; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Non-Federal sponsor, the California State Reclamation Board, has agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Coordination with local interests and pertinent agencies was continued. Lack of concensus of support by Federal, State and local entities led to recommendation to terminate project. Historical summary. A Plan of Action, February 1984, has been prepared. Design Memorandum No. 5 for Eastside Bypass at San Joaquin River was prepared in September 1984. First construction contract, 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT dredging Eastside Bypass, was awarded October 12, 1984 and completed in May 1985. 16. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 840 acre-feet occurred on March 21, 1990. Maximum daily inflow to the reservoir was 65 cubic feet per second on March 20, 1990, and maximum daily outflow of 64 cubic feet per second occurred March 20, 1990. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 17. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 18, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 1957. Existing project provides for construction of three new reservoirs-Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs-Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed.) Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks. Estimated project cost (October 1990) is $106,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $73,100,000 is Federal and $32,900,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $240,000, of which $200,000 is a cash contribution and $40,000 is for lands; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam first cost is $3,480,000 and includes cash contribution of $510,000. The California Reclamation Board and the City of Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. The Merced County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by letter of March 13, 1986, reaffirmed its support for and intent to furnish assurances for recreation aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the Reclamation Board to financially participate in the project. A new Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army November 30, 1988, in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Right-of-way condemnation actions were favorably completed in 35-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 September 1990 and Castle Dam construction contract was scheduled for award in February 1991. 18. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas above Merced County stream group reservoirs was far below normal for the year. Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 19. PAJARO RIVER, CA Location. In the Uvas-Carnadero and Llagas Creeks watersheds of the upper Pajaro River Basin in south Santa Clara County in vicinity of the city of Gilroy about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Provides for construction of a 2-mile levee along the north side of Uvas Creek from a point about 2,000 feet downstream of Thomas Road to about 3,500 feet upstream of Miller Avenue. Project will also include a bikeway and hiking trail. Estimated cost (October 1990) for existing project is $11,762,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $5,881,000 is Federal and $5,881,000 is non-Federal (which includes $645,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Flood Control Act of 1944, December 21, 1944 (HD 505-78, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, right-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay one-half of separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated Federal reimbursement of $4,581,000 for one half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed'to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and result during fiscal year. Second construction contract (levee work and hiking trails), was completed and the third and final construction contract (landscaping) was continued. A partial payment of $3,651,784 was made to the local sponsor. Historical summary. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications, and construction was transferred to Sacramento District in April 1982. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for flood control was executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District on June 25, 1987, and LCA for recreation was executed with the City of Gilroy on July 27, 1987. Construction began in October 1987. Construction for the first contract (levee work and bike path upstream of Thomas Road Bridge) and second contract (levee work and hiking trails) has been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. A partial reimbursement of $3,651,784 was made to the local sponsor in fiscal year 1990. 20. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructed by the Corps with two exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $13,188,021 for irrigation services through December 31, 1989. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Pine Flat Marina and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,727,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost to date of $476,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists of an outdoor-type powerhouse containing three generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat Dam when constructed in 1954. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds were paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 379,600 acre-feet occurred on June 9, 1990. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 4,500 cubic feet per second on May 7, 1990, and maximum outflow of 5,900 cubic feet per second occurred on June 29, 1990. During the year, 697,200 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950; completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles 35-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 21. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Location. Northeast and adjacent to the Fresno- Clovis Metropolitan Area in Fresno County about 170 miles southeast of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a dam 45.5 feet high to create a reservoir with gross capacity of 10,300 acre-feet for flood control on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreational development. Since the local sponsor does not support recreational development at this time, the recreation feature of the project is considered to be inactive. The authorization Act states "measures determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Army to minimize benefits to groundwater recharge" shall be included in the project. Estimated cost (October 1990) for existing project is $67,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $50,500,000 is Federal and $16,800,000 is non-Federal (which includes $5,008,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. (HD 98-147, 98th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, of which $5,008,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Cultural Resources Preservation contract was completed. Construction for Redbank Creek Detention Basin was initiated and completed at fiscal year cost of $8,524,490 and was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 23, 1990. Construction contract for Fancher Creek Dam was awarded May 23, 1990, and initiated at fiscal year cost of $2,051,184. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 1, 1987. Project construction was begun in September 1987 with initiation of archaeological work on Cultural Resources Preservation. Construction for Dry Creek Crossing was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on January 10, 1989. Construction at Redbank Creek Detention Basin was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 23, 1990. Construction contract for Fancher Creek Dam was awarded May 23, 1990, and initiated. 22. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Project also provides for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-K and 35-L for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the construction cost, (27.8% of total construction cost, currently estimated at $103,100,000) and the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, tentatively estimated at $460,000. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. Major items of contract work included: Completion of Rockpile Road Upgrade, $1,087,605; completion of Yorty Creek Beach, $46,171; and completion of remedial work at Buzzard Rock (now known as Liberty Glen) camping area, $2,480; continuation of downstream channel improvements, Phase III, $69,984; and downstream recreation area, $298,294. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 92,600 acre-feet occurred on June 6, 1990. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 3,000 cubic feet per second on January 7, 1990. Maximum release of 1,000 cubic feet per second occurred on January 15, 1990. During the year, 38,300 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 106,100 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 168,000 acre-feet occurred June 2, 1990. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 2,700 cubic feet per second on January 13, 1990. Maximum release of 120 cubic feet per second occurred December 5, 1989. During the year, 59,300 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 98 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Warm Springs construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, reservoir clearing in July 1981, project overlook in May 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985 and Rockpile Road Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990. Initial filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Major items of work remaining include fish hatchery expansion and emergency water supply, control tower grout, spillway stabilization, right-of-way fencing for Rockpile Road and Liberty Glen sewer treatment repairs. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 23. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee 35-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1988), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-M on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1987) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $31,000,000, of which $25,700,000 is Federal cost and $5,300,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations and cash contribution of $3,435,000. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1990) first cost for project is $144,000,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $101,000,000 is Federal (including $2,560,000 for recreation facilities) and $43,000,000 non-Federal comprising for lands and damages including relocations and $24,965,000 required cash contribution toward first cost. Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported by California Debris Commission under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1990) at $24,965,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries-None. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-Engineering and design activities continued. (See table 35-N for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. Minor engineering activities continued. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 56,000 acre-feet occurred June 4, 1990. Maximum bihourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 1,400 cubic feet per second on January 13, 1990, and maximum outflow of 770 cubic feet per second occurred on January 17, 1990. During the year, 5,000 acre-feet was released for flood control and 117,400 acre-feet was released for 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT irrigation and other purposes. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 90 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River, Tehama County-one site, mile 215, (Unit 5), was completed November 1982, two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in February 1985. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980 and completed in FY 1986. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at the dam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 24. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (October 1990) is $95,600,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $69,300,000 is Federal cost and $26,300,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $20,625,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,675,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. In addition, local developers have made channel improvements for Upper Pine Creek valued at $5,050,000. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1990) at $5,675,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. Flood Control District and city of Walnut Creek have requested that recreation be added as a project purpose and will share costs in accordance with Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Post Authorization Change was approved July 27, 1987. To date, $5,165,081 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering, design, and coordination for the uncompleted portions of Walnut and San Ramon Creeks and Upper Pine Creek is continuing. Construction on San Ramon Bypass Channel has been split into three contracts. Contract No. 2 was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $1,258,657. Contract No. 3 was initiated at fiscal year contract cost of $6,631,696. Construction on Upper Pine Channel was completed at a fiscal year contract cost of $51,026. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 92 percent complete. Total of 16.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 and construction under San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 2 35-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 and Upper Pine Creek Channel contract have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Due to contractor difficulties with partially completed Contract No. 1 (Lionsgate claims and court action which is still pending final decision), the remainder of the contract work was completed under Contract No. 1A with a different contractor. Work remaining consists of completion of Contract No. 3 for channel improvement on Walnut Creek (San Ramon Bypass-Ygnacio Valley Road to Rudgear Road along SPRR alignment), recreation, and erosion control mitigation. Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 25. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Current plan of improvement reflects removal of Reach 2 and now consists of 9,400 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 9,900 lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. Additionally, about 24 acres will be planted for mitigation of fish and wildlife. Approved estimated cost of new work (1990) is $26,440,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $15,070,000 is Federal cost, and $11,370,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $2,520,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map).For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of project; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73-466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of project costs for a modified plan of improvement. A flood control Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-661) and consistent with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), was executed on June 20, 1986 between the Department of the Army and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. By Resolution No. 1985-12-351, adopted December 17, 1985, the East Bay Regional Park and Recreation District stated support for development of trail and recreational improvements for the project and indicated its intent to share in 50 percent of the cost of such improvements and perform operation and maintenance responsibility. A recreation Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) will be required prior to initiation of that construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction on Reach 1, Contract 2, of channel improvement on Wildcat Creek was continued at a fiscal year contract cost of $1,559,262. Recreation Design Memorandum/LCA was submitted in March 1990. Decision Paper of March 1990 declared Reach 2 to be infeasible and recommended that status be changed to inactive. All costs have been deleted from project cost estimate. Historical summary. Local interests withdrew support of project in 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. After 1982-1983 floods, local interests again indicated support of the project, and in October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. A revised final environmental impact statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a General Design Memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed June 20, 1986. Recreation Design Memorandum/LCA was submitted in March 1990. Construction work under Contract No. 1 and Contract No. 2 for Reach No. 1 of Wildcat Creek has been transferred to local sponsor for operation and maintenance. Decision Paper of March 1990 declared Reach 2 to be infeasible and recommended that status be changed to inactive. All costs have been deleted from project cost estimate. Overall project is about 80 percent complete. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL 'PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed unit of Fairfield Vicinity Streams; completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Merced County Stream group; Middle Creek (Lake County); Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; completed units of Red Bank and Fancher Creeks including Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $1,909,588 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA ($916,267). 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were $404,946. See Table 35-0 for list of studies. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $374,466, of which $316,982 was for disaster preparedness and $57,484 was for emergency water supplies and drought assistance. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $26,520. Bank protection was continued on Duchesne River, UT ($3,142) and on Spanish Creek, CA ($1,402) and was completed on San Joaquin River, Madera County, CA, Road No. 7 Bridge ($6,976), and on Wolf Creek, Plumas County, CA ($15,000). Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). No snagging and clearing activities this fiscal year. Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, one flood insurance study was initiated, eight flood insurance studies were continued, and six flood insurance studies were completed in accordance with the Inter-Agency Agreements EMW-E-2226, 2549, 2768 and 2994, respectively, at a fiscal year cost of $175,083 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Lost Creek, Pineview, Red Fleet, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; and Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, and Vallecito, CO, were prepared. Work was completed on the Don Pedro, Red Fleet and Ridgway draft water control manuals. Water control manual revisions were started for Buchanan and Hidden reservoirs. Work was initiated on the new Little Dell, Castle and Redbank and Fancher Creeks reservoir manuals. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $582,060. Total cost to September 30, 1990, was $4,911,843. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 29. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.). Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations 35-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. Approved estimated (October 1989) Federal cost is $394,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do so. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Continuation of land acquisition activities, $415,907; completion of Glory Hole recreation area sanitary system contract, $188,878, and Two-Mile Bar recreation contract, $3,302; continuation of Peoria Mountain revegetation contract, $94,373; and initiation of administration building contract, $15,774. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. A boundary fencing contract, Lower Stanislaus Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities contract, Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard contract, and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contract have been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities contract, McHenry recreation area contract, Tuttletown wastewater treatment contract, Knights Ferry recreation area contract, and Knights Ferry Covered Bridge contract, Glory Hole recreation area sanitary system contract and Two-Mile Bar recreation contract have been completed. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements and/or specific Congressional appropriation of funds. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. On December 20, 1982, the Court upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits have been attained. Project is about 99 percent complete. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Total fiscal year costs were $4,689,021, of which $3,225,934 was for flood damage prevention studies (in addition, $1,156,724 was expended from required cost contributions for feasibility cost shared studies and $15,853 was expended from other non-Federal contributions); $5,000 for coordination with Soil Conservation Service; $10,000 for coordination with Bureau of Reclamation pertaining to projects under reclamation program (including PL 984); $108,000 for special investigations; $25,000 for Intragency Water Resources Development; $29,000 for review of FERC licenses; and $105,010 for planning assistance to states ($65,500, CA; $6,308, UT; and $33,202, CO). 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of $393,278. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for environmental data studies were $1,500. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $7,000. 32. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10, 1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $1,283,039, of which $28,648 was for special studies, $874,372 was for analytical techniques, $169,528 for Water Source Interrelationships, $1,752 for risk assessment for Corps dams, $96,179 for earth resources satellites, $24,988 for planning assistance to states; $188 for hydrologic manual preparation, and $1,812 for Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Program, all at the Hydrologic Engineering Center. 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA Project is located on eastern slope of the Coast Range. Clear Lake unit is about 110 miles north of San Francisco and Settling unit is about 15 miles northwest of Sacramento. Plan of improvement consists of two project units: Upper basin at Clear Lake (selected plan)-widening and/or deepening 4.5 miles of existing 5 mile long Clear Lake outlet channel to a capacity of 8,000 cubic feet per second, and nonstructural measures; and lower basin at the mouth of Cache Creek-enlarging existing perimeter levees of Cache Creek Settling Basin an average of 12 feet to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity and enlarging existing project levees from settling basin mouth upstream to County Road 102, reconstructing and enlarging existing Cobble weir, degrading the existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to the western perimeter levee to allow utilization of entire basin for sediment deposition, acquiring easements for 3,600 acres of existing settling basin and establishing a wildlife refuge; however, the refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. The second project unit-Cache Creek Settling Basin-is reported under Improvement No. 6. General Design Memorandum for the Clear Lake Outlet Channel (Upper Basin) which was completed at a fiscal year cost of $118,356, indicated that project was not economically feasible. Preconstruction planning estimate for the Outlet Works is $2,330,000. COTTONWOOD CREEK, CA Project will be located on main stem and the North, South, and Middle Forks of Cottonwood Creek on eastern slope of the Coast Range and southern slope of Trinity Range between cities of Redding and Red Bluff, CA, and was authorized by the 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed). Plan of improvement provides for two multiple-purpose reservoirs, one at Dutch Gulch (capacity 900,000 acre-feet) and one at Tehama (capacity 700,000 acre-feet), and includes base facilities for future installation of hydropower generating equipment. Advance Engineering and Design activities were essentially discontinued in FY 1985 as by the letter of June 25, 1985, the State of California indicated they could not financially participate in the project at this time. Work remaining for this project is a cultural resources contract with California State University regarding an archeological site. Work at Cottonwood Creek was done long ago, but work at Black Butte Dam was added to the contract and this part is still unfinished. 35-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 COYOTE CREEK, CA (KNOWN AS COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS) Project is located in the cities of San Jose and Milpitas immediately south of San Francisco Bay in Santa Clara County, CA. Plan of improvement on Coyote Creek consists of overflow channels and offset levees. Improvement on Berryessa Creek includes two sedimentation basins at the upstream end of the concrete lined trapezoidal channel and offset levees. Combined plan would provide flood protection from Coyote and Berryessa Creeks to cities of San Jose and Milpitas, which include large industrial complexes and some residential development. General Design Memorandums were continued on Coyote and Berryessa Creeks. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $4,000,000. TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV Project is located in metropolitan area of Reno and Sparks in Washoe County, NV. Current plan of improvement consists of about 7 miles of levees, 5 miles of floodwalls, 3 bridge replacements along Truckee River and includes limited channel excavation, a detention dam on Steamboat Creek at Huffaker Narrows, and backwater levees along Steamboat Creek, Boynton Slough, and the North Truckee Drain just north of the Interstate Highway 80 crossing. Plan also includes recreation facilities with bicycle and pedestrian paths, river overlooks, and picnic sites; mitigation measures (31 acres of riparian plantings to replace vegetation losses); and fish and wildlife features. Project will provide flood protection from Truckee River to cities of Reno and Sparks and Truckee Meadows urban areas. General Design Memorandum was continued. Preconstruction planning is currently unscheduled. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $4,300,000. NAPA RIVER, CA Project is located in city and county of Napa, CA. Current plan of improvement consists of channel excavation, floodwalls, set-back levees, bypass channels, and related environmental mitigation measures. The improvements on Napa River would extend about 5.7 miles, from Trancas Street to Kennedy Park. Approximately 4,200 feet of Napa Creek, from its mouth to Jefferson Street, would also be improved. Project will provide 100-year level of flood protection from Napa River and Napa Creek to city of Napa. A hazard and toxic waste investigation is a new requirement and is being included in the current General Design Memorandum. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $9,200,000. 34. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY Under the Aquatic Plant Control Program (River and Harber Act of 1958, sec. 104, Public Law 500, 85th Congress) a reconnaissance report regarding the hydrilla problem in Sacramento District was initiated in October 1989. Report is nearing completion. Infestations of hydrilla pose a significant threat to Sacramento River, the Delta and associated water systems. Due to seriousness of hydrilla infestation situation, a science advisory panel composed of experts from the Corps Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Department of Food and Agriculture, Tennessee Valley Authority, University of Florida, and the Imperial Irrigation District in southern California met in September 1989 to examine the problem. Their report expressed concern about further spread of hydrilla and recommended an assortment of chemical biological and mechanical methods to combat this noxious aquatic weed. Hydrilla was discovered in Madera and Mariposa counties, at Eastman Lake and in Chowchilla River in June 1989. Eastman Lake was quarantined. Once hydrilla is established in a water system, use of that system for recreational, domestic or agricultural purposes becomes severely limited or impossible. Eastman Lake has been drawn down to allow desiccation of exposed hydrilla plants. After top growth died, herbicides were applied to exposed lake bottom to prevent regrowth. River is being treated with copper-based herbicide "Komeen" which is not harmful to fish. Additional controls will include continued use of herbicides, and mechanical as well as biological methods. Corps will complete the reconnaissance report in 1991. Preparation of a State Design Memorandum and operation of this program will be cost shared 50-50 with the State of California. Fiscal year costs were $9,417. 35-24 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 1. Sacramento River CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (Required Contrib. Funds) 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) 4. San Joaquin River, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Buchanan Dam- New Work H.V. Eastman Lake, Approp. Chowchilla River, Cost CA (Federal Maint. Funds) Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 6. Cache Creek New Work Settling Basin, CA Approp. Cost 7. Calaveras River New Work and Littlejohn Approp. Creek and Trib- Cost utaries including Maint. New Hogan Lake Approp. & Farmington Dam, Cost CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 8. Corte Madera New Work Creek, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost $3,973,000 3,914,755 85,000 - - - - $40,331,192 1 - - - 40,331,192 1 $249,000 $150,700 $851,029 44,147,360 2 267,263 188,435 435,174 43,712,658 3 - - - 85,000 4 400,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 450,454 996,359 1,520,808 - - 750,000 - - 600,803 509,000 -6,476 700,000 631,142 4,362,474 5 3,605,142 5 1,450,000 1,231,945 3,137,000 2,547,000 1,676,000 2,901,000 57,717,000 6 4,354,831 1,750,433 2,635,686 1,645,007 56,190,660 7 778,000 764,102 - - - 5,833,117 8 - - - 5,833,117 8 92,500 48,500 109,661 12,976,137 s 92,763 54,591 105,669 12,961,931 9 - - - - 27,369,597 - - - - 27,369,597 1,150,000 1,306,500 1,224,800 1,031,893 11,439,693 1,062,828 1,298,349 1,238,494 988,885 11,258,441 - - - - 111,187 - - - - 111,187 217,000 21,396 - 450,000 195,375 118,862 10 10 667,000 335,633 - - - - 23,723,144 - - - - 23,723,144 1,740,300 1,515,200 1,779,600 1,542,127 19,719,396 1,641,032 1,629,933 1,715,926 1,409,970 19,410,334 4,000 6,780 1,325,000 1,869,610 11,109 144 1,223,000 310,625 20,000 4,052 11 11 12 12 - 1,398,251 13 14 15 - 1,398,251 13 14 15 -800,000 307,000 12,313,725 16 414,832 230,864 12,134,380 16 7,888 3,510 186,095 17 18 175,016 17 18 35-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 (Contrib. Funds, Other) 9. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 10. Guadalupe River, CA 11. Hidden Dam - Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 12. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 13. Kaweah and Tule Rivers including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 14. Little Dell Lake, UT (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 15. Lower San Joaquin River, CA New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 103,880 -20,000 582,000 3,892,000 998,510 2,264,005 - 27,000 - 9,618 200,000 620,000 - 608,438 739,000 435.345 786,921 19 762,222 20 2,939,000 4,260,133 9,000 13,115 1,886,000 961,970 2,135,000 2,556,001 22,000 15,211 525,000 1,354,036 11,615,000 11,510,184 58,000 37,944 3,231,000 21 2,924,444 22 625,000 661,000 739,000 2,789,000 821,612 717,234 495,497 2,486,510 - - - - 30,555,426 - - - - 30,555,426 918,000 1,102,800 1,126,100 1,130,718 12,136,118 893,031 1,129,940 1,096,138 1,085,236 12,007,895 - - - - 165,112 23 - - - - 165,112 23 - 24,450,537 24 - 24,450,537 24 3,882,598 3,863,211 20,000 10,320 1,810,000 1,794,140 80,000 69,885 2,145,000 2,027,598 105,000 109,422 1,962,566 1,874,165 60,000 74,314 33,240,162 25 26 32,881,831 25 26 703,000 27 701,941 28 - 34,997,230 29 - 34,997,230 29 2,164,000 2,076,605 105,000 114,581 2,500,000 1,443,225 3,260,000 2,250,170 900,000 132,867 2,180,700 2,314,446 185,000 184,483 1,750,000 2,482,603 660,000 496,240 710,000 1,983,921 2,125,600 2,053,516 51,000 107,190 2,266,701 2,113,057 64,000 62,501 29,710,526 30 29,396,750 30 602,420 31 32 34 594,944 31 32 35as 7,025,000 9,770,000 25,189,900 4,213,530 8,566,097 20,636,958 2,840,000 1,762,627 50,465 25,546 100,000 -49,000 197,045 450,299 6,100,000 4,138,434 9,600,000 6,397,301 - 4,320,465 36 24,528 4,284,164 37 - 4,049,000 249,048 4,016,248 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV, and CA 17. Merced County Streams, CA (Federal Funds) Contrib. Funds, Other) 18. Merced County Stream Group, CA 19. Pajaro River Basin, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 272,000 282,598 - - - 8,504,989 38 - - - 8,504,989 38 283,000 266,100 306,033 4,825,483 285,589 273,026 293,537 4,789,204 450,000 100,000 3,602,000 319,218 121,958 333,016 - - 2,582,500 - - 615,811 113,000 118,837 480,000 101,162 61,000 650 21,000 - -469,000 10,233,000 461,860 7,707,321 - 2,582,500 39 285,153 900,963 39 - - - 2,751,259 40 - - - 2,751,259 40 107,000 117,000 100,534 1,878,040 104,771 122,833 98,652 1,861,120 1,622,000 673,441 549,000 102,234 16,250 25,890 2,713,000 237,189 3,709,447 127,268 325,214 5,663 - 7,084,968 41 6,981,216 41 610,000 555,367 37,250 42 31,553 42 20. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 21. Redbank and New Work Fancher Creeks, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 22. Russian River Basin, CA, Coyote Valley Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - - - - 43,356,265 4 - - - - 43,356,265 4 1,395,000 2,054,500 1,387,000 1,393,797 24,478,582 45 1,365,827 2,042,413 1,450,874 1,337,111 24,330,409 4 - - - - 110,000 46 - - - - 110,000 46 685,000 468,756 10,000 1,100,000 908,733 250,000 138,073 4,053,000 1,101,483 202,500 124,396 10,270,000 12,714,707 1,340,000 1,121,482 620,000 95,000 16,957,065 47 16,007,473 47 1,802,500 1,383,951 620,000 48 95,000 48 - - - - 14,435,869 49 - - - - 14,435,869 49 3,467,102 1,778,000 1,646,600 1,566,640 31,147,423 so5501 3,445,754 1,755,996 1,614,367 1,540,757 30,931,383 50sos5 1 5,000 21.290 5,000 3,825 2,000 430 1,500 246,911 52 3,720 246,332 * 35-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 23. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 24. Walnut Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 25. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 26. Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA including and Stanislaus Tuolumne Rivers, CA, New Melones Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 12,670,000 8,577,136 1,962,000 1,864,917 55,000 60,698 7,574,000 6,714,273 2,058,000 2,007,449 400,000 969,483 100,000 78,785 7,700,000 6,049,719 1,026,834 625,832 2,323,166 1,672,179 2,800,000 2,606,849 15,158 140,472 265,000 302,467 6,830,000 7,915,389 593,000 608,037 6,600,000 9,292,267 2,307,000 2,378,477 73,000 57,926 9,216,000 7,968,616 1,123,500 1,136,243 2,476,000 609,953 40,000 62,582 3,935,000 6,398,725 130,000 474,213 3,674,950 3,858,569 4,661,000 1,104,454 575,000 71,359 260,000 184,140 4,664,000 3,312,754 637,000 620,542 8,099 1,900,000 2,701,746 2,244,700 2,254,939 20,000 31,714 4,450,000 5,634,386 1,242,100 1,183,415 1,210,000 1,921,720 15,000 17,604 4,400,000 2,544,540 260,000 238,792 1,958,714 1,513,579 1,621,000 2,515,019 -190,000 150,107 465,000 528,470 2,500,000 2,039,696 602,400 600,157 5,035,000 3,732,002 2,2 1,9 319,654,645 54 316,523,060 54 79,643 15,994,343 55 59,296 15,503,254 56 - 208,000 57 1,555 195,674 58 3,550,000 2,294,494 1,217,694 1,178,635 277,500 456,274 9,000 7,439 8,324,000 8,456,104 410,000 529,722 2,285,886 2,983,724 865,000 2,072,816 74,000 96,745 516,000 550,355 1,352,753 689,716 579,537 117,433,008 s59 o60 114,894,016 59 60 18,518,628 61 18,314,516 61 22,919,038 21,741,287 2,815,362 62 63 2,813,763 62 63 64 67,806,430 65 65,598,724 66 5,165,081 67 5,114,670 68 13,117,787 69 12,817,280 69 12,403,000 10,486,300 624,158 458,683 1,666,000 70 1,565,432 71 361,150,996 72 358,303,515 73 5,432,316 5,267,352 80,000 74 12,585 75 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,897,232 for shallow-draft and $27,626,408 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,838,000 for shallow-draft and $27,250,937 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 4. Includes $85,000 contributed funds, other, from Sacramento-Yolo Port District for clearing and grubbing on dredged material deposit areas to be used on ship channel maintenance dredging work. 5. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($33,474) for Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 6. Includes $26,205,000 funds for Sacramento District and $31,511,200 for San Francisco District. 7. Includes $25,999,704 funds for Sacramento District and $30,190,956 for San Francisco District. 8. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds. 10. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 11. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: Total to date $897,742. 12. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and costs at New Hogan Lake, and $265,000 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at New Hogan Lake beginning in FY 1988. 13. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $108,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 14. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 15. Includes $104,000 contributed funds, other, from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 16. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 17. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. 18. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 19. Contributed funds, other, from Marin County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $250,000 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 20. Contributed funds, other, costs including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $225,300 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 21. Includes $3,208,000 contributed funds, other, from State of California for relocations (automotive type bridges) at Laurel Creek Diversion near Fairfield, and $23,000 from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract for channel development on Laurel Creek. 22. Includes $2,297,552 contributed funds, other, costs from State of California for relocations at Laurel Creek Diversion and $18,454 contributed funds, other, costs from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract. 23. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 24. Includes $2,199,085 Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake, and $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 25. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees and costs at Isabella Lake. 26. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake beginning in FY 1985. 27. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula and $265,000 for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 28. Includes $263,941 contributed funds, other, costs for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 29. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date $704,000. 30. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees and costs at Success Lake. 31. Contributed funds, other, from the State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 32. Includes $392,000 contributed funds, other, from the Kaweah River Power Authority, Visalia, CA, for Terminus Dam hydropower studies. 33. Includes $387,600 contributed funds, other, costs for Terminus Dam hydropower studies. 34. Includes $168,000 contributed funds, other, from DITT Inc., Paris, France, for hydropower studies at Success Lake. 35. Includes $164,924 contributed funds, other, costs for Success Lake hydropower studies. 36. Includes $4,320,465 contributed funds, from the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 35-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 37. Includes $4,284,154 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 38. Includes $1,200, initiation of the plans and specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. 39. Includes contributed funds, other, for lands, easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam from State of California. 40. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations for Merced County Stream Group. 41. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds and costs and $260,000 Sacramento general investigation funds and costs for Pajaro River. 42. Includes $37,250 contributed funds, other, from Santa Clara Valley Water District for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 43. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date $1,595,100. 44. Includes Public Works Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities and $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 45. Includes $158,300 special recreation use fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake, and $228,785 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 46. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 47. Includes the unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($29,065) and FY 1986 allocation for Redbank and Fancher Creeks to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 48. Includes contributed funds, other, from Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District for road relocation (Nees Avenue) at Fancher Dam. 49. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds; $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 50. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 51. Includes $1,063,680 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985, FY 1986, FY 1987, FY 1988, FY 1989 and 1990. 52. Includes $246,911 contributed funds, other, from city of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 53. Includes $246,332 contributed fund, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 54. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 55. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 56. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 57. Includes $208,000 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies. 58. Includes $195,674 contributed fund, other costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies. 59. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 60. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 61. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees and costs at Black Butte Lake. 62. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and Major and Minor tributaries project). Includes State Highway Commission payment, $789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 63. Includes $41,984, contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $15,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; and $339,000 contributed funds, other, from the city of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake. 64. Includes $337,401 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies. 65. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds for Walnut Creek. 66. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs for Walnut Creek. 67. Includes $450,268 San Francisco required contributed funds for Walnut Creek. 68. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required contributed costs for Walnut Creek. 69. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other, and contributed fund costs for Walnut Creek. 35-30 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 70. Includes $1,666,000 contributed funds, other, from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 71. Includes $1,565,432 contributed funds, other costs for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 72. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries and Tuolomne River Basin, California). (See Table 35-E) 73. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 74. Includes $80,000 contributed funds, other, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones lake. 75. Includes $12,585 contributed funds, other, costs from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 35-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 1990 1 Cache Creek Basin, New Work CA Approp. $640,000 $280,000 293,000 $269,000 $2,080,336 2 Cost 514,136 502,475 356,775 309,365 2,058,033 Cache Creek New Work Settling Basin, CA Approp. - - 486,000 -12,000 474,000 Cost - - 99,032 374,936 473,969 Caliente Creek, CA New Work Approp. - - 60,000 - 60,000 Cost - - 58,303 1,688 59,991 Cottonwood Creek, New Work Approp. - - - - 15,765,000 Cost 4,979 -29,988 38,738 - 15,759,197 Coyote and Berryessa New Work Creeks, CA Approp. - 100,000 714,000 535,000 1,349,000 Cost - 64,285 357,290 695,054 1,116,629 Dry Creek, New Work Roseville, CA Approp. - - 59,000 -59,000 - Cost- - - - - Napa River, CA New Work Approp. - - 750,000 1,313,000 2,063,000 2 Cost - - 455,470 1,399,940 1,855,409 Sacramento River New Work Flood Control Approp. - - - 493,000 493,000 (G.C.I.D.), CA Cost - - - 107,838 107,838 Truckee Meadows, New Work NV Approp. - 440,000 1,528,000 1,356,000 3,324,000 Cost - 180,377 1,105,270 1,600,783 2,886,430 1. Beginning in FY 1982, Advance Engineering and Design (Preconstruction, Engineering and Design) programs are funded under General Investigations Appropriations. 2. Includes FY 1985 unobligated carryover and FY 1986 allocation for CP&E funds and all AE&D funds to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 3. Excludes $2,639,955 funds and costs for a previous flood control project. (See Table 35-E.) 35-32 TABLE 35-B SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1987 8. Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 17, 1986 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento. H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., works. 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). For work above Sacramento. H. Doe. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess. 1 The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 1st sess. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa Rivers and Harbors and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing Committee Doc. 35, at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers 73d Cong., 2d sess. is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Rivers and Harbors Federal Government of $12 million in cost Committee Doc. 35, of Shasta Reservoir. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., River, CA, to provide for construction of a ship 2d sess. channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. Deauthorization of shallow-draft channel, Colusa Sec. 1002, 1986 WRDA to Red Bluff, feature of project for navigation, Sacramento River, California. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as 2d sess. modified by Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to Sec. 204, 1966 Flood provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward Control Act. cost of Ross Valley unit. Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit Sec. 823, 1986 WRDA 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. 21. May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., 2d sess. PL 404, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 35-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA 22. Dec. 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 May 12, 1967 Mar. 7, 1974 June 19, 1975 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., to provide for extensions in levees and other 2d sess. 2 structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. Improvements for protection of Upper Butte Basin H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., (included full monetary authorization). 1st sess. 2 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning 2d sess. 2 area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Further modification of Sacramento River Flood S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., Control Project by construction of initial 10- year phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. Additional authorization of $7 million for bank PL 90-17 protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Initiation of construction of second phase of bank PL 93-251 erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose. 3 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Reservoir. 4 Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-34 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - $ 5,7521 2 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA Completed 1974 $ 8,3543 93,4944 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,1325 6 - Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,185 7 631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,1518 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,928s 10 11 3,316,62212 13 Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,48913 14 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,728 15 - 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, damages and public landings. Remaining portion of project, consisting of side channel at Orwood and completion of project channels from mouth of Old River to Lammers Ferry road and from Crocker Cut to Holly Sugar Factory was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveras River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58,901 for previous project. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal year 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA Completed American River, CA Completed Aquatic Plant Control, CA Completed Big Cry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Completed Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT Completed Burch Creek, Weber County, UT Chester, CA Active/no FY 90 expenditure Coyote Creek, CA Completed Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA Completed East Weaver Creek, CA Completed Folsom Lake, American River, CA Completed Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA Completed Kays Creek, UT Completed Kern River-California Adqueduct Intertie, CA Completed Klamath River, CA Completed Lake Camanche, CA Completed Lake Oroville, CA Completed Lakeport Lake, CA Active/no FY 90 expenditure Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Completed Marysville Lake, CA Active/no FY 90 expenditure Merced River, CA Completed Middle Creek, CA Completed Mormon Slough, CA Completed Napa River Basin, CA Active/no FY 90 expenditure New Bullards Bar, CA Completed North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Completed Pinole Creek, CA Completed Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Completed Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Completed Rheem Creek, CA Completed Rodeo Creek, CA Completed Salinas River, CA Inactive Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT Completed San Leandro Creek, CA Completed San Lorenzo Creek, CA Completed San Lorenzo River, CA Completed Sevier River near Redmond, UT Completed Sonoma Creek, CA Inactive Truckee River and tributaries, Active/no FY 90 CA and NV expenditure 1978 1959 1967 1955 1961 1964 1981 1968 1967 1965 1957 1963 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1976 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1974 1968 1970 1969 1962 1966 1952 1961 1973 1962 1966 1952 1973 1968 $26,995,350 2,125,8 18 3 1,000 1,369,9314 217,8795 6 26,049 5 3,570,000 7 705,622 1 5 664,825 5 8 220,636 1 5 9 63,014,810 10 136,026 6 11 407,989 6 12 1,503,073 6 13 4,838,000 1 10,252,950 14 70,425,470 15 2,353,003 16 27,835,263 17 - 18 10,918,796 19 2,643,499 20 2,965,40221 2,639,955 1 22 12,890,625 23 904,278 5 24 25 885,750 1 5 4,620,070 1 26 133,3395 27 400,000 1 28 974,100 1 5 94,213 1 29 1,227,570 30 1,000,000 1 31 5,130,8211 32 4,314,406 1 33 919,000 34 781,500 1 a6 1,038,960 35-36 $54,778 1 2 I - SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 6. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. 8. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 9. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 10. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 11. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 12. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocations. 13. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non-Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). 14. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $34,988,536. 15. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,105) for flood control reservation. Project prevented $500,000 in damages from the FY 1989 rainfloods. 16. Lakeport Lake was deauthorized November 17, 1986, and was reauthorized November 17, 1988. 17.Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (nonproject) at local interest expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-of-way for levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries. 18. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 19. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District, Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 20. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 21. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (FY 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 22. This project was reclassified as "active" on August 3, 1987. 23. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 24. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 25. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility alterations. 26. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 27. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. 28. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 29. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 (FY 1962 - 1963) to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 30. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. Project prevented $500,000 in damages from the May-July 1989 snowmelt runoff. 31. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 32. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 33. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). 35. Placed inactive 1974. 35-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 35-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Alhambra Creek, CA 1981 1986 $ 300,000 - Bear River, CA 1980 1986 - - Eel River, CA 1971 1986 1,272,816 - Gleason Creek, NV 1977 1986 215,826 - Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV 1982 1986 1,532,932 - Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 - - Mad River Basin, CA 1973 1986 4,243,750 - Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 - Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 - (Morgan County) TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Range in Feet Miles from Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Mouth of Tidal 1 Tidal 2 Flood 3 Flood 4 Place River Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.0 2 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 2. Tide at low water season only. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. 35-38 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT 1 (See Section 4 of Text) Federal Non-Federal 2 Modification Corps of Engineers (Construction) Coast Guard (Construction) Required Cash Contribution Lands and Damages (including Relocations) Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,170 Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,000 $2,519,500 $8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECTS UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 4 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineer Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff 1 $1,073,000 $ 30,000 $ 200,000 $ 230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel 2 s 7,882,0003 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement 4 s 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. 3. For lands and construction. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. 5. Deauthorized November 17, 1986. 35-39 Total Total Project REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 35-K RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 22 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,000 1 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake: Channel Improvements below Dam 258,600,000 103,220,000 361,820,000 Total $273,036,000 $108,818,000 $381,854,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use at completed projects. of storage is initiated and exclusive of lands and 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal damages. Government for costs allocated to water supply storage TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 22 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet- 122,500 $ 17,550,000 1 Mendocino) of Russian River Earthfill Channel Improvements (East Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork) Fork below Coyote Valley Dam Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian - - and lower 98 miles of River Russian River) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet- 381,000 358,974,000 Earthfill Channel Improvements (Dry Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 2,846,000 Creek) below Dry Creek Creek (Warm Springs Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 35-40 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-M SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 23 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek 2 Inactive $1,400,000 $ 340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin 3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomas Creek 2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek 2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees 4 Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees 4 Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin 2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 4. July 1961 price level. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 23 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 42 initiation (Bank protection, selected sites on Sacramento River, miles 23.6-56.7, and Georgiana, Steamboat and Sutter Sloughs) $168,302 $67,075 $235,377 Contract 43 initiation (Bank protection, selected sites on Feather River, Colusa Basin Drain, and Sutter and Yolo Bypasses 230,276 39,821 270,047 35-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 35-0 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 27 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Stage Cost Ashley Creek near Vernal, UT 1 Reconnaissance $ 1,226 Bitter Creek at Rock Springs, WY Feasibility 48,830 Blacksmith Fork River, Logan, UT 1 Reconnaissance 305 Burch and Jewett Creeks near Corning, CA Reconnaissance 28,589 Carson River below Lahontan Dam, Fallon, NV Reconnaissance 34,584 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO Feasibility 45,505 Colorado River at Riverside, CO Reconnaissance 47,194 Elder and Unionhouse Creeks, CA Reconnaissance 16,054 Henson Creek, Lake City, CO Reconnaissance 29,889 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA Reconnaissance 20,921 Roaring Fork River near Basalt, CO 1 Reconnaissance 3,311 Sacramento River near Hamilton City, CA 1 Reconnaissance 39,440 Sacramento River, Tehama, CA Reconnaissance 2,797 Salado Creek near Patterson, CA Reconnaissance 24,267 Settlement Canyon Dam near Tooele, UT Reconnaissance 49,453 White River at Meeker, CO 1 Reconnaissance 12.581 $404,946 1. No further studies recommended. 35-42 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION The Pacific Ocean Division is an operating division with both district and division functions. Its civil works responsibilities encompass the State of Hawaii, the Territory of Guam, the Territory of American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The division is unique in that the area of responsibility is totally comprised of islands dispersed over an ocean environment exceeding 6 million square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii ...... 2. Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ............. 3. Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii . 4. Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ........................ 5. Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ..... 6. Maalaea Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ........... 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 8. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... Erosion Control 9. Lepua Area, American Samoa ........... 10. Masefau Bay, American Samoa ........... 11. Sand Island Shore Protection Oahu, Hawaii ........................ 12. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ........................ . Page 36-2 36-2 36-2 36-2 36-2 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-4 Flood Control 13. 14. 15. 16. Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii .......... Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii ....... Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii ........... Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 36-4 36-4 36-4 36-4 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 17. Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia ........... General Investigations 18. Surveys ............................. 19. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ Page 36-4 36-5 36-5 Tables Table 36-A Cost and Financial Statement .... 36-6 Table 36-B Authorizing Legislation .......... 36-8 Table 36-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 36-10 Table 36-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ......... 36-11 Table 36-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 36-12 Table 36-F Not Applicable Table 36-G Deauthorized Projects ........... 36-13 Table 36-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 ................. 36-14 Table 36-I Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 .......... 36-14 Table 364J Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103 ......... 36-15 Table 36-K Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 .................. 36-15 Table 36-L Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 208 .................. 36-15 36-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Navigation 1. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the west coast of Oahu, about 25 miles from metropolitan Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 4110 and 4133) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-1 of the FY84 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-1 of the FY85 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. See page 36-2 of the FY84 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract for project beautification and revetment construction was completed in July 1990 at a total cost of $761,430 of which $282,930 was in Federal costs and $478,500 in non-Federal costs. Maintenance: Annual operational cost for the Regional Visitor Center located at Fort DeRussy was $56,298. 2. HILO HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. On the northeast coast of the island of Hawaii in the city of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19324) Existing project. The authorized plan provides for dredging the 35-foot deep Federal basin within Hilo Harbor to provide a 39-foot entrance and a 38-foot deep turning basin. The harbor basin lines will be realigned slightly from the existing location to allow a larger ship turning radius, while retaining the same net project area. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement will be prepared during the plans and specifications stage. Terminal facilities. Three piers, and pipelines for petroleum products, liquid fertilizer and molasses, owned by the State, and privately owned facilities for handling bulk commodities and for storage of sugar, molasses, petroleum products and liquid fertilizer. Equipment includes heavy-tilt cranes. Facilities are open to all on equal terms and considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Funds were provided to initiate preconstruction engineering and design efforts. An economic analysis is underway to determine shipment data to reflect load-out drafts. The General Design Memorandum is scheduled for completion in August 1991. 3. KAULANA BAY BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. On the southern tip of the island of Hawaii in the Ka'u Judicial District about 80 road miles southwest of the city of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-2 of the FY84 Annual Report. Total project cost estimate is $828,000 of which Federal cost is $751,000 and non-Federal cost is $77,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are describedin full on page 36-3 of the FY82 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There is an existingboat launching ramp owned by the State of Hawaii and open to the public on an equal basis. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were updated and NEPA actions for the project were resumed. The project is currently held in abeyance pending resolution of archaeological and social issues as well as receipt of a State security plan. 4. KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. Kawaihae Harbor is located on the west coast of the island of Hawaii, approximately 85 nautical miles northeast of Hilo, County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-2 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) will be prepared during the plans and specifications phase. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. The estimated cost of preconstruction engineering and design (PED) is $408,000. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $175,904. PED was approximately 86% complete as of September 30, 1990. 5. LAUPAHOEHOE HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. Laupahoehoe is located on a peninsula on the northeast coast of the island of Hawaii, about 25 road miles northwest of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-2 of the FY87 Annual Report. 36-2 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-2 of the FY87 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The current facility includes a single lane, concrete paved launch ramp, roadways and parking areas. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract to improve navigation safety was completed in January 1990. 6. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Maalaea Bay is situated on the southwest coast of Maui, approximately 7 miles south of Wailuku, the county seat of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) will be prepared during the plans and specifications phase. Terminal facilities. There is an existing 1,000-foot long south breakwater, a 870-foot long east breakwater, 300-foot long wharf, 90-foot wide entrance channel, and a single lane launch ramp, all constructed by the State of Hawaii. Operations during fiscal year. The estimated cost of preconstruction engineering and design (PED) is $395,000. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $152,254. The GDM phase of PED was approximately 90% complete as of September 30, 1990. 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were conducted at Barbers Point Deep Draft Harbor, Oahu; Hilo Harbor, Hawaii; Honolulu Harbor, Oahu; Kahului Deep Draft Harbor, Maui; Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai; and Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai in May 1990 by the Portland District for $42,000. Additional surveys in American Samoa were conducted during March 1990 as a result of Hurricane Ofa at Auasi Small Boat Harbor, Aunuu Small Boat Harbor, Ofu Small Boat Harbor, and Tau Small Boat Harbor for $40,000. 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-H. Beach Erosion Control 9. LEPUA AREA, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. Lepua Village is located on the island of Tutuila, about two miles east of Pago Pago on the north side of the Pago Pago Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190, Manua Islands) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY88 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of the FY88 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to construct a revetment to protect the coastal highway was awarded in September 1989 for $1,459,640 of which $1,102,640 is Federal cost and $357,000 is non-Federal cost. Construction was approximately 12% complete as of September 30, 1990, and is scheduled for completion in February 1991. 10. MASEFAU BAY, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. Masefau Village is located on the north coast of the island of Tutuila. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190, Manua Islands) Existing project. The proposed plan consists of a 525 foot long revetment fronting the coastal road and elementary school in Masefau. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of the FY88 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in September 1989 for $329,525, all Federal costs. Construction was approximately 7% complete as of September 30, 1990, and is scheduled for completion in February 1991. 11. SAND ISLAND SHORE PROTECTION, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Sand Island is located on the southern coast of Oahu. Sand Island is approximately 520 acres in area and shelters Honolulu Harbor from the open sea. It is connected to the Kapalama peninsula by a bascule bridge at its western end. There is approximately 4,700 feet of shoreline on the south side of the island adjacent to the State park. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4109) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY89 Annual Report. 36-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-4 of the FY88 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed in April 1990 between the Department of the Army and the State of Hawaii. A construction contract was awarded in September 1990 for $2,205,999. Completion is scheduled for November 1991. Work was not initiated as of September 30, 1990. 12. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-I. Beach Erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-4. Flood Control 13. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. The Alenaio watershed is located in the South Hilo District on the island of Hawaii. Hilo is the principal urban center in the South Hilo district and the County seat for the County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 81408) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-4 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) will be prepared during the plans and specifications phase. Terminal facilities. None Operations during fiscal year. The General Design Memorandum was completed in March 1990. Plans and specifications were approximately 25% complete as of September 30, 1990. Additional project authorization is required since the estimated project cost exceeds the maximum cost limit. 14. KAHAWAINUI STREAM, OAHU, HAWAII Location. The Kahawainui Stream watershed is located on the northeastern coast of the island of Oahu. Laie is the principal urban center in the Kahawainui watershed. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4110) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-4 of the FY88 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-4 of the FY88 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. The construction contract was completed in April 1990 for a total cost of $3,867,451. Project was transferred to the City & County of Honolulu for operation and maintenance in May 1990. 15. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. The Kahoma Stream drainage basin is located in Lahaina, Maui. Lahaina is on the west coast of Maui, about 4 miles from Kaanapali. The drainage basin of Kahoma Stream totals 5.3 square miles. (See NOAA Chart 19348) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-5 of the FY84 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-4 of the FY86 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. The construction contract was completed in April 1990 at a total cost of $13,859,121 and dedicated in May 1990. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. (Preauthorization). See Table 36-K Flood control activities pursuant to Section 208 Public Law 83-780. (Preauthorization). See Table 36-L. Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 84-99. Federal cost during the fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $182,498 ofwhich $175,002 was for disaster preparedness and $7,496 for rehabilitation. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 17. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA Location. Nanpil River is located on the island of Pohnpei in the Federated States of Micronesia (See State of Hawaii, the New Pacific map). 36-4 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION Existing project. For a description of the existing project see page 36-4 of the FY85 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-5 of the FY85 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Plans for modifications to the existing facility are underway to include installation of guardrails on the access road, a sound suppression wall, additional storage space, and a self cleaning trash rack at the intake structure. A contract to provide training for the operation and maintenance of the project is underway and is scheduled to run through FY91. General Investigations 18. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $408,946 of which $19,601 was for navigation studies, $141,849 for flood damage prevention studies, $5,263 for shoreline protection studies, $40,967 for comprehensive studies, $87,976 for miscellaneous activities, and $113,291 for coordination with other agencies. 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206, PL 86-645,1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, floodwater velocity, extent of flooding, duration of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests and responses for technical services and planning assistance totaled 1,875. Of this total, 223 were from other federal agencies, 1,094 from non-Federal agencies, and 558 from individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and others. Of the 1,875 requests, assistance resulted in 2,322 site specific responses. Costs for providing Flood Plain Management services during the fiscal year were $205,149. Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $4,272. Total costs for collection and study of basic data during the fiscal year were $209,421. 36-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 1. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, HI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, HI (Federal Funds) 3. Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (Federal Funds) 4. Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (Federal Funds) 5. Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Maalaea Harbor Maui, HI (Federal Funds) 9. Lepua Area, American Samoa (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Masefau Bay, American Samoa (Federal Funds) 11. Sand Island Shore Protection, HI (Federal Funds) 13. Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, HI (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost -200,000 -87,348 110,159 --- -154,000 28,044 40,616 --- 8,452 129,600 85,450 3,520 1,737 --- 64,000 --- 60,269 --- 1,000 407,775 --- 197 407,968 --- 12,000 --- 9,193 1,743 1,064 --- 170,000 156,000 --- 149,759 175,904 22,000 3,195,000 26,172 3,027,525 --- 365,000 --- 151,000 60,000 24,966 Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost -115,986 279,095 181,416 --- 200,000 --- 125,660 30,440 88,000 151,254 --- 15,000 753,300 31,050 7,308 120,617 --- 87,475 --- 35,732 8,000 227,500 3,018 220,506 --- 25,000 --- 21,679 --- 25,000 402 23,651 177 10,000 -55 --- 300,000 96,000 358,000 --- 107,388 261,384 259,599 36-6 53,521,100 53,392,769 4,253,190 2,393,629 5,487,440 5,483,709 4,091,308 4,090,698 171,400 171,400 326,000 325,663 3,623,450 3,615,321 365,000 362,856 483,000 471,914 1,021,300 376,940 87,475 35,732 260,500 245,203 182,500 171,273 754,000 628,371 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To In Text Project Funding FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 Sept. 30, 1990 14. Kahawainui Stream, New Work: Oahu, HI Approp. 30,000 --- 3,220,000 310,000 3,910,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 65,805 7,700 2,122,548 1,364,633 3,864,856 (Contributed Contrib. -- --- 510,000 --- 510,000 Funds) Cost ----- 307,910 186,541 494,451 15. Kahoma Stream, New Work: Maui, HI Approp. 5,800,000 2,087,000 1,607,000 300,000 10,650,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 2,350,275 3,297,665 3,056,250 1,084,136 10,629,801 (Contributed Contrib. 416,550 311,440 -209,164 ---- 518,826 Funds) Cost 104,911 164,744 146,882 101,608 518,145 17. Nanpil River New Work: Hydropower, Approp. 530,000 500,000 --- 120,000 7,324,000 Pohnpei, FSM Cost 4,090,598 703,045 290,511 183,039 7,207,963 (Federal Funds) 36-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized 1. Oct. 27, 1965 2. Mar. 2, 1907 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 27, 1965 6. Aug. 3, 1968 13. 15. Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 22, 1976 BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII An entrance channel 42 feet deep, 450 feet wide, and 3,100 feet long; an inshore basin of about 46 acres, 28 feet deep, a breakwater on the north side of the entrance channel, if model study shows it to be necessary; spending beaches with wave absorbers within the harbor totaling 1,320 feet in length; and a main access channel 12 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long to a smallboat harbor on the west side of the deep-draft harbor to be developed by local interests. HILO HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII For rubblemound breakwater. Dredging entrance of Kuhio Bay without increasing original limit of cost. Extension of the breakwater and dredging in the bay. Dredge the existing 35-foot deep basin within Hilo Harbor to provide a 39-foot deep entrance and a 35-foot deep turning basin. KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII An 850-foot long, 120-foot wide, and 12-foot deep entrance channel; a 1.2 acre and 12-foot deep existing turning basin; a 640-foot long, 80-foot wide, and 8-foot deep access channel; a 1,225-foot long west protective revetstructure; a 1,050-foot long east protective revetted structure a 400-foot long wave absorber; and a 2.5 acre, 650-foot long revetted offshore island MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII A 620-foot long extension of the south breakwater, a new 610-foot length, 150 to 180-foot width, 12 to 15-foot depth entrance channel, a 1.7 acre and 12-foot depth turning basin and a 720-foot length, 80-foot width and an 8-foot deep access channel ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Project consists of approximately 1,640-feet of concrete-lined channel; floodproofing five individual structures, relocation of one public and six residential structures and incorporating floodplain management regulations for undeveloped areas KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII A debris basin 100-feet wide and 700-feet long with a capacity of 22,000 cubic yards; a rock sill, a diversion levee which is 80-feet long to direct flows into the concrete channel; a concrete trapezoidal channel about 5,280-feet long; three concrete bridges with clear span of 50 feet; and revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the stream mouth. H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 407, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 417, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 235, 68th Cong. Sec 202, PL 99-662 Sec 301, PL 89-298 Cong., 1st sess. Sec 101, PL 90-438 Cong., 2nd sess. Sec 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc 94-488, 94th Cong.,2nd sess. 36-8 See Section in Text Documents PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 20, 1980 Dec. 8, 1983 NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FSM Construction of a hydroelectric power facility. Appropriation of funds for a feasibility study and construction of a hydroelectric project. Sec. 101, PL 96-205 Sec. 2, PL 98-213 36-9 17. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 36-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam Completed 1978 $ 937,7981 $ 52,550 AgatHarbor, Guam Completed 1989 1,998,812 2- Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,033,015 3-- Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,783,1294 186,737 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1978 527,047 5 208,902 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1971 781,0366 63,693 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 16,044,095 2,557,972 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1976 751,867 8 --- Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1984 7,203,2219 7,287,654 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1968 157,997 8 3,127 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1981 5,983,50110 61,800 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1956 3,348,000 11 41,857 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Active 1981 193,000 --- Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Completed 1986 372,00012 495,256 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1987 2,127,72413 10,116,779 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1976 584,51314 30,707 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1976 980,018 15 683,486 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1979 432,5238 --- Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1984 752,64516 1,172,833 Rota Harbor, CNMI Completed 1985 2,000,000 17 420,055 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI Active 1982 194,000 --- Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1985 1,991,5691s 65,000 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1979 1,940,01119 85,852 Welles Harbor, Midway Island Completed 1950 2,448,056 20 2,111 1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $282,474 for Construction. 2In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,239,364 for Construction. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $231,437 for Construction. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. 6In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. ?In addition, Contributed Funds of $201,282 for Construction. 8Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 9In addition, Contributed Funds of $30,200 for Construction. 10In addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. 11Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th Congress, 1st Session). 12In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. 1"In addition, Contributed Funds of $223,261 for Construction. 14Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. 15Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. 16In addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. 1 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $774,373 for Construction. " Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $54,034 for Construction. 19In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 20Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 36-10 TABLE 36-1) PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 $ 254,0151 $ --- Asquiroga Bay, Guam Completed 1986 227,1812-- Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 240,148 3-- Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,4884 --- Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158,916 .--- Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999,996 6 Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154,313 _--- Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,4728 --- Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa Completed 1984 225,000 2 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa Completed 1987 189,500 --- Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa Completed 1984 174,9412-- Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Deferred 1978 394,187 9._ Poloa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 136,04010 o Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1981 301,879 11--- Vatia Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 154,30912-- Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1979 729,08713 93,000 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. I31n addition, $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $97,075 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $56,916 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed funds. ?Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. 8Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition, $177,300 in Contributed Funds. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $312,480 in Contributed Funds. 1oAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $101,547 in Contributed Funds. "11Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $255,728 in Contributed Funds. 12Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $132,075 in Contributed Funds 1"In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contributed Funds. 36-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 36-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Project Status Report for: Cost to September 30, 1990 Construction Operations and Maintenance Agana River, Guam Inactive 1989 $ 250,000 $ --- Asan Village, Guam Completed 1986 1,275,500 --- Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 784,8671 --- lao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1985 12,285,000 --- Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,400 2 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,478 3__ Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,567 --- Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,000 4 --- Namo River, Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 s- Paauau Stream, Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,514 --- Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1966 1,044,888 --- 1In addition, $11,953 in Contributed Funds. 2Includes Non-Federal reimbursement of recreation construction cost of $5,668,300. In addition, $8,175 in Contributed Funds. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $540,335 in Contributed Funds. 36-12 TABLE 36-G Project Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawa Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Ha Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawa Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, Hawaii Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kaunakakai SmallDraft Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawai Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, Ha Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hi Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date See Annual and Report for: Authority 1976 November 1986 PL 99-662 1967 November 1977 HD #94-413 ii 1967 November 1981 HD #97-59 1965 November 1986 PL 99-662 waii 1972 January 1990 PL 99-662 1967 January 1990 PL 99-662 i 1975 July 1981 Director of Civil Works 1979 July 1981 Director of Civil Works 1966 January 1990 PL 99-662 --- January 1990 PL 99-662 1976 September 1975 Director of Civil Works i 1977 January 1990 PL 99-662 1972 January 1990 PL 99-662 waii --- January 1990 PL 99-662 awaii 1967 January 1990 PL 99-662 August 1981 Director of Civil Works 1,481 86,235 221,500 133,188 98,800 186,937 30,378 80,764 Contributed Funds Expended 292,441 36-13 ---- --- Federal Funds Expended $ 40,117 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 36-G (Cont'd) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii --- November 1986 --- --- PL 99-662 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 November 1986 --- -- PL 99-662 TABLE 36-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Apra Harbor, Gdam 32,444 East Hawaii Light Draft Navigation Facility, Hawaii, Hawaii 38,297 Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 81,131 Mahukona (North Kohala), Hawaii, Hawaii 39,688 TOTAL $191,560 TABLE 36-I EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Agat Shoreline, Guam $ 19,367 Fagasa Shore Protection, American Samoa 11,607 Inarajan Shoreline, Guam 6,764 Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa 4,436 Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii 23,905 Olosega Bridge Protection, American Samoa 5,912 Poloa Seawall, American Samoa 9,891 Power Plant Road, Guam 19,971 Saipan Beach Road, CNMI 11,476 South Agat (Route 2), Guam 7,064 Umatac Shoreline, Guam 7,566 Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii 160 TOTAL $128,119 36-14 TABLE 36-J PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Amouli-Tula, American Samoa $12,641 Canneries to Breakers Point, American Samoa 50,720 Commercial Port Road, Guam 22,533 East Agana, Guam 39,188 Faleasao, American Samoa 914 Lauliituai-Aumi, American Samoa 86,913 Nua-Amaluia, American Samoa 36,138 TOTAL $249,047 TABLE 36-K FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Agana Bayfront, Guam $ 4,237 Garapan Area, CNMI 14,819 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii 199,405 Kihei Area, Maui, Hawaii 31,097 Malaeloa Stream, American Samoa 40,074 Vaipito Stream, American Samoa 108,235 Waikomo Stream, Kauai, Hawaii 32,551 Total $430,418 TABLE 36-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 208, PUBLIC LAW 83-780, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii $ 3,540 Total $3,540 36-15 PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT * The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA ............................. 37-2 2. Chetco River, OR ......................... 37-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR ........... 37-2 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA ........... 37-3 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island ...................... 37-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA ... 37-4 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR ................... 37-4 8. Coos Bay, OR............................ 37-5 9. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR ............. 37-6 10. Coquille River, OR ....................... 37-6 11. Depoe Bay, OR .......................... 37-6 12. Elochman Slough, WA .................... 37-6 13. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization . 37-7 14. Port Orford, OR ......................... 37-7 15. Project Condition Surveys .................. 37-7 16. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR ...... 37-7 17. Siuslaw River, OR ........................ 37-7 18. Skamokawa Creek, WA ................... 37-8 19. Skipanon Channel, OR .................... 37-8. 20. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR ................ 37-9 21. Tongue Point, OR ........................ 37-9 22. Umpqua River, OR ....................... 37-9 23. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR .... 37-10 24. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR .............. 37-10 Flood Control 25. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ..... 37-11 26. Blue River Lake, OR .................... 37-11 27. Cottage Grove Lake, OR ................. 37-11 28. Dorena Lake, OR ....................... 37-12 29. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ..... 37-12 30. Fall Creek Lake, OR ..................... 37-13 31. Fern Ridge Lake, OR ..................... 37-13 32. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 37-13 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects37-14 34. Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA ... 37-14 35. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA ............................ 37-14 36. Mill Creek, Salem, OR ................... 37-15 Page 37. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, Castle Rock, WA ........................ 37-15 38. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 37-15 39. Willamette River Basin, OR ............... 37-15 40. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR . 37-16 41. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR .......... 37-16 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 42. Bonneville Lock and Dam -- Lake Bonneville, OR and WA.............. 43. Cougar Lake, OR ....................... 44. Detroit Lake, OR ....................... 45. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ............. 46. Hills Creek Lake, OR .................... 47. John Day Lock and Dam -- Lake Umatilla, OR and WA............... 48. Lookout Point Lake, OR .................. 49. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR .... 50. The Dalles Lock and Dam -- Lake Celilo, WA and OR .................. 37-16 37-17 37-18 37-18 37-19 37-19 37-20 37-20 37-21 General Investigations 51. Surveys ................................ 37-21 52. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 37-21 Tables Table 37-A Cost & Financial Statement ....... 37-23 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 37-30 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 37-37 Table 37-D Not Applicable Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 37-38 Table 37-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ........ 37-40 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 37-41 Table 37-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR .................. 37-42 Table 37-I Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 .... 37-42 Table 37-J Project Condition Surveys ......... 37-42 Table 37-K Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks................. 37-43 37-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990 Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 .... 37-43 Flood Control Reservoir Operations 37-43 Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA, Levees and Improvements to Existing Works ............... 37-44 Table 37-0 Willamette River Basin Comprehensive Plan ............. 37-45 Table 37-P Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock Spillway Dam and Powerplant 37-46 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88, August 15, 1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of the project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. The new lock chamber will be 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock is $329,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the upstream guardwall continued.. A contract for construction of the lock structure was awarded in February 1990. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification of 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 36,756 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina. The channel flusher Sandwick spent 23 days working at the project. 3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, and 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington.) Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from the mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens, (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet 37-2 Table 37-L Table 37-M Table 37-N PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended to its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth of Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver, about 3 feet at low stage of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver, they average about 12 feet, while highest know reached a stage of 33 feet above water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976 except for observation of channel to determine if additional control structures or dredging will be required. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette river and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift-on-liftoff and roll-on-roll-off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the West Coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement, and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll-on-roll-off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. A total of 3,943,120 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 840,992 cubic yards. The contract dredge Renegade removed 15,269 cubic yards,, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed 1,934,078 cubic yards, the contract dredge Padre Island removed 248,481 cubic yards and the contract dredge Smith Rice Super Scoop removed 904,300 cubic yards. The channel flusher Sandwick spent 16 days working at the project. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, was finished December 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and 37-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990 protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 17,586 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing Project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract clamshell dredge Mukiltco removed 110,146 cubic yards. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 4. Existing project. Provides for a one-half- mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 4,356,222 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 1,705,093 cubic yards of material, and the contract dredge Padre Island removed 2,651,129 cubic yards. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, See Section 4, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth 37-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, Wa, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of papermill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is a one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800- bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about threefourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 71,097 cubic yards of material. 8. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high- tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance of Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and smallboat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1989. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 to Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300,576, and 500-foot frontages, respectively. In the North Spit industrial area, there is one woodchip loading facility having a frontage of 1200 feet and a smaller T-dock operated by the Port of Coos Bay. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. A barge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port series No. 33, Corps of Engineers, published in 1975.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Total of 1,167,610 cubic yards removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina 37-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 199.0 removed 402,545 cubic yards, the U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 3,250 cubic yards, the contract clamshell dredge Great Lakes removed 411,493 cubic yards, and the contract hopper dredge Padre Island removed 350,322 cubic yards of material. The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced sand from shoal areas in Charleston entrance channel. 9. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Location. South Fork and Millicoma Rivers rise in Coast Range in southern Oregon, flow generally westerly and join to make Coos River, 5.3 miles above mouth of Coos River in Coos Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18587, Allegany and Daniels Creek Quadrangle.) Existing project. Originally authorized project: A channel depth of 3 feet, generally, from mouth of Coos River and 1 foot near head of navigation. Project as modified: Two channels 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from mouth of Coos River to Allegany on Millicoma River, mile 13.8 and to Dellwood on South Fork, mile 14, and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mile 14.7 on South Fork, including stabilization works on Coos River. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at the mouth of Coos River is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. Tidal range at head of navigation in both forks is about 1 foot. Freshet stages usually reach a height of from 10 to 15 feet at Allegany, head of navigation on Millicoma River. Originally authorized project providing for a channel from mouth of Coos River to head of navigation in both forks, to provide a depth of 3 feet generally and 1 foot near head of navigation, was completed in 1899. In March 1966, construction of project was modified by 1948 River and Harbor Act was completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned docks and landing places on the river are used by towboats and pleasure craft. There are no publicly owned docks. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Major log processing yards are located at the head of navigation on both rivers. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections were performed. 10. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high- tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) A plan to deepen the entrance channel of the Coquille River from 13 feet to 18 feet was approved in May 1988. Construction is planned for FY 92. Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 31,812 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. 11. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modifications, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, was accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Monitored the concrete retaining wall for deterioration. 12. ELOCHOMAN SLOUGH, WA Location. A side channel of the Columbia River, about 3.5 miles long, on Washington side about 75 miles below Portland, OR, (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6152.) Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from that depth in the Columbia River near east- 37-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT erly end of slough to existing terminals near mouth of Elochoman River, a distance of about 1.5 miles with suitable turning basin of same depth at inner end. Detailed project report on a small-boat basin at Cathlamet, WA, covering modification of project under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended by Section 310 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act was approved February 9, 1966 authorizing project for construction. Project provides for an entrance channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep, and a breakwater with a top width of 10 feet and elevation of 12 feet. Low water is plane of reference. Average tidal range during low water conditions in Columbia River is about 5 feet. Federal costs of modified project is $177,769. Existing project authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 510, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Required local interests contribution of an estimated $19,600 is 11 percent of Federal first cost of construction. An additional cash contribution of $67,031 was requested for accomplishment of local work consisting of dredging the mooring area by Federal contractor. Terminal facilities. Only terminals are privately owned wharves of Crown Willamette Paper Co., and International Wood Products Co. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Contract clamshell removed 59,043 cubic yards of material. 13. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). See Table 37-I. 14. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 55-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October, 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet is 90% complete. The installation of the second hydraulic crane was completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months, the sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic. 15. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during the fiscal year at a cost of $54,845; (See Table 37-J). 16. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water nd mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. In 1985, three pile dikes, located on the south side of channel oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 70,429 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina at Gold Beach boat basin channel. The channel flusher Sandwick spent 39 days working at the project. 17. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 19583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 37-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 17 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 85. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originate approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Work on the extension of the north and south jetties was completed on 31 December 1986. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modern docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract hopper dregde Padre Island removed 99,120 cubic yards of material. 18. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WA Location. Rises in Wahkiakum County, in southwestern part of the State of Washington, flows southwesterly and southerly about ten miles, and empties into the Columbia River about 34 miles above the mouth (see NOAA Chart 18523). Existing project. Provides for a channel 6.5 feet deep at low water and 75 feet wide, between Steamboat and Brooks Sloughs, about 1,600 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about seven feet and maximum variation of water level due to tides or freshets is about 12 feet. During ordinary freshets a stage of 12 feet is reached in creek at Skamokawa, WA. Project as authorized was completed in 1920. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are several privately owned docks on Skamokawa Creek, Steamboat Slough, and Brooks Slough for use of towboats, commercial fishing vessels, and pleasure craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The sandbypasser Sandwick displaced shoals in the channel. 19. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 7 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to pubic on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use by a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 14,345 cubic yards of material. 37-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 20. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956, and small-boat basin in 1958. Rehabilitation of north jetty was initiated April 1969 and was completed in September 1979. 18 foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections were performed. A general design memo was prepared for rehabilitation of the north jetty. 21. TONGUE POINT, OR Location. The northwest corner of Oregon at river mile 18 on the Columbia River, five miles east of the city of Astoria, OR. Existing Project. Tongue Point is located adjacent to the congressionally authorized Columbia River 40-foot deepdraft navigation channel. The harbor and port facilities were first developed in the 1930's as a U.S. naval base. After World War II, the site served as a temporary berthing area. The improvements, however, have not been actively maintained for 25 years. The State of Oregon obtained the majority of the port development in 1980 from the Federal Government, including five finger piers. The remaining acres and three finger piers are still Federally owned and used by the U.S. Department of Commerce as a Job Corps Center and the U.S. Coast Guard as a lifeboat station. Construction of a 34-foot deep by 350-foot wide channel 1.75 miles long from the existing Columbia River channel to Tongue Point docks was authorized in July 1989 under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. A 25-foot deep (mllw) by 1,050-foot wide turning basin is also being constructed and will be located near the piers. The estimated cost of the project is $4,640,000 of which $2,781,500 is federal costs and $1,858,500 non-federal. Local cooperation. The State of Oregon, acting through the Division of State Lands, is the non-federal sponsor. Terminal facilities. The State of Oregon owns five 30-foot wide concrete finger piers between 1,300 and 1,500 feet long. The site is served by a 12-inch water main, and electricity and sewage lines also exist at the site. Additional development of these existing port facilities, which will facilitate the movement of an estimated 225,000 automobiles annually, is the responsibility of the local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for construction of this project was awarded July 20, 1989 and was completed in November 1989. 22. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August, 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) 37-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990 Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 39,466 cubic yards of material, and contract hopper dredge Padre Island removed 180,285 cubic yards.. 23. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Canal and locks were originally constructed by private interest in 1873 and were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in the Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. The project includes four locks a canal basin and an extra guard lock used to prevent flooding when river levels are high. The system acts as a fluid staircase between the upper and lower reaches of the Willamette River. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37-K. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Until the 1940's, the gates were opened manually. Now, the gates are operated by hydraulic pumps controlled by switches in two control stations with the aid of closed-circuit television and radio communication. All the gates have been replaced under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in good condition and in continuous operation. New service building was completed in 1988 costing $523,000. The project was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. James River Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations during fiscal year. Normal operation and maintenance performed. 24. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Yaquina Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1988. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annul Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Ma- 37-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT rina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage of 120 boats, is completed. A swing hoist with 3- ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 216,696 cubic yards was removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 43,362 cubic yards and the contract hopper dredge Padre Island removed 173,334 cubic yards of material. 25. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate- controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 26. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chutetype spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-and-gravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board made an application on April 1982 for permit to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 37-M. 27. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. ON Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate- controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at five sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. 37-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990 Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract to replace supervisory control and data acquisition equipment was completed. Normal operation and maintenance work continued. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 28. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigational and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 14 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract to replace supervisory control and data acquisition equipment was completed. Normal operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 37-M. 29. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work for the 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam has been stopped due to a court injunction. The project would control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles, and provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of roads and the main dam structure and outlet works to elevation 1563 (approximately 1/3 proposed height). All lands for the project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal which originates within the project boundaries. Environmental statements were filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No. 1 addressing water quality and social/demographic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated cost of project is $172,000,000 of which $168,400,000 is federal and $3,600,000 is non-federal. In October 1985, the Corps was advised by Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC) and environmental group, they intended to file suit against the government to halt construction of Elk Creek, on specific environmental issues. A hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction was scheduled before Oregon Federal District Court 16, December 86. On that date, the Court refused to grant the injunction to halt construction and bids were opened and the contract subsequently awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. An appeal was filed by ONRC in March, 1986 and heard by the 9th Circuit Court in July, 1986. On 23 June 1987, the Circuit Court reversed the decision of the District Court and returned the case to the District Court for appropriate injunctive relief. The resulting District court order issued in August and September 1987 allowed construction of the dam to El. 1563 ft. (approximately 1/3 the height of the dam), backfilling of the foundation key trench, aggregate processing, quarry restoration, and other miscellaneous work. The construction of the main dam to elevation 1563 was reached in mid-January 1988. The Department of Justice petitioned the 9th Circuit Court for a rehearing. On December 10th 1987 the 9th Circuit Court rejected the petition for a rehearing, requiring the termination of the existing main dam, and reservoir clearing contracts. The Department of Justice petitioned with the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of the decisions made by the 9th Circuit Court. The hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court was held 1 May 1989. The U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case back for injunctive relief. In September 1989, the District Court was requested by the Corps to remand the case back to the Corps for preparation of a supplemental EIS. To lift the injunction against the dam a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EISS) is being prepared to address those issues. Additional studies are being conducted in water temperature and turbidity, and fish and wildlife. Public review of the draft EISS began at the end of calendar year 1990. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights 37-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain a minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities require a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation development and assume all operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Settling of contract claims, operation and maintenance during the construction phase of the project, and fishery evaluation studies. 30. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. SKY Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Bethel School District. Bethel School District has a subagreement with the Springfield Kiwanis Club for management of this facility. The Corps manages one park at the project. Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork, Willamette River, are shown in Table 37-M. 31. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane county, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane county, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory water fowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract to replace supervisory control and data acquisition equipment was completed. Normal operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 37-M. 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 37-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Fiscal year costs for completion of preauthorization studies on Myrtle Creek, OR were $7,500, and continuation of a preauthorization study on Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage District, OR were $8,929. A construction contract was awarded for Mill Creek, OR (see Mill Creek, Salem, OR for details). Beach erosion control (Sec 103, River and Harbor Act of 1962, Public Law 874, 87th Congress.) Fiscal year costs for continuation of a preauthorized study at Cape Lookout State Park, Oregon were $4,750. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were: $324,661 disaster preparedness, $15,528 emergency operations, $4,604 rehabilitation, field investigations. Mt. St. Helens Emergency Measures. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle River valleys. Volcanic debris substantially reduced the river's hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected even with normal runoff. 37-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990 A major recovery program for the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers funded under advance measures was initiated a short time after the eruption and was essentially completed during FY 1982. Total cost of Mt. St. Helens emergency measures, from initiation through FY 1990, with some contract modifications remaining to be negotiated, is $245,977,622. The authorized navigation channel on the Cowlitz between River Mile 0 and 4.2 remains unusable due to continued sedimentation. 33. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 66 leveed areas and 260 bank protection works are inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin are supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Of the 66 levee areas inspected during the fiscal year, three were reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $161,025. 34. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and minor tributaries, channels, and sloughs, between Sandy River, OR, about 15 miles east of Vancouver, WA, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Plan for bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin provides for new construction and supplementing and extending projects constructed in Lower Columbia River Basin under authority of 1936 Flood Control Act: (a) Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA provides for bank protection works at 96 locations on Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River and mouth of Columbia River, totaling about 224,000 linear feet. Estimated total Federal cost is $25,100,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,720,000; (b) See Table 37-N on Levees and Improvements to Existing works; (c) Lower Columbia River Basin levees at new locations, Oregon and Washington, provides for construction of flood control works at: Washougal area, Clark County, WA, about 5.5 miles of levee and appurtenant works at a Federal cost of $1,803,488, and non-federal cost at $98,000; and Vancouver Lake area in vicinity of Vancouver, WA, about 18 miles of levee and appurtenant works at an estimated Federal cost (1980) of $19,500,000 and non-Federal cost at $900,000. This portion, Vancouver Lake, WA, has been reclassified "deferred". Total estimated Federal costs (1980) for both areas of work are $21,303,488 and non-Federal costs $998,000. Federal cost for all work under project, Lower Columbia River Basin, OR, and WA, is $67,531,776. Construction of improvement to existing project in Sandy Drainage District, OR, was completed by local interests at no construction cost to the Government. Improvements of levees have been accomplished by contract at the following locations: Multnomah County Drainage District, No. 1, OR, June 1962; Suvie Island Drainage District, OR, October 1972; Woodson Drainage District, OR, December 1963; Rainier Drainage District, OR, June 1964; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts, OR, April 1967; Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District, No 2, Wa, June 1974; Beaver Drainage District, Or, June 1978; Wahkiakum County consolidated Diking District #1, WA, October 1979; and Scappoose Drainage District, OR, September 1980. Washougal Area, WA (new location) levee construction has been completed. Under authorization for Lower Columbia River Basin bank protection works, construction has been completed at numerous locations. (See Section 34 for additional information). Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interest will be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each project. Total non-Federal cost for all work is $6,488,000. For details of status or requirements of local cooperation, see individual project reports. Operations during fiscal year. See individual projects. 35. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 pleted. Estimated Federal cost is $2lo5c,6a0t0io,0n0s 0.has been com- Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Local Interests will also be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each 37-14 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT site. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $1,500,000. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of coordination with sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. 36. MILL CREEK, SALEM, OR Location. On the right bank of Mill Creek at the southeast fringe of the city of Salem, Oregon, near the junction of Interstate Highway 5 and State Highway 22. Mill Creek confluence with Willamette River is about 3.7 miles downstream of the project. Existing project. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 24 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damage to public works. Project consists of construction of three riprap groins along the upstream and middle portion of the eroding bankline, excavation of a portion of land area downstream of the groins, and extending the existing riprap revetment 250 linear feet upstream to the groins. This action will prevent the outflanking of the right abutment of Hawthorne Avenue Bridge and provide acceptable flow alignment to the bridge. The estimated cost of the project is $237,000 of which $178,000 is federal costs and $59,000 is non-federal. Local cooperation. The City of Salem, Oregon, the nonfederal sponsor, provided lands, easements and rights-ofway. In addition, the City of Salem participated financially in accordance with the cost sharing requirements of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for construction of the project was awarded on July 24, 1990 for $106,000 and is scheduled for completion in the first quarter of fiscal year 1991. 37. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the problems reside in the communities of Longview, Kelso, Lexington, and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "... to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green River, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125- foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. Local cooperation. Local interests are responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests are also responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites will be the responsibility of local interests. Nonfederal cash contribution is $3,600,000 and the estimated non-federal land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $21,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. Work on the Sediment Retention Structure was substaintally completed with some follow- on work remaining. Work on the fish collection facility contract was completed and the facility turned over to the State of Washington. 38. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at five Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, Scoggins, and Galesville) and one municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light (Mossyrock). The Bureau of Reclamation projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. Monitoring of Mossyrock flood control operation is assigned to the Corps by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the Mossyrock license calls for specific flood control regulation. The five Bureau of Reclamation projects and Mossyrock project were operated during 1990 within the flood control regulations specified for each project. A water control manual for Galesville Dam was completed in September 1990. Total cost of monitoring the six projects during the fiscal year was $8,837. 39. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. Willamette River, formed by Coast and Middle forks which join a few miles above Eugene, OR, flows north 189 miles, and enters Columbia River 101.5 miles above its mouth. The basin has an area of 11,200 square miles and lies between Cascade Range on the east and Coast Range on the west. Major tributaries of Willamette River rise in Cascade Mountains and consist of Coast and Middle Forks and McKenzie, Calapooia, Santiam, Molalla, and Clackamas Rivers. Important tributaries that head in the Coast Range are Luckiamute, Yamhill, and Tualatin Rivers. Minor tributaries, all of which enter the main stream from the west, are Long Tom River, Marys River, and Rickreall Creek. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Willamette River Basin and authorized 37-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990 funds for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan recommended for initial accomplishment of plan recommended for initial development; the reservoirs and related works to be selected by Chief of Engineers. Subsequent Flood Control Acts, 1941 through 1974, authorized additional flood control and other works and increased monetary authority. Following projects were completed as authorized and are in continuous operation: Fern Ridge Lake, August 1951; Cottage Grove Lake, April 1952; Dorena Lake, October 1952; Detroit Lake, December 1960; Lookout Point Lake, June 1961; Hills Creek Lake, June 1963; Cougar Lake, March 1964; Fall Creek Lake, November 1965; Green Peter-Foster Lakes, June-December 1967 respectively; and Blue River Lake, October 1968. Under the authorization for construction of recreation facilities at completed projects, work has been accomplished at Fern Ridge, Cottage Grove, Dorena, Lookout Point, and Fall Creek Lakes. Under the memoranda of agreements with the U.S. Forest Service, recreation facilities also have been constructed at Detroit, Lookout Point, Cougar, Blue River, and Hills Creek Lakes, Recreational facilities were constructed at Green Peter-Foster Lakes with initial construction funds. Details of operation, construction, and financial status of projects are in individual reports. During low-water season, July-September, supplemental water releases are made from Willamette River Basin Reservoirs. Uses which benefit from increased downstream flows include irrigation, navigation, power, fisheries, pollution abatement, and recreation. Although optimum regulation cannot be provided for every purpose, water released from reservoirs during the low-water season for a particular purpose will usually provide benefits to other uses as well. Basic policy is to provide most beneficial overall regulation, consistent with established water-use priorities. (See Table 37-0 on Willamette River Basin comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local cooperation for other projects is in individual reports for those projects. Operations during fiscal year. See individual reports. 40. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $30,800,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,300,000. Operations during fiscal year. Continued coordination and evaluation of local erosion problems. 41. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs (cubic feet per second), an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acrefeet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre- feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has leased recreation facilities at Willow Creek Lake. A courtesy handling dock was constructed by the Recreation District utilizing Oregon State Marine Board funds. A playfield area below the dam has been leased to the City of Heppner. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clear Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. Cost shared development of rercreation facilities with the Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District is currently being planned. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance performed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 42. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River, see Section 4. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel 37-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT from Cascade island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 verticallift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of one unit of 48,000 kilowatts, one unit of 59,500 kilowatts, and eight units of 60,000 kilowatts each, totaling 587,500 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough Channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded On andesite, and main dam rests on solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 27 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock, spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-P. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provided for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,145.7 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1943. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 1,500,000 project wide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure. The total cost for construction of the second powerhouse is $680,000,000. The first powerhouse, spillway, navigation lock and associated facilities have been designated as a National Historic District. A cost sharing agreement between The Corps and Skamania County has been finalized. Development of recreation facilities at Home Valley was completed in FY 89. Through September 1990, power generation totaled 210.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $384,309,471 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non-Federal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Research continued to find a solution for correction of deficiencies of fish guidance efficiency at the Second Powerhouse to reduce fingerling mortality incurred during annual downstream migration. A contract was awarded in August 1990 for realignment of Gibbons Creek, a portion of the Steigerwald Lake mitigation plan. Maintenance: The First Powerhouse modernization program continues to be implemented. Normal operation and maintenance was performed during period. During the fiscal year 5,437,534,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 5,413,964,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. 43. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit 37-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990 in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1990 power generation totaled 3.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville power Administration, $18,784,272 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of Strube lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $114,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 144,872,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 144,029,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-M. 44. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 40 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate- controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed online June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1990 power generation totaled 18.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $60,619,079 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 362,532,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 360,005,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 45. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gatecontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y- shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power- generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green 37-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1990 power generation totaled 7.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $45,976,470 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities at Foster Lake includes 4 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. Five of these parks were developed by the Corps and are operated by Linn county under lease agreement. One park is operated by the Corps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal year 344,861,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 342,520,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 46. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1990, power generation totaled 4.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $18,889,529 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 144,386,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 143,841,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 47. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acrefeet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 37-P. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 was completed in FY 1986. Entire project is estimated to be 99 percent complete. Through September 1990 power generation totaled 228.4 billion kilowatt-hour. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $299,589,412 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $513,168,000, consisting of $512,835,000 Corps of Engineers and $333,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 5 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease agreement with the Corps. Six developed recreation areas are operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers. Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract was awarded in August 1990 for modifications to the fish bypass system. Maintenance: Station service power supply system suffered extensive damage due to a fire on 29 May 1990. The navigation lock upstream gate was damaged on 15 July 1990. Generator #6 suffered a winding failure in 6 August 1990. Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 10,663,500,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 10,645,585,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. 37-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990 Rehabilitation: Refurbishment of one generator winding and rebuilding (to strengthen) one turbine was completed. Work on the next scheduled unit was initiated. Work continued on installation of the new control system to increase reliability and ease of operation of the powerhouse. Work continued for the FY 1991 completion of station service improvement contract which will allow black start up of the powerhouse. A powerhouse fire in May 1990 caused delays in ongoing construction contracts. 48. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of mainstem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel- fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide- gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the costsharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1,2, and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on- line May 1955. Dexter was placed in operation for reregulation in December 1954. Through September 1990 power generation totaled 14.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $65,404,589 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Recreation opportunities are provided at 2 parks on Dexter Lake which are operated by Lane County via the multi-project cost-sharing agreement and lease instruments. The north shore of Lookout Point Lake is also leased to Lane County for recreation purposes; there is essentially no development. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Studies to rewind/uprate the generators were initiated. Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 338,041,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 336,232,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 49. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On Upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility was provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Recreation opportunities are provided by 4 parks at the project. The State of Oregon operates 2 parks, including a 200 unit campground, part of Stewart State Park. Through September 1990, power generation totaled 3.7 billion kilowatt- hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $20,644,457 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that de- 37-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT mands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Cole M. Rivers Fish Hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 247,674,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated by project of which 244,640,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 50. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially with substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fish-water units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. The total generating capacity is 1,806,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 37-P. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Commission under a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, it was determined that it was not within the Chief of Engineer's authority to add these power facilities. A local interest, North Wasco County Public Utility District pursued the construction of these power facilities through the FERC license processes and awarded a construction contract in September 1989. Power-on-line is scheduled for August 1991. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. Through September 1990, power generation totaled 233.9 billion kilowatt- hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $300,180,669 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Further recreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operation and maintenance by local, non-federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design activities associated with preparation of a general design memorandum for juvenile fish bypass facilities continued. Maintenance: Unit 5 winding was received. Negotiations to have the manufacturer install the winding are underway. Studies to rehabilitate the fishwater generators and generating units 1-22 were started. Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 8,471,439,000 kilowathours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 8,451,577,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. General Investigations 51. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,585,641 of which $665,797 was for navigation studies, $455,671 for flood damage prevention studies, $229,564 for comprehensive studies, $145,485 for miscellaneous activities, and $89,124 for coordination with other agencies. 52. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plan Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from 37-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1990 floods. Federal and non- Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year: Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished totaled 660. Of this total, 21 were from other Federal agencies; 106 from non-Federal agencies; and 533 from private sector realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Cost for providing these services during the fiscal year totaled $66,102. A preliminary evaluation of flood protection measures was developed and furnished to the city of Stanfield, Oregon. Subsequently, the city of Stanfield is developing a preliminary implementation plan incorporating street and utility rehabilitation/upgrading plans into the flood protection plan and obtaining citizen input. The final flood control plan will be completed in FY 91. Costs during the fiscal year totaled $4,195. Portland Metro Special Study: A digitized map database covering the 22 quadrangle Portland urban area in three counties was obtained from Oregon Department of Transportation. To that database were added digitized overlays consolidating Flood Insurance Rate Map and Floodway Maps pertinent data. A tutorial and index file system is being developed to provide visual display and selected area printing capability. 37-22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY89 FY90 to In Text Sep.30, 1990 1. Bonneville Navigation New Work ........ .... bo... ... Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (Federal Funds) (Inland Waterway Trust Fund) 2. Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles OR Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 8,340,000 19,607,000 24,150,000 19,298,000 8,360,936 19,581,238 14,050,665 29,331,438 14,959,000 19,593,000 24,150,000 19,298,000 14,570,957 19,560,249 12,732,518 30,987,600 300,200 631,000 132,000 382,047 296,243 634,978 129,856 373,100 10,932,230 13,201,000 10,861,438 12,867,766 12,630,000 8,928,540 13,065,333 8,844,097 311,000 19,000 515,000 252,899 75,829 516,034 501,000 659,000 554,000 505,301 582,990 631,348 60,902 54,872 53,064 51,247 6,302,400 7,953,000 8,201,000 6,386,150 6,385,156 7,963,652 8,207,278 6,183,847 441,000 239,000 201,000 281,411 428,767 246,672 201,199 256,750 78,000,30751 77,744,654'51 78,000,000 77,851,324 2,043,713' 2,043,713' 6,264,673 6,252,912 28,349,3042 28,349,3042 281,839,2963 281,726,825 3 665,9544 665,9544 941,252 941,252 3,941,087 3,934,816 220,2835 220,2835 5,410,877 5,409,019 24,913,6618 24,913,6618 113,133,6497 112,919,352' 7,322,878 7,322,878 5,989,5098 5,989,5098 12,429,3599 12,399,,0489 37-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY89 FY90 to In Text Sep.30, 1990 8. Coos Bay, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR 10. Coquille River, OR 11. Depoe Bay, OR 12. Elochoman Slough, WA 14. Port Orford, OR 16. Rogue River Harbor At Gold Beach, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost 29,750,09210 29,750,09210 3,933,300 3,740,000 10,584,000 2,990,266 80,472,21811 3,886,842 3,787,393 10,573,892 2,934,530 80,383,12011 2,335,966 2,335,966 486,680 486,680 51,600 144,000 144,000 103,304 50,373 137,266 152,741 100,453 339,000 198,000 114,000 204,043 336,007 184,652 129,841 188,056 45,000 43,260 140,000 134,729 7,841 11,114 59,000 121,216 57,942 122,274 295,000 247,000 189,000 227,888 293,510 248,451 188,579 227,326 917,800 614,000 705,000 592,874 824,626 704,787 708,632 565,743 37-24 350,23812 350,23812 2,136,914 2,133,928 693,36613 693,36613 5,898,98714 5,882,10614 367,364 367,364 940,717 936,430 18,64152 18,64152 196,864 196,864 758,69215 758,69215 3,363,217 3,361,501 4,156,25216 4,156,25216 11,158,39417 11,130,762 635,783 635,783 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY89 FY90 to In Text Sep.30, 1990 17. Siuslaw River, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 62,000 -25,000 315,633 -15,013 689,000 473,000 353,000 473,285 687,256 453,180 374,215 452,345 45,000 -8,921 24,127 11,953 18. Skamokawa Creek, WA 19. Skipanon Channel, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 31,000 - 30,103 - 21,403 897 20,917 294,000 10,000 224,000 120,050 284,590 19,783 224,676 119,727 20. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 21. Tongue Point, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Umpqua River, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 20,000 28,000 20,691 27,333 57.500 143,792 59,942 132,773 32,500 219,000 2,030,000 500,000 25,934 121,926 2,123,166 463,585 89,500 1,779,100 - - 261,787 1,578,138 1,723,900 1,141,000 661,000 677,204 1,665,197 1,211,354 662,499 642,729 37-25 29,502,21218 29,502,21218 12,472,38419 12,449,49319 879,285 879,285 493,611 493,611 2,400 2,400 436,185 435,699 280,854 280,854 3,477,064 3,476,596 22,434,82720 22,434,82720 3.167,08221 3,155,60921 2,839,799 2,839,799 2,781,500 2,734,611 1,868,600 1,839,925 17,718,877 17,718,877 25,611,093 25,575,719 2,500,677 2,500,677 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY89 FY90 to In Text Sep.30, 1990 23. Willamette River at New Work Willamette Falls, OR 24. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 25. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin OR 26. Blue River Lake, OR 27. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 28. Dorena Lake, OR 29. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 30. Fall Creek Lake, OR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 748,000 1,160,000 610,000 571,995 746,399 1,163,445 619,085 539,137 1,834,400 7,399,000 686,000 692,556 1,817,346 7,395,427 713,859 644,105 996 6,767 11,238 625,000 399,000 437,000 441,415 605,461 396,186 460,289 435,982 284,000 163,000 135,000 145,308 267,968 178,769 135,957 139,048 896,000 635,000 663,000 731,610 854,918 641,975 690,448 723,552 619,000 472,000 705,115 512,171 544,805 520,149 711,406 513,852 9,100,000 30,437,000 26,012,598 29,918,249 5,911,000 1,190,000 6,361,434 1,445,595 341,000 398,000 361,000 434,256 337,548 387,439 359,851 419,192 520,00523 520,00523 17,048,81824 17,014,05224 234,794 234,794 19,242,04625 19,242,04625 29,287,25826 29,238,54826 12,005 12,005 91,642,489 91,642,489 4,659,11549 4,652,21649 32,038,22527 32,038,22527 2,641,299 2,634,276 4,013,12328 4,013,12328 10,904,28829 10,872,64729 14,568,26230 14,568,26230 6,728,460 6,707,746 100,730,579 100,686,371 22,118,264A31 22,118,2641 5,580,671 5,549,289 37-26 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY89 FY90 to In Text Sep.30, 1990 31. Fern Ridge Lake OR New Work 35. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection OR & WA 36. Mill Creek, Salem, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 37. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, Castle Rock, WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 40. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR .... O. _.. . , -, 2,332,000 760,000 747,000 719,564 2,289,234 778,941 755,964 701,482 216,000 224,638 5,000 8,357 7,500 29,000 803 32,724 76,000 74,921 86,000 24,832 27,000 137,000 14,238 140,393 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost 29,265,000 55,468,000 12,195,000 11,567,000 28,825,326 38,873,805 27,743,424 12,507,990 3,500,000 - 149,240 - 3,500,000 389,000 55,000 458,945 62,498 70,200 80,000 60,544 84,524 30,000 25,308 65,000 62,717 149,240 86,000 34,897 27,965 35,039 8,526,93532 8,526,93532 14,723,1983 14,685,77933 20,957,745 20,894,697 200,500 188,158 18,900 16,000 109,895,000 109,316,210 3,649,240 3,649,240 24,868,816" 24,813,017 3,784,709 3,783,811 41. Willow Creek Lake, OR New Work (See Walla Walla, WA District) Approp. Cost Maint Approp. 403,000 501,000 Cost 399,378 496,680 687,000 490,051 685,094 470,052 42. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville OR and WA 43. Cougar Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 6,850,000 4.098,000 1,152,000 4,115,000 5,472,560 4,102,274 2,405,289 3,851,145 11,512,000 10,754,000 10,727,000 12,090,262 11,118,185 10,944,639 10,813,072 11,967,851 1,260,000 696,000 786,000 795,480 1,245,605 679,113 818,440 743,983 37-27 3,047,051 3,007,743 769,511,60435 769,040,98735 175,353,36336 174,845,43936 58,636,39337 58,636,39337 13,068,296 s o 13,016,4385o 18,900 16,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY89 FY90 to In Text Sep.30, 1990 44. Detroit Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost 45. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR 46. Hills Creek Lake, OR 47. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA 48. Lookout Point Lake, OR 49. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 50. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,557,000 1,294,000 1,539,000 1,569,935 1,554,727 1,320,145 1,530,767 1,575,262 1,925,000 1,824,000 1,773,000 1,932,671 1,887,327 1,823,898 1,822,417 1,926,322 658,000 518,000 595,000 524,108 643,258 532,759 592,142 529,110 1,930,000 350,000 1,941,379 280,217 39,000 145,000 55,598 100,501 8,103,000 7,248,000 8,019,500 10,113,768 8,037,902 7,230,856 7,983,895 10,019,973 3,800,000 3,940,000 2,725,000 3,328,128 3,766,284 3,861,592 2,702,857 3,455,386 2,520,000 2,321,000 3,085,000 2,991,027 2,461,925 2,343,553 3,144,995 2,976,150 132 8,652 7,688 2,636,000 2,586,000 2,657,000 2,627,487 2,536,371 2,646,763 1,210,000 488,415 7,095,000 7,731,000 7,695,000 6,866,803 7,747,465 7,721,519 62,729,698 62,729,698 29,820,70748 29,801,02048 363,086 363,086 84,005,78838 84,005,78838 27,507,80339 27,484,88139 45,700,619 45,700,619 9,314,37540 9,313,14140 512,400,24641 512,213,42341 123,858,42742 123,498,39942 25,536,128 25,497,458 88,238,39543 88,238,39543 44,831,63244 44,761,27444 - 136,408,150 136,408,150 2,888,918 2,957,551 986,000 1,477,796 8,114,362 8,154,857 27,631,71845 27,577,72245 303,260,28846 303,030,49946 113,605,37047 113,366,09547 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project. Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 37-28 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393. Entrance to Oregon slough; $161,897, Camas-Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470, Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9. Includes $2,033,408 under code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project, Excludes contributed funds. 11.Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $80,000 (other funds) contributed for new work by Port of Coos Bay to cover additional cost of disposing of dredge spoils in Coos Bay, OR; includes $8,000 for previous project. 13. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. includes $36,000 under Code 711. 14. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 15. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 17. Includes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 18. Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 19. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 20. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 21. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 22. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 24. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 25. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 26. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 27. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 28. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 29. Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 30. Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 31. Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 32. Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 33. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 34. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 35. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recover Act Funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $627,593,352 allotted and $642,322,501 expended second powerhouse funds, $6,000 allotted, $6,000 expended power units funds. 36. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 37. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 38. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 39. Includes $358,578 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 40. Includes $75,400 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 41. Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 42. Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 43. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 44. Includes $363,578 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 45. Includes $358,578 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 46. Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15 - 22 funds. 47. Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 48. Includes $307,078 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 50. Includes $231,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 51. Includes $24,307 under code 422 General Investigation. 52. Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. 37-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Aug 15, 1985 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 02, 1945 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 04, 1981 Feb 27, 1911 Jul 25, 1912 Jul 27, 1916 Aug 08, 1917 Sep 22, 1922 Mar 04, 1923 2 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 03, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Sep 06, 19333 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 2. P. L 99-88 P.L 99-662 H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of existing lock. Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid into Inland Waterways Trust Fund. CHETCO RIVER, OR To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, WA Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. 37-30 H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.1 H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' No Prior Report H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. ' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. ' H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.1 H. Doc. 630. 77th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong.,2d Sess.' TABLE 37-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2 turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA East Channel Main channel West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Dec 11, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 02, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jun 20, 1938 Sep 03, 1954 Mar 03, 1905 Dec 22, 1944 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 30, 1983 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore.9 Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 1 P.L 98-63 COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from H. Committee Doc. 94, Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.1 by 800 feet long. COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong.,lst Sess. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. 37-31 Documents 5. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50,75th Cong., 2d Sess. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. 1 8. I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 30, 1935 ELOCHOMAN SLOUGH, WA A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from that depth in the Columbia River near easterly end of slough to existing terminals near mouth of Elochoman River, a distance of about 1.5 miles, with suitable turning basin of same depth at inner end. PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Build two high-tide stone jetties. Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot south jetty. 12-foot deep channel. Jul 24, 1946 Jun 30, 1948 Dec 31, 1970 37-32 For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. COOS AND MILICOMA RIVERS, OR Dredging channel from mouth to head of navigation. For a 5 ft depth from mouth to head of navigation on the Millicoma River and South Fork. Except on South Fork above M. 14 where 3 ft will suffice. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. DEPOE BAY, OR Construction of an inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with an entrance channel of same depth and 50 feet wide. Construction of an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet wide. Jun 03, 1896 Jun 30, 1948 10. Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 02, 1945 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 11. 12. 14. Aug 26, 1937 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 31, 1970 Sep 03, 1954 Sep 19, 1890 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 03, 1925 16. 17. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. 1 S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 646, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 237, 53d Cong., 3d Sess. S. Doc. 124, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. doc. 207, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Food Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 510, 74th Cong. 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong., 2d Sess H. Doc 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul 03, 1958 Oct 22, 1976 Oct 01, 1980 Mar 02, 1919 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 26, 1937 Jun 30, 1948 Jul 26, 1912 Mar 04, 1913 Mar 02, 1919 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 Jul 18, 1989 37-33 TABLE 37-B (Continued) 18. 19. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong.,lst Sess. 1 extension of north Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north Final Report of Chief and south jetty extensions. of Engineers Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and P.L 96-367 2,500 feet, respectively. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WA Channel 6.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, at low water H. Doc.03, 63rd Cong.,lst Sess. between Steamboat and Brooks Slough. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' bridge, 30 feet deep. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. S. Doc. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. ' TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay city. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.4 caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.1 Construct South Jetty, 80,000 feet long. S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.1 TONGUE POINT, OR Channel 34 feet deep and 350 feet wide from Columbia River Section 107 of the 1960 River and channel to Tongue Point docks, and a turning basin located Harbor Act, as amended. near the piers. UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. ocean bar. A short south jetty H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.1 A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging Rivers and Harbors Committee to a 26-foot depth. Doc. 9, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. ' to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel S. Doc. 86, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide , and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River. * S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.1 20. 21. 22. Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 20, 1938 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 08, 1917 Jun 26, 19346 Mar 02, 19458 Mar 02, 1919 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 03, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 07, 1974 May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 07, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 23. Jun 25, 1910 WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Roller compacted concrete dam. Authorized construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. 37-34 24. H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 H. Do. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. 1 H. Do. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Do. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 S. Do. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Do. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.1 Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 H. Do. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 93-251 H. Do. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 99-662 H. Do. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. See 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Do. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Do. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doe. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doe 403, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. TABLE 37-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. MILL CREEK, SALEM, OR Construction of three riprap groins and 250 feet of riprap bank protection. Sec 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, CASTLE ROCK, WA Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. P.L 99-88 35. 36. 37. 39. Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area COUGAR LAKE, OR Rockfill dam. Addition of power Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938) Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. )R AND WA S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug 21, 1933) Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended P.L 93-251 P.L 98-396 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 83-780 P.L 87-874 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. P.L 858, 80th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 83-780 F. C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 37-35 34. May 17, 1950 Documents WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation and other purposes in Willamette River basin. General improvements WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, O Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergengy Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by congress May 17, 1950 Jul 9, 1990 Aug 15, 1985 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Jun 22, 1936 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct 27, 1965 40. 41. 42. 43. Aug 30, 1935 Aug 20, 1937 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 07, 1974 Aug 22, 1984 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 Jun 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 44. 45. 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 46. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR May 17, 1950 Earth and gravel fill dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 47. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended Mar 24, 1965 John Day waterfowl management area. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 48. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR Jun 28, 1938 Earth-and-gravel filled dam. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended May 17, 1950 Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. as reregulating dam. 49. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Sep 21, 1962 Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Oct 15, 1966 Authorizes construction of project but not operation for P.L. 89-689, Public Works irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. Approp. Act, 1967 50. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3. Public Works Administration 4. Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 5. Inactive. 6. Permanent appropriations Repeal Act. 7. Flood Control Act 8. Classified Deferred 9. Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 37-36 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alsea River, OR AstoriaTurning Basin, OR 1 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR 1 Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA 1 Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR 1 Clatskanie River, OR 2 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA 1 Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR 1 Deep River, WA 2 Depoe Bay, OR 1 Grays River, WA 2 Hammonds Small Boat Basin, OR 1 Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge(Barge Channel), OR 1 Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA 1 Lake River, WA Lewis River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR 2 Nehalem Bay, OR Nestucca River, OR Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR 2 Salmon River, OR 2 Smith River, OR 2 South Channel, Government Island, OR 1 South Slough (Charleston), OR 1 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, Or 12 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Or and WA13 Umatilla Harbor, OR 14 Westport Slough, OR 2 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Or 1 Yaquina River, OR 1 Yaquina River, OR Youngs and Claskanie River, Or Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR 2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1985 1944 1971 1985 1969 1986 1985 1975 1963 1971 1941 1977 1961 1963 1986 1983 1985 1982 1987 1963 1949 1974 1985 1970 1939 1957 1952 1966 1985 1985 1979 1971 1984 1979 2,000 870,139 1,173,524 1,081,806 171,467 1,197,300 19,2403 1,589,231 277,436 * 329,423 15,384 145,588 5 2,500 519,0907 1,154,1628 15,281 302,000 2,700 58,132 437,669 s 302,00610 16,881 2,145 143,120 119,80011 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 16,276 862,918 1,616,369 891,69515 195,31316 28,800 2,000 9,348 26,237 16,648 194,896^ 1,474,036 32,768 35,670 58,127 685,677 4,000 25,000 55,195 6,000 90,514 205,130 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 17,900,293 749,694' 34,449 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 107). 2. Channel adequate for present commerce. 3. Includes $15,537 for previous project 4. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 5. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. 6. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 7. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 8. Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 9. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. 10. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $102,000 contributed funds. 12. Project abondoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 13. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool 14. Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 15. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds 17. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 37-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 163,397 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1941 163,291 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1942 69,724 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Completed 1943 574,123 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 161,381 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1941 258,795 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County WA Completed 1941 26,810 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR Completed 1951 169,542 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 240,939 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 33,080 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1941 25,773 Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 18,789 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 158,419 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1961 91,652 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 61,186 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 39,475 Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Completed 1939 77,7743 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1951 593,0344 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 241,148 Port of Kalama, WA1 Completed 99,844 Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1942 47,662 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1951 1,623,505 Scappoose Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,991,558 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1946 178,885 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA Completed 1985 5,289,833 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA1 Completed 1985 504,64213 Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District, 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co.,Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 Total Columbia River Basin 16,399,775 LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA Completed 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA' Completed 1985 250,000 Total Cowlitz River Basin 442,735 37-38 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,131,944 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA1 Completed 236,860 Hayden Island, OR Inactive Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1964 1,499,186 Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Active 1961 35,265 Rainier Drainage District, OR Completed 1967 593,945 Sandy Drainage District, OR Completed 1954 154,0126 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Completed 1966 674,137 Vancouver Lake Area, WA Deferred 1981 889,391 Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Inactive 1971 48,619 Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR Completed 1973 1,803,488 Woodson Drainage District, OR Completed 1964 162,500 Total Lower Columbia River Basin 11,928,364 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Completed 1960 1,214,3006 Cascadia Lake, OR Deferred 1976 1,066,1147 Gate Creek Lake, OR Deferred 1972 840,0008 Holley Lake, OR Deferred 1963 241,992 Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR1 Completed 276,700 Whelton Ditch, OR Inactive 1967 39,624 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging Inactive Total Willamette River Basin 3,678,731 ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR� Abandoned 1950 23,439 Bear Creek, Medford, OR1 Completed 23,050 Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Completed 1967 106,198 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Completed 1957 104,921 Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Completed 1959 182,655 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR 1 Completed 42,761 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR Completed 1952 70,84510 Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Deferred 1982 1,307,216 Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR1 Completed 22,963 Deschutes River, Bend, OR2 Completed 1988 106,250' John Day River (West), OR1 Completed 1986 127,800 Johnson Creek, OR Active 1981 170,245 McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR1 Completed 1985 29,500 McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Completed 1966 148,358 Miami River, OR1 Completed 15,321 Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Completed 1948 118,433 Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 Completed 1955 55,007 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Completed 1952 55,189 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, WA Completed 1989 42,158,000 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR1 Completed 11,690 Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR1 Completed 16,000 37-39 TABLE 37-E (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR11 (a) Riverside Area Units Deferred 1960 9,100 (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) Completed 1959 267,748 (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Completed 1960 161,540 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR10 Completed 1939 143,263 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Completed 1971 968,71612 Rogue River, OR' Completed 86,230 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Completed 1960 288,447 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA' Completed 1985 435,00014 Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR1 Completed 215,939 Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Completed 1961 176,351 Sumner Parker Airport, OR' Completed 92,500 Trask River, Tillamook County, OR' Completed 1984 121,273 Tualatin, OR Completed 1985 1,803,094 Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR' Completed 33,835 Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR' Completed 1985 154,600 Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Completed 1952 428,881 Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR Completed 1952 45,677 West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR ' Completed 1986 176,000 Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR' Completed 30,000 Total All Other Flood Control 7,965,985 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 9. Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam 3. pool. Includes Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act Funds $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L 80-85. See 4. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887 5. Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs 10. Excludes $2,520 contributed funds project constructed by local interests. 11. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974 6. Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 7. Includes $112,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Government furnished sheet steel pile. Sweet Home. 13. Includes $254,642 contributed funds. 8. Includes $95,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of 14. Includes $185,000 contributed funds. Quartz Creek Lake. 15. Excludes $5,822 contributed funds. TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR Completed 1969 185,000 37-40 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR 1977 Bachelor Island, WA 1977 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595 Cascadia Lake, OR 1987 954,114 1 Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR 1978 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR 1987 Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR 1977 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, Or 1960 1970 6,819 Deer Island Drainage District, OR 1987 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, Or 1978 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1977 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR 1977 Gate Creek Lake, OR 1987 745,0012 Holley Lake, OR 1963 1987 241,9923 John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 John Day River, OR 1974 1974 210,220 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 Lake River Delta Area, WA 1977 Lewis River Area, WA 1978 Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR 1987 9,000 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, Or 1967 1987 39,624 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 Soap Creek, WA 1977 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR 1978 Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR 1987 4,000 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR 1958 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 Wiley Creek Lake, OR 1960 112,000 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portions) 1987 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR 1961 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1948 1987 142,883 1. Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home Reservoir. 2. Excludes Pro-rata share of $95,000 for Quartz Creek Reservoir 3. Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. 37-41 TABLE 37-H REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1990 (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 28,349,304 281,726,825 301,076,129 Public Works 446,296 14,414 460,710 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 281,839,907 310,773,956 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 29,600,003 281,864,227 311,464,230 TABLE 37-I NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1990) Charleston Channel, OR 1,833 Charleston Harbor, Coos Bay, OR 1,894 Coquille River, Bandon, OR 14,702 Coos Bay, OR 10,644 Coos River Channel, OR 7,500 Columbia River, Kalama, WA 1,524 Columbia River, Longview, WA 452 Columbia River, Vancouver, WA 4,941 North Bonneville, WA 3,000 Newport, OR 8,179 Port of Brookings, OR 9,845 Port of Gold Beach, OR 12,740 Port of Morrow, Morrow, OR 8,289 Reed Island, WA 10,435 South Tongue Point Channel, OR 13,347 Westport, OR 31,861 Wind River, WA 84 TOTAL 141,270 TABLE 37-J PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted Elochoman Slough, WA October/December 1989 Skamokawa Creek, WA October 1989 Tillamook, OR October 1989 Willamette River, OR March/April/May/July 1990 37-42 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-K WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (See Section 23 of Text) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet1 Lift of each lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22,5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet2 Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland of water, is at upper end of canal basin. Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland 2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 General Electric Co. to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, 3. The dam is owned by private parties. which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for TABLE 37-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1990) D River, Linclon City, OR 58,706 Depoe Bay, OR 60,778 Lake Lytle, OR 7,500 Myrtle Creek, OR 59,280 Peninsula Drainage District No. 1, OR 5,105 Rivergate, OR 56,357 South Yamhill River, OR 4,638 Schooner Cr., Linclon City, OR 13,177 Springfield Millrace, OR 9,979 Waldport, OR 716 Warrenton Diking District No. 1, OR 7,300 Willamette River, Keiser, OR 64,680 TOTAL 348,216 TABLE 37-M FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Date of Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Peak Inflow Cu. Ft./Sec. Acre/feet 25. Applegate Lake, OR January 8, 1990 6,700 10,430 26. Blue River Lake, OR January 8, 1990 9,300 20,230 27. Cottage Grove Lake, OR January 8, 1990 3,460 4,290 43. Cougar Lake, OR January 8, 1990 10,140 27,120 44. Detroit Lake, OR January 8, 1990 23,120 88,770 28. Dorena Lake, OR January 8, 1990 7,290 14,270 30. Fall Creek Lake, OR January 8, 1990 11,770 18,580 31. Fern Ridge Lake, OR January 7, 1990 5,980 3,650 45. Foster Lake, OR January 8, 1990 12,690 1,140 45. Green Peter Lake, OR January 8, 1990 21,500 62,130 46. Hills Creek Lake, Or January 8, 1990 14,530 37,540 48. Lookout Point Lake, OR January 8, 1990 16,030 46,670 49. Lost Creek Lake, Or January 8, 1990 6,930 12,690 37-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 TABLE 37-N LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA LEVEES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WORKS (See Section 34 of Text) Estimated Cost of Work Location Approved 1990 Beaver Drainage District, OR $ 2,857,366 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA 363,000 Cowlitz county Diking Improvement District 13, WA 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Distict 15, WA 304,794 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 2, WA 1,661,367 Midland Drainage District, OR 304,511 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR 1,499,186 Peninsula Drainage District No. 2, OR 3,770,000 Rainier Drainage District, OR 593,945 Sandy Drainage District, OR 15,0561 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR 674,137 Scappoose Drainage District, OR 3,567,248 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District 1, WA 5,289,833 Woodson Drainage District, OR 162,500 Total Estimated Cost, Federal Funds 21,128,288 Estimated Non-Federal Cost 3,770,000 Locations deauthorized or reclassified inactive and excluded from above cost estimate: Bachelor Island, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Clatskanie Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatskanie River Area, OR (Deauthorized - 1965) Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1974) Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Columbia Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1987) Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Deer Island Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1987) Hayden Island, OR (Inactive) John Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1979) Kalama River Levee, WA (Deauthorized - 1978) Lake River Delta Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Lewis River Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Magruder Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1977) Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, WA (Inactive) 1. Cost is for Engineering only. Project was constructed by local interests. 37-44 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-0 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 39 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Authorized Act Cost (1990) Blue River Lake, McKenzie Basin 1 3 Cascadia Lake, South Santiam River4 5 11 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries 6 Channel Improvements for Flood control Tributary to Willamette River1 6 Cottage Grove Lake, Coast Fork1 Major Drainage on 16 Streams Cougar Lake, South Fork McKenzie1 3 Detroit Lake, Including Big Cliff Lake, North Santiam River 1 Dorena Lake, Row River 1 Fall Creek Lake, Middle Fork 1 Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River 1 Gate Creek Lake, McKenzie Basin3 s 11 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Middle Santiam1 4 Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork1 Holley Lake, Calapooya Rivers 11 Lookout Point Lake, Including Dexter Lake, Middle Fork 1 Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie) (Modification to Cougar Lake) Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works North Fork, Middle Fork Willamette River Willamette River Bank Protection 1 May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doe. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep 3, 1954, S. Doc 131, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. and June 30, 1948, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. doc., 531 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc 131, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. and Jul y 14, 1960, S. Doc. 104 86th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 5318, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 22, 1936, Special Report Division Engr., June 28 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess., and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. $ 32,038,2252 104,000,000 (1975) 3,005,000 (1960) 1,214,3003 4,013,1232 9 56,750,4052' 62,729,6982 14,568,2622 22,118,2642 ' 8,526,9352 9 127,000,000 (1980) 84,005,7882 45,700,6192 13,300,000 88,238,3952 9 106,000,000 29,200,000 (1987) 1. See individual report for details of the project. 2. Actual cost 3. For construction in lieu of originally authorized Quartz Creek Lake. 4. For construction in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake. 5. Project classified deferred. 6. Project classified inactive. 7. Does not include Reclassified Locations. 8. Authorization rescinded August 28, 1958, Public Law 85-820. 9. Includes cost of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, (710) 10. Does not include $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake and Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Units. 11. Authorization rescinded November 17, 1986, Public Law 99- 662. 37-45 Project NAVIGATION LOCK Bonneville Lock and Dam OR and WALake Bonneville (See Section 42 of Text) John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA - Lake Umatilla (See Section 47 of Text) Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Open to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Elevation(NormalXAbove Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length (First Powerhouse) Length (Second Powerhouse) Width (First Powerhouse) Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (First Powerhouse) Height (Roof to BedrockXSecond Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators (First Powerhouse) Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 76 Feet 500 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 24.2 Feet Andesite January 1938 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 CFS 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet Pool 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 Feet 190 Feet 235 Feet 190 Feet 200 Feet 1 @ 5,000 kw 1 @ 48,000 kw 1 @ 59,500 kw 8 @ 60,000 kw each 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2@ 13,100 kw each 1,145,700 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 86 Feet 669 feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Feet Tainter 50 ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 37-46 TABLE 37-P REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1990 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-P (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line The Dalles Lock and Dam, OR and WA -- Lake Celilo (See Section 50 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area At Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened To Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 Feet 276 Feet 500,000 Ac.-ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each 37-47 SEATILE, WA, DISTRICT This District comprises Washington State except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to the Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Bellingham Harbor, WA................... 38-1 2. Ediz Hook, WA ........................... 38-2 3. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA .... 38-2 4. Friday Harbor, WA ....................... 38-2 5. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ........ 38-3 6. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA ........... 38-4 7. Navigation Work under Special Authorization.. 38-4 8. Project Condition Surveys.................. 38-4 9. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA .... 38-4 10. Quillayute River, WA..................... 38-5 11. Seattle Harbor, WA ...................... 38-5 12. Swinomish Channel, WA .................. 38-5 13. Tacoma Harbor, WA ...................... 38-6 14. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA38-6 Beach Erosion Control 15. Beach Erosion Work under Special Authorization38-7 16. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA ............ 38-7 Flood Control 17. Bitterroot River, Florence, MT ............. 38-7 18. Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha, WA ...... 38-7 19. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization 38-7 20. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA .............. 38-8 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 38-8 22. Mud Mountain Dam, WA .................. 38-8 23. Neah Bay, WA ........................... 38-8 24. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 38-9 25. Stillaguamish, River, WA .................. 38-9 26. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA ................ 38-9 27. Wynoochee Lake, WA .................... 38-9 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 28. Albeni Falls Dam, ID ..................... 29. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA. 30. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT .......... General Investigations 31. Surveys ................................ 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 33. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ..... 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-11 38-11 38-11 Tables Table 38-A Cost & Financial Statement ....... 38-13 Table 38-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 38-18 Table 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 38-23 Table 38-D Not Applicable Table 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 38-24 Table 38-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ......... 38-27 Table 38-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 38-27 Table 38-H Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam ...................... 38-28 Table 38-I Project Conditions Surveys ........ 38-28 Table 38-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 .... 38-29 Table 38-K Emergency Flood Control Activities - Public Law 99, 84th Congress ...... 38-29 Navigation 1. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; I & J Street Waterway, a channel 100 feet wide and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water for a distance of 3,200 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and - 38-1 - _ __ REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet.The small-boat basin expansion from 3,900 feet to 5,400 feet at Squalicum Creek Waterway and channel at I & J Street Waterway were constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction costs for these features are recorded in Table 38-C. Project was completed in October 1980. (For further details see Annual Report for 1981. For details relating to previous project see page 797 of Annual Report for 1907.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-2 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Of the forty wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway; 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway; 3 on I&J Street Waterway; and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. There is one publicly owned terminal and small-boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: A comprehensive sediment sampling/testing plan was prepared to determine the suitability of Bellingham Harbor sediments from the federal channels and non-federal berthing areas for open-water disposal. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $13,104. 2. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and the city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 13,300 linear feet of rock revetment and 3,100 linear feet of rock blanketing, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Of the 27 waterfront facilities at Port Angeles Harbor, 3 are located along the inner side of Ediz Hook. Functional uses of the piers include placing logs into water from trucks for shipment by rafting; mooring harbor pilot boats; mooring U. S. Coast Guard vessels, Naval Reserve vessels, and occasionally, oceanographic research vessels; and fueling government vessels. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Annual inspection and coordination with local sponsor. A letter report for beach nourishment and re-keying armor rock was completed. Plans and specifications for the work were initiated. Survey work on the spit was also performed. 3. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23d Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. Project was completed in April 1963. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with four berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. A portion of the East Waterway has been deepened and modified by the U.S. Navy for a Homeport. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $76,901. Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract for the Lower Snohomish River channel and downstream settling basin was completed in January 1990. 270,634 cubic yards of shoal material was pipeline-dredged with beneficialuse disposal to create a protected salt marsh on the west shore of Jetty Island at a cost of $620,300. 4. FRIDAY HARBOR MARINA, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. San Juan - 38-2 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT * Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan Island County seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Existing project. 1,600-foot concrete breakwater to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the Port of Friday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. Construction was completed in March 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted an underwater dive inspection of the breakwater structure. 5. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel across the bar 600 feet wide and 30 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 30 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; and protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). Project was completed in March 1965. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Improved project. Authorized by Section 202 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Project will deepen and widen 23.5 miles of existing 30-foot channel across ocean bar (46 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide), through the harbor entrance (46-38 feet deep and 1,000-600 feet wide), through South to Cow Point Reaches (36 feet deep and 350 feet wide), to river channel (36 feet deep and 300-250 feet wide); expand and deepen Cow Point turning basin; expand Elliott Slough turning basin; deepen local berths; improve navigation aids; modify Union Pacific Railroad bridge; modify highway bridge fendering; remove two old highway bridge piers; relocate utility lines; and construct crab and fish mitigation. Construction started in 1990 and is scheduled for completion in 1993. Estimated project cost has been reduced from $70,200,000 to $64,200,000 ($41,600,000 Federal; $22,600,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement with Port of Grays Harbor, local sponsor for improvement project, was executed on February 16, 1990. The Port is contributing 25-35 percent of project cost. In complying with terms of local cooperation, the Port is required to furnish $3,438,000 in lands and diked disposal areas and $1,010,000 in utility relocations. Terminal facilities. There are 23 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which five are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company-owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government-owned vessels. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Grays Harbor and Olympia, WA, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Prepared plans and specifications and contract documents for all construction work. Inspected contract dredging. Supervised fish mitigation facility construction and crab mitigation test plot shell placement. Completed Feature Design Memorandum on railroad bridge modification. Coordinated with local sponsor, resource agencies, and Union Pacific Railroad. New work, contract: Construction of downstream portion of project under three continuing dredging contracts was initiated in April 1990 and removed 6,157,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $8,153,000. Construction of fish mitigation slough was completed at a cost of $797,000. Purchased and placed oyster shell on 4 crab mitigation test plots. A-E contracts covered monitoring of crab density in channel during dredging, ocean disposal sites, fish mitigation facility usage, and water quality in inner harbor. Contractor completed feature-level design on railroad bridge modification. Collected and analyzed inner harbor sediments. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredge Yaquina dredged in South Reach Channel in October/November 1989, removing 202,902 cubic yards of material at a cost of $610,411. The Corps hopper dredge Essayons dredged in Crossover, North Channel, Cow Point, and South Reaches in January/February 1990, removing 284,490 cubic yards of material at a cost of $942,073. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the inner harbor was completed in May 1990, at a cost of $885,916 with 702,000 cubic yards of material being removed. A small amount of maintenance material was dredged incidental to the navigation improvement project initiated in FY 90. - 38-3 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 6. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam from gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is about 22 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, WA) are set forth in Table 38-H. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The eight waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, passing 18,145 commercial and 63,083 pleasure vessels, and 2,131,600 tons of commerce. Fishladder passed more than 500,000 fish and there were more than 1,000,000 project visitors. Maintenance, contract: Entryway development contract was completed in the amount of $372,000. A contract for repair of the large lock upstream service and guard gates was awarded in August 1990 in the amount of $3,353,000. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Anacortes Harbor, WA, $28,083; Gooseberry Point Small Boat Harbor, Hale Passage, WA, $8,345; Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA, $36,803; Neah Bay, WA, $24,139; Port Townsend, WA. $58,926; and Whatcom Creek Waterway, WA, $290. In addition, $6,718 contributed funds were expended for Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298). The program consists of control measures for selected water bodies currently infested with Eurasian watermilfoil and measures to prevent its spread into uninfested waters. Operations under the cost-share program included mechanical harvesting of 46 acres, rotovating 15 acres, maintaining 6 acres of fiberglass bottom screens at Lake Washington, Lake Union and Lake Sammamish, WA; rotovating 100 acres at Pend Oreille River, WA; and, rotovating 20 acres and chemically treating (with the aquatic herbicide fluridon) 20 acres at Columbia River, WA. The FY 1990 work also included treatment effectiveness and carryover studies, cooperation with the University of Washington on a grass carp study, aquatic plant surveys, and public information efforts. Total costs for the fiscal year were $366,555. 8. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Hydrographic surveys and inspections to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, and channels, not funded on a project basis for the current fiscal year. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Hydrographic charts are prepared and distributed. Costs for the fiscal year were $232,955. Total costs to date are $2,882,641. (See Table 38-I.) 9. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441, and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, logs and other debris considered hazardous to navigation from Puget Sound and Federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. City of Seattle is cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in Seattle Harbor. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters and removed approximately 2,900 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and - 38-4 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: 1,700 tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $51,000. Contractor continues to recycle much of the debris, reducing the cost of disposal by contract. Remainder of debris is placed in a demolition landfill. 10. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; (c) basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel; and (d) maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit is nourished with dredged material in conjunction with channel dredging. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982. In addition, a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and extending the spit was constructed. Project was completed in February 1960. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project sponsorship was transferred from the Port of Port Angeles to the Quileute Tribe Port Authority in 1983. Terminal facilities. There are 3 privately-owned docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of the river channel. 11. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay, the 30-foot by 200-foot wide channel from West Waterway to 1st Avenue South Bridge, and the 20-foot by 150-foot-wide channel from 1st Avenue South Bridge to 8th Avenue; dredging Duwamish Waterway 150 feet by 15 feet from 8th Avenue to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep at the upper end of the waterway; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions. Total length of all waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding maintenance of East Waterway above the 750-foot section. Turning basin, constructed under authority of R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925, in 20-foot deep waterway was deauthorized by P.L. 99-662 dated Nov. 17, 1986 (see Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 31, 1985). (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local sponsor has no maintenance responsibility. Terminal facilities. There are 196 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/ outfitting/drydocking/conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company-owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. Sediment sampling and testing was performed to characterize sediments proposed for open water disposal. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $71,139. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the upper waterway was completed in March 1990, removing 127,619 cubic yards of material at a cost of $307,750. In cooperation with the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, 20,362 cubic yards of sand from the material was beneficially used to cap contaminated near-shore sediments in the vicinity of a combined sewer overflow. 12. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the- - 38-5 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, 1 is used for handling general cargo, 5 are used exclusively for moorage, unloading and servicing of fishing vessels; 2 are used for handling petroleum products; 3 facilities are used for log dumps; and 2 for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various reaches of the channel. Completed plans and specifications for a FY 1990 bid to perform clamshell maintenance dredging with open-water disposal. Bid opening was delayed until FY 1991. 13. TACOMA HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor includes Commencement Bay and tributary waterways at Tacoma, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel in City Waterway 500 feet wide and 29 feet deep from deep water in Commencement Bay to 11th Street Bridge, 500 feet wide and 22 feet deep to 14th Street Bridge, and varying from 500 to 250 feet wide and 19 feet deep from 14th Street Bridge to end of this waterway, a total length of 8,500 feet; (b) channel in Hylebos Waterway 30 feet deep, 3.1 miles long, and 200 feet wide except where width is increased to 250 feet at the bend below East 11th Street, to 300 feet at Lincoln Avenue bend, and to 510 feet and 770 feet, respectively, at the channel widening above Lincoln Avenue and the turning basin at the head of the waterway; (c) construction of two training walls, each about 700 feet long at mouth of Puyallup River; and (d) channel in Blair Waterway 2.6 miles long, including a portion seaward of East 11th Street, 650 feet wide and 30 feet deep over southerly 350 feet, and 35 feet deep over northerly 300 feet; and remaining portion, 35 feet deep and 150 feet wide at East 11th Street, 600 feet wide between East 11th Street and Lincoln Avenue, and 300 feet wide between Lincoln Avenue and a 1,200-foot wide turning basin at head of waterway. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.8 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 20 feet. Project was completed in December 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 1372 to 1376 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1875 of Annual Report for 1938 for Puyallup Waterway, and page 1702 of Annual Report of 1944 and page 1502 of Annual Report for 1954 for Blair (formerly Wapato and Port Industrial) Waterway.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 81 terminal facilities, exclusive of those available to recreational craft, located in Tacoma Harbor which is comprised of Commencement Bay and its many waterways. These facilities serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, fueling small vessels, ferry traffic, marine repair, conversion/outfitting, dry-docking, mooring, bunkering, ship-building and shipbreaking. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Grays Harbor, and Olympia, WA, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor; Hydrographic condition surveys were accomplished on Blair and Hylebos Waterways. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $87,599. 14. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram Lumber Mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; (e) mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. - 38-6 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels. One of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various segments of the project. Beach Erosion Beach Erosion Control 15. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (perauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Coupeville, Whidbey Island, WA, $5,381. 16. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA Location. Project is located within the city of Seattle, at Williams Point, and adjacent to the East Passage of Puget Sound. Existing project. Beach nourishment consisting of the initial placement of 34,000 tons of sand, gravel, and cobble fill seaward of the existing seawall, a distance of 2,300' along the southwest beach. The fill extends horizontally 10' seaward of the wall, then slopes downward on a 1V to 5H gradient to intersect the existing groundline 65' seaward of the wall. 250' of rock revetment, at Williams Point, consisting of 2 layers of 1,500- to 4,000-pound armor rock placed on a 2'-thick filter bed of quarry spalls, constructed with a 1V to 1.5H slope, a 10'-top width, and a top elevation approximately 1' above the existing seawall. The revetment is fronted by 2,000 tons of gravel and cobble fill, with the same top elevation, slope and seaward extent as the beach nourishment on the southwest beach. Periodic beach nourishment, consisting of placement of beach material to replenish the erosion loss, is required approximately every 5 years. Monitoring of beach nourishment consists of initial and periodic profile surveys, estimate alongshore/offshore volumes of material, installation of wind gage at site, and periodic beach sediment sampling. Estimated construction cost is $780,000 ($508,000 Federal; $272,000 non-Federal). Initial construction was completed in December 1988. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Seattle) will provide 35% of total project cost. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 15, 1988. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed operation and maintenance manual and postconstruction monitoring. New work, contract: Awarded post-construction evaluation contract. Flood Control 17. BITTERROOT RIVER, FLORENCE, MT Location. Project is located along the Bitterroot River in Ravalli County, 5.2 miles south of Florence, MT. Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for 900 linear feet of riprap protection consisting of a blanket 36" thick on a 1V to 2H slope and a 15-foot-wide, 4.5-foot-thick weighted riprap toe. Construction was completed in May 1989. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (State of Montana) has provided 25% of project cost. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 16, 1988. Local sponsor will provide operation and maintenance of completed project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Scheduled work was fiscally completed. 18. ELWHA KLALLAM RESERVATION, ELWHA, WA Location. Within the Elwha River basin on the Olympic peninsula of Washington State, and approximately 6 miles west of the city of Port Angeles in Clallam County. Existing project. A setback levee, 7,640 feet long, averaging 8 feet high with a 12-foot top width, to reduce flood damages along the lower Elwha River within the Klallam Tribal Reservation. The landward levee slope is covered with soil and the riverward slope protected with quarry spalls. Both slopes were planted with native grasses. Top of levee was surfaced with gravel to provide a suitable road for inspection and maintenance. Interior runoff reaching the levee is drained through gated culverts and a 1,000-foot-long drainage ditch which parallels the downstream portion of the levee. Ramps built across the levee will provide access to property and the existing hatchery fish holding pond has been relocated behind the levee. Construction was completed in November 1989, but final fiscal requirements remain to be completed. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe) will provide 25% of project cost. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on November 23, 1988. Local sponsor will also provide operation and maintenance of the completed project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervision and inspection of construction contract. Completed operation and maintenance manual. New work, contract: Completed construction contract. 19. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). - 38-7 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 Fiscal year costs were: Half Moon Bay, WA, $3,332 and Redondo Beach, WA, $277 (terminated). Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 38-J. Emergency flood-control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation.) See Table 38-K. 20. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64,6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, WA.") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, ditches, powerline, and other project features. The outlet works and stilling basin were inspected. Work continued on water quality surveys. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests, and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville, Dungeness River at Sequim, Sammamish River, and Yakima River, all in Washington State; Lightning Creek, Coeur d'Alene, St. Maries and Placer Creek projects in Idaho. Streambank vegetation evaluations were made at Omak and Oroville and on the Green River in Washington. Thirty Section 14 bank protection projects in WA, ID, and MT, were inspected in conjunction with flood control projects. Fiscal year costs were $73,494. Costs to date have been $960,822. 22. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, Washington.") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 425 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,700 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of 139,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreational facilities. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1953.) To date the Corps has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, and fish facilities. Approximately 6,180 fish were transported from the fish collection facility. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Value Engineering studies resulted in eliminating proposed access bridge across spillway. Initiated plans and specifications for new reservoir outlet tower. New work, contract: A contract for construction of the river diversion scheme was awarded in May 1990, in the amount of $6,248,000. Major Rehabilitation. New work, hired labor: Supervision and inspection of construction contract. New work, contract: A contract for construction of a seepage control cutoff wall in the core of the dam continued. Contract work resulted in creating a new world record depth for a cutoff wall on an existing dam, 402.6 feet. 23. NEAH BAY, CLALLAM COUNTY,WA Location. Project is located on the south side of Neah Bay, 60 miles west of Port Angeles, adjacent to Makah Indian Route 1 (Bay View Avenue), Clallam County, WA, on the Makah Indian Reservation. Existing project. Construction of a 900-foot-long rock revetment and 400 feet quary spall blanket along approximately 1,300 feet of beach, adjacent to the shore of the bay. The project will protect the primary access into Neah Bay against wave attacks and the impingement of floating debris - 38-8 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT caused by higher tide stages. Construction is scheduled for completion in October 1990. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Makah Indian Tribe) has provided 25% of project cost. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 28, 1990. Local sponsor will also provide operation and maintenance of completed project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications. Advertised, awarded, and supervised construction contract. New work, contract: Construction of bank protection. 24. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee project, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $151,412. Total costs to date have been $2,300,467. 25. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey Quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir (including a fishway) 275 feet long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor and equipment to replace rock riprap bank protection along 375 linear feet of segment #25. 26. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA. Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, WA, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps acquiring approximately 2,450 linear feet of setback levee in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased length of the project have been provided by the Port of Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Removed brush and noxious weeds from the entire project along slopes of levee. 27. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, WA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Montesano.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,000 acre-feet of total storage for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and fish and wildlife. Upstream fish facilities were operational in the fall of 1970. The project was completed and became operational in December 1972. Installation of power-generating facilities was not authorized, pending a reexamination report by the Chief of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1972.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-12 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 authorized the Secretary of the Army to transfer the Operations, Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation (OMR&R) of the Wynoochee project to the city of Aberdeen. The dam was built on a cost-share basis with the city which paid approximately 46% of the investment and the O&M costs. The legislation relieves the city of the O&M payment when it - 38-9 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 assumes the OMR&R, to the extent the city personnel does the work. The OMR&R was assumed by city of Aberdeen on July 1, 1990. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project facilities were operated through June 30, 1990. Maintenance was accomplished on dam and fish facilities, roads, ditches, culverts, and visitors' facilities. The project tank truck hauled upstream migrant fish past the dam. Beginning July 1, 1990 the Corps' effort was limited to quality assurance monitoring and water control assistance in flood control operations. Legislation is under way which, when enacted, will transfer fee title for the Wynoochee Lake project to the city of Aberdeen. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 28. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. Dam is on Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a power-house having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillways, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Work continued on the boundary monumentation. 29. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at River Mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet, Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 88,274 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,457,384 kilowatts. Additional work will be required to bring turbine efficiency for units 17-27 up to design standards. Uprating and plant modernization of units 1-16, and other miscellaneous project work, is essentially complete. Estimated cost of current construction project is $396,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Continued real estate acquisition. New work, contract: Contracts were awarded for debris boom cathodic protection, replacement parts for turbine deficiency work, and replacing one set of generator brakes. Contracts continuing through the fiscal year included generator stator rewind, transformers, project security, data acquisition and control system, project final completion, station service governors, repaint powerhouse interior, and turbine deficiency correction (units 17-27). Contracts completed during the fiscal year included spillway spall repair, debris boom cathodic protection, main unit excitation system, and powerhouse gallery drainage. Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Major contracts awarded during the fiscal year included seal spillway pier cracks, grout intake structure leaks, repair and seal paving, rebolt debris boom, replace governor air compressors, safety/OSHA-related warehouse modifications, guard services, and miscellaneous replacement orders. Contracts continuing through the fiscal year included repair and paint trachracks, and paint generator tops and barrels. 30. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai and Columbia Rivers. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project will be operated as a unit of comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units.A fifth unit was completed in 1984 with capacity of 105,000 kilowatts, and there is a provision for three additional units. Lake - 38-10 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acrefeet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water-resource development of the Columbia River basin. Construction is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Work continued to upgrade and maintain the left abutment instrumentation. Libby Additional Units Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam powerhouse. Fabrication of generators for units 5 through 8 is complete; however, only the unit 5 generator was installed. Installation of the electrical equipment was limited to unit 5. Parts for units 6 through 8 have been stored at the site. Project is complete. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. Operations during fiscal year. None. Libby Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 mile of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Funds were provided for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the reregulating dam. Operations during fiscal year. In FY 82, all work was terminated due to court direction. Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief of Engineers on March 3, 1981. General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $150,462 for navigation studies, $102,276 for flood damage prevention studies, $71,024 for review of authorized projects, $154,775 for miscellaneous activities, and $76,527 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $555,064. In addition, $115,450 contributed funds were expended for the navigation study, Olympia Harbor, WA. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Coordination with the Osoyoos Lake Board of Control included technical assistance in review of operation plans for the recently constructed Osoyoos Lake control structure. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies in flood hazard evaluation and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $2,401 for international water studies, $118,067 for flood plain management services, and $5,122 for hydrologic studies, a total of $125,590. 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Centralia, WA The city of Centralia lies in west central Washington at the confluence of the Chehalis and Skookumchuck Rivers, about midway along the Chehalis River from its source in the Willapa Hills to its mouth at Aberdeen at Grays Harbor. Floods of record on Skookumchuck and Chehalis Rivers occurred in January 1990. The plan of improvement authorized in P.L. 99-662 would reduce flooding in the Skookumchuck River valley for the 22 miles between Skookumchuck Dam and the river mouth and along the Chehalis River downstream from Centralia for about 20 miles to Oakville. The improvement, as recommended in the feasibility report, consists of structural modifications (flood control outlet tunnel and spillway gate) which would enable the existing, private water supply dam to provide flood control storage during winter months. The 200-year flood on the Skookumchuck River at Centralia would be reduced from 13,300 cubic feet per second to 6,700 cubic feet per second (about a current 4-year flow). The 200-year flood plain would be reduced by 1,500 acres with water surface reductions of between 2 and 5 feet. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) accomplishments during the fiscal year included refinement of project design to less costly gated spillway sluice; reevaluation of hydrology, existing local levees and embankments, flood damages, and flood reduction benefits; and determination that Skookumchuck Dam modification is no longer economically justified and lacks Federal interest. Investigation of structural and nonstructural alternatives was begun. Estimated PED cost is $1,785,000. Fiscal year costs were $632,568. Total costs to date have been $1,369,532. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington. The plan of improvement, authorized in P.L. 99-662, as refined by the General Design Memorandum, would protect most of the left bank flood plain at the mouth of the Chehalis River in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement would include segments of earthen embankment - 38-11 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 levee (2.2 miles) and steel sheetpile floodwall (0.9 miles), joining areas of high ground (1.1 miles). The project roughly follows the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire Slough to Cosmopolis. The levee would protect 1,176 acres of the cities from inundation by the standard project flood. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included completion of the General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement. Estimated preconstruction engineering and design cost is $1,828,000. Fiscal year costs were $38,139. Total costs to date have been $1,360,074. Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Grays Harbor is a large tidal estuary in southwestern Washington. The entrance is 45 miles north of the mouth of the Columbia River and 110 miles south of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The estuary lies entirely within Grays Harbor County, State of Washington. Preconstruction Engineering and Design work was essentially completed in Fiscal Year 1990 with additional work on continuing environmental contracts. Project improvement by construction commenced. See project write-up for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA. Fiscal year costs were $71,239. Total costs to date have been $5,668,621, $3,530,000 of which is now included in Cost and Financial Statement of this report. Other Preconstruction Engineering and Design Projects Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Total costs to date have been $1,310,000, including $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 101(c). A land claims settlement with the Puyallup Tribe was effective February 1990, and no more Corps involvement is anticipated. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1989. East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, WA Total costs to date have been $663,000. Project has been deferred. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1988. Yakama River at Union Gap, WA Total costs to date have been $502,000. Project has been deferred. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1988. - 38-12 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep.30, 1990 1. Bellingham Harbor New Work WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Ediz Hook, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Friday Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost Maint Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib.. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 188,000 68,000 170,000 86,031 -- 31,000 - 17,865 - 1,380 690 - 13,000 12,859 7,000 16,773 - 1 492,000 910,500 970,600 480,: 489,763 793,615 1,083,617 486,E -- - 13,800 -- -- 13,649 - 1,566,839 - 1,566,839 1 129,887 1,462,956 35,927 1,368,845 2 - 29,421 - 29,421 - 9,103 - 9,103 -- 5,878,740 -- 5,878,740 -- 1,162,860 873 1,162,372 - 385,850 -- 385,850 -- 131,965 362 131,947 - 1,723,745 -- 1,723,745 3 129 9,915,307 811 9,915,228 4 - 116,618 - 116,618 -- 584,090 - 584,090 -- 1,575,500 -- 1,575,500 5 152 28,952 749 28,398 -- 1,267,881 -- 1,267,881 - -- -- 14,030,000 19,149,962 6 -- - - 10,551,615 15,671,576 7 3,278,700 3,307,000 2,941,480 3,041,014 90,338,865 3,267,434 3,316,169 2,889,250 3,045,373 90,286,086 8 - - - - 9,592 - - - - 9,592 9 - - -- -- 4,606,145 -- - - - 4,606,145 - 38-13 - 15,1 14, 2, TABLE 38-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep.30, 1990 (Contrib. Funds) 6. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA 10. Quillayute River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Seattle Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 12. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Tacoma Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 4,561,000 - 3,753,379 4,561,000 3,753,37936 55,889 55,889 - - - -- 4,611,436 - - - - 4,611,43610 3,641,000 6,185,950 4,715,000 4,353,835 80,019,695 3,640,034 6,079,426 4,627,269 4,398,158 79,763,66611 -- -- -- -- 7,465,230 10,373 -- -- -- 7,465,230 -- - - -- 250,000 - - - -- 250,000 597,000 565,000 560,000 590,928 597,072 565,203 548,423 580,994 456,050 456,244 -- 902,000 5,415 901,651 402 43,337 43,337 18,725,230 18,692,26412 521,850 521,85013 10,494,072 10,494,049 20,000 20,000 393,000 61,000 144,900 647,227 459,554 57,688 108,357 685,066 376,000 523,000 570,290 521,808 83,100 91,253 206,820 81,218 170,335 170,335 8,438,873 8,435,098 69,333 69,333 20,000 20,000 808,332 808,33214 7,056,860 6,928,893 32,000 32,000 - - 2,383,891 - - 2,383,891'15 - 88,071 1,478,816 - 88,015 1,478,76018 26,000 26,000 - 38-14 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 890 Sep.30, 1990 (Contrib. Funds) 14. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17. Bitterroot River, Florence, MT (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 22. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 115,650 113,884 - 361,100 4,011 354,726 - 355,000 177,000 1,464 115,101 358,921 - 269,500 - 12,965 199,303 - 11,500 176,250 - 10,902 163,488 - - 59,750 -- - 56,302 20,000 155,000 963,000 19,091 154,383 860,712 - - 120,142 - - 95,315 -- 1,147,208 - 1,147,208 - 222,500 - 222,500 - 1,386,955 - 1,386,955" 2,300 13,641,496 5,863 13,638,03018 -- 78,372 -- 78,372 57,411 42,036 -6,800 6,560 -9,991 -6,543 52,999 8,156 722,500 721,922 269,500 254,304 180,950 180,950 49,759 49,759 1,523,900 1,471,368 120,142 103,471 - - - -- 37,048,061 - - - - 37,048,061 805,500 701,000 713,000 685,628 12,463,429 918,895 721,875 597,463 788,180 12,443,574'1 -- - - -- 2,000,000 - - - -- 2,000,000 1,200,000 1,196,536 1,151,000 1,152,114 2,175,000 2,256,885 1,121,000 1,031,680 1,420,000 1,429,669 965,000 990,238 4,223,000 3,343,165 1,066,322 1,141,473 520,000 1,500,000 13,400,000 13,743,500 515,530 1,479,084 13,366,684 13,311,323 23,726,84920 22,822,46221 22,493,798 22,461,27322 285,908 285,908 29,163,500 28,672,620 3,928 3,928 - 38-15 - TABLE 38-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep.30, 1990 23. Neah Bay, Clallam New Work County, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 25. Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 26. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Wynoochee Lake,WA 28. Albeni Falls Dam, ID 29. Chief Joseph Dam- Rufus Woods Lake, WA 30. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa,MT (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 100,000 100,000 96,786 97,881 35,000 32,177 54,405 50,000 52,358 6,165 - 290,500 - 121,031 -- 97,000 -- 52,805 86,177 149,583 97,600 38,459 30,000 29,686 290,500 121,031 97,000 52,805 134,595 134,5952 1,958,624 1,957,534 21,000 21,000 -- 3,947,853 -- 3,947,85324 35,986 647,767 33,919 644,458 - 54,405 843 7,007 - - - - 23,494,445 -- - - 23,494,44525 1,382,000 1,295,000 1,646,000 1,378,902 16,611,348 1,405,109 1,298,569 1,615,314 1,264,215 16,428,0512 -- - -- - 31,741,561 - - - - 31,741,56127 2,743,000 3,478,400 3,524,200 3,921,663 42,141,069 2,823,626 3,447,226 3,448,526 3,970,757 42,058,72028 6,200,000 7,151,901 6,885,000 7,054,829 17,893 3,746,100 3,782,076 5,145,000 5,161,387 8,183,000 8,068,534 4,370,000 4,344,812 9,134,400 8,840,800 - 791 3,699,000 4,084,000 3,615,043 4,100,378 9,701,000 8,576,556 9,479,470 9,670,106 531,449,235" 530,287,07130 106,552,382 106,302,1683' 297,630 297,630 -- 543,858,44032 312 543,857,29133 4,081,223 41,070,802 3,999,702 40,859,43034 - 1,458,252 - 1,458,25235 1. Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2. Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. 3. Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. - 38-16 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 4. Includes $5,869 appropriated and expended for previous project. 5. Includes $1,180,500 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L98-8). 6. Includes $3,530,000 appropriated or Preconstruction Engineering and Design, $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $113,134 for previous project. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended.. 7. Includes $3,528,621 expended for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $113,134for previous project. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 8. Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $409,660 Emergency Relief funds and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. 9. Excludes $111,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 10. Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $485,002 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $246,567 expendedby State of Washington and $742,071 expended by King County. Excludes $192,516 Public Works Administration funds expended. 11. Includes $1,631,195 1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subsequently S lapproparniadt eedx pended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $32,000 ex19pended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983(P.L 98-8). 12. Includes $64,996 appropriated and expended for previous project. 13. Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 14. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 15. Includes $159,585 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration funds expended. 16. Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous proj ects. 17. Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,314 Emergency Relief funds expended. 18. Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration funds expended. 19. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $8,000 expended under Productive EmploymentAppropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-8). 20. Includes $87,785 appropriated for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $10,457,000 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds expended. 21. Includes $87,785 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $9,552,613 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds expended. 22. Includes $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $378,162 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 23. Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief funds expended. 24. Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 25. Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 26. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $27,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 27. Includes $971,947 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 28. Includes $174,776 Special Recreation Use Fees, appropriated and expended. Includes $498,820 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $188,475 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 29. Includes $144,338,252 appropriated for original project, $386,963,000 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 30. Includes $144,338,252 appropriated for original project, $385,800,836 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 31. Includes $774,561 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $530,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 32. Includes $484,753,143 appropriated for original project, $42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, $475,000 for power planning, and $132,300 for Kelley Flats Airport. 33 . Includes $484,753,143 appropriated for original project, $42,220,485 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, $475,000 for power planning, and $132,300 for Kelley Flats Airport. 34. Includes $699,224 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $219,900 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 35. Excludes $161,849 expended by Federal Aviation Agency, $32,000 expended by Lincoln County- City of Libby Joint Airport Board, $8,000 expended by Bonneville Power Administration, and $379,555 expended by U.S. Forest Service. 36. Excludes $3,418,000 contributed by Port of Grays Harbor in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. - 38-17 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 as amended 2. Mar. 7, 1974 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. Channel 3,200 feet long, 100 feet wide, and 18 feet deep in I&J Street Waterway. EDIZ HOOK, WA Construction of 10,000 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment.Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. H. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 10, 1976. S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, P.L 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 5, 1965. H. Doc. 101, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L 93-251 H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. FRIDAY HARBOR MARINA, WA Construction of 1,600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. Sec. 107, P.L 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 9, 1981. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. The 18-foot channel. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty Rivers and Harbors Committee fixed at 13,734 feet. Doe. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. H. Doe. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. Dredging in bar channel. H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. Dredging in bar channel. H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of Rivers and Harbors Committee 16 feet above mean lower low water. Doc.2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized H. Doc. 53, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.; by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) Rivers and Harbors Committee and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 facilities. Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Report in Office, Chief of Engineers Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. - 38-18 - 5. July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Nov. 17, 1986 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26, 19341 Aug. 30, 1935 3 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1956 July 13, 1892 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Breakwater at Westhaven; H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel. Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Improve project features with accompanying fish mitigation. P.L 99-662 Modify existing railroad bridge. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. Government Locks to be known as P.L 84-779 Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by Annual Report for 1893, page 3425 snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. dike on westerly side, to stabilize entrance. Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess long; moorage basin.2 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". TACOMA HARBOR, WA City Waterway Hylebos Waterway H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report for 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 76, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 25, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and 91, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. - 38-19 - TABLE 38-B (Continued) 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 19353 Aug. 30, 19354 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 as amended July 24, 1946 as amended June 30, 1948 as amended May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 as amended June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 14. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. H. Doec. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. - 38-20 - Training walls at mouth of Puyallup River (previously Rivers and Harbors Committee authorized by Public Works Administration Sep. 6, 1933) Doe. 55, 72nd Cong.,2d Sess. Blair Waterway extension. H. Doc. 271, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. Blair and Hylebos Waterways extension. S. Doc. 101, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, H. Doe. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet Rivers and Harbors Committee and minimum width of 500 feet. Doc. 41,72d Cong., 1st Sess. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. Channel from deep water in Palix River to BayCenter dock. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA 250-foot rock revetment and 2,550 feet of sand and Sec. 103, P.L 87-874 gravel nourishment. Periodic monitoring and replenishing Authorized by Chief of Engineers, beach nourishment. Oct. 18, 1983 BITTERROOT RIVER, FLORENCE, MT Construction of riprap bank protection. Sec. 14, P.L 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 10, 1988 ELWHA KLALLAM RESERVATION, ELWHA RIVER, WA 7,640-foot long levee, 8 feet high with 12-foot Sec. 205, P.L 80-858 top width and bottom width of 45 feet. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sep. 1, 1987 HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. P.L. 85-592 MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. NEAH BAY, CLALLAM COUNTY, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. Sec. 14, P.L 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Aug. 22, 1990. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. P.L 75-761 TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, section of city of Tacoma. WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. 16. 17. 18. 20. 22. 23, 25. 26. 27. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Nov. 17, 1988 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended on May 4, 1977 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs, $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Amend contract between city of Aberdeen and United States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-year payments. Transfer operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (OMR&R) to the city of Aberdeen, WA. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L 93-251 P.L 93-251 H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 100-676 S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 469, 82d Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L 94-587 P.L 95-26 LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction P.L 89-789 personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. P.L 90-2395 Design standards for relocation of Montana State P.L 90-4836 Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, P.L 91-2827 operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded P.L 91-625 by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and P.L 91-611 sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering long-term economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation S. Doc. 29, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. P.L 93-251 Construction of fish production measures to P.L 93-251 compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land (not to exceed $2,000,000) for P.L 93-251 prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary P.L 93-251 County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. - 38-21 - TABLE 38-B (Continued) 28. 29. 30. I i 1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Compensation (not to exceed $1,500,000) to Drainage Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Amends P.L 93-251 by increasing limitation from $350,000 to $380,000 for reimbursement to Boundary County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge. Alleviate low water impact on existing facilities and protect Indian archeological sites exposed during course of operations, at an estimated cost of $750,000. P.L. 93-251 P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 100-676 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 5. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 502. 2. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of James 6. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. Island, is included in this modification. 7. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil 3. Included in Public Works Administration program. Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. 4. Included in Emergency Relief program, May 28, 1935. - 38-22 - Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1988 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep, 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and PROJECT Status Report for Construction Maintenance Anacortes Harbor, WA Completed 1989 222,345 5 1,149,212 Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA1 Completed 1977 825,263 -- Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)1 Completed 1966 125,634 8 -- Blaine Harbor, WA Completed 1958 346,650 -- Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA Completed 1923 274,3919 7,693 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA 1 Completed 1985 1,619,95610 -- Edmonds Harbor, WA2 Completed 1987 - 224,756 Flathead River, MT Completed 1901 9,811 -- Hammersley Inlet, WA Completed 1950 9,000 10,683 Hoquiam River, WA Completed 1950 18,9211 5,316 Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA1 Completed 1987 946,000 437,000 Kingston Harbor, WA Completed 1967 262,57012 5,000'13 Kootenai River, ID and MT Completed 1933 9,255 5,643 Lake Crockett, WA Completed 1989 377,990'1 697,640 Mats Mats Bay, WA1 Completed 1970 137,67915' -- Neah Bay, WA Completed 1982 2,057,266 1,854,058 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Abandoned 1913 63,879 7,634 Olympia Harbor, WA Completed 1989 337,70918 739,34117 Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Completed 1918 4,491 259 Port Angeles Harbor, WA3 Completed 1960 470,873 -- Port Gamble Harbor, WA Completed 1953 11,91118 13,337 Port Orchard Bay, WA4 Completed 1928 42,804 - Port Townsend, WA Completed 1987 480,89919 78,787 Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA' Completed 1985 1,461,590 - Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Completed 1962 2,575,0912- Skagit River, WA Completed 1950 99,830 38,758 21 Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA ' Completed 1981 1,744,02522 -- Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA Completed 1987 73,322 378,378 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA' Completed 1981 2,000,00023 -- 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 2. Constructed by local interests at a cost of $415,000. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended for new work. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. 3. Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 4. No maintenance required. 5. Excludes $2,000 Coast Guard funds and $59,524 contributed funds expended. 6. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds expended. 7. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 8. Excludes $2,500 Coast Guard funds expended. 9. Includes $8,005 appropriated and expended for previous project. 10. Excludes $2,184,766 contributed funds expended. 11. Excludes $32,373 Emergency Relief fundsexpended. 12. Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 13. Mitigation of shore damages study. 14. Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed projects (Code 710). 15. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds and $9,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 16. Includes $183,257 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration funds expended. 17. Includes $14,418 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 18. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 19. Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 20. Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 21. Includes $2,500 appropriated and expended for previous project. 22. Excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. 23. Excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. - 38-23 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA1 Completed 1957 59,582 s-- Bear Creek, Flathead CountyBridge, near Essex, MT Completed 1971 1,424- Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Completed 1964 17,836 - Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 156,000- Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 57,000 -- Cedar River, King County, WA3 Completed 1953 3,229 -- Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Completed 1949 32,264 - Chehalis River, City of ChehalisRaw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Completed 1966 35,454- Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1965 47,916 - Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Completed 1977 140,080 - Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 48,698 -- Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Completed 1981 43,500- Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Completed 1978 18,660- Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Completed 1978 31,548 -- Clark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Completed 1971 28,357- Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Completed 1950 27,947 -- Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Completed 1968 50,000 6 -- Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1950 49,165 - Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Completed 1941 152,872 - Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Completed 1950 25,452- Coffee Creek, WA3 Completed 1966 15,000- Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Completed 1983 384,862 7-- Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Completed 1959 42,726- Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge near Tumwater, WA2 Completed 1965 26,292 -- Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Completed 1967 22,956 -- Dungeness River, Area #5, WA2 Completed 1950 2,155 8 -- Dungeness River, Area #8, WA2 Completed 1950 2,895 a -- Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA' Completed 1964 52,04010 -- Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Completed 1981 99,000 -- Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1986 47,500 - Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Completed 1961 14,0931 -- Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1951 17,303 Entiat River, WA3 Completed 1971 49,300- Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Completed 1978 38,000 - Flathead River, M2 Completed 1972 20,940 -- Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT Completed 1955 26,265- Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT Completed 1948 33,347- Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT Deferred 1981 300,00012 Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT Completed 1964 13,438 Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT * Completed 1950 2,320 -- Foster Creek, West Fork, WA 2 Completed 1958 19,513's -- Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Completed 1962 50,000 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Completed 1972 24,605 -- Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Completed 1976 27,001 -- Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Completed 1977 37,359 -- Hoh River, County Road 216, WA2 Completed 1980 143,000 -- Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Completed 1980 194,000 -- Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Completed 1956 22,082's -- Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Completed 1961 11,916 - Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Completed 1964 41,622 -- - 38-24 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1983 173,000' 5 -- Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 21,083 -- Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Completed 1977 59,812 -- Hoquiam River, WA2 Completed 1977 52,600 -- Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA 3 Completed 1962 24,000 -- Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Completed 1950 42,325 -- Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID2 Completed 1965 14,885 -- La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Completed 1979 40,525 - Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Completed 1974 15,700- Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Completed 1974 11,200 - Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Completed 1974 13,450- Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Completed 1976 19,810- Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA2 Completed 1949 31,783 - Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Completed 1951 33,30016 -- Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Completed 1951 11,72617 -- Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Completed 1972 11,836 -- Missoula, MT (Sewage Treatment Plant) 2 Completed 1965 50,00018 - Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Completed 1977 17,608 -- Naches River, Naches, WA2 Completed 1982 59,000- Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Completed 1972 24,792 -- Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Completed 1948 37,636 -- Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1960 26,790 -- Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Completed 1952 19,345 -- Nooksack River, WA3 Completed 1948 24,006 -- Nooksack River, Acme, WA2 Completed 1985 77,300 -- Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Completed 1950 6,075' -- Nooksack River, Middle Fork,Deming, WA2 Completed 1986 79,00020 -- Nooksack River, above Highway 1Z Bridge, WA2 Completed 1960 10,807 -- Okanogan River, WA2 Completed 1974 10,100 -- Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1949 52,100 -- Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1953 7.987 -- Okanogan River, Omak, WA1 Completed 1981 2,231,030 -- Okanogan River, Oroville, WA1 Completed 1982 1,787,630 -- Pilchuck River, WA3 Completed 1948 25,401 -- Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1985 81,000 -- Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1971 10,713 -- Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Completed 1980 54,000 -- Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Completed 1971 30,973 -- Placer Creek, ID Completed 1986 5,865,000 -- Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Completed 1964 11,291 -- Puyallup River, WA Completed 1937 50,0002 -- Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 86,160 -- Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Completed 1981 125,000 -- Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA 2 Completed 1972 39,300 -- Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Completed 1981 208,000 -- Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Completed 1961 15,92822 -- Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Completed 1974 49,657 -- Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 Completed 1973 31,565 -- Rock Creek Road, MT2 Completed 1980 50,000 -- Rye Creek, MT2 Completed 1973 22,819 -- St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID Completed 1942 357,698 -- - 38-25 - TABLE 38-E (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance St. Regis River, MT 3 St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT 3 Sammamish River, WA Sauk River, WA2 Sauk River, Skagit County, WA2 Shelton Creek, WA1 Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements) Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA2 Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)2 Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA2 Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA2 Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Spokane River, Spokane, WA 2 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA1 Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Stillwater River, MT2 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 Strong Creek, Hope, ID2 Tahola, WA2 Upper Puyallup River, WA4 Willapa River at Raymond, WA Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 Yakima, Yakima River, WA Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Yakima River, Yakima WA2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1942 1951 1967 1974 1989 1979 1982 1949 1966 1980 1980 1963 1966 1967 1981 1969 1970 1977 1961 1963 1989 1970 1964 1973 1977 1970 1979 1938 1982 1976 1969 1972 1948 1949 1947 1977 1983 7,23423 2,983 2,582,53624 20,860 119.60025 872,021 1,934,792 50,000 46,489 93,000 137,000 40,753 17,719 50,00026 222,50027 44,227 60,90028 15,565 16,43729 11,433 122,1383� 271,713 50,00031 17,457 34,513 8,442 223,893 71,49532 508,13033 111,072 50,000* 50,00035 381,961 8,047 48,272 36,768 125,500" 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 2, Public Law 406, 75th Congress, as amended 4. Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. OP 65-93-917. 5. Excludes $10,000 contributed funds expended. 6. Excludes $24,728 contributed funds expended. 7. Includes $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $13,500 contributed funds expended. 8. Excludes $2,155 contributed funds expended. 9. Excludes $2,895 contributed funds expended. 10. Excludes $340,066 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 11. Excludes $3,314 contributed funds expended. 12. Preconstruction planning only. 13. Displayed as West Fork Foster Creek, WA in last report. 14. Excludes $21,807 contributed funds expended. 15. Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds expended. 16. Excludes $6,786 contributed funds expended. 17. Excludes $11,726 contributed funds expended. 18. Excludes $5,339 contributed funds expended. Displayed as Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, MT in last report. 19.Excludes $6,075 contributed funds expended. 20. Displayed as Middle Fork Nooksack River, Deming, WA in last report. 21. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 22. Excludes $4,843 contributed funds expended. 23. Excludes amount expended by Works Progress Administration which is not available. 24. Excludes $696,923 contributed funds and $1,000 Coast Guard - 38-26 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT funds expended. 25. Excludes $32,778 contributed funds expended. 26. Excludes $24,488 contributed funds expended. 27. Displayed as North Fork Skykomish River, WA in last report. 28. Excludes $14,307 contributed funds expended. 3209.. EExxcclluuddeess $1,960 contributed funds expended. $79,311 contributed funds expended. 31. Excludes $46,182 contributed funds expended. 32. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. Excludes $13,704 contributed funds expended. 33. Includes $8,888 expended for restudy, FY 1967- 1972. 34. Excludes $21,311 contributed funds expended. 35. Excludes $17,988 Office of Emergency Preparedness funds expended. 36. Includes $118,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). TABLE 38-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,0001 1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Calispell Creek, WA ' 1968 1968 $25,000 -- Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA 2 1958 1964 $ 9,0007 -- Entiat River, WA 3 1958 1986 - -- Methow River, WA 3 1958 1986 - -- Okanogan River, WA 3 1958 1986 1,1007 -- St. Regis River, MT 4 1958 1978 1,400' -- Wenatchee River, WA 4 1958 1978 -- -- Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA 3 1980 1986 44,300 8 -- Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (RH 68)3 1973 1989 52,0007 -- Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 48) (Uncompleted Portion) 3 1962 1989 - -- Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 30) 3 1933 1989 35,834 35,834 Hammersley Inlet, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 4 1950 1978 - -- Hoquiam,Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WA s 1948 1952 83,631 ' -- Olympia Harbor, WA (RH 45) 3 1973 1989 21,606 1o0 -- Port Angeles Harbor, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 4 1960 1977 - -- Port Gamble Harbor, WA (Uncompleted Portion) ' 1953 1977 - -- Quillayute River, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 3 1986 1986 - -- Seattle Harbor, WA (RH 25) ( A Completed Portion) 8 1986 1986 - -- Seattle Harbor, WA (RH 30) (Uncompleted Portion) 3 1986 1986 -- -- Skagit River, WA (Uncompleted Portion) ' 1950 1978 -- -- Skagit River, WA (Avon Pass) 3 1968 1989 54,468 -- Spokane River, Spokane, WA 3 1939 1986 2,944' -- Stillaguamish River, WA 3 1946 1986 4,2343 -- Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, WA 3 1978 1989 544,331? -- 1. Authority for project expired October 27, 1968. 6. Turning basin constructed under authority of R&H Act of March 2. Authority for project expired July 1964. 3,1925, was deauthorized under authority of Section 202, P.L. 99-662 3. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1002, P.L 99-662 dated dated November 17, 1986. Cost of turning basin is not available. November 17, 1986. 7. Preconstruction planning only. 4. Deauthorized under authority of Section 12, P.L 93-251 dated 8. Includes $14,300 expended for restudy, FY 1970. March 7, 1974. 9. Economic study only. 5. Authority for project expired in October 1952. 10. Includes $18,700 expended for restudy, FY 1968-1973. - 38-27 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 TABLE 38-H LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (SEE SECTION 6) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 11/4 11/4 Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter silli Feet 331/2 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill2 Feet 29 - Depth on lower miter sill2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 1. Low water in upper pool. 3. Cost of double lock and dam was $2,382,200 and the emergency 2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. gates, completed in 1923, $262,300. TABLE 38-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 8) Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Washington: Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA November 1989 Lake Crockett, WA May 1990 Olympia Harbor, WA October-December 1989 Port Angeles Harbor, WA August 1990 Quillayute River, WA November 1989 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA October 1989 Swinomish Channel, WA May-June 1990 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA August 1990 - 38-28 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Study Identification Cedar River, WA Centralia-Chehalis Flood Warning System, WA Chehalis River, Salzer Creek, WA Horseshoe Bend, WA Lower Green River, King County, WA Newaukum River, WA 1 Nooksack River, Everson, WA Nooksack River, Marietta, WA Okanogan River, WA2 Snohomish River, Ebey Island, WA2 Snoqualmie River, WA Stillaguamish River, Snohomish County, WA Sultan, WA2 TOTAL Fiscal Year Costs (1990) 27,791 a 8,691 30,172 472 176,250 2,866 472 472 9,121 3,784 23,380 14,749 6,684 $304,904 1. Unfavorable report. 3. Excludes $1,572 contributed funds expended. 2. Terminated TABLE 38-K EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES REPAIR, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (PUBLIC LAW 99, 84TH CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1990) Disaster Preparedness $468,338 Emergency Operations 246,508 Rehabilitation 561,623 TOTAL $1,276,469' 1. Excludes $136,473 contributed funds expended. - 38-29 - TABLE 38-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED _ (PREAUTHORIZATION) WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT * This District consists of all Columbia River drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary pool (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge (River Mile 290.5) below McNary Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge (River Mile 8.4) near Richland, WA. The primary tributary drainage area is the Snake River which includes more than 107,000 square miles in six states: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, and small portions of Nevada and Utah. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.. 39-1 Flood Control 2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects ................................. 39-1 3. Catherine Creek, OR ..................... 39-2 4. Clear & Burnt River, OR .................. 39-2 5. Colfax, Palouse River, WA ................ 39-2 6. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization39-2 7. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 39-2 8. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works ....... 39-3 9. Jackson Hole, WY ........................ 39-3 10. Lucky Peak Lake, ID ....................... 39-3 11. Mill Creek Lake, WA ..................... 39-3 12. Owyhee River, OR ....................... 39-4 13. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 39-4 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 14. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program ....................... 39-4 15. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID............ 39-4 16. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam -- Lake Sacajawea, WA ...................... 39-5 17. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and WA ...... 39-5 18. Little Goose Lock and Dam -- Lake Bryan, WA 39-6 19. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA .......... 39-6 20. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West,WA ................ 39-7 21. Lower Snake River Fish & Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA,OR, ID ......................... 39-7 22. McNary Lock and Dam -- Lake Wallula, OR and WA ............................. 39-7 23. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID .................. 39-8 General Investigations 24. Surveys ................................. 25. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... . 26. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ...... Tables Tables 39-A Tables 39-B Tables 39-C Tables 39-D Tables 39-E Tables 39-F Tables 39-G Tables 39-H Tables 39-I Tables 39-J Tables 39-K 39-8 39-9 39-9 Cost & Financial Statement ....... 39-10 Authorizing Legislation .......... 39-13 Other Authorized Navigation Projects39-16 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 39-16 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ............ 39-17 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Control Projects ................ 39-18 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 39-18 Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant and Impoundment .................. 39-19 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, and ID .... 39-23 Navigation Flood Control 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). No costs in Fiscal Year 1990. 2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Location. Improvements included in this project are along Columbia River and its tributaries. - 39-1 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, an amount not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization would be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Tables 39-B and 39-H for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. The following projects were deauthorized during FY 90: Catherine Creek Lake, OR, Mud Lake, ID and Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID. 3. CATHERINE CREEK, OR Location. Catherine Creek is a tributary to the Grande Ronde River located 8 miles east of the city of La Grande, Union County, Or. Existing project. Organic debris such as fallen trees, brush, and a select number of large cottonwood trees were removed from the creek to increase its capacity to convey future floods. The work was funded under authority of Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954. Local cooperation. The Catherine Creek Corridor Improvement District sponsored the project and complied with requirements set forth in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936 plus additional requirements set forth in the project document. Operations during fiscal year. None. 4. CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Location. At the city of Huntington waste water lagoon, Malheur County, Oregon. Existing project. Place 800 feet of riprap along three cells of the lagoon system under authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. City of Huntington sponsored the project and agreed to sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. None. 5. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Location. On the main stem North and South Forks of the Palouse River and includes a portion of Spring Flat Creek, a tributary stream, all within the city of Colfax, WA. Existing project. Project consists of 3,740 feet of concretelined channel, 4,910 feet of revetted channel, and 2,330 feet of unrevetted channel and drainage structures. Authorization was provided under PL 78-534, Section 10, Flood Control Act of 1944. Local cooperation. The city of Colfax has provided the necessary right of way and other sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. None. 6. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $3,505,180 which included $3,197,906 for construction of the Malheur Lake Project, OR and $307,274 for reconnaissance level studies as follows: Salmon River Ice Jam Study at Salmon, ID ($257,134); Stuart Gulch at Boise, ID ($10,000); Kahlotus Creek at Kahlotus, WA ($10,000); Coppei Creek at Waitsburg, WA ($9,995); Ririe Groundwater Study at Ririe, ID ($20,145). Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $214,506 for disaster preparedness, and $4,407 for flood fight and rescue operations. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $1,985 including reconnaissance level studies on Pataha Creek at Pomeroy, WA ($1,577), and Walla Walla River near Milton-Freewater, OR ($408). Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Fiscal year costs were $35,140 which included reconnaissance level studies on Prairie Creek Enterprise, OR ($31,009), Malheur River at Vale, OR ($976), Esquatzel Coulee at Connell, WA ($3,094), Salmon River at Salmon, ID ($36) and Boise River near Boise, ID ($25). 7. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. Geological and seismological investigations at Ririe Dam are complete and the Waterways Experiment Station (WES) has finalized all data and findings. Draft reports were received, reviewed, and forwarded to higher authority for review and final approval. The report and final recommendations will be distributed in FY 91. See Table 39-I for inspections made during fiscal year. Fiscal year costs were $82,032. Total costs to September 30, 1990 were $2,557,006. - 39-2 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 8. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS FY 89 was the last year for expenditures on this program. The program is carried under the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriations. 9. JACKSON HOLE, WY Location. On both banks of the Snake River, Teton County, west of Jackson, Wyoming. Existing project. 23.5 miles of levees consisting of: Right bank - a levee with full riprap protection from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Highway Bridge, to 3.5 miles below, a total of 13.5 miles. Left bank - a levee with full riprap protection extending from 10 miles upstream of Jackson- Wilson Highway Bridge to 5 miles upstream and extending 1.5 miles immediately upstream from the same bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge, for a 10-mile total length. Project authorized by Public Law 516, Flood Control Act of 1950 for flood control protection by channel improvements consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetment along Snake River in the vicinity of Wilson, Wyoming. Public Law 99-662 modified the original Public Law 516 to provide that the operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions to the project become Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors shall pay the initial $35,000 in cash or materials of any such costs expended in any one year, plus inflation as of the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations during fiscal year. An O&M Decision Document and EIS were completed and an LCA signed with the local sponsor. Levee maintenance and rock quarrying were initiated in September. A Section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act was conducted with the USFWS concerning bald eagle management. A draft General Investigations Decision Document was completed and submitted to higher authority with recommendations on levee improvements. An environmental restoration project proposal was submitted, at the request of the USFWS, State of Wyoming, and various environmental groups. A proposal for environmental restoration under Section 1135 of WRDA 86 was also submitted. Total costs during fiscal year were $139,305. 10. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of city of Boise, ID. Existing project. The project includes a rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet high above streambed and 1,700 feet long at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. Project provides for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. (For details, see page 2000 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed June 1961. Since 1961, $133,371,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. During the detailed investigation of outlet capacity and the potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976. In FY 78, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980 and modified on October 9, 1980 and 1982. Construction of the auxiliary outlet facility began in May 1984 and was completed in August 1986. Construction of modifications to the existing outlet tunnel and powerhouse excavation began in August 1986 and was completed January 1987. Powerhouse general contract construction began in April 1986. The project was completed and dedicated on October 7, 1988. Power on line for all units was August 18, 1988. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included the dam structures and recreation areas. Federally authorized 2nd outlet was deauthorized FY 90. 11. MILL CREEK LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. The project includes an off-stream earthfill storage dam about 125 feet high above streambed and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and division structures. Project provides for flood control and recreation. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the City of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Recreation was added to the project purposes through the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of the channel through City of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Recreation facilities were completed in 1966. (For details, see page 2005 of Annual Report of 1962.) Since 1942, $7,575,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. The rehabilitation of the existing project was to correct the seepage and internal erosion by constructing a cutoff wall. The construction of the cutoff wall did not alleviate the seepage problem, thus requiring limited flood control use of the project. The seepage and internal erosion create a high vulnerability for dam failure. During FY 89, the reservoir was drained and will be filled only for flood control use. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. (For details, see page 2006 of Annual Report of 1962.) Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued, which - 39-3 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. 12. OWYHEE RIVER, OR Location. The lower 12 miles of the Owyhee River from the junction with the Snake River, upstream 23 miles to the Owyhee River diversion dam, Malheur County, OR. Existing project. Remove organic debris and gravels from the lower 12 miles of the Owyhee River under the authority of Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. The Owyhee River Water Control District sponsored the project and agreed to sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. None. 13. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulation of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control was accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $247,163. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 14. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM Location. At Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Dams on the Snake River in the states of Idaho and Washington and McNary Dam on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. Existing project. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 89 Energy & Water Development Act (P.L. 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of $8.7 million in FY 88 and $9.6 million in FY 89 for the design, testing, and construction of fish bypass facilities. Funds for FY 88, 89 and 90 were expended on a project by project basis. However,the mitigation program starting in FY 91 will be considered one project and funds will be appropriated and expended as such. The program will consist of juvenile fish mitigation facilities which includes construction of juvenile fish passage facilities and a detailed mitigation study to be prepared in cooperation with regional interest, for juvenile fish losses at Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. Completion of the bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The plan of improvement includes the following facilities: (a) Lower Monumental - submerged traveling fish screens, gate raise modification, gantry crane, collection bypass facility, and holding and loading facility (b) Little Goose - gantry crane, gate raise modification, submerged traveling fish screens, and holding and loading facilities Phase I and II (c) Lower Granite - deflectors, two fish transport barges, gate raise modification, fish support facility, wet separator, barge moorage facility expansion, and gantry crane (d) McNary - prototype screens, submerged traveling fish screens, gantry crane modifications, collection and bypass facilities; transport holding and loading facility, gate raise modification, and extended screen rehab facility. The total estimated Federal project cost is $142,000,000. Ice Harbor bypass facilities were not initially authorized for construction under the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. However in FY 88, 89 and 90, Congress authorized expenditures to proceed with design of a bypass system. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Construction was completed on holding and loading facilities Phase I and II at Little Goose. Engineering and design continues at Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite, and Mc- Nary for design of submerged traveling screens, gate raise modifications, gantry cranes, collection bypass facilities, holding and loading facilities, and moorage facilities expansion. The fish mitigation program is approximately 25 percent complete. 15. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and area redevelopment. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 1600 and 1445 Mean Sea Level (MSL). The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The reservoir is habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. Dam structure is about 3,300 feet long and about 717 feet high above streambed. Fish passage is not feasible due to the height of the dam. A hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. Powerhouse has two - 39-4 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 90,000 kilowatt and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 400,000 kilowatts. Provisions have been made for three additional 220,000 kilowatt generating units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kilowatts. A reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 200,000 kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 78. Environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Unit 4 is undeveloped. Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized FY 90. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the project started in April 1963 and was completed in 1986. Since the project became operational in June 1972, it has prevented about $737,000 of potential flood damages. Power generation through September 1990 was 30.76 billion kilowatt hours. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres and Freeman Creek recreation sites are open to the public. Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, cartrailer parking, comfort stations, and fully-developed overnight camping. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control. Operation and Maintenance: Wildlife habitat browse continued on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. During fiscal year 1.82 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the three generating units. Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (DNFH) operations continued to be affected by IHN virus. Steelhead eggs were transferred to Kooskia and Hagerman National Fish Hatcheries (KNFH and HNFH). With over 12 million steelhead eggs taken in 1989, approximately 2 million each were taken to KNFH and HNFH. Of these, nearly 2.7 million were released despite moderate IHN losses at DNFH and KNFH, and, for the first time, IHN losses at HNFH. The release totaled over 400,000 pounds, up from less than 270,000 pounds and 1.85 million smolts in 1989. DNFH also released 174 million spring chinook salmon (over 96,000 pounds), and approximately 25,000 pounds of rainbow trout reared at HNFH were released into Dworshak Reservoir. For 1990, over 10,600 adult steelhead were spawned at DNFH and 11.3 million eggs were taken, and eggs were again distributed to KNFH (1.6 million) and HNFH (2.6 million). Magic Valley Hatchery also received 1.25 million eggs for state outplanting programs. From 1.6 million eggs, approximately 374,000 fingerlings were returned to DNFH from KNFH, and of 2.6 million eggs taken to HNFH, 950,000 fingerlings were returned to DNFH. Added to 1.45 million fingerlings on hand at DNFH, over 2.7 million steelhead were on hand going into the winter. It is expected that about 2.4 million will survive to release in the spring of 1991. With 1.7 million spring chinook fingerlings going into the winter, it is projected that 1.4 million smolts will be released in 1991. Despite a low return of steelhead to the Columbia River in 1990 (185,000 compared with a previous 5-year average of over 300,000), over 55,000 returned over Lower Granite Dam, and about 30,000 were expected to return to the Clearwater River in the winter of 1990-1991. 16. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula (McNary Reservoir) and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 440 and 435 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Sacajawea extends upstream about 31.9 miles and provides slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has three 90,000 kilowatt units and three 111,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 603,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 610 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 391 MSL is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provides the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 MSL and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 41.6 miles long is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam and from the dam to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in December 1955 and was completed in 1971. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1971 and completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1990 was 64.11 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 1.96 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 3,645,388 tons during calendar year 1989. 17. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Location. On the Snake River, River Mile 141.3, 1.7 miles upstream of the existing interstate bridge connecting the towns of Lewiston, ID and Clarkston, WA. Existing Project. The project consists of a new fixed highlevel four-lane highway bridge and approaches on U.S. Highway 12 across the Snake River constructed at a cost "not to exceed $21,000,000". In December 1981, Congress authorized an additional expenditure of $2,200,000 for construction - 39-5 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 of Lewiston's North Ramp. An approach roadway from the bridge to 16th Avenue in Clarkston, WA was authorized in July 1983 at an additional expenditure of $800,000. Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on July 16, 1979. Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests have provided without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the bridge and its approaches, and after construction have agreed to own, operate toll free, and maintain the bridge and approach facilities. The non-Federal costs for the land and relocation were $755,193. Operations during fiscal year. All work complete. 18. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mouth of Snake River at head of Herbert G. West Lake (Lower Monumental Reservoir), about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,670 feet long and about 160 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 498 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 581 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 feet by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide,14 feet deep and 37.2 miles long is provided from the dam to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 6.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry Bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in 1963 and was completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1974 and was completed in 1984. Power generation through September 1990 was 51.69 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control and contract awarded for Schulz Bar dredging. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 2.19 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 3,057,974 tons during calendar year 1989. 19. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan (Little Goose Reservoir) and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, appurtenant facilities, and required about 8 miles of backwater levees along the Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. Project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 738 and 733 Mean Sea Level (MSL) in Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area. Lower Granite pool extends upstream about 38 miles and provides slackwater to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 512 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 581 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 60 feet wide and 60.5 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 38.0 miles long is provided from the dam to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in July 1965 and was completed in 1984. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1974 and completed in 1979. Power generation through September 1990 was 42.81 billion kilowatt hours. Approximately $4,119,300 in potential flood damages have been prevented since the levees became functional. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 2.21 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 2,131,516 tons during calendar year 1989. As the first collection point on the Snake River, Lower Granite Dam is a primary component of the District's Juvenile Fish Transport Program. Transport began in the 1960's as a study of methods of bypassing juvenile steelhead and salmon around turbines of the Corps' Snake and Columbia River dams. Transport became a routine operation in 1980 while other structural modifications, installation of screens, and development of bypass systems continue. - 39-6 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT For the transport program, the District has collection facilities at Lower Granite, Little Goose, and McNary Dams. Juvenile salmon and steelhead collected at these dams are hauled by specially designed trucks or barges to release sites below Bonneville Dam. From there, they can travel unobstructed to the sea. In 1990, a record number of over 22,253,000 juvenile fish were collected, 9,352,000 at Lower Granite, 2,340,000 at Little Goose, and 10,561,000 at Mc- Nary Dam, of these, 814,000 were bypassed at McNary Dam, and 21,439,000 were transported. With two new barges, transport capacities were reached during the peak of the outmigration at Lower Granite Dam, but no fish had to be returned to the river because of inadequate barge capacity as occurred in 1989. New collection facilities at Little Goose Dam functioned well. Work continued on upgrading and improving facilities with new sampling and office facilities under construction at Lower Granite Dam, a new collection/handling facility under construction at Lower Monumental Dam, and new collection or bypass facilities under design for Mc- Nary and Ice Harbor Dams. With added fish production from Clearwater Anadromous Fish Hatchery and Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Wildlife Program restoration efforts, replacement trailers and additional barges will be required to keep the program functioning efficiently. 20. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM - LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA. Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea (Ice Harbor Reservoir), about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Herbert G. West extends upstream about 28.7 miles and provides slack water to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 3,800 feet long and about 135 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 508 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 483 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 61 feet high, which provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 553 MSL and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 28.1 miles long is provided from the dam to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included railroads and highways. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in June 1961 and was completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1975 and was completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1990 was 65.12 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control and generating Unit 2 repair. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 1.92 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 3,169,696 tons during calendar year 1989. 21. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, ID Location. At various locations within the Columbia Snake River drainage in the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Existing project. The project consists of a series of fish hatcheries, wildlife development areas and purchase of offsite project lands for fishing and hunting access. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple-purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). The real estate design memorandum, and feature design memorandums on all hatcheries and satellites, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The Dworshak National Fish Hatchery Expansion, the Irrigon Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, McCall Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery and Magic Valley Hatchery are in operation. The compensation plan is 75 percent complete. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $218,000,000. Local cooperation. None required Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work was completed at Crooked River Satellite. Contracts were awarded for Clearwater Hatchery, the Clearwater Hatchery Water Supply and Eagle Laboratory. Off-project land acquisition is being pursued. 22. McNARY LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and a system of levees and pumping plants. Project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 340 and 335 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Wallula extends upstream about 64 miles and provides slack water to Ice Harbor Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 7,300 feet long and about 183 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish lad- - 39-7 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 ders. Powerhouse has fourteen 70,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 980,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 1,310 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 291 MSL is surmounted by 22 vertical lift gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 2,200,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is singlelift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250-feet wide, 14-feet deep and 32 miles long is provided from the dam to the mouth of the Snake River. Relocations along the lake included railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started May 1947 and was completed in 1982. Power generation through September 1990 was 222.11 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 6.98 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 14 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 6,592,134 tons during calendar year 1989. 23. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 230 Snake River, which is largest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams as necessary for power, incidental irrigation, and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slack-water navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for the portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam -- Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam -- Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam -- Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Table 39-A and 39-K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite are in full operation. (See individual reports for details.) (For further details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 18 privately-owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, wood products, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slack-water navigation to Snake River Mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slackwater reaches the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual report for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. General Investigations 24. SURVEYS The principal ongoing survey is the Upper Snake River and Tributaries. The area covered by the study extends from the headwaters of the Snake River in Wyoming down to and including the Weiser River in Idaho. Interim studies were continued on the Snake River in the vicinity of Jackson Hole, WY,and Big Lost River, ID. An interim study of the Weiser River, ID was concluded. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Corps to operate and maintain a system of non-federal levees along the Snake River in the vicinity of Jackson Hole, WY. A reconnaissance study of the potential for improving the system with levee raises, extensions, or relocations was completed in FY 1990. The Weiser River interim study determined that a dam and 900,000 acre-foot reservoir at the Galloway Site was cost effective. However, the study was terminated following a finding that there was no reason that the proposed plan could not be implemented by non-federal interests. A reconnaissance study of a proposal to lower the Tri-Cities Levees at Kennewick, Pasco and Richland, WA was initiated. The levees were built by the Corps as part of the Mc- Nary Lock and Dam in the 1950's. Consequent upstream storage development may provide an opportunity to reduce levee heights for the purpose of land enhancement and recreation. We participated in the Columbia River and Tributary Study, a survey directed by the North Pacific Division. Total cost of surveys was $750,657 for FY 1990, including: flood control studies ($580,198); special studies including Soil Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, River Basin and Regional Planning Commissions, and Cooperation with States, ($56,745), Special Investigations, Inter Agency Water Resource Development and FERC Licensing Activities, ($109,320), and restudy of deferred projects, ($4,394). - 39-8 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 25. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $124,524 which included: flood plain management services ($28,118), flood warning system ($17,760), technical services, ($68,115), and environmental data studies ($10,531). 26. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Little Wood River Project, Vicinity Gooding and Shoshone, ID. The Little Wood River Project was authorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. The proposed project consists of a diversion channel and two ponding facilities to divert floodflows from the Little Wood River into adjacent lava fields via the Dietrich and Milner-Gooding Canals for the purpose of reducing flood damages in the Gooding and Shoshone, ID vicinities. The estimated cost is $5,400,000. Preconstruction engineering and design activities were initiated in FY 1990 to review and update the project formulation development for the 1976 feasibility report. Other FY 1990 activities included: obtaining a supplement to the USFWS Coordination Act Report, reevaluating floodplains for the cities of Gooding and Shoshone, and determining hydraulic capacities of the Dietrich and Milner-Gooding Canals. Fiscal year costs were $99,967. McNary Lock and Dam (Second Powerhouse), OR and WA McNary Second Powerhouse is a proposed addition on the south shore of McNary Lock and Dam on the Columbia River near Umatilla, OR. The project will increase the present 980,000 kilowatt generating capacity by an additional 774,000 kilowatts. Provisions are included for compensation of negative impacts on fish and wildlife. The project is estimated to cost $667,000,000 at October 1, 1986 price levels. The General Design Memorandum Phase I was prepared under the Water Resource Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94- 587, and submitted to the Secretary of the Army on July 1, 1981. Studies were initiated in FY 1982 and continued through FY 1984 on the General Design Memorandum Phase II and the Powerhouse Preliminary Design Report. There has been no further design activity on the project. The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA The proposed project consists of a roller compacted concrete dam 90 feet high with uncontrolled spillway and a fixed maximum release outlet works that would create a detention reservoir of 1,260 acre-feet of capacity. The storage comprises 860 acre-feet for flood control and 400 acre-feet for sediment. In addition, the project also includes a conduit with a capacity of 400 cfs and a dike and floodgate across the Union Pacific Railroad to protect downtown Kennewick, WA. The plan of improvement will provide protection against heavy rainfall, snowmelt, and thunderstorm floods to the city of Kennewick, WA. Reevaluation of the project economics due to hydrology modifications resulted in a revised General Design Memo No. 2 and a Post-Authorization Change Report. The GDM was approved by the Washington Level Review Board on January 24, 1990. The Post-Authorization Change Report which reduced the flood control storage of the authorized project and added a railroad floodgate was approved March 5, 1990. Fiscal Year Costs were $132,000. The total estimated Federal and Non-Federal project cost is $10,500,000. The estimated Federal cost is $7,875,000. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors shall pay 25 percent of the total project cost or an estimated $2,625,000. - 39-9 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Total to Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY89 FY 90 Sep. 30,1990 3. Catherine Creek, OR New Work 4. Clear & Burnt River, OR 5. Colfax, Palouse River, ID 9. Jackson Hole, WY 10. Lucky Peak Lake, ID 11. Mill Creek Lake, WA 12. Owyhee River, OR 15. Dworshak Dam & Reservoir, ID 16. Ice Harbor Lock & Dam,WA 17. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID & WA 18. Little Goose Lock & Dam, WA Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -9,200 265 11,000 35,526 2,236 115,000 65,000 96,159 52,958 20,000 379,000 50,833 139,306 1,560,698 1,078,000 852,000 784,014 1,492,378 855,418 1,068,450 761,029 499,000 573,000 1,047,550 853,797 494,044 575,148 1,046,431 799,866 -90,000 -89,857 -6,184 26,802 1,250 -1,023 1,974 28,800 28,800 99,500 99,500 5,810,240 5,810,240 2,388,270 2,388,270 579,000 339,306 19,652,081 1 19,652,081 1 14,480,565 2 14,374,4892 2,258,495 3 2,258,495 3 9,491,240 9,418,774 --- 17,705,607 24 17,705,603 69,316 69,316 13,689 --- 329,523,296 ' 399 --- 329,523,296 4 6,027,728 6,711,200 6,178,520 6,408,122 73,913,357 s 5,985,953 6,436,396 6,507,158 6,102,810 73,474,322 8 --- --- 690,000 --- --- 248,487 99,000 168,029,757 6 387,310 167,876,554 5,609,800 5,643,100 7,346,305 5,358,025 74,200,004 5,290,932 5,342,425 7,876,699 5,169,866 73,885,192 7 --- 128,168 --- 128,168 23,085,832 23,085,832 --- 3,000,000 4,963,000 4,043,000 233,361,022 6 ------ 6,391,061 5,071,935 232,818,018 8 5,298,710 4,882,100 3,704,800 3,711,324 57,027,729 e 5,145,627 4,569,571 4,257,639 3,572,515 56,876,520 s - 39-10 - TABLE 39-A TABLE 39-A (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Total to Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY89 FY 90 Sep. 30,1990 19. Lower Granite Lock New Work & Dam, WA Approp. --- 5,661,000 -563,000 1,958,000 374,836,315 o10 Cost --- 19,405 3,781,755 1,997,535 373,579,008 o Maint. Approp. 8,493,700 8,654,100 7,770,300 5,547,966 75,550,568 11 Cost 8,114,145 8,667,762 8,177,073 5,310,080 75,208,098 1 Maint Contrib. 20,000 ----- -- 20,000 Cost 20,000 --- --- -- 20,000 20. Lower Monumental New Work Lock & Dam, WA Approp. --- 20,000 2,140,000 99,000 238,632,732 12 Cost -- --- 363,114 1,335,148 238,071,994 12 Maint Approp. 5,556,200 6,514,800 5,837,300 3,961,605 56,655,137 13 Cost 5,375,064 5,290,609 7,270,127 3,760,855 56,413,959 13 21. Lower Snake Fish & Wildlife New work Compensation, ID, OR & WA Approp. 16,100,000 5,313,000 8,687,000 11,472,832 160,709,741 Cost 16,303,537 5,391,184 8,567,973 9,877,498 158,946,484 (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. --- --- --- --- 223,965 Cost --- --- --- --- 223,965 22. McNary Lock & Dam, - New Work Lake Wallula, OR & WA Approp. --- 20,000 1,180,000 2,578,000 326,293,105 14 Cost --- 18,801 1,022,277 2,231,198 325,787,381 14 Maint. Approp 13,440,800 9,389,800 8,865,480 9,351,148 168,388,263 15 Cost 13,048,173 9,350,922 9,331,470 8,897,860 167,699,501 15 (Contributed Funds) Maint. Contrib. --- --- --- --- 43,707 Cost --- --- --- --- 43,707 23. Snake RiverDownstream New Work from Johnson Bar Landing Approp. --- 8,681,000 7,230,000 6,199,000 1,015,294,589 16 OR, WA & ID Cost --- 19,405 10,784,417 8,791,928 1,012,780,337 1* Maint. Approp. 24,958,410 25,694,100 24,662,405 18,590,284 264,013,37717 Cost 23,928,713 23,870,367 27,588,435 17,815,413 262,954,364 17 1. Includes $570,831 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 2. Includes $66,700 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 3. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $96,340 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 4. Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 5.Includes $20,137,847 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 1972 for hatchery operations. FY 72-78 funds of $6,097,000 were charged to project as a cost, but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes $48,182 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. Includes $88,000 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 6. Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,748,021 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $914,256 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $789,000 appropriated and $635,797 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 7. Includes $48,919 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees; $641,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 8. Includes $60,941,807 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $12,006,000 appropriated and $11,462,996 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 9. Includes $621,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 10. Includes $46,212,534 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes $63,800 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at completed projects. Includes $10,645,966 appropriated and $5,798,695 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 11. Includes $338,163 appropriated and expended under - 39-11 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 12. Includes $51,661,371 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $2,259,000 appropriated and $1,698,262 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 13. Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 14. Includes $1,976,586 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $3,778,000 appropriated and $3,272,276 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 15. Includes $28,851 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees and $1,035,860 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 16. Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $85,000 for new work on existing projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 17. Includes $186,570 appropriated and expended for maintenance of previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $393,369 appropriated and $384,025 expended open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. - 39-12- WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID. Levee left bank. H Blackfoot River, ID. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, ID. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Ada County unit was deauthorized in 1986. Camas Creek, ID. Channel deepening and rectification of a 20-mile reach of Camas Creek. Deauthorized in 1965. Gooding Area, Little Wood River, ID. Channel improvement. Grande Ronde Valley, OR. Levees and channel clearing, May 17, 1950 I. Doc 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Oct 27, 1965 Sep 24, 1954 Jul 24, 1946 Dec 22, 1944 CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Construction of riprap bank protection at city of Huntington Waste Water Lagoon. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Colfax, WA, by channel enlargement and modification, levees, floodwalls, revetments, and modification of railroad bridges. straightening and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Deauthorized in 1986. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Henrys Fork Unit deauthorized in 1986. Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY. Flood protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID. Revetted levee. Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection in immediate area. Deauthorized in 1965. Malheur River, OR. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Mud Lake, ID, Idaho Falls Area. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1990. Palouse River, WA. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Deauthorized in 1986. Payette Valley, ID. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized October 3, 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, ID. Bank protection. South Fork Clearwater River, ID. Emergency construction of levees and revetments. Deauthorized in 1986. Teton River, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon, ID. Channel improvement. Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. Project deauthorized in 1990. Whitebird Creek, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. CATHERINE CREEK LAKE, OR Flood control and multipurpose dam on Catherine Creek H. Doc. 280, near Union, OR. Project deauthorized 1990. Oct 27, 1965 CATHERINE CREEK, OR Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek. Sec 208, P.L by Chief Engineers Sep. 3, 1985 Sec. 14, P.L 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jul 10, 1985 Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc 888, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. - 39-13 - TABLE 39-B 1. 89th Cong. 1st Sess. 83-780 Authorized 2. 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 39-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. Deauthorized in 1990. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WA Off-stream storage project upstream fromWalla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concretelined channel. OWYHEE RIVER, OR Gravel, brush and small tree removal from 12 miles of Owyhee River. P.L 79-526, Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 P.L 94-587 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 208, P.L 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 11, 1985. Jul 24, 1946 Oct 22, 1976 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Sep 24, 1954 as amended Jul. 19, 1988 - 39-14 - 10. 11. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM Design, test and construction of fish bypass facilities at P.L 100-371 Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite and McNary dams. (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Preparation of detailed plans. S. Doc 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, H. Doc. 403, 87th navigation, power, recreation, and area redevelopment. Cong., 2nd Sess. Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. P.L. 88-96 Dworshak Added Units 4, 5 and 6, ID. Units 5 and 6 were P.L. 87-874 deauthorized in FY 90. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Cong., 3rd Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec. 4, Flood Control of 1944 facilities. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Four-lane highway bridge and approaches. P.L 94-587 Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. P.L. 97-140 Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in P.L. 98-63 Clarkston, WA. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000,000. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BRYAN, WA Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. P. L 91-638 LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM - LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West. P. L 95-285 LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, AND ID Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. P.L 94-587 Changes to land acquisition authority. H.R. 6-P.L.99-662 12. 14. 15. 16. 17. Jul 3, 1958 Oct 23, 1958 Aug 15, 1963 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 2, 1945 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Oct 22, 1976 Dec 29, 1981 Jul 30, 1983 Mar 2, 1945 Dec 31, 1970 Mar 2, 1945 Mar 2, 1945 May 25, 1978 Oct 22, 1976 as ammended Nov. 17, 1986 18. 19. 20. 21. TABLE 39-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. Mar 2, 1945 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 17, 1986 23. Jun 13, 1902 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Table E Aug 18, 1941 Table E Dec 22, 1944 Table E Jul 11, 1956 Table E Oct 23, 1962 Table E Nov 7, 1966 9. & Table E Nov 17, 1986 McNARY LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Construction, operation and maintenance of a second powerhouse. SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OR, WA, AND ID Open-river navigation Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Mouth to Riparia. Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. H. Doc. 704., 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H.R. 6- P.L 99-662 H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong., 2nd. Sess. H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Supercedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, ID only. H. Doc. 704 See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Cong., 2d S Lower Granite Locks and Dams. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Dayton, Touchet River, WA. Flood protection. H. Doc. 662 Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR.Flood Protection. H. Doc. 719 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID. H. Doc 452, Channel improvement. Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR. Flood protection. Pullman, Palouse River, WA. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA. Levees and protective work P.L 84-685 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA. Channel improvement. Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID. Construction of levee. Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID. Channel improvement. P.L 87-874 Lapwai Creek Culdesac, ID. Construct left bank levee. Lyman Creek near Rexburg, ID. Channelization. Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, WA. Levee and channel work. Blackfoot Reservoir, Blackfoot River, ID. Modification to increase spillway capacity. Deauthorized in 1986. Ririe Lake, Willow Creek, ID. Storage for flood control. Grande Ronde Lake, OR. Flood control, irrigation, water P.L 89-298 supply, anadromous fish, downstream and resident trout fishery, recreation and downstream power. Deauthorized in 1986. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA. Local protection reservoir to provide flood protection to portions of the city of Kennewick, WA. Cottonwood Creek Dam, ID. Protection to highly- P.L 89-789 developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Deauthorized in 1986. Stuart Gulch Dam, ID. Protection to highly-developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Deauthorized in 1979. Jackson Hole, WY. Flood control protection by channel P.L 99-662 improvement consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetment along Snake River in vicinity of Wilson, Wyoming. Also operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions are Federal responsibility. Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection ,75th ess. , 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. ,76th Cong., 3rd Sess. 77th Cong., 1st Sess. - 39-15 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 39-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Columbia River and Tributaries Completed 1968 1,851,195 -- above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA1 1. Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary projects. TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID 1 Completed 1951 12,019 Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID 1 Completed 1970 133,518 Big Wood River, ID5 Completed 1985 170,000 Boise River, ID5 Completed 1985 236,500 - Catherine Creek Lake, OR Deferred 1978 1,552,000- Connell, WA1 Completed 1967 60,000 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, ID2 Completed 1984 23,400- Dayton, Touchet River, WA Completed 1966 380,617- Dry Creek, WA1 Completed 1961 384,426 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA1 Completed 1967 232,792 Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA 1 Completed 1969 2,665- Gooding Area, ID 1 Completed 1954 59,167 Graves Creek, ID 1 Completed 1953 75,469- Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Completed 1955 1,575,838- Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Completed 1978 2,388,270- Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID 1 Completed 1972 176,833 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID 1 Completed 1973 113,296 Little Wood River, ID 6 Active 1990 99,967 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA1 Completed 1972 17,592 Lyman Creek, ID1 Completed 1971 230,315- Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR Completed 1957 55,894- Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Completed 1968 1,786,753 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID 1 Completed 1965 54,538 Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID2 Inactive 1949 23,050 Rapid Creek, ID5 Completed 1985 19,500- Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA2 Completed 1977 110,815- Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID2 Completed 1967 39,172 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA Completed 1972 28,839 Ririe Lake, ID Completed 1983 39,677,448 Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR2 Completed 1985 75,000 Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR1 Completed 1970 5,000 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID 1 Completed 1980 131,700 Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID2 Completed 1952 8,501 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID 1 Completed 1968 32,425 South Fork, Boise River, ID5 Completed 1985 44,400 South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID Completed 1973 61,055 Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID 1 . Completed 1955 128,635 Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA1 Completed 1973 72,140 - 39-16 - TABLE 39-E (continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Tucannon River, Wooten, WA1 Completed 1971 73,932 Umatilla River, OR1 Completed 1961 161,540 Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR2 Completed 1960 16,118 Weiser River, ID5 Completed 1985 106,900 Willow Creek, ID' Completed 1963 976 Willow Creek Lake, OR Completed 1985 37,168,114 Yakima River, West Richland, WA1 ,4 Completed 1964 238,890 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, PL 4. Includes $9,000 contributed funds. 80-858. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208, PL 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL 83-780. 79-526. 6. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL99-662. No 3. Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. funds authorized until FY90. TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECT For Last Full report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID & WA 1964 1975 - Blackfoot Reservoir, ID 1980 1986 267,626- Boise Valley, ID Ada County Unit 1963 1986 46,084 - Canyon County Unit 1963 1967 10,600 - Camas Creek, ID 1960 1965 9,080 - Catherine Creek Lake, OR 1978 1990 1,552,000 - Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID 1972 1986 183,100- Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID 1990 1990 655,000- Grande Ronde Lake, OR 1966 1986 - - Grande Ronde Valley, OR 1958 1986 102,458- Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit 1968 1986 27,800 - Little Wood River, ID 1960 1965 21,334 - Lower Walla Walla River, WA 1953 1986 4,000 - Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID 1988 1990 - - Malheur River, OR Willow Creek Unit 1961 1969 13,000 - Mill Creek, WA 1958 1977 3,537- Mud Lake Area, ID 1957 1990 5,994- Palouse River, WA 1958 1986 2,000- Payette Valley, ID 1960 1978 23,178- Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID 1969 1969 -- Pullman, Palouse River, WA 1964 1986 99,540- S.Fork Clearwater River, ID 1973 1986 3,899- Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID 1974 1979 234,100- Teton River, ID 1955 1986 10,387 - Touchet River, WA 1957 1977 11,198 - Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID 1960 1990 112,757- Whitebird Creek, ID 1957 1986 1,896 - - 39-17 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 39-H COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Federal Cost to Project Status Cost Sep. 30, 1990 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 42,796 Blackfoot River, ID Completed - 391,143 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Snake River Unit Completed - 3,375,158 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Completed - 59,942 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit Completed - 325,581 Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,0321 Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 32,335 Weiser River, ID Deferred 1,565,000 37,757 Weiser River, ID Cambridge-Midvale Deferred - 75,000 TOTAL 10,801,740 1. Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. TABLE 39-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 7 of Text) Boise River, ID August 1990 Clearwater River, ID January 1990 Little Wood River, ID August 1990 Lyman Creek, ID August 1990 Mill Creek, WA September 1990 Palouse River, WA July 1990 Payette River, ID September 1990 Portneuf River, ID August 1990 Potlatch River, ID January 1990 Salmon River, ID July 1990 Snake River, ID August 1990 Snake River, WY August 1990 Touchet River, WA March 1990 Tucannon River, WA December 1989 Walla Walla River,WA September 1990 Wallowa River, OR May 1990 Yakima River, WA April 1990 - 39-18 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (See Section 15 of Text) Ice Harbor Iock and Dam, WA (See Section 16 of Text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Space for additional Rating, Each Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 cfs 1613 feet Tainter 50 ft. by 55 ft. 2 428 feet 3 2 @ 90,000 kw 1 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw 3 3 @ 220,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 150 feet March 1973 1600-1445 feet 1605 feet 2,000,000 ac.-ft. 53 miles 17,090 acres 175 miles 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 100 feet 103 feet 15 feet May 1962 Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 feet Radial 50 ft. by 51 ft. 10 671 feet 6 3 @ 90,000 kw 3 @ 111,000 kw 603,000 kw 226 feet December 1961 - 39-19 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 18 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation 440-437 feet 446 feet 31.9 miles 9,200 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 80 miles 86 feet 675 feet 93 feet 98 feet 101 feet 15 feet May 1970 SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 19 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 feet Radial 50 ft. by 60 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 244 feet March 1970 638-633 feet 646.5 feet 37.2 miles 10,025 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 92 miles 86 feet 675 feet 95 feet 100 feet 105 feet 15 feet May 1975 - 39-20 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 581 feet Radial 50 ft. by 60.5 ft. 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 feet April 1975 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 20 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation 738-733 feet 746.5 feet 38 miles 8,900 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 91 miles 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 98 feet 103 feet 15 feet April 1969 SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 feet Radial 50 ft. by 61 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 feet May 1969 - 39-21 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (See Section 22 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Acres Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 540-537 feet 548 feet 28.7 miles 6,590 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 78 miles 86 feet 675 feet 67 feet 75 feet 83 feet 15 feet November 1953 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 feet Vertical Lift 50 ft. by 51 ft. 22 1,348 feet 14 70,000 kw 980,000 kw 193 feet November 1953 340-335 feet 356.5 feet 64 miles 38,800 14 ft. by 250 ft. 242 miles - 39-22 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-K SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OR, WA, AND ID (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance Percent of Engineers to Sep. 30 1990 to Sep. 30, 1990 Corn- Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost pleted Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Totals Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Totals Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Totals Lower Monumental Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Totals Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing Open River Pasco to Lewiston Totals Existing Project Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 129,578,480 914,256 36,748,021 0 167,240,757 160,413,215 60,941,807 25,500,0003 246,855,022 321,503,981 63,800 46,212,534 23,300,000 391,080,315 184,712,361 51,661,371 34,300,0003 270,673,732 34,613 0 1,075,884,439 400,150 129,578,480 914,256 36,748,021 789,000 168,029,757 160,413,215 60,941,807 12,006,000 233,361,022 321,503,981 63,800 46,212,534 7,056,000 374,836,315 184,712,361 51,661,371 2,259,000 238,632,732 34,613 1 1,014,894,439 400,150 129,578,480 914,256 36,748,021 635,797 167,876,554 160,413,215 60,941,807 11,462,996 232,818,018 321,503,979 63,800 46,212,534 5,798,695 373,579,008 184,712,361 51,661,371 1,698,262 238,071,994 34,613 0 1,012,308,187 400,150 74,200,004 0 0 0 74,200,004 57,027,729 0 0 57,027,729 75,550,568 0 0 0 75,550,568 56,655,137 0 56,65556,1,63575,137 389,019 4,350 263,826,807 186,570 73,885,192 0 0 0 73,885,192 56,876,520 00 56,876,520 75,208,098 0 0 0 75,208,098 56,413,959 0 0 56,413,959 379,675 2 4.350 262,767,794 100 100 100 87 100 100 44 91 100 100 100 24 93 100 100 8877 FY 57 FY 57 FY71 FY 63 FY74 FY 89 FY 65 FY 84 FY74 FY 88 FY61 FY75 FY90 100 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 1,076,284,589 1,015,294,589 1,012,780,337 264,013,377 262,954,364 1. New work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. 2. Includes $11,364 appropriated and $2,097 expended in FY 1990 for project condition survey cost. 3. Does not include mitigation analysis. - 39-23 - --- -- --- --- ALASKA DISTRICT * This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK ..................... 2. Dillingham Harbor, AK ................... 3. Homer Harbor, AK ..................... 4. Kake Harbor, AK ........................ 5. Metlakatla Harbor, AK .................... 6. Ninilchik Harbor, AK ..................... 7. Nome Harbor, AK ........................ 8. Project Condition Surveys ................... 9. St. George, AK .......................... 10. St. Paul Island Harbor ..................... 11. Wrangell Harbor, AK ...................... 40-1 40-1 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-4 Flood Control 12. Chena River Lakes, AK ................... 40-4 13. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 40-4 14. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Project .......................... 40-4 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 15. Snettisham, AK........................... 40-4 Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along a 3,000-foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 35 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29.0 feet and the extreme range is 42.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977 was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of the limits from 2,070 feet north- General Investigations 16. Survey .................................. 40-5 17. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 40-5 18. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ...... 40-5 Tables Table 40-A Table 40-B Table 40-C Table 40-D Table 40-E Table 40-F Table 40-G Table 40-H Table 40-I Table 40-J Table 40-K Cost & Financial Statement ........ 40-6 Authorizing Legislation ............ 40-8 Other Authorized Navigation Projects 40-10 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 40-11 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ............ 40-11 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................. 40-12 Project Condition Surveys ......... 40-12 Not Applicable Not Applicable ward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging has been accomplished across the entire project during FY 1989. Controlling depth at the harbor was at a project depth of- 36 feet MLLW. Regular maintenance dredging was accomplished by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers hopper dredge Essayons during July through August 1990. A total of 200,284 cubic yards of silt was removed. 2. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. At the head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on the right bank of Nushagak River, just below its confluence of Wood River; about 470 miles northeasterly of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660) Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 0 -0 above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek; with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek; and a sill across the - 40-1 - _ __ REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 basin. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four docks at the city of Dillingham; three privately owned, one owned by the city of Dillingham, and four publicly owned small boat floats in the project basin. Two docks are used by the city to unload barges which come into Dillingham. New floats for the harbor were installed in June 1982 and removed before fall freezeup. They are replaced each spring. Cargo and passengers from ocean vessels are unloaded at the docks or in the small-boat basin. Facilities are inadequate for the number of boats using the small boat harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance was accompliahed by dredging from the end of May to the middle of June 1990. A total of 82,352 cubic yards of material was removed. 3. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water southwest of Anchorage. Harbor site is land based near the extremity of Homer Spit which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645) Existing project. Provides for a sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit about 50 acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower low water in the most western segment of the harbor to 20 feet below mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the most eastern segment of the harbor; a north entrance channel; protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels serves for passengers and general cargo. Small boat facilities in basin area include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has tripled size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance dredging was accomplished by contract. A total of 9,181 cubic yards were removed during July and August 1990. 4. KAKE HARBOR, AK Location. Kake Harbor is located in the city of Kake on the northwest corner of Kupreanof Island in southeastern Alaska, 39 air miles west of Petersburg, AK, and 850 water miles northwesterly of Seattle, WA. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 8201.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,580-foot-long west breakwater and a 1,750-foot-long south breakwater. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.0 feet with an extreme range of 22 feet. Estimated project cost is $13,417,000 (September 1988), including $13,378,000 for general navigation facilities, $22,000 for navigation aids and $17,000 for lands. Local interests will pay 10 percent of the costs initially plus 10 percent during a period of up to 30 years. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement would be required with the city of Kake. Terminal facilities. At Kake, a publicly owned wharf with seaplane float equipped airplanes and shallow draft vessels is located within area of proposed basin. At cannery 1 mile from city, there are two privately owned deep draft piers; one for cargo, open to all local boat owners, the second for fuel, including a float for fueling small boats. At Portage Cove, 2 miles from the city, the existing float was expanded into a small boat facility by the state in 1982. It consists of 2 mooring floats, a launch ramp, a grid and is protected by floating breakwater. Facilities are not considered adequate for present commerce due to the following deficiencies in small boat facilities: Shallow water at Portage Cove and its approaches; ice formation on the cove during the winter months causing major boat damage and limiting the use of the mooring float; and transportation problems between the city and present facility at Portage Cove. Operations during fiscal year. The wind monitoring station was removed in August 1990. 5. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small boat basins. Existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. New basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one general cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. Existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Project complete. - 40-2 - ALASKA DISTRICT 6. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the community of Ninilchik, AK about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/ NOS Chart #16640.) Existing project. A small boat basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide dredged to elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by a pile jetty 410 feet long. Project was modified in design stage to delete pile jetty and revise harbor dimensions to 400 feet long by 125 feet wide, and was completed in November 1961. Modification, including river channel diversion, two armor rock jetties, and beach protection, was accomplished 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are limited to shallowdraft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small boat floats in project basin, provided by State of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 8,588 cubic yards removed in 1990. 7. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly 951 and the westerly not exceeding 676 feet long, at mouth of Snake River; a channel 8 feet at mean lower low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing waterfront improvements on easterly beach by means of rock mount seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. Project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore, a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600-foot gravel filled causeway. Construction of the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete funding, the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 feet. Construction was completed in May 1987. Use of this causeway for offloading petroleum products was delayed until the September 1987 arrival of a required berthing barge. Operations during fiscal year. No maintenance dredging was done. Entrance soundings were taken. 8. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Total costs for fiscal year were $479,960. (See Table 40-I) 9. ST. GEORGE, AK Location. The city of St. George is located on St. George Island, the southernmost island of the Pribilof Islands, near the edge of the southwest Bering Sea shelf. Existing project. Project was authorized in Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1960, PL 86-845, as amended. The work consists of dredging approximately 176,000 cubic yards of material in the maneuvering area from an average depth of + 3 feet mean lower low water to -18 feet mean lower low water and the entrance channel from an average depth of -14 feet mean lower low water to -20 feet below mean lower low water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during the fiscal year. A contract was awarded in December 1988. Notice to proceed was acknowledged February 24, 1989 and the contractor mobilized to the island at the begining of April 1989. As of 1 September 1990, the contractor had completed construction and demobilized from the island. 10. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Location. St. Paul Island Harbor is located on the shore of Village Cove on the southern side of St. Paul Island, the largest and most populated island of the Pribilof group in the central southeast Bering Sea. Existing Project. A St. Paul Harbor project was authorized by Congress in Section 202 of Public Law 99-662, based on a 1982 Corps of Engineers feasibility report. Since that report was published, new wave and climatic information has been gained through field measurement and through a November 1984 storm that severely damaged a city built breakwater at St. Paul. American vessels have also assumed control of the groundfish harvest in the area more rapidly than expected, while crab stocks and catches have declined markedly. St. - 40-3 - REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 Paul also constructed 750 feet of breakwater and a 200-foot dock at the harbor site. On 31 March 1989, Assistant Secretary of the Army signed an Agreement under Section 204(e) of PL 99-662 which states that the government would pay 80 percent of the costs of general navigation features of the Authorized Project. The agreement was unique in that the city had to successfully build the harbor with their own funds and the government would reimburse them upon acceptance by the Corps of Engineers. The general navigation features consist of: (1) 1,050 feet of rubblemound breakwater with a finished elevation of + 37 feet MLLW; (2) 1,000 feet of rubblemound detached breakwater with a crest elevation of +18 feet MLLW; and (3) a 200 foot wide maneuvering area at a depth of -18 feet MLLW. Construction commenced in May 1989 and was completed in December 1989. The city was reimbursed in March 1990 in the amount of $18,150,000. Local Cooperation. A 204(e) agreement was signed by Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) Page on 30 March 1989. Operations during Fiscal Year 1990. Breakwater construction was essentially complete by the end of Fiscal Year 1990. 11. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Location. Wrangell Harbor is located on the west side of the northern end of Wrangell Island, 824 miles from Seattle and 160 miles from Juneau. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 8164, 8161, and 8201.) Existing project. This provides for a rubblemound breakwater 300 feet long to protect the southern portion of the outer harbor; dredging a mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep below mean lower low water within the protected area; an inner basin in the tide flat area east of Shakes Island, 325 feet wide and 550 feet long and a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long and a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long from the outer mooring basin all at a depth of 10 feet at mean lower low water; and construction of a rock mound breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Shakes Island. The range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.7 feet. The extreme tidal range is 26 feet. Heavy swells, dangerous to small fishing boats, are caused by the wind, which causes an additional rise of about 1 foot. Construction of the breakwater north of Shakes Island was placed on inactive status as material to be used from the inner basin was unsuitable and the breakwater considered unnecessary for safe moorage of vessels. The cost of this portion was last revised in 1956 and estimated to be $6,500. (See table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves and floats in Wrangell Harbor. Two privately owned wharves serving general cargo and passenger terminals, one of which includes a cold storage facility, are open for public use. The remaining wharves serve various industrial purposes. One of the floats is publicly owned and is open for public use for mooring and servicing small craft, and two privately owned floats serve oil handling facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A revised letter report on the repair of the concrete parapet wall on the breakwater was prepared during the spring and summer of FY 90. The recommended method of repair is to use shotcrete, a high quality wet-mix concrete containing steel fibers and silica powder. Shotcrete will be applied to both the harbor and seaward sides at the rubblemound's intersection with the walls foundation which will include rebuilding of all the construction joints and major fractures along the parapet structure. Project work is dependent upon future funding. Flood Control 12. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. In the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, C1, Dl, D2, and big delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek Dam has been constructed 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22-mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana river to a point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal cost is $210,000,000, Little Chena Dam was submitted for deauthorization in September 1990. Operations during fiscal year. Nike site cleanup was essentially completed. 13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities -- repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $609,067 for disaster preparedness, emergency operations, and rehabilitation. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of flood control works at Skagway River, Lowell Creek, Fairbanks, and Bethel during FY 1990. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 15. SNETTISHAM, AK Location. At mouth of Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 29 nautical miles - 40-4 - ALASKA DISTRICT southeast of Juneau. (See Coast Geodetic Survey chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a multi-stage power project. The initial stage, which was completed in 1977, tapped Long Lake and included an underground powerhouse with two 23.4 megawatt units and a transmission line to Juneau, AK. The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Administration for operation and maintenance. The second stage, which is nearly completed, provided a tunnel to Crater Lake and added a third unit. The final phase will provide a dam on Long Lake to increase storage and the energy capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is currently unscheduled. The existing Long Lake (elevation 815 feet) water is transported through an approximately horizontal 13-foot diameter tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400-foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the underground powerhouse at tidewater to drive two turbines with a combined generating capacity of 47,600 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by a 13.8 kilovolt overhead transmission line and a submarine cable traversing Taku Inlet. The Crater Lake stage of construction tapped Crater Lake (elevation 1,002 feet) to drive a third turbine installed in the existing underground powerhouse. An additional nameplated-rated generating capacity of 34,500 kilowatts was added. Estimated cost of Stage 1 and Stage 2 construction is $148,284,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. The Remote Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Contract was awarded in September 1989 and started in FY 1990. The Additions 2 Contract was awarded in May 1990, and the Transmission Line Improvement Contract was awarded in June 1990. Crater Lake Main Contract is essentially complete. Successful lake tap occurred on October 21, 1988. Power-on-line initially occurred in May 1989, but was shut down for repairs. Results of turbine efficiency tests are currently being evaluated. Repairs to the spherical valve have been completed. Repairs to the generator are due to be completed in January 1991. General Investigations 16. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys include $689,666 for flood control studies, $94,867 for coordination studies and $98,981 for miscellaneous activities. 17. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain management guidance and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, State agencies, Architectural/Engineering firms, lending institutions and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $101,960. Fiscal year cost for Hydrologic Studies were $16,492. 18. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Kodiak Harbor, AK The port of Kodiak is located 242 and 175 nautical miles south of Anchorage and Seward, respectively, and approximately 1,258 nautical miles northwest of Seattle. St. Herman Harbor is located at Near Island across Near Island Channel from Kodiak. The project authorized for construction consists of a 45 acre mooring basin with moorage facilities protected by a 1,900-foot rubblemound breakwater with a crest height of +18 feet MLLW. The 45 acres of mooring area would provide single berthing for approximately 475 vessels up to 80 feet in length. The average depth of water in the mooring area is -45 feet MLLW. The authorized entrance channel is 2,000 feet long, of which 930 feet would be dredged 150 feet wide to a depth of -20 feet MLLW. The recommended plan has a 1.865 foot rubblemound split breakwater with a crest elevation of + 22 feet MLLW. The main entrance channel is located in the split breakwater and has a design width of 200 feet and design depth of -20 MLLW. Since the natural water depth at the main entrance channel is -55 feet MLLW, no dredging is required in this channel. A 100-foot rubblemound stub breakwater is recommended next to a secondary entrance channel at the north end of the harbor. This secondary entrance channel is to be 100 feet wide with a design depth of -12 feet MLLW, and will require 4,400 square yards of rock excavation. The current estimated cost of $23,376,000, of which $21,038,000 would be the Federal first cost and $2,338,000 is the non-Federal first cost (cash and lands easements rights of way). Local interests will pay 10 percent initially plus 10 percent during a period of up to 30 years, resulting in an ultimate non-Federal cost of $4,676,000. A Local Cooperation Agreement will be required with the city of Kodiak. Thirty-one piers, wharves, and docks are located in the port of Kodiak. Four are located in Womens Bay and two in Gibson Cove, west of the main part of the city. Twenty-four facilities are along the main waterfront of Kodiak, with thirteen on St. Paul Harbor and eleven on Kodiak Harbor, west and east of the Kodiak Small Boat Harbor, respectively. The remaining facility is the St. Herman Small Boat Harbor between Uski and Near Islands, directly south of the Kodiak Small Boat Harbor. Fiscal year costs were $495,781. - 40-5 - TABLE 40-A REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep.30, 1990 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK 2. Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 3. Homer Harbor, AK 4. Kake Harbor, AK 5. Metlakatla Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 6. Ninilchik Harbor, AK 7. Nome Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,072,000 1,635,300 1,433,100 1,636,355 2,008,806 1,415,805 1,479,384 1,636,750 -- -- 95,934 31,419 320,500 317,600 720,600 550,061 1,159 318,768 714,936 535,593 439,000 437,000 323,000 345,002 435,194 431,274 333,942 338,376 8,757 115,000 75,668 1,000 84,161 1501,95--02,9323 500 2,924 20,000 36,504 20,000 50,258 222,000 134,100 229,200 161,063 211,162 146,168 198,740 159,540 479,000 353,400 236,700 330,628 465,606 273,481 443,745 158,884 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 5,000 5,000 - 40-6 - 533,235 533,235 23,288,927 23,050,219 548,790 580,209 7,247,582 7,222,228 1,700 1,700 3,512,350 3,512,350 4,007,713 4,001,074 67,974 67,974 870,700 869,125 5,077,470 5,074,730 148,520 148,520 830,644 722,096 428,720 428,720 4,066,839 4,033,601 1,348,240 1,348,240 9,549,680 9,366,501 172,500 172,500 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep.30, 1990 9. St. George, AK New Work Approp 53,400 160,000 3,710,000 -- 4,000,000 Cost 12,962 174,627 3,204,451 531,360 3,923,400 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp -- 4,000 633,828 2,366,172 3,004,000 Cost -- - -- 2,823,937 2,823,937 10. St. Paul Harbor, AK New Work Approp 534,000 510,000 450,000 18,141,200 19,635,200 Cost 530,857 509,055 248,714 18,304,806 19,593,432 11. Wrangell Harbor, AK New Work Approp -- --- 537,020 Cost ------ 537,020 Maint. Approp. 75,000 38,500 52,500 44,888 542,240 Cost 45,319 49,023 21,787 61,039 508,520 12. Chena River Lakes, AK New Work Approp. 7,200,000 5,528,000 1,268,000 114,000 214,105,765 Cost 6,819,420 3,009,031 3,477,192 474,789 213,744,946 Maint. Approp 887,000 774,000 962,300 994,754 7,457,878 Cost 847,469 759,085 962,828 947,827 7,300,005 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. - -- --- --- 2,182,300 Cost ----- --- --- 2,145,929 14. Snettisham, AK New Work Approp. 27,200,000 5,300,000 4,715,113 2,986,000 139,222,550 Cost 17,964,165 12,809,549 6,782,000 2,457,450 134,880,756 - 40-7 - REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 Table 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 July 3, 1958 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 P.L 94- 587 H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st, Sess. 2 P.L. 88- 451 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 13, 1981 S. Doc. 70, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acre in extent to a depth H. Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters Section 201, P.L. 89- 298 inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. S. Doc. 92- 64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess.2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410-foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long H. Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet H. Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., wide and 600 feet long. 3 and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Seawall Reports of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948 ST. GEORGE, AK Dredging the maneuvering area from an average depth of Section 107 of The Rivers and + 3 feet MLLW to 18 feet below MLLW and dredging the Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law entrance channel from an average depth of 14 feet MLLW 86-645, as amended. to 20 feet below MLLW. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Add 1,050 feet of breakwater at existing crest height, 37 feet mean low low water and 1,000 feet long with a crest height of +18 mean low low water. Section 202, PL 99-662 - 40-8 - Deep winter harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties. 1 Extension of project limits. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. KAKE HARBOR, AK Basin 7-acre berthing area, 15 feet deep, inclosed by a 1,580-foot west rock breakwater and a 900-foot south rock breakwater. July 2, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 July 14, 1960 4. 6. Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1958 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 June 16, 1948 Nov. 17, 1986 7. 9. 10. Nov. 17, 1986 ALASKA DISTRICT Table 40-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Sept. 22, 1922 Breakwater 300 feet long to protect southern portion H. Doc. 161, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. of harbor. Aug. 30, 1935 Mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep. H. Doc. 202, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Inner basin and connecting channel from the existing H. Doc. 284, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. mooring basin, both 10 feet deep at mean lower low water, and breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Snakes Island. 12. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Aug. 13, 1968 Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam and S. Doc. 89, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 detention reservoir on the Little Chena River, and a levee along the north side of the Tanana River.4 14. SNETTISHAM, AK Oct. 23, 1962 Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission H. Doc. 40, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.2 facilities. KODIAK HARBOR, AK Nov. 17, 1986 Breakwater 1,900 feet long with an entrance channel Section 202, PL 99-662 930 feet long and 20 feet deep to serve 45 acres of S. Doc. 6, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. moorage in St. Herman's Bay. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK Nov. 17, 1986 Streambank protection by placing riprap along 8,500 feet Section 202, PL 99-662 of riverbank. 1. Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized November 6, 1977 under section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 4. Little Chena Dam classified "deferred". - 40-9 - TABLE 40-C REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK1 Bar Point Harbor, AK2 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Cordova Harbor, AK2 Cordova, AK Craig Harbor, AK Douglas Harbor, AK Dry Pass, AK Egegik River, AK Elfin Cove, AK Gastineau Channel, AK Haines Harbor, AK2 Homer Harbor, AK2 Hoonah Harbor, AK Humboldt Harbor, AK Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Juneau Harbor, AK Kasilof Harbor, AK2 Ketchikan Harbor, AK Kodiak Harbor, AK Mekorykuk, AK Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Naknek River, AK Neva and Olga Straits, AK Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK2 Pelican Harbor, AK Petersburg Harbor, AK Port Alexander, AK Port Lions, AK2 Rocky Pass, AK St. Michael Canal, AK Seldovia Harbor, AK Sergius Whitestone, AK Seward Harbor, AK Sitka Harbor, AK Skagway Harbor, AK Valdez Harbor, AK Wrangell Narrows, AK Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1920 1983 1985 1977 1978 1986 1983 1963 1983 1972 1959 1964 1977 1987 1983 1977 1941 1974 1975 1979 1973 1986 1970 1961 1960 1972 1964 1972 1949 1986 1960 1916 1974 1973 1973 1973 1972 1968 1979 128,896 2,000,0003 1,520,272 1,220,000 843,534 9,642,000 1,033,5004 282,019 943,351 4,441 154,191 789,461 1,000,0005 2,000,000 4,255,0006 3,679,6837 66,037 1,381,150 109,848 1,602,417 1,891,2128 1,372,139 9,700 20,789 155,009 370,415 369,683 252,932 17,000 1,825,311 337,668 377,062 1,051,8839 1,798,010 712,36910 1,611,009 133,180 649,74011 3,562,343 2,154 5,000 488,156 72,500 23,466 3,107 102,701 260,991 331,256 37,946 132,946 18,973 26,800 560 5,518 1,934 219,789 15,400 32,665 221,498 309,260 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 3. In addition, $272,779 of State funds. 4. Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 5. In addition, $925,500 of State funds. 6. In addition, $973,875 of State funds. 7. In addition, $857,000 of State funds. 8. Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. 9. Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 11. Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710, Recreation facilities at Completed projects. - 40-10 - ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep, 30, 1990 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River' Completed 1985 553,970 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,006 2 4,301 Klutina River, Cooper Center, AK 3 Completed 1973 260,681 Lowell Creek, AK4 Completed 1945 416,382 5 30,771 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,770 6 7 162,925 $ Skagway River, AK Deferred a 1966 26,385 Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 1. Section 14. 6. Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 2. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 7. In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. 4. During FY 88, $551,690 was expended from FC and CE. 9. Project eligible for deauthorization. 5. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. TABLE 40-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Anchorage Harbor, AK (Uncompleted Portion) 1967 1977 Bradley Lake, AK 1983 1983 1982 46,701,000 Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) 1979 1979 Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) 1949 1977 Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) 1931 1977 Little Chena River Dam 1983 1990 Long Lake Dam 1975 1990 - 40-11 - REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1990 TABLE 40-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Anchor Point, AK Chenega Bay, AK Chignik, AK Dillingham, AK Larsen Bay, AK Manley Hot Springs, AK Mountain Point, AK Ouzinkie Small Boat Harbor, AK Point Mackenzie, AK Port Graham, AK Seldovia, AK Whittier Small Boat Harbor, AK St. George Island, AK St. Mary's, AK Atka, AK Craig, AK Hooper Bay (Airport River), AK Nelson Lagoon, AK Quinhagak Small Boat Harbor, AK Seward Expansion, AK Fiscal Year Costs $ 65,552 3,984 104,833 31,418 22,083 6,120 11,319 234 32,995 5,000 1,155 49,498 531,360 1,485 20,261 9,249 8,000 61,532 8,845 8,000 TOTAL TABLE 40-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Seward Harbor September 1989 Old Harbor November 1989 Thomas Basin, Ketchikan January 1990 Bar Point Harbor, Ketchikan January 1990 Petersburg Harbor January 1990 Sergius Narrows January 1990 Whitestone Narrows February 1990 Sitka Harbor (West Channel) February 1990 Aurora Harbor, Juneau February 1990 Harris Harbor, Juneau February 1990 Douglas Harbor February 1990 Wrangell Narrows (Burnt Island) March 1990 - 40-12 - LAW 86- 645 BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is a continuing body created by Section 3 of the 1902 River and Harbor Act. The board is selected by the Chief of Engineers and consists of seven senior engineer officers. The Deputy Chief of Engineers normally serves as chairman. The seven members are division engineers with membership rotated among divisions having civil works missions. The civilian staff members consist of an Acting Resident Member and three senior advisors. The board generally meets quarterly or on call of the chairman. The board under the direction of the Chief of Engineers: a. Conducts independent review of reports as requested by Acts of Congress or resolutions of Congressional Committees, or as directed by the Chief of Engineers, concerning proposed works for development of the water resources of the United States; prepares reports and recommendations thereon in compliance with study directives, with regard to formulation of project scope, suitability of engineering plans, adequacy of costs, economic justification, and requirements of local cooperation including cost sharing and propriety of proposed construction by the federal government. b. Reviews reports and makes recommendations for major modification or reconstruction of existing navigation improvements to ensure conformity with existing authorized improvements and essentiality for efficient and economical maintenance and operation. c. Provides independent evaluation and counsel with respect to the environmental quality aspects of water resources development. d. Provides assistance, as required, to HQUSACE in the development of policy and related procedures for the uniform application of standards in the project formulation process. e. Provides advice on potential issues related to ongoing planning studies, as discussed during feasibility phase Issue Resolution Conferences. Total membership of the board is fixed by law at seven. In December 1982, the Chief of Engineers instituted a mechanism for predesignating future members, based on their time of service as division engineers, geographical factors, and other criteria. This procedure achieves a wider involvement of division engineers and their staffs with the proceedings of the board. Members Designate attend and participate in the meetings of the board, but are not permitted to vote on board actions. The membership of the board as of September 30, 1990 was: Members: Major General C. Ernest Edgar III, Deputy Chief of Engineers, Washington, DC Major General John F. Sobke, Division Engineer, South Atlantic, Atlanta, GA Brigadier General (P) Arthur E. Williams, Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley, Vicksburg, MS Brigadier General Gerald C. Brown, Division Engineer, North Atlantic, New York, NY Brigadier General Paul Y. Chinen, Division Engineer, Ohio River, Cincinnati, OH Brigadier General Pat M. Stevens IV, Division Engineer, North Pacific, Portland, OR Brigadier General Jude W. P. Patin, Division Engineer, North Central, Chicago, IL Members Designate: Brigadier General Eugene S. Witherspoon, Division Engineer, Missouri River, Omaha, NE Brigadier General Roger F. Yankoupe, Division Engineer, South Pacific, San Francisco, CA Official Board Actions. In compliance with resolutions of the Congress and instructions from the Chief of Engineers, the board approved nine official report reviews during FY 1990. The favorable reports category includes favorable recommended projects for federal construction as well as projects for solving water resources problems for major metropolitan areas, even though they may not include recommendations for construction by any agency of the federal government. Reports Recommending Favorable for Federal Construction: The board approved nine projects at an estimated total first cost of $421,899,000, of which $357,447,000 is the first cost to the United States. A listing of the projects follows: Aloha-Rigolette Area, LA Buena Vista, VA Homer Spit, AS Moorefield, WV Oceanside Harbor, San Diego County, CA Ohio River, McAlpine Locks & Dam, OH Petersburg, WV Saugus River and Tributaries, MA Ventura Harbor, CA Reports Recommending Unfavorable for Federal Construction: During FY90, the board concurred in the unfavorable recommendations of the reporting officers for federal construction on 22 projects: Androscoggin River Basin, ME & NH Ashulelot River, NH Bear River Basin, UT, ID, WY Broward County, FL Central & Southern Florida Water Supply Study Grand River Basin, MO & IA Imperial County & San Diego County Streams, CA Jacksonville Harbor, St. Johns River, AIWW Mascoma River Basin , NH Minnesota River Subbasins, MN Missouri River, SD NE, ND, MT Moose & Black Rivers, NY Navajo Indian Reservation, AZ, NM, UT New Jersey Intracoastal WWY, NJ Phoenix Metro Area, Old Cross-Cut, AZ Quincy Bay, IL Saginaw River Basin, MI 41-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Sandusky River Basin, OH South Metropolitan Atlanta, GA St. Joseph River Basin, MI & IN St. Petersburg Coastal Areas, FL Suwanee River, GA & FL During FY90, the board held meetings on March 7, 1990 and June 20, 1990. Since 1902, the board has acted on 8,855 reports, recommending favorably on 3,944 and unfavorably on 4,911. 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: BG Arthur E. Williams, U.S. Army, President, appointed Apr. 27, 1990; Mr. Sam E. Angel, appointed Sep. 25, 1979; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1,1981; Mr. Frank H. Walk, appointed Oct. 22,1987; MG Charles E. Edgar III, appointed Oct. 22, 1987; RADM Wesley V. Hull, NOAA, appointed Jan. 4,1988; COL Gerald E. Galloway, U.S. Army, appointed Oct. 28, 1989; COL John P. Carey served as Secretary of the Commission until his retirement, Jul 30, 1990. This non-voting position is vacant at the present time. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of five salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement, four in lower Mississippi River Delta region, and one in the Mississippi - Louisiana Estuarine Area; Bonnet Carre' and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a demonstration erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portions east and west of Black River and south * Authorizing legislation (Tables 42-D and 42-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 42-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds- Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L'Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo- Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Channel improvements to Eight Mile Creek, Arkansas; Ten Mile and Fifteen Mile Bayous in West Memphis, Arkansas and vicinity; Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, Mississippi; and Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi. Navigation channel and harbor improvements to Helena Harbor, Arkansas at Mississippi River, mile 652 AHP. Channel improvements and pumping station for Helena, Arkansas and Vicinity and St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri. Field operations of the commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction-- St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N. page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER ALLUVIAL VALLEY CAPE GIRARDEAU, AND BELOW MO Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep.30,1982, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time high in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 61 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel 42-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $10,849,380,000 (cost projected through the construction period), and actual expenditures through Sep. 30, 1990, of $4,918,557,509, the entire project is about 79.9 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 21, 1979/1982, for Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1981, for Port of New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (57th edition), 1989. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, excluding maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30,1990, was $4,975,939,337. (See Table 42-S.) (See also Tables 42-R, 42-T, and 42-U for additional financial statements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Commission activities: The 335th Session was held Apr. 30 - May 4, 1990, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cape Girardeau, Missouri, to New Orleans, Louisiana. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed enroute. A separate tour was made of the Old River Control structure on May 3 as part of this inspection trip. Public meetings were held at Cape Girardeau, MO; Memphis, TN; Rosedale, MS; and Baton Rouge, LA, with approximately 255 people in attendance. This session adjourned at Baton Rouge, LA, at 4:30 p.m. on May 3, 1990. The 336th Session was held Sept. 10-14, 1990, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI. The Commission inspected the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers from Cairo, Illinois, to Morgan City, Louisiana. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed enroute. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Vicksburg, MS; and Morgan City, LA; with approximately 175 people in attendance. This 336th Session of the Commission adjourned at Morgan City, Louisiana, at 10:30 a.m. on Sept. 14, 1990. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Roadmap-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1989 (57th) edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed. Approximately 5,830 flight-line miles of black-andwhite aerial photography (various scales); 750 flightline miles of color photography; and about 340 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: The revision of 1:62,500 quadrangle maps Empire, LA; Fort Livingston, LA; and Southwest Pass, LA, is in progress. The revisions of Barataria, LA, was completed and will be printed in 1990. Memphis District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quads of Princedale, AR; Modoc, AR; Farrell, AR & MS; Valley Ridge, MO; Memphis, TN & AR; Bartlett, TN; Rector, AR; Gainesville, AR; Evadele, AR; and Marianna, AR are complete. Vicksburg District--Series Conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 - scale quadrangles to 1:62,500 - scale quadrangles ofWinnfield, LA; Shackleford Lake LA; Baskington, LA; Waverly, LA; Hurricane, LA; Mitchner, LA; Bonita, LA; Oak Grove, LA; Kingston, MS; Woodville, MS; Lorenzen, MS; Onward, MS; Mechanicsburg, MS; Bayland, MS; Morringsport, 42-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 LA; Greenwood, LA; Caspiana, LA; Hanna, LA; Bastrop, LA; Haile, LA; Farmerville, LA; Calhoun, LA; Chatham, LA; Sikes, LA; Columbia, LA; Plain Dealing, LA; Bernice, LA; and Ruston, LA is in progress. McGehee, AR; Lake Village, AR; Eudora, AR; Wesson, AR; Potts Camp, MS; Denmark, MS; Bogalusa, LA; Sun, LA; Oden, AR; Athens, AR; Collinston, LA; Mangham, LA; Celvin, LA; Ashland, LA; Coushatta, LA; Mansfield, LA; Mt. Ida, AR; Fordyce, AR; and Rison, AR, were published. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 48.0 feet at Cairo gage on Feb. 19,1990, and maximum discharge of 1,191,000 cubic feet per second occurred on May 23, 1990, at Hickman, KY and crest stage of 31.3 feet at Memphis on Feb. 24,1990, with maximum discharge of 1,189,000 cubic feet per second on Feb. 4, 1990. Vicksburg District-Flooding was widespread from January through June in the Vicksburg District during FY 90. Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg Districts reach of the Mississippi River were as follows: Arkansas City, 36.6 feet on June 7-8, 1990, and maximum discharge of 1,400,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg, 42.8 feet on June 7-10, 1990, and maximum discharge of 1,400,000 cubic feet per second; and Natchez, 49.9 feet on June 10-12, 1990, and maximum discharge of 1,400,000 cubic feet per second. New Orleans District-On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 54.60 feet NGVD on Jun. 12, 1990, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 15.50 feet NGVD on Jun. 12, 1990. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 36.70 feet NGVD on Jun. 11, 1990. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. No requests were received for modifications of the existing project, Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as amended (see Table 42-D). Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potamology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Investigations into the major causeand- effect relationships attributable to major changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and man-made modifications are continuing. Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Enlarged 25.1 miles of levees and surfaced 12.4 miles of roads on levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-K. Vicksburg District-Completed 7.7 miles of berms and levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District-Completed 3.0 miles of berms. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42-M, and 42- N.) There are 1,608.7 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.9 are in place with 1,223.7 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,202.5 miles, of which 2,195.7 are in place with 1,698.4 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are additional levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River (85.4 miles); along the south bank of Red River (59.2 miles, with 59.2 completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 in place with 330.1 completed to grade and section (see Table 42-N). Of the authorized 676.4 miles of berms, 517.2 are complete. Graveled or hardsurfaced roads have been constructed on 1,874.9 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,511.9 miles of authorized tributary levees in the MR&T Project, of which 1,120.7, are in place with 963.9 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 10.9 miles and 844.7 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For last summary of levee work accomplished under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act, see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. Mississippi River and Tributaries- Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 42-G.) Work included dredging 21,666,900 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was 42-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: New Orleans District, channel maintenance was performed by Government-owned dustpan dredge Jadwin. Vicksburg District, channel maintenance was performed by Government-owned dustpan dredge Jadwin and leased dustpan dredge Lenel Bean. The MR&T harbors, in the Vicksburg District, maintained were Greenville and Vicksburg by leased cutterhead dredge Alabama. Memphis District channel maintenance dredging was performed by Governmentowned dustpan dredge Burgess, and leased dustpan dredge Lenel Bean. The MR&T Harbor maintained was Memphis Harbor (McKellar Lake), by leased cutterhead dredges Natchez, and Missouri H. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J.) Construction of 17.03 miles of new bank revetment and 161,679 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 7.61 miles of new dikes were constructed and required maintenance. No work was performed on tributaries. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 937.84 miles of operative bank revetment and 233.2 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9 by 300 feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low- water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 99.8 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 68.91 miles of revetment and 5.2 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. New work by contract: Construction of floodside and landside berms and levee enlargement continued on the east and west protection levees. One contract on the west protection levee was completed over a distance of 0.1 mile with placement of 400,000 cubic yards; and on the east protection levee, three contracts were completed over a distance of 10.4 miles with placement of 1,740,000 cubic yards. On the west protection levee three levee and floodwall contracts, totaling 7.2 miles, are under construction with placement of 1,478,000 cubic yards during this period. On the east protection levee 5.5 miles of levee enlargement and floodside and landside berms are under construction with placement of 645,000 cubic yards during this period. A contract to replace 200 feet of corroded 72-inch corrugated metal pipe at Bayou des Glaises was completed. A contract was also initiated for constructing channel embankment along 22 miles of the main channel to confine flows and reduce backswamp sedimentation. Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrel Locks, Morganza Control Structure, the West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee borrow pit, and numerous drainage structures as required, condition and operation studies, and water control management. Gaps were closed at two locations along the west protection levee and another is currently underway. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 1,879,400 cubic yards by two leased cutterhead dredges from Berwick Bay harbor in April 1990, July and September 1990; and removal of 125,846 cubic yards by leased cutterhead dredge from Three Rivers during September and October 1990. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 86 percent complete. The current estimated Federal cost is $1,470,000,000 and non- Federal cost is $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees 42-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 330.1 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel training works in the lower basin, realignment of the principal distributaries of the Atchafalaya River, and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Approximately 37.4 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The remaining 2.5 miles were to be constructed when development of the initially constructed portion warrants expansion. Project expansion has not been necessary. Therefore this feature was deauthorized on Nov. 2, 1979, under the provisions of Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74), as amended. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $20,400,000 and non-Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement ofl 3.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. With the termination of the Eastern Rapides and South Central Avoyelles project, it has become necessary to provide an adequate outlet structure solely for the Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries project. The economic effects of this change along with current benefits estimates have caused the benefit-cost ratio for the project to be less than unity. As a result, the project has now been classified as "inactive." If economic conditions change, the project could be reactivated. BONNET CARRE' SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. o It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937,1945,1950,1973,1975,1979, and 1983. A new office building was completed in FY 1990 at a cost of $245,500. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, and engineering studies. A picket boat was previously used at the inflow channels to the low sill and auxiliary control structures. It was removed from operation in FY 1988. Maintenance by contract: In September 1989, 104,490 cubic yards of shoal were dredged from the lock forebay. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is complete at a Federal cost of $301,300,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; auxiliary structure, September 1986; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low-sill structure, February 1961; inflow and outflow channels for the auxiliary structure, August 1987; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 9.4 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Vicksburg District TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Planning and design on project features are complete. The Lake Chicot Pumping 42-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Plant and related features are complete and in operation. The riverside gate repair contract awarded August 26, 1988, and the contract for the bulkhead gate repairs awarded August 18,1989 are continuing. A third contract for pump repairs was awarded January 24, 1990. No further work on the Tensas River Project (Separable Element) will be initiated due to lack of commitment from a local sponsor to cost share remaining E&D and construction. The necessary action is being taken to place this project in the inactive" category. (b) Red River backwater area. Planning and design continued on project features. All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is complete. The gravity structure and the pumping plant are complete and are being operated and maintained by contract. One mitigation item, the construction of two water control weirs, was completed in May 1988. Contracts for three additional mitigation features were awarded in December 1988 and February 1989. Planning and design has been deferred on the two remaining mitigation features. Tensas-Cocodrie, Item 4-A, levee enlargement, 6.3 miles in length, was completed in September 1988, and Item 4-B, 2.4 miles of levee enlargement, was completed in October 1990. A contract for Item 2 is scheduled for award in March 1991. These contracts will complete the levee enlargement for the remaining 12.7 miles of the levee system. The FDM for Fool River Bayou Pumping Plant was completed September 1990 and submitted for review. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM has been delayed pending economic justification. A contract for Sicily Island Item 5-B, was awarded June 28, 1990. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. The GDM for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61, including Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal is complete. However, no further work will be initiated due to lack of a local sponsor. (b) Red River backwater area. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising of 3.0 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 63.4 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area was completed in Mar. 1985. Based on results of that study, work is underway to complete enlargement of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee system. Levee Item 4-A and levee Item 4-B have been completed. Levee work on Sicily Island area consists of 56 miles of new levee, 4 miles of which have been completed. LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bankprotection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. Little Bayou Meto gates and lifting mechanism were replaced during FY 88. YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (b) Greenwood protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of pumping plant, levees, and drainage facilities. (c) Main stem. Remaining unconstructed features are subject to Yazoo Basin Reformulation Study. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (d) Big Sunflower River, etc. Construction on Item 66-A, Steele Bayou Channel Improvement, Mi. 63.0 to 68.7, is complete. Construction: (1) Channels. An award for construction of new items includes: Channel Weir E, Mi. 70.0, and Channel Weir Mi. 56. The next item of work, Item 66-B Swan Lake Mi. 68.7 to 71.0, is scheduled for award in December 1990. (2) Levees. An award for construction of new items includes: Site Weir C&D, Site Weir A, and Lakes 3 & 4 Pipe Arch Structures. (e) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore- Tippo Project is complete. Levee work associated with Item 1 and Item 1-A Pelucia Creek is complete. A contract for construction on Pelucia Creek Item 2 was awarded on March 16, 1990. Pelucia Creek Levee Item 3 and Rising Sun Pumps 1 and 2 are scheduled for FY 91. (2) Channels. Construction of the Alligator-Catfish, Round Lake Water Control Structure was completed Nov. 28, 1989. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Contract forces continued operation and 42-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (3) Bank Stabilization. Government forces stablilized the left bank of the Little Tallahatchie River bank adjacent to Batesville, Mississippi, sewage lagoon ponds in June 1990. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (f) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 258.2 feet NGVD on June 6,1990, when storage in the flood control pool was 421,800 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 32,100 cubic feet per second on Feb. 4, 1990. On Sep. 30, 1990, pool elevation was 241.9 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 159,800 acre-feet. (g) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non- Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 219.3 feet NGVD on June 5,1990, when storage in the flood control pool was 717,400 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 34,900 cubic feet per second on Feb. 11, 1990. On Sep. 30, 1990, the pool elevation was 205.7 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 279,800 acre- feet. Construction of a levee to provide protection to the community of Coffeeville from high Grenada Lake stages was begun in FY 82. In addition to the levee, other features of Coffeeville project include: three drainage structures through the levee; portable pumps; area rehabilitation; and raising of a town street. Construction of the levee and two of the drainage structures was completed in FY 82. The remaining feature of the Coffeeville project was completed in early FY 84. (h) Sardis Lake (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 269.7 feet NGVD on June 6, 1990, when storage in the flood control pool was 975,300 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 56,400 cubic feet per second on Feb. 5, 1990. On Sep. 30, 1990, the pool elevation was 250.8 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 354,800 acre-feet. An 8-mile reach of the Little Tallahatchie River from Sardis Dam to Highway 51 was clogged with sediment restricting releases from the lake. This reach has been dredged to restore the design capacity of the river. Six disposal sites were selected, located in upland hill areas to reduce the adverse impact on prime agricultural lands along the river and still be in compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Dredging was completed in August 1982. Sardis Lower Lake Weir was awarded in FY 89 and was completed in FY 90. (i) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 235.8 feet NGVD on Feb. 19, 1990, and storage in flood control pool was 446,600 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 56,140 cubic feet per second on Feb. 4, 1990. On Sep. 30, 1990, the pool elevation was 216.5 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 83,500 acre-feet. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. A Phase I GDM was completed in FY 82 which addresses rural flooding from ponded runoff inside the backwater levee. A GDM for a pumping station of 17,500 cfs to reduce this ponding was approved Jul. 12,1985. Later budgetary guidance reduced the pumping plant capacity to 10,000 cubic feet per second. A contract for portions of the inlet and outlet channel excavation for the pumping plant has been completed. A construction schedule for the remaining project features is dependent upon the local sponsor meeting the cost sharing requirements specified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Rocky Bayou area levee Item IA was completed November 1987. Item lB was awarded in November 1986. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs and pumping stations are now complete. A decision on construction of the remaining reservoirs will be made in the future after the U.S. Forest Service has had a substantial period of time to monitor the operation of the existing facilities. Mitigation of the Yazoo Backwater is now underway. Approximately 8,800 acres of cleared, frequently flooded, agricultural lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Backwater area of Mississippi to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction the Yazoo Area and Satartia Area levees projects. This land is 42-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION now being reforested and will be managed for terrestrial wildlife. (k) Upper Yazoo Projects. The first eight items of channel improvement, approximately 56 miles, and five drainage structures have been completed. This work extends from Yazoo City, Mississippi, to about 15 miles upstream of Belzoni, Mississippi. The Fort Pemberton Flood Control Structure is under construction and will be completed in FY 91. Contracts scheduled for award after FY 90 are subject to Yazoo Basin Reformulation Study. (1) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter Creek, Item IA; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and 5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupan Bogue, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, Item 7. All construction under this feature is complete, and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), a joint project with the USDA Soil Conservation Service was initiated by FY 85 appropriations as a continuation on streambank erosion control efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the applicability of a systems approach to the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood control works by applying this approach to 15 demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin hill area. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 35 percent complete. A total of 50.9 miles of backwater levee has been completed to the interim grade. (1) Reformulation Study. Investigations of engineering, economic, and environmental aspects of the uncompleted segments of the Steele Bayou and Upper Yazoo Projects were initiated. The reformulation study will evaluate a reasonable array of alternatives to the project features remaining after construction of items budgeted and scheduled for award in FY 90. This effort is being conducted in phases, with the final Steele Bayou reformulation report scheduled for completion in December 1992 and the final Upper Yazoo Projects reformulation report scheduled for completion in December 1993. Re studies of the uncompleted portions of the Steele Bayou and Upper Yazoo Projects continued, including acquisition of new land use, data survey, mapping, real estate, and environmental data. The comprehensive Yazoo River Basin Study was completed, addressing other water resources problems and needs in the area, including urban and rural flood damage prevention, hydropower, and water supply. Preliminary findings indicated that a conceptual multipurpose flood control/water supply plan for the Yazoo Delta was potentially feasible. Cost-shared feasibility studies have been budgeted for FY 92. During FY 90, work continued in the DEC toward development of the systems plans and implementation of a monitoring program. The District completed the construction of 5 grade control structures; 43,330 linear feet of bank stabilization; and 58 riser pipe grade control structures. LOWER RED RIVER--SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 29 and is complete. All of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized are completed to approved grade and section. Memphis District ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Little River Drainage. Alteration of New Madrid County Route 282 for Ditch 281-9, awarded Apr. 18,1988,95 percent complete. Channel cleanout, Ditches 293 and 281-9, awarded Jul. 15, 1988, complete May 12, 1989. Channel cleanout, Castor River Item 2, Parcel 2 awarded Jul. 29,1988, completed Oct. 12, 1989. (b) Upper St. Francis River. Belle Fountain Ditch, alteration of Missouri State Highway NN Bridge awarded Jul. 16, 1986, completed Dec. 20, 1989. Alteration to Arkansas State Highways 77 and 119, Ditches 10 and 12 awarded Mar. 2, 1987, 98 percent complete. Alteration of seven powerlines Ditches 10 and 12 awarded Feb. 24, 1987, 70 percent complete. Oak Donnick Floodway alteration of railroad bridges awarded Jun. 5, 1987, 95 percent complete. Riprap protection and Ditch 61 channel extension, awarded Sep. 7, 1988, 75 percent complete. Blackfish Bayou, Item 3, awarded Jun. 17, 1987, completed March 20, 1990. Alteration of Missouri State Highway 164 Bridge, Main Ditch No. 9, awarded Jul. 21, 42-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 1988, 70 percent complete. Belle Fountain, Channel Enlargement, awarded Jul. 28, 1989,90 percent complete. Main Ditch 9,2 County Bridges, Miles 2.91 and 5.88, awarded May 30,1989, completed June 15,1990. Gravel Highway 18 Stateline, awarded Sep. 29, 1989, completed Jun. 23, 1990. Main Ditch 6, 2 County Bridges, Miles .92, and 1.98, awarded Sep. 16, 1989, 94 percent complete. Ditch 290 Channel Cleanout, awarded Sep. 22, 1989, completed Jun. 16, 1990. Gravel Surface Below Rivervale/Tulot, awarded Sep. 8,1989, completed Jun. 4,1990. Belle Fountain Channel Enlargement, awarded Jul. 28, 1989, 90 percent complete. Elk Chute Levee Set Back, awarded Aug. 9, 1989, completed Nov. 21, 1989. R-878, 1-R Point Pleasant, awarded Jun. 16, 1989, completed Sep. 13, 1989. Main Ditch 9, County Bridge, Miles 2.91 and 5.88, awarded May 30,1989, completed Jun. 15,1990. Castor River I-2, P-2 Channel, awarded Jul. 29,1988, completed Oct. 12, 1989. Alteration Railroad across Main Drainage District 6, awarded May 3, 1989, 10 percent complete. Alteration Missouri Highway 164 Bridge, Main Ditch 9, awarded Jul. 21, 1988, 64 percent complete. Alteration Highway NN Bridge Belle Fountain Ditch, awarded Jul. 16, 1986, completed Dec. 20, 1989. Alteration Highway 181 Bridge, Stateline Ditch 29, awarded Dec. 18, 1985, completed Dec. 28, 1989. Channel Clearing, Belle Fountain, awarded Dec. 29, 1989, completed Jun. 23, 1990. Main Ditch 9 Bridge, Miles 1.85 and 3.92, awarded Mar. 30, 1990, 57 percent complete. Main Ditch 9 Bridge, Mile 6.96, awarded Jun. 21, 1990, 8 percent complete. Main/New Franklin Bridge, Miles .54 and 3.03, awarded Sep. 28, 1990, 0 percent complete. Ditch 10 Bridge, Miles .89 and .05, awarded Sep. 28, 1990, 0 percent complete. Below Locust Creek, awarded Jun. 26, 1990, 18 percent complete. Elk Chute Levee, awarded Jun. 28, 1990, 75 percent complete. 10th/28th Pump Plant, awarded Jul. 28, 1990, 0 percent complete. Alteration Highway E Bridge, awarded Sep. 28, 1989, 0 percent complete. (c) Lower St. Francis River. Blackfish Bayou, Item 3, awarded May 26, 1989, completed Aug. 16, 1990. Below Marked Tree, Slope Restoration, Item 1, awarded Jun. 2,1989, completed July 27,1990. Channel Cleanout, Madison to Highway 64, awarded Sep. 30, 1988, 66 percent complete. Alteration Bridge Route 306, Blackfish Bayou, Item 3, awarded Sep. 5, 1989, 90 percent complete. Honey Cypress Creek Channel Improvement, awarded May 26, 1989, completed Sept. 19, 1989. Blackfish Bayou I-2 Channel Cleanout, awarded Sep. 28, 1989, 60 percent complete. Straight Slough Scour Repairs, awarded Sep. 28, 1989, 6 percent complete. Huxtable Backstops, awarded Sep. 25, 1989 0 percent complete. 15 Mile Bayou Channel Clearing, awarded Sep. 8, 1989, completed Aug. 16, 1990. Huxtable Clearing and Painting, awarded Aug. 25, 1989, 90 percent complete. Blackfish Bayou I-3, awarded May 26, 1989, completed Aug. 16, 1990. Below Mark Tree Slope Restoration, awarded Jun. 2,1989, completed Jul. 29, 1990. Channel Cleanout Madison to Highway 64, awarded Sep. 30, 1988, 66 percent complete. Burlington Northern Railroad Riprap Protect Ditch 61, awarded Sep. 7,1988,75 percent complete. Alteration Bridge Route 306 Blackfish Bayou I-3, awarded Sep. 5, 1989, 90 percent complete. Alteration Bridge Oak Donnick Floodway, awarded Jun. 5, 1987, 90 percent complete. Blackfish Bayou, I-3, awarded Jun. 17, 1987, completed Mar. 20, 1990. Alteration Highway 77, 119 Bridges - Ditch 10 and 12, awarded Mar. 2, 1987, 98 percent complete. Honey Cypress Creek, awarded May 26, 1989, completed Sep. 29, 1989. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Little River Drainage. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 90 percent complete. (b) Upper and Lower St. Francis River and Tributaries. Project was initiated during 1937 and is 81 percent complete. WHITE RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. Above and Below Elaine Gravel Surfacing, awarded Sep. 29, 1989, completed Jun. 26, 1990. Helena Harbor Stage 1, I-1, awarded Aug. 31, 1989, 69 percent complete. Scour Repairs, Miles 37 and 39, awarded Apr. 17, 1989, completed Aug. 10, 1989. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee.There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 4 percent complete. 42-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO.9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during this fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 89 percent complete. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Obion River, TN. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 64 percent complete. (b) Forked Deer River, TN. Forked Deer River channel improvement is 85 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries Project is 41 percent complete. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contract awarded or completed during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. Levee work, Item No. L-859, Parcel No. 1, awarded Aug. 18, 1988, complete Aug. 21, 1990. Canoe Lake, TN, drainage structure, awarded Jul. 31, 1990, 15 percent complete. Modifications to 10th and 28th Street Pumping Stations Cairo, IL, awarded Jul. 28, 1989, 0 percent complete. Lake 9 Kentucky/Tennessee Levees, awarded May 23,1989, completed Jul. 18, 1989. Nashville Levee Slide, awarded Jun. 28, 1990, 81 percent complete. Resurfacing Lambethville R-753, awarded Aug. 31, 1989, completed Mar. 17, 1990. 1-55 to Blue Lake, awarded Sep. 1, 1989, completed May 17, 1990. L649 R.M. Coahoma, awarded Sep. 8, 1989, completed Apr. 5, 1990. MEMPHIS HARBOR Operations and results during fiscal year. Item No. 6-717.5, Ensley, TN Berm, awarded Jun. 27, 1990, 20 percent complete. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL Ensley Engineering Yard Paving/Drainage, awarded Aug. 31, 1989, completed Mar. 24, 1990. Thirty-six Inch Steel Dolphin at Ensley, awarded Jun. 30, 1989 completed Jan. 24, 1990. Millington Levee Construction, awarded Aug. 17, 1990, 3 percent complete. 42-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-9571 Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL 10-81 The Jump-New Orleans, LA 11-25 Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA 38 Homeplace, LA 45 Bohemia, LA 118 Davis Pond, LA (formerly Myrtle Grove, LA) 81 Caernarvon, LA 44-91 Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA 81-96 New Orleans, LA 91-104 New Orleans, LA 96-279 New Orleans-Morganza, LA 104-234 New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA 127-129 Bonnet Carre' Floodway, LA 129-234 Bonnet Carre'-Baton Rouge, LA 235 Baton Rouge Harbor 279-287 Morganza Floodway, LA 287-303 Morganza-Old River, LA 303-314 Old River, LA control Dredging, revetment, and contract work Main line levee, right bank Local levees, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Main line levee, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Postauthorization change report, approved June 1987. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. -- Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Modified by Public Law 87-874. -- Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. 42-12 TABLE 42-A (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 314-572 437 437-721 490 537 646 605-666 672-993 722-725 721-734 803-873 857 890 890 890-954 902-922 922 946 9571 Old River-Cypress Creek, AR Vicksburg Harbor, MS Vicksburg-Lake View, MS Wilson Point, LA Greenville Harbor, MS Long Lake, Helena, AR Henrico-Helena, AR St. Francis River-Commerce, MO 3 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, TN Tiptonville-Obion River Near Mud Lake, TN St. Johns Bayou, MO New Madrid Floodway, MO New Madrid-Birds Point, MO Slough Bend, Hickman, KY Hickman, KY Peafield, MO Cairo, Cairo drainage district Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. Main line levee, left bank, levee extension, and diversion Obion River Pumping station and adjacent channel improvements Drainage floodgate and levee closure Drainage floodgate and levee closure Floodway, right bank Main line levee, left bank Floodwall, left bank Drainage floodgate Floodwalls and levees 42-13 Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. -- -- Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-A (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage Floodwalls, levees, and pumping -- district, Mounds, Mound plant City, and vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Levees, both banks Intermittent (Sec. 6). Cape Girardeau, MO, to Rock Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 42-14 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 29 Floodway Floodway Floodway ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA' Atchafalaya Basin, Morganza and West Atchafalaya Flood ways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Floodways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrell Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick' Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Floodways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. 42-15 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeufl Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 29 40 40 40 41 41 41 94 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. -- -- -- Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf Intercepting drainage channel. Washington to west protection levee. 42-16 East bank, levee 0-17 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 87 Bayous Cocodrie-Boeuf diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing, and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection Bank protection Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) (4) (4) 42-17 (2,3) 82-145 3-56 3-56 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 5 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-165 0-22 0-0.2 Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR and LA Boeuf River, AR and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou La Fourche Boeuf River, AR and LA above Bayou La Fourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks Tributaries of Boeuf River-- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Fletcher Bend, AR, to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Clearing Levee, south bank Revetment Levee, north bank (5) 42-18 Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977, MR&T authority.2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.23 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 42-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. 23-98 35-98 48-102 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocono River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, MS Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank Authorized by Public Law 81-516. -- Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Floodway channel Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. -- See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant. Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS, and for protection of Sheley Bridge See Table 42-C. -- See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Pubic Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. 42-19 Channel improvement REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 0-17 Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, AR CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement 42-20 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 -- Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND " OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-12 0-108 0-25 0-20 0-15 0-47 Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Obion Creek, KY LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO MISSOURI RIVER, MO Mouth to St. Charles, MO ILLINOIS RIVER, IL Mouth to Havana, IL Levees Levees Levees Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtenant structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station Channel improvement Mile 49 above Cairo. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). 42-21 Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 0-28 0-120 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Floodwall, levee, revetment, and Mounds, IL pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA, and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Tech Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans District. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526. 3 See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 42-22 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name' Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Nearest town to damsite Drainage area, square miles Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Elevation, feet, NGVD Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Outlet gates: Number Size, feet Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Length, feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Elevation, feet, NGVD Dam: Type, earthfill Length, thousand feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Yalobusha Grenada 1,320 10 86 193.0 65 1.252 17.8 3 7.5 by 14 10.7 Chute 200 231.0 52 106 1,385 19.7 247.5 Rolled 13.9 256.0 Yocona Enid 560 6 58 230.0 28 602 20.2 2 8by16 9.4 Chute 200 268.0 50 41 554 18.5 284.0 Rolled 8.4 293.0 Little Tallahatchie Sardis 1,545 11 108 236.0 58.5 1,462 17.7 4 6 by 12 10.0 Chute 400 281.4 132 90 1,447 17.6 301.0 Hydraulic 15.3 311.4 42-23 Coldwater Arkabutla 1,000 5 31 209.3 33 494 9.3 3 8.5 by 19 10.0 Chute 300 238.3 89 63 858 16.1 256.3 Rolled 11.5 264.3 St. Francis Wappapello 1,310 4 31 354.7 23 582 8.4 3 10 by 20 18.0 Gravity 740 394.7 229 32 521 7.5 413.7 Rolled 2.7 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis, and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carre' Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands. Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for floodcontrol work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title). Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN. Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR. Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River: construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwals, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN. Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL. Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood-control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Beouf, and Cocodrie, LA. Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 42-24 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 351, 72d Cong. Public Law 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS.' Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR.' Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA. Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees(below Plum Bayou).' Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA.' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO. Big Sunflower River, etc.' Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO, with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR. Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA.' Flood protection at Des Arc, AR. Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO. Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO. Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR. Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA.' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA. 42-25 TABLE 42-D (Continued) Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516,78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA. Bank protection, Amite River, LA. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA, levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.' Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR. Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA. Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS. Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN. Improve Greenville Harbor, MS. Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-- $50 million. Modification--Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA. Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS. Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874 Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 42-26 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA, project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR. Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA. Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS. Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR. Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR. Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS. Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS. Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA. Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report. Approved Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. 42-27 TABLE 42-D (Continued) Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 Apr. 29, 19703 Jun. 4, 19703 Dec. 31, 1970 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively. 4 River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and TN. b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR. Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS. b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251, Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. 42-28 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1-Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda-On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26,1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. 42-29 TABLE 42-D (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report.2 Jun. 28, 1980 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act. 1981 Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-88), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA. The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for the preservation and development of environmental resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc., for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, LA. Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, 1980. Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, 1980. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). 42-30 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 42-31 TABLE 42-D (Continued) Sec. 104(a), Authorization of Projects - Authorization of Construction: Incorporation of the project for flood control, Louisiana State Penitentiary levee, Mississippi River, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 10, 1982, at a total cost of $23,400,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $17,600,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,800,000. No acquisition of land for or actual construction of the project may commence until appropriate non-Federal interests shall agree to undertake measures to minimize the loss of fish and wildlife habitat lands in the project area. a. Bushley Bayou, LA. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project for flood control, Bushley Bayou, LA. b. Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, AR. Project entails channel improvement along the creek with miniparks and hiking/ biking trails. c. Helena and Vicinity, AR. The Helena Basin is an urban basin containing approximately 3,500 acres which frequently and severely floods the city of Helena. A pumping station and sump with channel enlargement and a gated culvert was recommended. d. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Channel improvements along Ten Mile Bayou and Fifteen Mile Bayou for a total of 23.86 miles, with limited revegetation of right-of-way to maintain environmental stability. e. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO. Flood control for urban and rural land. f. Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, TN and MS. Channel enlargement, recreation features with channel construction and environmental enhancement. g. Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS. This is an urban flood control project located in extreme northwest Mississippi and southwest Tennessee. The plan of improvement consists of 3.5 miles of selective drift removal on lower Horn Lake Creek and 2.6 miles of vegetative clearing on Horn Lake Creek, 2.1 miles on Rocky Creek and 0.6 miles of vegetative clearing and 1.8 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. Hike/bike trails are included along Rocky Creek and Cow Pen Creek. Sec. 601(a) Authorization of Projects. Authorization of Construction: a. Yazoo Backwater Area, MS. Authorized the project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at the Yazoo Backwater Project, MS. The project shall include acquisition of 40,000 acres for mitigation of project-induced fish and wildlife losses. b. Greenville Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, MS, as contained in the reports of Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1977 and Feb. 2, 1982, at a total cost of $43,700,000 with an estimated first Federal cost of $28,000,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $15,700,000. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document c. Vicksburg Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Vicksburg Harbor, as contained in the report of the Chief of Engineers, Aug. 13, 1979, at a total estimated first Federal cost of $55,900,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $23,300,000. d. Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR. The recommended plan consists of dredging a navigation channel to provide access to 685 acres of landfill; construction of an overlook park; implementing landscaping and erosion control measures; and mitigation fish and wildlife losses. The project is scheduled to be constructed in two phases. e. White River Navigation to Batesville, AR. The plan of improvement recommended in the Feasibility Report provides for construction and maintenance to provide a 200-foot wide, 9-foot deep channel available 95 percent of the time from mile 10 (Arkansas Post Canal) to mile 254, two scenic overlooks, a primitive camping area, and acquisition of about 1,865 acres of woodlands for mitigation. However, section 52 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 deauthorized this project. f. Obion Creek, KY. To prevent headwater flooding along tributary streams and backwater flooding of alluvial lands. g. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN. This is a navigation project in the vicinity of Memphis, TN, which would consist of dredging and maintaining a 4.9 mile long, 500-foot minimum width, 9-foot deep general navigation channel with additional dredging as required and strategic placement of dredged material to create and provide navigation access to 1,000 acres to be developed as a waterfront industrial complex. Sec. 806. Reelfoot Lake, KY. This project is modified to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operating the pumping plant feature of such project shall be 50 percent. Sec. 836. Mud Lake, Western Tennessee Tributaries. This project is modified to provide that the requirements of local cooperation shall be (1) 50 percent of the value of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, (2) to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, and (3) to maintain and operate all the works after completion. Jun. 4, 1987 Modification of Mississippi Delta Region project to construct Unpublished New Orleans salinity control structure at Davis Pond (mile 118) rather than District report, at Myrtle Grove (mile 59). Nov. 1, 1984. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 42-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 42-32 TABLE 42-E MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage 1941, p. 943 improvements, TN Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA 1946, p. 1029 Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, 1946, p. 1053 AR, on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou) Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to 1946, p. 1083 Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, AR Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou 1945, p. 982 Macon, LA Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton 1948, p. 1059 Rouge, LA (Baton Rouge Harbor) May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, LA 1953, p. 773 May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA 1953, p. 737 42-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost1 Project Title Fiscal Year 1990 Completed features2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River--South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO Eight Mile Creek, AR L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake, TN and KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance) St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway Nonconnah Creek Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries Greenville Harbor Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm) Helena Harbor Helena, AR, and Vicinity West Memphis, AR, and Vicinity Vicksburg Harbor, MS Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee Teche Vermilion Basin Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas TOTAL $ 199,238,000 1,359,000,000 5,270,0003 4,000,0003 3,600,000,000 1,530,000,000 125,000,000 20,400,0003 301,300,000 23,100,0003 50,000,0003 64,200,000 518,000,000 22,800,0003 130,900,0003 1,650,000,000 16,802,0003 45,090,0003 141,000,000 381,000,000 8,480,0003 13,100,0003 155,000,000 13,800,0003 (11,140,000)3 440,000 10,700,000 24,600,0003 40,000,0003 29,300,000 59,800,0004 18,400,0004 2,360,0004 32,400,00034 23,800,0004 33,900,0004 14,200,0003' 11,000,0004 63,500,0004 18,800,0004 35,700,0004 53,000,0005 $10,849,380,000 1. Inflation projected through the construction period. Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads. 2. Includes Bonnet Carre', Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche-Vermilion Basins, LA. 3. 4. 5. Incremental (not projected through the construction period). Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. New start in FY 1991. 42-34 TABLE 42-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Location Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Mileage Fiscal Year 1990 Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 -- 137.2 137.2 Main stem channel 234-320 -- 270.9 270.9 Vicksburg Main stem channel 322-600 -- 1,067.3 1,067.3 Vicksburg Harbor 437 -- 179.6 179.6 Greenville Harbor 537 -- 207.2 207.2 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 -- 19,675.8 19,675.8 Memphis Harbor, McKellar Lake 725 -- 128.9 128.9 TOTAL -- 21,666.9 21,666.9 42-35 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Venice, LA .............. Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ........ Buras, LA .............. Tropical Bend, LA ........ Bayou Lamoque, LA ...... Port Sulphur, LA ......... Point Michel, LA ......... Bohemia, LA ............ Diamond, LA ............ Gravolet, LA ............ Junior, LA .............. Harlem, LA ............. Myrtle Grove, LA ........ Monsecour, LA .......... Alliance, LA ............ Belair, LA .............. Jesuit Bent, LA .......... Linwood, LA ............ Oak Point, LA ........... Scarsdale, LA ........... English Turn, LA ........ Poydras, LA ............. Twelve Mile Point, LA ..... Cutoff, LA .............. Third district reach, LA .... Algiers Point, LA ......... Gouldsboro Bend, LA ...... Gretna Bend, LA ......... Greenville Bend, LA ...... Carrollton Bend, LA ...... Avondale Bend, LA ....... Kenner, LA ............. Luling, LA............. 12 R 22 25 30 33 39 44 46 49 51 54 56 59 61 62 65 68 71 72 75 78 82 84 88 93 95 96 97 100 104 109 114 27,802 R R R L R R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R R L R R R R L R L 6,933 1,000 460 6,439 _-- -- -- 1,520 -9,979 -- -- -- 9,979 -- -- -- _ -- -- -- 254 54 90 38 --67 67 -- .-- --. -- -- -- --. .-- .-- -- --. -- -- 44,883 6,023 1,874 27,790 .-- -- 5,735 -32,007 .-- -- 32,007 -- -- --. -- 737 2,437 3,132 -- _ -- 1,137 1,433 --1,969 -- 1,969 -- _-- .-- -- .-- 2,822 14,539 11,978 --. 5,653 6,746 --9,195 -- 9,195 -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,962 1,500 .-- -- .-- -- -- .-- -- -- -- -- .-- .-- -- -- .-- --. -- -- -- 119 R 15,430 17,283 25,012 14,197 39,995 22,932 15,441 11,600 23,874 23,599 15,148 17,435 11,571 17,265 26,111 24,978 10,638 12,377 13,852 19,718 45,864 9,979 21,256 27,167 7,728 4,960 9,662 22,045 15,015 28,409 37,167 -- 36,288 1I:; o 0 O O O z ! I I0 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Good Hope, LA ............... 126 L 5,643 169 37,052 -- -- -- -- 24,531 Waterford, LA ............ 128 R 3,654 116 18,812 -- -- -- -- 20,386 Montz, LA .............. 132 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,502 Lucy, LA ................ 136 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,826 Reserve, LA ............. .. 138 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,947 Willow Bend, LA ......... .. 141 R 1,596 112 7,880 -- -- -- -- 13,227 Angelina, LA ............ ... 145 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,727 Vacherie, LA .............. 148 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,025 Belmont, LA ............ .. 152 L -- -- -- 1,375 6,960 -- -- 25,575 Rich Bend, LA ........... .. 157 R 5,335 158 25,855 -- -- -- -- 38,498 Romeville, LA ........... .. 161 L -- -- -- 1,333 8,137 -- -- 25,966 St. Alice, LA ............ .. 165 R -- -- -- -- -- 5,072 -- 27,052 Burnside, LA ............ .. 170 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,304 Aben, LA ............... .. 172 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,700 St. Elmo, LA ............ .. 174 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,240 Smoke Bend, LA ......... .. 177 R -- -- -- 1,291 5,862 -- -- 17,075 Marchand, LA ........... .. 180 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,436 Philadelphia Point, LA .... 183 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,379 New River Bend, LA ...... 185 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 43,665 White Castle, LA ......... .. 193 R -- -- -- -- -- 20,456 -- 42,658 St. Gabriel, LA .......... ... 201 L -- -- -- -- -- 12,923 -- 31,292 Plaquemine Bend, LA ..... 209 R 5,175 200 24,378 687 3,132 4,514 -- 42,952 Manchac, LA ............ .. 215 L -- -- -- -- -- 15,717 -- 38,976 Missouri Bend, LA ........ .. 222 R 4,866 300 28,106 -- -- -- -- 27,498 Arlington, LA ........... ... 227 L 4,371 306 21,975 -- -- -- -- 16,615 Port Allen, LA ........... .. 231 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,627 Allendale, LA ........... ... 238 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,502 Springfield Bend, LA ...... 244 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,690 Arboth, LA ............. ... 250 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,190 Faulkner Lake, LA ....... 253 L -- -- -- -- -- 7,891 -- 17,382 Grand Bay, LA .......... ... 258 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,910 5,180 Bayou Sara, LA .......... .. 265 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 27,698 Red Store, LA ........... .. 269 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,315 Arrow Bend, LA ......... ... 272 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,600 Boies Point, LA .......... .. 275 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,094 Morganza, LA ........... .. 279 R -- -- -- -- -- 11,429 -- 20,513 00 m D~4 U, 0 O TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares1 Feet) Feet) Iowa Point, LA .......... Brunette Point, LA ....... Greenwood Bend, LA ...... Hog Point, LA ........... Carr Point, LA .......... Above Old River, LA ...... Fort Adams, MS ......... Point Breeze, LA ......... Coochie, LA ............. Palmetto, MS ........... Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River ..... Dikes: Profit Island Chute Closure, LA ............. OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel ........... Inflow channel ........... Outflow channel ......... Auxiliary inflow channel . .. Auxiliary outflow channel .. Total standard revetment, Old River ............ 282 285 289 296 304 305 308 313 317 322 L R L R R R L R R L 2,133 8,520 8,339 32,076 5,671 67,624 (12.81 Miles) 1,864 322,785 15,531 (2.94 Miles) 75,024 83,753 252 L 315 315 315 312 312 0 0 O H C O -- 11,375 -- 8,038 -- 14,987 -- 15,501 -- 17,120 -- 4,800 -- 17,219 -- 13,565 -- 17,150 -- 30,864 1,910 1,636,260 (309.90 Miles) I -- 4,315 (.82 Mile) L R L&R L&R L&R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,415 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,365 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,891 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,200 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,790 A (0I -- 49,661 (9.41 Miles) TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) ATCHAFALAYA RIVER Standard revetment: Mile One, LA........... Coville Bayou, LA ........ Legonier, LA ............ Simmesport, LA ......... Kuhlman Bayou, LA ...... Odenburg, LA ........... Cason, LA ............. McCrea, LA ............ Woodside, LA ........... Provosty, LA ............ Crooked Bayou, LA ....... Mercier, LA ............ Barberton, LA ............ Evans Point, LA ......... Goudeau, LA ........... Morris Bayou, LA ........ Goodwood, LA ........... Red Cross, LA ........... Melville LA ............. Cross Bayou, LA ......... Melville South, LA ....... Toles, LA .............. Petite Prairie, LA ........ Holloway Lake, LA ....... Bayou Sherman, LA ...... Krotz Springs, LA ........ Sherburne, LA ........... Below Confluence of Red and Atchafalaya Rivers 1 3 4 6 7 9 12 13 14 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 36 37 38 40 43 L R L R L R R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L L R R -- 4,150 -- 6,550 -- 8,940 -- 10,636 -- 5,565 -- 5,375 -- 10,798 -- 5,027 -- 13,002 -- 7,768 -- 9,600 -- 10,478 -- 3,592 -- 4,898 -- 3,938 -- 3,800 -- 8,505 -- 8,065 -- 4,870 -- 3,815 -- 4,070 -- 6,355 -- 8,381 -- 7,085 -- 5,200 -- 7,925 -- 7,035 CI) 0 N TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Bayou Big Graw, LA ...... 46 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,394 Morgan City ............. 115 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,410 Total standard revetment -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 197,227 (37.35 Miles) Dikes: None Below Confluence of Old River LOWER RED RIVER Outflow Channel and Red River Standard revetment: Long Lake, LA ................ 10 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,652 Naples, LA ............. ... . 7 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,190 Turnbull Island, LA ....... 9 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,038 Total standard revetment -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,880 (4.52 Miles) Dikes: None 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). bO 0IA O Oz eo TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, LA ........ Dead Mans Bend, MS ..... Glasscock Cutoff, MS-LA ... Railroad Landing, MS ..... St. Catherine Bend, LA .... Morville, LA ............ Natchez Island, MS ....... Carthage, MS ........... Vidalia Casting Field ...... Natchez Front, MS ....... Giles Cutoff, LA-MS ...... Gibson, LA ............. Ashland, LA-MS ......... Kempe Bend, LA ......... Browns Field, LA ........ Goldbottom, MS .......... Hardscrabble, LA ........ Grand Gulf, MS .......... Point Pleasant, MS-LA .... Togo Island, LA .......... Lake Karnac, LA-MS ...... Diamond Point, LA-MS .... Reid-Bedford, LA ......... Racetrack, MS ........... Barge Line Terminal, MS .. Vicksburg Harbor, MS ..... Delta Point, LA .......... King's Point--Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ...... False Point, LA .......... Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS .............. Milliken Bend, LA ........ Belle Island, LA-MS ...... 329 335 342 346 350 356 357 361 363 364 366 371 374 383 389 392 398 403 413 415 419 423 429 433 437 437 437 R L R L R R R L L L R R L R R L R L R R L R R L L L R 780 2,565 1,015 --. --_ -- .-- -- _ 340 1,305 -- --. -- .-- -- .-- -- -- -- _ .- 4,557 17,435 3,280 -- -- -- 1,049 7,646 .-- -- -- --. .-- .-- .-- --. .-- 2,165 4,388 -5,761 -- -- --. --. 488 -- .-- .-- .-- --. --. -- --. 439 L 443 R 446 L 453 R 460 L 26,055 4,554 9,430 12,265 29,108 14,855 2,180 14,700 2,670 6,510 3,195 26,285 28,397 28,285 9,280 30,250 22,530 53,948 32,345 7,064 19,260 12,125 18,392 13,935 3,040 7,350 7,650 -- 19,330 -- 12,860 19,580 44,650 24,160 CD, CD, CD, 0I ND TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Goodrich, LA ............ Cottonwood Bar, MS ...... Filter-Cottonwood, MS ..... Hagaman, LA ........... Ben Lomond, MS ......... Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS .......... Lake Providence, LA ...... Mayersville, MS ......... Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS .......... Carolina, MS ............ Cracraft, AR ............ Worthington, MS-AR ...... Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS ............ American Cutoff, MS-AR ... Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ... Vancluse, AR ............ Island 84, AR-MS ........ Warfield Point, MS ....... Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS .. Spanish Moss, AR ........ Tarpley Island, MS ....... Miller Bend, MS ......... Island 82, AR .......... Ashbrook Island, MS ...... Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR .............. Huntington Point, MS ..... Pair O'Dice, AR .......... Eutaw-Mounds, MS ....... Cypress Bend, AR ........ Catfish Point, MS ........ Ozark, AR-MS ........... Prentiss, AR-MS ......... 467 470 474 481 486 R R L R L 5,507 488 R 489 R 497 L 503 507 511 514 519 526 530 534 535 537 538 539 542 544 546 549 553 556 561 563 568 573 578 582 R L R R L L R R L L L R R L R R R L R L R L R L 428 -- -- 4,130 --. -- _ --. -- .-- 2,228 -- -- --. 13,845 -- -- -- --. --. 505 14,703 1,261 -- 5,659 0 0 I 0 0 0 O 0 39,155 21,360 28,427 37,756 10,235 51,1242 11,600 34,992 23,825 11,080 22,210 8,350 45,653 2,980 33,685 4,300 13,475 4,320 14,150 4,580 2,000 29,360 3,080 3,455 40,560 21,197 9,095 40,188 26,585 20,075 22,015 20,315 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Rosedale Bend, AR ....... Riverton, MS ........... Klondike, AR ............ Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS . Lake Concordia, MS ...... Big Island, AR ........... Smith Point, MS ......... Dennis, MS ............. Cessions, MS ............ Total revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ....... Dikes: Jackson Point, MS ........ Opposite Warnicott Ldg., MS ................. Natchez Island, LA-MS .... Waterproof Bar, LA ....... Spithead Towhead, MS .... Browns Field, LA ........ Cottage Bend, LA-MS ..... Bondurant Towhead, LA ... Coffee Point, LA ......... Yucatan, MS ............ Togo Island, LA .......... Below Racetrack, MS ...... Racetrack Towhead, MS ... False Point, LA .......... Marshall Cutoff, LA ...... Below Grand Gulf, MS .... Fritz Island, LA .......... Forest Home Towhead, LA . Willow Cutoff, LA ........ Arcadia Point, MS ........ 585 586 588 593 596 598 601 611 615 L L R L L R L L L 10,135 (1.92 Miles) -- 47,812 1,800 -- 4,898 -4,164 -- 22,200 2,241 --. 24,200 (3) 330 L 352 358 379 386 388 389 394 405 410 416 430 431 441 448 399 338 449 462 470 L R R L R L R R R L L R R R L R L R L 4,820 12,500 23,400 29,245 8,340 16,515 18,185 25,195 10,910 -- 1,411,497 -- 1,411,497 (267.32 Miles) -- 4,306 5,351 10,885 14,321 3,6614 4,8354 14,049 4,421 8,648 9,010 8,256 11,7694 1,752 5,355 5,1664 3,595 3,950 4,5744 4,2754 9,4634 3,595 3,950 --. -- _ ri) m 0 I 0 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Point Lookout, LA........ Ajax Bar, MS ............ Ben Lomond, MS ......... Balshed Ldg., MS ........ Wilson Point, LA ......... Corregidor, MS .......... Carolina, AR ............ Cracraft Lower, AR ....... Cracraft, AR ............ Leota, MS .............. Island 86, AR ........... Seven Oaks, AR .......... Walnut Point, MS ........ Refuge, MS ............. Island 84, AR ........... Leland Bar, AR-MS ....... Leland Neck, AR-MS ...... Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR .... Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-MS .............. Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS .............. Ashbrook Cutoff, MS ...... Chicot Ldg., AR .......... Catfish Point, MS ........ Below Prentiss, MS ....... Malone Field, AR ......... Terrene, MS ........... White River Landing, AR .. Montgomery Towhead, AR.. Victoria Bend, AR ........ 478 482 488 493 500 505 509 510 513 514 520 523 525 528 532 538 540 540 RL LLRLLRRL RRLLLRL R 2,975 -- -- _ -- --. -- -- -- .-- -- --. -- _ -- _ -- 2,751 -- 27,294 -- 24,6674 -- 10,938 -- 3,592 -- 6,730 -- 2,897 -- 9,614 -- 3,809 -- 7,571 -- 14,433 -- 5,754 -- 4,725 -- 10,528 -- 4,580 -- 16,878 -- 4,315 -- 10,318 -- 13,646 -- 13,015 -- 8,728 -- 17,451 -- 5,290 -- 7,813 -- 7,549 -- 7,921 -- 2,201 -- 6,071 -- 5,0334 544 R&L 547 549 564 571 580 585 590 591 592 596 L&R L RLRRLRRR 0 0IO 00 OT 0I0 0 0 is TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Smith Point, MS ......... Island 70, MS ........... Total dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ....... 600 L 608 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,617 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,949 15,770 (2.99 Miles) -- 426,320 (80.74 Miles) Miles Above Mouth ARKANSAS RIVERs Standard revetment: Menard Bend, AR ........ Como, AR .............. Morgan Bend, AR ........ Yancopin, AR ........... Total standard revetment, Arkansas River ........ Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, AR ...... Morgan Bend, AR ........ Fletcher Bend, AR ........ Total dikes, Arkansas River ................ RED RIVER 6 Standard revetment:8 Dupre, LA ............. Bringol, LA ............. Egg Bend, LA ........... Cologne Bend, LA ........ Roxana, LA ............. 31 34 36 24 30 36 39 L R L R RL R r,~ to to b 0r I O, 0x -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,770 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,720 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,250 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,800 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,540 (5.97 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,848 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,658 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,187 -- 7,693 (1.46 Miles) 69 73 75 77 83 R R R R R 2,690 4,000 2,400 650 3,325 c1 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Ryland, LA ............. ... 88 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,925 Whittington, LA ......... . 89 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,900 Smith, LA .............. 91 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Latanier, LA ............ 93 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,460 Hudson, LA ............. . 99 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,458 Robert, LA .............. 102 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,500 Alexandria Front, LA ..... 105 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,280 Callahan, LA ............ ... 110 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,000 Cotton, LA .............. .. 116 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,700 Rapides, LA ............. .. 119 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,030 Boyce, LA .............. 125 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,548 Total standard revetment, Red River ......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 61,566 (11.66 Miles) Dikes7: Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA .. 71 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 Bringol (Egg Bend), LA .... 73 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,477 Egg Bend, LA ........... ... 75 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 900 Cologne Bend, LA ........ 77 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,850 Echo, LA ............... ... 78 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,900 Richardson, LA .......... ... 79 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Alexandria, LA .......... ... 105 R -- -- -- -- -- -- (Rock groin) 270 Bertrand, LA ............ .. 122 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,630 Total dikes, Red River .... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,727 (3.74 Miles) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. Changed to correct previous errors. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. Includes all types of dikes and retards. 0 o 0H O O 0 0 0 TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, AR ........... Scrubgrass Bend, AR ...... Henrico, AR ............. Cessions Towhead, AR ..... Island 67, MS ........... Island 68 Bar-- Knowlton, AR .......... Ludlow, AR ............. Rescue Land, AR-MS ...... Fair Landing, AR ........ Burke Landing, MS ....... Island 62, AR ........... Island 63, MS ........... Island 63 Bar, MS ........ Oldtown Bend, AR ........ Horseshoe, MS .......... Westover, AR ........... Delta-Friars Point, MS .... Helena, AR ............. Trotters Landing, MS ..... Flower Lake, MS ......... St. Francis, AR .......... Harbert Point, MS ........ Walnut Bend, AR ........ Mhoon Bend, MS ......... Peters, AR .............. Commerce, MS .......... Porter Lake, AR ......... Pickett, MS-AR .......... Norfolk-Star, MS ......... Cow Island Bend, AR ..... Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN........... Coahoma, TN ........... 598 600 606 615 621 622 626 629 632 637 638 639 639 644 647 650 665 660 665 667 672 675 680 685 692 695 700 703 709 714 R R R L L R R L R L R L L R L R L R L L R L R L R L R R L R 895 3,365 3,760 -- -- .-- -- .-- -- .-- -- -- 47 590 .-- --. -- -- 3,126 12,498 -- -- -- -- 2,875 7,531 5,098 -- -- -- -- .-- -- _-- -- --. 716 R 717 L 3,905 7,315 25,040 10,615 9,630 26,710 10,390 27,020 25,690 19,070 9,030 11,519 3,795 26,860 16,385 12,730 30,090 36,460 36,665 16,385 24,663 9,065 27,220 35,828 33,760 29,085 34,155 12,575 35,582 22,274 -- 6,853 -- 9,270 C12A rg) 0y TABLE 424 BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Oper Construction erative tiv Above New Work Since Thr Head Bank Exten- Prior Thi of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY F Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Lin Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares Feet) Fee Ensley, TN ............. . 723 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 44,0 Dismal Point, AR ......... . 724 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,2( Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR .... 730 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24,5 Presidents Island, TN ..... 733 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,7 Hopefield Point, AR-TN .... 736 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,3 Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN .................. 737 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,2 Loosahatchie Bar, TN ..... 740 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,0 St. Clair, AR ............ 742 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,9 Island 40, TN-AR ........ 744 R -- -- -- -- -- 3,094 -- 30,7 Brandywine, AR-TN ...... 750 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,01 Shelby Forest, TN ........ 753 L -- ----- -- -- -- 9,5 Dean Island, AR ......... 756 R -- -- -- -- -- 10,505 -- 7,5 S Cedar Point-Densford, TN .................. 759 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,1 Chute of Island 36, TN .... 764 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,1 Lookout Bar, TN .......... 772 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,9 Lookout, TN ............. 774 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,0 Sunrise Towhead, TN ..... 776 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,61 Lower Bullerton, AR ...... 782 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 28,3 Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN ........... 786 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30,8 Osceola, AR .............. 786 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,3 Osceola, AR .............. 786 R --. -- - -- -- -- -- 5,82 Ashport-Keyes Point, TN ... 791 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 44,23 Kate Aubrey, TN .......... 793 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,5 Island 26, TN ............ 798 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,6 Bend of Island 25, TN ..... 803 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30,63 Barfield, AR ............ 808 R 1,3708 -- -- -- -- -- -- 52,33 Obion-Tamm, TN ......... . 819 L -- -- -- -- -- 4,764 -- 51,32 Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN ............... . 826 R -- -- -- -- -- 1,248 -- 26,9 Heloise, TN ............. . 831 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,9 Island 18, MO ........... . 836 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,1 Linwood Bend, TN ........ 841 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,8 Blaker Towhead, TN ...... 845 L 1,475 140 2,393 -- -- 2,077 -- 18,5 'ae u S ar t) 26 DO 30 55 60 93 70 03 50 LO 50 55 )0 0 03 )5 L5 50 )8 )04 32 )0 )0 30 35 1 34 35 P0 i0 i2 0 0 i0 C 0 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares Feet) Feet) Bells Point, MO .......... Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO .................. Island 15, TN ........... Hathaway Landing, TN .... Robinson Bayou, MO ...... Fritz Landing, TN ........ Lee Towhead, MO ........ Bend of Island 14, TN ..... Above Lee Towhead, TN ... Little Cypress, MO ....... Merriwether-Cherokee, TN .................. Linda, MO............. Below Toney's Towhead, TN .................. Toney's Towhead, KY-TN .............. Kentucky Point, KY ...... .. New Madrid Bar, KY ...... New Madrid Bend, MO .... La Forge, MO ........... Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY ............... Winchester Towhead, MO .................. Island 9, KY-TN ......... Milton Bell, MO ......... Chute of Island 8, KY ..... Bend of Island 8, MO ..... Island 8, KY ............ Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ..... Beckwith Bend, MO ...... Williams, KY ............ Wolf Island, KY .......... Columbus, KY ........... 845 R 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 R L L R L L L L R 869 L 876 R 879 L 882 887 888 889 892 1,260 3,900 --. 4,780 7,499 L L R R R 899 L 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 927 934 937 RLRL RRL RL RL -- 5,420 -- 25,600 -- 3,630 -- 1,000 -- 22,630 -- 15,670 -- 9,730 -- 12,050 -- 4,943 -- 34,090 -- 41,058 -- 11,950 -- 20,895 -- 13,6402 -- 7,960 -- 16,825 -- 43,262 -- 22,380 -- 37,520 -- 5,540 -- 33,585 -- 14,375 -- 12,620 -- 9,800 -- 18,515 -- 43,359 -- 14,588 -- 10,015 -- 19,205 -- 3,825 C,, ro z TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Belmont, MO ............ Island 3 and 4, KY ....... Campbell, KY ........... Pritchard, MO ........... Mayfield Creek, KY ....... Wickliffe, KY ............ Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) ........... 938 940 943 948 949 953 R R L R L L 958 R 5,785 19,970 6,865 15,045 8,935 8,455 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,152 Total revetment, Memphis District, Mississippi River ....... 12,125 (2.30 Miles) Dikes: Henrico, AR ............. Below Knowlton, AR ...... Island 67, MS ........... Below Ludlow, AR ........ Sunflower, AR ........... Island 64, AR ........... Island 62, AR ........... Island 63 Bar, MS ........ Island 63, MS ........... Kangaroo Point, AR ....... Friars Point, MS ......... Montezuma Bar, MS ...... Montezuma Towhead, AR .. Prairie Point, AR ......... Flower Lake, MS ......... St. Francis Towhead, MS ... Below Walnut Bend, AR ... Bordeaux Point, MS ...... Peters, AR .............. Commerce, MS .......... Basket Bar, AR .......... 603 616 621 624 627 630 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 671 676 681 693 694 R R L R L R R L L R L L R R L L R L R L 696 R 1,935 777 600 21,917 53,726 (6) 200 500 1,100 600 -- .-- -- 150 300 400 -- -- 5,830 200 -- 1,904,075 (360.62 Miles) (5) .-- -- .-- -- -- .-- -- -- --. .-- _-- -- _-- --. 6,310 15,718 4,320 5,040 5,520 7,330 23,180 2,600 5,640 5,730 6,870 15,240 3,450 10,391 11,060 3,380 6,420 4,920 7,830 10,745 -- 5,560 0 0I0 0 0I0 0 y) 0 500 1,400 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Buck Island, MS ......... Porter Lake, AR ......... Pickett, MS ............. Seyppel, AR ............. Cat Island, AR .......... Coahoma, TN ........... Armstrong, AR-TN ....... Dismal Point, AR ......... Hopefield Point, AR ....... Memphis Front, TN ....... Robinson Crusoe, TN ...... Loosahatchie Bar, TN ..... Above Loosahatchie, TN ... Redman Point, AR ........ Randolph Point, TN ....... Poker Point, AR .......... Corona Bar, TN-AR ....... Densford, TN ............ Cedar Point, TN ......... Below Richardson Landing, TN ........... Lookout, TN-AR ......... Plum Point, TN .......... Lake Neark, AR ......... Island 30 .............. Kate Aubrey, TN ......... Keyes Point, TN ......... Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ... Forked Deer, TN ......... Island 25, AR ........... Nebraska Point, TN ....... Below Tamm Bend, TN .... Wrights Point, AR ........ Island 21, Chute, TN ...... Head of Island 21, TN ..... Island 20, MO-TN ........ 700 701 704 706 710 718 720 724 736 736 738 739 742 743 747 748 755 757 759 767 771 784 786 787 791 791 795 798 804 808 813 820 824 828 831 L R L R R L R R R L R R L R L R R L L L R L R R R L R L R L L R L L R 4,835 -- -- .-- -- 6,300 4,915 .-- .-- -- --. --. -- 4,915 -- .-- --. 50 1,100 1,310 3,500 --. 150 940 -- 2,050 1,150 --. -- -- --. .-- --. -1-5 --. 50 -- 2,000 -- 350 -- 2,770 375 9,526 1,810 200 800 1,430 700 CD) CD) C) 0o 0 z 4,705 22,315 7,180 12,250 15,590 4,640 18,690 25,510 1,330 6,300 21,939 3,950 8,990 7,750 16,740 8,050 8,430 7,780 2,890 5,950 5,538 9,695 2,545 3,010 11,270 24,690 17,330 8,550 5,450 12,149 8,300 34,775 3,170 5,460 18,139 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Location Maintenance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Island 18, TN ........... Tennemo, TN ........... Blaker Towhead, TN ...... Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO ............. Sandy Hook, TN ......... Island 15, TN ........... Robinson Bayou, MO ...... Hathaway, TN ........... Island 15 Neck, TN ....... Above Lee Towhead, TN ... Below Cherokee, TN ...... Stewart Towhead, MO ..... Ruddles Point, MO ....... Island 11, MO ........... New Madrid Bend, MO .... Kentucky Point, KY ....... Morrison Towhead, MO .... Hotchkiss Bend, MO ...... Below Island 9, TN ....... Donaldson Point, MO ..... Island 9, KY ............ Moore Island, KY-MO ..... Above Williams, KY ....... Campbell, KY ........... 837 L 842 L 843 L 3,850 2,050 -. .- -- -- .-- -- -- - -- --. -- _ .-- .-- - .- -- 2,000 3,080 - .-- .- -. - .- - .- - .- - .. - - t0p1 4,070 1,000 200 2,770 50-_0 500 -- .. -. .- -. .- -. -. 844 850 851 853 854 854 859 866 871 874 882 887 887 890 895 901 905 906 929 930 942 R R L R L L L L R R R R L R R L R L R L L 0 0IO 0 0I 0 0 0 8,670 8,240 4,070 27,927 2,350 8,830 10,768 27,355 21,100 1,300 6,230 18,290 8,130 8,039 1,715 11,550 1,070 6,583 18,859 8,320 7,010b 4,685 1,150 2,610 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear Location (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares 1 Feet) Feet) Pritchard, MO ........... . 944 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,390 Island 1, KY ............ 948 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,260 Total dikes Memphis District, Mississippi River ....... 24,385 10,280 -- 44,881 -- -- -- 797,805 (4.62 Miles) (151.1 Miles) Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Changed to correct previous errors. Lumber mattress revetment. Rock Groins. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. Includes 665 feet of riprap paving only. Riprap paving only. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. C,, C) C,) z TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section In In Com- In Total System Comrn- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This Location System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees Fifth Louisiana Levee District .......... (16.8) (16.8) (--) (10.7) (--) (--) (--) (15.5) (--) (15.5) Levees........................... 15.5 15.5 -- 9.4 -- -- -- 15.5 -- 15.5 Old River structures and levees ........ 1.3 1.3 -- 1.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- Atchafalaya Basin Levee District ........ (126.3) (126.3) (5.5) (100.4) (5.3) (--) (1.0) (118.7) (--) (118.7) Levees........................... 118.7 118.7 5.5 92.8 5.3 -- 1.0 118.7 -- 118.7 Morganza structure and levee ......... 0.8 0.8 -- 0.8 -- -- -- -- -- -- Morganza forebay levee .............. 6.7 6.7 -- 6.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- Port Allen lock .................... 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- Lafourche Basin Levee District Levees . .. 61.7 61.7 -- 24.1 0.1 -- 0.1 61.7 -- 61.7 Plaquemines West Levee District Levees .. 37.9 37.9 -- 28.7 -- -- -- 37.9 -- 37.9 Buras Levee District ................. .(34.1) (34.1) (--) (19.7) (--) (--) (--) (34.0) (--) (34.0) Levees ........................... .34.0 34.0 -- 19.7 -- -- -- 34.0 -- 34.0 Empire lock ....................... .0.1 0.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Baton Rouge front levees .......... .... 2.1 2.1 -- 0.9 -- -- -- 2.1 -- 2.1 Pontchartrain Levee District ........... . (124.9) (124.9) (--) (91.1) (4.7) (--) (--) (110.8) (--) (110.8) Levees ........................... .110.8 110.8 -- 77.0 4.7 -- -- 110.8 -- 110.8 Bonnet Carre' guide levees ........... .11.3 11.3 -- 11.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- Bonnet Carre' forebay levee ........ 1.3 1.3 -- 1.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- Bonnet Carre' structure ............. .1.5 1.5 -- 1.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- East Jefferson Levee District Levees ..... 11.6 11.6 -- 10.8 -- -- -- 11.6 -- 11.6 West Jefferson Levee District .......... (20.0) (20.0) (6.8) (15.9) (--) (--) (--) (19.9) (--) (19.9) Levees ........................... .19.8 19.8 6.8 15.7 -- -- -- 19.8 -- 19.8 Floodwalls ........................ 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- -- -- 0.1 -- 0.1 Harvey Canal Lock ................. .0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- Orleans Levee District ................ (27.2) (27.2) (0.4) (21.4) (--) (--) (--) (18.4) (--) (18.4) Left descending, east bank ............ (13.3) (13.3) (0.2) (9.2) (--) (--) (--) (4.6) (--) (4.6) Levees........................... 4.6 4.6 -- 0.6 -- -- -- 4.6 -- 4.6 Floodwalls ........................ 8.6 8.6 0.2 8.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- IHNC lock ........................ 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 0H m A k O y O~ z0 0 0 0A 0C TABLE 42-K (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section In In Com- In Total System Comrn- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Comrn- This This Com- This This Location System FY FY FY pleted i FY FY pleted FY FY Right descending, west bank ........... Levees........................... Algiers Canal lock .................. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District Levees . Grand Prairie Levee District Levees ..... Total Mississippi River ............ Other Levees Included in Mainstem Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises .................. East bank Atchafalaya River .......... Bayou des Glaises .................. West bank Atchafalaya River ......... Simmesport Ring ................... Melville Ring..................... Krotz Springs Ring ................. Mansura Hills to Hamburg.... .... . West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet .... Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal ..... Morganza upper guide levee ........... East protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ................... Total Atchafalaya Basin ............ Total--Main Stem Levees ............... (13.9) 13.8 0.1 11.6 37.4 511.6 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 (13.9) 13.8 0.1 11.6 37.4 511.6 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 (0.2) 0.2 4.7 12.7 (--) (12.2) 12.1 0.1 11.6 28.4 363.7 (143.9) 52.5 7.9 55.6 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 (--) 10.1 (--) (--) (--) (13.8) -- -- 13.8 -- -- 11.6 -- -- 37.4 -- 1.1 479.6 (--) (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 (--) (--) (13.8) -- 13.8 -- 11.6 -- 37.4 -- 479.6 (--) (43.9) 20.2 12.0 11.7 11.7 (128.7) (128.7) (2.0) (89.8) (--) (--) (--) (127.7) (2.0) (89.5) (56.5) (8.9) (56.5) (--) (8.9) (--) (9.6) (--) (8.9) (--) (--) (--) (--) (--) (56.5) (--) (8.9) (--) (--) (8.9) (106.7) (106.7) (10.4) (77.9) (--) (--) (--) (105.0) (10.4) (75.6) 449.2 449.2 (12.4) 330.1 -- -- -- 446.5 12.4 217.9 960.8 960.8 25.1 693.8 10.1 -- 1.1 926.1 12.4 697.5 CI) CI) CI) H z II TABLE 42-K (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This Location System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA ................ (17.4) (17.4) (--) (17.4) (--) (--) (--) (17.4) (--) (17.4) Item A levees ...................... 5.0 5.0 -- 5.0 -- -- -- 5.0 -- 5.0 Item B levees ...................... 10.1 10.1 -- 10.1 -- -- -- 10.1 -- 10.1 Item C levees ...................... 2.3 2.3 -- 2.3 -- -- -- 2.3 -- 2.3 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ... 17.4 17.4 -- 17.4 -- -- -- 17.4 -- 17.4 GRAND TOTAL ..................... . 978.2 978.2 25.1 711.2 10.1 -- 1.1 943.5 12.4 714.9 1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. C.,' 0 0 C 0 0 0 A 0 TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Levees and Floodwalls Berms1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section In Comrn- In Com- In Total System plete System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built Thru When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This Location System FY FY FYI pleted3 FY4 FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees East bank in Mississippi .............. Greenville Harbor dikes .............. West bank in Arkansas ............... West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) .................. Total Mississippi River Levees ....... Other Levees Included in Main Stem Lower Red River--South Bank Red River levees .................. Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees ....... Arkansas River, South bank .......... Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem ..................... Total--Main Stem Levees ........... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Arkansas River, North bank .......... Red River Backwater Levees .......... Yazoo River Basin .................. 178.35 7.8 75.6 178.3 7.8 75.6 109.1 7.8 50.1 156.9 -- 114.0 168.4 58.5 -- 51.5 75.4 168.4 75.4 198.7 198.7 -- 67.1 91.0 -- 69.6 197.8 -- 197.8 460.4 460.4 -- 234.1 306.4 0 235.1 441.6 -- 441.6 (59.2) (59.2) (--) (59.2) (--) (--) (--) (59.2) (--) (59.2) 59.2 59.2 -- 59.2 -- -- -- 59.2 -- 59.2 85.4 85.4 -- 85.4 24.7 -- 24.7 84.1 -- 81.1 144.6 144.6 -- 144.6 24.7 -- 24.7 143.3 -- 140.3 605.0 605.0 -- 378.7 331.1 0 259.8 584.9 -- 581.9 61.5 7 263.6 (624.1) 56.2 160.5 (357.2) 7.0 56.2 154.8 (207.9) 8.3 8.3 47.4 -- 249.0 -- (624.1) 0 0 z Ol 2l 47.4 141.9 (323.6) TABLE 42-L (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Levees and Floodwalls Berms1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section In Comrn- In Com- In Total System plete System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built Thru When Built Thru for This This This Comrn- This This Com- This This Location System FY FY FY pleted FY4 FY pleted FY FY Headwater ...................... 527.56 305.6 -- 156.3 -- -- -- 527.5 -- 284.6 Backwater ....................... .96.6 51.6 0.7 51.6 -- -- -- 96.6 -- 39.0 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ................ 949.2 573.9 7.7 418.9 8.3 -- 8.3 920.5 -- 512.9 GRAND TOTAL ..................... .... 1,554.2 1,178.9 7.7 797.6 339.4 0 268.1 1,505.4 -- 1,094.8 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage berm contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 .MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 4. Based on refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line. 5. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 6. Reflects decrease of 97.2 miles. Lowering of Yazoo River design flowline reduced miles of headwater levees required. 7. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 8. Reflects results of 1985 flowline reanalysis. 1 0 O O C 0 0I A H, 0 TABLE 42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Levees and Floodwalls Berms1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Comrn- This This Com- This This Location System FY FY FY pleted i FY FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Mounds, IL ....................... Mound City, IL ..................... Cairo Drainage District ............... City of Cairo ....................... Little River Drainage District .......... Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO .. . Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO ...................... St. Johns Levee and Drainage District ... St. Francis Levee District of MO ........ City of Hickman, KY ................. Board of Levee Commissioners Fulton County, KY ....................... Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN ................. Madrid Bend Levee District, Lake Co., TN ..................... Lake County Levee and Drainage District. Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1 ..................... Tipton-Obion levee extension ........... St. Francis Levee District of AR ........ Helena Improvement District No. 1 ...... Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 ........ 3.9 2.7 13.82 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 59.03 55.7 1.4 16.7 4.5 5.2 15.9 21.3 6.5 156.7 5.3 23.9 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 58.7 55.7 1.4 16.7 4.5 5.2 15.9 21.3 156.7 5.3 23.9 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 58.2 55.7 1.4 0.5 2.5 1.6 4.4 9.7 4.2 12.9 9.2 23.0 -- 16.74 15.1 -- 4.54 -- 5.24 -- 15.9 -- 21.3 -- 153.24 -- 5.3 -- 23.9 0.6 0.5 2.5 2.0 4.9 4.9 12.0 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 13.8 26.0 46.9 55.1 0.5 -- 11.4 16.3 -- 0.3 4.5 -- -- -- 5.2 9.1 1.9 6.4 15.9 1.3 84.7 2.4 18.8 0.4 81.8 2.4 18.8 21.3 6.5 156.7 4.7 23.9 3.6 1.1 8.5 3.5 19.3 13.8 26.0 46.1 55.1 0IC' 0I b -- 16.3 -- 4.3 -- 5.2 -- 15.9 -- 21.3 -- 156.7 -- 4.2 -- 23.9 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section In In Com- In Total System Authorized Com- System plete Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Cornm- This This Com- This This Location System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County, AR ................. Laconia Levee District No. 1 of Desha County, AR .................. Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Desha County, AR ................ Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District ... Madrid Bend L.D., Fulton Co., KY ....... Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee ... Total Mississippi River ............. TOTAL MAIN STEM LEVEES .......... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT St. Francis River ..................... East bank ........................ W est bank ......................... Little River ......................... East bank (left) ..................... West bank ......................... Elk Chute ......................... West Basin and middle valley .......... Lower White River ................... White River backwater levee ........... Augusta to Clarendon ................ Clarendon levee.................... 20.5 18.1 6.6 93.6 4.8 35.3 636.7 636.7 (308.2) 159.5 148.7 (130.1) 40.7 35.1 39.9 14.4 (95.6) 40.2 49.2 6.2 20.5 18.1 6.6 93.6 4.8 35.3 629.9 629.9 (302.9) 156.2 146.7 (130.1) 40.7 35.1 39.9 14.4 (85.9) 40.2 39.5 6.2 -- 20.5 11.5 -- 18.14 12.6 6.64 93.6 4.84 35.3 625.9 625.9 87.3 23.8 335.2 335.2 -- 11.5 20.5 -- 9.2 16.5 1.9 1.9 87.3 256.3 256.3 (302.9) 156.2 146.7 (130.1) 40.7 35.1 39.9 14.4 (84.1) 40.2 39.5 4.4A 93.6 4.8 35.3 604.5 604.5 (301.0) 156.7 144.3 (128.9) 40.7 35.1 39.7 13.4 (88.0) 38.8 49.2 -- -- 20.5 -- 16.5 -- 93.6 -- 4.8 -- 35.3 -- 595.5 -- 595.5 (133.5) 94.7 38.8 (94.5) 40.1 23.7 17.3 13.4 (75.0) 38.8 36.2 .- bO 0O A 0 O 0I 0 0O CdD 0 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Levees and Floodwalls Berms1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section In In Corn- In Total System Comrn- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This Location System FY FY FY pleted1 FY FY pleted FY FY Memphis Harbor ..................... .10.5 10.5 -- 10.5 7.0 1.1 2.6 10.5 -- 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ..................... . 544.4 529.4 -- 527.6 7.0 1.1 2.6 528.4 -- 313.5 GRAND TOTAL ..................... . 1,181.1 1,159.3 -- 1,153.5 342.2 3.0 258.9 1,132.9 -- 909.0 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 4. Authority: CEMRC-ED-GS (CELMM-ED-GT 18 FEB 87) 3rd END 31 May 88. FP U,) Ul) Ul) b 0I 0x DISTRICT TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section In Comrn- In Com- In Total System plete System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built Thru When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This Location System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River New Orleans District, Table 42-K ....... Vicksburg District, Table 42-L .......... Memphis District, Table 42-M .......... Total Mississippi River .............. Other Levees Included in Main Stem Atchafalaya Basin Floodway--NOD ...... Lower Red River-South Bank--VXD ...... Arkansas"River-South Bank--VXD ....... Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem .................... Total Main Stem Levees ............. TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,--NOD .......... Yazoo River Basin--VXD ............... Arkansas River-North Bank--VXD ........ Red River Backwater--VXD ............. St. Francis River--MD ................. Little River--MD ..................... Lower White River--MD ................ 511.6 460.4 636.7 511.6 460.4 629.9 12.7 363.7 234.1 625.9 10.1 306.4 335.2 1.9 1.1 235.1 256.3 479.6 441.6 604.5 479.6 441.6 595.5 1,608.7 1,601.9 12.7 1,223.7 651.7 1.9 492.5 1,525.7 -- 1,516.7 449.2 449.2 12.4 330.1 -- -- -- 446.5 12.4 217.9 59.2 59.2 -- 59.2 -- -- -- 59.2 -- 59.2 85.4 85.4 -- 85.4 24.7 -- 24.7 84.1 -- 81.1 593.8 593.8 12.4 474.7 24.7 -- 24.7 589.8 12.4 358.2 2,202.5 2,195.7 25.1 1,698.4 676.4 1.9 517.2 2,115.5 12.4 1,874.9 17.4 624.11 61.5 263.6 308.2 130.1 95.6 17.4 357.2 56.2 160.5 302.9 130.1 85.9 0.7 7.0 17.4 207.9 56.2 154.8 302.9 130.1 84.1 8.3 8.3 17.4 624.1 47.4 249.0 301.0 128.9 88.0 17.4 320.5 47.4 145.9 133.5 94.5 75.0 0 bI 0 0 0 I C 0 TABLE 42-N (Continued) RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Levees and Floodwalls Berms Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section In Comrn- In Com- In Total System plete System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built Thru When Built Thru for This This This Comrn- This This Com- This This Location System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY Memphis Harbor--MD ................. .10.5 10.5 -- 10.5 7.0 1.1 2.6 10.5 -- 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .................... 1,511.0 1,120.7 7.7 963.9 15.3 1.1 10.9 1,466.3 -- 844.7 Grand Total in Project ............. . 3,713.5 3,316.4 32.8 2,662.3 691.7 3.0 528.1 3,581.8 12.4 2,719.6 1. Reflects decrease of 97.2 miles due to lowering of Yazoo River design flowline. F1O U,) H 0 0 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Total In Complete System Built Thru Year When This This Percent Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete (Miles) Bayou des Glaises diversion channel ....... . 1938 6.0 -- 6.0 100 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie ....... . 1946 92.6 -- 63.4 75 Charenton drainage and navigation canal ... 1939 6.3 -- 6.3 100 Wax Lake Outlet ....................... 1938 15.7 -- 15.7 100 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway ............. . 1933 244.2 -- 186.4 76 Morganza Floodway.................... 1941 3.3 -- 3.3 100 Old River outflow channel ............... . 1956 8.3 -- 8.3 100 Old River inflow channel ................ 1960 2.3 -- 2.3 100 Old River lock approach channels ......... . 1961 2.2 -- 2.2 100 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) ....... . 1958 2.5 -- 2.5 100 Teche-Vermilion Water Supply ........... . -- 6.3 -- 6.3 100 42-64 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Total In Complete System Built Thru Year When This This Percent Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River ................... . 1947 199.1 -- 199.1 100 Quiver River ......................... 1947 69.6 -- 69.6 100 Deer Creek .......................... .. 1947 7.0 -- 7.0 100 Steele Bayou ......................... .. 1947 54.9 -- 54.9 100 Steele Bayou1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 71.2 5.5 68.5 90 Main Canal .......................... 1959 21.1 -- 21.1 100 Main Canal 2 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 22.2- -- --- Black Bayou .......................... . -- 36.5 -- -- -- Big Sunflower River tributaries ........... . 1957 227.2 -- 227.2 100 Quiver River tributaries ................ 1960 35.4 -- 35.4 100 YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ...................... 1960 39.9 -- 39.9 100 YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project ................... . 1976 179.0 -- 58.1 32 Coldwater River ...................... 1941 54.6 -- 54.6 100 Arkabutla Canal ....................... 1948 0.4 -- 0.4 100 Tallahatchie Canal ..................... 1940 74.8 -- 73.5 85 Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway .............. 1939 48.0 -- 48.0 100 Greenwood protection works ............. . 1971 2.9 -- 2.9 100 Yacona River ......................... 1952 1.8 -- 1.8 100 Bobo Bayou .......................... .. 1944 16.1 -- 16.1 100 Cassidy Bayou........................ 1934 69.0 -- 69.0 100 Cassidy Bayou3 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 26.0 -- -- -- Bear Creek Diversion .................. -- 4.8 -- -- -- Lake Cormorant ....................... .. -- 20.9 -- -- -- Hurricane Bayou ...................... -- 2.5 -- -- -- Opossum Bayou....................... -- 20.8 -- -- -- Abaica Creek ......................... -- 7.7 -- -- -- Chicopa Creek ........................ -- 7.0 -- -- -- Bear Creek .......................... -- 23.3 -- -- -- Rocky Bayou ......................... -- 7.8 -- -- -- Whiteoak Bayou ...................... -- 55.9 -- -- -- Miscellaneous ditches .................. ... -- 12.3 -- -- -- Yalobusha River ...................... 1939 46.0 -- 46.0 100 Yazoo River .......................... 1940 160.2 -- 160.2 100 Whittington Auxiliary Channel ........... .. 1956 30.8 -- 30.8 100 Tchula Lake ......................... 1964 26.4 -- 26.4 100 David-Burrell Bayou ................... . 1957 40.4 -- 40.4 100 McKinney Bayou ...................... . 1960 3.5 -- 3.5 100 Hillside Floodway ..................... . 1964 11.0 -- 11.0 100 Yazoo City protection works ............. .. 1953 1.6 -- 1.6 100 Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous ................ .1975 30.2 -- 15.1 50 42-65 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: (Continued) VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Total In Complete System Built Thru Year When This This Percent Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete (Miles) YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS (Continued) Alligator-Catfish Bayou ................. . 1973 8.3 -- 8.2 99 Pelucia Creek ........................ .. 1975 8.3 -- 5.6 40 BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR Bayou Lafourche ...................... 1949 45.3 -- 45.3 100 Bayou Lafourche4'7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1972 43.0 -- 4.4 10 Big & Colewa Creeks ................... . 1947 81.4 -- 81.4 100 Big & Colewa Creeks5'7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 86.8 -- 51.5 60 Tensas River ......................... . 1947 96.5 -- 96.5 100 Tensas River 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1968 165.0 -- 61.0 37 Boeuf River, AR and LA ................ 1953 103.9 -- 103.9 100 Fleschmans Bayou, AR ................. . 1963 6.6 -- 6.6 100 Caney Bayou, AR ..................... . 1964 7.4 -- 7.4 100 Canall8,AR ......................... 1963 10.3 -- 10.3 100 Big Bayou, AR........................ 1952 33.3 -- 33.3 100 Black Pond Slough, AR ................. . 1962 14.3 -- 14.3 100 Bayou Macon, AR and LA ............... . 1959 150.8 -- 150.8 100 Rush Bayou, AR ....................... 1964 6.7 -- 6.7 100 Canal 19, AR ......................... 1957 50.2 -- 50.2 100 Canal 43,AR ......................... 1956 34.5 -- 34.5 100 Canal 81, AR ......................... 1957 32.7 -- 32.7 100 Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal-Bayou Vidal Cutoff.......................... .. -- 17.1 -- -- -- Kirsch Lake Canal..................... -- 9.3 -- -- -- Canal 19 Extension .................... 1964 9.4 -- 9.4 100 Lake Chicot Pumping Plant .............. -- 2.5 -- 2.5 100 MillBayou........................... 1955 4.8 -- 4.8 100 RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant .......... 1976 6.9 -- 6.9 100 Six MileBayou, LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. -- 1.5 -- 1.5 100 GRAND PRAIRIE, AR8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 338.1 -- -- -- BAYOU METO, AR8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 164.9 -- -- -- 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project. 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 68.5 additional miles of channel to the project. 7. Further work on these items has been deferred due to local oppositions and withdrawal of sponsorship by the levee district. 8. Deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989. 42-66 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1990) Total In Complete System Built Thru Year When This This Percent Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO ......................... 1952 9.6 -- 9.5 100 ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO ............... . 1963 298.9 -- 278.9 93 St. Francis River, MO and AR ............ 1953 638.5 16.5 457.5 72 West Memphis Drainage, AR ............. . 1951 19.8 -- 19.8 100 Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR .......... 1960 28.0 -- 28.0 100 Tyronza River, AR ..................... 1939 12.7 -- 12.7 100 L'Anguille River, AR ................... . (1) 95.0 -- -- -- LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR ................. . 1972 231.5 -- 7.2 3 Big Creek and tributaries, AR ............ . (1) 103.8 -- -- -- WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES ObionCreek,KY ...................... (1) 41.71 -- -- -- WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) ........... . 1952 34.3 -- 34.3 100 Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act) ........................ (1) 9.3 -- -- -- Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ...... 1974 15.8 -- 3.0 19 Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN ............. . 1955 19.7 -- 19.7 100 MS River Below Cape Girardeau: West TN tributaries (1948 Act) .............. 1961 225.0 -- 89.8 41 Wolf River and tributaries, TN ........... . 1960 25.5 -- 25.5 100 1. Not started. 42-67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-R COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: St. Louis District: General investigations $ -- $ -- $ -- Advance engineering and design -- -- -- St. Francis Basin-Wappapello Lake -- 3,889,471 -- Subtotal 3,889,471 Memphis Distriet: General investigations -- -- 2,197,499 Mississippi River levees 1,736,228 2,615,262 -- St. Francis Basin 11,067,209 8,935,232 -- Lower White River, Augusta to Clarendon 1,144 -- -- Clarendon Levee, Lower White, AR 229 -- -- White River Backwater -- 756,522 -- Cache Basin, AR 526,962 -- -- Channel improvement 17,168,108 22,807,432 -- West Tennessee tributaries 729,008 -- -- West Kentucky tributaries 2,990 -- -- Inspection of completed works -- 693,869 -- Mapping -- 242,135 -- Reelfoot Lake No. 9, TN-KY 4,356 -- -- Mud Lake, TN 2,365 -- -- Eight Mile Creek 185,760 -- -- Helena Harbor 1,616,625 -- -- L'Anguille River 29,315 -- -- Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm 899,885 -- -- Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS 360,052 -- -- Lake #9 Pumping Plant, KY -- 2,500 -- Subtotal 34,330,236 36,052,952 2,197,499 Vicksburg District: General investigations -- -- 607,135 Mississippi River levees 1,918,935 1,232,722 -- Lower Arkansas River -- 370,710 -- Tensas Basin 7,386,866 4,288,519 -- Yazoo Basin 35,705,865 23,621,523 -- Channel improvement 23,903,637 9,306,868 -- Mapping -- 275,890 -- Inspection of completed works -- 125,342 -- Lower Red River--South Bank Red River Levee 19 32,216 -- Dam Safety Assurances 589,412 -- -- Subtotal 69,504,735 39,253,789 607,135 New Orleans District: General investigations -- -- 98,563 Mississippi River levees 7,930,971 3,890,485 -- Mississippi Delta Region 7,788,677 -- -- Old River 129,857 4,084,616 -- Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries -- 119,843 -- Atchafalaya Basin 20,314,207 8,486,806 -- 42-68 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-R (Continued) COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Item Construction Maintenance Other New Orleans District (Continued): Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 7,826,364 -- -- Channel improvement 60,877,440 13,593,685 -- Mississippi & LA Estuarine 543,684 -- -- Teche Vermilion Basin Water Supply 700,000 - -- B. R. Harbor Devil Swamp -- 206,403 -- Inspection of completed works -- 210,615 -- Mapping -- 261,008 -- Subtotal 106,111,200 30,853,459 98,563 Total Federal Funds 209,946,171 110,049,671 2,903,198 CONTRIBUTED FUNDS New Orleans District: Old River -- 65,698 -- Atchafalaya Basin 68,210 -- -- Mississippi Delta Region 2,117,375 -- -- Total Contributed Funds 2,185,585 65,698 -- Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 212,131,756 110,115,369 2,903,198 42-69 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-S STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1990 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1990 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, AR Contraction works DeValls Bluff, AR Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet Carre' Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 1 n Qc) $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 1 1o ' 169,352 169,3J52 -- 1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,736,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,055 39,546,055 -- 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 17.384.031 17.384.031 -- . 1 , V .,VV. 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 1 , ,,VV1 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 42-70 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1990 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1990 New Orleans District: (Continued) Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 387,917 387,917 -- 75,893,123 75,893,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 - 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 165,432,500 165,432,500 -- 579,462 579,462 -- 1,897,980 1,897,980 -- 94774429 92.474.42 -- V, 1/,Z L 175,889,354 98,000 357,857,807 58,579,000 141,519,900 439,434 7,895,000 9,019,908 226,149,682 965,429 51,295,592 175,502,300 98,000 356,442,582 58,566,439 141,336,715 439,434 7,885,430 9,019,908 225,129,915 965,429 51,286,733 387,054 -- 1,415,225 12,561 183,185 9,570 1,019,766 88,8,58959 42-71 ,z , zz REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1990 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1990 Lower White River: Clarendon Levee Augusta to Clarendon, AR White River backwater levee, AR Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 West Tennessee tributaries Helena Harbor Cache Basin, AR West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN L'Anguille River Eight Mile Creek Subtotal Vicksburg District: Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) Section 6 Levees Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot pumping plant Tensas River Red River Backwater: Below Red River Red River backwater levee, LA Tensas Cocodrie pumping plant Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Greenwood Belzoni Yazoo City 505,715 1,788,846 10,624,501 1,000,000 1,500,000 108,651 39,983,900 5,291,000 10,050,000 1,440,000 107,000 196,000 1,693,000 1,103,997,720 207,317,990 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 94,882,400 41,507,200 639,800 65,729,646 54,913,900 756,300 39,800,000 423,270,065 23,549,260 107,857,040 958,175 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,356,100 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 505,703 1,788,125 16,624,501 899,885 360,052 108,651 39,412,037 3,035,394 9,826,762 1,427,625 93,717 147,477 1,675,185 1,096,578,000 205,479,427 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 93,445,251 41,507,200 639,370 62,885,718 54,142,163 756,300 39,800,000 419,113,639 23,549,260 106,528,276 958,175 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,356,100 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 42-72 12 722 -- 100,115 1,139,948 571,863 2,255,606 223,238 12,375 13,283 48,523 17,815 7,419,720 1,838,564 1,437,149 0 430 2,843,928 771,737 0 -- 4,156,427 1,31,32288,7,67464 -- MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1990 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1990 Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel Big Sunflower, etc. Main Stem Upper Yazoo Projects Yazoo Basin--Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) Tributaries--Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater Rocky Bayou Yazoo Backwater Pumping Plant Muddy Bayou Yazoo Backwater, F&WL Mitigation Streambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. Demonstration Erosion Control Dam Safety Assurances-Sardis Dam Subtotal New Orleans District: Teche-Vermilion Basin Water Supply Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Miss. & LA Estutarine Channel Improvement: Dredging Revetments Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River Levees Mississippi Delta Region Atchafalaya Basin Floodway: Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River Navigation Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System Old River Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River 1,645,394,610 34,506,000 5,008,008 640,000 35,945,266 737,011,117 18,056,600 200,680 252,915,000 17,309,000 631,779,537 303,463 18,973,000 291,239,000 150,000 30,000 420,000 365,000 1,609,475,655 34,506,000 5,008,008 543,684 35,945,266 733,316,691 18,056,600 200,680 250,997,713 15,625,190 628,781,644 303,463 15,453,510 291,105,070 150,000 30,000 420,000 364,339 42-73 10,950,966 45,183,000 34,380,300 79,633,306 78,068,360 612,484 23,978,100 56,444,200 3,416,200 9,064,850 5,145,200 4,106,400 14,767,000 61,371,900 6,342,000 10,950,966 42,818,637 34,377,347 75,995,117 74,143,752 612,484 23,978,100 56,320,333 3,359,062 9,064,850 5,145,200 4,044,898 14,767,000 48,977,954 6,038,772 2,364,363 469,265 3,638,189 3,924,608 24 123,867 57,138 2,274,275 N 61,502 12,393,946 303,228 35,918,955 96,316 3,694,426 -- 1,917,287 1,683,810 2,997,894 -- 3,519,490 133,930 2,043,886,671 2,029,843,517 14,043,153 4,795,756,442 4,738,374,614 57,381,828 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1990 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1990 Memphis District: (Continued) Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes Subtotal TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN RECREATION FACILITIES-COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Project Funds St. Louis District: Wappapello Lake, MO Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing Subtotal Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Subtotal Total Eight-Year Program Funds Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies Total maintenance since Aug. 18, 1941 65,000 175,000 350,000 540,000 65,000 175,000 350,000 540,000 2,095,000 2,095,000 -- 29,700 29,700 -- 200,000 200,000 -- 229,700 229,700 -- 69,753 69,753 -- 1,109,000 1,109,000 - 965,247 965,247 -- 2,144,000 2,144,000 -- 4,468,700 4,468,700 -- 4,965,657,642 4,908,275,814 57,381,828 2,405,300 2,405,300 -- 203,286 203,286 -- 2,608,586 2,608,586 -- 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- 7,673,109 10,281,695 4,975,939,337 2,056,350,855 7,673,109 10,281,695 4,918,557,509 2,045,883,792 57,381,828 10,467,063 42-74 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1990 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1990 Vicksburg District: (Continued) Total rehabilitation 31,113,000 31,113,000 -- Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- Total general investigations 78,749,381 77,676,815 1,072,566 Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 7,157,052,873 7,088,131,416 68,921,457 Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1990 7,189,121,782 7,120,200,325 68,921,457 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been excluded from this report. 42-75 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-T STATEMENTS OF EXPENDITURES FOR LEVEES BY STATE AND LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH DEC. 31, 1989 Engineer District Expenditures St. Louis $ 79,819,059 Memphis 287,352,633 Vicksburg 138,089,086 New Orleans 678,558,316 Total $1,183,819,094 42-76 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-U COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 Mississippi River General investigations: and tributaries Allotted 5,890,000 4,860,000 5,029,000 2,628,500 78,749,381 (Regular Funds)1 Cost 6,296,443 4,961,997 5,286,048 2,903,198 77,676,815 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Allotted 192,260,000 191,020,000 210,139,000 216,161,500 4,795,756,442 Cost 168,890,918 198,487,453 197,370,967 209,946,171 4,738,374,614 Maintenance Allotted 112,403,000 120,874,000 121,878,000 113,768,000 2,056,350,855 Cost 110,409,871 121,485,216 119,586,856 110,049,671 2,045,883,792 Rehabilitations Allotted -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Cost -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Allotted -- -- -- 14,885,992 Cost -- - -- -- 14,885,992 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 124,692 1,590,000 2,028,507 1,845,800 15,169,770 Cost 121,303 1,387,953 1,296,903 2,185,585 14,569,212 Maintenance Contributed 101,108 79,126 83,164 85,742 2,684,154 Cost 69,827 63,060 64,994 65,698 2,444,653 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1990): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Transferred to revolving fund: Impounded savings: Flood control emergencies: Net total allotted: Impounded savings: Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1990 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: $4,965,237,870 10,281,695 4,995,215 24,944,460 1,593,097 14,885,922 14,378 78,749,381 2,056,350,855 $5,007,052,337 14,900,300 2,135,100,236 32,068,909 7,189,121,782 42-77 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-U (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep. 30, 1990 Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1990 Transferred to revolving fund: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 7,157,574,632 24,944,460 4,995,215 1,607,475 Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1990: 7,189,121,782 Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 87: $310,553,000 FY 88: $316,754,000 FY 89: $337,046,000 FY 90: $332,558,000 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 1978, teletype. 42-78 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 90 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (112) New Orleans District Atchafalaya Basin Water & Land Res-12026 $6,051 Subtotal 6,051 Vicksburg District Boeuf-Tensas Basin, AR & LA-81273 28,611 Natchez, MS-12675 47,327 Southeast Arkansas, AR-12756 303,271 Yazoo River Basin, MS-12074 Subtotal 412,810 Memphis District Birds Point-New Madrid Alt Study-12642 130,109 Eastern AR Reg-Comprehensive Study-81266 237,564 Mayfield Creek-10850 2,328 Reelfoot Lake, TN-00086 182 St. Francis River Below Wappapello (Whiteman's Creek)-22000 91,355 St. Francis River F&WL, AR & MO-79690 15,990 Subtotal 477,528 TOTAL (Category 110) $896,389 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) Vicksburg District 193,671 Memphis District TOTAL (Category 120) 259,230 SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-AUTH STUDIES (Category 130) Flood Damage Prevention (132) Vicksburg District MS River East Bank Natchez-76022 537 TOTAL (Category 130) 537 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 140) Flood Control Projects (142) Vicksburg District Bushley Bayou Area, LA-75226 132 New Orleans District MS-LA Estuarine Area ADVCPE-12193 TOTAL (Category 140) 92,645 42-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 42-V (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 90 Categories PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) Flood Control Projects (162) Memphis District St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy-77005 90,820 Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS-12417 4,745 Horn Lake Creek & Tribs/Cowpen Creek-81282 139,768 Helena AR & Vicinity-81280 410,169 L'Anguille River Basin-00082 18 Lower White River Big Creek & Trib-12472 322,755 West Memphis & Vicinity-81281 478,256 Harris Fork Creek, TN & KY-77009 207,881 TOTAL (Category 160) 1,655,412 GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 2,904,213 42-80 US ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORIES The US Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL) at Champaign, Illinois conducts research in the planning, design, construction, operations, and maintenance and attendant environmental quality for military and civil works facilities. During FY90, significant accomplishments of USACERL applicable to civil works included: (1) Research was completed on evaluation of coatings that can be applied underwater. The research included evaluating the applications and durability of propriety coatings as well as developing a new formulation coating. The new coating has superior adhesion and corrosion protection and can be applied without the need for underwater mixing or specialized application equipment. The coating is being used in the North Pacific, New England and Southwest Divisions on piling and other marine structures which cannot be dewatered. Use of the coating will greatly extend the life of underwater structures which would otherwise fail due to corrosion. (2) The evaluation was completed on reinforced epoxy fillers. These materials are used to fill pits in metal caused by corrosion. Their use on miter gate seals on the Ohio and Arkansas Rivers has resulted in an estimated cost avoidance of $50,000 per structure. (3) Several Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation (REMR) Management Systems were completed, field validated and demonstrated at Corps of Engineers District Offices. The systems address timber dikes, steel sheet pile structures, miter lock gates, and concrete navigation lock walls. They provide uniform and objective procedures for condition assessment, and the tools for economic analysis and data management. Cost savings are realized through the development of optimal maintenance and repair work plans and optimal budge planning. (4) An Environmental Review Guide for Operations (ERGO) manual of checklists and reference information was designed. The first draft was tested in the Nashville District. The revised and updated manual was competed and is being distributed to Division and District Offices along with a procedure summarizing the ERGO program. 43-1 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY BACKGROUND The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), in Hanover, N.H., maintains the finest research and engineering staff and facilities in the world for the study of cold regions science and technology. CRREL's cold regions experience spans 50 years, starting with the Boston District's Soils Laboratory work on frozen soils in the early 1940s. The creation of CRREL in 1961 with the merger of the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory (ACFEL) and the Snow, Ice, and Permafrost Research Establishment (SIPRE), both of which were outgrowths of the Army's World War II experience in Alaska, Iceland, and Greenland, put the nation's and DOD's principal cold regions expertise in one place. CRREL's traditional program involves the study of the earth's cold regions, focusing onbasic and applied scientific research and on expanding the technologies required for both military and civil works development and operations. CRREL was the first organization in the world to recover complete ice cores from the Greenland and Antarctic ice caps for analysis of the world's climate over the past 100,000 years. This accomplishment has served as a platform for the present international global change research effort. CRREL provided engineering support for the design and construction of the Alyeska Oil Pipeline in Alaska, early exploration and scientific work in Antarctica, and helped develop engineering testing methods and design criteria for construction in cold regions that are used as national and international standards. CRREL has also provided the Army with military engineering capabilities for winter operations, supported the development of materiel and techniques that permit operation in extreme environments, and developed river ice technology and management systems that allow cost-effective use of the nation's 25,000 miles of inland waterways throughout the winter. CRREL serves as the Air Force's principal resource for construction and operation of its cold regions facilities, for the development of environmental evaluation-prediction-enhancement tools related to Smart Weapon Systems performance, and for evaluation of the fate and transport of contaminants in Arctic terrain. CRREL hosts the Polar Oceanography Branch of the Naval Oceanographic and Atmospheric Research Laboratory and provides the Navy with expertise in sea ice mechanics, arctic boundary layer processes, ice forces on vessels and structures, and ship icing/deicing phenomena. CRREL's new mission directions are in strong support of a changing Corps, a changing Army, and a changing nation. CRREL has recognized its responsibility to use its exceptionally creative scientists and engineers to assist the Corps in its mission as engineer- defender and builder of a new nation. Wornout and outmoded infrastructure; environmental degradation of land, water, and air; increased awareness of the need to understand and master the complexities of the global environment; the apparent end of the cold war; and increased international economic pressures making long term investment in research and development difficult-all cry out for innovative and effective action. The Corps has responded decisively and effectively to the challenge of new mission responsibility, and CRREL has been at the leading edge of this effort. Other priority national programs to which CRREL has made significant contributions include work in pavement and transportation systems for the Federal Aviation and Highway Administrations, including participation in the Strategic Highway Research Program. CRREL continues to be a principal consultant to the National Science Foundation in its Arctic, Antarctic, and Greenland IceSheetresearchprograms. CRREL works with the Department of the Interior to study the effects of global climate change on water regimes in the north and has been a significant participant with the Navy to develop DOD initiatives to complement the U.S. Global Climate Change Program. CRREL also provides support to DOE and EPA concerning the environmental characterization and restoration of toxic and hazardous materials in the special conditions of permafrost and high-latitude envi ronments. Private industry also comes to CRREL for assistance not available in the private sector. As the Army's center of expertise, CRREL conducts cold regions scientific and engineering research that addresses problems encountered by the Army and otherDOD agencieswhereveraccomplishmentof their mission is impacted by winter/ cold regions effects. CRREL's unique and capable research staff and facilities are matched to its equally unique mission. The approximately 320 members of the CRREL staff include many of the world's experts on snow, ice, frozen ground, and cold regions engineering. The dominant in-house execution of programs, coupled with a very rigorous peer review, has maintained the high level of staff expertise and the laboratory's reputation as the best of its kind in the world. This national and international reputation has been the most effective recruiting tool of all and serves to attract young, high-quality scientists and engineers to perpetuate the quality of the technical staff. The combination and variety of specialized research and experimental facilities at CRREL is unequaled in the world. The main laboratory contains 24 coldrooms that can be operated at temperatures as low as -50 0F, a computer center, chemistry laboratories, a well-equipped soil physics laboratory, a cleanroom complex, soil chemistry facilities, and a remote sensing analysis center. Specialized equipment includes low-temperature materials testing machines, gas chromatography-mass spectrometers (GC-MS), atomic absorption spectrometers, supercritical fluid chromatography, a low-temperature electron microscope, a dual-gamma NDT device, a Hopkinson pressure-bar impact test device, and nuclear magnetic resonance equipment. The Ice Engineering Facility (IEF) is one of the largest refrigerated hydraulics laboratories in the world. It contains a research area for large-scale refrigerated hydraulic models, a refrigerated flume, and a wind tunnel for simulating drifting snow, and it includes the only active low-temperature, ice towing tank in the United States. It serves the civil works needs of the Corps, the Navy's needs for testing the ice capability of its surface and submarine hulls, and, when necessary, provides support to industry. The Frost Effects Research Facility (FERF) is a 29,000- square-foot refrigerated soils laboratory consisting of 12 test cells. Here pavements, base and subbase courses, and buried utilities can be tested at full scale. Six to eight natural freeze-thaw cycles can be simulated in a single year using refrigeration panels. Unique in the world, the FERF was planned as a facility to support the DOD as well as other federal agencies such as FAA and FHWA. The CRREL Cold Regions Information Analysis Center is recognized as having the world's foremost collection of cold regions scientific and technical literature. More than 2,000 requests for information are filled each year. In addition, the Bibliography on Cold Regions Science and Technology is prepared at the Library of Congress under joint CRREL/NSF sponsorship. It contains over 140,000 citations of world cold regions literature, including approximately 50,000 Russian items. The newly rebuilt Cold Laboratory Complex at CRREL is the only major low-temperature physical sciences complex in the nation. It supports work for the three military services as well as other federal agencies such as the Geological Survey and the National Science Foundation. The CRREL Sleepers River Experimental Watershed in Danville, Vermont, was recently named a national site for study of climate change in conjunction with the Department of the Interior. CRREL's Permafrost Research Site at Farmer's Loop, Alaska, and the close association of CRREL's Alaska Projects Office with the 6th Inf Div (Light) at Ft. Wainwright provides day-to-day field interaction with the user. CRREL's basic and applied research covers abroad spectrum of cold regions studies. Basic research includes work in terrestrial ecology, boundary layer processes, and the physical, mechanical, and chemical properties of snow and other forms of frozen precipitation, freshwater ice, sea ice, and frozen soils. Basic research supports applied research in the major cold regions mission areas of * Ice-jam floods * Winter navigation * Remote sensing for civil works * Base support * Infrastructure design and construction * Combat operations and materiel performance Major civil works cold regions research topics include ice engineering, river ice management, water resources in cold regions, remote sensing, and environmental impact. CRREL has an international reputation and maintains close ties with the international research community and with federal and state agencies, where it provides consulting services on a reimbursable basis. As the cold regions scientific and engineering expert for the Corps of Engineers, CRREL supports Corps districts and divisions by publishing field engineering reports, conducting demonstrations, sponsoring technical seminars for field engineers, and making field visits to consult on engineering problems. OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FY90 CRREL provides a world-class capability not available in academia or industry through its highly focused mission, one-of-a-kind research and engineering facilities, and renowned technical staff, making it an invaluable and unique resource for the Army, DOD, and the nation. The synergism of applying these assets to a broad range of military and civilian problems, and the ability to sustain a critical mass of resources in a highly specialized and sophisticated area, contribute significantly to CRREL's effectiveness as an organization. In FY90, CRREL published and distributed 294 scientificand engineering documents (17 CRREL Reports; 1 engineer technical letter; 39 special reports; 10 technical notes; 4 fact sheets; 5 technical videotapes; 1 information exchange bulletin; 60 journal articles; 124 conference papers and abstracts; 24 other Corps, DA, and government publications; and 9 books and nongovernment publications). This past year, CRREL responded to 981 installation support requests (One-Stops). These are requests that can be answered with the expenditure of no more than two days' effort. Requests for 1990 covered subjects from environmental quality to flood control and navigation. Examples of One-Stops include the following efforts: * Provided ice engineering support to the Rock Island District, the Detroit District, and to the departments of transportation in Alaska and Vermont. * Provided advice on design and construction to the North Atlantic Division and the Sacramento and Kansas City Districts. * Provided advice on environmental quality to the Missouri River Division, the Sacramento, Philadelphia, and Nashville Districts, and the Directorate of Engineering and Housing at Ft. Drum, New York. * Provided assistance on sanitary engineering to the Alaska District. * Assisted Corps districts and divisions in the application of remote sensing technology. For example, CRREL provided technical assistance in the schedule of Landsat 5 over the Ohio River. CRREL'S CIVIL WORKS R&D PROGRAM There are four major thrusts in CRREL's civil works R&D program: * The Ice Engineering Program has developed the nation's principal guidance for winter navigation, river ice management, and ice-jam flood control. In severe winters, ice jams are responsible for over $100 million in damage due to iceinduced flooding. Efforts to alleviate and control ice jams and ice-induced flooding have helped reduce their cost to the nation. * The Remote Sensing Program emphasizes the exploitation of real-time in situ sensors and commercially available satellite imagery and integration of these data into a spatial data management system. Development and utilization of remote sensing technology for civil works applications in water and natural resources are urgently needed to provide cost-effective information necessary for many of the Corps engineering, operations, and planning missions. * In the Water Resources of Cold Regions Program, techniques have been developed to analyze winter low flows, with a new emphasis on determining whether or not wetlands are a major source for winter flows. Distributed snowmelt routines are being developed to replace outdated snowmelt algorithms to help improve spring flood forecasting, including processes in partially glacierized basins in Alaska. * The Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Program is a cost-shared partnership between the Corps of Engineers, the U.S construction industry, academic institutions, state and local governments, and other groups. Its purpose is to cooperatively advance the research innovation in the U.S. construction industry, thereby enhancing its productivity and competitiveness. ACCOMPLISHMENTS Ice Engineering Program At Salmon, Idaho, historic flooding of the town was avoided. Flooding was prevented through the use of an ice boom on the Salmon River and by moving the ice boom's right bank anchor approximately 240 feet upstream from its previous location. This action encouraged the formation of a full-width ice cover by placing the most downstream portion of the ice boom in a slower flow area. The boom, which is upstream from the town, successfully caught much of the moving ice, thereby preventing an ice jam near the town. Statistical analysis of a very cold period in late December 1990 showed that without this action in-town flooding would have occurred, caused by an ice jam forming below the town and then progressing through it. This year, the ice jam's closest approach to town was 7 miles. Blockage of water intake trash racks by frazil ice is a serious and common problem in cold regions, severely reducing or eliminating power generation capability at hydropower plants. In 1990, a model intake trash rack, incorporating a new concept in trash rack heating, was tested in the CRREL Refrigerated Flume Facility. In this new concept, only the leading edge of each trash rack bar is heated, greatly increasing the efficiency of the heat application and decreasing power requirements. The new system utilizes heat tape placed along the leading edge of the 1/4- x 11/2-inch trash rack bars, protected by a stainless steel shield. Using this design, the system applies heat only at the locations needed to avert ice adhesion and subsequent blockage. Laboratory tests showed that this new concept of trash rack heating will keep the racks free of frazil ice accumulation under all conditions tested. To confirm these results, a prototype was designed, built, and installed at a low-head hydroelectric plant for field testing in 1991. Thus far, results are very encouraging. In conjunction with the New York State Department of Transportation, CRREL has installed a load sensor on the leading edge of a bridge pier in upstate New York. The sensor system has been designed to measure the total dynamic ice load on the pier and to describe its position. Field measurements of ice loads on in-stream structures are difficult to obtain and, consequently, few have been taken. Data from this planned 10-year effort will provide the information CRREL needs to refine the engineering codes for pier design, thereby leading to improved construction efficiency and cost reduction. In its Hydraulic Research and Model Facility, CRREL has begun construction of a model of Lock and Dam 20 on the Mississippi River. The objective of this effort is to evaluate a variety of schemes for passing ice, thereby avoiding traditional ice build-up at the locks that reduces lock operating efficiency. The original design for Lock and Dam 20 included space for a second lock, and possibilities are being examined to use the second lock space for anice passage system. Design alternatives to be evaluated in the model include submergible gates and high-flow air systems for directing ice. This work follows a previous effort in which ice passage through river lock tainter and submergible tainter gates was investigated through hydraulic model studies. These tests simulated low river flow conditions with brash ice in the ship channel. Submergible gates were found to pass more ice than conventional gates, and it was concluded that successful incorporation of submergible gates at Corps of Engineers river locks could prevent ice buildup in lock approaches and allow more efficient winter operations. A Corps diver was killed during the annual installation of the St. Mary's River Ice Boom in late November 1989. CRREL was asked to design an ice control structure at the head of Little Rapids Cut that would eliminate the need for a diver. CRREL responded to this request by designing a modified anchoring system that allowed the anchor chain to remain attached to the submerged pile anchors and remain on the bottom during non-ice periods. This modification was implemented during the removal of the boom in the spring of 1990, and the boom was reinstalled in November 1990 without the use of divers. Because national expertise and experience in ice engineering resides primarily at CRREL, consultation on ice problems is an ongoing effort. Remote Sensing Program Snow, soil moisture, water quality, and geotechnical sensors have been evaluated to obtain the highest quality data products for models used in our water and natural resource mission areas. These sensors provide real-time information to the district offices, allowing more effective forecasts of water conditions and the ability to regulate the reservoirs and navigable waterways to optimize their operational efficiency. The reduction in maintenance (sensor costs and manpower) of this data collection activity has reduced the costs at the rate of $1 million/yr. It has also provided the data to reduce flooding and improve navigation at greatly reduced costs. A new data management package has been developed that allows rapid input of real-time in situ sensor data and remotely sensed satellite and aircraft imagery to water resource models. The ability to integrate large volumes and varieties of data rapidly will be especially beneficial for resource planning, conducting feasibility studies, operation of inland navigable waterways, reservoir regulation, and emergency operations. The cost-benefit of this capability is now being established and is expected to be in the millions. Remote Sensing and Geographic Informations Systems (GIS) Center A Remote Sensing and GIS Center has been established at CRREL that will help meet the operational needs of the Corps of Engineers and the nation. Major activities of the center will include: * Tailoring of remote sensing and GIS technology for district use * Maintaining a central point of contact for remote sensing/GIS technology * Developing information and providing direct assistance for field operating activities in research and applications of remote sensing and GIS * Providing a structured means for technology transfer * Coordinating training for special applications * Developing standardized software and an integrated spatial data management system; * Providing an increased emphasis on lessons learned and an enhanced ability to share these lessons with field operating activities. Inland Waterways Remote Sensing Demonstration Program The Rock Island District, in conjunction with CRREL, is conducting a demonstration of remote sensing technologies applicable to Corps water resources operations. The major objectives of this program are 1) To demonstrate the use of satellite and aerial images in water resources activities, including the comparison of information content and reliability and the cost of acquiring and analyzing such data 2) To demonstrate the operational use of state-ofthe- art hydrometeorological and environmental sensors for the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) and other data relay systems. The Rock Island Inland Waterways Remote Sensing Program began in 1985 and is in its final year. During the program, a complete operational remote sensing spatial data management system was configured that will allow the water control data management and reservoir regulation groups to run realtime forecasting models in a workstation environment. The system will merge point, spatial, and temporal data into a data storage system for use by the district field staff. In addition, 10 engineer technical letters (ETLs), eight reports, and five software programs were prepared that can also be used by all Corps districts in their day-to-day activities. Geotechnical instrumentation that will automate the data collection of many of the parameters required in the dam safety program have also been tested and recommendations have been made on the usefulness of the sensors to Corps projects. Major benefits to the Corps willbe increased quantity and higher quality of data at less cost and faster reaction times to better meet operational needs. The total cost of the six-year Remote Sensing Demonstration Program is approximately $1.55 million. The estimated annual cost savings will be $364,000 per year. Cold Regions Water Resources Corps technology for the snowmelt component of flood forecasting is of 1950s vintage. Two projects are underway to improve and/or replace this outdated technology. The first is the development of a new manual that addresses snowmelt runoff modelling, and the second is the development of improved methods for predicting snowmelt runoff, with a specialfocus on distributed methods utilizing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology. Periods during which winter low flows occur are extremely significant in some portions of the nation, and identifying and protecting the water source and storage areas in these regions is of prime importance. This research also addresses calibrating existing flood forecast models to water temperature. Findings will be transmitted among the districts through publication of an ETL and updates to engineering manuals (for example, a Watershed Run-Off Analysis). The Alaska, Rock Island, Baltimore, and Detroit Districts have already participated in field tests or otherwise shown interest in the technology. Current research will determine the magnitude of bank erosion caused by interactive freeze-thaw processes, for example, how fluctuating surface waters and varying groundwater levels contribute to bank erosion. In this program, the products are improved techniques, models, and sensors, all of which will help measure and predict runoff, sediment transport, erosion, and water quality and their effects on hydrologic systems. The use of new computer technology, especially GISapplications, to analyze water resources engineering problems offers tremendous time-saving through the use of spatial databases that have not been feasible in the past. This added capability will improve the Corps's ability to make better hydrologic and water resources analyses. The estimated cost savings are $500,000 per year. Construction Productivity Advancement Research Under the Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Program, CRREL started several new efforts in 1990. CPAR is a cost-shared partnership between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. construction industry (contractors, equipment and material suppliers, architects, engineers, and financial organizations), academic institutions, state and local governments, and other groups interested in construction productivity and competitiveness. CPAR's objective is to facilitate research, development, and application of advanced technologies through cooperative R&D, field demonstration, li censing agreements, and other means of technology transfer. New CPAR projects for 1990 include * Freezing temperature protection admixture for Portland cement concrete * Anti-freeze admixture for winter concreting * Geotextiles to reduce frost effects in roadway construction * Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils and groundwater in northern climates * Soil Remediation Demonstration Project of bioremediation of No. 6 fuel oil (in seasonal climates). The success of these projects will greatly enhance construction productivity as well as reduce undesirable environmental impacts in these areas. The total program, including partner contributions for these CPAR projects, is $1.5 million. NEW MISSION INITIATIVES Work for Private Industry A major new initiative for CRREL in FY90, and an effort that augments CRREL's Civil Works-funded winter navigation research, was the development of collaborative research efforts with private industry as authorized by the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 and the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986. This legislation allows federal laboratories to enter into cooperative research and development agreements (CRDAs) with private industry. CRREL was one of the first Army laboratories to complete a CRDA with private industry for research sponsored by this legislation. CRREL's effort involved evaluation of a commercial icebreaker for North American Shipbuilding, Inc., of Larose, Louisiana. The tests were completed in CRREL's Ice Engineering test basin and included towed resistance, propulsion, and ramming tests of a scale-model icebreaker. The tests were successful, and construction of the vessel, the R/V Nathaniel B. Palmer, has been completed. The ice breaker is now under lease to the National Science Foundation and is being used for polar research. This agreement has proved to be a prototype for other research efforts with private industry. CRREL is negotiating four other CRDAs with industry on topics ranging from ice forces on structures to basic research on frozen soils. CRREL Support of Corps New Mission Initiatives Maglev The creation of a U.S.-developed magnetically levitated (Maglev) high-speed transportation system has been considered by many as an essential cornerstone for a viable, healthy, and competitive U.S. economy in the 21st century. During FY90, the Corps led the nation's effort to develop a U.S. Maglev transportation technology that could provide a superior transportation network and a significant product for the domestic and international marketplace of the next century. As part of the Corps effort, CRREL researchers made significant contributions to the interagency effort to develop a U.S. pilot program for research and development of Maglev transportation. Through CRREL's contribution, key staff positions were filled to provide technical and managerial assistance to this federal interagency initiative. CRREL's participation was instrumental in developing the long-term vision and the scope of the federal effort as a catalyst for private industry and fostering cooperation with other agencies, academia, and private industry. Planetary Surface Systems (PSS) In July 1989, President Bush challenged the nation to a new adventure in space. "We must commit ourselves anew to a sustained program of ... permanent settlement of space ... And next-for the new century--back to the Moon. Back to the future. And this time, back to stay ... and then a manned mission to Mars ..." In pursuit of these goals, NASA asked the Corps to consider the possibility of assisting in the research, development, and execution of tasks related to the development of permanently manned stations on the surfaces of the moon and Mars. Under leadership from the Office of Strategic Initiatives and the Directorates of Civil Works and Research and Development, a task force consisting of the four Labs and the HuntsvilleDivision developed and presented toNASA a partnership proposal. As a result, CRREL developed a comprehensive analysis of present capabilities related to the Planetary Surface Systems mission, including several proposals to initiate development of long-lead-time technology areas. This effort, combined with the work of the other Corps Labs, produced a comprehensive proposal that was presented to Dr. Aaron Cohen, director of NASA's Johnson Space Center, in December 1990. As a result of the joint NASA/Corps effort, CRREL is now developing plans for how CRREL's expertise in extreme environments can be leveraged for both science and engineering issues that will be faced in lunar and martian exploration and habitation. U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION Organization and functions. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the staff supervision of the Director, Research and Development. COL Larry B. Fulton, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. Dr. Robert W. Whalin, PE, is Technical Director. Dr. Dennis R. Smith is Assistant Technical Director. WES, the Corps of Engineers largest laboratory complex for research, testing, and development, consists of six technical laboratories: Hydraulics, Geotechnical, Structures, Environmental, Coastal Engineering Research Center, and Information Technology Laboratory. The Hydraulics Laboratory, the largest laboratory of its kind in the world, uses a wide range of working models and computer-based numerical models for research and analysis of dams, levees, river and harbor projects, soil and streambank erosion, thermal pollution, etc. The Geotechnical Laboratory conducts research in soil mechanics, structural foundation design, embankment design and slope stability, seepage analysis, military pavements, engineering geology, rock mechanics, expedient surfacing, earthquake engineering, and mobility and trafficability. The Structures Laboratory uses theoretical, analytical, experimental, and modeling approaches to research the effects of nuclear and non-nuclear explosions, the response of structures to natural and explosive disturbances, and various construction materials with emphasis on concrete, especially the testing, repair, and preservation of existing concrete structures. The Environmental laboratory researches the problems caused by man's activities with respect to the environment. Research programs include Dredged Material, Aquatic Plant Control, Environmental and Water Quality Operational Studies, Environmental Impact, Wetlands, and the Natural Resources Research Program. These and other programs of the Environmental Laboratory range through waste management, environmental regulations, and military aspects of terrain and camouflage. The Coastal Engineering Research Center conceives, plans, and conducts research and data collection in coastal/ocean engineering and nearshore oceanography to: provide a better understanding of waves, winds, water levels, tides, and currents; and provide scientific and engineering data and design criteria for materials as they apply to navigation improvements, flood storm protection, beach erosion control, recreation, and protection of structures in the coastal zone. The Information Technology Laboratory is responsible for all communications, mainframe computer functions for both technical and administrative applications, graphic presentations, and printed media at the station. WES Laboratories are engaged in research and engineering investigations in support of the civil and military missions of the Chief of Engineers. On a reimbursable basis, WES performs basic and applied research, develops state-of-the-art methods and techniques, tests materials and equipment, and provides consulting services. Subject to the approval of the Chief of Engineers, studies and investigations may be undertaken for agencies outside the Department of the Army. WES maintains an extensive scientific and engineering reference library to serve the specialized needs of the Corps of Engineers and issues publications of general interest; operates DoD Information Analysis Centers in the fields of Pavements and Soils Trafficability, Concrete Technology, Hydraulic Engineering, Soils Mechanics, and Coastal Engineering; and maintains the Corps of Engineers Engineering Computer Programs Library. During Fiscal Year 1990, 272 WES numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for WES, 6 instruction reports, 30 information exchange bulletins, and 117 various special purpose technical documents (conference reports, special study reports, etc.) for WES and other offices were printed and distributed to Corps offices and interested outside agencies. Operations and results during the period. Work accomplished at WES is, in general, initially financed by the Corps of Engineers Revolving Fund, with direct reimbursement from agencies requesting research investigations and related services. The Station's total program during Fiscal Year 1990 was $139,654,900 which included $30,055,800 performed by contract. Of the total program $76,833,900 was oriented toward the civil sector and $62,821,000 to military. The plant replacement and improvement program was $4,153,000 for this period. 45-1 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABORATORIES Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Engineer Topographic Laboratories (USAETL) began during World War I as a temporary Engineer Detachment formed to test aerial photographic mapping. Since that time, USAETL has grown to become a sophisticated, modern research and development complex. The laboratories perform research and development by applying the latest advances in electronics, information processing and related technologies in the environmental and topographic sciences to military and civilproblems in mapping, surveying, land navigation and geographic information. USAETL is a field operating agency of the Corps of Engineers commanded by Colonel David F. Maune. USAETL is the only defense research and development laboratory that addresses the full range of developments in the topographic sciences, from basic research to a final product. Support is provided to both Civil Works and Military elements of the Corps, the Army Materiel Command, Army Space Program Office, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and other federal Government organizations. To provide this support, USAETLis divided into six operational elements, three of which are developmental laboratories. The Geographic Sciences Laboratoryperforms research and development associated with the extraction and presentation of geographic data. The Topographic Developments Laboratory supports technology developments in surveying, map making, military geographic information systems and reproduction systems. The Space Programs Laboratory conducts research and development relating to the Army Space Program and acts as the Corps executive agent for space. The Research Institute performs most of the laboratories' basic and applied research. The Terrain Analysis Center prepares terrain studies needed by Army elements in the field. The Digital Concepts and Analysis Center serves as the primary point of contact to Army developers and users for digital topographic data. In recent years, the emphasis of USAETL's research and development program has shifted from historic map making and surveying equipment and related techniques to new topographic data systems. These systems are required to support emerging weapons systems and military geographic information systems needed by field commanders for improved command, control, communications and intelligence. The new systems frequently use data acquired by remote sensing, and much of the work at USAETL involves this technology. Researchers atUSAETL are investigating the types of data acquired through sensors and the means to exploit that data. Studies showing the possibility of automating digital image interpretation are an important aspect of this work. Other work is to investigate digital processing of remotely sensed data and define remote sensing inputs required for Army terrain graphics and terrain data bases. Operations and results during FY89. The total program for USAETL in FY89 was $107.9 million. This included work done forother agencies as well as for the Corps of Engineers. Of this total program, $44.7 million supported work performed by contract. Work in FY89 included $788,000 accountable to civil works funds. Civil works efforts by USAETL in FY89 included research to develop and demonstrate new equipment and techniques for the Surveying and Mapping Research and Dredging Research Programs. USAETL scientists continued development of the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS) for use by Corps surveyors and mappers as a high precision and special purpose tool. Demonstration and consultation projects on GPS applications were completed in ten districts. These demonstrations were performed on actual projects with USAETL scientists providing the lead and District surveyors accomplishing the effort. A detailed design study for Corps-wide implementation of GPS for marine positioning was begun. Also developed and distributed was an easy to use software package for transformation of coordinates from NAD27 to NAD83. Completed an in-house installation of a Computer Aided Design and Drafting system to begin development of software for Corps-wide implementation of this technology within the Surveying and Mapping functional area. WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) is a field operating agency under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works, Headquarters, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Center consists of the Institute for Water Resources, the Navigation Data Center, the Washington Level Review Center and support elements. It is located at the Humphreys Engineer Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, with satellite elements at other locations, including the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California; and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, part of the Navigation Data Center, in New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments of WRSC during FY90 are listed by division. THE INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES (IWR) NAVIGATION DIVISION The IWR Navigation Division provides support to Corps field divisions and districts for project-specific and system studies of navigation improvements. It also provides support for the Inland Waterways Users Board and performs special studies as directed by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. The special studies address a variety of subjects where expertise in economic analysis is required, and range from assessment of transportation infrastructure to identification of economic impacts. Continuing Support Activities. The foundation for evaluation of navigation projects, both inland waterway and deep draft harbors, is the comparison of transportation costs with and without proposed improvements. The division maintains and annually updates data on ocean and inland waterway vessel operating costs, the dimensions of those vessels, the distribution of ocean vessel sizes in the world fleet, and the configuration of barge tows on inland waterways. Coordination of Navigation Studies. The Inland Waterways Users Board, created by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, is charged with advising Congress on priorities for improving inland waterways. To provide information desired by the Board and by the Corps, the division lead a Corps Task Force which has evaluated 38 high priority inland navigation projects to determine the sequence which would maximize net national transportation benefits and observe the budget constraints imposed by the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. POLICY AND SPECIAL STUDIES DIVISION The Policy and Special Studies Division undertakes investigations, studies and research on current or emerging water resources issues and assists in the development of Corps policy concerning national water resources issues. During FY90, the Division staff worked on a number of important studies. The National Drought Management Study, a major three-year project, was initiated. A major program initiated in FY89 employing alternative disputes resolution techniques in planning and legal activities, was successfully pursued. Two studies which evaluated Corps activities - the project management program at selected district offices, and the division material testing laboratories - were completed. The Corps dredging program benefited from a published study on beach and nearshore placement of material dredged from Federally authorized navigation projects. Staff members participated on interagency on coastal zone and water resources management. A series of background papers were prepared which addressed issues related to the deteriorating national infrastructure. RESEARCH DIVISION The Research Division responds to the water planning research needs of the field offices, as well as one-of-a-kind projects assigned by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. At the same time, technical assistance is given to Corps field divisions and districts. Staff members of the Technical Analysis and Research Division apply specialized knowledge in fields such as economics, environmental science, sociology and engineering, to develop and conduct a broad range of research aimed at producing practical and effective planning and management tools. Research outputs are applied in Civil Works (CW) throughout the Corps. During FY90, the Technical Analysis and Research Division was responsible for two long range research programs: Planning Methodologies and Risk Assessments Planning. Planning Methodologies and Risk Assessments focused on developing economic, financial, environmental and social evaluation techniques for planning and operatingflood control, navigation, and other water resources projects. Work included developing economic evaluation manuals, microcomputer applications, navigation project evaluation procedures, and flood control evaluation. In FY90, as part of a series of economic evaluation manualsfor planning water resources projects, a manual for evaluation coastal shore protection projects was developed. The manual provides a consistent and defensible methodology which can reduce the time and effort 47-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 required to prepare and review water plans. Also, a technique to assist the planning of environmental mitigation has been developed which incorporates economic considerations into the traditional biologically based mitigation planning process. The technique incremental cost analysis will greatly improve our ability to assure that mitigation plans are cost-effective as well as environmentally sound. In the risk assessment area, a method for assessing the environmental risk-cost of dredged material disposal sites has been developed and tested at Puget Sound. This technique will help to insure that dredge disposal sites are cost effective and environmentally safe. Also, a risk based model for assessing the economic costs and benefits of dredging to alternative channel dimensions and alternative dredge deployment and scheduling has been developed for applications to the Southwest Passes on the lower Mississippi River. The model will enable the Corps to make better decisions about dredging and minimize impacts on navigation due to shoaling. THE NAVIGATION DATA CENTER (NDC) The Navigation Data Center's mission is to collect, process, manage, and distribute information regarding the characteristics of the U.S. Waterway system, including use, operation and physical aspects. Included is system-wide use data such as domestic and foreign commodity tonnage and ton-miles, passengers, vessel movements and lockages; physical characteristics oflocks, commercial ports and terminal facilities, vessels and waterways; and operation and performance data for dredging and locks. The Center's FY 1990 focus was on strategic planning intended to strengthen internal data partnerships between Waterborne Commerce, Lock Performance Monitoring, Dredging and Port Facilities. To ensure user-oriented design of the new integrated data base management systems, a series of workshops and meetings with both the Corps and user community were held. The modernization and integration of each data area continues The Center consists of the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, Port Facilities Branch, the Lock Performance Monitoring Program and Dredging Statistics Program. WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS CENTER (WCSC) Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center began processing the FY 1990 waterborne commerce data using new computer software based on the ORACLE Database Management System. WCSC also reorganized. The new organization brought the enforcement function in-house which will improve the timeliness, accuracy, and completeness of the data collected from the carriers. It also established a Products and Services Office which specializes in responding to special request for data and products. LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM (LPMS) LPMS continues the collection and archiving of data. first set of changes regarding the shipt log was imple- Users meetings with planning and operations personnel mented in January 1990 and the second set will be were completed in FY 1990 reviewing LPMS data re- implemented in January 1991. A micro-computer data quirements. These meetingsresultedinproposedchanges entry and edit has been initiated and will be impleto allow for performance monitoring to be collected. The mented in FY 1991 for lock personnel. PORT FACILITIES BRANCH Automated port facility information is rapidly being integrated into the overall NDC database. Latitude/ longitude coordinates are being included in each facility record, thereby forming a commonality for interagency dissemination of port and waterway information. Descriptive data encompassing over 9,000 docking facilities is resident in the NDC database. In FY 1990, four reports were completed: Number 42 Number 41 20 Title Ports of Buffalo, Rochester, Oswego and Ogdenburg, NY Ports of New Orleans, LA 14 Ports of Savannah and Brunswick, GA Title Ports on Lake Erie, PA and OH 47-2 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 DREDGING STATISTICS PROGRAM A scope of work for a newly assigned Dredging Statis- formulation and implementation will begin in FY 1991. tics Program was initiated in FY 1990. The programs THE WASHINGTON LEVEL REVIEW CENTER (WLRC) Establishment of the Washington Level Review Center was approved by the Commander, USACE,, on 19 Decemeber 1988, to provide an accelerated and more efficient civil work project review process. It is the mission of the WLRC is to review feasibility reports, post authorization change reports, detailed project reports where approval authority has not been delegated, general design memorandums, and other decision documents recommending USACE implementation that the Director of Civil Works may request. These reports address proposed water resource developments involving deep-draft harbors, inland navigation, flood damage reduction, fish and wildlife restoration and mitigation, hydroelectric power, water supply, recreation, beach erosion, hurricane and storm damage protection, and other related water resource needs. In addition to reviewing reports, WLRC: a. Manages the concurrent Washington level review process for feasibility reports in which projects have been recommended for Corps implementation. b. Coordinates feasibility report review comments from Washington echelons and provides information to assist the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH); Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE); and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works (ASA(CW)). c. Monitors and tracks the review and processing of feasibility reports recommending Corps action beginning with issuance of the division commander's public notice until project authorization. d. Provides all administrative support to the BERH and its advisory staff. e. Conducts professional training in water resources planning and project management as directed by the Chief of Engineers. During the period of 1 October 1989 through 30 September 1990, WLRC managed the comprehensive review of 12 feasibility reports recommending USACE action. In addition, WLRC staff reviewed and provided written documentation for 51 design memoranda, 11 detailed project reports, 8 post authorization change reports, 29 feasibility reports recommending no USACE action, and 24 miscellaneous documents. Also, staff members reviewed draft reports in preparation for attendance at 27 conferences. During FY 1990, the WLRC Education and Policy Division conducted the Water Resources Planning Associates Program. This program was an 11-month internship for Corps water resource planners from various areas of expertise who exhibited exceptional promise and demonstrated potential for advancement to positions of greater responsibility. There were ten participants who graduated from this program in June 1990, including four women/minorities. Instruction in the form of lectures, workshops, short courses, case studies, and field trips was presented by staff members of WLRC, BERH, and HQUSACE, and by representatives from other government agencies and private consultingfirms. Also, the planning associates were assigned to work at HQUSACE for 8 weeks, and they taught the Planners Orientation Course for 2 weeks in several Corps offices. THE HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER (HEC) The mission of the Hydrologic Engineering Center is to support the Corps and the Nation in its water resources management responsibilities. This is accomplished through research, training, and technical assistance programs in hydrologic engineering and planning analysis. HEC makes every effort to be aware of the present needs and upcoming problems of the water resources community. HEC maintains continuous dialogue with universities, private industry, other Federal agencies and state and local governments to keep abreast of latest developments. Approximately $1,022,000 in technical assistance was provided in FY 1990 supporting more than 18 offices. The offices included 14 Corps districts and divisions, the Institute for Water Resources (IWR), the Waterways Experiment Station (WES) and HQUSACE. Nine formal training courses, involving 11 weeks of training, were conducted at HEC. Three workshops, totaling 2.5 weeks, and three seminars at 1.5 weeks, were also held. Planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of today's multiple-purpose water projects require complex interdisciplinary analyses. These complex problems present major methodological and computational tasks to water resource professionals. HEC seeks solutions to these problems through development of systematic methods and use of modern computers. Research funding represented about 30 percent of HEC's budget in FY 1990. Activities were carried out in 15 work units. These work units represent specific technical areas that have been identified in the Corps R&D Program. The primary research programs are entitled "Hydrologic Engineering", "Cost-shared Impacts". 47-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 HEC was also involved in the Remote Sensing, research program. HEC's R&D work units for FY 1990 are shown below: River Analysis System Catchment Analysis System Analytical Methods for Water Resources Planning and Management Reservoir Analysis Systems Hydrologic Techniques for Leveed Interior Areas Flood Warning Systems Statistical Methods in Hydrology Water Quality Data Management System Hydrologic Performance of Flood Damage Mitigation Projects Community Flood Threat: Definition and Communication Hydrologic/Hydraulic Analysis Design Management ofGroundwater/Surface Water Resources Groundwater/Surface Water Management During Drought Consideration of Groundwater in Comprehensive and Multiple-Purpose Planning Remote Sensing and Spatial Data Application HEC continues to emphasize the development of computer programs and companion user's materials. New releases of several major HEC personal computer packages were completed. New executable code, user's manuals, and installation instructions for the Flood Hydrograph package, Water Surface Profiles, Flood Damage Analysis package, and HEC-DSS were released. HEC began an important new computer program development effort. A reservoir system operation optimization model is under development at the request of HQUSACE and the Missouri River Division. The model implements a network-flow programming algorithm for monthly period- of-record analysis of the operation of existing reservoir systems. Initial completion of the model is scheduled for January, 1992. Important progress was made on the new Interior Flood Hydrology Computer program. Preliminary release is scheduled for fall 1991. 47-4 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESS (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization consisting of approximately 40 national members, with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearinghouse where technology and experiences relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements are exchanged among engineers, scientists, port operators, and marina and vessel owners, to name a few. Its objective, broadly stated, is to promote the worldwide progress of inland and maritime navigation through the exchange of technical information on port and waterway development. The objective of the Association is met by holding International Congresses and by publishing quarterly technical bulletins and special reports. Special reports are published as a result of international research teams, called Working Groups, made up of those national members interested in the particular subject under study. Examples include methods of disposal of dredged material, an international survey of dry dock facilities and their characteristics, the beneficial use of dredged material, and othervarious topics relating to port and waterway development. The organization also serves as an excellent source of identifying individual and corporate expertise throughout the world on PIANC-related subjects. Personal interchange of ideas and information also is promulgated by members attending the International Congresses held once every four years. The affairs of the Association are managed by a Permanent International Commission (PIC), composed of delegates from each member government. It is in this way that member governments are represented in PIANC. The number of delegates is determined by the size of the national membership, but may not exceed ten per country. The United States has been a member of PIANC since 1902 and has since provided an annual appropriation for the support and maintenance of the organization. This includes an annual subvention to PIANC International and payment of the travel expenses of properly accredited national delegates (Commissioners) of the United States to meetings of the International Commission and Congresses. Total appropriations for the U.S. Section, PIANC are currently $45,000 per year, including the annual subvention of approximately $10,000 to PIANC International. The United States Section is administered, by law, under the auspices of the Department of the Army (Corps of Engineers). The U.S. Section is composed of both individual and corporate members who pay their own membership dues. Membership of the U.S. Section on December 31, 19909, totaled 490, consisting of 413 individual members and 77 corporate members. Like all other member nations, the United States National Commission constitutes the governing body of the National Section. The ex-officio Offices of the U.S. NationalCommission are: Chairman (Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW)); Chairman Pro Tempore (Director of Civil Works); and Secretary (Mr. DuWayne A. Koch). During calendar year 1990, U.S. National Commissioners were: Mr. J. Ron Brinson, President and Chief Executive Officer, Port of New Orleans; Mr. Charles F. Connors, Director of Maritime Services, Mofatt & Nichol, Engineers; Dr. Tudor T. Davies, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Dr. G. Edward Dickey, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works); Mr. John M. Pisani, Maritime Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; Mr. Charles R. Roberts, Director of Engineering, Port of Oakland; Mr. R. Erik Stromberg, President, American Association of Port Authorities; and Dr. Alan R. Thomas, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The U.S. Section representatives to the two Permanent Technical Committees (PTCs) and Working Groups of PTCs were as follows: Permanent Committee for Developing Countries- Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, LSU/GW Ports and Waterways Institute Permanent Technical Committee I (Inland Waterways and Ports) - Major General Robert F. Seedlock, USA (Ret.) Working Group 1, Economic Implications of Inland Waterway Development-George Antle, USACE IWR Working Group 2, Disposal of Dredged Materials - Charles C. Calhoun USACE WES Working Group 3, Consideration Or Risk in Determining Bank Protection - Alan D. Crowhurst, Maccaferri Gabions Working Group 4, Guidelines for the Design and Construction of Flexible Revetments Incorporating Geotextiles for Inland Waterways -Max Lamb, USACE LMVD Working Group 5, Container Transport with Inland Vessels - John M. Pisani, US DOT/MarAd Working Group 6, Problems Created by Salt Water Intrusion (from the sea or marine estruaries) in Inland Navigation - Christina E. Correale, USACE SAW Working Group 7, Management of Dredged Material from Inland Waterways - Charles C. Calhoun, USACE WES Working Group 8, Automatic Management of Canalized Waterways and Its Hydraulic Problems- Jack R. Niemi, USACE LMS Working Group 9, Standardization of Inland Waterways' Dimensions, Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, LSU/GW Ports and Waterways Institute Working Group 10, Supervision and Control of Long Lateral Embankments - No U.S. Representative Working Group 11, Analysis of the Cost of Water Transportation and the Cost of Terminal Fees -George Antle, USACE IWR Working Group 12, Design, Installation and Maintenance of Natural Vegetation Bank Protections Utilizing Geotextile Reinforcement for Inland Waterways - Max Lamb, USACE LMVD Working Group 13, Special Inland Waterway Craft - Charles F. Lehman, American Commercial Barge Line Co. Working Group 14, Inland Waterway Craft and Pollution - Darrell D. Brown, International Maritime Organization (London, England) 48-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 Workng Group 15, Barge Fleeting - Alpha H. Ames (Acting Chairman), USDOT/MarAd-Great Lakes Working Group 16, Coasters-No U.S. Representative Permanent Technical Committee II (Maritime Ports and Seaways) - Dr. Ernst G. Frankel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Group 1, Navigation in Muddy Areas - No U.S. Representative Working Group 2, Stability of Rubble Mound Breakwaters in Deeper Water Eugene H. Harlow, Eugene H. Harlow, Inc. Working Group 3, Ice Navigation - C. Allen Wortley, University of Wisconsin Working Group 4, Dangerous Goods in Ports - No. U.S. Representative Working Group 5, Underkeel Clearance for Large Ships in Maritime Fairways with Hard Bottoms - Ronald C. Uhl in, Exxon International Working Group 6, Classification of Soils and Rocks to be Dredged - James W. Bean, C. F. Bean, Inc., New Orleans Working Group 7, Dimensions and Layout Or Channels - Leonard Van Houten, Greenwich, CT Working Group 8, The Damage Inflicted by Ships with Bulbous Bows on Underwater Structures - Wesley Allen, Jr., Georgia Ports Authority Working Group 9, Development of Modern Marine Terminals - Charles R. Roberts, Port of Oakland Working Group 10, Disposal of Dredged Material at Sea-Robert Engler, USACE WES Working Group 11, Consequences ofNew Developments Or Car/Passenger Ferries - No U.S. Representative Working Group 12, Performance and Design Parameters of Rubble Mound Breakwaters - Robert Whalin, USACE WES Working Group 13, Floating Breakwaters ---John Oliver, USACE WES Working Group 14, Economic Methods of Channel Maintenance - DeWitt D. Barlow, Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Co. Working Group 15, Dry Docks - Michael Yachnis, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Working Group 16, Specification of Quantities and Related Risks on Maritime Transportation of Hazardous Chemicals and Wastes -Patrick Tobin, USEPA Working Group 17, Inspection, Maintenance and Repair of Maritime Structures Exposed to Material Degradation Caused by a Salt Water Environment - Charles F. Connors, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers Working Group 18, Planning of (Commercial) Fishing Ports - No U.S. Representative Working Group 19, Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material - Jesse Pfeiffer, USACE CERD-C Working Group 20, Capacity Simulation Models for Approach Channels and Fairways in Harbors - Haruzo Eda, Stevens Institute of Technology Working Group 21, Flexible in the Marine Environment - Gene Chatham, USACE WES Working Group 22, Armored Slopes Under Piled Piers - Dennis V. Padron, Han-Padron Associates Working Group 23, Site Investigation Requirements for Dredging - Richard M. Lowry, Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Co. Working Group 24, Movement of Moored Ships- Gary K. Greene, LPA Group, Inc. Working Group 25, Coastal Instrumentation - Thomas W. Richardson, USACE WES/CERC Working Group 26, Means of Combating Oil Spills - No U.S. Representative Joint Subcommittee on Pleasure Navigation - hn M. Nichol, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers (Retired) Working Group 1, Ecological Conservation in Relation to Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Neil W. Ross, International Marina Institute Working Group 2, Wave Climate Criteria for the Design of Yacht Harbors and Marinas - Orson Smith, Clayton, NC Working Group 3, Provision of Navigation Aids for Pleasure Craft - Austin E. Brant, Jr., TAMS Working Group 4, Chartering Services - Their Growth and Impact on Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Eugene H. Harlow, Soros Associates Working Group5, Standards for Construction, Equipment and Operation of Yacht Harbors and Marinas- William A. Jansen, Illinois Department of Conservation. 48-2 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation numerous international boards, committees, and other groups. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering, technical, or study boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources ofjoint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 49-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY 80 annual reports. An innovative study organization, neither a board nor a committee, was established to conduct a study offluctuating Great Lakes levels pursuant to a Reference to the IJC from the Governments of Canada and the United States, dated August 1, 1986. A discussion of that study organization follows Table 49-1. TABLE 49-1 IJC BOARDS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Int. Lake Superior Int. St. Croix River Int. Lake of the Woods Int. Lake Champlain Int. Kootenay Lake Int. Rainy Lake Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River 11. Int. Souris River 12. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineer 13. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 14. Int. Great Lake Diversios and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 1959 1948 1975 1977 1979 *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr., Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr., St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr., Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma, WA 3. Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission, Olympia, WA *1.'Div. Engr., NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. St. Lawrence-Eastern Ontario Commission, Waterton, NY 3. NY Power Authority, Massena, NY *Dist. Engr., Seattle 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. ND State Engr., Bismark, ND 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Bismark, ND 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, BOR, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Reston, VA *1. New York Dept. Environ. Conser. 2. Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Environ. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commision, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior F&WS Boston, MA *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. of Envir. Res. 5. Dept. of Energy, FERC, New York, NY *1. CENCE-ED, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab., NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA 49-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 16. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. YEAR ESTABLISHED 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 Study of Fluctuating Great Lakes Levels Under the August 1, 1986, Reference. In 1986, the Governments of Canada and the United States issued a reference to the IJC to study methods to alleviate the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. The IJC was requested to address the immediate high lake level crisis and identify and evaluate intermediate and long-term potential measures, while considering such vital matters as domestic waste supply and sanitation, navigation, agriculture, shore property, flood control, wildlife and others. The IJC is to determine the full costs and benefits of any works or measures and indicate how the various interests on either side of the boundary would be affected. Compensatory works or measure to offset costs to the interests which may be adversely affected by any proposed regulatory measures also must be determined. The IJC proceeded with its reference responsibilities on three tracks. First, it submitted an initial report to the federal governments on November 14, 1986, listing immediate actions that could be taken to lessen damages from the then current high water levels. Second, the IJC UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Eng. Div., North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD *Div. Engr., NCD 1. Div. Engr., NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR *1. HQUSACE, CECW-ZB, Washington, D.C. 2. Dept. of Energy, Tulsa, AR formed a taskforce to evaluate measures which could be implemented within approximately one year to reduce high lake levels. The third track is the comprehensive study of long-term measures. The U.S. Department of State requested, by letter dated November 24, 1986, that the Corps of Engineers provide lead agency support to the IJC effort on this study. A Plan of Study was completed in April 1987. The plan called for a two-phase study emphasizing problem identification and detailed evaluation of selected measures, respectively. The initial phase was completed with a progress report to the IJC in July 1989. After a public review period, the IJC issued a Directive for Phase II in February 1990. A bi-national eleven member study board was appointed, and a full-time study director was engaged to direct study activities. The board, in turn, created a citizens advisory committee and four working committees, Public Participation and Information; Land Use and Management; Existing Regulation, System-Wide Regulation, and Crises Conditions; and Principles, Measures Evaluation, Integration, and Implementation. The final report is scheduled to be submitted to the IJC in March 1993. 49-2 INVESTIGATION OF PROJECTS UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT The Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920, created the Federal Power Commission (in 1977 renamed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC) composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior, and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development in all water over which Congress has jurisdiction. The act further required that work of the commission be performed by and through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided by law. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to Reorganize the Federal Power Commission," Secs. 1 and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided for, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the Department of War, Interior and Agriculture was removed and the commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By Title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Parts II and III were added to the Act. On October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 59-91 Stat. (August 4, 1977) an Executive Order No. 12009, 42 Fed. Reg. 46267 (September 15, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary of Energy and the Federal Energy Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission within the Department of Energy was activated on October 1,1977. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no water power license affecting navigable capacity of any navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the dam or other structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and Secretary of the Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1975, the Secretary of the Army delegated to the Chief of Engineers his authority under Sec. 4(e) of the Federal Power Act. The Chief of Engineers on September 5, 1980 delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4(e) approval of plans for non-Federal hydropower affecting navigation. The following work of an engineering nature was accomplished by the Corps division and district offices under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: (1) 335 applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design, construction and operation of hydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control, navigation, and structural safety, and environmental impacts, relative to Corps projects, were furnished to the FERC. (2) 26 licensed power plants were in various stages of design review for addition of power at Corps dams, and (3) 10 Corps approved non-Federal power plants were in active construction stages by the end of the fiscal year. The Corps bills FERC licensees for the costs incurred by the Corps for reviewing and approving final design, plans and specifications for construction of power plants at Corps projects. In FY90, the total cost reimbursement to the Corps for this service was $527,396. Review of license applications is funded by the Corps as aline item in the General Investigation Account, in FY90, the cost of this activity was $496,388. This cost was reported to FERC for the Commission's assessment of annual charges to licensees. 50-1 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL & NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 1. Regulatory Activities Authorities. The following authorities charge the Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various waterrelated construction activities: Sections 9 and 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (structures in an alteration of waterways, e.g. boat docks); Section 103 of the Marine Protection Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (ocean dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (discharge of dredged and fill material). Work Completed. During FY 1990, the Corps received approximately 14,400 applications for permits and issued about 7,000 permits and 2,700 letters of permission. In addition about 20,000 activities were authorized by regional or statewide permits which did not require individual applications from the public. More that 50,000 other minor activities were authorized by the Corps' nationwide permits. On February 3, 1988, the Corps issued final regulations for procedures implementing the National Environmental Policy Act. TABLE 51-A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 87 ............ $ 464,164 Allotm ents ............................................ 55,262,000 Total Funds Available............................. 55,726,164 Obligations ................... .. ................ 55,046,819 Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 88 ............. $ 679,345 Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 87 ............ $ 1,021,096 Allotments ......................................... 55,262,000 Total Funds Available ............................. 56,283,906 Expenditures ........................................ 54,788,407 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 88 ............ $ 1,494,689 2. Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels Under the authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and removed those obstructing navigation. For obligations expenditures, see Table 51-B. TABLE 51-B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 89 ............. $ Allotm ents .......................... ................... Total Funds Available ............................. O bligations.............................................. Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 90 ............ $ Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 89 ............ Allotments ............................ ........... Total Funds Available ............................. Expenditures .................................. Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 90 ............ $ 47,926 472,400 520,326 238,135 282,191 80,127 472,400 552,527 238,135 314,392 3. National Emergency Preparedness Activities Authority. Executive Order 12656, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies to undertake national emergency planning and preparedness to develop an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and defense needs during major domestic emergencies and national security emergencies. Status: During FY 1990, The Corps of Engineers continues its efforts to improve its readiness posture and ability to respond to various national emergencies. Emphasis was placed on the initiation of program activities that require a long-term commitment of resources. These activities included the continuation of the Emergency Command Readiness Program to address national security emergency requirements and resource needs; the Corps of Engineers Readiness Evaluation System, maintenance of planning for and development of emergency facilities to support continuity ofoperationns; and, planning to meeting the Nation's water needs during a national emergency. In the latter case, Executive Order 12656 has tasked the Corps of Engineers to be the Executive Agency responsible for emergency water planning. 51-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 51-C NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 89 ............. $ 1,228,857 Appropriations FY 90.............................. 8,000,000 Total Funds Available........................ Obligations ........................... ............... 9,228,857 7,519,397 Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 90 ............. $ 1,709,460 Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 89 ......... :..$ 2,023,037 Appropriations FY 90.............................. 8,000,000 Total Funds Available ............................. 10,023.037 Expenditures ........................................ 7,598,413 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 90 ............ $ 2,424,624 51-2 NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ACTIVITIES Activities. Disaster preparedness activities included the review and updating of existing emergency response plans, training response personnel, procurement and maintenance of critical supplies and equipment used during emergency response activities, upgrading emergency operations centers, coordination with Federal, State, and local response agencies, establishing a working group for developing USACE response responsibilities under the new Federal Response Plan, developing the implementation plans for a USACE earthquake Preparedness Center of Expertise. As FiscalYear 1990 began, USACE was already deeply involved in Hurricane Hugo response and recovery activities in South and North Carolina, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. Emergency activities included such things as: debris clearance and removal, emergency beach dune restoration, emergency power generation, ferry service, and removal of sunken vessels in the Carolinas; providing emergency drinking water and emergency power in Puerto Rico and in the Virgin Islands, debris removal, emergency power generation, restoration of the infrastructure of the Island of St. Croix, restoration of public housing, and provisions for temporary shelters. At the peak there were over 1,000 USACE personnel involved in Hurricane Hugo response and recovery activities. USACE recovery activities on St. Croix are expected to last severalyears. AsUSACE was responding to Hugo, California was devastated by an earthquake in mid October. Again, USACE was asked by FEMA to provide assistance. This time FEMA asked for 300 volunteers from USACE to provide assistance in FEMA's earthquake response and recovery efforts. Under both its own and FEMA's authorities the USACE provided engineering and technical assistance, inspection services, damage survey reports, and nontraditional assignments from FEMA to perform habitability inspections of individual residencies, USACE also provided engineering and technical assistance to the General Services Administration, Small Business Administration and the Department of Education. At the peak, there were over 900 USACE personnel involved in the earthquake response and recovery efforts. In FY 1990, USACE responded to major record flooding over southeast Oklahoma, eastern Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Southern Alabama, Florida panhandle, southern Ohio, Indiana, and Iowa. USACE response was supplemental to State and local efforts and included a wide range of emergency response efforts such as: flood fighting, emergency contracting, providing sandbags, loaning pumps for dewatering flooded areas, and technical assistance. USACE completed emergency water assistance to two towns in North Dakota inn late 1989 and early 1990. However, at the same time USACE was providing flood response assistance, USACE was continuing to provide emergency water assistance to none drought stricken communities in south central Iowa and continued the assistance to five of the communities until November. 52-1 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION This Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into the Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. On November 19, 1986, the Commission was abolished by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and all authorities, powers, functions, and duties were transferred to the Secretary of the Army. All acquired lands and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission were authorized to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans.................. 53-1 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control) . ................... 53-2 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA ........ 53-2 Flood Control 4. Sacramento River, CA................53-3 Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provides for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners are fully investigated Tables Page Table 53-A Cost and Financial Statement.................53-5 Table 53-B Table 53-C Authorizing Legislation ............... 53-7 Sacramento River, CA: Total Cost of Existing Project . . 53-8 by California Debris Commission and permits to operate are issued to those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Governmentconstructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners must bear all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 53-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. On March 1, 1984, Permit No. DACWO5-4-79-527 was renewed for 5 years, was again renewed for 5 years on March 1, 1989, and will be effective until February 28, 1994. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105-eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $18,000 per year for the first 30 years (December 29, 1942 through December 28, 1972) and $48,000 per year between December 29, 1972, and December 28, 1992, in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1990, amounts to $1,373,393; these funds are paid to California Debris Commission and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant was put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1990, amounts to $1,973,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $535,877, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies at Englebright Dam have been completed. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debris-control structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981 and were completed in FY 1987. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATION-RESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. 53-2 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations consisted of condition and operation studies by hired labor on Yuba River. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic feet, are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 53-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1987) cost for original project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $163,925,000 of which $68,925,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non-Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Estimated October 1990 total project cost is $210,730,000, of which $99,130,000 is Federal and $111,600,000 is non-Federal. Total estimate now includes remedial levee work for Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109); Colusa Basin Drain (Unit 132); Knights Landing Ridge Cut (Unit 127) and Marysville/Yuba City Area levees (engineering and design only), but excludes Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Phase I - Sacramento River Flood Control System Evaluation recommended reconstruction of 32 miles of Sacramento area levees. Report was approved and in March 1989, Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. New project is located within boundaries of Sacramento River Flood Control System in highly urbanized area around city of Sacramento, near confluence of Sacramento and American Rivers. It includes Natomas area levees from Natomas Cross Canal Bypass through Reclamation District 900 and portions of the Yolo Bypass east levee in West Sacramento; and, in South Sacramento, the east bank of Sacramento River from Miller Park to town of Freeport. Estimated (October 1990) cost for Sacramento Urban project is $43,500,000 of which 53-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 $24,750,000 is Federal and $18,750,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $2,160,000). Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work. Local interest costs from required contributed funds for project work total $4,949,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Engineering continued. Levee stage construction on Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109) was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $568,249. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948, 1949, and 1951. Yolo Bypass and Cache Slouth (Unit 109) was completed in 1991. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction, Colusa Basin Drain (Unit 132); Knights Landing Ridge Cut (Unit 127); and Marysville/Yuba City Area levees. (See Table 53-C for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1990.) 4 53-4 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION TABLE 53-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 1990 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (Debris Control) (Contributed Funds, Other) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barriers, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 4. Sacramento River, CA including Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) and Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $821,325 821,325 - - - - 5,093,999 1 2 - - - - 5,093,999 1 2 $633,000 $634,800 $706,300 571,490 9,707,6333 593,316 670,765 691,157 582,877 9,648,1034 - - - - 12,420 s - - - - 12,4206 361,482 361,482 37,000 15,778 36,865 14,901 85,000 65,648 104,250 54,096 20,000 -16,325 36,360 5,257 43,163 5,257 1,796,331 8 1,786,090 6 1,053,904 1,053,904 361,777 361,777 1,801,838 1,774,316 1,053,904 1,053,904 34,000 7 34,000 7 248,000 2,435,000 2,285,000 425,000 73,520,835 8 159,929 158,963 3,536,455 1,026,885 72,947,905 8 - - - - 1,979,104 - - - - 1,979,104 - - - 10,724,085 9 - - - 10,724,085s - - - 9,68610 - - - 9,68610 - 1,200,000 3,600,000 4,800,000 - - 2,478,099 2,478,099 53-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 53-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 Sep 30, 1990 (Required New Work Contributed Contrib. - - - 390,000 390,000 Funds) Cost - - - 54,411 54,411 (Contributed New Work Funds, Other) Contrib. - - - 510,000 510,000 11 Cost - - - 10,559 10,559 11 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $477,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations and costs. 3. Includes $8,388,551 from regular funds and $1,319,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 4. Includes $8,329,021 from regular costs and $1,319,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 5. Funds from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float at Englebright Dam. 6. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 7. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 8. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 9. Includes $680,000 required contribution funds for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 10. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 11. Includes contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocation of utilities, irrigation ditch, access ramps, and miscellaneous small structures in the Natomas, Greenhaven Pocket and West Sacramento areas. 53-6 TABLE 53-B CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, 47th Cong., 1st sess. 1 (Amendment of sec. 13, Act of Mar. 1, 1893.)1 Mar. 1, 1893 Feb. 27, 1907 53-7 REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit hydraulic mining without construction of impounding works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rightsof- way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. Abolished the California Debris Commission and transferred all authorities, powers, functions, and duties to the Secretary of the Army. Authorized all acquired land and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. Sec. 1001, 1986 WRDA June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1990 TABLE 53-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Dec. 22, 1944 Additional levee construction and reconstruction, H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., and May 17, 1950 including levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, 2d sess., and 367, 81st and multipurpose reservoirs. 2 Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Bank protection and incidental channel improve- H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., ments, Sacramento River from Chico Landing 2d sess. to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing. 2 July 14, 1960 Bank protection works at critical locations, S. Doc. 103, 86th Cong., Sacramento River. 2 2d sess. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, 74th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 53-C 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 23. Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $73,446,900 $1,979,104 $75,426,004 Public Works 1,486,469 - 1,486,469 Total U.S. 74,933,369 1,979,104 76,912,473 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 - 5,104,333 Total All Funds 84,977,454 1,988,790 86,778,880 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plant purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 53-8 SACRAMENTO RIVER CA: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 (See Section 4 of Text) APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) ALASKA Chena River Lakes Yukon -Kuskokwim Chena River Fairbanks 1981 2,000 NPP FR ARIZONA Adobe Alamo Cave Buttes Dreamy Draw New River Painted Rock Tat Momnolikot Whitlow Ranch ARKANSAS Blakely Mountain Dam Blue Mountain DeGray DeQueen Diezks Gillham Millwood Nanows Dam Nimrod CALIFORNIA Black Butte Brea Buchanan Dam- H.V. Eastman Lake Carbon Canyon Coyote Valley Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Fannington Fullerton Hansen Nany L Englebright Hidden Dam- Hensley Lake Isabella Lopez Matis Creek Merced County Stream Group: Bear Burns Mariposa Owens Mojave River New Hogan North Fork Pine Flat Prado San Antonio Santa Fe Sepulveda Gila Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Skunk Creek Bill Williams River Cave Creek Dreamy Draw New River GilaR iver Santa Rosa Wash Queen Creek Ouachita Ouachita Arkansas Ouachitsa Red Red Red Red Ouachita Akansas Sacramento Santa Ana San Joaquin Phomenix Wenden Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Gila Bend Cas Grande Superior 1982 18,350 1968 1,046,310 1979 46,600 1973 320 1985 43,520 1959 2,476,340 1974 198,550 '960 34,500 Hot Springs 1955 2,768,500 Petit Jean River Caddo Rolling Fork River Saline River Cossatot River Little River Little Misauri Fourche La Fave River Stony Creek Brea Croeek Chowchilla River Santa Ana Carbon Canyon River Russian East Fork Russian River Russian San Joaquin Santa Ana Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaqumin Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaqumin San Joaquin San Joaquin Majave San Joaquin Sacramento San Joaquin Santa Ana Santa Ans SSan Gabriel Los Angeles Dry Creek Littlejohn Creek East Fullerton Creek Big Tujunga Wash Yuba River Fresno River Kern River Pacoima Wash MartiCsr eek Bear Creek Bums Creek Mariposa Creek Owens Creek Mojave Calaveras American River Kings River Santa Ana River San Antonio Creek San Gabriel River Los Angeles River Paris Arkadelphia DeQueen Dierks Gillham Ashdown Murfreesboro Plainview Orland Fullerton Chowchilla Brea Ukiah Healdsburg Farmington Fullerton Los Angeles Marysville Madera Bakersfield San Fernanado Reno Merced Merced Merced Merced Victorville Valley Springs Auburn Piedra Corona Upland Duarte Van Nuys 1947 257,900 1971 881,900 1977 136,100 1975 96,800 1975 221,800 1966 1,854,930 1949 407,900 1942 336,010 1963 160,000 1942 4,010 1975 150,000 1961 6,610 1959 122,500 1983 381,000 1952 52,000 1941 760 1940 25,450 1941 69,000 1975 90,000 1953 570,000 1954 440 1971 20,400 1954 7,700 1950 7,000 1948 15,000 1949 3,600 1971 89,670 1963 325,000 1939 14,700 1954 1,000,000 1941 196,240 1956 7,700 1948 22,110 1941 17,430 NPP FR 560 FRWX NPP FRX NPP FRX NPP F NPP FRWX NPP GWX NPP FX 20,900 FP 2,910 FRWX 6,400 FRZRS 1,680 FSQRW 1,360 FSRAW 1,370 FSQW 29,200 FSW 2,500 FP 3,550 FSWX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 50 40,200 109 2,275 283 975 109 2,275 50 448 104 2,320 1281 4,780 75.5 12,500 149 637 235 1,100 Earth 115 2,800 Earth 243 3,400 Earth 160 2,360 Earth & Rock 153 2,500 Earth & Rock 160 1,750 Earth 88 17,554 Concrete 175 941 Concrete 97 1,012 770 FIRX Earth 156 2,970 NPP FRX Earth 87 1,765 470 FIRW Earth & Rock 205.5 1,800 NPP FERX 1,700 FRX 500 FRSW NPP F NPP FRX 120 FRWX 400 DR 5,000 FIRW 1,850 FIRW NPP FX 71 FSR NPP F NP F NPP F NPP F NPP FRWX 715 FIRX 280 DR NPP FIRX NPP FRX NPP FX NPP FRX NPP FRX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth 99 2,610 160 3,500 319 3,000 60 7,800 45 575 97 10,475 280 1,142 163 5,730 185 4,952 50 1,300 113 2,670 92 1,830 55 4,075 88 1,330 75 790 200 2,200 210 1,960 155 620 429 1,820 106 2,280 160 3,850 92 23,800 57 15,444 A-I APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA (Continued) Success Terminus Whittier Narrows COLORADO Bear Creek Chatfield Clhrry Creek John Martin Trinidad CONNECTICUT Black Rock Colebrook River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson7 IDAHO Lucky Peak ILLINOIS Carlyle Famnndale Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake INDIANA Brookville Cagles Mill CecilM . Harden Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Pataka Salamonie IOWA Coralville Red Rock Rathbum Saylorville San Joaquin Tule River San Joaquin Kaweah River San Gabriel San Gabriel River ;and Rio Hondo Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Housatonic Connecticut Housatonic Housatonic Thames Thames Housatonic Thames Bear Creek South Platte River Cherry Creek Azkansas River Purgatoire River Branch Brook West Branch, Fannington River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Natchaug River Northfield Brook Naugatuck River Quinebaug River Columbia Boise River Upper Kaskaskia River Mississippi Upper Farm Creek Mississippi Upper Fondulac Creek Mississippi Upper Kaskaskia River Mississippi Upper Big Muddy River Mississippi Ohio East Fork of Whitewater River Ohio Mill Creek Ohio Raccoon Creek Ohio Wabash River Ohio Mississinewa Ohio Salt Creek Ohio Patoka River Ohio Salamonie Upper Iowa River Mississippi Upper Des Moines River Mississippi Missouri Chariton River Upper Des Moines River Mississippi Porterville Visalia El Monte Denver Denver Denver Lamnar Trinidad Thomaston Riverton Plymouth Middlebury Willimantic Thomaston Thomaston Thompson Boise Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookville Tere Haute Rockville Huntington Peru Harrodsburg Ellsworth Wabash Iowa City Des Moines Centerville Des Mines 1960 85,000 '1961 150,000 1967 35,150 1978 30,810 1974 231,429 1950 93,920 1943 615,500 1977 123,500 1970 8,700 1969 97,700 1960 4,030 1968 6,970 1952 52,000 1965 2,430 1960 42,000 1965 26,800 1956 306,000 1967 983,000 1951 15,500 1951 3,780 1970 684,000 1970 294,000 1974 359,600 1952 228,120 1960 132,800 1969 153,100 1967 368,400 1964 441,000 1978 301,600 1966 263,600 1958 492,000 1969 1,830,000 1969 552,000 1975 602,000 400 FIRX Earth 345 FIRX Earth NPP FRWX Earth 109 1,412 852 1,844 280 20 760 40 21 450 8 NPP 200 FRX FRX FRX FIR FIRX FR FRSX FRW FR FRW FRW F FRW Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 2,850 FIR Earth 26,000 NPP NPP 11,100 18,900 2,250 1,400 1,100 500 1,100 3,280 2,010 976 1,820 8,950 11,000 74,000 FSNRWA Earth F Earth F Earth FSNRW Earth FQRSW Earth FRSW FRX FRX FRW FRW FARS Earth& Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FRW Earth FARW Earth FARWQ Earth FNRWXQ Earth FARWQ Earth A-2 142 3,490 250 2,375 56 19,960 180 5,300 148 12,400 141 14,300 106 13,962 200 6,610 154 933 223 1,300 57 630 97 520 68 12,420 118 810 142 2,000 70 2,550 250 1,700 67 6,570 80 1,275 67 1,000 108 3,000 54 10,600 182 3,000 150 950 117 1,790 91 5,332 137 8,100 93 1,400 84 1,550 133 6,100 100 1,400 110 5,676 86 10,600 125 6,750 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) KANSAS Clinton Council Grove El Dorado Elk City Fall River Hillsdale John Redmond Kanopolis Marion Melvemrn Milford Pearson Skubitz Big Hill Perry Pomona Toronto Tuttle Croeek Wilson KENTUCKY Barren River Buckharn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fisahtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Paintsville Ninn Rough River Taylormville Yatesville LOUISIANA Bayou Badcau Caddo Lake Wallace Lake MARYLAND Jennings Randolph Lake MASSACHUSETTS Banrre Falls Birch Hill Buffumville Charles River Natural Valley Storage Conant Brook East Brimfield Hodges Village Knighotvile Littleville Missouri Akansas Akansas Azkansas Akansas Missouri Akansas Missouri Akansas Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Akansas Missouri Missouri Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Red Red Red Potmac Connecticut Connecticut Thames Chades Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Wakamsa River Grand (Neosho) Walnut River Elk River Fall River Big Bull Creek Grand (Neosho) Smoky Hill River Cottonwood River Marais des Cygnes Republican River Big Hill Creek Deleware River 110 Mile Creek Verdigris River Big Blue River Saline River Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fok licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River ittle Sandy Green River Martins Fork Paint Creek Nolin River Rough River Salt River Blain Creek Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou North Branch Potomac River Ware River Millers River ittle River Charles River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Westfield River Middle Branch, Westfield River Lawrence Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River Hillsdale Burlington Marquette Marion Melvem Junction City Cherryvale Parry Pomona Toronto Manhattan Wilson Glasgow Buckhomrn Hazard Fanners Paintsville Pikeville Grayson Campbells -vile Harlan Paintsville Kyrock Leitchfield Tayloraville Yatesville Shreveport Shreveport Shreveport Barnum Bazze So. Roylaston Chariton Millis Monson Fisbdale Hunington Chester 1977 397,200 1964 112,882 1981 236,200 1966 287,300 1949 287,300 1981 160,000 1964 628,540 1948 450,000 1968 141,770 1972 363,000 1965 1,160,000 1981 39,740 1969 770,000 1963 230,000 1960 200,800 1962 2,346,000 1964 776,000 1964 815,200 1960 168,000 1976 47,700 1974 614,100 1949 93,000 1968 164,360 1967 118,990 1969 723,200 1978 21,00 1983 73,500 1963 609,400 1958 334,400 1983 291,670 1988 86,951 1949 357,300 1971 175,000 1946 96,100 1981 130,900 1958 24,000 1941 49,900 1958 12,700 1983 35,000 1966 3,740 1960 30,000 1959 12,800 1941 49,000 1965 32,400 7,000 FSWAXR Earth 3,310 FSQR Earth 8,000 FSQR Earth 4,122 FSQ Earth 4,122 FSX Earth 4,580 FSQR Earth 9,710 FSQR Earth 3,815 FRWX Earth 6,210 FRQS Earth 6,930 FRQWX Earth 15,600 FRSXWQ Earth&Rock 1,190 FSR Earth 12,500 FRSXW Earth&Rock 4,000 FRSWXQ Earth&Rock 2,660 FX Earth 15,800 FRWXQAN Earth&Rock 9,000 FIRWXNA Earth 4,340 FARS 550 FQRW 530 FQRW 6,790 FQRW 1,100 FARW 569 FARW 1,050 FQRW 5,070 FRSQW 578 FQ 261 FQRW 2,890 FAR 2,180 FRX 1,625 FQRW 3,921 FQRW NPP FRW 32,700 NFRS 2,300 FQRS 114 9,250 96 6,500 99 20,930 107 4,840 94 6,015 75 11,600 86.5 21,790 131 15,360 67 8,375 98 9.700 126 6,300 83 3,902 96 7,750 85 7,750 90 4,712 157 7,500 160 5,600 Earth 146 3,970 Earth 162 1,020 Earth&Rock 130 720 Earth & Rock 148 2,740 Earth 118 913 Rock 195 1,100 Earth & Rock 120 1,460 Earth & Rock 142 2,350 Concrete 97 574 Earth & Rock 160 1,600 Earth & Rock 174 990 Earth & Rock 124 1,530 Earth & Rock 164 1,280 Earth & Rock 105 760 Earth Concrete & Earth Earth 70 12,850 3,700 30 4,994 952 FQRS Earth & Rock 296 2,130 NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 FRW NPP F NPP F 360 FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW 275 FRWS Earth & Rock 62 885 Earth & Rock 56 1,400 Earth & Rock 66 3,255 Nonstructural - -- Earth & Rock 85 1,050 Earth & Rock 55 520 Earth & Rock 55 2,140 Earth& Rock 160 1,200 Earth & Rock 1,164 1,360 A-3 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) MASSACHUSETTS (Continued) Tully West Hill Westville MINNESOTA Big Stone Lake- Whetstone River Lac Qui Parle Chippewa River LacQui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake MISSISSIPPI Aikabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake MISSOURI Clearwater Long Branch little Blue River lakes Blue Springs Lake Lmongview Pomme de Terre Smithville Wappapello NEBRASKA Harlan County Paipillion Creck and Tributaries Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) Salt Creok & Tributaries Olive Creek (Site 2) Blue Stem (Site 4) Wagon Train (Site 8) Stagecoach Site (9) Yankee Hill (Site 10) Conestoga (Site 12) Town Lake (Site 13) Connnecticut Tully River Blackstone West River Thames Quinebaug River Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Red River a the North Red River f the North Lower LoMweisrsissippi LowMeirssissippi Pascagoula Lower Mississippi White Grande Chariton Missouri Missou i Missouri Mississippi Missouri Missouri MMisouri Mamni Missouri Missouri Minnesota River Chippewa River Minnesota River Minnesota River Otter Tail River Red Lake River Coldwater River Yocona River Yalobusha River Okatibbee Creek little Tallahatchie River Black River little Charlton little Blue River little Blue River Pomme de Teae River little Platte River St. Francis River Republican River Knight Creek Trib of Big Papillion Creek S. Trib. Olive Br. Croeek Fryville Uxbridge Sturbridge Ortonville Montevideo Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls Red River Azkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis Piedmont Macon Kansas City Kansas City Hennrmitage Smithville Wappapello 1949 22,000 1960 12,350 1961 11,100 1973 45,000 1950 (2) 1950 122,800 1953 14,100 1953 14,100 1951 3,270,000 1943 525,300 1951 660,000 1954 1,337,400 1969 142,400 1940 1,570,000 1948 413,700 1980 65,000 1988 26,600 1986 46,900 1961 650,000 1982 246,500 1941 613,200 Republican City 1952 850,000 Omaha Omaha Kramer N. Trib Olive Br. Creek Sprague N. Trib. Hickman Creek Holland S. Trib. Hickman Creek Hickman Cardwell Creek Denton Holmes Creek Denton Middle Creek Plesantdale 1975 17910 1973 5,220 1964 5,470 1963 10.260 1963 9,280 1964 6,640 1966 7,560 1964 10,640 1966 8,080 300 FRW Earth & Rock 62 1,570 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 51 2,400 23 FRW Earth & Rock 78 560 12,700 FRW NPP 6,500 210 210 279,000 5,100 6,100 9,800 1,280 10,700 FRWX FRWX FARS FARS FARSX F F F FQSR F Earth 25 13,700 Earth & Rock 21 17,97 Earth & Rock 21 4,100 Earth & Rock 19.5 11,800 Eaarth & Rock 47 1,355 Earth & Rock 15.5 36,500 Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock 81 11,500 99 8,400 102 13,900 67 6,543 117 15,300 1,630 FRWX Earth & Rock 154 4,225 2,430 FRSQW Earth 71 3,800 560 930 7,820 7,190 4,100 FRWQ FRWQ FRWX FSQRW FR Earth&Rock Earth&Rock Earth&Rock Earth Earth & Rock 78 22,500 120 1,900 155 4,630 95 4,200 109 2,700 13,600 FIRWX Earth & Rock 107 11,827 391 137 174 316 303 196 208 230 255 FQEX Earth FRX Earth FR FR FR FB FR FR FR Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 67 1,940 70 1,460 45 3,020 57 2,760 52 1,650 48 2,250 52 3,100 63 3,000 A-4 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) NEBRASKA (Continued) Pawnee (Site 14) Holiness Park Lake (Site 17) Branched Oak (Site 18) NEW HAMPSHIRE Blackwater Edward MacDowell Franklin Falls Hopkinton-Everett OtteBrr ook Surry Mountain NEVADA Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon NEW MEXICO AAbiquiu Conditi Conchas Galisteoo Jemnz Canyon Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rocky Dam Santa Rosa Dam & Reservoir NEW YORK Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point NORTH CAROLINA B. Everett Jordan Falls W. Kerr Scott NORTH DAKOTA Baldhill Bonnan-Haley Homnime Pipestem OHIO Alum Creek Missoumi Missouri Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Connecticut Connecticut N. Middle Creek Antelope Creek Oak Creek Blackwater River Nubanusit Brook ParnigewausRsiveert Contoocook River Piacataquog River Otter Brook Ashuolot River Colorado Mathews Canyon Colorado Pine Canyon Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Rio Grrande Rio Grande Rio Grande Rio Grande PScos Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna Cape Fear Neuse Yadkin- Poe Dee Rio Charma Rio Grande Canadian River Galistoo Creek Jemez River Rio Hondo Rocky Arroyoo Pocas Canacadea Creek Canin Creek Ouleout Creek Genece River Otaelic River New Hope Neuse Yadkin Emerald Lincoln Raymond Webster West Peterborough Franklin West Hopkinton East Weare Keene Keene Caliente Calinte Abiquio Pena Blanca Tucumcai Santa Fe Bemailillo Roswell Santa Rosa Hornell Arkpot Franklin Mount Morris Whitney Point Durham Raleigh Wilkesboro Red River Sheyenne River Valley City t the North Missouri North Fork, Grand River Haley Red River South Branch of Park River of the North Park River James River Pipesmt Creek Jamestown Ohio Alum Credek Africa 1965 29,520 1963 6,510 1968 97,560 1941 46,000 1950 12,800 1943 154,000 1962 71,500 1962 87,500 1958 18,300 1941 32,500 728 FR 100 FR 1,780 FR NPP FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 FRW 120 FRW 85 FRW 265 FRW 1957 6,270 NPP FX 1957 7,750 NPP FX 1963 1,212,000 1975 596,300 1939 529,000 1970 89,000 1953 112,809 1963 168,000 1979 447,010 1949 14,600 1940 7,900 1950 33,550 1952 337,000 1942 86,440 1982 753,500 1983 3374450 1963 153,000 1950 70,000 1967 92,980 1951 3,660 1974 146,880 1975 134,800 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth NPP FXS Earth 1,200 FRWX Earth 2,694 FI Concrc & E NPP FX Earth NPP FX Earth NPP FX Earth NPP FIX Earth 124 FRW Earth NPP F Earth 210 FRW Concr Eart 170 FR Conch 1,200 FRW Earth 14,300 FQRSWX Earth 11,300 FQRSWX Earth 1,470 FARSX Earth 325 FARS Earth 1,750 FSRWK Earth 51 FARS Earth 885 FRWX Earth rte srth ere& h ete 348 FRSW Concrete & Earth A-5 65 5,000 55 7,700 70 5,200 75 1,150 67 1,030 140 1,740 76 790 115 2,000 133 1,288 86 1,670 71 800 92 884 325 1,540 241 28,300 200 19,400 156 2,820 135 760 96 4,885 218 2,940 212 1,950 90 1,260 113 1,200 130 2,010 210 1,028 95 4,900 112 1,330 92 1,915 148 1,740 61 1,650 79 5,730 67 865 108 4,000 93 10,000 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OHIO (Continued) Berlin Caesar Creek Clarence J. Brown Deer Creek Delaware Dilon Michael J. Kirwan Mosquito Creek Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Beach City Bolivar Charles Mill Clendening Dover Leesville Mohawk Mohicanville Piedmont Pleasant Hill Senecaville Tappan Wills Creek North Branch, Kakosing River Lake PainCtr eek Tom Jenkins West Fork Mill Creek William H. Harsha OKLAHOMA Arcadia Birch Canton Copan Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heybum Hugo Hulah Kaw Ooologah Optima Pine Creek Sardis Skiatook Waurika Wister OREGON Applegate Blue River Cottage Grove Dorema Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Mahoning Creek Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek icking River icking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Indian Fork Sugar Creek Sandy Creek Black Fork Brushy Fork Tuscarawas River McGuire Creek Walhondoaing River Lake Fork Stillwater Creek Clear Fork Seneca Fork ittle Stillwater Creek Wills Creek North Branch of Kakosing River Paint Creek East Branch, Sunday Creek Mill Creek little Miami River Azkansas Deep Fork River Arkansas Birch Creek Arkansas North Canadian River Arkansas Little Caney River Arkansas Wolf Creek Azkansas Salt Fork of the Arkansas River Azkansas Polecat Creek Red Kiamichi River Arkansas Caney River Arkansas Arkansas River Arkansas Verdigris River Arkansas North Canadian River Red Little River Red Jackfork Creek Arkansas Hominy Creek Red Beaver Creek Arkansas Poteau River Rogue River Applegate River Columbia Blue River Columbia Coast Fork, Willamette River Columbia Row River Deerfield Wilmington Springfield New Holland Zanesville Zanesville Newton Falls Cortland New Cumberland Beach City Bolivar Muffin Tippecanoe Dover Leesville Nellie Mohicanville Piedmont Perrysville Senecaville Tappen Cnesville Fredericktown New Petersburg Gloucester Mount Healthy Williamsburg Edmond Bamsdall Canton Copan Fort Supply Cherokee Sapulpa Hugo Baztlesville Ponca City Oologah Hardesty Wright City Clayton Skiatook Waurika Wister Medford Blue River Cottage Grove Cottage Grove 1943 91.200 1978 242,200 1974 63,700 1968 102,500 1961 273,000 1961 273,000 1966 78,700 1944 104,100 1937 49,700 1937 71,700 1938 149,600 1936 88,000 1937 54,000 1938 203,000 1937 37,400 1937 285,000 1936 102,000 1937 65,000 1938 87,700 1937 88,500 1936 61,60-0 1937 196,000 1973 14,900 1972 145,000 1951 26,900 1952 11,380 1978 284,500 1986 92,010 1977 58,200 1948 377,100 1983 227,700 1942 100,700 1941 271,400 1950 55,395 1974 966,700 1951 289,000 1976 1,348,000 1963 1,519,000 1978 29,460 1969 465,780 1984 596,900 1985 500,700 1977 343,500 1949 427,900 240 FARSWQ Concrete & Earth 13,300 FRSQW Earth & Rock 1,010, FQRW Earth & Rock 727 FRW Earth 1,325 FRWX Earth 1,325 FRWX Earth 580 FAQRSW Earth 700 FARSWQ Earth 1,540 420 NPP 1,350 1,800 350 1,000 NPP NPP 2,270 850 3,550 2,350 900 98 710 394 200 18,760 1,820 1,137 7,910 4,850 1,820 8,690 880 13,250 3,570 17,040 29,460 5,340 3,750 13,610 10,190 10,100 5,360 FRX FRX FR FRX FRX FRX FRX FR FR FRX FRX FRSX FRX FRX FRW FRSQW FRSWX FRX FRSQW FSR FSQRW FSI FSQRW FSX FRWX FRWXS FSQRW FSAX FSQRW FSN FSRW FSQWR FSRW FSQRW FISQWR FSAX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 1981 82,000 988 AFIQRSW Gravel Embankment 1968 85,000 975 FINR Earth 1942 30,060 1,155 FINR Concrete & & Earth 1949 70,500 1,885 FINR Concrete & Earth 96 165 72 93 118 118 83 47 65 64 87 48 64 83 74 111 46 56 113 45 52 87 71 118 84 100 200 5,750 2,750 6,620 3,880 1,400 1,400 9.900 5.650 3,700 5,600 6,300 1,390 950 824 1,694 2,330 1,220 1,750 775 2,350 1,550 1,950 1,400 700 944 1,100 1,450 102 5,250 97 3,190 68 15,140 70 7,730 85 111,861 68 6,010 89 2,920 101 10,200 94 5,200 125 9,466 137 4,000 120 15,200 124 7,712 81 14,138 143 3,590 106 16,600 99 5,700 242 1,300 319 1,329 114 2,110 145 3,352 A-6 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OREGON (Continued) Columbia Middle Fork, Columbia Long Tom River Columbia Willow Creek Eugene Eugene Heppner 1965 115,000 1941 110,000 1983 13,250 1,865 10,305 FINR Rockfill FINR Rockfill & Concrete 96 FRN Roller Compacted Concrete PENNSYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Ayleswarth Creek Behaville Blue Marsh Conenaugh Cowaneuque * Crooked Creek Cuwensville East Branch, Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Indian Rock Kirnzua Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Promptoa Raystown Shenanago Stillwater Troga-Hanmmend Lakes Hammeond Lakes Tionesta UnionCity Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River SOUTH DAKOTA Cold Brook Cottonwoiod Springs Lake Traverse: Reservation Control Dam White Rock TEXAS Addicks Aquilla Susquehanna Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Kettle Creek Aylesworth Creek Phopo Creek Tulephoken Creek Conemaugh River Cowanesque River Crooked Creek West Branch, Susquehanna River East Branch, Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Lehigh River Dyberry Creek Codorus Creek Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Lackawaxean River Raystown Branch, Juniata River Shenanago River Lackawanna River floga River Crooked Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek French Creek Youghiogheny River Missouri Cold Brook Missouri Cottonwood Springs Creek Red River Bois de Sioux River of the North Red River Bois de Sioux River af the North San Jacinto South Mayde Creek Brazes Aquilla Creek Rcnovo Archbald Lehighton Reading Sahsburg Lawrmceville Ford City Curwenaville Wilcox Blanchard White Haven Honesdale York Waren Saltsburg New Bethlehem Honesdale Huntingdon Sharpsvilie Uniondale Tioga Tioga Tionesta Union City Meadville Confluence Hot Springs Hot Springs Wheaton Wheaton Addicks Hillsboro 1962 75,000 1970 1,700 1971 68,250 1978 50,010 1952 274,000 1980 89,000 1940 93,900 1965 124,200 1952 84,300 1969 99,000 1961 107,610 1960 24,500 1942 28,000 1965 1,180,000 1942 95,300 1941 74,200 1960 52,000 1973 762,000 1966 191,400 1960 12,000 1978 62,000 1978 63,000 1940 133,400 1970 47,640 1973 20,000 1943 254,000 19534 7,200 1970 8,385 1941 164,500 1941 85,500 1948 204,500 1983 146,000 160 NPP 947 960 300 1085 350 790 90 1,730 80 NPP NPP 1,900 210 170 290 8,300 1,910 85 470 680 480 NPP 118 450 FRW Earth & Rock F Earth&Rock FQRSWA Earth & rock FAQRSW Earth & Rock FW Concrete & Earth FRS Earth & Rock FRW Earth FR Earth FARQW Earth FRW Earth FRW Earth & rock F Earth FRW Earth PFAQRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete FRW Earth FRW Earth & Rock FAQRW Concrete FS Earth FR Earth & Rock FR Earth & Rock FRW Earth F Earth FQRA Earth FARWQ Earth 36 FRWX Earth 41 FRWX Earth 10,925 6,500 FRX FRX NPP FX 3,280 FSX Earth Earth Earth Earth * Amended Water Supply operable FY 1990 A-7 Fall Creek Fem Ridge Willow Creek 193 5,100 49 6,624 160 1,780 165 90 170 98 137 151 143 131 184 100 234 109 83 1'77 114 162 140 225 68 77 140 122 154 88 90 184 1,350 1,270 4,560 1,775 1,265 3,100 1,480 2,850 1,725 6,835 3,000 1,255 1,000 1,877 960 926 1,~200 1,700 720 1,700 2,710 6,450 1,050 1,420 4,650 1,610 127 925 123 1,190 14 16 9,100 14.400 49 61,166 104.5 11,890 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) TEXAS (Continued) Belton Benbrook Canyon Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' the Plains Granger Dam and Lake Grapevine Hords Creek Joe Pool Lake Kemp Lavo Lewisville Navarro Mills North San Gabriel Dam, Lake Georgetown O.C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Ray Roberts Somerville Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman VERMONT Ball Mountain North Hartland North Springfield Townshend Union Village VIRGINIA John W. Flanagan Gathright Dam & Lake Moomaw North Foik of Pound River WASHINGTON Howard A. Hanson Mill Creek Mud Mountain Wynoochee Brazos Trinity Guadalupe Red Brazes Trinity Colorado Trinity Red Trinity Trinity Trinity Brazos Colorado Red Brazes Trinity Brazos Brazos Brazos Red Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Ohio James Chehalis Green Columbia Puyallup Chehalis Leon River Clear Fork, Trinity River Guadallupe River Cypress Creek San Gabriel River Denton Creek Herds Creek Mountain Creek Wichita River East Fork, Trinity River Elm Fork, Trinity River Richland Creek North Fork, San Gabriel River North Concho River Sanders Czeek Leon River Elm Fork Yegua Creek Lampasas River Bosque River Sulphur River West River Ottauguechee River Black River West River Ompompanoosuc River Pound River Jackson Wynoodicee River Green River Mill Creek White River Wynoochdee River 12,300 3,770 346,400 18,700 4,400 7,280- 510 7,470 15,590 21,400 23,280 5,070 1,310 5,440 5,993 4,610 29,350 11,460 6,430 7,270 20,300 75 220 290 100 NPP 310 2,532 1,150 Belton Fort Worth New Braunfels Jefferson Granger Grapevine Coleman Grand Prairie Wichita Falls Fort Worth Lewisville Corsicana Georgetown San Angelo Paris Comanche Denton Somerville Belton Waco Texarkana Jamaica North Hartland Springfield Townshend Union Village Haysi Alleghany Montesano Kanaskat Walls Wals Enumclaw Montesano FIRSX FNRXA FRSX FRS FRSWX FNRSXA FARSX FRSX FX FRSW FRSX FRSX FRSWX FRSX FRSW FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FAWR FQR FSARI 1954 1,097,600 1952 258,600 1964 366,400 1959 842,100 1980 244,200 1952 425,500 1948 25,310 1966 304,000 1972 502,900 1953 748,200 1954 989,700 1962 212,200 1980 130,800 1952 396,400 1967 189,100 1963 374,200 1987 1,064,000 1967 5107,500 1968 630,400 1965 726,400 1957 2,654,300 1961 54,600 1960 71,420 1960 51,067 1961 33,700 1950 38,000 1963 145,700 1979 123,739 1972 70,000 1961 106,000 1942 8,300 1953 106,000 1972 70,000 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Concrete & Earth Rock Earth Rock Concrete & Earth 192 130 224 97 115 137 91 109 115 81 125 82 164 128 96 86 109 80 200 140 100 265 185 120 133 170 250 257 177 235 125 425 177 5,524 9,130 4,410 10,600 16,320 12,850 6,800 22,360 8,890 19,483 32,888 6,700 6,700 40,885 7,080 13,460 14,965 26,175 15,624 24,618 18,500 915 1,520 2,940 1,700 1,100 960 1,172 1m700 675 3,200 700 1,700 1,600 FAS 225 FR NPP FR 1,150 FSARI A-8 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) WEST VIRGINIA Beech Fork Ohio Bluestone Ohio Bumsville Ohio East Lynn Ohio R. D. Bailey OhioG Stonewall Jackson L,WV Ohio Summcaville Lake Ohio Sutton Ohio Tygart River Ohio WISCONISIN Beech Fok New River Little Kanawha Twelve Pale Creek uynabdot River West Fodrk River Gauley River Elk River Tygart River Lavale Hinton Burnsmville East Lynn Justice Wested Summeraville Sutton Grafton 1977 37,540 1952 631,000 1977 65,400 1970 82,500 1979 203,700 1988 74,650 1965 413,800 1960 265,300 1938 287,700 450 FRW Earth 86 1,080 1,800 FRWX Concrete 180 2,048 550 FQRW Earth & Rock 89 1,400 823 FQRW Earth & Rock 122 650 440 FQRW Earth & Rock 310 1,397 3,470 FAQAS Concrete 45 620 407 FANR Rock 390 2,280 270 FNAR Concrete 220 1,921 620 FNAR Concrete 230 1,921 Chippewa Eau Galle Spring Valley 1969 43,600 A-9 Eau Galle 150 FR Earth 122 1,800 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Pod Characteritics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acraage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stram in Vicinity Useful Op. (Aac-Pt.) Pool (NPP) Functiona Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA Big Dry Creek Camanche2 Cherry Valley3 Del Valle Eaton Wash New Bullards Bar2 New Don Pedro3 New Exchequer2 Oroville2 Tahchevah Creek COLORADO Pinon Canyon CONNECTICUT East Branch Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook HAWAII Kaneohe-Kailua Area San Joaquin Big Dry Creek San Joaquin Mokelumne River Tuolumne Cherry Creek Alameda Arroyo Del Valle Rio Hondo Eaton Wash Sacramento Yuba River San Joaquin Tuolumne River San Joaquin Merced River Sacramento Feather River Whitewater Tahchevah Creek Colorado Pinon Canyon Arroyo Housatonic East Branch, Naugatuck River Housatomc Hall Meadow Brook Connecticut Mad River Connecticut Sucker Brook Kaneohe Kaneohe Stream IDAHO Ririe MARYLAND Savage River MISSOURI Bear Creek NEW YORK Onandaga OKLAHOMA Altus 4 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Lake Hudson5 Upper Snake Willow Creek Potomac Upper Mississippi Oswego Savage Bear Creek Onondaga Creek Red North Fork, of the Red Riv. Arkansas Grand (Neosho) River Arkansas Grand (Neosho) River UTAH Big Wash VERMONT East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville Beaver Big Wash Winooski Jail Branch Winooski Waterbury Winooski North Branch, Fresno Clements Sonora' Livermore Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs Trinidad Torington Torrington Winchester Winchester 1948 16,250 NPP 1963 431,500 NPP 1956 268,000 475 1968 77,000 200 1937 960 NPP 1968 960,00 1,910 1970 2,030,000 3,520 1966 1,026,000 1,900 1964 3,539,000 5,838 1965 960 NPP 1954 4,350 NPP 1964 4,350 NPP 1962 8,620 NPP 1963 9,700 10 1970 1,480 NPP Kaneohe 1981 3,800 26 Idaho Falls 1979 100,500 364 Westemrn Port 1952 20,000 360 Hannibal 1962 8,700 NPP Syracuse 1949 18,200 NPP Altus Disney 1948 152,429 6,260 1941 2,197,000 46,5006 Locust Grove 1964 444,500 10,9006 Milford 1961 1,200 NPP East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville 1938 12,050 NPP 1938 37,000 890 1938 20,300 570 F FRS FS FRS F FIRPW FISP FIR FIRSW F Earth 40 Earth & Rcck 171 Earth & Rock 315 Earth 223 Earth 82 Concrete 645 Earth & Rock 565 Rock 480 Earth 770 Earth 42 FW Earth FR F FR F 20,038 2,450 2,500 880 1,795 2,323 1,920 1,200 6,850 3,610 92 700 Earth 92 Earth & Rock 73 Earth 178 Earth 68 FR Earth FIR Earth 92 100 184 840 FRS Earth & Rock 184 F Earth 65 F Earth 67 1,782 FISR Concrete 98 FRP Concrete 147 FRP Concrete & Earth F Earth F Earth FRP Earth FR Earth 90 4,494 34 2,814 65 158 115 A-10 100 1,200 940 1,160 1,050 1,450 1,112 6,565 1,460 1,800 1,525 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 (Continued) NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS A - Low Flow Augmentation D - Debris Control F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigatimn P - Power Q - Water Quality Control R - Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S - Water Supply W - Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation 1 Acres of water surface at top of permnnanent pool 2 Federal Government contributed for flood storage 3 Cherry Valley Reservoir: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on interim basis. Second and final phase,N ew Don Pedro Reservoir Federal Government contributed for flood protection, construction and operation by City and County of San Francisco, and Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts. 4 Construction by Bureau of Reclamation. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 5 Construction by Grand River Dam Authority. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 6 Top of power pooL A-11 APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, IL and MO......................................................... Arcadia Lake, OK .............................................................. Ardsley, NY ....................................................................... Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control (Area VIII). OK, TX, and KS (Stage II)..................... Ascalmore-Tippo Items, MS ............................................... Atchafalaya Basin, LA....................................................... B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC................................. Batesville Sewage Lagoon .................................................. Bassetta Creek, MN............................................................ Big Blue River, Saline Co., NE, Tuxedo Park Road & Bridge (Sec 14)........................................................... Big South Fork National River & Recreation Area, KY and TN....................................... Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (Sec 14) ......... Black River, Hwy HH, Wayne Co., MO............................. Blue River Channel, Kansas city, MO................................. Boggy Creek, TX ............................................................... Browns Creek, Nashville, TN.............................................. Brush Bayou, LA................................................................ Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX..................................... Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX, Addicks and Barker, Dam Safety Assurance.................................... Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ......................................... Candy Lake, OK ................................................................ Cannon River at Fairbault, MN (Sec 14) ............................ Canton Bridge, Trigg Co., KY ............................................ Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO ............................................. Central and Southern, FL................................................... Century Park, Lorain, OH (Sec 103)................................... Charlevoix, East Jordan, MI (Sec 14) ................................. Chaska, MN................................................................... Chatfield Lake, CO ............................................................ Chena River Lakes, AK ..................................................... Clear Creek, TX ................................................................. Clinton, IA.......................................................................... Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .......................................... Copan Lake, OK ................................................................ Corte Madera Creek, CA.................................................... 1983 1980 1987 1976 1984 1928 1967 1990 1987 1986 1979 1985 1988 1984 1985 1988 1977 1956 1986 1990 1976 1986 1986 1990 1950 1990 1990 1988 1968 1973 1988 1974 1958 1973 1966 1986 1990 1987 (2) 1982 1990 1986 1985 1989 1989 1990 1980 1981 1981 1983 1992 Indefinite4 1989 19883 1987* 2010 1993 1990 1993 1987 1988 1986 1989 1998 1990 1991 1980 Indefinite Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Chloride Control Local Protection Floodway and Levees Reservoir S treambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection National Recreation Area Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection 1991 Dam Safety 1993 Local Protection Deferred Reservoir 1989 Streambank Protection 1987 Streambank Protection 1994 Local Protection 1997 Local protection 1991 Shoreline Protection and Nourishment 1990 Shore Protection 1994 Local Protection 1992 ReservoirC 1989 Reservoirs and Levee 1996 Local Protection 1991 Deficiency Correction 1994 Reservoir, channel improvement 1990 Reservoir Indefinite 123 3Local Protection 3Completion of Stage I (Truscott facilities) only. Stage II (Ross facilities) indefinate. 4Remaining recreation unscheduled pending settlement of lawsuit filed against Edmond, OK for payment of completed recreation work. Public use areas, Stages III-B and III-C, are unscheduled pending resolution of repayments by the sponsor for completed facilities. B-1 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project County Line Road Bridge, Mantachie, MS (Sec 14)........... Cowanesque Lake, PA....................................................... Cuyahoga River, Riverview Rd, OH (Sec 14)...................... Dade County, FL ................................................................ Deleware Coast Protection, DE........................................... Demonstration Erosion Control, MS................................... Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA............. Devils Lake, ND (Sec 205) ................................................. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel...................... Dry Creek, Goodlettsville, TN............................................ Dunbar (Sewage Facilities), WV (Sec 14).......................... East Branch, Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel near Huger, SC (Sec 14).............................................. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL............................................ East St. Louis and Vicnity, IL - Rehabilitation.................... El Dorado Lake, KS........................................................... El Paso, TX ........................................................................ Eldon, IA (Sec 14).............................................................. Elizabeth, NJ ...................................................................... Elk Creek Lake, OR........................................................... Elkhorn River, West Point, NE (Sec 205)............................ Ellicot Creek, NY............................................................... Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha, WA (Sec 205)........... Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN (Sec 205)......................... Enslava Creek, Mobile, A1L(Sec 205) ................................ Evansville, IN..................................................................... Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ........................................... Falls Lake, NC.................................................................... Farmington, IA................................................................... Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY............................... (Remainder) ............................................................... Fisher Ferry Road, MS (Sec 14) ......................................... Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO ............................................... Four Rivers Basin, FL........................................................ Fourche Bayou, Vicinity of Little Rock, AR ...................... Galena Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK........................ Grafton Pumping Station, ND (Sec 14) .............................. Grand Isle & Vicinity, LA................................................... Grand Mound, State Historic Site, MN (Sec 14) ............... Great Bend,KS..................................................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 3, MS ....................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 4, MS ....................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 5, MS ....................................... Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co., FL (Sec 14)........................... Guntersville Lake, Guntersville, AL ................................... Halstead,KS......................................................................... Hannibal, MO...................................................................... Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD (Sec 14).................. 1989 1987 1989 1975 1971 1985 1989 1983 1967 1988 1986 1986 1974 1988 1974 1971 1990 1972 1971 1989 1986 1987 1988 1988 1939 1985 1973 1990 1963 1963 1987 1987 1966 1987 1987 1988 1983 1990 1987 1986 1987 1987 1989 1988 1989 1989 1989 1990 1986 1983 1990 1990 1990 2032 2021 Indefinite 2000 1989 1992 1990 1987 1987 1987 1986 1986 1995 1981 1990 1973 Indefinite 1991 1991 Indefinite 1991 1989 1990 1991 1991 1995 1992 1983 1994 1991 Indefinite Indefinite 1990 1989 1991 1986 Indefinite 1991 1988 1988 1990 1985 1991 1991 1993 1988 1988 1988 1989 1989 1993 1992 1989 1989 S treambank Protection Water Supply Modification Streambank Protection Shore Protection Local Protection Local Protection Recreation Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protectio Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Streambank Protection Beach Replenishment Streambank Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection S treambank Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection B-2 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS (Sec 14)............... Humboldt, TN (Sec 205).................................................... Hurricane Creek , Prentiss Co., MS (Sec 14)....................... Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City,MD (Sec 14)......................... Joe Pool Lake, TX .............................................................. Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI (Sec 205)............................. Kahoma Stream, Maui, HI.................................................. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Leeve Dist., IL..................... Kirbyville, TX (Sec 205).................................................... Lake Chicot Pumping Plant, AR ......................................... Lake Erie State Park, Brocton NY (Sec 14)........................ Lake Pontchartrain, LA...................................................... Lake Wichita, Holiday Creek, TX ..................................... Larose to Golden Meadow, LA........................................... Lead Bayou, MS (Sec 205)................................................... Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & Cumberland River, KY, WV & VA............................. Liberty State Park, Levee and Seawall, NJ (Sec 205)......... Little Blue River Lakes, MO............................................... Little Calumet River, IN .................................................... Little Dell Lake, UT........................................................... Lake Erie, Linwood Park, Vermillion, OH (Sec 14)........... Lake Erie, Middle Bass Island, Deist Rd. OH (Sec 14)...... Lake Erie, St. Joseph Christian Life Center, OH (Sec 14).. Lake Erie State Park, Brocton, NY (Sec 14)....................... Little Kanawha River, Glenville, WV (Sec 14).................. Little Red River, Clinton, AR (Sec 205)............................. Long Branch Lake, MO ..................................................... Los Coches Creek, San Diego County CA (Sec 205)......... Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA....... Lower San Joaquin River, CA (Snagging & Clearing)....... Madison River, Quake Lake,MT (Sec 14)............................ Magby Creek, Columbus, MS (Sec 205).............................. Malheur Lake, OR.............................................................. Mankato and N. Mankato, MN ........................................... Manistee, Bar Lake, MI (Sec 14)......................................... Martin Creek, Prentiss Co., MS .......................................... Marysville, MI (Sec 14)...................................................... Masefau Bay, Tutuila Island, American Samoaa (Sec 14).. Mauvaise Terre, IL............................................................. McGee Creek Drainage and Levee Dist., IL....................... Medicine Bow River, Elk, MT, WY (Sec 14)..................... Merced County Streams, CA .............................................. Middle River at Argyle, MD (Sec 205)............................... Milan, IL ............................................................................ Mill Creek, OH .................................................................. Mill Creek, Salem, OR (Sec 14) ......................................... Millington, TN ................................................................... Minnesota River at Henderson, MN (Sec 205)................... Mingo Creek, OK................................ 1989 1986 1989 1989 1975 1989 1986 1980 1989 1981 1989 1967 1987 1972 1982 1981 1987 1978 1990 1985 1990 1990 1990 1989 1986 1985 1973 1986 1961 1985 1988 1989 1989 1971 1989 1986 1989 1989 1985 1979 1985 1985 1985 1980 1981 1990 1990 1988 1988 1988 1990 1986 1990 1990 1988 1986 1980 1987 1989 1990 1989 1989 1989 1986 1990 1988 1990 1990 1990 1988 1990 1990 1993 1990 1990 1986 1991 19924 1990 Indefinite 1993 2002 1988 Indefinite 1988 1990 1996 1992 1990 1990 1991 1990 1987 1987 Indefinite 1990 Indefinite 1993 1989 1990 1990 1991 1990 1987 1990 1992 1987 1985 1987 Indefinite 1990 1988 1999 1990 1992 1990 1995 S treambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shore Protection Reservoir Local Protection Reservoirs Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Shore Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Proection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection B-3 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Miss. River Channel Improvements (AR, IL, KY, LA, MI, MO & TN)............................................................ Miss. River Levees............................................................. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO ......... MLt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA................................ Mudline to Pineville, MS ................................................... Murder Creek, Brewton, AL (Sec 205)............................... Muskegon (Duck Lake), MI (Sec 14) ................................. Muskegon (Filtration Plant), MI (Sec 14)............................ Muskingham River Lakes, OH ........................................... Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety Assurance).............................................. Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA......................................... New Orleans to Venice, LA................................................ Newark, OH ....................................................................... Nonconnan Creek, TN & MS ............................................. North Branch Chicago River, IL ......................................... North Portage Path, Akron, OH (Sec 14)............................. North Raccoon River, Ia State Hwy, 7 Bridge, Buena Vista, IA............................................................ North River, Co. Route 116, Klein Bridge, Marion co., MO............................................................ Oates Creek, GA ................................................................ O'Hare Reservoir, IL.......................................................... Oil Creek Ice Control Project, Oil City, PA ....................... Osage River, Miller Co., MO, Road HH (Sec 14).............. Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR (Sec 205) ......................... Owyhee River, OR (Sec 208) ............................................. Paintsville Lake, KY .......................................................... Pajaro River, CA ................................................................ Panola-Quitman Item C, MS ............................................... Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE .......................... Passaic River Basin, NJ and NY (Sec 205)......................... Pearl River, MS .................................................................. Pelucia Creek, Item 1, MS .................................................. Pelucia Creek, Item 1A, MS ............................................... Pelucia Creek, Item 2......................................................... Pennypack Creek, Hatboro, PA........................................... Perkins Street Bridge, TN (Sec 14)...................................... Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (Sec 14)................................. Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO................................ Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (including New River) ............. Plainview Road Bridge, Chester Co., TN ........................... Poquessing Creek, Bucks Co., PA ...................................... Porter Bayou, MS (Sec 205) ............................................... Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR....................................... Presque Isle Peninusula, PA (Norurishment)...................... Presque Isle Peninsula, PA (Permanent)............................. Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA (Sec 205).................................. Pt. Leflore, MS................................. 1928 1928 1948 1986 1984 1986 1990 1989 1976 1982 1990 1969 1976 1990 1988 1989 1987 1987 1990 1990 1987 1986 1984 1986 1973 1987 1984 1972 1987 1984 1985 1987 1990 1988 1987 1989 1977 1980 1990 1987 1982 1975 1975 1989 1989 1985 (4) (4) 1990 1985 1989 1989 1989 1986 1984 1983 1974 1989 1989 1989 1985 1988 1975 1986 2010 2008 Indefinite 1991 1985 1991 1991 1989 1988 1995 1991 2013 1991 1994 1991 1990 1989 1989 1992 1993 1989 1987 1986 1987 1991 1988 1986 1991 1988 1985 1987 1987 1993 1989 1990 1989 1985 1992 1990 1988 1988 1993 1989 1992 1990 1986 Channel Improvement Main Line Levees Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Major Rehabilitation Modernization of Dams Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Beach Replentishment Breakwaters Local Protection Streambank Protection B-4 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Puerco River, Gallup, NM................................................... R. D. Bailey Lake, WV ...................................................... Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA (Sec 205)............................ Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections........................................... Ray Roberts Lake, TX........................................................ Redbank & Fancher Creeks, CA......................................... Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN.......................................... Red River Below Deanson Dam ......................................... 1988 1967 1989 1965 1975 1987 1989 1971 Red River of the North at Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN (Sec 204)................................................ 1990 Reserve Sewage Lagoon, NM (Sec 14) .......................... . 1986 Rio Grande Floodway, Truth or Consequences, NM........... 1989 Richmond, VA..................................................................... 1989 Roanoke River, Upper Basin, VA....................................... 1990 Rochester, MN ................................................................... 1987 Root River at Hokan, MN (Sec 14)....................................1990 Running Slough Ditch........................................................ 1990 Sabana Grande, PR (Sec 205) ......................................... . 1987 Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA ......................... . 1963 Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA ........ 1963 Sacramento River Flood Control, CA............................. . 1918 Sacramento River, Major and Minor Tributaries, CA ........ 1949 Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, CA..................................................... 1990 Saginaw River, MI............................................................. 1965 San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX............................. 1957 Sangamon River, Sewage Treatment Facility Riverton, IL.................................................................. 1987 San Lui s Rey River, San Luis Rey River, Buoin, CA........ 1987 Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA... .................... 1990 San Vincente Arroyo, Silver Sprint;, NM ........................... 1988 Sardis Lake, OK................................................................. 1976 Savan Gut, VI (Sec 205) .................................................... 1987 Saw Mill River at Ardslay.................................................. 1987 Saxon Harbor, WI (Sec 111)................................................ 1989 Saylorville Lake, IA........................................................... 1965 Scotts Creek, newberry, SC (Sec 205)................................ 1986 Sewer Line Protection, Valley, AL (Sec 14)......................1985 Sheyenne River, ND .......................................................... 1990 Sicily Island, LA, Levee .................................................... 1983 Silver Creek, Rome, GA (Sec 205)...................................... 1989 Sims Bayou, TX ................................................................. 1990 Skiatook Lake, OK............................................................. 1974 Sope Creek, Marietta, GA.................................................. 1986 Souris River Basin, ND...................................................... 1985 South Fork, Boise River, ID (Sec 208) ............................... 1984 South Fork Elkhorn River, Hold Co Ewing, NE (Sec 14).. 1990 5 Project consists of Levee upgrade and enlargement. 1991 1988 1990 Indefinite 1987 1995 1993 1990 1990 Indefinite 1989 1991 1990 1990 1989 1989 1979 1989 1988 1983 1989 1989 1989 1977 1986 1985 1991 1987 1991 1993 1995 1995 1990 1990 1990 1996 Indefinite Indefinite 1989 1993 1992 1994 1989 1992 Indefinite 1988 1990 1990 1990 1990 1993 1988 1989 1993 20105 1990 1998 1988 1990 1995 1985 1991 Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Reservoir StreambankProtection Levee & Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Mitigation Reservoir Local Protection Sewer Line Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Reservoir Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection B-5 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project South Platte River, EFt. Lupton Lagoon, CO (Sec (14)..... South Quincy, Levee & Drainage District, IL .................... Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ................................... Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS.......................................... Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA (Sec 14)......... State Road and Ebner coulees, WI...................................... Steele Bayou, MS............................................................... St. Francis Basin ................................................................ Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV ............................................. Swan Creek, Taney County, MO (Sec 14).......................... Sweetwater River, CA........................................................ Tallahatchie River, Site 1, MS ............................................ Taylors Bayou, TX............................................................. Taylorsville Lake, KY........................................................ Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA 11............................. Tensas Cocodrie, LA, Levee (5)........................................ Texas City and Vicinity, TX (1958 authorization) ............. Threemile Creek, AL.......................................................... Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS ......................... Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock Creek, PA (Sec 14)..... Tynes Branch, Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., M S....................................................................... Upper Scioto River, Marion County, OH (Sec 205)........... Upper Yazoo Projects, MS.................................................. U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL (Sec 14)........................ U.S. Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (Sec 14) .................. U.S. Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL (Sec 14)................ Valley Creek, AL (Sec 14).................................................. Vnnim Buren County, IA (Sec 14).......................................... Village Creek, AL .............................................................. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX.................................... Virginia Beach Streams, Canal No. 2, VA.......................... Walnut Creek, CA.............................................................. Wapello County, IA (Sec 14).............................................. Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (Sec 14)..... Waterloo, IA (Bridge) ........................................................ Westerly Creek, Colorado.................................................... West Ray, Marshall, PA (Sec 14) ....................................... West Tennessee Tributaries ................................................ Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205)......................... Wharton's Bend Road, Coosa River,AL (Sec 14)................ White River, Batesville, AR (Sec 14) ................................. White River, Jacksonport, AR (Sec 205)............................ White River, Newport, AR (Sec 14).................................... White River, St. Paul, AR (Sec 208).................................... Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA..................................... Wilamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR...................... 6 Durham Prong Diversion local support problem. 7 Item 2A temporarily deferred. 1990 1987 1974 1988 1989 1988 1966 1938 1977 1984 1972 1988 1982 1974 1983 1974 1962 1986 1965 1989 1986 1986 1976 1985 1985 1985 1985 1990 1989 1968 1988 1964 1990 1986 1990 1988 1990 1960 1983 1989 1984 1984 1988 1988 1980 1938 1991 1991 1983 1989 1992 1990 1990 1993 2010 (4) 1999 1988 1986 1986 1992 1988 Indefinite 1983 1990 Indefinite6 19927 1987 1987 1992 1990 Indefinite 1990 1990 1986 1986 1986 1989 1990 1986 1991 1990 1094 1986 1986 1989 1990 1987 1987 2013 1986 1986 1987 1986 1991 1994 1988 1990 1900 1990 1987 1992 1992 1990 Indefinite 1 1984 1990 1986 1986 1989 1990 Indefinite Indefinite Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local protection Local Protection Tributary levees & channels Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Bridge Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Sewerline Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank protection Streambank Protection Flood Control Local Protection Streambank Protection Drainage and Flood Control Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Local Protection B-6 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Winona, MN....................................................................... Wolf River at 2nd Street, Memphis, TN (Sec 14)................ Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL ..................... Wyoming Valley, PA......................................................... Yatesville Lake, KY........................................................... Zumbro River at Genoa, MN (Sec 14)................................ 1979 1988 1953 1983 1964 1990 1985 1989 1962 1976 1988 1990 1986 1991 1991 1991 Local Protectin Local Protection Local Protection Rehabilitation of levee system Reservoir Streambank Protection 1 Construction of further channel improvement was halted in 1987 due to the denial of water quality certification. Construction work currently underway includes the stabilization of bridge, utility and tributary crossings in the uncompleted portion of the project. B-7 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Locks Dams Authoriaed Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Nrmal _Length Year Length Depth Width Poject Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (ft) Alabma-CCoom Rivers, AL Caiboa Lock &Dam Miles Perry Lockand Dam Jess Bluff Lock and Dam Aleany River, PA andNY Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and DamNa. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5S Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Apachica, ChQuahoochooee, and Fli Rivers, GA, AL aaznadi FPLL Jim WoodruffLock and Dam Geor W. Andrews Lockn dDam Walter P. 3eep Lock andDam AMlantiIca racmastal Waaerway Albemale and Champeake Can.l Rou: Oat Bride Lock Dismal Swamp Caal RRaonamts: DoeepC eek Lock South Mills Lock Bayou Techd, LA Berwick Lock Eytam Lock Black Rack Chamnl and Tawaonda Harlbor, NY Black Rock Lock Black Warner, Warrier andTambigbee Rivers AL Coffeevlle (Jackson) Lock and Dam Dopalis Lock and Dam Amstad I. SeldMeLno ck and Dam WamB. acon Oliver Lock d Dam Hot Lockrad Dam John Hlia Banklead Lock and Dam (New Lock) Canaveral Harbor, PL Cmaveral Lock Cape Fear River, NC Lock a DamNo. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Willism 0. 1ks Lock and Dam Cmntraaln d SoutbemnF lorida S-61 Lock S-645L ock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock 81.82 Claibosne, AL 14232 Camen, AL 254.42 Bentms, AL 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 14. 5 Qswick, PA 242 Naimas, PA 30A4 lsc t, PA 363 Ointmu PA 45.7 KissaBag. PA 52.6 TenmplemaPmA, 62.2 Rimer, PA 107.64 Chattahoochee, FL 182.85 Columbia, GA 182.85 Pest GOais, GA 11.56 Geat Bridgp, VA 10.66 Deep Caek, VA 33.26 South Mills. NC 1.53 Berwick, LA 72.53 New Iberia, LA 0.0 Buffalo, NY 116.610 Coffievile, AL 213.210 Demopolis, AL 261.110 Eutaw, AL 338.110 Tuscaloosa, AL 347.010 Holt, AL 365.1 Adger, AL 2.7 Cocoa, FL 67.0 King Bluff NC 99.0 rowns Landing, NC 123.0 Tdaars Landing, NC 0.0 St. Cowd, PL 56.0 lroaseoof FL 46.0 Avon Park, PL 32.0 Sebrng, PL 25.0 Seobring,PL 600 600 600 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 30 45 45 11 13 10 12 12 13 18 22 33 25 88 16 16 16 11 12 9 10 11 11 14 11 14 19 18 13 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 12 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Fixed 11 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Fixed 10 Fixed 11 Fixed 14 Movable 13 Movable 13 Movable 72 530 3 167 167 New 52 300 12 127 52 300 12 12 7 45 307 79 36 162 9 97 9 12 7 Naw 127 Nae 97 None 8 Fixed 3,160 1973 9,900 1969 14,9623 1974 1,393 193420 1,436 193420 876 1927 780 1927 1,140 1928 916 1930 984 1931 950 1938 5,924 1957 620 1963 13,371 1963 1932 60.5 9 200 103.1 9 200 88.0 9 200 7.8 9 200 9.7 9 200 6.2 9 200 5.9 9 200 9.4 9 200 6.9 9 200 9.6 9 200 9.8 9 200 46.7 6 100 28.5 6 100 85.0 6 100 12 90 1940 6 50 1941 6 1950 175 1913 68 625 5 21.6 21.6 Nae 600 600 600 460 600 600 33 40 22 28 64 68 90 600 30 30 30 30 30 200 200 300 90 90 90 90 90 13 13 13 12 19 13 13 Movable 13 Fixed 13 Movable 12 Fixed 13 Movable 13 Fixed 14 14 None 11 9 9 26 6 6 7 9 12 9 6 6 6 6 6 9 Fixed 12 Fixed 9 Fixed 6 Naoe 6 Nanoe 6 Nano 6 Nae 6 Nano 50 8 80 34.5 6 80 1914 7.1 21 200 1,185 1965 1,485 1962 1,832 1962 700 1940 1,138 1969 1,170 1975 1965 275 1915 229 1917 220 1935 1963 1964 1967 1965 1965 96.6 9 200 47.9 9 200 77.0 9 200 8.9 9 200 18.1 9 200 42.7 9 200 12 125 32.0 8 100 24.0 8 100 20.0 8 100 8 28.0 3 10.0 3 14.0 3 7.0 3 20 30 30 30 30 C-1 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Locks Dams Authoriand Chimnl Miles Width Avsilable Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth i Vicinity Chlmber Width Pool Ievel Upper Lower Typol (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (foet) Central and Southel Florida (continued) S-65D Lock S-65B Lock S-308B S-310 ChicagHo arbor, IL Chicago Lock Columbia River, OR and WA BoonnevilleL ock and Dam The Dalles Lock and Dam John Day Lock and Dam McNary Lock and Dam oss-Florida Barge Canal Inglis Lock, Dam and Spillway BuasekLa ock and Dam Harry H. Buckman Lock umbeuandRiver, KY andTN Barkley Dam Cheatham Lock and Dam Old Hickoy Lock and Dam Cordell Hall Dam and Reservoir Fox River, WI DaPoe Lock Depbe Dam Little Kaukauna Lock Little Kaukauna Dam RapideQ cberLo ock Rapide Croche Dam Kaukanam Flfth Lock Kakaunm Fourth Lock KaukamanT hird Lock KaukaunmS econd Lock Kaukamna at Lock Kaukaum Dam Kaukauam Guard Lock Little caute combined Lock Lower Upper Little Chae Second Lock Little Cme Firat (Guard) Lock Little Chute Dam CoedmrLso ck Codars Dam Appleton Forth Lock ApplonLower Dam Apple ThirdLock Appleton Seoad Lock Appleon First Lock AppletonUpper Dam ManaeshaLock Menasha Dam Freshwater Bayou, LA rashwater Bayou Lock Green and Barren Rivers, KY Green River: Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock andDam No. 2 Gulf ltracoastal Waterway Ioer Harbor Navigation Chamel Lock Harvey Lock 16.0 12.0 38.7 0.0 Okmechobee, FL Okmechobee, PL Pat Mayaca,PL owistan, FL 0.0 Chicago. IL 146.0 Boeoville, OR 190.0 The Dalles,OR 215.0 Rufus, OR 292.0 Umstilla. OR 168.611 Ingl, FL 20.0 Sparr,PL 90.4 Palatka, PL 30.6 Kuttawa, KY 148.7 Ashland City, TN 216.2 Old Hickory, TN 313.5 Carthage, TN 7.1 7.2 13.0 13.1 19.2 19.3 22.8 23.1 233 23A4 23.6 24.0 24.0 25.4 25.4 26.4 26.5 26.6 27.3 274A 30.7 30.9 313 31.6 31.9 32.2 37.8 37.8 DePolet, WI DcPoe, WI DePose, WI DaPose, WI Wrigttown, WI Wrightstown, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukana, WI Kankama, WI Kaukana, WI Kaukauna, WI Kankauna. WI Kaukauna, WI Little Cate, WI Little Chte, WI Little CoumtWe, I Little Ate , WI Little Chute, WI Little CoumtWe.,I Little ChutemW. I Appletm,. WI Appletm. WI Appletm, WI Appleto, WI Appletos, WI Appletm, WI Mesha, WI Meaasha, WI 19.08 tracoastal City, LA 9.1 Spattavle, KY 63.1 Calhoun, KY 92.612 98312 New Orleans, LA 75 Harvey, LA 75 30 30 56 50 90 90 400 60 6 5S 14 5 6 6 14 13 6 6 14 13 NNaoneo Nana Movable Movable 80 600 4 23 23 Naoe 76 86 86 86 84 84 84 110 110 84 84 36 36 36 36 37 31 35 35 40 35 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 34 34 84 500 675 675 675 600 600 600 800 800 400 400 146 146 146 144 144 144 144 144 147 144 144 144 144 144 145 145 144 600 65 88 110 75 28 20 20 57 26 60 59 32 15 15 15 18 14 14 11 14 14 14 9 10 7 8 8 9 9 7 10 7 10 7 10 6 11 7 9 11 6 11 8 14 8 7 10 7 8 8 9 6 10 7 10 7 24 15 15 20 15 15 13 12 10 13 12 10 10 96 66 6 96 6 7 8 966 Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Noew Movable Movable Movable Movable 1964 1964 1977 1980 9.0 3 4.0 3 5.0 8 .5 6 30 30 100 50 1939 .15 21 470 2,680 1938 8,735 1957 5,900 1968 7,365 1953 5,100 1968 3,830 1971 1972 9,959 1964 801 1959 3,605 1957 1,138 1973 1936 Movable 986 1929 1938 Movable 588 1926 1934 Movable 461 1930 1898 1879 1879 1903 1883 Movable 603 1931 1891 1879 1879 1881 1904 Movable 562 1932 1888 Movable 654 1933 1907 Movable 549 1934 1900 1901 1884 Movable 691 1940 1899 Movable 401 1937 16 16 Noes 84 600 12 12 11 Fixed 84 600 14 15 12 Fixed 640 99 425 109 31 127 317 127 Nano Noanoe 1968 47.5 27 25,0 14 76.0 14 64.0 14 300 250 250 250 11.0 12 150 12 150 21.2 12 150 118.1 9 67.5 9 97.3 9 71.9 9 5.9 6 6.2 6 3.6 6 0.3 6 0.2 6 0.1 6 0.2 6 0.4 6 1.4 6 6 6 1.0 6 0.7 6 3.4 6 0.6 6 0.3 6 0.3 6 5.1 6 28.3 6 150 150 150 150 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 12 125 482 1956 54.0 9 200 519 1956 45.4 9 200 1923 1935 12 150 12 125 C-2 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Locks Dams AuthoriazeCdh annel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth ca Sills Above Comnunity of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width lPoject Mouth ia Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typeol (feet) Opetsd (miles) (feet) (fet) Gulf htracoastal Waterway (cntiniad) Algiers Lock Bayou Bonf Lock Bayou Seonel Lock Port Allem Lock Calcasin Lock Brasos River Ploodgptes Coldaado River East Lock Wet Lock Htdson River, NY Troy Lock anldD am lmois Waterway, L LaGrange Lock andDam Peoria Lock and Dam Starved Rock Lock and Dam MaraoKll Lock Marsmilles Dam Deidesnl and Lockamndd Dam BrandonRoad Lock and Dam LockportLock TLomas J.(O Brien Lock and Dam Iland Roub, MI cmoed RiverR Lock and Weir Kamawha River, WV Winfald Lockamnd Dam Marmot Lock manDda m London Lock mad Dam Kaskaski River, L Kakakia Lock and Dam Keetacky River, KY Lock amd Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock iaDnadm No. 3 Lock mad Dam No. 4 Lockamn d Dam No. 5 Lock manDda m No.96 Lock manDda m No. Lock mad Dam No. 84 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock minDd am No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lockand Dam No. 12 Lockad Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 14M La. Wauhington Ship Canal KamM. ChilnenLock LargeLock Small Lock McOsn-Ksr Arkansas River Navigation Syatem, AR andOK Nosell Lock and Damn Wilbur D. Mils, Lock No. 2 DamnNo. 2 88012 93.3 131.013 228.512 238513 404.113 AlgiesI LA Merpn City, LA laquomm., LA PIt Allen, LA Lab Curies.LA Repoet, Tx 75 75 56 84 75 75 797 1.158 800 1,198 1,25 109 69 109 45 69 13 13 14 13 13 15 444.8 Mastagorda, TX 75 1,200 59 444.8 Matagorda,TX 75 1,200 59 1538 Troy.NY 13 7 13 7 14 14 7 137 1 7 S Nane Nape Neae Nas Nape 1956 1956 1952 1961 1950 1943 1954 1954 15 Nam 157 NaNo 45 493 17 16 13 Fixod 1,495 1917 16 16 12 12 16 12 150 150 125 125 200 125 12 125 12 125 22 14 200 80.2 BeardstownIL 110 600 10 16 13 Movable 1.066 1939 77.5 9 300 157.7 Ioria, L 110 600 11 16 12 Movabe 536 1939 73.3 9 300 231.0 Uica, L 244.6 Mamsilles, IL 247.0 MmaseillesI, L 2715 Morris, L 286.0 Jolot, IL 291.1 Lockpoet, L 3265 O .icago,IL 30.0 Alamcn, MI 31.1 67.8 82.8 Winfield, WV Mmat, WV Landon, WV 110 6Q 19 17 14 Movable 1,280 1933 13.6 9 110 600 24 19 14 1933 26.9 9 Movable 819 1933 24.6 300 300 110 600 22 17 12 Movable 1,616 1933 14.5 9 300 110 600 34 18 14 Movable 2,373 1933 110 600 40 12 15 No. 1933 110 1,000 14 14 Movable 257 1960 17.8 66 1 6.9 7.9 SSP Weir 83 1967 56 56 56 360 360 28 24 24 12 12 12 Movable 834 1937 Movable 707 1934 Movable 707 1934 5.1 9 300 9 300 6.9 9 300 4.0 5 30 36.7 9 300 15.0 9 300 7.8 9 300 .8 Ellis GroveIL 84 600 3 18 11 Movable 130 1973 35.0 9 225 4.0 31.0 42.0 65.0 822 96.2 117.0 1399 137.5 176.4 201.0 220.9 2399 249.0 Carroitcn, KY lIckpot, KY Ge KY PkankktfKo,Y Tyrane. KY High Bridge. KY High Bridge, KY Camp Nelson, KY Valley View, KY Ford. KY Irvine., KY Raveena, KY Willow, KY Heidelberg, KY 1.3 Seatst, WA 13 Sattls, WA 103 13.3 40.5 Akan Pwt AR MaI.uIP~AR Arkansas Pot AR 38 38 38 38 38 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 145 145 145 145 145 147 147 146 148 148 148 148 148 148 8S 14 13 13 15 14 15 19 17 17 18 17 18 17 8 8 96 10 9 9 11 11 9 10 10 10 9 15 6 76 6 6 7 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 80 760 26 33.5 29 28 123 26 16 16 110 110 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed 424 1839 400 1939 465 1844 534 1844 556 1844 413 1891 350 1897 257 1900 362 1907 472 1907 208 1906 240 1910 248 1915 248 1917 Movaube 235 1916 600 30 16 15 Fixed *4.577 1967 600 20 18 14 1967 Movable *42,073 1968 27.0 6 11.0 6 23.0 6 17.2 6 14.0 6 20.8 6 22.9 6 17.6 6 18.9 6 24.6 6 19.9 6 19.0 6 9.1 6 9.6 6 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 17.0 34 150 3.0 9 250 36.9 9 250 C-3 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Locks Dams Authoriand Chmnl Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Conmunity of Length for Norml Length Year Length Depth Width Ioject Mouth m Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typeol (feet) Opeod (miles) (feet) (fo McGelan-Kesr Arkansas RiverNavigation System, AARandIK(contEed) Emmett D. Sanders Lock and Dam Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 DavidD. Terry Lock andDam Murray Lock and Dam Toad SudcFkesr ry Lock and Dam Lock andDam No. 9 Dardanelle Lock and Dam Ozark-Jetta Taylor Lock* and Dam Lock and Dam No. 13 W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir Webber Falls Lock and Dam Chutuau Lock and Dam Newt Graham Lock and Dam Minsisip River Between Ohio and Missouri Riven Lock and4 Dam No. 27 Miusissp River Between Mismri River and Minnmap lis, MN Locak and Dam No. 2626 Malvin Price Locks & Dam Lock and Dam No. 25 Lock and Dam No. 24 Lock and Dam No. 22 Lock and Dam No. 21 Lock and Dam No. 20 Lock and Dam No. 19 Lock and Dam No. 18 Lock and Damn No.17 Lock and Damn No.16 Lock and Dam No.15 Lock and Dam No.14 Lock and Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No 8 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock a DDamN o. 6 Lock and Dam No SA Lock and Dam No. 5S Lock and Dam Noa 4 Lock ad DamNo. 3 Lock .andDam No. 2 Lock and Dam Noa. 1 50.2 Grady. AR 66.0 Pine Bluff AR 863 Redfeld, AR 108.1 Little Rock, AR 125A Little Rock, AR 155.9 Conway. AR 176.9 Mrrilton, AR 206.5 Rumellviile, AR 256.8 Ozark. AR 292.8 Fot Smith, AR 319.6 Fort Smith, AR 336.2 SSallisawOK 366.6 Webbers Pails, OK 4014A Muskoe, OK 4421.7 Inoa, OK 185.114 (ranie CiQtyI,L 202.915 Alton, IL 200.8 Alton, L 241A 15 Cap Au Gris, MO 2734 1 5 Qarksville, MO 301215 Sv toMO 324.915 Quincy, L 343215 Canton, MO 364215 Koakuk, IA 410.515 Burlington, IA 437.115 New BoatmnI,L 457215 Mu scatine, IA 482.915 Rock Island, L 493.115 LeQaUie, IA 493315 Loaite, IA 522.515 Ointm, IA 556.715 Belleven, IA 583).015 Dubulqa, A 615.115 GteUb IA 647.915 Lynxvllo, IA 679215 Geno., WI 702.515 D b MN 714315 Tnpealleau, WI 728.515 Wiaana, MN 738.115 Mimiska, MN 752.815 Alms, WI 796.915 Red Wing. MN 815215 HILstinlpMgsN, 847 15 Mimsuaponis,, MN St Paul 110 110 110 600 20 18 600 14 18 600 17 18 110 600 18 110 600 18 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 16 600 19 600 54 600 34 600 20 600 20 14 Movable *6,1110 1968 15.8 9 14 Movable *5,745 1968 20.3 9 250 14 Movable *7.455 1968 21.8 9 250 18 14 Movable 8,890 1968 17.3 9 250 18 14 Movable (3,930 1969 30.5 9 250 18 14 Movable 1,580 1969 21.0 9 250 18 14 Movable *1,50(5 1969 28.6 9 250 18 14 Movable *1.815 1969 51.3 9 250 18 15 Movableo *12,480 1969 36.0 9 250 18 14 Movable *4,725 1969 26.8 9 250 14 15 Movable 7,400 1970 16.6 9 250 110 600 48 18 14 Movable 7.230 1970 30.4 9 250 110 600 30 19 16 Movable 4,370 1970 34.8 9 250 110 600 21 15 14 Movable 11,690 1970 20.2 9 150 110 600 21 15 14 Movable 11,630 1970 23.7 9 150 110 1,200 21 16 15 Fixed 3,240 1953 17.8 9 200 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 100 110 110 110 80 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 56 600 24 360 24 1,200 24 600 15 600 15 600 10 600 10 600 10 1.200 38 600 10 600 8 600 9 600 16 360 16 320 11 600 11 600 11 600 9 600 11 600 8 600 9 600 11 600 8 600 7 600 6 600 9 600 7 600 8 600 12 500 12 400 38 400 38 19 16 23 19 19 18 17 15 15 17 16 17 27 27 18 21 19 17 19 15 16 22 18 17 18 18 17 17 22 16 13 13 10 Movable 1,725 1938 38.5 9 300 10 18 Moveable 1160 1990 40.6 9 300 12 Movable 1,296 1939 32.0 9 300 12 Movable 4.280 1940 27.8 9 300 14 Movable 1,024 1938 23.7 9 NS 12 Movable 1,066 1938 18.3 9 NS 12 Movable 2.144 1936 21.0 9 NS 13 Fixed 4,434 1913 46.3 9 NS 14 Movable 1.350 1937 26.6 9 NS 13 Movable 921 1939 20.1 9 NS 12 Movable 1,099 1937 25.7 9 NS 11 Movable 1.203 1934 10.4 9 NS 11 11 1922 14 Movable 1,343 1939 29.2 9 NS 13 Movable 1.066 1939 34.2 9 NS 13 Movable 849 1938 26.3 9 NS 13 Movable 1,278 1937 32.1 9 NS 12 Movable 763 1937 32.8 9 NS 13 Movable 811 1937 31.3 9 NS 14 Movable 935 1937 23.3 9 NS 12 Movable 940 1937 11.8 9 NS 13 Movable 893 1936 14.2 9 NS 13 Movable 682 1936 9.6 9 NS 12 Movable 1,619 1935 14.7 9 NS 13 Movable 1,367 1935 44.1 9 NS 14 Movable 365 1938 18.3 9 NS 13 Movable 822 1930 32.4 9 NS 15 1948 8 Fixed 574 1932 5.7 9 NS 10 1917 C-4 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Locks Dams Authorized Chlmml Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Canmunity of Lengthfo r Norml Lensth Year Length Depth Width Project Month at Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) St. Anthony Palls Lower Lock and Damn Upper Lock and Dam Mananhiala River, PA and WV Locks and Dam No. 2 Locks and Dam No. 3 Locks and Dam No. 4 Maxwell Locks and Dam Locks andD amnN o. 7 PoianMt adrid (Lock A Replacemeea) MorgtownLock and Dam HildebranLodc k and Dam Opokisk Lock and Dam Ohio River Locks and Dam No. 53 Locks and Dam No. 52 Smithland Locks and Dam Uniontown Locks and Dam Newburgh Locks and Dam Camlton Locks and Dam McAlpimn Locks andDam Marland Locks and Dam CaptainAnthonyMldabl Locks manDda m Gmeoap Locks and Dam Oallipolas Locks and Dam Racine Locks and Dam Belleville Locks and Dam Willow Island Locks and Dam Hannibal Locks and Dam Pike iand Loch and Dam New Cambedand Locks and Dam Mag aeeydLochks and Dam DaushieldsLocks ad Dam Bnswath Locks and Dam OkeeodmcoWbeaste rway, IL St. Lade Lock and Dam Moose avem Lock Onam Lock and Dam W. P. Pranklin Lock and Camal Stacture 853315 MnmnmpoliMs,N 853915 Mimnapolis, MN 11. 2 Braddock, PA 238 miiasbth, PA 41.5 ManessinP, A 61.2 Maxwell, PA 85.0 lemnboro, PA 90 Point Marion, PA 102.0 Merantown, WV 108.0 MerpantownW, V 115.4 Margpntown, WV 184A Mound City. L 42.1 Brookpoet, L 353 Smithand, KY 135.0 Uniantown, KY 204.9 Newburgh, IN 2603 Canmlton, IN 3742 Lonisville, KY 449.5 Markland,IN 544.8 Chilo, OH 640.0 Ommeup, KY 701.8 Hogitt, WV 743.5 Letat Palls, OH 777.1 Roedsville, OH 8193 Wavely, WV 854.6 New Martinsvilleo, WV 896.7 Warwood, WV 926.6 StrattmnO, H 9493 IndustiyPA 967.7 Glenwillard, PA 974 Emswarth, PA 15.1 Stuart, PL 78.0 Moose Haven, FL 93.6 LaBelle, PL 121A Fort Myers, FPL 56 400 25 14 56 400 49 16 56 110 56 56 56 56 84 84 56 56 84 84 84 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 110 56 110 56 50 50 50 56 360 9 16 720 9 16 360 8 12 720 8 12 360 17 20 720 17 20 720 20 21 720 20 21 360 15 11 360 19 15 600 17 18 600 21 14 600 22 18 600 12 15 1,200 12 15 600 12 15 1,200 12 15 1,200 22 34 1,200 22 34 1,200 22 34 600 22 34 1,200 16 32 600 16 32 1,200 25 38 600 25 38 1,200 37 49 600 37 19 360 37 19 1.200 35 50 600 35 50 1,200 30 45 600 30 45 1,200 30 45 600 30 45 600 23 18 360 23 18 1,200 22 37 600 22 37 1,200 22 37 600 22 37 1,200 20 35 600 20 35 1.200 21 38 600 21 38 1.200 21 17 600 21 17 1,200 21 17 600 21 17 600 18 16 360 18 16 600 10 13 360 10 13 600 18 17 360 18 16 250 13 14 250 2 10 250 11 12 400 3 13 10 Movable 188 1956 14 Fixed 3,584 1963 16 Fixed 748 1951 16 19532 12 Fixed 670 1907 12 190721 11 Movable 535 1932 11 19322 15 Movable 460 1964 15 1964 10 Fixed 610 19252 10 Movable 560 1925' 15 Movable 410 1950 15 Movable 530 1959 14 Movable366 1964 7.0 10 Movable 3,978 1929 10 Temnpray Lock 1980 11 Movable 3.073 1928 11 Temiporary Lock 1969 12 Movale 3,560 1980 12 12 Movable 3,516 1975 12 16 Movable 2,272 1975 16 13 Movable 1,965 1972 13 12 Movable 8,627 1961 11 1921 11 1930 15 Movable 1.395 1963 15 1963 15 Movable 1.756 1962 15 1962 15 Movable 1.287 1962 15 15 Movable 1.132 1937 15 15 Movable 1,202 1970 15 15 Movablel,206 1969 36.4 15 15 Movable 1,128 1973 15 17 Movable 1,098 1972 17 18 Movable 1,306 1965 18 15 Movable 1,315 1961 15 15 Movable 1,379 1936 15 18 Fixed 1,585 1929 18 13 Movable 1,717 1921 13 12 Movable 170 1941 11 Noe 1953 11 Movable 104 1937 - Movable 1,150 1965 0.6 9 100 3.8 9 100 12.6 9 300 17.7 9 300 19.7 9 300 23.8 9 300 5.8 9 300 11.2 9 300 6.0 9 300 7.4 9 300 9 300 23.7 9 300 35.8 9 300 99.7 9 300 69.9 9 300 55.4 9 300 116.3 9 400 75.3 9 300 95.3 9 300 9 300 95,2 9 300 61.8 9 300 41.7 9 300 33.6 9 300 9 300 35.3 9 1.000 36.0 9 300 29.9 9 300 22.7 9 300 18.4 9 300 7.1 9 300 6.2 9 300 15.1 8 80 15.6 8 90 15.6 8 90 7.9 8 90 C-5 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Locks Dams Authoriaed Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Coammunity of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth m Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typol (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (foet) Old River, LA Old River Lock Ouchita and Black Rivers, AR& LA Janesville Lock and Dam (Black River) Columbia Lock and Dam (Ouschita River) Calion Lock (Ouschita River) Felsenthal Lock (Ouachit River) IPardR iver, MS and LA Lock 1 Lock 2 Lock 3 Red River Wabrway Lock 1 Lock 2 Sacramento River, CA Barge Canal Lock Snak River, WA Ice Harbor Lock and Dam Little Gome Lock and Dam Lower Granite Lock and Dam Lower Monumental Lock and Dam St. Mary a River, MI South Canal: MacArthur Lock Poe Lock North Canal: Davis Lock SabinL ock Savannah, GA New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam Teome River. TN, AL. MS, and KY 1 8 Kentucky Lock andDam Pickwick Landing Lock andDam Auxiliary Lock Main Lock Wastrway Coemcting Tombigbee and Tennesme Rivers. AL andMS Gainesvill Lock and Dam Aliovill Lock and Dam Cldumbus Lock and Dam Abeden Lock and Dam Lock A and Spillway Lock B and Spillway Lock C and Spilway Lock D and Spillway Lock B and Spillway Bay Springs Lock and Dam WileanLock andDam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock General Joe Wheelr Lock andDam Main Laock Auxilary Lock 304.0 Simmesport, LA 25.0 Jonesville, LA 117.2 Columbia, LA 281.7 226.8 29A 17 PIari River, LA 40.717 Bush, LA 43.917 Sun, LA 43.8 86.5 42.8 West Sacramento, CA 920 Psco, WA 70.3 Starbuck, WA 1073 Ibmroy,.WA 41.6 Kalotus, WA 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 SaulStt e. Marie, MI 47.0 SaultS t. Marie, MI 47.0 SaultS te.M arie, MI 1872 Augusta, GA 22.4 GibertsvIle, KY 206.7 Hamburg, TN 206.7 Hamburg, TN 49.1 Gainesvile, AL 89.8 Alicoville, AL 117.6 Columbus, MS 1404A Aberdeen, MS 154.1 Amory, MS 1593 Smithville, AL 174.0 Paltmn, MS 1814A Paltmn, MS 189.7 Belmont, MS 194.9 TupeloM,S 259 4 Roemnco, AL 2594 Rosenme, AL 274.9 Roence, AL 274.9 Roenaoe, AL 75 1,200 35 11 84 84 84 84 65 65 65 84 84 86 86 86 86 86 80 110 80 80 600 30 18 600 18 18 600 12 18 600 13 18 310 26.7 10 310 15 10 310 11 10 685 38 22 685 24 23.5 600 4 13 675 89 15 675 93 15 675 93 15 675 94 15 800 22 31 1,200 22 32 1350 22 24 1,350 22 24 56 360 15 14 110 600 56 11 110 600 55 10 110 1,000 55 10 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 60 600 36 15 600 27 15 600 27 15 600 27 15 600 30 15 600 25 18 600 25 18 600 30 18 600 30 18 600 84 18 600 94 13 292 94 11 110 600 48 13 60 400 48 15 11 None 1963 14 Movable 450 1972 13 Fixed 400 1972 13 Movable 350 1984 13 Movable 350 1984 10 None 10 Nane 10 None 1951 1951 1951 13 Movable 550 1984 15 Movable 300 1987 13 Nane 1961 15 Movable 1961 14 15 Movable 1970 14 15 Movable 1975 14 15 Movable 1969 14 31 None 32 None 23 None 23 Nae 1943 1968 1914 1919 12 Movable 360 1936 13 Tainer 7,976 1944 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1937 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1984 15 Movable 15,460 1978 15 Movable 14,790 1979 15 Movable 10,040 1981 15 Movable 10,640 1984 15 Movable - 1985 18 Movable - 1985 18 Movable - 1985 18 Movable - 1985 18 Movable - 1985 18 None 10,640 1985 13 Bulkhead 3,728 1959 11 Bulkhead 3,728 1927 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1963 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1962 12 125 92.2 9 100 106.2 9 100 50.3 9 100 55.2 9 100 11.1 7 80 3.2 7 80 13.2 7 80 44.2 9 200 74.3 9 200 1.5 13 120 250 250 250 250 27 16.2 9 90 184.3 9 300 52.7 9 300 52.7 9 300 49.1 9 300 40.7 9 300 27.8 9 300 22.8 9 300 13.7 9 300 14.7 9 300 7.4 9 300 8.3 9 300 5.2 9 300 64.5 9 300 15.5 9 300 15.3 9 300 74.1 9 300 74.1 9 300 C-6 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Locks Dams Authoria d 0mnal Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Lengh for Normal Length Year LIUgth Depth Width Project Month ia Vicinity (mber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Waterway Coemecting Tamnbigbee and Tennes- -e Rivers, AL manMd S (camtned) Omnatnesvill Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxilary Lock Nickajack Lock and Dam Chickam Lock and Dam Watts Har Lock eand Dam P~arlta dcn Lock and Dam Mlton Hill Lock -andD am (Qinch River) Willamette River at Willamtte Falls, OR Lock No. 1 Lock No 2 Lock No. 3 Lock No. 4 Guard ILock 349.0 Gnsersville, AL 110 600 39 13 13 Tainier 3,837 1965 75.7 9 300 349.0 Geninville, AL 60 400 39 13 12 Tainmer 3,837 1939 75.7 9 300 424.7 Gtlwoogs, TN 110 600 39 13 11 Tairtar 3,763 1967 46.3 9 300 471.0 mattaooga, TN 60 360 49 10 14 Taitaor 5,654 1940 58.9 9 300 529.9 &eendartoq, TN 60 360 58 12 12 Taimer 2,646 1942 72.4 9 300 6023 Lenoir City, TN 60 360 72 12 12 Taier 3,687 1943 49.8 9 300 23.1 Kingsto, TN 75 400 54 13 13 Taitr 1.072 1963 38.2 9 30019 26.0 Oegon Cty, OR 40 210 20 26.0 Oegon C ty, OR 40 210 10 26.0 Osegoa Qty, OR 40 210 10 26.0 Oegon City, OR 40 210 10 26A OgonCity, OR 40 210 10 8 Nme 8 Naoe 8 Nam 8 Naoe 8 Name 1872 6 150 1872 1872 1872 .4 1872 23.6 6 NS 1 ind; cest without gates or other facility to contrld stcamflow. Movable; includes any type of est gates, tainter gates, wickets, or others to contrl steamflow. 2Above mouth of Mobile River. 3 lacludes length of earth dikes. 4 lroemonth of Apalachicola River. Froenmnuth of OCbattaboocheRei ver. 6Above Norflk, VA. 7 With refesem to manmlo w water, or low mean Gulf as case may be. 8promGulf Iracoastal Waterway. 9 Average high andlo w water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. 1 foot of GovemmentStret, Mobile, AL. 11l4am mouth of St. Joits River. 12Above Head of Passes. 13rmNew Orlem, I.A. 14Salt water barrier in down position. Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position. 15 Above the OhioRiver. 160smal completed to depth of 6.5 fot. 17Pm mouth ofWestdaR iver. 1Temeassee River locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority. 19300-foot width from lock to mouth of CQinch River and 175-foot width upstnam from lock to Cintm, TN. Dateshveown epesut seplaoen.t aructues. 2 Dates shown srepsent ec uction for locks and dams Nos. 2-8 inclusive. 22Dasm w asrebilt in 1959. Ol 3 2 0d 11(YX 358' lock replaced in 1957. 26 noperable, cmetaer stats September 7,1982. 2 Inoperable, casmetasr states October 1, 1981. 26 Lock and Dam 26 has been removed and rieplaced by Melvin Price Locks and Dam * Includes length of left and right ensnkrmnts ** Includes lee gth of left embankent C-7 APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam (Sec 107).......................... AIWW - Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC..... Baltimore Harbor (50 foot), MD & VA.............................. Barnegat Inlet, NJ .............................................................. Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR & WA........................... Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN................................. Calumet-Sag. Mod., Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, Part 1. Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) ..................... Channel to Newport News, VA (1986 Mod.) ..................... Charleston Harbor, SC ....................................................... Chicago Harbor, IL ............................................................ Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ....................................... Dashields L/D, Ohio River, PA........................................... 1987 1974 1987 1985 1985 1990 1955 1967 1987 1988 1990 1972 1986 Delaware River in the Vicinity of Camden, NJ ............... 1987 Emsworth Locks and Dams, Ohio River, PA .................. 1980 Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, IN and KY ...................................................................... 1989 Dredging and breakwater 19861 Indefinite Streambank Protection 1990 Deepdraft channel deepening 1992 Jetty realignment and dredging 1993 New larger lock 1991 Breakwater & Nay, Light Foundation 1968 Indefinite Channel improvements and relocation 1968 Indefinite Deferred anchorage construction 1989 Indefinite Dredge 50 ft. Channel. Deepen to 55 feet 1994 Dredging and channel wideningand deepening 1990 1990 Lock Gate Repair 1990 Dredging 1991 Major rehabilitation of ocks and dams 1088 1988 Dredging 1985 Major rehabilitation of lock and dam 1984 Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VW.................................. 1988 Freeport Harbor, TX .......................................................... 1987 Gallipolis Locks and Dam, Ohio River............................... Grays Habor, WA .............................................................. Grays Landing Lock & Dam (Lock & Dam 7) Monongahela River, PA............................................... Jonesport Harbor, ME ........................................................ Helena Harbor, AR ............................................................ Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY ........................... Krebs Lake, MS (Sec 107).................................................. LaGrange Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL ............... Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI ....................................... Little Machi pongo River, VA ............................................ Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Little Rock, AR................ Lock and Dams 3, 5A, 6,7,8 and 9, MN, WI and IA.......... 1985 1990 1986 1987 1989 1986 1983 1986 1988 1989 1987 1989 1988 1990 1983 1988 1990 1987 Indefinite Protection of a National Natural Landmark 1988 Dredging 1992 Dredging, jetty construction, and recreation 1999 Replacement of existing locks and major rehabilitation of the dam 1995 Navigation channel widening and deepening 1995 Construct new lock & dam to replace existing lock & dam 7 1990 Breakwater, dredging of new channel and anchorage 1993 New Slackwater Harbor 1995 Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening 1984 Dredging, navigation channel 1990 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1988 Breakwater 1990 Dredge 8 foot channel 1988 Dredging, deepening, channel and turning basin 1999 Major rehabilitation of electrical/mechanical systems D-1 APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Lock and Dam 17, IL .................................................... 1989 Lock and Dam 18, IA......................................................... 1989 Lock and Dam 20, MO................................................. 1986 Lock and Dam 21, IL .................................................... 1987 Lock and Dam 22, MO ................................................. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR.. Melvin Price Lock and Dam, MO....................................... Michigan City Harbor, IN................................................... Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers IL and M O .................................................................. Mississippi River, Gulf Outlet, LA ..................................... Mississippi River, Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA........................................................ Montgomery Locks & Dams, Ohio River, PA.................... Moriches Inlet, NY ............................................................ Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal W aterway)...................................................................... Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI ............................................. New York Harbor, NY and NJ............................................ Newburgh Locks & Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY............. Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.)......................... Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1986 Mod) ......................... Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, VA.................... Oakland Harbor, CA .......................................................... Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA............................... Peoria Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL..................... Point Marion, Lock & Dam 8 Monongahela River, PA................................................... Port Everglades Harbor, FL ................................................ Port Hueneme, CA ............................................................. Portsmouth Harbor & Piscataqua River, ME and NH ........ 1987 1963 1974 1990 1910 1958 1987 1983 1987 1984 1985 1976 1965 1966 1987 1987 1987 1964 1986 1986 1979 1970 1989 1968 1990 1992 Major maintenance of lock and dam 1993 Major maintenance of lock and daml 1992 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1991 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1991 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1989 Locks and dams 1992 Replacement 1990 Dredging 2000 Regulating works 1984 Dredging and jetties 1987 2 Indefinite 3 Dredging 55-foot channel 1989 Major rehabilitation of locks & dams 1991 Dredging and jetty repair 1993 Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation 1987 1987 Breakwater repair Incremental Indefinite Collection and removal of drift 1969 1974 Replacement of locks and dams 46 and 47 1967 Indefinite Deferred anchorage const. 1989 Indefinite Dredge 50 ft. channel and deepen to 55 feet 198 Indefinite Dredge outbound element and deepen to 55 feet 1995 Channel deepening and widening turning basin 1984 Indefinite Replacement of six locks and dams, channel deepening to 9 feet and realignment 1990 Major Rehabilitation of lock and dam 1972 1993 Replaces existing 50'x360' lock chamber with new 84'x720' chamber 1987 Dredging 1987 Dredging 1992 Dredging (widening channel) D-2 APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA........ Richmond Harbor, CA....................................................... Rudee Inlet, VA.................................................................. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA.............. St. George, AK................................................................... St. Paul, AK........................................................................ San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA............................... San Francisco Bay to Stockton, VA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)< CA.............................. Savannah Harbor Widening, GA ........................................ Saxon Harbor, WI (Sec 111)............................................... Smithland Locks and Dam, IL, IN, and KY ....................... Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) .................................... Thimble Shoal Channel, VA ............................................... Tenn River, Decatur Morgan County Port, AL................... Tombigbee River, Columbus Port, MS (Sec 107) ............. Tongue Point, OR .............................................................. Wallisville Lake, TX.......................................................... Waukegan Harbor, IL........................................................ Winfield Lock and Kams, Kamiala Rover. WV ................. 1974 1985 1990 1986 1989 1989 1948 1971 1990 1989 1971 1976 1987 1988 1987 1989 1967 1990 1990 19844 Indefinite Lock and dam construction. Channel improvement and realignment 1995 Channel deepening and turning basin 1991 1991 Dredge 7 foot channel 1994 Deep draft channel, widening and deepending 1990 1990 Dredging breakwater 1990 1990 Construction Indefinite Dredging and breakwater 1998 Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging 1991 Widening channel 1990 1990 Shoreline Mitigation 1980 1987 Replacement of existing locks and dams 50 and 51 1987 Dredging 1989 Indefinite Dredge 50 ft. outbound element and dredge to 55 feet 1989 Channel excavation 1987 1989 Navigation channels & turning basin 1990 1990 Dredging Indefinite Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreational) 1991 Dredging 1996 Lock Replacement 1 Walter Jones and Joseph P. Knapp completed; Core Creek has been funded for initiation of construction; Hobucken has been funded for initiation of design; Fairfield has not been funded 2 Phase I, forty-five foot channel to New Orleans, LA. Forty-five foot channel to Mile 181 (Donaldsonville, LA) placed in useful operation in 1988. 3 Awaiting further LCA's to extend project to Baton Rouge, LA, and to go deeper than 45 feet. 4 Lock and Dam No. 1 placed in useful operationn in 1984. and Lock and Dam No. 2 in 1987. Construction is continuing on Lock and Dam No. 3, and has not been initiated on Lock & Dam Nos 4 and 5. D-3 APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 lood Control Total Nay. Featue Storaga Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimnate Canunity Capability inuseful Power Intallation hstallation Installation Project Height Length Pkoject River inViciny (acre-feet) 1 OperationCY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (fet) (fct) Albeni Falls, ID PoendO reille Allaton Lalk,GA Etowah Barkaley Dam & Cmberland Laske Barkelcy, KY KY & TN Beaver Lake, AR Whiae Big Bend Dam (Lake Sharpel), SD Missouri Blakely Mountain Ouachits Damlesv Onachit Bamvllle L&D Columbia Lake Baoneville, OR &WA Broken Bow Lake, Mountain Fork OK Buford Dam, Oaanshoooee Lmnar, GA Bull Shoals Lake Whit AR&MO aten e Camon Salt Dam Cartes Dam, GA Coasawate oenier Hill Lake, Caney Fork TN Qeatham LAD, TN Cmbedand OiefJonsephDam Columbia (Rufus Woods Lake),WA Cooper River, Sme Cheson Harbor. SC CwrdellH all L&D, Cumberand TN Congr Lake, OR S. Fork McKenzie Dale Hallow Lake, Obey TN & KY Dardmele L&D, Arkansas AR DaGmraLya ke, AR Caddo DanisonDen(Lake Red Texama), TX & OK Detroit Lake, OR, Noth Santiam including Big Cliff Lake, OR DworahakDam N. Pork, & Reservoir, Clearwater ID EBfaula Lake, OK Canadian Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) Lake Fot Peck Lake, Missouri MI Fart Randd Dam Missouri (Lake Irancis Case), SD Gaisomn Dam Misouri (Lake Sakakawea), ND Gavie Point Dam Missouri (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NB CareePn er Middle Setiam LakeOR, ncluding Fodr Lake, OR Groes Perry Lido Red LaWoAe,R Harry S. Truman Osage Dam& Res. Haitwell Lake, Savannah GA & SC Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fok OR Wilmette Ice Harbor LAD Snake ake Sacajawea), WA NewportWA 1,153,000 1952 CartervilleGA 670,000 1950 Frand Riversn, 2,082.000 1964 Eurtka Springs, 1,952,000 ClamberlainSD 1,883,000 Mt Pine, AR 2,768,000 1963 1964 1953 1955 1950 1966 1965 1965 1956 42,600 74,000 130,000 112,000 468,000 75,000 Bon ville,OR 537,000 1938 1938 1,145,700 Broken Bow, 1,368,230 OK Buford, GA 2,554,000 MountainHome 5,408,000 AR Pary, MO 1,428,000 Carters, GA 472,756 Lancaster,TN 2,092,000 Ashland City, TN 104,000 Bridgeport, WA 593,000 St. Stephen, SC 2,560,000 Carthage, TN Blue River, OR CelinTaN Dardatre, AR Arkadelphia, AR Denison, TX Mill City, OR 310,900 219,000 1,706,000 486,200 831,.900 5,312,300 1968 1956 1952 1983 1975 1948 1952 1955 1970 1957 1953 1985 1975 1951 1958 1956 42,600 NFPR C 90 1,055 74,000 FPRW C 190 1,250 130,000 NPFR CE 157 9,959 112,000 FPSR CE 228 2,575 468,000 FPRIW E 95 10,570 75,000 FPRW E 235 1,100 1,145,700 NPR 100,000 86,000 340,000 58,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 2,457,384 N/A 1985 84,000 1973 1963 1943 1969 1969 1944 1974 1964 1949 1965 1972 1945 100,000 25,000 54,000 124,000 68,000 70,000 461,000 1953 1954 118,000 Orofino, ID 3,453,000 1972 1973 400,000 Eufaula, OK 3,825,400 Pt. Gibson, OK 1,284,400 Glasglow, MT 18,909,000 Lake Andes, SD 5,574,000 Riverdale, ND 24,137,000 Yankton, SD 1964 1949 1938 1953 1964 1953 1944 1954 C 122 2,690 100,000 FPWSR E 225 2,750 86,000 NFPW E 192 5,400 340,000 FPR C 258 2,256 58,000 FNPRSW CE 138 1,700 500,000 FPRW ER 450 1,950 135,000 FPR CE 250 2,160 36,000 NPR C 75 801 2,457,384 PIR C 230 5,998 84,000 NIPW CE 86 876 100,000 NPR CE 93 1,306 64,600 NFPRI ER 445 1,738 54,000 FPR C 200 1,717 124,000 NPR C 68 2,683 108,000 FNPRS E 243 3,400 175,000 FPRSN E 165 17,200 118,000 NFPRI C 382 1,528 1,060,000 PNFR 90,000 45,000 185,250 320,000 1954 1956 430,000 504,000 1956 1957 100,000 Sweet Home, OR 491,000 Heber Spings Warsaw, MO Hartwell, GA Okridge, OR Pasco, WA 2,844,000 5,202,000 2,842,700 356,000 417,000 1967 1967 100,000 1962 1964 1982 1982(4) 1961 1962 1961 1962 1962 1962 96,000 160,000 344,000 30,000 603,000 C 717 3,300 90,000 FNPS CE 114 3,200 67,500 FP CE 110 2,990 185,250 NFPRIW E 251 21,026 320,000 NFPRIW E 165 10,700 430,000 NFPRIW E 210 11,300 100,000 NFPRIW E 74 8,700 100,000 PFNIR C 340 1,380 96,000 FPRS C 243 1,704 160,000 FPRW CE 96 5,000 344,000 NFPRS CE 204 17,852 30,000 NFPRI GE 304 2,150 603,000 NPRI CE 130 2,790 E-1 APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Flood Cntrol andcr Total Nay. Fature Storage Placed Initial Eisting Scheduled Ultinma Community Capability in useful Power Itallatltio l on Instllatokm Project Height Length Poject River in Vicinity (ace-fet)l Operation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functims Typc 2 (feet) (fact) J. lrcy Priest Stones Dam & Reservoir, TN J. Stram Thurmond Savannah Dam & Reservoir GA & SC Jim Woodruff Dam Appalachicd (Lake Seminle), FL, GA & AL John Day LD Columbia (Lake Umatilla), OR &WA John H. Kerr Roarnake Dam& Reservoir, NC &VA Keystone Lake, Arkansas OK Lake (Greeaon, AR Little Missouri Laurel River, KY Laurel Li'bbyDam, Lake Kootemai Koocanusa, MT Litle Goose L&D Snake (Lake Bryan). WA Lookout Pobint Middle Fork Lake including Willanett Dexter Lake, OR Lost Cek Lake, Rogue OR Lower Granit Snake L&D, WA Lower Snake Moanumrtal L&D(Labke Herbert G. West), WA McNary LAD Columbia (Lake Wallula) OR&WA Mila s Ferny Alabam LAD, AL Nanpi River Nanpil River Hydropower, PobhnpeFi,S M New Melons Stanislaus Lake. CA 6 Norfock Lake, AR North Fork &MO Oabe Den (ake Missouri Oaho), SD & ND Old Hickory LAD, Cumberland TN Omark-Jeta Arkansas Taylor LAD, AR Philpott Lake, VA Roanoke Richard G. Russell GA and SC Robert F. Henry Alabama L&D, AL Robert S. Kerr Arkansas LAD and Reservoir, OK SamRayburn Dam Angelim & Reservoir, TX St. Mary'sRiai ver, Geat Lakes MI Sam RaybumDam Angelin & Reservoir, T8 Snettislam, AK 7 Spedl StoctaLake, MO Sac Table Rock Whitt Lake, AR& MO Tenkiler Lake, finois OK Te Da s LAD Columbia (Lake Cello), WA& OR WalterF. G org Qasttahoocho LAD, GA & FL WebbersFalls Arkansas LAD, OK Nashville, TN 652,000 1967 1970 28,000 Augusta, GA 2,900,000 1952 1953 280,000 Osattahooche, FL 367,300 Rufus, OR 1957 1957 30,000 2,500,000 1968 1969 2,160,000 Boydtm, VA 2,750,300 1952 1953 204,000 Tulsa, OK Murfaeesboro,AR London, KY Libby, MT Starbuck, WA Lowell, OR Trail, OR PbmanroyW, A Kablotus, WA 1,737,600 407,900 435,600 5,809,000 565,000 483,000 465,000 484,000 376,000 1964 1968 1950 1950 1973 1978 1972 1975 1970 1970 1954 1955 1977 1977 1975 1975 1969 1969 70,000 25.500 61,000 525,000 810,000 135,000 49,000 810,000 810,000 Umatilla, OR 1,550,000 1953 1954 980,000 Camde AL PbhnpoeiF, SM 331.8090 1969 1979 1 1987 1988 75,000 2,000 Oakdale, CA 2,400,000 1978 1979 300,000 Norfolk, AR Pirne, SD Henderasonvile, TN OGark, AR Bassett, VA Angusta, GA BentoumA,L Sallisaw, OK Jasper, TX Sault Ste. Markie MI Jasper, TX Juncau, AK Stockton, MO BmraouMO Gore, OK The Dales, OR 1,983,000 23,337,000 545,000 148,400 318,500 1,026,244 234,200 522,700 3,997,600 3,997,000 352,400 1,674,000 3,462,000 1,230,800 53,000 Fort Gaines, GA 934,000 Wevbbers Falls, OK 170,100 1943 1944 1959 1962 1954 1957 1969 1973 1951 1954 1984 1984 1972 1975 1970 1971 1965 1966 1855 1952 1965 1966 1973 1969 1973 1958 1959 1952 1953 1957 1957 80,550 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 300,000 68,000 110,000 52,000 18,400 52,000 73,700 45,200 200,000 40,000 1,806,800 1963 1963 130,000 1970 1973 60,000 28,000 FPRW CE 147 2,716 280,000 NFPRSW CE 200 5,680 30,000 NPRW CE 67 6,150 2,700,000 NPRFI CEG 161 5,900 204,000 FPRW CE 144 22,285 70,000 FNPWS E 121 4,600 25.500 FPRW C 183.5 941 61,000 FPRW R 282 1,420 840,000 FPR C 420 3,055 810,000 NPRI CE 160 2,670 135,000 NFPRI CE 243 3,381 49,000 DFPISWR CE 345 3,600 810,000 NPRIF CE 146 3,200 810,000 NPRI CE 135 3,800 1,754,000 NPRI CE 183 7,300 75,000 NPRW CE 90 11,380 2,000 P C 17 70 300,000 FIPRW ER 625 1,560 163,000 FPRS C 216 2,624 595,000 NFPRIW E 245 9,300 100,000 NPR CE 98 3,605 100,000 NPR C 58 2,480 14,000 FPR C 220 892 600,000 NPR CE 195 4,524 68,000 NPRW CEG 101 14,962 110,000 NPR E 75 7,230 52,000 FPWR CE 120 19,430 18,400 NP CantrolGi ate 52,000 FPWR CE 120 19,430 73,700 P C 9 18 338 45,200 RW CE 128 5,100 200,000 FPR CE 252 6,423 40,000 FP E 197 3,000 1,806,800 NPR CR 300 8,875 130,000 NPRW CE 114 13,585 60,000 NP E 84 4,370 E-2 APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Flood otroal Total Nay. Fatumn Stora Plod hbi rExiting Scheduled Ultimae Camnmnity Capablky muamful Power Ialatm Installation Installation Project Height LIngth Poject River m Vickity (cot-ot) I Operation CY InFY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (fet) (feot) West Point Chtataooche West Point, GA 604,500 1975 1975 73,375 108,375 FPRW CE 97 7,250 Lale, AL & GA Whimny Lade, TIX Bras Whitney, TX 1,999,500 1953 1954 30,000 30,000 FPR CE 159 17,695 Wlf GeekDam Cumberland Jamtown, KY 6,089,000 1950 1952 270,000 270,000 FPR (E 258 5,736 Cumberland), KY 1 Total of all a t ~era fugn ction, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool level 2 gravel; R: rock; C: concrea; B earth 4 All ni are synchroniazd-to-lia and two units have pasd the pumnpbactke st. However, due to damaging effects to fish, no further pumping wll be done for their inting or aperation until a solutimn to the problem is found. 6 feing operated for the Departaent of Interior by the Baean of Redamatio Beog operatei by the Alaka Power Adninistartion Weir for Lang Lake 9FPormerClyl arks Hill La Nonoalatue for Project Punctions D-Debris Comtrl P--Power P--Plood Conmtrl R-Public Recaeatin Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000 I-Irrigation S-Water Supply N-Navigation W-Fsh and Wildlife (Federal or State) E-3 APPENDIX F MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SEPTEMBER 30, 1990 Nameplate Capacity Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Year for for Scheduled Ultimate Project Started Operation Completion Functions Installation Installation Bonneville Second Powerhouse, OR and WA .............................. 1974 1981 1996 PR 558,200 558,200 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO...................................... 1966 1985 1990 FNPRSW 58,000 58,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO .................................... ..................... 1965 19821 19931 FRPW 160,000 160,000 New Melones Lake, CA2 ............................. ... .. ... .. ... .. ... .. .. . . .. 1966 1979 Indefinite DFIPRW 300,000 300,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC................................... ......................... 1975 1985 1991 FRP 600,000 600,000 Cooper River, Charleston Hbr, SC........................................... 1977 1985 1986 NWDP 84,000 84,000 Snettisham, AK................................................................... 1967 1989 1989 P 73,700 27,000 KEY D - F - I - N - P - R - S - W - Redevelopment Flood Control Irrigation Navigation Power Recreation Water Supply Fish and Wildlife 1 All units are synchronized-to-line and two units have passed the pumpback test. However, due to damaging effects to fish, no further pumping will be done for either testing or operation until a solution to the problem is found. 2 New Melones Lake was turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation on November 20, 1979. Corps retains responsibility for facilities along the lower Stanisalaus River. Remaining construction consists of recreation facilities and minor feature closeouts. 1 F-1 POTENTIAL FLOOD DAMAGES IN THE UNITED STATES 40 33. 27. 8.8 5.8 2.2 2 20. I I I .8 .3 I 10-Year 19. Avg. - 12.8 QI lliwam ml ml mI mI I m mIUm I WI ml I I Im 9.4 6.7 S2.6j, i W 1 - 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 Fiscal Year Flood damages suffered O Flood damages prevented Potential flood damages in the United States since Fiscal Year 1980. The potential damages for each years is the sum of the damages suffered and the damages prevented. The Ten (fiscal) year 1980-89) average is shown for comparison. U) L_ aos -0 0 C0 co U) N 0) E tOd 0 *0 0o 0 30 - 20 10 0 __t13.. L: G I """ir ""z Sui4 I 2 "I - "I '"' FISCAL YEAR 1990 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BY REGION FY 1980 FY 1981 FY 1982 FY 1983 FY 1984 FY 1985 FY 1986 FY 1987 FY 1988 FY 1989 10-Year FY 1990 Percent Average of the 1980-89 10-Year Average Region New England Mid-Atlantic Gulf & S. Atlantic Ohio Tennessee Great Lakes Upper Mississippi Souris-Red-Rainy Missouri Arkansas-Red-White Lower Mississippi Rio Grande Texas and Gulf Colorado Great Basin California Columbia N. Pacific Alaska Hawaii 75,911 16,740 28,086 289,655 0 9,594 0 0 2,243 108,025 4,087,675 46,260 14,910 117,761 0 1,981,428 514,257 2,117 4,254 53,661 239,970 9,496 839,029 625 665 463,321 0 250 168,293 63,094 24,171 10,419 25,703 2,486,292 18,823 357,665 30,340 26,450 24,802 302,140 16,607 2,499 24,398 49,384 27,756 21,301 41,774 219,938 11,438 30,014 45,659 57,057 231,431 188,802 207,363 556,603 268,796 633,658 172,866 63,538 285,510 289,822 248,699 0 0 0 0 45 570 4,376 0 16,176 2,117 3,082 9,842 27,836 5,856 24,593 30,107 28,071 51,245 9,587 24,982 22,207 16,849 11,622 96,150 251,594 66,209 57,941 113,777 430,592 1,576 6,761 103,622 516,506 0 0 2,700 1,314 1,721 18,966 52,015 411 68,814 14,594 7,156 89,862 370,993 435,296 1,077,828 32,555 860,513 1,504,538 2,669 176,066 455,256 250,873 11,617 55,960 161,010 88,788 168,558 174,737 996,615 161,923 186,727 211,396 456,041 3,067 552,850 20,386,036 10,294,428 9,820,704 9,336,140 666,758 1,453,371 5,970,206 6,257,124 10,820,837 889 2,526 29,918 98,419 127,698 87,139 113,621 21,528 2,755 53,075 42,531 83,436 441,874 17,537 8,513 28,840 208,168 190,914 6,026 535,689 153,591 4,105,103 0 0 13,000 90,630 14,300 0 0 0 0 23,569 0 0 800 15,015 18,600 2,200 16,300 0 0 500 6,062 500 680 307,013 1,075,869 102,360 72,800 13,910,920 154,858 98 4,770 1,761,080 9,500 633,016 1,939,909 547,510 979,308 94,350 1,521,659 125,995 296,159 918,874 757,104 962,433 4,473 4,741 4,885 5,055 6,846 6,828 17,000 0 8,000 5,994 0 220 800 624 0 0 220 220 8,540 82 1,496 1,085 7,298,916 1,160,486 4,272,241 23,238,796 16,766,085 10,768,210 27,317,770 5,195,212 2,063,314 8,260,978 10,634,201 17,577,953 t) 37 5 125 86 146 76 498 49 55 216 173 80 2,673 0 8 1 127 0 73 Total Flood damages preventsd (in thousands of dollars), by state, by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers during Fiscal Year 1990. Damage Damages Prevented Total Flood Damage Damage. Prevented Total Flood Prevented by by CorpSupported Damages Prevented Prevented by by Corps-upported Damage Prvented Corpe-Controlled Emergency by the Corporppe-Controllc n Energency by the Corp Projects Operation of Engineer. Projects Operation. of Englneer _sem osb * * 6 * N.**S **. * * NempshNi 0 0 0 Adam . * O NewJ Msy 4,061 4o1 O o @or.n. .411 63,56 N .w Me.Io 5at *, 4,t _oor. **a o 6 INeWoeCa1Is7, 13 * 1ass co or* ih Nori dnn 4n 4in Famine a65 125 Oudsmes 22,12 * 224a3 ca t ao. ,rt aso .. o. wem. * 0 . .* Hmwd -n tei O 1,0s PnnSbyuni 16,424 1,44 mM s 5,07 Rho oislnd 2,14 * 2,04 Mmn 473 n 314 455,667 Sdi Cainwe S a ____ , $,56 oa5 7,563 Suds bo 41 e o__ 12,157 6 a126,74 Tmee 7, s. *. 7,s Kans 7s - 7,1 Tee 4 * t,122,60s6, Ku2,ay 25,66 Ut2h g1 a 5O Liul*.,* e.,1,m . 12,4r . o,23,26 V.met 1.7,4 1,674 Mae O O Vglel 1,6135 16,OS Mu'ym wa.k 2 47 n2,s DIM O nbl Wet Vkgl 7,40 e 74 .____3__,4,4656 6 3,4156' w i 'oo2,663 6 " " MIVdUS 1,415 o 1,4o5. w, Noo Welselppi .15. S2,766 at V 14I Meansl 2u0 * 245,1 Mnnma0 7314 7,304 TOTAL 17,t521,62 5,121 1r,str,6s Naraska 1107 11, 01r Major Floods during Fiscal Year 1990 and their effects (damages in millions of dollars). Lives Damages Month Location Lost Suffered milions of dollars) October 1989 Southeastern U.S. 7 8 Januay 1990 Pacific Northwest 3 60 January 1990 Lous Misiuisppi 0 100 February 1990 Deep South/Sothest g 40 March 1990 Deep South/Southet 23 115 Apri 1990 TexauOklahoema 6 105 May 1990 SouthCentral U.S. 7 _00 May 1990 Midwest 115 June 1990 Shalyside, Ohio Midwest/Middle June 1990 Mississippi Valley/ 330 Great Lakes July 1990 Mid-Atlantic 7 25 SUBTOTALS 103 1,506 TOTALS (All floods in U.S.) 125 1,600 Other major weather events during Fiscal Year 1990 and their effects (damages in millions of dollars) Total Damages Events Number Lives Suffered Lost (millions of dollars Tropical Cyclones 12 5 70 Tornadoes 1,122 84 731 Drought 1 o o Blizzards/ Winter Storms 18 47 121 TOTALS 1,153 136 922 G-4 FISCAL YEAR 1990 DISTRIBUTION BY DISTRICT FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) Vicksburg Memphis New Orleans St. Louis Kansas City Omaha Baltimore New York Norfolk Philadelphia Buffalo Chicago Detroit Rock Island St. Paul New England Alaska Portland Seattle Walla Walla Huntington Louisville Nashville Pittsburgh Pacific Ocean Charleston Jacksonville Mobile Savannah Wilmington Sacramento Los Angeles San Francisco Albuquerque Fort Worth Galveston Little Rock Tulsa TOTAL Corps Controlled Projects 1,527,338 248,207 8,936,580 57,940 187,428 62,931 145 8,797 7,665 0 13,444 300 3,405 514,903 8,184 63,094 0 756,309 200,442 5,282 121,953 96,960 3,082 29,786 1,085 59 256 36,280 1,880 18,582 500 9,500 0 42,531 4,073,091 32,012 185,895 265,986 17,521,832 Supported Emergency Operations 50,508 00 264 0 514 0 0 000 200 0 75 0000 400 000000000000000 4,160 000 56,121 Corps of Engineers 1,577,846 248,207 8,936,590 58,204 187,428 63,445 145 8,797 7,665 0 13,444 500 3,405 514,978 8,184 63,094 0 756,309 200,842 5,282 121,953 96,960 3,082 29,786 1,085 59 256 36,280 1,880 18,582 500 9,500 0 42,531 4,073,091 32,012 190,055 265,986 17,577,953 G-5 FISCAL YEAR 1990 DISTRIBUTION BY DIVISION FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) Corps Controlled Projects 10,770 250,359 16,607 540,236 63,094 962,033 251,781 1,085 57,057 10,000 4,599,515 17,521,832 Supported Emergency Operations 50,772 514 0 275 0 400 0 0 0 0 4,160 56,121 Corps of Engineers 10,820,837 250,873 16,607 540,511 63,094 962,433 251,781 1,085 57,057 10,000 4,603,675 17,577,953 G-6 District LMVD MRD NAD NCD NED NPD ORD POD SAD SPD SWD TOTAL Flood damages suffered (in thousands of dollars) by state, during Fiscal Year 1990. Location LIsN Lost rrop.ry Damage 1 '1 - -l"----" Agricutunlr Lo*o Alrlk_ 16 10,000 . Araene 4 3,200 20 Adimm 1 2,056 117,000 Dmbn... 3 570 N namomol 010 * C __od 0 107 6 l, 4 17,04054,005 .rr 1 28550 80,000 Kanm 0 1,770 276 Daskr 0 * Gelortd .Ioo 0e 11 316 25 ,k O 1o o Mafel 0 50 a oulnen 4 s2 12 tdene. 1 1.02 1, 50 Me l 5..rl 1, 32 510 0smSN * *30 1 132 I 1l620 Location Livs Lost Property Damage Agricultural Loosses Nvad 2 51 " New Hmpshirs 0 1,200 - Now J .rey 0 1 - Now Mt.eico 2 1,17o New York 0 ,.4s52 7 Nor Carolna 4 1,075 Noteh Dakota 0 * Ohio 32 36,401 1,445 Oldahonm 1 20,s0O 20,000 Oregon 0 55 515 Penney1vara 0 72 Ahode Island 0 50 Sout CarolIne 4 627 50 outh Dakota 0 * ao00 Teinnas 3 18,06 " Tesas 13 35,036 26,650 utah 1 as Veritu 0 15,575 82 Virgi niai sln i Wnd Vlgkles 0 31,627 TOTAL' 12 1,12,375 412,232 TOTAL LOS SE (PROPERTY AND A GRICULTURAL) 1. BILIUON _ _._ I I I I I I .. Nbaska MONTHLY FLOOD LOSSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990 800 12 151 JAN FEB JAN FEB 113 23 411 15 I 37 11 50 a MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP Month Monthly flood losses (damages and deaths) for Fiscal Year 1990. Damages D Deaths 800 - Cu) 001 E O 0 00-: 400 200 0 4.) 10 OOCCTT NNOOVV DDEECC DROUGHT SEVERITY Start of Fiscal Year 1990 EEXTR DiE MODERATE~/sVERE I NO DROUGHT End of Fiscal Year 1990 ~D EXTREME MODERATE/SEVERE I NO DROUGHT Data ftn NWS, Climate Analysis Center. Drought severity (from Palmer Long-term Index) at the start of Fiscal Year 1990 (top) and at the end of Fiscal Year 1990 (bottom) G-9 h ATLANTIC TROPICAL CYCLONES 1980-1990 FISCAL YEARS - " m""m "" _m"-"m"m - -8 - - - m 12 11 11 8 - I///', - fKIII - - _i 11-1-r-1l- 111.R- -11i 1, J--#- i' - 11 - i I,1 I1I - 11 - 1- - I " "m !) 12 a3) CO v 10 o% 0 Oi 8 0 .. 6 )- 6 z - I 6 3 " 6 10-Year (1980-1989) Tropical Storm Average = 9.1 10-Year (1980-1989) Hurricane Average = 5.1 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 Fiscal Year [ (Nwoin. dosf torof gpirceaal tceyrc tlhoanne s35 mph) No. of hurricanes (tropical cylones with winds greater than 74 mph.) Atlantic tropical cyclones in the Atlantic Ocean Basin since Fiscal Year 1980. The ten (fiscal) year 1980-89) average is shown for comparison. 14 5 0 C Ii v-0L .ED Z 41- 2 0 A 6 -- '_/1iI" vIi,"v//"""/1 lliii i lii . . -- - " " " 2 1 / / /, i i 1 H 1 11 -- 1 i 1 Atlantic Ocean Basin tropical cyclones and their effects during Fical Year 1990 (damages in millions of dollars). Name Month and Year Location U.S. Deaths U.S. Damage 1. Hurricane Jerry Oct. 1989 Gulf of Mexico 3 $70 million Texas/Louislana 2. Tropical Storm Karen NovJDec. 1989 W. Caribbean 0 Cuba Atlantic 3. Tropical Storm Arthur Jul. 1990 E. Caribbean 0 4. Hurricane Bertha Jul.Aug. 1990 W. Atlantic 2' 5. Tropical Storm Cesar JulJAug. 1990 Atlantic 0 6. Hurricane Diana Aug. 1990 Mexico 02 7. Tropical Storm Edouard Aug. 1990 Atlantic/Azores 0 8. Tropical Storm Fran Aug. 1990 Atlantic/E. Caribbean 0 9. Hurricane Gustav AugJ.Sep.1990 Atlantic 0 10. Tropical Storm Hortense Aug. 1990 Atlantic 0 _ 11. Hurricane Isldore Sep. 1990 Atlantic 0 12. Hurricane Josephine SepJOct. 1990 Atlantic 0 1. Both deaths were caused by drowning on north Florida beaches. Strong waves generated by Bertha caused unusually strong rip currents, resulting in the drownings. Some 200 others were rescued. Seven others (not US. citizens) perished in two separate maritime accidents caused by Bertha in the Atlantic Ocean. 2. An estimated 96 persons (unofficial) died in Mexico, as torrential rains produced flooding and mudslides. 3. Though no dollar estimate is available, damage from flooding and mudslides was extensive to property, agdriculture and roads. A AIWW, Jacksonville to Miami, FL (SAJ), 9-54 AIWW, Norfolk to St. Johns River, FL (SAJ), 9-54 AIWW-Mooring Basins (SAW), 6-29 ATWW-New River Onslow County, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 AIWW-Peltier Creek (SAW), 6-29 AIWW-Tidal Lock in Snows Cut (SAW), 6-29 AR River Basin, AR, OK, and KS (SWL), 28-1, 28-2, 28-13 Aben, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Aberdeen Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Aberdeen, MS (SAM), 10-58 Aberdeen, OH (ORH), 17-23 Abilene, KS (MRK), 27-17 Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK), 27-20 Abiquiu Dam, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-5, 32-12 Above Lee Towhead, TN (MR+T), 42-49, 42-52 Above Loosahatchie, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Above Old River, LA (MR+T), 42-38 Above Williams, KY (MR+T), 42-52 Absecon Inlet, NJ (NAP), 3-1, 3-2, 3-15, 3-19, 3-24 Accotink Creek, VA (NAB), 4-36 Acequias Irrigation System, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-11, 32-13 Active General Investigations Charleston, S.C., District (SAN), 7-1, 7-7, 7-16 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK), 27-1, 27-21 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM), 13-1, 13-8 New Orleans District (LMN), 11-1, 11-21 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO), 26-1, 26-21, 26-22 St.Louis, Mo., District (LMS), 14-1, 14-16 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK), 12-1, 12-22 Adams Creek, SC (SAN), 7-14 Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Adams, Hossie River Basin, MA (NAN), 2-32 Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-11 Addison, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-14 Adena, OH (Short Creek) (ORP), 18-23 Adkin Branch, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Advance Engineering and Design Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA), 32-1, 32-11 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB), 20-1, 20-13 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN), 7-16 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC), 22-1, 22-9 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL), 16-1, 16-12 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM), 10-2, 10-33 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR), 23-1, 23-6, 23-8 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS), 24-1, 24-19 Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD), 36-11 Agana Bayfront, Guam (POD), 36-15 Agana River, Guam (POD), 36-12 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD), 36-10 Agat Harbor, Guam (POD), 36-10 Agat Shoreline, Guam (POD), 36-14 Airport, Glendale, WV (ORP), 18-29 Aitkin, MN (NCS), 24-31 Ajax Bar, MS (MR+T), 42-44 Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Alabama Bayou, LA (MR+T), 42-27 Alabama River at Montgomery, AL (SAM), 10-52 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-25, 10-39, 10-54 Alameda Creek, CA (SPK), 35-36 Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ (SPL), 33-1, 33-05, 33-15, 33-32 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico (SWA), 32-16 Albeni Falls Dam, ID (NPS), 38-1, 38-10, 38-16, 38-21 Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-2, 32-11 Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-1, 36-4, 36-6, 36-8 Alesa River, OR (NPP), 37-37 Alexandria, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Alford, Green River, MA (NED), 1-45, 1-54 Algiers Point, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Algoma Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-77 Alhambra Creek, CA (SPK), 35-38 Allatoona Dam Coosa River Basin, GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-28, 10-39 Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, GA (SAM), 10-50 Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP), 18-23 Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP), 18-23 Allegheny River Statistics (ORP), 18-1, 18-24 Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (ORP), 18-29 Allegheny River, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-2, 18-12, 18-15 Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work (ORP), 18-20 Allendale, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Allentown, Lehigh River, PA (NAP), 3-26 Allenville, AZ (SPL), 33-39 Alley Bay, Beals, ME (NED), 1-45 Alliance, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Alloway Creek, NJ (NAP), 3-24, 3-25 Alma Harbor, WI (NCD), 25-7 Almond Lake, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-14 Almond Village, NY (NAB), 4-39 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA (LMN), 11-19 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA (LMK), 12-19, 12-20 Alpena Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-77 Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL (NCR), 23-15 Alpine, Texas (SWA), 32-16 I-1 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, GA (SAS), 8-1, 8-10, 8-12 Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN), 11-17 Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED), 1-48 Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL and MO (LMS), 14-1, 14-3, 14-7, 14-9 Alton, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Alum Creek Lake, OH (ORH), 17-1, 17-2, 17-13, 17-18 Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA (NAB), 4-2, 4-20, 4-29 Amazon Creek, OR (NPP), 37-39 American Cutoff, MS-AR (MR+T), 42-42 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA (NPS), 38-24 American River, CA (SPK), 35-36 Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA (NCR), 23-14 Amesbury, Powwow and Merrimack Rivers, MA (NED), 1-45, 1-55 Amite River and Tributaries, LA (LMN), 11-17, 11-19 Amite River, LA (MR+T), 42-17, 42-26, 42-27 Amory, MS (SAM), 10-58 Amouli-Tula, American Samoa (POD), 36-15 Amsterdam, OH (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Anacortes Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-23 Anacostia River Basin, MD (NAB), 4-41 Anacostia River and Flats (NAB), 4-36 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD (NAB), 4-38 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD (NAB), 4-38 Anacostia River, VA (NAB), 4-42 Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange County, CA (SPL), 33-38 Anahuac Channel, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-9 Anchor Point, AK (NPA), 40-12 Anchorage Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-6, 40-8, 40-11 Anchorages (NAO), 5-18 Anclote River, FL (SAJ), 9-54, 9-55 Andalusia Harbor, IL (NCD), 25-7 Anderson Park, Newport News, VA (NAO), 5-22 Anderson, IN (White River) (ORL), 16-23 Andover Lake, CT (NED), 1-48 Andover, Dyke Creek, NY (NCB), 20-33 Andrews River, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-3, 1-26, 1-35, 1-57 Angelina, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO (LMS), 14-13 Annapolis Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-3, 4-24, 4-30 Anniston, AL (SAM), 10-58 Anoka, MN (NCS), 24-32 Ansonia-Derby, CT (NED), 1-54 Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE (MRO), 26-21 Anthony Shoals, GA (SAS), 8-17 Apalachee Bay, FL, To New Orleans, LA (SAM), 10-44 Apalachicola Bay, FL (SAM), 1041 Apalachicola River To St. Andrew Bay, FL (SAM), 10-44 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL and GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-28, 10-39, 10-50, 10-55 Apalachiocola Bay, FL (SAM), 10-1, 10-35 Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK (NPA), 40-10 Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-11, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Appomattox River, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-2, 5-11, 5-16, 5-21, 5-23 Apponaug Cove, RI (NED), 1-40 Appoquinimink River, DE (NAP), 3-24, 3-27 Apra Harbor, Guam (POD), 36-14 Aquashicola Reservoir, PA (NAP), 3-27 Aquatic Plant Control Charleston, S.C., District (SAN), 7-1, 7-8, 7-10, 7-14 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG), 31-2, 31-19, 31-23, 31-37 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ), 9-1, 9-2, 9-29, 9-37, 9-55 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM), 10-1, 10-3, 10-35, 1041 New Orleans District (LMN), 11-17 New England Division (NED), 1-1, 1-3, 1-26, 1-35 New York District (NAN), 2-1, 2-3, 2-19, 2-23 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP), 3-25 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK), 35-36 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS), 8-1, 8-2, 8-10, 8-16 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW), 6-1, 6-2, 6-19, 6-26 Aquia Creek, VA (NAB), 4-36 Aquilla Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Ararat River, Mount Airy, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Arboth, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Arcadia Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-2, 21-42, 21-58 Arcadia Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-2, 29-11, 29-16 Arcadia Point, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Arch Creek, Dad County, FL (SAJ), 9-62 Archers Creek, SC (SAN), 7-14 Archusa Creek (SAM), 10-58 Ardsley, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-16, 2-22, 2-27 Area East of Albany, OR (NPP), 37-41 Arecibo Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-2, 9-29, 9-37 Arecibo Harbor, PR (SAJ), 9-54 Arkansas City, KS (SWT), 29-22 Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-42 Arkansas River Basin Multiple-Purpose Plan (SWT), 29-2, 29-20 Arkansas River Basin, AR and OK (SWT), 29-22 Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS (SWL), 28-1, 28-17, 28-20, 28-23, 28-24, 28-24, 28-25, 28-26 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX (SWT), 29-1, 29-2, 29-11, 29-16 Arkport Dam, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-14 Arlington Lake, MO (MRK), 27-18 Arlington, Alkali Canyon,OR (NPP), 37-39 Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF), 30-23 Arlington, LA (MR+T), 42-37 I-2 Armstrong, AR-TN (MR+T), 42-51 Armuchee Creek, GA (SAM), 10-52 Arrow Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Arrow Creek, Hwy 50 Chouteau County (MRO), 26-23 Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-14, 31-37 Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No.9), AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-2, 28-13 Asan Village, Guam (POD), 36-12 Ashbrook Cutoff, MS (MR+T), 42-44 Ashbrook Island, MS (MR+T), 42-42 Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS (MR+T), 42-44 Ashland Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-2, 21-42, 21-58 Ashland, KY (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Ashland, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-41 Ashley Creek near Vernal, UT (SPK), 35-42 Ashley River, SC (SAN), 7-14 Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR (MR+T), 42-51 Ashport-Keyes Point, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Ashtabula Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-2, 20-14, 20-19 Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID (NPW), 39-16 Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID and WA (NPW), 39-17 Aspinwall, PA (ORP), 18-24 Asquiroga Bay, Guam (POD), 36-11 Astoria Turning Basin, OR (NPP), 37-37 Atchafalaya Basin, LA (MR+T), 42-1, 42-5, 42-15, 42-26, 42-34, 42-70 Atchafalaya River, LA (LMN), 11-17 Atchison County Levee District No. 1 (MRO), 26-18 Atchison, KS (MRK), 27-17 Athalia, OH (ORH), 17-23 Athens, OH (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Atka, AK (NPA), 40-12 Atlantic Beach Channels, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-3, 6-19 Atlantic City, NJ (NAP), 3-26 Atlantic Coast of Maryland (NAB), 4-1, 4-12, 4-26, 4-34 Atlantic Coast of NJ, Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet (NAN), 2-32 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (NAO), 5-1, 5-2, 5-11, 5-16, 5-20, 5-23 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-2, 9-29, 9-37 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (SAN), 7-1, 7-2, 7-8, 7-10 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (SAW), 6-1, 6-3, 6-19, 6-23 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (SAS), 8-1, 8-3, 8-10, 8-12 Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-5, 5-13, 5-17, 5-23 Au Sable Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-3, 21-42, 21-58 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa (POD), 36-10 Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet (NCB), 20-31 Augusta LPP, KS (SWT), 29-19 Augusta to Clarendon, AR (MR+T), 42-72 Augusta, KY (ORH), 17-22 Augusta, Savannah River, GA (SAS), 8-17 Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA (NED), 1-50 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (POD), 36-10 Aurora, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam, CO (MRO), 26-18 Avalon (SPL), 33-37 Avoca, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-15 Avoca, WI (NCS), 24-32 Avon Harbor, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Avondale Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA (NAB), 4-1, 4-13, 4-26 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-11, 6-21 Bachelor Island, WA (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 Back Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36 Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, SD (MRO), 26-18 Bagaduce River, ME (NED), 1-40, 1-45, 1-48 Bailey Creek, Indianapolis, IN (ORL), 16-33 Bainbridge, NY (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Baker Brook, MA (NED), 1-48 Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-3, 9-29, 9-37, 9-54 Baldwin Creek, Fremont County Bridge, WY (MRO), 26-23 Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-42 Ball Mountain Lake, VT (NED), 1-1, 1-12, 1-29, 1-52 Balshed Ldg., MS (MR+T), 42-44 Baltimore Harbor and Channels (NAO), 5-1, 5-2, 5-11, 5-16 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA (NAB), 4-1, 4-3, 4-24, 4-30, 4-39 Baltimore Harbor, MD Collection and Removal of Draft (NAB), 4-1, 4-4, 4-24, 4-31 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR (NPP), 37-37 Bank Revetments and Dikes: Memphis District (Fiscal Year 1990) (MR+T), 42-1, 42-47 Bank Revetments and Dikes: New Orleans District (Fiscal Year 1990) (MR+T), 42-1, 42-36 Bank Revetments and Dikes: Vicksburg District (Fiscal Year 1990) (MR+T), 42-1, 42-41 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-3, 28-13 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification (SWT), I-3 29-20 Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-15 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL (NCR), 23-12 Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA (MR+T), 42-12 Bar Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40, 1-48, 1-50 Bar Point Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Barataria Bay Waterway, LA (LMN), 11-17 Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-1, 36-2, 36-6, 36-8 Barberton, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Barbourville, KY (ORN), 15-13, 15-19 Barcelona Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-29 Bardwell Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Barfield, AR (MR+T), 42-48 Barge Line Terminal, MS (MR+T), 42-41 Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, KY and TN (ORN), 15-14 Barnard, KS (MRK), 27-17 Barnegat Inlet, NJ (NAP), 3-1, 3-2, 3-15, 3-19 Barnegat Light, NJ (NAP), 3-26 Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River) (ORL), 16-26 Barre Falls Dam, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-12, 1-29, 1-52 Barren River Lake, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-4, 16-13, 16-29 Bartley, Republican River, NE (MRK), 27-17, 27-20 Basket Bar, AR (MR+T), 42-50 Bass Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40, 1-50 Bassett Creek, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-3, 24-20 Bastrop Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-37 Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, NY (NCB), 20-31 Bath, NY (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA (MR+T), 42-1, 42-6, 42-25, 42-26 Baton Rouge Harbor, LA (MR+T), 42-12, 42-70 Baton Rouge Harbor, Segment between Mi 2.5 and 5.0 (LMN), 11-17 Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek, NE (MRO), 26-20 Baudette Harbor, MN (NCS), 24-25 Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR (MR+T), 42-48 Bay City Harbor, WI (NCD), 25-7 Bay Port Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-58 Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Bay River, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Bay View Beach, Milford, CT (NED), 1-51 Bayard, WV (NAB), 4-38, 4-42 Bayfield Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-77 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK), 12-1, 12-3, 12-9, 12-11, 12-15, 12-17 Bayou Big Graw, LA (MR+T), 42-40 Bayou Bodcau Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA (LMN), 11-19 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK), 12-1, 12-4, 12-9, 12-11, 12-18, 12-19, 12-20 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA (LMK), 12-19, 12-20 Bayou Boniface, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Choupique, LA (LMN), 11-19 Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries, LA (MR+T), 42-1, 42-6, 42-16, 42-29, 42-34 Bayou Coden, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-3, 10-35, 10-41 Bayou Cumbest, Jackson Co., MS (SAM), 10-53 Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN (MR+T), 42-28 Bayou Dupre, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Grosse Tete, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou La Batre, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-4, 10-35, 10-41, 10-54 Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Lacombe, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Lamoque, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, LA (LMN), 11-19 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, LA (LMK), 12-18 Bayou Pierre in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMK), 12-18, 12-19, 12-20 Bayou Pierre in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMN), 11-19 Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Rapides, LA (LMN), 11-19 Bayou Rigolette, LA (LMN), 11-15 Bayou Sara, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Sherman, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Bayou Teche and Vermilion River, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Terrebonne, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou Vermilion, LA (LMN), 11-17 Bayou des Glaises Diversion Channel, LA (MR+T), 42-25, 42-33 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA (LMK), 12-15 Bayous Rapides, Beouf, and Cocodrie, LA (MR+T), 42-24 Bayport Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-3, 21-42 Bayport, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Baytown, Texas (SWG), 31-37 Beals Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40 Bear Creek Lake, CO (MRO), 26-1, 26-2, 26-9, 26-12 Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Bear Creek, Flathead County Bridge, near Essex, MT (NPS), 38-24 I-4 Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID (NPW), 39-16 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP), 37-39, 37-41 Bear River, CA (SPK), 35-38 Beards Brook Reservoir, NH (NED), 1-48 Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE (MRK), 27-18 Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-5, 6-19, 6-24 Beaver Brook Lake, NH (NED), 1-48 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH (NED), 1-45, 1-51, 1-53 Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR (NPP), 37-39 Beaver Creek, Brush, CO (MRO), 26-22 Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA (SAM), 10-52 Beaver Dam Creek, Damascus, VA (ORN), 15-19 Beaver Drainage District, OR (NPP), 37-39, 37-44 Beaver Lake, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-9, 28-15 Beaver Lake, Stearns County, MN (NCS), 24-32 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, PA and OH (ORP), 18-20 Beckwith Bend, MO (MR+T), 42-49 Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA (MRK), 27-17 Beebe Lake, Frankfort, MN (NCS), 24-32 Beech Fork Lake, OH (ORH), 17-18 Beech Fork Lake, WV (ORH), 17-1, 17-3, 17-13, 17-18 Belair, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Belfast Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40, 1-50 Belford, NJ (NAN), 2-35 Belhaven Harbor, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Bellaire, OH (ORP), 18-23 Bellamy River, NH (NED), 1-40 Belle Fountain Ditch and Tributaries, MO and Drainage District No. 17, AR (MR+T), 42-27 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River, SD (MRO), 26-18 Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD (MRO), 26-15 Belle Glade, FL (SAJ), 9-56 Belle Island, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-41 Belle River Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-77 Bellevue, KY (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees (MRO), 26-18 Bellingham Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-13, 38-18, 38-23 Bells Point, MO (MR+T), 42-49 Bellville Point, GA (SAS), 8-16 Belmont, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Belmont, MO (MR+T), 42-50 Below Cherokee, TN (MR+T), 42-52 Below Grand Gulf, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Below Island 9, TN (MR+T), 42-52 Below Knowlton, AR (MR+T), 42-50 Below Ludlow, AR (MR+T), 42-50 Below Prentiss, MS (MR+T), 42-44 Below Racetrack, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Below Richardson Landing, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Below Tamm Bend, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Below Toney's Towhead, TN (MR+T), 42-49 Below Walnut Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-50 Belpre, OH (ORH), 17-23 Beltline Road, Cottonwood Creek, TX (SWF), 30-23 Belton Lake Modification, TX (SWF), 30-22 Belton Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Beltzville Lake, PA (NAP), 3-1, 3-10, 3-17, 3-22 Ben Lomond, MS (MR+T), 42-42, 42-44 Benbrook Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Bend of Island 14, TN (MR+T), 42-49 Bend of Island 25, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Bend of Island 8, MO (MR+T), 42-49 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO), 26-20 Bennington Reservoir, NH (NED), 1-48 Bennington, VT (NAN), 2-34 Benwood, WV (ORP), 18-21 Berkeley Harbor, CA (SPN), 34-11 Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP), 18-1, 18-5, 18-12, 18-16, 18-27 Berrien County, MI (NCE), 21-73 Bertrand, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Berwick, LA (MR+T), 42-24 Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK (NPA), 40-9 Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River (NPA), 40-11 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA (NAP), 3-26 Bettendorf, IA (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Betterton Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-39 Beverly Harbor, MA (NED), 1-40 Beverly Hills, McLennan Cnty, TX (SWF), 30-23 Biddeford Pool, ME (NED), 1-57 Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH (NCB), 20-29 Big Bay Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-77 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD (MRO), 26-1, 26-6, 26-11, 26-14 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD (MRO), 26-18 Big Bend, WV (ORH), 17-24 Big Black River, MS (LMK), 12-15 Big Blue Lake, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-30 Big Blue River, Blue Springs, NE, Sewerline and Road (MRK), 27-22 Big Blue River, Seward, NE (MRK), 27-17 Big Brown Creek, Prentiss Co, MS (SAM), 10-52 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA (LMK), 12-20 Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN (LMM), 13-6 Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR (LMM), 13-6 Big Creek and Tributaries, AR (MR+T), 42-67 Big Cry Creek Dam and diversion, CA (SPK), 35-36 Big Darby, OH (ORH), 17-24 Big Dry Creek, Littleton, CO (MRO), 26-22 Big Fossil Creek, TX (SWF), 30-22 Big Hole River, MT (MRO), 26-18, 26-23 Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin, MT I-5 (MRO), 26-18 Big Island, AR (MR+T), 42-43, 42-47 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA (LMN), 11-17 Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-22 Big Pine Lake, TX (SWT), 29-19 Big River Reservoir, RI (NED), 1-45 Big Run, PA (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Big Sandy Lake, TX (SWF), 30-22 Big Sandy River (ORH), 17-21 Big Sioux River, IA (MRO), 26-15, 26-21 Big Sioux River, SD (MRO), 26-18, 26-21, 26-23 Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR (MR+T), 42-67 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN (ORN), 15-1, 15-4, 15-9 Big Spring, TX (SWF), 30-22 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD (NCS), 24-1, 24-3, 24-20, 24-31 Big Stranger Creek, KS (MRK), 27-17 Big Sunflower River, MS (MR+T), 42-33, 42-65 Big Sunflower River, MS (LMK), 12-15 Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL (LMS), 14-13 Big Thompson River, Johnstown, CO (MRO), 26-18 Big Timber Creek, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Big Walnut Creek, 500 W, Putnam Co., IN (ORL), 16-33 Big Walnut Lake, IN (ORL), 16-22, 16-30 Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT (SPK), 35-36 Big Wood River, ID (NPW), 39-16 Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks (SWT), 29-22 Billings, MT (MRO), 26-17 Biloxi Harbor, MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-4, 10-35, 10-42, 10-54 Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS (SAM), 10-52 Binghamton, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-15 Birch Hill Dam, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-12, 1-29, 1-52 Birch Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-3, 29-11, 29-17 Birch, WV (ORH), 17-24 Bird Creek, Owasso, OK (SWT), 29-20 Bird Rock Area, La Jolla San Diego County, CA (SPL), 33-38 Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO (MR+T), 42-67 Birds Point-New Madrid Setback Levee (MR+T), 42-60 Biscayne Bay, FL, Hurricane Protection (SAJ), 9-62 Bitter Creek at Rock Springs, WY (SPK), 35-42 Bitterroot River, Florence, MT (NPS), 38-1, 38-7, 38-15, 38-20 Black Bayou Lake, LA (LMK), 12-19 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA (LMK), 12-20 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA (LMN), 11-19 Black Bayou River, MS (LMK), 12-20 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, LA (LMN), 11-19 Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN (NCS), 24-26, 24-31 Black Creek, Gadsden, AL (SAM), 10-52 Black Fork at Hendricks, WV (ORP), 18-22 Black River, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-3, 21-42, 21-58 Black River Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-3, 21-4, 21-42, 21-58, 21-73, 21-77 Black River Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-29 Black River Lake, WI (NCS), 24-28 Black River, AR and MO (SWL), 28-20, 28-21 Black River, N.C. (SAW), 6-26, 6-26 Black River, WI (NCS), 24-25, 24-28 Black Rock (NED), 1-54 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-2, 20-14, 20-19, 20-34 Black Rock Harbor, CT (NED), 1-40, 1-48 Black Rock Lake, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-17, 1-31 Black Walnut Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-36 Black Walnut Point, MD (NAB), 4-38 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-2, 10-5, 10-35, 10-42, 10-52, 10-56 Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA (SAW), 6-32 Blackbird Creek, NE (MRO), 26-15, 26-20 Blackboy Creek, Tulsa County, OK (SWT), 29-20 Blackfoot Reservoir, ID (NPW), 39-17, 39-18 Blackfoot River, ID (NPW), 39-18 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT (NPS), 38-24 Blacksmith Fork River, Logan, UT (SPK), 35-42 Blackstone River Basin (NED), 1-1, 1-2, 1-10, 1-45, 1-52, Blackwater Dam, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-17, 1-31, 1-55 Blackwater River, FL (SAM), 10-51, 10-53, 10-54 Blackwater River, VA (NAO), 5-21 Blaine Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-23 Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR (LMK), 12-17, 12-20 Blaker Towhead, TN (MR+T), 42-48, 42-52 Blandinsville, IL (NCR), 23-18 Bldwn, Sqw Crk Lndr Swg Lng, WY (MRO), 26-23 Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Block Island, RI (NED), 1-57 Blounts Creek, Fayetteville, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 Blue Bluff Rd., Morgan Co., IN (ORL), 16-33 Blue Marsh Lake, PA (NAP), 3-1, 3-10, 3-17, 3-22 Blue Mountain Lake, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-5, 28-13, 28-27 Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS (MRK), 27-22 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO (MRK), 27-1, 27-2, 27-10, 27-13, 27-21 Blue River Lake, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-11, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH), 17-1, 17-3, 17-13, 17-18 I-6 Bluff Creek, MS (SAM), 10-51 Board of Levee Commissioners Fulton County, KY (MR+T), 42-59 Bodie Island, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR (MR+T), 42-26 Boeuf River, LA (LMK), 12-15 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in AK (MR+T), 42-26, 42-66, 42-79 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, LA (MR+T), 42-33, 42-66, 42-79 Bogachiel River, WA (NPS), 38-24 Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL (SAM), 10-1, 10-15, 10-37, 10-48 Boggy Creek, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Bohemia, LA (MR+T), 42-12, 42-36 Boies Point, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Boise River, ID (NPW), 39-16, 39-18 Boise Valley, ID (NPW), 39-17 Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL (SAM), 10-52 Bolivar, NY (ORP), 18-28 Bolles Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-4, 21-42, 21-58, 21-77 Bon Secour River, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-7, 10-35, 10-43, 10-54 Bondurant Towhead, LA (MR+T), 42-43 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND (NCS), 24-26 Bonnet Carre' Spillway, LA (MR+T), 42-1, 42-6, 42-12, 42-70 Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, OR and WA (NPP), 37-1, 37-2, 37-16, 37-23, 37-27, 37-30, 37-35, 37-46 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Bonum Creek, VA (NAB), 4-36 Boone County, Ky (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) (ORL), 16-21 Booneville Lake, KY (ORL), 16-22, 16-29 Boothbay Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40 Bordeaux Point, MS (MR+T), 42-50 Boston Harbor, MA (NED), 1-2, 1-40, 1-48, 1-56, 1-57 Boswell Lake, OK (SWT), 29-19 Bougere Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-41 Boulder, CO (MRO), 26-17 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA (NED), 1-45 Bowman-Haley Lake, ND (MRO), 26-1, 26-2, 26-9, 26-12 Box Elder Creek Basin, CO (MRO), 26-21 Boyce, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Boyer River, Missouri Valley, IA (MRO), 26-22 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA (ORP), 18-23 Braddock, PA (ORP), 18-25 Bradford, PA (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Bradford, TN (LMM), 13-6 Bradley Lake, AK 1983 (NPA), 40-11 Brake Branch, Montgomery County, VA (SAW), 6-32 Bramwell, WV (ORH), 17-25 Brandywine, AR-TN (MR+T), 42-48 Branford Harbor, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-3, 1-26, 1-35, 1-57 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA (NAB), 4-36 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA (NED), 1-48 Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO (MRK), 27-17 Brays Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-12 Brazos Island Harbor, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-3, 31-19, 31-23, 31-38, 31-39, 31-44 Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington (SWG), 31-37 Breckenridge, MN (NCS), 24-31 Breton Bay, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-39 Brevard County, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-19 Brevoort Levee, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (NED), 1-40, 1-48 Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) (NPP), 37-37 Bridgewater, VA (NAB), 4-38, 4-42 Brigantine Island (NAP), 3-26 Brilliant, OH (ORP), 18-23 Bringol, LA (MR+T), 42-45, 42-46 Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI (NED), 1-40 Broad Creek River, DE (NAB), 4-36, 4-40 Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Broad Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Broad Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Broadkill River, DE (NAP), 3-24 Broadwater Creek, MD (NAB), 4-39 Broadway Street, Pecan Creek, Gainesvile, TX (SWF), 30-23 Brockway Lake, VT (NED), 1-48 Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP), 18-23 Broken Bow Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-9, 29-15, 29-18 Broken Bow, Mud Creek, NE (MRO), 26-20 Bromley, KY (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Bronx River, NY (NAN), 2-30, 2-34 Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO (MRK), 27-17 Brookgreen Gardens, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-2, 7-8, 7-10, 7-14 Brooklyn, WV (ORH), 17-23 Brookport, IL (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Brookville Lake, IN (ORL), 16-1, 16-5, 16-14, 16-29 Brookville, PA (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project (SAJ), 9-1, 9-20, 9-34, 9-48 Brown's Creek, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30, 2-34 Browns Creek, Nashville, TN (ORN), 15-19 Browns Field, LA (MR+T), 42-41, 42-43 Brownville-Nemaha Levee (MRO), 26-18 Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX (SWF), 30-22 Brunette Point, LA (MR+T), 42-38 Brunswick County Beaches, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 I-7 Brunswick Harbor, GA (SAS), 8-1, 8-3, 8-10 Brush Creek, Jeannette, PA (ORP), 18-29 Brush Creek, Johnson City, TN (ORN), 15-19 Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (MRK), 27-1, 27-3, 27-10, 27-13 Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-5, 35-25 Buck Creek, NC and SC (SAN), 7-15 Buck Island, MS (MR+T), 42-51 Buckhannon River, WV (ORP), 18-20, 18-21, 18-28 Buckhorn Lake, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-5, 16-14, 16-29 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME (NED), 1-40, 1-50 Bucksport Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40 Buena Vista, IA (NCR), 23-17 Buena Vista, OH (ORH), 17-23 Buena Vista, VA (NAO), 5-22 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-11, 31-20, 31-34 Buffalo Creek, Lee County, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE (MRO), 26-15 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND (MRO), 26-15 Buffalo Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-2, 20-3, 20-14, 20-20, 20-21 Buffalo River, MS (LMK), 12-20 Buffalo, Johnson County Diversion Channel, WY (MRO), 26-17 Buffumville Lake, MA (NED), 1-2, 1-20, 1-32, 1-56 Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-29, 10-39 Bull Run, PA (NAB), 4-38 Bull Shoals Lake, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-9, 28-15 Bullock Neck, East Providence, RI (NED), 1-50 Bullocks Point Cove, RI (NED), 1-40 Bunker Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40 Buras, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Burch Creek, Weber County, UT (SPK), 35-36 Burch and Jewett Creeks near Corning, CA (SPK), 35-42 Bureau of Reclamation (SWT), 29-22 Burgettstown, PA (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT (NED), 1-44 Burke Landing, MS (MR+T), 42-47 Burketts Creek, Amory, MS (SAM), 10-52 Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND (NCS), 24-26 Burlington Harbor, VT (NAN), 2-30 Burlington, IA (NCR), 23-15 Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (NCC), 22-1, 22-2, 22-10, 22-13, 22-17 Burnside, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH), 17-1, 17-4, 17-13, 17-18 Burton Creek, Bryan, TX (SWF), 30-23 Bushley Bayou Area, LA (MR+T), 42-31, 42-79 Butler County Drainage District 3, MO (SWL), 28-21 Butler, PA (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA (NED), 1-40 Buttermilk Channel, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-3, 2-19, 2-23 Butternut Creek, E. Syracuse, NY (NCB), 20-33 Byram River at Pemberwick, CT (NAN), 2-32 C Cabrillo Beach (SPL), 33-38 Cache Basin, AR (MR+T), 42-1, 42-10, 42-34, 42-68, 42-72 Cache Creek Basin, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-5, 35-25, 35-32 Cache La Poudre River, CO (MRO), 26-18, 26-22 Cache River Basin, AR (MR+T), 42-29, 42-67 Cache River Diversion, IL (LMS), 14-13 Cache River Levee, IL (ORL), 16-31 Cache River, Heron Pond, IL (ORL), 16-33 Cache River, IL (MR+T), 42-24 Cache-Cairo, IL (MR+T), 42-50 Caddo Lake, LA (LMK), 12-18, 12-20 Cadet Bayou, MS (SAM), 10-51, 10-54 Cadle Creek, MD (NAB), 4-39 Caernarvon, LA (MR+T), 42-12 Caesar Creek Lake, OH (ORL), 16-1, 16-5, 16-14, 16-29 Cagles Mill Lake, IN (ORL), 16-1, 16-6, 16-14, 16-29 Cairo Drainage District (MR+T), 42-13, 42-14, 42-27, 42-59 Cairo, WV (ORH), 17-25 Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (NCR), 23-14 Calapooya River, OR (NPP), 37-41 Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-6, 35-25 Calcasieu River, LA (LMN), 11-17 Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act (NCB), 20-34 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT (NED), 1-44 Calhoun County, AL (SAM), 10-58 Caliente Creek, CA (SPK), 35-32 California (Cincinnati), OH (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Calion, AR (LMK), 12-14, 12-17 Calispell Creek, WA (NPS), 38-27 Callahan, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Calloway Branch, TX (SWF), 30-22, 30-23 Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (NCC), 22-1, 22-2, 22-10, 22-13, 22-17 Calumet River Bridges (NCC), 22-18 Camas Creek, ID (NPW), 39-17 Cambridge Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-4, 4-24, 4-39 Cambridgeport Lake, VT (NED), 1-48 Camden Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40 Camp Ground Lake, KY (ORL), 16-22 Camp Perry, OH (NCB), 20-31 I-8 Campbell, KY (MR+T), 42-50, 42-52 Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL (NCR), 23-14 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMK), 12-18, 12-20 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMN), 11-19 Canal 43, AR (LMK), 12-1, 12-4, 12-10, 12-11 Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY (NCB), 20-33 Canadian River, OK, TX, and NM (SWT), 29-22 Canal Point, FL (SAJ), 9-56 Canandiagua Lake, NY (NCB), 20-33 Canapitsit Channel, MA (NED), 1-40 Canaveral Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-3, 9-29, 9-37, 9-51 Candy Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-3, 29-11, 29-17 Cane River, LA (LMN), 11-17 Caney Creek, MS (LMK), 12-12 Caney Fork River, TN (ORN), 15-13 Canisteo, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-15 Cannelton, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Canneries to Breakers Point, American Samoa (POD), 36-15 Cannon River at Fairbault, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-3, 24-20 Cannonball River, Shields, ND (MRO), 26-23 Cano Cacul, Aguadilla, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Cano Madre Vieja, Aguadilla, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Canoe Creek, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-31, 16-33 Canton (Nimishillen), OH (ORH), 17-25 Canton Creek, GA (SAM), 10-58 Canton Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-4, 29-11, 29-17, 29-20 Canton, MA (NED), 1-45 Canton, MO (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Canton, OK (SWL), 28-27 Canyon Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-5, 30-15, 30-19 Cape Charles, VA (NAO), 5-21 Cape Cod Canal, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-3, 1-26, 1-35, 1-57 Cape Fear River Basin, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-5, 6-10, 6-19, 6-31 Cape Florida State Park, FL (SAJ), 9-56 Cape Girardeau, Jackson Metropolitan Area, MO (LMS), 14-1, 14-3, 14-7, 14-10 Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 (LMS), 14-13 Cape Girardeau, MO, to Rock Island, IL (MR+T), 42-14 Cape Henry Channel, VA (NAO), 5-16 Cape Lookout, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Cape May City, NJ (NAP), 3-26 Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, NJ (NAP), 3-1, 3-9, 3-17, 3-22 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-29, 20-34 Carbon Cliff, Sec 3 and 4, RIE, IL (NCR), 23-17 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX (SWF), 30-22 Carlyle Lake, IL (LMS), 14-13 Carolina Beach and Vicinity (SAW), 6-1, 6-12, 6-21 Carolina, AR (MR+T), 42-44 Carolina, MS (MR+T), 42-42 Carpenters Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-13 Carr Fork Lake, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-6, 16-14, 16-29 Carr Point, LA (MR+T), 42-38 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL (SAM), 10-51, 10-54 Carrizo Creek, Carrizo Spring, TX (SWF), 30-23 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR), 23-14 Carrollton Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Carrollton, KY (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Carson River below Lahontan Dam, Fallon, NV (SPK), 35-42 Carters Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-26, 10-39 Carthage, MS (MR+T), 42-41 Caruthersville Harbor, MO (LMM), 13-5 Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO (MR+T), 42-52 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME (NED), 1-40 Carysville, FL (SAM), 10-53 Cascadia Lake, OR (NPP), 37-39, 37-41 Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA (LMN), 11-17 Caseyville, KY (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Cashie River, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Casino Beach, Chicago, IL (NCC), 22-18 Cason, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA (NPP), 37-39 Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO (MRO), 26-17 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene, TX (SWF), 30-23 Cat Island, AR (MR+T), 42-51 Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR (NPP), 37-39 Catfish Point, MS (MR+T), 42-42, 42-44 Cathance River, ME (NED), 1-40 Catherine Creek Lake, OR (NPW), 39-13, 39-16, 39-17 Catherine Creek, OR (NPW), 39-1, 39-2, 39-10, Cathlamet, WA (NPP), 37-37 Cattaraugus Creek, NY (NCB), 20-29, 20-33 Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-3, 20-14, 20-21 Cattletsburg, KY (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Cave Run Lake, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-6, 16-14, 16-29 Cave Springs, GA (SAM), 10-58 Cave-in-Rock, IL (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Cayuga Creek, NY (NCB), 20-31 Cayuga Lake, NY (NCB), 20-32 Cazenovia Creek, Buffalo, NY (NCB), 20-33 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN (ORL), 16-1, 16-6, 16-14, 16-29 Cedar Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-3, 31-19, 31-24, 31-38 Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD (MRO), 26-15 I-9 Cedar Creek at Cedar, Lodge, CO (MRO), 26-23 Cedar Creek, Jacksonville, FL (SAJ), 9-62 Cedar Falls, Cedar River, IA (NCR), 23-16 Cedar Hammock, Bradenton, FL (SAJ), 9-62 Cedar Keys Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Cedar Point Lake, KS (SWT), 29-19 Cedar Point, GA (SAS), 8-16 Cedar Point, TN (MR+T), 42-48, 42-51 Cedar River, WA (NPS), 38-24, 38-29 Cedar River, NE (MRO), 26-23 Ceder Creek, DE (NAP), 3-24 Celina Dam, KY (ORN), 15-14 Center Hill Lake, TN (ORN), 15-1, 15-6, 15-9, 15-18 Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA (NCR), 23-14 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ), 9-1, 9-24, 9-34, 9-49, 9-57, 9-58, 9-59, 9-60 Centralia-Chehalis Flood Warning System, WA (NPS), 38-29 Century Park, Lorain, OH (NCB), 20-27 Ceredo-Kenova, WV (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Cessions Towhead, AR (MR+T), 42-47 Cessions, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Chacon Creek, Laredo, TX (SWF), 30-23 Chagrin River, OH (NCB), 20-33 Chambersburg, OH (ORH), 17-23 Channel Between North and South Hero Island (NAN), 2-30 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD (NAB), 4-39 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Channel Connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Slaights Wharf (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Channel Improvements: Memphis District (Fiscal Year 1990) (MR+T), 42-1, 42-67 Channel Improvements: New Orleans District (Fiscal Year 1990) (MR+T), 42-1, 42-64 Channel Improvements; Vicksburg District (Fiscal Year 1990) (MR+T), 42-1, 42-65 Channel Islands Harbor, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-2, 33-13, 33-26 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-5, 6-19 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-4, 9-29, 9-37 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Channel from Phoebus, VA to Deepwater in Hampton Roads (NAO), 5-21 Channel to Liberty, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-9 Channel to Newport News, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-6, 5-13, 5-17, 5-21, 5-23 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX (SWG), 31-37 Channels in the Straits of Mackinac, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-4, 21-43, 21-58 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY (ORL), 16-21 Chariton River, MO (MRK), 27-17, Chariton River, Schuyler County, MO, Eason Bridge (MRK), 27-22 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (MRK), 27-17, 27-18 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA (NED), 1-1, 1-11, 1-29, 1-38 Charles River Dam, MA (NED), 1-45 Charleston Channel, OR (NPP), 37-37, 37-42 Charleston Harbor, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-2, 7-8, 7-10, 7-16 Charlestown, NH (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Charlevoix Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-5, 21-43, 21-59 Charlotte Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-4, 9-29, 9-37, 9-48 Chartiers Creek, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-3, 18-12, 18-28 Chaska, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-4, 24-20 Chatfield Lake, CO (MRO), 26-1, 26-2, 26-9, 26-12 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (NED), 1-1, 14, 1-26, 1-35 Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL (SAM), 10-52, 10-58 Chattooga River, Trion, GA (SAM), 10-53 Chattooga Units, GA and SC (SAS), 8-17 Cheat River, WV (ORP), 18-20 Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN (ORN), 15-14 Cheboygan Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-77 Cheesequake Creek, NJ (NAN), 2-29, 2-34 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA (LMN), 11-17 Chehalis River, WA (NPS), 38-24, 38-29 Chelsea River, MA (NED), 1-57 Chena River Lakes, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-4, 40-7, 40-9 Chenega Bay, AK (NPA), 40-12 Cherokee County, GA (SAM), 10-58 Cherry Creek Lake, CO (MRO), 26-1, 26-3, 26-9, 26-12, 26-18 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks, OK (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Cherryfield, ME (NED), 1-45 Chesapeake, OH (ORH), 17-23 Chesconessex Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Cheshire, OH (ORH), 17-23 Chester River, Delaware County, PA (NAP), 3-27 Chester River, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-5, 4-24, 4-31, 4-39 Chester, CA (SPK), 35-36 Cheswick, PA (ORP), 18-24 Chetco River, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-2, 37-23, 37-30 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR (NPP), 37-39 Chicago Harbor, IL (NCC), 22-1, 22-3, 22-10, 22-13, 22-17 Chicago River, IL (NCC), 22-1, 22-3, 22-10, 22-14, 22-17 Chicago River, IL (North Branch) (NCC), 22-1, 22-6, 22-11 Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL (SAM), 10-52 Chickasawhay River (SAM), 10-58 1-10 Chicopee Falls, MA (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Chicopee, MA (NED), 1-45, 1-48, 1-53 Chicot Ldg., AR (MR+T), 42-44 Chief Joseph Dam-Rufus Woods Lake, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-10, 38-16, 38-21 Chignik, AK (NPA), 40-12 Chikaskia River, Blackwell, OK (SWT), 29-20 Chillicothe, OH (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Chilo, OH (ORH), 17-23 Chincoteague Bay, VA (NAO), 5-21 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Chincoteague Inlet, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-3, 5-11, 5-16 Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 FC Act (NCB), 20-34 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA (LMN), 11-19 Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Choctawhatchee Bay To Pensacola Bay, FL (SAM), 10-44 Choctawhatchee Bay To West Bay, FL (SAM), 10-44 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL (SAM), 10-51 Choptank River, MD (NAB), 4-36 Chouteau Lock and Dam, OK (SWT), 29-20 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Vencie Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-13 Chowan River, NC (SAW), 6-26 Chowan River, NC (NAO), 5-21 Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI (SAJ), 9-54, 9-55 Chute of Island 36, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Chute of Island 8, KY (MR+T), 42-49 Cibolo Creek, Texas (SWA), 32-16 Cincinnati, OH (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Cincinnatus, NY (NAB), 4-41 City Creek Levee, San Bernardino County, CA (SPL), 33-39 City Dam, Little Caney River, KS (SWT), 29-20 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO (MRO), 26-15 City of Cairo (MR+T), 42-59 City of Hickman, KY (MR+T), 42-59 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR (NPP), 37-39 Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL (SAM), 10-2, 10-26, 10-39 Clairborne Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA (NPS), 38-24 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA (NPS), 38-24 Clanton, AL (SAM), 10-52 Claremont Lake, NH (NED), 1-48 Claremore OK, FWIP (SWT), 29-22 Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Salt River, MO (LMS), 14-1, 14-5, 14-11 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, OH (ORL), 16-1, 16-7, 16-15 Clarendon Levee, Lower White, AR (MR+T), 42-68 Clarendon to Laconia Circle, White River Basin, AR (LMM), 13-6 Clariborne County Port, MS (LMK), 12-15 Clarington, OH (ORP), 18-23 Clarion River, Ridgeway, PA (ORP), 18-29 Clark Fork River, MT (NPS), 38-24 Clark Maritime Center, Jeffersonville, IN (ORL), 16-33 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA (NED), 1-44 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek, NE (MRO), 26-15, Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek (MRO), 26-15 Clarksville, AR (SWL), 28-21 Clatskanie Drainage District 1, OR (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 Clatskanie River Area, OR (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 Clatskanie River, OR (NPP), 37-37 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR (NPP), 37-41 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 Clayton County, AL (SAM), 10-58 Clear and Burnt River, OR (NPW), 39-1, 39-2, 39-10 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-13 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX (SWG), 31-37 Clear Creek, Freedom, NY (NCB), 20-33 Clear Creek, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-13, 31-20, 31-35 Clear River, Burrillville, RI (NED), 1-45, 1-52 Clearwater River, ID (NPW), 39-18 Clearwater Lake, MO (SWL), 28-1, 28-5, 28-14 Clearwater Pass, FL (SAJ), 9-54, 9-55 Clearwater River, WA (NPS), 38-24 Cleveland Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-3, 20-14, 20-21 Cleves, OH (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Clewiston, FL (SAJ), 9-56 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI (NED), 1-44 Clifton, AZ (SPL), 33-1, 33-10, 33-21, 33-39 Clifton, WV (ORH), 17-23 Clifty Creek Lake, IN (ORL), 16-24 Clinch River, TN and VA (ORN), 15-13, 15-19 Clinton Harbor, CT (NED), 1-40 Clinton Harbor, IA (NCD), 25-7 Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS (MRK), 27-1, 27-3, 27-10, 27-13 Clinton River, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-5, 21-43, 21-59 Clinton, IA (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Clinton, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Clinton, PA (ORP), 18-24 Cloverport, KY (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Clyde Park, Shields River, MT (MRO), 26-18 Clyde, RI (NED), 1-48 Coahoma, TN (MR+T), 42-47, 42-51 I-11 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake city), TN (ORN), 15-13 Coal Creek, Henryetta, OK (SWT), 29-20 Coal Grove, OH (ORH), 17-23 Coal River, WV (ORH), 17-22 Coan River, VA (NAB), 4-39 Coast of California, Point Mugu, to San Pedro Breakwater, CA (SPL), 33-38 Coasters Island Harbor, RI (NED), 1-40 Cobscook Bay, ME (NED), 1-40 Cocheco River, NH (NED), 1-40, 1-45 Cochiti Lake, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-5, 32-12 Cochrane, WI (NCS), 24-31, 24-32 Cockrells Creeks, VA (NAO), 5-21 Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID (NPS), 38-24 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID (NPS), 38-24 Coffee County, AL (SAM), 10-58 Coffee Creek, WA (NPS), 38-24 Coffee Point, LA (MR+T), 42-43 Cohansey River, NJ (NAP), 3-1, 3-3, 3-15, 3-19 Cohasset Harbor, MA (NED), 1-40 Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (NAP), 3-1, 3-3, 3-15, 3-19 Cole River, Swansea, MA (NED), 1-50 Colebrook River Lake, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-13, 1-29, 1-52 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA (LMK), 12-19, 12-20 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA (LMN), 11-19 Colfax, Palouse River, WA (NPW), 39-1, 39-2, 39-10, 39-13 Collection and Study of Basic Data Alaska District (NPA), 40-1, 40-5 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA), 32-1, 32-10 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB), 4-2, 4-22 Buffalo, NY., District (NCB), 20-1, 20-13 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC), 22-1, 22-9 Detroit, Mi., District (NCE), 21-2, 21-41 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF), 30-2, 30-13 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG), 31-2, 31-18 Huntington, WV., District (ORH), 17-1, 17-12 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ), 9-1, 9-28 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL), 28-1, 28-11 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL), 33-1, 33-09, 33-20 Louisville, KY., District (ORL), 16-1, 16-12 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM), 10-2, 10-33 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN), 15-1, 15-8 New York District (NAN), 2-1, 2-18 New England Division (NED), 1-2, 1-24 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO), 5-1, 5-10, 5-15 Pacific Ocean District (POD), 36-1, 36-5 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP), 3-1, 3-16 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP), 18-1, 18-11 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP), 37-1, 37-21 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR), 23-1, 23-6 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK), 35-1, 35-23 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN), 34-1, 34-4 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS), 8-1, 8-9 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS), 38-1, 38-11 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS), 24-1, 24-19 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT), 29-2, 29-10 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW), 39-1, 39-9 Wilmington, NC., District (SAW), 6-1, 6-18 Colliers, WV (ORP), 18-28 Collinsville, AL (SAM), 10-52 Cologne Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-45, 42-46 Colonial Beach, VA (NAB), 4-37 Colorado River, CO (SPK), 35-42 Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas (SWG), 31-37 Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado (SWA), 32-16 Colquitt County, GA (SAM), 10-58 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL (LMS), 14-13 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NPW), 39-1, 39-13, 39-18 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: (NPS), 38, 24 38-27 Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (NPW), 39-1, 39-4, 39-14 Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA (NPW), 39-16 Columbia River, WA (NPP), 37-1, 37-3, 37-4, 37-23, 37-31, 37-37, 37-42 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA (NPS), 38-23 Columbia Slough,OR (NPP), 37-41 Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-2, 37-23, 37-30, 37-42 Columbia, LA (LMK), 12-14, 12-17 Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus, NE (MRO), 26-20 Columbus, KY (MR+T), 42-49 Columbus, Loup River, NE (MRO), 26-20 Columbus, MS (SAM), 10-58 Columbus, OH (ORH), 17-23 Commerce, MS (MR+T), 42-47, 42-50 Commercial Port Road, Guam (POD), 36-15 Communities, Chicago, IL (NCC), 22-18 Como, AR (MR+T), 42-45 Compo Beach, Westport, CT (NED), 1-44 Conant Brook Dam, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-13, 1-29, 1-52 Conchas Lake, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-11 Concordia Parish, LA (MR+T), 42-30 Concordia, KY (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 1-12 Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-5, 18-12, 18-17, 18-27 Conesus Lake, Livonia, NY (NCB), 20-28 Conetoe Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Coney Island Channel, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Coney Island Creek, NY (NAN), 2-34 Conklin-Kirkwood, NY (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Conneaut Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-4, 20-14, 20-22, 20-34 Connecticut River, CT (NED), 1-40, 1-48, 1-57 Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT (NED), 1-1, 1-2, 1-11, 1-52 Connecticut River, NH (NED), 1-45, 1-51 Connell, WA (NPW), 39-16 Conoho Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP), 37-38 Construction General (MR+T), 42-1, 42-11 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORD), 19-1, 19-5, 19-7 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORH), 17-1, 17-2 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORL), 16-1, 16-2 Construction of locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORP), 18-1, 18-2 Contentnea Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-26, 6-28, 6-29 Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Coochie, LA (MR+T), 42-38 Cook Inlet Shoals, AK (NPA), 40-10 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (LMN), 11-19 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-5, 30-15, 30-19 Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-4, 7-8, 7-11 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-3, 7-8, 7-11 Cooper River, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC (SAN), 7-16 Coos Bay, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-5, 37-24, 37-31, 37-42 Coos River Channel, OR (NPP), 37-42 Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-6, 37-24, 37-32 Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL (SAM), 10-2, 10-27, 10-39 Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA (SAM), 10-58 Copan Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-4, 29-12, 29-17 Copes Corner Lakes, NY (NAB), 4-39 Coquille River, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-6, 37-24,37-32,37-41, 37-42 Coralville Lake, IA (NCR), 23-1, 23-4, 23-7, 23-11 Coraopolis, PA (ORP), 18-23 Corbin, KY (ORN), 15-13, 15-19 Cordele Creek and Malcolm Branch, GA (SAM), 10-58 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN (ORN), 15-14 Cordova Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Core Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME (NED), 1-40 Corning, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-16 Corning-Monkey run, NY (NAB), 4-41 Cornucopia Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-77 Corona Bar, TN-Ar (MR+T), 42-51 Corporate Gulch, Norfolk, NE (MRO), 26-23 Corpus Christi Beach, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-11, 31-20, 31-34 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-3, 31-19, 31-24, 31-38, 31-39, 31-44 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal (SWG), 31-37 Corregidor, MS (MR+T), 42-44 Corsica River, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ (NAP), 3-26 Corte Madera Creek, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-7, 35-25, 35-33 Cortland, NY (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Cottage Bend, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-43 Cottage Grove Lake, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-11, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 (MR+T), 42-59 Cotton, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Cottonwood Bar, MS (MR+T), 42-42 Cottonwood Creek (SPK), 35-32 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, ID (NPW), 39-16 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID (NPW), 39-17 Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL (LMM), 13-6 Cotuit Harbor, MA (NED), 1-48 Cougar Lake, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-17, 37-27, 37-35, 37-43 Council Bluffs, IA (MRO), 26-15, 26-18, 26-20 Council Grove Lake, KS (SWT), 29-1, 29-4, 29-12, 29-17 County Bridge, Elk River, Elk City, KS (SWT), 29-20 County Bridge, Walnut River, Arkansas City, KS (SWT), 29-20 County Hwy. 41 No.-MN R.-Mankato, MN (NCS), 24-32 County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba CO., MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-16, 10-37, 10-48 Courtnay Channel, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Cove Island, Stamford, CT (NED), 1-44 Coville Bayou, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Covington County, MS (SAM), 10-58 Covington, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 1-13 Cow Castle Creek, SC (SAN), 7-15 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS (SWT), 29-19 Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN (MR+T), 42-47 Cow Island Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-47 Cowanesque Lake, PA (NAB), 4-2, 4-19, 4-28 Coweta Creek, Coweata, OK (SWT), 29-20 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR (NPP), 37-41 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, WA (NPP), 37-44 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 2, WA (NPP), 37-39, 37-44 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 13, WA (NPP), 37-39, 37-44 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 15, WA (NPP), 37-39, 37-44 Cowlitz County Drainage improvement District 1, WA (NPP), 37-38 Cowlitz River, WA (NPP), 37-37, 37-38, 37-39, 37-41 Cowpen Creek, TN and MS (MR+T), 42-29 Cowpens Swamp, SC (SAN), 7-15 Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (ORP), 18-29 Coyote Creek, CA (SPK), 35-36 Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA (SPK), 35-32, Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA (SPL), 33-39 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP), 37-41 Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA (NPS), 38-27 Crabtree Swamp, SC (SAN), 7-15 Cracraft, AR (MR+T), 42-42, 42-44 Craig Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10, 40-12 Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Crane Creek State Park, OH (NCB), 20-34 Cranes Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Crawford County Levee District, AR (SWL), 28-21 Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (SWA), 32-16 Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-16, 10-37, 10-48 Criehaven Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40 Crisfield Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-5, 4-24, 4-31 Crooked Bayou, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Crooked Creek Lake and Levee, AR (SWL), 28-22 Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-5, 18-13, 18-17 Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, SC (SAN), 7-15 Crooked Creek, PA (ORP), 18-27 Crookston, MN (NCS), 24-34 Cross Bayou, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Cross Florida Barge Canal (SAJ), 9-1, 9-4, 9-30, 9-52 Cross Lake, NY (NCB), 20-33 Cross Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA (NED), 1-40 Cross-Florida Barge Canal, FL (SAJ), 9-38, 9-51 Crutcho Creek LPP, OK (SWT), 29-19, 29-22 Crystal River, FL (SAJ), 9-54, 9-55 Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-5, 33-15, 33-32 Cuckold Creek, MD (NAB), 4-39 Cuivre River, MO (LMS), 14-12 Cumberland River, TN and KY (ORN), 15-1, 15-2, 15-9, 15-11, 15-14, 15-15, 15-16, 15-19 Cumberland, KY (ORN), 15-18 Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV (NAB), 4-1, 4-12, 4-26, 4-34, 4-41 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT (NED), 1-44 Cunninghill Cove, MD (NAB), 4-39 Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, AR (SWL), 28-21 Curiosity Creek, Tampa, FL (SAJ), 9-62 Current River, AR and MO (SWL), 28-20 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA (SAS), 8-17 Curwensville Lake, PA (NAB), 4-2, 4-20, 4-29 Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR (NPP), 37-37 Cutoff, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (NED), 1-40 Cuyahoga River Basin, OH (NCB), 20-31, 20-33 Cypress Bayou and Waterway Between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA (LMK), 12-15 Cypress Bayou and Waterway Between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA (LMN), 11-17 Cypress Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-42 Cypress Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY (ORL), 16-31 Cypress Creek, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-13, 31-20, 31-35 Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ), 9-62 D D River, Lincoln City, OR (NPP), 37-43 Dade County-North of Haulover Beach, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-26, 9-35, 9-48 Dade County, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-26, 9-35, 9-48 Dale County, AL (SAM), 10-58 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY (ORN), 15-1, 15-6, 15-9, 15-18 Dam "A" Lake, TX (SWF), 30-22 Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, KS (SWT), 29-20 Damariscotta River, ME (NED), 1-40 Dams and Reservoirs (SAW), 6-2, 6-31 Dan River, Madison Wastwater Treatment Plant, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Dana Point, Harbor, CA (SPL), 33-37 Danbury, CT (NED), 1-45, 1-54 Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, NY (NCB), 20-31 1-14 Danvers River, Danvers, MA (NED), 1-50 Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No.10), AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-10, 28-15 Darien Harbor, GA (SAS), 8-16 Data Relative to the Completed Locks (NAO), 5-1, 5-20 Dauphin Island Bay, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-7, 10-35, 10-43, 10-54 Davenport Center Lake, NY (NAB), 4-39 Davenport Harbor, IA (NCD), 25-7 Davenport, IA (NCR), 23-14 David Bayou, MS (MR+T), 42-27 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No.6), AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-3, 28-13 Davids Creek Lake, IA (MRO), 26-17 Davis Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Davis Pond, LA (Formerly Myrtle Grove, LA) (MR+T), 42-12 Davis, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) (NPP), 37-39 Dayton, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Dayton, Touchet River, WA (NPW), 39-16 Dayton, WY (MRO), 26-17 DeGray Lake, AR (LMK), 12-17, 12-20 DeKalb, Ii (NCR), 23-15, 23-16 DeQueen Lake, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-5, 28-14 DeValls Bluff, AR (MR+T), 42-70 Dead Mans Bend, MS (MR+T), 42-41 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Dean Island, AR (MR+T), 42-48 Dearmenville and Golden Springs, AL (SAM), 10-58 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., VA (NAO), 5-21 Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Deep Creek, Newport News, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-3, 5-11, 5-16, 5-21 Deep River Area, WA (NPP), 37-38 Deep River, WA (NPP), 37-37 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH), 17-1, 174, 17-13, 17-18 Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Deer Island Area, OR (NPP), 37-38 Deer Island Drainage District, OR (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME (NED), 1-40 Deerfield River, Wilmington, VT (NED), 1-51 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL (LMS), 14-13 Delaware Bay to Lebanon (NAP), 3-24, 3-25 Delaware Bay to Millville (NAP), 3-24 Delaware Coast Protection, DE (NAP), 3-1, 3-11, 3-17, 3-23 Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX (SWF), 30-23 Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH), 17-1, 17-4, 17-13, 17-18 Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA, and Trenton, NJ (NAP), 3-1, 3-3, 3-15, 3-19 Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing (NAP), 3-24 Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink (NAP), 3-27 Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE, Philadelphia to the Sea (NAP), 3-1, 3-4, 3-15, 3-19 Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Delphi, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Delta Point, LA (MR+T), 42-41 Delta-Friars Point, MS (MR+T), 42-47 Dennis Creek, NJ (NAP), 3-25 Dennis, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Densford, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Depoe Bay, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-6, 37-24, 37-32, 37-37, 37-39, 37-43 Derby, CT (NED), 1-45, 1-54 Derby, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA (NCR), 23-1, 23-4, 23-7, 23-11 Des Moines River, Bridge 32527, MN (NCR), 23-17 Des Moines River, IA (NCR), 23-16 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Des Moines, IA (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Deschutes River, Bend, OR (NPP), 37-39 Deschutes River, WA (NPS), 38-24 Detour Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-77 Detroit River, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-5, 21-43, 21-59, 21-73, 21-75 Detroit Lake, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-18, 37-28, 37-35, 37-43 Devils Lake, ND (NCS), 24-1, 24-4, 24-20 Devils Swamp Barge Channel at Baton Route, LA (Baton Rouge Harbor) (MR+T), 42-33 Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORH), 17-1, 17-4, 17-14 Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH), 17-18 Diamond Point, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-41 Diamond, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME (NED), 1-48 Dickinson Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-37 Dierks Lake, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-5, 28-14 Dillingham Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-6, 40-8, 40-12 Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH), 17-1, 17-5, 17-14, 17-18 Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) (ORP), 18-23 Disaster Preparedness Program-Inspections (MRK), 27-1, 27-8, 27-12 Dismal Point, AR (MR+T), 42-48, 42-51 Districkt of Columbia and MD Projects, VA (NAB), 4-42 District No, 7, Poinsett County, AR (MR+T), 42-27 Dively Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-13 Dixie Creek, GA (SAM), 10-58 Dodge City, LPP, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 1-15 Doe and Watanga River, Elizabethtown, TN (ORN), 15-19 Dog Creek, Waynoka, OK (SWT), 29-20 Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-8, 10-36, 1044 Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), CA (SPL), 33-38 Donaldson Point, MO (MR+T), 42-52 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (NED), 1-40, 1-48 Dorena Lake, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-12, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Double Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-37 Double Creek, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Douglas Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Douglas Lake, KS (SWT), 29-22 Dover, KY (ORH), 17-23 Downeyville Lake, IN (ORL), 16-22, 16-30 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Dredging Operations (SWG), 31-2, 31-44 thru Drinkwater Sewer, MO (LMM), 13-6 Drum Inlet, N.C. (SAW), 6-26, 6-30 Drury Drainage District, IL (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Dry Branch Creek, Dallas, TX (SWF), 30-23 Dry Brook Creek, Poland, NY (ORP), 18-29 Dry Creek, Braman, OK (SWT), 29-20 Dry Creek, Goodlettsville, TN (ORN), 15-19 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA (MRO), 26-15 Dry Creek, Roseville, CA (SPK), 35-32 Dry Creek, WA (NPW), 39-16 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO (MRK), 27-18 Dry Pass, AK (NPA), 40-10 Dry Run, IA (NCS), 24-26 DuBois, PA (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Dubuque Harbor, IA (NCD), 25-7, Dubuque, IA (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX (SWF), 30-22 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN (ORL), 16-33 Duck Creek, Garland, TX (SWF), 30-23 Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA (SPK), 35-36 Duck Island Harbor, CT (NED), 1-40 Duck Island Water Refuge, Lake Barkley, KY (ORN), 15-19 Duck Point Cove, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Duck River, TN (ORN), 15-13, 15-19 Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-6, 2143, 21-60, 21-73 Dungeness River, WA (NPS), 38-24 Dunkirk Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-4, 20-14, 20-22 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, GA Macon, GA (SAS), 8-17 Dupre, LA (MR+T), 42-45 Dutch Creek, Columbine Valley, CO (MRO), 26-23 Duval County, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-20, 9-34, 9-48 Duxbury Harbor, MA (NED), 1-40 Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (NPW), 39-1, 39-4, 39-10, 39-14, 39-17 Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1 (MR+T), 42-59 Dyersburg, TN (LMM), 13-6 Dymers Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 E Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, ND (MRO), 26-15 Eagle Creek Lake, KY (ORL), 16-22 Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH (ORP), 18-23 Eagle Creek, SC (SAN), 7-15 Eagle Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-7, 21-44, 21-60, 21-77 East Agana, Guam (POD), 36-15 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, VT (NAN), 2-32 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX (SWG), 31-37 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA (NPS), 38-23 East Boothbay Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40 East Bow Creek, Cedar County, NE (MRO), 26-23 East Branch Dam, CT (NED), 1-45, 1-54 East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-6, 18-13, 18-17, 18-27 East Brimfield Lake, MA (NED), 1-2, 1-21, 1-32, 1-56 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, IL (LMS), 14-13 East Fork White River, IN (ORL), 16-32, 16-33 East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail, IA (MRO), 26-21 East Fork of Clarks River, KY (ORN), 15-19 East Harbor State Park, OH (NCB), 20-32 East Hartford, CT (NED), 1-45, 1-53 East Haven Beaches, CT (NED), 1-50 East Hawaii Light Draft Navigation Facility, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-14 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-12, 23-15 East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH), 17-1, 17-5, 17-14, 17-19 East Moline, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 East Muddy Creek, MO (MRK), 27-17 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR (NPP), 37-41 East Nishnabotna River, IA (MRO), 26-20, 26-23 East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL (SAM), 10-1, 10-8, 10-36, 10-44 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 East Peoria Sanitary District, IL (NCR), 23-15 East Peoria, IL (NCR), 23-16 East Plum Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (SWT), 29-20 East Point, LA (LMK), 12-20 1-16 East Point, LA (LMN), 11-19 East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO (SWL), 28-21 East Rainelle, WV (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 East River, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 East River, Wareham, MA (NED), 1-50 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY (NAN), 2-32, 2-34 East Rockaway Inlet, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-3, 2-19, 2-23, 2-29, 2-34 East Sidney Lake, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-16 East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (LMS), 14-1, 14-3, 14-7, 14-10 East Weaver Creek, CA (SPK), 35-36 Eastchester Creek, NY (NAN), 2-30 Eastern Branch, VA (NAO), 5-18 Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA (MR+T), 42-17, 42-27, 42-34 Eastern SD and Upper Big Sioux River, SD, IA (MRO), 26-21 Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act (NCB), 20-34 Eastpoint Channel, FL (SAM), 10-53 Eastport Harbor, ME (NED), 1-48 Eau Galle River, WI (NCS), 24-1, 24-4, 24-20 Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-5, 9-30, 9-38 Echo Bay Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-30 Echo, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Edenton Harbor, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Edgartown Harbor, MA (NED), 1-40, 1-48 Edgewater Park, OH 1954 RandH Act (NCB), 20-34 Edisto River, North Fork, SC (SAN), 7-15 Edisto River, SC (SAN), 7-14, 7-15 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC (SAN), 7-15 Ediz Hook, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-2, 38-13, 38-18 Edmonds Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-23 Edward MacDowell Lake, NH (NED), 1-1, 1-18, 1-31, 1-55 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN (ORL), 16-31 Eel River, CA (SPK), 35-38 Egegik River, AK (NPA), 40-10 Egg Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-45, 42-46 Eight Mile Creek, AR (MR+T), 42-31, 42-34 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY (ORL), 16-32 El Dorado Lake, KS (SWT), 29-1, 29-4, 29-12, 29-17 El Dorado, West Branch, Walnut River, KS (SWT), 29-19 El Paso, TX (SWA), 32-1, 32-3, 32-11, 32-14 El Tuque Beach, Ponce, PR (SAJ), 9-56 Elder and Unionhouse Creeks, CA (SPK), 35-42 Eldon, IA (NCR), 23-17 Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-10 Eldred, IL (LMS), 14-13 Eldred, PA (ORP), 18-28 Elfin Cove, AK (NPA), 40-10 Elizabeth, NJ (NAN), 2-32, 2-34 Elizabeth, PA (ORP), 18-25 Elizabethtown, IL (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Elk City Lake, KS (SWT), 29-1, 29-4, 29-12, 29-17, 29-20 Elk City, KS (SWL), 28-27 Elk Creek Harbor, PA (NCB), 20-29 Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-12, 37-26, 37-34 Elk Creek, Clyde, KS (MRK), 27-17 Elk Creek, NE (MRO), 26-20 Elk River, AL and TN (ORN), 15-13 Elk River, MN (NCS), 24-26, 24-31, 24-32 Elk River, WV (ORH), 17-21 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD (NAB), 4-36 Elkhorn River, NE (MRO), 26-20, 26-23 Elkins, WV (ORP), 18-1, 18-4, 18-12, 18-16, 18-21 Elkland, PA (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Elkport, IA (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Ellicott Creek, Lehn Springs, NY (NCB), 20-33 Ellicott Creek, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-11, 20-17, 20-28 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Elm Creek, NE (MRO), 26-20, 26-21 Elm Fork Floodway, TX (SWF), 30-22 Elmira, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-16 Elochoman Slough, WA (NPP), 37-1, 37-6, 37-24, 37-32, 37-42 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY (LMM), 13-5 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-7, 38-15, 38-20 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA (NPS), 38-24 Emergency Bank Protection (NAP), 3-1, 3-11, 3-18 Emergency Flood Control Activities Norfolk, VA., District (NAO), 5-1, 5-9, 5-15 Tulsa, OK., District (SWT), 29-1, 29-9 Emergency Flood Control Activities Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work (NPS), 38-29 Emergency Flood Control Activities-Public Law 99, 84th Congress (NPS), 38-1, 38-29 Emergency Shore Protection (NCE), 21-2, 21-32 Emergency Steambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization New York District (NAN), 2-1, 2-18 Savannah, GA., District (SAS), 8-1, 8-7 Emergency Stream Bank and Shoreline Erosion Work and Snagging and Clearing Under Special Authorization (SWG), 31-2, 31-17 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 (POD), 36-1, 36-14 Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (LMS), 14-13 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (LMS), 14-13 1-17 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (LMS), 14-13 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (LMS), 14-13 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County, IA (MRO), 26-21 Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-5, 24-20 Emmett D. Sanders Lock and Dam (No.3) (SWL), 28-1, 28-3, 28-13 Empire-Stratton, OH (ORP), 18-23 Enderlin, Maple River, ND (NCS), 24-1, 24-5, 24-20 Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 England Pond Levee, IL (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 English Turn, LA (MR+T), 42-36 English, IN (Little Blue River) (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Enid Diversion Channel, OK (SWT), 29-20 Enid LPP, OK (SWT), 29-19 Enid Lake (LMK), 12-20 Ensley, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Entiat River, WA (NPS), 38-24, 38-27 Erie Harbor, PA (NCB), 20-1, 20-5, 20-15, 20-23, 20-34 Escambia Bay, FL (SAM), 10-54 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL (SAM), 10-51 Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-16, 10-37, 10-48 Esquatzel Coulee, WA (NPW), 39-16 Essex River, MA (NED), 1-40 Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI (SAJ), 9-62 Etna, PA (ORP), 18-28 Eufaula Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-9, 29-15, 29-18, 29-20 Eufaula, OK (SWL), 28-27 Eutaw-Mounds, MS (MR+T), 42-42 Evans Point, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Evansdale, IA (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Evanston, IL (NCC), 22-18 Evansville, IN (ORL), 16-1, 16-3, 16-13, 16-26, 16-31 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-2, 38-13, 38-18, 38-27 Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Exeter River, NH (NED), 1-40 Existing Levees and Extensions Thereto from Bastrop, LA, to Mouth of Boeuf River and at West monroe, LA (LMK), 12-17 Existing Projects (NCC), 22-1, 22-17 F Fabius River Drainage District, MO (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Fagasa Shore Protection, American Samoa (POD), 36-14 Fair Grounds Park, Clarksville, Tn (ORN), 15-19 Fair Landing, AR (MR+T), 42-47 Fairbanks, Tanana River and Chena Slough, AK (NPA), 40-11 Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE (MRK), 27-17 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-7, 35-26 Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY (NCB), 20-34 Fairport Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-5, 20-15, 20-23, 20-34 Fajardo Harbor, PR (SAJ), 9-55 Falcon/Little Eagle Creeks, IN (ORL), 16-33 Faleasao, American Samoa (POD), 36-15 Falfurrias, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-14, 31-20, 31-35 Fall Brook Lake, PA (NAB), 4-39 Fall Creek Lake, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-13, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Fall River Basin, SD (MRO), 26-1, 26-3, 26-9, 26-12 Fall River Harbor, MA (NED), 1-40, 1-48 Fall River Lake (SWT), 29-17 Fall River Lake, KS (SWT), 29-1, 29-4, 29-12, 29-17, 29-20 Fall River, KS (SWL), 28-27 Falls Lake, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-12, 6-21 Falmouth Harbor, MA (NED), 1-40 Falmouth Lake, KY (ORL), 16-22, 16-29 False Point, LA (MR+T), 42-41, 42-43 Fancy Bluff Creek, GA (SAS), 8-16 Far Creek, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-6, 6-19 Fargo, ND (NCS), 24-31 Farm Creek, IL (NCR), 23-1, 23-4, 23-7, 23-11 Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX (SWF), 30-23 Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-14, 23-15 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-13, 1-29, 1-38 Farmington, Des Moines River, IA (NCR), 23-17 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Faulkner Lake, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Feather Creek, Clinton, IN (ORL), 16-33 Feather River, CA (SPK), 35-35 Features of Existing Project (NCE), 21-2, 21-75 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD), 19-1, 19-7 Felsenthal, AR (LMK), 12-14 Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, OR (NPP), 37-41 Fern Ridge Lake, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-13, 37-27, 37-34, 37-43 Fernandina Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-5, 9-30, 9-38 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines, TX (LMN), 11-19 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-6, 30-15, 30-19 Filberts Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA (MR+T), 42-25 Filter-Cottonwood, MS (MR+T), 42-42 Finney Creek At Wachapreague, VA (NAO), 5-21 I-18 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-4, 2-19, 2-23, 2-32 Fire Island to Montauk Point, NY (NAN), 2-32 First Broad River, Polkville, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 Fischer Creek, Sand Springs, OK (SWT), 29-20 Fishing Bay, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-6, 4-24, 4-32 Fishing Creek, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-6, 4-24, 4-32 Fishing Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV (ORH), 17-25 Fishpond Drain and Tributaries (SAM), 10-58 Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORH), 17-1, 17-5, 17-14, 17-19 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) (NED), 1-45 Fivemile River Harbor, CT (NED), 1-40, 1-48 Flambeau Lake, WI (NCS), 24-32 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP), 37-41 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, Tulsa, OK (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Flathead River, MT (NPS), 38-23, 38-24 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Fletcher Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-45 Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 New England Division (NED), 1-2, 1-51 Pacific Ocean Division (POD), 36-1, 36-15 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP), 37-2, 37-43 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK), 35-2, 35-42 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS), 38-1, 38-29 Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 208 (POD), 36-1, 36-15 Flood Control Reservoir Operations New England Division (NED), 1-2, 1-23 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP), 37-2, 37-43 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Alaska District (NPA), 40-1, 40-4 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA), 32-1, 32-10 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB), 4-2, 4-21 Buffalo, NY., District (NCB), 20-1, 20-13, 20-17 Charleston, SC., District (SAN), 7-1, 7-7, 7-15 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC), 22-1, 22-9 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE), 21-2, 21-35 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG), 31-2, 31-16 Huntington, WV., District (ORH), 17-1, 17-12 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ), 9-1, 9-28 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK), 27-1, 27-8, 27-22 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL), 28-1, 28-6 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL), 33-1, 33-09, 33-20 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL), 16-1, 16-12 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM), 13-1, 13-3 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM), 10-2, 10-25 Nashville, TN., District (ORN), 15-1, 15-6, 15-9, 15-19 New Orleans District (LMN), 11-1, 11-11 New England Division (NED), 1-2, 1-24 New York District (NAN), 2-1, 2-17 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO), 26-1, 26-6, 26-22 Pacific Ocean Division (POD), 36-1, 36-4 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP), 3-1, 3-11, 3-17 Pittsburgh, Penn., District (ORP), 18-1, 18-11, 18-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP), 37-1, 37-13 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR), 23-1, 23-6, 23-16 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK), 35-1, 35-21 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN), 34-1, 34-4 Savannah, GA., District (SAS), 8-1, 8-7 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS), 38-1, 38-7 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS), 24-1, 24-32 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS), 14-1, 14-5, 14-8 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT), 29-1, 29-2, 29-8, 29-21 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK), 12-1, 12-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW), 39-1, 39-2 Wilmington, NC., District (SAW), 6-1, 6-2, 6-15, 6-32 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC and CE) (SAM), 10-2, 10-32 Flood Damage Prevention Studies Charleston, SC., District (SAN), 7-16 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT), 29-22 Flood Plain Management Services Charleston, SC., District (SAN), 7-16 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT), 29-22 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR (NPP), 37-41 Florence LPP, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Flourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-6, 28-14 Flower Lake, MS (MR+T), 42-47, 42-50 Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT (NPS), 38-24 Floyd County, GA (SAM), 10-58 Floyd River, Sioux City, IA (MRO), 26-15 Flushing Bay and Creek, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-9, 10-36, 10-44, 10-54 Follansbee, WV (ORP), 18-23 Folly Beach, SC (SAN), 7-16 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Folly River, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-4, 7-8, 7-11 Folsom Lake, American River, CA (SPK), 35-36 Forest Heights, MD (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Forest Home Towhead, LA (MR+T), 42-43 Forestville Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-73 Forked Deer River, TN, including South Fork (LMM), 13-5 Forked Deer, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Forsyth, MT (MRO), 26-15 Forsythe, Yellowstone River, MT (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Fort Adams, MS (MR+T), 42-38 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL (LMS), 14-13 1-19 Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW), 6-27 Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-9, 29-15, 29-18, 29-20 Fort Gibson, OK (SWL), 28-27 Fort Kent, ME (NED), 1-45 Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal (MRK), 27-16 Fort Lupton, CO (Lagoon) (MRO), 26-23 Fort Macon Park, N.C. (SAW), 6-27, 6-29 Fort Madison Harbor, IA (NCD), 25-7 Fort Myers Beach, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-5, 9-30, 9-38 Fort Niagara State Park, NY Sec 201 1965 FC Act (NCB), 20-34 Fort Peck Lake, MT (MRO), 26-1, 26-6, 26-11, 26-14, 26-18 Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-6, 9-30, 9-38, 9-54 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD (MRO), 26-1, 26-7, 26-11, 26-15, 26-18 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS (MRK), 27-17, 27-20 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Fort Supply Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-4, 29-12, 29-17 Fort Toulouse, Wetumpka, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-16, 10-37, 10-50 Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX (SWF), 30-22 Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX (SWF), 30-22 Foster Creek Road, WA (NPS), 38-24 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA (NAB), 4-2, 4-21, 4-29 Foster Lake, OR (NPP), 37-43 Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO (SWA), 32-1, 32-3, 32-11, 32-14 Four River Basins, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-27, 9-35, 9-50, 9-60, 9-61 Fourche Bayou, AR (SWL), 28-21 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR (SWL), 28-21 Fourmile Run, VA (NAB), 4-38, 4-42 Fourpole Creek, WV (ORH), 17-25 Fowl River, AL (SAM), 10-54 Fox Point Barrier, RI (NED), 1-45 Fox River, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-8, 21-44, 21-60 Fox River, WI: Locks and Dams (NCE), 21-2, 21-76 Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (NAP), 3-1, 3-12, 3-18, 3-23 Frankfort Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-8, 21-44, 21-61, 21-77 Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS (MRK), 27-17 Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) (ORL), 16-21, 16-22, 16-26, 16-31 Franklin Falls Dam, NH (NED), 1-1, 1-18, 1-31, 1-55 Frazer-Wolf Point, MT (MRO), 26-15 Frazeysburg, OH (ORH), 17-24 Freeport Harbor, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-4, 31-19, 31-26, 31-38, 31-39, 31-40, 31-44 Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG), 31-37 Freeport, IL (NCR), 23-14 Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) (ORP), 18-23, 18-24 Fremont, Ohio, Sandusky River (NCB), 20-31 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN (ORN), 15-13 Frenchboro Harbor, ME (NED), 1-40 Freshwater Bayou, LA (LMN), 11-17 Friars Point, MS (MR+T), 42-50 Friday Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-2, 38-13, 38-18 Friendly, WV (ORH), 17-23 Friendsville, MD (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Fritz Island, LA (MR+T), 42-43 Fritz Landing, TN (MR+T), 42-49 From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR (SWL), 28-21 From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, AR, on North Bank of Arkansas River (Portion Below Plum Bayou) (MR+T), 42-33 Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK (SWT), 29-22 Ft. Clinch State Park, Nassau County, FL (SAJ), 9-62 Ft. Collins, CO (MRO), 26-21 Fullerton, KY (ORH), 17-23 Fulton County, GA (SAM), 10-58 Fulton, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Furnace Brook, Quincy, MA (NED), 1-51 G Gadsden to Rome Coosa River Channel, AL (SAM), 10-52 Galax, VA (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Gale Creek, Oregon, IL (NCR), 23-16 Galena, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Galisteo Dam, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-6, 32-12 Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MD (MRO), 26-23 Gallipolis, OH (ORH), 17-23 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-5, 31-19, 31-26, 31-38, 31-40, 31-44 Gapway Swamp, N.C. and S.C. (SAW), 6-28 Gapway Swamp, SC (SAN), 7-15 Garapan Area, CNMI (POD), 36-15 Gardner, MA (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Gardners Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Garland City, AR (LMK), 12-18, 12-20 Garland City, AR (LMN), 11-19 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS (MRK), 27-18, 27-20 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (MRO), 26-1, 26-7, 26-11, 26-15, 26-18 Gasconade River, MO (MRK), 27-16 Gastineau Channel, AK (NPA), 40-10 Gate Creek Lake, OR (NPP), 37-39, 37-41 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-9, 5-14, 5-19 Gauley River, WV (ORH), 17-21 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis and Clark Lake, SD and NE 1-20 (MRO), 26-1, 26-7, 26-11, 26-15, 26-17, 26-18 Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO (MR+T), 42-49 Gaysville Lake, VT (NED), 1-48 Genegantslet Lake, NY (NAB), 4-39 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (NAP), 3-1, 3-12, 3-23 Genesee River, Village of Belmont, NY (NCB), 20-33 Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-5, 20-15, 20-24 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL and GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-30, 10-39, 10-50 Georges River, ME (NED), 1-40 Georgetown Harbor, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-4, 7-8, 7-11 Gering Valley, Gering Drain and Tributaries, NE (MRO), 26-20 Gering Valley, NE (MRO), 26-15 Gibson Creek, TN (ORN), 15-19 Gibson, LA (MR+T), 42-41 Gila River Basin, AZ (SPL), 33-1, 33-05, 33-16, 33-39 Gilder Creek, Mauldin, SC (SAN), 7-15 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE (MRO), 26-17 Giles Cutoff, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-41 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Gillham Lake, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-6, 28-14 Gills Creek, SC (SAN), 7-16 Gilmore Creek, MN (NCS), 24-32 Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS (MR+T), 42-26 Girty's Run, Allegheny County, PA (ORP), 18-29 Girty's Run, Millvale, PA (ORP), 18-21 Glasgow, MT (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Glasscock Cutoff, MS-LA (MR+T), 42-41 Gleason Creek, NV (SPK), 35-38 Glen Cove Creek, NY (NAN), 2-30 Glen Cove Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-34 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA (NED), 1-40, 1-50 Goat Island, GA and SC (SAS), 8-17 Golconda, IL (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Gold Creek, AK (NPA), 40-11 Goldbottom, MS (MR+T), 42-41 Goldsboro, Neause River, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Good Hope, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS (SAM), 10-52 Gooding Area, ID (NPW), 39-16 Goodrich, LA (MR+T), 42-42 Goodwood, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Goose Creek, Boulder, CO (MRO), 26-21 Goose Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36 Gordon Creek, Iowa Park, TX (SWT), 29-20 Gordon's Landing, Lake Champlain, VT (NAN), 2-30 Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM), 10-52 Goshen Creek, NJ (NAP), 3-25 Goudeau, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Gouldsboro Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Governors Run, MD (NAB), 4-39 Gowanus Creek Channel, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Grafton Pumping Station, ND (NCS), 24-1, 24-6, 24-20 Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL (LMS), 14-12 Grafton, ND (NCS), 24-26 Grahn, KY (ORH), 17-25 Grand (Neosho) River Basin, KS and OK (SWT), 29-22 Grand Bay, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Grand Bayou Pass, LA (LMN), 11-17 Grand Forks, ND (NCS), 24-31, 24-34 Grand Gulf, MS (MR+T), 42-41 Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI 21-9 (NCE), 21-1, 21-44, 21-61, 21-73 Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (LMN), 11-1, 11-6, 11-12, 11-15 Grand Lake O'the Cherokees (SWT), 29-20 Grand Marais Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-10, 21-44, 21-61 Grand Mount-State Historical Site, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-6, 24-20 Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill) (SWF), 30-22 Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road) (SWF), 30-22 Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control and Water Supply) (MR+T), 42-19, 42-34 Grand River Basin, MO and IA (MRK), 27-21 Grand River at Grandville, MI (NCE), 21-73 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-13 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-10, 21-45, 21-61 Grande Ronde Lake, OR (NPW), 39-17 Grande Ronde Valley, OR (NPW), 39-17 Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 RandH Act (NCB), 20-34 Grandview, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Grant Parish Below Colfax, LA (LMK), 12-19, 12-20 Grant Parish Below Colfax, LA (LMN), 11-19 Granville, PA (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Grapevine Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-6, 30-15, 30-19 Grasse River (Massena), NY (NCB), 20-29 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River) (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Graves Creek, ID (NPW), 39-16 Gravolet, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN (LMM), 13-6 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-3, 38-13, 38-18, 38-27 Grays Landing Lock and dam, Grays Landing, PA (ORP), 18-25 Grays Reef Passage, MI (NCE), 21-77 1-21 Grays River, WA (NPP), 37-37 Grayson Lake, KY (ORH), 17-1, 17-6, 17-14, 17-19 Grayville, Ii (ORL), 16-22 Great Bend, KS (SWT), 29-1, 29-5, 29-12, 29-17 Great Chazy River, NY (NAN), 2-30 Great Coharie Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ (NAP), 3-1, 3-12, 3-23 Great Falls, MT (MRO), 26-1, 26-3, 26-9, 26-12 Great Kills Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-30 Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI (NCE), 21-73 Great Lakes to Hudson River WW, NY (NAN), 2-30 Great Miami River, OH (ORL), 16-32, 16-33 Great Pee Dee River, SC (SAN), 7-14 Great Salt Plains Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-5, 29-12, 29-17 Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (NED), 1-40, 1-48, 1-50 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-29, 20-34 Great South Bay, NY (NAN), 2-30 Green Bay Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-10, 21-45, 21-61 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Green Brook, NJ (NAN), 2-35 Green Harbor, Marshfield, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-4, 1-26, 1-35, 1-50, 1-57 Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA (NCR), 23-14 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-18, 37-28, 37-35, 37-43 Green River Lake, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-7, 16-15, 16-29, 16-32, 16-33 Green River, Calhoun, KY (ORL), 16-32 Green River, WA (NPS), 38-24 Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA (SPK), 35-36 Green and Barren Rivers, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-2, 16-13, 16-18, 16-25 Greene County, AL (SAM), 10-58 Greene, NY (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-22, 16-26 Greenport Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-30 Greens Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-12 Greens Creek, Petal, MS (SAM), 10-53 Greensboro, PA (ORP), 18-25 Greenup, KY (ORH), 17-23 Greenvale Creek, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-3, 5-11, 5-16, 5-21 Greenville Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Greenville Harbor, MS (MR+T), 42-13, 42-26, 42-28, 42-34, 42-31 Greenville, TX (SWF), 30-22 Greenwich Bay, RI (NED), 1-40 Greenwich Harbor, CT (NED), 1-40 Greenwich Point Beach, CT (NED), 1-48 Greenwood Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-38 Greers Ferry Lake, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-10, 28-16 Gregg Creek, Brown County, KS, Granada Bridge (MRK), 27-22 Gregory Drainage District, MO (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Greilickville Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-77 Gretna Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Greybull, WY (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Griffithsvile-Yawkey, WV (ORH), 17-25 Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS (MRK), 27-18 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas (SWG), 31-37 Guadalupe River, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-8, 35-26 Guayanes Harbor, PR (SAJ), 9-55 Guilford Harbor, CT (NED), 1-40 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT (NED), 1-44 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT (NED), 1-44 Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co., FL (SAM), 10-1, 10-17, 10-37, 10-48 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border (SWG), 31-2, 31-5, 31-19, 31-27, 31-38, 31-42, 31-43, 31-44 GulfIntracoastal Waterway Between Apalachee Bay, FL, and Mexican Border (LMN), 11-17 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Between Apalachee Bay, FL, and Mexican Border (SAM), 10-1, 10-9, 10-36, 10-44 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Gulf Street, Milford, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-16, 1-30, 1-38, 1-53 Gulfport Harbor, MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-10, 10-36, 10-44 Guttenberg, IA (NCS), 24-26 Guyandotte River, WV (ORH), 17-21 Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS (MRK), 27-17 H Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO (MRK), 27-18 Hagaman, LA (MR+T), 42-42 Haikey Creek, OK (SWT), 29-20 Haines Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-11 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT (NED), 1-45, 1-54 Halls Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-12 Halstad, MN (NCS), 24-31 Halstead, KS (SWT), 29-1, 29-5, 29-12, 29-17 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River, IA (MRO), 26-20 Hamlet City Lake, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-13, 6-21 Hamlin Beach State Park, NY (NCB), 20-30, 20-34 Hammersley Inlet, WA (NPS), 38-23, 38-27 1-22 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT (NED), 1-44 Hammonds Small Boat Basin, OR (NPP), 37-37 Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY (NCB), 20-34 Hampton Beach, Hamptom, NH (NED), 1-44 Hampton Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Hampton Harbor, NH (NED), 1-40, 1-57 Hampton Institute, VA (NAO), 5-22 Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) (NAO), 5-1, 5-4, 5-12, 5-17 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-12 Hancock Brook Lake, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-17, 1-31, 1-54 Hanging Rock, OH (ORH), 17-23 Hannibal Harbor, MO (NCD), 25-8 Hannibal SBH, MO (NCR), 23-12 Hannibal, MO (NCR), 23-1, 23-4, 23-7, 23-11 Hanover, Hennepin County, MN (NCS), 24-26 Hanover, MN (NCS), 24-31 Hansen Dam, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-11, 33-21, 33-39 Harbert Point, MS (MR+T), 42-47 Harbor Beach Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-11, 21-45 Harbor Beach, Lake Huron, MI (NCE), 21-62 Harbor Office at Morro Bay, CA (SPL), 33-37 Harbor of Refuge (NAP), 3-1, 3-5, 3-15, 3-20 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (NED), 1-1, 1-4, 1-26, 1-36, 1-48 Harbor of Refuge, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Harbors at Washington Island, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-11, 21-73 Hardscrabble, LA (MR+T), 42-41 Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE (MRK), 27-1, 27-3, 27-10, 27-13, 27-20 Harlem River, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Harlem, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Harpers Ferry, WV (NAB), 4-39 Harpeth River, Williamson Co., TN (ORN), 15-19 Harraseeket River, ME (NED), 1-40 Harris Fork Creek, KY and TN (MR+T), 42-30, 42-34, 42-73, 42-80 Harrisburg, IL (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Harrison County, MS, shore protection (SAM), 10-51 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, II (LMS), 14-13 Harrisville Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-77 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) (ORL), 16-31 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO (MRK), 27-1, 27-8, 27-12, 27-16, 27-17, 27-20 Hartford, CT (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Hartford, WV (ORH), 17-23 Hartford, White River, VT (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-10 Hartwell Lake, GA and SC (SAS), 8-1, 8-8, 8-11, 8-16, 8-17 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA (LMN), 11-19 Hastings Harbor, MN (NCD), 25-7 Hatchie River, Alcorn, Co., MS (LMM), 13-6 Hathaway Landing, TN (MR+T), 42-49, 42-52 Haverhill, MA (NED), 1-45, 1-55 Haverstraw Bay, NY (NAN), 2-29 Havre, MT (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Hawarden, Dry Creek, IA (MRO), 26-20 Hawesville, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY (NED), 1-41 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA (NAP), 3-26 Hayden Island, OR (NPP), 37-39, 37-44 Hays, Big Creek, KS (MRK), 27-18 Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS (MRK), 27-22 Haysi, VA (ORH), 17-22 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA (NED), 1-45 Hazard, KY (ORL), 16-19, 16-22 Head of Island 21, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL (MR+T), 42-12 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID (NPW), 39-16, 39-17, 39-18 Helena AR and Vicinity (MR+T), 42-28, 42-31, 42-32, 42-34, 42-47, 42-59, 42-80 Helena Harbor, AR (LMM), 13-5 Hellens Crek, MD (NAB), 4-40 Helm Lake, IL (ORL), 16-24, 16-30 Heloise, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR (LMK), 12-19, 12-20 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR (LMN), 11-19 Hempstead Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-4, 2-19, 2-23, 2-34 Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA (NPS), 38-24 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1,2,3, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Henderson River, II (NCR), 23-14 Henderson, WV (ORH), 17-23 Hendrick's Harbor, ME (NED), 141 Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Henrico, AR (MR+T), 42-13, 42-47, 42-50 Henson Creek, Lake City, CO (SPK), 35-42 Hereford Inlet (NAP), 3-26 Hergot Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-15 Herkimer, NY (NAN), 2-32 Herreid, Spring Creek, SD (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Herring Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36 1-23 Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-5, 29-13, 29-17 Holbrook Levee Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ (SPL), 33-39 Hickman-Reelfoot, KY (MR+T), 42-13, 42-49 Hickory Creek, Warren Co., TN (ORN), 15-19 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-9, 35-26 Higginsport, OH (ORH), 17-23 Highland Bayou, Texas (SWG), 31-37 Highway 12, Colorado (SWA), 32-16 Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-17, 10-37, 10-48 Hildebrand lock and dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV (ORP), 18-25 Hills Creek Lake, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-19, 37-28, 37-36, 37-43 Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD (NAB), 4-38 Hillsborough Bay, FL (SAJ), 9-62 Hillsborough River, FL (SAJ), 9-45 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS (MRK), 27-1, 27-3, 27-10, 27-13, 27-20 Hillview Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-10 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-1, 36-2, 36-6, 36-8 Hingham Harbor, MA (NED), 1-41 Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-17, 10-37, 10-48 Hiwassee River, Polk and Bradley Counties, TN (ORN), 15-14 Hockanum River, Manchester, CT (NED), 1-50 Hockingport, OH (ORH), 17-23 Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA (SPL), 33-41 Hodges Village Dam, MA (NED), 1-2, 1-21, 1-33, 1-56 Hog Point, LA (MR+T), 42-38 Hoh River, WA (NPS), 38-24, 38-25 Hoko River, Sekiu, WA (NPS), 38-25 Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio (Great Miami River) (ORL), 16-22 Holland Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-12, 21-45, 21-62, 21-73 Holley Lake, OR (NPP), 37-39, 37-41 Holloway Lake, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Holly, Colorado (SWA), 32-16 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL (NCC), 22-18 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME (NED), 1-45 Holmes Creek, FL (SAM), 10-51 Holston River, TN (ORN), 15-13 Holyoke, MA (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Homeplace, LA (MR+T), 42-12 Homer Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-2, 40-6, 40-8, 40-10 Hominy Swamp, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Homme Lake and Dam, ND (NCS), 24-1, 24-6, 24-21 Homochitto River, MS (LMK), 12-15, 12-20 Homosassa River, FL (SAJ), 9-54, 9-55 Honeoye Lake, NY (NCB), 20-33 Honey Creek Levee, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Honey Hill Lake, NH (NED), 1-48. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-6, 4-24, 4-32 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA (NPS), 38-25 Hoonah Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Hooper Bay (Airport River), AK (NPA), 40-12 Hooper, NE (MRO), 26-15, 26-20 Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, NY (NAN), 2-32 Hop Brook Lake, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-17, 1-31, 1-54 Hopedale Cutoff, AR (MR+T), 42-45 Hopefield Point, AR-TN (MR+T), 42-48, 42-51 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH (NED), 1-1, 1-18, 1-31, 1-55 Hoquiam River, WA (NPS), 38-23, 38-25, 38-27 Hords Creek Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-6, 30-15, 30-19 Horn Harbor, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-4, 5-12, 5-17, 5-21 Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS (MR+T), 42-31, 42-34 Hornell, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-17, 4-28 Horseshoe Bend, WA (NPS), 38-29 Horseshoe Cove, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Horseshoe, MS (MR+T), 42-47 Hoskins Creek, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-4, 5-12, 5-17, 5-21 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel, SD (MRO), 26-18 Hotchkiss Bend, MO (MR+T), 42-52 Hotwells to Moncla, LA (MR+T), 42-57 Houlka Creek, Chickasaw and Clay Counties, MS (SAM), 10-52 Houma Navigation Canal, LA (LMN), 11-17 Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA (NED), 1-1, 1-2, 1-16, 1-41, 1-45, 1-48, 1-54 Houston County, AL (SAM), 10-58 Houston School Rd. Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS (SAM), 10-52 Houston Ship Channel, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-7, 31-19, 31-20, 31-30, 31-38, 31-40, 31-44 Houston, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-7, 24-21, 24-34 Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-8, 38-15, 38-20 Howards Mill Lake, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Hudson Harbor, WI (NCS), 24-28 Hudson River Channel, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Hudson River, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Hudson River, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-5, 2-19, 2-23, 2-28, 2-34 Hudson River, NY Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project (NAN), 2-1, 2-28 1-24 Hudson, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN (MR+T), 42-48 Hugo Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-5, 29-13, 29-17 Hulah Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-5, 29-13, 29-17 Hull Branch, MS (SAM), 10-58 Humboldt Bay, CA (SPN), 34-11 Humboldt Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV (SPK), 35-38 Humboldt, TN (LMM), 13-6 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Hunting Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-12 Hunting Island Beach, SC (SAN), 7-14 Huntingdon, TN (LMM), 13-6 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA (NPP), 37-38 Huntington Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30, 2-34 Huntington Lake, IN (ORL), 16-1, 16-8, 16-15 Huntington Point, MS (MR+T), 42-42 Huntington, MA (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Huntington, WV (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Huot, MN (NCS), 24-31 Huron Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-6, 20-15 Huron Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-24, 20-34 Hurricane Barrier Operations (NED), 1-2, 1-23 Hurricane Creek, Prentiss Co., MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-18, 10-37, 10-48 Hutchins, KY (ORH), 17-25 Hutchinson LPP, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Hyannis Harbor, MA (NED), 1-41 Hyde County Dike, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Hydrologic Studies San Francisco, Calif., District (SAN), 7-16 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT), 29-22 I Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii (POD), 36-12 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam (NPW), 39-1, 39-5, 39-10, 39-14, 39-23 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA (NAP), 3-25 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE (NAP), 3-25 Ida Grove, IA (MRO), 26-15, 26-20 Iliuliuk Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Illinois River, IL (MR+T), 42-21 Illinois River, Liverpool, IL (NCR), 23-17 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, IL (NCC), 22-18, 22-19 Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) (NCR), 23-14 Illinois Waterway, IL (LMS), 14-1, 14-2 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (NCR), 23-1, 23-2, 23-7, 23-9, 23-14, 23-18, 23-19, 23-20, 23-21 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL (NCR), 23-1, 23-2, 23-7 Illinois and Michigan Canal, IL (NCR), 23-16 Imperial Beach, CA (SPL), 33-38 Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, IL (LMS), 14-13 Indian Creek Lake, IA (MRO), 26-17 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-31, 16-33 Indian Creek, Hastings, IA (MRO), 26-23 Indian Grave Drainage District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-15 Indian Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK), 27-18 Indian River County, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-21, 9-34, 9-48 Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (NAP), 3-1, 3-5, 3-16, 3-20 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (Beverly Shores, IN) (NCC), 22-1, 22-5, 22-11, 22-15 Indiana Harbor, IN (NCC), 22-1, 22-4, 22-11, 22-14, 22-17 Indiana Shoreline, IN (NCC), 22-1, 22-6, 22-11, 22-15 Indianapolis, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-22, 16-31 Indianola, NE (MRK), 27-17, 27-20 Industrial Levee (Ensley Bottoms) (MR+T), 42-13 Industry, PA (ORP), 18-23 Inez, KY (ORH), 17-25 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay (NAP), 3-24 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE and MD (NAP), 3-21 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA (LMN), 11-17 Inland Waterway from Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE (NAP), 3-1, 3-6, 3-16, 3-21 Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects (NED), 1-1, 1-10 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Alaska District (NPA), 40-1, 40-4, 40-7 Albuquerque, NM., District (SWA), 32-1, 32-9 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB), 4-2, 4-21 Buffalo, NY., District (NCB), 20-1, 20-12 Charleston, SC., District (SAN), 7-1, 7-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE), 21-2, 21-35 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF), 30-2, 30-11, 30-22 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG), 31-2, 31-16 Huntington, WV., District (ORH), 17-1, 17-11, 17-20 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ), 9-1, 9-28 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK), 27-1, 27-7, 27-12, 27-20 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL), 28-1, 28-6 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL), 33-1, 33-42 Louisville, KY., District (ORL), 16-1, 16-12, 16-33 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM), 13-1, 13-2 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM), 10-2, 10-25 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN), 15-1, 15-6, 15-9, 15-19 New York District (NAN), 2-1, 2-17 New England Division (NED), 1-2, 1-22 New Orleans District (LMN), 11-1, 11-11 I-25 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO), 26-1, 26-6, 26-11 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP), 3-1, 3-14 Pittsburgh, Penn., District (ORP), 18-1, 18-11, 18-28 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP), 37-1, 37-14 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR), 23-1, 23-6, 23-15 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK), 35-1, 35-21, 35-28 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN), 34-1, 34-4, 34-12 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS), 8-1, 8-10 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS), 38-1, 38-8 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS), 24-1, 24-18, 24-31 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS), 14-1, 14-5 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT), 29-1, 29-2, 29-8, 29-20 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK), 12-1, 12-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW), 39-1, 39-2, 39-18 Wilmington, NC., District (SAW), 6-1, 6-15 Inspection of Completed Local Protection Project (MRO), 26-1, 26-18 Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works (NPW), 39-1, 39-3 Inspection of Completed Projects (NAB), 4-2, 4-41 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO), 26-20 Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL (SAM), 10-52 Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) (NPP), 37-37 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), OR (NPP), 37-37 Intracoastal Waterway Miami to Key West, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA (LMN), 11-17 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-6, 9-30, 9-39 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-7, 9-30, 9-39 Intragency Water Resources Development (SWT), 29-22 Inventory of Dams (SWT), 29-22 Iola LPP, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Iowa Point, LA (MR+T), 42-38 Iowa River, IA (NCR), 23-17 Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Ipswich River, MA (NED), 1-41, 1-48 Irondale, AL (SAM), 10-53 Irondequoit Bay, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-6, 20-15, 20-24 Ironton, OH (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Iroquois River, Sugar Creek, Watseka, IL (NCR), 23-17 Irving Township, WI (NCS), 24-26 Irvington Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-34 Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-9, 35-26 Island 1, KY (MR+T), 42-53 Island 11, MO (MR+T), 42-52 Island 15, TN (MR+T), 42-49, 42-52 Island 18, MO (MR+T), 42-48 Island 18, TN (MR+T), 42-52 Island 20, MO-TN (MR+T), 42-51 Island 21, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Island 25, AR (MR+T), 42-51 Island 26, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Island 3 and 4, KY (MR+T), 42-50 Island 30 (MR+T), 42-51 Island 40, TN-AR (MR+T), 42-48 Island 62, AR (MR+T), 42-47, 42-50 Island 63, MS (MR+T), 42-47, 42-50 Island 64, AR (MR+T), 42-50 Island 67, MS (MR+T), 42-47, 42-50 Island 68, AR (MR+T), 42-47 Island 70, MS (MR+T), 42-45 Island 8, KY (MR+T), 42-49 Island 82, AR (MR+T), 42-42, 42-44 Island 84, AR (MR+T), 42-42, 42-44 Island 86, AR (MR+T), 42-44 Island 9, KY-TN (MR+T), 42-49, 42-52 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA (NED), 1-45 Island Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36 Island End River, MA (NED), 1-41, 1-57 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-22, 16-27 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME (NED), 1-41 Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH (NED), 1-41 Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-13, 4-26, 4-34 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME (NED), 1-45 Israel River, NH (NED), 1-51, 1-53 Ithaca, NY, Cayuga Inlet, NY (NCB), 20-31, 20-34 J J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN), 15-1, 15-7, 15-9, 15-18 J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (SAS), 8-1, 8-8, 8-10, 8-15, 8-17 Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA (NPS), 38-25 Jackson County Levee District 2, White River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Jackson Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Jackson Hole, WY (NPW), 39-1, 39-3, 39-10, 39-16 Jackson Point, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-6, 10-35, 10-43 Jackson, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV (ORH), 17-25 Jacksonville Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-8, 9-9, 9-31, 9-40 Jacksonville-Clarksville, IN (ORL), 16-26 Jamaica Bay, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 James River, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-4, 5-12, 5-17, 5-23 James River, Yankton, SD (MRO), 26-21, 26-23 1-26 James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No.13) (SWL), 28-1, 28-3, 28-13 Jamestown Reservoir, ND (MRO), 26-15 Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI (NCR), 23-14 Jarvis Creek, A (NAO), 5-21 Jefferson River, MT (MRO), 26-18 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Jemez Canyon Dam, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-6, 32-12 Jenks LPP, OK (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT (NED), 1-44 Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV (NAB), 4-1, 4-13, 4-26, 4-34 Jeremy Creek, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-5, 7-8, 7-11 Jesuit Bent, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL and GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-30, 10-39, 10-50 Joe Creek, Tulsa, OK (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Joe Pool Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-7, 30-16, 30-19 John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA (NPP), 37-1, 37-19, 37-28, 37-36, 37-46 John Day River, OR (NPP), 37-38, 37-39, 37-41 John Drainage District, OR (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, VA and NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-15, 6-21 John Martin Reservoir, CO (SWA), 32-1, 32-4, 32-12 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS (SWT), 29-1, 29-6, 29-13, 29-17 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA (ORH), 17-1, 17-6, 17-14, 17-19 John's Pass, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-9, 9-31, 9-40, 9-54 Johnson Bay, Luec, Me (NED), 1-45 Johnson Bayou, LA (SWG), 31-37 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF), 30-23 Johnson Creek, OR (NPP), 37-39 Johnsonburg, PA (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Johnstown, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-4, 18-12, 18-16, 18-21, 18-29 Jones Inlet, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-6, 2-19, 2-24, 2-29 Jonesport Harbor, ME (NED), 1-1, 1-5, 1-27, 1-36, 1-57 Jonesville, LA (LMK), 12-14 Jonesville, LA (MR+T), 42-26, 42-33, 42-70 Josias River, ME (NED), 1-41 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Julian, Rock Creek, NE (MRO), 26-20 Juneau Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Junior, LA (MR+T), 42-36 K Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-11 Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-1, 36-4, 36-7 Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii (POD), 36-1, 36-4, 36-7, 36-8 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (POD), 36-14 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Kake Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-2, 40-6, 40-8 Kalama River Levee, WA (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA (NPP), 37-37 Kalamazoo River, MI (NCE), 21-2, 21-33, 21-69, 21-72, 21-73 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Kanagaroo Point, AR (MR+T), 42-50 Kanawha River Locks and Dams, WV (ORH), 17-18 Kanawha River, WV (ORH), 17-1, 17-2, 17-13 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-12 Kankakee River, IL and IN (NCC), 22-19 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK), 27-1, 27-4, 27-10, 27-14, 27-20 Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (MRK), 27-1, 27-20 Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (MRK), 27-17 Kansas City on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS (MRK), 27-17 Kansas River Navigation (MRK), 27-18 Kansas River and Minor Tributaries (MRK), 27-20 Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-11 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Kasilof Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-1, 14-4, 14-7, 14-10, 14-13 Kaskaskia River, IL (LMS), 14-9, 14-13 Kate Aubrey, TN (MR+T), 42-48, 42-51 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-1, 36-2, 36-6 Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii (POD), 36-12 Kaw Lake (SWT), 29-17 Kaw Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-6, 29-13, 29-17 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-1, 36-2, 36-6, 36-8 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-15 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-12 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-10, 35-26 Kawishisi River, MN (NCS), 24-32 Kawkawlin River, MI (NCE), 21-2, 21-34, 21-56, 21-69 1-27 Kays Creek, UT (SPK), 35-36 Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-13 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Keene, NH (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Kehoe Lake, KY (ORH), 17-22 Keithsburg Drainage District, IL (NCR), 23-15 Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-11 Kelleys Island, OH (NCB), 20-29 Kempe Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-41 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID (NPW), 39-18 Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA (NPS), 38-23, 38-28 Kennebec River, ME (NED), 1-1, 1-5, 1-27, 1-36, 1-48, 1-51, 1-57 Kennebunk River, ME (NED), 1-41, 1-57 Kenner, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Kenosha Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-13, 21-46, 21-62, 21-73 Kentucky Point, KY (MR+T), 42-49, 42-52 Kentucky River, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-2, 16-13, 16-25, 16-33 Kern River-California Adqueduct Intertie, CA (SPK), 35-36 Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-16 Keshequa Creek, Nunda, NY (NCB), 20-33 Ketchikan Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10, 40-11 Keuka Lake Outlet, NY (NCB), 20-33 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Kewaunee Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-62 Kewaunee River, WI (NCE), 21-73 Kewaunee, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-13, 21-46 Keweenaw Waterways, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-14, 21-46, 21-62 Key Creek, Minden, IA (WW Lagoon) (MRO), 26-23 Key West Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Key West, FL (SAJ), 9-56 Keyes Point, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Keyport Harbor, NJ (NAN), 2-1, 2-6, 2-19, 2-24, 2-29, 2-35 Keystone Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-9, 29-15, 29-18, 29-20, 29-22 Keystone, OK (SWL), 28-27 Kickapoo Creek, DeWitt Co., IL (NCR), 23-17 Kickapoo River, WI (NCS), 24-26, 24-32 Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii (POD), 36-11, 36-15 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, NJ and NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-6, 2-20, 2-24 Kindred Lake, ND (NCS), 24-28 King's Point--Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-41 Kings Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA (NED), 1-41 Kingston Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-23 Kingston-Edwardsville, PA (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC (SAN), 7-15 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, SC (SAN), 7-15 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY (ORP), 18-1, 18-6, 18-13, 18-17, 18-27 Kirbyville, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-14, 31-21 Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL (NCR), 23-13 Kissimmee River, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Kittaning, PA (ORP), 18-28 Kittanning, PA (ORP), 18-21, 18-23, 18-24, 18-28 Kitzmiller, MD (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Klamath River, CA (SPK), 35-36 Klondike, AR (MR+T), 42-43 Klutina River, Cooper Center, AK (NPA), 40-11 Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Knapps Narrows, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-7, 4-25, 4-32 Knife River Harbor, MN (NCE), 21-77 Knife River, Stanton, ND (MRO), 26-23 Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA (SPN), 34-12 Knightville Dam, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-13, 1-29, 1-52 Knobb's Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Kodiak Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-9, 40-10 Kootenai River, ID and MT (NPS), 38-23, 38-25 Krotz Springs, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-11 Kuhlman Bayou, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-12 L L'Anguille River Basin, AR (MR+T), 42-21, 42-34, 42-67, 42-73 La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS), 38-25 La Crosse, WI (NCS), 24-28, 24-34 La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI (NCS), 24-1, 24-7, 24-21 La Forge, MO (MR+T), 42-49 La Grange Bayou, FL (SAM), 10-51, 10-54 La Trappe, MD (NAB), 4-36 LaPointe Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-77 Lac LaBelle Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-77 Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-7, 24-21 Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-16 Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-13 Lackawanna River Basin, PA (NAB), 4-1, 4-13, 4-34 Lackawanna, NY, Smokes Creek (NCB), 20-31 Lafayette River, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-22 Lago de Cerillos, PR (SAJ), 9-50 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA (NED), 1-41, 1-50 1-28 Lagrange Gut, Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI (SMAJ), 9-62 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Lake #9 Pumping plant, KY (MR+T), 42-68 Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN (NCS), 24-26 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND (NCS), 24-1, 24-8, 24-21 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur-Bulkheads and Jetties (LMN), 11-17 Lake Brownwood Modification, TX (SWF), 30-22 Lake Camanche, CA (SPK), 35-36 Lake Champlain, VT (NAN), 2-30 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA (LMN), 11-17 Lake Charles, LA (LMN), 11-14 Lake Charlotte, MN (NCS), 24-32 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY (ORP), 18-23 Lake Chicot, AR (MR+T), 42-27 Lake City Harbor, MN (NCD), 25-7 Lake City, TN (ORN), 15-19 Lake Concordia, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Lake County Levee and Drainage District (MR+T), 42-59 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL (SMAJ), 9-55 Lake Crockett, WA (NPS), 38-23, 38-28 Lake Darling Dam, ND (NCS), 24-26 Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA (SAM), 10-52 Lake Elsinore, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-11 Lake Erie, OH (NCB), 20-33 Lake Erie, NY (NCB), 20-33 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA (ORP), 18-23 Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX (SWF), 30-22 Lake George, Hobart, IN (NCC), 22-1, 22-6, 22-12, 22-16 Lake Guntersville, AL (ORN), 15-19 Lake Harbor, FL (SMAJ), 9-56 Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) (SWT), 29-20 Lake Karnac, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-41 Lake Kemp, TX (SWT), 29-1, 29-6, 29-13, 29-17 Lake Lytle, OR (NPP), 37-43 Lake Michigan Edgewater/Rogers Park (NCC), 22-18 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL (NCC), 22-18 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL (NCC), 22-18 Lake Montauk, NY (NAN), 2-30 Lake Neark, AR (MR+T), 42-51 Lake Ogleton, MD (NAB), 4-40 Lake Oroville, CA (SPK), 35-36 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA, (Hurricane Protection) (LMN), 11-1, 11-6, 11-13, 11-15 Lake Pontchartrain, LA (MR+T), 42-17, 42-56 Lake Pontchartrain, North Shore, LA (LMN), 11-15 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA (MR+T), 42-33 Lake Providence Harbor, LA (LMK), 12-15 Lake Providence, LA (MR+T), 42-42 Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-8, 24-21 Lake River Delta Area, WA (NPP), 37-41, 37-44 Lake River, WA (NPP), 37-37 Lake Shelbyville, IL (LMS), 14-13 Lake Sidney Lanter, GA (SAM), 10-50 Lake St. Clair, MI Channels (NCE), 21-1, 21-14, 21-47, 21-63 Lake Texoma, OK and TX (SWT), 29-1, 29-9, 29-15, 29-18, 29-22 Lake Traverse, MN and SD (NCS), 24-1, 24-9, 24-21, 24-25 Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-4, 38-14, 38-19, 38-28 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (SWT), 29-1, 29-6, 29-13, 29-17 Lakeport Lake, CA (SPK), 35-36 Lakes, Levees, and Recreational Facilities (LMS), 14-1, 14-12 Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, OH (NCB), 20-27 Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH (NCB), 20-30 Lamoille River, VT (NAN), 2-32, 2-34 Lamprey River, NH (NED), 1-41 Lancassange Creek, Clark Co., IN (ORL), 16-33 Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY (NCB), 20-31 Lancaster, Israel River, NH (NED), 1-45 Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-16 Lansing (Grand River), MI (NCE), 21-74 Lansing Harbor, IA (NCD), 25-7 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID (NPW), 39-16 Larchmont Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-30 Largo Sound Channel, FL (SMA), 9-55 Larned LPP, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane Protection) (LMN), 11-1, 11-7, 11-13, 11-16 Larsen Bay, AK (NPA), 40-12 Las Animas, Colorado (SWA), 32-16 Las Cruces, New Mexico (SWA), 32-16 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego Co, CA (SPL), 33-38 Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV (SPL), 33-41 Latrobe, PA (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Latta Brook Rd., NY (NAB), 4-38 Lauderdale County, MS (SAM), 10-58 Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa (POD), 36-14 Lauliitaui-Aumi, American Samoa (POD), 36-15 Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii (POD), 36-14 Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-1, 36-3, 36-6 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORN), 15-1, 15-7, 15-10, 15-18 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID (NPW), 39-16 Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas (SWG), 31-37 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel 1-29 Improvement, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 Lavon Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 Lawrence, Kansas River, KS (MRK), 27-17, 27-20 Lawrenceburg, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 LeSueur, MN (NCS), 24-31 Lead Bayou, MS (LMK), 12-1, 12-5, 12-10, 12-12 Leading Creek, WV (ORH), 17-24 Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS (SAM), 10-52, 10-58 Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-18, 10-37, 10-48 Leavenworth, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Lebanon Junction, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Lee County, FL (SAJ), 9-56 Lee Towhead, MO (MR+T), 42-49 Lee, Housatonic River, MA (NED), 1-45 Leesville, VA (SAW), 6-28 Leetonia, OH (ORP), 18-21, 18-28 Leetsdale, PA (ORP), 18-23 Legonier, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA (NAP), 3-27 Leipsic River, DE (NAP), 3-25 Leith's Creek, NC (SAN), 7-15 Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Leland Bar, AR-MS (MR+T), 42-44 Leland Bowman Lock, LA (LMN), 11-17 Leland Harbors, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-15, 21-47, 21-63 Leland Neck, AR-MS (MR+T), 42-44 Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS (MR+T), 42-42 Lemon Creek, NY (NAN), 2-34 Leota, MS (MR+T), 42-44 Lepua Area, American Samoa (POD), 36-1, 36-3, 36-6 Letanier, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Letart Falls, OH (ORH), 17-23 Letart, WV (ORH), 17-23 Levee Between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN (NCC), 22-19 Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO (MR+T), 42-59 Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO (MR+T), 42-59 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10 and 13 (LMS), 14-14 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL (LMS), 14-14 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN (ORL), 16-23 Levee Unit 10, White River, IN (ORL), 16-23 Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN (ORL), 16-23 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Levee Unit 2, White River, IN (ORL), 16-27 Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, In (ORL), 16-23 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Levee Unit 9, White River, IN (ORL), 16-23 Levee Unit 5, Wabash River, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Levee Unit 8, IN (White River) (ORL), 16-21 Levee Unit 8, Wabash River, IN (ORL), 16-31 Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL (ORL), 16-23 Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa (SWT), 29-20 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN (ORL), 16-27 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA (ORH), 17-1, 17-6, 17-14, 17-19 Lewis River Area, WA (NPP), 37-38, 37-41, 37-44 Lewis River, WA (NPP), 37-37 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Lewisport, KY (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and WA (NPW), 39-1, 39-5, 39-10, 39-14 Lewisville Dam, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Lexington Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-15, 21-47, 21-63, 21-77 Libby Dam-Lake Koocanusa, MT (NPS), 38-1, 38-10, 38-16, 38-21 Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas (SWG), 31-37 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, NJ (NAN), 2-1, 2-16, 2-22, 2-27 License Fees Collected Through Fiscal Year 1990 (NCD), 25-9 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County) (ORL), 16-31 Lick Run Creek, Baldwin, PA (ORP), 18-29 Lick Run, Roanoke, VA (SAW), 6-28 Licking River, KY (ORL), 16-20, 16-32 Lido Key, FL (SAJ), 9-56 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT (NED), 1-44 Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY (NCB), 20-33 Lincoln Lake, IL (ORL), 16-24 Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-7, 38-15, 38-20 Lincoln, NH (NED), 1-45 Lincoln, Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (MRO), 26-20 Linda, MO (MR+T), 42-49 Linderberg Bay Area, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ), 9-62 Linton, ND (MRO), 26-15 Linwood Bend, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Linwood, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Lisle, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-17, 4-28 Little Arkansas River, Sedgwick, KS (SWT), 29-20 1-30 Little Bay DeNoc, MI (NCE), 21-77 Little Bay, TX (SWG), 31-37 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO (MRK), 27-17 Little Blue River Lakes, MO (MRK), 27-1, 27-4, 27-10, 27-14 Little Blue River, Clay County, NE, Weyenberg Bridge (MRK), 27-22 Little Blue River, Nuckolls County, NE, Bridge #4525 (MRK), 27-22 Little Blue River, Thayer County, NE, Gilead North Bridge (MRK), 27-22 Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, Spence Bridge (MRK), 27-22 Little Blue River, Wasington County, KS, County Road (MRK), 27-22 Little Buffalo Creek, Sanford, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 Little Caillou Bayou, LA (LMN), 11-17 Little Calumet River Basin (Cady March Ditch), IN (NCC), 22-18 Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN (NCC), 22-19 Little Calumet River, IL (NCC), 22-18 Little Calumet River, IN (NCC), 22-1, 22-7, 22-12, 22-16 Little Chena River Dam (NPA), 40-11 Little Colorado River at Holbrook (SPL), 33-1, 33-09, 33-21 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-18, 10-37, 10-48, 10-52 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD (NAB), 4-36 Little Cypress, MO (MR+T), 42-49 Little Dell Lake, UT (SPK), 35-1, 35-11, 35-26 Little Egg Harbor, NJ (NAP), 3-25 Little Goose Lock and Dam-Lake Bryan, WA (NPW), 39-1, 39-6, 39-10, 39-14, 39-23 Little Harbor, NH (NED), 1-41, 1-57 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA (NED), 1-41 Little Harpeth River, Brentwood, TN (ORN), 15-19 Little Kanawha River, WV (ORH), 17-21 Little Lagoon, Gulf Shores, AL (SAM), 10-53 Little Lake Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-15, 21-47, 21-63 Little Limestone Creek, TN (ORN), 15-19 Little Machipongo River, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-5, 5-12, 5-17, 5-21 Little Manatee River, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL), 28-21 Little Miami River, OH (ORL), 16-32 Little Missouri River Below Murfreeboro, AR (LMK), 12-17 Little Missouri River, AR (LMK), 12-15 Little Missouri River, Medora, ND (MRO), 26-23 Little Neck Bay, NY (NAN), 2-30 Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE (MRO), 26-17 Little Papillion Creek, NE (MRO), 26-15, 26-20 Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-7, 28-14 Little Red River District 1, AR (SWL), 28-21 Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR (SWL), 28-21 Little River (Creek), VA (NAO), 5-21 Little River Basin, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-7, 28-14, 28-28 Little River Dike, Westfield, MA (NED), 1-45 Little River Diversion Channel, MO (MR+T), 42-21 Little River Drainage District, MO (MR+T), 42-59,42-67 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-5, 7-9, 7-12 Little River at Cayuga Island, NY (NCB), 20-29 Little River, Belfast, ME (NED), 1-2, 1-19, 1-32, 1-38 Little River, DE (NAP), 3-24 Little River, LA (LMK), 12-15 Little Rock Levee, AR, East End (SWL), 28-21 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Little Scooba Creek, MS (SAM), 10-58 Little Sioux River, IA (MRO), 26-1, 26-3, 26-9, 26-12, 26-21, 26-23 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-6, 20-15, 20-24 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Little Tallahatchie River, MS (LMK), 12-15 Little Tennessee River, TN (ORN), 15-13 Little Turtle Creek, SUllivan Co., IN (ORL), 16-33 Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT (SPK), 35-38 Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX (SWF), 30-23 Little White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-13 Little Wicomico River, VA (NAB), 4-1, 4-7, 4-25, 4-32 Little Wood River, ID (NPW), 39-16, 39-17, 39-18 Littleville Lake, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-13, 1-29, 1-52 Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Lock Haven, PA (NAB), 4-1, 4-14, 4-26, 4-34, 4-38 Lock No.2 and Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No.2), AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-3 Lock and Dam 13, AR (SWT), 29-20 Lock and Dam No.3, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-3 Lock and Dam No.5, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-4, 28-13 Locklies Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Locks and Dams (NCD), 25-5, 25-6 Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD), 19-6 Lockwoods Folly River, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-6, 6-19 Lodge Creek, Chinook, MT (MRO), 26-23 Logan Creek, NE (MRO), 26-23 Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft, NE (MRO), 26-20 Logan, OH (ORH), 17-24 Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR (SWL), 28-22 Long Beach Island (NAP), 3-26 Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO (MRK), 1-31 27-1, 27-4, 27-11, 27-14 Long Branch, Jacksonville, FL (SAJ), 9-62 Long Interlaken Lake, WI (NCS), 24-32 Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Long Lake Area Helena, AR (LMM), 13-6 Long Lake Dam (NPA), 40-11 Long Lake, Helena, AR (MR+T), 42-13 Long Lake, LA (MR+T), 42-40 Long Tom River, OR (NPP), 37-37 Longboat Pass, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-9, 9-31, 9-40, 9-54 Lookout Point Lake, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-20, 37-28, 37-36, 37-43 Lookout, TN-AR (MR+T), 42-48, 42-51 Loosahatchie Memphis, TN (MR+T), 42-48, 42-51 Lorain Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-6,20-15,20-24,20-34 Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF), 30-23 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-06, 33-16, 33-33 Los Angeles River, CA (SPL), 33-26 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA (SPL), 33-26 Los Coches Creek, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-6, 33-16, 33-35 Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-20, 37-28, 37-36, 37-43 Lost Creek at Columbus, NE (MRO), 26-1, 26-3, 26-10, 26-12, 26-23 Lost Creek, Carbon Hill, AL (SAM), 10-53 Lost River, MN (NCS), 24-26 Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee (MR+T), 42-34 Louisville Lake, IL (ORL), 16-22, 16-30 Louisville, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-22, 16-23, 16-26, 16-31 Loup River, Columbus, NE (MRO), 26-15 Loves Park, IL (NCR), 23-11 Lowell Creek, AK (NPA), 40-11 Lowell, MA (NED), 1-45, 1-55 Lower Arkansas Basin, AR (MR+T), 42-1, 42-7 Lower Arkansas River, AR (MR+T), 42-18, 42-34 Lower Big Sioux River, IA and SD (MRO), 26-15 Lower Branch Rush River, ND (NCS), 24-26 Lower Bullerton, R (MR+T), 42-48 Lower Childress-Fort Jackson, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA (NPP), 37-1, 37-14, 37-27, 37-35 Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA (NPP), 37-1, 37-14, 37-35, 37-39 Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA, Levees and Improvements to Existing Works (NPP), 37-2, 37-44 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA (NPW), 39-16 Lower Fox River, WI (NCE), 21-74 Lower Grand River, MO (MRK), 27-17 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (NPW), 39-1, 39-6, 39-11, 39-14, 39-23 Lower Green River, King County, WA (NPS), 38-29 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV (ORH), 17-23 Lower Heart River, ND (MRO), 26-1, 26-4, 26-10, 26-12, 26-15, 26-23 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA (NAB), 4-36 Lower Mission Creek, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-11, 33-22 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam (NPW), 39-1, 39-7, 39-11, 39-14, 39-23 Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees, LA (MR+T), 42-1, 42-9, 42-17, 42-34 Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-14, 31-21, 31-35 Lower San Francisco Bay, CA (SPN), 34-11 Lower San Joaquin River, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-12, 35-26, 35-36 Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR, ID (NPW), 39-1, 39-11, 39-7, 39-14 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD (NAB), 4-36 Lower Walla Walla River, WA (NPW), 39-17 Lower White River (MR+T), 42-1, 42-10, 42-34 Lower White River and Basin, AR (MR+T), 42-20, 42-34 Lower Woonsocket, RI (NED), 1-45, 1-52 Lowes Wharf, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Lowndes County, MS (SAM), 10-58 Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-6, 18-13, 18-17, 18-27 Lubec Channel, ME (NED), 1-41 Lucky Peak Lake, ID (NPW), 39-1, 39-3, 39-10, 39-14, 39-17 Lucky, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Ludington Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-16, 21-48, 21-63 Ludlow Lake, VT (NED), 1-48 Ludlow, AR (MR+T), 42-47 Ludlow, KY (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Lukfata Lake, OK (SWT), 29-19, 29-22 Luling, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL (ORL), 16-32 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Lyman Creek, ID (NPW), 39-16, 39-18 Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC (SAN), 7-14 Lynn Harbor, MA (NED), 1-41, 1-48 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA (NED), 1-44 Lynnhaven Inlet, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-5, 5-12, 5-17, 5-21 Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana Basin, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-07, 33-16, 33-35 Lytle Creek, Murfreesboro, TN (ORN), 15-19 M 1-32 Maalaea Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (POD), 36-1, 36-3, 36-6, 36-8 MacDowell (NED), 1-55 MacKay Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Machias River, ME (NED), 1-41, 1-45 Mackay Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Macy, Blackbird Creek, NE (MRO), 26-20 Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA (NCR), 23-16 Mad River Basin, CA (SPK), 35-38 Mad River Lake, CT (NED), 1-45, 1-51, 1-52 Madison Bay, MD (NAB), 4-36 Madison Parish Port, LA (LMK), 12-15 Madison River, MT (MRO), 26-18, 26-23 Madison, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks (MRO), 26-15, 26-20 Madrid Bend Levee District, Lake Co., TN (MR+T), 42-59 Magby Creek, Columbus, MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-19, 10-37, 10-48 Maggoddee Creek, Franklin County, VA (SAW), 6-32 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA (SPK), 35-42 Magruder Drainage District, OR (NPP), 37-38, 37-41, 37-44 Mahnomen, MN (NCS), 24-31 Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-7, 18-13, 18-17, 18-27 Mahoning River, OH (ORP), 18-29 Mahukona (North Kohala), Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-14 Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA (NAP), 3-27 Maidendown Swamp, SC (SAN), 7-15 Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (ORP), 18-29 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-4 Malaeloa Stream, American Samoa (POD), 36-15 Malden River, MA (NED), 1-41 Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR (NPW), 39-16 Malheur River, OR (NPW), 39-17, 39-18 Maline Creek, MO (LMS), 14-10 Malone Field, AR (MR+T), 42-44 Mamaroneck Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-7, 2-20, 2-24, 2-29 Manard Bayou, Muskogee County, OK (SWT), 29-20 Manasquan River, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Manatee County, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-21, 9-34, 9-48, 9-56 Manatee Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-10, 9-31, 9-40 Manatee River, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Manchac, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Manchester Harbor, MA (NED), 1-48 Manchester, OH (ORH), 17-23 Mandan, Heart River, ND (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Manhasset Bay, NY (NAN), 2-34 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS (MRK), 27-17, 27-20 Maniece Bayou, AR (LMK), 12-18, 12-20 Maniece Bayou, AR (LMN), 11-19 Manistee Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-16, 21-48, 21-63, 21-77 Manistique Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-16, 21-48, 21-63 Manitowoc Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-17, 21-48, 21-64, 21-74 Mankato, North Mankato, and LeHillier, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-9, 24-21, 24-31 Manley Hot Springs, AK (NPA), 40-12 Mann's Harbor, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Manokin River, MD (NAB), 4-36 Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT (NED), 1-2, 1-21, 1-33, 1-56 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-6, 6-20 Manticoke River, MD (NAB), 4-36 Mantua Creek, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Maple River, ND (NCS), 24-28 Maple Swamp, SC (SAN), 7-15 Mapleshade, OH (ORH), 17-23 Marais River, ND (NCS), 24-33 Marais des Cygnes River, Osawatomie, KS, Water Supply Facilities (MRK), 27-22 Marblehead Harbor, MA (NED), 1-48 Marchand, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Marengo County, AL (SAM), 10-58 Marengo, IA (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME (NED), 1-45 Marietta, OH (ORH), 17-23 Marina Del Rey, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-03, 33-11, 33-14, 33-22, 33-29 Marion County Drainage District, MO (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Marion Reservoir, KS (SWT), 29-1, 29-6, 29-13, 29-17 Marion, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-30 Marion, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Markham Ferry, OK (SWL), 28-27 Marmarth, ND (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Marne Creek, Yankton, SD (MRO), 26-18 Marquette Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-18, 21-49, 21-64, 21-77 Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY (NCB), 20-31 Marshall Cutoff, LA (MR+T), 42-43 Marshall, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-9, 24-21, 24-31, 24-34 Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-41 Marshalltown, IA (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM), 10-52 Martin, KY (ORH), 17-22 Martins Creek, Unicoi Co., TN (ORN), 15-19 Martins Ferry, OH (ORP), 18-23 1-33 Martins Fork Lake, KY (ORN), 15-1, 15-5, 15-9, 15-18 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-13, 35-27 Marysville Lake, CA (SPK), 35-36 Marysville, KS (MRK), 27-18 Masefau Bay, American Samoa (POD), 36-1, 36-3, 36-6 Mason Creek, VA (SAW), 6-32 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Mason, WV (ORH), 17-23 Massillon, OH (ORH), 17-1, 17-14, 17-19 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa (POD), 36-11 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-7, 31-20, 31-31, 31-40, 31-44 Matawan Creek, NJ (NAN), 2-29, 2-30, 2-34 Matinicus Harbor, ME (NED), 1-41 Matrimony Creek, Rockingham County, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 Mats Mats Bay, WA (NPS), 38-23 Mattapoisett Harbor, MA (NED), 1-48 Mattituck Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-7, 2-20, 2-24, 2-29 Mauckport, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Mauldin Creek, Mauldin, SC (SAN), 7-15 Maumee Bay State Park, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-10, 20-17, 20-27 Maumee River, OH (NCB), 20-33, 20-34 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Maurice River, NJ (NAP), 3-25, 3-27 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-10, 14-14 Maxwell Creek, Parker County, TX (SWF), 30-23 Maxwell Locks and Dams, Maxwell, PA (ORP), 18-25 Mayaguez Harbor, PR (SAJ), 9-1, 9-10, 9-31, 9-40, 9-54 Mayersville, MS (MR+T), 42-42 Mayfield Creek, KY (MR+T), 42-50 Maysville, KY (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-2, 29-11, 29-16, 29-20 McCook Lake, SD (MRO), 26-15 McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL (NCC), 22-1, 22-7, 22-12, 22-16 McCrea, LA (MR+T), 42-39 McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR (NPP), 37-39 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-11, 14-14 McGinnis Levee, IN (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 McGrath Creek, TX (SWT), 29-19, 29-22 McKees Rocks, PA (ORP), 18-23 McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR (NPP), 37-39 McKinney Bayou, AR (LMK), 12-18 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR (LMK), 12-20 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR (LMN), 11-19 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21 McNary Lock and Dam-Lake Wallula, OR and WA (NPW), 39-1, 39-7, 39-11, 39-15 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek, NE (MRO), 26-20 Medomak River, ME (NED), 1-41 Medora, ND (Sewage Lagoon) (MRO), 26-23 Meherrin River, VA (NAO), 5-21 Mekorykuk, AK (NPA), 40-10 Melbourne Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-10, 9-31, 9-40 Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvements) KS (MRK), 27-18, 27-20 Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS (MRK), 27-1, 27-4, 27-11, 27-14, 27-20 Melville, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Melvin Prive Locks and Dam (LMS), 14-9 Memphis Front, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm) (MR+T), 42-34 Memphis Harbor, TN (MR+T), 42-1, 42-11, 42-13, 42-24, 42-32 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM), 13-6 Menard Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-45 Menemsha Creek, MA (NED), 1-41 Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-18, 21-49, 21-64 Meramec Park Lake, MO (LMS), 14-14 Meramec River Basin, MO (LMS), 14-10, 14-12 Merced County Stream Group, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-13, 35-14, 35-27 Merced River, CA (SPK), 35-36 Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO (MRK), 27-17 Mercier, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-11, 14-14 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Merkle Creek, Norman, OK (SWT), 29-20 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA (LMN), 11-18 Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS (MRK), 27-18 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME (NED), 1-45 Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA (NED), 1-1, 1-2, 1-17, 1-55 Merrimack River, MA (NED), 1-41 Merriwether-Cherokee, TN (MR+T), 42-49 Metamora Lake, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-29 Methow River, WA (NPS), 38-25, 38-27 Metlakatla Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-2, 40-6, 40-8 Metropolis, IL (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 1-34 Mhoon Bend, MS (MR+T), 42-47 Miami Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-11, 9-32, 9-40, 9-54 Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH (ORL), 16-19, 16-22 Miami River, FL (SAJ), 9-54 Miami River, OR (NPP), 37-39 Miami and Vicinity, OK (SWT), 29-22 Mianus River, CT (NED), 1-41 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, OH (ORP), 18-1, 18-7, 18-13, 18-17, 18-27 Michigan City Harbor, IN (NCC), 22-1, 22-4, 22-11, 22-15, 22-17 Middle Beach, CT (NED), 1-44 Middle Creek, CA (SPK), 35-36 Middle Fork Wolf River, Brown County, KS, Avenue Road Bridge (MRK), 27-22 Middle Nodaway River, Adair County, IA, Bridge #56240 (MRK), 27-22 Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder, NE (MRO), 26-20 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA (SPK), 35-35 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Middle River at Argyle, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-10, 24-21 Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (ORP), 18-29 Middleport, OH (ORH), 17-23 Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY (ORN), 15-1, 15-5, 15-9, 15-13, 15-14, 15-19 Middleton Shoals, GA and SC (SAS), 8-17 Midland Drainage District, OR (NPP), 37-38, 37-39, 37-44 Milan, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Mile One, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Miles City, MT (MRO), 26-15 Milford Harbor, CT (NED), 1-41, 1-48 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS (MRK), 27-1, 27-5, 27-11, 27-14, 27-20 Milk River, MT (MRO), 26-23 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Mill Creek Lake, WA (NPW), 39-1, 39-3, 39-10, 39-14 Mill Creek Levee (MRO), 26-18 Mill Creek, Dalton, GA (SAM), 10-1, 10-19, 10-38, 10-48 Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-7, 28-14 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Mill Creek, MD (NAB), 4-40 Mill Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Mill Creek, OH (ORH), 17-24 Mill Creek, OH (ORL), 16-1, 16-3, 16-13 Mill Creek, Salem, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-15, 37-27, 37-35 Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-19, 10-38, 10-48 Mill Creek, Texas (SWG), 31-37 Mill Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Mill Creek, WA (NPW), 39-17, 39-18 Mill Creek, Warrenville Twsp, OH (NCB), 20-33 Mill Creek, Yarmouth, MA (NED), 1-50 Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR (NPP), 37-39 Mill Lake, Blue River, MO (MRK), 27-18 Mill Run, Sinclairville, NY (ORP), 18-29 Miller Bend, MS (MR+T), 42-42 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL (LMS), 14-14 Miller, OH (ORH), 17-23 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM), 10-2, 10-27, 10-39 Millersburg, OH (ORH), 17-24 Millford Haven, VA (NAO), 5-21 Millican, TX (SWF), 30-22 Milliken Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-41 Millington, TN (LMM), 13-1, 13-4 Millville Fixed Bridge to Upper End of Project (NAP), 3-24 Millwood Lake, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-7, 28-15 Millwood, WV (ORH), 17-23 Milton Bell, MO (MR+T), 42-49 Milton Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-30 Milton, KY (ORL), 16-23, 16-27 Milton, PA (NAB), 4-41 Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR (NPW), 39-16 Milwaukee Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-18, 21-49, 21-64, 21-74 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA (NPS), 38-25 Mingo Creek, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-6, 29-13, 29-17 Mingo Creek, SC (SAN), 7-14 Mingo Junction, OH (ORP), 18-23 Mining City Lake, KY (ORL), 16-22, 16-29 Minneota, MN (NCS), 24-26, 24-31 Minnesota River Basin, MN (NCS), 24-34 Minnesota River, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-2, 24-10, 24-20, 24-21, 24-24, 24-26 Minot, ND (NCS), 24-26, 24-31 Mishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA (MRO), 26-15 Mispillion River, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI (NED), 1-44 Mission Beach (SPL), 33-38 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID (NPW), 39-16 Missisquoi River at Richford, VT (NAN), 2-32 Mississinewa Lake, IN (ORL), 16-1, 16-8, 16-15 Mississippi Delta Region, LA (MR+T), 42-34 Mississippi River (MR+T), 42-59 Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO (LMS), 14-14 Mississippi River Agricultural Area 10, MO (LMS), 14-14 Mississippi River Below Baton Rouge, LA (MR+T), 42-27 Mississippi River Between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN (NCS), 24-25 Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (NCD), 25-10 Mississippi River Between Missouri River and 1-35 Minneapolis, MN (NCR), 23-1, 23-3 Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-2 Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (LMS), 14-1, 14-2, 14-7, 14-9 Mississippi River Improvements (MR+T), 42-1, 42-13 Mississippi River Levees (MR+T), 42-1, 42-11, 42-34 Mississippi River Main Stem Channel Improvements (MR+T), 42-1, 42-35 Mississippi River Near Atikin, MN (NCS), 24-26 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA (LMN), 11-18 Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA (LMN), 11-1, 11-4, 11-12, 11-14 Mississippi River Tributary Dams and Lakes (MR+T), 42-1, 42-23 Mississippi River Tributary and Outlet Improvements (MR+T), 42-1, 42-15 Mississippi River and Alluvia Valley Below Cape Girardeau, MO (MR+T), 42-1, 42-2 Mississippi River and Tributaries Active General Investigations (96X3112) (MR+T), 42-1, 42-79, 42-80 Mississippi River at Alton, IL (LMS), 14-12 Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO (LMS), 14-14 Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (LMS), 14-1, 14-2 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures (LMS), 14-14 Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA (LMN), 11-1, 11-2, 11-12, 11-14 Mississippi River, LA (MR+T), 42-31 Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez Area) (MR+T), 42-28 Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo Area) (MR+T), 42-28 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (LMN), 11-1, 11-3, 11-12, 11-14, 11-18 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN (NCS), 24-25 Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas (MR+T), 42-34 Missoula, MT (Sewage Treatment Plant) (NPS), 38-25 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA (MRO), 26-1, 26-2, 26-9, 26-12, 26-20 Missouri Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD (MRO), 26-1, 26-4, 26-10, 26-12 Missouri River Additional Fish and Wildlife Mitigation (MRK), 27-17 Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, and MO (MRK), 27-1, 27-2, 27-10, 27-13 Missouri River Levee System (MRK), 27-1, 27-5, 27-11, 27-14, 27-18, 27-19, 27-20 Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE (MRO), 26-1, 26-4, 26-10, 26-13, 26-18 Missouri River Main Stem (MRK), 27-20 Missouri River at New Haven, MO (MRK), 27-17 Missouri River, Aten, NE (MRO), 26-15 Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, SD (MRO), 26-18 Missouri River, Bank Stablization, Fort Benton, MT (MRO), 26-18 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND (MRO), 26-18 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA (MRO), 26-1, 26-4, 26-10, 26-13 Missouri River, MO (MR+T), 42-21 Missouri River, Niobrara, NE (MRO), 26-15 Missouri River, SD, NE, ND, MT (MRO), 26-21 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT (MRO), 26-15 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) (MRK), 27-1, 27-2, 27-10, 27-13 Mitigation of Shore Damages (NCE), 21-2, 21-33 Mixons Creek, Lamar Co., MS (SAM), 10-53 Mobile Bay, AL, To New Orleans, LA (SAM), 10-44 Mobile Harbor, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-10, 10-36, 10-45 Mocassin Swamp, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Moccasin Springs, MO (LMS), 14-12 Moclips River, Moclips, WA (NPS), 38-25 Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-07, 33-16, 33-35 Mokelumne River, CA (SPK), 35-35 Molalla River, OR (NPP), 37-39 Moline Harbor, IL (NCD), 25-7 Moline, IL (NCR), 23-14 Moncrief Creek, Jacksonville, FL (SAJ), 9-62 Monessen, PA (ORP), 18-25 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County, IA (MRO), 26-21 Monongahela River, PA and WV (ORP), 18-1, 18-2, 18-12, 18-15, 18-25, 18-26, 18-27 Monoosnoc Brook, MA (NED), 1-48 Monoosnoc Lake, MA (NED), 1-48 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA (NAB), 4-36 Monroe County, AL (SAM), 10-58 Monroe County, FL (SAJ), 9-48 Monroe County, IA (NCR), 23-17 Monroe County, MS (SAM), 10-58 Monroe Floodwall, LA (LMK), 12-20 Monroe Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-29, 21-49, 21-65 Monroe Lake, IN (ORL), 16-1, 16-8, 16-15, 16-29 Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita Parish, LA (LMK), 12-12 Monroe, LA, Floodwall Extension (Plan B) (LMK), 12-17 Monsecour, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Montcalm, WV (ORH), 17-25 Monterey Harbor, CA (SPN), 34-11 1-36 Montezuma Bar, MS (MR+T), 42-50 Montezuma Towhead, AR (MR+T), 42-50 Montgomery County, AL (SAM), 10-58 Montgomery Towhead, AR (MR+T), 42-44 Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, NY (NCB), 20-31 Montz, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Moore Island, KY-MO (MR+T), 42-52 Moorefield, WV (NAB), 4-40 Moores Ferry, VA (ORH), 17-24 Moorhead, MN (NCS), 24-28 Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR (NPP), 37-37 Moosabec Bar, ME (NED), 1-41 Morehead City Harbor, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-7, 6-20, 6-29 Morgan Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-45 Morgan City (MR+T), 42-40 Morgan City and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (LMN), 11-1, 11-8, 11-13, 11-16 Morgantown lock and dam, Morgantown, WV (ORP), 18-25 Morganza Floodway, LA (MR+T), 42-12 Morganza, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Morganza-Old River, LA (MR+T), 42-12 Moriches Inlet, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-8, 2-20, 2-24, 2-29 Mormon Slough, CA (SPK), 35-36 Morris Bayou, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Morrison Towhead, MO (MR+T), 42-52 Morrison, Bear Creek, CO (MRO), 26-17 Morristown Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-29 Morro Bay Harbor, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-04, 33-15, 33-29 Morville, LA (MR+T), 42-41 Moscow, OH (ORL), 16-24, 16-27 Mosquito Creek Lake, OH (ORP), 18-1, 18-8, 18-13, 18-18, 18-27 Mosquito Creek Levee (MRO), 26-18 Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees (MRO), 26-18 Moss Street, Pecan Creek Gainesville, TX (SWF), 30-23 Mott, ND (MRO), 26-15 Mound City, IL (MR+T), 42-59 Mound State Park, Moundville, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-19, 10-38, 10-43 Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL (LMM), 13-6 Mounds, IL (MR+T), 42-59 Moundsville, WV (ORP), 18-23 Mount Carmel, IL (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI (NCE), 21-72 Mount Morris Lake, NY Genesee River (NCB), 20-1, 20-11, 20-17 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, WA (NPP), 37-39 Mountain Brook Dam, NH (NED), 1-48 Mountain Point, AK (NPA), 40-12 Mouth of Yazoo River, MS (LMK), 12-15 Moyock Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN (NCC), 22-18 Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, Castle Rock, WA (NPP), 37-1, 37-15, 37-27, 37-35 Mt. Holly, NJ (NAP), 3-26 Mt. Morris Lake, Genesee River, NY (NCB), 20-28 Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA (MRO), 26-21 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE (MRO), 26-15 Mud Lake Area, ID (NPW), 39-17, 39-18 Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN (MR+T), 42-34, 42-72, 42-73 Mud Lake, TN (MR+T), 42-32, 42-68 Mud Mountain Dam, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-8, 38-15, 38-20 Mud River, WV (ORH), 17-24 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR (NPP), 37-41 Muddy Bayou, MS (MR+T), 42-27 Muddy Creek Dam, PA (ORP), 18-23 Muddy Creek Near Syracuse, NE (MRO), 26-20 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-7, 4-25, 4-32 Mulberry Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Mullet Key, FL (SAJ), 9-56 Multiple Purpose Project Including Power (NAP), 3-1, 3-27 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA (SAM), 10-49 Multiple Purpose Projects, including Power St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project (NCE), 21-2, 21-72 Multnomah Channel, OR (NPP), 37-37 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR (NPP), 37-38, 37-39, 37-44 Muncie, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-20, 10-38, 10-48, 10-52, 10-53 Murderkill River, DE (NAP), 3-1, 3-7, 3-16, 3-21 Murderkill River, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK), 12-20 Murray County Bridge, OK (SWT), 29-20 Murray County, GA (SAM), 10-58 Murray Lock and Dam (No.7), AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-4, 28-13 Murrells Inlet, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-5, 7-9, 7-12 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN (ORL), 16-32 Muscatine Harbor, IA (NCD), 25-7 Muscatine Harbor, IA (NCR), 23-12 Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa County Drainage District, NO. 13, IA (NCR), 23-12, 23-13, 23-16 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA (NCR), 23-13 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL (NCR), 23-12 Muskegon Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-20, 21-50, 21-65 Muskingum River Lakes, OH (ORH), 17-1, 17-7, 17-15, 1-37 17-19, 17-21 Muskogee, OK (SWT), 29-20 Mustinka River, MN (NCS), 24-30 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Myrtle Beach, SC (SAN), 7-16 Myrtle Creek, OR (NPP), 37-43 Myrtle Grove, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Mystic River, CT (NED), 1-41, 1-48 Mystic River, MA (NED), 1-41 Mystic, CT (NED), 1-48 N N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) (LMM), 13-6 N. Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY (NAN), 2-34 NY and NJ Channels (NAN), 2-34 Naches River, Naches, WA (NPS), 38-25 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO), 26-20 Nags Nead, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 Naguabo River, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Nahunta Swamp, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Naknek River, AK (NPA), 40-10 Nameless Creek, County Road 850 N, IN (ORL), 16-33 Namo River, Guam (POD), 36-12 Nan Cove, MD (NAB), 4-36 Nandua Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia (POD), 36-1, 36-4, 36-7, 36-9 Nansemond River, VA (NAO), 5-21 Nantasket Beach, MA (NED), 1-48 Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork), DE and MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-8, 4-25, 4-32, 4-41 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA (NED), 1-41, 1-48 Napa River Basin, CA (SPK), 35-36 Napa River, CA (SPK), 35-32 Napatree Beach, RI (NED), 1-48 Naples, LA (MR+T), 42-40 Narragansett Pier, RI (NED), 1-48 Narraguagus River, ME (NED), 1-41, 1-50 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR (LMK), 12-17, 12-20 Narrows of Lake Champlain, NY and Vermont (NAN), 2-1, 2-8, 2-20, 2-24 Nashua, NH (NED), 1-45, 1-55 Natchez Front, MS (MR+T), 42-41 Natchez Island, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-41, 42-43 Natchez Port Area, MS (LMK), 12-20 Natchez, MS (MR+T), 42-79 Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMK), 12-19, 12-20 Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMN), 11-19 National Emergency Preparedness Buffalo, NY., District (NCB), 20-1, 20-12 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC), 22-1, 22-5 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM), 10-2, 10-32 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO), 26-1, 26-8 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP), 3-1, 3-15 Natrona, PA (ORP), 18-24 Navajo Reservoir, NM (SPK), 35-35 Navarro Mills Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX (SWF), 30-22 Navigation Lock (NPW), 39-19, 39-20, 39-21, 39-22 Navigation Projects (SWT), 29-22 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Alaska District (NPA), 40-1, 40-12 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB), 4-1, 4-11 Buffalo, NY., District (NCB), 20-1, 20-9, 20-17 Charleston, SC., District (SAN), 7-1, 7-7, 7-14 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE), 21-1, 21-32 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG), 31-2, 31-11 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ), 9-1, 9-19 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL), 28-1, 28-4 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL), 16-1, 16-3 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM), 13-1 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM), 10-1, 10-15 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN), 15-1, 15-4 New York District (NAN), 2-1, 2-14 New Orleans District (LMN), 11-1, 11-5 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO), 5-1, 5-8, 5-14 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO), 26-1, 26-2, 26-9 Pacific Ocean Division (POD), 36-1, 36-3 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP), 3-1, 3-7, 3-16 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP), 37-1, 37-7 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN), 34-1, 34-3 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS), 8-1, 8-5 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS), 38-1, 38-4 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS), 14-1, 14-5 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK), 12-1, 12-3 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW), 39-1 Wilmington, NC., District (SAW), 6-2, 6-30 Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Neabsco Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36 Neabsco Creek, VA (NAB), 4-40, 4-41 Neah Bay, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-8, 38-16, 38-20, 38-23 Neale Sound, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-8, 4-25, 4-32 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Near Mud Lake, TN (MR+T), 42-13 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL (NCR), 23-13 Neavitt Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-36 Nebraska City Levee (MRO), 26-18 Nebraska Point, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, TX (SWG), 31-37 1-38 Nehalem Bay, OR (NPP), 37-37 Nelson Lagoon, AK (NPA), 40-12 Neodesha Lake, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Neodesha, KS (SWL), 28-27 Neon-Fleming, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-32 Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA (NAP), 3-24 Neshannock Creek, New Castle, PA (ORP), 18-29 Nestucca River, OR (NPP), 37-37, 37-39 Neuse River Barrier, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Neuse River, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-12, 6-13, 6-21, 6-26, 6-29, 6-31 Neuse River, 300 ft-wide channel in front of New Bern (SAW), 6-29 Neva and Olga Straits, AK (NPA), 40-10 Neville Island, PA (ORP), 18-23 New Albany, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 New Amsterdam, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-27 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (NED), 1-41, 1-49, 1-57 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-19, 1-32, 1-38 New Buffalo Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-20, 21-50, 21-65 New Bullards Bar, CA (SPK), 35-36 New Cumberland, WV (ORP), 18-23 New Harbor, ME (NED), 1-41 New Harmony Bridge, IL and IN (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-21, 16-22, 16-26, 16-27 New Harmony, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-27 New Haven Harbor, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-5, 1-27, 1-36, 1-49, 1-57 New Haven Breakwater, CT (NED), 1-41 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP), 3-1, 3-7, 3-17, 3-21 New Kensington and Parnassus, PA (ORP), 18-23 New London Harbor, CT (NED), 1-41 New London, CT (NED), 1-2, 1-19, 1-32, 1-38 New Madrid Bar, KY (MR+T), 42-49 New Madrid Bend, MO (MR+T), 42-49, 42-52 New Madrid Floodway, MO (MR+T), 42-13, 42-26 New Madrid Harbor, MO (LMM), 13-5 New Madrid-Birds Point, MO (MR+T), 42-13 New Martinsville, WV (ORH), 17-23 New Matamoras, OH (ORH), 17-23 New Melones Lake, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-21 New Orleans to Venice, LA (Hurricane Protection) (LMN), 11-1, 11-9, 11-13, 11-16 New Orleans, LA (MR+T), 42-12 New Pass, Sarasota, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-11, 9-32, 9-41, 9-54 New Richmond, OH (ORL), 16-24, 16-27 New River Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-37 New River Inlet, N.C. (SAW), 6-30 New River, FL (SAJ), 9-55 New River, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 New River, Onslow County, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 New River, WV and VA (ORH), 17-21 New Rochelle Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 New York Harbor Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN), 2-1, 2-9, 2-20, 2-25 New York Harbor, Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN), 2-1, 2-10, 2-21, 2-25 New York Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-29 New York State Barge Canal, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-7, 20-15, 20-25 New York State Barge Canal, NY (NAN), 2-30 New York and New Jersey Channels (NAN), 2-1, 2-9, 2-20, 2-25, 2-29 Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, NJ (NAN), 2-29, 2-30, 2-34 Newark, OH (ORH), 17-1, 17-8, 17-15, 17-19, 17-22, 17-25 Newaukum River, WA (NPS), 38-25, 38-29 Newbegun Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Newburg, IN (Ohio River) (ORL), 16-21 Newburyport Harbor, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-6, 1-27, 1-36, 1-41, 1-49, 1-57 Newmarket Creek, VA (NAO), 5-22 Newport Bay Harbor, CA (SPL), 33-37 Newport Harbor, RI (NED), 1-41 Newport News Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Newport, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-24, 16-26, 16-31 Newport, OH (ORH), 17-23 Newport, OR (NPP), 37-42 Newport, White River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Newry-Old Pickens, SC (SAS), 8-17 Newt Graham Lock and Dam, OK (SWT), 29-20 Newtown Creek, NY (NAN), 2-30 Niagara Remedial Works, NY (NCB), 20-29 Niagara River, NY (NCB), 20-29, 20-34 Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT (NED), 1-41 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY (ORL), 16-32 Nichols, NY (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Nimrod Lake, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-8, 28-15, 28-27 Nine Mile Drain, Scottsbluff, NE (MRO), 26-23 Ninilchik Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-3, 40-6, 40-8 Niobrara River, NE (MRO), 26-20, 26-23 Nisqually River, WA (NPS), 38-25 Nixon Creek, TN (LMM), 13-6 No Name Creek, Waterloo, IA (NCR), 23-17 Nodaway County, MO, South Pickering Bridge (MRK), 27-22 Nogales Wash, AZ (SPL), 33-1, 33-12, 33-22, 33-39 Nolin Lake, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-9, 16-15, 16-29 Nome Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-3, 40-6, 40-8 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA (NAB), 4-36 Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM), 13-1, 13-2, 13-4, 13-6 Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS (MR+T), 42-29, 42-31, 1-39 42-34, 42-68, 42-72, 42-80 Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT (NED), 1-45 Nookagee Lake, MA (NED), 1-49 Nooksack River, WA (NPS), 38-25, 38-29 Norfold-Star, MS (MR+T), 42-47 Norfolk Floodwall, VA (NAO), 5-22 Norfolk Harbor and Channels (Deepening), VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-5, 5-6, 5-12, 5-13, 5-17 Norfolk Harbor, VA (NAO), 5-23 Norfolk Lake, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-10, 28-16 Norfolk, NE (MRO), 26-15, 26-20 Normal, KY (ORH), 17-23 Norrell Lock and Dam (No.1) and Entrance Channel, AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-4, 28-13 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, MA (NAN), 2-32 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-14 North Andover and Lawrence, MA (NED), 1-49 North Bonneville, WA (NPP), 37-42 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH (ORH), 17-1, 17-8, 17-15, 17-19 North Branch, Chicago River, Ii (NCC), 22-1, 22-7, 22-12, 22-16 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT (NED), 1-45, 1-54 North Canadian River, OK (SWT), 29-22 North Canadian River Wastewater Plan, Oklahoma City, OK (SWT), 29-20 North Ellenville, NY (NAN), 2-32 North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA (ORH), 17-1, 17-8, 17-15, 17-20 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA (SPK), 35-36 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH (NED), 1-49 North Hartland Lake, VT (NED), 1-1, 1-14, 1-29, 1-52 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21 North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA (NED), 1-50 North Nashua River, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-55 North Platte River, Bank Stablization, Minatare, NE (MRO), 26-20 North River Dike, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 North River, MO (NCR), 23-17 North Sandy Pond, Oswego Co., NY (NCB), 20-32 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA (NED), 1-44 North Second St at Wolf River, Memphis, TN (LMM), 13-1, 13-2, 13-4 North Springfield Lake, VT (NED), 1-1, 1-14, 1-30, 1-52 North Stratford, NH (NED), 1-53 North Wildwood, NJ (NAP), 3-26 North and South Buffalo Creeks, Guilford County, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 Northampton, MA (NED), 1-45, 1-53 Northeast Cape Fear River, N.C. (SAW), 6-26, 6-28 Northeast Harbor, ME (NED), 1-41 Northeast River, MD (NAB), 4-36 Northfield Brook Lake, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-17, 1-31, 1-54 Northport Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Northport Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-21, 21-74 Norwalk Harbor, CT (NED), 1-41, 1-57 Norwalk, CT (NED), 1-46 Norwalk-Wilton, CT (NED), 1-49 Norwich, CT (NED), 1-46, 1-56 Norwich, NY (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Nottoway River, VA (NAO), 5-21 Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS (SAM), 10-52 Noxubee River, MS (SAM), 10-51, 10-52 Nua-Amaluia, American Samoa (POD), 36-15 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-11, 14-14 0 O'Hare Reservoir, IL (NCC), 22-1, 22-8, 22-12, 22-16 O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND (MRO), 26-1, 26-7, 26-11, 26-15, 26-18 Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, MA (NED), 1-50 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA (NED), 1-44 Oak Creek, Dannebrog, NE (MRO), 26-23 Oak Orchard Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-29 Oak Point, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Oakdale, PA (ORP), 18-22 Oakford Special Drainage District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI (NED), 1-44 Oakland Harbor, CA (SPN), 34-1, 34-5, 34-9, 34-12 Oakland, IA (MRO), 26-23 Oates Creek, GA (SAS), 8-1, 8-6, 8-10, 8-15, 8-17 Obey River, TN (ORN), 15-13 Obioj and Forked Deer Rivers, TN (MR+T), 42-28 Obion Creek, KY (MR+T), 42-32, 42-67 Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act) (MR+T), 42-67 Obion River, TN (LMM), 13-5 Obion and Forked Deer Rivers, TN (MR+T), 42-30 Obion-Tamm, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Occohannock Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Occoquan Creek, VA (NAB), 4-36 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA (SPL), 33-38 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-8, 4-25, 4-33, 4-40 Ocean City, NJ (NAP), 3-26 Ocean Springs Harbor, MS (SAM), 10-53 Oceans, WV (ORH), 17-22 Oceanside Harbor, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-02, 33-13, 33-29, 1-40 33-39 Oceanside Sand By-Pass, CA (SPL), 33-38 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA (SPL), 33-38 Oconto Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-77 Ocracoke Inlet, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-8, 6-20, 6-29 Ocracoke Island, NC (SAW), 6-29 Odenburg, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Oelwein, Fayette County, IA (NCR), 23-17 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (POD), 36-11 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD), 36-10 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-34 Ogdensburg Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-29 Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH), 17-1, 17-9, 17-15 Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) (ORL), 16-1, 16-9, 16-15, 16-18, 16-26 Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) (ORN), 15-1, 15-6, 15-12, 15-18 Ohio River Basin (Pittsburg District) (ORP), 18-1, 18-8, 18-13, 18-18, 18-27 Ohio River Locks and Dams (ORD), 19-1, 19-8, 19-9, 19-10, 19-11 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY (ORL), 16-32, 16-33 Ohio River, City Park, West Point, KY (ORL), 16-33 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, IL and KY (MR+T), 42-22 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Madison, IN (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Moscow, OH (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, RockportlRockport Landing, IN (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, State Rd 166, Perry County, In (ORL), 16-33 Ohio River, Troy, IN (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY (ORL), 16-32 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN (ORL), 16-32 Oil City Ice Control Structure (ORP), 18-21 Oil City, PA (ORP), 18-21 Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN (NCR), 23-13 Okanogan River, WA (NPS), 38-25, 38-27, 38-29 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA (NPS), 38-23 Okatibbee Lake, MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-20, 10-38, 10-48 Okeechobee Waterway, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-12, 9-32, 9-41, 9-53, 9-54, 9-56 Oklahoma City Floodway, OK (SWT), 29-20 Oklahoma City LPP, OK (SWT), 29-19 Oklawaha River, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-12, 9-32, 9-42, 9-54 Oktasasi Creek, AL (SAM), 10-58 Olcott Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-7, 20-16, 20-25 Old Field Swamp, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK (NPA), 40-10 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN (ORN), 15-14 Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (SAM), 10-52 Old River, CA (SPK), 35-35 Old River, LA (MR+T), 42-1, 42-6, 42-12, 42-34 Old River-Cypress Creek, AR (MR+T), 42-13 Old US 41 Bridge, Vigo Co., IN (ORL), 16-33 Oldmans Creek, NJ (NAP), 3-24, 3-27 Oldtown Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-47 Olean, NY (ORP), 18-21 Olive Hill, KY (ORH), 17-25 Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-6, 10-35, 10-43 Olmsted Locks and Dam, IL and KY (ORL), 16-19 Olosega Bridge Protection, American Samoa (POD), 36-14 Olympia Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-23, 38-27, 38-28 Omaha, Missouri River, NE (MRO), 26-20 Omaha, NE (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS (MRK), 27-19 Onancock River, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Oneida Lake, NY (NCB), 20-33 Oneonta, NY (NAB), 4-41 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY (NCB), 20-31 Onset Bay (NED), 1-57 Ontonagon Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-21, 21-50, 21-65, 21-74 Oologah Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-7, 29-14, 29-17, 29-20 Oologah, OK (SWL), 28-27 Oothcalooga Creek (SAM), 10-58 Opekiska lock and dam, 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV (ORP), 18-25 Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-2, 16-13 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD), 19-1, 19-3, 19-5, 19-6 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORH), 17-1, 17-2 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORL), 16-1, 16-3 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORP), 18-1, 18-3 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar (NPW), 39-23 Opposite Warnicott Ldg., MS (MR+T), 42-43 Optima Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Oquawka, Mississippi River, IL (NCR), 23-17 1-41 Orange River, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Orange Road, Mercer County, PA (ORP), 18-29 Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR (NPP), 37-37 Orleans Parish, LA (MR+T), 42-26 Orleans, IN (ORL), 16-24 Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL), 33-39 Orofino Creek and Clearwater River, Orofino, ID (NPW), 39-16 Orowoc Creek, NY (NAN), 2-34 Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River), MN (NCS), 24-30 Osage River, MO (MRK), 27-20, 27-22 Osage River, MO, lock and dam (MRK), 27-16 Osawatomie, KS (MRK), 27-17, 27-20 Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS (SAM), 10-52 Osceola Harbor, AR (LMM), 13-5 Osceola, AR (MR+T), 42-48 Oslo, MN (NCS), 24-31 Oswego Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-7, 20-16, 20-25, 20-34 Ottawa River Harbor, MI and OH Sec 201, 1965 FC Act (NCB), 20-34 Ottawa, IL (NCR), 23-17 Ottawa, OH (NCB), 20-31 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS (MRK), 27-17, 27-20 Otter Brook Lake, NH (NED), 1-1, 1-14, 1-30, 1-52 Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR (SWL), 28-21 Otter Tail River, MN (NCS), 24-30 Otto County Drainage District No. 2 (MRO), 26-18 Ottumwa, IA (NCR), 23-13 Ouachita River Levees, LA (LMK), 12-1, 12-5, 12-10, 12-17 Ouachita River and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK), 12-1, 12-5, 12-17, 12-12 Ouachita and Black Rivers Below Camden, AR (LMK), 12-1, 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (LMK), 12-1, 12-14, 12-15 Ouzinkie Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-12 Overton-Red River Waterway, LA (LMK), 12-15 Owasco Inlet, NY (NCB), 20-31, 20-33 Owego, NY (NAB), 4-41 Owensboro, KY (ORL), 16-24, 16-27, 16-33 Owl's Head Harbor, ME (NED), 1-41, 1-57 Owyhee River, OR (NPW), 39-1, 39-4, 39-10, 39-14 Oxford Junction, Wapsi River, IA (NCR), 23-17 Oxford, MD (NAB), 4-37 Oxford, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-17, 4-28 Oyster Channel, VA (NAO), 5-21 Oyster Creek, TX (SWG), 31-37 Ozan Creek, AR (LMK), 12-17 Ozark, AR-MS (MR+T), 42-42 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No.13), AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-11, 28-16 Ozona, FL, Channel and Turning Basin (SAJ), 9-55 P Paauau Stream, HI (POD), 36-12 Packard, IA (NCR), 23-18 Paducah, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Pagan River, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa (POD), 36-11 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD), 36-11 Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH), 17-1, 17-9, 17-15, 17-20 Paint Creek, OH (ORH), 17-25 Paint Rock River, AL (ORN), 15-13, 15-19 Painted Post, NY (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ (SPL), 33-1, 33-5, 33-32 Paintsville Lake, KY (ORH), 17-1, 17-9, 17-16, 17-20 Pair O'Dice, Ar (MR+T), 42-42 Pajaro River, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-14, 35-27 Palm Beach County, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-22, 9-34, 9-48,9-49, 9-56 Palm Beach Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-13, 9-32, 9-42, 9-54 Palm Beach, FL, Side Channel and Basin (SAJ), 9-55 Palmetto, MS (MR+T), 42-38 Palouse River, WA (NPW), 39-17, 39-18 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-8, 6-20 Pamona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS (MRK), 27-15 Pamunkey River, VA (NAO), 5-21 Panacea Harbor, FL (SAM), 10-51, 10-54 Panama City Beaches, FL (SAM), 10-46 Panama City Harbor, FL (SAM), 10-1, 10-11, 10-36, 10-46 Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS (MR+T), 42-27 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Panther Creek, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-32 Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL (NCR), 23-17 Panther Creek, WV (ORH), 17-24 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE (MRO), 26-1, 26-5, 26-10, 26-13 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee, NE (MRO), 26-18 Papineau, IL (NCR), 23-18 Parish Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Park City, KS (SWT), 29-20 Park River, CT (NED), 1-53 Park River, Hartford, CT (NED), 1-46, 1-53 I-42 Park Row, Arlington, TX (SWF), 30-23 Parker Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Parker Lake (SWT), 29-17 Parker Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Parkersburg, WV (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Parrotts Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Parsons, Hambleton, Hendricks, WV (ORP), 18-29 Pascagoula Harbor, MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-12, 10-36, 10-46, 10-54 Pascagoula River, MS (SAM), 10-51 Pasquotank River, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Pass Christian Harbor, MS (SAM), 10-51 Pass Manchac, LA (LMN), 11-18 Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL (SAJ), 9-54, 9-55 Passaic River Basin, NJ and NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-16, 2-27, 2-35 Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME (NED), 1-47 Pat Mayse Lake, TX (SWT), 29-1, 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA (NPW), 39-16 Patchogue River, CT (NED), 1-41, 1-57 Patoka Lake, IN (ORL), 16-1, 16-9, 16-16, 16-29 Patoka River, IN (ORL), 16-32 Patriot, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-27 Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (MRK), 27-17, 27-19 Patuxent River, MD (NAB), 4-36 Paw Paw Lake, MI (NCE), 21-72 Pawcatuck River, RI and CT (NED), 1-41, 1-46, 1-49 Pawtucket, RI (NED), 1-49 Pawtuxet Cove, RI (NED), 1-41 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI (NED), 1-46, 1-51, 1-52 Pax, WV (ORH), 17-25 Payette River, ID (NPW), 39-16, 39-18 Payette Valley, ID (NPW), 39-17 Pea and Choctawhatchee Rivers, Geneva, AL (SAM), 10-53 Pea River, Elba, AL (SAM), 10-53 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA (SAS), 8-17 Peafield, MO (MR+T), 42-13 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA (LMK), 12-1, 12-6, 12-7, 12-10, 12-12, 12-13, 12-15, 12-21 Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS (SWT), 29-1, 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (MRO), 26-1, 26-5, 26-10, 26-13, 26-23 Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI (NCR), 23-15 Peconic River, NY (NAN), 2-30 Pecos, Texas (SWA), 32-16 Peekskill Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Pelican Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Pelican Lake, Frankfort, MN (NCS), 24-32 Pembina River Lake, ND (NCS), 24-28 Pembina River, ND (NCS), 24-26 Pembina, ND (NCS), 24-31 Pembroke Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Pendleton Levees, OR (NPP), 37-40, 37-41 Peninsula (SWG), 31-37 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR (NPP), 37-38, 37-41, 37-43 Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR (NPP), 37-39, 37-44 Penitentiary Jones Run, KY (ORL), 16-33 Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-16 Penny Slough, Rock River, IL (NCR), 23-13 Penobscot River, ME (NED), 1-41, 1-46 Pensacola Bay, FL To Mobile Bay, AL (SAM), 10-44 Pensacola Harbor, FL (SAM), 10-1, 10-12, 10-36, 10-47 Pensacola, OK (SWL), 28-27 Pentwater Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-21, 21-50, 21-65, 21-74 Peoria, IL (NCR), 23-14 Pepin Harbor, WI (NCD), 25-7 Pepper Creek, DE (NAP), 3-24 Pepperell Cove, ME (NED), 1-41, 1-49 Percosin Creek and Tribs, GA (SAM), 10-58 Perdido Pass Channel, AL (SAM), 10-1, 10-13, 10-37, 10-47 Perkins Cove, Ogunquit, ME (NED), 1-50 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (NED), 1-2, 1-19, 1-32, 1-38 Perquimans River, N.C. (SAW), 6-26, 6-28 Perry County Drainage and Levee District Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO (LMS), 14-14 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS (MRK), 27-17 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS (MRK), 27-1, 27-5, 27-11, 27-14, 27-20 Perryville, KY (ORL), 16-31 Peru Dike (MRO), 26-18 Peters, AR (MR+T), 42-47, 42-50 Petersburg Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Petit Jean River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA (LMN), 11-18 Petite Prairie, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI (NCS), 24-26 Peyton Creek, Texas (SWG), 31-37 Philadelphia Point, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Phillippi Creek Basin, FL (SAJ), 9-62 Phillips Lake, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-55 Philpott Lake, VA (SAW), 6-1, 6-16 Phoenix, AZ., and Vicinity (SPL), 33-1, 33-6, 33-33 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) (MRK), 27-1, 27-5, 27-14 Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha Dist) (MRO), 26-1, 26-5, 26-13, 26-18 Pickens County, AL (SAM), 10-58 1-43 Pickett, MS-AR (MR+T), 42-47, 42-51 Pierce, NE (MRO), 26-15, 26-20 Pig Island Gut, ME (NED), 1-41, 1-50 Pilchuck River, WA (NPS), 38-25 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR (NPP), 37-41 Pine Bluff, AR, Local Protection (LMK), 12-17 Pine Creek Lake, TX (SWT), 29-1, 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN (NCS), 24-25 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-14, 35-27 Pine Ford Lake, MO (LMS), 14-1, 14-5, 14-7 Pine Mountain Lake, AR (SWL), 28-21 Pine Point Harbor, Scarborough, ME (NED), 1-50 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV (SPL), 33-1, 33-07, 33-17, 33-35 Pinellas County, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-23, 9-34, 9-49 Pineville, KY (ORN), 15-13, 15-19 Pineville, Red River, LA (LMK), 12-19, 12-21 Pineville, Red River, LA (LMN), 11-19 Pinole Creek, CA (SPK), 35-36 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (SWA), 32-16 Pioneer Lake, KS (MRK), 27-19 Pipestem Lake, ND (MRO), 26-1, 26-5, 26-10, 26-14 Pithlachascotee River, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Pittsburg Harbor, PA (ORP), 18-20 Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) (ORP), 18-23 Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) (ORP), 18-23 Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) (ORP), 18-23 Pittsfield, MA (NED), 1-54 Placer Creek, ID (NPS), 38-25 Plainview Local Flood Protection Project, TX (SWF), 30-22 Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN (LMM), 13-1, 13-2, 13-4 Planning Assistance to States (SWT), 29-22 Planning and Engineering (SWG), 31-2, 31-17 Planning, Engineering and Design (NED), 1-2, 1-24 Plants Creek, Seymour, TX (SWF), 30-23 Plaquemine Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Platte River Bank Stablization Project, NE (MRO), 26-21 Platte River Basin, CO (MRO), 26-21 Platte River and Tributaries, NE (MRO), 26-15, 26-20, 26-23 Plattsburgh Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-30 Pleasant Bay, MA (NED), 1-49 Pleasant Meadow Swamp, Loris, SC (SAN), 7-15 Pleasant Point, Perry, ME (NED), 1-46 Pleasant River, ME (NED), 1-41 Pleasant Valley Levee (MRO), 26-18 Plum Creek, Bank Stablization, Aurora, CO (MRO), 26-18 Plum Creek, Norden Dam Access Road, NE (MRO), 26-23 Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (ORP), 18-29 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY (ORL), 16-32 Plum Creek-Pine Island, MN (NCS), 24-31 Plum Island, MA (NED), 1-44 Plum Point, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Plymouth Harbor, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-6, 1-27, 1-36, 1-50 Plymouth, PA (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Poca, WV (ORH), 17-24 Pocasset River, RI (NED), 1-51 Pocomoke River, MD and VA (NAB), 4-1, 4-9, 4-25, 4-33, 4-40 Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN (ORL), 16-33 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Point Beach, Milford, CT (NED), 1-51 Point Breeze, LA (MR+T), 42-38 Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, Point Judith, RI (NED), 1-1, 1-7, 1-27, 1-37, 1-50 Point Judith, RI (NED), 1-49 Point Lookout Harbor, (Au Gres River), MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-22, 21-51 Point Lookout, LA (MR+T), 42-44 Point Mackenzie, AK (NPA), 40-12 Point Marion, PA (ORP), 18-25 Point Michel, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Point Place, Toledo, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-12, 20-17, 20-28 Point Pleasant, MS-LA (MR+T), 42-41 Point Pleasant, WV (ORH), 17-25 Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, AR (SWL), 28-21 Pointe Lookout Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-65, 21-77 Poker Point, Ar (MR+T), 42-51 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA (NED), 1-41 Poloa Area, American Samoa (POD), 36-11 Poloa Seawall, American Samoa (POD), 36-14 Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, MT (NPS), 38-23 Pomeroy, OH (ORH), 17-23 Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO (MRK), 27-1, 27-6, 27-11, 27-20, 27-15 Pomona Lake, KS (MRK), 27-1, 27-6, 27-11, 27-20 Ponca City, OK, Flood Forecast Map (SWT), 29-22 Ponce De Leon Inlet, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-13, 9-32, 9-42, 9-54 Ponce Harbor, PR (SAJ), 9-1, 9-14, 9-32, 9-43, 9-54 Ponce Regional, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Ponce, PR (SAJ), 9-50 Pond Creek, Cheatham Co., TN (ORN), 15-19 Pontiac Diversion, RI (NED), 1-49 Popperdam Creek, SC (SAN), 7-15 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT (NED), 1-46 Port Alexander, AK (NPA), 40-10, 40-11 Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Port Allen, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Port Angeles Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-23, 38-27, 38-28 Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG), 31-2, 31-15, 31-21, 31-35 1-44 Port Austin Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-22, 21-51, 21-65, 21-77 Port Bay, NY 1950 RandH Act (NCB), 20-34 Port Chester Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-11, 2-21, 2-26, 2-29 Port Clinton Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-29 Port Dickinson, NY (NAB), 4-41 Port Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-14, 9-33, 9-43, 9-54 Port Gamble Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-23, 38-27 Port Graham, AK (NPA), 40-12 Port Henry Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-30 Port Hueneme, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-04, 33-15, 33-30 Port Jefferson Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Port Lions, AK (NPA), 40-10 Port Ontario Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-8, 20-16, 20-26 Port Orchard Bay, WA (NPS), 38-23 Port Orford, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-7, 37-24, 37-32 Port Royal Harbor, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-6, 7-9, 7-12 Port San Luis Shore and Bluff Erosion (SPL), 33-38 Port San Luis, CA (SPL), 33-37 Port Sanilac Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-23, 21-51, 21-66 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL (SAM), 10-51 Port Sulphur, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Port Townsend, WA (NPS), 38-23 Port Washington Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-23, 21-52, 21-66 Port Wing Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-23, 21-52, 21-66, 21-77 Port of Brookings, OR (NPP), 37-42 Port of Gold Beach, OR (NPP), 37-42 Port of Kalama, WA (NPP), 37-38 Port of Morrow, Morrow, OR (NPP), 37-42 Portage Lake Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-22, 21-51, 21-65 Portage, PA (ORP), 18-21 Portage, WI (NCS), 24-1, 24-10, 24-22, 24-34 Portchester Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-34 Porter Bayou, MS (LMK), 12-1, 12-7, 12-10, 12-13 Porter Gap, TN (MR+T), 42-30 Porter Lake, AR (MR+T), 42-47, 42-51 Portersville Bay Shoreline, AL (SAM), 10-53 Portland Harbor, ME (NED), 1-41 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) (ORL), 16-21, 16-32 Portland, OH (ORH), 17-23 Portneuf River, ID (NPW), 39-17, 39-18 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH (NED), 1-1, 1-7, 1-28, 1-37 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot (NAO), 5-21 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (SA), 9-1, 9-27, 9-35, 9-50 Portville, PA (ORP), 18-21 Post Oak Creek, Corsicana, TX (SWF), 30-23 Posten Bayou, AR (LMK), 12-18, 12-21 Posten Bayou, AR (LMN), 11-19 Poteau River Navigation Project, OK and AR (SWT), 29-18 Potlatch River, ID (NPW), 39-18 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB), 4-1, 4-9, 4-25, 4-33 Potomac River Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC (NAB), 4-1, 4-10, 4-25, 4-33 Potomac River North Side of Washington Chennel, DC (NAB), 4-36 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut (NAB), 4-36 Potomac River at Alexandria, VA (NAB), 4-36 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD (NAB), 4-36 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA (NAB), 4-36 Potomac River below Washington, DC (NAB), 4-1, 4-10, 4-25, 4-33 Potowomut River, RI (NED), 1-41 Pottstown, PA (NAP), 3-26 Poverty Point, LA (LMK), 12-21 Powder River, Arvada, WY (MRO), 26-23 Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT (NPS), 38-25 Power Creek, Lenoir, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 Power Plant Road, Guam (POD), 36-14 Powerplant (NPW), 39-19, 39-20, 39-21, 39-22 Powhaten Point, OH (ORP), 18-23 Poydras, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Prairie Point, AR (MR+T), 42-50 Prairie du Chien, WI (NCS), 24-1, 24-10, 24-22 Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI (NCD), 25-7 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL (LMS), 14-14 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL (LMS), 14-14 Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL (SAM), 10-52 Prentiss, AR-MS (MR+T), 42-42 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP), 37-41 Presidents Island, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Presque Isle Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-24,21-52,21-66 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (NCB), 20-1, 20-10, 20-17, 20-27 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME (NED), 1-46 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-14 Prestonsburg, KY (ORH), 17-25 Prestonville, KY (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-10, 4-26, 4-33 Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA (NPS), 38-27 Princeton, WV (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and I-45 Kentucky River Navigation Systems (ORL), 16-1, 16-25 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR (NPP), 37-41 Pritchard, MO (MR+T), 42-50, 42-53 Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA (SAM), 10-1, 10-20, 10-38, 1048 Proctor Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Proctor, Otter Creek Basin, VT (NAN), 2-34 Proctor, WV (ORP), 18-23 Proctorville, OH (ORH), 17-23 Profit Island Chute Closure, LA (MR+T), 42-38 Prompton Lake, PA (NAP), 3-1, 3-15, 3-23 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT (NED), 1-44, 1-50 Prosperity Lake, MO (SWL), 28-22 Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA (NPS), 38-23 Providence River and Harbor, RI (NED), 1-1, 1-8, 1-28, 1-37, 1-49 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA (NED), 1-49 Provincetown Harbor, MA (NED), 1-41, 1-49, 1-50 Provosty, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Pt. Pleasant, WV (ORH), 17-22 Pudding River, OR (NPP), 37-41 Pueblo, Arkansas River, Colorado (SWA), 32-16 Puerco River, Gallup, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-4, 32-12, 32-14 Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-4, 38-14, 38-19 Pullman, Palouse River, WA (NPW), 39-17 Pultneyville Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-29 Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, GA (SAM), 10-52 Pungo Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Pungo River, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Punta Salinas, PR (SAJ), 9-56 Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-4, 18-12, 18-16, 18-21 Put in Bay, OH (NCB), 20-29 Puyallup River, WA (NPS), 38-25 Pysht River, Sekiu, WA (NPS), 38-25 Q Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino Co., CA (SPL), 33-39 Queens Creek, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-7, 5-13, 5-19, 5-21 Queenstown Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-36 Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA (NPS), 38-25 Quillayute River, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-5, 38-14, 38-19, 38-25, 38-27, 38-28 Quinalt River, WA (NPS), 38-25 Quinby Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Quincy Harbor, IL (NCD), 25-8 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA (NED), 1-44 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel (NCR), 23-12 Quinhagak Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-12 R R.D. Bailey Lake, WV (ORH), 17-1, 17-9, 17-16, 17-20 Raccoon Creek Levee, IN (ORL), 16-24 Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-21, 10-38, 10-49 Raccoon Creek, DandL Townships, IL (ORL), 16-33 Raccoon Creek, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-28 Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA (NCR), 23-17 Racetrack Towhead, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Racetrack, MS (MR+T), 42-41 Racine Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-74 Racine, OH (ORH), 17-23 Rahway River, NJ (NAN), 2-34 Rahway, South Branch, NJ (NAN), 2-32 Railroad Landing, MS (MR+T), 42-41 Rainer Drainage District, OR (NPP), 37-38, 37-39, 37-44 Rainy River Basin, MN (NCS), 24-34 Ralston and Leydon Creeks, CO (MRO), 26-21 Rancocas River, NJ (NAP), 3-27 Randleman Lake, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-11, 6-21 Randolph Point, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam, SD (MRO), 26-18 Rapid Creek, ID (NPW), 39-16 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Rapides, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Rappahannock River, VA (NAO), 5-21 Rappahannock Shoal Channel, VA (NAO), 5-16 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, NJ (NAN), 2-32 Raritan R-Arthur Kill Cutoff, NJ (NAN), 2-30 Raritan River Cuttoff, NJ (NAN), 2-29 Raritan River, NJ (NAN), 2-1, 2-11, 2-21, 2-26, 2-29 Raritan River, NY (NAN), 2-34 Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK), 27-17 Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA (MRK), 27-1, 27-6, 27-11, 27-15 Rawls Creek, SC (SAN), 7-15 Ray Roberts Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-9, 30-16, 30-20 Raymondville Drain, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-15 Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA (NAB), 4-1, 4-14, 4-34 Recapitulation Project Levee Tables 42-K, -L, and -M (Fiscal Year 1990) (MR+T), 42-1, 42-62, 42-63 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Baltimore, Md., District (NAB), 4-1, 4-2, 4-11, 4-40 Buffalo, NY., District (NCB), 20-1, 20-9 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN), 7-1, 7-7 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC), 22-1, 22-5 1-46 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE), 21-1, 21-2, 21-31, 21-77 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG), 31-2, 31-10 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL), 33-1, 33-5, 33-15, 33-42 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM), 10-1, 10-2, 10-15, 10-54 New York District (NAN), 2-1, 2-2, 2-14, 2-29 New England Division (NED), 1-1, 1-2, 1-9, 1-57 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO), 5-1, 5-23 Pacific Ocean Division (POD), 36-1, 36-3 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP), 3-1, 3-15 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN), 34-1, 34-3 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS), 8-1, 8-5 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW), 6-2, 6-30 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA (NED), 1-42 Red Creek, NY (NCB), 20-34 Red Cross, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Red Lake Falls, MN (NCS), 24-31 Red Lake and Clearwater Rivers, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-10, 24-22, 24-34 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-11, 24-22, 24-25, 24-26, 24-32, 24-33 Red River Backwater Levee, LA (MR+T), 42-72 Red River Backwater, LA (MR+T), 42-66 Red River Bank Stablization Below Denison, OK and TX (SWT), 29-19 Red River Basin, AR, TX, LA, and OK CM (SWT), 29-22 Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) (LMK), 12-1, 12-7, 12-10, 12-13, 12-18, 12-19 Red River Below Denison Dam Including Little River Basin, OK and AR (SWL), 28-18 Red River Below Fulton, AR (LMK), 12-15 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (LMK), 12-1, 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL), 16-22 Red River Parish, LA (LMK), 12-19, 12-21 Red River Parish, LA (LMN), 11-19 Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX (LMK), 12-1, 12-2, 12-8, 12-9, 12-10, 12-11, 12-13, 12-15 Red River Waterway to Denison Dam, TX (SWT), 29-22 Red River and Tribs (SWT), 29-20 Red River, MN, ND (NCS), 24-30 Red River from Fulton, AR, to Mouth of Washita River (SWT), 29-18 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMK), 12-19, 12-21 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMN), 11-19 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND (NCS), 24-1, 24-13, 24-22, 24-30 Red River of the North, ND, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-11, 24-12, 24-22, 24-25, 24-26, 24-32, 24-33, 24-34 Red River, Clay City, KY (ORL), 16-33 Red River, TN (ORN), 15-13 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA (NCR), 23-1, 23-5, 23-8, 23-11 Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI (NCE), 21-74 Red Store, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Red Wing Harbor, MN (NCD), 25-7 Redbank Creek Lake, PA (ORP), 18-23 Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-16, 35-27 Redbird Creek, O'Neill, NE (MRO), 26-20 Reddies River Lake, NC (SAW), 6-28 Reddies River Lake, NC (SAN), 7-15 Redman Point, AR (MR+T), 42-51 Redondo Beach Harbor, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-2, 33-10, 33-13, 33-21, 33-37 Redwater River and Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD (MRO), 26-17 Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA (SPK), 35-36 Redwood River Below Marshall, MN (NCS), 24-26 Reed Island, WA (NPP), 37-42 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-13 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR (NPP), 37-40 Reedy River, SC (SAN), 7-15 Reelfoot Lake Area, KY and TN (MR+T), 42-1, 42-11, 42-21, 42-26, 42-32, 42-34, 42-67, 42-68, 42-71, 42-79 Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN (MR+T), 42-59 Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV (SPK), 35-36 Reevesville, IL (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Refuge, MS (MR+T), 42-44 Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans (CDC), 53-1, 53-5, 53-7 Regulatory Functions Program (SAM), 10-2, 10-32 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE (NAP), 3-26 Reid-Bedford, LA (MR+T), 42-41 Remedial Studies on Completed Units (MRO), 26-18 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida (SAJ), 9-1, 9-15, 9-33, 9-43 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA (LMN), 11-18 Removing Snags and Wrecks from Mississippi River Below Mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK), 12-15 Removing Water Hyacinths (SAM), 10-51 Removing Snags and Wrecks from Mississippi River Below Mouth of Missosuri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMM), 13-5 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL (LMS), 14-11, 14-14 Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-12, 20-17, 20-28 Republican River, KS, Sewage Lagoons (MRK), 27-22 Republican River, Nebraska and Kansas (MRK), 27-20 Rescue Land, AR-MS (MR+T), 42-47 Research and Development 1-47 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL), 33-1, 33-09, 33-20 Pittsburgh, Penn., District (ORP), 18-1, 18-11 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK), 35-1, 35-23 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS), 8-1, 8-9 Reserve, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Reservoirs (ORN), 15-1, 15-18 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-2, 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Restudy of Deferred Projects (SWT), 29-22 Restudy of Levee System (MRO), 26-18 Revere Beach, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-10, 1-28, 1-37 Review of Authorized Projects (SWT), 29-22 Review of FERC Licenses (SWT), 29-22 Reynoldsville, PA (ORP), 18-21 Rheem Creek, CA (SPK), 35-36 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD (NAB), 4-36 Rice Creek, FL (SAJ), 9-55 Rich Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (SAS), 8-1, 8-8, 8-11, 8-16 Richardson County Drainage Dist. No. 8 (MRO), 26-18 Richardson, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Richland Creek, IL (LMS), 14-14 Richland Lake, MO (MRK), 27-19 Richmond Filtration Plant, VA (NAO), 5-22 Richmond Harbor, CA (SPN), 34-1, 34-2, 34-6, 34-9 Richmond Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42 Richmond, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-9, 5-15, 5-19 Richwood and Fenwick, WV (ORH), 17-25 Ridgeley, WV (NAB), 4-42 Ridgeway and Vicinity (on Clarion River) (ORP), 18-22 Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) (ORP), 18-21 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY (ORH), 17-25 Rillito River in the vicinity of Tucson, Gila Rvr and Tribs, AZ (SPL), 33-1, 33-10, 33-21 Rimer, PA (ORP), 18-24 Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio Cubebrinas, Aguada, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio El Ojo De Agua, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio Fajardo, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio Grande Basin, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-4, 32-12, 32-14, 32-15 Rio Grande Floodway, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-6, 32-12, 32-14 Rio Guadiana, Naranjito, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio La Plata, Comerio, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio Loco, Guanica, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio Manati, Barceloneta, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio Niqua, Arroyo, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR (SAJ), 9-50 Ripley, OH (ORH), 17-23 Ripley, WV (ORH), 17-25 Ririe Lake, ID (NPW), 39-16 Rising Sun, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 River Rouge, MI (NCE), 21-72 Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-14, 1-30, 1-38, 1-51, 1-53 Rivergate, OR (NPP), 37-43 Riverland Levee District, MO (LMS), 14-14 Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds (SAM), 10-2, 10-34 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA (NPW), 39-16 Riverton, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Riverview, WV (ORH), 17-23 Roanoak Lake, TX (SWF), 30-22 Roanoke Island, Dare County, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 Roanoke River Basin, VA and NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-15 Roanoke River Upper Basin, VA-Headwaters Area (SAW), 6-1, 6-14, 6-21 Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon (SAW), 6-29 Roanoke River, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Roaring Fork River near Basalt, CO (SPK), 35-42 Roaring River Lake, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Roaring River, NC (SAN), 7-15 Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-12, 30-16, 30-21 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM), 10-2, 10-27, 10-39 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-9, 29-15, 29-18, 29-20 Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK (SWT), 29-20 Robert, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Robinson Bayou, MO (MR+T), 42-49, 42-52 Robinson Crusoe, TN (MR+T), 42-51 Rochester Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-1, 20-8, 20-16, 20-26 Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA (NCR), 23-15 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Rochester, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-14, 24-22 Rochester, PA (ORP), 18-23 Rock Creek Road, MT (NPS), 38-25 Rock Creek, Burlington, KS (SWT), 29-20 Rock Creek, MT (NPS), 38-25 Rock Creek, Pottawatomie County, KS, County Bridge (MRK), 27-22 Rock Hall Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Rock Harbor, Orleans and Eastham, MA (NED), 1-50 Rock Island Harbor, IL (NCD), 25-7 Rock Island, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL (NCR), 23-14 Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-14, 2-21, 2-27 1-48 Rockfish Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Rockford, IL (NCR), 23-1, 23-5, 23-8, 23-11 Rockland Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42, 1-49 Rockland Lake, TX (SWF), 30-22 Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA (NED), 1-42, 1-50 Rockport, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 Rocky Bayou, MS (MR+T), 42-27 Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS (SAM), 10-58 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-13 Rocky Pass, AK (NPA), 40-10 Rocky River Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-26 Rocky River, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-8, 20-16 Rocy Fork, OH (ORH), 17-24 Rodeo Creek, CA (SPK), 35-36 Rogers City Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-74 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-7, 37-24, 37-32 Rogue River, OR (NPP), 37-40 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, AR (SWL), 28-21 Rolling Fork, Lebanon Junction, KY (ORL), 16-33 Rollinson Channel, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-8, 6-20 Rome Mohawk River, NY (NAN), 2-34 Rome, Coosa River, GA (SAM), 10-52 Rome, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 Romeville, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Rondout Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-30 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME (NED), 1-44 Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (ORP), 18-21 Root River at Hokah, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-13, 24-22 Roque Bluffs, ME (NED), 1-50 Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA (SPL), 33-39 Roseau River, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-14, 24-22 Rosedale Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-43 Rosedale Harbor, MS (LMK), 12-15 Rosendale, NY (NAN), 2-32 Roseville, OH (ORH), 17-1, 17-10, 17-16, 17-20, 17-25 Rosiclare, IL (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Rossview Lake, TN and KY (ORN), 15-14 Rossville, Cross Creek, KS (MRK), 27-22 Rota Harbor, CNMI (POD), 36-10 Rouge River, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-24, 21-52, 21-66 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-9, 16-16 Rough River, KY (ORL), 16-20, 16-26, 16-29, 16-32 Roughans Point, Revere, MA (NED), 1-2, 1-20, 1-32, 1-38 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, NY (NAN), 2-30 Rouseville, PA (ORP), 18-22 Route River, MI (NCE), 21-74 Rowlesburg Lake, WV (ORP), 18-22 Roxana, LA (MR+T), 42-45 Royal River, ME (NED), 1-42 Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, Near Twin Bridge, MT (MRO), 26-18 Ruddles Point, MO (MR+T), 42-52 Rudee Inlet, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-7, 5-13, 5-19 Ruffy Brook, MN (NCS), 24-28 Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN (MR+T), 42-67 Rush Creek, Arlington, TX (SWF), 30-23 Rush River, ND (NCS), 24-30 Rushford, MN (NCS), 24-26, 24-31 Russell and Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL), 16-22, 16-26 Russell, KY (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Russian River Basin, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-2, 35-16, 35-27, 35-33, 35-40 Rutland, Otter Creek, VT (NAN), 2-34 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX (SWF), 30-22 Rye Creek, MT (NPS), 38-25 Rye Harbor, NH (NED), 1-1, 1-9, 1-28, 1-37 S S.Fork Clearwater River, ID (NPW), 39-17 Sabana Grande, PR (SAJ), 9-62 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (SWG), 31-37 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-8, 31-20, 31-31, 31-38, 31-40, 31-41, 31-45 Sabula, IA (NCR), 23-13, 23-16, 23-17 Sackets Harbor, NY and OH (NCB), 20-29, 20-34 Saco River, ME (NED), 1-42, 1-49 Saco, MT (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Sacramento River CA: Total Cost of Existing Project to September 30, 1990 (CDC), 53-8 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-3, 35-25 Sacramento River Flood Control, CA (SPK), 35-32 Sacramento River, CA (CDC), 53-1, 53-2, 53-3, 53-5, 53-8 Sacramento River, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-2, 35-17, 35-25, 35-28, 35-33, 35-34, 35-38, 35-41, 35-42 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD (MRO), 26-15,26-18 Sag Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-30 Sagamon River (Mouth), IL (NCR), 23-13 Saginaw River, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-2, 21-24, 21-34, 21-53, 21-56, 21-66 Saginaw River, MI Flood Control (NCE), 21-69 Saint Georges Creek, MD (NAB), 4-40 Saipan Beach Road, CNMI (POD), 36-14 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI (POD), 36-10 Sakonnet Harbor, RI (NED), 1-42, 1-49 1-49 Salado Creek near Patterson, CA (SPK), 35-42 Salamanca, NY (ORP), 18-21 Salamonie Lake, IN (ORL), 16-1, 16-10, 16-16 Salamonie River, IN (ORL), 16-32, 16-33 Salem Church Lake, VA (NAO), 5-22 Salem Harbor, MA (NED), 1-42, 1-49 Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK), 27-17, 27-20 Salinas River, CA (SPK), 35-36 Saline Point, LA (LMK), 12-19, 12-21 Saline Point, LA (LMN), 11-19 Saline River and Tributaries, IL (ORL), 16-21, 16-32 Saline River, AR (LMK), 12-15 Salisbury, CT (NED), 1-54 Salkahatchie River, SC (SAN), 7-14 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA (NPP), 37-40 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR (NPP), 37-40 Salmon River, AK (NPA), 40-11 Salmon River, Cochester, CT (NED), 1-46, 1-53 Salmon River, ID (NPW), 39-18 Salmon River, OR (NPP), 37-37 Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (MRO), 26-1,26-5,26-11, 26-14 Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln, NE (MRO), 26-20 Salt Creek, Levees, Lincoln, NE (MRO), 26-23 Salt Creek, OH (ORH), 17-24 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT (SPK), 35-36 Saluda River, SC (SAN), 7-15 Salyersville, KY (ORL), 16-22, 16-33 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-12, 30-16, 30-20 Sammamish River, WA (NPS), 38-28 San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-9, 30-16, 30-20 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA (SPL), 33-38 San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas (SWG), 31-37 San Diego Harbor, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-02, 33-13, 33-30 San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA (SPL), 33-39 San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-5, 33-15, 33-31 San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA (SPN), 34-1, 34-3, 34-6 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPK), 35-1, 35-3, 35-25 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (SPN), 34-1, 34-2, 34-6 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA (SPN), 34-11 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA (SPN), 34-11 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA (SPL), 33-38 San Gabriel River, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-10, 30-17, 30-20 San Joaquin River, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-4, 35-25, 35-39 San Juan Harbor, PR (SAJ), 9-1, 9-17, 9-33, 9-44, 9-54, 9-56 San Leandro Creek, CA (SPK), 35-36 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA (SPN), 34-11 San Lorenzo Creek, CA (SPK), 35-36 San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) (SPN), 34-12 San Lorenzo River, CA (SPK), 35-36 San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-7, 33-35 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Valejo and South Vallejo) (SPN), 34-12 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME (NED), 1-46 Sand Creek LPP, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Sand Creek, Sterling, CO (MRO), 26-23 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI (NED), 1-44 Sand Hill River, MN (NCS), 24-30 Sand Island Shore Protection Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-1, 36-3, 36-6 Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-11 Sand Lake, OK (SWT), 29-19 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, NY (NAN), 2-32 Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI (NCS), 24-32 Sandusky Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-8, 20-16, 20-26 Sandusky River, OH (NCB), 20-29 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA (NED), 1-42, 1-49 Sandy Creek Jackson, TN (LMM), 13-6 Sandy Creek, Village of Albion, NY (NCB), 20-33 Sandy Drainage District, OR (NPP), 37-39, 37-44 Sandy Hook Bay, NJ (NAN), 2-29, 2-30 Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, NJ (NAN), 2-1, 2-15, 2-21, 2-27 Sandy Hook, TN (MR+T), 42-52 Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR (NPP), 37-39 Sandy River, Danville, VA (SAW), 6-32 Sandy River, Farmington, ME (NED), 1-51 Sangamon River, Riverton, IL (NCR), 23-17 Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL (NCR), 23-16 Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK (SWT), 29-20 Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-8, 33-18, 33-35, 33-39, 33-41 Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-7, 33-18 Santa Barbara Harbor, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-03, 33-14, 33-31 Santa Clara River, Fillmore, CA (SPL), 33-40 Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara Rvr Basin, CA (SPL), 33-40 Santa Cruz County, CA (SPN), 34-11 Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA (SPL), 33-40 Santa Paula Creek channel and debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara Rvr Basin, CA (SPL), 33-40 1-50 Santa Paula Creek, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-12, 33-22 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-7, 32-13 Sante Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico (SWA), 32-16 Santee River, NC and SC (SAN), 7-14 Sapelo Harbor, GA (SAS), 8-16 Sarah Island-Oppossum Point, LA-MS (MR+T), 42-42 Sarasota County, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-23, 9-34, 9-49 Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance) (MR+T), 42-34 Sardis Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-8, 29-14, 29-17 Sardis, OH (ORH), 17-23 Sasanoa River, ME (NED), 1-42 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT (NED), 1-44 Satilla River, GA (SAS), 8-16 Saucelito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA (SPN), 34-11 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-28, 21-53, 21-68, 21-77 Saugatuck Shores, Westport, CT (NED), 1-51 Saugerties Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-31 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA (NED), 1-50 Sauk River, WA (NPS), 38-28 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR (NPP), 37-39, 37-44 Savage River Dam, MD (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ), 9-50, 9-62 Savanna Harbor, IL (NCD), 25-7 Savannah City Park, TN (ORN), 15-19 Savannah Harbor, GA (SAS), 8-1, 8-4, 8-10, 8-13 Savannah River Basin, GA and SC (SAS), 8-1, 8-5, 8-7, 8-10, 8-15, 8-16, 8-17 Saw Mill Run Rd., Salamanca, NY (ORP), 18-29 Saw Mill Run, PA (ORP), 18-21 Sawmill Branch, SC (SAN), 7-15 Sawmill R. Elmsford and Greenburgh, NY (NAN), 2-32 Saxis Island, VA (NAO), 5-22 Saxon Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-28, 21-54, 21-68 Saxonville, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-55 Saylorville Lake, IA (NCR), 23-1, 23-5, 23-8, 23-11 Scajaquada Creek, NY (NCB), 20-31, 20-33 Scappoose Drainage District, OR (NPP), 37-38, 37-44 Scarboro River, ME (NED), 1-42 Scarsdale, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Albuquerque, NM., District (SWA), 32-1, 32-9 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB), 4-2, 4-21 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF), 30-2, 30-11 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK), 27-1, 27-7, 27-12 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL), 33-1, 33-09, 33-20 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM), 10-2, 10-32 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO), 26-1, 26-6, 26-11 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP), 37-1, 37-15 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK), 35-1, 35-21 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS), 38-1, 38-9 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT), 29-1, 29-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW), 39-1, 39-4 Wilmington, NC., District (SAW), 6-1, 6-16 Schoharie Creek, NY (NAN), 2-35 Schooner Dr., Lincoln City, OR (NPP), 37-43 Schuyler, Lost Creek and Platte River, NE (MRO), 26-20 Schuylkill River, PA (NAP), 3-1, 3-8, 3-17, 3-21, 3-24 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH (ORH), 17-21 Sciotoville, OH (ORH), 17-23 Scipio Creek, Franklin, FL (SAM), 10-53 Scituate Harbor, MA (NED), 1-42 Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL (LMS), 14-14 Scotts Creek (NAO), 5-18 Scotts Creek, SC (SAN), 7-15 Scottsville, VA (NAO), 5-22 Scranton, Buffalo, ND (MRO), 26-18 Scranton, PA (NAB), 4-38, 4-42 Scrubgrass Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-47 Scuppernong River, N.C. (SAW), 6-26, 6-29 Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-10, 1-28, 1-37, 1-50 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-16 Searsport Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42 Seaside Park, CT (NED), 1-44 Seattle Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-5, 38-14, 38-19, 38-27 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME (NED), 1-46 Sebewaing River, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-2, 21-28, 21-35, 21-54, 21-56, 21-68, 21-69, 21-77 Sec 6 Levees, 1928 Flood Control Act (MR+T), 42-34 Section 107 Reconnaissance Reports (NAN), 2-2, 2-35 Section 14 Reports and Plans and Specs (NAN), 2-2, 2-35 Section 20 Aqueduct Washita River, Caddo (SWT), 29-20 Section 205 Projects (NAN), 2-2, 2-35 Section 24 Aqueduct Washita River, Caddo (SWT), 29-20 Section 24 Road North Canadian River, Pottawatomie (SWT), 29-20 Section 27 Road North Canadian River, Pottawatomie (SWT), 29-20 Seekonk River, RI (NED), 1-42 Seldovia Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10, 40-12 Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, NY (NCB), 20-30, 20-34 Seneca Lake, Geneva, NY (NCB), 20-32 Sequoyah Hills Park, Knoxville, TN (ORN), 15-19 Sergius Whitestone, AK (NPA), 40-10 Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA (SPL), 33-40 Sesuit Harbor, MA (NED), 1-42 Settlement Canyon Dam near Tooele, UT (SPK), 35-42 I-51 Seven Oaks, AR (MR+T), 42-44 Sevier River near Redmond, UT (SPK), 35-36 Sewage Lagoon, South Canadian River, New Castle (SWT), 29-20 Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR (NPW), 39-16 Sewage Lagoons, North Canadian River (SWT), 29-20 Seward Expansion, AK (NPA), 40-12 Seward Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Seward, NE (MRK), 27-17 Sewer Outfall, Glendale, WV (ORP), 18-29 Sewerline Protection, Valley, AL (SAM), 10-52 Seymour Creek, Seymour, TX (SWF), 30-23 Seyppel, Ar (MR+T), 42-51 Shad Landing State Park, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Shades Creek (SAM), 10-58 Shallotte River, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-8, 6-20, 6-30 Shallow Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36 Shark River, NJ (NAN), 2-29, 2-31 Shawneetown, IL (ORL), 16-21, 16-24, 16-28, 16-31 Sheboygan Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-29, 21-54, 21-68 Sheepshead Bay, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-31 Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH (NCB), 20-34 Sheffield Water Intake, AL (ORN), 15-19 Sheffield, MA (NED), 1-54 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH (NED), 1-46 Shelby Forest, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS (MR+T), 42-27 Shell Creek, NE (MRO), 26-17, 26-20 Shell Lake, WI (NCS), 24-32 Shelley Area, Snake River, ID (NPW), 39-18 Shelton Creek, WA (NPS), 38-28 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, OR (NPP), 37-41 Shenango River Lake, PA and OH (ORP), 18-1, 18-8, 18-13, 18-18 Shenango River, PA and OH (ORP), 18-27 Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS), 24-26, 24-31 Sherburne, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Sherburne, NY (NAB), 4-41 Sheridan, WY (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT (NED), 1-44 Sheyenne River, ND (NCS), 24-1, 24-14, 24-22, 24-26, 24-28, 24-31, 24-34 Shidler Lake, OK (SWT), 29-19 Shields River, MT (MRO), 26-15, 26-23 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA (NPS), 38-23, 38-28 Shinnecock Inlet, NJ (NAN), 2-26 Shinnecock Inlet, NY (NAN), 2-1, 2-12, 2-21, 2-29 Shipyard River, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-6, 7-9, 7-12, 7-14 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, NJ (NAN), 2-1, 2-12, 2-21, 2-26 Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) (ORL), 16-24 Shobe Canyon Heppner, OR (NPW), 39-16 Shoreline Protection Studies (Category 130) (SAN), 7-16 Short Beach, CT (NED), 1-44 Shoshone River, WY (MRO), 26-18 Shot Pounch Creek, Sumter, Co., SC (SAN), 7-15 Shrewsbury River, NJ (NAN), 2-1, 2-13, 2-21, 2-27, 2-29 Shuflebarger Levee, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 Shupe Run, Mt. Pleasant, PA (ORP), 18-29 Sid Simpson Project, IL (NCR), 23-13 Sidney, NE (MRO), 26-23 Sierra Madre Wash Channel, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA (SPL), 33-41 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (NED), 1-44, 1-49 Silver Creek, Rome, GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-21, 10-38, 10-49 Silver Creek, Silver Creek, NY (NCB), 20-33 Silver Lake Harbor, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-9, 6-20, 6-24 Simmerport, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Simmons Bay, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Simpson Creek, SC (SAN), 7-15 Sims Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-15, 31-21, 31-35 Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX (SWF), 30-23 Sink Creek, Waterloo, IA (NCR), 23-17 Sioux City, Floyd River, IA (MRO), 26-20 Sioux Falls, SD (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Sipsey River, AL (SAM), 10-52 Sistersville, OH (ORH), 17-23 Sitka Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Siuslaw River, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-7, 37-25, 37-32, 37-40 Six Runs Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Sixes Bridge Lake, MD and PA (NAB), 4-40 Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR (SWL), 28-21 Skagit River, WA (NPS), 38-23, 38-27, 38-28 Skagway Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Skagway River, AK (NPA), 40-11 Skamokawa Creek, WA (NPP), 37-1, 37-8, 37-25, 37-33, 37-38, 37-41, 37-42 Skiatook Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-8, 29-14, 29-17 Skipanon Channel, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-8, 37-25, 37-33 Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA (NPS), 38-28 Slaughter Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 Slough Bend, Hickman, KY (MR+T), 42-13 Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY (MR+T), 42-49 Slovan, PA (ORP), 18-21 Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL (LMS), 14-12 Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL (LMS), 14-12 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA (MRO), 26-15 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA (NED), 1-46 Smith Creek, CO (SWA), 32-16 Smith Creek, MD (NAB), 4-37 Smith Ferry, PA (ORP), 18-23 Smith Point, MS (MR+T), 42-43, 42-45 Smith River, OR (NPP), 37-37 Smith, LA (MR+T), 42-46 1-52 Smithfield, WV (ORH), 17-25 Smithland, KY (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 Smiths Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO (MRK), 27-17 Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO (MRK), 27-1, 27-6, 27-11, 27-15 Smoke Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers (MRK), 27-20 Smyrna River, DE (NAP), 3-24, 3-27 Snake River, OR, WA, WY and ID (NPW), 39-1, 39-8, 39-11, 39-15, 39-16, 39-18, 39-23 Snake River, Alvarado, MN (NCS), 24-32 Snettisham, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-4, 40-9 Snohomish River, WA (NPS), 38-28, 38-29 Snoqualmie River, WA (NPS), 38-28, 38-29 Sny Basin, IL (NCR), 23-13 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL (NCR), 23-13, 23-16, 23-18 Soap Creek, WA (NPP), 37-41 Socastee Creek, Horry County, SC (SAN), 7-15 Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico (SWA), 32-16 Soil Conservation Service (SWT), 29-22 Soldier River, Ute, IA (MRO), 26-23 Soldiers and Palmetto Creek, AL (SAM), 10-53 Soleduck River, WA (NPS), 38-28 Somerville Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-10, 30-17, 30-20 Sonoma Creek, CA (SPK), 35-36 Sope Creek, Marietta, GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-21, 10-38, 10-49 Souris River Basin, ND (NCS), 24-1, 24-15, 24-22, 24-26 South Agat (Route 2), Guam (POD), 36-14 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, NY (NAN), 2-32 South Bank Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-21, 28-22 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-14, 23-16 South Beloit, IL (NCR), 23-15 South Bristol Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42, 1-57 South Carolina Shores, (SAN), 7-16 South Channel, Government Island, OR (NPP), 37-37 South Coventry Lake, CT (NED), 1-49 South Creek, Martinburg, NE (MRO), 26-20 South Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 South Deer Creek, OK (SWT), 29-20 South Ellenville, NY (NAN), 2-32 South Fork Catawba River, Cramerton, N.C. (SAW), 6-32 South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID (NPW), 39-16 South Fork Wildcat Creek, Road 7E, Tippecanoe (ORL), 16-33 South Fork of Cumberland River, KY (ORN), 15-13 South Fork of the Santa Clara Rvr, Santa Clarita Valley, CA (SPL), 33-40 South Fork, Boise River, ID (NPW), 39-16 South Fork, Bon Secour River, AL (SAM), 10-53 South Fork, Ewing, NE (MRO), 26-23 South Haven Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-29, 21-54, 21-68, 21-77 South Main Channel, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-15 South Mesquite, Mesquite, TX (SWF), 30-23 South Milwaukee Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-74 South Orange, NJ (NAN), 2-32 South Plate River Basin, CO (MRO), 26-1, 26-5, 26-14, 26-15, 26-18, 26-23 South Plymouth Lake, NY (NAB), 4-40 South Point, OH (ORH), 17-23 South Portsmouth, KY (ORH), 17-23 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-1, 23-6, 23-8, 23-11, 23-14 South River Drainage District, MO (NCR), 23-14, 23-16 South River, Conway, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-53 South River, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 South Slough (Charleston), OR (NPP), 37-37 South St. Paul, MN (NCS), 24-31 South Table Creek, Nebraska City, NE (MRO), 26-23 South Tongue Point Channel, OR (NPP), 37-42 South Tunbridge Lake, VT (NED), 1-49 South Williamson, KY (ORH), 17-25 South Yamhill River, OR (NPP), 37-43 Southeast Arkansas, AR (MR+T), 42-79 Southeast Missouri Port, MO (LMS), 14-1, 14-2, 14-7, 14-9 Southern Branch (NAO), 5-18 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB), 4-1, 4-14, 4-35 Southport Beach, CT (NED), 1-44 Southport Harbor, CT (NED), 1-42 Southwest Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42, 1-50 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-4, 16-13, 16-31 Southwind Maritime Center, Mt. Vernon, IN (ORL), 16-33 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS (SAM), 10-2, 10-22, 10-38, 10-49, 10-52 Spanish Fork River, UT (SPK), 35-38 Spanish Moss, AR (MR+T), 42-42 Special Investigations (SWT), 29-22 Spicket River, Salem, NH (NED), 1-51 Spillway Dam (NPW), 39-19, 39-20, 39-21, 39-22 Spithead Towhead, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Spokane River, Spokane, WA (NPS), 38-27, 38-28 Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA (NAB), 4-1, 4-18, 4-28, 4-35 Spring City, TN (ORN), 15-19 1-53 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-14, 23-16 Springdale, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-53 Springers Branch, MS (SAM), 10-58 Springfield Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Springfield Millrace, OR (NPP), 37-43 Springfield, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-51, 1-53 Springfield, SD Water Intake (MRO), 26-17 Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA (NPS), 38-23 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT (NED), 1-46, 1-54 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL (NCR), 23-12 Squaw Creek, Hwy 287 Bridge, WY (MRO), 26-23 St Francis Basin, AR and MO (MR+T), 42-29 St Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayouk, AR (LMM), 13-5 St John River Basin, ME (NED), 1-46 St Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-16, 9-33 St Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO (LMS), 14-14 St. Alice, LA (MR+T), 42-37 St. Catherine Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-41 St. Clair River, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-25, 21-53, 21-66, 21-74, 21-75 St. Clair, AR (MR+T), 42-48 St. Croix River, MN and WI (NCS), 24-25 St. Elmo, LA (MR+T), 42-37 St. Francis Basin, AR and MO (MR+T), 42-1, 42-9, 42-28, 42-34 St. Francis Levee District of AR (MR+T), 42-59 St. Francis Levee District of MO (MR+T), 42-59 St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO (MR+T), 42-13, 42-20, 42-27, 42-47, 42-67, 42-79 St. Francis Towhead, MS (MR+T), 42-50 St. Gabriel, LA (MR+T), 42-37 St. James Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-77 St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO (MR+T), 42-13, 42-29, 42-31, 42-34 St. Johns Levee and Drainage District (MR+T), 42-59 St. Joseph Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-25, 21-53, 21-67 St. Marys River, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-26, 21-53, 21-67, 21-74 St. Paul, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-16, 24-23, 24-26, 24-31, 24-34 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, NY (NAN), 2-30 St. Augustine Harbor, FL (SA), 9-1, 9-15, 9-33, 9-43, 9-54 St. Catherines Sound, MD (NAB), 4-36 St. Clair County, AL (SAM), 10-58 St. Croix River, ME (NED), 1-42 St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR (LMM), 13-6 St. George Island, AK (NPA), 40-12 St. George, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-3, 40-7, 40-8 St. Georges Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36 St. Jeromes Creek, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-10, 4-26, 4-33 St. Johns County, FL (SAJ), 9-49 St. Johns River and Tributaries and Withacoochee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers (SAJ), 9-44, 9-54 St. Jones River, DE (NAP), 3-24, 3-25 St. Lucie Inlet, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-16, 9-33, 9-44 St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID (NPS), 38-25 St. Marks River, FL (SAM), 10-51, 10-54 St. Mary's AK (NPA), 40-12 St. Mary's River, GA and FL, and North River, GA (SAS), 8-16 St. Mary's, WV (ORH), 17-23 St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP), 18-23 St. Michael Canal, AK (NPA), 40-10 St. Michaels Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-36 St. Patrick's Creek, MD (NAB), 4-36, 4-41 St. Paul Harbor, MN (NCD), 25-7 St. Paul Island Harbor (NPA), 40-1, 40-3, 40-7 St. Paul Island, AK (NPA), 40-8 St. Peters Creek, MD (NAB), 4-37 St. Petersburg Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-55 St. Petersburg River, FL (SAJ), 9-54 St. Regis River, MT (NPS), 38-27, 38-28 St. Thomas Harbor, VI (SAJ), 9-55 Stamford CT (NED), 1-2, 1-20, 1-32, 1-39 Stamford Harbor, CT (NED), 1-42, 1-49, 1-57 Starlings Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA (NPS), 38-28 State Highway 156, Kay County, OK (SWT), 29-20 State Hwy 101 and 401, Columbia River, WA (NPP), 37-38 State Island, NY (NAN), 2-32 State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI (NCS), 24-1, 24-16, 24-22, 24-26 Statement of Allotments and Accrued Expenditures for Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries, From May 15 192, Through Sep. 30, 1990 (MR+T), 42-1, 42-70, 42-71, 42-72, 42-73, 42-74, 42-75 Statements of Expenditures for Levees by State and Local Organizations Through Dec. 31, 1989 (MR+T), 42-1, 42-76 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Bridge Across Arthur Kill, NY (NAN), 2-31 Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO (LMS), 14-14 Ste. Genevieve, MO (LMS), 14-11 Steambank Erosion Under Special Authorization (SAN), 7-1, 7-7 Steele Bayou Basin, MS (MR+T), 42-28 Steinhatchee River, FL (SAJ), 9-54, 9-55 1-54 Stelle Bayou, MS (MR+T), 42-25 Stewart Towhead, MO (MR+T), 42-52 Still Well Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR (NPP), 37-40 Stillaguamish River, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-9, 38-16, 38-20, 38-27, 38-28, 38-29 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-10, 30-17, 30-20 Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB), 4-1, 4-18, 4-28, 4-35 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT (NPS), 38-28 Stockton Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO (MRK), 27-1, 27-9, 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA (SPK), 35-35 Stone Harbor, NJ (NAP), 3-26 Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS (MRK), 27-17 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY (ORL), 16-32 Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV (ORP), 18-1, 18-8, 18-13, 18-18, 18-27 Stonington Harbor, CT (NED), 1-42, 1-49, 1-50 Stonington Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42, 1-49 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH (NED), 1-46 Stony Creek, CT (NED), 1-42, 1-57 Storm Studies (SWT), 29-22 Stratford, CT (NED), 1-49 Strawberry Hill, St. Croix, VI (SAJ), 9-62 Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL (LMS), 14-14 Strong Creek, Hope, ID (NPS), 38-28 Strugis, KY (Tradewater River) (ORL), 16-26 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID (NPW), 39-17 Stuart, IL (NCR), 23-17 Stuart, VA (SAW), 6-28 Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. (SAW), 6-26, 6-30 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-30, 21-55, 21-68 Sturgeon Point, Evans, NY (NCB), 20-27 Sturgis, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-31 Subdistrict No.1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL (NCR), 23-14, 23-16 Sucker Brook Dam, CT (NED), 1-46, 1-52 Sugar Creek Levee, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH (ORL), 16-33 Sugar Creek, Watermelon Hollow Road, Montgomery Co., IN (ORL), 16-33 Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH (NED), 1-49 Suisun Bay Channel, CA (SPK), 35-35 Suisun Channel, CA (SPK), 35-35 Suisun Point Channel, CA (SPK), 35-35 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42 Sullivan Run, Butler, PA (ORP), 18-29 Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX (SWF), 30-23 Sulphur River, AR and TX (LMN), 11-18 Sultan, WA (NPS), 38-29 Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH), 17-1, 17-10, 17-16, 17-20 Sumner Parker Airport, OR (NPP), 37-40 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, NY (NAN), 2-31 Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS (SAM), 10-52 Sun River, Great Falls, MT (MRO), 26-18 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) (ORN), 15-19 Sunbury, PA (NAB), 4-38, 4-42 Sunflower, AR (MR+T), 42-50 Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR (MR+T), 42-42 Sunrise Towhead, TN (MR+T), 42-48 Sunset Harbor, CA (SPL), 33-32, 33-37 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN), 2-1, 2-2, 2-14, 2-21, 2-28 Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (NAO), 5-1, 5-7, 5-14 Surry Mountain Lake, NH (NED), 1-1, 1-14, 1-30, 1-52 Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters (NCE), 21-2, 21-36, 21-56 Surveys Alaska District (NPA), 40-1, 40-5 Albuquerque, NM. District (SWA), 32-1, 32-10 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB), 4-2, 4-22 Buffalo, NY., District (NCB), 20-1, 20-13 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC), 22-1, 22-9 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE), 21-2, 21-39 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF), 30-2, 30-13 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG), 31-2, 31-17 Huntington, WV., District (ORH), 17-1 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ), 9-1, 9-28 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL), 28-1, 28-11 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL), 33-1, 33-9, 33-20 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL), 16-1, 16-12 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM), 10-2, 10-33 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN), 15-1, 15-8 New York District (NAN), 2-1, 2-2, 2-18, 2-33 New England Division (NED), 1-2, 1-24 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO), 5-1, 5-10, 5-15 Pacific Ocean Division (POD), 36-1, 36-5 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP), 3-1, 3-15 Pittsburgh, Penn., District (ORP), 18-1, 18-11 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP), 37-1, 37-21 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR), 23-1, 23-6 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK), 35-1, 35-23 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN), 34-1, 34-4 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS), 8-1, 8-9 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS), 38-1, 38-11 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS), 24-1, 24-19 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT), 29-2, 29-10 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW), 39-1, 39-8 1-55 Wilmington, NC., District (SAW), 6-1, 6-17 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA (NAB), 4-1, 4-19, 4-35 Susquehanna River, MD and PA (NAB), 4-37, 4-41 Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH), 17-1, 17-10, 17-16, 17-20 Suwannee River, FL (SAJ), 9-54, 9-55 Swamp Creek at Versailles, Oh (ORL), 16-33 Swan Creek Bank Stabilization, MO (SWL), 28-22 Swan Creek, Toledo, OH (NCB), 20-33 Swanton Harbor, VT (NAN), 2-34 Sweetwater Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-08, 33-19, 33-36 Swift Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-26, 6-28 Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-5, 38-14, 38-19, 38-28 Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA (NAB), 4-38, 4-42 Sycamore Creek, Coffeyville, KS (SWT), 29-20 Sykesville, PA (ORP), 18-21 Sylvia State Beach, Oak Bluffs, MA (NED), 1-50 Syracuse, OH (ORH), 17-23 Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, NY (NCB), 20-31 T Tacoma Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-6, 38-14, 38-19 Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-9, 38-16, 38-20 Tahlequah Creek (SWT), 29-20 Tahola, WA (NPS), 38-28 Talkeetna River, AK (NPA), 40-11 Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS (SAM), 10-52 Tallahala Creek, MS (SAM), 10-2, 10-22, 10-38, 10-49, 10-52 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS (LMK), 12-15 Tallow Hill, GA (SAS), 8-17 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam (POD), 36-13 Tama, IA (NCR), 23-17 Tamaqua, PA (NAP), 3-1, 3-15 Tampa Harbor Branch Channels (SAJ), 9-47 Tampa Harbor East Bay Channel (SAJ), 9-47 Tampa Harbor, FL (SAJ), 9-1, 9-18, 9-33, 9-45, 9-46 Tampa and Hillsborough Bays (SAJ), 9-45 Tangeman, Little Nemaha River, NE (MRO), 26-20 Tangier Channel, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Tangier Island Shore Protection (NAO), 5-1, 5-8, 5-14, 5-19 Tangipahoa River, LA (LMN), 11-18 Tar River and tributaries, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 Tarentum, PA (ORP), 18-21 Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR (MR+T), 42-44 Tarpley Island, MS (MR+T), 42-42 Tarrytown Harbor, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-31 Taskinas Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD), 36-10 Taunton River, MA (NED), 1-42, 1-49 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-77 Taylors Bayou, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-16, 31-21, 31-35 Taylorsville Lake, KY (ORL), 16-1, 16-10, 16-16 Taylorsville, KY (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Teche-Vermilion Basins, LA (MR+T), 42-16, 42-27,42-34 Technical Services General (SWT), 29-22 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA (SPL), 33-40 Tell City, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-26, 16-31 Templeton, PA (ORP), 18-24 Ten Mile Creek, TX (SWF), 30-23 Tenants Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-10, 29-16, 29-18, 29-20 Tenkiller Ferry, OK (SWL), 28-27 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA (ORP), 18-21 Tennemo, TN (MR+T), 42-52 Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN (MR+T), 42-25 Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY (ORN), 15-1, 15-3, 15-9, 15-17, 15-18, 15-19 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS (ORN), 15-1, 15-4, 15-9, 15-12 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-2, 10-13, 10-37, 10-47, 10-57 Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL and MS (SAM), 10-1, 10-14, 10-37, 10-48 Tensas Basin, AR and LA (MR+T), 42-1, 42-6, 42-17, 42-28, 42-34 Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge (MR+T), 42-34, 42-72, 42-73 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA (LMK), 12-15 Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers, LA (MR+T), 42-30 Terre Haute, IN (ORL), 16-21, 16-24, 16-31 Terre Noire Creek, AR (LMK), 12-17 Terrene, MS (MR+T), 42-44 Teton River, ID (NPW), 39-17 Texas City Channel, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-8, 31-20, 31-33, 31-38, 31-45 Texas City and Vicinity, TX Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG), 31-2, 31-16, 31-21, 31-35 Thames River Basin, CT, RI, and MA (NED), 1-2, 1-20, 1-42, 1-49, 1-56 Thatcher Brook, Gowanda, NY (NCB), 20-33 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR (NPP), 37-37 The Dalles Lock and Dam-Lake Celilo, WA and OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-21, 37-28, 37-36, 37-37, 37-46 The Inland Route, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-12, 21-46, 21-62 The Island Lake, VT (NED), 1-49 The Jump-New Orleans, LA (MR+T), 42-12 1-56 The Sny Basin, IL (NCR), 23-16 Thebes-Rock Island, IL (MR+T), 42-14 Thimble Shoal Channel, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-7, 5-13, 5-18, 5-23 Third District Reach, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Thomaston Dam, CT (NED), 1-1, 1-17, 1-31, 1-54 Thompson River, Union County, IA, H17 Bridge (MRK), 27-22 Thoroughfare Swamp, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Three Forks, Lower Madison River, MT (MRO), 26-18 Three Island Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN), 15-14 Three Rivers, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-53 Three Rivers, Texas (SWG), 31-37 Threemile Creek, Mobile, AL (SAM), 10-2, 10-22, 10-38, 10-49 Thumpertown Beach, Eastham, MA (NED), 1-49 Thurman to Hamburg, IA (MRO), 26-18, 26-21 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA (LMN), 11-18 Ticonderoga River, NY (NAN), 2-34 Tijuana River Basin, CA (SPL), 33-40 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD (NAB), 4-37, 4-41 Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-9, 37-25, 37-33, 37-42 Timber Creek, Double Oak, TX (SWF), 30-23 Timbigbee River Tributaries, MS and AL (SAM), 10-49 Timer Creek, Double Oak, TX (SWF), 30-23 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA (NAB), 4-2, 4-19, 4-28 Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-9, 18-13, 18-19, 18-27 Tiptonville-Obion Levee and Drainage Improvement, TN (MR+T), 42-33, 42-59 Tiptonville-Obion River (MR+T), 42-13 Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No.8), AR (SWL), 28-1, 28-4, 28-13 Tocks Island Lake, PA, NJ, and NY (NAP), 3-27 Todd Swamp, SC (SAN), 7-15 Togo Island, LA (MR+T), 42-41, 42-43 Toledo Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-9, 20-16, 20-27 Toles, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Tolovana River, AK (NPA), 40-11 Tolu, KY (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH), 17-1, 17-11, 17-16, 17-20 Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK), 27-19 Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID (NPW), 39-16 Tombigbee River, MS and AL (SAM), 10-2, 10-23, 10-38, 10-49, 10-51, 10-52 Toms River, NJ (NAP), 3-24, 3-27 Toney's Towhead, KY-TN (MR+T), 42-49 Tongue Point, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-9, 37-25, 37-33 Tongue River Lake, ND (NCS), 24-28 Topeka, Kansas River, KS (MRK), 27-17, 27-20 Topsail Beach and Surf City, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Toronto Lake, KS (SWT), 29-1, 29-8, 29-14, 29-17, 29-20 Toronto, KS (SWL), 28-27 Torrington, CT (NED), 1-46, 1-54 Totuskey Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21 Touchet River, WA (NPW), 39-16, 39-17, 39-18 Toussaint River, Carrol Twsp., OH (NCB), 20-32 Towanda Lake, KS (SWT), 29-19 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (NED), 1-44, 1-49 Town BluffDam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 Town Branch Creek, Lockhart, TX (SWF), 30-23 Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (NED), 1-2, 1-21, 1-33 Town Creek, Americus, GA (SAM), 10-52 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY (ORL), 16-21 Town Creek, MD (NAB), 4-37 Town Creek, SC (SAN), 7-1, 7-6, 7-9, 7-13 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA (NED), 1-49 Townbrook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (NED), 1-39 Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ (NAP), 3-26 Townshend Lake, VT (NED), 1-1, 1-15, 1-30, 1-52 Trace Creek, Waverly Park, TN (ORN), 15-19 Tradewater River, KY (ORL), 16-20 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas (SWG), 31-37 Tranters Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-29 Trask River, Tillamook County, OR (NPP), 37-40 Treasure Island, MO (LMM), 13-6 Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA (CDC), 53-1, 53-2, 53-5 Tred Avon River, MD (NAB), 4-37 Trempealeau River, Arcadia, WI (NCS), 24-32 Trent River, N.C. (SAW), 6-26, 6-28, 6-29 Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO (MRK), 27-17 Trexler Lake, PA (NAP), 3-27 Tri Pond Levee, IL (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 Tributary of Kill Creek, DeSoto, KS, Sewage Treatment Plant (MRK), 27-22 Trim Cane Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS (SAM), 10-52 Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO (MRK), 27-1, 27-7, 27-11, 27-15 Trinidad Lake, CO (SWA), 32-1, 32-8, 32-13 Trinity River Project, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-15, 30-21 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-9, 31-20, 31-34, 31-38, 31-45 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (ORL), 16-22, 16-32 Tropical Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Tropicana/Flamingo Wash, NV (SPL), 33-1, 33-12, 33-22 Trotters Landing, MS (MR+T), 42-47 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY (ORL), 16-32 Troy, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 1-57 Truckee Meadows, NV (SPK), 35-32 Truckee River and tributaries, CA and NV (SPK), 35-36 Trumbull Lake, CT (NED), 1-46 Truth or Consequences Unit, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-7, 32-13, 32-15 Tualatin, OR (NPP), 37-40 Tucannon River, WA (NPW), 39-17, 39-18 Tuckahoe River, MD (NAB), 4-37 Tuckerton Creek, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Tucson diversion channel Goleta, CA, and vicinity (SPL), 33-39 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, VA and KY (ORN), 15-1, 15-5 Tully Lake, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-15, 1-30, 1-52 Tulsa Forecast Maps (SWT), 29-22 Tulsa and West Tulsa LPP, OK (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock Township, PA (NAB), 4-2, 4-20, 4-29, 4-35 Turkey Creek Basin, KS and MO (MRK), 27-21 Turkey Creek, SC (SAN), 7-15 Turnbull Island, LA (MR+T), 42-40 Turner Creek, Corinth, MS (LMM), 13-6 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR (NPP), 37-41 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ), 9-62 Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK (SWT), 29-19 Turtle Creek, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-4, 18-12, 18-21 Tuskahoma Lake, OK (SWT), 29-19 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (MRK), 27-1, 27-7, 27-12, 27-16, 27-19, 27-20 Twelve Mile Point, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Twelvemile Bayou, LA (LMK), 12-21 Twelvemile Bayou, LA (LMN), 11-20 Twin Valley, MN (NCS), 24-26 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare River, MD (NAB), 4-37, 4-41 Two Harbors, MN (NCE), 21-1, 21-30, 21-55, 21-68 Two Rivers Dam, NM (SWA), 32-1, 32-8, 32-13 Two Rivers Harbor, WI (NCE), 21-1, 21-31, 21-55, 21-69, 21-74 Tyaskin Creek, MD (NAB), 4-37 Tybee Island, GA (SAS), 8-1, 8-6, 8-10, 8-15 Tygart Lake, WV (ORP), 18-1, 18-3, 18-12, 18-16 Tygart River, Phillipi, WV (ORP), 18-29 Tyland, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Tylers Beach, VA (NAO), 5-21 Tyrone, PA (NAB), 4-38, 4-42 Tyronza River, AR (MR+T), 42-67 U Umatac Shoreline, Guam (POD), 36-14 Umatilla Harbor, OR (NPP), 37-37 Umatilla River, OR (NPP), 37-40, 37-41 Umatilla River, OR (NPW), 39-17 Umpqua River, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-9, 37-25, 37-33, 37-40, 37-41 Unadilla, NY (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-9, 18-14, 18-19, 18-27 Union Lake, MO (LMS), 14-14 Union River, ME (NED), 1-42 Union Township Drainage District, MO (NCR), 23-14 Union Village Dam, VT (NED), 1-1, 1-15, 1-30, 1-52 Uniontown, KY (ORL), 16-22, 16-26, 16-31 Uniontown, PA (ORP), 18-23 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA (SPL), 33-41 Unnamed Tributary, Tecumseh, OK (SWT), 29-20 Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM), 10-2, 10-23, 10-38, 10-49 Upper Grand River, MO (MRK), 27-17 Upper Grays River Area, WA (NPP), 37-38 Upper Iowa River, IA (NCS), 24-26 Upper Little Arkansas River Watershed, KS (SWT), 29-22 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA (NAB), 4-37 Upper Marlboro, MD (NAB), 4-38, 4-41 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program (LMS), 14-1, 14-6 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program (NCR), 23-1, 23-3, 23-7, 23-10 Upper Puyallup River, WA (NPS), 38-28 Upper River Rouge, MI (NCE), 21-72 Upper Thorofare, MD (NAB), 4-37 Upper White Oak Bayou, Texas (SWG), 31-37 Upper White River, AR (SWL), 28-20 Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX (SWF), 30-23 Urban areas at Alton, IL (LMS), 14-14 Urbanna Creek, VA (NAO), 5-21, 5-23 Utica, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 Utica, OH (ORH), 17-24, 17-25 V VA Beach Streams, Canal No. 2, VA Beach, VA (NAO), 5-19 Vacherie, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Vaipito Stream, American Samoa (POD), 36-15 Valdez Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-10 Valley City Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-14 Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-16 Valley View Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF), 30-23 Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO (MRO), 26-23 Van Buren County, IA (NCR), 23-17 Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-22 I-58 Van Meter, IA (NCR), 23-14, 23-16 Vanceburg, KY (ORH), 17-22 Vancluse, AR (MR+T), 42-42 Vancouver Lake Area, WA (NPP), 37-39 Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD), 36-11 Vaughn, MT, (MRO), 26-15, 26-18 Velva, ND (NCS), 24-26, 24-31 Venice, LA (MR+T), 42-36 Ventnor, Margate, and Longport, NJ (NAP), 3-26 Ventura Harbor, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-3, 33-14, 33-32, 33-40 Ventura River Basin, CA (SPL), 33-40 Ventura-Pierpont Area, CA (SPL), 33-38 Verdigris River Basin, KS and OK, (SWT), 29-20, 29-22 Vermilion Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-29 Vermilion River, Pontiac, IL (NCR), 23-17 Vermillion River and Tributaries, SD (MRO), 26-17, 26-18 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN (NCS), 24-26, 24-31 Verona Lake, VA (NAB), 4-38 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN (NCS), 24-26, 24-31 Vevay, IN (ORL), 16-24, 16-28 Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR (NPP), 37-40 Vicksburg Harbor, MS (MR+T), 42-13, 42-32, 42-34, 42-41 Vicksburg, MS (MR+T), 42-13, 42-26 Victoria Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-44 Victoria Bend-Terrence, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Victory Lake, VT (NED), 1-49 Vidalia Casting Field (MR+T), 42-41 Village Creek, AL (SAM), 10-2, 10-24, 10-38, 10-49 Village Creek, AR (SWL), 28-22 Village Creek, SC (SAN), 7-14 Village of Hull, IL (NCR), 23-16 Village of Malone, NY (NCB), 20-33 Village of New Athens, IL (LMS), 14-14 Village of Saxtons, VT (NED), 1-46 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-16, 31-21, 31-35 Vincennes, IN (ORL), 16-22, 16-24, 16-26, 16-28, 16-31 Vineyard Haven, MA (NED), 1-42 Vinton Waterway, LA (LMN), 11-18 Virginia Beach Streams, Canal Number 2, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-9, 5-15 Virginia Beach, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-8, 5-14, 5-19 Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, FL (SA), 9-56 Volga, IA (NCR), 23-16 W W. Br. Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY (NCB), 20-33 W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY (LMM), 13-7 W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-14, 6-21 W. Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (ORP), 18-29 W. Magnesia Canyon Channel, Rancho Mirage, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-08, 33-19 W.D. May Lock and Dam, OK (SWT), 29-20 WTP, Great Miami River, Ross, OH (ORL), 16-32 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL (LMS), 14-12 Wabash River Basin (ORL), 16-1, 16-11, 16-19, 16-30, 16-32, 16-33 Wabasha Harbor, MN (NCD), 25-7 Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN (NCS), 24-32 Waccamaw River and Seven Creeks, NC and SC (SAW), 6-28 Waccamaw River, NC and SC (SAN), 7-14 Wachapreague Channel, VA (NAO), 5-23 Waco Creek, Waco, TX (SWF), 30-23 Waco Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-11, 30-17, 30-21 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District 1 and 4, WA (NPP), 37-38, 37-39, 37-44 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-10 Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii (POD), 36-11 Waikomo Stream, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-15 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD), 36-12 Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-14 Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii (POD), 36-14, 36-15 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD), 36-14 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR (NPP), 37-41 Waldport, OR (NPP), 37-43 Walla Walla River, WA (NPW), 39-18 Wallabout Channel, NY (NAN), 2-31 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Wallace Lake, LA (LMK), 12-19, 12-21 Wallace, WV (ORP), 18-22 Wallhill River (Black Dirt), NY (NAN), 2-35 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH (NED), 1-44 Wallisville Lake, TX (SWG), 31-2, 31-10 Wallowa River, OR (NPW), 39-17, 39-18 Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Walnut Bend, AR (MR+T), 42-47 Walnut Bottom Run, Beaver Falls, PA (ORP), 18-29 Walnut Creek, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-19, 35-28 Walnut Creek, Clive, IA (NCR), 23-17 Walnut Creek, TX (SWF), 30-23 Walnut Creek, Purcell, OK (SWT), 29-20 Walnut Point, MS (MR+T), 42-42, 42-44 Walnut River, Cowley County, KS (SWT), 29-20 Walpeton-Breckenridge, MN (NCS), 24-34 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL and GA (SAM), 10-2, 10-31, 10-39, 10-50 Wapello County, IA (NCR), 23-17 1-59 Wappapello Lake, MO (MR+T), 42-73 Wappinger Creek, NY (NAN), 2-31, 2-32 Ware, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-53 Wareham Harbor, MA (NED), 1-42, 1-49 Wareham-Marion, MA (NED), 1-49 Wares Creek, Bradenton, FL (SAJ), 9-62 Warfield Point, MS (MR+T), 42-42 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-17, 24-23, 24-26, 24-31 Warren River, RI (NED), 1-42 Warrenton Diking Districts 1 and 2, OR (NPP), 37-38, 37-43 Warroad Harbor and River, MN (NCS), 24-25, 24-28 Warsaw Harbor, IL (NCD), 25-8 Warsaw, NY, Oatka Creek (NCB), 20-31 Warwick Cove, RI (NED), 1-42 Warwick River, MD (NAB), 4-37 Warwood, WV (ORP), 18-23 Washington Aqueduct (NAB), 4-2, 4-22 Washington Canal and South River, NJ (NAN), 2-31 Washington Harbor, DC (NAB), 4-1, 4-11, 4-26, 4-33 Washington Island, WI (NCE), 21-77 Washington Street Bridge, Laredo, TX (SWF), 30-23 Washington, DC and Vicinity, VA (NAB), 4-38, 4-42 Washington, PA (ORP), 18-21 Washita River, OK (SWT), 29-20 Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR (NPP), 37-39 Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR and MO (SWL), 28-22 Water Works, Wellsburg, WV (ORP), 18-29 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, VT (NAN), 2-32 Waterbury-Watertown, CT (NED), 1-46, 1-54 Wateree River, SC (SAN), 7-14 Waterford, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Waterford, NY (NAN), 2-34 Waterloo, IA (NCR), 23-14, 23-16 Waterloo, NE (MRO), 26-15, 26-20 Waterman Creek, O'Brien County, IA (MRO), 26-23 Waterproof Bar, LA (MR+T), 42-43 Watertown and Vicinity, SD (MRO), 26-21 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-9, 6-20, 6-24 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA (NPS), 38-23 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico (LMN), 11-18 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE (NAP), 3-1, 3-5, 3-16, 3-20 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (LMN), 11-1, 11-5, 11-12, 11-15 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD (NAB), 4-40 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA (LMN), 11-18 Waterway on the Coast of VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-8, 5-14, 5-19, 5-23 Waterway-Norfolk, VA. to Sounds of N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Watkins Glen, NY (NCB), 20-34 Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees (MRO), 26-18 Waukegan Harbor, IL (NCC), 22-1, 22-5, 22-11, 22-15, 22-17 Waurika Lake (SWT), 29-17 Waurika Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-8, 29-15, 29-17 Waverley, WV (ORH), 17-23 Waycake Creek, NJ (NAN), 2-34 Webb District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-10, 29-16, 29-18, 29-20 Weber River and Tributaries, UT (Morgan County) (SPK), 35-38 WeegiePipe Creeks, Shadyside, OH (ORP), 18-29 Weeks Bay, AL (SAM), 10-53 Weiser River, ID (NPW), 39-17, 39-18 Welcome Creek, SC (SAN), 7-15 Welles Harbor, Midway Island (POD), 36-10 Wellfleet Harbor, MA (NED), 1-42 Wells Harbor, ME (NED), 1-1, 1-9, 1-28, 1-37, 1-57 Wellsburg, WV (ORP), 18-23 Wellsville, NY, (NCB), 20-31 Wellsville, OH, (ORP), 18-21 Wenatchee River, WA (NPS), 38-27 Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, WA (NPS), 38-27 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA (NED), 1-44 West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA (LMN), 11-16 West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE (MRO), 26-20 West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA (NAB), 4-2,4-20, 4-35 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA (NED), 1-46 West Bridgewater, PA (ORP), 18-23 West Brookfield Reservoir, MA (NED), 1-49 West Canaan Lake, NH (NED), 1-49 West Des Moines, IA (NCR), 23-12 West Fork Grand River, IA (MRK), 27-22 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH (ORL), 16-1, 16-11, 16-16, 16-29 West Fork, WV (ORH), 17-24 West Glendive, Yellowstone River, MT (MRO), 26-18 West Harbor, OH (NCB), 20-1, 20-9, 20-16, 20-27 1-60 West Hill Dam, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-11, 1-28, 1-51 West Kentucky Tributaries, KY (MR+T), 42-1, 42-11, 42-21, 42-34 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (ORP), 18-21 West Magnesia Canyon Channel, Rancho Mirage, CA (SPL), 33-37 West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR (NPP), 37-40 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR), 23-16 West Memphis and Vicinity, AR (MR+T), 42-31, 42-34, 42-67 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR (NPP), 37-41 West Nishnabotna River, IA (MRO), 26-20, 26-23 West Oneonta Lake, NY (NAB), 4-40 West Papillion Creek, Douglas County, NE (MRO), 26-23 West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and AL (SAM), 10-2, 10-31, 10-40, 10-50, 10-52 West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and FL (SAS), 8-1, 8-9 West Point, KY (ORL), 16-28 West Point, NE (MRO), 26-15, 26-20 West River, CT (NED), 1-2, 1-22, 1-33, 1-39, 1-51, 1-56 West Run, Munhall, PA (ORP), 18-29 West Springfield, MA (NED), 1-1, 1-16, 1-30, 1-38, 1-53 West Tennessee Tributaries, TN (MR+T), 42-1, 42-11, 42-21, 42-34 West Terre Haute, IN (ORL), 16-22, 16-26, 16-31 West Thompson Lake, CT (NED), 1-2, 1-21, 1-33, 1-56 West Union, Middle Island, WV (ORH), 17-25 West Warren, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-53 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR (SWL), 28-22 Westchester Creek, NY (NAN), 2-29, 2-31, 2-34 Westcott Cove, CT (NED), 1-42 Westerly, RI (NED), 1-49 Western Branch (NAO), 5-18 Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY (MR+T), 42-28 Westfield, MA (NED), 1-49 Westfork, MS (SAM), 10-52 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA (NPS), 38-23 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Weston Mills, NY (ORP), 18-22 Weston, VT (NED), 1-46, 1-53 Westover, AR (MR+T), 42-47 Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR (NPP), 37-38 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (NED), 1-42, 1-49 Westport Harbor, Westport, MA (NED), 1-50 Westport River, MA (NED), 1-49 Westport Slough, OR (NPP), 37-37, 37-41 Westport, CT (NED), 1-49 Westport, KY (ORL), 16-22, 16-24, 16-28 Westport, OR (NPP), 37-42 Westville Lake, MA (NED), 1-2, 1-21, 1-33, 1-56 Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (LMN), 11-1, 11-10, 11-13 Wet Spottedtail Creek, Mitchell, NE (MRO), 26-23 Weymouth Back River, MA (NED), 1-42 Weymouth, Fore and Town Rivers, MA (NED), 1-42 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to Fixed Bridge (NAP), 3-24 Wheeling, WV (ORP), 18-23 Whelton Ditch, OR (NPP), 37-39 Whiskey and Rock Creeks, Independence, KS (SWT), 29-20 White Castle, LA (MR+T), 42-37 White City Park, OH (NCB), 20-34 White Fish Point Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-69 White Lake Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-31, 21-56, 21-69, 21-77 White Oak Creek, Mullins, SC (SAN), 7-15 White Oak Creek, OH (ORH), 17-24 White Oak Dike, Bladen and PenderCounties, N.C. (SAW), 6-28 White River Backwater Levee, AR (MR+T), 42-1, 42-10, 42-26, 42-72 White River Bank Stabilization, Batesville, AR (SWL), 28-22 White River Basin, AR and MO (SWL), 28-1, 28-8, 28-9, 28-15, 28-18, 28-20, 28-22, 28-29 White River Landing, AR (MR+T), 42-44 White River Levees, Augusta to Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, AR (MR+T), 42-33 White River Navigation to Batesville, AR (MR+T), 42-32 White River at Meeker, CO (SPK), 35-42 White River, AR (MR+T), 42-24 White River, AR (below Newport) (LMM), 13-5 White River, IN (ORL), 16-20, 16-32, 16-33 White River, Tripp County, SD (MRO), 26-23 Whitebird Creek, ID (NPW), 39-17 Whitefish Point Harbor, MI (NCE), 21-1, 21-31, 21-55 Whites and Ewing Creeks, TN (ORN), 15-19 Whitesburg Br., Morgan County, AL (ORN), 15-19 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) (ORL), 16-32 Whitetie River, Grundy County, IL (NCR), 23-17 Whitewater River, CA (SPL), 33-1, 33-8, 33-19, 33-40 Whitewater River, IN (ORL), 16-32, 16-33 Whitings Creek, VA (NAO), 5-1, 5-8, 5-14, 5-19, 5-22, 5-23 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, Gila River Basin, AZ (SPL), 33-33 Whitmanville Lake, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-55 Whitney Creek, Whitney, TX (SWF), 30-23 Whitney Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-12, 30-17, 30-21 1-61 Whitney Point Lake, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-18, 4-28 Whitney Point Village, NY (NAB), 4-1, 4-18, 4-28 Whittaker Creek, Oriental, N.C. (SAW), 6-30 Whittier Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-12 Whittington, LA (MR+T), 42-46 Whorton's Bend Road, AL (SAM), 10-2, 10-24, 10-39, 10-49 Wichita Falls, TX (SWT), 29-20 Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-20 Wickford Harbor, RI (NED), 1-42 Wickliffe, KY (MR+T), 42-50 Wicomico River, MD (NAB), 4-1, 4-11, 4-26, 4-34 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO (LMS), 14-15 Wiggle Creek, Homer, NE (MRO), 26-20 Wilcox, PA (ORP), 18-23 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers, MN (NCS), 24-26, 24-30, 24-31, 24-33 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA (SPK), 35-1, 35-20, 35-28 Wilders, KY (ORL), 16-28 Wiley Creek Lake, OR (NPP), 37-41 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA (NAB), 4-38, 4-42 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR (NPP), 37-41 Willamette River Basin, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-2, 37-15, 37-16, 37-27, 37-35, 37-37, 37-39, 37-41, 37-42, 37-43, 37-45 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-10, 37-26, 37-34, 37-41, 37-43 Willapa River and Harbor, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-6, 38-15, 38-20, 38-28 Willard Beach, South Portland, ME (NED), 1-44 William H. Harsha Lake, OH (ORL), 16-1, 16-11, 16-16, 16-29 William L. Springer Lake Decatur,IL (NCR), 23-15 Williams Delight Basin, St. Croix, VI (SAJ), 9-62 Williams, KY (MR+T), 42-49 Williamson, WV (ORH), 17-22, 17-25 Williamsport, PA (NAB), 4-38, 4-42 Williamstown, WV (ORH), 17-23 Williamsville Reservoir, VT (NED), 1-49 Williston, ND Water Intake (MRO), 26-17 Willoughby Channel, VA (NAO), 5-22, 5-23 Willow Bend, LA (MR+T), 42-37 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-16, 37-27, 37-35 Willow Creek Lake, OR (NPW), 39-17 Willow Creek, ID (NPW), 39-17 Willow Creek, Mason City, IA (NCR), 23-17 Willow Cutoff, LA (MR+T), 42-43 Wilmington Harbor, DE (NAP), 3-1, 3-9, 3-17, 3-22 Wilmington Harbor, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-9, 6-21, 6-29, 6-30 Wilmore, PA (ORP), 18-21 Wilson Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN), 7-15 Wilson Harbor, NY (NCB), 20-29 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS (MRK), 27-1, 27-7, 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Wilson Point Harbor, CT (NED), 1-42 Wilson Point, LA (MR+T), 42-13, 42-27, 42-44 Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR (NPP), 37-40 Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR (NPP), 37-37 Winchester Towhead, MO (MR+T), 42-49 Wind River, WA (NPP), 37-42 Winfield LPP, KS (SWT), 29-19, 29-22 Winnipesaukee Lake, NH (NED), 1-42 Winona Harbors, MN (NCD), 25-7 Winona, MN (NCS), 24-26, 24-31 Winooski River, VT (NAN), 2-32 Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ (SPL), 33-40 Winsted, CT (NED), 1-46, 1-53 Winter Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42 Winter Harbor, VA (NAO), 5-22, 5-23 Winthrop Beach, MA (NED), 1-44, 1-49 Winthrop Harbor, MA (NED), 1-42, 1-50 Wisconsin River, WI (NCS), 24-25 Wishart Point Channel, VA (NAO), 5-22 Wister Lake, OK (SWT), 29-1, 29-8, 29-15, 29-18, 29-20 Wister Lake, OK (SWL), 28-27 Withlacoochee River, FL (SAJ), 9-54, 9-55 Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORN), 15-1, 15-8 Wolf Creek, MS (SAM), 10-52 Wolf Island, KY (MR+T), 42-49 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN (LMM), 13-5 Wolf River and Tributaries, TN (MR+T), 42-67 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS (SAM), 10-51, 10-54 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK), 27-19 Wood Island Harbor, Biddeford, ME (NED), 1-42, 1-50 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL (LMS), 14-11, 14-15 Wood River, Grand Island, NE (MRO), 26-21 Woodbridge Creek, NJ (NAN), 2-31 Woodbury Creek, NJ (NAP), 3-24 Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP), 18-1, 18-9, 18-14, 18-19, 18-27 Woodlands, WV (ORP), 18-23 Woodmont Beach, CT (NED), 1-50 Woodmont Shore, Milford, CT (NED), 1-44 Woods Hole Channel, MA (NED), 1-42 Woodside, LA (MR+T), 42-39 Woodson Drainage District, OR (NPP), 37-38, 37-39, 37-44 Woonsocket, RI (NED), 1-46, 1-52 Worcester Diversion, MA (NED), 1-46, 1-52 Worthington, MN (NCR), 23-16 1-62 Worthington, MS-AR (MR+T), 42-42 Wrangell Harbor, AK (NPA), 40-1, 40-4, 40-7, 40-9 Wrangell Narrows, AK (NPA), 40-10 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX (LMN), 11-20 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX (SWF), 30-2, 30-17, 30-21 Wrights Creek, N.C. (SAW), 6-26 Wrights Point, AR (MR+T), 42-51 Wrightsville Beach, NC (SAW), 6-1, 6-14, 6-21 Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, VT (NAN), 2-32 Wynoochee Lake, WA (NPS), 38-1, 38-9, 38-16, 38-20 Wynoochee River, WA (NPS), 38-28 Wyoming Valley, PA (NAB), 4-38 Y Yadkin River Basin, NC and SC (SAW), 6-1, 6-14, 6-31 Yakima River, WA (NPW), 39-17, 39-18 Yakima River, WA (NPS), 38-27, 38-28 Yalobusha River, MS (LMK), 12-16 Yancopin, AR (MR+T), 42-45 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR (NPP), 37-1, 37-10, 37-26, 37-34, 37-37 Yaquina River, OR (NPP), 37-37 Yatesville Lake, KY (ORH), 17-1, 17-11, 17-16, 17-20 Yazoo Backwater Area, MS (MR+T), 42-24, 42-31, 42-65 Yazoo River Basin, MS (MR+T), 42-1, 42-7, 42-19, 42-28, 42-34, 42-65, 42-66, 42-79 Yazoo River, MS (LMK), 12-16 Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District (MR+T), 42-60 Yelkow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA (SAM), 10-52 Yellowstone River, MT (MRO), 26-15, 26-18, 26-23 Yonkers, NY (NAN), 2-32, 2-35 York Harbor, ME (NED), 1-42, 1-57 York River, VA (NAO), 5-22 York Spit Channel, VA (NAO), 5-16 York, Indian Rock Dam, PA (NAB), 4-2, 4-21, 4-29, 4-35 Yough, Turkeyfoot Township, PA (ORP), 18-29 Youghiogheny River Lake, PA and MD (ORP), 18-1, 18-10, 18-14, 18-19 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (ORP), 18-23, 18-27 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR (NPP), 37-37 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR (NPP), 37-38 Youngs and Claskanie River, OR (NPP), 37-37 Youngstown, OH (ORP), 18-21 Yucatan, MS (MR+T), 42-43 Z Zacate Creek Channel, TX (SWF), 30-22 Zanesville, OH (ORH), 17-23 Zarzamdra Creek, San Antonio, TX (SWF), 30-23 Zippel Bay Harbor, MN (NCS), 24-25 Zippel Bay, MN (NCS), 24-25, 24-31 Zumbro River Lake, Zumbro, MN (NCS), 24-32 Zumbro River, MN (NCS), 24-1, 24-17, 24-18, 24-23, 24-26, 24-31 1-63 ~III~